HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2007.03.19 BWR NGAME
woo Q,m
�Awi[o JUNe 0
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
Monday March 19,2007
STUDY SESSION - 6:00 p.m. Conference Room A
a. Police Enforcement Priorities
1. CALL TO ORDER—7:00 p.m. - Council Chambers
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—Regular Council Meeting of March 5, 2007
5. PRESENTATION
a. Best of Burlingame Presentation
b. Proclamation for Dominic Davino, one of the State's five top free throw basketball hoop shooters
in the 12 to 13 year old age group
c. Key Indicators for Finance
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. Appeal of Beautification Commission denial to remove two Redwood trees at 2022 Trousdale
Drive
b. Public Hearing and Resolution increasing the 2007 solid waste rates by five percent(5%)
c. Adopt Ordinance to amend the contract with the California Public Employees Retirement
System (Ca1PERS) and the City of Burlingame to provide Section 21548 (Pre-Retirement
Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit) for Local Miscellaneous Employees
1
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter
within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from
acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the
door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Introduce Ordinance to designate 2- hour parking at 1361 N. Carolan Avenue (Public Works
Corporation Yard) - INTRODUCE
b. Resolution of Intention Broadway Business Improvement District setting 2007-08
assessments—APPROVE
c. Approval for Chamber of Commerce Art & Jazz Festival, August 11-12, 2007-APPROVE
9. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Resolution approving a Professional Services Contract with BKF Engineers for design of
California/Oak Grove Area Sewer Improvement and Rehabilitation Project, Phase I
b. Resolution accepting Waste Water Treatment Plant Co-Generation Project
c. Warrants & Payroll
10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
11. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within
the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from acting on any
matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to
staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
12. OLD BUSINESS
a. Status of residential parking permits
b. Discuss feedback on Caltrain Resolution approved by Council at the March 5, 2007 meeting
c. Status of citywide clean up
13. NEW BUSINESS
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Parks & Recreation, February 15, 2007; Beautification, March 1, 2007;
Planning, March 12, 2007
b. Department Reports: Building, February, 2007; Finance, February, 2007
2
15. ADJOURNMENT
Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650 558-7203 at least 24 hours
before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall, 501 Primrose
Road, from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org.
Agendas and minutes are available at this site.
NEXT MEETING-SATURDAY, MARCH 24, 2007,JOINT COUNCIL & PLANNING
COMMISSION, TRAINING ROOM, AT THE CORPORATION YARD,1361 NORTH CAROLAN
AVENUE
3
�6 CITY 0
BURUNGAME
e
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of March 5, 2007
STUDY SESSION
Study Session on Police Enforcement Priorities was canceled.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Terry Nagel called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Jeff Carter.
3. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Cohen, Keighran, Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. MINUTES
Two corrections were made to the minutes of the February 21, 2007 regular Council meeting: Item 6.a.:
Second Paragraph, correct spelling of Helen Whalen to Helen Whelan; Change Third Paragraph, last
sentence, to read: ...end week day events Monday-Thursday at 10:00 p.m...
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve the amended minutes of the February 21, 2007 regular
Council meeting; seconded by Vice Mayor O'Mahon . The motion was approved unanimously by voice
vote, 5-0.
5. PRESENTATIONS
a. RECOGNITION OF BURLINGAME DOG, HUNTER,WINNER OF BEST OF BREED IN
THE BORZOI BREED CATEGORY AT THE 2007 WESTMINSTER KENNEL CLUB
SHOW
Mayor Nagel presented Marilyn and William McGraw of Burlingame with a proclamation congratulating
them on their Russian Wolfhound, Hunter, for winning the Best of Breed in the Borzoi Category at the
prestigious 2007 Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show. Hunter attended the proclamation presentation.
1
Burlingame City Council March 5,2007
Unapproved Minutes
b. BEST OF BURLINGAME AWARD
No award was presented at this meeting.
C. THE BIG READ PROCLAMATION—APRIL IS "TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD" MONTH
Mayor Nagel presented a proclamation to Library Board Member, Deborah Griffith, and Librarian Al
Escoffier recognizing April as the"To Kill A Mockingbird Month" for the Big Read Program.
d. REVIEW OF CHARRETTE
CP Monroe introduced Ellis Schoichet and Noemi Avram representing the San Mateo County Chapter of the
AIA who presented the Destination: SOBA Charrette Idea Book and Event Overview. The following
charrette team leaders and team members also made presentations of their teams' ideas: Wayne Gehrke, Paul
Jamtgaard, Dale Meyer, John Stewart, Susan Eschweiler and Tom Gilman.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mayor Nagel and Councilman Cohen were recused and left the Council Chambers before discussion of Item
6.a.
a. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A USE BASELINE FOR EXISTING
MERCY HIGH SCHOOL AND SISTERS OF MERCY FACILITIES (CONTINUED FROM
FEBRUARY 21, 2007—PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AND NO FURTHER TESTIMONY
WILL BE TAKEN AT THIS MEETING)
CP Monroe reviewed the staff report and requested Council to review the resolution and conditions of
approval and to take action. CA Anderson advised that the word "standpoint"had been omitted inadvertently
in the 9th paragraph on the second page of the proposed resolution. The corrected sentence should read:
...from either an environmental or economical standpoint; and...
Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to approve Resolution No. 20-2007 affirming a decision of the
Planning Commission to approve a Conditional Use Permit for the existing uses and facilities at Mercy High
School and Sisters of Mercy properties at 2300 and 2750 Adeline Drive and denying the appeal; seconded by
Councilwoman Baylock. Further, as noted by Council, the resolution incorporates 27 conditions which
incorporates Council and citizen concerns; and the project is exempt from CEQA review. The motion was
approved by roll call vote, 3-0-2 (Cohen and Nagel recused).
Mayor Nagel and Councilman Cohen returned to the dais.
b. APPROVAL OF REVISION TO BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL CODE 417.04.030
Fire Chief Dornell reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt
Ordinance No. 1800 amending Municipal Code §17.04.030 to clarify the original intent of the Retrofit
Sprinkler Ordinance for commercial buildings.
Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
2
Burlingame City Council March 5,2007
Unapproved Minutes
Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to approve adoption of Ordinance No. 1800 amending Section
17.04.030 (adding Subsections 1003.2.1.2 to the Uniform Fire Code)to clarify sprinkler retrofitting
requirements; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote,
5-0. Mayor Nagel directed CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
C. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1801 SETTING CONTRIBUTION LIMITS FOR INDIVIDUALS
AND ORGANIZATIONS AND LOAN REIMBURSEMENT LIMITS FOR CAMPAIGNS
FOR ELECTIVE CITY OFFICES
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on the adoption of
Ordinance No. 1801 setting campaign contribution limits and loan reimbursement limits.
Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve adoption of Ordinance No. 1801 establishing contribution
and loan reimbursement limits in campaigns for elective city offices; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The
motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Nagel directed CC Mortensen to publish a
summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
CA Anderson stated that staff would present Council with the results of the 2007 campaign in spring 2008.
d. PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON ORDINANCE NO. 1802 AMENDING THE
MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 18.07 TO SPECIFY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTENSIONS
OF BUILDING PERMITS AND AMENDING CHAPTER 8.17 TO REOUIRE
CONSTRUCTION SITE MAINTENANCE
CP Monroe reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on the adoption of
Ordinance No. 1802 to amend the Municipal Code for building requirements for extensions of building
permits and requirements for construction site maintenance.
Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve adoption of Ordinance No. 1802 amending Chapter 18.07
to specify requirements for extensions to permits and amending Chapter 8.17 to require construction site
maintenance; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote,
5-0. Mayor Nagel directed CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
e. RESOLUTION NO. 19-2007 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY OF
NOT TO EXCEED $27,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF WATER AND
WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO THE
WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS OF THE CITY; AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
AND DELIVERY OF INSTALLMENT SALE AGREEMENTS AND A BOND PURCHASE
AGREEMENT; APPROVING FORM OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT; AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THE TAKING OF ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS
RELATING TO THE FINANCING WITH THE BURLINGAME FINANCING AUTHORITY
3
Burlingame City Council March 5,2007
Unapproved Minutes
FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and approve the
resolution authorizing the sale of up to $27 million in revenue bonds for water and sewer improvements.
Mayor Nagel opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Vice Mayor O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 19-2007 approving the issuance by the
Burlingame Financing Authority of not to exceed $27,000,000 aggregate principal amount of water and
wastewater revenue bonds to finance certain improvements to the water and wastewater systems of the city;
authorizing execution and delivery of installment sale agreements and a bond purchase agreement; approving
form of official statement; and authorizing execution of documents and the taking of all necessary actions
relating to the financing with the Burlingame Financing Authority; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock.
The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jeff Carter, 1720 Adeline Drive, spoke on Caltrain ridership. Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline Drive, spoke on
Mercy properties. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke on several items and requested Council to send a
letter to Caltrans in support of the City of San Mateo's request that Caltrans provide landscaping for the new
Peninsula overpass. There were no further comments from the floor.
8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING EXPANSION OF AND
SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS TO TRANSIT SERVICE ON THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY
PENINSULA
Mayor Nagel reported that she and Councilman Cohen are members of an ad hoc committee made up of
those city council members on the peninsula who share transit concerns throughout the county. Through the
adoption of the proposed resolution, Caltrain would be urged to expand local train service to co-exist with
the Baby Bullet service. The committee's and Caltrain's goals are the same: to increase ridership. Since the
year 2000, Burlingame has lost 63 weekday Caltrain stops.
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 18-2007 supporting expansion of and safety
enhancements to transit service on the San Francisco Bay Peninsula; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The
motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
b. PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCIES
CM Nantell reviewed the staff report and requested Council open the application period for two Planning
Commission seats that are scheduled to expire in April. Council agreed to open the application period with
the application deadline set for April 5, 2007. Interviews will be held on April 16, and the appointments are
scheduled for May 7, 2007.
Mayor Nagel asked Council if they would like to continue the new interview process with all council
members present for all candidate interviews. Council consensus was to continue with the new process. CA
Anderson stated that staff would present the revised set of interview procedures to Council for their approval
in May.
4
Burlingame City Council March 5,2007
Unapproved Minutes
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City.
10. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke on an upcoming neighborhood meeting on the Peninsula overpass.
Rudy Horak, 1332 Edgehill Road, reminded staff of Daylight Savings Time taking effect this weekend. Jim
Nantell, City Manager, advised of the following meetings taking place on the Safeway process: March 7 at 7
pm at the Recreation Center with previous petitioners for a new Safeway, March 8 at 8:30 am at City Hall
with Downtown Burlingame merchants and property owners, March 12 at 7 pm at the Library with
homeowners located west of the Safeway property, and March 13 at Noon with the Chamber of Commerce
(a meeting on March 1 was attended by the Citizens for a Better Burlingame). Linda Abbey, 2415 Adeline
Drive, spoke on the public comments for the February 21, 2007 City Council meeting. There were no further
comments from the floor.
11. OLD BUSINESS
a. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
Mayor Nagel stated that the subcommittee, made up of the mayor and Councilman Cohen, determined that
the goal is citizen satisfaction. Providing the tools for citizens to take on civic projects helps to empower the
citizens. Mayor Nagel summarized recent opportunities the City has already provided for civic engagement.
The subcommittee determined other opportunities for civic engagement: personal involvement, mass
education, communications and community building. The subcommittee's recommendation includes several
projects to start: a quarterly newsletter, neighborhood networking for emergency planning/block parties, and
a Town Hall meeting to encourage citizens to voice their desires for civic engagement. Council concurred
with the recommendation.
12. NEW BUSINESS
Councilwoman Baylock requested adding Design Review for R-2 zoning to the Joint Council and Planning
Commission meeting agenda for March 24, 2007.
Councilwoman Baylock suggested sending a letter to Caltrans in support of the City of San Mateo's request
that Caltrans provide landscaping for the new Peninsula overpass. Council agreed to send a letter of support.
Council set the hearing date for an appeal to the Beautification Commission's decision for 2022 Trousdale
Drive for March 19, 2007.
Mayor Nagel requested an update on the citywide spring cleanup and on the residential parking permit
program.
13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library, January 16, 2007; Planning, February 26, 2007
b. Department Reports: Police, January 2007
5
Burlingame City Council March 5,2007
Unapproved Minutes
14. ADJOURNMENT TO FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING
Mayor Nagel adjourned the meeting to the Burlingame Financing Authority meeting at 9:09 p.m. in memory
of Burlingame residents Frank P. Kelly, Jr., Todd Moher, and George Prevot; and John Barton, the husband
of former Mayor Gloria Barton.
15. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed meeting of the Burlingame Financing Authority was held on March 5, 2007, in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Terry Nagel called the meeting to order at 9:12 p.m.
16. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Cohen, Keighran,Nagel, O'Mahony
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
17. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
18. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. RESOLUTION NO. FA 1-2007 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF WATER
AND WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO
THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS OF THE CITY; AUTHORIZING THE
PROCUREMENT OF BOND INSURANCE FOR THE BONDS; APPROVING THE FORMS OF
A TRUST AGREEMENT AND INSTALLMENT SALE AGREEMENTS; APPROVING
FORMS OF AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF AN OFFICIAL
NOTICE OF SALE, A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL BONDS,AND AN OFFICIAL
STATEMENT DESCRIBING SAID BONDS; AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
DOCUMENTS AND THE TAKING OF ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS RELATING TO THE
ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS
FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council approve Resolution No. FA 1-2007 to authorize
the issuance and sale of water and wastewater revenue bonds.
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve Resolution No. FA 1-2007 authorizing the issuance and
sale of water and wastewater revenue bonds to finance certain improvements to the water and wastewater
systems of the city; authorizing the procurement of bond insurance for the bonds; approving the forms of a
trust agreement and installment sale agreements; approving forms of and authorizing publication and
distribution of an official notice of sale, a notice of intention to sell bonds, and an official statement
describing said bonds; and authorizing execution of documents and the taking of all necessary actions
relating to the issuance of the bonds; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved
unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
19. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Nagel adjourned the meeting to the Closed Session at 9:14 p.m.
6
Burlingame City Council March 5,2007
Unapproved Minutes
CLOSED SESSION
CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following:
a. Pending Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(a): Aerobay Office Park vs. City of Burlingame, San
Mateo Superior Court Case No. CIV 457326
20. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Nagel adjourned the meeting at 9:24 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Doris J. Mortensen
City Clerk
7
Burlingame City Council March 5,2007
Unapproved Minutes
Gti�� of Buringg
BURLINGAME
Solomon Li
t
IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED ONE OF THE
(vt Of 4""W
r A FOR PROVIDING OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY SERVICE
URRY NAGEL,MAYOR
StJRLINGAME
PROCLAMATION
HONORING DOMMC DAVINO
A 'Top Five" Free Throw Shooter in California
Whereas, Dominic Davino, a Burlingame resibent, participated in the annual Elk Club
National Hoop Shoot Free Throw Contest at Serra High School in San Mateo on
Januarn 13, 2oo7, in the r2 & 13 near olb age group; and
Whereas, Dominic won the local competition making zg out of 25 free tfjrows; and
Whereas, Dominic made 21 out Of 25 on januarn 27, 2oo7, to win the regional competition
and quali f ieb to compete in the State competition; and
Whereas, Dominic made 20 for 25 at the Sacramento competition on Februarn 3, 2oo7,
f inisl ing as the 2nd best free t6vow shooter in �s age group and one of 0 top five �
free throw shooters in the State of California; and
Whereas, Dominic's .boo shooting percentage is better than over 30o NBA planers,
including Vince Carter, Tonn Parker, Mike Dunleavn, Grant Hill, stephon
Marburn, Luke Walton, Elton Brand, Jermaine O'Neal, Antawn Jamison, Tracn
McGrabn, Shaquille O'Neal, LeBron James, Antonio McDness, Donnell Marshall,
Tim Duncan, Garn Panton, and Jason Richardson;
NOW, THEREFORE] BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Terra Nagel, Manor of the Citn of Burlingame,
bo herebn congratulate Dominic Davino for his tremendous achievement and well representing the
Burlingame communitn.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set mn hand and
caused the seal of the Citn of Burlingame to be a f f ixeb
this r9th ban of March 2007.
Terra Nagel, Man r
7
BURL11 GAME
Performance Indicators
Finance Department
City of Burlingame
March 19 , 2007
1
Financial Services Division
• General Ledger reports sent to
departments by the 10th of each month
— Printed revenue/expenditure reports sent to
departments
— Allows departments to monitor their budgets
— Reports are also available on-line
— Used to prepare quarterly financial reports
— Standard achieved
2
1
Financial Services Division
• Cash deposited and balanced daily 100%
of the time
—Performed on-line with Bank of America
—Prevents loss of cash and interest income
—Maintains accurate records between
depository and general ledger
—Performed daily by Deputy Treasurer and
Assistant Treasurer
—Standard achieved
3
Financial Services Division
• Mail processed and delivered daily 100%
of the time
—Includes incoming and outgoing mail
• Average 1500 incoming pieces weekly
• Average 2000 outgoing pieces weekly
—Ensure proper postage and accounting
—Staff back-up during leave
—Standard achieved
4
2
Financial Services Division
• All approved invoices paid within 2 weeks
— Invoices must be reviewed and approved by
departments (formal approval process)
— Performed by Accounts Payable Clerk
— 7800 annual invoices paid annually
— Average of 150 invoices paid per week
— Activity reflected in monthly warrants report
— Standard achieved
15
Financial Services Division
• All completed purchase orders received by
Finance processed within 1 business day
— Performed by Accounts Payable Clerk
— Average of 250 purchase orders per year
— Standard achieved
6
3
Financial Services Division
• Personnel Action Notices entered into
payroll system prior to next payroll 100%
of the time
—Performed by Payroll Technician
—Guarantees proper payroll payments to
employees based on status changes
—Approximately 390 annually
—Accomplished per standard
Financial Services Division
• Payroll related payments made to vendors
100% on time
—Performed by Payroll Technician
—Includes payments to CalPERS, Insurances,
Federal and State taxes, Unions
—Standard achieved
• 95% adherence to annual budget calendar
—Standard achieved
8
4
Financial Services Division
• Treasury and Warrants Reports delivered
to Council monthly (for approval)
— Prepared by Deputy Treasurer and Accounts
Payable Clerk
— Review and approved by Director
— Standard Achieved
• Payment made to Community Groups
within 30 days of start of new fiscal year
— Standard Achieved
9
Utility Billing & Customer
Service
• Customer requests for "Start and End of
Service" processed on date requested
— Customers usually request start and
termination of services in advance
— Requests average 90 per month
— Can usually accommodate emergency starts
in service (caused by not knowing process)
— Standard achieved
m
5
Utility Billing & Customer
Service
• Customer requests for utility bill
adjustments responded to within 1 week
— Requests average about 5 per month
— Customers must have proper documentation
• Paid invoice for sprinkler or plumbing repairs
• Adjustment is discretionary
• Usual adjustment based on prior usage
— Standard achieved
Utility Billing & Customer
Service
• Utility rebate adjustments (conservation)
completed within 2 business days
— Rebate for installation of water saving devices
• Low flow Toilets
• Low flow Shower heads
— Average 12 per month
—Adjustments made to accounts in the form of
credits
— Standard achieved
,2
6
Utility Billing & Customer
Service
• Utility edit rechecks completed by the
following business day
— Review of approximately 200 readings a day
• Looking for wide variances from prior use data
— Average of 10 readings are rechecked by
meter readers for accuracy
— Bills processed after verification of reading
— Standard met
13
Utility Billing & Customer
Service
• Customer queries responded to within 2
business days
— Complaints about water and sewer charges
— Methods of payment
— Water conservation and rebates
—Water audits and leak detections
— Request for bill reprints
— Request for extension of due date
14
7
Utility Billing & Customer
Service
• Utility bills mailed within 1 day of
generation
— Bills are printed and stuffed in-house
— Average of 11 ,000 bills mailed per week
— Average of 40 delinquent bills mailed per
month
• Finance Director delivers them in a pinch
15
8
STAFF REPORT
BURLINGAME AGENDA 6a
ITEM#
MTG. 3/19/07
DATE
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL sUBTED
BY
DATE: March 4,2007
APPR
FROM: Parks& Recreation Director BY
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION DENIAL TO
REMOVE TWO REDWOOD TREES AT 2022 TROUSDALE DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council hold a public hearing on the appeal of
the Beautification Commission's denial of an application to remove two protected trees at 2022
Trousdale Drive in Burlingame.
BACKGROUND:
On December 1, 2006 Walter and Evelyn Reed applied for a permit to remove two protected
private Redwood trees at 2022 Trousdale Drive. The property is a fourteen unit apartment
complex. The Reeds own the property and reside in one of the units. The Reeds had the
property landscaped twelve years ago, including the installation of the two Redwoods.
City Arborist Steve Porter inspected the two trees and found them to be in good health and
having good structure. Based on that inspection he denied the permit. The Reeds then appealed
the denial to the Beautification Commission. In the appeal they indicated that they wanted more
light in their unit and wished to create more room for the Alder trees in their landscape. They
submitted an Arborist's Report from John McClenahan, which confirmed Arborist Porter's
observations on the health of the trees.
The Beautification Commission held a public hearing on the appeal on February 1, 2007.
Neither the Reeds nor their representatives were present for the hearing and no members of the
public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the appeal. The Beautification Commission denied
the appeal of the denial based on the health of the trees. The Commission also found"...that
pruning and thinning of the trees would help to mitigate the concerns expressed."
The Reeds then appealed the denial by the Beautification Commission to Council.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There is no budget impact associated with this decision. If Council permits the appeal, the trees
would be removed at the cost of the applicant.
ATTACHMENTS:
Minutes from the February 1, 2007 Beautification Commission meeting
,21;/'c
Appeal of the Denial of One Private Spruce Tree at 2827 Arguello Drive— (Contd.)
Chairperson McQuaide stated that she noticed the sidewalk damage and the roots in the area. She noted that
the neighborhood is without trees, this tree being the only tree in the area. She stated that this is a beautiful.
specimen tree; that the shape and size of the tree is nice and the skirt could be raised if need be.
Commissioner Ellis commented that she would like to see the roots pruned and root barriers placed rather
than removal of the tree. Commissioner O'Connor agreed and stated she would like to see the tree saved.that
it is a very healthy and beautiful tree. Commissioner Carney thought the fiinge could be raised, root pruning
performed, and root barriers placed. She asked Arborist Porter how long the root barriers might be effective.
Arborist Porter responded that if root barriers are installed correctly, their effectiveness might last for 10-20
years. Superintendent Richmond asked Arborist Porter if they could circumscribe the entire tree with root
barriers. Arborist Porter responded, yes,that roots could be pruned all the way around the tree at the drip line,
and root barriers could be placed. Commissioner Lahey stated she would not approve removal, that there are
very few large trees in the area, and that the tree is healthy and thriving. She stated the sidewalk damage is
not uncommon and can be repaired as well as the damaged telephone/cable boxes. She concluded that there
are creative landscaping options available and that, pruning the tree and roots, and the placement of root
barriers can address the concerns of the applicant.
Following the discussion, Commissioner Carney moved to deny the appeal of the denial to remove the Spruce
tree at 2827 Arguello Drive with the recommendation that the applicant consider root pruning and placement
of root barriers to mitigate the problems with the roots; seconded, O'Connor. The motion carried 5-0-2
(absent/Grandcolas and Wright).
Appeal of the Denial of Two Redwood Trees at 2022 Trousdale Drive
Arborist Porter reported that the applicant requests removal of two Redwood trees to open up light to their
patio and open up the view from their upstairs bedroom; this is not a bav view tree issue. He stated that both
trees are mid life and will get larger, and like most large trees, will continue to need regular maintenance.
Arborist Porter concluded that the concerns expressed by the applicant do not meet the criteria used to justify
removal of protected trees and so the application was denied.
Commissioner Lahey stated that the trees are beautiful and asked if the trees could be pruned away from the
building and the gutters. Arborist Porter responded, ves, that the trees can be trimmed back from the building
and pruning for sunlight could also be done. He added that the trees proximity to the building is not a
problem.
The applicants were not present for comment.
Commissioner Ellis noted that only one small window is totally blocked by the tree and removal of the tree
would leave a huge expanse with no significant trees in the neighborhood. Commissioner Lahey agreed and
noted that if the tree near the patio were pruned it would help with winter light. She asked Arborist Porter if
the nearby Alder tree is leaning due to lack of light. Arborist Porter responded, yes, that trimming the
Redwood could provide more sunlight but removal of the small Alder could be considered as well.
Chairperson McQuaide stated that Redwood trees can be messy, but that they are gorgeous trees, and can be
thinned and should stay as there are not many significant trees in the area. Commissioner O'Connor
commented that the trees are beautiful and pruning should be considered first and would also be less
expensive. Commissioner Carney agreed that both trees are beautiful and could be trimmed in order to
address the concerns of the applicants.
Following the comments from the Commission, Commissioner O'Connor moved to deny the appeal of the
denial to remove two Redwood trees at 2022 Trousdale Drive with the recommendation that the applicants
consider pruning and thinning of both trees to mitigate the concerns expressed; seconded, Lahey. The motion
carried 5-0-2 (absent/Grandcolas and Wright).
2
February 19, 2007
City of Burlingame
Parks& Recreation Dept.
850 Burlingame, California 94010
Re: 2022 Trousdale Drive -Trees
To whom this may concern:
We are appeal" g the Commissions decision to the City Council. I am enclosing the
required $2500 check.
Sincerely,
Walter& Evelyn Reed
C111 y CITY OF BURLINGAME
B Y!1L I N G A M E PARKS & RECREATION DEPART • ENT
850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, California 94010-2899 m ��
��, 9• Telephone (650) 558-7300 • Parks/Trees (650) 558-7330
RP ar
Fax (650) 696-7216 E-mail. recreation@burlingame.org y
February 2, 2007
Mrs. Evelyn Reed
2022 Trousdale Drive 410
Burlingame, CA 94010
RE: APPEAL OF THE DENIAL TO REMOVE TWO PRIVATE REDWOOD TREES @
2022 TROUSDALE DRIVE -BURLINGAME
At its meeting of February 1, 2007, the Beautification Commission voted 5 - 0 - 2 (absent) to deny your
appeal of the denial for the removal of two Redwood trees at the above address because the trees are
healthy and beautiful, and that pruning and thinning of the trees would help to mitigate the concerns
expressed.
You may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council in writing by February 26th. Such letters
of appeal must be accompanied with a$250 fee(made payable to the City of Burlingame) and delivered
to the Parks & Recreation Department, 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame, California, 94010.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may call the Parks Division at (650) 558-7330.
Sincerely,
&
Tim Richmond
Parks Superintendent
TR/kh
CC: Hendrick& Margaret Gunawan Bruno & Adriana Cadona Susan & Robert Mahoney
2823 Arguello Drive 2100 Trousdale Drive 5825 Prancing Deer Place
Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Paso Robles, CA 93446
January 17, 2007
City of Burlingame
Parks & Recreation Department
850 Burlingame Ave
Burlingame, California 94010
Re: 2022 Trousdale Drive 910
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing in regards to appealing the decision of not allowing my husband and I to
remove a Redwood Tree (12 years old) so that our surrounding Alder trees may have the
opportunity to develop without leaning.
41 Redwood is depriving our unit of normal daylight and sunshine on our patio. We live
in unit 410 and have recently moved back to our property. We have owned the property
for 'DO years and have been generous in keeping it in good repair. In the last 12 years we
have spent $50,00. in landscaping so you can see we are responsible property owners.
We realize 91 tree is hale and hearty and I wish I could say the same for mylliusband and
1. Walter will be 82 in a few months (with Alzheimer's) and I will follow to 80 years this
year. (I am his Caregiver) I also have a spine injury and use a walker or cane. We are
not able to get out too much and would really enjoy more daylight, fresh air and sunshine
on our patio. The Redwood is preventing this from happening. Tree 42 (on Sequoia side
is as tall and spreads just like#1! It is currently ready to invade my bedroom through the
windows. (Please see photos). I would like to replace it with a specie that is lighter and
less dense.
The requirements for trees on our lot size (10,00 sq t.) is 5 trees. We currently have 15
trees including I Palm in the court. 41 Redwood is not visible from Trousdale or Sequoia
as the Alders surround the property at this point The portion of the lot that has SEVEN
trees growing on it is approx 35feet by 45 feet! That includes the walks! Surely that is
not reasonable space for Redwoods. We just were not aware (12 years ago) that these
trees would grow to such a size in 12 years. They perhaps get too much water in a lawn
area. So be it.
I could have talked to the gentleman that came to view the trees if he had rang my door
bell or knocked on the door. Then perhaps this lengthy explanation would not have been
necessary. I hope you will find it possible to help us make our remaining years much
more pleasant and our Alders (Happy Campers)!
Sincerely,
;i
1f
Evelyn Reed ("Caregiver") Mrs Walter Reed
Jl�I t5��rE��p lllllI�I�II�Ii hl Ilyi '�i�tIIUIll TgI�RIligI�Ill
kilsI4'�il�i� W'kPylI 1( w, `rL... {�I�liIIltl�l � llarldllbl'�Cpl it f•.G � p M.1C S f�l.y
I`
I'4 i I I Agyp'
i iql�y „�III�i i fill I iii i i I it �NIIIII it I�.ill IIIA .Aug t h i� 4fµ^ � �. Y 1 I�IFI{�il� �j�44G �y. � �Nl.•l�A��k iry� .y� c
� �vll�ll i;,ISII �il L� .I
Fj II'�hl�ll IIII�I�li �!�II�,t
4�I IIS 'III :oil I� �I Illilfi i .�'ti41A .y
b isa,
I
VII {IIII I
II1116�.1a 4 II �I
vt
f
fIn [�S.,rli5 �47a a a
,
4�ilgl�P k��lijl II I :" f n I ' e
li� ��ill�111!1 II d h 14 f 1
I. �����tl�pl�l��i I li'll I � 1µi � • ;: �, s� ���a ;
�IPll pfrl OMA
I 4 it l' 4�NIh II , vi, s �
I I I II al I I III 11.1 h I I � "
�✓,�1��II YI�I �) h 1�0� ��1� I III
..,
i�l�nq
d -
k :� �a� x
.:': >•�i_F a ww.wk« .amawwi7, wY xp�axa^rc� �� - .� :� ,:
CNN
Jr ,
s
t
•� � 'o r gib" ar .
el t
fit �l "k Ms 18;^. �'rt;t h.�'&',kr 1;•4 �, Y� fl �r ��t :�•t rix:',. :q.
�����,•V `•• '�we > �7 •W�?� Li �;. �"� .'6. '�Q � ;fir^ '�! + .�`"" '� .wdlY'�P",
ell ate`
77. tcwc�• x s r ax v a v ,� �` Lt � ��.
� I
} w
r
a
JA
Al
'r1 0 ti 1�Y 1"� �j n��•L y'}' � 1 �Y' }
��[M�+ yy�'��x i�C+�?( �'�''�1 �,/] `.i��¢ x� ..��',/'r ffi.- �, ��� re� rn. 9 `Y � i .•;
Al
�� lames' o�r' s xy �,�'�+��I $ ' i_� r 'i 5 ;Ai{'f� w r '. •S.
''wr M�'e � !?�:' N�. � �F`iL1 i � '( R„�, 1�tr7+', kart xl i {,,,,sq �i 5 ° + •, •.
� :,4 � � * Sy&�� � J i + ° �7`�, ��63'��/Yµ$,�G � i ,py r�" - uiF�..' '•�tl 1
. � :; �°"� tr � ���`�t"�" ro•Ike jb3 ��'�'�1 y;3+ "�!f�• �" a3I''""�F� 1 r�,j� rtid7 ,✓•. act F
�`� r ,'�,��• ia'l �L'x�� A fid: j �"� �f'''i "' a fit
a,;.�r', t � '�°X^s'�iw71t �' j ��.t. �.�' i t'1'..o'.} i IgYR� � ��'e� � ,i;•«.� .u�1� :� .•.,
"c � �'' t � 'R• tel;' �x Y 1 h „7 ,�`, rt.
j{
9r A• �
a,
��w I
04 •'� "� .RC<.,
��� i���. lad.• 5p # $` �A" '�,i S��`�M r�kP '°' ';w� T 6
f� i�tb' .�'Yfw,• �+1 f rya I?y .. ,.:
I •
II 1 rc
w r
�?� r.At p ��,ter? .+ ;b x�•a I 1��3 .�.
(F '�IF
M � •"v � y �',s�, � " "I4- '9 ar•A + r+ a +I f'� ,fry �
ti '�ry,�y,}�, * �h h! k"� .f � �wf, � '"�",.' r*' ,�;�' � ,'y`, �� s.•.r y g p
r
g
r. -
t J t
r m
n.... ..M1 9 4. , `,". -1 `a' 0.ffi✓ 1 1$°Sr V'�.,.t D 1 ). (� t y 4 7 S '�.A .4..
'�xQ
gg
✓'lW a �ra�J�rLct Si Y I 7
11
E Ail-
^
M
1
R ,
c - "9 1 2r 511 p� vl SSI t
a�,t\ g
,.. �l 'I N' .. ,.r q.. 1,x r,■< yff
,
,..�.,�I� � • y'. �'kw' ez f�R
1 '
r
4 w.. a Aa K o-,UN- �' ,I. r
�6 � �"°� � . � � " �^���, r,� w @�� � $ tie• \1lh\� y "i 1 Ir. 57 �+,+a � , °�}
,r f
"`L,,ye
SV
Y
# 1: 11 '1 - a �t a r Ir b'i�•r '�rt i �v �r�
/°�° x ,��, ., �` Y ! s a � w.:• R fief 14k .. a Yar Ak r1 fv v 6# i
+ r I^ 4
�x �w°�d '�'ll�.Yr�rr• �4r� Y, •`F �'����.� y � ��" �. � *Y� w �" `�i tt°, tt� F 4're 'ie°v� ,�•.V�, v 'e
C
r
;� �'��! ,ytihwl --�f��� �+v'�1� ,�:�Fa ��" •� 1, + a `' .>Ir ` � � Y `�1 , I,�•,� e.
ala i.
.s
� Y
T, jr�� ��1� ` ,� C �' � g ^•! !, a �,�M p1•.t .�rfp .r + ��.
71.
7 "'fly- . •. .:.
'fit 4,
' '�y„'a°R lyN, A-IW a t r., t �rw,.��.r s.,: � f p� y ��+•i''w ,r:
- r 21•J�r4�„(1
fi 7 y
'Y I
„7�"y�.r�°� m• '' ,.:�G .�.., �`A I'' .,.� .�r. "�•�y ,.�+q�r�' .x ° e '�,.
�g �� x.H' 4 F''' � `}I� r8 �rN �,''-r•".a '�ice' �'[ -.•..n 8,, W ,,,'
y ,S` - y� I �i h 'E• �'
.,,
rp
` ��'� G •���A� p � ;Y � ns r,`#+fw�, Y .c 5 :�*„�Ir
NOWC�,�.�w'�
`dc ry •+' 'i' y,d 7.,'4 f E + P"T�w x4t ru '$ W
d
,� ',.n ., Hi.,. s� { - 'A�,S�e��•� '7 mfr ���
e ,
AIM
McCLENAHAN CONSULTING, LLC
January 9, 2007
Trousdale Manor
Attention: Mrs. Evelyn Reed
2022 Trousdale Drive #10
Burlingame, CA 94010
Assignment
As requested, I performed a visual inspection of two Coast redwoods proposed for
removal to determine condition.
Background
This site consists of 14 townhouse style apartments. As part of this development
Redwoods and Alders were planted. Two of the Redwoods at unit 10, the property
owner's residence, are now protected trees. They would like to remove the Redwoods
because they compete with the smaller Alders for light and block sunlight from
penetrating into their home.
Summary
The homeowner requests removal of these two trees to enhance the quality of their
lives. It is understood that the trees are in good condition as they are only 12 year old
Redwoods receiving a consistent supply of supplemental irrigation.
Methodology
No root crown exploration, climbing or plant tissue analysis was performed as part of
this survey.
In determining Tree Condition several factors have been considered which include:
Rate of gr lwth over several seasons;
Structural decays or weaknesses;
Presence of disease or insects; and
Life expectancy.
The following guide for interpretation of Tree Condition as related to Life Expectancy is
submitted for your information.
0 - 5 Years = Poor
5 - 10 Years = Poor to Fair
10 - 15 Years = Fair
15 - 20 Years = Fair to Good
20 + Years = Good
1 ARASTRADERO ROAD,PORTOLA VALLEY, CA 94028-8012 •TEL(650)326-8781 •FAX(650)854-1267
OCopynghl MCCLENAHAN CONSULTING,LLC 2006
www.spmcclenahen.com
Trousdale Manor
Attention: Mrs.Evelyn Reed
Page 2 January 9,2007
Tree Description/Observation
#1: Coast redwood(Sequoia sempervirens)
18.7"DSH(diameter standard height)
Height:40' Spread:20'
Condition: Good
Location: Lawn area left of front door
Observation:
Foliage is typical of the species and indicates normal tree vitality.Tree structure
appears sound with no visible signs of decay. However,a codominant leader is
developing near the top.Six Alders(Alnus rhombifolia)are growing between this tree
and the intersection of Sequoia Avenue and Trousdale Drive.Two of the Aiders are
developing one sided and starting to lean as a result of competition.
#2: Coast redwood
20.6"DSH
Height:40' Spread:25'
Condition: Good
Location: Side of unit#10 along Sequoia Avenue
Observation:
Foliage is typical of the species and indicates normal tree vitality.Tree structure
appears sound with no visible signs of decay.The property owner would like to remove
this tree to allow sunlight into their master bedroom.
Conclusion
The criteria used to determine removal decisions on protected size trees has not been
met and criteria is based on health,stability,and possible damage to property,none of
which appear to be significant issues in this case.While this is true,the property owner
would like to remove the trees to better preserve their Alder trees and improve the
quality of their life by adding winter sunlight and warmth to their home. They planted the
trees approximately 12 years ago not knowing about their rapid growth rate.Should a
permit be granted, I recommend planting two 24-inch box deciduous trees along the
building side on Sequoia Avenue,species to be approved by the city arborist.The
existing Alders will continue to create screening for neighbors for tree one.I recommend
replacing with deciduous trees because they will allow sun into the house during the
winter and create shade during the summer to reduce energy consumption.
All written material appearing herein constitutes original and unpublished work of the
Arborist and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without written consent of the
Arborist.
McCLENAHAN CONSULTING,LLC
1 ARASTRADERO ROAD,PORTOLA VALLEY,CA 94028-8012•TEL(650)326-8781•FAX(650)854-1267
Trousdale Manor
Attention: Mrs. Evelyn Reed
Page 3 January 9, 2007
We thank you for this opportunity to be of assistance in your tree preservation concerns.
Should you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance in these concerns,
kindly contact our office at any time.
Very truly yours,
McCLENA,J4QN CONSULTING, LLC
By: Jolxn H. McClenahan
Certified Arborist, WE-1476A
member, American Society of Consulting Arborists
JHMc: pm
McCLENAHAN CONSULTING, LLC
1 ARASTRADERO ROAD, PORTOLA VALLEY, CA 94028-8012 • TEL (650) 326-8781 • FAX (650) 854-1267
2�w CITY o� CITY OF BURLINGAME
6 U R L I N G A M E PARIS & RECREATION DEPARTNIENT _
350 Burlingame Avenue,Burlingame, California 94010-2899
Telephone (650) 558-7300 ° Parks/Trees(650) 558-7330
RpoggiEo Fax (650) 696-7216 ° E-mail: recreation@burlingame.org --_
December 19, 2006
Mrs. Walter Reed
2022 Trousdale Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
RE: APPEAL OF THE DENIAL
r TO REMOVE TWO PRIVATE REDWOOD TREES
2022 1 RO U SDALE D Ri vT -B 1J1�1.11 GMvIE
Your letter of December 6, 2006 appealing the denial to remove two private Redwood trees, on the
Sequoia side of the property at the above address, has been received at our office. Your appeal will be
placed on the February 1, 2007 agenda of the Beautification Commission meeting.
The Commission meets at 5:30 p.m. in Conference Room "A" at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame. If you wish, you may attend this meeting and address your concerns to the Commission.
Prior to the meeting, any other supporting documentation you may have to assist the Commission in
making their decision, can be forwarded to our office at 850 Burlingame Avenue,Burlingame, CA, 94010.
Your neighbors are also being sent copies of this letter, pursuant to City Ordinance, so they may attend
the Commission meeting and make any comments.
If you have any further questions please call our office at (650) 558-7330.
Sincerely,
Tim Richmond
Parks Superintendent
TR/kh
CC: Hendrick & Margaret Gunawan Bruno & Adriana Cadona Susan &Robert Mahoney
2101 Trousdale Drive 2100 Trousdale Drive 5825 Prancing Deer Place
Burlingame, CA 94010 Burlingame, CA 94010 Paso Robles, CA 93446
December 11, 2006
City of Burlingame
Parks &Recreation Department
850 Burlingame Avenue, Ca 95010-2899
RE: 2022 Trousdale Drive Permit
In response to your letter, I am requesting an appeal to denying a permit of the trees in
question. I may have been remiss in not listing other reasons for removal of these trees
but cannot meet your criteria at this time. I am requesting an extension to enable me to
make arrangements to meet the criteria in the following Beautification C`ornrnissinn'g
February Agenda.
My husband and I are both physically handicapped. He is diagnosed with Alzheimer's
and I am the care-giver(use a walker) and my free time to take care of these details is
limited. I will try to obtain an Arborist as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
n
Evelyn Reed(Mrs. Walter Reed)
CITY o CITE' OF PURLIT'*GAME
2Y
BU RINGAMPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
LE
850 Burlingame Avenue,Burlingame. California 94010-2899 r
�9 a Telephone (650) 558-7300 , Parks/Trees (650) 558-7330
"'"ArEo> Fa (650) 696-7216 ® E-mail: recreation@burlingame.org
December 6, 2006
Walter Reed
2022 Trousdale Drive 910
Burlingame, CA 94010
RE: REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF TWO REDWOOD TREES @ 2022 TROUSDALE DRIVE
- BURLINGAME
I reviewed your request for the removal of two Redwood trees in the front yard of the Sequoia side
of the property at the above address, and have made the following determination:
1)Both Redwood trees are healthy and structurally sound.
2) Criteria used to determine removal decisions of protected size trees has not been met
and criteria is based on health, stability, and possible damage to property, none
of which appear to be significant enough issues in this case.
3) Therefore, the application has been denied.
If you wish to appeal this decision you may: 1) Submit an independent Arborist Report supporting
justifiable criteria for removal of these trees and/or any other supporting documentation you may have
supporting your request for removal and, 2) Appeal this decision in writing to the Burlingame
Beautification Commission, 850 Burlingame Avenue, Burlingame. Any documentation must be
received at our office by December 22, 2006 if you wish your appeal to be placed on the Beautification
Commission's January 4' agenda.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (650) 558-7330.
Sincerely,
Steven Porter
City Arborist - (ISA 4WC-3073)
SP/kh
PROTECTED TREE REM017AL
PERMIT APPLICATION
P4PXS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
850 I3URLINGAME AVENUE
I3 URLINGAME, CA 94010
(650) 558-7330
The undersigned owner of the property at:
ADDRESS:
(print or type)
hereby applies for a permit to remove or prune more than 1/3 of the crown or roots of the following protected
tree(s):
SPECIES CIRCUMFERENCES
LOCATION ON PROPERTY :11 e`er
WORK TO BE PERFORMED
REASON WORK IS NECESSARY
(Please use back of form for additional comments.)
NOTE: A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE TREE(S) OWNER (Print)
MUST BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH A
$50.00 CHECK TO: CITY OF BURLINGAME ADDRESS
Attach any supporting documentation you may have
(Example: Report from an Independent Arborist). PHONE
T_'_ ' -/--G -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PERMIT
This permit allows the applicant to remove or prune the above listed tree(s)in accordance with the provisions of the
Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 11.06). By signing this permit,the
applicant aclmowledges receipt of a copy of Chapter 11.06, and agrees to comply with its provisions and all
conditions listed below; and that all appeals have expired or been resolved.
OWNER
CITY ARBORIST
PARKS& RECREATION DIRECTOR
CONDITIONS: 24- inch box size landscape trees) will be required and may be
planted anlnvhere on the property. If conditions are not met within:
the allotted time as specified in Section 11.06.080,paynnent of$400
for each tree into the tree replacement fiend will be required.
NO replacentent(s) required Contact the Parks Division at
(650) 558-7330 when removals) completed
DATE PERMIT EFFECTIVE PERMIT EXPIRES
This work should be done by qualified tree professionals and a copy of this permit must be
available at theJob site at all times when work is being performed.
r y x
V41u ,
•,., '' ..}MFS` ,,,n :.,�, .;�_, ,'�.; ,�W .; �:. - � ��.e ��� ._ �� � i' 41. 1..� �t, � i.
14
{{�
'I
'e o't
y F Y
tt +
h�
�t['4 7�t yY„V�
t
CITY 0 STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAME AGENDA
ITEM# 6b
9De
MTG
%LCDq . 3/19107
DAATED JUNE 6 DATE _
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMIt BY
DATE: February 5,2007
APP O
FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director ir
558-7222
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Resolution Increasing the 2007 Solid Waste Rates by Five Percent (5%)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council hold a public hearing to solicit public input on the proposed rate adjustment for
residential and commercial accounts and adopt a resolution increasing all solid waste rates by 5%.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Burlingame is a member of the South Bayside Waste Management Authority Joint Powers
Agreement (SBWMA) and has an exclusive franchise agreement with Allied Waste Services for residential
and commercial solid waste, residential recycling and residential green waste (brush & yard clippings). All
12 SBWMA member jurisdictions have a uniform franchise agreement with Allied Waste.
The franchise agreement sets the methodology for establishing annual rates based on Allied's rate proposal
for the subsequent calendar year. Rate adjustments are determined individually for each SBWMA member
agency based on revenue shortfalls or surpluses from prior year activities. Revenue and expenses are
estimated and maintained for each member city in individual balancing accounts.
Each fall Allied submits its rate proposal for the next the rate year. The rate proposal includes any changes
in services and costs that may have been approved by the SBWMA during the current year. The SBWMA
then reviews the annual solid waste rate proposals submitted by Allied for compliance with the franchise
agreement. Hilton, Farnkopf and Hobson(HFH), a consulting firm specializing in rate analysis, audits the
rate proposals and makes rate adjustment recommendations to the SBWMA member cities.
The recommended rate adjustment for 2007 is 5%based on increases in labor costs incurred by Allied
Waste Company and a$2.00 increase in the tipping fees charged by SBWMA at the transfer station.
Last year(2006) the City of Burlingame increased solid waste rates by 3% given the need to establish a
revenue reserve in the Burlingame balancing account. The balancing account is used to offset revenue and
expenditure variances that may result in a deficit at the end of any rate year. Revenue shortages have
occurred in prior years because of reductions in residential and commercial accounts during a rate year.
However, most of the variances are on the expense side and are due to increases to operating costs by
Allied Waste. The increases in operating costs are mostly due to collective bargaining agreement with the
Teamsters and changes in operations that occur throughout the rate year.
The initial rate adjustment for 2007 was 1.3%. The increase would cover a projected shortfall of
$85,000 in costs for 2007. As part of the rate proposal, Allied Waste requested that additional costs that
were incurred by the company in 2006 be reimbursed by the member agencies. A negotiating committee
was formed to represent the SBWMA in its negotiations with the company. The SBWMA committee
members were from Burlingame, Hillsborough and the City of San Mateo. The negotiations committee
accepted some of the additional costs as eligible for reimbursement by the SBWMA cities and negated
others. This increased the 2007 rate adjustment to 3.8%.
On January 25, 2007, the SBWMA voted to increase tipping fees at the transfer station by$2.00 a ton. The
City of Burlingame voted "no" on the increase because the tipping fees were reduced in 2005 and 2006 to
offer rate relief to a number of agencies that were facing double digit increases. Burlingame was not one of
those agencies. Without the tipping fee increase, the SBWMA would face a year-end shortfall of $2.3
million based on current operations (revenue from tonnage versus operating expenses).
Burlingame's opposition was based on the fact that the SBWMA is beginning the 2007 rate year with a
carry-over surplus of $4 million, which is sufficient to cover the shortfall and still post a 2007 year-end
surplus of $2.6 million. This surplus is in addition to other reserves held by the SBWMA for various
purposes. The Board voted 7 to 4 to approve the $2.00 per ton tipping fee at the transfer station. The
increase in the tipping fees raised the final rate adjustment to 5%.
City of Burlingame Solid Waste Rate Adjustments
Rate Year: 2004 2005 2006 2007
Proposed
Rate Adjustment: 17% 0% 3% 5%
The following table provides examples of the affects of the rate adjustment on the most common types of
solid waste accounts.
City of Burlingame, CA
Monthly Solid Waste Rates for 2007
Customer 2006 Rate 2007 Rate Increase Increase
Service Level Current Proposed Amount Percentage
Residential:
32 gallon can $12.92 $13.57 $0.65 5%
64 gallon can $25.84 $27.13 $1.29 5%
95 gallon can $38.35 $40.27 $1.92 5%
Commercial:
95 gallon bin $38.35 $40.27 $1.92 5%
1 yard bin $81.54 $85.62 $4.08 5%
3 yard bin $244.62 $256.85 $12.23 5%
The rate adjustments are not retroactive to January 1, 2007. They are effective on the date of Council
approval. Customers should see the adjusted rate for the billing cycle beginning in April 2007.
ATTACHMENTS:
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Increasing the 2007 Solid Waste Rates by Five
Percent(5%) in the City of Burlingame
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AUTHORIZING ALLIED WASTE SERVICES (FORMERLY BFI) TO INCREASE RATES
FOR REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES
RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS,Allied Waste Services (formerly BFI)holds a franchise from the City to collect
and dispose of refuse and various recyclables within the City; and
WHEREAS,pursuant to that franchise and Municipal Code Section 8.16.040, Allied Waste
Services has submitted a rate proposal for its services; and
WHEREAS, the rate proposal is intended to meet the funding and revenue requirements of
the franchise agreement; and
WHEREAS,the City has had Hilton Farnkopf& Hobson, independent consultants, evaluate
the rate request and concurs that the rate proposal is consistent with the franchise; and
WHEREAS,the recommended rates appear just and reasonable and necessary for continued
operation of the franchise within the City; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed rates and the public hearing on the rates has been given
in accordance with California law to all ratepayers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and considered all testimony, objections, and
protests regarding the proposed rates; and
WHEREAS, no written majority protest has been made to the proposed rates as may be
made under California law,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The Refuse Collection Rates are accepted as follows, and Allied Waste Services is
authorized to utilize such rates effective on March 19, 2007:
A. Commercial bin and can rates are increased by 5%;
B. Commercial compactor rates are increased by 5%; and
C. Residential rates are increased by 5%.
MAYOR
1
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day of , 2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
2
2
��ICIWTYot_
STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAMEAGENDA 6c
ITEM#
00 MTG. 3/19/07
DATE
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED / )
BY J�1
DATE: March 19, 2007
APPROVED ,A
FROM: Deirdre Dolan, Human Resources Director BY
SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance to Amend the Contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement
System (Ca1PERS) and the City of Burlingame to Provide Section 21548 (Pre-Retirement Optional
Settlement 2 Death Benefit) for Local Miscellaneous Members
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council adopt the proposed Ordinance authorizing an amendment to the contract
with the California Public Employees Retirement System to provide the Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2
Death Benefit to miscellaneous members, and direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance
within 15 days of adoption.
BACKGROUND:
At the February 21, 2007 regular Council meeting, staff introduced the attached ordinance to amend the City
of Burlingame's contract with the California Public Employee's Retirement System (Ca1PERS). This
ordinance would amend the CalPERS contract to provide the Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death
Benefit to miscellaneous members.
This contract amendment will provide improved survivor benefits to miscellaneous employees who die and
are eligible to retire. Currently, if a miscellaneous employee dies and is eligible to retire(age 50 or over with
at least 5 years of PERS service), the employee's surviving spouse or domestic partner is eligible to receive
50% of the monthly retirement allowance the employee would have received if he/she had retired on the date
of death. The Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit is a PERS contract option that provides a
monthly allowance in an amount calculated as though the employee had retired on the date of death and
selected the option that gives the highest amount to a survivor.
The Police Safety and Fire Safety plans already have this contract option in place, as it is a mandatory benefit
for plans that have less than 100 members and are therefore pooled. The miscellaneous plan is not pooled, and
requires a contract amendment to implement this option. To do so would provide peace of mind to retirement-
eligible employees, and parity with the Fire and Police safety plans.
The effective date of this contract amendment will be April 30, 2007, since Ca1PERS requires that the
effective date coincide with the first day of a pay period following the effective date of the ordinance.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The change in the total employer rate that the Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death Benefit represents
is 0.246%. There is sufficient funding in the 2006-2007 budget to cover this rate increase.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance to Amend Agreement
Amendment to Contract
1 ORDINANCE NO.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND
3 THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS)
TO PROVIDE PRE-RETIREMENT OPTIONAL SETTLEMENT 2 DEATH BENEFIT
4 TO MISCELLANEOUS MEMBERS
5
6 The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows:
7 Section 1. Pursuant to the California Government Code and the Contract between the City
8 of Burlingame and the California Public Employees Retirement System(CALPERS),the City has
9 recognized that its miscellaneous members are being treated differently than its safety members in
10 that safety members are automatically provided a pre-retirement death benefit for survivors, and
11 that the failure to provide this benefit could deprive a member's survivors of the retirement benefit
12 that an eligible member has earned over years of service, simply because the member did not file
13 for retirement before a sudden death. On February 21,2007,the City Council adopted a Resolution
14 of Intention to consider this amendment at a duly noticed public hearing,and notice of that public
15 hearing has been properly provided. Written comments and oral testimony of all interested persons
16 have been considered.
17 Section 2. The Amendment to the Contract between the City of Burlingame and the Board
18 of Administration, California Public Employees Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy
19 of this amendment is attached to this ordinance,marked Exhibit A,and by such reference is made
20 a part hereof as though herein set out in full. The amendment shall be effective on April 30, 2007.
21 Section 3. The Mayor of the City of Burlingame is hereby authorized, empowered, and
22 directed to execute this amendment for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame.
23 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall take effect thirty
24 days after its adoption.
25
26
Mayor
27
28 I,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
1
I foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 215`day
2 of February,2007,and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
3 day of , 2007, by the following vote:
4 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
5 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
6 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
7
8
City Clerk
9 U:AFILES\ORDMANC\calpersemn7.per.wpd
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
All
Ca1PERS
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees ' Retirement System
and the
City Council
City of Burlingame
The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency,
hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective July 1,
1942, and witnessed July 6, 1942, and as amended effective February 1, 1954, July 1,
1956, April 1, 1963, March 1, 1964, April 1, 1965, March 16, 1967, November 1, 1968,
September 1, 1970, April 1, 1973, May 1, 1974, November 1, 1974, February 20, 1975,
March 16, 1975, July 1, 1976, August 16, 1976, May 1, 1979, December 1, 1985,
December 1, 1987, December 6, 1989, November 15, 1990, May 26, 1997, December
12, 2000, November 1, 2001, December 30, 2001, July 15, 2002, June 5, 2003, July 12,
2004 and June 26, 2006 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said
System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows:
A. Paragraphs 1 through 13 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed
effective June 26, 2006, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs
numbered 1 through 13 inclusive:
1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall
mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members, age 55 for local fire
members and age 50 for local police members.
2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after July 1, 1942 making its employees as hereinafter
provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public
Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a
contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments
to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions
thereof,apply only on the election of a contracting agency.
3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
a. Local Fire Fighters(herein referred to as local safety members);
b. Local Police Officers(herein referred to as local safety members);
C. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
local miscellaneous members).
4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law,the following classes of employees shall not become
members of said Retirement System:
a. PLAYGROUND LEADERS WHO ARE PAID ON AN HOURLY
BASIS; POLICE CADETS,AND LIBRARY PAGES HIRED ON OR
AFTER MARCH 16,1967;AND
b. FIRE CADETS AND CROSSING GUARDS HIRED ON OR AFTER
MAY 1,1974.
5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall
be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law
(2%at age 55 Full).
6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local police member shall be
determined in accordance with Section 21362.2 of said Retirement Law
(3%at age 50 Full).
7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local fire member shall be
determined in accordance with Section 21363.1 of said Retirement Law
(3%at age 55 Full).
8. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
a. Section 21573 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local
miscellaneous members only.
b. Section 20425 ("Local Police Officer" shall include employees of a
police department who were employed to perform identification or
communication duties on August 4, 1972 and who elected to be
local safety members).
C. Section 21222.1 (One-Time 5% Increase - 1970). Legislation
repealed said Section effective January 1, 1980.
d. Section 21222.2 (One-Time 5% Increase - 1971). Legislation
repealed said Section effective January 1, 1980.
e. Sections 21624, 21626 and 21628 (Post-Retirement Survivor
Allowance).
f. Section 21319 (One-Time 15% Increase for Local Miscellaneous
Members Who Retired or Died Prior to July 1, 1971). Legislation
repealed said Section effective January 1, 2002.
g. Section 20614, Statutes of 1978, (Reduction of Normal Member
Contribution Rate). From May 1, 1979 and until December 1, 1985,
the normal local miscellaneous member contribution rate shall be
3.5% and local safety member contribution rate shall be 4.5%.
Legislation repealed said Section effective September 29, 1980.
h. Section 20690, Statutes of 1980, (To Prospectively Revoke Section
20614, Statutes of 1978).
i. Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation).
j. Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local
safety members only.
k. Section 20965 (Credit for Unused Sick Leave) for local
miscellaneous members and local fire members only.
I. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service).
M. Section 20903 (Two Years Additional Service Credit).
n. Section 21037 (Cancellation of Payment for Optional Service Credit
Upon Retirement for Industrial Disability).
o. Section 21548 (Pre-Retirement Optional Settlement 2 Death
Benefit) for local miscellaneous members only.
9. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20790,
ceased to be an "employer" for purposes of Section 20834 effective on
August 16, 1976. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be
fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834,
and accumulated contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as
provided in Government Code Section 20834.
10. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions
determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with
respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said
Retirement System.
11. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21573 of said Retirement
Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and
liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a
single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all
local miscellaneous members.
b. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement
Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and
liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a
single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all
local safety members.
C. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of
administering said System as it affects the employees of Public
Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the
periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
d. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
13. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid
by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the
end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed
by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of
contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in
connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of
errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct
payments between the employee and the Board.
B. This amendment shall be effective on the day of
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM CITY OF BURLINGAME
BY BY
LORI MCGARTLAND, CHIEF PRESIDING OFFICER
EMPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Witness Date
Attest:
Clerk
AMENDMENT ER#18
PERS-CON-702A(Rev. 10\05)
Agenda
Item # 8a
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: Ma ch 19 2007
SUBMITTED BY
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE.- February 26, 2007
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE 2-HOUR PARKING AT
1361 N. CAROLAN AVENUE (PUBLIC WORKS CORPORATION
YARD)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council introduce the attached
ordinance to implement 2-hour parking for three spaces in front of 1361 North
Carolan Avenue (Public Works Corporation Yard) by:
1 . Requesting City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance.
2. Waiving further reading of the ordinance.
3. Introducing the proposed ordinance.
4. Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five
days before proposed adoption.
BACKGROUND: Prior to December 2006, the Burlingame Public Works
Corporation Yard used on-street parking to accommodate both employee and guest
parking for the facility. In October 2006, the City exercised its option to demolish the
adjacent building and convert it to much-needed employee parking.
The new fenced lot is used for employee and city construction vehicle parking. In
order to address the lack of visitor parking, the Public Works Department is
requesting the designation of three on-street parking spaces in front of the
Corporation Yard as 2-hour parking for visitors and other short-term parkers.
DISCUSSION: The on-street parking both in front of the Corporation Yard, as well
as the rest of North Carolan Avenue currently has unlimited time parking and is
being used by businesses on the street.
Based upon field investigations, staff has determined that there are no short-term
parking spaces available on North Carolan Avenue. The designation of short-term,
on-street parking spaces would be a benefit to the Corporation Yard and to the auto
businesses in the immediate vicinity.
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Corp Yard 2-hr Parking.doc
In the future, staff will investigate the possibility of designating additional on-street
spaces farther down the street to serve as short-term parking for vendors.
BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in the Public Works Department
operating budget to implement and maintain the proposed change.
EXHIBITS: Ordinance
Location Map
TSPC Minutes (February 8, 2007)
Aug u!dine Chou
Traffic Engineer
S:W Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Corp Yard 2-hr Parking.doc
I ORDINANCE No. 1638
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
ESTABLISHING TWO-HOUR PARKING LIMIT FOR THREE PARKING SPACES IN
3 FRONT OF 1361 NORTH CAROLAN AVENUE
4
5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
6
7 Section 1. The North Carolan neighborhood is a mix of uses, including automobile
8 service, supply stores,warehousing,public facilities, and manufacturing. Parking in the area has
9 been unlimited, which means that visitors and customers of the businesses and public buildings
10 have great difficulty finding on-street parking during the work day. This ordinance is intended to
11 provide three short-term parking spaces in front of City buildings so that the City facility and
12 neighboring businesses will have some on-street parking available on a limited basis.
13
14 Section 2. Subsection 13.36.040(a) is amended to read as follows:
15 (a) 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.:
16 (1) Adrian Road,west side,one hundred fifty-five(155)feet southerly from the southeast
17 end of the curb return of David Road.
18 (2) Anita Road,west side, from Peninsula Avenue one hundred and forty-five(145) feet
19 north toward Bayswater Avenue;
20 (3) Bayswater Avenue from El Camino Real to Park Road; south side, from California
21 Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way;
22 (4) Bellevue Avenue, except the south side from Primrose Road to Almer Road;
23 (5) Burlingame Avenue, from Myrtle to Carolan Avenue; south side from Occidental to
24 El Camino Real;
25 (6) California Drive,west side, from Carmelita Avenue to Palm Drive; from Burlingame
26 Avenue to Peninsula Avenue; from Oak Grove Avenue four hundred(400)feet northwards to 755
27 California Drive, except areas designated for thirty(30) minute parking;
28 (7) Capuchino Avenue from four hundred(400)feet southerly to four hundred ninety-five
1
1 (495) feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway;
2 (8) Carmelita Avenue, south side, from El Camino Real to Chula Vista Avenue;
3 (9) Carolan Avenue,west side,from Oak Grove Avenue to Burlingame Avenue;east side,
4 from one hundred (100) feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty(460) feet northerly
5 of Toyon Drive; and east side, from Cadillac Way to Broadway;
6 (10) Chapin Avenue, from Chapin Lane to El Camino Real;
7 (11) Chula Vista Avenue from the centerline of Broadway to four hundred ten feet (410)
8 southerly of the centerline of Broadway;
9 (12)Douglas Avenue;
10 (13) East Lane, east side, from Burlingame Avenue to Howard Avenue;
11 (14) El Camino Real service road between Dufferin Avenue and Murchison Drive;
12 (15) Howard Avenue, south side, from Crescent Avenue to El Camino Real and from
13 California Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way;
14 (16)Laguna Avenue from two hundred eighty feet(280)southerly to five hundred ten(5 10)
15 feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway;
16 (17)Lorton Avenue,west side,from Bayswater Avenue to Howard Avenue;east side,from
17 Howard Avenue one hundred twenty(120) feet south toward Bayswater and forty(40) feet north
18 toward Burlingame Avenue;
19 (18) Magnolia, west side, from Trousdale Drive to Plaza Lane;
20 (19)North Carolan Avenue with three(3)parking spaces along the lot front of 1 361 North
21 Carolan Avenue,
22 (20) Occidental Avenue, from El Camino Real to Ralston Avenue;
23 (21)Paloma Avenue from three hundred ten(3 10)feet southerly to one hundred thirty(130)
24 feet northerly of the centerline of Broadway;
25 (22) Park Road, except the west side, from Howard Avenue to Bayswater Avenue;
26 (23) Primrose Road, west side, from Howard Avenue to El Camino Real;
27 (24) Ralston Avenue, from Occidental Avenue to El Camino Real;
28 (25)Rollins Road from ninety(90)feet northerly of Toyon Drive to four hundred sixty feet
2
1 (460)northerly of Toyon Drive;
2 (26) South Lane,both sides;
3 (27);Trousdale Drive, north side, from the curb return of Trousdale Drive and California
4 Drive to ninety(90) feet west of said curb return.
5
6 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
7
8
Mayor
9
10 I,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
11 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day
12 of , 2007, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on
13 the day of , 2007, by the following vote:
14 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
15 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
16 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
17
City Clerk
18 UAFILES\0RDINANC\PARKZ0N7.wpd
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Public Works Corp Yard
Facility Public Works Corp Yard
1361 N. Carolan Ave. Parking Lot
L L ..L 1 -L J L 1 1 J
Proposed 2- Hour Parking
N. Carolan Avenue
Corp Yard / Fueling Station Fire Station 436
The City of Burlingame 1361 N. CarolScale: NTS an Avenue Date: 2/2/07
Public Works Department 2 - Hour Parking Drawn by: Jon Roldan
URLINGAME The City of Burlingame
California 94010-3997
www.burlingame.org
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes—Approved
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Commissioners Present: Victor James, Chair
Michael Bohnert
J. Mark Noworolski
Stephen Warden
Commissioners Absent: Dan Conway, Vice Chair
Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer, Public Works
Traffic Sergeant Dean Williams, Police Department
Joanne Louie, Administrative Secretary, Public Works
Visitors: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa
Kirsten Wallerstedt, Office of State Senator Leland Yee
Farris Horak, 1332 Edgehill
1
1. CALL TO ORDER
7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4 of 5 Commissioners present.
4. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Chair James mentioned that a formal proclamation was being prepared for former
Commissioner Gene Condon to acknowledge his service to the Commission.
Chair James also acknowledged Kirsten Wallerstedt. Ms. Wallerstedt made a brief
introduction and explained that she was from the office of State Senator Leland Yee; and,
she expressed her availability to the cities along the peninsula as a resource from Senator
Yee's office.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—January 11,2007
Motion:To accept the minutes of January 11,2007 as submitted.
M/S/C Warden,Noworolski;4/0/1
6. CONSENT
Motion:To move Item 8.1 1361 N.Carolan Avenue/City Corp Yard—Designation of three,2-
hr parking to the consent and approve.
M/S/C Warden,Bohnert;4/0/1
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Pat Giorni suggested that the B/PAC determine when the next meeting would occur and to
put a notice in the Burlingame newsletter seeking public participation. Another suggestion
Ms.Giorni made was that a meeting should occur every 3 months or so to look at the bicycle
pedestrian bridge over Broadway and also at Carolan Avenue.
Ms. Giorni suggested that if the TDA grant got approved for the lighted crosswalk at
Broadway/Paloma Avenue intersection, that perhaps Council could borrow funds from the
general fund to get the project underway immediately.
Ms. Giorni also requested that complete staff packets be made available to the public for
future meetings.
Ms.Horak asked Mr.Chou what the timeline would be for the TDA grant process. Mr.Chou
replied that the City was awaiting a March decision. He said that funding would be available
in June,and each City would have three years to complete the projects. Mr.Chou said that
provided that all the City's projects are selected, two projects could start in July or August
with a completion date in September or October,with the third project not starting until spring
of 2008.
2
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1 1361 N. Carolan Avenue/City Corp Yard— Designation of three, 2 hr parking spaces
Moved to Consent.
9. CURRENT BUSINESS.
9.1.Traffic and Parking Issues
None.
9.2 Staff Reports
9.2.1 Traffic Engineer's Report
None.
9.2.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report
None.
10. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT
None.
11. ACTION
None.
12. OLD BUSINESS
None.
13. COMMUNICATIONS
13.1 Letter from Pat Giorni stop signs at Hillside Drive and Balboa Avenue.
Mr. Chou reported that this request would be addressed in a staff report to the
Commission for discussion at the next meeting.
13.2 Communication from Dr. Sonny DeMarto, Burlingame School District, on crosswalks at
Trousdale Drive and Ogden Avenue.
Mr. Chou provided a map of the location and said that staff would take a look at
relocating and realigning some of the crosswalks and bring the findings to this
commission at a later date. Mr. Chou stated that this request could be handled directly
by Public Works staff.
14. COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
14.1 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (B/PAC)
Commissioner Bohnert reported that Craig Horak would like to join this committee. He
added that currently this committee consisted of two TSPC Commissioners, one
Planner Commissioner, one engineer, and one planner. He said that they would like to
3
bring in additional community members. Commissioner Bohnert reported that the
B/PAC had plans to meet at 6:00 pm prior to the next TSPC meeting.
Mr. Chou said that the next meeting would be used to lay down some groundwork for
projects for this year, while past meetings were focused on determining projects for the
last round of TDA grants.
14.2 Broadway/Paloma—Traffic Safety Measures
Commissioner Warden reported that the sub-committee met about a week prior to
finalize some of their plans for this area. He said that in the past, the committee had
established a set of procedural parameters to determine such requests, but that these
procedures were overlooked regarding this issue. He said the sub-committee wanted
to go back and follow those established procedures by making the following
recommendations.
Motion: To accept the recommendation from the sub-committee as follows.
• Leave the crosswalk laddering at the two existing crosswalks locations.
• Continue with selective enforcement by the Police Department on an on-going
basis.
• Follow the TDA Grant process and act expeditiously with the bidding process once
fund authorization is approved.
• Staff to review signage and eliminate redundancy while maintaining aesthetics on
Broadway
M/S/C Warden, Bohnert; 4/0/1
14.3 Bi-Annual Commission Report to Council
Chair James reported that he would like to provide the Council with a bi-annual report
of TSPC activities. He said the initial target dates for these reports would be around
July 1•'and December 1s'of each year.
14.4 Quad Map
Chair James introduced the concept of managing the activities of the Commission by
dividing the city in quadrants. He said each Commissioner had been assigned to a
quad and would take the lead on any activities or issues within their quad. He added
that the assigned quads were negotiable and their boundaries could be realigned
accordingly.
15. ADJOURNMENT
8:23 p.m.
4
CITY 0 STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAME AGENDA
- ITEM # 8b
MTG.
�AAIEU JUNE 0
DATE 3/19/07
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL suBMt
BY
DATE: March 19, 2007
AP AFROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director BY
SUBJECT: Resolution of Intention:
Broadway Avenue Business Improvement District — Setting 2007-2008 Assessments
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council (1) Approve the Broadway Avenue Business Improvement District Annual Report for
FY06-07; (2) Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessments for Fiscal Year 2007-08; and, (3) set a
public hearing for Monday, April 16, 2007 at 7:00 p.m.
BACKGROUND
The Broadway Avenue Business Improvement District submitted its annual report on March 12, 2007. A
review of their FY 2006-07 budget is included as part of the report. There are no recommended changes in the
boundaries, assessments or classifications of businesses within the improvement district.
The Resolution of Intention to Levy Assessments notifies all businesses within the district of the City
Council's intention to levy and collect fees. The public hearing gives the businesses an opportunity to voice
their opinions, comments, suggestions and concerns directly to the City Council.
The recommended hearing date is April 16, 2007 at 7:00 p.m.
BUDGET IMPACT
Approximately $25,000 in assessments is collected annually with our business licenses. The funds are
forwarded to the Broadway Business Improvement District for improvements as authorized by the BID Board
of Directors. The City of Burlingame covers the expenses associated with the renewal of the BID. Those
expenses are approximately $6,000.
ATTACHMENTS:
Broadway Business Improvement District Annual Report for FY2006-2007
A Resolution of the City Council Of The City of Burlingame Declaring Its Intention To Establish 2007-08
Assessments For The Broadway Area Business Improvement District And Approving the 2006-07Annual
Report
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH 2007-2008 ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT,
AND APPROVING 2006-2007 ANNUAL REPORT
WHEREAS,pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq.,the
Broadway Area Business Improvement District was established for the purpose of promoting
economic revitalization and physical maintenance of said business districts, and
WHEREAS,the Broadway Area Business Improvement District Advisory Board has filed
its 2006-2007 annual report and requested the Burlingame City Council to set the assessments for
the 2007-2008 year; and
WHEREAS,it appears that the Broadway Area Business Improvement District has provided
important services in enhancing the District and its businesses and properties,
NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve,determine, and find as
follows:
1. The 2006-2007 annual report of the Broadway Area Business Improvement District
Advisory Board is approved.
2. The Burlingame City Council intends to levy an assessment for the 2007-2008 fiscal
year on businesses in the District, as the District is described in Ordinance No. 1461, to pay for
improvements and activities of the District.
3. The types of improvements and activities proposed to be funded by the levy of
assessments on businesses in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by
reference. These activities and improvements are without substantial change from those previously
established for the District.
4. The method,basis,and amounts for levying the assessments on all businesses within
the District are set forth in Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference, and would remain the
same as those levied in the previous fiscal year.
5. New businesses shall not be exempt from assessment.
6. A public hearing on the proposed assessments for 2007-2008 is hereby set for April
1
16,2007,at 7:00 p.m.before the City Council of the City of Burlingame,at the Council's Chambers
at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
7. The Council will receive testimony and evidence at the public hearing, and interested
persons may submit written comments before or at the public hearing, or they may be sent by mail
or delivered to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010.
8. Oral or written protests may be made at this hearing. To count in a majority protest
against the proposed assessments or programs and services for 2007-2008, a protest must be in
writing and submitted to the City Clerk at or before the close of the public hearing on April 16,2007.
A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public
hearing. Each written protest shall identify the business and its address,include a description of the
business and the number of employees. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official
records of the City of Burlingame as the owner of the business, then the protest shall contain or be
accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the business. Any written protest
as to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the
irregularity or defect to which objection is made.
9. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record written protests by the
owners of businesses within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total
assessments of the entire District, as to the proposed assessments for 2007-2008, no assessment for
2007-2008 shall occur. If at the conclusion of the public hearing there are of record written protests
by the owners of businesses within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the
total assessments of the entire District only as to an improvement or activity proposed,then that type
of improvement or activity shall not be included in the District for the 2007-2008 fiscal year.
10. Further information regarding the proposed assessments and changes and procedures
for filing a written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California, phone 650 - 558-7203. The annual report of the Business Improvement
District is on file and available at the Office of the City Clerk at 510 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California.
11. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing
notice as well as this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Burlingame in
2
accordance with the requirements of the Government and Streets & Highways Codes and mailing
them in accordance with those requirements as applicable.
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame do hereby certify that the
foregoing.Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
, 2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
U:\FILES\BIDBRDWY\BDWYfNTr2OO7.BID.wpd
3
EXHIBIT A
TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BE FUNDED
BY THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS
1) Streetscape Beautification, Seasonal Decorations, and Public Arts Programs
a. Seasonal street plantings of flowers.
b. Seasonal flags and banners.
f. Sidewalk enhancement and maintenance.
2) Business Recruitment and Retention
a. Matching funds for storefront improvement incentive
b. Develop strategy to fill commercial vacancies.
C. Small business assistance workshops.
3) Commercial Marketing, Public Relations, and Advertising
a. Organize special events throughout the year.
4) Shuttle
Establish a people mover system between the area and the hotel district, to be funded on a
cooperative cost sharing basis.
U:\FILES\B IDBRD W Y\improvmtl i s2000.bi d.wpd
EXHIBIT B
BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT BASIS*
BUSINESS TYPE NO. OF STAFF *X ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
RETAIL & 4+ $450
---------------------- ------------------------------
RESTAURANT 1 - 3 $300
$250
SERVICE ----------3+------------ -------------$250------------
1 - 2 $150
PROFESSIONAL ----------3+------------ -------------$200$200
------------
1 - 2 $150
FINANCIAL NA $500
* ----- Amount shown is annual total
** --- Staff means any persons working (full time or full time
equivalency) including owners, partners, managers,
employees, family members, etc.
Business Definitions (Burlingame Municipal Code § 6.52.010):
Retail ❑ Businesses that buy and resell goods. Examples are clothing stores, shoe
stores, office supplies, etc.
Restaurant ❑ Selling prepared food and drink.
Service ❑ Businesses that sell services. Examples are beauty and barber shops,
repair shops that do not sell goods, contractors, auto shops, etc.
Professional ❑ Includes engineering firms, architects, attorneys, dentists, optometrists,
physicians, realtors, insurance offices, etc.
Financial ❑ Banks, savings and loans, household finance companies, etc.
U:\FILES\B IDB RDWY\assessbas.bid.wpd
Green & Green, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
EDMUND M.GREEN 5 Third Street,Suite 616 Phone:415.778.3969
DIANE A.GREEN San Francisco,CA 94103 Fax:415.243.8411
To the Board of Directors
Broadway Burlingame Business Improvement District
Burlingame,CA
We have compiled the Statement of Funds — Cash Basis of Broadway
Burlingame Business Improvement District (a not-for-profit corporation) as of
February 28, 2007 and the related Schedule of Income Received and
Expenditures — Cash Basis for the period then ended included in the
accompanying prescribed form in accordance with Statements and Standards for
Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants. The financial statements have been prepared on the cash
basis of accounting, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than
generally accepted accounting principals.
Our compilation was limited to presenting in the form prescribed by the City of
Burlingame information that is the representation of management. We have not
audited or reviewed the financial statements referred to above and, accordingly,
do not express an opinion or any other for of assurance on them.
The Statement of Funds—Cash Basis and related Schedule of Income Received
and Expenditures — Cash Basis are presented in accordance with the
requirements of the City of Burlingame, which differ from generally accepted
accounting principals. Accordingly, these financial statements are not designed
for those who are not informed about such differences.
We are not independent with respect to this engagement.
Com--- X- Cn,-- ,
GREEN&GREEN, LLP
March 13,2007
Broadway Burlingame Improvement District
Schedule of Income Received and Expenditures - Cash Basis
For the Thirteen Months Ended February 28, 2007
Income Received
Interest Income $ 44.24
Bid Assessment Collected 261062.50
Other Income 0.00
Total Income Received 26, 106.74
Expenditures
Advertising & Promotion 131 .53
BID Events 4,589.58
Shuttle Contribution 0.00
Streetscape Beautification 71371 .02
Miscellaneous 1 ,310.00
Total Expenditures 13,402. 13
Total Income Received less Expenditures $ 12,704.61
7-e)
Y7 69
` C
Pt 764r'
Broadway Burlingame Improvement District
Statement of Funds - Cash Basis
For the Thirteen Months Ended February 28, 2007
Checking Account 1 $ 2,674.89
Checking Account II 22,781.40
Checking Account III (Merchants' Association) 11,750.44
Total $ 37,206.73
O��AY�✓.gII1[111 �rING
BROADWAY
VILLAGE
SHOPS
RESTAURANTS
SERVICES
March 13, 2007
City Manager
City of Burlingame
c/o Broadway Burlingame Business Improvement District
1399 Broadway
Burlingame, CA 94010-3422
Dear City Manager:
,
S ;u
A
Mum 4-10%
RE: BID Annual Report and 2005-2006 Budget
F
The BID proposes no changes in boundaries or assessments.
Budget outline for fiscal 2005-2006 activities (in percent of total
revenue):
A) Advertising 5%
B) Burlingame Shuttle 25%
C) Streetscape Beautification 70%
Detail of Funds as of February 28, 2007 (Funds on Hand)
Income Received
Interest Income $ 44.24
Bid Assessment Collected 26,062.50
Other Income 0.00
Total Income Received $ 26,106.74
Broadway Business Improvement District • 1399 Broadway, Burlingame,California 94010
O�wAY ,-�BU�ING
BROADWAY
VILLAGE
SHOPS
RESTAURANTS
SERVICES
Expenditures
Advertising & Promotion $ 131.53
BID Events 4,589.58
Shuttle Contribution 0.00
Streetscape Beautification 7,371.02
Miscellaneous 1,310.00
Total Expenditures $ 13402.13
rr.
Status of Funds as of February 28, 2007 (Funds on Hand)
Checking Account 1 $ 2,674.89
lwChecking Account II 22,781.40
Checking Account III (Merchants' Association) 11,750.44
Total $ 37,206.73
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at
A.V.R. Realty, Inc. (650) 342-2073.
Sincerely,
f 1
Ross Bruce
President, BID
Broadway Business Improvement District • 1399 Broadway, Burlingame,California 94010
CITY 0 AGENDA
oc, ITEM# - --HC
BURLINGAME
STAFF
REPORT MAG.
DATE March 19,2007
'$��t[o�m[6,•0
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
DATE: March 13, 2007 BY
APPROVED
FROM: Ana Silva (558-7204) BY
SUBJECT: Approval for Chamber of Commerce Art&Jazz Festival,August 11- , 2007
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval for Chamber of Commerce Art&Jazz Festival.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the request letter from the chamber of Commerce for approval of the above event. The Chamber is requesting
permission to hold the event on Burlingame Avenue on Saturday and Sunday, August 11 and 12, 2007 from 10:00 a.m, to
6:00 p.m. each day.
The Chamber has contracted with Team PRO Event of Mill Valley, CA to operate the event which includes the following
elements:
• Closure of Burlingame Avenue from California Drive to EI Camino Real (up to the driveway of the Chevron station)
from 2:00 a.m. Saturday, August 11 until 11:59 p.m. Sunday August 12.
• Closure of Lorton Avenue between Donnelly and Howard for the full duration of the festival, closure of Parking Road
between Burlingame Avenue and Howard for the full duration of the festival and closure of Primrose Road for the full
duration of the festival (as it was in 2006). All public parking lots in the area will remain accessible at all times during all
hours of closure.
• Festival booths set up on Burlingame Avenue (the 1100, 1200, 1300, and 1400 blocks), as well as on Lorton and
Primrose Avenues will remain set up overnight on Saturday. Team PRO Event will arrange for overnight security.
• Team PRO Event will arrange for entertainment throughout each day of the festival as part of this community event,
The City of Burlingame fees in conjunction with this event will be paid directly by the Chamber within seven (7) days after
the event.
The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce requests that the City of Burlingame allow the sale of beer, wine, margaritas and
commemorative glassware as part of the Burlingame Art and Jazz Festival on August 11 and 12, 2007. Insurance for
general and liquor liability in the amount of$1 million will be obtained and a certificate of insurance naming the City of
Burlingame as additional insured will be issued. The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce carries liquor liability insurance in
addition to its general liability insurance and will provide a certificate of insurance naming the City of Burlingame as an
additional insured. The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce will purchase the beer, wine and margarita license.
BURLINGAME
CHAMBER
OF
COMMERCE
March 8, 2007
Mayor Terry Nagel
Vice Mayor Rosalie O'Mahony
Council Members: Cathy Baylock,Russ Cohen,and Ann Keighran
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mayor Baylock and Council Members:
The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce respectfully requests the City's permission for the 2007
Burlingame Art&Jazz Festival as described below.
The Chamber requests the City's permission for the
"Burlingame Art and Jazz Festival," calendared for Saturday and Sunday,August 11 and
12, 2007,from 10:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m. each day.
The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce is in contract with Team PRO Event, of Mill
Valley, CA,based upon the Burlingame City Council's permission to allow this
community event.
Details of the production are under the auspices of Team PRO Event and include the
following elements:
A. Closure of Burlingame Avenue from California Drive to El Camino Real(up to
the driveway of the Chevron Station)from 2:00 a.m. Saturday,August 11 until
11:59 p.m., Sunday August 12.
B. Closure of Lorton Avenue between Donnelly and Howard for the full duration of
the festival,closure of Park Road between Burlingame Avenue and Howard for
the full duration of the festival and closure of Primrose Road for the full duration
of the festival(as it was in 2006). All public parking lots in the area will remain
accessible at all times during all hours of closure.
C. Festival booths set up on Burlingame Avenue(the 1100, 1200, 1300 and 1400
blocks),as well as on Lorton and Primrose Avenues will remain set up overnight
on Saturday. Team PRO Event will arrange for overnight security.
D. Team PRO Event will arrange for entertainment throughout each day of the
festival as part of this community event.
290 California Drive • Burlingame,CA 94010 • 650.344.1735 • Fax 650.344.1763
e-mail:info@burlingamechamber.org • www.burlingamechamber.org
2
E. The City of Burlingame fees in conjunction with this event will be paid directly
by the Chamber within seven(7)days after the event. Please advise if fees will
be different from last year.
F. The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce respectfully requests that the City of
Burlingame allow the sale of beer,wine, margaritas and commemorative
glassware as part of the Burlingame Art and Jazz Festival on August 11 and 12,
2007. Insurance for general and liquor liability in the amount of$1 million will
be obtained and a certificate of insurance naming the City of Burlingame as
additional insured will be issued. The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce
carries liquor liability insurance in addition to its general liability insurance and
will provide a certificate of insurance naming the City of Burlingame as an
additional insured. The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce will purchase the
beer,wine and margarita license.
The Burlingame Chamber of Commerce and Team Pro Event will gladly meet with City staff to
address any questions or concerns.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
David Lewi ,Chair rgette N or, President/CEO
Burlingame Chamber of Commerce Burlingame Chamber of Commerc
Agenda
Item # 9a
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: March 19, 2007
4
SUBMITTED BY
APPROVED BY
TO : HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE : March 1 , 2007
FROM : PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
WITH BKF ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF CALIFORNIA AND OAK
GROVE AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION
PROJECT — PHASE 1 , CP 81800
RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution
for a professional contract with BKF Engineers in the amount of $ 185,461 for design
services for the California and Oak Grove Area Sewer Improvement and Rehabilitation
Project — Phase 1 .
BACKGROUND: The sewer system in the California Drive and Oak Grove area is
experiencing capacity and back up problems as the result of undersized pipes that are
over 80 years old . As a result, this area has been identified as the next priority in the
City's Sewer Master Plan . Due to the amount of work, the project is divided into three
phases which will be completed over the next three years. (see map)
Phase 1 includes modifying the storm drain system at California Drive and Oak Grove
Avenue to allow sewer flow by gravity and combining two existing sewer mains into one
larger main on California Drive, between Burlingame Avenue and Oak Grove Avenue.
Additional work includes constructing a bypass line on Winchester Drive. This will
reduce sewer surcharges and back-ups significantly.
Phase 2 includes replacing undersized sewer pipes on Burlingame Avenue and
adjacent side streets north of the business district. This will reduce sewer infiltration and
inflow.
Phase 3 includes increasing the size of sewer mains along Oak Grove Avenue and
replacing the upstream area sewer system on Willow Avenue, Walnut Avenue, Newhall
Avenue and Arc Way. This will reduce sewer back-ups as well as infiltration and inflow.
Staff will seek approval of design services for phase 2 and 3 at a later date.
DISCUSSION : Staff believes that continuing to use BKF for design services is in the
best interests of the City for the following reasons:
• BKF has successfully provided design services for the Easton Creek Sewer
Rehabilitation Project and Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project.
They have completed both projects in a timely manner which resulted in lower
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81800 consultant design.DOCDesign Service
costs to the City. Their fee continues to be reasonable and is within industry
standards.
• BKF can complete the design more efficiently due to their significant institutional
knowledge of the City's sewer system and past involvement in a capacity study
of the area.
• As an experienced and multi-disciplinary engineering firm, BKF can provide the
technical resources necessary to design such a complex project.
• BKF has successfully managed several construction projects for the City
involving the replacement of three miles of sewer pipes and over 500 laterals
with minimal disruption to affected residents and very few complaints.
The cost of the services as a percentage of the estimated$1,900,000 construction cost
is within the industry standards of 10%to 12%.
Construction is estimated to start in July 2007.
EXHIBITS: Resolution,Agreement and Fee Schedule, Map
BUDGET IMPACT:
Design Services $185,461
contigency 14,539
Total (10%) $200,000
There are sufficient funds available in the current Sewer Capital Improvement Program
to do this work.
Donald Chang, P.E.
Sr.Civil Engineer
c:City Clerk,City Attorney,BKI
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81800 consultant design.DOCDesign Service
RESOLUTION NO.
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH BKF ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF CALIFORNIA AND OAK
GROVE AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION PROJECT- PHASE 1
CITY PROJECT NO. 81800
RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this
Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
1 . The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the
title above.
2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and
on behalf of the City of Burlingame.
3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature.
Mayor
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on
the day of , 2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\Projects\RESAGRMT.GEN
Pro
Siphons Replacement and Sewer Main ImprovementProject
�
Bk F A. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
City of Burlingame has decided to eliminate the existing 15" siphon at Oak Grove Avenue, and the 12"
siphon at California Drive to reduce the constant sewer back up, and to install cleaning structures for
easy maintenance at the 27" siphon at Rollins Road. BKF submitted the "PHASE I - FEASIBILITY
STUDY OF SEWER BY-PASS SYSTEM AT OAK GROVE AVENUE AND CALIFORNIA DRIVE
AND PHASE II— SEWER CAPACITY STUDY FOR CALIFORNIA DRIVE SIPHON"in July 2006.
The conclusion of that report was to install an underground submersible pump station at each siphon
location with the option of combining the two pump stations to a larger one at the intersection of
California Drive and Oak Grove Avenue. After further review of the feasibility study report and
subsequent project meetings with Engineering and Maintenance Department staff of both City of
Burlingame and Town of Hillsborough,City has decided to do the following:
1. Selected the single large pump station at the intersection of Oak Grove Avenue and California
Drive alternate for further engineering study and final design.
2. To eliminate the cluster sewer mains at Oak Grove Avenue by combining the multiple lines into
a single larger pipe.
3. Installing new sewer main in Oak Grove Avenue from California Drive through Winchester
Drive to Rollins Road which will by-pass a majority of sewerage from and reduce maintenance
at the 27"siphon at Rollins Road.
After these decisions were made, in the January 10, 2007 review meeting and subsequent discussions,
additional alternates were proposed. A different approach was adopted over the pump station alternate
stated in item 1 above. The City wants further study on the following concepts:
1. Installing a junction box at the existing 90" storm drain to allow the 12" siphon sanitary sewer
at California Drive to go through.
2. Lowering the existing 54" storm drain upstream of the existing Ralston Creek Inlet Structure to
clear the 15"siphon at Oak Grove Avenue.
3. Installing cleaning structures at the 27"siphon at Rollins Road to allow for easy maintenance.
The goal of this proposal is to establish a work plan to:
1. Eliminate the 12"siphon at California Drive by installing a storm drain junction structure
2. Eliminate the 15"siphon at Oak Grove Avenue by lowering the existing 54" storm drain pipe
3. Install a larger pipe in Oak Grove Avenue to eliminate the existing multiple sewer lines
4. Install cleaning structures at the 27"sewer siphon at Rollins Road for easy maintenance
5. Install new sewer main in Oak Grove Avenue from California Drive through Winchester Drive
to Rollins Road
6. To provide sewer lines improvement in California Drive from Oak Grove Avenue to
Burlingame Avenue
7. Possible additional sewer main at Oak Grove Avenue from California Drive to El Camino Real
1 650.482.6300
www.bkf.com
®® B. PROJECT APPROACH
BKF City already adopted the concept of modifying the existing storm drain pipeline to eliminate the siphons.
BKF will develop a work plan, one that will have the least interruption to traffic and the public, to
implement the proposed work by the City. To accomplish this,we propose the following:
BKF has already reviewed the information collected from the City and had a few review meetings
with the City of Burlingame and Town of Hillsborough and is very familiar with the project. BKF
will gather any other relevant information on underground utilities from the City and all the utility
companies and contact any other sources regarding street boundaries and right-of-way to determine
if soil boring and pothole are necessary.
➢ BKF will revisit the project sites to identify any problematic areas and possible utility conflicts
based on visible surface evidence to determine the extent of potholing and survey work. BKF will
also verify that the storm drain pipe at the existing Ralston Creek Inlet Structure can be lowered to
allow for sewer line crossing. If ground elevations and the existing sewer and major storm drain
line elevations can be reasonably determined from the available as-built drawings,then an extensive
ground topographic survey can be reduced to a smaller scale survey for this sewer line improvement
project.
r BKF will search for the as-built drawings of the 21"and 14" sewer main that run under the railroad
tracks to determine the best method to increase sewer capacity and to minimize the cost of boring
under the railroad tracks. Alternates will be proposed to City for discussion during the course of
this engineering design project.
BKF will review the available sewer main video inspections to identify the sewer line sagging areas,
and discuss with the City on the findings either to spot repair or use other alternates to improve the
sewer main. If there are known problematic areas and TV video inspection is not available, BKF
will discuss with the City staff to identify those problem areas and provide the best method for
repair and upgrade. TV inspection of these problem areas may be required at that time.
BKF will superimpose all the existing known underground utilities and the PG&E overhead and
underground electrical and gas lines onto our drawings in the early stage of design for use in the
junction structures and sewer main alignments layout design.
> Since Oak Grove Avenue has high traffic volume, BKF will evaluate the proposed gravity sewer
alignment that replaces the existing multiple sewer lines and develop a plan on construction
sequence in order to minimize construction cost,to speed up project progress,and to control traffic.
> BKF will also review and study the sewer capacity for the sewer main along Oak Grove Avenue
and California Drive to alert the City of any issue on capacity.
> Pipe bursting method, open cut method, or the combination of these methods will be used on the
design of this improvement project to minimize the overall construction cost which will be to the
City's benefit.
SCOPING AND CONDUCTING THE PROJECT:
TASK 1. Initial Coordination Meeting
BKF's Project Manager,Michael C.Liu,already obtained and reviewed the relevant project information
and submitted the feasibility study report to eliminate the siphons at Oak Grove Avenue and California
Drive. We studied the City sewer, water and storm drain maps and the 90" Oak Grove Avenue storm
2 650.462.6300
www.bkf.com
lw
®! drain as-built drawings and have good understanding on how the existing systems affect the proposed
design. In the initial coordination meeting, BKF will be capable of providing valuable input and
g pointing out any project concern. BKF will have further discussion with the City and Town
Engineering staff and operation department personnel to exchange different opinion for better project
engineering design.
Deliverables: Initial coordination meeting minutes to document project concern and design parameter.
TASK 2. Project Schedule
BKF will develop the project schedule which outlines the project approach and include a time line and
all deliverables by tasks for this project.
Deliverables: Project schedule spread sheet.
TASK 3. Utility Research -
We already collected some information in the vicinity of the project area. Since BKF has done quite a
bit of work within the City of Burlingame, some of the information from the past projects may be useful
for the proposed engineering design project. We will contact the utility companies to obtain the as-built
plans affecting the project. To minimize conflict with existing utilities during construction, potholing
at critical locations maybe needed for engineering design. We will outline any necessary pothole
locations and submit to the City for review.
Deliverables: Utility inventory by location along the proposed sewer main alignment and junction
structure site.
TASK 4. Conceptual Design Summary
The preliminary conceptual design memorandum will be organized to address the followings:
1. Underground sewer main alignment
2. Sewer main capacity analysis
3. Proposed size and material for sewer main
4. Evaluation of the junction structure site location and cleaning structure control options
5. Detail study on upsizing the existing 14" and 21" sewer mains under the railroad tracks to
possibly eliminate major sewer boring under the tracks
6. Construction sequence and method
7. Existing manhole and new junction structures connection options
8. Operational issues,traffic control during construction
9. Preliminary cost estimate
Deliverables: Preliminary conceptual design summary and final conceptual design summary upon
receipt of City comments.
TASK S. 50%Design and Preparation of Construction Plans
After the conceptual stage, the alignment of the proposed sewer main and the location of the junction
and cleaning structures will be finalized. At the 50% design stage, we will develop the base sheets and
begin preliminary design. This stage of work will include:
1. Develop base sheets
2. Summarize all the underground utility crossings to determine the proposed pipeline profile
3. Prepare sewer main plan and profile and trench detail
4. Develop junction structure site plan and layout
5. Tie-in to discharge manhole detail
650.482.6300
3 www.bkf.com
®��s� 6. Storm drain modification for sewer mains crossing at Oak Grove Avenue
7. Sewer lines through junction structure detail and piping arrangement at the intersection of
BKFCalifornia Drive and Oak Grove Avenue
8. Cleaning structures layout for sewer main maintenance at Rollins Road
9. Construction sequence or operation statement
10. To decide if any environmental review agencies will be involved, prepare for any necessary
permit applications
11. City review meeting at 50%submittal
12. Administration including weekly project log
We will meet with the City to receive the 50%review comments.
Deliverables: 50%preliminary design construction plans for City to review
TASK 6. 75%Design and Preparation of Construction Plans
After receiving the comments from the City on the 50%preliminary design submittal,we will update all
the drawings to incorporate the City's comment. We will continue to develop the construction drawings
to include addition details. At this stage, we will prepare specifications, bid schedule, construction
estimate and bid documents including City's boilerplate contract documents.
We will meet with the City to discuss comments on the 75%submittal package.
Deliverables: 75% construction document including bid schedule, technical specification, and
construction cost estimate.
TASK 7. 90%Design and Preparation of Construction Plans
Review City's comments from 75% submittal and continue to update the construction document
package. If the estimated project construction cost exceeds the City's construction budget, BKF will
bring the issues to the City's attention and will assist the City to take any remedial action. If the
construction estimate is below the City's construction budget, additional sewer improvement at Oak
Grove Avenue can be incorporated as part of this design project.
BKF will have meeting with City to discuss the 90%comments.
Deliverable: 90% construction document including bid schedule, technical specification, and
construction cost estimate.
TASK 8. 100%Design and Preparation of Final Construction Plans
BKF will review City's comments from the 90% submittal and make final changes to the construction
document. We will submit to the City the final construction package with updated construction cost
estimate for bidding. We will work closely with the City staff on the construction budget and assist City
on bid opening process.
Deliverable: 100% construction document including bid schedule, technical specification, and final
engineering construction cost estimate for public bidding.
TA SIC 9. Meetings and Agency Coordination
BKF representatives will attend progress, construction, and coordination meetings with City staffs and
other involved agencies as required throughout the entire project. BKF will prepare meeting minutes for
distribution.
Deliverables: Meeting minutes.
— -- ----- - 4 650.432.6300
www.bkf.com
URIC.PROJECT TEAM
BKF
BU RLI NGAME.
a'-µms
�^
7Te
�r
5 850.4$2.6300
wv,w.bkt.ccm
i serve as Principal-in-Charge. Ms. O'Flahert will be
Ms. Janine O'Flaherty, PE, PLS willY
responsible for the implementation of the overall design strategy. Ms. O'Flaherty has successfully
BKF coordinated the production of plans, specifications, and estimates for major sewer main projects. Ms.
O'Flaherty will provide strong leadership at
• All Progress/Trend Meetings • Public Hearings
• Agency Coordination Workshops • Technical Design Meetings
Mr. Michael C. Liu, PE will serve as Project Manager. Mr. Liu has extensive experience in pump
station and sanitary sewer pipeline design. In addition to portable water and storm drain pump station
design, he has managed the design and construction of at least 8 new sanitary sewer pump station/force
main projects and sanitary sewer and storm drain rehabilitation projects just inthe last two years.
Ms. Susie Lim, PE will serve as Project Engineer. Ms. Lim is actively involved in many pump
station and force main and sanitary sewer rehabilitation and storm system projects. Ms. Lim is
experienced in producing plans,specifications,and estimates for major construction projects.
Mr. Edward Boscacci,PE will serve as Hydraulic/Hydrology Engineer. Mr. Boscacacci has been in
charge of all BKF Hydrology/Hydraulics studies for all the projects.
Mr.Billy Martin,PLS will serve as Survey Manager. As Vice President in charge of surveying,Mr.
Martin is responsible for all surveying activities performed by BKF. Mr. Martin will be responsible for
coordinating the survey activities for this project.
Mr. James Cline will serve as Geotechnical Engineer. Mr. Cline will be responsible for the
geotechnical aspects of the project. Mr. Cline is a consultant from The Bay Area Geotechnical Group
(BAGG), a geotechnical and geo-environmental consulting firm. Mr. Cline is a certified geologist with
over 30 years of experience and has worked with BKF as a consultant on projects such as the
Burlinghome Subdivision Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation for the City of Burlingame.
Mr.Jose Bohorquez will serve as the Utility Location, Potholing Engineer. Mr. Bohorquez will be
responsible for potholing the existing utilities to determine exact depth and location along the proposed
sewer force main alignment. Mr. Bohorquez has over 20 years of experience with Best Test Laboratory
as Operations Manager for this entire region.
The key team members proposed for this sewer improvement project have worked together successfully
and completed all projects within budget and schedule and maintained many satisfied clients. We are
confident that we will complete the assignment to meet all the City of Burlingame's requirements.
D. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
BKF has extensive experience in sanitary sewer, storm drain and portable water pump station and
pressure pipeline designs. Our project manager, Michael C. Liu, has managed the following sanitary
sewer pump station, force main and sewer line rehabilitation projects:
i= Easton Creek Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project (Burlingame, CA) - 4,858 LF of 8" -18"
open cut and pipe burst sewer main and 57 manholes.
Engineering design completed in May 2005, and construction completed in May 2006
r Burlinghome Subdivision Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project (Burlingame, CA) - 21,260
LF of 8"— 12"open cut and pipe burst sewer main and 91 manholes.
Engineering design complete in May 2006 and construction is currently in progress and will be
completed in May 2007.
6 6550.482.6300
vvww.bkf.corn
�® ➢ Bayshore Boulevard Sewer Force Main (City of Brisbane, CA) —Project includes 2,300 LF of
10"pump station force main.
BRFThe project will be issued to bid in May, 2007.
Hasting Drive Pump Station (City of Belmont, CA)-Underground sewer lift station with 700 LF
of 6"force main(FM) with emergency generator.
The project was issued to bid on November 15, 2006
Haskins Drive Pump Station (City of Belmont, CA) - Underground sewer lift station with 2,200
LF of 6"FM.
The project was issued to bid on November 15, 2006
"r Sandhill Rosewood Hotel Pump Station (Stanford University) - Engineering design of an
underground sewer lift station with 1,315 LF of 4"FM.
Engineering design was completed at the end of 2006
Bayport Sanitary Sewer Lift Station#6 (City of Alameda, CA) - Underground sewer lift station
with 2,707 LF of 6"FM.
Construction completed in September 2006
v Stanford University Stadium Sewer Lift Station(Stanford, CA)-Underground sewer lift station
with 797 LF of 8"FM.
Engineering design and construction completed within 42 weeks with construction completed in
September 2006 for the first football home game.
➢ Santa Clara University Library (Santa Clara, CA) - Engineering designs of two submersible
pumps with 400 LF of 6"FM.
Construction will be completed in June 2007.
In addition to the above current projects, we completed design and provided construction management
for the following pump station and force main projects within the recent years:
San Juan Sewer Pump Station with three-120 hp submersible pumps and 4,650 LF of 12"FM
Hiller Pump Station for City of Belmont
Cherry Creek Pump Station with 1,500 LF of 12"FM for the Town of Hillsborough
• Wilmington Pump Station with four-47 hp pumps and 1,135 LF of 18" FM for the City of
Petaluma, CA.
• Santa Clara Pump Station with three-25 hp pumps and 2,800 LF of 12"FM for the City of San
Mateo, CA.
7 850.482.6300
www.b-kf.com
®nReferences:
g Donald Chang-City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame,CA 94010
Tel: 650-558-7438
Bozhena Palatnik/Lyle Johnson-City of Belmont
1 Twin Pines Lane
Suite 385
Belmont, CA 94002
Tel: 650-595-7463
E. TIME ALLOCATION
As shown on the attached spreadsheet, all the tasks as indicated in the RFP are outlined with the
estimated hours required to complete each task.
F. CONSULTANT FEE
The preliminary engineering design, including the out-of-pocket budget of $20,000 for soil
investigation, spot elevation survey,and underground utility potholes,is estimated to be $64,511 for this
project. Engineering design including the complete bid document is estimated to be $119,950.
Construction services are not included in the engineering design services. If these services are need, the
fee is based on time and material that is actually spent on the project.
We have worked with the City on several projects. We completed all the projects within or ahead of
schedule and budget. We encourage the City to check our references on our efforts to save time and
money for our clients.
8 - 550.482.6300
www.bkf.com
Schon Replacement and Sewer Main Improvement Project
Estimated Work Effort by Task for Preliminary Engineering, Design Phase
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive,Suite 200
Redwood City Ca 94065 Prepared by:Michael Liu
Senior Proj Project Engineer Engineer Structural Soil
TASKSIWORK SCOPE TOTAL Principal Manager Manager III I Engineer Survey Engineer Pothole TOTAL
HOURS Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Cost Cost Cost COST
$175.00 $152.00 $148.00 $126.00 $97.00 $142.00
Preliminary Engineering Phase I
Task 1.Initial Coordination Meeting
1.01 Preliminary Engineering,data collection,site visit 47 1 1 16 2 16 12 $ 6,083
1.02 Meeting with City staffs to document project concern and 9 1 8 $ 1,391
design parameter
Subtotal 56 2 24 2 16 12 0 $ 7,474
Task 2. Project Schedule
2.01 Prepare project schedule and outline project approach and 19 1 8 8 2 $ 2,593
tasks
Subtotal 19 1 8 0 8 2 0 $ 2,593
Task 3.Utility Research
3.01 Site visit to review existing sewer line and project site 12 6 6 $ 1,668
3'02
Gather data on existing sewer system and underground
utilities,topographic survey and spot elevations check 20 6 2 8 4 $7,500 (3) $ 10,104
3.03 Existing utilities crossing and sewer lateral analysis 20 4 12 4 $7,500 (2) $ 10,008
3.04 Geotechnical investigation at critical locations 6 4 2 $5,000 (1) $ 5,860
3.05
Combine utilities information into sewer main plan and
profile and junction structures site map drawings 24 4 12 8 $ 2.896
3.06 Prepare a summary outlining the problem construction 12 4 6 2 $ 1,558
areas
3.07 Administration and reporting requirements 5 1 4 $ 783
Subtotal 99 1 32 2 46 18 0 $7,500 $5,000 $7,500 $ 32,877
Task 4. Conceptual Design Summary
4.01 Evaluate sewer main alignment and pipeline capacity study 50 12 30 4 4 $ 7,156
4.02 Junction structures preliminary layout,and structural detail 48 24 4 16 2 2 $ 6,734
study
4.03 Prepare preliminary cost estimates 10 8 2 $ 1,468
4.04 Document in a brief written report with cost and 30 16 4 8 2 $ 4,226
recommendations
4.05 Meeting with City to review recommendations select final 8 4 4 $ 1,200
design concept
4.06 Administration and reporting requirements 5 1 4 1 1 $ 783
Subtotal 151 1 6842 30 8 2 $ 21,567
Phase I Subtotal 325 5 1.32 46 106
? AO 2 $7;500 $5,000 $7;500 $ 64,51.1
Siphon Replacement and Sewer Main improvement.xis/Study&Design 1 of 3 2/22/2007
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive,Suite 200
Redwood City Ca 94065 Prepared by:Michael Liu
Senior Proj Project Engineer Engineer Structural Soil
TASKSIWORK SCOPE TOTAL Principal Manager Manager 111 I Engineer Survey Engineer Pothole TOTAL
HOURS Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Cost Cost Cost COST
$175.00 $152.00 $148.00 $126.00 $97.00 $142.00
Engineering Design Phase II
Task 5. Design and Preparation of Construction Plans
50%Design Phase
5.01 Prepare base sheets for the project 80 16 48 16 $ 10,032
5.02 Develop sewer main plan&profile and detail drawings 84 12 48 24 $ 10.200
5.03 Prepare junction structure detail layout and site plan 58 16 24 12 6 $ 7,472
5.04 Modify existing storm drain line for sewer main crossing 44 8 24 12 $ 5,404
5.05 Cleaning structures layout for sewer main maintenance 28 12 12 4 $ 3,904
5.06 Project detail preparation 52 24 16 12 $ 6,828
5.07 Coordinate&permitting with affected agencies 9 1 8 $ 1,391
5.08 Submit 50%plans,specifications and cost estimate to City 36 10 8 12 4 2 $ 4,888
for review
5.09 Administration and reporting requirements 5 1 2 2 $ 731
Subtotal 396 2 108 8 186 80 12 $ 50,850
Task 6. Design and Preparation of Construction Plans
75%Design Phase
6.01 Upgrade sewer main plan and profile and detail drawings 68 24 32 12 $ 8,844
6.02 Incorporate City's review comments 26 12 12 2 $ 3,620
6.03 Structural design and detail drawings preparation 46 6 24 16 $ 6,208
6.04 Project documents preparation and engineering design 42 6 24 12 $ 5,100
6.05 Prepare preliminary cost estimate 12 6 4 2 $ 1,700
6.06 Coordinate&permitting with affected agencies 5 1 4 $ 783
6.07 Submit 75%plans,specifications and cost estimate to City 50 10 32 4 4 $ 6,508
for review
6.08 Administration and reporting requirements 6 2 2 2 $ 906
Subtotal 255 3 70 0 130 28 1 24 $ 33,669
Task 7. Design and Preparation of Construction Plans
90%Design Phase
7.01 Meet with City staff to review plans and receive comments 36 12 16 8 $ 4,616
7.02 Incorporate 75%City comments after review 28 4 16 6 2 $ 3,490
7.03 Upgrade construction cost estimate 8 4 4 $ 1.112
7.04 Submit 90%plans,specifications and cost estimate to City 42 8 2 24 6 2 $ 5,402
for review
7.05 Administration and reporting requirements 7 1 4 2 $ 1,035
Subtotal 121 1 32 2 62 20 4 $ 15,655
Siphon Replacement and Sewer Main improvement.xis/Study&Design 2 of 3 2/22/2007
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive,Suite 200
Redwood City Ca 94065 Prepared by: Michael Liu
Senior Proj Project Engineer Engineer Structural Soil
TASKSIWORK SCOPE TOTAL Principal Manager Manager III I Engineer Survey Engineer Pothole TOTAL
HOURS Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Cost Cost Cost COST
$175.00 $152.00 $148.00 $126.00 $97.00 $142.00
Task 8. Design and Preparation of Construction Plans
100%Design Phase
8.01 Meet with City staff to review plans and receive comments 8 8 $ 1,216
8.02 Incorporate 90%City comments after review 40 12 24 2 2 $ 5,326
8.03 Complete construction drawings 55 1 8 8 24 12 2 $ 7,047
8.04 Package final design files submittal to City including plans, 39 1 12 16 8 2 $ 5,075
specifications and final cost estimate
Subtotal 142 2 40 8 64 22 6 $ 18,664
Task 9.Meetings and Agency Coordination
9.01 Coordinate with affected agencies 8 4 4 $ 1,112
Subtotal 8 0 4 0 4 0 0 $ 1,112
Phase If Subtotal 922. 8 254 181 446 150, 46 $119;950
Reimbursable Budget I $ 1,000 (4)
Project Total 1,247 13 386 64 546 190 48 $7,500 $5,000 $7,500 $185,461
Notes:
1. We propose to have BAAG perform borings to investigate soils condition along the proposed sewer main alignments and proposed junction structures location if no existing soil information can be located for this project.
2.We will make great effort in engineering design to minimize the possibility of utility conflict with the proposed sewer main,and Best Test Laboratory will assist BKF to perform utility potholes and to determine the utility
crossing elevations and soil investigation for this sewer main improvement project.
3. It is assumed that some of the ground profile information can be obtained from the City's water,sewer and SD maps or As-Built drawings and only spot elevations check may be needed for this project.
4. Reimbursement includes computer time,printing,postage,mileage etc.
5. Structural engineer billing rate is weighted for all disciplines
Siphon Replacement and Sewer Main improvement.xis/Study 8,Design 3 of 3 2/22/2007
CALIFORNIA & OAK
GROVE AREA SEWER
IMPROVEMENT AND
REHABILITATION
PHASE 1 ,2 & 3
.y
--
`oQoo,,_
QL
QQQ QQ
> Q� �oQQ QQ ooQ Q
CHASE 1 �QQ �Qo QQ o Q�j
o Q Q Q
\ ` Q Q o
QQ , Q
Q
PHASE 3
PHASE 21
Q
QQ �
h',
ro
Qo
Q- Q
QQ
.,f o
Q QQ
Q
Agenda
Item # 9b
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: Mar h 19 2007
SUBMITTED BY A Zi
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: March 8, 2007
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CO — GENERATION PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 81510
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution
accepting Waste Water Treatment Plant Co — Generation project in the amount of
$ 929, 039.25
DISCUSSION: In November 2005, Council awarded the Waste Water Treatment Plant
Co — Generation Project to California Power Partners Company in the amount of
$912,039.25. The project construction has been satisfactorily completed in accordance
with project plans and specifications. The final project construction cost is $ 929,039.25
which is $ 17,129.44 or 2.0 % above the awarded contract. This is within the industry
standards of 10% to 15% for this type of work based on the complexity of the project.
The additional cost is due to two change orders resulting from unforeseen construction
issues including the addition of a power connection switch and related safety
modifications.
Following are the estimated final project expenditures:
• Engineering, Design and Construction $ 929,168.00
• Construction Management $45,000.00
Total $ 974,168.00
FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $1,100,000 is available through a loan from the General
fund to the Sewer fund to finance the project. The City will receive a $160,000 rebate
from PG&E and save en estimated $100,00 additionally from reduced power usage.
Exhibits: Resolution, Final Progress Payment
Doug Bell
Senior Engineer
Public Works Engineering Dept.
S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81510 Acceptance.doc
N
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF PAYMENT m
Project Name: Waste Water Troabmnt Sheet: 1 of I cyl
CITY OF SURLINGAME Plant Cogeneration Applfcatlon Date: 1!29[2047 N
Finance Department Payment No.: 11 m
501 Primrose Road
Pay Period Retainage
Burlingame,California 94010-3997 Project No. 91510 Schedule(s)
(650)557230 P.O.No. 10057 Contractor. Cafifornia Power Partners,Inc W
CS)
W
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Application is arcade for Payment,as shown below,In connection with the Contract. _,,t
m
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS CD
APPROVED By OWNER Additions$ Deductions$ The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: OD
N
TOTAL50.00 $0.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM S 912,039.25
—_......�.......�............._...._......._..—........_..................... .........— 1j
Not Change by Change Orders ..........— $ 17,129.44 m
SUBSEQUENT CHANGE ORDERS CONTRACT SUM TO DATE S 929,169.69
NUMBER APPROVED TOTAL COMPLETED&STORED TO DATE ............. S 929,169.69
1 Doug Bell Doll $13,825.00
2 Doug Bell $3,504.44 RETAINAGE @ 1096 ....... $ 0.00
TOTALS $17,129.44 $0.04 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE _......._..........._._._.........— _....... $ 829,169.69
Net Change by Change Orders $17,129,44 LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATED FOR PAYMENT .... $ 882+885.89 n
n
F-
11011=07
Payment Due Date 1[31[2007 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE THIS IS THE BALANCE POR RETAINAGE DUE _ $ 46,283.00
..— ....... �
PAYMENTS TO BE MADE TO:CALIFORNIA POWER PARTNERS,INC.CIO AC STAR INSURANCE COMPANY
233 MAIN STREET,PO BOIL 2350,NEW BRITAIN,CT 060542350
The undersigned Contractor certifies that the work Reviewed by: Date:n
/ -
covered by this Application for Payment has been Project Manager
CITY OF 9URLINGAME
completed in accordance with the Contract Documents,
that all amounts have been paid by him for work for
Date.
which previous Certificates for Payment were issued
and payments received from the Owner,and that the Division Manager
current payment shown herein is now due.
CT R-
Date: - S b�
This C flcate is not negotiable. It Is payable only to the payee named herein and its issuance,payment and acceptance are without
preiudice to an rights of the Owner or Contractor under their Contract. D
M
m
W
carat•�1�r�lda
RESOLUTION NO. -
ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CO -GENERATION PROJECT
BY CALIFORNIA POWER PARTNERS COMPANY
CITY PROJECT NO. 81510
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame,California,and this Council does
hereby find, order and determine as follows:
I. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by CALIFORNIA
POWER PARTNERS COMPANY under the terms of its contract with the City dated NOVEMBER 2005
has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 81510.
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
Mayor
I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
, 2007, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
S:\A Public Works Directory\Author,By Name\Peggy Adam letters\RES0WTN.ACC.wpd
$2,499,724.52
Ck. No. 23936-24397
Excludes Library Checks 23936-23957
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
r
Cj
Payroll for February 2007
$2,279,076.78
Ck. No. 167887- 168106
INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
PERS HEALTH
PERS RETIREMENT
FEDERAL 941 TAX
STATE DISABILITY TAX
STATE INCOME TAX
PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP
SECTION 125 DEDUCTION
ID
�D
CL
CD
m
(D 3
W
IT
S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS d
CITY OF BURLINGAME
03-09-2007 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
FUND RECAP - 06-07
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 52,372.72
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 36,329.44
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 487.38
WATER FUND 526 187, 204 .41
SEWER FUND 527 262 . 00
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 299.02
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 197. 78
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1 , 238.48
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 541607. 06
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1 ,870 . 17
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2, 129.90
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 50 .00
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 501 . 16
FEDERAL GRANTS FUND 737 649.45
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 '878. 02
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $339,076.99
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL :
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 24312 THROUGH 24397 INCLUSIVE ,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $339, 076.99, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON .
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./ . . ./ . . .
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./ . . ./. . .
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
03/09/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24385 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26898 33.51
COMMUNICATIONS 33.51 101 64100 160
24386 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26899 66.92
MISC. SUPPLIES 66.92 101 64150 120
24387 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26901 138.56
COMMUNICATIONS 138.56 101 65300 160
24388 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26910 767.30
COMMUNICATIONS 767.30 101 66100 160
24389 CINGULAR WIRELESS 27019 878.02
UTILITY EXPENSE 878.02 896 20281
24390 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 27057 130.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 130.00 101 64420 262
24391 SAN MATEO COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY C 27112 2,021.95
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,021.95 201 65200 220
24392 PUTNAM CHEVROLET CADILLAC HUMMER 27245 37,064.89
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 37,064.89 620 66700 800
24393 NOR CAL FIRE PREVENTION OFFICERS 27319 1,040.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,040.00 201 65200 260
24394 GOLDEN WEST CONSTRUCTION 27320 1,125.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,125.00 101 22546
24395 STEVEN HARRIS 27321 108.80
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 108.80 101 64420 121
24396 SEAN SHERIDAN 27322 125.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 125.00 101 65100 200
24397 ROBERT SCHILTZ 27323 161.79
MISCELLANEOUS 161.79 526 22502 (�J
TOTAL $339,076.99
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
03/09/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24371 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 2,212.22
TRAINING EXPENSE 2,212.22 526 69020 260
24372 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 609.37
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220
24373 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 448.21
OFFICE EXPENSE 32.57 201 65200 110
MISCELLANEOUS 415.64 731 22554
24374 JAKE PELK 25236 400.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 400.00 201 65200 260
24375 FEDEX KINKO'S 26021 217.95
MISC. SUPPLIES 217.95 619 64460 120
24376 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26161 85.87
COMMUNICATIONS 85.87 530 65400 160
24377 VISION INTERNET PROVIDERS INC 26294 200.00
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 200.00 621 64450 220
24378 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26373 64.53
COMMUNICATIONS 64.53 101 65100 160
24379 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL REVENUE & T 26477 50.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50.00 101 64250 240
24380 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26519 152.69
COMMUNICATIONS 152.69 201 65200 160
24381 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 331.87
OFFICE EXPENSE 16.18 101 65300 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 21.65 101 64100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 4.63 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 235.92 101 65300 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 53.49 101 66210 120
24382 PDSI 26853 411.11
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 411.11 625 65213 203
24383 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26896 106.84
COMMUNICATIONS 106.84 201 65200 160
24384 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26897 785.10
COMMUNICATIONS 785.10 201 65200 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
03/09/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24358 OFFICE MAX 23306 184.89
OFFICE EXPENSE 143.44 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 77.17 101 65300 110
OFFICE EXPENSE -27.90 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 61.96 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES -174.68 101 68010 120 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 104.90 621 64450 110
24359 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. 23419 487.38
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 487.38 320 80480 220
24360 CHEM QUIP 23481 150.81
MISCELLANEOUS 150.81 526 69020 233
24361 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 194.58
MISC. SUPPLIES 94.58 619 64460 120 5240
TRAINING EXPENSE 100.00 619 64460 260
24362 AT&T 23661 23.56
COMMUNICATIONS 23.56 621 64450 160
24363 VENTURE BUILDERS 23824 828.00
MISCELLANEOUS 828.00 101 22546
24364 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 2,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,000.00 101 23620
24365 QUILL 24090 347.36
OFFICE EXPENSE 347.36 621 64450 110
24366 JOHNSON WOO 24137 739.27
MISC. SUPPLIES 389.68 526 69020 120
SMALL TOOLS 349.59 619 64460 130
24367 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 810.00
MISCELLANEOUS 810.00 526 69020 233
24368 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 4,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 4,500.00 526 69020 290
24369 COMPUCOM 24467 1,149.35
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,149.35 621 64450 200
24370 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 1,261.43
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 382.65 101 64420 121
TRAINING EXPENSE 419.00 201 65200 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 262.00 527 66520 260
MISCELLANEOUS 197.78 618 64520 234
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
03/09/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24343 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 3,366.88
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,648.09 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,718.79 625 65213 203
24344 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT INC 19697 221.76
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 221.76 101 68020 200 2300
24345 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220
24346 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 4,066.00
RENTS & LEASES 4,066.00 526 69020 180
24347 SPRINT PCS 20724 707.56
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 707.56 101 65100 220
24348 AARONSON, DICKERSON, COHN & 20798 6,875.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,875.00 101 64420 210
24349 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 1,296.96
OFFICE EXPENSE 1,230.90 101 64420 110
SMALL TOOLS 66.06 101 65300 130
24350 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 59.96
SUPPLIES 59.96 620 15000
24351 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 4,990.87
MISC. SUPPLIES 4,990.87 526 69020 120
24352 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 400.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 400.00 620 66700 210
24353 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 2,945.00
MISCELLANEOUS 855.00 201 35221 000 7100
MISCELLANEOUS 2,090.00 201 35220 000 7100
24354 TURF STAR 22682 50.00
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 50.00 101 68020 190 2200
24355 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 649.45
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 649.45 737 65120 140
24356 A&B TRAILER HITCH CO. 22998 113.50
SMALL TOOLS 113.50 101 68020 130 2200
24357 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 511.00
MISCELLANEOUS 511.00 101 64420 031
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
03/09/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
24331 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 232.20
OFFICE EXPENSE 232.20 101 65100 110
24332 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 75.47
SMALL TOOLS 75.47 619 64460 130
24333 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,536.33
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,536.33 101 65100 220
24334 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 16,876.76
SUPPLIES 16,876.76 620 15000
24335 LOS ALTOS TYPEWRITER 15853 855.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 45.00 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 45.00 101 68020 110 2100
MISC. SUPPLIES 22.50 101 64150 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 22.50 101 64350 120
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.00 101 64200 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 225.00 101 64250 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 90.00 101 66100 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 225.00 101 65100 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.00 201 65200 200
OFFICE EXPENSE 45.00 526 69020 110
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 45.00 621 64450 200
24336 SYDNEY MALK0O 16347 58.42
SMALL TOOLS 58.42 620 66700 130
24337 CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS 17141 6,999.96
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,999.96 101 68020 220 2200
24338 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 253.31
SMALL TOOLS 253.31 201 65200 130
24339 BAY ALARM 18854 83.62
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 83.62 619 64460 220 5230
24340 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 645.50
MISCELLANEOUS 574.50 526 69020 233
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 71.00 526 69020 250
24341 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 144.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 144.00 101 64350 210
24342 PRIORITY 1 19239 73.07
RADIO MAINT. 73.07 201 65200 205
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
03/09/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24324 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 4,503.51
OFFICE EXPENSE 113.11 101 68010 110 1100
MISC. SUPPLIES 8.57 101 68010 120 1422
MISC. SUPPLIES 154.15 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 280.51 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.95 101 68010 120 1520
MISC. SUPPLIES 267.84 101 68010 120 1890
COMMUNICATIONS 199.95 101 68010 160 1101
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 240.00 101 68010 220 1648
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198.00 101 68010 220 1784
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 323.00 101 68010 220 1645
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,266.00 101 68010 220 1349
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 240.00 101 68010 220 1647
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.00 101 68010 220 1641
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 672.00 101 68010 220 1644
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 125.00 101 68010 250 1100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 217.43 101 68020 250 2300
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 10.00 101 68020 250 2100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 730 69533 220
24325 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 461.92
MISC. SUPPLIES 461.92 101 64350 120
24326 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 24,109.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24,109.00 201 65200 220
24327 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 749.00
PRISONER EXPENSE 749.00 101 65100 291
24328 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER 11101 583.20
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 583.20 101 64350 210
24329 CHIEF DON DORNELL 11568 1,750.87
MISC. SUPPLIES 9.73 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 286.05 201 65200 120
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 79.57 201 65200 140
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 55.00 201 65200 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 30.00 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,205.00 201 65200 260
MISCELLANEOUS 85.52 731 22554
24330 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 1,335.51
OFFICE EXPENSE 21.64 101 65150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 233.55 101 65100 110
COMMUNICATIONS 77.48 101 65100 160
TRAINING EXPENSE 850.91 101 65100 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 151.93 530 65400 260
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
03/09/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24312 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 311.67
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 311.67 101 68020 190 2200
24313 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 248.98
SMALL TOOLS 248.98 101 68020 130 2300
24314 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,441.66
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,441.66 101 64560 220
24315 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 136.55
SUPPLIES 136.55 620 15000
24316 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 207.08
SMALL TOOLS 141.64 201 65200 130
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 65.44 201 65200 203
24317 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 99.74
MISCELLANEOUS 99.74 101 68020 192 2200
24318 FEDEX 02160 215.54
MISC. SUPPLIES 56.99 101 64350 120
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 29.02 101 64420 121
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 42.63 101 65100 200
OFFICE EXPENSE 25.68 201 65200 110
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 61.22 530 65400 200
24319 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 10.48
SUPPLIES 10.48 620 15000
24320 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 880.90
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 335.58 101 66210 219
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 545.32 101 66210 226
24321 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 317.27
MISC. SUPPLIES 317.27 619 64460 120 5250
24322 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 169,232.54
WATER PURCHASES 169,232.54 526 69020 171
24323 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 12,751.50
MISCELLANEOUS 341.04 101 66100 172
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,410.46 101 66100 220
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
03-01-2007 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
FUND RECAP - 06-07
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 86,248.67
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 20,579.59
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 720.98
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 170,469.56
WATER FUND 526 1,870.09
SEWER FUND 527 18,069.47
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 9,735.29
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 480.00
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 4,792.80
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,364.89
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 36,715.87
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,708.41
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 362.57
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 300.00
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 23,770.57
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 51,231.31
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $429,420.07
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 24211 THROUGH 24311 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $429,420.07, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../-../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../-../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24306 KATHLEEN HOLMES 27311 18.00
MISCELLANEOUS 18.00 101 36330 000 1422
24307 MARY T BANNON 27312 87.00
MISCELLANEOUS 87.00 101 36330 000 1521
24308 SUZANNE LEE 27314 114.00
MISCELLANEOUS 114.00 101 36330 000 1661
24309 CATHY POLINSKY 27315 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593
24310 NEETA PATEL 27316 300.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593
24311 CHRISTINE FITZPATRICK 27317 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593
TOTAL $429,420.07�(i�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R G I S T E R PAGE 7
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24292 NICK CAIRNS 25614 2,902.50
MISCELLANEOUS 2,902.50 101 22546
24293 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 153.15
RENTS & LEASES 153.15 526 69020 180
24294 HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC 25852 512.46
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 512.46 621 64450 200
24295 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC 26304 875.00
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 875.00 625 65213 203
24296 CHEESE PLEASE 26635 160.31
MISC. SUPPLIES 160.31 101 64100 120
24297 MCNABB CONSTRUCTION 26807 134,154.90
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 134,154.90 320 81090 220
24298 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 507.47
OFFICE EXPENSE 243.89 101 65300 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.99 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 65.03 101 64100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.99 101 64150 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.46 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 112.11 526 69020 120
24299 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 26977 113.00
UTILITY EXPENSE 113.00 896 20281
24300 DONOVAN BOYLE 27196 120.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1780
24301 CINGULAR WIRELESS 27305 28.65
COMMUNICATIONS 28.65 101 65100 160
24302 JADE DECOU 27307 50.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1780
24303 DARCY WONG 27308 39.00
MISCELLANEOUS 39.00 101 36330 000 1644
24304 LISA TIMPANO 27309 185.00
MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1891
24305 ROBIN NGAI 27310 18.00
MISCELLANEOUS 18.00 101 36330 000 1422
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24278 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00
MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024
24279 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 600.00
MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024
24280 C.L.E.A. 24523 585.00
MISCELLANEOUS 585.00 130 20026
24281 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 420.00
UNION DUES 420.00 130 21091
24282 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60
MISCELLANEOUS 320.60 130 21092
24283 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1780
24284 W.L. BUTLER 24697 7,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 7,500.00 101 22546
24285 AETNA 24760 3,738.88
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,375.88 130 20022
MISCELLANEOUS 363.00 130 20028
24286 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 5,011.48
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,011.48 130 20014
24287 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,284.63
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,155.98 130 20021
MISCELLANEOUS 1,128.65 130 20025
24288 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 24815 90.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00 201 65200 220
24289 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 350.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 350.00 730 69583 120
24290 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. 25180 17,447.32
COMMUNICATIONS 4,469.42 101 65150 160
COMMUNICATIONS 7,263.90 101 65100 160
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,714.00 101 65100 220
24291 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 139.70
OFFICE EXPENSE 107.24 201 65200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 32.46 201 65500 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24267 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 76.81
SMALL TOOLS 76.81 619 64460 130
24268 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 202.22
MISC. SUPPLIES 75.20 619 64460 120 5120
MISC. SUPPLIES 127.02 619 64460 120 5160
24269 AT&T/MCI 23728 8,720.67
COMMUNICATIONS 18.34 101 68020 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 8,702.33 896 20281
24270 KEITH MARTIN 23788 171.54
MISC. SUPPLIES 4.00 526 69020 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 43.29 527 66520 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 47.99 527 66520 120
TRAINING EXPENSE 76.26 527 66520 260
24271 KAREN LIU 23823 148.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 148.50 101 68010 220 1645
24272 PHILIP MALOUF 23825 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593
24273 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 1,788.52
MISC. SUPPLIES 660.20 101 68010 120 1111
MISC. SUPPLIES 441.47 101 68010 120 1114
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 471.34 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 215.51 619 64460 220 5240
24274 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 2,431.89
OFFICE EXPENSE 89.31 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 59.54 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 335.57 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 178.62 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 1,180.93 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 536.92 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 51.00 621 64450 110
24275 OMEGA ENGRAVING 24337 9.50
OFFICE EXPENSE 9.50 101 64100 110
24276 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,370.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,370.00 130 20016
24277 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 69.00
UNION DUES 69.00 130 21080
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24254 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 783.36
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 783.36 101 66210 222
24255 CHRISSY HOLMES 21723 192.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 192.00 101 68010 220 1644
24256 JORGENSON, SIEGEL, MCCLURE & FLE 22144 480.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 480.00 618 64520 210
24257 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 28.19
SUPPLIES 28.19 620 15000
24258 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 704.82
MISC. SUPPLIES 704.82 527 66520 120
24259 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 23,770.57
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,043.47 736 64572 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,727.10 736 64571 220
24260 MELISSA DATA CORP 22699 865.64
OFFICE EXPENSE 865.64 101 64250 110
24261 JONES AND MAYER 22818 48.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 48.00 101 64350 210
24262 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 157.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 157.50 101 68010 220 1645
24263 INTOXIMETERS 22987 148.46
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 148.46 101 65100 200
24264 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 88.06
MISC. SUPPLIES 88.06 619 64460 120 5150
24265 DATASAFE 23410 1,206.57
OFFICE EXPENSE 1.70 101 65150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 87.22 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 180.15 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 300.50 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 206.20 101 64350 120
BANKING SERVICE FEES 386.60 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.20 101 64400 120
24266 BANK OF NEW YORK 23553 2,450.00
BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 1,600.83 526 69020 763
BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 849.17 527 66520 763
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24240 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 325.02
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 325.02 101 64200 150
24241 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 117.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 117.00 101 64420 260
24242 PRIORITY 1 19239 2,439.64
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 606.23 620 66700 200
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,833.41 625 65213 203
24243 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 246.99
OFFICE EXPENSE 17.58 101 64250 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 229.41 201 65200 111
24244 WILSEY & HAM 19397 12,553.66
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 12,553.66 320 81740 210
24245 WINGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 19471 300.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22525
24246 SPRINT 19514 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
24247 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,166.84
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,166.84 528 66600 210
24248 THE MERCURY NEWS 19610 125.14
MISC. SUPPLIES 125.14 101 66100 120
24249 REDWOOD CITY-SAN MATEO COUNTY 19698 990.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 495.00 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 495.00 101 64100 250
24250 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1100
24251 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 2,150.41
COMMUNICATIONS 2,150.41 621 64450 160
24252 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 730.47
SUPPLIES 730.47 620 15000
24253 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 4,069.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,033.74 527 66520 120
MISCELLANEOUS 2,036.01 619 64460 400
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
24224 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 5,776.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,776.00 320 76350 220
24225 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 03764 1,379.37
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 1,379.37 101 68020 190 2200
24226 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 284.65
RENTS & LEASES 284.65 101 68020 180 2300
24227 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 780.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 780.00 320 81550 210
24228 MCGRAW-HILL COMPANY 11245 82.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 82.00 101 66100 240
24229 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 40.68
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 40.68 201 65200 203
24230 3M COMPANY 13848 1,193.47
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,193.47 . 101 66210 222
24231 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 110.00
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 110.00 101 64420 121
24232 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 16460 12.57
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.57 730 69583 120
24233 STARKEY LABORATORIES INC 17798 56.47
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 56.47 101 65150 200
24234 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 644.80
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 644.80 101 64420 210
24235 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 18565 36.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 36.00 101 66100 120
24236 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 5,772.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,772.00 528 66600 210
24237 NITV 18941 1,440.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,440.00 101 65100 260
24238 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 29.80
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 29.80 101 64420 240
24239 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 221.19
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221.19 201 65200 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
03/01/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24211 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 34,002.00
COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 33,702.00 621 64450 220
24212 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 1,710.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,710.00 101 68010 220 1644
24213 VEOLIA WATER 02110 14,314.20
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 7,570.98 527 66530 190
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,034.38 527 66530 210
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 1,708.84 527 66530 800
24214 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 350.22
MISC. SUPPLIES 350.22 101 68020 120 2200
24215 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 1,384.50
MISC. SUPPLIES 391.26 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 904.88 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 75.80 619 64460 120 5160
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.56 619 64460 120 5150
24216 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 679.82
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 679.82 101 66210 226
24217 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 318.35
MISC. SUPPLIES 318.35 619 64460 120
24218 P. G. & E. 03054 77,463.39
GAS & ELECTRIC 35,047.41 101 66100 170
UTILITY EXPENSE 42,415.98 896 20280
24219 AT&T 03080 77.85
COMMUNICATIONS 77.85 101 65100 160
24220 SANDRA POBE 03175 2,016.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,016.00 101 68010 220 1644
24221 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT 03271 17,205.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,205.00 320 81790 220
24222 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,962.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,962.75 101 65150 220
24223 TESTAMERICA SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL 03536 2,796.45
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,796.45 528 66600 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
02-23-2007 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11
FUND RECAP 06-07
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 97,905.37
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 9,758.65
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 6,769.01
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 16,407.86
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 46,736.13
WATER FUND 526 3,564.14
SEWER FUND 527 209,214.32
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 17.44
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,537.39
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 10,476.00
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 8,286.40
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 6,487.42
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 681.94
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 990.66
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,120.00
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 111,849.08
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,836.10
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 2,065.87
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $537,703.78 Vol� Com'
C )144v >
5 54, 01(03.-7q,
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 24080 THROUGH 24210 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $537,703.78, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../-../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 .
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks -
24208 SUBTRONIC CORPORATION 27302 750.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 750.00 101 22520
24209 RESCUE ROOTER 27303 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
24210 CARLMARTIN 27304 2,250.00
MISCELLANEOUS - 2,250.00 101 22546
TOTAL 8537,703.71 /
212��0�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
24192 LE CROISSANT 27286 40.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 40.00 101 64420 120
24193 CONNIE T. WONG 27287 176.00
MISCELLANEOUS 176.00 101 36330 000 1644
24194 ELISABETH ZORNES 27288 104.00
MISCELLANEOUS 104.00 101 36330 000 1762
24195 THEA HAYDEN 27289 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1370
24196 PATRICIA VOGEL 27290 48.00
MISCELLANEOUS 48.00 101 36330 000 1762
24197 LESLIE WITH 27291 79.00
MISCELLANEOUS 79.00 101 36330 000 1349
24198 ESTELA BAIRES 27292 48.00
MISCELLANEOUS 48.00 101 22593
24199 KAY MCBRIDE 27293 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593
24200 JOHN RODDY 27294 300.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593
24201 KIMBERLI MOFFITT-TSUI 27295 395.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593
MISCELLANEOUS 295.00 101 36330 000 1213
24202 ARIA KASUGA 27296 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
24203 OKUSITIND APELE 27297 750.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 750.00 101 22520
24204 JOHNSON LAM 27298 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
24205 YOUNG YI 27299 11129.92
MISCELLANEOUS 1,129.92 101 22546
24206 RB MOBILE DIESEL TESTING 27300 540.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 540.00 620 66700 200
24207 RICHARD HUDDLESTON 27301 1,125.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,125.00 101 22546
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24177 MARC SYMKOWICK 26350 384.50
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 384.50 130 20060
24178 R.A. METAL PRODUCTS, INC 26527 674.19
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 674.19 625 65213 203
24179 PRINTING INNOVATIONS 26591 262.64
OFFICE EXPENSE 262.64 101 68010 110 1101
24180 NEAL MARTIN & ASSOCIATES 26660 730.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 730.00 530 65400 210
24181 EARTH PROTECTION SERVICES INC 26823 237.26
MISC. SUPPLIES 237.26 619 64460 120
24182 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 238.91
MISC. SUPPLIES 50.54 101 66210 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 90.38 619 64460 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 97.99 620 66700 110
24183 ANA RECINOS MBA 26956 1 ,050.90
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 498.40 101 65150 200
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 552.50 101 64420 210
24184 KAREN MYHRE 26986 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593
24185 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 27057 580.50
TRAINING EXPENSE 580.50 101 64420 262
24186 OLIVIA E. LEVITT 27217 170.00
MISCELLANEOUS 170.00 101 36330 000 1646
24187 STACEY GRAY 27262 20.00
MISCELLANEOUS 20.00 101 36330 000 1644
24188 EDWARD EISENMAN 27273 244.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 244.00 130 20060
24189 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF SAN 27283 985.05
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 985.05 201 65200 203
24190 ASSOC FOR FACILITIES ENGINEERING 27284 205.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 205.00 619 64460 240
24191 CMTA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 27285 445.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 445.00 101 64250 260
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24162 MICHAEL GAUL 24813 1,000.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,000.00 101 22520
24163 SHIRLEY LADDY 24826 2,770.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 70.00 130 20060
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,700.00 130 20015
24164 NETMOTION WIRELESS INC. 24843 750.00
COMMUNICATIONS 750.00 101 65100 160
24165 A2Z BUSINESS SYSTEMS 25020 168.79
OFFICE EXPENSE 168.79 201 65200 110
24166 JOHN CHILCOTT 25032 2,660.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,660.00 130 20015
24167 MICHAEL VONADA 25235 100.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060
24168 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 738.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 738.00 101 65100 110
24169 SHARON OLDS 25301 737.50
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 737.50 130 20060
24170 PAT KERRISK 25322 458.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 458.00 130 20015
24171 MICHELLE TANDOWSKY 25380 2,214.90
MISCELLANEOUS 21214.90 101 22546
24172 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 25729 94.06
TRAINING EXPENSE 49.63 101 68020 260 2200
TRAINING EXPENSE 44.43 101 68020 260 2300
24173 ED BARTON 25850 100.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060
24174 PRISTINE AUTO DETAIL 26046 60.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 60.00 101 65100 200
24175 BURLINGAME MOTHERS CLUB 26150 300.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593
24176 AMY SHEK 26299 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
02/23/07
NUMBER NAMEVENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
24147 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 96.00
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 96.00 101 64420 210
24148 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,970.13
BANKING SERVICE FEES 586.98 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,383.15 530 65400 120
24149 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292
24150 NCRL 23936 300.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 300.00 101 68010 120 1781
24151 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 4,327.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,104.00 619 64460 220 5120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,098.00 619 64460 220 5120
24152 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 34.47
COMMUNICATIONS 34.47 101 65300 160
24153 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 131.52
SUPPLIES 131.52 620 15000 .
24154 QUILL 24090 295.52
OFFICE EXPENSE 295.52 621 64450 110
24155 LITHIA CHRYSLER JEEP 24171 407.28
VEHICLE KAINT. 407.28 201 65200 202
24156 DOUG BELL 24189 50.68
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 50.68 320 80520 210
24157 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 594.30
OFFICE EXPENSE 594.30 101 64250 110
24158 A&G SERVICES 24400 10,916.43
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,916.43 320 81720 220
24159 SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER 24408 700.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 700.00 101 65100 292
24160 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 31,047.05
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 31,047.05 326 80910 210
24161 CALIFORNIA BMW TRIUMPH 24782 222.17
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 222.17 620 66700 200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24133 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 77.02
SUPPLIES 77.02 620 15000
24134 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 1,664.06
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,664.06 526 69020 120
24135 CUTTERS EDGE 22407 38.48
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 38.48 201 65200 203
24136 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 3,300.00
GAS, OIL & GREASE 1,650.00 101 65100 201
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,650.00 620 66700 210
24137 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 735.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22554
UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281
24138 MDL PLASTIC BAGS COMPANY 22807 309.29
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 309.29 530 65400 200
24139 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 10,476.00
CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 10,476.00 618 64520 225
24140 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00
MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031
24141 OFFICE MAX 23306 837.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 23.41 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 4.18 101 68010 110 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 768.57 101 68010 120 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 40.84 621 64450 110
24142 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 108.23
MISCELLANEOUS 108.23 101 22518
24143 TAMMY MAK 23445 430.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 430.00 130 20060
24144 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 12,663.08
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 78.80 326 73171 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 12,584.28 326 81690 210
24145 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 56.04
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 56.04 625 65213 203
24146 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 1,345.42
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,345.42 527 66520 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24118 PRIORITY 1 19239 235.97
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 235.97 620 66700 200
24119 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 384.53
MISC. SUPPLIES 298.95 201 65200 111
OFFICE EXPENSE 85.58 621 64450 110
24120 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 478.95
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 218.52 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 260.43 625 65213 203
24121 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT INC 19697 571 .76
SUPPLIES 571 .76 620 15000
24122 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1 ,836. 10
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,836.10 736 64570 220
24123 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 260.00
COMMUNICATIONS 260.00 621 64450 160
24124 TIMPAC, INC 20428 196.86
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 196.86 101 65150 200
24125 VICENTE QUINTANA 20437 533.65
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 533.65 130 20015
24126 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 123.82
OFFICE EXPENSE 123.82 101 64420 110
24127 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 3,026.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 31026.00 326 80950 210
24128 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 372.93
MISCELLANEOUS 372.93 101 64350 031
24129 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT 21316 1 , 120.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 1 , 120.00 730 69547 120
24130 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 5,562.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1 ,375.00 101 64420 210
TRAINING EXPENSE 4, 187.50 101 66210 260
24131 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 7,203.20
MISCELLANEOUS 7,203.20 101 37010
24132 DAWN CUTLER 21991 44.00
MISCELLANEOUS 44.00 101 36330 000 1762
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24106 ELECTRO-MOTION INCORPORATED 14007 2,968.05
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 538.66 619 64460 210 5140
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 538.25 619 64460 210 5160
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 260.00 619 64460 210 5140
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,001.14 619 64460 210 5240
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 315.00 619 64460 210 5160
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 315.00 619 64460 210 5130
24107 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 344.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 344.00 619 64460 210
24108 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 1,442.25
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 1,406.17 526 69020 230
SMALL TOOLS 36.08 619 64460 130
24109 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,627.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,627.00 101 65100 220
24110 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 178.01
TRAINING EXPENSE 178.01 101 66210 260
24111 SYDNEY MALK00 16347 140.71
SMALL TOOLS 140.71 620 66700 130
24112 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 70.18
SUPPLIES 70.18 620 15000
24113 SUPERIOR TRANSMISSIONS INC 17388 692.79
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 692.79 620 66700 200
24114 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 453.15
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 453.15 201 65200 203
24115 PENINSULA CONFLICT 18633 4,500.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,500.00 101 65100 220
24116 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 202.40
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 202.40 101 64420 121
24117 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,068.53
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 243.45 101 66210 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 393.91 526 69020 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 243.41 527 66520 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 17.44 528 66600 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 12.64 619 64460 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 157.68 620 66700 140
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24094 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 40,314.62
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 40,314.62 101 68010 190 1114
24095 RANDY SCHWARTZ 03518 447.00
MISCELLANEOUS 447.00 101 68010 031
24096 SYMPRO, INC. 03705 2,499.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 2,499.00 101 64250 200
24097 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 8,162.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,721.75 101 68020 220 2300
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,440.75 320 76350 220
24098 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 200.00
OFFICE EXPENSE - 100.00 526 69020 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 100.00 527 66520 110
24099 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 980.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 980.75 101 68020 120 2200
24100 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220
24101 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN 10567 4,767.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,500.00 101 66100 010
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 267.00 101 67500 011
24102 WINGF00T COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,763.20
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,763.20 201 65200 203
24103 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 181.38
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 181.38 201 65200 203
24104 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 207.96
MISC. SUPPLIES 35.70 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 172.26 527 66520 120
24105 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 325.74
COMMUNICATIONS 160.00 101 65100 160
TRAINING EXPENSE 50.79 101 65100 260
MISC. SUPPLIES 114.95 530 65400 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
02/23/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24080 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 2,186.65
GAS, OIL & GREASE 212.60 201 65200 201
VEHICLE MAINT. 490.15 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 215.96 201 65200 203
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.65 619 64460 120
SUPPLIES 1,251.29 620 .15000
24081 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 844.50
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 147.08 201 65200 140
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 697.42 201 65200 203
24082 D & M TOWING, INC. 02029 35.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 35.00 101 65100 200
24083 VEOLIA WATER 02110 207,343.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 207,343.00 527 66530 220
24084 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 51.09
MISCELLANEOUS 51.09 101 68020 192 2200
24085 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 1,630.87
MISCELLANEOUS 1,630.87 896 20282
24086 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 49.34
SMALL TOOLS 49.34 619 64460 130
24087 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 339.91
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 339.91 101 66210 219
24088 HAINES & COMPANY, INC. 02326 364.15
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 364.15 101 65150 220
24089 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 648.34
SUPPLIES 546.65 620 15000
SMALL TOOLS 101.69 620 66700 130
24090 P. G. & E. 03054 1,365.59
GAS & ELECTRIC 1,355.36 101 68010 170 1286
GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170
24091 AT&T 03080 156.48
COMMUNICATIONS 156.48 101 67500 160
24092 ALFRED J. PALMER 03085 1,341.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11341.00 130 20015
24093 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 111,549.08
MISCELLANEOUS 111,549.08 731 22587
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
02-15-2007 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 12
FUND RECAP 06-07
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 80,446.50
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 9,344.70
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 7,919.76
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 942,144.30
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 25,587.08
WATER FUND 526 4,109.48
SEWER FUND 527 11,387.92
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 912.32
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 25,004.80
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 37,402.55
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 45,131.93
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1,887.68
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,220.41
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 703.89
PUBLIC TV ACCESS FUND 738 245.04
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 515.32
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $1,194,963.68
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 12
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 23958 THROUGH 24079 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,194,963.68, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24069 R&L DIESEL 27190 3,106.05
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 3,106.05 201 65200 203
24070 NICK BOVIS 27239 4,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,500.00 101 22546
24071 TONY LOTTICE 27274 1,260.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,260.00 101 68010 220 1349
24072 INLINE PROMOTIONS INC 27275 632.74
MISC. SUPPLIES 316.37 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 316.37 527 66520 120
24073 SOUTHWOOD UPHOLSTERY 27276 1,001.08
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,001.08 101 68010 200 1101
24074 AFFINITY BANK OF SAN MATEO 27277 142,640.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 142,640.00 326 81370 210
24075 GULLIVER'S RESTAURANT 27278 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
24076 WILL BACHAR 27279 750.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 750.00 101 22520
24077 NORTHERN SUN 27280 2,250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546
24078 SABER ROOFING 27281 233.84
MISCELLANEOUS 233.84 101 31510
24079 LORI WEINBERG 27282 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
TOTAL $1,194,963.68
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
24056 CEMEX 26506 29.89
MISC. SUPPLIES 29.89 101 66210 120
24057 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26519 159.96
COMMUNICATIONS 159.96 201 65200 160
24058 R.A. METAL PRODUCTS, INC 26527 88.77
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 88.77 201 65200 203
24059 BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS #510486 26530 1,259.46
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 241.80 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 1,017.66 101 67500 129
24060 UNITED COMFORT SOLUTIONS INC 26639 280.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 280.00 619 64460 210 5130
24061 AMERICAN MESSAGING 26822 66.04
COMMUNICATIONS 22.01 101 66210 160
COMMUNICATIONS 22.01 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 22.02 527 66520 160
24062 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 433.50
OFFICE EXPENSE 11.43 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 82.92 101 65300 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 339.15 101 66210 120
24063 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26910 273.51
COMMUNICATIONS 273.51 101 66100 160
24064 CINGULAR WIRELESS 27040 33.68
COMMUNICATIONS 33.68 101 65100 160
24065 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 27057 40.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 40.00 101 64420 262
24066 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 27091 52.01
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 19.20 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 32.81 101 67500 125
24067 CARPET SYSTEMS 27137 264.00
MISCELLANEOUS 264.00 619 64460 804
24068 STOLOSKI AND GONZALEZ INC 27163 10,870.30
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,870.30 326 81230 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24043 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 944.26
MISC. SUPPLIES 175.64 101 66210 120
TRAINING EXPENSE 768.62 527 66520 260
24044 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 289.16
OFFICE EXPENSE 96.69 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 192.47 201 65200 110
24045 LAUREL TANG 26121 360.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 360.00 101 68010 220 1349
24046 LANCE BAYER 26156 625.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 625.00 101 64350 210
24047 DATABANK IMX 26176 3,591.34
MISCELLANEOUS 3,591.34 101 22518
24048 CALIFORNIA POWER PARTNERS 26205 3,329.22
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,329.22 327 81510 220
24049 BAKER AND TAYLOR BOOKS 26270 383.12
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 85.88 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 297.24 101 67500 129
24050 BAKER AND TAYLOR BOOKS 26271 728.24
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 166.60 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 561.64 101 67500 125
24051 BAKER AND TAYLOR BOOKS 26272 6,143.54
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 1,047.20 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 5,096.34 101 67500 125
24052 BAKER AND TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 26273 383.99
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 102.40 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 281.59 101 67500 125
24053 BAKER AND TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 26274 365.41
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 76.80 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 288.61 101 67500 125
24054 BAKER AND TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 26275 115.90
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 32.00 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 83.90 101 67500 125
24055 BAKER AND TAYLOR BOOKS 26375 380.33
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 70.50 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 309.83 101 67500 129
' �[BRARY EXPENSES 363.40 731 22531
MISC. SUPPLIES 245.04 738 64580 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
24042 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 16,367.68
MISCELLANEOUS 390.00 101 64150 031
OFFICE EXPENSE 24.95 101 64100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 71.00 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 401.69 101 67500 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 84.53 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,357.35 101 68010 120 1891
MISC. SUPPLIES 157.59 101 68010 120 1370
MISC. SUPPLIES 91.22 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 92.59 101 68010 120 1423
MISC. SUPPLIES 5.94 101 65300 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.00 101 64420 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 126.85 101 68020 120 2300
MISC. SUPPLIES 19.13 101 68010 120 1780
MISC. SUPPLIES 62.77 101 68010 120 1422
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.18 101 64150 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 6.50 101 68010 120 1781
MISC. SUPPLIES - 140.88 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,562.05 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 145.00 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 111.95 101 68010 120 1423
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 40.08 101 64420 121
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 116.60 101 67500 129
SMALL TOOLS 854.03 101 68020 130 2200
SMALL TOOLS 150.19 101 68020 130 2300
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 1,140.00 101 65100 140
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 120.00 101 64420 150
COMMUNICATIONS 198.17 101 65150 160
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 116.86 101 67500 190
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,250.35 101 68010 220 1212
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 781.75 101 68010 220 1423
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 165.00 101 67500 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 300.00 101 64250 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 109.18 101 64150 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 154.01 101 68020 260 2200
TRAINING EXPENSE 19.45 101 65100 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 100.00 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 135.95 101 65150 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 400.00 101 65100 260
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE - 480.00 101 64560 290
COMMUNICATIONS 1,634.29 201 65200 160
MISC. SUPPLIES 142.80 526 69020 120
COMMUNICATIONS 86.59 526 69020 160
TRAINING EXPENSE 499.00 526 69020 260
OFFICE EXPENSE 68.22 527 66520 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 286.71 530 65400 120
MISCELLANEOUS 430.81 530 65400 400
TRAINING EXPENSE 50.00 619 64460 260
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 169.00 620 66700 210
MISC. SUPPLIES 622.70 730 69533 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 61.08 730 69583 120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 134.25 730 69533 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T ER PAGE 7
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24038 J&L CONSTRUCTION,INC. 24256 - 21,801.93
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT - 5,114.38 320 81710 800
MISCELLANEOUS 16,687.55 619 64460 804
24039 BAKER & TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 24465 48.72
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 12.80 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 35.92 101 67500 125
24040 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1780
24041 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 75.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 75.00 619 64460 210 5121
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24028 AT&T/MCI 23728 311.93
UTILITY EXPENSE 311.93 896 20281
24029 JANNETTE GREER 23769 270.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 270.00 101 68010 220 1648
24030 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5160
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5150
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5170
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5130
24031 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES - 23941 17,289.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 516.00 619 64460 210 5170
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 150.00 619 64460 210 5230
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 989.00 619 64460 210 5210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,873.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,892.00 619 64460 210 5240
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 480.00 619 64460 210 5121
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,101.00 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,246.00 619 64460 210 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 902.00 619 64460 220 5190
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,140.00 619 64460 220 5110
24032 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 437.86
COMMUNICATIONS 278.15 101 68020 160 2300
COMMUNICATIONS 159.71 619 64460 160
24033 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 422.81
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 422.81 620 66700 200
24034 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 2,204.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,204.50 320 80520 210
24035 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521
24036 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 555.20
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 555.20 101 68010 220 1521
24037 CHRISTINE GRANUCCI 24197 3,070.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,070.50 101 64420 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
24014 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 3,218.54
MISC. SUPPLIES 757.32 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,461.22 527 66520 120
24015 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 2,755.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,710.00 201 35220 000 7100
MISCELLANEOUS 1,045.00 201 35221 000 7100
24016 QUENVOLDS SAFETY SHOEMOBILES 22479 165.08
TRAINING EXPENSE 165.08 527 66520 260
24017 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 243.60
MISCELLANEOUS 243.60 526 69020 233
24018 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 157.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 157.50 101 68010 220 1645
24019 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 292.17
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 97.37 101 65100 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 194.80 530 65400 140
24020 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 - 228.02
OFFICE EXPENSE 228.02 101 68010 110 1101
24021 OFFICE MAX 23306 341.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 56.48 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 285.27 101 68010 110 1101
24022 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 63.33
MISC. SUPPLIES 63.33 619 64460 120 5180
24023 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 1,600.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 300.00 101 66100 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,300.00 526 69020 260
24024 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. 23419 600.88
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.88 320 80480 220
24025 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 1,040.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,040.00 101 68010 220 1762
24026 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 284.44
MISC. SUPPLIES 177.96 619 64460 120 5120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 106.48 619 64460 210 5120
24027 BKF ENGINEERS - 23641 22,257.86
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 22,257.86 327 81500 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
23998 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 144.00
MISCELLANEOUS 144.00 101 64350 031
23999 SPRINT PCS 20724 340.49
MISCELLANEOUS 340.49 731 22554
24000 JEFF DOWD 20779 171.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.00 101 68010 220 1785
24001 AARONSON, DICKERSON, COHN & 20798 7,301.30
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,301.30 101 64420 210
24002 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 885.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 885.00 101 68010 220 1331
24003 CEB 21210 375.14
MISC. SUPPLIES 375.14 101 64350 120
24004 CIR 21211 575.83
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 575.83 527 66520 220
24005 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 989.16
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 742.71 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 246.45 619 64460 220 5130
24006 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 509.96
MISC. SUPPLIES 509.96 527 66520 120
24007 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 491.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 491.75 201 65500 120
24008 HILLYARD/SAN FRANCISCO 21658 369.52
MISC. SUPPLIES 369.52 101 68020 120 2200
24009 SEWER RAT 21821 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
24010 VB GOLF LLC 21948 - 780.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 780.00 101 68010 220 1784
24011 REEDEQUIPMENTCO 21980 226.16
EQUIPMENT MAINT. - 226.16 101 68020 200 2200
24012 IEDA 21981 21688.25
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,688.25 101 64420 210
24013 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 358.78
SUPPLIES 358.78 620 15000
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
23984 SHAW PIPELINE INC 17959 788,634.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 788,634.00 326 80950 220
23985 ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 18050 125.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 125 .00 101 68010 240 1100
23986 SMITH-EMERY COMPANY 18114 272.00
MISCELLANEOUS 272.00 619 64460 804
23987 SIERRA MORENO MERCANTILE CO. 18357 125.68
SMALL TOOLS 125.68 101 68020 130 2300
23988 BAKER AND TAYLOR ENTERTAINMENT 18420 1 ,415.34
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 307.20 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 1 ,108. 14 101 67500 125
23989 PENINSULA PUMP & 18450 2,644.05
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 2,644.05 527 66520 230
23990 LANIER WORLDWIDE INC 18555 1 ,727.68
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1 ,727.68 621 64450 200
23991 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 142.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 142.00 526 69020 240
23992 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 2, 149.45
MISC. SUPPLIES 2, 149.45 101 68010 120 1781
23993 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 74.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.99 101 68010 120 1788
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.99 101 68010 120 1780
MISC. SUPPLIES 48.71 101 68010 120 1785
23994 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 415.46
MISC. SUPPLIES 128. 14 101 64400 120
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 287.32 101 64200 150
23995 L.E. COOKE CO 19765 668.99
MISC. SUPPLIES 668.99 730 69560 120
23996 S & C FORD 20190 67,940.14
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 23,758.80 618 64520 800
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 44, 181 .34 620 66700 800
23997 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 270.00
MISCELLANEOUS 270.00 526 69020 233
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
23973 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,624.84
OFFICE EXPENSE 67.08 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 221.39 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 15.13 101 66210 120
SMALL TOOLS 124.20 101 68020 130 2200
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 99.89 101 68020 190 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 70.87 101 66210 222
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 55.30 201 65200 203
MISC. SUPPLIES 69.79 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 249.62 527 66520 120
SMALL TOOLS 480.66 527 66520 130
MISC. SUPPLIES 43.92 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 126.99 619 64460 120 5250
23974 ANA FITZGERALD 09975 180.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 180.00 101 68010 220 1647
23975 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSN 13935 130.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 101 68010 240 1100
23976 ELECTRO-MOTION INCORPORATED 14007 4,709.03
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 1,697.12 101 66210 230
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 260.00 526 69020 230
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 2,751.91 527 66520 230
23977 HDL COREN&CONE 14750 1,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 11500.00 101 30400
23978 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 180.57
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 109.12 527 66520 230
MISC. SUPPLIES -9.74 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 81.19 619 64460 120 5250
23979 HITECH SYSTEMS, INC. 15712 5,760.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 51760.00 101 65100 220
23980 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 221.91
MISC. SUPPLIES 221.91 101 65100 120
23981 TEAM CLEAN 15827 235.18
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 235.18 201 65200 220
23982 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 680.80
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 680.80 101 68020 140 2200
23983 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 60.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 60.00 101 65100 200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
02/15/07
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
23958 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 263.05
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 263.05 201 65200 140
23959 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 71.12
MISC. SUPPLIES 71.12 101 68020 120 2200
23960 FEDEX 02160 38.05
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 24.42 101 64420 121
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13.63 101 68010 220 1212
23961 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 316.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 316.00 619 64460 120 5240
23962 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 2,139.62
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,874.38 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 265.24 527 66520 120
23963 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 733.39
MISC. SUPPLIES 733.39 730 69560 120 2300
23964 P. G. & E. 03054 4,347.85
GAS & ELECTRIC 4,152.22 101 66100 170
GAS & ELECTRIC 195.63 201 65200 170
23965 AT&T 03080 203.39
UTILITY EXPENSE 203.39 896 20281
23966 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 350.00 101 65100 260
23967 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 160.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 160.00 621 64450 110
23968 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 323.86
MISC. SUPPLIES 323.86 101 64350 120
23969 LIFE ASSIST 09392 167.25
SUPPLIES 167.25 201 65200 112
23970 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 1,168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,168.00 101 65100 220
23971 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 127.31
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 127.31 101 68020 190 2100
23972 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 1,246.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 1,246.00 618 64520 601
CITY AGENDA
°o ITEM # IZb
BURLINGAME TAFF REPORT
MTG.
DATE March 19, 2007
% S
°A ATE° J° E e.
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE
BY
DATE: March 15, 2007
APPROVED
FROM : Ana Silva (558-7204) BY __ r' lk
_.
SUBJECT: DISCUSS FEEDBACK ON CALTRAIN RESOLUTION NO. 18-2007 APPROVED BY COUNCIL
AT THE MARCH 5, 2007 MEETING
RECOMMENDATION
Review additional material relative to the CalTrain Resolution No. 18-2007 and direct staff
accordingly.
BACKGROUND
Council at their March 5, 2007 meeting approved the CalTrain resolution as recommended by the
Coalition to Expand Transit Service (CETS). Since that time Council members have received an
email from Mike Scanlon , Director of CalTrain . We have received additional correspondence from
CETS regarding the basis for the original resolution . Mayor Nagel has placed this item on the agenda
to allow the Council to discuss the various correspondence that you have received .
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 18-2007
Email from Mike Scanlon of March 8, 2007 to City Managers
Email from CETS of March 12 , 2007 to City Managers (with attachments)
Email of March 15, 2007 from Terry Nagel (with attachments)
From: Martinez, Martha [mailto:martinezm(dsamtrans.com] On Behalf Of Scanlon, Mike
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:28 PM
To: acroce@)citvofsanmateo.org; barry.nagel@ssf.net; 0acksonCalci.sanbruno.ca.us;
diane.mcgrath(abci.colma.ca.us; dsboeschCa�menlo rk.org; eeverettaredwoodcity.org;
jhardy0fostercitv.or4; mweiss(&cityofsancarlos.org; inantell0burlin ame.org,
irobinsonaci.atherton.ca.us; pmartelCa)dalycity.org; rjaeckCa)ci.millbrae.ca.us;
citymanager@ci.brisbane.ca.us; saeorgeawoodsidetown.org; aconstantourosahilisca.org;
ajames0cityofeoa.org; angela(apgrrtolavalley.net; jcrist@belmont.gov;
nortonw(&ci.pacifica.ca.us; marciar0hmbcity.com
Cc: Miller, David; Simon, Mark
Subject: Caltrain Service in San Mateo
Dear City Manager,
It has come to our attention that your City Council may be asked to consider a resolution
that calls into question the effectiveness of Caltrain service in San Mateo County.
The concluding points of the resolution,a copy of which is attached, contain statements
with which we are in full agreement, specifically the need to proceed with"all due
diligence" on safety improvements and working with the cities to develop additional
means of connectivity between transit services.
We are troubled, however,by the manner in which this resolution has been circulated, the
belated and second-hand way we learned about it and, most importantly,that the
recitation clauses, while purporting to be fact, contain significant misstatements of fact.
One recitation states that Measure A funds currently spent on Caltrain can be redirected
to the cities. This is simply untrue. The language of Measure A is very clear in how
funds must be spent and reflects the overwhelming desire of San Mateo County voters
that the highest priority be placed on Caltrain, a desire expressed and reaffirmed on more
than one occasion.
Another recitation states the reduction in Caltrain service has made it more difficult for
many riders to use Caltrain. It is noteworthy that ridership is substantially higher on
Caltrain—including within San Mateo County --than it was before the changes that have
prompted the complaints inherent in the resolution.
A third recitation asserts, without benefit of fact,that properties near Caltrain stations
have suffered economically, an assertion we would vigorously dispute.
The resolution appears to have been prepared by an ad-hoc group that wants Caltrain to
run more local service than it currently operates under the new service model adopted by
the Joint Powers Board in 2004. In their passion to advocate for their position, they have
produced a resolution that is fundamentally flawed.
We are particularly concerned that this effort has gone forward without an opportunity to
comment on it or to correct some fundamental flaws contained within it. In fact, it has
been reported to us that one city already has adopted a resolution like the one attached,
but, as of today, we have yet to receive any formal notification of the council's action,
nor were we afforded an opportunity to comment or provide factual information as the
resolution was prepared, debated and approved. We remain concerned that this city
council has enacted into law a resolution that is based on incorrect information and it is
our hope the council will take the opportunity to reconsider its prior decision.
Should your council elect to consider this matter, we would appreciate the opportunity to
provide accurate information to you and your colleagues about Caltrain, ridership,
revenue and service.
During the next several days, I will be out of the office in Washington, D.C., advocating,
among other things, for federal support for our future plans to modernize Caltrain and
create an electrified rapid rail system that will provide the kind of local service being
sought by those who continue to oppose the current rail service.
If you have questions or you wish to discuss this issue further, please contact Caltrain
General Counsel David Miller or Special Assistant Mark Simon. Their contact
information is listed below.
David Miller
(415) 995-5007
dmiller@hansonbridgett.com
Mark Simon
(650) 508-6340
simonmAsamtrans.com
Page 1 of 3
MGR-Nantell, Jim
From: Terry Nagel [terrynagel@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 4:57 PM
To: acroce@cityofsanmateo.org; barry.nagel@ssf.net; cjackson@ci.sanbruno.ca.us;
diane.mcgrath@ci.colma.ca.us; dsboesch@menlopark.org; eeverett@redwoodcity.org;
jhardy@fostercity.org; mweiss@cityofsancarlos.org; MGR-Nantell, Jim;
jrobinson@ci.atherton.ca.us; pmartel@dalycity.org; rjaeck@ci.millbrae.ca.us;
citymanager@ci.brisbane.ca.us; sgeorge@woodsidetown.org; aconstantouros@hillsca.org;
ajames@cityofepa.org; angela@portolavalley.net;jcrist@belmont.gov;
nortonw@ci.pacifica.ca.us; marciar@hmbcity.com
Cc: Simon, Mark; dmiller@hansonbridgett.com; Jerry Hill
Subject: Response to Caltrain comments
Attachments: CETS resolution March 10 FINAL.DOC; Caltrain_Measure_A FINAL.xls;
Caltrain_stop_comparison FINAL.As
From: Coalition to Expand Transit Service(CETS)
To: City Managers in San Mateo County
Date: March 12, 2007
Dear City Manager:
Our Coalition to Expand Transit Service(CETS)feels it is important to respond to the message you received on
March 8 from Caltrain staff representatives on behalf of CEO Mike Scanlon.
We feel strongly that San Mateo County residents could be better served with a schedule that provides more
balanced service than the current schedule,which added more stops to "Baby Bullet" stations at the expense of
service to other stations. We wonder why San Mateo County stations have lost more than 20 percent of stops
since 2002, compared to a 13 percent reduction in Santa Clara County and a 2 percent increase in San Francisco
County.
Mr. Scanlon's message states that"the resolution appears to have been prepared by an ad-hoc group that wants
Caltrain to run more local service." He is correct. Our group is comprised of current and former city council
members from many San Mateo County cities who have attempted to work with Caltrain staff over the past two
years to restore some local service and complete important safety projects. Our suggestions have been ignored.
At a recent meeting with the three San Mateo County members of the Joint Powers Board and one Caltrain staff
member,we presented the same requests that are included in the proposed Caltrain resolution. We were asked if
our council members represented an official city position.We honestly responded that we did not, although many
of us have had extensive conversations with council members from a variety of cities who agree with these
suggestions. We received the clear message from Caltrain that unless we represented our cities in an official
capacity,our concerns would be ignored.Therefore,we proceeded to develop the enclosed resolution in order to
solicit official responses from city councils regarding these important issues.
Mr. Scanlon's message further states that the Caltrain staff is troubled"by the manner in which this resolution has
been circulated,the belated and second-hand way we learned about it and,most importantly,that the recitation
clauses,while purporting to be fact, contain significant misstatements of fact."We stand by every word in the
resolution and are enclosing data taken directly from the San Mateo County Transportation Authority's Web site
regarding payments to Caltrain, as well as information taken exactly from Caltrain train schedules to document
the number of stops each station in San Mateo County has lost.
We are troubled by this kind of response from a public agency that receives approximately$29 million annually
from county taxpayers and whose purpose is to serve everyone in the service area. It is in everyone's best interest
to invite open dialogue on Caltrain's practices.No city in San Mateo County was consulted and no passengers
3/15/2007
Page 2 of 3
were surveyed before Caltrain began cutting service in 2003. We believe it is now time to begin a conversation
about service that meets the needs of more cities.In fact, Caltrain has told us that its "limited" trains(ones that
stop at both local and Baby Bullet stations)are more popular than its express trains(ones that stop only at Baby
Bullet stations). It is entirely possible to adjust the current schedule to more equitably serve cities and attract more
riders in San Mateo County without significant cost or disruption to Baby Bullet service.
Mr. Scar lon's letter further states that it is untrue that funds could be redirected to the cities. That statement is not
correct. Reallocation of funds would require an amendment to Measure A,which would require approval by cities
and voters in this county. Obviously,we are not proposing that action at this time,but we want to make sure that
the dollars allocated to public transit are well spent. In keeping with the spirit of Measure A,which promised
better transit service for everyone,we believe it is important to include cities in the planning of Caltrain
scheduling and improvements.
Mr. Scanlon also questions our statement that"the reduction of service has made it more difficult for many riders
to use Caltrain." We have received significant feedback from our constituents that the current schedule does not
meet their needs.Faced with having to walk,bike or drive farther to the closest station or having to make
complicated shuttle connections,many have abandoned mass transit altogether.
Mr. Scanlon questions the statement that properties near Caltrain stations have suffered economically. In fact, a
consultant hired by Burlingame in 2006 to do a comprehensive economic development study of downtown
Burlingame found that the value of the land within one-half mile of the Burlingame Avenue train station was
valued at approximately$100 million more due to its proximity to the station. Clearly,the value of the land
around a station decreases with the closure of a station, as evidenced by the loss of business around the
Broadway-Burlingame station since weekday service was eliminated(including the recent closure of Pisces
restaurant in the old station building)and the difficulty that San Mateo is experiencing in promoting transit-
oriented development near its Hayward Park station,which has experienced a 42 percent decrease in weekday
service since 2000.
We are greatly concerned about Caltrain's lack of response to our requests for urgent safety measures,particularly
improvement projects at holdout stations for which funds have been allocated but which Caltrain refuses to begin
constructing.At holdout stations, one train is held outside a station when another is stopped at the station. Holdout
stations delay trains.When stations are upgraded to eliminate holdouts,they also are made much safer.
In summary,we want to clarify that we are making relatively minor requests: that Caltrain retain an outside
scheduling consultant to develop and evaluate alternative train schedules that would provide a better balance
between local service and express train service in the county;that cities be provided the opportunity to review and
comment on the alternative schedules developed;that Caltrain complete with all due diligence the safety
improvements planned within the county;and that Caltrain, SamTrans and the cities work together to develop and
evaluate additional and improved means of connectivity between transit services.
We hope that you will invite your city council members to consider adopting the enclosed resolution at your next
council meeting. We would welcome a conversation with you and your council on these important issues, and we
hope all cities will participate in an open dialogue with Caltrain to provide service that best meets the interests of
all residents.
Sincerely,
Members of the Coalition to Expand Transit Service
Jerry Carlson, Council Member,Atherton
Judith Christensen, Council Member,Daly City
Andy Cohen, Council Member,Menlo Park
Russ Cohen,Council Member,Burlingame
Bill Dickenson, Council Member,Belmont
Sue Digre, Council Member,Pacifica
Malcolm Dudley,former Mayor, Atherton
3/15/2007
Page 3 of 3
Kelly Fergusson,Mayor,Menlo Park
Jim Janz, Vice Mayor, Atherton
Phil Mathewson, Council Member, Belmont
Terry Nagel,Mayor,Burlingame
3/15/2007
Measure"A"Allocations and Totals
Local Entitv FY 2004-2005` Cumulative Local` Total'04-'05 Tax Caltrain Alloc."* Caltrain Cumulative
Atherton $ 219108.00 $ 3,007,752.00 $ 1,095,540.00 $ 547,770.00 $ 7,519,380.00
Belmont $ 411,149.00 $ 5,698,503.00 $ 2,055,745.00 $ 1,027,872.50 $ 14,246,257.50
Brisbane $ 88,436.00 $ 1,211,217.00 $ 442,180.00 $ 221,090.00 $ 3,028,042.50
Burlingame $ 488,152.00 $ 6,633,368.00 $ 2,440,760.00 $ 1,220,380.00 $ 16,583,420.00
Colma $ 35,468.00 $ 462,141.00 $ 177,340.00 $ 88,670.00 $ 1,155,352.50
Daly Ci $ 1,209,996.00 $ 16,207,856.00 $ 6,049,980.00 $ 3,024,990.00 $ 40,519,640.00
East Palo Alto $ 381,164.00 $ 4,583,064.00 $ 1,905,820.00 $ 952,910.00 $ 11,457,660.00
Foster Cit $ 389,915.00 $ 5,331,900.00 $ 1,949,575.00 $ 974,787.50 $ 13,329,750.00
Half Moon Ba $ 185,973.00 $ 2,336,075.00 $ 929,865.00 $ 464,932.50 $ 5,840,187.50
Hillsborough $ 352,463.00 $ 4779,538.00 $ 11762315.00 $ 881,157.50 $ 11,948,845.00
Menlo Park $ 562,471.00 $ 7,329991.00 $ 2,812,355.00 $ 1,406,177.50 $ 18,324,977.50
Millbrae $ 340679.00 $ 4,691,670.00 $ 1,703,395.00 $ 851,697.50 $ 11,729,175.00
Pacifica $ 606106.00 $ 8,280,762.00 $ 3,030,530.00 $ 1,515,265.00 $ 20,701,905.00
Portola Valle $ 172 906.00 $ 2,117,973.00 $ 864,530.00 $ 432,265.00 $ 5,294,932.50
Redwood Cit $ 1,117,359.00 $ 15,118,495.00 $ 5,586,795.00 $ 2,793,397.50 $ 37,796,237.50
San Bruno $ 590,472.00 $ 8,088,019.00 $ 2,952,360.00 $ 1,476,180.00 $ 20 220,047.50
San Carlos $ 497,252.00 $ 6,724,097.00 $ 2,486,260.00 $ 1,243,130.00 $ 16,810,242.50
San Mateo $ 1,389670.00 $ 18,592,453.00 $ 6,948,350.00 $ 3474,175.00 $ 46,481,132.50
South San Francisco $ 889,267.00 $ 11 869 382.00 $ 4,446,335.00 $ 2,223,167.50 $ 29,673 455.00
Woodside $ 205,574.00 $ 2,574,656.00 $ 1,027,870.00 $ 513 935.00 $ 6,436,640.00
Co.of San Mateo $ 1,533,525.00 $ 20,792,793.00 $ 7,667,625.00 $ 3,833,812.50 $ 51,981 982.50
Total $11,667,166.00 $ 156,431,714.00 $ 58,335,525.00 $29,167,762.50 $ 391,079,262.50
*Source:San Mateo County Transportation Authority,http:/twww.smcta.com/TAentities.asp
"*The highlighted column represents each city's 2004-2005 allocation of sales tax revenues to Caltrain,two-and-a-half times
more than its share of local sales tax revenues that can be used for local road and street repairs.
Cumultative totals represent half-cent sales tax collected since January 1989 under the original Measure A.
Comparison of Weekday Caltrain Service between Nov. 2000 & Feb. 2007
Total eekday Stops
Station Nov. 2000 Feb. 2007 Difference % Change
4th & King 78 96 18 23%
22nd Street 64 56 -8 -13%
Paul Avenue 7 0 -7 -100%
San Francisco County 149 152 3 2%
Bayshore 64 38 -26 -41%
South San Francisco 65 44 -21 -32%
San Bruno 67 60 -7 -10%
Millbrae 65 88 23 35%
Broadway, Burlingame 62 0 -62 -100%
Burlingame 63 62 -1 -2%
San Mateo 70 74 4 6%
Hayward Park 66 38 -28 -42%
Hillsdale 71 78 7 10%
Belmont 68 52 -16 -24%
San Carlos 71 68 -3 -4%
Redwood City 72 78 6 8%
Atherton 63 0 -63 -100%
Menlo Park 76 70 -6 -8%
San Mateo County 943 750 -193 -20%
Palo Alto 78 84 6 8%
California Avenue 75 58 -17 -23%
San Antonio 74 52 -22 -30%
Mountain View 78 84 6 8%
Sunnyvale 78 62 -16 -21%
Lawrence 77 60 -17 -22%
Santa Clara 78 64 -14 -18%
College Park 15 4 -11 -73%
San Jose - Diridon 78 96 18 23%
Tamien 68 48 -20 -29%
Capitol 8 6 -2 -25%
Blossom Hill 8 6 -2 -25%
Morgan Hill 8 6 -2 -25%
San Martin 8 6 -2 -25%
Gilroy 8 6 -2 -25%
Santa Clara County 739 642 -97 -13%
Grand Total 1831 1544 -287 -16%
Number of Trains 78 96 18 23%
San Francisco Count 152/149 2%
San Mateo Count 750/943 -20.50%
Santa Clara Count 642/739 -13.10%
Source: Caltrain schedules, 2000 and 2007
Page 1 of 2
MGR-Nantell, Jim
From: Terry Nagel [terrynagel@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:44 AM
To: aconstantouros@hillsca.org; ajames@cityofepa.org, angela@portolavalley.net;
barry.nagel@ssf.net; citymanager@ci.brisbane.ca.us; cjackson@ci.sanbruno.ca.us;
diane.mcgrath@ci.colma.ca.us; dsboesch@menlopark.org; eeverett@redwoodcity.org;
jhardy@fostercity.org;jrobinson@ci.atherton.ca.us; marciar@hmbcity.com;
mweiss@cityofsancarlos.org; nortonw@ci.pacifica.ca.us; pmartel@dalycity.org;
sgeorge@woodsidetown.org; acroce@cityofsanmateo.org; Jack Crist; MGR-Nantell, Jim;
Ralph Jaeck
Subject: More train info
Attachments: Cal price correlation REV.pdf; Caltrain_Ridership_Comparisons FINAL.xIs; Train article 1.jpg;
Train article 2.jpg
Dear City Manager:
Since we understand that you will be discussing our train resolution at your meeting on Friday,we
would like to provide some additional information for your consideration. Attached are four documents.
I will send a fifth document on passenger boardings separately because it is a large file. In addition, we
hope you will consider these points:
Main points:
• The current Caltrain schedule was put into place at a time when Caltrain was facing a dire financial
emergency. It made severe cuts to many local stations. No cities were consulted and no surveys of riders
were done before the schedule went into place.
• We have received significant feedback from our constituents that the current schedule does not meet our
needs.
• There is no need to debate the"Mereas" clauses of the resolutions. Councils can rewrite them if they
wish. All we are asking is that they consider the four action clauses at the end, which are very modest
requests: We would like an outside party to revisit the schedule to make sure it is optimal, we want the
chance to review any alternative schedules proposed, we want safety improvements to be made as soon
as possible, and we want to Caltrain, SamTrans and the cities to work together to promote better
connectivity.
Other points:
• We are not lobbying for service to be returned to Broadway and Atherton. We are looking for an objective
analysis by an outside party and objective standards that are used to determine how service is provided.
(The current system is highly politicized.) We would not control the outcome of that study.
• We aren't asking for lots of stops to be added and we aren't trying to do away with Baby Bullet service. We
believe it is possible to improve service by merely rearranging some of the current runs or by adding a few
stops that would add only a couple of minutes to train runs.
• Why is Caltrain so worried about allowing local cities to participate in the process? Since residents pay
huge taxes to support Caltrain, cities are entitled to have input into how the train operates.
• There are other factors that have contributed to Caltrain's higher ridership: rising gas prices, more crowded
highways, the rebounding of the economy and people's desire to help alleviate global warming by taking
public transit.
• Some cities whose service was cut due to low ridership were, in fact, the victims of previous cuts by
Caltrain. Caltrain has had a pattern of eliminating express service and then reducing stops. When ridership
drops, it argues that the stations don't warrant as much service.
• Our local cities were built around the train system and our economies(including our plans for transit-
oriented development)depend on reliable Vain service.
• We all have the same goal: better transit service. Why are Caltrain reps objecting to a group that wishes to
3/15/2007
Page 2 of 2
work with them to improve service and help find political and financial support for transit?
Thank you,
Terry Nagel
Mayor, Burlingame
Coalition to Expand Transit Service
3/15/2007
2006 ANNUAL COUNT
CALTRAIN WEEKDAY PASSENGER BOARDINGS
%change difference
(Feb '06vs. (Feb'05vs.
STATION Oct.192 Feb. '95 Mar. '96 Feb. '97 Feb. '98 Feb. '" Feb.'00 Feb. 101 Feb. '02 Feb. '03 Feb.'04 Feb.105 Feb. '06 Feb'051 Feb'05)
San Francisco 6,280 5,303 5,536 6,126 6,302 5,898 6,602 6,807 6.180 5,846 5,065 5,910 7155 21.1% 1245 San Frani
22nd Street 208 235 297 397 517 510 574 673 524 456 382 545 797 46.3% 252 22nd Strc
Paul Avenue 52 37 37 17 20 6 11 10 25 9 6 1 -100.09/0 •1 Paul Ave
Bayshore 169 170 241 316 402 403 458 513 463 403 344 247 166 -32.9% -81 Bayshore
So. San Francisco 418 392 398 521 509 517 549 621 597 510 472 487 521 7.1% 35 So. SF
San Bruno 454 529 578 650 694 704 723 844 762 659 505 488 412 -15.5% -76 SnBruno
Millbrae 501 549 543 618 698 655 782 870 776 657 1,148 1,507 1816 20.5% 309 Millbrae
Broadway 336 392 377 430 464 423 495 567 492 433 333 205 -100.0% -205 Broadwa,
Burlingame 546 618 638 674 686 755 842 985 884 726 645 604 588 -2.7% •17 Brl'game
San Mateo 589 633 719 845 905 957 1,105 1,389 1,302 1,084 1,004 1,062 1238 16.6% 176 SnMateo
Hayward Park 211 198 216 299 275 320 381 607 565 447 417 347 244 -29.8% -103 Hayward
Bay Meadows 127 2 134 180 167 154 62 67 70 57 65 71 10 -86.0% -61 BayMead
Hillsdale 920 961 1,038 1,156 1,193 1,163 1,278 1,318 1,193 1,065 1,080 1,487 1815 22.08/9 328 Hillsdale
Belmont 554 529 554 506 548 590 648 892 770 629 568 518 435 -16.004 -83 Belmont
San Carlos 620 749 716 835 878 865 1,028 1,216 987 848 816 836 867 3.7% 31 SnCarlos
Redwood City 764 778 874 1,142 1,286 1,331 1,597 1,804 1,597 1,356 1,360 1,423 1870 31.4% 447 Redwood
Atherton 299 240 230 250 206 225 266 260 246 198 182 122 -100.00/0 -122 Atherton
Menlo Park 859 863 847 1,017 1,133 1,104 1,174 1,321 1,194 1,034 1,055 1,009 1171 16.1% 162 Menlo Ps
Palo Alto 1,020 1,162 1,242 1,610 1,706 1,693 1.960 2,249 2,016 1,880 1,849 2,425 3054 26.00/9 629 Palo Alto
Stanford - - - - 18 14 12 11 - - - - 0 Stanford
California Ave. 981 974 950 1,125 1,163 1,211 1,280 1,376 1,225 1,026 976 839 822 -2.1% -17 CalifAve.
San Antonio - - - - 550 841 694 644 697 610 488 -20.0% -122 SAntonio
Castro 276 263 236 246 281 271 111 - 0 Castro
Mountain View 962 1,023 1,162 1,369 1,477 1,478 1,640 2,200 1,854 1643.6 1519 2,423 2764 14.1% 341 MtView
Sunnyvale 814 828 1,001 1,204 1,214 1,230 1,363 1,427 1.222 1020.2 1149.4 970 1342 38.4% 372 Sunnyval
Lawrence 601 558 687 822 965 981 1,124 1,309 956 773 593.4 534 514 -3.7% -20 Lawrence
Santa Clara 558 579 554 770 809 863 1,031 1,124 991 853 798 706 657 -6.9% -49 SantaClar
College Park 161 150 154 167 197 178 206 185 180 184 192 133 97 -27.0'/0 -36 College F
San Jose Diridon 1,352 1,092 1,197 1,486 1,616 1,492 1,454 1,747 1,421 1.244 1,183 1,906 2270 19.1% 364 SJose Dir
Tamien 287 382 468 492 531 526 676 821 04 520 480 343 446 30.2% 104 Tamien
Captiol 33 39 54 76 63 95 121 82 67 56 57 29 -49.1% -28 Captiol
Blossom Hill 52 84 91 128 148 119 161 177 136 130 101 99 77 -21.7% -21 Blossom
Morgan Hill 138 128 151 195 318 297 387 437 340 276 194 191 151 -20.9% 40 Morgan I
San Martin 63 51 95 170 175 200 252 164 158 91 78 72 -7.9% -6 SMartin
Gilroy 112 198 182 300 394 420 468 569 421 357 226 210 141 -32.7% -69 Gilroy
TOTAL 11,111 20,695 12,138 16,043 27,967 27,591 31,191 35,609 30,961 27,191 15,550 18,393 32,031 12.8% 3638
6.97% 17.64% 7.39% -1.35% 13.41% 13.80% -13.05% -12.18% -6.03% 11.13% 12.81%
Gilroy Extension 302 506 514 773 1,107 1,074 1,311 1,555 1,143 987 667 636 471 -25.9% •164
1.58% 50.39% 43.18% -2.96% 22.07% 18,64% -16.53% -13.62% -32.41% -4.74% -2187%
San Francisco 6,709 5,745 6,111 6,856 7,241 6,817 7,646 8,004 7,191 6,714 5,797 6,703 8,118 21.1% 1414
San Mateo 7,198 7,433 7,862 9,123 9,644 9,763 10,928 12,760 11,433 9,701 9,650 10,[66 10,987 8.1% 821
Santa Clara(Inc.1 7,214 7,517 8,165 10,065 11,082 11,011 12,717 14,845 12,337 10,776 10,103 11,524 12,926 12.2% 1402
San Francisco 31.80/0 27.8% 27.62/0 26.3% 25.9% 24.74/9 24.4% 22.5% 23.2% 24.7% 22.7% 23.6% 25.3%
San Mateo 34.1% 35.99/o 35.5% 35.00/0 34.5% 35.4% 34.9% 35.8% 36.9'/0 35.7% 37.8% 35.8% 34.3%
Santa Clara(Inc. t 34.2% 36.3% 36.9% 38.60/6 39.60/6 39.9% 40.6% 41.7% 39.8% 39.6% 39.5% 40.60/. 40.4%
N:1Rait ServiceslPASSENGER COUNTSQ006 Annual February%5-06Trand.xls 3/21/2006
Source:: "Key Findings: February 2006 Caltrain Annual Passengers Counts" from Caltrain.
CORRELATION BETWEEN GAS PRICE AND CALTRAIN RIDERSHIP
+-CALTRAIN RIDERSHIP -�-AVERAGE GAS PRICE
40,000 $3.00
F 9/111 DOT COM BUST
G WEEKENDSHUTDOWN FG H
H BABY BULLET BEGINS35,000
$2.50
30,000
A M%DISCOUNT ONMULTIRIDETO(
B3D%DISCOUNT ENDS E IOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE Z
F C EVENING SERVICE REDUCED
0 M FARE INCREASE $2.00
Vo 25,000
CL
Z W
A B C D E d
0 20,000 $1.50
S
J uj
z 15,000
a
a
10,000
$0.50
5,000
$0.00
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
YEAR
Prepared by Jeffrey S Carter(c)Jan.2006
FSAREAGASPRICEmtcEChart2 printed:?/1020076:40 PM
Caltrain, BART & Metrolink Ridership Comparisons
Caltrain , BART, & Metrolink Comparisons
160% _ . _ ._._-_ __._ . -.___.._.
140% - - - - - -
120%
ca 100% -�-
Caltrain
80% - Metrolink
L 60% -* BART
a 40%
20% - --
0% --- -
Feb. Feb . Feb. Jun . Sep . Nov. Feb.
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2005 2007
Year
Caltrain Metrolink BART
Date Riders Chane % Riders Chane % Riders Chane %
Feb. 2001 35,609 0 100 / 32,314 0 100% 331 ,586 0 100%
Feb. 2002 30,961 (4,648) 87% 33,093 779 102% 310,725 20,861 94%
Feb. 2003 27, 191 8,418) 76% 35,924 3,610 111 % 295, 158 (36,428) 89%
Jun. 2004 25,550 10,059 72% 38,982 6,668 121 % 306,570 25,016 92%
Se . 2005 28,393 (7,216) 80% 41 ,579 9,265 129% 310,717 (20,869 94%
Nov. 2005 32,868 (2,741 ) 92% 41 ,748 9,434 129% 321 ,775 (9,811 ) 97%
Feb. 20071 34,015 (1 ,594) 1 96%1 44,070 11 ,756 136% 333,519 1 ,933 101 %
TODAY'S TOP STORY »'TRANSPORTATION
Transit is area I s top worry
Poll released on same day
that state OKs$1.3 billion x,
for regional road repairs _
By David Smith
Staff Writer f
s�
Whether stopped still on a high- F
way or waiting endlessly for a train '
or bus, Bay Area commuters are
keenly aware of transportation
�7 problems,a new Bay Area Council
poll finds.
The 600-person survey released
v Wednesday shows that 33 percent of
M. Bay Area residents feel that trans-
portation — including traffic and
public transit—is the"most impor-
-� Cant problem"facing the Bay Area
today.comparison area residents A survey shows that 33 percent of Bay Area residents are concerned about
ranked housing problems — cost traffic and transit problems._.Exam;nerfile photo
_r and availability — second behind SURVEY SAYS
transportation,with just 11 percent
calling it the most important issue. Able to buy Medan Minimum
Residents in the East Bay and The first home price qualifying income
City pushed crime to the third-place San Francisco County 17% $716,030 $147,920
slot,with 10 percent saying it was San Mateo County 20% $722;500 $149,260
the biggest issue facing the area. Bay Area 25% $627,560 5129,640
The survey results came on the Calffomia 24% $478;710 $98,890
same day that the California Trans- San Francisco County median household income in 2005 $57,496
portation Commission announced San Mateo County median household income in 2005 $74,546
the Bay Area would receive$1.2.9
billion in funding from public DAILY FREEWAY DELAYS
infrastructure bonds passed last Per county,expressed in total hours
November for regional highway Freeway miles 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
projects,approximately 72 percent San Francisco 19 10.700 8,900 11.200' 11,400 8,500
,1 of the funds doled out to Northern San Mateo 73 7,600 7,800 7,300 7,700 10,900
California. Bay Area total 621 135,700 124,100 121,800 147,900 155,500
Jim Wunderman, the CEO and FREEWAY LOCATIONS WITH LONGEST COMMUTE DELAYS
president of the Bay Area Council, Per vehicle during 2005 weekdays
a business-oriented public poliev Location Hours of delay
advocacy group, said the funding I-80 westbound between SR 4 and Bay Bridge,a.m. 10,930
unsustainable traffic situation
was a positive step to cortorn"in an 1 580 eastbound between 1-680 and EI Charro Road,p.m. 6,100
- " 1-580 westbound between North Flynn Road
the area. and Airway Boulevard,a.m. 5,830
We're trying to make this U.S.101 to I-80,northbound and eastbound between
region globally competitive in the Alemany Boulevard and Bay Bridge,p.m. 5,140
long term,' ased economy
said."The Sources:CaliforniaAsso ialion oJRenit(irs A1TC,(AdfronsDistriet 1
knowledge-based economy is incum-
bent upon bringing in and retaining
the best minds,and some of those
minds are too bright to sit-in traffic crime,residents said it was the fifth The lack of available and afforda-
three hours a day." most important issue,behind hous- ble housing is driving out the middle
San Francisco and San Mateo ing in fourth place. class and should be local officials'
counties both rated transporta- Citizens in San Mateo County put highest priority,she said.She has
tion the most important problem, housing in second place,with 13 per- no family or friends in The City
but differed on other issues. San cent calling it the biggest problem, anymore, because they have been
Franciscans put the economy and and health care in third,with 8 per- driven away by high prices.
inflation in second place, with 17 cent. "It's beautiful in the Bay Area,"
percent calling them the biggest Mary Stagnaro,-a retired 75-year- she said,lamenting the high prices
problem. Homelessness garnered old who took part in the poll,lives that drove her son to live in Utah.
14 percent of the vote, 10 percent in Belmont but was born and raised "You think,`You know,I don't really
higher than in any other county. in The City,having also lived in San need this."'� , I •. - 1 . ' t
Despite The City's struggles with Mateo,Burlingame.andDaly City.. . . dstnith(�emmine,cdm
4 weekend Edition,March 18-19,2006 the Examiner
Aging may
create county
transportation crisis
Baby boomers' y
retirement will be
system's test
BY EDWARD CARPENTER
$ft�1i`ri:zr -
SAI7 CARLOS—Transit agen-
cies in the county won't be able to
meet the growing needs of a gray-
Ing population in coming years
without Wp as baby boomers }
head toward retirement,accord- &«'
ing to anew report.
The Senior Mobility Action
Plan, compiled by a San Mateo
County Transit District steer-
ing committee,warns of a rising +f
number of traffic injuries and
deaths due to older drivers,
stress on family members as they
attempt to dealwith limited mobil-
ity among seniors and potential
isolation of older residents.
L
L
"If[Seniors]can't get.
around it's unhealthy.
Even their trips to the
doctor's office,which you
wouldn't expect,decrease
with age."
Corinne Goodrich, .
semormobflityprojectm.axq,!�T M1
"Existing alternatives to
driving and conventional public
transportation, especially para- srw"s wFrvsoca.ronEexe ra4x
transit such as Redi-Wheels,will [Philips gets on the bus home from the senior center.SamTrans
not be able to meet all the needs is reminding seniors how easy it is for them to take the bus with
ceasease driving, according to thhee seniors who must limit handicap-aceessibie elevators and well-trained drivers,
ce
report. STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE SENIOR MOBILITY
The,countys older than 65
population is expected to increase i.,Cormmunity transit Services
by about 40 percent,from 97,000 2'
Community-based transportatioci Services
in W05 to about 159,000 in 9020, 3.Encouraging u3e of transit
City/County Association of Gov- '4.Safedriving
ernments projections show. S:Taxicabs
In an effort to get a handle on 6.lntormation anti referral
the looming problem,the 25-mem- 7:1A'alking
ber steering committee has pined .. Sou"Sanbtatw w*Senior Liabi td Acthn Wal.FehNay]G£
approval to extend its woic,which r
was scheduled to end in April,
another four months.
Armed with statistics show. is that the number of people older system and educating seniors on
Ing driver performance begins than 85 in San Mateo County will how to use buses and trains.
to drop dramatically around 75, increase by 50 percent in the next "This plan will provide a way
the committee has begun work- 10 years,Goodrich said. for seniors to become more aware
ing with local.cities and agencies -'If[seniors] can't get around of what[transit]'services exist and
to promote pedestrian safety; its unheatthy," Goodrich said. possibly lead to adding services,"
establish senior shuttle bus routes "Even their trips to the doctor' said Marshall Loring, a 76-year-
and hold driver safety classes for office,which you wouldn't expect, old transit rider from San yriateo,
older drivers. decrease with age." after reviewing the report.
The transit system will face its .At the top of a list of seven That' not only important to
biggest test around 2020, when potential-strategies for improv- those approaching •retirement
the first baby boomers begin to ing senior mpbility,is establishing but younger residents ds well
retire,said Corinne Goodrich,sen- local shuttles and van routes for who have older friends and fam-
ibr mobility project manager for short trips to the grocery store ily."Imagine what it would be like
Sam'Trans.So establishing alter- and doctors,officials said, if[your loved ones]were totally
natives in the intervening years Others are establishing pedes- deprived of an automobile,Loring
crnild amid a crisis,official.-said. trianroutestopublietransitstops, said."Whatwillthey do?"
An even more immediate concern implementing a" taxi voucher c.ms;mrpenterovaisYmrrT
MEETING MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, February 15, 2007
The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by
Chairman Dittman at 7:02 pm at Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Dittman, Muller, Shamus, Larios, Castner-Paine, Comaroto
Commissioners Absent: Hesselgren
Staff Present: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz;
Account Clerk II Joleen Butler;
Others Present: Kirsten Wallerstedt, Senator Leland Yee's Liaison
MINUTES
The Minutes of the January 18, 2006 regular meeting were approved as submitted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS — Kirsten Wallerstedt introduced herself as a liaison from Senator
Yee's office. She is visiting each Commission for the City of Burlingame to let them know that
she is here to communicate the on-goings of the community to the Senator. She left her card for
those interested in contacting her in the future for any reason.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Status of Bayside Park Restroom/Snack Shack Project
The building is installed but not completely finished. The plumbing and electrical
permits need to be completed. Groupings of three picnic tables are to be added. The
original Snack Shack will remain in place and both restrooms will stay open until
Airport Blvd is expanded.
B. Review of CIP Plan for 2007-08 Budget
Director Schwartz provided a gridline handout illustrating the Proposed Funded
Capital Improvement Projects for the upcoming budget year. (See attached)
Schwartz reported that City Council approved the fundraising effort for synthetic
fields at Bayside 3 & 4 and Murray Field.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Burlingame School District/City of Burlingame Relationship
Schwartz distributed a spreadsheet outlining the Parks & Recreation Programs
Operating on Burlingame School District (BSD) property along with the costs
associated in producing those programs. The spreadsheet (attached) shows the City
contributes $107,000 from the General Fund to support programs operating on BSD
property and $164,000 including in-kind services. The handout also included a
survey done Peninsula wide on Middle School Sports programs and the operation and
subsidy for those programs for each city.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
January 11, 2007—Page 2
Schwartz mentioned that although the relationship has weakened over the last 10
years,the partnership still provides a higher level of service to the Burlingame
community than other cities on the Peninsula. At a recent meeting with the City of
Burlingame and School board, some board members were expressed that the quality
of the current programs was great however there were not enough programs and not
enough class space to offer more.
Commissioner Larios pointed out the figures on the spreadsheet do not include over
$300,000 the City of Burlingame contributed to BSD for field renovation and the
Intermediate school gym and asked that they be included. Schwartz stated that he
would note this and that it was his hope that the City and BSD would jointly focus on
how the partnership offers opportunities to keep kids healthy, active and occupied.
After much discussion at the liaison meeting,the district requested that a liaison for
the District and Commission be appointed. Schwartz reported that Paula Valerio,
McKinley School Principal, has been appointed to schedule BSD facilities for the
City. Schwartz also stated that the BSD requested that Council appoint one Parks &
Recreation Commissioner who has children in the District. This Commissioner
would make a report to the BSD Board once or twice a year on the City programs
operating on District property.
Chairperson Dittman stated that the BSD Board members are more than welcome to
attend any Parks &Recreation Commission meetings. Commissioner Larios stressed
historical knowledge needs to be extended to the District regarding the relationship of
"In-kind" services of maintenance and programs.
B. Consideration of Audio Taping Commission Meetings
Commissioner Comaroto initially requested that audio taping of the Parks &
Recreation Commission meetings be placed onto the agenda for the following
reasons:
1) Ease of making up a meeting by Commissioners by listening to the
recorded meeting;
2) Complete detail would be captured;
3) Public Awareness would be higher.
Commissioner Muller stated the she was very comfortable with not taping the
meetings. She feels the comfort level and overall feel of the meetings themselves
would change because of being taped. Commissioner Dittman agreed that the taping
the meetings would change the atmosphere.
Commissioner Shanus noted that any member of the public could tape a meeting and
that the City keeps the meeting minutes for a certain amount of time. There is the
possibility, if the meetings are taped, things that are said will be pulled out of context.
Commissioner Castner-Paine agreed with the "out of context" possibility that taping
would create. Commissioner Larios also agreed on the "out of context" aspect being
troublesome as, if this did occur, the Commissioner quoted did not have any recourse
or a chance to explain any comments.
Parks&Recreation Commission Minutes
January 11, 2007—Page 3
Dittman reminded the Commissioners of the Freedom of Information Act in whereas
that at any time the public can request a copy of the written notes and any
documentation from a meeting. The notes from the meetings are kept indefinitely.
Schwartz summarized that the positive aspect of taping the meetings would be there
would then be a verbatim record of the meeting and the negative point of taping
would be the inhibitive feel that it creates among the Commission.
MOTION by Castner-Paine (seconded by Muller): The Parks & Recreation
Commission will not tape the meetings as a rule with the exception that if at any
point there are ANY meetings Commission wishes to tape they can be decided on a
case-by-case basis. A request to tape can be asked of the Chairperson and a vote
can then be taken. MOTION PASSED 5-1 (Comaroto)
REPORTS/HAND-OUTS
A. Staff Reports
1. Monthly Report dated August 17, 2005 —attached
2. 2004-05 Revenue Report—attached
B. Commissioners
1. Commissioner Castner-Paine mentioned that she was concerned about the
number of parents emerging from the Recreation Center and having their
kids get in and out of the car on the street side. She feels staff should
educate the parents regarding the dangers of this practice. Schwartz
responded that staff does this for our summer camp parents and can send
some information to the parents of our youth classes.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday,
March 15, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. at Burlingame City Hall.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at
9:05 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Joleen Butler
Burlingame Parks &Recreation
Account Clerk III
City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreation Dept.
BURL® Parks & Recreation CIP Plan - January 30, 2007
CITY CIP PLAN - "B" CATEGORY
Project Balance Funds From Proposed UNFUNDED
Number PROJECT DESCRIPTION Available Projects Funded PROJECTS
10/31/05 '05-'06 '06-'07 '07-'08 108-109 Details
1 76350 Eucalyptus Tree Management 85,171 - 50,000 55,000 55,000
2 Street Tree Reforestation Plan 5,000 5,000 New On-Going Proposal for 2007-08 Budget
3 77370 Wash Park Tennis Court Resurface 10,000
4 78490 Special Landscaping Improvements 50,965 50,000 55,000 55,000 Pershing (10K-2007)
5 81070 Pershing Park Playground Rehab 23;897
6 81080 Cuernavaca Playground 258,392 180,000
7 81090 Bayside Restroom/Snack Shack 265,748 15,537 from B2 (77290)
8 81100 Washington Park Irrigation 52,076 50,000 Central Controller
9 Village Park Restroom 150,000 Funds moved from 06-07 to 07-08
10 78490 Laguna Tennis Court Repairs 10,000
11 Lower Bayside Park Improvements 1 500,000
12 78490 Village Park Picnic/Court 20,000
13 Pershing Park Court Resurfacing 10,000
14 81790 Resilient surface at Village 60,000
15 Resilient surface at Ray Park 60,000
16 81790 Resilient surface at Paloma 40,000
17 81790 Resilient surface at Laguna 40,000
18 Resilient surface at J Lot 40,000
19 Park Fencing - Bayside 85,000
20 80530 BHS Football Field Contribution 55,000 Transfer to B7 (81060)
21 Funding available through Prop. 40 296,903 Transfer$220;000 to 139; $76,903 to B10
Total 15,537 270,000 690,000 615,000
(Note: This plan does not include any funds for the B.I.S. tennis courts; a project that the City will split with the BSD when District funds are available)
Parks & Recreation Programs Operating on BSD Property Febmary 16, 2007
Direct Costs In-Kind Costs Revenues Total
Field Management
Field Maintenance (Mow, Edge, Seed,Fertilize,Irrigation,Handweet4 Weedwhip,Aerate,Litter/Garbage Removal,Ballfield Maintenance)
$20,099 $2,500 $0 -$22,599
Field Scheduling (City, School&Non Profit Group Use of Osberg Field and Franklin Field)
$0 $17,000 $4,000 -$13,000
Recreation Programs
Misc. Classes (Art in Action,Into the Woods,Pre-K Summer School)
31,901 1,800 38,006 $4,305
Youth Sports (Flag Football, Volleyball,Basketball, Summer Basketball)
88,371 11,000 51,495 -$47,876
Enrichment (Art, Sports Lessons,Musical,Drama,Legos Fun w/Yarn,Dance, Skyhawks Gymanstics Languages, Chess,Dance,Poetry)
111,512 6,000 113,933 -$3,579
Teen Sports (Flag Football, Volleyball, Basketball, Cross Country, Track/Fielg Tennis,Badminton, Golf, Lacrosse)
135,547 15,000 72,845 -$77,702
District Use of City Facilities
BIS Events (Dances, Softball Game, 8th Grade Day)
288 2,302 0 -$2,590
Elementary Events (Walk-a-thon at Ray Park,McKinley& Washington Schools use of Washington Park)
0 1,170 0 -$1,170
TOTALS 387,718 56,772 280,279 -164,211
City's General Fund Contribution: 107,439 City's Total Contribution: 164,211
*Items not included are:
- Teen Sports use of BHS or City facilities
- Lincoln School's typical use of Ray Park
- City contributions to District Capital Improvements(Field, BIS Gym#2, Sports Equipment)
Middle School Sports-Operation&Subsidy
City of Middle Schools City or District Operation District Subsidize Program? Other Information
Atherton n/a n/a n/a
Belmont 1 District Yes
Brisbane 1 City No
Burlingame 1 city No Subsidized program until 2001
Colma n/a n/a n/a
Daly City 3 District Yes
Foster City 1 District Yes
Half Moon Bay 1 District Yes
Hillsborough 1 District Yes
Menlo Park 6th&7th 3 City Yes $200 per team
MenIoPark(8th) 3 District Yes
Millbrae 1 city Yes
Pacifica 1 Boys&Girls Club
Redwood City 2 Ci *Yes Equipment,Uniforms
San Bruno 1 District *Yes City Pemtit for firework sales
San Carlos 2 District Yes
San Mateo 3 District Yes
South San Francisco 3 Cit *No *Facility&Equipment
Woodside 1 District Yes
City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreation Dept.
850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010
,RUNGAME phone: (650) 558-7300 fax: (650) 696-7216
recreationAburlin ame.org
Date: February 8, 2007
To: Parks & Recreation Commissioners
City Council
From: Randy Schwartz
Re: Monthly Report
Parks Division
1. Parks Division successfully completed its annual pesticide use audit by the County.
2. Bayside Restroom building has been installed on site; contractor will next install utility service lines and pour concrete
around the perimeter of the building.
3. Play equipment at Village Park was upgraded to meet current regulatory requirements.
4. Upgrade of Washington Park baseball infield was successfully completed. The project was a collaborative effort
between the City and Burlingame Youth Baseball Association with many hours of volunteer labor provided by BYBA
officials.
5. City Tree contractor is completing work on lower Burlingame Avenue Eucalyptus trees.
6. Parks Division planted several Elms that are resistant to Dutch Elm Disease in selected locations.
7. Parks Division hedged/cut weeds/pruned easement on the west side Carolan Avenue north of Oak Grove.
8. Parks Division employees Richard Holtz and Mike Rancatore are now Certified Playground Inspectors after
completing course work and passing the national examination.
Recreation Division
Preschool
1. The Playschool Villagers class took a field trip to the Burlingame Public Library in January.
2. All 13 sessions of Half Moon Music class are filled, with 156 participants enrolled.
Teens/Youth Programs
3. 181 Burlingame Participants in the 4t'/5t` Grade Boys & Girls Basketball League
4. The Youth Advisory Committee donated $330 ($1 per person) from their Jan 19'h All City Dance to Call Primrose
5. 119 children are enrolled in the first session of dance classes offered by Dance Force (12 classes including Tiny Tot
Dance, Hip Hop, etc.)
6. Manners class for 5-8 year olds was full with 12 students.
Adult Programs
7. 6 full Women's '5 and Over Soccer teams for the Upcoming Spring 2007 Season
8. 12 Participants in the Badminton Spring 2007 Session (8 Residents/ 4 Non Residents)
9. All 38 private Piano classes are full.
Senior Citizens Programs
10. 18 seniors took a trip to Jersey Boys
11. The Emeritus Lecture, "Exercise and Your Heart" had 30 people attend
12. The Friday drop in program is averaging 12-16 a week for Bridge and 25-30 for the Movie
13. The Spring Computer class has 25 seniors enrolled
Classes
14. Began Spring session of classes
UpcomingEvents
vents
1. Centennial Parade & Vintage Base Ball Game — June 2nd
BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
MARCH 1,2007
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by
Chairperson McQuaide.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson McQuaide, Carney, Ellis, Lahey, and Wright
Absent: Commissioners Grandcolas and O'Connor
Staff: Superintendent Richmond and Secretary Harvey
MINUTES - The Minutes of the February 1, 2007 Beautification Commission Meeting, were approved as
submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE
Letter to the Beautification Commission from Superintendent Richmond, informing the Commission of the
Arbor Day ceremony on Monday, March 5ffi at Cuernavaca Park.
Letter to Mrs. John Chaney from Superintendent Richmond informing that the Commission voted 5 - 0 - 2
(absent)to deny the appeal for the removal of one private Spruce tree at 2827 Arguello because it is a healthy
tree and that root pruning and placement of root barriers would mitigate the concerns expressed, noting that
the Commission's decision could be appealed to the City Council.
Letter to Mrs. Evelyn Reed from Superintendent Richmond informing that the Commission voted 5 - 0 - 2
(absent)to deny the appeal for the removal of two private Redwood trees at 2022 Trousdale because the trees
are healthy and that pruning and thinning of the trees would help to mitigate the concerns expressed, noting
that the Commission's decision could be appealed to the City Council
Letter from Walter and Evelyn Reed requesting the Commission's decision to deny the appeal to remove two
Redwood trees at 2022 Trousdale Drive be appealed to the City Council.
Industry standard, ISA Tree Hazard Evaluation Form, that will be used by the designated Arborist reporting
on Easton Drive trees.
FROM THE FLOOR-None
OLD BUSINESS
Street Tree Reforestation Proiect
Chairperson McQuaide stated that she has received from several Commissioners, lists of streets with few
trees. She clarified that the Commission needs to identify streets and areas that are void of trees rather than
individual addresses. Superintendent Richmond added that once the streets/areas are identified the
Commission will need to develop a plan or strategy designed to generate public support and enthusiasm as
well as a strategic plan for funding the project.
Consideration of Reinstating of Landscape Award
Commissioners Lahey and Wright submitted a draft of a proposed Beautification Commission Award policy
as well as Award Rules and Standards. Commissioner Lahey stated that they envision a perpetual plaque
being awarded to a small and large business and when the plaque moves on to the next recipient, a certificate
with a Centennial design would be left in place. If desired, an artists pencil rendering of the business could be
commissioned by the business. Dale Perkins, Art Consultant for the Burlingame Elementary School District,
has offered to do the art work. She concluded that the Committee would like to see the award presented at the
annual Tree Lighting Ceremony in December;this year being the first presentation of the award.
1
Consideration of Reinstatine of Landscape Award— (Contd.)
Commissioner Wright stated that other artists will also be asked to look at businesses with the Committee.
The areas currently being considered for review are Burlingame Avenue, Broadway, the Burlingame Plaza,
the Bay front, with the possibility of expanding and including Howard Avenue.
Commissioner Lahey commented that any small or large business would be eligible and that businesses
would self-nominate. The Commission would evaluate and select the award recipient and the Beautification
Commission would make the presentation at the Tree Lighting Ceremony. She added that since the goal
would be to present an award 2 times each year,awarding 2 plaques and 2 certificates,the Commission would
need to decide which other public event might be appropriate for this type of award presentation.
Commissioners Lahey and Wright encouraged the Commission to look over the policy, rules, and standards
and submit any ideas, changes, comments and/or suggestions to their email addresses.
Arbor Day —Monday, March 5`h, 2007(-, 10:00 am— Cuernavaca Park
Superintendent Richmond reported that John Melvin from the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection will be coming to present the Tree City USA Award and that Burlingame Intermediate School will
be the only school not attending. Several Crabapple and several Crape Myrtles will be planted in the lawn
area, West of the children's playground. Chairperson McQuaide stated that Commissioner Grandcolas
drafted a format for a presentation to be made at the ceremony, but if he is unable to attend, another
Commissioner will need to make the presentation. Commissioner Lahey volunteered to bring cookies for the
event.
Arbor Day—2008
The Commission tabled this item to the April 5, 2007 meeting.
REPORTS -
Superintendent Richmond
1. Update on Easton Library Eucalyptus Plan: Arrangements have been made for Kevin Kielty to
assemble a team to further investigate the roots on the tree. This will involve exposing the roots to a
greater depth and performing any required tests. Kevin will report back on the health of the tree and
its roots and on what actions are possible over the roots in the street. Kevin will then begin to
reassess all the street trees with the ability to perform additional tests as needed.
2. A copy of a tree hazard evaluation form that is common in the industry has been included in
Commission packets. Kevin Kielty will use this form when evaluating the trees on Easton. Staff
recommends that the Commission consider adopting this standard for purposes of a reforestation plan
for Easton Drive. We will agendize the document for April and fully discuss it at that time. Bob uses
it frequently for his work on Street Trees.
3. Tree Pruning Contractor is completing work on Burlingame Avenue in the vicinity of Washington
Park.
4. Permission granted to PG&E contractor to remove two small Eucalyptus trees behind City Hall,
which have been repeatedly headed back. The trees are both 6-10" diameter. They probably began as
volunteers. PG&E was also permitted to remove a large dead limb on a Euc at Easton/ECR SW
corner by church parking lot.
5. City Crew continues to work West of ECR and North of Carmelita.
6. 2022 Trousdale appeal of the denial was appealed to City Council.
7. Elms were removed by the Cal Trans contractor on ECR; there was a lot of DED this year on ECR.
We received no notice, so it took us and members of the community by surprise. Director is
discussing future notification and replacement plans with the new Cal Trans district administrator.
2
REPORTS—(Contd.)
Chairperson McQuaide-
Chairperson McQuaide reported that the Beautification Commission's meeting with Council has been
postponed and will be rescheduled.
Chairperson McQuaide reminded the Commission of the Commissioner's Dinner to be held at the Broadway
Grill on March 9`h. She stated that Mayor Nagel has asked that each Commissioner provide a sentence or two
about themselves for introductions at the Commissioner's Dinner and the information should be sent to Vice-
Chair Grandcolas' email address because he will be speaking on behalf of the Commission that evening.
Chairperson McQuaide reported that she and Vice-Chair Grandcolas have received several complaints from
citizens that the entrances to Burlingame are"pathetic"and should be improved.
Chairperson McQuaide shared information emailed to her from Mayor Nagel regarding the Budget Study
Session.
Commissioner Lahey—
Commissioner Lahey reported that the Cleanup Task Force has scheduled the first Cleanup Day for Sunday.
April 29h' from 8 to 10 am. Litter cleanup in City parking lots will be the focus; the meeting location will
soon be announced. The Citizens for a Better Burlingame will be doing planting, painting, etc. on the same
day. Commissioner Lahey concluded that several new trash cans with ash trays have been recently installed
by the City.
Commissioner Wright-
Commissioner Wright stated that she is hopeful that something will be done to improve the entrances to
Burlingame. Superintendent Richmond noted that some improvements, such as the planting of Accolade
Elms in the median islands, will be part of the Mills-Peninsula Hospital project.
There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned at 6:55 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
h-'
Karlene Harvey
Recording Secretary
3
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
March 12, 2007
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Brownrigg called the March 12,2007,regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling, and
Terrones
Absent: Commissioner Vistica(arrived at 7:15 p.m.)
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner,Ruben Hurin; City
Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer, Doug Bell.
III. MINUTES The minutes of the February 26, 2007 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were approved as mailed.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Brownrigg noted that 329 Occidental has been continued so will not be
heard tonight and,based on correspondence the Commission received,he will
remove 945 Paloma Avenue from the consent calendar to the regular action
calendar for public hearing.
V. FROM THE FLOOR Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, felt that the design at 2209 Hillside Drive
lost its elegance when the Commission allowed the change in the shape of the
columns,would like Commission to require that no dumpster be allowed on
Adeline Drive when the project at 1447 Cortez is built, and would like to
speak on the hospital memo at the end of the meeting. The Chair agreed to
allowing public comment on the hospital memo.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1. 12 VISTA LANE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND VARIANCE
FOR LOT FRONTAGE(DENHAM LLC,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;MACLEOD AND
ASSOCIATES, CIVIL ENGINEER)
a. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR A LOT SPLIT OF PARCEL A, BLOCK 4,
BURLINGAME HILLS NO. 2 SUBDIVISION, 12 VISTA LANE -PM 06-07—PROJECT
ENGINEER: VICTOR VOONG
b. APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FOR LOT FRONTAGE FOR CREATION OF TWO LOTS
WITH 55-FOOT WIDE STREET FRONTAGE WHERE 60 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE IS
REQUIRED—PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Plr Hurin presented a summary of the staff report. Chair Brownrigg noted that he expressed an interest in
this property several years ago and spoke to the applicant about it at that time,but has not discussed the site
with the applicant since then. C. Vistica arrived at 7:15 p.m.
Commissioners asked:
Request that staff provide conditions of approval and any other information regarding approval of the
previous subdivision which split the original lot into two lots;
■ Would like applicant to consider a reduction in the maximum allowed floor area ratio on these two
lots since a variance is being requested for substandard lot frontage;
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2.007
■ Would like applicant to address the maximum building height allowed since the lot has a significant
downward slope,this will be a very tall building at the rear if height is measured from average top of -�
curb level, should consider limiting the building height based on the existing contour of the lot;
■ Applicant is requesting approval for a subdivision without any mitigations, applicant should
address how the two lots will function together, regarding drainage, access, etc.;
■ Can adjacent property owners located in San Mateo County object to view blockage when
applications for new houses are submitted in the future;
■ Request that staff explain why there is a required for a minimum 60' lot frontage;
■ How will lower lot off Adeline Drive be accessed;how would this proposed subdivision affect access
to the lower lot; and
■ Would like to see what the treatment will be between the buildings and the street; how will the lot
frontage be developed; applicant should explain the building envelope massing for each of the lots
and how that will relate to the area between the building and the street.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:23 p.m.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
2b. 1477 CORTEZ AVENUE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO-
STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (SEAN AND ERICA CAFFERKEYBART AND CAROL -�
GAUL, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JACK MCCARTHY, JACK MCCARTHY
DESIGNER, INC., DESIGNER) (58 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
2c. 329 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMITS FOR A BASEMENT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND
DETACHED GARAGE (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;
JOE AND JULIA MCVEIGH, PROPERTY OWNERS) (49 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA
WHITMAN(Request to continue)
Item 2c, 329 Occidental Avenue, was continued. This item will be renoticed when project is placed on a
future agenda.
Chair Brownrigg noted that item 2c,329 Occidental Avenue was continued and item 2e,945 Paloma Avenue
has been set for the action calendar. He asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call
any other items off the consent calendar. Commissioners noted that they would like to remove 2f, 50
Broderick Road;2a, 1221 Cabrillo; and 2d, 117 Channing Road. Chair Brownrigg noted that the remaining
item on the consent calendar was item 2b, 1477 Cortez Avenue.
C. Vistica moved approval of the consent calendar item 2b, 1477 Cortez Avenue,based on the facts in the
staff report,commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff report with recommended conditions in
the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a
voice vote on the motion to approve the consent calendar and it passed 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures
were advised. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m. -�
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
'-2a. 1221 CABRILLO AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMITS FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A BASEMENT AND
DETACHED GARAGE (BRET AND SUZANNE BOTTARINI, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS•MARK ROBERTSON,DESIGNER)(65 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report March 12, 2007,with attachments. Plr Hurin presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Seventeen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of
staff.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing.Mark Robertson 918 El Grant Place,San Mateo;Bret Bottarini,
property owner; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, spoke. Issues noted: ceiling height on the second floor; space
between floors;plate heights on first and second floor;maximum size house and confirming with the rest of
the block. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
C. Vistica noted that the house was well designed, the 9 foot first floor plate is not a set rule and depends
upon circumstances,in this case it works,so move approval by resolution with amended condition that there
be no more than 13 inches of space between the first and second floor, which would reduce the overall
height by three inches, and a maximum 8'-1" plate on the second floor and the with conditions in the staff
report:
(1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
February 16, 2007, sheets 1-6, with a maximum space between the first and second floor of thirteen (13)
inches, maximum second floor plate height of 8'-1",and a reduction in overall building height of at least 3
inches, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building
shall require an amendment to this permit; (2) that the sump pump shall be located in an enclosed
mechanical room in the basement and it shall be soundproof so that the noise from the pump will not exceed
5 dBA at any property line of the site; (3) that one, 15-gallon street tree shall be planted by the Parks
Department in the planter strip in front of the property; the species and location may be chosen by the
property owner from the street tree list for trees located under power lines; (4) that the conditions of the
Chief Building Official's December 4, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's January 11, 2007 memo, the Fire
Marshal's December 5,2006 memo, and the NPDES Coordinator's December 5, 2006 memo shall be met;
(5) that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall
not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; (6) that any changes to the size or envelope
of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),
moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject
to Planning Commission review; (7) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor
shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; (8) that prior to underfloor frame inspection
the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be
accepted by the City Engineer; (9) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or
residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural
certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing,
such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification
documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before
the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; (10) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a
licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the
Building Department; (11) that prior to final inspection,Planning Department staff will inspect and note
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2.007
compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; (12) that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and -�
flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not
visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued; (13) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California
Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; (14) the project
shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected
demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling
requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition
permit; (15) that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence,the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's
Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; (16) that the
applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and
Discharge Control Ordinance;and (17) that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation
program,and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation
plans at time of permit application. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on the motion: can support the change to the plans, the change to the porch is significant; to
address the mass and bulk caused by the first floor plate height should reduce the space between floors to a
13-inch maximum with a second floor plate not to exceed 8'-1",the change to the space between floors will
also reduce the height of the structure by about 3 inches, making the structure more compatible with the
neighborhood; clarify minutes that the Commission did not direct the applicant at the study meeting, the
commissioners did the direction.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the amended motion to approve the project with the space
between the first and second floors not to exceed 13",the second floor plate height of 8'-1" and a reduction
in overall height of the structure of 3 inches. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures
were advised. This item concluded at 7:40 p.m.
2d. 117 CHANNING ROAD, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION
AND NEW DETACHED GARAGE(JOHN KLOPF,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;GERALD AND
NORMA COOK PROPERTY OWNERS) (74 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Reference staff report March 12, 2007,with attachments. Plr Hurin presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Twelve conditions were suggested for consideration.There were no questions of staff.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. John Klopf,architect,3012 16th Street,San Francisco.Porch is
very narrow; could keep roof at present location and extend porch; still show Italian Cyprus but note on
plans says trees from street tree list; could add 18 inches to porch landing without affecting the driveway.
There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
C.Deal moved to approve the project by resolution with the amended condition that the existing landing on
the porch be extended 18 inches so that it is still covered by the existing roof,retain the existing column at
the bottom of the stairs and install a guard rail on the new landing with a j og to the existing post and with the
conditions in the staff report as follows:
(1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped --�
February 14, 2007 (sheets T1.0, A0.1,A0.2,Al.1,A1.2, and A2.0) and February 28, 2007(revised sheets
A0.0, A1.0, A2.1, and A2.2) with the raised porch landing extended 18 inches on the driveway side,
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
installation of a guardrail along the landing edge which ties into the existing post next to the relocated stairs;
and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall
require an amendment to this permit; (2) that all new windows shall be wood or wood clad; (3) that the
conditions of the Chief Building Official's August 8, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's August 11, 2006
memo,the Fire Marshal's August 10,2006 memo,the Recycling Specialist's August 9,2006 memo,and the
NPDES Coordinator's August 14,2006 memo shall be met; (4) that demolition or removal of the existing
structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued
and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District; (5) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,first or second floors,or
garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review;
(6) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional,shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural
details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and
bays,are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance
with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be
scheduled; (7) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; (8) that prior to final
inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim
materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and
Building plans; (9) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting
details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (10) that
the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,
�-' as amended by the City of Burlingame; (11) that the project shall comply with the Construction and
Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration
projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of
a structure,interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and (12) that the applicant shall comply
with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance.
The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with amended conditions to widen the
landing of the front porch 18 inches on the driveway side and add a guardrail along the new edge of the
porch. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at
8:00 p.m.
2e. 945 PALOMA AVENUE,ZONED R-2-APPLICATION FOR FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A
NEW,TWO-STORY DUPLEX WITH A DETACHED GARAGE AND CARPORT(STEVE JOHNSON,
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;JD&ASSOCIATES,DESIGNER)(75 NOTICED)PROJECT
PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
C. Deal noted that he had a business relationship with the applicant and recused himself from this item.He
stepped down from the dais and left the Council Chambers.
Reference staff report March 12,2007,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Nine conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Steve Johnson, builder and architect; Katie Hultgren, 935
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
Paloma Avenue;Amy Michael,937 Paloma Avenue;Aline Bier,934 Paloma Avenue;spoke.House built in
the 1920's,tried to keep front porch,found dry rot and termite damage so need to remove;concerned about —�
failure to follow proper process before removed porch; no justification for the minor modification for
parking if the building is new;city not protecting older homes in the R-2 district;construction is continuing,
the first floor is framed; narrow driveway, so park on street, on-street parking is a problem; protection of
large oak in rear yard. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commissioners discussion: property zoned R-2,design review criteria and process do not apply;CP noted
that variance provisions require findings that structure is consistent with neighborhood;average setback 19
feet because of one lot with a 63 foot front setback.
C.Brownrigg noted that parking was not raised as an issue when the minor modification was approved,there
is some historic precedence for the front setback since the porch will be installed at the same location and
foot print as it was in the 1920's so will not have a changed impact on the block and will aesthetically
benefit the house, so move approval of the front setback variance by resolution with the following
conditions:
(1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
February 5,2007, sheets 1 through 6 and garage plan, and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of
the building shall require an amendment to this permit; (2) that the conditions of the City Engineer's,Chief
Building Official's, Fire Marshal's and the NPDES Coordinator's February 12, 2007 memos shall be met;
(3) that if the structure is demolished or the envelope changed at a later date the variance to front setback as
well as the minor modification for a 10% reduction in the required covered parking space width for all
covered parking spaces in a new detached garage and carport structure will become void; (4) that
demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur -�
until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; (5) that the project shall comply with the
Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new
construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any
partial or full demolition of a structure,interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit; (6) that during
demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant
shall use all applicable"best management practices"as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to
prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; (7) that the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; (8)
that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program,and a complete Irrigation Water
Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; and
(9) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001
Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica.
Comment on the motion: find that the one property with the extreme front setback skews the average on the
whole block and creates a hardship for this property;city's process on this proj ect is justified because design
review is not required on an R-2 zoned lot.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the front setback variance. The motion
passed on a 6-0-1 (C.Deal abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:25 p.m.
C. Deal returned to the Chambers and took his seat on the dais.
6
City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
2f. 50 BRODERICK ROAD, ZONED RR– APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL
DESIGN REVIEW FOR EXTERIOR CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT
N.— INVOLVING INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS AND ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING(MCA ARCHITECTS,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;HACOR,
INC., PROPERTY OWNER) (4 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
Reference staff report March 12,2007,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Jeff Wright,architect,Portland,Oregon. Not see overhang on
entry door on the north side; for conservation should require 35% energy to operate this business from
renewable sources for three years. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was
closed.
Commissioners discussion: regarding renewable energy requirements, uncomfortable having a condition
which is hard to enforce,prefer"best effort"language; CA this is an amendment to the previously granted
design review, concerned about the connection between this action at this point and a new condition
requiring the use of renewable energy;LEED requirements and renewable energy requirements should first
be spelled out in a city policy.
C.Terrones moved to approve the amendment to the exterior design as submitted with the addition of adding
an over hang or awning on the entry door on the north side and that the applicant make a`best effort pledge'
to use renewable energy at this location,by resolution with the following conditions:
(1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
December 26,2006,sheets A0.0 thru L1.2,and date stamped January 2,2007,sheet L1.1,as amended by the
December 27,2006 letter from the applicant,and date stamped December 28,2006,supplemental packet for
HACOR Burlingame In-Flight kitchen;that an overhang or awning shall be added over the entry on the north
side of the building;that any changes to building materials,exterior finishes,awnings,footprint or floor area
of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;that any signs shall require a separate permit from
the Planning and Building Departments; and that the operator will make an effort to provide 35% of the
electrical power for this activity for three years from renewable sources; (2) that the point-of-sale for all
products produced on this site shall be the City of Burlingame and should this change the conditional use
permit shall be subject to review and revocation by the Planning Commission; (3) that the vertical lifts for
parking shall be operated by a parking valet shall be in the employ of the business on the site and shall be
on-site to operate the lifts during all hours that the business is open and for one hour before and after opening
and closing;the lifts shall be maintained in working order and a valet present at all times; and the applicant
shall submit a report on their maintenance and operation record to the Planning Department on an annual
basis, commencing one year after project approval; if the lifts are ever removed or become inoperable for a
period to exceed 30 days,the parking variance for this use at this site shall become null and void; and the
applicant shall be required to apply to the Planning Commission within 30 days for review of all permits
granted to this site for this use; (4) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's October 6, 2006
memo, the Fire Marshall's October 10, 2006 memo, the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinators
October 16,2006 memos and the City Engineer's October 23,2006 memo shall be met; (5) that demolition
or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a
building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the
Bay Area Air Quality Management District; (6) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,
first or mezzanine floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or
changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
Planning Commission review; (7) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect,
engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed
professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under
penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; (8) that prior to
scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide
certification of that height to the Building Department; (9) that prior to final inspection, Planning
Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,
etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; (10)
that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and
Discharge Control Ordinance;and (11) that any improvements for the use shall meet all California Building
and Fire Codes, 2001 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C.
Auran.
Comment on the motion: see a correlation between this use and high energy consumption making using
renewable sources appropriate.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the design review amendment with the
changes to the entry on the north side of the building and a "best effort" pledge by the applicant to use
renewable energy sources for at least three years. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:40 p.m.
3. 2849 RIVERA DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW
AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NEW TWO-
STORY DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE; VAN LY, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;
AND STAN MUI PROPERTY OWNER(37 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:ERICA STROHMEIER
Reference staff report March 12,2007,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Van Ly,architect. Note errors in drafting: left side eave,fascia
on rear, chimney. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Deal noted that with these drafting errors on the plans corrected he would move to approve the
application for amendment to design review and hillside area construction permit, by resolution, with the
following conditions:
(1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
September 15,2004, site plan,roof plan, and Architectural Site Survey, and February 12,2007, floor plans
and elevations;and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment
to this permit; and that all drafting errors on the approved plans shall be corrected before the plans are
accepted for a building permit; (2) that in addition to the trees required by the City's reforestation
ordinance, the property owner shall install two new 24-inch box size trees chosen from the City's tree list
which will grow to a size equivalent to the removed pine trees; they shall be planted at the front and/or
exterior sides of the lot as replacements for the un-permitted removal of two protected size pine trees;
appropriate irrigation measures and on-going maintenance shall be provided to these trees as approved by the
City Arborist; (3) that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on
the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply
with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; (4) that the conditions of the City
Engineer's March 10, 2004, Chief Building Official's and Fire Marshal's March 8, 2004, and Recycling
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
Specialist's March 3,2004,memos shall be met; (5) that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or
second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing
windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning
Commission review; (6) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,engineer or
other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as
window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional
involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of
perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; (7) that prior to final inspection,
Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials,
window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building
plans; (8) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details
shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (9) that prior to
scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the
building footprint; (10) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor
elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; (11) that
during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the
applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water
Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff, (12) that the project is
subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management
Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; (13) that prior to
scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide
certification of that height to the Building Department; (14) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance
1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and (15) that
�-- the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,
as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones.
Comment on the motion: Commission takes seriously the hillside area construction permit,but this project
did not impact any views and this proposed change is within the development envelope studied previously.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the request for design review amendment
and amendment to the hillside area construction permit. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m.
4. 1548 NEWLANDS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN
REVIEW AND FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE FOR CHANGES TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;
WILLIAM AND SANDRA LINDSELL,PROPERTY OWNERS)(58 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:
RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report March 12,2007,with attachments. Plr.Hurin presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. Acknowledge letter from Bill and
Sandy Lindsell, date stamped March 9, 2007.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Mark Roberts,architect,918 E.Grant Place,San Mateo;Sandy
Lindsell, property owner; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; spoke. Discussed rear porch, problems with
corbels and knee braces; drawings poor,project looks better in the field;not maximum FAR; should have
discussed changes with Commission before final inspection. There were no further comments. The public
hearing was closed.
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 1007
C.Deal noted that with the field changes the site is respected and the changes are good quality and add to the
proj ect,no problem with removal of planter boxes they can be a problem after a proj ect is built,so moved by -�
resolution to approve the application with the following conditions:
(1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
February 23,2007, sheets 1-6, and that any changes to building materials,exterior finishes,footprint or floor
area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; (2) that a building permit shall not be issued
until the revised plans have been stamped and signed by a licensed civil engineer; (3) that any changes to
the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or
enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or
pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review; (4) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,
the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the
architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the
certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; (5) that
prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and
provide certification of that height to the Building Department; (6) that prior to final inspection,Planning
Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,
etc.)to verify that the proj ect has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; (7) that
all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and
installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (8) that the conditions
of the City Engineer's and Fire Marshal's May 6, 2005, memos, the Chief Building Official's, Recycling
Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's May 9,2005,memos,shall be met; (9) that the project shall meet all
the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City
of Burlingame; (10) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling
Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste
Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or
exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and (11) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,
the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance.
The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the amendment to the design review and
hillside area construction permit,noting that the change proposed is within the original envelope outlined by
the story poles. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item
concluded at 9:05 p.m.
5. 1353 VANCOUVER AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A NEW,TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED
GARAGE(TONY LEUNG,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;JAMES CHU,CHU DESIGN&
ENGR. INC. DESIGNER)(68 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Cers. Auran and Osterling noted that they live within 500 feet of the project and would recuse themselves
from the proceedings. They left the chambers.
Reference staff report March 12,2007,with attachments. Plr.Hurin presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. James Chu, 55 W. 43rd Avenue, San Mateo;Pat Giorni, 1445
Balboa Avenue;Dennis and Michelle Kleid, 1349 Vancouver Avenue,spoke. Issues noted: massing,design
and materials of proposed stairway from sidewalk to front entry; front yard landscaping; existing 10-inch
Mayten tree; lack of street trees on this block; side setback along driveway side;building height exceeding
maximum allowed; grading the lot down to reduce the building height; site drainage; storm drainage and
sewer lines on Vancouver Avenue. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was
closed.
Commission discussion: proposed 10-foot side setback along the driveway is substantial, prior to design
review attached garages were built with 4-foot side setbacks;detached garage is located in the rear corner of
the lot creates greater separation between houses;mass of house along the left side was substantially reduced
by shifting the second floor bedroom to the right side of the house,mass and bulk is primary at the front of
the house and therefore improves back yard privacy for the neighbors, design of this two-story house is
modest; Public Works Department requires that all roof drainage be designed to flow to the street and
therefore will not impact adjacent properties; special permit for building height is justified because the lot
slopes up 10 feet from front to rear property line, excavating the lot to lower the building height is not
appropriate, would require 5 to 6 foot tall retaining walls on both sides since the grade on the adjacent
properties would be higher,would look bad and out of character with the neighborhood, excavating the lot
could also impact the water table,if sewer line is lowered to reduce the height of the house an ejector system
would be required since sewer main is located behind this lot,not in Vancouver Avenue; special permit for
height is appropriate because the additional height needed for the pitched roof enhances the architectural
style of the building.
Continued discussion: concerned about the stairway and solid railing from the sidewalk to the front entry,
proposed railing is 3 to 4 feet above grade; stairway design is out of character with the block, suggest
designing a less prominent meandering pathway to follow the existing grade;will also be able to retain the
existing 10-inch Mayten tree at the front of the lot;may not have to have railings in some areas;would like
to see revised pathway in front yard brought back for review as a FYI item.
C. Deal moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following amended conditions to require
that the pathway from the sidewalk to the front door be redesigned so that it is not a prominent feature and
the redesign for the pathway be brought back as an FYI:
(1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
February 14, 2007 sheets A.l through A.6 and sheet L1.0, and that any changes to building materials,
exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; (2) that
the pathway from the sidewalk to the front door shall be redesigned so that it follows the existing grade and
is designed to preserve the existing 10-inch Mayten tree in the front yard;the pathway shall be designed so
that it contains no retaining walls or handrails, if a handrail is required to comply with building code
requirements it shall be designed using a light,visually less prominent material;the redesigned pathway shall
be reviewed by the Planning Commission as an FYI item prior to issuance of a building permit; (3) that the
conditions of the Chief Building Official's August 25, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's August 28, 2006
memo,the Fire Marshal's August 28,2006 memo,the Recycling Specialist's September 6,2006 memo,and
the NPDES Coordinator's August 28, 2006 memo shall be met; (4) that demolition for removal of the
existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has
been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air
Quality Management District; (5) that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,first or second
`-- floors, or garage,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review;
11
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
(6) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners
and set the building footprint; (7) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first -�
floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; (8)
that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another
architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural
details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and
bays,are built as shown on the approved plans;architectural certification documenting framing compliance
with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be
scheduled; (9) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of
the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; (10) that prior to final
inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim
materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and
Building plans; (11) that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible,to a
single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting
details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (12) that
the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,
as amended by the City of Burlingame; (13) that the project shall comply with the Construction and
Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration
projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of
a structure,interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit; (14) that during demolition of the existing
residence,site preparation and construction of the new residence,the applicant shall use all applicable"best
management practices"as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site
sedimentation of storm water runoff; (15) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of
Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and (16) that the project is -�
subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management
Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application. The motion was
seconded by C. Cauchi.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the amended motion to approve the project requiring the pathway
from the sidewalk to the front door be redesigned so that it is not a prominent feature. The motion passed on
a 5-0-2 (Cers. Auran and Osterling abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at
9:35 p.m.
Cers. Auran and Osterling returned to the dais.
6. 1509 LOS ALTOS DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JACK AND
KIMBERLY STRATTON, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES,
DESIGNER) (46 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
C. Deal noted a business relationship with the applicant and recused himself from this action. He stepped
down from the dais and left the Council Chambers.
Reference staff report March 12,2007,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Thirteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Kimberly Stratton, property owner; Stuart Grunow, JD &
Associates,project applicant; Sheri Saisi, 1505 Los Altos Drive, spoke. Issues noted: proposed landscape
design is inappropriate for this house and block;roof pitch above existing garage;lack of muntins on French
doors off living room; expansive roof over porch;massing adjacent to downhill neighbor; change in grade
12
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
between properties; side setback variance approved in 1967, how side setback variance relates to
nonconforming status;request to continue project so that all issues can be adequately addressed;placement
of second floor windows above garage along left side property line, and privacy. There were no further
comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
C. Cauchi made a motion to continue the item to the regular action calendar when the following changes
have been made and plan checked and there is room on the agenda. The motion was seconded by C.Vistica.
■ Consider keeping the existing 5:12 roof pitch above the garage,the existing garage has a T-2" side
setback and is imposing on the adjacent neighbor,reducing the pitch from 7:12 to 5:12 would help to
reduce the mass and bulk and mitigate its impact on the adjacent downhill neighbor;
■ Grids should be added to the sliding glass doors in the living room,doors do not have to contain full
grids but something should be added to reduce the scale of these doors;
■ Concerned with large roof over the porch, an element such as a dormer or eyebrow vent should be
added to break up this large expanse, a dormer with a window may also allow for more natural
lighting into the house, could also consider using a different roofing material;
■ Landscaping does not relate to the house or the street and is inconsistent, Red Maple trees are not
consistent with this block and is unusual in Burlingame;kidney-shaped lawn area at the front of the
lot is inappropriate; landscape plan needs to be revised so that it is compatible with the house and
neighborhood;
■ The scale of flowering cherry trees proposed along the right side property line at the rear is too small
for this large house, need to choose larger scale trees and shrubs for the front and rear;
■ Concerned that the landscaping and walkways at the front of the lot do not provide a sense of arrival
or welcome, pathway is on driveway with two steps up to the house, design of pathway and
landscaping at the front of the house needs to be improved to create a sense of arrival;
Will pathway be lighted; and
■ Would like to see a condition of approval added requiring that the family room wall along the left
side property line be constructed so that it is soundproof.
Comment on the motion: addressing the roof pitch above the garage to reduce the massing does not affect
the living space, living area above the garage is being improved because the kitchen and living unit will be
replaced with a family room;clerestory windows in family room can be clear glass since window sill will be
4'-6"to 5'-0" above the floor,at that height cannot see through these windows into the neighbors'rear yard.
CA Anderson noted that if the roof configuration above the garage/family room is changed,which includes
changing the roof pitch, height or configuration, the previously approved side setback variance granted in
1967 will need to be modified when the project returns for action.
Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to continue with directed revisions. The motion
passed on a 6-0-1 (C.Deal abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:10 p.m.
C. Deal returned to the dais.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
7. 1605 QUESADA WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT
SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING(SUZANNE DEHNE,DESIGNER; AND CHARLES CAMMARATA,APPLICANT AND
PROPERTY OWNER) (57 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: LISA WHITMAN
Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
13
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Charlie and Laura Cammarata, property owners, were
available to answer questions. —�
Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project:
■ Replace existing garage door with a new door that contains windows, is more decorative and is
consistent with the design of the house, suggest using a carriage style garage door;
■ Concerned with the front porch columns, 4x4 posts are not substantial enough, need to make the
porch more significant, would like to see porch details provided on plans including details of the
columns and railing; do not necessary need to use a larger column,but more finish detail should be
added to announce the front porch;
■ Need to add something for the front porch posts to terminate the top and bottom;
■ Provide size and details of brackets below bay window in kitchen on left elevation,need to call out
size so the contractor know what to build;
■ Plans need to clearly indicate if new windows will be true divided lite or simulated true divided lite;
■ Revise plans to show stone veneer base wrapping around the sides of the bay window at the front of
the house;
■ Concerned with proposed stone vertical stack at front of house and how it looks from the side,will
look odd and will be visible from the street, it appears that it is there to solve a problem with how
two roof forms tie together, applicant should find a better resolution; this vertical element is not
appropriate to the design of the house;
■ Should add muntins to French doors in master bedroom,muntin design should be consistent with the
windows at the front of the house;
■ Suggest making the skylight at the top of the stairway operable to add light and ventilation;
■ Provide landscape plan showing larger scale plant materials and include an automatic irrigation
system;
■ Plans show two options for the kitchen layout, before this project returns for review by the
Commission the applicant needs to choose one; and
■ Consider adding something at the front of the house to soften the second story addition, suggest
looking in the neighborhood for good examples,suggest adding an element to provide a shadow line
between the first and second floor at the front such as corbels under the second floor cantilever, a
trellis or other architectural element.
There were no other comments from the floor. The public comment was closed.
Chair Brownrigg made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the above
revisions have been made and plan checked and there is space on the agenda. This motion was seconded by
C. Auran.
Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:35 p.m.
X. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
- There were no Commissioner's Reports for review.
14
City gfBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes March 12, 2007
XI. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of March 5, 2007.
CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of March 5, 2007.
FYI: 1243 Cabrillo Avenue—changes to a previously approved design review project
Commission acknowledged proposed changes. Noted that it would be much easier to review such
proposals if the changes requested were called out on the plans.
- FYI: Peninsula Hospital Complaint Log—January—February 2007
CP Monroe noted the complaint log. Items noted were the city's role on the Mitigation Monitoring
Panel; neighbor complaints and participation; break down in communications; CA noted listed
several unresolved problems.
Chair Brownrigg opened Public Comment: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue. Concerned that building
conditions were not being met,parking on Marco Polo; communications is poor, not city's role to step in;
project will be on-going a long time,need to resolve;
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Brownrigg adjourned the meeting at 11:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
�. David Cauchi, Secretary
VAMINUTEMunapproved 03.12.07.doc
15
City of Burlingame
FEBRUARY PERMIT ACTIVITY
* Permit activity is down compared to the same time last year. Small, over-the-counter permits were about the same as last year. Large
commercial projects were only 2% of the value compared to last year. 2006 figures included the $ 15MM parking structure at Mills Hospital.
* There were no requests for pre-application meetings during the month of February.
THIS MONTH Feb. 2006 DIFF F. Y. 2007 F. Y.2006 DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
WATER HEATER 1 976 1 900 8 32 47,592 43 38,290 24
SWIMMING POOL 2 86,500 5 1037800 -17
SIGN 5 20,400 2 39600 467 34 209,895 23 60,137 249
ROOFING 11 1209300 10 1255005 -4 191 21624,137 177 231949588 20
RETAINING WALL 3 274,020 6 2549017 8
PLUMBING 13 541248 19 45,958 18 120 351,456 296 1,0399311 -66
NEW SFD 8 49169,000 12 41345,000 -4
NEW COMMERCIAL
NEW 5 UNIT APT OR CO 1 395007000
NEW 3 OR 4 UNIT APT
MECHANICAL 5 19,575 4 29,845 -34 39 404,058 31 134,365 201
KITCHEN UPGRADE 5 212,370 1 19,000 1,018 26 8649470 20 506,594 71
FURNACE 3 13,825 4 165436 -16 12 62,761 26 965801 -35
ELECTRICAL SERVICE 1 45200 12 325150 6 655400 -51
City of Burlingame
FEBRUARY PERMIT ACTIVITY
THIS MONTH Feb. 2006 DIFF F. Y. 2007 F.Y.2006 DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
ELECTRICAL 3 32,400 5 45,600
-29 32 293,645 50 183,617 60
BATHROOM UPGRADE 4 20,500 7 75,500 -73 27 351,700 34 602,363 -42
ALTERATION RESIDENTI 19 971,371 18 1,044,425 -7 209 9,576,106 283 10,467,095 -9
ALTERATION NON RES 5 306,100 7 15,130,700 -98 53 8,830,274 62 21,977,666 -60
Totals: 74 1,772,065 79 16,541,169 -89 801 31,677,764 1,074 42,069,044 -25
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 28, 2007
Investments Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
LAIF&County Pool 20,235,440.74 20,235,440.74 20,235,440.74 64.78 1 1 4.902 4.970
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 11,000,000.00 10,966,420.00 11,000,000.00 35.22 1,091 671 4.579 4.643
31,235,440.74 31,201,860.74 31,235,440.74 100.00% 385 237 4.788 4.855
Investments
Total Earnings February 28 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 112,956.49 916,755.07
Average Daily Balance 29,660,635.78 30,512,752.83
Effective Rate of Return 4.96% 4.51%
Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and
availability of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g. Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds).
ES S AVA, FINANCE DIR./TREASURER �Z
Reporting period 02/01/2007-02/28/2007 Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:03/12/2007-09:10 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRepl 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
February 28,`2007
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
LAIF&County Pool
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 14,058,771.28 14,058,771.28 14,058,771.28 5.181 5.181 1
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 6,176,669.46 6,176,669.46 6,176,669.46 4.490 Aaa 4.490 1
Subtotal and Average 18,282,946.41 20,235,440.74 20,235,440.74 20,235,440.74 4.970 1
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 994,690.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 Aaa 3.500 113 06/22/2007
3133XDGM7 519 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2005 1,000,000.00 998,440.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 4.817 603 10/24/2008
3133XDNL1 520 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/17/2005 1,000,000.00 996,880.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 627 11/17/2008
3133XE2W8 521 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/28/2005 1,000,000.00 998,440.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 302 12/28/2007
3133XGQM9 528 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 09/18/2006 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5.400 Aaa 5.400 932 09/18/2009
3133XJ6F0 531 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/20/2006 1,000,000.00 994,380.00 1,000,000.00 5.025 Aaa 5.025 1,390 12/20/2010
3128X5LP1 529 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 10/06/2006 1,000,000.00 998,830.00 1,000,000.00 5.250 Aaa 5.250 1,680 10/06/2011
3128X5SU3 532 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 12/29/2006 1,000,000.00 996,950.00 1,000,000.00 5.220 Aaa 5.220 1,398 12/28/2010
3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 996,560.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 Aaa 3.100 57 04/27/2007
3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 991,250.00 1,000,000.00 3.820 Aaa 3.547 231 10/18/2007
31359MMP5 530 FANNIE MAE 12/01/2006 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5.250 Aaa 5.215 45 04/15/2007
Subtotal and Average 11,000,000.00 11,000,000.00 10,966,420.00 11,000,000.00 4.643 671
Federal Agency Issues-Discount
Subtotal and Average 377,689.37
Total and Average 29,660,635.78 31,235,440.74 31,201,860.74 31,235,440.74 4.855 237
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:03/12r/007-09:10 PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
t Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 3
Portfolio Details - Cash
February 28,2007
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date-: Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity
Average Balance 0.00 0
Total Cash and Investmentss 29,660,635.78 31,235,440.74 31,201,860.74 31,235,440.74 4.855 237
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:03/12/2007-09:10 - PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept 6.41.202a
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 5
Activity Summary
February 2006 through February 2007
Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number
Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average
End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity
February 2006 10 27,236,535.77 3.734 3.786 3.836 0 0 363 196
March 2006 11 28,865,253.49 3.750 3.802 3.721 1 0 361 192
April 2006 11 31,600,492.83 3.997 4.052 4.136 0 0 330 165
May 2006 15 34,904,265.49 4.169 4.227 4.293 4 0 317 155
June 2006 16 33,717,988.31 4.224 4.283 4.375 1 0 330 150
July 2006 16 32,218,943.80 4.307 4.367 4.539 0 0 346 143
August 2006 16 32,238,322.45 4.317 4.377 4.558 0 0 345 128
September 2006 14 30,514,724.43 4.326 4.386 4.500 1 3 379 158
October 2006 15 29,368,136.07 4.375 4.435 4.533 1 0 456 210
November 2006 14 26,276,897.39 4.464 4.526 4.812 0 1 496 211
December 2006 15 30,496,489.44 4.455 4.517 4.691 3 2 506 267
January 2007 14 29,678,426.66 4.672 4.737 4.780 0 1 410 260
February 2007 13 31,235,440.74 4.788 4.855 4.970 0 1 385 237
Average 14 30,642,455.14 4.275% 4.335% 4.442 1 1 386 190
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:03/12/2007-09:10 PM(PRF_PM4)SynnRept 6.41.202a
` ( Report Ver.5.00
l/
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 4
Activity By Type
February 1, 2007 through February 28, 2007
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary)
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 5.181 3,500,000.00 0.00
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 4.490, 37,709.64 1,500,000.00
Subtotal 18,197,731.10 3,537,709.64 1,500,000.00 20,235,440.74
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
Subtotal 11,000,000.00 11,000,000.00
Federal Agency Issues-Discount
313588CFO 526 FANNIE MAE 4.964 02/23/2007 0.00 480,695.56
Subtotal 480,695.56 0.00 480,695.56 0.00
Total 29,678,426.66 3,537,709.64 1,980,695.56 31,235,440.74
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:03/12/2007-09:10 PM(PRF_PM3)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 6
Distribution of Investments By Type
February 2006 through February 2007
February March April May June July August September October November December January February Average
Security Type 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 by Period
LAIF&County Pool 63.3 58.4 62.0 58.6 55.6 53.6 53.6 54.2 49.0 46.8 52.5 61.3 64.8 56.4%
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
Certificates of Deposit-S&L
Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln
Negotiable CD's-Bank
CORP NOTES
Bankers Acceptances
Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing
Commercial Paper-Discount
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 36.7 41.6 38.0 37.2 40.0 41.9 41.9 44.2 49.4 51.4 45.9 37.1 35.2 41.6%
Federal Agency Issues-Discount 4.2 4.3 4.6 4.5 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.6 2.0%
Treasury Securities-Coupon
Treasury Securities-Discount
Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon
Miscellaneous Securities-Discount
Non Interest Bearing Investments
Mortgage Backed Securities
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:03/12/2007-09:10 PM(PRF_PM5)SynnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 7
Interest Earnings Summary
February 28, 2007
February 28 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
CD/Coupon/Discount Investments:
Interest Collected 19,304.44 381,337.77
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 149,953.47 149,953.47
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 124,770.29) ( 119,852.38)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 44,487.62 411,438.86
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 44,487.62 411,438.86
Pass Through Securities:
Interest Collected 0.00 0.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00
Cash/Checking Accounts:
Interest Collected 0.00 569,237.98
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 389,924.01 389,924.01
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 321,455.14) ( 453,845.78)
Interest Earned during Period 68,468.87 505,316.21
Total Interest Earned during Period 1:12,956.49 916,755.07
Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Total Earnings during Period112,956.49 916,755.07
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:03/12/2007-09:10 PM(PRF_PM6)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
/ i iManagement
- CAMP
PROGRAM I , I ,
Investment Portfolio Information For
CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00)
Portfolio #
12510150
Section/Report Title
A. Account Summary
B. Detail of Securities Held
C. Fair Market Values&Analytics
D. Security Transactions&Interest
E. Cash Transactions Report
F. Realized Gains&Losses
G. Cash Balance Report
For The Month Ending
February 28,2007
CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME
CA
PFM Asset Management LLC*One Keystone Plaza*North Front&Market Streets,Suite 300*Harrisburg,PA 17101-2044*(717)232-2723
/ For more information,please contact your client manage -SESA KAZADI (415)982-5544 KAZADIN@pfm.com /
PFMAssetManagement I I PROGRAM II / I
Account Summary: 12510150 CAMP-CITYOFBURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: February 28,2007
MARKET%OF YTM AT YTM AT DURATION
SECURITY TYPE PAR VALUE AMORTIZED COST MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO COST MARKET TO WORST
FED AGY BOND/NOTE 1,000,000.00 999,865.11 999,687.50 50.144 5.221 5.419 0.046
FED AGY DN 1,000,000.00 994,225.83 993,942.89 49.856 5.191 5.223 0.112
TOTAL SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 1,994,090.94 1,993,630.39 100.000 5.206% 5.321% 0.079
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 2,000,000.00 1,994,090.94 1,993,630.39 100.000%
ACCRUED INTEREST 22,479.17 22,479.17
TOTAL PORTFOLIO $2,000,000.00 $2,016,570.11 $2,016,109.56
Disclosure Statement: PFM's monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes(i.e.settles)all investment transactions.The custodian
statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.Only the client has the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian and to direct the movement of securities.Clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies,implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.PFM recognizes that our clients may use these
reports to facilitate record keeping,therefore the custodian bank statement and the PFM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.PFM's market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last
business day of the month as supplied by F.T.Interactive Data,Bloomberg or Telerate.Prices that fall between data points are interpolated. Non-negotiable FDIC insured bank certificates of deposit are priced at par.
A-1
PFMAsset Iement LLC- I PROGRAM I ,
Detail of Securities Held: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: February 28,2007
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY S&P TRADE SETTLE ORIGINAL YTM ACCRUED AMORTIZED MARKET
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE RATING DATE DATE COST AT COST INTEREST COST VALUE
FED AGY BOND/NOTE
3134A4NW0 FHLMC GLOBAL REFERENCE NOTES 1,000,000 4.875 03/15/07 AAA 09/27/06 09/28/06 998,391.00 5.221 22,479.17 999,865.11 999,687.50
1,000,0001. 5. 22,479.17 7.5
FED AGY DN
313588EE1 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/11/07 A-1+ 10/27/06 10/27/06 976,621.67 5.191 0.00 994,225.83 993,942.89
0,000 976,621.67 3
TOTAL SECURITIES $2,000,000 $1,975,012.67 5.206% $22,479.17 $1,994,090.94 $1,993,630.39
Issuers by Market Value Ratings by Market Value
Q FliMC $999.688 50.1% r[I
,993.943 1■FNMA $993,943 49.9% otal: $$993,630 100.0%
Total: $1,993,630100.0%
\// B-1
-Now PFMAsset Management JW-'- CAMP PROGRAM
Fair Market Values & Analytics: 12510150 CAMP-CITYOFBURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: February 28,2007
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY FIRST CALL MARKET MARKET UNREAL G/(L) UNREAL G/(L) DURATION YTM
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE DATE PRICE VALUE ON AMORT COST ON COST TO WORST AT MKT
FED AGY BOND/NOTE
3134A4NW0 FHLMC GLOBAL REFERENCE NOTES 1,000,000 4.875 03/15/07 99.969 999,687.50 (177.61) 1,296.50 0.046 5.419
FED AGY DN
313588EEI FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/11/07 99.394 993,942.89 (282.94) 17,321.22 0.112 5.223
SUBTOTALS $1,993,630.39 ($460.55) $18,617.72 0.079 5.321 %
ACCRUED INTEREST ON INVESTMENT 22,479.17
TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF INVESTMENTS $2,016,109.56
PFMAsseLLC t Management
I PROGRAM
Security Transactions & Interest: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: February 28,2007
S&P MATURITY PRINCIPAL ACCRUED
TRADE SETTLE TRAN TYPE SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP RATING PAR COUPON DATE AMOUNT INTEREST TOTAL
02/15/07 02/15/07 INTEREST FHLMC GLOBAL REFERENCE NOTES 3134A4UN2 AAA 1,000,000 2.375 02/15/07 0.00 11,875.00 11,875.00
1,000,000 0.00 11,875.00 11,875.00
02/15/07 02/15/07 MATURITY FHLMC GLOBAL REFERENCE NOTES 3134A4UN2 AAA 1,000,000 2.375 02/15/07 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
TOTAL SECURITY TRANSACTIONS 1,011,875.00
( ( D-1
PFM Asset Management LLC-CAMP PROGRAM
Cash Transactions Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINCAME(116-00)
MONTH ENDED: February 28,2007
CASH DATE TRANSACTION CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
02/15/07 CW WITHDRAW (1,011,875.00)
(1,011,875.00)
NET CASH CONTRIBUTIONS/(WITHDRAWS) ($1,011,875.00)
E-1
PFM Asset Management LLC -
I PROGRAM, I
Realized Gains and Losses: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: February 28, 2007
TRADE SETTLE PRINCIPAL REALIZED REALIZED
DATE DATE TRAN TYPE SALE METHOD SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP PAR VALUE COUPON PROCEEDS G/(L) COST G/(L)AMORT CST
02/15/07 02/15/07 MATURITY FHLMC GLOBAL REFERENCE NOTES 3134A4UN2 1,000,000 2.375 1,000,000.00 10,932.00 0.00
TOTAL GAINS AND LOSSES $10,932.00 $0.00
F-I