HomeMy WebLinkAboutMin - TSP - 2016.04.141
TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION
Approved Minutes
Regular Meeting of Thursday, April 14, 2016
1. CALL TO ORDER. 7:03 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
3. ROLL CALL.
MEMBER PRESENT: Bush, Martos, Londer, Wettan
MEMBERS ABSENT: Akers
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: To accept the minutes of March 10, 2016 with the following edit to item 6a:
Replace the word ‘speeding’ with ‘school’ on page 2, paragraph 5 so the sentence
reads “…overall school and traffic safety issues…”
M/S/C: Martos/Bush; 4/0/0
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA
Manito Velasco conveyed that this is his fourth time during public comment requesting an
update regarding the Carolan Avenue Project. The last community meeting was over a year
ago and there have not been any updates to the City’s website. Mr. Velasco feels this is
very disrespectful to the public process and to those that participated in the community
meeting(s).
6. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
a) Burlingame Community Center
Representatives from Group 4 Architecture, along with the assistance of the Recreation
Supervisor, gave a presentation regarding the new Community Center design. The goal
of the presentation was to obtain feedback from the Commissioners regarding
construction impacts and parking options. Parking option one includes underground and
surface parking, allowing for a total of 143 spaces. Option two would allow for the same
2
number of spaces with surface parking and additional stalls ½ level below the tennis
courts. Option one was well received by the City Council, Planning Commission and our
constituents. A third option, which would combine both options one and two, is also
being considered but cost is a concern. By combining both options, the number of
parking spaces increases from 143 to 207.
During the public outreach process, a common concern raised by community members
was the noise from the parking lot adjacent to residential homes. To mitigate the noise
concern, the consultant included design details such as a (green sound wall) of trees,
underground parking, and configured the drop-off zone outside of the parking lot to help
alleviate noise.
The construction will be completed in phases and the consultant requested feedback
from the Commissioners about the options for a phased approach. Two construction
phasing options were presented.
Option 1: Would begin on the east side with the playground and park, then the
building, under building parking and plazas. The second phase of this option
consists of the tennis courts and park promenade, then basketball court and
surface parking.
Option 2: Would begin with the tennis courts, under court parking and park
promenade, followed by the basketball court, surface parking and playground
and park. The last phase of option two is the building, plazas and surface
parking.
Chair Londer opened the floor for public comment.
No public comment.
Commissioner Wettan noted that based on his experience, most parking constraints
occur in the evenings when there are large events as people are more willing to look for
parking in the neighborhood during the daytime. He noted the cost difference with the
increase in parking (combining both option one and option two), but feels more parking
options would be beneficial. With that said, Commissioner Wettan also suggested to
consider a fee bearing lot to help pay for the additional spaces. Lastly, he complimented
the playground redesign.
Commissioner Bush asked many clarifying questions which yielded the following
information:
The peak usage of the community center is typically during the evenings, on
weekends, and throughout the summer. With the new building, the usage and
room rentals are anticipated to increase.
3
The traffic study that was completed as part of the Community Center redesign
looked at the increase in roadway traffic but the anticipated usage did not trigger
next level traffic concerns. The City has other improvement plans for the area
such as the California Drive Roundabout Project and placing a traffic signal at
Oak and Carolan if necessary.
The idea of sharing the High School’s parking facilities during peak periods for
overflow parking was considered. However, due to the distance and safety
concerns, the overflow parking location is not ideal.
Bicycle and pedestrian access to the Community Center has and continues to be
an important part of the design. Design elements such as varying pavement
surfaces for bicyclists and pedestrians in the promenade and traffic calming
strategies such as raised pedestrian surfaces that also work as built in speed
ramps are being integrated into the plans. Also, a goal for the Community Center
building is to be LEED certified which comes with a separate set of sustainable
design requirements.
The cost differential between the parking lot options (which should probably be
slightly escalated) is about $75k per stall for the underbuilding parking. The
surface structure parking is about $35-40k per stall. To add the tennis courts on
top is about $50-$55k. Even though the cost difference is significant, there was
strong support for the under building parking option at the community outreach
meetings.
The Community Center parking facilities will be City-owned and therefore subject
to enforcement by Burlingame PD. There is no overnight parking allowed.
Commissioner Bush felt that the significant, additional money to combine both parking
options can be better spent on bike paths that increase the connectivity in Burlingame.
He also noted that an over overabundance of parking will influence transportation
decisions. On-site parking for bikes is essential but more importantly is proper
infrastructure so people can make transportation decisions they are comfortable with.
Lastly, Commissioner Bush suggested to consider access to the parking facilities to
downtown Burlingame patrons during low peak periods.
Commissioner Martos posed a few questions which provided the following information:
Community Center rooms have flexible usage if demographics shift with new
building.
The surface parking adjacent to the residential homes is being considered
employee / handicap / permitted parking as it would be less noisy to the residents
because of limited turnover.
4
The construction phasing options were created based on the City’s availability of
funding.
Commissioner Martos is in favor of under building/facility parking as opposed to under
the tennis courts.
Chair Londer noted that we are more than doubling the current parking conditions. He
also reiterated that we should be encouraging people to walk and bike whenever they
can and thanked Group 4 Architecture and staff for the presentation.
b) Broadway Grade Separation Update
Mr. Chou provided a direct update to the Commission regarding the Broadway Grade
Separation Project similar to what was presented at the third and final community
meeting on March 31, 2016 with the focus on outlining the top two alternatives: A and B.
c) Selection of TSPC Member to Represent at ECR Stakeholder Subcommittee Meetings
The subcommittee will be about a 12 – 18 month commitment starting early or late
summer. The Commission decided to postpone the selection of a representative to next
month’s meeting when all Commissioners are present.
d) Hoover School Update
This item was moved to 6b due to the number of people in attendance for the Hoover
School Update.
Mr. Wong gave a presentation to provide an update regarding the progress of the
pedestrian access and safety improvements around Hoover School, which is scheduled
to open this fall. The City and the School District have completed the layouts for the
proposed improvements to pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, the new traffic island on
Summit Drive, and traffic and parking restrictions near the school site. The traffic and
parking restrictions are being implemented to improve the circulation during drop-off and
pick-up and will be as follows:
No Parking along Summit Drive: Monday – Friday (8:00-8:45 AM and 1:30-3:15
PM).
No Parking along Easton Drive: 2812 Easton Drive to Easton Circle.
No left-turns from eastbound Canyon Drive onto Summit Drive: Monday – Friday
(8:00-8:45 AM and 1:30-3:15 PM).
No right-turns from westbound Easton Drive onto Summit Drive: Monday – Friday
(8:00-8:45 AM and 1:30-3:15 PM).
5
No left-turns from northbound Summit Drive onto westbound Easton Drive:
Monday – Friday (8:00-8:45 AM and 1:30-3:15 PM).
No westbound access to Easton Drive beginning at Easton Circle: Monday –
Friday (8:00-8:45 AM and 1:30-3:15 PM).
It should also be noted that the traffic and parking restrictions will be a pilot program in
order to make changes on the fly as needed.
Chair Londer opened public comment.
Meredith of 2223 Easton Drive thanked Mr. Wong for all his efforts with the pedestrian
safety and access efforts related to Hoover School. She conveyed her biggest concern
is the “accessibility path” and vehicle traffic and suggested striping on Easton to create a
buffer so cars are more aware and stay away from the “accessibility path”. She also
sees Canyon Drive problematic with pedestrians and two-way vehicular traffic.
Roy Mayer of Hillside Circle and Michelle Galvin of 2101 Summit Drive would like to see
permanent one-way streets given the large construction and waste trucks that pass
through, and especially due to general safety concerns. Specifically, they are concerned
about the handicap ramp going in front of 2101 Summit. The markings on the street now
reflect a portion of the driveway at 2101 Summit to be impacted. A request to see clearer
drawings of the plans for that strip of road has been requested.
A resident from 2818 Easton Drive suggested speed bumps on Canyon Road as he
notices people speeding down that stretch frequently. The resident asked what the
liability will be if there are children that get hurt in front of their home because of the trip
hazards and what the aesthetics will look like in the neighborhood with all the new
signage. He suggested photos of the houses be taken with an overlay of all the
proposed improvements so they can see how each property will be affected. He is still
very unclear about the parking restrictions in front of the residential properties.
Mrs. Iverson of Canyon Road spoke of the stop sign on Canyon Road as it’s about thirty
feet from the corner and feels it needs to be moved in order to be effective. It is unclear if
it is a City or County stop sign. Staff will review but believes it belongs to the City of
Burlingame.
A resident of 2711 Easton inquired about the stop sign at Easton Circle and whether or
not anyone will be manning the crosswalk at that location. He also questioned the
liability of trip hazards to property owners in the area. Mr. Wong answered his questions
and shared the purpose of the Sidewalk Feasibility Study that will be shortly underway.
Sharon of 1387 Hillside Circle sought clarification that the pedestrian path from Easton
Circle to the school site will remain in the same condition as it is now.
6
Director Murtuza got up to speak to the public to convey the City shares the same
concerns and sees the need for dedicated sidewalks on Summit and Easton. The goal at
this time is to improve pedestrian safety and traffic flow before the school opens.
Lenny of 2816 Easton has been pleased with the communication between Engineering
staff and residents. He suggested a resident parking program to address school visitors
and overnight.
Valerie of 2818 Easton Drive commented about the safety of the children along Easton
and whether or not no parking along that stretch of road would be safer for students.
Manito Velasco commented on using chalk lines to help illustrate the proposed
improvements to the homeowners. He shared that the signage for turn restrictions where
his children go to school are not effective and also suggested lighting improvements for
increased driver and pedestrian safety.
Trisha Tayama of 2617 Easton Drive thanked staff for their presentation and then
conveyed her questions pertaining to the possibility of a stop-sign or flashing lights for
the new crosswalk on Easton Drive, the need for sidewalk between Easton Circle and
the school site, and signage for westbound Canyon and Skyline to divert cars.
A resident of 2109 Summit inquired about lowering the speed limit as Easton to Canyon
is 30 MPH. He also inquired about a permit parking program for residents.
Lenny of 2816 Easton spoke again and asked if the City has considered changing the
garbage collection schedule since having the bins out front may create problems.
Chair Londer thanked the public for speaking, reiterated what Director Murtuza shared
and closed public comment.
Commissioner Martos thanked the public as well for all of their comments, and explained
the goal of the Commission is to minimize the risk to students and impacts to residents.
He noted that Police enforcement will be a large factor, and asked Sergeant Ford to
share what the Police enforcement efforts will be. Serg eant Ford responded by
indicating there will be education through the media and directly to the school and
residents. The PD will be making adjustments to their schedule when the school opens
to have a presence during the peak periods, in addition to having a school resource
officer assigned to assist with ongoing concerns. Commissioner Martos closed by noting
that this would be a good opportunity for a speed reduction pilot program.
Commissioner Bush had a few questions regarding the possibility of temporary barriers
and suggested staff to look into it. He also inquired about monitoring efforts for
access/routes and perceived concerns once the school opens
7
Commissioner Wettan shared with the public that there are improvements that we can
accomplish before the school opens and there are also other things the City would like to
accomplish but cannot prior to Hoover School opening. The Commissioner also shared
that he was generally happy with the plans presented by City staff before seeking
clarification regarding Easton Circle; more specifically warnings for no entry and the
crosswalk.
Chair Londer thanked everyone for their comments and moved on to the next item on
the agenda.
7. INFORMATION ITEMS
a) Engineering Division Reports
US101/Broadway Interchange Project – Stage 2 construction completed. Stage
3 construction is underway. Demolition of the former overpass is nearly 100%
complete. W estbound approach lane configuration at Broadway/Carolan was
scheduled to be returned to the previous configuration on April 7; a single left-turn
lane, and three through lanes to California Drive.
California Drive Roundabout – Traffic simulations and feasibility analysis are
almost complete. Coordinating to schedule second public meeting in May.
TSPC Email Communications – Three new communications.
City Hall Traffic Study – Staff held the first neighborhood meeting on March 29.
Over 30 residents attended, and they were able to provide comments and mark-up
layouts. Design team working towards a second presentation anticipated for late-
April.
California Drive Parking Restriction – Introduction of ordinance for the p.m. peak
parking restriction at the April 4, 2016, City Council meeting, with adoption of
ordinance scheduled for the City Council meeting on April 18.
BPAC Update – Staff to present draft BPAC by-laws to City Council at their April 18,
2016 meeting.
Carolan Complete Streets Update – Archeological Study Report (ASR) for Caltrans
was approved at the end of March. Finally able to finalize the design to include ASR
mitigations in plans. Goal is to submit final PS&E package to Caltrans by June for
approval.
Trousdale/Ogden/Marco Polo – City to review implementing pilot stop signs along
Trousdale Drive on the eastbound approach of Ogden Drive, and the westbound
approach of Marco Polo. Intersection to be monitored by Police and Engineering.
8
Analysis to be brought back at future TSPC meeting.
TSPC Priority List (Updated April 2016):
TSPC Led Effort
1 Downtown Modal Access
2 B/PAC setup
3 School Speed Limit Notices/Review
4 School Traffic Issues
5 California Drive Commuter bike route
6 California Drive parking restrictions
7 Broadway Parking
8 Public Shuttles/Transit
9 Downtown Speed Limit Review
10 Review TSPC Mandate
11 Joint agreements with Caltrans Countywide
12 ECR Corridor Infrastructure
13 Bay Trail
14 Fee Schedules
15 Joint Commission Meeting (City Council)
Staff Update via Report
1 Caltrans’ ECR/Floribunda Completed
2 Hoover School Update 4/14/16: Item 6d
3 Downtown Parking Strategies 3/10/16: Item 6b
4 City Hall Traffic Calming/Floribunda 4/14/16: Item 7a
5 California Roundabout 4/14/16: Item 7a
6 General Plan – Circulation Element
7 Bike\Ped Plan Update: fwd to BPAC
8 Taxi Regulation: Update by BPD
9 Carolan Complete Streets Update 3/10/16: Item 7a
10 Grant Opportunities
11 Grade Separation 4/14/16: Item 7a
12 Traffic Brochure Completed
13 San Mateo's Peninsula Ave OC
b) Police Department Reports
Since the last TSPC meeting, there have been 31 accidents with 13 minor injuries with
the majority of the accidents due to unsafe turning movements. No accidents with major
injuries or fatalities occurred. Two of those 31 accidents occurred at Broadway and El
Camino. There were no accidents at El Camino and Floribunda.
April is National Distracted Driving Awareness Month so additional efforts will be made
to enforce safe driving habits. May is “Click It or Ticket” month so the PD will focus on
seatbelt violations.
9
c) Farmer’s Market
Chair Londer and Commissioner Wettan committed to attending the next Farmer’s
Market for a few hours. Chair Martos committed to attend the following Farmer’s
Market.
d) TSPC Chair/Commissioner’s Communications
Commissioner Wettan shared that a resident feels the midblock crosswalks in the
Bayswater and Howard area are confusing and should be a future discussion item.
Commissioner Wettan received a compliment regarding the additional signage in the
Broadway area that was put in as a result of people turning the wrong way on
Capuchino.
Bush attended the Planning Commission meeting last Monday and noted comments
regarding significant parking issues in the Plymouth/Lexington area and feels this
should be a future topic of discussion. Also, Commissioner Bush would like to have
some open dialog regarding upcoming Planning projects that have major traffic and
parking implications.
Commissioner Martos shared that there is General Plan meeting on Wednesday, April
27 to discuss mobility alternatives with the next General Plan Workshop to occur in May
regarding land use alternatives.
8. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS
a) Downtown Parking
To set the table, Commissioners Martos and Wettan have posed the following
questions/scenarios to address:
Have measures been implemented that were recommended when we did this the
first time around?
Did they work?
How long does it take a shopper to park in the middle of the day?
What are the vacancies in the outer lots?
Continue to gather data from the Merchants with assistance from Commissioners
and some BPAC representatives with staff to aid by ensuring there are no Brown
Act violations.
b) Broadway Parking
Commissioners Bush and Wettan conducted a preliminary survey of peak periods in the
Broadway area and plan to speak with John Kavrainian regarding peak times to
10
compare information.
c) BPAC
Commissioner Bush met with a smaller subset of BPAC to discuss the charter. Two
main concerns were expressed:
Inclusion of Planning Commissioner or mechanism for advanced notice of
Planning Commission items that may impact bicyclist and / or pedestrians and
expanding the scope of the BPAC to include some of those future development
items; and
Citizen members of the BPAC being appointed by a governing body such as the
City Council or TSPC or other variation as opposed to the City Manager.
d) School Speed Limits
No update.
9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
10. ADJOURNMENT 11:40 p.m.