HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - TSP - 2011.02.10 1
City of Burlingame
CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.burlingame.org
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - Approved
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Commissioners Present: Jeff Londer, Chair
Laurie Simonson, Vice Chair
Nicklas Akers
Mark Noworolski
Commissioners Absent: Caroline Serrato
Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Transportation Engineer, Public Works
Sergeant Ed Nakiso, Police Department
Joanne Louie, Administrative Secretary, Public Works
Visitors: Laura Held, Principal, Mercy High School
Velvet Hewett, Mills Peninsula Health Services
Helen Chaknova, Mills Peninsula Health Services
Bob Hortop, Mills Peninsula Health Services
Ben Cohn, 2018 Trousdale Drive
John Funghi, 2805 Adeline Drive
1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:04 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
3. ROLL CALL. 3 of 5 Commissioners present. (Commissioner Akers late, Commissioner
Serrano absent)
4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Chair Londer thanked former Chair Noworolski for his fine job as Chair this past year.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -
Motion: To accept the minutes of January 13, 2011 with the following amendment:
Item 10.3 Neighborhood Parking Working Group – Chair Noworolski reported that
minor work was done but no formal meeting had taken place.
M/S/C: Simonson/Noworolski; 3/0/2 (Akers not present, Serrano absent)
2
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Cohn spoke regarding the traffic and safety concerns on Trousdale Drive below Sequoia
Avenue. Mr. Cohn shared a copy of the petition that was circulated amongst the residents of
this area. Mr. Cohn said he has also been communicating with Officer Witt regarding these
concerns and will be bringing this item to the City Council.
7. CURRENT BUSINESS
7.1 Trousdale Drive/Marco Polo Way – Discussion of possible on-street parking
modifications
Commissioner Akers recused himself from discussion and vote.
Mr. Chou presented a staff report providing background on this request, with a
recommendation to receive public comments and review staff analysis in order to
determine if a change to the current on -street parking situation was feasible or
necessary for the curb area surrounding 1875 Trousdale Drive.
Mr. Hortop provided photos of the parking and visibility situation at this facility. Mr.
Hortop requested that the two spaces on Trousdale Drive and two spaces on Marco
Polo Way be limited to 2-hour parking and supported red zoning the parking space on
the right side of the exit driveway on Trousdale to improve visibility.
Discussion occurred amongst the Commissioners about maximizing the existing red
zones without losing parking spaces to enhance visibility.
Motion: To accept the staff report and a make recommendation to City Council to
implement 2-hour time restrictions Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. for the
four on-street parking spaces surrounding 1875 Trousdale Drive (two on Trousdale
Drive and two on Marco Polo Way). And, additionally to extend the red curb as far as
practical while maintaining the on-street parking space on the right as you exit the
facility at 1875 Trousdale Drive.
M/S/C: Noworolski/Simonson; 3/0/2 (Akers – recused, Serrano – absent)
7.2 Alvarado Avenue – Discussion of single red curb removal near south/west
Alvarado/Adeline corner
Mr. Chou presented a staff report seeking Commission action to either support the staff
recommendation to maintain the new red zone, or for the Commission to determine a
possible alternate solution.
Mercy Principal Laura Held gave a summary of steps Mercy High School took to
address traffic concerns since the last time they came before the Commission. Ms. Held
reported that the traffic conditions for entire neighborhood were greatly improved due to
the measures taken. She added that the installation of the single red curb on Alvarado
3
Avenue at Adeline Drive helped to improve the traffic flow at the intersection.
Mr. Funghi entered a letter for the record. Mr. Funghi requested the return 18’ of on -
street parking on Alvarado Avenue and Adeline Drive in front of his property at 2805
Adeline Avenue. He stated that the City:
1. Incorrectly interpreted the Planning Commission Mercy High School Resolution of
July 26, 2010
2. Created a critical safety issue by promoting the “stacking” of vehicles in front of a
Fire Hydrant for the morning and evening peak student commutes
3. Relied on traffic data prepared by unlicensed engineers in accordance with the
State of California Professional Engineer’s act
4. Relied on a traffic study that was prohibited from looking at internal re -routing
within the mercy Campus that would alleviate the external congestion at the
Alvarado Gate
5. Allowed a commercial entity to use his property frontage as a “kiss and drop -off”
point
The Commissioners asked Mr. Funghi for clarification regarding his statement to relocate
his driveway from Adeline Drive to Alvarado Avenue since he stated that he would need
the remaining curb spaces on Alvarado for a new driveway. He explained that there
were no officials plans submitted at this time.
The Commissioners asked for clarification of Mr. Funghi’s assertion that the traffic data
was prepared by an unlicensed engineer. He stated that the studies should not be
considered valid. Mr. Chou clarified that some of the type of studies conducted did not
require licensing stamps.
Mr. Chou also explained that a simple and obvious test of whether the new red zone
helps with traffic flow would be to park a vehicle in the space during the peak morning
and afternoon times.
Chair Londer requested staff to also consider extending the red zone across the street if
it could be done without losing any additional parking spaces, and for staff to report back
to the Commission.
Motion: To accept the staff recommendation to maintain the new single red zone at
Alvarado Avenue
M/S/C: Akers/Simonson; 4/0/1 (Serrano – absent)
Chair Londer asked for Commission concurrence to move Item 8.1 to precede Item 7.3
so as to allow Mr. John Root to hear the update and go home early.
Motion: To move Item 8.1 to precede Item 7.3
M/S/C: Simonson/Akers; 4/0/1 (Serrano absent)
4
7.3 2011 Goal Setting for Commission – Further discussion of possible goals
Mr. Chou sought input and/or clarification of the potential goals established at the last
Commission meeting. He asked if there should be any changes to the list established
at the Commission’s last meeting. The Commission felt that the goals identified were
sufficient.
Chair Londer noted that there was a Council Goal Setting session this past Saturday
and three of their goals related to this Commission were:
1. Establish parking permits for employees of Broadway to park in Lot S
2. Look at options for new parking meters that accept credit cards
3. Publicize parking philosophy, distributes maps and improves signage directing
drivers to parking lots
The Commissioners determined the broad goal of the Commission was to work with
Council in achieving Council goals, improve Council/Commission communication, and
serve a more active role on items related to parking and traffic.
8. INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEMS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF
8.1 Engineer’s Report – Update on various traffic items brought to Commission at last
meeting
Mr. Chou gave an update on the following three items which were brought to the
Commission by Mr. John Root:
- Traffic stop signs at Floribunda & Primrose – staff has put out a traffic counter at
this intersection and has collected approximately a week’s worth of data which will
be broken down and reviewed to see if it warrants a stop sign.
- Consider additional crosswalks at Oak Grove – enhancements were made just prior
to school starting and staff is considering a crosswalk at Arundel. Pedestrian counts
will be performed to further substantiate a crosswalk
- Sight visibility & shrubbery at Carmelita & Paloma – awaiting response from Parks
& Rec as to whether or not this is within their scope of work. If not, a letter will be
sent to property owners.
Chair Londer sought public comment. Mr. Root suggests a stop sign as opposed to a
yield sign on Primrose at Floribunda. He also suggested installing a crosswalk at
Ansel & Oak Grove.
Mr. Root expressed his frustration with the slow process to correct the foliage issue at
Paloma & Carmelita. He said this was first brought to the attention of the City in early
2009, and turned over to the Parks Department eight months ago an d nothing has
been done to date.
5
8.2 Traffic Sergeant’s Report – General/Selective Traffic Enforcement Report
Sergeant Nakiso reported that selective enforcement has been working with San
Mateo Police Department to saturate areas in both San Mateo and Burlingame twice a
month.
8.3 Commissioners’ Comments and Concerns
None.
9. COMMUNICATIONS
None.
10. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS
10.1 Burlingame Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory committee (B/PAC)
Mr. Chou and Vice-chair Simonson reported that there was no meeting this month.
10.2 Website/Communications Subcommittee
Mr. Chou reported that he would be contacting each Commissioner to determine if
there is agreement to consider use of an outside email for the entire commission.
10.3 Neighborhood Parking Working Group
Commissioner Noworolski reported that there was a request to Sergeant Nakiso to
collect parking related data in preparation for discussion with DBID for Burlingame
Avenue.
11. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
11.1 Devereux Drive/Lincoln School Traffic Flow (March)
11.2 Pedestrian Corridors (March)
11.3 Burlingame Avenue 2-Hour Parking Evaluation (pending date)
11.4 Burlingame Avenue/Downtown Parking Study (pending date)
12. ADJOURNMENT 9:53 p.m.