HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - TSP - 2018.05.10Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
City of Burlingame
Meeting Agenda
BURLINGAME CITY HALL
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Council Chambers7:00 PMThursday, May 10, 2018
Members of the public may comment on any action or study item appearing on the agenda at the time
it is called. Comments on other items should be made under agenda item #5. Provision of identifying
information is optional but assists in preparation of the minutes. All votes are unanimous unless
separately voted for the record.
1. Call To Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of Minutes
April 12, 2018 Meeting Minutesa.
Meeting MinutesAttachments:
Members of the public may speak on any item not on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to
suggest an item for a future Commission agenda may do so during this public comment period. The
Ralph M. Brown Act (the State-Local Agency Open Meeting Law) prohibits the Commission from
acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a "Request To
Speak" card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The provision of a name, address or
other identifying information is optional. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. The Commission
Chair may adjust the time limit in light of the number of anticipated speakers.
5. Public Comments: Non-Agenda
6. Discussion/Action Items
Community B/PAC Update (Informational Item Only)a.
2019 Street Resurfacing Projectb.
Exploring the Feasability of an East-West Public Shuttlec.
Presentation
Meeting Notice
Attachments:
7. Information Items
Page 1 City of Burlingame Printed on 5/4/2018
May 10, 2018Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission
Meeting Agenda
Engineering Division Reportsa.
Staff Report
Lime Bike Burlingame Data Share (March)
Attachments:
Police Department Reportsb.
Farmer's Marketc.
TSPC Chair/Commissioner's Communicationsd.
8. Committee & Sub-Committee Reports
Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)a.
Broadway Parking (Bush & Wettan)b.
School Traffic (Londer & Israelit)c.
9. Future Agenda Items
10. Adjournment
NOTICE: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at
650-558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public viewing at the City Clerk's office, 501 Primrose Road, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. before the
meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are
available on the site.
NEXT TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION MEETING: Thursday, June 14, 2018
Page 2 City of Burlingame Printed on 5/4/2018
1
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of Thursday, April 12, 2018
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:03 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Israelit, Bush, Londer, Martos, Wettan
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: To accept the minutes of March 8, 2018 as written.
M/S/C: Londer/Wettan; 4/0/1
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA
Brian Benn spoke of an economist article regarding autonomous vehicles and traffic
projections. He stated one study projected a 60% decline in street traffic by 2030 and a
separate study that stated by 2035, 80% of people in urban areas will be using robotaxis. Mr.
Benn felt this information should be considered when determining our parking needs, such as
the parking garage plan for Lot N.
Mr. Benn stated he is supportive of the east-west shuttle concept. In addition, he would like
to see the City consider a zero emissions bus, such as Proterra. Mr. Benn would also like the
City to consider easy multi-bike loading and unloading and a web based application that would
provide real-time updates on the bus location, various stops, etc.
6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
a) Community B/PAC Update (Informational Only)
No update provided by B/PAC. Commissioner Wettan explained that the B/PAC was still
2
meeting with a City consultant to provide comments regarding the 2018 pavement plan.
He also stated tonight’s B/PAC meeting agenda was available last week and suggested it
was good practice to include the B/PAC agenda in the TSPC meeting materials for future
months as it would give the Commission the ability to discuss items as opposed to only
receiving information.
Commissioner Londer confirmed the B/PAC subcommittee members are Vice-Chair Bush
and Commissioner Wettan. Commissioner Wettan stated the subcommittee assignments
are not a fixed term and can be changed at any time.
b) Lot N Parking Structure Size
Chair Martos indicated the purpose of this item was to review last month’s determinations
pertaining to the size of the parking structure planned for Lot N and receive any last
comments prior to forwarding to City Council and the Planning Commission.
Chair Martos reviewed the proposal including the considerations and rationale behind the
Commission’s proposal.
Commissioner Wettan suggested the clarifying edits below.
• Under Background, correct the Commissioner’s vote to 4/0/0.
• Under Discussion, add new bullet to indicate “consider the engineering guideline
to maintain 15% capacity for open parking at peak times.”
• Under Discussion, switch the words downtown and core in bullet 3 and add “such
as lots E or J.” Also consider adding additional language after the word future, such
as “due to changes in driving habits and technology.”
• In the first paragraph on page two, add additional language to state “the
Commissioners data indicates almost no capacity on peak days thus a need to
add more than the 160 additional spaces that Lot N would provide.”
Chair Wettan indicated he would share his notes, including the renumbering of
considerations.
Chair Martos stated he would fix the typo in the first sentence under Discussion to read
“the Commission considered” as opposed to considers.
In the same sentence, Commissioner Londer requested to remove the word commission
after TSPC as the acronym already includes the word commission. He also suggested
to include text to indicate Vice-Chair Bush was absent for the vote.
Vice-Chair Bush asked if it was possible to add a varying viewpoint at the bottom of the
letter, such as the potential considerations below.
• Maintaining 15% vacancy is an important goal to pursue but it is dependent on the
3
cost of parking . He thought an additional pricing structure may change the
distribution of the current parking utilization.
• The higher you go in the levels of a structure the less desirable the parking stalls
are and cited the Library lot as an example.
• The new Parks and Recreation Center will have additional parking and could
potentially offset some of the parking issues in the downtown core.
Commissioner Wettan asked to note that the one place in Burlingame where parking was
stacked vertically, Lot A, the Lot is consistently full during the day.
Commissioner Wettan also noted the goals of insuring proper shuttle utilization and
economic efficiency, including typical costs per rider that are below $4. He stated that a
program paying for ride sharing services such as Uber or Lyft could be more cost-effective
and worth considering at least by comparison. He also suggested such a program might
be easy to pilot as an experiment.
The Commission discussed the best way to present the recommendation given the
varied opinions and collectively crafted the motion below.
Motion: To accept the letter with permission to include additional edits from
Commissioner Wettan and allow Commissioner Bush to write his
dissenting position in a separate letter to the City Council and Planning
Commission and submit proposal to City Council in a timely manner.
M/S/C: Bush/Israelit; 5/0/0
c) Development of Framework and Objectives for Working Session with Community B/PAC
Mr. Wong provided a short presentation with suggested outcomes for the framework and
objectives for a working session between TSPC and B/PAC.
Commissioner Wettan began by echoing comments previously made by Councilmember
Beach and stated it’s difficult for the City to provide competitive grant applications without
an overall vision and clear plan. He stated the update to the 2004 Bike Plan is B/PAC’s
number one priority.
Commissioner Israelit stated she was interested in knowing the vision of the B/PAC to
ensure everyone is on the same page.
Commissioner Londer agreed with comments provided by Commissioners Wettan and
Israelit to avoid getting into the nuts and bolts—keep the working session discussion at a
high level. He stated he would like to see bicyclists and pedestrians receive the same
considerations in the updated plan.
Commissioner Wettan suggested two joint sessions, one front end session to
4
communicate desirable considerations and a second session for feedback as they
approach the final stages of work.
Vice-Chair Bush said the ultimate goal is to revamp 2004 Bicycle Plan and incorporate
pedestrians. In addition, he probed the group about what populations TSPC wants to
appeal to (use cases), what problems TSPC wants B/PAC to tackle, and how to prioritize
the use cases in an effort to create an improved plan.
Commissioner Londer stated he was in favor of having the sessions prior to a TSPC
meeting. Chair Martos suggested the first working session be Thursday, June 14 from
5:30 – 7:00 p.m. and the second session take place at a regular TSPC meeting.
Vice-Chair Bush confirmed with Mr. Wong that there are funds earmarked for a bicycle
boulevard study and those funds cannot be applied towards the master plan efforts. Mr.
Wong indicated funds for the master plan are separate and would be available at the start
of fiscal year 2018-2019.
Vice-Chair Bush suggested defining a scope of work for the master plan work and how to
pursue the bike boulevard plan as possible agenda items for the working session with
B/PAC. Vice-Chair Bush also suggested potential consultants provide a presentation
specific to their ideas and processes for creating a master plan. Mr. Wong explained that
consultant selection for Public Works projects is typically done at the staff level but would
look into the feasibility of his request and get back to the Commission.
In closing, Chair Martos summarized the following goals and outcomes for the working
session:
• Preparation of grant applications;
• Vision of B/PAC and how it fits into the master plan;
• Keep session at high-level, do not get into the nuts and bolts;
• Revamp 2004 Bike Plan to align with current vision;
• Look at use cases and prioritize them to assist with master plan development;
• Provide pedestrian considerations; and
• First working session to occur Thursday, June 14 from 5:30 – 7:00 p.m.
d) Exploring the Feasibility of East-West Public Shuttle
Mr. Wong provided a presentation to the Commission with a brief background on existing
shuttles and routes, costs, and industry metrics from Commute.org. He suggested TSPC
examine potential east-west shuttle routes and develop next steps.
Chair Martos opened public comment.
Brian Benn clarified the proposed east-west route and stated he was supportive of the
shuttle and would use it for multiple purposes.
5
Commissioner Wettan sought clarification on the cost of the shuttles and what problem
TSPC is trying to solve with the proposed shuttle. He expressed concerns with shuttle
utilization and economic efficiency. Commissioner Wettan felt the cost per rider should be
in the $3-$4 range for it to make economic sense. He stated it would be cheaper to Uber
and suggested a subsidy option may be more economical and efficient than a public
shuttle.
Commissioner Londer noted that the Transportation Authority produced a table of shuttle
rankings for shuttle services provided within San Mateo County. He stated the North
Burlingame Shuttle ranked 4th in highest valued shuttle in the County out of 34 shuttles.
Commissioner Londer indicated that he is generally in favor of investigating/pursuing
anything with the potential to reduce traffic, congestion, pollution, and increases parking.
Commissioner Israelit inquired about the population the proposed shuttle is targeting and
why, as she felt the east-west route is circuitous. Based on the route shown, she did not
feel elementary aged children would utilize the shuttle and wasn’t certain she could buy
into the notion the shuttle would serve a large number of people.
Vice-Chair Bush inquired about metrics for determining the timing and length of an
effective shuttle route. Mr. Wong stated he would seek clarification from Commute.org.
Vice-Chair Bush stated knowing the population density is a fundamental concept when
determining the need for an additional shuttle. He said he was in favor of increasing shuttle
routes but the challenge is hitting the correct collection and distribution points. Vice-Chair
Bush also suggested an Uber partnership option to subsidize shared rides. In response,
Mr. Wong said San Mateo County has a subsidized carpool application as part of their
Commute Alternative Program.
Jan Robertson requested to speak and shared the following three points: (1) Students
living in the hills could use the proposed shuttle to get to Burlingame High School as the
proposed route is near the Caltrain station. She felt this may provide some relief to parents;
(2) The new Recreation Center is very close to the Caltrain station and would enable kids
to get to the Recreation Center for activities; and (3) From a shopping perspective, the
shuttle would be very convenient.
Commissioner Israelit felt the shuttle may be better utilized by shortening the route and
suggested removing the BART and Trousdale stops. Commissioner Wettan agreed and
strongly recommended breaking the route up by extending existing shuttle routes such as
the North Shuttle for access to the Millbrae Transit Hub and Broadway.
Chair Martos inquired about the old east-west shuttle route in an effort to avoid another
unsuccessful shuttle due to lack of ridership. He felt the community need is not fully
defined yet but said there is plenty of time to survey residents. Mr. Wong indicated he
would look into the previous east-west shuttle route.
The Commission continued with a lengthy and interactive discussion in an effort to come
6
to a consensus on the purpose of the shuttle and potential route, which produced the
comments and suggestions below.
• Reach out to the City of Mountain View regarding their efforts and experience with
Uber and Lyft for shared rides.
• Define the community need(s) and survey residents with proposed ride sharing
reimbursement via the City to gauge public interest.
• Eliminate some of the proposed shuttle stops and focus on the connection from
the Hills to Burlingame Avenue and Broadway.
• Extension of existing shuttles (North Shuttle) for access to Millbrae Transit Hub
and other key areas.
• Keep route between Alvarado and downtown Burlingame. Consider additional
stops between OLA and Hillside Circle, such as Columbus.
• Density should be a key factor when considering a new route and shuttle stops.
Easton Addition is a prime area with the greatest density.
• Start with a small vehicle (minivan) and transition to a shuttle if the need is there.
In closing, Chair Martos confirmed that the Commission was in agreement that the shuttle
route as proposed is too long and to eliminate the stops near Hoover School and continue
to the Broadway and Burlingame Avenue areas. He also confirmed the Commission was
in agreement that the purpose of the proposed east-west shuttle is to get more people to
Burlingame Avenue and Broadway, alleviate parking capacity concerns, and also be a
potential means for students to get to Burlingame High School.
Mr. Wong suggested the Commission review alternative routes at a future meeting and
explained that the route presented was not meant to be the proposed route.
Lastly, Commissioner Wettan stated that at the time of the meeting, a ride share via Uber
from City Hall to Cortez/Hillside was just over $3 and wanted to note that as a data point.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
a) Engineering Division Reports
Mr. Wong provided updates on the following Public Works – Engineering projects and
activities.
• Lime Bike – Data for February’s activity attached as an exhibit to the Engineer’s
Report.
Commissioner Wettan suggested to have more bikes available at the Millbrae
Transit Hub. Mr. Wong said he would confirm the length of the LimeBike trial period
for the Commission.
7
• California Drive Roundabout Project – Anticipated start of construction in May.
Project updates can be found online at: www.burlingame.org/roundabout.
• TSPC Email Communications – No new communications.
• TSPC Priority List (Updated April 2018):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Downtown Parking Strategies 3/8/18: Item 6b
2 Downtown Modal Access
3 Grant Opportunities 3/8/18: Item 7a
4 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC
5 SR2S Review
6 School Traffic Issues
7 California Complete Streets 3/8/18: Item 7a
8 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
9 Broadway Parking
10 Public Shuttles/Transit 4/12/18: Item 6d
11 ECR Corridor (ECR Task Force)
12 Bay Trail
13 Intro to Paving
14 Halloween Traffic Impacts (July)
15 Parking and traffic considerations w/Planning
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda
2 Hoover School Update
3 Downtown Parking Strategies 3/8/18: Item 6b
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda
5 California Roundabout 4/12/18: Item 7a
6 General Plan – Circulation Element
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC
8 Rec Center Parking
9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 3/8/18: Item 7a
10 Grant Opportunities 3/8/18: Item 7a
11 Grade Separation 3/8/18: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC
13 School Speed Limit Updates
14 Burlingame Point - Bay Trail
15 School Safety Improvements
16 California Complete Streets
8
17 Traffic Brochure (one outstanding) 3/8/18: Item 7a
2018 Agenda Item Action Status
1 Chap. 13.52 of BMC To City Council in March 2018
2 Citywide Parking Restrictions To City Council in April 2018
b) Police Department Reports
Corporal Orloff indicated collisions were up over the last reporting period—from 18 to 29
documented collisions. He stated there were no fatal accidents but there were two major
injury accidents at El Camino Real and Murchison and the Broadway overpass due to
unfamiliarity of the roadway. Corporal Orloff also indicated there was an increase in minor
injury accidents and one DUI collision with no injuries. Lastly, he reported a collision at
the intersection of El Camino Real and Floribunda where a car failed to yield to a
pedestrian.
The Commissioners congratulated Corporal Orloff on his promotion.
Vice-Chair Bush requested the collision reports differentiate the collisions with bicyclists
and pedestrians. Corporal Orloff said he would pass the request to Jim Ford as this would
be his last meeting.
c) Farmers Market
Commissioner Londer indicated they received feedback from the community at the
previous Farmer’s Market. He said residents requested better signage on Broadway as
the approaches can be confusing.
Commissioner Londer said there would be another Farmer’s Market next Sunday but
Commission agreed to take a month off.
d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications
Commissioner Wettan said he received an email from former Planning Commissioner
Jeff DeMartini and he stated there is very little capacity for parking on Burlingame Avenue
in the evening but a lot of capacity in lots K-1 and E. Mr. DeMartini felt the current
distribution may be due to a lack in communication regarding the parking hours (6 pm).
Chair Martos indicated he met with Mayor Brownrigg to discuss the proposed parking lot
structure and public meeting for the Lyon Hoag residents. He said the Mayor suggested
agenda items such as the Residential Parking Program and the Peninsula Avenue
Overpass Project. Chair Martos said there is no date set but the Mayor wants the meeting
to take place before the summer months at the Recreation Center on a Saturday between
the hours of 9:00 – 11:00 a.m.
9
Chair Martos said he and Commissioner Londer attended a presentation regarding Anza
Airport Park (lot by Kinkaid’s) and indicated the presentation was to help determine the
best way to utilize the state-owned land.
8. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS
a) Downtown Parking (Martos & Wettan)
No update.
b) Broadway Parking (Bush & Wettan)
No update.
c) School Traffic (Israelit & Londer)
Commissioners Israelit & Londer said they met with Rusty Hopewell from the Burlingame
School District to inform him of the School Traffic Subcommittee. Commissioner Israelit
said the School District has an extensive list of desired improvements. She said the hope
is to have ongoing talks with Rusty and work with him on short-term, low cost
improvements.
9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
• Further discussion on list of desired improvements from School District (coordinate with
Rusty Hopewell)
• Neighborhood traffic calming in advance of Mayor’s neighborhood meeting
• California Drive Roundabout
• 2018 Repaving Program
• California Drive Complete Streets design before it is finalized as there is one point of
contention related to bikes in the “door zone”
10. ADJOURNMENT 9:41 p.m.
Prior to adjournment Commissioner Londer said May 10 is Bike to Work Day and refreshments
and goodie bags will be available for participants. Chair Martos requested the information be
included in the City’s enews.
Commissioner Israelit requested to use enews and/or Next Door to communicate to the public
when there is a change in Burlingame, such as the no right turn on red on Chapin or the new
stops signs on Balboa and Ray Drive.
DRAFT EAST‐WEST SHUTTLE ROUTE ALTERNATIVESTraffic Safety and Parking CommissionMay 10, 2018
GoalsReview the presentation with three route alternatives“out and back”“counter‐clock‐wise”“clock‐wise”Obtain additional public inputDevelop next steps Additional routesForm sub‐committee
Discussion
Discussion
Discussion
GoalsReview the presentation Obtain public input For tonight’s meeting a meeting notice was included in E‐news and in NextDoor. Develop next steps Additional public outreachDevelop additional routesForm sub‐committee
Questions & Feedback
The City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997
PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE
EXPLORING THE FEASIBILITY OF AN EAST-WEST
PUBLIC SHUTTLE DISCUSSION
On Thursday, May 10, the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC) will
continue the discussion regarding the feasibility of an East-West public shuttle.
The TSPC is seeking additional community input about the necessity of this
shuttle as well as input on some alternative routes.
The TSPC meeting will start at 7:00 PM, on Thursday May 10, 2018 and take
place in the City Hall Council Chambers.
The staff report related to this discussion can be found by Tuesday May 8,
2018 at the following link on the City’s website:
https://www.burlingame.org/government/commissions/traffic_safety_agendas_and_minutes.php
Please contact Mr. Andrew Wong, Senior Engineer at (650) 558-7230 or via
email at awong@burlingame.org with any comments or concerns in regards to
the above discussion. Written comments should be submitted no later than 3:00
PM on Wednesday, May 9, 2018.
1
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NO:
7.a – Engineering
Division Reports
MEETING DATE:
May 10, 2018
To: Traffic Safety and Parking Commission
Date: May 10, 2018
From: Andrew Wong, Senior Engineer – (650) 558-7230
Subject: Item 7.a - Engineering Division Reports/Public Works Update
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission receive a presentation by staff providing an update on
various Public Works – Engineering projects and activities.
BACKGROUND
• Lyon Hoag Working Group Session – to occur on Wednesday, May 23, starting at
6:30 p.m. in the Community Center. Items up for discussion will include traffic calming,
residential permit parking program, private development, and San Mateo’s Peninsula
Interchange Project.
• Hoover School Sidewalk Improvements – Design consultant selected. Construction
anticipated for summer of 2019.
• Lime Bike – Data for March’s activity attached.
• Primrose Road Pilot Stop Signs – City to implement a pilot stop sign along Primrose
Road in the vicinity of City Hall and the Main Library. Notices will be posted prior to the
installation. Intersections to be monitored by Police and Engineering. Analysis to be
brought back at future TSPC meeting.
• TSPC Priority List (Updated May 2018):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Downtown Parking Strategies 3/8/18: Item 6b
2 Downtown Modal Access
3 Grant Opportunities 3/8/18: Item 7a
4 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC
5 SR2S Review
6 School Traffic Issues 5/10/18: Item 6x
Item 7.a – Engineering Division Reports May 10, 2018
2
7 California Complete Streets 3/8/18: Item 7a
8 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
9 Broadway Parking
10 Public Shuttles/Transit 5/10/18: Item 6c
11 ECR Corridor (ECR Task Force)
12 Bay Trail
13 Intro to Paving 5/10/18: Item 6b
14 Halloween Traffic Impacts (July)
15 Parking and traffic considerations w/Planning
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda
2 Hoover School Update 5/10/18: Item 7a
3 Downtown Parking Strategies 3/8/18: Item 6b
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda
5 California Roundabout 4/12/18: Item 7a
6 General Plan – Circulation Element
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC
8 Rec Center Parking
9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 3/8/18: Item 7a
10 Grant Opportunities 3/8/18: Item 7a
11 Grade Separation 3/8/18: Item 7a
12 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC
13 School Speed Limit Updates
14 Burlingame Point - Bay Trail
15 School Safety Improvements
16 California Complete Streets
2018 Agenda Item Action Status
1 Chap. 13.52 of BMC Adopted
2 Citywide Parking Restrictions To City Council in May
DISCUSSION
Some of these items may have been originally presented to City staff and/or the Traffic Safety
and Parking Commission as public requests or comments. Items on this list are matters that
would typically be addressed by City staff on an administrative level, or are City capital
improvement projects. Matters that require broad public input or have a wide-spread impact are
addressed as Commission “Discussion/Action Items” (TSPC Agenda Item 6).
EXHIBITS
• Lime Bike Burlingame Data Share (March)
LimeBike - Burlingame Data Share
Sunday, April 1, 2018
Updates for the month of April on our program in Burlingame.
In this report, we have provided updates on:
-Customer Service
-Trip Data
If you have any questions about the report, please contact Megan Colford at
megan@limebike.com.
Customer Service:
-Our response time remains within our 2-hour window, and our Customer
Service Department has increased staff numbers to address the growing
volume nationally.
-Zendesk featured LimeBike’s Customer Service department in a recent post:
https://www.zendesk.com/customer/limebike/
Trip Numbers:
March numbers stayed strong, despite some cold and wet weather in the early half
of the month.
Total: More than 4,200 rides during March
-Average Ride distance: 1.13mi
-Rides on Lime-E bikes typically make up slightly more than 50% of daily rides
during the week, and slightly less than 50% of daily rides over the weekend.
Since our launch:
-6,700 vehicle miles saved!
-300,000 calories burned!
-5,400 lbs CO2 saved!
-3,700 registered users!
Heat Map, trips for overall month and specific ride map:
Hourly Rides starting in Burlingame (spikes all throughout 4pm - 8pm):