HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2004.11.15 City OfBurll�lgdme
8URLINGA. E
Crrr HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA%010
(650)558-7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting - Monday, November 15, 2004
Page 1 of 2
CLOSED SESSION: 6:00 p.m. Conference Room A
a. Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6; City Negotiators:
Jim Nantell and Bob Bell to discuss labor negotiations with
Teamsters Local 856
(Microphone check)
1. CALL TO ORDER 6:15 p.m. Council Chambers
2. ROLL CALL
3. CEREMONIAL
a. Rotation of Mayor Ceremony
4. MINUTES -Joint City Council/Public Works Study Meeting of Approve
October 26, 2004; Regular Meeting of November 1, 2004
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the
agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State
local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda.
It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are
requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The
Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
6. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Introduce ordinance amending revisions and amendments to Introduce
Municipal Code Section 17.04 (Fire Code)
b. Make two appointments to Beautification Commission Appoint
7. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve
a. Adopt Resolution approving the annual report of the Advisory
Board of the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District(BID) and declaring intention to
establish assessments for the 2005 year for the District
b. Authorization to solicit donations
C. Tentative condominium map for a 3 unit condominium at 508
Peninsula Avenue, Lot 1, Block 31, Map of Town of
Burlingame
d. Resolution approving changes to the Department Head and
unrepresented classifications compensation and benefit plan
i'5MVN City ofBurlulgame
BURLINGAME
k CITY HALL-Sot PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010
(650)5557200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting - Monday, November 15, 2004
Page 1 of 2
e. Resolution approving a salary increase for the City Manager
and City Attorney
f. Warrants and Payroll
8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. NEW BUSINESS
11. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library, September 21, 2004; Planning,
November 8, 2004
b. Department Reports: Building, October, 2004; Finance,
October, 2004
12. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayormaylimit speakers to three minutes each. 7:00 p.m.
a. Public Hearing to take action on the Peninsula Hospital Hearing/Action
Replacement Project at 1783 El Camino Real, Zoned C-3 and
Unclassified (to be Rezoned C-1 and Unclassified). The
following actions are required:
1. Certification of the final Environmental Impact Report
prepared for the project with findings of Overriding
Consideration.
2. Adoption of an Ordinance to amend the text of the
zoning code to add medical offices as a conditional
use in the C-1 Zoning District within the Mills
Peninsula Block Subarea of the North
Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan.
3. Adoption of an Ordinance to rezone from C-3 to C-1
for 1515 Trousdale Drive (APN 025-123-040) and to
rezone from Unclassified to C-1 1791 El Camino Real
(APN 025-123-100)
4. Conditional Use permits for all proposed uses in the
Unclassified Zoning District and for medical office
use and structures over 35 feet in height in the C-1
Zoning District.
City ofBiUY1)7gdMC
9VRLINGAME
CITY HALL-SOl PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA wio
(650)55II-7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting - Monday, November 15, 2004
Page 1 of 2
5. Design Review for commercial buildings in the C-1
Zoning District
13. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558-7203 at
least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's
office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p,m.before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the
City's website at www.burlinQame.orR. Agendas and minutes are available at this site.
NEXT MEETING—Monday December 6, 2004
Tuesday, October 26, 2004
Joint Study Meeting
Burlingame City Council and Public Works Department
1. STUDY MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
A joint study meeting of the Burlingame City Council and the Public Works Department was held
on October 26,2004,at City Hall,Conference Room A.The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m.
by Mayor Rosalie O'Mahony.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Council Present: Baylock, Galligan, Nagel, O'Mahony
Council Absent: Coffey
StaffPresent: CM Nantell,CA Anderson,DPW Bagdon,ADPW Murtuza,SCE Monaghan,
HRD Bell, CP Monroe, FinD Nava, P&RD Schwartz, PC Van Etten, AFC
Dornell, CBO Cyr
4. PRESENTATION
a. FACILITIES MASTER PLAN AND STORM DRAINAGE
ADPW Murtuza stated that future major general fund needs are:$4 million for sidewalks,$3 million
for traffic signals and street lights, $36 million for storm drainage, and$52-63 million for building
facilities. He emphasized storm drainage needs and facilities needs.
ADPW Murtuza categorized facilities needs as: (1) Essential Needs which include ADA
requirements which must be met to avoid liability concerns for new structures; (2)Required Needs
which include structural and seismic deficiencies and asbestos issues on existing structures;and(3)
Desirable Needs which include increased office space,proper lighting, as well as parking.
The initial issues to consider in implementing the various projects are financing, prioritization,
packaging and community outreach. Staff will discuss these issues with the Finance Committee in
the future.
Councilwoman Baylock recommended polling the residents to determine extent of voter support for
projects. There was some discussion on what facilities should be considered and how to package
them for voter-approved financing.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor O'Mahony adjourned the meeting at 7:05 p.m.
CITY 0
BURLINGAME
o°
°9
�NMTED JUNE 6
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of November 1, 2004
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Rosalie O'Mahony called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Irving Amstrup.
2. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan,Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None
3. MINUTES
A correction was made to Item 8.d. changing the word"TO" in the title to "DO."Also an addition was made
to Item 7.b., second paragraph: "Councilwoman Baylock questioned whether forming another committee is a
good idea as there have been multiple committees formed around this project over the years and it might be
more productive to examine what might be the best use of the three acre site using some of the principles of
Congress on New Urbanism."Vice Mayor Galligan made a motion to approve the amended minutes of the
October 18, 2004 Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman Nagel, approved unanimously by voice
vote, 5-0.
4. PRESENTATIONS
a. CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE SAFETY POSTER CONTEST
FC Reilly introduced Fire Marshal Rocque Yballa who gave a brief presentation on the First Annual Fire
Safety Poster Contest created by Volunteer Angelina Ciucci to commemorate Fire Prevention Month. There
were 180 local elementary school entries. FM Yballa announced the winners. The grand prizewinner was
Rachel Ling of Lincoln Elementary School.
b. PROCLAMATION HONORING IRV AMSTRUP
Mayor O'Mahony presented former Mayor and Councilman Irving S. Amstrup with a proclamation
commemorating his 20 years of service including five times as Mayor to the City of Burlingame. Mayor
O'Mahony recognized the Amstrup family in attendance and noted not only Amstrup's commitment to
community service but the importance of the family's support over the years. She recalled that when
1
Burlingame City Council November 1,2004
Unapproved Minutes
Amstrup was mayor how important to her his recognition of her service in the Beautification Commission
was and wanted to take this opportunity to recognize him for his many contributions to the community
during her term of office as mayor.
CLOSED SESSION
CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following:
a. Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6; City Negotiators: Jim Nantell and Bob Bell meet to discuss
labor negotiations with Teamsters Local 856 and the Burlingame Association of Middle Managers
b. Council and Human Resources Director to discuss salary increases for City Manager and City
Attorney
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. PUBLIC HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BAY
LANDING HOTEL AT 1550 BAYSHORE HIGHWAY
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and recommended Council hold a public hearing and determine what
recommendation to communicate to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Department regarding the on-sale liquor
license application at 1550 Bayshore Highway.
Mayor O'Mahony opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilman Coffey made a motion to communicate to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Department that the
public convenience or necessity would be served by issuance of the proposed license as per the finding of the
Burlingame Police Department; seconded by Vice Mayor Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote,
5-0.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Al Heriz, 218 California Drive; Ron Carton, 211 West Lane; Ken Schrum, 260 East Lane; Karen Allen, 217
West Lane; Gary Doss, 214 California Drive; Sonya Hong, 216 California Drive; and Marguerite Heriz, 210
California Drive. These merchants located in the West Lane area expressed four major concerns on the
proposed improvements of the Burlingame Train Station: (1) loss of existing customer parking on West
Lane, (2) emergency vehicle access on West Lane with the Caltrain plan, (3) traffic flow on East Lane, and
(4) a petition was submitted opposing the closing of the pedestrian crossing across the tracks to Burlingame
Avenue. Mr. Doss stated that some of the merchants had met with the San Mateo County Transportation
Authority staff on October 27, 2004. Pat Giomi, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke in favor of the construction of a
medical office building for Peninsula Hospital only if the community is getting a full replacement hospital.
Tim Fanelli spoke in favor of Peninsula Hospital replacement.
There were no further comments from the floor.
7. STAFF REPORTS
2
Burlingame City Council November 1,2004
Unapproved Minutes
a. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION ON 1515
TROUSDALE FROM C-3 TO C-1 AND ON 1791 EL CAMINO REAL FROM
UNCLASSIFIED TO C-1
CP Monroe requested Council introduce an ordinance to change the zoning designation on 1515 Trousdale
Drive from C-3 to C-1 and on 1791 El Camino real from Unclassified to C-1.
Mayor O'Mahony requested CC Mortensen to read the title of the proposed ordinance amending the
Burlingame Municipal Code and the Zoning Maps incorporated in the Zoning Code by reclassifying property
located at 1791 El Camino Real from unclassified to C-1 District and property located at 1515 Trousdale
Drive from C-3 District to C-1 District. Vice Mayor Galligan waived further reading of the proposed
ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman
Nagel, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Mayor O'Mahony requested CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five
days before proposed adoption.
b. MAKE APPOINTMENT TO TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to appoint Dan Conway to the Traffic, Safety and Parking
Commission; seconded by Vice Mayor Galligan, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilwoman Baylock requested Item 8.b. be removed from the Consent Calendar for further information.
a. AFFIRMATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF INTERESTS IN EASTON ADDITION,
NOS. 1, 2, 3 AND 4
CA Anderson requested Council adopt Resolution No. 99-2004 affirming acceptance of deed of interests in
Easton Addition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 100-2004 OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL SURFACING TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)
FUNDING FOR AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROJECT
DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 100-2004 authorizing an application to be filed for
STP funding for the Airport Boulevard Resurfacing Project.
d. RESOLUTION NO. 101-2004 APPROVING REQUEST FOR TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT, PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING, FISCAL YEAR
2005-2006
DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 101-2004 approving a request for Metropolitan
Transportation Commission 2005-06 Transportation Development Act Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding.
3
Burlingame City Council November 1, 2004
Unapproved Minutes
e. APPROVAL TO REPLACE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S AIR COMPRESSOR FOR
BREATHING APPARATUS
FC Reilly requested Council approve the use of funds to replace the Fire Department's air compressor for
breathing apparatus and provide a ventilation system for the air compressor room at Fire Station No. 34.
f. RECOMMENDATION TO CANCEL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF
DECEMBER 20, 2004
CC Mortensen requested Council approve cancellation of the regularly scheduled Council meeting of
December 20, 2004, due to lack of Council business.
g. SPECIAL EVENT STREET CLOSURE (BURLINGAME AVENUE) HOLIDAY OPEN
HOUSE
Executive Assistant Shinday requested Council authorize the closure of Burlingame Avenue, Donnelly
Avenue and portions of Primrose Road, Park Road and Lorton Avenue on December 3, 2004, for the
Chamber of Commerce/Merchants' Association Holiday Open House event.
Councilwoman Nagel made a motion to approve Items a, c, d, e, f and g of the Consent Calendar; seconded
by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
b. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH CALLANDER ASSOCIATES FOR RESTROOM
AND SNACK SHACK PROJECT AT BAYSIDE PARK
PR&D Schwartz requested Council approve an agreement with Callander Associates for the restroom and
snack shack project at Bayside Park.
Councilwoman Baylock requested staff to contact those groups who typically use Bayside Park to invite
them to the Stakeholder Review Meeting as described in Item 2.07 of the proposal. PR&D Schwartz advised
that such groups have already been contacted.
Councilwoman Baylock made a motion to approve Item b of the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilman
Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City.
10. OLD BUSINESS
Councilwoman Nagel asked when Caltrain would return to Council to present their plans for the Burlingame
Train Station platform project. DPW Bagdon advised that staff has asked Caltrain to perform a thorough
community outreach to obtain additional input from local merchants. Once completed, staff will again meet
with Caltrain to determine when Caltrain will return to Council.
11. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
4
Burlingame City Council November 1,2004
Unapproved Minutes
12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, October 7, 2004; Traffic, Safety &Parking, October 14, 2004;
Planning, October 25, 2004
b. Department Reports: Police, August & September 2004
13. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor O'Mahony adjourned the meeting at 7:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Doris J. Mortensen
City Clerk
5
Burlingame City Council November 1,2004
Unapproved Minutes
4� CITY o6 STAFF REPORT
BURLINGAME AGENDA
ITEM# 6a
MTG.
o4°aarco JUNE6'9 DATE November 15,2004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTEDV� i
BY Roc ue a Fir Ma a
DATE: October 29, 2004
APPROVE ,0`!,
FROM: Central County Fire Department BY /
*�
SUBJECT: Revisions to Burlingame Municipal Code Section 44 (Fire Code)
Introduction:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt revisions and amendments to Section 17.04 of the Burlingame
Municipal Codes.
A. Request City Clerk to read title of the proposed amended ordinance.
B. Waive further reading of the ordinance.
C. Introduce the proposed ordinance.
D. Direct the city clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed
adoption.
1 �
BACKGROUND:
On November 4"', 2002, the City Council for the City of Burlingame adopted the 2001 Edition of the
California Fire Code (CFC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC) with California Amendments. At that same time, the
Council approved an amendment that changed the existing threshold for fire sprinkler requirements from
5,000 square feet to 2,000 square feet. With the increase level of fire sprinkler installations within the city, the
fire department is proposing further amendments to the ordinance. These amendments are intended to clarify
the threshold requirements and provide objective criteria for improved application of the ordinance.
Adoption of this ordinance will, for the most part, retain existing local amendments. However, there have
been some changes.
1. Adoption of the new fee schedule based upon hourly work does not properly account for"Phased"
projects. As such, fire construction permits will have a set number of inspections; ensuring that the
fire bureau will recover associated costs to extended construction projects. See §17.04.023
Section 105.9 #4
2. Increase construction activity in existing buildings has increased the need for inspection schedule
flexibility. After hours inspections and rates are now identified in both the fee schedule and the
city's fire code. See §17.04.023 Section 105.9 #5
3. Previously, the City of Burlingame referenced the Building Valuation Data published by the
International Conference of Building Officials. This document is no longer published. The
ordinance now references the Building Valuation Data as published by the International Code
Council. This change is implemented throughout §17.04.030.
4. Due to the fluctuations in building values over recent years, the $75,000 threshold for fire
sprinklers has now been dropped for both commercial and residential projects. In lieu of utilizing a
dollar factor that fluctuates, we no utilize a square footage threshold of 750 square feet for
residential projects and 1200 square feet for commercial projects. The valuation tables are still
utilized for comparison purposes for small projects in relatively large buildings whereas sprinklers
are not required if the work to be done is less than 20% of the value of a building. A designer is
given the option to use either method. This change was made to §17.04.030.
5. Improved installation standards are now codified to improve contractor expectation. The standards
are consistent with NFPA 13D and address target hazard areas within the city. See new
§17.04.028.
6. A clarification for remodel and alteration is now addressed. See §17.04.030 Section 1003.2.1.4
where language is added. This language was previously reviewed by the National Fire Sprinkler
Association for adoption in other Bay Area communities such as Monterey, California. This will
allow designers to identify the requirement for fire sprinklers prior to submission to plan review or
even as early as design review.
7. A retrofit requirement is now introduced to install radio repeater/receiver antenna for existing
highrise structures. The threshold for compliance is based upon major infrastructure modifications
to these existing structures (ie: complete HVAC renovation or Piping renovation). See
§17.04.055.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memo to Planning Commission dated April 26, 2004
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 26, 2004
To: Meg Monroe
Burlingame City Planner
From: Rocque J.Yballa
Fire Marshal
Central County Fire Department
Copies: Jim Nantel,Burlingame City Manager
Burlingame City Council
Bill Reilly, Fire Chief
Fred Cullum,Chief Building Official
sunj: APPLICATION&INTENT OF§17.04.030 BMC,FIRE SPRINKLERS
At the January 12th,2004 Planning Meeting,Commissioner Brownrigg requested
staff to prepare a report on the residential fire sprinkler requirements,what is
their intent and how they are triggered. The following information will describe
the public problem,intent to address that problem,and the direction of the
sprinkler ordinance for the future.
PUBLIC PROBLEM
Historically,typical Burlingame residential lots varied from 5,000 to 6,000 square
feet per parcel. Original construction varied from 1,100-1,800 square foot
homes with one-car garages being served by streets that are as narrow as 26
feet in width. Typical fire department response was two fire engines and a truck
company.
Over recent years,construction has taken off within Burlingame residential
neighborhoods with many homeowners and developers pushing their square
1
2
footages to the maximum size that zoning will allow. With the majority of
households owning multiple cars and the increased parking on the streets, fire
apparatus access has been significantly impacted. Additionally, the reduced side
yard spaces and reduced back yards have limited the abilities of typical fire
department suppression and rescue efforts. It's virtually impossible to raise a
standard 24' ladder to the side of many of our properties.
SOLUTION
On September 3rd, 2002 the City of Burlingame modified the existing fire
sprinkler ordinance threshold from a 5,000 square foot building activation down
to 2,000 square foot building activation. The new ordinance requires fire
sprinklers be installed in all new construction in excess of 2,000 square feet. The
ordinance also requires that existing structures which have new construction via
addition and/or remodel in excess of $75,0001 (or 20% of the buildings value
replacement cost', when the final square footage is in excess of 2,000 square
feet, shall be retrofitted throughout with an approved fire sprinkler system.
In the case of single-family dwellings, a NFPA 13D fire sprinkler is the approved
fire sprinkler system. This type of system is a life safety system, intended to
control a fire and provide occupants sufficient time to exit the residence prior to
the fire departments arrival. The system is an integrated system of piping,
connected to a water supply, with listed sprinklers that automatically initiate
water discharge over a fire area. Two or less fire sprinkler heads activated have
controlled or extinguished more than 90% of fires that occurred in homes
protected by fire sprinklers.
INSTALLATION
The fire sprinkler system is designed to have sprinklers installed throughout the
living areas. Due to the number of fires that occur within Burlingame that
initiate within bathrooms and garages, fire sprinklers are installed throughout
these areas as well. Because the system is designed as a life safety system, the
sprinkler system is not typically installed within attic areas. Detached garages
without living spaces that are separated from the main house by six feet are not
required to be equipped with fire sprinklers.
Fire sprinkler systems are designed based upon the assumption that two
sprinkler heads are flowing at the same time. Given the minimum pressure and
1 Construction costs and valuation are based upon cost as defined by the Building Valuation Data published
bimonthly in the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBG) Building Standards magazine
publication.
3
water flow to operate two fire sprinkler heads, the street meter must be sized at
a minimum of one inch in diameter.
RETROFIT APPLICATION
1003.2.1.2 All existing buildings with a total building floor area in excess
of two thousand(2,000) square feet or more than two (2) stories in height
shall be retroactively protected by an approved automatic extinguishing
system when costs of additions or alterations for which a building permit
is required will exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) or twenty
percent (20%) of the building's replacement cost as defined by the
Building Valuation Data published bimonthly in the International
Conference of Building Officials (ICBG) Building Standards magazine
publication, whichever is greater.
The current valuation data as it applies to single-family dwellings is
$107.18 per square foot. As such the following criteria apply before a fire
sprinkler system retrofit is required:
• The proposed final square footage of a home is in excess of 2,000 square
feet.
• An addition or alteration is made to a property which requires a building
permit and $75,000 worth of work. Given the above information, $75,000
equates to approximately 700 square foot of addition and/or alteration.
• In areas of alteration that require building inspections, the entire floor
area of the room is considered in the determination of the area of a total
alteration.
• Considering $107.18 per square foot is the factor for single-family
dwellings, the 20% rule would take effect if a house exceeds 3,500 square
feet.
UPCOMING PROPOSALS
Building valuation has been used to determine the need for compliance
since the original fire sprinkler ordinance that was adopted in 1991. With the
lowering of the threshold down to 2000 square feet from 5000 square feet, the
application of this ordinance has become more frequent. As such, the building,
planning, and fire department have been inundated with requests for clarification
of the Building Valuation Data tables as published by the International
Conference of Building Officials and the application of $75,000 verses 20% of the
overall building valuation.
In order to establish a simpler formula and more uniform application, the
Fire Department will be introducing new language to §17.04.030 of the
Burlingame Municipal Code which drops the references to Building Valuation and
4
specifies a prescriptive square footage amount. The thresholds for addition
and/or alteration are consistent with the application of$75,000 but
conservatively speaking,less stringent. In order to do that,the application will
have to be different for residential and commercial. The threshold for residential
occupancies will be 750 square feet and the threshold for commercial
occupancies will be 1200 square feet of addition and/or alteration.
End:
I ORDINANCE No.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 17.04 —
UNIFORM FIRE CODE TO CLARIFY ALARM, FEE, AND SPRINKLER
3 PROVISIONS
4
The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
5
6
Section 1. The City of Burlingame is located between the Santa Cruz Mountains foothills
7
and San Francisco Bay, with a number of substantial creeks flowing through highly developed
8
residential and industrial areas. It is surrounded by large areas of open space maintained in natural
9
condition, as well as having a significant natural canyon in the center of the residential area. The
10
City normally receives no measurable precipitation between May and October , and it can often
11
extend into late October or early November. During this period, average temperatures average
12
between 70' F and 90' F, and strong winds comedown the foothills. These conditions eliminate
13
most of the moisture in the natural vegetation and heavily wooded hillsides. The area also suffers
14
periodic droughts that extend the dry periods to other months of the year. In addition, many wood
15
roofs over wood construction predominate the residential areas. The City is directly east of the
16
San Andreas Fault, and much of the highly developed part of the City is located along the front of
17
the Bay, some on fill. The foothill areas have a variety of soil formations with steep canyons and
18
heavy precipitation. Fires in the community could quickly spread because of the extensive,
19
natural vegetation throughout the City. The City has a number of highly developed commercial
20
areas with older buildings, and an industrial area that is filled with mixed uses utilizing various
21
materials that could be highly hazardous. In addition, heavily traveled approach and departure
22
routes for San Francisco International Airport are immediately adjacent or over the City. Much of
23
the residential areas that are immediately adjacent to woodland and canyon are served by narrow
24
one- or two-lane roads with confused access caused by the steepness of the terrain. Access by fire
25
suppression equipment is extremely limited by both topography and improved access. It is only
26
through strong building standards and effective fire prevention and containment programs that
27
citizens will receive the protection they deserve, and that citizens will be able to obtain reasonably
28
10/8/2004 1
I priced insurance for their homes and businesses. In seeking to attain these goals, the fire
2 prevention standards in Title 17 have been adopted. The amendments adopted in this ordinance
3 implement important safeguards in
4
5 Section 2. In addition,in order to provide appropriate, clear information to applicants for
6 construction approvals, Section 17.04.023 is amended to conform Title 17 to Title 18 and the
7 Zoning Code requirements established in the Municipal Code.
8
9 Section 3. Section 17.04.023 is amended to read as follows:
10 17.04.023 Section 105.9 added-- Fees.
11 Section 105.9 is added to read as follows:
12 105.9 Fees and Special Requirements.
13 1. The fees for the permits and other services shall be as established by
14 resolution of the Burlingame City Council as amended from time to time. The fees
15 shall be set to cover the cost of the Fire Department to review and inspect the
16 intended activities, operations or functions. The fees must be paid to the City of
17 Burlingame prior to engaging in the listed activities, operations, or functions.
18 EXCEPTION: 1. The applicant for a given permit shall be exempt
19 from the payment of such fees if they can show proof of non-profit
20 status.
21 2. The applicant for a given permit shall be exempt from the
22 payment when the work to be conducted is for properties or events
23 owned by the City of Burlingame.
24 2. In the case of multiple permits for an applicant,the permit applicant will
25 be charged the single highest listed rate of all the permits required. The other
26 permitable items will be charged at a rate of 50% of the listed fee as long as the
27 permits are for the same address.
28 3. Where processes or materials are inherent with a permitable item,
10/8/2004 2
I subsequent fees may be waived at the discretion of fire chief.
2 4. Pemift fees charged cover one fire and fife safety inspection and one
3 - -
. . tion to ensure compliance with aff appficable sections of the4
5 subsequent re-inspection
6 All fire permits and firs constractioh permits shall have a set.number
7 of inspections per permit s set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the Cid
8 Councii. Additional inspections and additional re-inspections will be billed at tri
9 hourly rate consistent with ft fee schedule.
10 5. "After Hours"inspections will be invoiced at a rate of cine and one-half
11 times the n6rn%�4l hourl� rate. `*After 140-ars"inspections will be billed at a rate of
12 three(3,)hours minimum. "After Hours'insp ctions means inspections conducted
13 outside of normal business hours,forth Fire:Prevention Division.
14 6. Any person,group,organization,institution or business failing to pay the
15 applicable fees under this Article shall after thirty (30) days of the due date, for
16 either existing or new permit applicants, shall be issued a citation for non-payment
17 of the required permit fee. The penalty for all permit payments delinquent after
18 thirty(30) days shall be a doubling of the original fee.
19
20 Section 4. A new Section 17.04.028 is added as follows:
21 17.04.028 Sections 1003.1.3 and 1003.1.4 added - Installation requirements for fire
sprinkler systems.
22
23 Sections 1003.1.3 and 1003.1.4 are added to read as follows:
24 1003.1.3 Local Fire Sprinkler Requirements. Inspector Test Valves shall be
25 provided for each system and located the furthest point away from the sprinkler
26 riser.
27 1003.1.4 Additional Fire Sprinkler Requirements in all Residential
28 Occupancies. The installation of a residential fire sprinkler system shall conform
10/8/2004 3
I to the following:
2 1. Sprinklers shall be required in all restrooms,bathrooms,powder rooms,
3 and toilet rooms regardless of their size.
4 2.. Sprinklers shall be required throughout carports and garages.
5 EXCEPTION: Detached carports and garages less than 2,000
6 square feet in area and separated from residential buildings in
7 accordance with Table 5A of the Building Code and assuming a
8 property line between all other structures.
9 3. Sprinkler coverage shall be provided in attics adjacent to storage,
10 mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, and attic access openings.
11
12 Section 5. Section 17.04.030 is amended to read as follows:
13
17.04.030 Sections 1003.2.1.1 and f003. through 1003.1.4 added—Required
14 installations of automatic fire extinguisher systems.
15 Sections 1003.2.1.1 tbroug 1003.2.1.4 mid 1003-2.12 are added to read as follows:
16 1003.2.1.1 All new buildings with a total building floor area in excess of two
17 thousand (2,000) square feet or more than two (2) stories in height shall be
18 protected by an approved automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system, with the
19 following provisions:
20 1. The shut-off valves and the water flow devices shall be supervised, and
21 their operations shall transmit a signal to an approved central station.
22 EXCEPTION: Residential one- and two-family dwellings.
23 2. In all buildings more than two (2) stories in height, shut-off valves and
24 water flow devices shall be supervised through an annunciator board at a location
25 approved by the Fire Department.
26 EXCEPTION: Residential one- and two-family dwellings.
27 3. If there is a local fire alarm in the building, the operation of the water
28 flow devices shall activate the local alarm system.
101812004 4
1 4.Any local fire alarm system shall be designed to be heard by all occupants
2 of the building and shall,when activated,transmit an alarm to an approved central
3 station.
4 5. Area separation walls may be used for area increases as per the fz3nifarm
5 Building Code,but shall not be used to separate buildings or structures in lieu of the
6 automatic sprinkler systems required by this section.
7 1003.2.1.2 All existing buildings with a total building floor area in excess of two
8 thousand (2,000) square feet or more than two (2) stories in height shall be
9 retroactively protected by an approved automatic extinguishing system when the
10 size casts of additions or alterations for which a building permit is required will
11 exceed twelve hundred (1200) square feet in areaseventy-five12 ($75;660)-or the costs of additions or alterations for which a building permit is
13 required will exceed twenty percent (20%) of the building's replacement cost as
14 defined by the Building Valuation Data (BVD) table as published by the
15 International Code Council(ICC),whichever is greater.as defined by the Building
16
17 ,
18 with the f6flowing specific pro i i
19 EXCEPTION: Residential one- and two-family dwellings.
20 The following provisions apply to all sprinklered buil.
21 1. The shut-off valves and the water flow devices shall be supervised, and
22 their operations shall transmit a signal to an approved central station.
23 EXCEPTION. Residential one- and two-f�nffly
24 2. In all buildings more than two (2) stories in height, shut-off valves and
25 water flow devices shall be supervised through an annunciator board at a location
26 approved by the Fire Department.
27 ExeEPTf ON. Residential one- and two-fmnily •
28 3. If there is a local fire alarm in the building, the operation of the water
10/8/2004 5
I flow devices shall activate the local alarm system.
2 4.Any local fire alarm system shall be designed to be heard by all occupants
3 of the building and shall,when activated,transmit an alarm to an approved central
4 station.
5 5. Area separation walls may be used for area increases as per the Uniform
6 Building Code and may be used to divide a portion of the building that is not
7 involved with a remodel or renovation for purposes of this section.
8 6. In the event that a building is partially retrofitted with an approved
9 automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system pursuant to this section,the building
10 shall complete the fire extinguishing system retrofit throughout the unprotected
11 building interior areas within six (6) years from completing the initial partial
12 retrofit.
13 7. The size or cost of additions and alterations used in calculating the size
14 or replacement cost value formula shall not be cumulative with regard to individual
15 additions or alterations in a building unless either of the following two
16 circumstances apply:
17 (a) Where more than one (1) addition or ;alteration for which
18 building permits are required are made within a two(2)year period and said
19 additions or alterations are made to the premises of the same occupant. In
20 such circumstances,the sum of these size or costs
21 of these additions or alterations during this two (2) year period shall be
22 aggregated for the purpose of calculating the size or replacement cost value
23 formula; or
24 (b) Where more than one (1) addition or alteration for which
25 building permits have been issued have not yet received final Building
26 Department approval. In such circumstances, the sum of these issued but
27 not yet finalized building additions' or alterations' sizes or construction
28 costs shall be aggregated for the purpose of calculation of the size or
10/8/2004 6
1 replacement cost value formula.
2 EXCEPTIONS: The cost of additions and alterations used
3 in calculating the replacement cost value formula shall be exclusive
4 of the cost to design and install an automatic fire sprinkler
5 extinguishing system pursuant to this section; building roof
6 repair/replacement; building heating and/or cooling unit
7 repair/replacement; and any other federal, state and local
g construction code upgrade requirements including but not limited to
9 the American Disability Act architectural barrier removal
10 requirements, Title 24 handicap compliance requirements, seismic
11 retrofit requirements, asbestos and other hazardous material
12 abatement;ete.
13 1003,2.13 All existing residential one-and-t €o-family dwellings buildings with
14 a total building floor area in exce§s of two thousand (2,000) square,f or
15 than two (2) stories in Height shall be retroactively protected by an.approved
16 automatic extinguishing system when the size of any combination of addition or
17 alteration for which a building permit i required will exceed seven hundred fifty
18 (750) square feet in area or the cost is greater than twenty= percent (200 ) of the
19 building's replacement cost as defined by the Building Valuation Data:(BVD)-table
20 as published by the International Code Council (ICC), whichever is greater,with
21 the following specific provisions
22 1. In the event that a building is partially retrofitted with an approved
23 automatic sprinkler fire extinguishing system pursuant to this section,the building
24 fire extinguishing system-retrofit shall be completed throughout the unprotected
25 building interior areas within two (2) years from co,in
pl ting the initial partial
26 retrofit.
27 2. The size or cost of additions and ;alt 5 used in calculating the
28 replacement cost value formula shall not be cumulative with regard to individual
10/8/2004 7
I additions or alterations in a building unless either of the following two
2 circumstances apply:
3 (a) Where more than one (1) addition or alteration for which
4 building permits are required are made within a two(2)year period and said
5 additions or alterations are made to the premises of the same occupant. In
6 such circumstances, the sum of the sizes or costs of these additions or
7 alterations during this two (2) year period shall be aggregated for- the
8 purpose of calculating the size or replacement cost value formula; or
9 (b) Where more than one (1) addition or alteration for which
10 building permits have been issued have not yet received final Building
11 Department approval. In such circumstances, the sum of these issued but
12 not yet finalized building additions' or alterations' sizes or construction
13 costs shall be aggregated for the purpose of calculation of the size or
14 replacement cost value formula.
15 EXCEPTIONS: The cost of additions and alterations used in
16 calculating the replacement cost value formula shall be exclusive of
17 the cost to design and install an automatic fire sprinkler
is extinguishing systern pursuant to this section; building roof
19 repair/replacement; building heating and/or cooling unit
20 repair/replacement; and any other federal, state and local
21 construction code upgrade requirements including but not limited to
22 the seismic retrofit requirements,, asbestos and other hazardous
23 material abatement.
24 1003.2.1.4 Addition s/Alterations. The standard for determining the size of
25 addition and/or alteration subject to the provisions of 1003.2.1.2 and 1003.2.1.3
26 shall be determined by the following:
27 1. The square footage of every room being added or altered shall be
28 included in the calculation of total square footage of addition or alteration.
101812004 8
1 2. The entire square footage of an individual room shall be considered
2 added or altered when at least fifty percent(50%)or greater of the linear length of
3 interior wall sheeting or ceiling of any one wall within the room is new,removed,
4 or replaced.
5 3. The entire square footage of an individual room shall be considered
6 added or altered when at least fifty percent (50%) or greater of the linear length of
7 concrete,brick or masonry walls of any one wall within the room is new,removed,
8 or replaced.
9
10 Section 6. Section 17.04.035 is added to read as follows:
11 17.04.035 Section 1006.1.2.1 added—False alarms.
12 A new section 1006.1.2.1 is added to read as follows:
13 1006.1.2.1 False alarms. Any building owner or owner's agent who fails to
14 properly maintain and service any fire alarm system,smoke detector,or water-flow
15 detection alarm or fire sprinkler tamper alarm after being notified that service or
16 maintenance is required,will be subject to payment as provided in the fee schedule
17 adopted by the City Council.
18
19 Section 7. A new Section 17.04.055 is added to read as follows:
20 17.04.055 Section 6.1, Item 6.1 added—Building Security
21 Section 6.1 is amended by adding item 6.1 to read as follows:
22 Item 6.1 Building Security. All existing high-rise buildings shall provide a
23 location on the building for installation of a repeater/receiver antenna and supporting
24 equipment for City communications whenever a permit is secured to replace, modify, or
25 upgrade any of the building's basic infrastructure utilities. An electrical supply source shall
26 be provided by building owner or operator at the antenna/equipment location, and
27 reasonable access shall be provided by the building owner or operator to City staff and/or
28 city contractors for installation ofnecessary telephone lines and for purposes of installation,
101812004 9
I maintenance, adjustment and repair of the antenna/equipment. This access and location
2 agreement shall be recorded in terms that convey the intent and meaning of this condition
3 in a form approved by the City Attorney.
4
5 Section 8. Wherever in the Municipal Code or the Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by
6 the Municipal Code,the term"fire department"or`Burlingame Fire Department"is used,it shall
7 mean the Central County Fire Department.
8
9 Section 9. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
10
11 Mayor
12
I,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
13
foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
14
2004, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council
15
held on the day of , 2004, by the following vote:
16
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
17
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
18
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
19
20 City Clerk
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10/8/2004 10
CITY AGENDA 6b
��� °�` ITEM#
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT
MTG.
c DATE N_wamhpr 004
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUB7 ,
BY
DATE: October 25, 2004
APPROVED
FROM: Netie Shinday(558-7204) BY
SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to Beautification Commission ( '
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider appointment recommendation of interview committee and make appointment, or take other
action.
BACKGROUND:
Two commissioner terms are due for appointment because of term expiration.
The positions were advertised and three applications were received. The interview committee
(Coffey/Galligan) will interview all applicants and make a recommendation at the Council meeting on
November 15, 2004.
The term will be for three years ending in October 2007.
CITY G� AGENDA 7a
ITEM#
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT DAT
DATE 11/15/04
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTE '&'
C D
BY
DATE: November 9, 2004 APPROVE
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD OF
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) AND
DECLARING INTENTION TO ESTABLISH ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2005 YEAR FOR
THE DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt proposed resolution approving annual report of the advisory board of the San Mateo County Tourism
BID and declaring intention to establish and levy 2005 assessments in the District.
DISCUSSION:
In early 2001, the City Council formed the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District (BID)
under Streets & Highways Code §§ 36500 and following, with the consent of 11 participating agencies: County
of San Mateo and the Cities of Belmont, Daly City, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Millbrae, Redwood City, San
Bruno, San Carlos, and San Mateo. In 2002, Daly City withdrew from the District, and South San Francisco
joined.
Annual assessments have generated a steady source of income to fund tourism promotion and sustainment
activities through a contract with the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau
The BID Advisory Board has submitted the annual report for 2004 explaining the activities and
accomplishments over the past year. The Board is recommending that the assessments for 2005 remain the
same as in 2004.
The resolution sets a public hearing for December 6, and the Convention and Visitors Bureau and the City Clerk
will mail the resolution and the assessment details to all the included hotels.
Attachments
2004 Annual Report from the Advisory Board
Proposed Resolution
Draft Assessments by Hotel
Summary of Total Assessments by Agency
Distribution: Anne LeClair, SMCCVB; Finance Director
i
San Mateo County
canventi on anal visitors bureau.
T4 94-ty? -c Sm- F44f-e, ,>d 9-r-t Aw
U 1 2004
I I
CITY OF BURLINGAME b
CITY"ATTORNEY
October 27, 2004
Burlingame City Council
C/o Larry Anderson
501 Primrose Rd.
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Burlingame Council:
Our Tourism Business Improvement Advisory Board respectfully requests
that the TBID assessment level for 2005 remain at the 2004 level. We are
forwarding an outline of the services we will render for those assessments,
as well as an annual report. Please don't hesitate to contact us with any
questions.
Thank you, as always for the strong support you and your City staff
consistently provide to our organization.
Best regards,
Anne LeClair, CAE, CDM
President/CEO
San Mateo County
convention & visitors bureau
111 anza boulevard
suite 410
burlingame CA 94010
phone 650.348.7600
800.288.4748
www.visitsanmateocounty.com
fax 650.348.7687
ATTACHMENT A
San Mateo County Convention& Visitors Bureau Annual Report
October 12, 2004
Activities/Accomplishments in last 12 months
Overall: In the last 12 months, the Bureau has generated 320 "leads" for county properties and has
assisted in booking 80,964 room nights This total does NOT include individual corporate and leisure
nights generated through advertising and promotion.) The estimated economic impact from these
bookings alone is: $35,883,318.00
Accomplishments in Group Sales:
• Conducted interviews with meeting planners who booked in SMC properties or considered
booking and did not, using professional research company to determine what planners like
in our area and/or find missing;
• Continued outreach in the Midwest, building relationships and an identity with association,
corporate and SMERF meeting planners in that region;
• Participated in 58 trade shows (list attached), considerably increasing visibility of San Mateo
County;
• Held third annual reception for meeting planners in Sacramento, with a record number of
planners (65) in attendance;
• Held receptions for planners in Chicago,Washington, DC and New York to introduce our
area to planners;
• Held luncheons in Washington, DC to continue building our rapport with planners.
• Reached out to larger association management and meeting management companies,
including Smith Bucklin, Conferon, Booz Allen Hamilton, and Association Management
Center, making presentations and securing listings in their directories;
• Active involvement in MPI chapter in Chicago;
• Active involvement in the Greater Washington Society of Association Executives
(GWSAE).
• Secured appointment to do presentation before group of planners for 25 education-related
associations in January 2005
• Advertised in publications directed at meeting planners and tour group operators,
including ads in the following publications: HSMAI(Affordable Meetings) Sourcebook,
Meetings West(three editions), Smart Meetings (five editions),ASAE(two editions) and several
MPI chapter newsletters.
• Served (various employees) on Society of Government Meeting Planners Board of
Directors; National Board of Trustees for Institute for Organization Management,
California Travel Industry Board of Directors and Institute for Organization Management
Board of Regents (Eastern Institute site).
• Won best booth award for second year at SGMP educational conference, generating
additional publicity for the county.
• Created promotional flyers for several booked clients to enhance attendance at their
meetings in SMC;
Accomplishments in Recruiting Leisure Travelers/Individual Corporate Travelers for Smaller
Properties:
• Placed 40,000 of 80,000 visitor guides produced in California Welcome Centers around the
state to encourage drive-in business;
• Placed ads aimed at individual travelers in: CA Visitor Guide (500,000 copies), Sunset(two
editions) and VIA,plus local publications, such as High Tides Magazine. Total readership for
all ads is well over 7.21 million;
• Sent monthly ebulletins to several thousand prospective visitors in our database, listings
special events and special rates to encourage visits;
• Provided links for member properties, with website averaging 180,000 hits and over 4,000
unique visitors per month, for an annual total of. 2,340,000 hits and 52,000 unique visitors.
(These numbers continue to grow on a monthly basis--60,000 hits last week.);
• Initiated extensive professional research program to tell us what individual corporate and
leisure travelers to our area like or find missing (quarterly/seasonal results to be announced
mid-2005);
• Responded to phone calls, emails, ad response cards requesting local lodging information;
• Participated in Adventures in Travel leisure travel show, POWWOW show for tour planners
from all over the world and California Travel Market show and appointments, as well as
MayFair;
• Updated and/or created smaller guides on filming in San Mateo County, BART/CalTrain,
beaches, recreation, ghosts and graveyards and historical areas to generate additional
interest in our area;
• Maintained visitor kiosk at Hiller Aviation Museum for drive in visitors.
MEDIA OUTREACH
• Exponentially increased outreach to the media, following a move to allow Margi Grant, our
publications editor, to spend over 90% of her time on media outreach.
• Attended three national and international travel writer shows this year, meeting one on one
with travel writers and showing them all types of stories, including a major piece on our being a
breeze for transportation, due to SFO and the new BART and intermodal station. The county
was written up in Canadian Traveller Magazine for its BART-Airport connection, thanks to
our efforts.
• Attended the travel media show for major New York-based travel publications, set up by
California's Travel and Tourism Commission. (It was at this show that Governor
Schwarzenegger appeared to personally encourage the national media reps to come and do
stories about California.) ;
• Generated articles in the Orlando Sentinel, High Tides Magazine, Emerging Horizons,
Canadian Traveller, The Meeting Professional, LeisureSuitTraveler.com, Avidgolfer and other
publications,with additional pieces scheduled for future issues of several publications;
• Customized stories to fit needs of extensive media calendars we have purchased, sending
numerous "made to fit"pieces out on a monthly basis;
• "Pitched" stories ranging from BART/Caltrain/getting around the Bay, Small Meetings,
Wining and Dining in San Mateo County, Convention& Exhibition Centers, Family Travel,
Holiday Escapes, Sun Destinations, SMC Conference and Meeting Facilities, SMC Convention
and Visitors Bureau services; San Francisco International Airport; Eco-Tourism; Family
Travel; Golf; Spas and Luxury Travel; Romantic Coastside; Beaches; Coastside Drive; Trails
(Walking, Hiking, Biking); Wining and Dining; Entertainment and Nightlife.
• More than tripled our media database, allowing us to send editorial ideas to numerous
publications and travel media outlets on a monthly basis. (In the last year, we have emailed
editorial ideas on our county to approximately 500 travel editors each month, in addition to
sending information to fit their prescheduled stories.
• Hosted our annual travel writer familiarization tour of the county, which has already
resulted in articles in San Francisco Magazine, broadcasts on Ginny Prior's radio show Out and
About(broadcast over satellite radio and over Armed Forces Network around the world) and a
an upcoming broadcast on Don Jackson's "The Good Life Report" on KRLA Radio regarding
the fact that when listeners fly into SFO,they are actually in San Mateo County. The broadcast
will feature hotels, dining and attractions in the area;
• Generated mentions of our free visitor guides in various national newspapers;
• Made presentations on SMC before the Bay Area Travel Writers and Society of American
Travel Writers (Margi's status as a member of these groups, rather than merely a promoter,
enhances her influence with them.);
• Worked closely with the California Travel and Tourism Committee (CTTC) team (and on
California Travel Industry Board), responding to all publicity leads that came in to the state;
FILMING OUTREACH
• Continued active recruitment of major motion picture filming through our film commission,
led by Film Commissioner Brena Bailey;
• Targeted professional location scouts and location managers, sending out monthly email
updates of new/interesting filming locations to the Northern California Location
Scouting/Managers Internet List AND the Southern California Location Scouting/Managers
Internet List;
• Developed (or provided) ongoing script breakdowns for proposed film projects, matching
them with available San Mateo County coastal locations and sending appropriate images of
venues from our digital library;
• Doubled number of photographs in digital library for use in promotion to film industry;
• Handled average of 20 requests per week for filming/permitting assistance to make
production easier for film crews;
• Participated in film industry trade shows, including the "Locations" Trade Show put on by
the AFCI (Association of Film Commissioners International—of which we are an active
member.) This is the world's largest locations trade show, geared to reach an audience of
filmmakers--producers, directors, location managers and scouts.
• Participated in the "Cinegear" Show, (an industry only showcase),promoting filming in San
Mateo County;
• Recruited numerous small film, advertising and video productions (with small crews)
through our film commission, including Southwest Airlines commercial, which brought 45
professional filmmakers from LA to our county, commercial projects for CSAA and
Greyhound Bus Lines; the independent film "When All Else Fails"; two History Channel
productions (From Tactical to Practical and The Rescue), plus numerous commercials, videos
and catalog shoots.
• Worked to ensure that several photo pages are devoted to San Mateo County in the Reel
Directory (goes to film industry);
ADDITIONAL OUTREACH
• Assisted with the recruitment of Virgin USA to San Mateo County, building relationships
with their corporate team for future teamwork in bringing in visitors from the east coast;
• Worked closely with SFO, continuing to build strong relationships there;
• Attended all new airline/new flight service ceremonies at SFO, creating strong visibility for
San Mateo County with new carriers; '
• Met with multiple arts organizations, to assist with promotion to visitors;
• Gave numerous speeches and presentations in Bay Area in effort to get local assistance with
recruitment;
• Continued to build relationships with Cow Palace, South San Francisco Conference Center
and San Mateo County Expo center,working to bring leads to their sales teams and assist
in closing business;
• Created group dining, entertainment and happy hour guides for San Mateo County
restaurants to promote our nightlife;
• Worked with SFO, SamTrans, CalTrain and BART to promote our area as easily
accessible.
San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau
Tradeshow Calendar 2004
No.
snows Trade Show Location bate
1 PCMA Indianapolis, IA Jan. 11-14
2 ABA _ New York, NY Jan- 16-21
3 SGMP Winter Conf. Washington, DC Feb. 3
4 WACE Ontario, CA Feb 4-6
5 SGMP Education Sacramento Feb 5
6 LA Travel Show Long Beach, CA Feb. 7-8
7 NCCMPI Santa Clara Feb_18 -
8 Just Because Annual Meeting Washington DC Feb 19
9 Destinations Showcase Washington DC Feb 26
10 MPI Tri State Education Conf. Cincinnati, OH Mar. 1-2
11 Mayfair San Francisco April
CCCCA(Cal.Community Colleges
12 Commission on Athletics) Burbank CA April 1-2
13 CMCA TBD Spring
14 t Affordable Meetings Mid America Chicago, IL April 14-15
15 CA Marketplace Santa Monica, CA April 19-20
16 Nat9 Assoc.of Sports Commissions Jacksonville, FL Apr. 20-24
17 CA Travel Market TBD Apr. 22-24
18 Pow Wow Los Angeles, CA April 24-28
19 SGMP Annual Conference Nashville,TN _ _May 26-30
20 Springtime in the Park Washington, DC May 13-
21 SGMP Education Conference Washington, DC TBD
22 Affordable Meetings West Long Beach, CA June 9-10
23 CaISAE Golf Tournament Sacramento June
24 Corp Meetin World New York - July or Sept.
25 CESSE Miami, FL July 12-16
26 Institutes for Advanced Management Notre Dame University, IN June 6-10
27 MPI/WEG Denver, CO July 25-27
28 NBTA Orlando. FL Aug. 1-4
29 ASAE Minneapolis, MI Aug. 14-17
30 Destinations ShowcaseChicago, IL Aug. 26
31 Affordable Meetin s East Washington, DC Sept 8-9
32 Amateur Athletic Union of the U.S., Inc. Stamford CT _- Sept. 28 Oct. 2
33 October Fest San Mateo _--Oct.
34 CMCA TBD Fall
35 Meetings Quest Chicagq IL Oct 24
36 DGS(Dept.of Gen.Services) Sacramento Oct.
37 MPI Golf Sacramento Nov.
38 Teams 2004 Houston,TX Nov.
39 ICPA Maui, HI I Nov. 14-18
San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau
Tradeshow Calendar 2004
No.
Shows Trade Show Location Date
40, Meetings Quest _ Washington DC Nov. 23
41 WASCBO Washington, DC TBD
42 Nat'l Coalition of Black Meeting Planners Honolulu, HI Nov. 17-21
43 Holiday Showcase Chicago, IL _Dec.
44 NIC(National Intrafraternal Conference) Hollywood, CA_ Dec. 1-5
45 MILO TBD TBD
46 NCSAE TB D Dec.
$52
NCCMPI Golf Tournament TBD Dec.
CSAE Seasonal Spectacular Sacramento Dec.
`Meetin s Quest Anaheim TBD
CALTia(CA Travel Indust ) TBD TBD
Helms Briscoe Partner Fair TBD TBD
Sacramento Business Expo Sacramento I TBD
San Mateo County Convention&Visitors Bureau
Terms of Office
2005-2006-2007
Scott Castle, Crowne Plaza — Foster City
Susan Lee, Quality Suites - Millbrae
Chris Middleton, Holiday Inn Express &Suites — Belmont
Tim Lusher, Clarion Hotel — Millbrae
Larry Ivich, Hillsdale Shopping Center
Rudy Ortiz, Embassy Suites — SSF
David Lewin — Hyatt Regency- Burlingame
2003- 2004 - 200S
Colman Conneely, Sheraton Gateway- Burlingame
Stan Moore, SFO Marriott - Burlingame
Sandra O'Toole, SSF Conference Center
Stephen Algood, Radisson Villa— San Mateo
Chris Carpenter, San Mateo County Expo Center
Alan Waufle, Hiller Aviation Museum
Eric Buitenhuis, Sofitel San Francisco Bay, Redwood City
VACANCY— non-hotelier--tourism related member
2004 - 2005 - 2006
Len Almalech, Enterprise Rent A Car
Phil Brezinski, San Mateo Marriott — San Mateo
Ken Landis, Landis Shores — Unincorporated County
Paul Herbert, Best Western Grosvenor Hotel — South San Francisco
Bruce Carlton, Doubletree Hotel — Burlingame
Paul Ratchford, Ritz Carlton — Half Moon Bay
Kandance Bender, SFO
Bill Gillespie, Half Moon Bay Brewing Company
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO ESTABLISH AND LEVY ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2005 YEAR
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS,pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seg.,the
San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District was established for the purpose of
promoting tourism in the District through promotion of scenic,recreational,cultural,hospitality,and
other attractions in the San Mateo County region; and
WHEREAS,the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board
has filed its 2004 annual report and requested the Burlingame City Council to set the assessments
for the 2005 year; and
WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District through the
City's agreement with the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau has established a basic
foundation to promote tourism in the District and the programs for the coming year should
significantly help the hospitality industry continue its recovery in the County; and
NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve,determine,and find as
follows:
1. The 2004 annual report of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement
District Advisory Board is approved.
2. The Burlingame City Council intends to levy an assessment for the 2005 year on
hotels in the District, as the District is described in Ordinance Nos. 1648 and 1678, to pay for
programs and activities of the District.
3. The types of programs and activities proposed to be funded by the levy of assessments
on hotels in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference. These
programs and activities are without substantial change from those previously established for the
District.
4. The method and basis for levying the assessments on all hotels within the District are
set forth in Exhibit"B",incorporated herein by reference,and would retain the same basic formulas
1
as those used in the previous year. This means that the assessments for a hotel would be the same
as the previous year, unless the number of hotel rooms in the hotel had been reduced or increased.
5. New hotels shall not be exempt from assessment.
6. A public hearing on the proposed assessments and programs for the year 2005 is
hereby set for December 6,2004,at 7:00 p.m.before the City Council of the City of Burlingame,at
the Council Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
7. The Council will receive testimony and evidence at the public hearing, and interested
persons may submit written comments before or at the public hearing, or they may be sent by mail
or delivered to the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA 94010.
8. Oral or written protests may be made at the hearing. To count in a majority protest
against the proposed assessment for the 2005 year,a protest must be in writing and submitted to the
City Clerk at or before the close of the public hearing on December 6,2004. A written protest may
be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of that public hearing. Each written
protest shall identify the hotel and its address. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the
official records of the City of Burlingame as the owner of the hotel,then the protest shall contain or
be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the hotel. Any written protest
as to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceeding shall be in writing and clearly state the
irregularity or defect to which objection is made.
9. If at the conclusion of the public hearing,there are of record written protests by the
owners of hotels within the District which will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total
assessments of the entire District,as to the proposed assessments for the 2005 year, no assessment
for 2005 year shall occur. If at the conclusion of the public hearing there are of record written
protests by the owners of hotels within the District which will pay fifty percent(50%)or more of the
total assessments of the entire District only as to a program or activity proposed, then that type of
improvement or activity shall not be included in the District for the 2005 year.
10. Further information regarding the proposed assessments and procedures for filing a
written protest may be obtained from the City Clerk at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame,
California, phone 650 - 558-7203. The annual report of the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District is on file and available at the Office of the City Clerk at 501 Primrose Road,
Burlingame, California.
2
11. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing the
this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Burlingame in accordance with
the requirements of the Government and Streets&Highways Codes and mailing in accordance with
those requirements and Ordinance Nos. 1648 and 1678 as applicable.
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 15`h day of
November, 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
CAFILES\HotelBid\2005 intro.res.wpd
3
EXHIBIT A
ACTIVITIES, PROGRAMS AND SERVICES TO BE FUNDED BY THE
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2005
In addition to the existing programs from 2004:
1. Increased Generation of Leisure travel leads for"togethering"trend among
couples/families
a. Advertising and editorials in leisure publications to emphasize this market
2. Group Leads
a. Sales team to continue to make contacts/build business in Washington,D.C.,
Sacramento, and Midwestern markets;
b. Sales team to continue focus on new feeder markets for discounted airlines into
SFO, including Washington,DC, Indianapolis, Boston, New York and Calgary;
C. In-house sales to continue to focus on corporate, SMERF markets;
d. Stronger emphasis on tour and travel as rates are coming back;
e. More emphasis on local and national sports groups;
d. Continue to host familiarization trips for planners from all over the US;
3. Marketing Program for Meetings and Tourism
a. Continue investment in extensive research to determine profiles of business and
leisure visitors;
b. Begin PR/marketing campaign targeted at potential customer outlined by
research;
C. Create overall destination"audit" and more localized area audits to assist the
Bureau, the County, and cities in planning for visitor needs;
d. Continue to host annual receptions in Sacramento,D.C., Chicago,New York and
add receptions in Boston;
e. Continue to participate in trade shows deemed promising by Bureau sales team
and member hotels;
f. Continue to place visitor guides in California Welcome centers throughout the
State to generate drive traffic;
g. Enhance advertising in publications/web programs aimed at meeting planners;
h. Expand upon outreach to travel media and meeting planner publications,
generating editorial on San Mateo County;
i. Host annual group familiarization tour for travel writers from around the U.S.;
j. Continue to participate in shows for travel writers around the U.S. and to host
individual familiarizations;
k. Work with new airlines into SFO, offering familiarization tours for airline sales
teams and meeting planners from target markets;
1. Continue publishing specialty guides/promotional pieces aimed at target market
segments;
in. Continue outreach to film/ad/catalogue producers through film commission;
n. Continue work with SFO, Caltrain, and BART on coordinated marketing of the
area;
o. Continue to build on relationships built by film commissioner to encourage more
filming and room nights in the County;
p. Continue to update/enhance website to increase number of"hits"by travelers.
EXHIBIT B
ASSESSMENT BASIS FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR 2005 YEAR
CATEGORY ZONE A—ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2004 ZONE B—ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2004
Hotel with full service $360 per sleeping room X 65% $360 per sleeping room X 55%
and more than 20 sleeping
rooms
Hotel with limited service $180 per sleeping room X 60% $180 per sleeping room X 40%
and more than 1000 square
feet of meeting space
and more than 20 sleeping
rooms
Hotel with limited service $90 per sleeping room X 60% $90 per sleeping room X 40%
and some meeting space but
less than 1000 square feet
and more than 20 sleeping
rooms
Hotel with standard service $54 per sleeping room X 60% $54 per sleeping room X 40%
and more than 20 sleeping (no assessment in Half Moon Bay)
rooms
Hotel with full service, $54 per sleeping room X 30% $54 per sleeping room X 25%
limited service, or standard (no assessment in Half Moon Bay)
service, and
20 sleeping rooms or less
ZONE A—Includes all cities participating in the District except Half Moon Bay
ZONE B—Includes Half Moon Bay, and most of the unincorporated areas of San Mateo County
Assessment of new hotels opening during fiscal iscal year:
A new hotel shall be assessed for an amount equal to the ratio of the number of full quarters remaining in the fiscal year multiplied by the full annual
assessment that would have been due. A partial quarter is not counted for the ratio. For example, if a hotel opens in May, there are two full quarters
and 2 months of one partial quarter remaining in the fiscal year. The full annual assessment would be multiplied by 2/4 for that year's assessment for
the new hotel.
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2005
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
Burlingame -
Embassy Suites A $ 360.00 340 $ 79,560.00 $ 6,630.00
Doubletree Hotel A $ 360.00 390 $ 91,260.00 $ 7,605.00
SFO Marriott A $ 360.00 685 $ 160,290.00 $ 13,357.50
Hyatt Regency SFO A $ 360.00 789 $ 184,626.00 $ 15,385.50
Sheraton Gateway A $ 360.00 404 $ 94,536.00 $ 7,878.00
Hilton Garden Inn A $ 180.00 132 $ 14,256.00 $ 1,188.00
Crowne Plaza A $ 360.00 309 $ 72,306.00 $ 6,025.50
Holiday Inn Express A $ 90.00 144 $ 7,776.00 $ 648.00
Red Roof Inn A $ 54.00 212 $ 6,868.80 $ 572.40
Vagabond Inn A $ 54.00 91 $ 2,948.40 $ 245.70
Burlingame Hotel A $ 54.00 41 $ 1,328.40 $ 110.70
Country House A $ 54.00 27 $ 874.80 $ 72.90
Hampton Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 77 $ 2,494.80 $ 207.90
Bay Landing A $ 54.00 130 $ 4,212.00 $ 351.00
Room Total 3771
Total: $ 723,337.20
Name of Property-_ _ Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment, Monthly assessment
- - -
San Mateo
SM Marriott A $ 360.00 476 $ 111,384.00 $ 9,282.00
Radisson Villa Hotel A $ 360.00 286 $ 66,924.00 $ 5,577.00
Residence Inn rA
$ 54.00 160 $ 5,184.00 $ 432.00
Hilton Garden $ 180.00 156 $ 16,848.00 $ 1,404.00
Homestead Village $ 54.00 136 $ 4,406.40 $ 367.20
Holiday Inn $ 360.00 110 $ 25,740.00 $ 2,145.00
Best Western Los Prados $ 90.00 113 $ 6,102.00 $ 508.50
Comfort Inn A $ 54.00 111 $__ 3,596.40 $ 299.70
Hillsdale Inn A $ _ 54.00 90 $ 2,916.00 $ 243.00
Howard Johnson A $ 54.00 57 $ 1,846.80 $ 153.90
Super 8 A $ 54.00 53 $ 1,717.20 $ 143.10
- -- ------
Avalon A $_ _ 54.00 -
48 $ 1,555.20 $ 129.60
Firestone Lodge IA $ 54.00 46 $ 1,490.40 $ 124.20
San Mateo Motel A $ 54.00 33 $ 1,069.20 $ 89.10
Coxhead House A $ 54.00 4 $ 64.80 $ 5.40
Wingate Inn A $ 54.00 99 $_-- 3,207.60 $ 267.30
Room Total 1978
Total: $ 254,052.00
11/4/2004
1 of 7
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2005
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
South San Francisco _
Embassy Suites A $ 360.00 312 $ 73,008.00 $ 6,084.00
Comfort Suites A $ 54.00 166 $ 5,378.40 $ 448.20
Best Western Grosvenor Inn A $ 360.00 206 $ 48,204.00 $ 4,017.00
Hilton Garden Inn A $ _ 180.00 169 $ 18,252.00 $ 1,521.00
Holiday Inn North A $ 360.00 224 $ 52,416.00 $ 4,368.00
La Quinta Inn#659 A $ 180.00 _ 174 $ 18,792.00 $ 1,566.00
Larkspur Landing A $ 90.00 111 $ 5,994.00 $ 499.50
Good Nite Inn A $ 360.00 323 $ 75,582.00 $ 6,298.50
Residence Inn A $ 90.00 152 $ 8,208.00 $ 684.00
Travelodge A $ 54.00 199 1 6,447.60 $ 537.30
Airport Inn A $ 54.00 34 $ 1,101.60 $ 91.80
Americana Inn Motel A $ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ 22.95
Courtyard by Marriott A $ _ 180.00 197 $ 21,276.00 $ 1,773.00
Travelodge A $ 54.00 49 $ 1,587.60 $ 132.30
Days Inn(Airport Blvd.) A $ _ 54.00 25 $ 810.00 $ 67.50
Deluxe Inn A $ _ _ 54.00 20 $ 324.00 $ 27.00
Economy Inn A $ 54.00 21 $ 680.40 $ 56.70
Hallmark House Motel A $ _ 54.00 13 $ 210.60 $ 17.55
Hampton Inn A $ 54.00 100 $ 3,240.00 $ 270.00
Howard JohnsonNagabond A $ _54.00 51 $ 1,652.40 $ 137.70
Inn at Oyster Point A $ 90.00 30 $ 1,620.00 $ 135.00
Quality Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 45 $ 1,458.00 $ 121.50
Royal Inn A $ 54.00 17-$ 275.40 $ 22.95
Motel A 1 $ 54.00 117 $ 3,790.80 $ 315.90
Travelers Inn A $ 54.00 20 $ 324.00 $ 27.00
Holiday Inn Express A $ 54.00 87 $ 2,818.80 $ 234.90
Sheraton Four Points A $ 90.00 100 $ 5,400.00 $ 450.00
Ramada Limited A $ 54.00 45 $ 1,458.00 $ 121.50
_ Room Total 3024____ I
_ I
Total: $ 360,585.00
11/4/2004
2of7
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2005
Millbrae
Name of Properly rA
Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
_
Westin_ $ 360.00 390 $ 91,260.00 $ 7,605.00
Clarion $ 360.00 250 $ 58,500.00 $ 4,875.00
EI Rancho Inn&Suites $ 54.00 306 $ 9,914.40 $ 826.20
Millwood Inn A $ 54.00 34 $ 1,101.60 $ 91.80
Travelodge A $ 54.00 58 $ 1,879.20 $ 156.60
Comfort Inn A $ 54.00 100 $ 3,240.00 $ 270.00 i
Quality Suites Millbrae A $ 90.00 80 $ 4,320.00 $ 360.00
Room Total 1218
Total: $ 170,215.20
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessmeni Monthly assessment
Foster City
Crowne Plaza A $ 360.00 356 $ 83,304.00 $ 6,942.00
_ Marriott Courtyard A $ 180.00 147 $ 15,876.00 $ 1,323.00
Room Total 503
Total: $ 99,180.00
I
I
i
i
11/4/2004
3of7
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2005
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
Half Moon Bay
Beach House Inn B $ 180.00 54 $ 3,888.00 $ 324.00
Ritz Carlton B $ 360.00 261 $ 51,678.00 $ 4,306.50
Half Moon Bay Lodge B $ 180.00 81 $ 5,832.00 $ 486.00
Ramada Limited B $ 54.00 29 $ - $ -
Holiday Inn Express B $ 54.00 52 $ - $ -
Cameron's Inn B $ 54.00 3 $ - $ -
Mill Rose Inn&Garden B $ 54.00 6 $ - $ -
Miramar Lodge&Conf. Center B $ 90.00 40 $ - $ -
Moon Dream Cottage B $ 54.00 0 $ - $ -
Old Thyme Inn B $ 54.00 7 $ - $ -
Plum Tree Court B $ 54.00 6 $ - $ -
San Benito House B $ 54.00 12 $ - $
The Gilchrest House B $ 54.00 1 $ - $ -
Zaballa House B $ 54.00 23 $ - $ -
Room Total 575 i
Total: Is 61,398.00
I
11/4/2004
4of7
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2005
Name of Property 'Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment 1Monthly assessment
Unincorporated County
Best Western Exec. Suites A $ _ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Costanoa Coastal Lodge B $ 90.00 172 $ 6,192.00 $ 516.00
Cypress Inn on Miramar Beach B $ 54.00 8 $ 108.00 $ 9.00
Farallone Inn B&B B $ 54.00 9 $ 121.50 $ 10.13
Goose&Turrets B&B B $ 54.00 5 $ 67.50 $ 5.63
Harbor View Inn B $ 54.00 18 $ 243.00 $ 20.25
Harbor House B $ 54.00 6 $ 81.00 $ 6.75
Landis Shores B $ 54.00 8 $ 108.00 $ 9.00
Motorville Motel B $ 54.00 30 $ 648.00 $ 54.00
_ Pacific Victorian B $ 54.00 3 $ 40.50 $ 3.38
Pillar Point Inn B $ 54.00 11 $ 148.50 $ 12.38
Princess Port B $ 54.00 4 $ 54.00 $ 4.50
Seal Cove Inn B $ 54.00 10 $ 135.00 $ 11.25
Estancia del Mar B $ 54.00 5 $ 67.50 $ 5.63
Pescadero Creek Inn B $ 54.00 4 $ 54.00 $ 4.50
Pescadero Creekside Barn B $ 54.00 1 $ 13.50 $ 1.13
Stillheart B $ 54.00 16 $ 216.00 $ 18.00
Atherton Inn A $ 54.00 5 $ 81.00 $ 6.75
The Miramar Victorian B $ 54.00 3 $ 40.50 $ 3.38
Rose Cottage by the Beach B $ 54.00 1 $ 13.50 $ 1.13
Room Total 348
Total: $ 9,372.60
I
11/4/2004
5of7
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2005
I
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment I #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
Redwood City
Hotel Sofitel A $ _ 360.00 419 $ 98,046.00 $ 8,170.50
Best Western Inn A $ 54.00 26 $ 842.40 $ 70.20
Budget Inn A $ 54.00 27 $ 874.80 $ 72.90
Capri Hotel A $ 54.00 50 $ _ 1,620.00 $ 135.00
Pacific Euro A $ 54.00 55 $ _1,782.00 $ 148.50
Comfort Inn A $ 54.00 52 $ 1,684.80 $ 140.40
Das Inn A $ 54.00 68 $ 2,203.20 $ 183.60
Garden Motel A $ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ 22.95
Good Nite Inn A $ 54.00 123 $ 3,985.20 $ 332.10
Holiday Inn Express A $ 54.00 38 $ 1,231.20 $ 102.60
Pacific Inn Hotel A $ 54.00 75 $ 2,430.00 $ 202.50
Redwood Motor Court A $ 54.00 12 $ 194.40 $ 16.20
Best Inn A $ 54.00 38 $ 1,231.20 $ 102.60
Sequoia Inn A $ 54.00 22 $ 712.80 $ 59.40
Super 8 Motel A $ 54.00 40, $ 1,296.00 $ 108.00
Sequoia Hotel A $ 54.00 531 $ 1,717.20 $ 143.10
Marriott Towne Place Suites A $ 54.00 95 $ 3,078.00 $ 256.50
Hampton Inn A $ 54.00 61 $ 1,976.40 $ 164.70
Room Total 1271
Total: $ 125,181.00
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
San Bruno _
_ Budget Inn A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Cable Car Inn A $ 54.00 24 $ 777.60 $ 64.80
Super 8 A $ 54.00 54 $ 1,749.60 $ 145.80
StayBridge Suites A $ 180.00 95 $ 10,260.00 $ 855.00
Marriott Courtyard A $ 180.00 147 $ 15,876.00 $ 1,323.00
Regency Inn A _ $ 54.00 32 $ 1,036.80 $ _ 86.40
_ Ramada Inn Limited A $ 54.00 61 $ 1,976.40 $ 164.70
Ritz Motel A $ _ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10
Best Inn A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
The Gateway Inn A $ 54.00 _ 31 $ 1,004.40 $ 83.70
Howard Johnson A $ 54.00 _ 49 $ 1,587.60 $ 132.30
Guest House International" A $ 54.00 42 $ 1,360.80 $ 113.40
_ Days Inn A $ 54.00 _ 48 $ 1,555.20 $ 129.60
Room Total 664
Total: $ 39,808.80
-Opening Spring 2005
11/4/2004
6 of 7
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2005
Name of Property Zone ICategory/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
Belmont
Bel Mateo Motel A $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10
Econolodge Belmont A $ 54.00 231 $ 745.20 $ 62.10
Holiday Inn Express&Suites A $ 90.00 82 $ 4,428.00 $ 369.00
Motet 6 A $ 54.00 273 $ 8,845.20 $ 737.10
Summerfield Suites A $ 90.00 132 $ 7,128.00 $ 594.00
Belmont Palms A $ 54.00 14 $ 226.80 $ 18.90
ExtendedStay A $ _ 54.00 108 $ 1,749.60 $ 145.80
Kingsway Motel A $ 54.00 16 $ 259.20 $ 21.60
Room Total 671
Total: $ 24,127.201
'Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment I #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
San Carlos
Comfort Inn A $ 90.00 50 $ 2,700.00 $ 225.00
Days Inn A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Homestead Village Guest Stes A $ 90.00 116 $ 6,264.00 $ 522.00
Inns of America A $ 54.00 112 $ 3,628.80 $ 302.40
Best Value Inn A $ 54.00 32 $ 1,036.80 $ 86.40
Travel Inn A $ 54.00 29 $ 9.39.60 $ _ 78.30
Room Total 3681
Total: $ 15,508.80
11/4/2004
7 of 7
SUMMARY BY AGENCY FOR ASSESSEMENTS PROPOSED FOR SAN
MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT--2005
TOTAL OF AGENCIES Rooms 2005 Assessment Per Room
Belmont 671 24,127.20 $35.96
Burlingame 3771 723,337.20 $191.82
County of San Mateo 348 9,372.60 $26.93
Foster City 503 99,180.00 $197.18
Half Moon Bay 575 61,398.00 $106.78
Millbrae 1,218 170,215.20 $139.75
Redwood City 1,271 125,181.00 $98.49
San Bruno 664 39,808.80 $59.95
San Carlos 368 15,508.80 $42.14
San Mateo 1,978 254,052.00 $128.44
South San Francisco 3,024 360,585.00 $119.24
TOTAL 14,200 $1,882,765.80 $132.59
CITY STAFF REPORT
BURI.INGAME AGENDA 7b
ITEM#
MTG.
A* DATE 11/15/04
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SSUBMITTED
BY "�&,, /,DATE: November 8.2004
APPROVE
FROM: Jim Nantell 558-7205 BY
suBjEcT: Authorization to Solicit Donations
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council authorize the solicitation of donations from the public to fund items
to assist the staff in better serving the community.
BACKGROUND: Recently Council Member Nagel informed staff that she had secured donations and in-
kind support to put together a"Community Wish List"as a venue for soliciting donations for Burlingame-
based community organizations. The idea is that the holidays are usually the best time of year to ask for help
from the public and, realizing that community organizations have been hit by the economic downturn, she
thought that a"Community Wish List" publicizing the different needs of our community groups would be
helpful.
Having gone through our own budget reduction process, Council Member Nagel offered staff the opportunity
to include in the list the items that the City is unable to afford that could help us better serve our community.
Below is a compilation of items that we would suggest be included in the "Community Wish List" on the
city's behalf.
Tree Lighting Ceremony
The Annual Burlingame Holiday Tree Lighting Ceremony kicks off the season each year with this community
event. The carols, music, and lights are the perfect prelude to Burlingame Avenue's Open House where
thousands of community members each year enjoy the stores, hayrides and ambiance.
Costs associated with the Tree Lighting Ceremony include:
$6,000 to block off the streets
$2,500 for sound system and backlighting
$4,000 for lights on the Tree
$1,000 for School performer costs
Donations for this event can be made to:
City of Burlingame
c/o City Manager's Office
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Small Dog Area
Burlingame's Bayside Park features the City's Dog Exercise Park; a large open area where dogs are permitted
to run off-leash and play with their canine friends. The Park enjoys amenities such as benches, bulletin
boards, water station and a time-out area.
One long-sought improvement to this Park is the creation of a small dog area for our under-20 pound, four
legged friends. The donation of additional fencing and one gate will create an area where the smaller dogs
(and their owners)can feel more comfortable, while still enjoying their freedom. The cost of the fencing and
gate is approximately$4,000 and donations for this item can be given to:
City of Burlingame
Parks & Recreation Department
850 Burlingame Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
Park Benches &Picnic Tables
The City of Burlingame has many beautiful facilities and settings, such as the Library, City Hall and our
Parks. Park Benches and Picnic Tables afford visitors to these settings an opportunity to relax and enjoy a
conversation or observe nature. These benches and tables are made from a very durable, recycled plastic.
They are six to eight feet long and the tables are all accessible to those in wheelchairs. Benches cost$1,000
and tables are $1,400. Donations for this program can be made to:
City of Burlingame
Parks & Recreation Department
850 Burlingame Avenue
Burlingame, CA 94010
LCD Projectors
Growing technologies requires newer equipment. Such is the need for LCD projectors for both City Hall and
the Library. To be used for public presentations and City meetings, City Hall is seeking LCD projectors such
as the Sony SuperBright XGA or Sony SuperLite VPL-CX85 Ultra-Portable Multimedia. Both can be
purchased for approximately $3,500. The LCD for the Lane Room of the Burlingame Library will be part of
the automated system and will make it possible to view the entire complex computer screens. An LCD from
Ceitronics in San Jose can be purchased and donated for$6,000 including installation.
Books& Library Materials
The Library has lost over$50,000 this year from the General Fund budget for library books and media. In
these uncertain times, it is difficult to know when this funding might be restored. Contributions of funds
earmarked for collections go into a special fund administered by the Library Board of Trustees. Donations
may be made for specific types of materials or just materials in general. A popular way of giving funds for the
newly opened Easton Branch Library is to "buy" a faux book spine for$ 250.00. This funding goes to the
Foundation to further support the Easton Branch collections. Those who buy a book spine will have the
inscription of their choice on the donor pillars in the children's area of the Easton Library. Of course smaller
donations are always welcome for all aspects of collection building.
Since the City Council is the appropriate authority to accept donations to the City, we are presenting the list of
possible donations for your review and approval prior to soliciting for the donations.
AGENDA
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT
ITEM# 7c
MTG. 11/15/04
DATE
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE13
DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2004 BY
APPRO
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY
SUBJECT:
TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR A 3-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 508 PENINSULA AVENUE,
LOT 1, BLOCK 31, MAP OF TOWN OF BURLINGAME, PM 04-02
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve this map subject to the following conditions:
• All frontage sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new.
• All conditions dated July 26, 2004 from the condominium permit shall be met.
• The conditions,covenants and restrictions for this map must be approved by the City Attorney and conform
to all approval conditions and City codes.
BACKGROUND: Staff has reviewed this map along with the condominium permit. All conditions of the
condominium permit are included in the Planning Commission memorandum dated July 26, 2004.
EXHIBITS: Map, Staff Memorandum, Planning Commission Minutes
Cr V ng
sistant gineer
r'
c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Applicant
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2004
exist here. One foot setbac has bothered me,prob m is that the neighb I has not objected. An alternative
/hatwou7ld'
ant request a can put garage at re . There is space in t proposed garage for th table saw.
gg ma a motion to approve e project as propos because granting 19 SF floor area over
b lowed seems like a s all price to pay to pr ect a heritage tree with the dditional condition
that should e redwood tree ever e removed the side s ack an floor area ratio v ' ces would be voided,
with the onditions in the staf eport and by resolu ' n. Chair Osterling seco ed the motion.
C it Osterling called r a roll call vote o the motion to approve the added condition that the
ances would bec e void if the redw d tree were ever remove . The motion was denied on a split
vote, 2-2-2-1 (Crs ojues and Vistica ssenting, Crs. Keighran Keele absent, C. Auran absta' g).
Commissio r discussion on th action: would it matter ' the FAR was considered as i ere were a
detached arage on the site, the applicant reduced 20 from the shed;no because the is an alternative
for a ached garage on t site; CA presented a nu er of choices for action: appr e without the shed;
red ce the size of the s d 100 SF or less, let the otion stand denied; form a ne motion with direction;
d deny without pr ' dice.
C. Vistica ma a motion to deny the p sect without prejudice and a ed the applicant to consi the
comments i the record should they c ose to resubmit. The motio as seconded by C. Boju' .
Chair sterling called for a roll c 1 vote on the motion to deny ithout prejudice. The tion passed on a
4- -1 (Crs. Keighran and ele absent; C. Auran abstai ng) roll call vote. A al procedures ere
advised. This item conclud at 9:00 p.m.
C. Auran re-entered the chambers and took his se in the dias.
6. 508 PENINSULA AVENUE, ZONED R-3 — APPLICATION FOR CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND
FRONT SETBACK LANDSCAPE VARIANCE FOR A NEW THREE-UNIT RESIDENTIAL
CONDOMINIUM (DINO ROPALIDIS,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAIME RAPADAS,
A/R DESIGN GROUP) (54 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
A. CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND FRONT SETBACK LANDSCAPING
B. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP
Reference staff report July 26,2004,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria
and staff comments. Twenty-seven conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if open
pavers with turf block were used in the delivery vehicle parking area would we count it as landscaping. CP
Monroe responded that it would not count toward landscaping, not suggesting that it be used since
sometimes it does well and looks just like grass and then people do not know to use it for parking.
Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Dino Ropalidis, 839 Laurel Avenue,Burlingame,was available
to answer questions. He is a 20 year Burlingame resident. Commission noted that the mailboxes appear to
be free standing, kind of a prominent features, can they be set in a wall or moved back into the landscape
area? Jaime Rapadas,architect,801 Mahler Road#106,Burlingame,stated that the mailboxes are 3 stations
located by the driveway,will look at relocating them. Commission noted that is area on the eastern side of
the property between the parking curb and property line there are only a few pockets of landscaping noted on
sheet A2, can additional landscaping and irrigation be added. Mr. Ropalidis stated that they can add
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2004
landscaping in the whole length of this area, from the property line to the wheel stops. Commission noted
that they would also like to see some trees added to this area for a vertical element,take trees from the City
tree list. Front elevation is kind of bland,can you use wood shingles for front canopy overhangs. Can you
move second story,unit#3 bedrooms windows towards the center of the building,would add balance to the
elevation.
Glenn Hout, owner of 12 Clarendon Road, concerned with parking, cars line the side streets that abut
Peninsula Avenue,local apartment buildings only have one parking space permit unit but occupants have 2
cars,or have campers stored in parking space and keep cars on the street;would like to see a minimum of 2
parking spaces required for each unit and 3 guest parking spaces. If this request can not be met then would
like to request that there be no overnight parking allowed at the top of Clarendon Road, by Peninsula
Avenue. Because of this parking overflow onto the side street, chose to move to Margarita Avenue in the
Burlingame Hills. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
CAAnderson noted that the City has tried to enforce the existing law which is on the books that prohibits
on-street parking form 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., but the neighbors do not support this enforcement and
complain to the police.
Commission on discussion: this is the third or fourth time this project has been reviewed, applicant has
invested a lot in this plan,o.k.with the project as is,aware of the parking problem but this project meets the
on-site parking and delivery space requirement,can see how the landscape requirement can't be met for this
site,would like see approve with conditions added: 1)that landscaping be added along the eastern property
line between the parking curb and the property line including trees taken from the City street tree list, 2)
second story bedroom windows be centered on front elevation,3)that the mailboxes be relocated into a wall,
and 4)that the exterior building light comply with the City ordinance that the cone of light will be contained
on-site.
C.Vistica moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following amended conditions: 1)that
the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 22,
2004, sheets A-1 through A-4 and L-1, and that any changes to the size or envelope of the building,which
would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or
changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review;2)that lot coverage shall
not exceed 50% of the lot area and any increase in the lot area shall require an amendment to the
Condominium Permit and Tentative Map and a variance from the Planning Commission; 3) that the
conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 1, 2004 memo, the Fire Marshal's February 23, 2004
memo,the Recycling Specialist's February 25,2004,memo,and the City Engineer's July 15 and March 10,
2004 memos shall be met; 4) that the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed
elevation 57.28' as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Peninsula Avenue
(23.11')for a maximum height of 34'-2",and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed
and approved by the City Engineer as the framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing
inspections. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so
that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved
plans; 5)that this proposal shall comply with all the requirements of the Tree Protection and Reforestation
Ordinance adopted by the City of Burlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department; complete
landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted at the time of building permit application and the street
trees will be protected during construction as required by the City Arborist;6)that common landscape areas
shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-off, promote surface filtration and minimize the use of
fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides; 7) that one (1) guest parking stall (8' x 17' compact space) shall be
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2004
designated and clearly marked at the rear of the site and marked on the final map and plans, shall not be
assigned to any unit or used for any kind of enclosure,but shall be owned,maintained,and kept available for
guest parking by the condominium association; 8)that parking assignments to each dwelling unit shall be
left to the developer and tenant association however at least one space shall be assigned to each unit; 9)that
the parking garage shall be designed to city standards and shall be managed and maintained by the
condominium association to provide parking at no additional fee, solely for the condominium owners,and
no portion of any parking area and the egress aisles shall be converted to any other use or any support
activity such as storage or utilities; 10) that the Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the
condominium project shall require that the guest parking stall shall be reserved for guests only and shall not
be used by condominium residents; 11) that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of
occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 12)that the developer shall provide to
the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner
purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the
project,copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of
all depreciable component parts of the property,including but not limited to the roof,painting,common area
carpets,drapes and furniture; 13)that the trash receptacles, furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a
legal compartment outside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and
California Building and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; 14)that if a gate system
is installed across the driveway,there shall be an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows
residents to provide guest access to their site by pushing a button inside their units; 15)that the project shall
meet the requirements of the Municipal Code Chapter 15.14 Storm Water Management and Discharge
Control including the Storm Water Pollution Prevention guidelines; 16)that the project shall be required to
comply with all the standards of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the
City of Burlingame for structural stability; 17)that storage of construction materials and equipment on the
street or in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited; 18) that all runoff created during construction and
future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES)standards; 19)that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing
BMPs(Best Management Practices)to be used to prevent soil,dirt and debris from entering the storm drain
system;the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and
slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing
vegetation to be protected;existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures;watercourse or sensitive
areas on-site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging
areas and washout areas; 20)that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps,silt fences,straw
bale dikes, storm drain inlet protection such as soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to
stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control
continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established;21)that if construction is done during
the wet season (October 15 through April 15), that prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a
winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting,maintaining
and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even;
stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding,mulching matting,or tarping;rocking
unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored
construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 22) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be
covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas,a
self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor;23)that demolition of the
existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 24) that the applicant shall install fire
sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station prior to the final inspection for
building permit; 25)that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the Municipal
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes July 26, 2004
Code;26)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1645,the City of Burlingame Recycling and Waste
Reduction Ordinance,and shall submit a waste reduction plan and recycling deposit for demolition and new
construction, before receiving a demolition permit; 27) that this project shall comply with Ordinance No.
1477,Exterior Illumination Ordinance;28)that the area in between the parking curbs and eastern property
line from the front setback to the rear property line shall be fully landscaped and property irrigated and that
at least 3 appropriate tree species taken from the City tree list be planted in this area; 29) that the second
story, unit #3 bedroom windows be centered to balance the front elevation; and 30) that the mailboxes be
relocated into a wall. The motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Crs.
Keighran and Keele absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:19 p.m.
B. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP
C. Bcjues made a motion to recommended approval of the tentative condominium map for a new three unit
residential condominium building to City Council. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica.
Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend approval of the tentative map. The
motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Crs. Keighran and Keele absent). This item concluded at 9:20 p.m.
7. 1864 RO NS ROAD,ZO M-1 -APPLICAT FOR CONDITION USE PERMIT,PARKING
AND ANDSCAPE V CES FOR AN OOR PAINTBAL ACILITY (COMMERCIAL
ATION USE) T TAKAMOT , APPLICANT AND SIGNER; ARTHUR RUDE JR.,
OPER TY O 14 NOTICED P JECT PLANNER: R EN HURIN
Reference sta report July 26,200 ,with attachments. CP onroe presented the repo ,reviewed criteria
and staff c ents. Eight co tions were suggested fo consideration.
Cha' Osterling opened a public hearing. Grant akamoto, project archite , and Will Archie,property
o her, were availabl o answer questions. Sit is required to have 10% dscaping in order to soften the
ook of the build' g and make it more a eptable. However, in o der to conform, or come close to
conforming wi this regulation need to d landscaping down the ' e and at the rear of the ite. It is very
hard to con rm to this requirement ith the existing building is is a start-up busi ss and it is very
expensiv , seems like there is no much gained by addin e landscaping in thes side and rear yard
locat' s, won't really be seen y passers by. Commiss* n noted that landscape alculation comes very
cl a to meeting requireme , isn't there any way to gi that extra 1%required r. Takamoto noted that
ere are quite a few recre ion uses in the area that o received landscape v ances,the basketball facili
didn't provide the re 'red 60% front landscapi , the batting cages an Iso the go-cart facility rece' d
landscaping varian s. This is nota huge re st. Commission aske if there was any way to ad ust an
extra 400 SF to e landscaping to get th extra 1%. Mr. Taka oto noted that when they st started
working on t site there was only I% -site landscaping, in eased to 7% and now 9.6°o, but this is a
hardship t the business owner and ' won't benefit the p lic much, would 7 or 60, suffice? Project
architec Iso noted that asZine.alte tive to just ground c er landscaping that the e proposing vertical
lands ping elements like n the side of the con ete building to soften t presence.
Sheila Janakos, 720 How d Avenue, stated th she is a 20 year Burl' game resident an as owned
businesses in Burling e, has 3 children, 2 enagers, is happy to s more recreatio uses in town,
supports project. Th e were no further comments from the floor an the public hearing was closed.
11
PC f 2lv�aQ'
Item
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS -ENGINEERING
DATE: JULY 15, 2004
RE: CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR 3 UNITS,TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP-
RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1,BLOCK 31,MAP OF TOWN OF BURLINGAME-
508 PENINSULA AVENUE, PM 04-02
CONDOMINIUM PERMIT
The following comments apply to this project.
I GENERAL:
1. Show proposed drainage system and indicate that all roof and site drainage shall go to street
frontage. Show direction of drainage on adjacent property to confirm that no drainage enters
this site or else that drainage needs to be included in the on-site system.
2. If large trees are to be removed, approval from the Parks Department is required.
3. Show required seven foot(T)minimum clearances at parking garage floor areas not just floor
to floor. Provide room for all pipings,ducts and fire sprinklers.Disabled parking shall have
access and parking area at eight feet two inches (87')clear.
4. All utilities to this site must be installed underground. Any transformers needed for this site
must be installed underground or behind the front setback on this site.
5. Indicate that new curb, gutter and sidewalk fronting this site shall be designed by a civil
engineer, approved by the City Engineer, and installed by this development.
11 SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS:
1. All irrigation systems and planting shall follow City's water conservation guidelines.
2. Rear landscape area shall drain to street or to a storm drainage system without pumping.
3. Show the location for the proposed fire sprinkler connection.All fire system work shall conform
to the City's current procedures for underground water systems.
1
4. All on site catch basins and drainage inlets shall be stencilled.All catch basins shall be protected
during construction so no debris will be dumped into them. The City will provide a stencil.
III PARKING:
1. Dimension the structural columns and dimensions with respect to parking stalls. Columns that
are on the side of parking spaces are to be clear of vehicle's side door access and should be at
least two feet(2)clear of the rear of the stalls to facilitate maneuvering.
2. Back-up aisle for space is not dimensioned and must be 24 feet minimum clearance.
3. A sequential dimensional layout of all parking spaces needs to be provided on plans.
IV TENTATIVE MAPS:
1. The CCR's for this map must be approved by the City Attorney and conform to all approval
conditions and City Codes.
e
c: Owner, Architect
F:\WP51\FILES\CONDOMAP.RVW
2
���i&r
� STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAMEAGENDA
ITEM# 7d
MTG.
DATE 11/15/04
�1i�TED JYNE 6•
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
A,
BY
DATE: November 5, 2004
APPROVE
FROM: James Nantell, City Manaeer BY
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Changes to the Department Head a d Unrepresented Classifications
Compensation & Benefit Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council approve the attached Compensation and Benefit Plan for the Department
Head and Unrepresented Classifications.
BACKGROUND:
The Department Head and Unrepresented Classifications (DH/JR) have met and conferred with the City on
changes to their compensation and benefit plan. The criteria used in adjusting salaries is consistent with
Council policy and direction in moving classifications to median this budget year. The DHIUR unit's last
salary increase was in July of 2002.
In addition to moving classifications to the San Mateo County market median, the unit has also agreed to
participate in the City's new tiered medical plan. This newly designed benefit structure reallocates current
benefit dollars while providing employees some health plan choices that do not require payroll deductions
from their checks. Employees that opt for the more expensive health care plans will have to pay a portion of
the premium. This is a departure from the City's previous practice of having one contribution amount for all
employees regardless of their coverage levels.
The other change to the compensation and benefit plan deals with sick leave payout at retirement. The unit
will receive the same sick leave payout as other miscellaneous units and will no longer be eligible for the
annual sick leave incentive program. Due to expanding protective leave laws, the sick leave incentive plan is
no longer a viable program for the City.
BUDGET IMPACT
■ The salary increases were budgeted in the current fiscal year and are under projected budgeted
amounts.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Compensation and Benefit Plan
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF BURLINGAME APPROVING CHANGES TO THE COMPENSATION AND
BENEFIT PLAN FOR THE BURLINGAME
DEPARTMENT HEADS &UNREPRESENTED CLASSIFICATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE
COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PLAN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame and the Department Heads &
Unrepresented Classifications have met and conferred in good faith on the terms and
conditions of employment as provided by State law; and
WHEREAS,the City and employees have reached agreement on certain changes
to be made to the existing terms and conditions of employment
WHEREAS, the proposed changes are fair and in the best interests of the public
and the employees represented by the Association;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The changes in existing salary of the Department Head and Unrepresented
classifications as contained in the Compensation and Benefit Plan hereto are approved.
2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the terms contained in
the Compensation and Benefit Plan between the Department Heads and Unrepresented
classifications and the City of Burlingame.
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held
on day of November, 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
COMPENSATION & BENEFIT PLAN
FOR
THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
DEPARTMENT HEAD &
UNREPRESENTED CLASSIFICATIONS
Owww%%
BURLINGAME
November 15, 2004
This Compensation and Benefit Plan covers the City of Burlingame (City) Department
Head and Unrepresented Group (DH/UR). The parties have entered into this agreement
after meeting and conferring in good faith and agree to the following terms:
1. Salary
1.1 Salary Adjustments
Effective December 3, 2004 a 2% salary increase will be granted to the following
classifications:
City Clerk, Finance Director, City Planner, Public Works Director, Human
Resources Specialist, Deputy Fire Chief
Other classifications covered under this compensation and benefit plan, will
receive market adjustments to bring them to the median in their survey market
effective December 3, 2004. Salary increases necessary to bring classifications up
to market median are as follows:
• Fire Chief 7.52%
• Human Resources Director 10.82%
• City Librarian 8.15%
• Parks and Recreation Director 6.55%
• Police Chief 2.81%
• Executive Assistant 2.31%
In subsequent years of the agreement, the City will perform a salary survey of
the benchmark classifications. This survey will be conducted no later than
October 15 as stipulated in Section 1.2 of this agreement. The results of the
survey will be used to determine the across the board salary adjustment that
will be effective the first pay period of December.
1.2 Salary Survey
Step#1: The City will determine the average percentage increase necessary to
bring the benchmarks to match the third place in the comparable survey market
for department heads and the unrepresented classifications. The agreed upon
benchmark classifications that will be surveyed are as follows:
Department Head Classifications:
Finance Director City Librarian
Fire Chief Human Resources Director
Parks &Recreation Director City Planner
Police Chief Public Works Director
Unrepresented Classifications:
City Clerk Deputy Fire Chief
Executive Assistant Human Resources Assistant
Human Resources Specialist
The City's survey market is comprised of the following public agencies:
City of Belmont City of Daly City City of Foster City
City of Menlo Park City of Millbrae City of Palo Alto
City of Redwood City City of San Bruno City of San Carlos
City of San Mateo City of South San Francisco
If the market data for one or more of the benchmark classification varies more
than twice the average of all the benchmarks, the City will drop that
classification(s) as a benchmark(s) for that year and will increase the
compensation for that classification(s) equal to the third place in the
classification's specific market.
Step #2: The City will determine the average percentage increase necessary to
bring the remaining benchmarks to third place in the market. If the average of
one or more of those benchmarks is less than half the average they will be
dropped for use in determining the average for that year. The actual adjustment
for that classification(s) shall be determined between the employee(s) and the
City Manager.
Step #3: The average percentage increase necessary to bring the remaining
benchmarks to third place in their market will be used as the across the board
increase for all classifications represented by the DH/UR unit.
Ability to Pay: Upon request of the City Manager, the compensation and benefit
plan can be reopened relative to salary increases prior to the scheduled salary
survey each year.
1.3 Deferred Compensation
The City will maintain a matching contribution to deferred compensation of$30
per pay period. Deferred compensation is part of the total salary and will be
included as such for future salary market analysis.
2. Benefits
2.1 Health Plans
Effective January 1, 2004, the City agrees to pay up to $795 per month towards
employee medical insurance.
Effective January 1, 2005,the City will implement the tiered medical plan.
Contributions for medical will be based on enrollment levels and will be as
follows:
1. No Plan- Any employee that demonstrates they have medical
insurance through another source, will receive $200 per month in
lieu of medical benefits. The $200 per month allowance may be
put in deferred compensation, section 125 plans or taken in cash.
Any cash payout is subject to normal taxation.
2. Employee Only - The City will contribute $389.96 per month
towards employee only medical coverage. This amount is equal to
the 2005 Blue Shield HMO rate for employee only.
3. Employee Plus One - The City will contribute $779.92 per
month towards employee plus one medical coverage. This amount
is equal to the 2005 Blue Shield HMO rate for employee plus one.
4. Employee Plus Two or more - The City will contribute $922.19
per month towards employee plus two or more for medical
coverage. This amount is equal to the 2005 Kaiser Rate for
employee plus two or more.
An employee that enrolls in a medical plan that has a higher
premium than the City's contribution as stated above, will pay the
difference via pre-tax payroll deductions.
The City's maximum retiree medical contribution for 2005 will be $922.19 per
month, which is equal to the 2005 Kaiser Family rate. In subsequent years, the
City will adjust the tiered health contribution amounts to be equal to that of the
Burlingame Association of Mid-Managers (BAMM) employees.
2.2 Dental and Vision Plans
Effective 01/01/04 — the City agrees to pay $88.71 per month per employee for
employee and dependent coverage for Dental and $10.48 per month per employee
and dependent for employee and dependent coverage for Vision.
Effective 01/01/05 the City will maintain 2004 contribution levels for dental and
vision coverage for employees and dependents. Effective 01101105 the City agrees
to increase the dental benefit coverage as follows: Employees will receive up to
$1700 of reimbursable dental expenses per year. Dependents will receive a
cumulative amount of$1800 of reimbursable dental expenses per year.
In subsequent calendar years of the compensation and benefit plan, the City
agrees to increase the monthly dental and vision contribution for employee and
dependent coverage by the change in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area
Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers from April
of the prior calendar year to April of the current year. In the event, the BAMM
and/or the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
(AFSCME) units receive higher benefit levels than those offered to the members
covered by this compensation and benefit plan, the members can request that the
compensation and benefit plan be reopened relative to dental and vision benefits.
2.3 Long Term Disability (LTD)
The City agrees to provide Long-Term Disability (LTD) coverage to department
heads and unrepresented classifications. Such coverage will be 60% of covered
earnings with a maximum monthly benefit of $6000. If the Police Chief, Fire
Chief, or Deputy Fire Chief elect to obtain LTD coverage through their
respective professional organizations, the City agrees to pay the premium of such
LTD coverage.
2.4 Life Insurance
The City agrees to provide a term life-insurance policy of $100,000to the
Department Head and Unrepresented group.
3. Retirement
3.1 Retirement Formula
Effective 05/26/97, the City amended its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the
2% @ 55 retirement formula for miscellaneous employees.
3.2 One-Year Final Compensation
Effective 01/01/02, the City amended its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the
One-Year Final Compensation Benefit (GC Section 20042)
3.3 Sick Leave for Service Credit
Effective 01/01/02, the City amended its contract with Ca1PERS to provide for the
service credit for accrued sick leave at time of retirement (GC Section 20965).
The employee will still have an option to take a payment for unused sick leave
and/or the a combination of some service credit and cash out of sick leave upon
retirement per section 5.2 of this compensation and benefit plan.
3.4 Military Buy Back for Creditable Service
Effective 01/01/02, the City amended its contract with Ca1PERS to provide
for Military Service Credit (GC 21024).
4. Vacation
4.1 Vacation Accrual
Vacation Accrual rates will change on an employee's anniversary date as
follows:
Biweekly Additive Maximum
Length of Service Accrual Rate Amount Accrual
0-4 years 3.07 160
5 4.62 +40 240
11 4.93 +8 256
12 5.24 +8 272
13 5.54 +8 288
14 5.85 +8 304
15 6.16 +8 320
16 6.47 +8 336
17 6.78 +8 352
18 7.09 +8 368
Note: The Fire Chief maximum accrual rate at 18 years of service is 7.09. The
Deputy Fire Chief maximum accrual rate at years of service is 7.39.
4.2 Vacation Accrual Maximum
An employee shall not be allowed to have an accumulation of more than two (2) years'
credit at any time.
5. Sick Leave
5.1 Sick Leave Accrual
Employees will accrue 3.69 hours of sick leave per pay period. The Deputy Fire Chief
accrues 4.62 hours of sick leave per pay period.
5.2 Payoff Upon Retirement
If an employee elects to be paid off for accrued sick leave he/she will be paid
according to the following schedule:
All Hours Between: Payout
0000—0600 25% will be paid out to a
maximum of 150 hours
0601 — 1200 35% will be paid out to a
maximum of 209.65 hours
1201 — 1560 50% will be paid out to a
maximum of 179.50 hours
Under this program the maximum amount of hours that will
be paid out is 539.15 hours.
5.3 Sick Leave Conversion
Employees can elect to have all sick leave hours converted to CalPERS
credible service per GC Section 20965. If an employees elects to have
sick leave hours paid out per Section 5.2, the remaining sick leave balance
not paid out is eligible for conversion to credible service per GC Section
20965. Any sick leave hours paid out at retirement are not eligible for
conversion.
5.4 Sick Leave Incentive
Upon approval of this compensation and benefit plan, the unit will no
longer be eligible for the sick leave incentive plan.
5.5 Maximum Accrual
The maximum sick leave accrual is 1560 hours.
6. Administrative Leave:
6.1 Department Head Classifications
Effective July 1 of each year, all Department Head classifications shall be granted 80
hours of administrative leave per year. A maximum of 80 hours of administrative leave
can be paid out in a fiscal year. The payout can occur in the first pay period of
December and/or the last pay period of June. An employee shall not be allowed to
have an accumulation of more than two (2) times the annual accrual. Administrative
leave will be paid out upon separation of service with the City of Burlingame.
6.2 Unrepresented Classifications
Effective July 1 of each year, Unrepresented Classifications shall receive
administrative leave as follows:
• Human Resources Specialist shall be granted 60 hours of administrative leave per
year.
• Deputy Fire Chief shall be granted 80 hours of administrative leave per year.
• City Clerk shall be granted 80 hours of administrative leave per year.
• Other unrepresented classifications covered by the compensation and benefit plan
are considered FLSA non-exempt positions and are not eligible for administrative
leave.
6.3 Administrative Leave Payout
A maximum 1-year allotment of administrative leave can be paid out in a fiscal year. The
payout can occur in the first pay period of December and/or the last pay period of June.
An employee shall not be allowed to have an accumulation of more than two (2) times
the annual accrual. Administrative leave will be paid out upon separation of service with
the City of Burlingame.
7. Professional Development&Allowances
7.1 Professional Development
Department Head Classifications are eligible to receive up to $2,500 per fiscal
year for professional development and unreimbursed healthcare costs. This
includes reimbursement for such things as: civic and professional association
memberships, unbudgeted conference participation— including travel expenses,
health programs, and job-related computer equipment.
7.2 Auto Allowance
Department Head Classifications are eligible to receive auto allowance as
enumerated in Appendix A. Department Heads can elect to waive their monthly
auto allowance and defer an equivalent amount into their Section 457 —
Deferred Compensation Account. Such elections can be changed annually with
an effective date of January 1.
7.3 Uniform Allowance
The Police, Fire Chief, and Deputy Fire Chief will receive an annual uniform
allowance of $875. Future increases will be the same as granted to the mid-
management classifications within their respective departments.
8. Recognition
8.1 Positions Covered
The positions covered by this agreement include all department head and
unrepresented classifications that work under the direction and at the will of the
City Manager or are considered "confidential' classifications based on the
nature of their work. The classifications that are covered by this compensation
and benefit plan are as follows:
Department Head Classifications: Unrepresented Classifications:
Finance Director City Clerk
Fire Chief Deputy Fire Chief
Human Resources Director Executive Assistant
City Librarian Human Resources Assistant
Parks & Recreation Director Human Resources Specialist
City Planner
Police Chief
Public Works Director
The City Manager and City Attorney are not included as part of this agreement.
9. Term
This agreement shall be effective on November 15, 2004 and will remain in effect
until opened by either the City or the employees at least 90 days before December
1"of each year.
The City agrees not to alter, amend, or reduce any existing benefit included in this
document without meeting and conferring regarding such change.
For the City: For the DH/UR:
Date: Date:
Appendix A
Car Allowance or Deferred Compensation Equivalent
Classification Monthly Amount
Finance Director $100
City Clerk $100
Human Resources Director $100
City Librarian $100
Parks &Recreation Director $300
Planning Director $100
Public Works Director $300
CITY o� STAFF REPORT
guRLINGAME AGENDA 7e
ITEM#
MTG. 11/15/04
mss, .q�0 DATE
�AYTEO JUNE o,
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY �-
DATE: November 5, 2002
APPROVED
FROM: Robert BellHuman Resources Director BY
SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Salary Increase for the City Manager and City Attorney
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council approve the attached resolution granting a 4.8% salary increase for the City
Manager and a 12% salary increase for the City Attorney effective December 3, 2004.
BACKGROUND:
The City Manager and City Attorney are unrepresented classifications that serve at the pleasure of the City
Council. Salary surveys on both of these classifications were recently conducted. Consistent with Council
policy and direction on salary increases for all units this fiscal year, the increases are to get the classifications
at or close to San Mateo County market median. The City Attorney classification is 18.5% below market
median. After consulting with the City Attorney and Council, an agreement was made to move the City
Attorney classification to market median in two steps. The first step is to adjust the salary by 12% on
December 3, 2004 and the second adjustment of 6.5% will be done at a later date. The City Manager's last
salary increase was in November of 2002 and the last salary increase granted to the City Attorney was in July
of 2002.
BUDGET IMPACT
A total of$7,625 was budgeted this fiscal year for salary increases for both of these classifications. The actual
cost of the above salary adjustments are $15,165. The difference is $7,540 and will be funded by salary
savings from the department head unit's salary projections. The amount of increases granted to that unit to get
them to market median came in under budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution Approving Salary Increases for the City Attorney and City Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING ADJUSTMENT TO SALARY FOR
THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS,the City Council has considered its understandings with the unrepresented
employees of the City and believes that an adjustment in the terms of employment of the City
Manager and City Attorney would be fair and equitable,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The City Manager will receive a 4.8% increase effective December 3, 2004 bringing the base
monthly salary to $15,249.
2. The City Attorney will receive a 12%increase effective December 3, 2004 bringing the
based monthly salary to $14,015.
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day
of November 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
$2,637,896.87
Ck.No.98061-98559
Excludes Library Cks.98173-98209
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
<7
PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER 2004
$2,288,429.22
Ck.No.160111-160383
INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
PERS HEALTH
PERS RETIREMENT
FEDERAL 941 TAX
STATE DISABILITY TAX
STATE INCOME TAX
PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP
SECTION 125 DEDUCTION
D
m m
m �
Q
ou W
D io
m
S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS
CITY OF BURLINGAME
11-05-2004 W A R R A N T REG 1 ST ER PAGE 9
FUND RECAP - 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 52,959.45
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 16,871.64
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 55,345.73
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 110,251.33
WATER FUND 526 259,755.83
SEWER FUND 527 4,574.75
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,950.03
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 57.29
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 130,474.70
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 5,852.83
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,483.49
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND -- 621 683.56
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,166.95
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 280.00
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 850.00
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 1,191.79
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $644,749.35 vJl
<1251
1000•c?0>
i
519, 32
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98450 THROUGH 98559 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF$644,749.35, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
98547 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 984.75
COMMUNICATIONS 371.95 101 66100 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 612.80 896 20281
98548 KEN GIACOTTO 24642 475.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 475.00 201 65200 260
98549 STEVE MUSICH 24669 1,000.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,000.00 101 22520
98550 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 582.80
MISCELLANEOUS 582.80 101 64420 030
98551 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 223.87
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 223.87 201 65200 203
98552 T MOBILE 24846 30.88
COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160
98553 LAURA MARSH 24964 602.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 602.00 101 68010 220 1646
98554 ARBORWEAR LLC 24999 48.00
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 48.00 101 68020 140 2200
98555 KMS SYSTEMS, INC. 25060 407.02
COMMUNICATIONS 407.02 621 64450 160
98556 BOB KOTMEL 25090 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
98557 STEVE IVERSON 25091 200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 22525
98558 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 280.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 280.00 730 69583 220
98559 ABW CONSTRUCTION 25093 800.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 800.00 101 22520
TOTAL 8644,749.35
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98534 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 1,293.49
MISC. SUPPLIES 315.99 101 68010 120 1114
MISC. SUPPLIES 47.35 101 68010 120 1112
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 140.00 619 64460 220 5121
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 132.00 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 619 64460 220 5190
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.62 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32.53 619 64460 220 5110
98535 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 212.83
COMMUNICATIONS 212.83 101 68020 160 2200
98536 TRI STATE METER 24028 3,166.31
MISCELLANEOUS 3,166.31 320 80480 400
98537 MIKE GARZOUZI 24128 175.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 175.00 101 68010 220 1781
98538 CHARLES SAUL 24141 1,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 22546
98539 CHRISTINE REED 24153 500.25
TRAINING EXPENSE 500.25 201 65200 260
98540 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,350.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,350.00 101 68010 220 1644
98541 AT&T WIRELESS-TITAN 24299 946.71
MISCELLANEOUS -46.73 527 23611
COMMUNICATIONS 993.44 527 66520 160
98542 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 123.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 123.75 101 68010 220 1644
98543 SHOE CLINIC 24434 40.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 40.00 101 68020 120 2200
98544 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 6,793.52
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,793.52 326 80910 210
98545 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 24,456.97
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 24,456.97 326 80950 210
98546 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 1,367.96
COMMUNICATIONS 471.91 101 65100 160
COMMUNICATIONS 317.06 201 65200 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 578.99 896 20281
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hard Written Cheeks
98522 OFFICE TEAM 23256 761.60
MISCELLANEOUS 761.60 101 65300 010
98523 MICHAEL GAUL 23276 3,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546
98524 PETE OUISELL 23297 275.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00 101 68010 220 1781
98525 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 1,316.96
OFFICE EXPENSE 814.42 101 65300 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 46.19 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 118.09 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 338.26 526 69020 120
98526 OFFICE MAX 23306 307.81
OFFICE EXPENSE 70.29 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 214.34 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 23.18 201 65200 110
98527 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 2,400.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 2,400.00 101 64420 262
98528 CULVER GROUP 23448 48,685.48
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S - 48,685.48 326 80770 210
98529 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 26,944.36
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 15,151.75 326 80870 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,792.61 326 80722 210
98530 DAVID GRANUCCI 23777 1,758.74
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,758.74 101 64420 210
98531 KEITH MARTIN 23788 94.82
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.04 526 69020 120
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 47.00 527 66520 250
MISC. SUPPLIES 3.78 619 64460 120 5180
98532 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 254.97
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 254.97 619 64460 210 5190
98533 MELISSA GINSBERG 23877 344.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 344.00 101 68010 220 1646
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98506 LINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 49.59
COMMUNICATIONS 49.59 101 66100 160
98507 SEWER RAT 21821 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
98508 CRANE CERTIFICATION CO 22007 1,160.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 580.00 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 580.00 527 66520 120
98509 EXPRESS PLUMBING 22092 3,371.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,371.00 326 80770 220
98510 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 403.40
SUPPLIES 403.40 620 15000
98511 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 57.91
MISC. SUPPLIES 57.91 526 69020 120
98512 OTTO MILLER 22399 - 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
98513 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT 22529 556.12
MISC. SUPPLIES 556.12 101 68010 120 1114
98514 DUNCAN PRINTING 22581 141.81
OFFICE EXPENSE 141.81 621 64450 110
98515 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38,81
COMMUNICATIONS 38.81 101 68010 160 1101
98516 NICK'S DELI AND FINE FOODS 22721 127.80
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 127.80 101 64420 121
98517 DAN RADOS 22872 321.00
MISCELLANEOUS 321.00 101 22546
98518 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 541.14
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 541.14 101 65100 140
98519 ALADDIN HOMES 22926 5,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 5,500.00 101 22546
98520 T. RANDOLPH GRANGE 23112 850.00
MISCELLANEOUS 850.00 731 22525
98521 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 49.00
COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 201 65200 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98491 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180
98492 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 523.87
SUPPLIES 523.87 620 15000
98493 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 157.96
OFFICE EXPENSE 157.96 101 64420 110
98494 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 77.90
MISCELLANEOUS 77.90 526 69020 400
98495 MELANIE MARANI 21132 688.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1331
98496 CEB 21210 67.65
MISC. SUPPLIES 67.65 101 64350 120
98497 FRANK WEBER 21344 200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1781
98498 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 114.50
MISCELLANEOUS 33.84 526 69020 400
OFFICE EXPENSE 80.66 621 64450 110
98499 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 530.60
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 530.60 201 65200 203
98500 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 54.07
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 54.07 621 64450 190
98501 D.L. FALK CONSTRUCTION INC. 21647 47,223.54
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 47,223.54 320 80370 220
98502 HILLYARD 21658 - 381.04
MISC. SUPPLIES 381.04 101 68020 120 2200
98503 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 34.47
SUPPLIES 34.47 620 15000
98504 TRACY SIRI 21685 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1645
98505 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO-CONTROL CORP. 21699 1,163.69
SUPPLIES 1,163.69 201 65200 112
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
98476 CALIFORNIA PNEUMATIC TOOL CO 17741 126.24
SMALL TOOLS 126.24 526 69020 130
98477 JO CROSBY & ASSOCIATES 18077 370.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 370.00 320 80370 210
98478 GCS SERVICE, INC 18250 72.80
MISC. SUPPLIES 72.80 619 64460 120 5220
98479 PENINSULA PUMP & 18450 427.02
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 427.02 527 66520 230
98480 BAY ALARM 18854 2,442.45
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,098.95 619 64460 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 154.50 619 64460 220 5210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 189.00 619 64460 220 5190
98481 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 5,474.70
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,474.70 618 64520 210
98482 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 19131 518.93
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 518.93 201 65200 200
98483 PRIORITY 1 19239 134.15
SUPPLIES - 134.15 620 15000
98484 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 268.03
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 268.03 201 65200 203
98485 WILSEY & HAM 19397 4,461.18
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,461.18 320 78510 210
98486 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210
98487 RICH POLONSKY 19761 34.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 34.50 101 68010 220 1660
98488 KATHY KARAS 19812 99.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.00 101 68010 220 1644
98489 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINE 19821 440.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 440.00 101 66100 240
98490 UTILITY AERIAL INC 19990 1,200.13
SUPPLIES 1,200.13 620 15000
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98464 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 240.89
RENTS & LEASES 240.89 101 68020 180 2200
98465 POM INC. 09248 181.99
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 124.70 320 80480 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 57.29 530 65400 200
98466 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 1,840.75
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,840.75 101 66210 222
98467 CRAIG W. REED 09881 2,000.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,000.00 101 68010 220 1787
98468 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,156.79
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,156.79 625 65213 203
98469 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,512.68
MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 201 22585
MISC. SUPPLIES 296.14 201 65200 111
SUPPLIES 155.58 201 65200 112
MISC. SUPPLIES 203.53 201 65200 120
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 485.15 201 65200 140
GAS, OIL & GREASE 20.00 201 65200 201
VEHICLE MAINT. 10.00 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 3.12 201 65200 203
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 90.00 201 65200 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 25.00 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,189.00 201 65200 260
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 10.16 625 65213 203
98470 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13753 9,034.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,034.00 101 64420 210
98471 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORP. 15055 230.09
MISCELLANEOUS 230.09 101 22585
98472 ALFRED H. ESCOFFIER 15413 2,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,500.00 101 67500 031
98473 TELEKEY SCADA SYSTEMS INC. 16085 2,984.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,367.00 526 69020 210
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 617.00 527 66520 230
98474 COLORPRINT 17497 391.32
OFFICE EXPENSE 391.32 526 69020 110
98475 ACCURATE MAILINGS, INC 17623 398.68
MISC. SUPPLIES 398.68 101 66210 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
11/05/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98450 * ALINE BIER 25089 125,000.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 125,000.00 618 64520 601
98451 SAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 49.51
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 49.51 201 65200 203
98452 GCS WESTERN POWER & 01857 41.43
SUPPLIES 41.43 620 15000
98453 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 2,838.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,838.00 101 68010 220 1644
98454 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 1,502.92
MISCELLANEOUS 1,502.92 101 68020 192 2200
98455 FEDEX 02160 43.75
BANKING SERVICE FEES 21.58 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 22.17 101 64400 120
98456 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 838.75
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 838.75 528 66600 210
98457 IRVINE & JACHENS INC. 02599 504.45
OFFICE EXPENSE 504.45 101 64100 110
98458 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 2,946.71
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,288.18 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 635.55 619 64460 120 5120
MISC. SUPPLIES 191.61 619 64460 120 5130
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 483.89 619 64460 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S _ 347.48 619 64460 210 5120
98459 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 446.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 300.71 619 64460 120
SUPPLIES 146.04 620 15000
98460 SANDRA POBE 03175 612.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 612.00 101 68010 220 1646
98461 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 189.44
MISC. SUPPLIES 189.44 619 64460 120 5240
98462 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 254,362.32
WATER PURCHASES 254,362.32 526 69020 171
98463 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 10,250.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,250.00 201 65200 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
10-28-2004 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 11
FUND RECAP - 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 147,507.69
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 17,498.49
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 5,496.75
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 153,710.14
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 369,617.65
WATER FUND 526 5,266.77
SEWER FUND 527 239,611.91
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND. 530 2,860.05
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 32,373.75
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 5,917.21
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 7,113.62
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 8,719.80
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 153.97
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 500.00
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND - 731 260,910.50
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 19,300.74
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 66,918.22
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $1,343,477.26
- 1160. 60 VVID 4SS3-7
7ITI, a,317.z�
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
-
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98312 THROUGH 98449 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,343,477.26, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 10
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
98440 A.L.D. COMPANY INC 24897 - 10,193.38
POLICE--SUPPLIES 96.36 101 65100 126
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 355.60 101 65100 140
COMMUNICATIONS 149.95 101 65100 160
TRAINING EXPENSE 474.78 101 65100 260
MISCELLANEOUS 9,116.69 101 65100 400
98441 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 288.34
SMALL TOOLS 288.34 527 66520 130
98442 DEREK TURNER 24984 84.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1788
98443 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 98.24
UTILITY EXPENSE 98.24 896 20281
98444 HARTY PIPELINES 25064 119,763.90
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 119,763.90 320 80110 210
98445 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 25084 3,710.55
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 3,710.55 201 65200 140
98446 URSULA DUNCAN 25085 290.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 290.00 618 64520 601
98447 PETER JENSEN 25086 1,350.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,350.00 101 22546
98448 IRONCOMPANY.COM, INC. 25087 953.85
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 953.85 619 64460 210 5240
98449 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 1,123.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 709.50 101 68010 220 1646
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.00 101 68010 220 1644
TOTAL 81,343,477.26
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98427 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 580.00
MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 130 20024
98428 C.L.E.A. 24523 682.50
MISCELLANEOUS 682.50 130 20026
98429 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 476.00
UNION DUES 476.00 130 21091
98430 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60
MISCELLANEOUS 313.64 130 21092
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6.96 130 21015
98431 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 1,197.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 27.00 619 64460 210 5160
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 54.00 619 64460 210 5150
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 369.00 619 64460 210 5240
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 360.00 619 64460 210 5130
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 360.00 619 64460 210 5140
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 27.00 619 64460 210 5170 ..
98432 BANK OF WALNUT CREEK 24613 32,867.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,867.40 327 79480 220
98433 RUTAN & TUCKER LLP 24678 1,275.34
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,275.34 618 64520 210
98434 AETNA 24760 2,865.48
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,621.31 130 20022
MISCELLANEOUS 244.17 130 20028
98435 CALIFORNIA BMW TRIUMPH 24782 50.43
SUPPLIES 50.43 620 15000
98436 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 3,587.39
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,587.39 130 20014
98437 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 4,962.52
MISCELLANEOUS 941.40 130 20025
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,021.12 130 20021
98438 MARK ROMANO 24834 1,020.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22546
98439 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 19,14
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 19.14 201 65200 203
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98413 SBC/MCI 23728 8,006.75
COMMUNICATIONS 119.39 101 65300 160
COMMUNICATIONS 16.45 101 67500 160
COMMUNICATIONS 184.57 101 65200 160
COMMUNICATIONS 70.21 101 64400 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 7,616.13 896 20281
98414 ED NEALE CONSTRUCTION 23756 1,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 22546
98415 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 224.94
MISC. SUPPLIES 224.94 619 64460 120 5170
98416 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,700.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,700.00 101 23620
98417 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 1,910.65
BANKING SERVICE FEES 528.10 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,382.55 530 65400 120
98418 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292
98419 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 500.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 730 69533 220
98420 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 23990 303.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 303.00 101 65300 200
98421 H.C. BECK LTD 24239 2,540.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,540.00 101 22546
98422 COMPUCOM 24467 24.93
TRAINING EXPENSE 24.93 101 65200 260
98423 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 322,806.60
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 322,806.60 327 79480 220
98424 BURLINGAME FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 3,800.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,800.00 130 20016
98425 BURLINGAME FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00
UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080
98426 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 160.00
MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 130 20024
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
98399 EXPRESS TOWING 22633 60.00
SUPPLIES 60.00 620 15000
98400 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 650.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 150.00 101 64400 120
MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 526 69020 233
98401 ALADDIN HOMES 22926 3,950.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,950.00 101 22546
98402 GRAPHIC CONTROLS 23023 615.70
MISC. SUPPLIES 615.70 526 69020 120
98403 PITNEY BOWES 23128 548.00
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 548.00 621 64450 200
98404 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 531.23
OFFICE EXPENSE 408.30 101 68010 110 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 122.93 101 68010 120 1422
98405 OFFICE TEAM 23256 2,772.70
MISCELLANEOUS 2,772.70 101 65300 010
98406 OFFICE MAX 23306 623.80
OFFICE EXPENSE 133.22 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 79.85 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 232.43 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 57.97 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 120.33 201 65200 110
98407 RUSSELL JACKSON 23388 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
98408 DATASAFE 23410 120.72
OFFICE EXPENSE 31.90 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 88.82 101 64420 110
98409 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 101.00
MISCELLANEOUS 101.00 101 22518
98410 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 1,344.15
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,344.15 526 69020 220
98411 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 2,404.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,404.50 618 64520 210
98412 ANDREW FREEMAN 23653 120.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 120.00 101 68010 120 1422
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
98385 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 1,605.77
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 1,605.77 101 66210 219
98386 MONICA EHLERS 21627 258.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 258.00 101 68010 220 1661
98387 DEPARTMENT ISSUE 21653 721.93
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 721.93 101 65100 140
98388 EILEEN P. GOLDENBERG 21846 1,402.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 840.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 562.50 101 68010 220 1646
98389 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 22,796.00
MISCELLANEOUS 22,796.00 101 37010
98390 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 1,073.28
SUPPLIES 1,073.28 620 15000
98391 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 1,587.06
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,587.06 526 69020 120
98392 KEVIN COLLOPY 22197 409.89
MISCELLANEOUS 409.89 618 64520 604
98393 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 22216 1,182.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 199.09 101 65100 120
COMMUNICATIONS 333.06 101 65100 160
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 650.54 101 65100 292
98394 UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 22305 35,278.65
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 21,335.00 320 80520 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 13,943.65 327 81010 210
98395 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT 22382 1,125.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,125.00 101 68010 220 1785
98396 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 850.00
GAS, OIL & GREASE 450.00 101 65100 201
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 400.00 620 66700 210
98397 DAVID DJANIKIAN 22447 84.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1788
98398 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 19,300.74
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,300.74 736 64571 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98370 GE CAPITAL 20216 498.67
OFFICE EXPENSE 99.73 101 68020 110 2100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 398.94 101 68010 220 1101
98371 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 533.66
COMMUNICATIONS 533.66 621 64450 160
98372 CENTRAL GARDEN CENTER 20300 2,150.36
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,150.36 320 80370 210
98373 SIMPLEX GRINNELL 20315 835.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 835.00 619 64460 220 5120
98374 RACQUET SMITH 20339 1,960.80
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,960.80 101 68010 220 1782
98375 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 236.87
SUPPLIES 236.87 620 15000
98376 DAN COFFEY 20513 56.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 56.00 101 68010 220 1788
98377 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 183.51
OFFICE EXPENSE 157.54 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.97 530 65400 120
98378 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 26,297.38
DEPOSIT REFUND 26,297.38 101 22590
98379 CWEA - CALIFORNIA WATER 20631 676.00
TRAINING EXPENSE - 676.00 527 66520 260
98380 SPRINT PCS 20724 104.40
COMMUNICATIONS 33.80 101 64420 160
COMMUNICATIONS 70.60 101 64150 160
98381 CATHERINE J.M. NILMEYER 20801 200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 731 22525
98382 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 7,638.14
MISCELLANEOUS 7,638.14 621 64450 400 6001
98383 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, IN 21107 2,049.90
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 2,049.90 619 64460 230
98384 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 1,075.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,075.00 101 68010 220 1331
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR - DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
�•� Denotes Hand Written Checks
98355 COLORPRINT 17497 560.19
OFFICE EXPENSE 280.10 526 69020 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 280.09 527 66520 110
98356 RAYMOND STOKLOSA 17545 180.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 180.00 101 68010 220 1660
98357 CALIFORNIA PNEUMATIC TOOL CO 17741 454.04
SMALL TOOLS 454.04 526 69020 130
98358 BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY 17760 31.53
MISCELLANEOUS -1.80 101 23611
OFFICE EXPENSE 33.33 101 64400 110
98359 CRANE PEST CONTROL 18103 1,160.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 580.00 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 580.00 527 66520 120
98360 KELLEHER & ASSOCIATES 18239 914.17
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 914.17 618 64520 210
98361 MICHAEL ADAM 18275 296.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 296.00 101 68010 220 1788
98362 LINDA LENORE 18729 129.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 101 68010 220 1660
98363 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF 18806 100.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 101 64250 240
98364 WESTERN RIGGING PRODUCTS INC 18976 622.44
MISC. SUPPLIES 622.44 101 66210 120
98365 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 78.49
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 78.49 101 66210 140
98366 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 180.84
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 180.84 101 64200 150
98367 PRIORITY 1 19239 534.66
SUPPLIES 534.66 620 15000
98368 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 262.69
WATER PURCHASES 262.69 526 69020 171
98369 UTILITY AERIAL INC 19990 4,758.38
MISCELLANEOUS 4,758.38 620 66700 400
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hard Written Checks
98340 LEE STAMBOLIS 11361 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788
98341 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 153.97
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 153.97 625 65213 203
98342 CAMINO REAL PET CLINIC 11577 99.96
MISC. SUPPLIES 99.96 101 65100 120
98343 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 11707 567.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 3.54 101 67500 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 263.81 101 67500 120
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 263.30 101 67500 129
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 36.35 320 80370 190
98344 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 98.02 '.
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 98.02 101 65100 200
98345 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 320.42
SMALL TOOLS 320.42 619 64460 130
98346 DHL EXPRESS 14958 113.32
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 113.32 530 65400 200
98347 PINPOINT 15095 894.24
MISC. SUPPLIES 894.24 527 66520 120
98348 DON E. GIOVANNETTI 15229 112.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.00 101 68010 220 1788
98349 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,412.21
MISCELLANEOUS 3,412.21 731 22594
98350 TIM GLENO 15629 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788
98351 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,487.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,487.00 101 68010 220 1787
98352 HITECH SYSTEMS, INC. 15712 322.76
COMMUNICATIONS 322.76 101 65100 160
98353 HAROLD FIELDS 16438 112.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.00 101 68010 220 1788
98354 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 23,791.06
MISCELLANEOUS 19,066.06 101 22515
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,725.00 101 65300 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98328 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 03483 37,407.25
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 37,407.25 527 66530 270
98329 TAP PLASTICS 03739 99.91
MISC. SUPPLIES 99.91 101 66210 120
98330 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 357.66
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 357.66 101 64350 210
98331 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 486.93
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 486.93 320 80370 210
98332 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 1,375.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,375.00 201 65200 220
98333 POM INC. 09248 11,046.88
MISCELLANEOUS 9,708.67 320 80480 400
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,338.21 530 65400 200
98334 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 2,222.00
PRISONER EXPENSE 2,222.00 101 65100 291
98335 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 158.91
PRISONER EXPENSE 158.91 101 65100 291
98336 ABAG . LIABILITY 09518 27,079.85
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 19,253.00 618 64520 210
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 7,826.85 618 64520 601
98337 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,400.01
OFFICE EXPENSE 17.51 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 391.09 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 175.97 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 39.96 101 68020 120 2300
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 144.29 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 23.04 201 65200 120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 126.09 320 80370 210
MISC. SUPPLIES 223.03 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.99 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 69.55 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 176.49 619 64,460 120
98338 ANA FITZGERALD 09975 516.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1646
98339 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 3,612.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,612.00 101 68010 220 1644
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
10/28/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98312 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 92.66
FIRE APPARATUS MA1NT. 92.66 201 65200 203
98313 SAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 20.72
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 20.72 201 65200 203
98314 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 993.00
RECREATION EXPENSES 993.00 101 10700
98315 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 135.31
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 135.31 201 65200 140
98316 VEOLIA WATER 02110 199,473.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,473.00 527 66530 220
98317 GENE EVANS 02149 376.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 376.25 101 68010 220 1644
98318 NATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 1,859.18
MISCELLANEOUS 1,859.18 896 20282
98319 N.N. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 • 90.06
SMALL TOOLS 90.06 619 64460 130
98320 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 437.23
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 437.23 101 66210 226
98321 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 493.62
MISC. SUPPLIES 493.62 101 66210 120
98322 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 102.84
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 102.84 320 80370 210
98323 P. G. & E. 03054 74,081.25
GAS & ELECTRIC 16,736.58 101 66100 170
UTILITY EXPENSE - 57,344.67 896 20280
98324 SBC 03080 99.80
COMMUNICATIONS 99.80 101 65100 160
98325 DON PLAGMANN 03172 252.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1788
98326 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,963.83
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,963.83 101 65150 220
98327 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 257,298.29
MISCELLANEOUS 257,298.29 731 22587
C
• CITY OF BURLINGAME
10.22-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
FUND RECAP - 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 94,594.19
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 601.44
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 2,403.59
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 23,585.05
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 483.26
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 85,317.40
WATER FUND 526 14,567.46
SEWER FUND 527 17,336.52
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 2,272.50
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 891.45
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 9,184.00
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1,123.08
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,295.14
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1,677.55
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 115.22
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 518.00
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1,038.83
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,587.53
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 680.89
DEBT SERVICE FUND 930 1,750.00
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $262,023.10
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98210 THROUGH 98311 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $262,023.10, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../. ./.
COUNCIL• DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98302 HOWARD CLOWES 25074 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
98303 CAREY WELSH 25075 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
98304 MARK GRANCOLAS 25076 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
98305 ROBERT O'CONNOR 25077 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
98306 NANCY KUSICH 25078 960.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 960.00 101 22520
98307 TREADMILL OUTLET 25079 4,500.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 4,000.00 101 65100 200
MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 730 69534 400
98308 JAMES MURPHY 25080 423.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 423.75 101 68010 220 1661
98309 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 25081 688.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661
98310 DALE ROYAL 25082 130.50
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 130.50 130 20060
98311 KNOX COMPANY 25083 220.83
MISC. SUPPLIES 220.83 619 64460 120 5121
TOTAL 8262,023.10
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98287 BRIAN MCKAGUE 24778 150.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 150.00 130 20060
98288 MARY PIAZZA 24807 688.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661
98289 T MOBILE 24846 30.88
COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65100 160
98290 JOSH RUEMMELE 24858 322.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 322.00 101 68010 220 1787
98291 CAPORICCI & LARSON 24920 32,017.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 32,017.50 101 64560 210
98292 BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY 24943 11,419.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 11,419.00 526 69020 240
98293 BAY AREA SMART AUTO GLASS 24956 481.15
SUPPLIES 481.15 620 15000
98294 PENINSULA OIL 25019 2,158.45
GAS, OIL & GREASE 1,190.87 101 65200 201
GAS, OIL & GREASE 967.58 201 65200 201
98295 TOMASI-DUBOIS & ASSOCIATES 25021 858.45
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 858.45 320 80430 210
98296 QUALITY ENGINEERING 25068 14,290.15
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,073.48 320 80880 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 13,216.67 320 80900 210
98297 HART CONSTRUCTION 25069 150.00
SUPPLIES 150.00 620 15000
98298 MARK LAURIN 25070 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
98299 SHELTER CONSTRUCTION 25071 3,200.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,200.00 101 22520
98300 CUTTING EDGE CONSTRUCTION 25072 1,200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,200.00 101 22546
98301 JEFF MALMUTH & CO. 25073 587.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 587.50 101 64420 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98279 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150
98280 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 32.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 32.00 101 64420 210
98281 CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE 24030 66.71
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 66.71 201 65200 200
98282 CWS UTILITY SERVICES 24249 576.00
MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233
98283 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 343.13
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 343.13 101 68010 220 1661
98284 COMPUCOM 24467 914.34
TRAINING EXPENSE 431.08 101 65200 260
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 483.26 326 80870 210
98285 CRAIG SUHL 24473 2,888.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,888.00 101 22520
98286 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 3,009.01
OFFICE EXPENSE 257.46 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE -24.55 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 52.55 101 67500 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 61.69 101 68010 120 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES $9.54 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 97.36 101 68010 120 1111
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.10 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 199.59 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 809.60 101 68010 120 1422
MISC. SUPPLIES 46.90 101 69537 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 375.69 101 67500 120
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 38.66 101 64420 121
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 201.93 101 67500 129
COMMUNICATIONS 39.95 101 65100 160
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 287.37 101 67500 200
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95.96 101 65400 220
MISCELLANEOUS 58.26 101 67500 235
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 225.00 101 67500 251
MISCELLANEOUS 100.95 731 22542
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98269 BONDLOGISTIX 23088 2,500.00
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 375.00 526 69020 764
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 375.00 527 66520 764
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 930 66840 764
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 1,000.00 930 66830 764
98270 NADINE RONSON 23195 317.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 317.63 101 68010 220 1661
98271 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 1,736.15
OFFICE EXPENSE 18.68 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 10.49 101 64100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 51.96 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 15.43 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 432.32 101 66210 110
OFFICE EXPENSE - 18.69 101 64150 110
TRAVEL 8 MEETINGS 345.98 101 66210 250
OFFICE EXPENSE 394.44 526 69020 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 7.03 526 69020 120
TRAVEL 8 MEETINGS 154.23 526 69020 250
OFFICE EXPENSE 51.46 527 66520 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 144.25 619 64460 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 91.19 620 66700 110
98272 OFFICE MAX 23306 188.93
OFFICE EXPENSE 188.93 101 64400 110
98273 DATASAFE 23410 187.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 31.90 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 123.20 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 31.90 101 64350 120
98274 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200
98275 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 27.06
TRAINING EXPENSE 27.06 526 69020 260 -
98276 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,272.50
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 2,272.50 528 66600 210
98277 SBC/MCI 23728 297.53
COMMUNICATIONS 14.26 101 68010 160
COMMUNICATIONS 178.87 101 65150 160
COMMUNICATIONS 104.40 621 64450 160
98278 CITY OF HALF MOON BAY 23862 424.04
MISCELLANEOUS 424.04 731 22587
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
98255 CHRISSY HOLMES 21723 153.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 153.75 101 68010 220 1644
98256 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 9,823.65
MISCELLANEOUS 9,823.65 101 37010
98257 SEWER RAT 21821 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
98258 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 564.19
MISC. SUPPLIES 149.45 101 68010 120 1787
MISC. SUPPLIES 216.29 101 68010 120 1788
MISC. SUPPLIES 198.45 101 68010 120 1785
98259 GREG BARNES 21885 645.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 645.00 101 68010 220 1422
98260 REED EQUIPMENT CO 21980 142.91
EQUIPMENT MAINT, 142.91 101 68020 200 2200
98261 SARTOR SAW WORKS 22070 160.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 160.00 101 68020 200 2300
98262 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 62.23
SUPPLIES 62.23 620 15000
98263 MORI CONSULTANTS 22209 1,300.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,300.00 320 79160 210
98264 TOM MCGOVERN 22273 184.94
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 184.94 130 20060
98265 NICK'S DELI AND FINE FOODS 22721 389.35
MISCELLANEOUS 389.35 731 22542
98266 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 520.00
UTILITY EXPENSE 520.00 896 20281
98267 JENKINS/ATHENS INS 22851 9,184.00
CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,184.00 618 64520 225
98268 S&S WORLDWIDE 23085 17.82
MISC. SUPPLIES 17.82 101 68010 120 1423
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98239 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 299.60
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 299.60 101 64420 121
98240 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 277.95
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 277.95 201 65200 220
98241 AND NEWSPAPERS 19083 57.16
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 57.16 101 64200 150
98242 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 325.77
MISC. SUPPLIES 325.77 201 65200 111
98243 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 79.94
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 79.94 201 65200 203
98244 JOHN CAHALAN, ASLA 19561 486.45
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 486.45 320 79300 210
98245 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 19679 124.49
MISCELLANEOUS 124.49 731 22548
98246 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 19781 359.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 359.00 101 64420 240
98247 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,587.53
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,587.53 736 64570 220
98248 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 520.36
MISC. SUPPLIES 520.36 101 68010 120 1521
98249 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORP. 20284 622.70
RENTS & LEASES 622.70 101 66210 180
98250 PHIL SCOTT 20550 150.81
MISC. SUPPLIES 150.81 526 69020 120
98251 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 210.82
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 210.82 619 64460 220 5130
98252 JACKIE COOPER 21469 720.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 645.00 101 68010 220 1646
98253 GEORGE WHITE 21497 105.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1660
98254 MONICA EHLERS 21627 229.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 229.50 101 68010 220 1661
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98225 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 297.15
MISC. SUPPLIES 297.15 101 68020 120 2200
98226 OCE 09493 857.34
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210
98227 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220
98228 CAL-STEAM 10557 526.77
MISCELLANEOUS 214.98 101 68020 192 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 132.57 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 55.43 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 81.47 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 21.43 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 20.89 619 64460 120
98229 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 115.22
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 115.22 625 65213 203
98230 COAST OIL CO. 13818 17,964.17
GAS, OIL & GREASE 17,964.17 101 65100 201
98231 1ZMIRIAN ROOFING 15573 6,650.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S - 6,650.00 320 80790 210
98232 JOE MCCLAIN 16066 70.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 101 68010 220 1787
98233 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 27.05
SMALL TOOLS 27.05 620 66700 130
98234 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16919 1,258.38
SUPPLIES 1,258.38 620 15000
98235 OCT INC 17944 1,350.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,350.00 526 69020 260
98236 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 554.98
OFFICE EXPENSE 274.61 101 65100 110
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 280.37 101 65100 200
98237 O'BRIEN & SONS CONSTRUCTION 18437 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
98238 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 58.46
COMMUNICATIONS 58.46 526 69020 160
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME '
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E.R PAGE 1
10/22/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
-*- Denotes Hand Written Checks \J
98210 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 225.14
SUPPLIES 225.14 620 15000
98211 BRENTON SAFETY, INC. 01400 478.47
MISC. SUPPLIES 478.47 527 66520 120
98212 VEOLIA WATER 02110 101,657.29
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 85,317.40 327 79480 210
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 16,339.89 527 66530 190
98213 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 382.12
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 382.12 101 66210 226
98214 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 74.86
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.86 619 64460 120 5130
98215 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 18.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 18.00 730 69560 120
98216 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23
GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170
98217 SBC 03080 196.77
COMMUNICATIONS 35.88 101 67500 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 160.89 896 20281
98218 ALFRED J. PALMER 03085 136.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 136.00 130 20015
98219 STEPHEN J. PICCHI 03168 177.60
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 177.60 101 68010 220 1372
98220 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 360.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 360.00 101 68010 120 1785
98221 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC. 09112 535.75
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 535.75 101 68010 190 1787
98222 POM INC. 09248 891.45
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 891.45 530 65400 200
98223 LIFE ASSIST 09392 77.81"
SUPPLIES 77.81 201 65200 112
98224 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 116.83
SUPPLIES 116.83 201 65200 112
CITY OF BURLINGAME
10-14-2004 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10
FUND RECAP - 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 59,166.04
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 45,862.14
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 30,552.45
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 23,436.79
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 180,364.07
WATER FUND 526 10,870.07
SEWER FUND 527 5,841.98
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 4,036.00
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 816.15
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 17,464.41
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 17,205.24
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 30,055.11
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,306.23
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 86,785.48
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8513,762.16
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98061 THROUGH 98172 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF 8513,762.16, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98168 DIAMOND DIESEL SERVICE INC. 25062 643.23
SUPPLIES 643.23 620 15000
98169 ACCUSOFT ENTERPRISES 25063 2,983.88
MISCELLANEOUS 2,983.88 320 80420 400 6001
98170 HARTY PIPELINES 25064 750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502
98171 BEHZAD NASRE 25065 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
98172 MIDDLE EAST BAKING COMPANY 25066 912.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 912.50 320 80520 220
TOTAL 8513,762.16
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hard Written Checks
98155 COMPUCOM 24467 2,943.60
TRAINING EXPENSE 362.05 101 65200 260
MISCELLANEOUS 2,124.47 320 80420 400 6001
MISCELLANEOUS 457.08 526 69020 400
98156 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 234.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 99.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 72.00 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S - 63.00 619 64460 210 5110
98157 HONEYWELL 24546 678.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 678.00 619 64460 210 5240
98158 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 6,651.59
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 12.00 101 64420 121
TRAINING EXPENSE 150.00 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 5,202.71 201 65200 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 642.73 527 66520 260
MISCELLANEOUS 644.15 618 64520 234
98159 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 587.50
MISCELLANEOUS 587.50 101 64420 030
98160 GENSLER 24758 22,904.10
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 22,904.10 320 80760 210
98161 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 415.75
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 415.75 201 65200 200
98162 GRAND INDUSTRIES INC. 24945 2,250.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,250.00 101 22520
98163 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 534.06
TRAINING EXPENSE 534.06 527 66520 260
98164 TOMASI-DUBOIS & ASSOCIATES 25021 1,627.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,627.50 320 80430 210
98165 UC HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW 25059 175.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 175.00 101 64350 250
98166 KMS SYSTEMS, INC. 25060 2,468.03
COMMUNICATIONS 2,468.03 621 64450 160
98167 RINA SHAPIRA 25061 195.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.75 101 68010 220 1644
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98144 AT&T 23661 25.12
COMMUNICATIONS 25.12 621 64450 160
98145 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 875.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 875.00 101 68010 220 1331
98146 JP LINDSTROM, INC. 23720 2,250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546
98147 KEITH MARTIN 23788 160.93
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 39800
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.93 101 66210 120
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 18.26 526 69020 250
OFFICE EXPENSE 2.39 527 66520 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 6.69 527 66520 120
TRAINING EXPENSE 26.66 527 66520 260
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 6.00 620 66700 250
98148 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 14,222.58
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 355.00 619 64460 220 5170
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 364.77 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 619 64460 220 5230
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 313.81 619 64460 220 5110 -
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,967.00 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,856.00 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 732.00 619 64460 220 5210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,386.00 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 367.00 619 64460 220 5120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,885.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 896.00 619 64460 220 5190
98149 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 322.38
COMMUNICATIONS 322.38 201 65200 160
98150 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 778.76
SUPPLIES 778.76 620 15000
98151 QUILL 24090 206.97
OFFICE EXPENSE 206.97 621 64450 110
98152 SPANGLE ASSOCIATES 24113 10,572.20
DEPOSIT REFUND 10,572.20 101 22590
98153 AT&T WIRELESS-TITAN 24299 449.99
COMMUNICATIONS 449.99 $27 66520 160
98154 SUTTER HEALTH a WORK MEDICAL ASS 24381 100.00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 100.00 101 30700
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98128 SARTOR SAW WORKS 22070 200.50
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 200.50 101 68020 200 2300
98129 THOMAS REID ASSOCIATES 22103 1,991.00
DEPOSIT REFUND 1,991.00 101 22590
98130 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,445.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,445.00 201 35220
98131 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22620 19,023.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,023.75 201 65200 220
98132 MILLER DEVELOPMENT 22629 5,281.00
MISCELLANEOUS 5,281.00 101 22546
98133 STEVE MENDENHALL 23056 1,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 22546
98134 D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC 23092 180,364.07
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 180,364.07 327 81010 220
98135 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.04
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.04 526 69020 210
98136 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00
MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031
98137 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 49.00
COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 201 65200 160
98138 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 605.94
OFFICE EXPENSE 605.94 101 65300 110
98139 OFFICE MAX 23306 7.83
OFFICE EXPENSE 7.83 101 64250 110
98140 CULVER GROUP 23448 21,335.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 21,335.00 326 80770 210
98141 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 110.95
MISC. SUPPLIES 43.30 101 66210 120
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 67.65 101 66210 226
98142 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 553.60
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 553.60 101 68010 220 1661
98143 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 249.60
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 249.60 101 68010 220 1762
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
98114 SPORTS CHOICE 20845 962.88
MISC. SUPPLIES 962.88 101 68010 120 1780
98115 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 2,101.79
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,101.79 326 80870 120
98116 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 870.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 870.00 101 68010 220 1331
98117 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 789.66
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 789.66 101 66210 219
98118 CEB 21210 99.05
MISC. SUPPLIES 99.05 101 64350 120
98119 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 485.48
MISC. SUPPLIES 485.48 527 66520 120
98120 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 150.40
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.57 101 64400 120
MISCELLANEOUS 45.48 526 69020 400
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.35 621 64450 110
98121 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 298.19
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 298.19 201 65200 203
98122 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 997.50
TRAINING EXPENSE 299.25 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 299.25 526 69020 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 299.25 527 66520 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 99.75 619 64460 260
98123 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 160.83
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.83 621 64450 190
98124 HILLYARD 21658 411.35
MISC. SUPPLIES 411.35 101 68020 120 2200
98125 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 - 127.14
COMMUNICATIONS 127.14 101 65300 160
98126 SUNSET PRINTING & ADV. SPEC. CO. 21850 202.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 202.00 201 65200 120
98127 REED EQUIPMENT CO 21980 142.91
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 142.91 101 68020 200 2200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98100 BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY 17760 36.99
MISCELLANEOUS •2.25 101 23611
OFFICE EXPENSE 39.24 101 64400 110
98101 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 172.00
MISCELLANEOUS 172.00 618 64520 234
98102 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 18635 2,974.10
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,974.10 526 69020 240
98103 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 67.91
COMMUNICATIONS 33.96 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 33.95 527 66520 160
98104 WESTERN RIGGING PRODUCTS INC 18976 1,055.44
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,055.44 527 66520 120
98105 PEGGY GUARALDI 19044 230.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 230.40 101 68010 220 1660
98106 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 670.50
MISC. SUPPLIES 670.50 101 68010 120 1780
98107 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 269.23
MISC. SUPPLIES 94.84 101 64400 120
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 174.39 101 64200 150
98108 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 1,429.20
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 477.57 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 951.63 625 65213 203
98109 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 4,036.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,036.00 528 66600 210
98110 MONICA OLSEN 19832 144.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 144.00 101 68010 220 1661
98111 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180
98112 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORP. 20284 312.65
RENTS & LEASES 312.65 101 66210 180
98113 SASE COMPANY, INC. 20639 950.90
MISC. SUPPLIES 199.71 101 66210 120
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 751.19 101 66210 219
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R EG I S T E R PAGE 3
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98085 BOETHING TREELAND FARMS, INC. 13743 1,483.30
MISCELLANEOUS 1,483.30 731 22560
98086 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO 13758 787.31
OFFICE EXPENSE 787.31 621 64450 110
98087 DAY-TIMERS, INC. 14411 59.49
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 59.49 101 66210 240
98088 RECHARGE-EM 14523 126.65
OFFICE EXPENSE 126.65 201 65200 110
98089 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 48.71
SMALL TOOLS 48.71 619 64460 130
98090 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 100.00
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 100.00 101 64420 121
98091 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 2,432.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,432.00 101 68010 220 1787
98092 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 347.96
OFFICE EXPENSE 13.26 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 9.47 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 258.76 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 58.89 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 7.58 620 66700 120
98093 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 14,838.92
SUPPLIES 14,838.92 620 15000
98094 TEAM CLEAN 15827 198.18
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198.18 201 65200 220
98095 ACTION SPORTS 16167 1,975.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,975.00 101 68010 220 1781
98096 MASATOSHI MORITA 16464 92.80
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 92.80 101 68010 220 1762
98097 BROADWAY BUSINESS 16849 23,525.00
MISCELLANEOUS 23,525.00 731 22555
98098 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 22.21
MISC. SUPPLIES 22.21 101 68020 120 2200
98099 PRIDE PAINT 17414 988.32
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 988.32 101 68020 190 2200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
98073 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 1,723.22
MISC. SUPPLIES 29.08 101 66210 120
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 30.92 101 68020 190
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 37.27 101 65200 190
MISCELLANEOUS 3.02 101 68020 192 2200
VEHICLE MAINT. 12.37 101 65200 202
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 596.28 101 66210 219
TRAINING EXPENSE 542.05 101 65200 260
MISC. SUPPLIES 472.23 526 69020 120
98074 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 649.71
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 84.65 201 65200 203
SUPPLIES 210.46 620 15000
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 354.60 625 65213 203
98075 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 809.71
MISC. SUPPLIES 809.71 101 68010 120 1787
98076 STEPHEN J. PICCHI 03168 177.60
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 177.60 101 68010 220 1372
98077 DOROTHY RAOYK 03235 445.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 445.50 101 68010 220 1644
98078 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 32,597.56
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,413.72 101 68010 120 1423
MISC. SUPPLIES 5,514.12 101 68010 120 1422
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 24,669.72 731 22562
98079 JEAN BUCKS 09019 99.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.00 101 68010 220 1644
98080 STATE OF CA/CONSERVATION DEPT 09073 1,303.74
MISCELLANEOUS 1,303.74 731 22550
98081 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 20,906.82
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,754.00 201 65200 220
98082 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 262.31
SUPPLIES 262.31 201 65200 112
98083 NOEL L. MILLER, INC, 09499 260.00
SUPPLIES 260.00 620 15000
98084 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 1,108.64
SMALL TOOLS 954.67 101 68020 130 2200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 153.97 101 68020 200 2200
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 0 ���\tA
10/14/04
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Herd Written Checks
98061 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 176.81
MISC. SUPPLIES 87.23 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 89.58 527 66520 120
98062 BURLINGAME ELEM. SCHOOL DIST. 01500 35,803.72
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 35,803.72 731 22563
98063 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220
98064 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01745 79.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 79.00 101 64400 120
98065 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 25,462.38
OFFICE EXPENSE 72.88 101 64250 110
COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 25,089.50 621 64450 220
98066 COMPUTER TECHNICIANS, INC., 01987 987.00
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 987.00 621 64450 200
98067 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 258.49
MISCELLANEOUS 258.49 101 68020 192 2200
98068 N.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 1,875.23
MISC. SUPPLIES 348.31 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 54.32 619 64460 120 5110
SMALL TOOLS 1,472.60 619 64460 130
98069 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 628.63
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 126.82 101 66210 222
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 501.81 101 66210 226
98070 PENINSULA BATTERIES 02625 460.29
SUPPLIES 460.29 620 15000
98071 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 323.45
MISC. SUPPLIES 76.20 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 247.25 619 64460 120 5130
98072 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 02880 3,670.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 3,670.67 526 69020 120
BURL .INGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY
Burlingame Public Library
Board of Trustees
Minutes
September 21 , 2004
I. Call to Order
President Herman called the meeting to order at 4 :30pm.
II . Roll Call
Trustees Present: Mary Herman, Catherine McCormack,
Carol Rossi and Pat Toft
Trustee Absent: David Carr
Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian
Sidney Poland, Recorder
III. Warrants and Special Funds
The Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants. M / S/ C
(McCormack/ Herman)
IV. Minutes
The Trustees unanimously approved the minutes of the August 17,
2004 meeting. M/ S/ C (McCormack/Toft)
V. Correspondence and Attachments - Item a. Art in Public Places will
be discussed under Section 8 Unfinished Business.
VI . From the Floor
A student majoring in Journalism from San Francisco State
attended the meeting to complete a requirement for her major.
VII . Reports
A. City Librarian's Report - Highlights of Report
1 . Easton Opening Day Celebration - The dedication
and opening celebration will be held October 2nd from 2 PM - 5 PM.
Mayor Rosalie M . O'Mahony will cut the ribbon signifying the
official opening of the Easton Library. Jackie Speier, our State
Senator, and Susan Hildreth, the new State Librarian, as well as
Mary Herman, President of the Library Board of Trustees will
speak at the event.
480 Primrose Road • Burlingame • CA 94010-4083 .
Phone (650) 558-7474 ' Fax (650) 342-6295
2. Vendor Cataloging and Processing - Baker and
Taylor, our outsourcing agent, are now processing and cataloging
the majority of adult fiction and media titles that will be added to
the Library collection.
B. Foundation Report -
l. Easton Donor Reception - Honorary Members of the
Easton Branch Campaign and donors who contributed $1,000 or
more through the 2002 Newsletter will be invited to a reception
and tour of the Easton Branch on the evening of September 30th.
Carr, McClellan, Ingersoll, Thompson and Horn, Professional Law
Corporation, of Burlingame have graciously offered to sponsor the
reception.
2. Book Sale - Stephen Hamilton and Jim Cannon have
agreed to co-chair the fall book sale. It will be a one-day book sale
on Saturday, November 13t" from 10:00am to 5:00pm.
VIII. Unfinished Business
A. Public Art Project - Trustee Rossi's motion approving the
selection of Katie McCormack and Pat Toft to represent the Library
on the Public Art Committee was passed unanimously.
(Rossi/Herman) The first Commission meeting will be Monday,
September 27th. It was noted that the Committee will set the
policy but the Library Trustees will make the final determination
on art works donated to the Library.
B. Gift of Bronze Statue to the Library-The Trustees agreed to
table agenda item (8b) regarding the acceptance of the bronze
statue that friends of the late Mayor and Councilwoman Gloria
Barton want to donate to the Library in her memory until the
Public Art Committee has met.
C. Employee Appreciation Awards/Dinner, December 5th
1. The letter and nomination form for the Employee
Achievement Awards will be given to all employees by October 5th
with a return date of November 5th. Depending on the response
from staff, the date may be extended to November 12th.
2. Trustee Rossi and Foundation Board Member Heidi
Kenney will co-chair the dinner event. Manuel Caneri and Vicki
Machado will provide entertainment.
D. Staff Orientation of Easton Branch
Library staff and the Trustees will have a chance to tour the new
Easton Branch at the morning staff meeting on September 30th.
The Trustees will bring refreshments.
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2
September 21,2004
E. Trustee Dinner - The Trustees' dinner honoring former
Trustee Cecile Coar and welcoming new Trustee Pat Toft will be
held October 24th at the home of Carol Rossi.
IX. New Business
Resolution for Foundation - The Trustees approved President
Herman's proposal that a Resolution be prepared thanking the
Foundation for their efforts in spear heading a successful fund
raising campaign for the Easton Branch. M/S/C (Rossi/Toft)
X. Announcements
A. CLA Trustees' Day-This event will be held November 13th at
The San Jose Convention Center. All Trustees present are
considering attending the event.
B. Foundation Website - Trustee Rossi suggested that the
Foundation update its Website with names of current Board
Members.
C. New Employee Orientation-Trustee McCormack advised that
PLS is having an orientation for new employees and Trustees on
September 28th from 4:00-6:OOpm at the PLS office.
D. October Agenda - System Advisory Board and the utilization
of PLS system resources will be placed on the October 19th agenda.
E. City Council Representatives-Each Trustee will contact their
individual Council members with regard to important issues and
events.
Carol Rossi Mayor Rosalie O' Mahony
Pat Toft Vice Mayor Joe Galligan
Mary Herman Terry Nagel
Katie McCormack Cathy Baylock
Dave Carr Mike Coffey
XI. Adjournment -
The meeting was adjourned at 6:OOPM. M/S/C (Rossi/Toft) The
next meeting of the Library Board of Trustees will be held October
19th, 2004 in the Library Conference Room.
Respectfully Submitted,
Alfred H. EscoVier
City Librarian
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3
September 21,2004
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
November 8, 2004
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Osterling called the November 8, 2004, regular meeting of the
Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Boju6s, Brownrigg (arrived 7:08 p.m.),
Keighran, Keele, Osterling and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: None
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Catherine Barber;
City Attorney, Larry Anderson.
III. MINUTES The minutes of the October 25, 2004 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were approved as mailed.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, went to the City Council meeting on the
hospital last Monday night and want them to send the project back to the
Planning Commission,there are some core services which will not be in the
new hospital building. On November 4 the hospital district had a meeting,
told them there were reservations from the Planning Commission,about the
skin of the building, lack of core services within the building, there was not
one hospital district representative at the Planning Commission meeting, the
district passed out a newsletter and on page 5 they omit saying that lab is a
cores service and is not located in the new hospital, she asked the Planning
Commission and citizens of Burlingame to go to the district and to the City
Council to express their reservations.
Ray Taylor, 65 California Drive, Burlingame, represents Hertz Rent a Car,
want to open rental site at 65 California Drive, want to know the fees and
concerns of the Planning Commission before proceeding with the application.
CP Monroe noted that usually the auto row area is limed to auto sales and
services, the Planning Commission will need to decide if the use is
appropriate for the area and site. The fees can be calculated by Planning staff
during office hours. There were no further comments from the floor.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1. 919 CAPUCHINO AVENUE,ZONED R-2—APPLICATION FOR PARKING AND SIDE SETBACK
VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
(JEANETTE BARRACO, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; DIEGO PEREZ, DREAM
BUILDERS, DESIGNER)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
Plnr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
Commissioners asked:
• Why is a full bathroom in the accessory structure necessary,can easily be used as a second unit with
a shower in the bathroom;
• Staircase in the driveway should be removed;
• Previous approval required compliance inspection 6 months after the action,why wasn't this caught;
• Should explore widening driveway to have at least one code complying uncovered parking space on-
site;
• Hard to consider granting with no covered parking on-site,looks like might be able to get down the
driveway if stairs were removed, but addition would prohibit access down driveway, could add a
covered parking space in driveway;
• Concerned with adding on the south side of the building into driveway, will prohibit ever adding
covered parking, too crowded with the duplex on the side, better to added on the north side or
somewhere else on the lot.
Planning Commission asked City Attorney if the project could be denied now. CA Anderson stated that no,
this is a study meeting,denial can only be at the public hearing. CP Monroe noted that at the public hearing
the Commission can grant an exemption to the driveway width and return existing garage to covered parking
or can require,with a variance, that one covered space be added at the front of the house.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:11 p.m.
2. 1512-1516 FLORIBUNDA AVENUE,ZONED R-3—APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FRONT SETBACK
LANDSCAPING AND LANDSCAPE VARIANCE FOR COMMON OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING
FOR A NEW, FOUR-STORY, 9-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DALE MEYER
ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; THORENFELDT CONSTRUCTION, PROPERTY
OWNER)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commission asked if the Planning Commission can set
parameters on the low income unit required,it is only one bedroom, concerned with the size, seems like a
token unit that will not be suitable for families locally employed people like teachers. CP Monroe stated that
staff will explore issue. Commission asked staff to clarify statement about parking maneuvers on page 3,
may be a typo. Commission asked CP to clarify Public Works review of the driveway and requirements for
driveway slope,but project description does not clarify if Commission review is required. Public Works
comments say 18%driveways slope is allowed,but does not comment on suitability.
Commissioners asked:
Why is driveway width 17'6", seems a lot wider than required by code,will be a big dark hole;
• Can applicant identify common open space clearly on site plan,hard to tell what is being counted;
• Seven trees on-site, there are three in the back,but the rest are in planters over the garage, should
look at other options, more location alternatives e.g. should be planted in dirt not planters;
• Variance for landscaping and common open space is generated because of the size of the building,
which is driven by the size of the units,too much packed on this site,the hardship for the variance is -�
created by the project;
• In order to grant variance must find exceptional circumstances on property, what is the hardship;
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8,2004
• Parking space#4 seems very narrow, does it meet required dimensions;
• Look at option for eliminating variances;
• Understand that the planting area is limited in the front,but can add a larger scale tree at the front to
keep in scale with the building;
• On sheet P8, all elevations have same size windows,room at front appears to be the"great room",
could use a variety of windows in a room like that, should review and increase the variety of
windows sizes and reduce the uniformity;
• Step back top floor so it will look more like a 3 %z story building rather than a 4 story building;
• Architect has designed a number of multi-family buildings in this area,would like to know what his
view of this area is for the future, since he is having a big impact on the outcome;
• Applicant shall provide cross section of driveway and show the slopes and run at each sloped
section.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:35 p.m.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
3. 214-216 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, BURLINGAME AVENUE
COMMERCIAL AREA—APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW TO CONVERT
�. THE GROUND FLOOR OF AN EXISTING TWO-STORY HOTEL TO RETAIL (LORTON LLC,
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MICHAEL KASTROP, THE KASTROP GROUP INC.,
ARCHITECT) (38 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Chair Osterling asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the
consent calendar. C.Bojues requested that item#3,214-216 Lorton Avenue be moved to the regular action
calendar.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
3. 214-216 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A, BURLINGAME AVENUE
COMMERCIAL AREA— APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW TO CONVERT
THE GROUND FLOOR OF AN EXISTING TWO-STORY HOTEL TO RETAIL (LORTON LLC,
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MICHAEL KASTROP, THE KASTROP GROUP INC.,
ARCHITECT) (38 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report November 8,2004, with attachments. Plnr. Barber presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Six conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioner asked if he
was eligible to vote on this item since he was not at the study meeting. CA Anderson noted that if
Commissioner was not present for a design review study or a regular study item, he does not have to listen
to the tapes,just needs to read the study meeting minutes before participating in the public hearing and
voting on the item. CP Monroe noted that condition 4 states that deliveries to the site shall be limited to the
area of the building along Hatch Lane but should add to the condition an exception for BFI,which would
block the Lane for only a few minutes on regular collection days.
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. There were no comments and the public hearing was closed
Commission discussion: support project, but think that because of the hotel use on the second floor
condition 4 should be revised to limit the hours of afternoon deliveries to 6:00 p.m.to 10:00 p.m.rather than
11:00 p.m., 11:00 p.m. is too late for those sleeping.
C. Auran moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following conditions, amended to
shorten the delivery hours in condition 4 from 11 p.m. to 10 p.m. and to exempt BFI pickups: 1)that the
project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped August
6, 2004, Existing and Proposed Site Plans, Lower Floor Plans,Upper Floor Plans, and Building
Elevations, and shall adhere to the color and material sample of the exterior materials of the building as
shown on the materials board date stamped October 27, 2004; any changes to the colors or materials
shall require review by the Planning Commission; 2)that any changes to the size or envelope of
building, which would include changing or adding exterior walls or parapet walls, moving or changing
windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design
review; 3) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of
the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.)to verify that the project has been built
according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 4) that deliveries to businesses located on this
site shall be limited to the hours of 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. daily, except
Sundays and holidays; deliveries to the site shall be limited to the rear of the building on Hatch Lane,
BFI pickups shall be excepted; 5)that the conditions of the City Engineer's July 6, 2004 memos, the
Chief Building Official's July 8, 2004 memo, the Fire Marshal's July 6, 2004 memo, and the Recycling -�
Specialist's July 12, 2004,memo shall be met; and 6)that the project shall meet all the requirements of
the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of
Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:45 p.m.
4. 1147 ROLLINS ROAD,ZONED C-1—APPLICATION FOR SIGN VARIANCE FOR SIGN LOCATION
OF NEW SIGNS(MARK GRAFF,RHL DESIGN GROUP,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;CONOCO
PHILIPS, PROPERTY OWNER) (6 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
Reference staff report November 8, 2004, with attachments. Plnr. Barber presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Three conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Mark Graff, RHL Design Group, 3001 Douglas Blvd.,#210,
Roseville, applicant commented that he was available to answer any questions for the Planning
Commission. Commission asked Mr. Graff to clarify the location of the pole sign; noted that the new
pole sign will replace the existing 76 ball and will be placed at an angle at the corner of Cadillac Way
and Rollins Road, will be visible from both frontages, and the square footage of one face is counted on
each frontage. Commission noted that sheet A3, #13 shows the canopy sign, but it doesn't match the
canopy sign shown on sheet A2; explained that sheet A2 shows the food mart sign only, #4 only calls out
the new fascia on the canopy. Commission asked what will happen to the 76 ball; was not sure, noted
that 76 is doing a major brand change, no orange 76 ball and color scheme will also change. There were
no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
C. Boju6s moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1)that the total
signage along Rollins Road, the primary frontage, shall not exceed 3 signs totaling 108.5 SF, and that the
total signage along Cadillac Way,the secondary frontage, shall not exceed 2 signs totaling 76 SF,with the
total signage on the property limited to 5 signs totaling 184.5 SF, and shall be installed and maintained as
shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and dated October 12,2004; 2)that any increase
in the number,sign height,location or area of the signs on the primary or secondary frontages,shall require
an amendment to sign variance;and 3)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the municipal code
and of the 2001 edition California Building and Fire Codes as amended by the City of Burlingame. The
motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Commission comments on motion: Cadillac Way is like a primary frontage for this site with a lot of traffic,
new pole sign is smaller than the existing 76 ball,the visible signage on the site will be reduced,proposal is
under the limit for total square footage allowed on the site;Commissioner asked CA if all four sign variance
findings need to be made for the Planning Commission to grant the variance;CA Anderson stated that yes all
4 conditions must be met in order to grant variance; having a hard time deciding if all of the variance
conditions are met,especially#1,CA Anderson noted that the total sign area on the site is going from larger
to smaller square footage,and will have a lower visibility than the existing,the purpose of the code is always
to drive toward conformity; other uses surrounding this site are commercial uses.
Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:57 p.m.
�X. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
5. 1453 BALBOA AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION
(MICHAEL CAFFERKEY,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;PETER SANO,ARCHITECT) (63
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
Plnr. Barber briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Michael Cafferkey, 1453 Balboa,property owner was available
to answer questions. Noted that he is a native of Burlingame,went to Our Lady of Angels, is proposing a
beautiful home that meets all the City requirements,will add character to the neighborhood. Commission
asked the applicant to clarify the second floor plate height. Mr. Cafferkey stated that the numbers on the
plans are hard to read looks like 9'6"on the second floor,but the second floor plate height is 8'6".
Donna Lema-Cerna, 1457 Balboa Avenue, Diana and Raymond Mason, 1451 Balboa Avenue, and Pat
Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, and Tom Niland, 1122 Clovelly Lane, had the following comments:
concerned with sewer line which is shared between her property and the proposed development,called City
Attorney,bought this house in 1975,it flooded with raw sewage and there were legal proceedings,the line
was then brought out to the front,there was a sewer test done when the house at 1453 Balboa Avenue was
purchased and her bathrooms were again flooded with sewage,concerned that the house now has Ibathroom
and no washing machine and was occupied by a single lady,with this project there will be three bathrooms
and a washing machine,much more impact on sewer line. Staff noted that the new development would be
�-' required to install their own sewer lateral. Have lived in home for 33 years,children also attended Our Lady
of Angels,concerned with this project on a substandard lot,there is not even 6 feet between the houses,most
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
houses in Burlingame are located on 50' wide lots with driveways and have 13 to 15 feet between houses,
my house was built in 1937 after the applicant's houses which was built in 1921;living room,formal dining
room and breakfast nook are 21 feet along right side and all get afternoon sun, a second story addition at
1453 Balboa Avenue will block light,usually new homes have driveway on one side and the neighbor has a
driveway on the other side which creates separation, new porch fill in will block light and view, the rear
addition will shadow breakfast nook,second floor room currently has a view of trees and up Balboa,but now
will have view of new roof and no light, second story at 1453 Balboa will cast shadows,submitted photos
showing sun in upper room windows;see many nice bungalows in Burlingame becoming big houses,this is
unusual lot was three 50 foot wide lots and was divided into 4 lots,this project will dwarf the two houses on
the side,three full bathrooms will be in this small house with ambitions to be big house,out of balance and
scale, needs to be re-worked with smaller bathrooms, won't fit in; took neighbors concerns into
consideration when designing the project, there are a lot of big houses on this block, this is not a massive
house, tried to add character to house. There were no other comments from the floor and the public
comment was closed.
The Commission had the following comments and concerns:
• There have been considerations made for the neighbors concerns, but need to look at more
concessions,towers over neighbor on left, design reviewer may be able to help with some ideas, ;
• Project is lacking the amount of detail that the Planning Commission usually sees for a new house,
needs more work;
• Troubled by three hanging bays on the right side,looks lop sided,too heavy,consider using materials
to soften right elevations;
• Need to add materials for interest,brick, slate, add landscaping;
• With narrow lot,need to minimize the effect on the neighbors;
• Need landscape plan, try to soften the front and back;
• Front elevation-consider adding another window on second floor instead of vent;too much stucco,
nice roof lines, like the bay;
• Need window detail, would like to see patterns, use divided light windows, looks like stucco trim
proposed around windows,usually see stucco mold;
• Funny roof pitch on section at the rear, doesn't match, should be blended into larger roof; and
• Stone or brick on chimney veneer looks like it is applied at the same plane, look at how to give it
texture and differentiate from the house.
C. Boju6s made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion
was seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on motion: good start to the project, design is o.k. overall more work and detailing.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant with the
direction given. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and
not appealable. This item concluded at 8:19 p.m.
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
6. 2112 EASTON DRIVE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-
STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; ORLANDO AND MINERVA BUENA,PROPERTY OWNERS)(51
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Dale Meyer, architect, 851 Burlway Road,Burlingame, and
Orlando Buena, property owner, were in attendance. Noted that they sited the new house and detached
garage in the same location as the existing structures,talked with the arborist about constructing the garage
on a pier and beam foundation in order to preserve the health of the Coast Live Oaks at the rear of the lot,
they provide good screening and provide a nice backdrop for the backyard, proposal is meeting all of the
code requirements. Commission asked if owner will live in the house or sell the house. Mr. Buena noted
that he has two children,one goes to school in Burlingame,plan to live in this house. Commission asked if
owner knows about the garage proposed on the adjacent property at 2108 Easton Drive. Mr. Buena noted
that he is aware of the project and was at one of the hearings. He planned the layout of the house based on
the assumption that they would be building a garage on the right side property line,so he moved his kitchen
to the opposite side where it would have more light, but this caused the disconnect with the family room.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
The Commission had the following comments and concerns:
• Oak trees at rear need to be trimmed before to the demolition and construction of the garage,should
be done under a licensed arborist supervision;
• Still concerned with proximity of garage construction to trees,can garage be moved forward slightly
�-' away from trees;
• Commission asked to clarify eave detail, looks like a hefty end to the roof rafter, 4 x 6;
• Roof shown as slate,applicant should be sure that this can be done structurally,have approved these
before an applicants come back and change material,say it is too expensive,it is an important design
element that should be retained or changed now;
• Plate heights need to be lowered too much mass, now they are 10' on the first floor and 9' on the
second floor, should be 9' on the first floor and 8' on the second floor;
• Garage doors look forced in and tight can they be made into two separate doors or broken up with a
different look;
• Garage roof is held tight to the building with out eaves, doesn't really match the house;
• Project is very close to maximum floor area and lot coverage,unusual to be so close on both,need to
scale back on both to fit the neighborhood better;
• Look into reducing family room at the rear and creating more yard space(addressing lot coverage
and FAR),would encroach into the breakfast noon area but will bring the kitchen closer to the family
room.
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the requested
revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Comment on motion: requests made by the Commission are not complicated,the architect is familiar with
the Commission and what they are looking for,will be o.k. to bring back as an action item.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
had been revised as directed, reviewed by staff, and there is space on an agenda. The motion passed on a
voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at
8:35 p.m.
7. 1546 NEWLANDS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR WINDOWS AND
SKYLIGHTS IN AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE(EDWARD SUPPLEE,APPLICANT AND
PROPERTY OWNER; RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT) (57 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Randy Grange,TRG Architects,205 Park Road,noted that this
project is an addition,restoration and beautification,house is an old classic bungalow that was messed with
over the years,family room addition that has T-111 siding,there were concrete shingles added,there are a lot
of permits requested on this application,however most are the result of correcting existing conditions on the
property,the upper floor already encroaches into the declining height envelope,it is close to meeting the 14
foot exception for declining height envelope measurement,but the City requires that the finished floor be 3
feet above average grade at the perimeter of the house so it does not qualify. The garage was built with
permits,kitchenette is being removed,spiral stairs to second floor being removed,garage did meet 20 foot
depth but the wall at the bathroom is TX 6'so the depth is 2"short,the windows within 10 feet ofproperty
line are already there, two windows at the front are being pushed together, eave detail on the garage will
match the house. Commission asked why one side and the rear elevation of the garage is left as cinder
block when the rest is shingled? Can see this block wall from Crescent Drive. Mr. Grange noted the
garage is too close to the property line, would have to go on neighbor's property to place battens and
shingles on the side. CP Monroe noted that cannot request shingles on elevation if they will encroach onto
adjacent property. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
Commission discussion: nice job on the design,eliminating a lot of the bad things on this house;suggested
planting a substantially sized tree in the front between the front door and the driveway near the stepping
stones.
C. Keighran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C.
Auran.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar with the suggested
changes. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not
appealable. This item concluded at 8:44 p.m.
8. 1813 CASTENADA DRIVE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(LINCOLN LUE,
ARCHITECT AND APPLICANT; MARK AND AMY LISW, PROPERTY OWNERS) (43 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN --�
Plnr. Barber briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Lincoln Lue, project architect, 1567 33`d Avenue, San
Francisco, noted that this is a small house on a large lot, reasonable addition proposed, only 60% of
allowable FAR proposed, want to expand the living room and family room on the first floor, add sitting
room to master bedroom on second floor, impact to street is minimal,hardly visible from the curb, owner
can fit two cars in the garage even though it doesn't meet the City standard for width. Commission noted
that the cricket at the intersection of new and existing roof does not have much of a slope and will be visible
from the neighbors. Architect noted that the roof may need adjustments made to the cricket, could end up
larger during engineering but will not be visible from the street; did not think views would be affected
because of the steep the slope at the rear of the lot; bridging the addition with the existing structure would
create a large roof area and wanted to design the project to be hidden from the street.
Mahmound Tabrizi,5 Rio Court,like neighbor at 3 Rio Court concerned with view blockage caused by the
project. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
The Commission had the following comments and concerns:
• Why isn't the wood siding continued up the front elevation on the second floor, the plaster is more
dominant;
• Rear elevation is all plaster, consider adding shutters to the second floor to match the first floor,
neighbor will see big blank wall, sheet A4 has a lot of plaster;
• Concerned with the additions affect on views,need to install story poles;
• Addition looks like a block stuck on the back of the house,there is no melding of the addition with
the existing structure,doesn't tie in with the existing architecture at all,addition is not integrated into
the existing style;
`— • Plate heights should be lowered, 10' at first floor is too large; and
• Concerned with large balcony off of the rear of the second floor impact neighbors,should considered
eliminating.
C. Auran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion
was seconded by C. Keighran.
Comment on motion: it is a challenge to go up on these ranch style homes,should consider installing story
poles before re-designing so architect knows from neighbors if views will be blocked before making
changes to the drawings.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to design review with the direction given.
The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable.
This item concluded at 9:00 p.m.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of October 18,2004, and November 1, 2004.
CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of October 18,2004,noting that because of
the late hour this item was skipped at that meeting. She then reviewed the Council meeting of
November 1, 2004. She also noted that there was a Council Study Meeting on Wednesday,November
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 8, 2004
9, 2004, in the Lan Community Room at 6:30 p.m. The purpose was to explore how New Urbanism
concepts could be applied to a site in the Downtown Burlingame area.
- Review Design of Medical Office Building and access to Shopping Center from Trousdale Drive
Following the Planning Commission meeting of October 25, 2004, the architects for the hospital
replacement project had tried to apply to the eastern fagade of the medical office building the direction
given them by the Commission. They sent a revised elevation which staff brought FYI for comment if
they were on the right track. Commissioners noted that the color of the building as shown on the
diagram was a little light, liked the trees added and the building would fade into the pedestrian
background more if it were darker; commissioners noted that it is very hard to show accurate color on
these electronically rendered drawings, thought the color would be darker in reality because of the
shadows caste by the groves in the precast panels,would like to see a sample;thought that a change to
color of the MOB would also affect the hospital since the two tie together; lightened sunscreens with
horizontal shadow pattern are an improvement; like the parapet shown, windows work OK, it's a
distinctive building, but addresses the issues; still would like darker, maybe can go with darker
aggregate; seems to be a consensus do not want a very light building, maybe in future coloration on
exhibits can be more representative. Applicant prepared a video of the building from El Camino Real,it
is an interesting tool and a good way to present the design to the City Council, would recommend it.
Noted that a member of the public at tonight's meeting commented on the location of the key services in
the hospital, that is not an issue before the Planning Commission, can the applicant contact her and
explain how you intend the project to work on the service side.
- FYI—Update on Conditional Use Permit for Car Rental and Storage at 1815 Bayshore Highway and 840 -
Cowan Road
Commission reviewed the submittal which documented that the operation of the car rental and storage
use at 1815 Bayshore Highway and 840 Cowan Road is consistent with the conditions of the use permit
granted. Commission saw no reason to review this further, noting that this fulfilled the review
requirement.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Osterling adjourned the meeting at 9:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Brownrigg, Secretary
SAMR4UTESWinutes Template.doc
10
CITY OF BURLINGAME BUILDING INSPECTION
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY OCTOBER, 2004
F.Y. 2004 F.Y. 2003
SAME NONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF TO DATE TO DATE DIFF
Permit type # Valuation # Valuation % # Valuation # Valuation %
New Single Family 2 $721,079 2 $698,000 3.3 9 $3,3.14,767 5 $2,058,000 61.1
New Multi-Family 0 $0 0 $0 .0 0 $0 0 $0 .0
New Commercial 1 $1,200,000 1 $0 .0 1 $1,200,000 2 $2,500,000 52.0-
Alterations-Res 32 $1,734,823 29 $627,222 176.6 118 $6,552,973 120 $4,744,187 38.1
Alterations-NonRes 11 $589,800 10 $973,000 39.4- 30 $3,535,832 32 $4,059,300 12.9-
Demolition 8 $22,000 4 $0 .0 22 $35,500 22 $24,000 47.9
Swimming Pool 0 $0 0 $0 .0 0 $0 2 $50,000 100.0-
Sign Permits 4 $21,850 3 $7,200 203.5 17 $47,582 11 $50,650 6.1-
Fences 0 $0 0 $0 .0 0 $0 1 $1,500 100.0-
Reroofing 27 $289,,699 39 $424,078. 31.7- 121 $1,557,505 149 $1,597,500 2.5-
Repairs 4 $116,394 7 $61,700 88.6 12 $222,194 19 $131,400 69.1
Window Repl 3 $34,883 14 -$273,795 87.3- 27 $250,625 40 $463,439 45.9-
Miscellaneous 3 $52,700 5 $45,101 16.8 10 $119,805 11 $151,101 20.7-
TOTALS...... 95 $4,783,228 114 $3,110,096 53.8 367 $16,836,783 414 $15,831,077 6.4
11/02/04 8:41:12
i } I
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
October 31 , 2004
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
LAIF & County Pool 21,964,592.72 21,964,592.72 21,964,592.72 75.83 1 1 2.582 2.618
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 7,000,000.00 6,998,600.00 7,000,000.00 24.17 991 744 2.776 2.814
Investments 28,964,592.72 28,963,192.72 28,964,592.72 100.00% 240 181 2.629 2.666
Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 61,526.50 264,574.69
Average Daily Balance 27,883,663.60 30,007,519.97
Effective Rate of Return 2.60% 2.62%
Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and
availabil't of some of these funds is restricted by law (e.g. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds).
0001
J S NAV FINANCE DIR./TREASURER
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 11/09/2004- 10:27 PM (PRF_PM1)SymRept V6.21
Report Ver. 5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
October 31, 2004
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
LAW&County Pool
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD, 3,786,537.88 3,786,537.88 3,786,537.88 1.890 1.890 1
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 18,178,054.84 18,178,054.84 18,178,054.84 2.770 2.770 1
Subtotal and Average 21,432,050.70 21,964,592.72 21,964,592.72 21,964,592.72 2.618 1
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
3128X16Q5 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,996,880.00 2,000,000.00 2.300 2.300 381 11/17/2005
3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,999,220.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 820 01/30/2007
3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 1,001,560.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 3.100 907 04/27/2007
3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 1,000,940.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 1,081 10/18/2007
Subtotal and Average 6,451,612.90 7,000,000.00 6,998,600.00 7,000,000.00 2.814 744
Total and Average 27,883,663.60 28,964,592.72 28,963,192.72 28,964,592.72 2.666 181
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:11/09/2004-10:27
PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept V6.21
� 1
n ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 3
Activity By Type
October 1, 2004 through October 31, 2004
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary)
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCYINV.FD. 1.890 3,011,614.11 1,000,000.00
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 2.770 702,414.54 0.00
Subtotal 19,250,564.07 3,714,028.65 1,000,000.00 21,964,592.72
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 3.000 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 6,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 7,000,000.00
Total 25,250,564.07 4,714,028.65 1,000,000.00 28,964,592.72
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:11/09/2004-10:27 PM(PRF PM3)SyrnRepl V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 4
Activity Summary
October 2003 through October 2004
Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number
Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average
End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity
October 2003 3 26,475,202.01 2.711 2.749 2.739 0 0 42 29
November 2003 3 26,087,655.91 2.614 2.651 2.680 1 1 57 56
December 2003 3 28,680,215.64 2.617 2.654 2.680 0 0 52 49
January 2004 4 27,400,432.25 2.663 2.700 2.696 1 0 174 168
February 2004 4 27,499,689.16 2.557 2.592 2.564 0 0 174 163
March 2004 4 29,579,440.12 2.512 2.547 2.512 0 0 161 146
April 2004 5 31,824,022.87 2.373 2.405 2.318 1 0 184 165
May 2004 5 32,351,524.97 2.412 2.445 2.368 0 0 181 157
June 2004 5 32,705,947.05 2.452 2.486 2.420 0 0 180 150
July 2004 5 31;221,968.21 2.561 2.597 2.553 0 0 188 151
August 2004 5 31,242,288.45 2.603 2.639 2.605 0 0 188 145
September 2004 5 25,250,564.07 2.625 2.662 2.624 0 0 232 172
October 2004 6 28,964,592.72 2.629 2.666 2.618 1 0 240 181
Average 4 29,175,657.19 2.564% 2.600% 2.567 0 0 158 133
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:11/09/2004-10:27 PM(PRF_PM4)SynnRept V6.21
I ( ' Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 5
Distribution of investments By Type
October 2003 through October 2004
October November December January February March April May June July August September October Average
Security Type 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 by Period
LAIF&County Pool 96.2 92.3 93.0 81.8 81.8 83.1 81.2 81.5 81.7 80.8 80.8 76.2 75.8 83.6%
........... ................... ..................... .......... ....................... ...................
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
........... ...................................................I 11 ..1.-1 1 .......................................................................................................................................... ..........-......................................-................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................... ................ ........................
Certificates of Deposit-S&L
Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln
Negotiable CD's-Bank
......................... ....................... .................................. .................. ............ ..........I..........I................. ............................. ............................................................................................................................................ .......................................
CORP NOTES
..............-................
Bankers Acceptances
................................ ............... ........................................................................... .............. .. -- ................ ............................... ...................
Commercial
.P.....a..per-Interest Bearing
........
. ......... ......................................................................................... ........... ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Commercial Paper-Discount
.......... ..................................
................
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3.8 7.7 7.0 18.3 18.2 16.9 18.9 18.6 18.4 19.2 19.2 23.8 24.2 16.5%
Federal Agency Issues-Discount
.................. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................... .................................. .................... ............... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Treasury Securities-Coupon
..................... ......... ......I.,....,.,,.,,............................................................. ......
Treasury Securities-Discount
.............. ................................................................................................................- ................. .......................................................................... ........................... .................. ........................ ......................... .......... .....................- .......................................... .............................................
Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon
.................................... ...... ......................... ...................*.......... ....... .............................................................*........... ................................ ......
Miscellaneous Securities-Discount
.............. ................ ...................................... ............... ....... .................................................. . .................... ...........
Non Interest Bearing Investments
Mortgage Backed Securities
........... ............................I...................................... ............... ................... .......... .......................................- ............................................................................. .................... ................................-................................................................................................................................................................................................ ............................................... ................
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3
........... ...... ........... .. .........................q ..................................................... .................... ..........................................- ...........................................................-.....................................................
Portfolio CITY
CID
Run Date:11/09/2004-10:27 PM(PRF-PM5)SymRept V6,21
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 6
Interest Earnings Summary
October 31, 2004
October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
CD/Coupon/Discount Investments:
Interest Collected 15,500.00 60,500.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 45,133.33 45,133.33
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 45,633.33) ( 48,883.33)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 15,000.00 56,750.00
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 15,000.00 56,750.00
Pass Through Securities:
Interest Collected 0.00 0.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00
Less.Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase.During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00
Cash/Checking Accounts:
Interest Collected 161,298.19 313,670.79
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 276,614.06 276,614.06
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 391,385.75) ( 382,460.16)
Interest Earned during Period 46,526.50 207,824.69
Total Interest Earned during.Period 61,526.50 264,574.69
Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Total Earnings during Period 61,526.50 264,574.69
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:11/09/2004-10:27 PM(PRF PM6)SyrnRept V6.21
'ieport Ver.5.00
03BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
October 31, 2004
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Managed Pool Accounts 203,559.26 203,559.26 203,559.26 100.00 1 1 1.864 1.890
Investments 203,559.26 203,559.26 203,559.26 100.00% 1 1 1.864 1.890
Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 378.97 2,206.07
Average Daily Balance 251,508.31 387,703.50
Effective Rate of Return 1.77% 1.69%
Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months.Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is
restri law(e.g.G Tax,Tr &Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds).
J s Nava, inance Director/Treasurer
Portfolio 03BD
CP
Run Date:11/09/2004-10:29 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
03BD
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
October 31, 2004
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
SYS82 82 Local Agency Investment Fund 203,559.26 203,559.26 203,559.26 1.890 1.864 1.890 1
Subtotal and Average 251,508.31 203,559.26 203,559.26 203,559.26 1.864 1.890 1
Total and Average 251,508.31 203,559.26 203,559.26 203,559.26 1.864 1.890 1
Portfolio 036D
CP
Run Date:11/09/2004-10:29 PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept V6.21
Irt Ver.5.00
4l CITY 0 STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAME AGENDA I2j 0.
ITEM# L
a
MTG.
DATE 11.15.04
q°RATED., Ne 6
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 2004
APPROVE
FROM: CITY PLANNER BY
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENI ULA HOSPITAL
REPLACEMENT PROJECT AT 1783 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED C-3 AND
UNCLASSIFIED (TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should hold a public hearing and vote on the following actions:
1. Certification of the Final Environmental Report(FEIR) consisting of the Draft EIR, the Revised
Draft EIR, the Response to Comments Documents, and the public record of documents and testimony
commenting on the EIR. Because the FEIR identifies two significant and unavoidable impacts that
may be caused by the project, the Council must adopt a "Statement of Overriding Considerations"
regarding these two impacts if the project is to be approved.
2. Adopt ordinance rezoning of parcels on El Camino Real (see separate staff report):
a. Rezoning from C-3 to C-1 for 1515 Trousdale Drive
b. Rezoning from Unclassified to C-1 for 1791 El Camino Real
3. Adopt ordinance amending Zoning Code to establish health service use as a conditional use in
Trousdale area of C-1 District (see separate staff report).
4. Approve Conditional Use Permits for 1) proposed uses on Unclassified zoned property; 2) structure
over 35 feet tall in C-1 Zoning District; and 3) medical office use in C-1 Zoning District (approval
includes conceptual approval of lot line adjustments and tentative parcel maps required to implement
project).
5. Approve Design Review for new commercial buildings in C-1 Zoning District.
A comprehensive draft resolution for these action is attached at the end of this report on buff-colored
paper.
Affirmative action on each of these items should include findings for the action. The reasons for any action
should be clearly stated for the record. Criteria for findings are attached to this report. The conditions
recommended by the Planning Commission to be considered at the public hearing are listed at the end of this
report beginning on Page 13.
Planning Commission Action:
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application on September 2`7, 2004, and continued
the public hearing to October 25, 2004. On September 27, 2004, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 on a
voice vote to recommend conceptual approval of the lot line adjustment and the tentative parcel map, the
zoning code text amendment and the rezoning for the project. At their meeting on October 25, 2004, the
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED (TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S, 2004
Planning Commission voted 6-0-1 (C. Keele absent) on a voice vote to recommend to the Council approval
of the Final Environmental Impact Report and Statement of Overriding considerations, and to approve the
conditional use permits with amended conditions as listed at the end of this report. The Commission
approved the design review for the hospital, medical office building and parking garage on a 5-1-1 (C.
Bojues dissenting, C. Keele absent) voice vote.
September 27, 2004 Planning Commission Hearing: At the September 27, 2004 the Planning
Commission hearing, the Commission noted that the EIR is excellent, one of the best the Commission has
seen, and commended the applicant on the extensive revisions made to come up with a project with the
fewest significant and unavoidable impacts. However, since it appeared that there were many neighbors who
are new to the process, the Commission voted to continue action on the project to allow the applicant to meet
with neighbors to discuss the constraints on the site which affect the siting of buildings, and how the
construction and operation impacts on the immediate neighbors might be addressed as a part of the project.
Neighborhood Meeting October 7, 2004: After a presentation by the applicant of the project objectives
which affected the physical shape and layout of the buildings, and a discussion of the reasons why the
existing hospital needs to be retained while building the replacement, the October 7th meeting focused on
ideas suggested by the public for relocating the buildings and on combining structures like the medical office
building and the parking structure. The discussion involved the site constraints, alternatives examined and
mitigations and the significant and unavoidable effects caused by the original project. There was also
discussion about the impacts of the Revised Project (preferred alternative) on the Plaza Shopping Center and
on Trousdale Drive. At the October 7th meeting there was little focused discussion on the physical interface
between the Ray Park neighborhood and, more particularly, on the properties along Davis Drive which share
a common property line with the hospital. Therefore, a second meeting was set for October 13, 2004.
Neighborhood Meeting October 13, 2004: Discussion at the October 13th neighborhood meeting included
how to address the relationship between the hospital and the immediately adjacent Davis Drive properties
and the nearby Ray Park residential neighborhood, and possibilities for relocating the structures on the site.
The discussion between the immediate neighbors and the applicant focused on the following specific
concerns: landscaping next to Davis Drive, including landscaping opposite Balboa; the issues of landscaping
over both the existing and proposed water easements; landscaping on the Hospital (north) side of the water
easement and the potential for berming to create taller landscaping; fencing along the property line; keeping
drainage on the hospital site and allowing existing drainage patterns where the residential properties drain to
the hospital site, noise from the cooling towers, construction and loading docks; design of the hospital;
concern with Davis Drive on-street parking and traffic at Davis Drive hospital entrance; impacts from
demolition of the existing hospital; providing adequate access to Plaza Shopping Center; and increased
traffic on Trousdale.
The conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission include revised conditions which,
where appropriate, address the items identified by the neighbors (these are identified by the word 'neighbor'
at the end of each condition). The resolution of some of the neighbor's concerns do not relate to actions
which can be addressed on the hospital site or on the public right-of-way. In these cases, the neighbors were
given the contact information for the project manager and were urged to discuss their individual issues with
him; these concerns are not addressed in the conditions of approval.
-2-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
October 25, 2004 Planning Commission Continued Hearing: In their action on the FEIR, conditional use
permits and design review, the Commission amended the conditions of approval to address some of their
concerns regarding the following issues. The conditions revised by the Planning Commission are shown in
bold face at the end of this report.
• Design of the Medical Office Building: Requires revisions to the design of the office building, two
additional design schemes were presented by the applicant, and the Commission suggested that the
qualities of the two schemes be combined, noting that the revised design should focus on the lower
two or three stories at the pedestrian level; break the void at the cafeteria and add articulation to the
glass, similar to stair towers on the hospital building, use horizontal striation to break vertical mass;
treatment of top windows should reflect the style of other parts of the building and reflect an
individual interior office scale; add visual interest at the top of the structure to finish the series of ribs
on the building; make sure the cornice element visually relates to the vertical elements of the fagade;
use polished granite at the base of building rather than ribbed cement; use warmer stone along
stairway and in the entry area off El Camino Real; remove strong horizontal elements on lower
portion and extend/connect the vertical elements of the upper floors to the ground floor base;
horizontal elements across the glazing at the front look like scaffolding; make louvers across the
building have less weight and fade out; windows on lower level of office building should mimic
those on hospital. (Condition No. 5)
• Public Art: Requires as gateway mitigation for garage at corner that there shall be a piece of public
art placed at the El Camino Real/Trousdale corner of the site. Given the restrictions on the water
easement and the future choice of a piece of art to be chosen by the community and applicant, some
latitude in location may be required. The intent should be to create a focal point in the gateway area
in the vicinity of the parking garage. (Condition No. 18)
• Parking: Requires that when the remainder 4.15 acres is developed by the Peninsula Hospital
District, a reduction in at-grade parking for the hospital should be facilitated by encouraging the
District and applicant to consider and investigate construction of a shared parking structure. This
concern grew from the amount of the hospital site devoted to surface parking which is a less desirable
land use and may unduly constrain good design, access and other options for developing the 4.15
acres in the future. This condition establishes a'flag' for future decision makers; it does not require
compliance. (Condition No. 19)
• Parking Supply: Requires that parking usage at the new hospital shall be monitored quarterly and if
parking is determined inadequate, the applicant shall identify acceptable solutions to be reviewed by
the City and implemented. (Condition No. 23)
• Loading Dock Hours: Limits the hours for delivery at the loading dock and requires them to be
posted at the dock. (Condition No. 35)
• Left-turn into Plaza Shopping Center from Trousdale: Commission required that the applicant
work with the City Engineer to come up with a solution which will allow left-turn movements from
Trousdale into the existing driveway for the Burlingame Plaza Shopping Center. After the Planning
Commission action, the City and traffic engineer for the EIR met and identified an acceptable
solution to retain the present eastbound left-turn pocket from Trousdale into the Plaza Shopping
Center. This solution will not affect the length of the left-turn access into the hospital from Trousdale
and will also not cause cars accessing the Plaza eastbound to back up cars through the Magnolia
intersection. (Condition No. 41)Refer to attached memo from Fehr and Peers with diagram for
proposed solution. This condition is in compliance with Mitigation No. 124 (with double not single
left-turn lanes equalling 175'); and since the left-turn pocket from eastbound Trousdale into the Plaza
remains, the signage in Mitigation No. 125 is no longer required.
-3-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
• Landscaping at Parking Garage: Requires that the landscaping around and on the parking garage
be enhanced to include planters and vines to break up the mass of the building and blend into the
gateway landscaping. (Condition No. 88)
• Site Landscaping: Requires refinement of the landscape plan at various stages of construction to
include tree protection measures and long-term maintenance programs to ensure the proposed
landscaping as installed is adequate size to grow to the desired height in a reasonable time.
(Condition No. 103, 104)
• Noise from filling of oxygen tanks: Limits the number of times per week the oxygen tanks may be
filled and limits the times that they are filled to daylight hours. (Condition No. 93)
• Construction Noise: Imposes a stricter standard for construction noise in the areas of the site along
the southerly property line near the Davis Drive residences. Requires more limited construction
hours for the part of the building within 150 feet of the southern (Davis Drive)property line. Noise
consultant is evaluating the effectiveness of this measure; and whether there is a more appropriate
way to achieve this objective. These limitations were to be in effect until the skin was on the outside
of the part of the building within 150 feet was in place, construction of interior work was not to be
limited. (Condition No. 94)
• Davis Drive Access: Clarifies the limitations on the use of the Davis Drive access both during
construction and after the hospital is opened. At issue was the use of this access by staff only during
the various phases of construction, how the use limitation can be enforced and what the result of
failure to enforce would be. (Condition No. 99)
• Landscaping and Undergrounding of Utilities Along Southerly Property Line: Clarifies that the
applicant will work with neighbors and the City Arborist to determine the landscape screening along
the southerly property line adjacent to Davis Drive residences and that applicant will look into and
work with residents regarding the feasibility of undergrounding existing utility lines (a public utility
easement runs along the property line shared by the hospital and Davis Drive residences; five feet on
each side). The City Arborist will arbitrate landscape issues if there are any unresolved differences
between the neighbors and applicant. (Condition No. 101)
• Landscaping Maintenance: Requires applicant to pursue a high level of maintenance of all on-site
landscaping after construction. (Condition No. 105)
• Wind and Turbulence: Requires that the applicant monitor the impact of the new structures on
wind velocity and turbulence on adjacent residential properties and that landscaping should be
adjusted if needed for mitigation and property owners agree. (Condition No. 109)
• Cooling Tower Noise: Establishes a method for determining an ambient baseline and monitoring of
the cooling tower noise; requires compliance with a noise standard stricter than the community
standard. Given the location of the new cooling towers and the noise level of the existing cooling
towers, neighbors want a reduction in ambient noise levels after replacement; Commission focus was
on reducing noise generated from cooling towers and finding a way to translate that to a new ambient
benchmark for future testing. The noise consultant is evaluating the direction given and will discuss
how to establish a benchmark for ongoing evaluation after the hospital replacement is complete
which will meet the community's interests. (Conditions No. 110& 111)
The Commission also stated reasons and findings in support of the applications, indicating that the hospital is
the largest employer in the City, retaining the hospital is important to the City's economy, especially when
many local businesses are moving to the East Bay; that it is important for the City to encourage and continue
the location of health care facilities close to our residents; because of the importance of providing ongoing
health care, and given the need to provide continuous health services to City residents and residents of the
-4-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
district and the location of the existing hospital, the replacement hospital needs to be placed on the lower
portion of the site where with any alternative it would be impossible to avoid a significant impact on the
open sky view from Davis Drive residences; the hospital needs to stay open because it is hard to attract staff
and employees to a new hospital given current costs on the Peninsula and without jobs, the current
employees and staff will move to other locations; although the project is not perfect, given all the studies, it
is the best project for replacing the hospital; the continuous monitoring of conditions will be important for
the project's success, particularly regarding noise and landscaping; this is a full-service hospital, it has been
in our community since the 1950's, it is important to the City's economic base and is part of our community;
neighbors on Davis Drive and Albemarle purchased their properties with a hospital in place and with the
chance that the hospital would change or relocate on site and other immediate neighbors will benefit; the
applicant has responded to neighborhood and community concerns policy objectives and relocated the
parking garage, have taken the neighbors' concerns into account and maintained an acceptable balance so
that the project will be an asset to the community; have looked at mitigations based on new location and past
experience, feel that the applicant has done their best to make the best use of the campus.
Public Hearing and Input History: In accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Code and the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project and the Final EIR (FEIR) was subject to the
following notices and public reviews:
Planning Commission Scoping Session for Environmental Impact Report July 14, 2003
Notice of Preparation to Office of Planning and Research for SCH #2003072005 June 30, 2003
Notice of Availability and Completion of Draft EIR January 21, 2004
Public Hearing on Draft EIR February 23, 2004
End of 45-day review period for Draft EIR March 6, 2004
Notice of Availability and Completion of Revised Draft EIR June 30, 2004
Public Hearing on Revised Draft EIR July 26, 2004
End of 45-day review period for Revised Draft EIR August 13, 2004
Joint City Council/Planning Commission Study Session August 30, 2004
Response to Comments document made available to public September 17, 2004
Planning Commission Hearing on the Final EIR and the project September 27, 2004
Planning Commission Continued Hearing on the project October 25, 2004
BACKGROUND:
History:
The applicant, Mills Peninsula Health Services, proposes to replace the existing Peninsula Medical Center
hospital building and nearby office buildings with a new hospital, medical office building and parking
garage. After the replacement hospital is completed, the existing hospital and medical office buildings will
be demolished as part of the project.
The replacement hospital would consist of approximately 440,000 square feet in a six to seven story
structure, attached to a five story medical office building of approximately 150,000 square feet. A parking
garage with 809 spaces would be built as part of the project, along with 681 surface parking spaces for a total
of 1,490 on-site parking spaces. The main entrance to the hospital would be from Trousdale Drive opposite
Magnolia Avenue. There would also be a staff entrance from Marco Polo Way, a combined staff/emergency
department entrance from Trousdale Drive near Ogden Drive, and the loading dock entrance from El Camino
Real.
-5-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
As part of the project, the applicant proposes to restripe the portion of Trousdale Drive between Ogden Drive
and El Camino Real, to modify the median strip in El Camino Real for a left-turn opening and for a
northbound truck holding lane, and to modify the signal at the corner of Trousdale Drive and El Camino
Real. The project also includes relocating the San Francisco Water Department line and easement for the
Crystal Springs #3 water distribution main from its current location at the center of the site to the perimeter
of the site along the rear of the properties facing Davis Drive, along El Camino Real, and westward back up
along Trousdale to the existing connection at Magnolia Drive.
In order to have the main entrance to the hospital and medical office building directly opposite Magnolia
Drive, the hospital is proposing a land swap with the Magnolia Gardens Care Center. A strip of land
approximately 35 feet wide will be transferred from Magnolia Gardens to the hospital on the east side by
Magnolia Drive, while a strip of land approximately 35 feet wide will be transferred from the hospital to
Magnolia Gardens on the west side towards Marco Polo Way. The total site area of the Magnolia Gardens
Care Center parcel will remain the same, and the amount of parking provided on the site will be 26 (26
spaces are required).
Zoning and Parcel Merger: As shown in the top map on Figure 1 in the October 25, 2004 Planning
Commission staff report: Parcel Ownership and Merger, the project site consists of six parcels, four of which
are owned by the Mills Peninsula Health Services and two of which are owned by the Peninsula Hospital
District, a public agency. Four of these parcels will be merged, and upon completion of the project, all of the
underlying parcels will be owned by the public agency, Peninsula Hospital District, as shown on the bottom
map on Figure 1.
Similarly, the zoning for several parcels associated with the project will need to be changed. The top map on
Figure 2: Existing and Proposed General Plan and Zoning Designations, shows the existing zoning and
General Plan designations. The lower map on Figure 2 shows the final zoning and General Plan designations
for the project. As this map shows, before the replacement hospital is built, the four main parcels composing
the project site will be merged into one parcel in public ownership and zoned Unclassified.
However, the parcel transfers and mergers will not occur immediately. City policy restricts the Unclassified
zoning district to parcels in public ownership only. Therefore, two of the parcels, those owned by Mills
Peninsula Health Services at this time, will need to have an initial zoning of C-1 assigned which would allow
construction of a medical office building with parking. A zoning text amendment is proposed to allow
medical offices as a conditional use in the C-1 zoning district in the Mills-Peninsula Block Subarea of the
adopted North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. This initial zoning is shown in Figure 3: Proposed
General Plan and Initial Zoning Designations, and would allow work on the main entrance and parking
garage for the project to move forward while the parcel transfers and mergers are in process. A condition of
approval is included that would require the site to be zoned to Unclassified prior to issuance of a building
permit for the medical office building.
After the replacement hospital project is complete and the existing hospital demolished, a legal lot will be
created for the 4.15 acre undeveloped area left on the back portion of the parcel. Because this parcel
includes part of the land in the footprint of the existing hospital and structures cannot cross property lines,
this parcel cannot be created until after the existing hospital is demolished.
-6-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
General Plan Consistency and Zoning Code Compliance: The Burlingame General Plan as amended by
the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan designates this site for Institutional Uses, and the proposed
replacement of the Peninsula Medical Center has been found to be consistent with this designation. The
project is also consistent with the Design Guidelines of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan.
This project has been analyzed for conformity with both the C-1 and Unclassified zoning district regulations,
and complies as phased with regulations for both districts.
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
As the replacement hospital project proceeded through the environmental and public hearing process several
issues emerged as the focus of public discussion with the Planning Commission and applicant. Each of these
with their status is summarized below.
Undergrounding Utilities in the PG and E Easement
A PG and E easement runs along the southern (Davis Drive side)property line of the hospital. Five feet of
this ten foot easement is on each side of the property line e.g. five feet runs across the rear yards of the
private properties fronting on Davis Drive and five feet runs parallel to the property line on the hospital side.
The present power poles are set pretty much on the dividing property line at the middle of the easement.
These poles carry the power to the adjacent houses, to the hospital and to the Ray Park neighborhood to the
south. Service to all these areas is above grade at this time.
At the community meeting, the property owners on Davis Drive asked if the applicant could investigate
placing this unsightly utility service underground, both to improve their views and to protect view blockage
of the new hospital so that they would not have to trim trees to 20 feet in the area under and next to the
power lines. Oren Reinbolt, the project manager for the hospital replacement project has begun investigating
with PG and E the requirements and implications for undergrounding this service. His memo of November
4, 2004, included in your packet, summarizes what is known at this time. Because these lines serve a bigger
area than the individual properties, it will not be possible to underground the entire length of the southern
property line, strategic poles with conduit to carry hot wires from below grade to existing over head service
mains will need to remain along with large transformer boxes. In addition, PG and E has severe restrictions
about what can be done within PUE easements when lines are underground. Their requirements preclude
fences and significant plantings, two prohibitions which would substantially affect the landscape mitigations
proposed in the conditions of approval, e.g. no fence replacement and removal of the first layer of view
protecting trees to be located between the south property line and the new SF water easement line. In
addition, in many cases, major existing view protecting vegetation in private yards will have to be removed,
not to be replaced.
Condition No. 100 requires the applicant to do a feasibility study and to meet with the neighbors on the
issue of undergrounding. While this condition may remain, it appears based on the information presently
available that this solution would affect implementation of a number of other view protecting landscape
conditions included in the staff report.
Public Art
The Planning Commission raised this issue as a way for the applicant to off set the impact of the rather tall
parking structure which frames the landscaped gateway setback at the corner of El Camino Real and
Trousdale Drive. The applicant is agreeable to paying for and placing a piece of public art (statue, fountain,
-7-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
etc.) in the vicinity of the parking garage as well as being involved in a public process to identify the
appropriate piece. The Planning Commission recommended that the art be placed at the corner of Trousdale
and El Camino Real. Staff would note that because of the limitations of the use of the San Francisco Water
easement, it may not be possible, or an appropriate sized piece may not be able to be installed, directly at the
corner of El Camino Real and Trousdale. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommendation has been
modified to broaden the possible location to include the gateway area along El Camino Real so long as it is
approved by the Planning Commission(see Condition No. 18).
Left Turn Ingress (East Bound) from Trousdale into the Plaza Shopping Center
The lane modifications for Trousdale provided for both the original and revised project show that an existing
left-turn pocket from east bound Trousdale into the Plaza Shopping Center would be removed. During the
public hearings on the project before the Planning Commission, loss of this left-turn pocket into the
Trousdale access to the shopping center became a concern for local residents who frequently use the
shopping center as well as for center property owners and businesses located in the shopping center. In all
proposed roadway lane configurations for the replacement hospital, the use of the Trousdale access for right
turn in and out at the shopping center has been continued.
The Planning Commission added a condition(No. 41) indicating that the applicant study and see if there was
a way to continue the existing left-turn pocket from eastbound Trousdale into the mid-block center access on
Trousdale. Immediately following the Planning Commission meeting, City staff met with the Traffic
Engineer for the EIR. Attached to the packet is a memo from Fehr&Peers, traffic consultants, which
discusses two options for retaining the current left-turn pocket from east bound Trousdale into the shopping
center. While both are feasible, the alternative which shows the double left-turn from west bound Trousdale
into the new hospital entrance at Magnolia is the option currently preferred by the City Traffic Engineer.
(See Planning Commission Memo, FYI,November 8, 2004 attached). The main reason for choosing the
double left-turn option, is that it will improve the operation of the Magnolia/Trousdale intersection by
reducing the green time necessary to clear the left turning movement and will also reduce the possibility of
cars waiting to turn left from backing up across the left turn pocket, blocking east bound cars wanting to turn
into the shopping center. Both alternatives for revising the lanes to retain the left-turn pocket will cause the
removal of six on street parking spaces. These spaces are located on the north side of Trousdale,between the
frontage road and the mid-block Trousdale entrance into the shopping center. Both Planning Commission
and the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission are being given an opportunity to see these proposed
changes.
Incorporating the double left-turn pocket alternative into the project will implement Planning Commission
Condition No. 41 as well as implementing the mitigation monitoring plan Condition No. 124 by providing
175 feet of storage in two parallel lanes which equals the amount of storage that would be provided in a
single 175-foot left-turn lane. This alternative would modify the transition area to between 20 and 60 feet as
well. However, mitigation Condition No. 125 requiring signage at Magnolia to announce the Magnolia
entrance to the shopping center is no longer needed. The EIR consulting traffic engineer agrees that these
changes are consistent with the mitigations to the circulation impacts of the project in this area to keep the
impacts less than significant. In this case since the proposed change is consistent with all the studies done
for the environmental impact report and will improve the circulation in the area, these changes may be
incorporated into the conditions to accomplish Planning Commission direction. Planning Commission
reviewed the change in lane configuration as an FYI item at their meeting on November 8, 2004, and noted
-8-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
that it addressed their intention to maintain access to the Plaza Shopping Center from eastbound Trousdale;
and that with this change a sign at Magnolia was no longer necessary.
Noise: Cooling Tower, During Construction, at the Loading Dock
Cooling tower noise: With the revision to the original project the cooling towers were relocated from at-
grade 20 feet from the edge of the sidewalk on El Camino Real to a partially buried bunker, 90 feet from the
rear of the properties on Davis Drive. In their new location the towers will be surrounded by a masonry wall,
with dirt bermed up against it and screened from view by tall (redwoods etc.) masses of landscaping. The
issue which emerged from the neighbors regarding the cooling towers is the potential for noise from the
operation of the cooling towers becoming an audible annoyance for them.
As a part of the Noise Element of the General Plan the city adopted a "community standard" for noise. An
EIR evaluates projects against the community standards and identifies as impacts, only those things which
the new development would cause to become greater than the community standard. For example, the
community standard for noise is that no new development shall raise the noise level at property line by more
than 5 dBA over the ambient (existing) noise level at any hour of the day. In the case of the cooling towers
the EIR notes that the impact is insignificant because the addition of the new cooling towers over the existing
ambient is 0.4 dBA. Most acoustical engineers note that any increase 3 dBA or less is not detectable to most
people.
The neighbors pointed out in their testimony that the existing ambient noise level includes the noise from the
current cooling towers; and to add any thing over that is unreasonable, let alone the 5 dBA of the community
noise standard. In fact some neighbors felt that the ambient noise level should be calculated without the
cooling towers and the new project held to that standard. The neighbors felt that if the standard could not be
met, the cooling towers should be relocated away from the neighbors. Staff suggested that another option
might be to reduce to 3 dBA the amount of decibels added over either existing ambient or the ambient
adjusted (without the current noise from the existing cooling towers). In either case these proposed changes
represent a betterment e.g. improvement over the existing condition, so are outside of the environmental
review mitigations.
This issue over how to define the baseline for noise evaluation arose at the last Planning Commission
meeting on the hospital project. The applicant has hired a noise consultant to do additional evaluation of
how the noise level increase at property line might be measured(e.g. from what baseline). Their studies are
not available at this time. The Planning Commission recommended Condition No. 110 establishing a criteria
that the new cooling towers should not generate more dBA than the existing towers; and Condition No. 111
noting that the applicant shall establish an adjusted baseline ambient (e.g. without current cooling tower dBA
included) and shall be allowed only to exceed the adjusted baseline ambient by 3 dBA. The condition also
says that if the studies show that this is not achieved by the present design of the cooling towers, then the
design will have to be adjusted until the 3 dBA over adjusted ambient is met.
Construction Noise: One of the significant, unavoidable impacts of the replacement hospital is noise during
construction. This EIR finding means that there is no way known to current science that construction noise
levels during the building process can be kept to levels below the community noise standard (5 dBA over
ambient at property line). It should be noted that noise levels from construction will not be constant over the
six year duration of the project. For example, construction noise will be at a much lower level when interior
finish work is being done, than when they are grading and putting the frame of the building together.
-9-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
In an effort to give the neighbors some relief, the Planning Commission added Condition No. 94 which
requires shorter construction hours on the part of the hospital building (including the cooling towers)within
150 feet of the southern property line of the site. The hours proposed by the Planning Commission ( 8 am to
6 pm Mon-Sat and no construction on Sundays and holidays) are more restrictive than the city's code
established construction hours (7 am-7pm Mon-Fri, 9 a.m.-6 pm Sat, 10 am-6 pm Sun. and holidays). With
Condition No. 94 the applicant would be allowed to follow the city construction hours on the entire building
except for that portion within 150 feet of the southern property line; and for all interior work. Staff has some
concerns about this condition, because of enforcement. There is nothing to shield the travel of sound
between the hospital construction site and the Ray Park neighborhood. Sound travels in a straight line, and
does not dissipate much over 10 or 100 feet. Since construction at 160 feet from the southern property line
would be able to begin at 7:00 a.m. but construction at 150 feet not until 8:00 a.m., during much of the
grading, framing and exterior construction, it will be difficult to tell the location of construction. To address
both this problem and the Planning Commission need to provide some relief to the adjacent neighbors, staff
would suggest that Condition No. 94 be modified to allow all construction on the exterior(including grading)
to begin at 7:00 a.m. Monday through Saturday, and no construction on any of the exterior of the hospital
building on Sundays and holidays (as defined in the Municipal Code). If Council wishes to modify
Condition No. 94, direction should be given to staff.
Loading Dock Noise: One of the on going complaints of Davis Drive residents about the current hospital
operation is the noise generated at the present loading dock which is oriented with its back toward the
southern property line. In the past, the City Attorney worked with the neighbors, the hospital and the City
Council to adopt an ordinance which regulates the loading dock hours at the hospital. Staff included the
limitations of this ordinance in the conditions of approval (Condition No. 35). It should be noted that an
ordinance was necessary in the past because there was no condition addressing use of the loading dock in the
action on the existing hospital. On review of Condition No. 35 a neighbor has noted that there is a loop hole
in the present conditions which would allow for the delivery of"medical equipment or consumable medical
supplies" at any time. She would like all but deliveries made during emergencies to be limited to the hours
set out in the current code (7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Mon-Fri, 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturdays, Sunday, and holidays).
Condition No. 35 has been amended clarify that the only exception is for medical equipment and consumable
medical supplies required for emergency use.
Design of the Medical Office Building and Project
It became apparent at the September 27, 2004, Planning Commission meeting that a lot more attention had
been given to the exterior(skin) design of the hospital and parking garage structures than had been given to
the exterior of the medical office building. The Planning Commission gave specific directions to the
applicant to "flesh out" the design of the medical office building before the October 25, 2004, continued
meeting. The applicant returned with two alternatives, one sketched and one elevation. The Commission
approved a combination of these two alternatives with direction. (See Planning Commission Minutes,
October 25, 2004, attached) They also added a condition,Number 5, which directed staff review of the
medical office building for consistency with the Commission's direction, at the time of submittal for building
permits. This condition allows changes to this project to be treated the same as changes to any commercial
design review project in the City. If the City Council wishes to give some further direction on design of any
of the structures, implementation can be handled in the same way, relying on Condition No. 5. However, it
is important that Council direction be very clear, because the Staff and Planning Commission will be
responsible for insuring that the appropriate features are included at the building permit stage. The process
-10-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
outlined in Condition No. 5 would allow approval of the design review with direction, so that the Council
can go forward with the action on the entire project.
Because the applicant was concerned that they clearly understood the Planning Commission's direction, they
prepared a new El Camino Real elevation for the medical office building which was taken FYI to the
Commission at their November 8, 2004, meeting. This elevation is included in the Council staff report for
your reference, and so that you are aware of the current status of the design of the medical office building.
Planning Commission reviewed the Design Revision date stamped November 5, 2004, and noted the positive
nature of the added landscaping at street level and the benefits of the changes noted on the elevation. They
also encouraged the hospital designers to consider a darker material at the base of the building to make it
fade more into the background behind the new trees and landscaping. The Commission liked the changes to
the window pattern making the building blend more into a residential setting. Commission suggested that
the computer rendering did not represent well the color of the walls or shadows created by the grooves in the
concrete and how they would affect the overall color. They suggested that the applicant look into better
ways to represent the exterior finish.
Future Development of the Remainder of the Hospital Site
The phasing plan for the site development shows that after the existing hospital is demolished the Peninsula
Hospital District will create a 4.15 acre parcel for future development at the rear of the site. Since the
hospital replacement project will take 6 or 7 years to complete, including the demolition of the current
hospital, the Planning Commission was concerned that the applicant remain aware of the Commission's
design concern that so much of the site was covered by at-grade,paved parking.
In order to remind the applicant, Peninsula Hospital District and future Planning Commissions and City
Councils about the many benefits of more landscaping and less paving, the Commission added Condition
No. 19 which requires that at the time development of the 4.15 acres is undertaken, the applicant enter into
"good faith" negotiations with the District and facilitate good development of the 4.15 acres by considering a
joint parking facility(thus reducing at grade paved parking areas). This reminder is particularly important
since, in order for the city to approve required parking on a separate parcel, the city must grant a variance.
This condition will serve as a flag in the future that the Planning Commission and City Council acting on the
hospital replacement project would have supported a joint facility with a variance, if it would have reduced
the amount of the site paved for parking.
Commission Directed Changes to Conditions
Following the public hearing and commission discussion, the commission amended and modified a number
of the staff proposed conditions of approval on the project. In the final action some of these became more
important; these items are discussed in detail above. For your reference the subject of each issue is noted by
condition:
- Design medical office building (Condition 5, see above)
- Public Art and gateway feature (Condition 18, see above)
- Future conversion of at-grade parking areas to development by encouraging shared parking structures
(Condition 19)
- Insure adequate on-site parking for the combined hospital/medical office use (Condition 23)
- Loading dock and delivery hours-noise impact along El Camino Real (Condition 35, 93, see above)
- East bound Trousdale access into the Plaza Shopping Center (Condition 41, see above)
- Gateway landscaping, vines on the parking garage (Condition 88)
-11-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
- Process for implementing landscaping, insure tree protection measures (Condition 90)
- Limitation on construction hours within 150' of the southern property line (Condition 94, see above)
- Use of Davis Drive access during construction, limiting to staff use, measuring abuse (Condition 99)
- Undergrounding utilities along southern property line, timing to complete feasibility study and
process for decision (Condition 100, see above)
- Landscaping, installation size, work with property owners,planting on private property(Condition
103, 104)
- Maintenance of landscaping after the project is completed (Condition 105)
- Noise from cooling towers, when a violation, how correct(Conditions 110,111, see above)
A final note about the conditions of approval. The conditions of approval include the mitigation monitoring
plan (conditions in italics). These conditions represent the actions necessary to reduce issues identified in the
EIR as significant to a level less than significant. For this reason any change to these conditions (Nos. 118
through 144 ) must be shown to cause the same or greater mitigation as the original condition. For example,
doubling the left hand turn lane from Trousdale to the new entrance at Magnolia actually improves the
circulation at the intersection and on Trousdale, as determined by the EIR consultant so the mitigations can
be changed accordingly. Many of the project conditions go beyond the recommendations of the EIR and
represent a "betterment" to the existing condition. In that case the City Council may modify these conditions
without concern that such a change would somehow violate the environmental evaluation. These distinctions
are important to bear in mind when discussing changes to the conditions of approval suggested by the public
or your own membership.
Environmental Review: The Draft EIR for the project was released on January 21, 2004. Based on the
analysis in the Draft EIR which identified significant unavoidable impacts and the alternatives proposed, the
applicant worked with city officials and staff to identify redesign options for the project. From this
discussion came a revised design which had fewer significant and unavoidable environmental impacts. The
Revised Project was analyzed in a Revised Draft EIR released on June 30, 2004. Comments were received
on both of these documents, both in writing and at public hearings before the Planning Commission. A
Response to Comments document was released on September 17, 2004. This document includes and
responds to all comments submitted on both the Draft EIR and the Revised Draft EIR. Together, the Draft
EIR, Revised Draft EIR, and the Responses to Comments document comprise the Final EIR for the project.
City officials, staff and consultants explored alternatives and worked with the project architects to examine
the development options available on the site (see Sketch Studies, Appendix A of the Response to Comments
Document, September 17, 2004) and found no alternatives other than the now proposed project with fewer
significant unavoidable impacts that would meet the project objectives. The constraints on the site, including
the need to keep the existing hospital open until the replacement hospital is operating and the presence of the
San Francisco Water Department line and easement, substantially limit the development alternatives.
The environmental review indicates that the now proposed project has two significant and unavoidable
impacts. Neither of these impacts can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. These impacts are: 1)
visual quality impacts (loss of sky view) on Davis Drive residents between Coronado Way and Albemarle
Way/El Camino Real, and 2) construction noise impacts. Because the project has two significant
unavoidable impacts, the City would need to adopt a Statement of Overriding Consideration in order to
approve the project. Staff has drafted a possible Statement of Overriding Consideration (attached) for the
City Council to consider.
-12-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
A number of comment letters were received after the close of the comment period on August 13, 2004.
These letters are included in the attachments to the September 27, 2004 staff report. Some of the issues
raised in these comment letters were addressed in the Response to Comments document. In addition, staff
prepared Appendix A: Additional Information on Key Issues, for the September 27, 2004 staff report to
provide additional information on a few key issues that have been raised in several letters and/or public
meetings throughout the process (see attachments for September 27, 2004, Planning Commission staff
report). These issues relate to locating the hospital on the Trousdale (north) side of the site and providing the
entrance to the project off El Camino Real. Also included in the attachments to the Planning Commission's
October 25, 2004 staff report are a number of separate items which specifically relate to responding to
questions asked by the Planning Commission at the September 27, 2004 meeting, and correspondence
received regarding the project since September 27, 2004 (Refer to Binder 2).
C/CAG ACTION REGARDING CONSISTENCY WITH THE AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN:
At its regular meeting on October 14, 2004, the City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) Board,
acting as the Airport Land Use Commission, considered the consistency of the Peninsula Hospital
Replacement project and related rezonings with the San Mateo County Airport Land Use Plan (see attached
letter from C/CAG Chair dated November 3, 2004). The C/CAG Board determined that the project is
consistent with the applicable airport/land use compatibility criteria for San Francisco International Airport,
as contained in the San Mateo County Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan December 1996, as amended,
subject to the conditions contained in the letter.
CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE CONSIDERED AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING:
Note that the conditions below which are in bold face were added by the Planning Commission following
their October 25, 2004 public hearing. The mitigation measures from the EIR and mitigation monitoring are
in italics starting with Condition No. 118 below.
The following table provides a cross-reference showing which conditions address each issue.
Area of Concern Related Condition Numbers
Air Quality 112, 133
Davis Drive 14, 24, 25, 27, 28, 33, 37, 94, 98-111, 115-117
Drainage 63, 66-68, 108, 137, 138
Fire Safety 33, 77-85
Handicapped Accessibility 71-73
Hazardous Materials 117, 134-136
Heli ad 45-49
Landscaping 14, 86-90, 100-109, 118, 139-142
Lighting 36, 115
Noise 91-94, 110, 111, 132
Parcel Changes 7, 8, 9, 10
Parking 3, 11, 20, 22, 23, 26, 30-32, 113, 114, 126, 127
Recycling 95-97
Security 69-70
Traffic & Circulation 6, 21, 24-29, 33-35, 37-44, 50-57, 98, 99, 116, 120-124, 128-131
Utilities 59-61, 64, 100
-13-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
General:
1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date
stamped September 10, 2004, Sheets A0.01 through PS7, including topography, grading, utilities,
landscape plans, floor diagrams, site plans,phasing plans, site section, elevations, parking structure
plans, etc.; (Planning, Building)
2. that the project shall include a hospital with a floor area of not more than 441,000 square feet and a
medical office building with a floor area of not more than 150,000 square feet; (Planning, Building)
3. that the project shall provide a minimum of 1,490 parking spaces, with 809 spaces in the parking
garage and no more than twenty (20) percent of the required parking shall be in compact parking
spaces; (Planning, Building)
4. that construction shall be carried out in the phases described in the Environmental Impact Report and
the phasing plans dated September 10, 2004; (Planning, Building, Public Works)
5. that the approved exterior design of the medical office building shall be further refined by the
applicant pursuant to Commission direction at the October 25, 2004 Planning Commission
meeting, and the refined design shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval
prior to issuance of the building permit for the parking garage; if the City Planner determines
that the submitted exterior design is inconsistent with the exterior design approved by the
Commission, the design shall be forwarded for review and approval to the Planning
Commission; in any event the emerging and final design of the medical office building, hospital
and parking garage shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their information; and
that any material changes in floor area, design, or use shall require City approval of an
amendment to this use permit;(Planning)
6. that the applicant shall record an access easement between the Mills Peninsula Health Services
property at 1811 Trousdale Drive and the adjacent Peninsula Hospital District property to the south
before closing the El Camino Real access to the existing hospital, and that prior to issuance of a
building permit for the garage, the applicant shall record an access easement or otherwise
demonstrate legal irrevocable access for construction and parking ingress and egress between the
merged Mills Peninsula Health Services properties along El Camino Real and the Peninsula Hospital
District property to the west, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney; (Public Works)
7. that an application shall be submitted and recorded for a lot line adjustment for the exchange of 35
feet of street frontage along Trousdale Drive from the east side to the west side of Magnolia Gardens
Care Center between Mills Peninsula Health Services and Magnolia Gardens Care Center prior to the
issuance of a building permit for the parking garage; (Public Works)
8. that the two parcels with frontage on El Camino Real that are owned by Mills Peninsula Health
Services shall be merged and the map recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the parking
garage; (Public Works)
9. that prior to issuance of a building permit for the medical office building, the three parcels remaining
after compliance with Condition#8 shall be merged, the map shall be recorded, and the zoning shall
be changed to Unclassified for the resulting parcel; (Public Works)
10. that if the actions described above in Condition#9 and all prerequisite conditions are not complete
within five years of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the City shall review and modify the
Conditional Use Permit as appropriate; (Planning)
-14-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
11. that no building permit shall be issued to any structure whose required parking is on a separate
parcel;(Building)
12. that any improvements for the replacement hospital structure shall meet all requirements of California
law and shall be approved by the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development;
(Building, Planning)
13. that within three years of completion and occupancy of the new hospital facilities and medical office
building, the existing hospital structure and its support facilities shall be demolished and all on-site
and off-site improvements completed, inspected and approved by the city; (Building, Planning,
Public Works)
14. that no later than the last phase of hospital construction (demolition of the existing hospital), the
applicant shall meet with the property owners in the Davis Drive neighborhood to discuss whether or
not the proposed landscaped area and improved pedestrian access from Davis Drive to the hospital
site, which is shown on the approved plans, shall be provided or the site shall be used for an
alternative use; and that if the parties cannot agree, the issue shall be decided by the Planning
Commission; (Planning,Neighborhood)
15. that any future development on the 4.15 acre undeveloped area to be left for future use or disposition
by the Peninsula Hospital District shall require a conditional use permit from the City of Burlingame
and shall be subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act; (Planning)
16. that the applicant shall apply for and receive approval, including required permits, from all other
regulatory public agencies as necessary and required prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
parking garage, including but not limited to the California Department of Transportation, the San
Francisco Water District/ SF PUC, the Federal Aviation Administration, the San Francisco Regional
Water Quality Control Board, the San Francisco Air Quality Control Board, the San Mateo County
Airport Land Use Commission, and San Mateo County Transit Authority; (Planning)
17. that in the event of any discrepancy between adopted EIR mitigation measures for the project and
these conditions of approval, or between any of these conditions of approval, the most stringent
requirement shall apply; (Planning)
18. that the applicant shall pay for and designate an appropriate area to locate a significant piece
of public statuary, art or fountain in the gateway area along El Camino Real at a location no
further south than the medical office building approved by the Planning Commission; this
proposed art work shall be selected and reviewed using a process with public input developed
by the City for the selection and placement of public art and shall be installed at the time of the
final landscaping and hardscape on this corner of the site; the public art shall be substantial
enough to become a focal point for the gateway and site and to help mitigate the location of the
parking structure; (Planning)
19. that the surface parking area which is a part of the lease agreement for the hospital
development shall be available through good faith negotiations with the lessor and hospital
operator to facilitate future development of the remaining 4.15 acre site by the Peninsula
Hospital District and to reduce the extent of surface parking on the total site; required parking
for the hospital can be met after CEQA review by joint use of an appropriately located and
sized multi-level parking structure by amendment to this conditional use permit; (Planning)
-15-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER I5,2004
Traffic, Parking and Transportation:
20. that neither the hospital or medical office building nor any other use on the site shall charge
employees, clients, patients or visitors for the use of on-site parking without an amendment to the
conditional use permit, for which the application shall include traffic and circulation studies
documenting the impacts of a pay-for-parking program on the site access, on-site circulation, use and
shift of use of on-site parking, impact on access to and from any part of the site, and any possible
impact on off-site and on-street parking in the vicinity of the hospital and medical office building;
(Planning)
21. that the applicant shall develop a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for the
hospital and medical office building which shall be approved by C/CAG and the City of Burlingame
consistent with C/CAG requirements, and that the required facilities for the TDM program shall be
included in the plans for each facility prior to filing the plans for the new hospital structure with the
California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development or issuance of a building permit for
the parking garage, whichever comes first, and shall be installed and/or implemented prior to
occupancy of each structure; (Planning)
22. that the applicant shall do a baseline study and then monitor parking usage quarterly throughout
construction, and if the monitoring reports, resident complaints and/or staff observations demonstrate
that parking for this project is occurring off-site, the hospital shall propose modifications on-site to
address the increase above the baseline which shall be approved by the City Engineer; and the
approved necessary changes shall be implemented as soon as feasible by the hospital operator;
(Planning, Public Works)
23. that following the completion of construction and occupancy of the replacement hospital, the
applicant shall monitor parking usage quarterly for the first three years; if any quarterly study
indicates that the on-site parking required is inadequate, the applicant shall identify solutions
in consultation with the City Engineer and shall implement the approved improvements in a
time frame established by the City Engineer; (Planning, Public Works)
24. that no construction traffic shall use the Davis Drive access to the hospital, and no employees
associated with the construction shall use the Davis Drive entrance to the site or shall park on Davis
Drive or nearby residential streets; (Public Works, Neighborhood)
25. that during construction, no vendor vehicles serving the hospital shall gain access to or from the
hospital site from Davis Drive; (Public Works,Neighborhood)
26. that to monitor the effectiveness of traffic access, circulation and parking during the entire
construction period, including construction trucks and equipment, the applicant shall hire an
independent traffic consultant to conduct a baseline parking and traffic study prior to the start of
garage construction and to update the study quarterly during each critical phase of construction, and
the baseline and intermediate studies by the traffic consultant shall be reviewed by the City Planner
prior to issuance of the building permit for the garage; and that the applicant shall resolve any
unanticipated problems identified through these traffic and parking studies and/or by the City
Engineer within 15 days; (Public Works, Planning)
27. that the recycling deposit for the demolition of the existing hospital structure that is required pursuant
to Condition#96 will be retained until the Davis Drive entrance is closed and landscaped to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Arborist, and that the City may use these funds to close
the Davis Drive entrance as required;
-16-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
28. that the applicant shall include language in all construction documents prohibiting all construction
traffic from using the Davis Drive entrance; (Planning)
29. that the applicant shall provide a plan for traffic control for each phase of construction, to be
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the next set of permits required for
the project; (Public Works)
30. that at no time shall any person connected with the operation of the hospital direct, order or
encourage parking off-site, and the hospital shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that staff and
employees park on the site itself in the parking provided pursuant to this approval; (Public Works,
Planning, Neighborhood)
31. that the relocation and reconstruction, including paving and striping, of the Magnolia Gardens Care
Center's required parking (west side lot) shall be done prior to the time that the construction entrance
at Magnolia/Trousdale is built, with the final provision of a total of at least 26 on-site parking spaces
for Magnolia Gardens; (Planning, Building)
32. that existing parking on the east side at the Magnolia Gardens Care Center shall not be demolished or
restriped until the new west side lot parking is in place, construction of the west side lot shall not
commence until the City has approved all required permits, and all construction shall be completed
within 90 days;(Planning, Building)
33. that use of the fire access lane on the south side of the property shall be limited to pedestrians and
emergency vehicles only; (Planning)
34. that trucks shall not be left more than 48 consecutive hours on the hospital site, either at the loading
docks or in the parking areas; however, this condition shall not apply to a truck that is directly
attached to the technology dock; (Planning)
35. that the hours for delivery at the hospital loading dock off El Camino Real shall be limited to
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Saturdays, Sundays
and Holidays; these hours do not apply to delivery of medical equipment or consumable
medical supplies that are required for emergency use in the following 24 hours; holidays are
defined in Burlingame Municipal Code Section 13.04.100; these hours shall be posted in clear
public view and each vendor shall be notified of the hours of delivery; (Planning)
36. that the applicant shall install and/or replace streetlights along the project frontage on El Camino Real
and Trousdale Drive, and the size, design and location of the streetlights shall be approved by the
Department of Public Works and shall have CalTrans permits prior to installation; (Public Works)
37. that the hospital operator shall permanently maintain an off-site supply warehouse to be used to stage
deliveries to the hospital in smaller trucks for the duration of this permit, and that if this warehouse
supply system is materially altered, the hospital shall pay for an independent traffic analysis of the
change in the number and size of trucks used for deliveries, and shall provide appropriate mitigation
as determined by the Planning Commission by amendment to this Conditional Use Permit; (Planning)
38. that the hospital shall inform and require all vendor trucks to use El Camino Real and city-designated
arterial streets and not to use adjacent residential streets (collector or local) in traveling to or from the
hospital, and failure to comply shall result in a review of the use permit; (Planning)
39. that the applicant shall pay the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Development Fee based on peak hour
trips generated by the hospital and medical office building; with the fee for the hospital paid in two
-17-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
installments, one-half at the time of city approval of the project and one-half before demolition
permits are issued for the existing hospital building; and the fee for the medical office building paid
in two installments, one-half within 90 days of City Council certification of the Final EIR and one-
half before the final inspection is scheduled for the medical office building; (Planning)
40. that the applicant shall replace the bus shelter on El Camino Real as directed by SamTrans and shall
obtain all approvals for adjusting the location of the bus stop from required agencies prior to
installing the curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements on the El Camino Real frontage of the site;
(Public Works)
41. that, because of the importance of providing continued access to the Burlingame Plaza
Shopping Center from Trousdale between E1 Camino Real and Magnolia, the applicant shall
prepare a traffic study to modify the left-turn movement/lanes into the hospital site to retain
the existing left-turn pocket on Trousdale eastbound into the Burlingame Plaza Shopping
Center, and, working with the City Engineer, determine how these changes can be most safely
implemented including modifications to the mitigation monitoring plan which will clarify and
improve access to both the hospital and shopping center; the identified solution shall be
incorporated into the roadway improvements on Trousdale to be installed by the applicant;
(Public Works)
Signals:
42. that the applicant shall design, install and pay for any and all necessary upgrades to traffic signals
including at Trousdale/Magnolia and El Camino Real/Trousdale intersections, as well as roadway
restriping, and other transportation improvements required by the project, as described in the project
plans dated September 10, 2004, the EIR for the project, and in the transportation Mitigation
Measures set forth below; (Public Works)
43. that traffic signal plans shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for all changes to
traffic signals due to the project, and the plans shall be reviewed and approved prior to
implementation pursuant to encroachment permits; (Public Works)
44. that prior to issuance of the demolition permit for the existing hospital building, the applicant shall
provide an irrevocable letter of credit or other form of security acceptable to the City Attorney to
cover the estimated cost of installation of a single traffic signal at the new Trousdale Drive
emergency/staff entrance, which improvements, if necessary, shall be installed within three years of
the date the security is provided. The applicant shall conduct traffic counts at the
Trousdale/emergency entrance intersection approximately twelve months after the start-of-service
date of the new hospital to determine whether the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices peak
hour signal warrants are met or exceeded at the new entrance, and if so, the applicant shall pay for the
cost of installing said traffic signal improvements to City standards and requirements. In the
alternative or in combination with improvements at the Trousdale/emergency entrance and if
determined to be necessary by the City Engineer, the applicant shall pay for the cost of installing
appropriate traffic control improvements at the intersection of Trousdale and Ogden or Marco Polo
Way, provided that in no event shall the applicant be responsible for total costs, construction or
installation greater than the dollar amount of the security provided for the one traffic signal; (Public
Works)
-18-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER I5,2004
Helipad:
45. that a State Heliport permit shall be issued by the California Department of Transportation, Division
of Aeronautics, for the replacement helipad prior to the issuance of a building permit for the medical
office building; (Planning)
46. that the helipad shall be operated within the criteria of the State Heliport Permit and that no more
than eight helicopter trips shall arrive at the hospital within any single month, with a maximum of 24
trips per year and that the only exception without amendment to this permit shall be in the event of
natural or declared emergency; (Planning)
47. that helicopter service to the site shall cease during construction as required by the Federal Aviation
Administration and the CalTrans Division of Aeronautics; (Planning)
48. that the primary helicopter flight path shall be the approach from the northeasterly direction over the
intersection of El Camino Real and Trousdale Drive as shown on the Flight Path Layout dated
September 29, 2004, prepared by Heliplanners Aviation Planning Consultants, and that the westerly
flight path arc shall only be used when strong wind conditions prevent the use of the primary flight
path; helicopters shall not use the westerly flight path arc without Planning Commission review and
approval except in emergency situations; (Planning)
49. that before the Peninsula Medical Center is identified and/or licensed to operate as a regional trauma
center, the Planning Commission shall review and rule on any physical changes caused, including
changes in helicopter and emergency service vehicles, and determine how the implementation of
these changes will have the least impact on the safety and environment of the residents and
businesses in the area; (Planning)
Public Works/Engineering:
50. that curb and street elevations and detailed driveway profiles, as well as driveway transitions, for
each phase of work shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
issuance of construction permits for that phase of work; (Public Works)
51. that detailed plans for the curb, gutter and sidewalk realignment at the Marco Polo entrance shall be
submitted and approved by the City prior to the commencement of work on the entrance and in the
Marco Polo staff parking lot and that the driveway at Marco Polo Way shall be redesigned to be
perpendicular to the street to provide safe sight distance for vehicles exiting from the parking lot, and
the design shall be approved by the City Engineer before issuance of an encroachment permit; (Public
Works)
52. that all changes required within the right-of-way of Trousdale Drive for this project shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works pursuant to the encroachment permit process and
approved for each phase by the Department of Public Works prior to implementing each phase;
(Public Works)
53. that any damaged asphaltic concrete pavement along the project frontage on Trousdale Drive, El
Camino Real and Marco Polo shall be repaved to pre-project conditions; (Public Works)
54. that, for each phase of construction, the applicant shall post a performance bond payable to the City
of Burlingame for an amount sufficient to construct all required improvements for that phase of the
project which are located within the public right-of-way including, but not limited to, curb, gutter,
-19-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER IS,2004
sidewalk, road way construction, utilities, traffic signals and street lighting to the satisfaction of the
City Attorney prior to issuance of any permits for that phase; (Public Works)
55. that detailed plans for the modifications proposed to the medians along El Camino Real shall be
reviewed and approved by CalTrans and the Burlingame Department of Public Works pursuant to the
encroachment permit process and approved for each phase by the Department of Public Works prior
to implementing each phase; (Public Works)
56. that the applicant shall, at its own cost, design and construct public improvements including curb,
gutter, sidewalk, asphaltic concrete pavement, street furniture and other necessary appurtenant work
along the El Camino Real frontage of the site, Trousdale Drive between El Camino Real and the
Magnolia Gardens Care Center property, and the entrance at Marco Polo Way in compliance with the
streetscape guidelines in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, and the improvements
shall be designed by a civil engineer, approved by the City Engineer, and installed by the project, and
that the design of these improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the
building permit for the parking garage; (Public Works)
57. that the applicant shall submit detailed plans for the loading dock entrance on El Camino Real,
including a complete dimensional layout, to the Department of Public Works for review and approval
prior to issuance of a building permit for the medical office building;(Public Works)
Water, Sewer and Drainage:
58. that the hospital shall design in and employ water conservation measures as adopted for the region or
specifically by the City during construction and operation; (Planning )
59. that the applicant shall submit detailed plans for the proposed new water connection and sizing to the
Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the building permit for the parking garage, and shall
incorporate any on-site or off-site improvements deemed necessary by the Department of Public
Works; (Public Works)
60. that prior to the issuance of the building permit for the parking garage, the applicant shall provide
plans as approved by the San Francisco Water Department for the realignment of the SFPUC water
line, including details of tie-ins and turn-outs, and all work associated with the realignment shall be
coordinated with the Department of Public Works; (Public Works)
61. that, before issuance of the building permit for the medical office building, the applicant shall submit
an updated sanitary sewer analysis of the public sewer system at the project site to assess the project
flow effect of the proposed new sanitary sewer connection to the Department of Public Works,
together with anticipated demands on the sanitary sewer system and the 1740 Rollins Road pump
station, and shall incorporate any on-site or off-site improvements deemed necessary by the
Department of Public Works; (Public Works)
62. that the applicant shall relocate, restore or replace any City facility affected or damaged by the
project, or of insufficient size, and shall replace any such facility in kind; (Public Works)
63. that prior to issuance of the building permit for the parking garage the applicant shall submit detailed
plans to address storm and surface drainage on the site which identify potential impacts on CalTrans,
the adjacent neighbors and the City's storm drain system, and shall comply with NPDES
requirements to keep as much drainage on-site as possible, and shall incorporate any improvements
deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works; (Public Works)
-20-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER I5,2004
64. that, for each phase of construction, the applicant shall submit detailed plans for all City utilities in
public rights-of-way adjacent to and affected by the work to the City Engineer,who shall approve the
plans prior to issuance of any permits for that phase of the project; (Public Works)
65. that all irrigation systems and plantings shall follow the City's water conservation guidelines and
each facility within the project shall be appropriately metered as determined by the City Engineer;
(Public Works)
66. that all on-site catch basins and drainage inlets shall be protected during construction so that no
debris can enter them, and all catch basins shall be stenciled with a City-provided stencil; (Public
Works)
67. that the applicant shall submit an overall site drainage and erosion control plan for approval prior to
the issuance of the building permit for the garage, and the plans shall conform to the guidelines and
requirements of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program; (Public Works)
68. that, for each phase of construction, the site drainage and erosion control plan shall be refined and
approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any permits for that phase of the project; (Public
Works)
Safety and ADA Access and Compliance:
69. that the hospital shall work with the Burlingame Police Department to identify and inspect
installation of appropriate security surveillance devices along the all pedestrian pathways including
the fire access lane, and the effectiveness of these devices in providing security shall be reviewed
jointly each year, with improvements made as necessary; (Police Department)
70. that a safety and security measures shall be installed over or around the cooling towers and that there
shall be an alarm system and surveillance provided for oxygen storage bunker; (Planning
Department, Building)
71. that a pedestrian access way that is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act shall be
provided from El Camino Real to the main entrance area of the hospital and medical office building;
(Building, Public Works)
72. that all work shall be done in conformance with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act (Building, Public Works)
73. that pedestrian access along all street frontages shall be provided continuously throughout
construction and shall comply with ADA requirements; (Pubic Works)
Building Division:
74. that a set of plans clearly showing the division between the portions of the project that are under the
jurisdiction of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) and
the portions that are under the jurisdiction of the City of Burlingame shall be approved by both
OSHPD and the Burlingame Building Official and provided to the Building Official before plans for
the medical office building shall be accepted by the Building Department for plan check; (Building)
75. that the applicant shall verify compliance with the California Building Code for building type,
occupancy group, allowable area, allowable area increases, height, sprinklers,property lines or
assumed property lines, exiting plan, accessibility, and minimum plumbing facilities according to
-21-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
Appendix Chapter, Table 29-A, for both the parking garage and the medical office building;
(Building)
76. that all improvements for the Medical Office Building and garage shall meet all the requirements of
the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 Edition as amended by the City of Burlingame;
(Building)
Fire Department:
77. that Fire Department access shall be consistent with Section 902 of the 2001 California Fire Code,
including clearly identified fire lanes and curb parking restrictions consistent with the Burlingame
Municipal Code Section 17.04.025; (Fire)
78. that canopies and vegetation along fire lanes shall maintain clear heights of 13'6"to provide
clearance for fire and emergency equipment; (Fire, City Arborist)
79. that turn radii and surface support capabilities of fire lanes shall accommodate the largest fire
department apparatus within San Mateo County and fire lanes shall not exceed sixteen(16) percent in
slope at any point; (Fire)
80. that fire flow requirements shall be consistent with Appendix IIIA and 11IB, and fire sprinklers shall
be provided for all structures over 2000 square feet, with consideration for fire sprinklers being
applied to fire flow reductions to be negotiated with the Fire Marshal, and additional considerations
shall be made to ensure roof tip standpipes achieve a minimum pressure of 100 psi at the outlet;
(Fire)
81. that fire pumps shall be diesel driven or have secondary power supplied by emergency generators
with an on-site fuel supply of 48 hours of more;(Fire)
82. that Fire Department connections for standpipes and fire sprinkler systems shall be located within 50
feet of a fire hydrant;(Fire)
83. that a post indicator valve shall be provided for each separate building and so located as to be at least
two-thirds the height of the building away from the building, and control valves and separate shut-off
valves shall be provide for each floor of each building and electronically monitored;(Fire)
84. that fire alarm annunciation shall be identified by each smoke compartment and/or by each floor for
buildings equipped with a fire alarm system (required for all buildings in excess of 20,000 square
feet), and that activation shall clearly identify the location of the device and remote annunciation
shall be visible from the exterior of the building, in a location to be approved by the Central County
Fire Department;(Fire)
85. that the applicant shall receive approval by the Central County Fire Department for the location of the
fire control room in the hospital structure, and the fire control room shall be clearly shown on the
floor plans,prior to issuance of a building permit for the medical office building; (Fire)
Landscaping:
86. that any land area which is to remain undeveloped and not specifically landscaped as shown on the
approved plans, including the 4.15 acre area to be left for future use by the Peninsula Hospital
District, shall be hydromulched and planted with materials which will meet NPDES erosion control
requirements and shall be properly irrigated and maintained with ground cover until the use of the
land changes; (Public Works)
-22-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
87. the applicant shall submit a report from a certified arborist citing measures to be taken to protect trees
during construction, particularly the redwood grove behind the Magnolia Gardens Care Center, and
that report shall be approved by the City Arborist prior to issuance of a building permit for the garage
and that protection shall be installed for each phase of construction as required by the City Arborist
before grading and/or building permits are issued for the phase of work; (City Arborist)
88. that planters with irrigation shall be installed as approved by the Planning Department and City
Arborist on the upper roof level of the parking garage as shown on the landscape plans before an
occupancy permit shall be issued for the garage, plant materials shall be approved by the City
Arborist; and vines shall be planted at various locations at the base of the parking garage
structure on both the El Camino Real and Trousdale sides to break up the mass of the building
and blend it into the gateway landscaping and design at this corner and along these street
frontages, the City Arborist shall review the selection of vine and its irrigation and proposed
maintenance program; (Planning, City Arborist, Building)
89. that the landscaped setback areas along El Camino Real and Trousdale Drive and along the entire
south property line parallel to Davis Drive shall be irrigated and maintained by the hospital operator;
(Public Works)
90. that the approved landscape plan for the site shall be further refined in the following stages by
the applicant pursuant to Commission direction prior to the issuance of a demolition or
building permit for (1) the construction of the new emergency/replacement entrance to the
existing hospital, (2) the installation of the San Francisco water main on the south side of the
property, (3) the construction of the new main entrance and parking garage (to include
landscaping construction detail along Trousdale and El Camino Real street frontages) and (4)
the demolition of the existing hospital (landscaping of the remainder of the site); and the
refined plans at each of these stages shall include detailed tree protection measures including
long-term maintenance programs, and planting, irrigation and hardscape plans and shall be
submitted to the City Planner and reviewed by the City Arborist who will make
recommendations, the plans will then be forwarded to the Planning Commission for
information; during each period of construction the City Arborist shall inspect the site for
compliance with the approved installation plan; if the project landscaping causes an unusual
level of inspection by the City Arborist, the costs for inspection shall be reimbursed by the
applicant to the City; (Planning, City Arborist)
Noise:
91. that truck deliveries, pick-ups, collection of trash and other wastes, and other truck service noise-
generating activities shall be prohibited prior to 7:00 am and after 10:00 p.m. Monday through
Friday, and prior to 8:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, Sundays and holidays or as stated in
the Municipal Code, Section 10.40.039; (Planning, Neighborhood)
92. that the testing of the emergency generators shall be limited to once per week or the minimum
required by law, whichever is more frequent, and if possible, shall occur between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00
p.m. on weekdays only; (Planning, Neighborhood)
93. that the oxygen storage tanks adjacent to the loading dock shall only be filled three times a
week during daylight hours, and only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.; (Planning,
Neighborhood)
-23-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
Construction Noise:
94. that because of the impact on the residential neighborhood along the southern property line of
the hospital site, there shall be stricter construction hours imposed for the grading, foundation,
framing and exterior cladding of all structures or portion of structures within 150 feet of the
southern property line; in this area construction shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and no construction on Sundays and holidays as defined
in C.S. 13.04.100; these construction noise restrictions shall not apply to work done within the
building after it is fully enclosed; construction on all other portions of the site shall comply with
the City's adopted construction hours, although there shall be no exterior construction on any
part of the site on Sundays and Holidays; (Planning)
Recycling:
95. that the applicant shall submit to the City a recycling plan for each structure to be approved prior to
issuance of the demolition permit for that structure, and a site inspection for compliance shall be
required prior to each new phase of construction; (Building)
96. that a recycling deposit and compliance report shall be required for each phase of the project;
(Building)
97. that the hospital and medical office building shall have a recycling plan approved by BFI and the City
and shall continuously recycle as much of their waste stream as is possible and insures the public
health; (Building)
CONDITIONS FROM NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS
Traffic, Parking and Transportation
98. that during construction and demolition of the existing hospital, at the direction of the City Engineer,
the applicant shall evaluate the operation of the Marco Polo/Trousdale intersection whenever a traffic
safety/operation problem is identified by the City, and the applicant shall install whatever interim
solution the City Engineer determines to be appropriate for the duration of the phase of construction
or the event causing the problem; (Public Works, Neighborhood)
Davis Drive Access
99. that the Davis Drive access to the hospital shall be open only to hospital staff during construction and
when demolition is occurring; the Davis Drive access shall be regulated by kiosk with security officer
or by card actuated gate between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily; outside of these hours the
entrance shall be closed by a gate or chain; the use of this staff access shall be monitored prior to
any construction to establish a current baseline of the use and then quarterly during
construction; should the usage during construction exceed 100% of the current baseline usage,
the applicant shall review with the City Engineer ways to reduce the level of use; the
determination of the City Engineer may be appealed to the Planning Commission; should the
staff gate access prove to be inadequate or exceed the 100% of current baseline and become a
neighborhood nuisance the applicant shall meet with the neighbors and the City Engineer to discuss
appropriate and safe alternatives, the City Engineer shall determine an appropriate and safe the
alternative solution, and the applicant shall install or construct the necessary facilities; (Public Works,
Neighborhood)
-24-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER I5,2004
Landscaping:
100. that before the end of 2004, the applicant shall undertake a feasibility and cost study for
undergrounding and connecting to the houses the electric and any other utilities currently placed
along the shared property line between the hospital site and Davis Drive and, provided it is possible
and economically feasible to underground just the utilities behind the north side of Davis Drive; and
based on the conclusions of the feasibility and cost study, the applicant shall work with all the
affected parties to determine if the utility work is feasible, how the costs to underground would be
shared and its effect on landscaping; all of the affected parties must agree on the program and the
timing for accomplishing the work in the context of the landscaping and other construction and
operations on the hospital site; (Planning,Neighborhood)
101. that the applicant shall investigate the feasibility including P.U.C. approval of moving the San
Francisco Water Line Easement along the rear of the properties facing Davis Drive north to increase
the planting area between the property line and easement to at least 15 feet, the City Engineer shall
review the study and shall determine the viable setback; however that setback shall be no less than 10
feet at any point except where the existing line connects to the new line at Balboa extended; (Public
Works, Neighborhood)
102. that the applicant shall build a wall or fence between the rear of the Davis Drive residences and the
replacement hospital's landscaped areas along the southern property line of the hospital, the wall or
fence shall be built at a location and of a common design agreed to by all parties; if the parties cannot
agree the Planning Commission shall select the location and type of wall or fence prior to the
completion of the installation of the San Francisco Water Main in the new easement; (Planning,
Neighborhood)
103. that the landscaping within the area between the rear of each of the property lines on Davis Drive and
the San Francisco Water Line Easement shall be selected by each property owner from a palette of
trees and shrubs provided by the applicant and approved by the City Arborist, with each property
owner receiving individual assistance from the project's licensed landscape architect; selection of all
trees and shrub sizes shall be based on achieving the design intention of the landscape plan
including the maximum growth in a reasonable time given the species, location including
utilities and landscape objectives, and any discrepancies between property owner and applicant
shall be arbitrated by the City Arborist; the applicant, with permission, shall install trees on
private property if it is determined that such planting is a reasonable or better way to address
the wind or visual impacts caused by the project; the entire planted area on the hospital site shall
be irrigated with irrigation in place within 30 days of planting, and the landscaping shall be installed
as soon as the segment of the water line along the hospital's south property line is installed unless it is
necessary to wait for a better planting season or timing as determined by the City Arborist; (Planning,
City Arborist, Neighborhood)
104. that the parking lot landscaping on hospital property at the southern property line west of the San
Francisco Water Line Easement shall be selected by each adjacent Davis Drive property owner from
a palette of trees and shrubs provided by the applicant and approved by the City Arborist, with the
objective of providing a 20 foot tall vegetative screen for the property line fences and to extend the
overall pattern of landscaping for the replacement hospital site; this landscaping and its irrigation
system as approved by the City Arborist shall be installed in a planter area no less than 4 feet in width
on the hospital side of the replacement property line wall or fence; the plant size at installation shall
be based on achieving the design intent of the landscape plan including the maximum growth in
-25-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER I5,2004
a reasonable amount of time given the species, location including utilities and landscape
objectives, disputes shall be resolved by the City Arborist; planting and irrigation shall be
installed no later than the second phase of construction of the replacement hospital; and that the
applicant shall provide individual landscape consultation to each property owner in order to
determine the best solution for screening along the hospital property line, with mutual
agreement this could include plantings on the private property side, if it is agreed that it is the
best location to achieve the landscape goals for the location; (Planning, City Arborist,
Neighborhood)
105. that because the maintenance landscaping is so important to achieving the growth goals and to
the quality of the hospital project, the property owner shall be required to provide intensive
professional maintenance of all landscaped areas and to maintain all irrigation systems in
operating condition, failure to do so shall result in Planning Commission review of the use
permit; (Planning, City Arborist, Neighborhood)
106. that if the eucalyptus trees at the end of Albemarle Drive cannot be retained, the applicant shall
investigate relocating them within the planting area between the hospital's southern boundary and the
San Francisco Water Easement; if this is not a viable option as determined by the City Arborist, the
applicant shall with the cooperation of the City plant a tree variety selected by the City Arborist, at a
size selected by the City Arborist, which will achieve at height of at least 25 feet in six years and a
maximum height of at least 60 feet, irrigation shall be provided to this cluster of trees and they shall
be planted with irrigation when the water line installation is completed and before a building permit
is issued for the medical office building; (Planning, City Arborist,Neighborhood)
107. that the area on the north side of the San Francisco Water Main Easement adjacent to the replacement
hospital shall be raised with the approval of the P.U.C. by an earthen berm and planted with a
massing of redwood trees and other varieties of tall growing trees and shrubs which will grow to a
height to screen the view of the lower and closer portions of the new hospital structure from view of
the near by residents; the selection and various sizes of plant material and trees as well as the
irrigation system, shall be approved by the City Arborist prior to installation, no trees installed shall
be smaller than 24 inch box size, and this landscaping and its necessary grading shall be installed
before issuance of the demolition permit for the existing hospital structure; (Planning, City Arborist)
108. that the design of the grading and landscaped area between the replacement hospital and the rear of
the properties along Davis Drive shall include drainage which will retain all surface and subsurface
drainage on the hospital site and which will accommodate as necessary existing natural surface and
subsurface drainage now occurring from adjacent private properties; the City Engineer shall approve
all site grading and drainage plans affecting this area prior to commencement of the work to relocate
the San Francisco Water Main; (Public Works,Neighborhood)
109. that the applicant shall evaluate the impact of the proposed hospital structure on the wind
velocity and turbulence on the properties adjacent to the south property line of the hospital site,
this study shall be completed by the mid-point of Phase Two of the construction (installation of
the San Francisco water line) so that landscaping along the southern property line east of the
Davis Drive access can be adjusted to mitigate any changes to prevailing wind velocity or
turbulence caused on the adjacent properties, landscape consultations with individual property
owners shall include this information and address the wind issue; (Planning, City Arborist,
Neighborhood)
-26-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED Gl AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER I5,2004
Noise:
110. that the applicant shall establish a 24-hour baseline of the noise generated by the current cooling
towers at the closest point to the property line facing Davis Drive prior to commencing any
demolition or construction on any portion of the site, and shall insure that after construction is
completed with the full operation of the hospital and cooling towers that the noise level of the
cooling towers at the Davis Drive (south)property line of the hospital site shall not increase over
the dBA generated by the current cooling towers and should the noise level from the new
cooling towers exceed the current dBA of the cooling towers at the south property line, the
applicant shall cause the noise level from the cooling towers to be reduced or relocate them;
(Planning, Neighborhood)
111. that the applicant shall establish, before construction, an adjusted current ambient baseline
without cooling tower noise, and should the noise level at any property line exceed 3 dBA over
ambient at any time of day, the hospital operator shall take whatever steps are necessary to
reduce the noise increase to less than 3 dBA, the City Planner shall review the measures taken
and subsequent study shall confirm that the operation is within the maximum 3 dBA limit;
failure to make correction based on complaint shall result in review by the Planning
Commission; (Planning, Neighborhood)
Construction Impacts
112. that the applicant shall adhere to all NPDES and air quality requirements throughout construction,
and shall meet with homeowners or tenants at their request and provide individually negotiated and
reasonable on-site mitigation for observed impacts of dust and particulates from the replacement
hospital construction, landscape installation or demolition of the existing hospital; (Public Works,
Building, Neighborhood)
113. that during the construction of the replacement hospital, the demolition of the existing hospital and
the final landscaping of the site, parking on the Peninsula Hospital site shall be limited to employees,
staff, patients, patient visitors and construction workers only during the hours of their employment on
the site; on site parking shall not be used for off-site parking for any other facility or service and shall
not be used by any employee, staff, or member of the community for more than 24 consecutive hours;
(Planning, Neighborhood)
114. that for the duration of the project construction and any use of the site for a hospital and medical
office building, no on-site parking required by the municipal code or by city approval for staff,
employees, or users of Peninsula Hospital shall be leased, loaned or otherwise obligated to any other
user or business; (Planning, Neighborhood)
Construction/Design
115. that the south tower of the hospital facing Davis Drive shall be clad in translucent spandrel glass with
a low reflectivity rating (reflectance out) of 9%to limit the amount of interior light emitting to the
exterior, and that all hospital rooms above the third floor level facing the Davis Drive side of the
property shall include interior design which shall encourage occupants to stand back at least 3 feet
from the window, all windows shall be provided with blinds or coverings, and glazing shall reduce
light transmission at night; (Planning, Neighborhood)
116. that, if feasible given the location of protected trees, the agreement of adjacent commercial property
owners to the north, the amount of grading/fill required to achieve appropriate slope and the approval
-27-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER IS,2004
of the PUC regarding appropriate protection of the San Francisco water line and its facilities in the
area as determined by the City Engineer, to reduce the heavy truck traffic immediately adjacent to the
single family residences on the south side and west end of Davis Drive during the phase of
construction which includes the demolition of the existing hospital, there shall be a truck entrance to
the site established and maintained from Marco Polo Drive, in addition to the existing Marco Polo
staff entrance; and should it be feasible and necessary during other phases of construction for more
than two days a week for heavy trucks to stage or access the site from Marco Polo the applicant shall
provide a second access to Marco Polo sooner; if this additional entrance causes a relocation of staff
parking on site, the applicant shall submit a plan to the City Engineer for approval to show how this
parking will be accommodated elsewhere; the approved plan will be implemented immediately as
directed by the City Engineer; (Public Works, Neighborhood)
117. that prior to removal of hazardous materials and demolition of the existing hospital, the applicant
shall meet with the neighbors to discuss the methods of removal to be used, the precautions being
taken, the timing of the various activities, and how possible impacts on their properties can be
cooperatively addressed; (Public Works, Building, Neighborhood)
Mitigation Measures from EIR: Listed below in italics are the mitigation measures taken from the Draft
EIR, Revised Draft EIR and Response to Comments document. There is a notation after each mitigation
measure which references the impact being mitigated and the City Department(s) responsible for monitoring
its implementation. Some of the requirements listed below are also covered by conditions imposed by other
Departments listed above, and others are addressed by revisions made to the project.
118. that the project sponsor shall install planters at the upper deck(roof level) of the EI Camino Real and
Trousdale Drive sides of the garage upon completion of garage construction; (visual quality;
Planning) (VQ 1.1)
119. that the project sponsor shall agree to develop and implement a Construction Visual Improvements
Plan that would make visual improvements to construction zones within a given construction phase
and between phases if the zone is not scheduled for construction activity or will remain unused for a
period greater than six months; construction zones subject to this mitigation measure shall be defined
by the City Planner, and shall consider the size of the area, the nature of the construction activity,
and the proximity or visibility of the area to public vantage points or residential uses; the
Construction Visual Improvements Plan shall be implemented by the project contractor(s) and must
be approved by the City Planner; the intent of the plan is to aesthetically improve portions of the
project site that would remain unimproved for an extended period and screen the construction zone
from view by passersby along the public streets and sidewalks, or to make the zone usable for MPHS
employees,patients, and the public;possible improvements in the plan include, but are not limited to,
the following(if timelines other than six months are specified below, the shorter of six months or the
time specified below shall apply):
a. the project sponsor shall clear a construction zone of construction debris and remove
construction equipment whenever construction is not anticipated for at least two weeks;
b. if a site is a construction zone, but no construction activities are scheduled for more than one
month, the project sponsor shall be responsible for regular garbage removal and watering of
any existing landscaping;
C. the project sponsor shall ensure fencing is removed or visually treated around construction
zones that front onto El Camino Real, Trousdale Drive, Marco Polo Way, or Davis Drive in a
-28-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
manner deemed acceptable by the Chief Building Official, in order to promote safety,
connectivity through the site, and pedestrian friendliness;
d. if a site is not in use as a construction zone for more than six months due to demolition or
construction of a structure, the project sponsor shall improve the site with landscaping (e.g.,
trees, shrubs, and groundcover),passive recreation/open space facilities (e.g., benches,picnic
tables), decorative fencing and/or seating walls, and pedestrian and bicycle routes that
connect to adjacent open spaces;pedestrian/bicycle networks shall be defined by and to the
satisfaction of the City Planner;
e. the project sponsor shall install all landscaping as early as possible to decrease visual
impacts of construction; (visual quality; Planning, Building) (VQ 6.1)
120. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for lengthening the left-turn pocket on northbound El
Camino Real(to westbound Trousdale Drive)from about 180 feet to 375 feet; this improvement
would eliminate left-turning vehicles from blocking traffic flow along northbound El Camino Real
and satisfy the queue storage requirement; note that under cumulative conditions, a lengthier turn
pocket (475 feet) is required, as described in Mitigation Measure TR-12.1 below; (transportation;
Public Works) (TR 2.1)
121. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for converting the eastbound through lane on Trousdale
Drive at El Camino Real to a shared left-through lane; the project sponsor shall be responsible for
extending the existing dedicated left-turn lane to provide 145 feet of storage (a 35 foot extension)for
vehicles turning left; the left-turn pocket (145 feet) and the extra capacity in the shared left-through
lane (about 380 feet) would be sufficient to accommodate the 400 foot queue length; (transportation;
Public Works) (TR 2.2)
122. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for extending the southbound left-turn pocket on El
Camino Real at Trousdale Drive an additional 100 feet; this measure would require the removal of a
portion of the median strip; this measure is necessary because, by adding project traffic to the other
turning movements at this intersection, signal green time is taken away from the southbound left-turn
movement; longer turn storage is needed; (transportation; Public Works) (TR 2.3)
123. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for extending the eastbound left-turn pocket on
Trousdale Drive at Magnolia Avenue to 175 feet; (transportation; Public Works) (TR 2.4)
124. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for extending the westbound left-turn pocket on
Trousdale Drive at Magnolia Avenue/Main Entrance to 175 feet; adequate distance is available
between the main entrance and the El Camino Real intersection to accommodate the left-turn pocket
requirements identified in Mitigation Measure TR-2.2 and this measure (in a back-to-back
configuration)plus a 20- to 60 foot taper; (transportation; Public Works) (TR 2.5)
125. that the prqjeet spensoi-shall be i-espensiblefer 19reviding signage on eastbound Trousdale DFive to
126. that the project sponsor shall implement an attendant parking program to increase the parking
supply during critical phases of construction; the project sponsor shall fully fund a mitigation
monitoring program (Program) that will enable City of Burlingame to monitor parking demand on a
quarterly basis throughout the critical phases of construction; the Program shall also provide an
-29-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
alternative that could be quickly implemented should the monitoring show that the parking deficit
remains; (transportation; Public Works) (TR 9.1)
127. that the project sponsor shall adjust the property line and construct the proposed replacement
parking area at the northwest end of the Magnolia Gardens Care Center property prior to
demolishing existing parking area and both property line adjustments may occur on the same map;
(transportation; Public Works) (TR 9.2)
128. that the project sponsor shall complete the roadway improvements needed to mitigate the project
traffic impacts (i.e., Mitigation Measures TR-2.1 through TR-2.5)prior to the start of Phase 2, to
ensure that construction traffic would have a less-than-significant impact; (transportation; Public
Works) (TR 10.1)
129. that the Revised Project with cumulative development would result in LOS E operations on the El
Camino Real/Trousdale Drive intersection during the AM&PMpeak hours; one turn lane is
insufficient to accommodate this high turn volume; the project sponsor shall be responsible for
ensuring that sufficient capacity is available by converting the eastbound Trousdale Drive through
lane to a left-through lane, which would require the signal to operate in a split phase scheme in the
east-west direction; converting this lane would improve operations to LOS D, reducing this impact to
a less-than-significant level; (transportation; Public Works) (TR 11.1)
130. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for lengthening the left-turn pocket on northbound El
Camino Real (to westbound Trousdale Drive)from about 180 feet to 475 feet; this improvement
would eliminate left-turning vehicles from blocking traffic flow along northbound El Camino Real
and satisfy the queue storage requirement; (transportation; Public Works) (TR 12.1)
131. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for extending the southbound left-turn pocket on El
Camino Real at Trousdale Drive an additional 100 feet; this measure would require the removal of a
portion of the median strip; (transportation; Public Works) (TR 12.2)
132. that the project sponsor shall incorporate the following practices into the construction documents to
be implemented by the project contractor, and these practices shall be provided to the City Planner
for approval prior to the issuance of building permits;
a. maximizes the physical separation between noise generators and noise receptors; such
separation includes, but is not limited to, the following measures:
• use heavy-duty mufflers for stationary equipment and barriers around particularly
noisy areas of the site or around the entire site;
• use shields, impervious fences, or other physical sound barriers to inhibit
transmission of noise to sensitive receptors;
• locate stationary equipment to minimize noise impacts on the community; and
• minimize backing movements of equipment;
b. use quiet construction equipment whenever possible;
C. impact equipment (e.g.,jack hammers and pavement breakers)shall be hydraulically or
electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust
from pneumatically-powered tools; compressed air exhaust silencers shall be used on other
-30-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
equipment; other quieter procedures, such as drilling rather than using impact equipment,
shall be used whenever feasible;
d. prohibits unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines;
e. select routes for movement of construction-related vehicles and equipment in conjunction with
the Burlingame Planning Department so that noise-sensitive areas, including residences,
hotels, and outdoor recreation areas, are avoided as much as possible; include these routes
in materials submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to the issuance of building
permits;
f. designate a noise disturbance coordinator who will be responsible for responding to
complaints about noise during construction; the telephone number of the noise disturbance
coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site and shall be provided to the
Burlingame Planning Director; copies of the construction schedule shall also be posted at
nearby noise-sensitive areas; (noise; Planning, Building, Public Works) (NO 1.1)
133. that to reduce particulate matter emissions during project demolition and construction phases, the
project sponsor shall require the construction contractors to comply with the dust control strategies
developed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD); the project sponsor shall
include in construction contracts the following requirements:
a. cover all trucks hauling construction and demolition debris from the site;
b. water all exposed or disturbed soil surfaces at least twice daily;
C. use watering to control dust generation during demolition of structures or break-up of
pavement;
d. pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved
parking areas and staging areas;
e. sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved parking areas and staging areas during the
earthwork phases of construction;
f. provide daily clean-up of mud and dirt carried onto paved streets from the site;
g. enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non- toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt,
sand, etc.);
h. limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph;
i. install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways;
and
j. replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible; (air quality; Public Works,
Building) (AQ 1.1)
134. that Mills-Peninsula Health Services (MPHS) shall retain a qualified environmental specialist (e.g., a
Registered Environmental Assessor or similarly qualified individual) to inspect existing buildings
subject to demolition for the presence of asbestos,polychlorinated byphenyls (PCBs), mercury, lead,
or other hazardous materials;MPHS shall submit the report to the City prior to demolition, together
with an explanation of how the project will address any issues identified in the report; if found at
levels that require special handling(i.e., any building material containing 0.1 percent asbestos,paint
that contains more than S,000 parts per million of lead, or any building materials known or
-31-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-I AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
suspected to contain PCBs or mercury), MPHS shall manage these materials as required by law and
according to federal and state regulations and guidelines, including those of the Department of Toxic
Substances Control(DTSC), BAAQMD, California Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(Cal/OSHA), County of San Mateo Health Services Agency (CSMHSA), and any other agency with
jurisdiction over these hazardous materials (hazardous materials; CSMHSA, Building, Planning)
(HM 1.1)
135. that in the event that contamination is visually discovered during construction activities, MPHS shall
be required to conduct a Phase HEnvironmental Site Assessment; this investigation shall involve the
collection and analysis of soil and groundwater samples as directed by the site assessment
consultant; sampling shall extend at least to depths proposed for excavation, and samples shall be
tested for elevated levels of petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, or lead, if any;soil and/or groundwater
samples shall be collected throughout the project site as directed by the site assessment consultant;
this assessment shall be completed by a Registered Environmental Assessor, Registered Geologist,
Professional Engineer, or similarly qualified individual prior to initiating any further earth-moving
activities at the project site; if it were determined by sample collection and analysis that petroleum
hydrocarbons, VOCs, or lead is present in soil and/or groundwater samples, the impacted materials
shall be segregated and stockpiled separately from non-impacted soils throughout the construction
phase; if deemed necessary by the local oversight agency, some impacted materials shall be
mitigated prior to construction; soils with elevated petroleum hydrocarbon, VOC, or lead
concentrations may require excavation and off-site disposal;soils with concentrations above
regulatory threshold limits for petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, or lead shall be disposed of offsite in
accordance with California hazardous waste disposal regulations (CCR Title 26) or shall be
managed in place with approval of DTSC, CSMHSA or the Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control
Board; (hazardous materials; CSMHSA, Building, Planning) (HM 2.1)
136. that in the event that contaminated soil or groundwater is encountered, MPHS shall comply with the
Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities regulatory
requirements for hazardous materials/waste health and safety plans; the Site Health and Safety Plan
shall establish policies and procedures to protect workers and the public from potential hazards
posed by residual contamination issues at the site; the plan shall include items applicable to site
conditions, such as:
• identification of contaminants;
• potential hazards;
• material handling procedures;
• dust suppression measures;
• personal protection clothing and devices;
• controlled access to the site;
• health and safety training requirements;
• monitoring equipment used during construction to verify health and safety of workers and the
public;
• measures to protect public health and safety; and
-32-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
emergency response procedures;
if petroleum hydrocarbons are present in the soil or groundwater proposed for the use of backfill or
disposal, the handling and disposal of the contaminated soil or groundwater shall be governed by the
applicable local and federal hazardous materials regulations; (hazardous materials; CSMHSA,
Public Works, Planning) (HM 2.1)
137. that in the event that runoff induced by the Revised Project implementation would enter the Caltrans
storm drainage system under SR-82, the project sponsor would immediately contact Caltrans for
necessary review and approval; (hydrology; Public Works, Caltrans) (HY 1.1)
138. that the project applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to
prevent polluted runoff from flowing into public drainage facilities during construction of the
proposed facilities; the SWPPP shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) that include
schedules of activities,prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management
practices to prevent or reduce the pollution in storm water runoff during construction; the SWPPP
shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Burlingame and other appropriate agencies, such as
the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB),prior to issuance of any grading or building
permit; (hydrology; Public Works)
139. that the project sponsor shall submit an application to the City of Burlingame's Parks and
Recreation Department Director for a tree removal permit and meet the replacement requirements of
the Tree and Vegetation Ordinance (Municipal Code, Title 11.06.020); included with the permit
application shall be a landscaping plan that illustrates species, numbers, and sizes of replacement
trees; (biological resources; City Arborist, Building) (BR 1.1)
140. that the project sponsor shall be responsible for maintaining andprotecting the existing on-site trees
to be retained; the following specific actions shall be followed to maintain the health of the
remaining trees:
a. any pruning shall be done according to the direction of a certified arborist and all pruning
shall comply with International Society of Arboriculture, Western Chapter Standards or other
comparable standards deemed acceptable to the City Arborist;
b. any abandoned utility lines (water, electrical, etc.) in the root zones (radius of ten times the
trunk diameter)shall be cut and left in the ground to the satisfaction of the City Arborist;
C. any surfacing material inside the root zone shall be pervious and installed on top of the
existing grade; as an example,pervious pavers are acceptable provided the base material is
also sufficiently pervious; base rock containing granite fines is not sufficiently pervious;
d. temporary construction fencing shall be erected to protect the retained trees of a size to be
established by the City Arborist; the fencing shall be placed at the perimeter of the root zone
unless the pavement is supervised by a certified arborist; the fencing shall be in place prior to
the arrival of construction materials or equipment;
e. the landscape irrigation shall be designed to prevent trenching inside the root zones of
retained trees;
f. supplemental irrigation shall be provided during construction; approximately 10 gallons of
water for each inch of trunk diameter should be applied at or near the perimeter of the root
-33-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 1 S,2004
zone every two weeks during the dry months (any month receiving less than 1 inch of rainfall
on average);
g. retained trees shall be thoroughly mulched with a 3-inch layer of bark chips with the
exception of a 6-to 12-inch area around the base of the root collar, which must be left bare
and dry; (biological resources; City Arborist) (BR 1.2)
141. that the removal of trees, shrubs, or weedy vegetation shall be avoided during the February 1
through August 31 bird nesting period to the extent possible; if no vegetation or tree removal is
proposed during the nesting period, no surveys shall be required; if it is not feasible to avoid the
nesting period, a survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist no
sooner than 14 days prior to the start of removal of trees, shrubs, grassland vegetation, buildings,
grading, or other construction activity;survey results shall be valid for 21 days following the survey;
therefore, if vegetation or building removal is not started within 21 days of the survey, another survey
shall be required; the area surveyed shall include all construction sites, access roads, and staging
areas, as well as areas within 150 feet outside the boundaries of the areas to be cleared or as
otherwise determined by the biologist; in the event that an active nest is discovered in the areas to be
cleared, or in other habitats within 150 feet of construction boundaries, clearing and construction
shall be postponed for at least two weeks or until a wildlife biologist has determined that the young
have fledged(left the nest), the nest is vacated, and there is no evidence of second nesting attempts;
(biological resources; City Arborist, Planning) (BR 2.1)
142. that the project sponsor shall revise the preliminary planting plan to give preference to native trees;
suggested native tree species, subject to approval by the City Arborist, include California sycamore,
box elder, Monterey cypress, and Monterey pine; (biological resources; City Arborist, Planning) (BR
3.1)
143. that the project sponsor shall include methods of water conservation in the Proposed Project's
buildings and landscaping; these methods shall include, but not be limited to the following:
a. install water-conserving dishwashers and washing machines, and water-efficient centralized
cooling systems in the hospital and MOB;
b. install water-conserving irrigation systems (e.g., drip irrigation and automated irrigation
systems);
C. design landscaping with drought-resistant and other low-water-use plants;
d. install water-saving devices such as water-efficient toilets,faucets, and showerheads;
(utilities; Public Works, Building) (UT S.1)
144. that the following mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the grading and construction
contracts:
a. ifpotential historical or unique archaeological resources are discovered during construction,
all work in the immediate vicinity (within approximately 50 feet)shall be suspended and
alteration of the materials and their context shall be avoided pending site investigation by a
qualified archaeological or cultural resources consultant retained by the project applicant;
construction work shall not commence again until the archaeological or cultural resources
consultant has been given an opportunity to examine the findings, assess their significance,
and offer proposals for any additional exploratory measures deemed necessary for the further
-34-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER 15,2004
evaluation of and/or mitigation of adverse impacts to any potential historical resources or
unique archaeological resources that have been encountered;
b. if the find is determined to be a historical or unique archaeological resource, and if
avoidance of the resource would not be feasible, the archaeological or cultural resources
consultant shall prepare a plan for the methodical excavation of those portions of the site that
would be adversely affected; the plan shall be designed to result in the extraction of sufficient
volumes of non-redundant archaeological data to address important regional research
considerations; the work shall be performed by the archeological or cultural consultant, and
shall result in detailed technical reports; such reports shall be performed by the
archaeological or cultural resources shall be submitted to the California Historical
Resources Regional Information Center; construction in the vicinity of the find shall be
accomplished in accordance with current professional standards and shall not recommence
until this work is completed;
C. the project applicant shall assure that project personnel are informed that collecting
significant historical or unique archaeological resources discovered during development of
the project is prohibited by law;prehistoric or Native American resources can include: chert
or obsidian flakes,projectile points, mortars, and pestles; and dark friable soil containing
shell and bone dietary debris, heat-affected rock, or human burials; historic resources can
include nails, bottles, or other items often found in refuse deposits;
d. if human remains are discovered, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the
discovery site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains
until the project applicant has complied with the provisions of State CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.5(e); in general, these provisions require that the County Coroner shall be notified
immediately; if the remains are found to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify
the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours; the most likely descendant of the
deceased Native American shall be notified by the Commission and given the chance to make
recommendations for the remains; if the Commission is unable to identify the most likely
descendent, or if no recommendations are made within 24 hours, remains may be re-interred
with appropriate dignity elsewhere on the property in a location not subject to further
subsurface disturbance; if recommendations are made and not accepted, the Native American
Heritage Commission will mediate the problem; (cultural resources; Planning)
Note: To facilitate staff oversight and enforcement of the conditions of approval, the responsible department
has been noted at the end of each condition and they have been organized according to the phase of
development in which they are required. This table, 'Phasing of Implementation of Conditions of
Approval", including phasing diagrams is included in the attachments for your reference.
ATTACHMENTS:
Required Findings and Criteria for Each Action
Table—Phasing of Implementation for Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Minutes, September 27, 2004 and October 25, 2004
Figure 1: Existing Parcel Ownership Pattern and Proposed Final Parcel Ownership Pattern
Figure 2: Existing and Proposed General Plan and Zoning Designations
Figure 3: Final General Plan and Zoning Designations
-35-
PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT
1783 EL CAMINO REAL,ZONED C-3 AND UNCLASSIFIED(TO BE REZONED C-1 AND UNCLASSIFIED)
NOVEMBER I5,2004
Memorandum from Oren Reinbolt regarding utility undergrounding investigation dated 11/4/04
Memo to Planning Commission regarding change to Trousdale lane striping dated 11/8/04
Memo to Planning Commission regarding design direction for medical office building dated 11/8/04
Memorandum and medical office building design concept drawings from Anshen &Allen dated 11/5/04
Letter from C/CAG regarding consistency with Airport Land Use Plan dated November 3, 2004
Notice of Appeal Hearing, mailed November 5, 2004
City Council Ordinance—Zoning Code Text Amendment
City Council Ordinance—Rezoning
City Council Resolution—Certification of EIR, Approval of Conditional Use Permits and Design Review,
and Conceptual Approval of Lot Line Adjustment Tentative Parcel Map (Buff-colored paper)
Attachments from previous meetings (in Binder No. 2):
Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments 10/25/04
Planning Commission Staff Report, attachments and desk items 9/27/04
Attachments Delivered Previously (Please bring to meeting): All EIR Documents (3): Draft EIR dated
1/20/04, Revised Draft EIR dated 6/30/04 and Response to Comments Document dated 9/17/04
-36-