HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2017.08.10Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
City of Burlingame
Meeting Agenda
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, August 10, 2017
Members of the public may comment on any action or study item appearing on the agenda at the time
it is called. Comments on other items should be made under agenda item #5. Provision of identifying
information is optional but assists in preparation of the minutes. All votes are unanimous unless
separately voted for the record.
1. Call To Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of Minutes
July 13, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutesa.
Meeting MinutesAttachments:
Members of the public may speak on any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to
suggest an item for a future Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The
Ralph M. Brown Act (the State-Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from
acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a "Request To
Speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The provision of a name, address or
other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. The
Commission Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers.
5. Public Comments: Non-Agenda
6. Discussion/Action Items
BPAC Updatea.
7. Information Items
Engineering Division Reportsa.
Staff Report
Traffic Log
Attachments:
Police Department Reportsb.
Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 8/7/2017
August 10, 2017Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission
Meeting Agenda
Farmer's Marketc.
TSPC Chair/Commissioner's Communicationsd.
8. Committee & Sub-Committee Reports
Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)a.
Broadway Parking (Bush & Wettan)b.
School Traffic (Akers & Londer)c.
Envision Burlingame (Londer & Martos)d.
El Camino Real Task Force (Londer & Wettan)e.
Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (Bush & Londer)f.
9. Future Agenda Items
10. Adjournment
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at
650-558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public viewing at the City Clerk's office, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the
meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes
are available on the site.
NEXT TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING: September 14, 2017
Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 8/7/2017
1
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of Thursday, July 13, 2017
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:03 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBER PRESENT: Akers, Bush, Londer, Wettan
MEMBERS ABSENT: Martos
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
May 11, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes
• Page 5, item 6a, paragraph 1 – for clarification purposes, add “to avoid having a
restriction” to the one sentence in that paragraph;
• Page 5, item 6a, paragraph 1 – add a period at the end of the only sentence;
• Pages 5-10, item 6b – verified the spelling of the resident’s name on Easton Drive is
correct by reviewing the request to speak card provided during the meeting, therefore
no edits were necessary;
• Page 14, item 8a, paragraph 5 – change “suggested it is indicated…” to “suggested it
be indicated…” for clarification; and
• Page 14, item 8a, paragraph 3 – request to add Fridays to the days mentioned that
long-term parking capacity is considerably reduced during peak hours. After review of
the audio file, Fridays were mentioned but specifically to say the Commissioner did
not want to highlight Fridays due to the fact that they did not have a particular data
point for Fridays.
M/S/C: Londer/Bush; 4/0/1
2
June 8, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes
Commissioner Londer noted that although absent for June’s meeting, he listened to the
complete audio file and will therefore be voting on the approval of the June Meeting
Minutes.
• Page 9, item 7a (Hoover School), paragraph 2 – change the sentence to reflect Chair
Wettan was contacted by the homeowner, he did not speak to the homeowner; and
• Page 10, item 7b, paragraph 2 – request to add additional language to highlight that
not only were there no accidents reported at the intersection of El Camino Real and
Floribunda Avenue during the current reporting period, but more importantly, there
have been no accidents at that specific location since Sergeant Shepley’s tenure in
January 2017.
M/S/C: Londer/Bush; 4/0/1
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA
Manito Velasco acknowledged his appreciation for the Burlingame Police Department as he
was happy to observe their presence and enforcement efforts last week on California Drive
and Broadway. He also specifically thanked Bob Disco in the Parks and Recreation
Department for trimming the bushes along the track side of California Drive between Millbrae
and Broadway again and indicated it helps to increase the safety of the corridor. Lastly, he
commended Mr. Wong for implementing a few safety improvements on California Drive such
as shifting the center line in between Murchison Drive and Trousdale Drive which he felt
created adequate space for drivers and bicyclists to share the lane safety and for installing an
edge line at Dufferin Avenue to direct drivers away from the parking lane. Mr. Velasco said it
is the small things he mentioned that make a big difference in the daily lives of residents.
Residents Kieran and Finola Muldowney said they have noticed recently that Victoria Road
between Burlingame Avenue and Howard Avenue has become a parking lot. They said this
is a source of frustration for them because they cannot park on their own street. In addition,
the Muldowney’s specifically mentioned commercial trucks are also parking on their street.
They explained that within a two-week period, Comcast lines were torn down due to the large
commercial trucks and they’ve incurred the cost associated with replacing the lines. The
residents also said this has happened to other neighbors they have spoken to. Lastly, the
Muldowney’s mentioned the lack of signage on Victoria Road and observed vehicles traveling
from Rollins Road flying down the street to park at the end of Victoria Road. They requested
advice from the Commission as to what they can do to alleviate this problem.
Chair Wettan advised Kieran and Finola Muldowney that the Commission cannot act on the
issue they have presented but indicated he would request Mr. Wong to add their concern to
the agenda at a future TSPC meeting.
3
6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
a) TDA Article 3: Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Grant Applications
Mr. Wong began with a presentation to the Commission regarding the applications for
submittal for the TDA Article 3 Grant opportunity. He gave a high level overview of the
grant opportunity indicating there is a total of $2,260,000 in available funding for all
projects in this grant cycle. Mr. Wong said that includes a $400,000 max for capital projects
and a $100,000 max for planning projects. He went on to say that applicants can submit
up to three applications and the earliest funds would be available is the end of the year,
but more than likely it would be sometime in early 2018. Mr. Wong reminded the
Commission that the application deadline is tomorrow, July 14, 2017.
Mr. Wong reviewed the following three applications that were prepared for submission:
1. California Drive Complete Streets, Phase II Feasibility Study for additional
improvements on California Drive south of Broadway to the Burlingame Train
Station;
2. Traffic Signal at Carolan Avenue and Cadillac Way to improve safety and help
facilitate bicyclists traveling through the intersection; and
3. Bicycle Plan with a focus on residential streets to interconnect with other residential
and commercial areas via bicycle boulevards, Bayshore, and Rollins Road.
Mr. Wong indicated letters of support have already been obtained from the Citizens
Environmental Council and Irvin Dawid.
Chair Wettan opened public comment.
Manito Velasco conveyed his concern with the proposed signal light at the intersection of
Carolan Avenue and Cadillac Way. He stated that he does not believe installing a traffic
signal will necessarily make the intersection safe. He stated the problem is currently
undefined and the street will change dramatically with the upcoming project
improvements. He confirmed with Mr. Wong that the proposed signal would force bicyclists
to wait to make a left turn on Cadillac Way and stated this was also a concern to him. Mr.
Velasco said forcing bikes to wait for the signal is concerning as he felt it put bicyclists at
risk of being rear-ended or prematurely entering the intersection. He asked that the City
wait until the Carolan Complete Streets Project is complete and the problem is defined
before installing a signal.
Manito Velasco went on to state that he shares the same opinion of Pat Giorni regarding
the proposed Bike Plan. He said they do not believe a bike plan is needed because it
paralyzes the option for short-term improvements, such as sharrows and crosswalks. Mr.
Velasco said that a bike plan can cause short-term improvements to be deferred in an
4
effort to complete the improvements identified in a bike plan first. He stated that the City
of Burlingame is small enough to develop a plan for bicycle-related improvements
incrementally. He suggested the first step be to utilize paving projects as a trigger for
identifying improvements as he felt repaving essentially allows for a blank slate. Mr.
Velasco provided an example by sharing he felt that when the street in front of the
Burlingame Intermediate School was repaved, it was an opportunity for the City to
consider installing a crosswalk on a busy street. He ended his comments by stating a bike
plan would hinder those types of efforts and suggested using a “technical urbanism”
approach.
Chair Wettan closed public comment.
Commissioner Londer inquired where the applications will be submitted and Mr. Wong
said they will be sent to the City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG), reviewed
by the San Mateo County Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee (BPAC), and the San Mateo
County BPAC will make their project recommendations to the San Mateo County C/CAG
Board of Directors. Commissioner Londer indicated he was torn regarding the proposed
bike plan as he partly shared the same opinion of Mr. Velasco and Ms. Giorni in that a
bike plan might impede short-term improvements that are not in the bike plan. He closed
by stating the deadline to submit the funding applications was tomorrow and he did not
want to put a “monkey wrench” into all the work staff has already invested in the application
process since he did not have an opportunity to weigh in on the proposed projects until
this evening.
Commissioner Akers also noted that the deadline was approaching and inquired when the
City was notified about the grant opportunity. Chair Wettan responded by saying that the
grant opportunity was presented at a higher level at last month’s Commission meeting.
Mr. Wong explained that the City received the call for projects about two weeks prior to
last month’s Commission meeting. Vice-Chair Bush confirmed this by stating the call for
projects was dated May 31. Commissioner Akers said it was unfortunate that the notice
was not provided sooner and although it was a thoughtful process, he suggested staff may
want to engage with the County regarding the lead time for grant opportunities.
Commissioner Akers also thanked staff for the opportunity for the Commission to review
the proposed projects and noted he was not present at the previous meeting when the
information was originally presented. Commissioner Akers then asked how much the City
anticipated to expend on the match for each project. Mr. Wong indicated that there is a
50% match requirement for planning projects. He said for all three proposed projects, the
City is anticipated to spend approximately $300,000 in general funds, of which $70,000
has already been earmarked to review bicycle boulevards that will go towards the
proposed Bike/Pedestrian Transportation Plan project.
Chair Wettan clarified with Mr. Wong that the match for planning projects is 50% with
Capital projects being a little less. Mr. Wong shared that the match for capital projects are
on a sliding scale and the County does not indicate exactly how much the match will be
for capital projects.
5
Mr. Wong explained for the proposed traffic light at Carolan Avenue and Cadillac Way that
the City is requesting $250,000 with the City’s match as the estimated cost for a new traffic
signal is approximately $350,000.
Commissioner Akers responded to say he struggled in principle; although the projects
generally seemed like a good idea, he has concerns with the proposed traffic signal given
they know traffic flow will change on Carolan Avenue. He went on to say that generally
grant funding is a good thing but it would be an easier sell if the match for the traffic signal
and feasibility study for Phase II of the California Drive projects were lower. In response
to the public comments, Commissioner Akers agreed that we should be thinking more
about the “tactical urbanism” concept. He closed by saying that we should continue looking
for opportunities to do good, indicating if the City had an appropriation of $200,000 in
general funds to do what we needed or wanted to do on a rolling basis, it might be a more
effective use of City funds as opposed to the grant funding match.
Vice-Chair Bush said he certainly understood the potential for paralysis wi th an updated
Bike Plan but he felt that with no vision, things perish, and it is a critical and important
concept for the overarching vision of what the City wants to accomplish. He indicated the
City has largely executed on the priorities within the 2004 Bike Plan and felt it provided a
road map to handle situations like the one they currently are in with the grant applications.
Vice-Chair Bush also said it was critically important to have a plan in place that reflects
the updates to the County Bike Plan and restated he felt it was time for the City to update
the Bike Plan to reflect the improvements that have already been implemented and the
City’s current vision.
Vice-Chair Bush also felt the suggested feasibility study for California Drive, Phase II
improvements is critically important as it was a priority that was laid out in the 2011 San
Mateo Bicycle and Pedestrian Comprehensive Plan and is a critical piece of infrastructure
we should be developing. He stated California Drive is a direct path that links people to
the vast majority of Burlingame. Vice-Chair Bush also said that linking together some of
the proposed initiatives in Millbrae and San Mateo is another critical piece of infrastructure
and he is very much in favor of the proposed feasibility study.
In regard to the proposed traffic signal at the intersection of Carolan Avenue and Cadillac
Way, Vice-Chair Bush said he understood it might be a little premature and asked Mr.
Wong if the City would be entirely locked in to the initial plan or would staff have the ability
to tweak the scope of work once the Carolan Complete Streets Project is complete. Mr.
Wong indicated there are certain guidelines the City would have to follow and grant
applications that deviate from Caltrans’ standards would not be approved for funding. He
stated there might be the possibility to tweak the scope, but within certain constraints.
Vice-Chair Bush recognized Manito Velasco’s comment regarding his concern of bicyclists
forced to wait for the traffic signal to turn left on to Cadillac Way. Vice-Chair Bush provided
an example of a bike boulevard in Palo Alto at the intersection of Embarcadero and Bryant
where it appeared the signal was tripped upon approach and asked Mr. Wong if we would
6
have the ability to explore and fine tune concepts such as the example in Palo Alto. Mr.
Wong explained he hasn’t been through the intersection of Embarcadero and Bryant and
Mr. Bush’s approach to the intersection could have been good timing since traffic lights
typically have censors and advanced loops. Mr. Wong confirmed the proposed signal at
Carolan Avenue and Cadillac Way would have detections—censors or video. He said a
left-turn provision for a flashing yellow arrow and flashing green arrow is an option they
can explore. Vice-Chair Bush liked the idea and felt it would mitigate and allow more
experienced riders to make the left turn when it’s safe, but give the less experienced riders
the option to wait for the signal to turn for additional surety.
Chair Wettan addressed Commissioner Akers concern and stated that while we don’t
control the timing of the call for projects and application timeline, he pointed out the utility
of having an active BPAC as he felt they could provide effective feedback and assist with
developing concepts for proposed projects such as the traffic signal.
Chair Wettan also agreed with Commissioner Akers’ statement that the economics for the
planning application were fairly beneficial to the City as we were already planning to spend
most of the money that would have to go into the match. He said this would allow the City
to generate a lot of additional help with investing very little additional money. Chair Wettan
also recognized Mr. Velasco’s comments about the Bike Plan causing “analysis paralysis”
meaning we are thinking about the plan for long-term improvements and don’t implement
anything that could help the people in the short run. He said it was his hope the City would
not fall into that trap and he would like to see an overall plan for the City. Chair Wettan
went on to say that a lot has changed since 2004 and was very supportive of the Bike
Plan.
Chair Wettan spoke of the proposed traffic light at Carolan Avenue and Cadillac Way and
said there were good reasons for the proposal and they have received interesting
comments opposing the idea, but thought Vice-Chair Bush’s inquiry was helpful to him.
Chair Wettan moved on to the prosed feasibility study for Phase II of the California Drive
Complete Streets Project and said he is the least supportive of this project. He said while
we may need it eventually, because we have not done much high level planning, he felt
like it was the “cart before the horse.” Chair Wettan explained that we already have a route
on Carolan Avenue we are spending money on, in addition to the northern route on
California Drive. He said he is concerned by all the individual routes with no plan to tie
them together. Chair Wettan said it was worth noting the proposed project is right on the
Caltrain corridor and in the news today, he saw the City of Belmont may lose some land
to Caltrain under eminent domain. He said this concerns him and he wondered at this
point if it’s the best way for the City to spend money without an overall plan in place. He
closed by saying he is not completely sold on this project.
Chair Wettan indicated Vice-Chair Bush has prepared two letters of support—one for the
Carolan Avenue and Cadillac Way signal light and one the Bike Plan (planning study).
Chair Wettan proposed that the Commission review the letters of support after item 6b as
7
a courtesy to those in the audience for the Hoover School item. The Commissioners
agreed and Commissioner Akers noted that the Commission should review all three
proposed projects separately to decide which projects they would like to provide letters of
support for after the Hoover School discussion.
After the discussion of item 6b, Chair Wettan thanked Vice-Chair Bush for drafting the
letters of support and stated they would continue to discuss the proposed projects to
determine where everyone stands prior to reviewing the actual letters.
Chair Wettan suggested to start with the Bike Plan application and it was clear the Bike
Plan had the support of all the Commissioners so he moved on to the application for the
signal at Carolan Avenue and Cadillac Way.
Commissioner Londer did not oppose a letter of support for the traffic light if there is an
acceptable design with workable solutions. He said although there are some concerns, he
felt the City could figure out a way to utilize the funds and would not want to give up the
opportunity for free money essentially. Commissioner Akers stated he is concerned about
the match and he is unsure of the need and justification for the traffic signal. He said if we
move forward with the application, he is hopeful staff has written it in a broad way that
allows for flexibility and therefore he would not oppose the letter of support. If there is not
any flexibility, he stated he would not be supportive of the letter, especially given the
uncertainty of the circumstances after the Carolan Complete Streets Project is completed.
Vice-Chair Bush felt the traffic signal was a question of prioritization and he would
ultimately rank this project below the feasibility study for Phase II of the California Drive
Project. He said he was unsure the level of traffic on Carolan Avenue make this a critical
project.
Chair Wettan stated he now had mixed feelings about the traffic light which just developed
that evening and mentioned his surprise of the amount of negative correspondence. The
Commissioners then continued to engage in a detailed and lengthy discussion regarding
the traffic signal during which Commissioner Akers pointed out the City removed a traffic
signal in that location once already.
Chair Wettan sought feedback from Traffic Sergeant Shepley and Sergeant Shepley felt
Carolan Avenue is a heavily traveled road. He explained that drivers use it to access US
101 south from Cadillac Way, which does back-up during particular times so from an
enforcement perspective, he does not like the idea.
Chair Wettan opened public comment again to allow Manito Velasco to share additional
comments. Mr. Velasco stated the TDA grant opportunity is an annual program and
therefore would afford the City another opportunity to obtain funding for a future signal and
the Commission should not see this as a last opportunity. He said the Measure A Program
is bi-annual and an additional avenue to entertain grant opportunities. Mr. Velasco said
the design of Carolan Avenue calls for a striped buffer area and suggested building it up
to an island or the use of vertical bollards to create additional safety measures. He also
8
recommended to improve the street lighting on Carolan Avenue and suggested the
Commissioners drive along Carolan Avenue after tonight’s meeting. Mr. Velasco closed
his comments by stating the opportunity may cost the City a “black eye” if we apply and
receive the grant but do not follow through with the project.
The Commission continued their discussion regarding the traffic signal at Carolan Avenue
and Cadillac Way and in summary, the Commission agreed to postpone the application
for the traffic signal until the next grant application cycle or until they have more information
regarding the other outlining pieces.
In regards to the feasibility study of Phase II of the California Drive Complete Streets
Project, the Commission engaged in another interactive discussion to which they decided
to support the proposed project as long as the applications and letters of support are
structured in a way to indicate the additional phase of the California Drive Complete
Streets Project Study is subsidiary to the overall Bike Plan.
Commissioner Akers provided the following motion:
The Traffic Safety and Parking Commission directs and requests that the Chair work in
coordination with the Vice-Chair to author and execute letters in support of the Bicycle
Plan and California Drive Complete Streets Phase II grant proposals.
M/S/C: Akers/Londer; 4/0/0
b) Hoover Parking Update
Mr. Wong began with a presentation to the Commission that provided a refresher with a
high level overview of the Hoover School parking issue. He explained that with the
reopening of Hoover School, improvements were put in place such as parking and access
restrictions to create a safe and walkable path for pedestrians via Summit Drive. He
indicated staff also worked with homeowners along Easton Drive to find workable solutions
to create adequate space for a walking path while still allowing for on-street parking. He
shared that the City successfully applied for and received grant funds through the One
Bay Area Grant (OBAG) to install sidewalks on Summit Drive and that staff would be
working closely with the residents through that process. Mr. Wong stated that staff has
determined that the efforts made to date to improve the access and safety along the
Easton path towards Hoover School have not been successful; children were still walking
in the street along Easton Drive during the school year.
Mr. Wong then reviewed the street measurements and challenges with the space available
on Easton Drive. He indicated the stretch of Easton with no on-street parking is 17 feet
wide, with a 4 foot wide walking path. Mr. Wong said further down where they have allowed
for on-street parking, the current road width from the edge of the pavement to the fence is
approximately 24 feet, but with a vehicle parked on the street, the width is reduced to
approximately 16 feet. Staff has met with Central County Fire and Mr. Wong explained
9
that their emergency vehicles require a 20 foot clearance and the addition of a 4 foot
walking path would make what is already considered substandard conditions, worse.
Mr. Wong closed the presentation and requested the Commission consider extending the
no parking restriction or a time-restricted parking restriction to coincide with school drop-
off and pick-ups. He indicated that two properties on Easton Drive would be effected by
either option.
Chair Wettan opened public comment.
Easton Drive resident, Lenny Blyukher requested clarification of the intent to extend the
no parking zone. Mr. Wong responded to explain there is currently no parking from the
pedestrian bridge to the Easton gate on either side of the street. He said the intent is to
extend the no parking zone further down Easton Drive to the crosswalk at Hoover School
because the pinch points along the road don’t allow for adequate space for on-street
parking and a safe walkable path for pedestrians.
Mr. Blyukher stated he hates both options. He felt the City is forcing the effected residents
to pick the lesser of two evils to which he said he would prefer option two (timed
restriction). He noted that he sent an article to Chair Wettan regarding other places with
alternative parking options and still felt the City has not engaged enough with the Town of
Hillsborough to see if they would consider making Easton Drive a one-way street. Mr.
Blyukher said the access restriction during school drop-off and pick-up that makes Easton
temporarily a one-way street appears to work well.
Chair Wettan indicated that the Commission would weigh in on the matter and the resident
could return to the podium for further public comment if he wished to.
Vice-Chair Bush confirmed the 20 foot clearance for emergency fire vehicles is an
absolute requirement. Mr. Wong explained the width requirement is critical and would
apply regardless if Easton Drive was a one or two-way street. Vice-Chair Bush said he
recalled the initial plan was to extend the no parking all the way down Easton Drive but
we created an accommodation as a gesture of goodwill to see how workable other options
would be. He said while he is sympathetic to not having access to curbside parking, he is
more concerned with parents and children walking in the street. Vice-Chair Bush stated
he is in favor of the least restrictive option as it meets the Fire Department requirements
and still accommodates guest/resident parking outside of regular school hours.
Commissioner Londer inquired about the 20 foot minimum clearance requirement for the
Fire Department as well and noted other “explorer” streets in Burlingame, west of El
Camino Real, don’t appear to follow that requirement. Mr. Wong explained that there are
certain streets that do not meet the width requirements and the Fire Department has made
due. Furthermore, Mr. Wong reiterated that Easton Drive is already considered to be
substandard conditions and the Fire Department and Public Works staff are not in favor
of further exacerbating the access concerns for large emergency vehicles. Commissioner
10
Londer indicated he agreed with Mr. Blyukher in that he would prefer the option that is
considered “lesser of the two evils.” He explained that implementing a no parking
restriction indefinitely would be a big burden to the impacted homeowners and he does
not like the idea of residents having to park blocks away from their home. Commissioner
Londer expressed that he would like to see some solution that would allow homeowners
to park near their home at the very least, but did not have any specific suggestions.
Commissioner Akers felt there are three alternatives being considered—no parking on
Easton Drive, time restricted no parking, and the third being what he felt we are doing now
which is creating a street that pedestrians cannot use safely. He stated this was the worst
of the three options and said streets should fundamentally provide vehicular and
pedestrian access, unless pedestrianized. He went on to say that if the street cannot
adequately provide for both vehicle and pedestrian access, we should not be considering
on-street parking. Commissioner Akers stated that he felt we should do something as the
current conditions of the street are unacceptable and he is in favor of making the street
safe and walkable over what he called “vehicular storage.” He stated that the 20 foot width
requirement is meaningful as Fire and other emergency responders should have adequate
access to a residential neighborhood and the school, especially if an emergency requires
a multi-agency response. Commissioner Akers said he does not see Easton Drive as an
option for a one-way street and recognized the two palatable alternatives place a burden
on certain homeowners. He explained he preferred to err on the side of no parking as the
street is made for vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Commissioner Akers felt it should be that
way all the time in order to provide safe pedestrian access on evenings and weekends.
Chair Wettan acknowledged this was a tough choice as providing a safe path is very
important but does not blame the present homeowner for not being happy about either of
the two proposed options because it impacts his ability to park in front of his home. He
shared that he gave Mr. Wong a tough time about the proposed alternatives and width
requirements and does not feel the only issue is resident parking. He stated that there is
a geometry issue and access for Central County Fire is necessary. Given the restraints of
the road, Chair Wettan stated he was wishful there was a solution that could create space
for a safe walkable area, on-street parking, and provide for a road width that satisfies our
emergency responders.
Chair Wettan asked Mr. Wong to clarify the 20 foot requirement for Fire since he stated
the need was for the maneuverability of equipment. Mr. Wong stated that although the
truck apparatus is not 20 feet wide, it is factored in for maneuverability and clearance
needs. Given the options presented, Chair Wettan stated he too favors the lesser of the
two evils (time restricted no parking) because it’s less of an inconvenience for the
homeowners. Chair Wettan stated they determined in May that a decision would need to
be made in July in order to implement additional measures prior to the start of the
upcoming school year. He noted that he does not like the impact imposed on the
homeowner, Mr. Blyukher, but mentioned he would be very supportive of the homeowner
working with appropriate City staff to find a way to create adequate space somehow for
an additional parking space on his property. Chair Wettan said if the geometry changes,
11
the Commission can revisit this issue again. He said in the spirit of incrementalism, he
was in favor of the less invasive option.
Through the Chair, Mr. Wong acknowledged Commissioner Akers’ comment about the
after hour’s use of the school playground and shared that the agreement the School
District has only allows for limited events. He explained this was a condition of approval
for the reopening of Hoover School because of the impacts it would have on the
neighborhood. Mr. Wong also pointed out the available parking to those that want to use
the facility on weekends. Commissioner Akers thanked Mr. Wong for the information but
still felt residents should have the option to walk safety to the playground and that it
contradicts the City’s goal to have walkable streets in Burlingame.
Vice-Chair Bush inquired about the available parking at Hoover School during off -school
hours and the potential use for residents. Chair Wettan responded to say he felt the issue
is more about residents having to move their cars prior to the start of the parking restriction.
Vice-Chair Bush said with the fair amount of parking at Hoover School during off-school
hours, he contemplated whether the time-based restriction would really provide much
additional benefit to the residents. Chair Wettan thought Vice-Chair Bush’s comment was
a good time to provide Mr. Blyukher another opportunity to share his additional comments.
Mr. Blyukher reiterated the inconvenience of a parking restriction as they have two
disabled residents with mobility challenges. He said he thought the parking in front of the
school is for school staff and Mr. Wong confirmed this. Mr. Blyukher inquired to Mr. Wong
about the discussion with Fire staff and wanted to clarify what direction they would be
traveling to in the event of an emergency at the school. Mr. Wong explained emergency
personnel needed access from all directions as we would not know which station would
respond. Mr. Blyukher then mentioned that most of the properties on Canyon Road are
designed in a way that the driveways accommodate more than two vehicles. He closed
his comments by stating he appreciated the efforts made to attempt to preserve the on-
street parking.
Although he commented that it may get voted down, Commissioner Akers wanted the
opportunity to make the following motion:
The Traffic Safety and Parking Commission recommend the City extend the no parking
zone currently along Easton Drive, west of the Alvarado stairs, and westward to the
intersection of Summit and Easton Drive.
M/S/C: Akers/Bush; 2/2/0 (motion failed).
Chair Wettan felt the need to clarify the duration of the time frame for the extended parking
restriction and noted the kindergarten pick-up and drop-off times are still unclear. Mr.
Wong said he would confirm the times as Commissioner Akers could not find the
information available online. However, the Commission felt they could still craft an
appropriate motion.
12
Chair Wettan and Commissioner Akers crafted the following motion:
The Traffic Safety and Parking Commission recommend the City establish a time limited
no parking zone westward from the currently existing no parking zone along Easton, west
of the Alvarado stairs, westward to the intersection of Summit and Easton Drive. The
TSPC further recommends that the time limitations for that no parking zone commence 15
minutes before the first planned school drop-off in the morning to 15 minutes after the last
planned school drop-off in the morning and then 15 minutes before the earliest school
pick-up in the afternoon to 15 minutes after the last school pick-up in the afternoon.
Chair Wettan clarified to Commissioner Londer that the motion for the parking restriction
is for a single window in the morning and a single window in the afternoon.
M/S/C: Wettan/Bush; 4/0/0.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
a) Engineering Division Reports
• US101/Broadway Interchange Project – Stage 5 work is currently underway.
Remaining operations include landscaping; restriping; and resurfacing, specifically
the US 101 northbound ramps. The approach to Crowne Plaza has been finished.
Starting Monday the overcrossing will be closed for a maximum of two weeks to
demo the eastern end and make the connection to Old Bayshore and Broadway. Mr.
Wong stated pedestrians will be directed to the new overcrossing but bicyclists will
not. Vice-Chair Bush commented to indicate he felt this was not an adequate
accommodation for bicyclist during that two-week period.
• 2017 Street Resurfacing Program – The resurfacing portion of the project has been
completed. The contractor will be completing adjustments of utility valves and
manholes in the street, as well as re-striping.
Chair Wettan brought up Mr. Velasco’s comment regarding the opportunity to install
or restripe crosswalks in conjunction with repaving efforts and suggested that Mr.
Wong reach out to the appropriate parties regarding the possible need for additional
crosswalks or restriping needs.
• Carolan Avenue Complete Streets – Staff has had a pre-construction meeting with
the contractor and they have provided submittals for staff to review. Construction is
set for this summer, with work to coincide with Summerhill construction operations
as they will be completing a major sewer connection.
Vice-Chair Bush asked about the expected timeline to which Mr. Wong indicated
13
they do not have a construction schedule yet.
• Larkspur/Linden Traffic Circle – The installation of the new pedestrian ramps have
been completed. The contractor was pulled off the project onto another, and the
neighborhood has been updated. Residents have contacted staff regarding irrigation
lines which have been damaged. City staff will work with the contractor to re-
establish them.
• Peninsula Avenue Overcrossing – Data collection effort has been completed and
San Mateo’s consultants are currently processing the data. A report with results is
to be presented at an upcoming public meeting but logistics are still to be
determined. The meeting will share the results of the data collection and more
detailed discussions regarding impacts will occur.
• California Drive Complete Streets – Staff is working with the design team to move
toward 90% plans for the project.
• Stop Sign Installations – Pilot stop signs have been installed on Bayswater Avenue
at Anita Road and another on Hillside Drive at Cortez Avenue. They are under a pilot
study and staff has received some feedback in support of the stop-signs. Mr. Wong
also pointed out the stop-sign warrant attachment as requested at a previous TSPC
meeting.
• TSPC Email Communications – No new communications.
• TSPC Priority List (Updated July 2017):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Downtown Modal Access
2 School Traffic Issues 5/11/17: Item 6a
3 California Complete Streets 7/13/17: Item 7a
4 B/PAC setup
5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
6 SR2S Review
7 Broadway Parking
8 Public Shuttles/Transit
9 Grant Strategies 7/13/17: Item 6a
10 ECR Corridor (ECR Task Force)
11 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 7/13/17: Item 7a
12 Parking and traffic considerations w/Planning
13 Bay Trail
14 Intro to Paving
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda
14
2 Hoover School Update 7/13/17: Item 6b
3 Downtown Parking Strategies
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/13/17: Item 7a
5 California Roundabout
6 General Plan – Circulation Element
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 7/13/17: Item 6a
8 Rec Center Parking
9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 7/13/17: Item 7a
10 Grant Opportunities 6/8/17: Item 7a
11 Grade Separation 5/11/17: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 4/13/17: Item 7a
13 School Speed Limit Updates 3/9/17: Item 7a
14 Burlingame Point - Bay Trail
15 School Safety Improvements 3/9/17: Item 7a
16 California Complete Streets 5/11/17: Item 7a
17 California Drive parking restrictions 6/8/17: Item 7a
18 Traffic Brochure
b) Police Department Reports
Sergeant Shepley indicated he did not have an opportunity to tabulate the traffic collision
data from the last reporting period due to traffic enforcement priorities.
Sergeant Shepley shared that the number one complaint the PD has received is the
confusion with the Broadway interchange. He stated he observed turn movements from
improper lanes and indicated the cause for the majority of the accidents that have
occurred at that location have been due to red-light runners. Sergeant Shepley indicated
he felt the configuration appeared to become clearer recently due to the reduction in
complaints.
Sergeant Shepley shared that the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant has been
tentatively approved for another year in the amount of $70,000. He said the next DUI
checkpoint funded through the OTS grant is scheduled for August 24.
Sergeant Shepley shared that Corporal Martin is out and that Jason Orloff would be
taking over some of his administrative duties and therefore the Commission may get an
opportunity to meet him.
The radar trailer is currently on California Drive and Sergeant Shepley said they are still
troubleshooting to determine the problem with the speed count operation. He also shared
the PD will be busy next month with taxi cab recertification’s.
Chair Wettan inquired about any accidents at the intersection of El Camino Real and
Floribunda and Sergeant Shepley indicated he would provide a report for this period and
the following reporting period at next month’s TSPC meeting.
15
Vice-Chair Bush and Sergeant Shepley agreed to communicate via email about Vice-
Chair Bush’s concern regarding bicycle citations on Carolan Avenue that he observed
from the online crime map.
c) Farmer’s Market
Chair Londer said there was no representation from the TSPC at last month’s Farmer’s
Market. However, when he was there, Commissioner Londer said he walked through the
alleys at Park/Lorton and Park/Primrose at the request of a Chamber of Commerce
employee. The employee suggested the City consider making those alleyways one-way
versus the current two-way traffic because the current width does not allow for two cars to
pass simultaneously.
Commissioner Londer indicated they will not participate in the July Farmer’s Market and
agreed to work out participation at the August Farmer’s Market at the August TSPC
meeting.
d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications
Commissioner Londer wanted the record to reflect he received a voicemail about the
Residential Parking Permit Program and attempted to call back twice but the resident’s
voicemail box was full.
Commissioner Akers stated he appreciated the quick follow-up on emails with City staff
recently.
Vice-Chair Bush indicated he spoke to a community member at the corner of Howard and
Anita by Washington School that stated her concern with the speed in which cars are
traveling in that area.
Vice-Chair Bush also shared he looked into data regarding modes of transportation
according to the 2014 Census and noted that the City of Burlingame, relative to the rest
of San Mateo County, rated under average for biking and over average for pedestrian
access and public transit. He said he would send the chart to Mr. Wong for distribution
as he felt the data was very interesting.
8. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS
a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)
No update.
b) Broadway Parking (Bush & Wettan)
16
No update but Chair Wettan did mention the loss of a few more restaurants on Broadway.
He said he had the opportunity to speak to a Council Member and hoped to partner with
other commissions to look at Broadway holistically.
c) School Speed Limits (Akers & Londer)
No update.
d) Envision Burlingame (Londer & Martos)
Commissioner Londer indicated an email was sent out requesting availability for a final
meeting either at the end of August or the first part of September.
e) El Camino Real Task Force (Londer & Wettan)
Commissioner Londer stated there has been no meetings since the last TSPC meeting
and Chair Wettan indicated they were off for the summer with plans to reconvene in the
fall.
f) BPAC (Bush & Londer/Wettan)
Chair Wettan advised that there will be a meeting for what will hopefully be a reconstituted
BPAC on Tuesday, July 18. Chair Wettan and Vice-Chair Bush plan to attend and
encouraged others to attend. They shared that the meeting will be at the Library in
Conference Room “C” at 6 p.m. Chair Wettan stated he is very excited and the
subcommittee will touch base prior to the meeting next Tuesday.
9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
BPAC (timing dependent on progress of the July 18 meeting)
Downtown Parking (confirm with Commissioner Martos)
Extension of red-curbing on Willborough
Safe Routes to School in September or October
10. ADJOURNMENT 9:48 p.m.
1
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NO:
7.a – Engineering
Division Reports
MEETING DATE:
August 10, 2017
To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
Date: August 10, 2017
From: Andrew Wong, Senior Engineer – (650) 558-7230
Subject: Item 7.a - Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission receive a presentation by staff providing an update on
various Public Works – Engineering projects and activities.
BACKGROUND
• US101/Broadway Interchange Project – Stage 5 work is still underway. Remaining
operations still include landscaping, restriping, resurfacing; specifically the US 101
northbound ramps. Expect some night detours and delays associated with roadway
resurfacing on US 101. Project completion anticipated for mid-September.
• 2017 Street Resurfacing Program – The resurfacing portion of the project has been
completed. Contractor in process of completing final striping and punch list items.
• Carolan Avenue Complete Streets – Construction anticipated for this summer, with
portions of work to coincide with Summerhill’s construction operations currently underway.
• Larkspur/Linden Traffic Circle – The installation the traffic circle itself has been completed.
Remaining work by contractor includes some asphalt patch work, signing, and striping. Park
and Recreation staff to install landscaping in circle. Resident irrigation concerns have been
resolved.
• Peninsula Avenue Overcrossing – Data collection effort has been completed, and San
Mateo’s consultants are currently processing the data. A report with results to be presented
at a TBD public meeting.
• Hoover School Update – Flashing beacon scheduled to arrive this week, and staff has
contacted the residents along Easton with regards to pole locations for the parking
restrictions.
• Roosevelt School Update – Staff has generated work order for pole and sign installations
for access restrictions.
Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports August 10, 2017
2
• TSPC Email Communications – Ms. Finola Muldowney to Commissioner Martos on 8/1/17.
Staff has been in contact with Ms. Muldowney and discussed next steps.
• TSPC Priority List (Updated August 2017):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Downtown Modal Access
2 School Traffic Issues 5/11/17: Item 6a
3 California Complete Streets 7/13/17: Item 7a
4 B/PAC setup
5 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
6 SR2S Review
7 Broadway Parking
8 Public Shuttles/Transit
9 Grant Strategies 7/13/17: Item 6a
10 ECR Corridor (ECR Task Force)
11 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 7/13/17: Item 7a
12 Parking and traffic considerations w/Planning
13 Bay Trail
14 Intro to Paving
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda
2 Hoover School Update 7/13/17: Item 6b
3 Downtown Parking Strategies
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/13/17: Item 7a
5 California Roundabout
6 General Plan – Circulation Element
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC 7/13/17: Item 6a
8 Rec Center Parking
9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 7/13/17: Item 7a
10 Grant Opportunities 6/8/17: Item 7a
11 Grade Separation 5/11/17: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC 4/13/17: Item 7a
13 School Speed Limit Updates 3/9/17: Item 7a
14 Burlingame Point - Bay Trail
15 School Safety Improvements 3/9/17: Item 7a
16 California Complete Streets 5/11/17: Item 7a
17 California Drive parking restrictions 6/8/17: Item 7a
18 Traffic Brochure
DISCUSSION
Some of these items may have been originally presented to City staff and/or the Traffic Safety and
Parking Commission as public requests or comments. Items on this list are matters that would
typically be addressed by City staff on an administrative level, or are City capital improvement
projects. Matters that require broad public input or have a wide-spread impact are addressed as
Commission “Discussion/Action Items” (TSPC Agenda Item 6).
Burlingame TSPC Contact LogUpdated: 3/6/14CompletedCompletedPending Under Review by City StaffNot yet addressed by City StaffNo. Date Requestorct InfInfRequest StatusResponse No. 13 11/5/2014 Alvares 650johTaxi regulationCompletedBPD responded and contacted the tresspassing taxi 6 7/30/2014 SchweisoscRed‐tipping for improved dwy accessCompletedWO issued and completed7 7/23/2014 SchuhkaRRRP prgram for CypressCompletedCC approved RRRP, signs to be installed by Corp Yard8 6/16/2014 ParianispX‐ing guard request @ Ray/ECR/RosedaleCompletedSch. District and CM approved9 1/26/2015 Rogers 650sjrSchool traffic along PalomaCompletedBPD responded and is checking 10 1/15/2015 DemarcojusPalm/ECR X‐walkCompletedTo be addressed as part of Caltrans' Crosswalk Enhancement Project11 3/18/2015 ValadaomRRPP questions re: CypressCompletedemailed resident response, additionally notices sent out12 3/16/2015 James 925‐78parking concerns @1525 CalifCompletedemailed resident response13 3/19/2015 Dawid No mid block U‐turnCompletedphone call back to resident1 6/20/2014 Constantinocoall‐way stop: Howard/VictoriaCompletedUnder review by staff2 10/1/2014 HanifAhSpeeding on Ray Dr.CompletedAll‐way stop review completed @ Ray/Balboa4 11/5/2014 CoutantmSpeeding on RalstonPendingStaff to determine location for installation of temporary driver feedback signs5 10/2/2014 VelascochBicycling concerns on CaliforniaCompletedUnder review by staff (BPAC), Class I facilities to be studied 14 4/30/2015 Giorni hoTour Buses dbl parking on Class II along Airport (Near Doubletree)CompletedBPD providing enforcement 15 4/20/2015 Velasco chNACTO Complete Street Webinar on May 20CompletedStaff enrolled in webinar16 5/7/2015 Stacie Low stared‐curbing along Hillside CircleCompletedStaff to mark out No Parking Restriction along Hillside Circle, then issue WO17 5/27/2015 Salvia 415saPedestrian crosswalk safety at ECR/WillowCompletedForwarded info and contact info to Caltrans18 6/22/2015 WallachanEvent at Ray ParkCompletedPark & Rec Staff to coordinate with neighborhood19 6/19/2015 VelascochDesign comments on Carolan Complete StreetsCompletedComments have been forwarded to design team for consideration20 9/10/2015 Shmygol Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway21 9/10/2015 Chan Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway22 9/9/2015 Harvey Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway23 9/9/2015 Fox Larkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedTSPC supported installation, design options underway24 10/16/2015 AnncoBroadway OC ConstructionCompletedemailed resident response25 10/15/2015 Janice & Henry MokjchLarkspur/Linden Traffic CircleCompletedemailed resident response26 10/21/2015 Wendy RossieWBroadway OC ConstructionCompletedemailed resident response27 10/16/2015 AnncoCalif‐Palm constructionCompletedemailed resident response28 11/5/2015 CairnsSCCrosswalk at El Camino and WillowCompletedemailed resident response29 10/30/2015 JonesGUTraffic Congestion Information re Broadway Completedemailed resident response30 11/21/2015 Tidmarsh Concerns regarding RRFB at Paloma/BroadwayCompletedemailed resident response31 12/9/2015 Velasco comment regarding installation of all‐way stop st Balboa/RayCompleted32 12/18/2015 Ryan Drake Avenue onto Adeline red‐curbing for sight distanceCompletedStaff responded to resident, as well as generated work order33 1/12/2016 Dunn Striping of crosswalks along Broadway (ECR to Vancouver)PendingStaff responded to resident. Staff to review34 1/13/2016 Velasco red curbing along ECR (Murchison and Trousdale)CompletedStaff responded to resident. WO to be issued for Feb.35 1/19/2016 Dawid comment regarding pedestrian safety treatments at cornersCompleted36 1/21/2016 Peters Speeding along Rivera and ArguelloPendingBPD dispatched as well as traffic hose counters. Staff to review data, then make determination37 2/5/2016 Dobson Burlingame/California pedestrian crossing on CaliforniaCompletedStaff responded to resident. Staff to review signal timing.38 1/17/2017 White RRFB at Rollins/Edwards for Pen. Humane SocietyStaff to review and bring back at future TSPC meeting.39 5/1/2017 Desedare No Parking" on part of WillboroughCompletedStaff has contacted resident. No further action.40 8/1/2017 Muldowney Traffic Issues along VictoriaPendingStaff has contacted resident. Will notice for red‐curbing, and proceed with what follows