Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso - CC - 066-2017RESOLUTION NO. 66-2017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR) AND ADOPTING MITIGATION MEASURES AND A MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN PREPARED FOR A MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT CONSISTING OF 27 RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1128-1132 DOUGLAS AVENUE (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS: 029-132-180 and 029-132-190) AND RELOCATION OF A PORTION OF THE EXISTING HOUSE AT 1128 DOUGLAS AVENUE TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 524 OAK GROVE AVENUE (ASSESSORS PARCEL NO: 029-083-010) WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and application has been made for Design Review, Conditional Use Permit to allow a building height of 56'-10", Front Setback Landscape Variance, Parking Variance for driveway width, and Tentative Parcel Map to merge the existing two parcels for construction of a new five -story, 27 -unit multi -family residential apartment building at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue, zoned R-4; and Design Review and Front Setback Variance to relocate the existing house at 1128 Douglas Avenue to 524 Oak Grove Avenue, which includes a first and second story addition to the relocated house and a new detached garage at 524 Oak Grove, zoned R-1, property owner Jianguang Zhang (Assessor Parcel Nos: 029-132-180 and 029-132-190 (1128-1132 Douglas Avenue) and 029- 083-010 (524 Oak Grove Avenue)); and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2015, a Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was submitted to the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR), and OPR notified State agencies of the preparation of the preparation of the EIR and directed that they make comments on the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame held a duly noticed public hearing to conduct a scoping session on May 11, 2015, to receive any oral or written comments that the public might wish to offer in defining the scope of the environmental review; and WHEREAS, the City retained Panorama Environmental, Inc. to prepare an project EIR; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2016, the City posted a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR (DEIR) and duly noticed its availability for public review and comment for a 45 -day period ranging from September 6, 2016 through October 20, 2016; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 11, 2016, to receive any oral or written comments that the public might wish to offer on the DEIR; and WHEREAS, in response to the comments received during the comment period, the City's independent consultant prepared responses to each of the comments made in the form of a Response to Comments document which will append the DEIR; and RESOLUTION NO. 66-2017 WHEREAS, on February 3, 2017, the Response to Comments Document was made available to the public; and WHEREAS, the Final EIR (FEIR), consisting of the Draft EIR (DEIR), Responses to Comments and Revisions to the DEIR, clearly presents the issues involved in the development of these properties and identifies appropriate alternatives as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 13 of the California Code of Regulations); and WHEREAS, the FEIR concludes that all of the potential significant impacts identified can be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of the mitigation measures identified DEIR, as outlined in Exhibit A to this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the FOR provides the Planning Commission, the City and the public with sufficient and thorough information regarding the potential significant environmental impacts of the project; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2017, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the FEIR and on the project, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and oral testimony presented at said hearing, and continued action on the FEIR and on the project until additional information was provided by the applicant and staff; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2017, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the FEIR and on the project, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and oral testimony presented at said hearing, and approved both the project and the FEIR with all mitigating measures identified; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the Planning Commission's action, Larry Stevenson, 1124 Douglas Avenue filed a timely appeal of the Commission's decision; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2017, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission's actions related to the proposed project at 1128-32 Douglas Avenue and 524 Oak Grove Avenue; and WHEREAS, following conclusion of the public hearing, and taking into consideration all oral and written testimony provided as part of the hearing, the City Council denied the appeal and upheld the Planning Commission's April 24, 2017 approval of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the FEIR outlines the proposed project, presents the issues involved in the development of these properties, analyzes all potentially significant environmental impacts, and identifies appropriate mitigation measures (incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project — attached as Exhibit B) and alternatives as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 13 of the California Code of Regulations). RESOLUTION NO. 66-2017 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame that: 1. The FEIR has been prepared and considered in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, with independent preparation by a City -retained consultant and application of the independent comment and judgment of both City staff and this Commission. 2. The FEIR provides sufficient disclosure of the issues involved as required by CEQA, including an assessment of impacts upon: (1) Aesthetics, (2) Air Quality, (3) Biological Resources, (4) Cultural Resources, (5) Geology and Soils, (6) Hazards and Hazardous Materials, (7) Hydrology and Water Quality, (8) Land Use and Planning, (9) Noise, (10) Transportation and Traffic, and (11) Utilities and Service Systems, a summary of the potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures is outlined in Exhibit A to this resolution. 3. The extensive public participation in the development of this Final EIR has provided valuable information and analysis, as well as important changes and alterations to the original project. 4. The mitigation measures required by the FEIR as described in the attached Exhibit A have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project as outlined in the separate resolution approving all project entitlements. 5. On the basis of the FEIR documents and comments received and addressed by this Commission, the Council finds that the Final Environmental Impact Report is complete pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 150907 7 e certifies the/ R.c Ricardo Orliz, Mayor I, Meaghan Hassel -Shearer, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 191' day of June, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BEACH, BROWNRIGG, COLSON, KEIGHRAN, ORTIZ NAYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 3 EXHIBIT "A" MITIGATION MEASURES 1128-1132 DOUGLAS AVENUE & 524 OAK GROVE AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT Impact Mitigation Measures Aesthetics Impact Aesthetics -1: Would the proposed project have a MM AES -1: The applicant shall submit revised plans for substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? the proposed building at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue to the City of Burlingame for design review. The Planning Impact Aesthetics -3: Would the proposed project Commission as the responsible body for design review substantially degrade the existing visual character or shall review the proposed project for compatibility with the quality of the site and its surroundings? City's guidelines for a residential apartment building in the Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Downtown Specific Plan R-4 Base District. Incorporated Impact Aesthetics -4: Would the proposed project create MM AES -2: Prior to issuance of a building permit, a a new source of substantial light or glare that would detailed Exterior Lighting Plan shall be provided to the adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? City of Burlingame for design review. The lighting plan shall utilize the following standards: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated a) Control stray light through use of low -brightness fixtures with optical controls. b) Fully block all exterior light sources from off-site views. c) Do not permit any uplighting from any outdoor light fixture. d) Employ on -demand exterior lighting systems where feasible. Area lighting and security lighting shall be controlled by the use of timed switches and/or motion detectors. e) Use tinted windows in all buildings to reduce glare from interior lights. MM AES -3: Flat, non -reflective paint or integrated coloring shall be used in all exterior building materials throughout the project. Air Quality Impact Air -3: Expose sensitive receptors to substantial MM AIR -1: Construction Equipment Emissions pollutant concentrations— Construction Reduction Impact Air -4: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of The construction contractor shall implement the BAAQMD the applicable air quality plan—Construction Enhanced Exhaust Emissions Reduction Measures for Project Construction Equipment measure that requires Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation project off-road equipment greater than 25 horsepower Incorporated (hp) that operates for more than 20 total hours over the entire duration of construction activities to meet the 0 Impact Impact Air -3: Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations—Operation Impact Air -4: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan—Operation Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Mitigation Measures following requirements: • All backhoes engines shall meet CARB Tier 4 off- road emission standards. • All other equipment engines shall meet or exceed CARB Tier 3 off-road emission standards or be retrofitted with a CARB Level 2 diesel particulate filter (DPF). MM AIR -2: Air Filtration A standard house heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system with a permanent filter of a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 13 or greater shall be installed at the relocated residence at 524 Oak Grove Avenue. The MERV13 filter shall provide one air exchange per hour if the air source is outside/unfiltered air or four air exchanges per hour if the air source is inside/recirculated air to provide an 80 percent or greater reduction of outdoor fine particulate matter (including DPM). Biological Resources Impact Biology -1: Would the proposed project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated MM BIO -1: Pre -construction Bat Surveys The applicant shall implement the following measures during demolition of structures and tree removal or tree pruning. Structures. Before demolition of existing structures, a qualified bat specialist shall conduct a day time search for potential roosting habitat and evening emergence surveys to determine if the structure is being used as a roost. Biologists conducting surveys for roost sites shall use naked eye, binoculars, and a high power spotlight to inspect buildings features that could house bats. The surfaces of the structure and the ground around the structure shall be surveyed for bat signs, such as guano, staining, and prey remains. Evening (i.e., dusk) emergence surveys shall consist of at least one bat specialist positioned at different vantage points from the structure, watching for emerging bats from a half hour before sunset to 1 to 2 hours after sunset for a minimum of 2 nights within the season that construction will be taking place. Night vision goggles or full spectrum acoustic detectors should be used during emergence Impact Mitigation Measures surveys to assist in species identification. All emergence surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions (i.e., calm nights with temperatures conducive to bat activity [55° F and above] and no precipitation predicted). If roosting, special -status bats are present, measures developed by the bat specialist shall be implemented, as needed. Measures to protect the bats may include postponing demolition until after the May 1 st through October 1 st roosting period. Measures may include monitoring roosting to determine if the roost site is a maternal roost by either a visual inspection of the roost bat pups, or monitoring the roost after the adults leave for the night and listening for bat pups. Eviction of a maternal roost cannot occur because bat pups are not mature enough to leave the roost. If a roost is determined not to be a maternal roost, eviction of bats shall be conducted using bat exclusion techniques developed by Bat Conservation International and in consultation with CDFW that allow the bats to exit the roosting site, but prevent re- entry to the site. This work shall be completed by a BCI - recommended exclusion professional. The exclusion of bats shall be timed and carried out concurrently with any scheduled bird exclusion activities. Each roost lost (if any) shall be replaced in consultation with the CDFW and may include construction and installation of BCI -approved bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement shall be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the structures may be removed or sealed. Tree Removal. A qualified bat specialist shall examine trees to be removed or trimmed for suitable bat roosting habitat. High quality habitat features (large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark, larger snags, etc.) shall be identified and the area around these features searched for bats and bat sign (guano, culled insect parts, staining, etc.). The qualified bat specialist shall conduct evening visual emergence surveys of the source habitat feature, from a half hour before sunset to 1 to 2 hours after sunset for a minimum of two nights within the season that construction will be taking place. If it is found that roosting, special -status bats are present, measures developed by the bat specialist shall be implemented, as needed. Impact Biology -5: Would the proposed project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated 7 MM BIO -2: Tree Protection Measures Tree protection specifications were developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. for the protected trees surveyed at the Douglas Avenue and Oak Grove Avenue project sites. The applicant shall implement the following tree protection measures developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. and approved by the Arborist for protected trees. The Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. reports shall be included on the demolition and construction plans of the project. Mulching. A 6 -inch layer of coarse mulch woodchips shall be placed beneath the dripline of protected trees. Mulch is to be kept 12 inches from the trunk. Protective Barrier. A protective barrier or 6 -foot chain link fence shall be installed around the dripline of protected trees. The fencing can be moved within the dripline if authorized by the Project Arborist or the City Arborist, but no closer than 2 feet from the trunk of any tree. Fence posts shall be 1.5 inches in diameter and are to be driven 2 feet into the ground. The distance between posts shall not be more than 10 feet. This enclosed area is the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Moveable barriers or chain link fencing secured to cement blacks can be substituted for "fixed" fencing if the Project Arborist and City Arborist agree that the fencing would have to be moved to accommodate certain phases of construction. The applicant may not move the fence without authorization from the Project Arborist or City Arborist. Construction Restrictions. During construction, the following restrictions shall be implemented: • Runoff or spillage of damaging materials to the area below any tree canopy shall not be allowed • Storing materials, stockpiling soils, or parking/driving vehicles within the TPZ is not allowed • Cutting, breaking, skinning, or bruising roots, branches, or trunks of protected trees is prohibited without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist • Fires shall not be allowed under and adjacent to trees • Securing cables, chains, or ropes to trees or shrubs is prohibited • Trenching, digging, or excavating within the dripline of the TPZ of trees is prohibited without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist • Applying soils sterilants under pavement near existing trees is prohibited • Machine trenching is prohibited within the driplines of trees, only excavation by hand or compressed air is allowed Avoiding injury to roots. When a ditching machine, which is being used outside of the dripline of trees, encounters roots smaller than 2 inches, the wall of the trench adjacent to the street shall be hand trimmed, making clear, clean cuts through the roots. All damaged, torn, and cut roots shall be given a clean cut to remove ragged edges, which promote decay. Trenches shall be filled within 24 hours, but, where, this is not possible, the side of the trench adjacent to the trees shall be shaded with four layers of dampened, untreated burlap, wetted as frequently as necessary to keep the burlap wet. Roots 2 inches or larger, when encountered, shall be reported immediately to the Project Arborist, who will decide whether the applicant may cut the roots as mentioned above or shall excavate by hand or with compressed air under the root. The root is to be protected with dampened burlap. In addition, the top 2 feet of the foundation closest to trees shall be air spaded or hand dug under supervision of a licensed arborist to locate and evaluate any significant roots prior to mechanical excavation. The licensed arborist shall be required to submit a report to the City regarding the findings of the excavation and recommend any additional actions needed to protect the roots to preserve the health and structure of both the redwood and oak trees. Routing pipes. To avoid conflict with routes, pipes shall be routed outside of an area, ten times the diameter of a protected tree. In addition, where it is not possible to reroute pipes or trenches, the applicant shall bore beneath the dripline of the tree. The boring shall take 0 place not less than 3 feet below the surface of the soil in order to avoid encountering feeder roots. Reporting. The City Arborist, or his designee, shall be present when any digging occurs in the vicinity of the narrowest portion of the proposed shared driveway in the vicinity of the root ball of the adjacent protected tree to ensure that all appropriate measures are taken to protect the tree roots. If a protected tree is damaged, the applicant shall follow any remedial actions deemed necessary by the City Arborist, such as planting additional trees, consistent with Chapter 11.06.090. Cultural Resources Impact Cultural -1: Would the project cause a substantial MM CUL -1: Compatible Cladding for Historic House adverse change in the significance of a historical resource New construction on the relocated historic house shall be as defined in Section 15064.5? differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation to protect the integrity of the property and its environment Incorporated consistent with the Secretary of Interior's standards for rehabilitation. The choice of materials shall be submitted to the City for approval as part of the design review process. Geology and Soils Impact Geology -3: Would the project be located on a MM GEO-1: Implementation of Geotechnical geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become Recommendations unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in The Applicant and their contractors shall implement the on or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, measures outlined and recommended in the Geotechnical liquefaction or collapse? Investigation Report Chapters 5 through 10 for the proposed construction at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue. Impact Geology -4: Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact Hazards -1: Would the proposed project create a MM HAZ-1: Preparation of a Site-specific Spill significant hazard to the public or the environment through Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous The applicant shall prepare a site-specific Spill materials? Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan that will identify spill prevention and response measures Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation and Best Management Practices (BMPs). The plan will Incorporated emphasize site specific physical conditions to improve hazard prevention (e.g., identification of flow paths to nearest drains) and reduce effects of accidental spills if 0 10 they occur. The Applicant shall designate a representative to ensure that all hazardous materials and safety plans are followed throughout the construction period. BMPs identified in SPCC Plan shall be implemented during project construction to minimize the risk of an accidental release and to provide the necessary information for emergency response. A copy of the project SPCC shall be submitted to the City for approval at least 30 days prior to construction. All construction personnel shall be required to attend SPCC training prior to conducting any work on the project site. Impact Hazards -2: Would the proposed project create a MM HAZ-1: Preparation of a Site-specific Spill significant hazard to the public or the environment through Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the MM HAZ-2: Soils Test environment? Prior to construction, the applicant shall evaluate shallow soils at the structure locations for the possible presence Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation of lead and pesticides. If lead or pesticides are found Incorporated within the tested soils, the applicant shall dispose of the soils, consistent with federal, state and local laws regarding disposal of hazardous materials. Impact Hazards -3: Would the proposed project emit MM HAZ-1: Prepare and Implement a Site-specific hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? MM AIR -1: Construction Equipment Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Impact Hazards -7: Impair implementation of or physically MM HAZ-3: Project -specific Emergency Access Plan interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The Applicant shall develop and implement a Project specific Emergency Access Plan. The applicant shall Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation submit the plan to the City and all emergency services Incorporated within the city, including the fire department and police department, at least 30 days prior to construction. The Emergency Access Plan shall require provisions for the: a. Implementation of standard safety practices, including installation of appropriate barriers between work zones and transportation facilities, placement of appropriate signage, and use of traffic control devices. b. Use of flaggers and/or signage to guide vehicles through or around construction zones using proper techniques for construction activities, including staging yard entrance and exit. c. Traffic detours for any road or lane closures with 10 11 appropriate signage marking the detours. d. Timing of worker commutes and material deliveries to avoid peak commuting hours. e. Timing of lane and road closures. f. Plans for construction worker parking and transportation to work sites. g. Methods for keeping roadways clean. h. Storage of all equipment and materials in designated work areas in a manner that minimizes traffic obstructions and maximizes traffic sign visibility. i. Limiting vehicles to safe speed levels according to posted speed limits, road conditions, and weather conditions. j. Coordination with public transit providers. k. Repair of asphalt and other road damage (e.g., curb and gutter damage, rutting in unpaved roads) caused by construction vehicles. I. Detours for cyclists and pedestrians when bike lanes or sidewalks must be closed. The Emergency Access Plan must at a minimum comply with the requirements of the City and must be submitted to the City for approval prior to commencing construction activities. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact Hydrology -1: Would the proposed project violate MM HYDRO -1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Best any water quality standards or waste discharge Management Practices requirements? The applicant will implement the following best Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation management practices during construction of the Incorporated proposed project: • Preserve existing vegetation where feasible • Limit disturbance to the work site • Install silt fences around the perimeter of the project site 11 Impact Hydrology -6: Would the proposed project MM HAZ-1: Preparation of a Site-specific Spill otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Land Use and Planning Impact Land Use -2: Would the proposed project conflict MM TRAFFIC -2: Driveway Safety Enhancements (see with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of Impact Transportation 4, below) an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Noise Impact Noise -1: Would the proposed project expose MM NOISE -1: Prepare a Relocation Plan and Obtain persons to, or generate noise levels in excess of standards Approval from the City for Historic House Relocation established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or Outside of Permitted Construction Hours applicable standards of other agencies? The Applicant shall prepare a Relocation Plan and obtain Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation approval from the City under Municipal Code Section Incorporated 18.07.110 for historic house relocation. The Relocation Plan shall include: 1. Exact procedure for cutting and dismantling the historic house, and loading on trucks 2. Specific routes for movement of the historic house from its existing location to 524 Oak Grove Avenue 3. Exact procedure for setting the house in its new location 4. Estimated duration for the various activities involved in the cutting, dismantling, loading, and setting of the house 5. Coordination procedures with utilities, Caltrain, and appropriate City Departments 6. Advance Notice to residents at each project site and along the route regarding the start and duration of power interruption 7. Measures to reduce impacts of power outage on residents such as: 12 13 a. Power interruption phasing to reduce amount of time houses are affected b. Offering affected parties dry ice for freezers and refrigerators c. Offering generators for life support equipment d. Security lighting Approval from the City for relocating the historic house outside of permitted construction hours would be contingent on abiding by all the best management practices required under Condition of Approval 19, and the measures included in the Noise Management Plan for the project. MM NOISE -2: Compliance with Title 24 Prior to issuance of a building permit, a qualified acoustical consultant shall review the final building plans to calculate expected interior noise levels. The building permit shall not be issued until the qualified acoustical consultant has reviewed the acoustical test report of all sound rated windows and doors and confirmed that the proposed building treatments will adequately reduce interior noise levels to 45 dBA or below. Impact Noise -4: Would the proposed project result in MM NOISE -1: Prepare a Relocation Plan and Obtain substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise Approval from the City for Historic House Relocation levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without Outside of Permitted Construction Hours the project? MM NOISE -3: Noise Management Plan Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation The applicant shall prepare a noise management plan Incorporated that includes: a. Identified routes for movement of construction - related vehicles and equipment developed in conjunction with the Burlingame Community Development Department so that noise -sensitive areas, including residences and schools, are avoided as much as possible. b. A designated "Community Liaison' for construction activities. The Community Liaison would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise and vibration. The Community Liaison would determine the cause of the noise or vibration complaint and would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. c. Sending advance notice to neighborhood residents 13 14 within 50 feet of the project site regarding the construction schedule and including the phone number for the disturbance coordinator. A notice with the name and phone number of the Community Liaison shall be posted at the project site. In the event that construction noise complaints are not resolved by scheduling, the applicant shall install temporary sound absorption barriers, such as noise control blankets, in addition to the standard noise barriers around the construction site required under Condition of Approval 19, best management practices. These additional barriers would be specifically designed for exterior use and would reduce the noise level beyond the fence line by at least 3 dBA. If noise complaints continue, the applicant shall install a temporary sound absorption barrier that would reduce the noise level beyond the fence line an additional 2 dBA, for a total noise reduction of 5 dBA beyond the fence line. Transportation and Traffic Impact Transportation -1: Would the project conflict with MM TRAFFIC -1: Construction Management Plan an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing The project applicant and its construction contractor(s) measures of effectiveness for the performance of the shall develop a construction management plan for review circulation system, taking into account all modes of and approval by the City of Burlingame. The plan must transportation including mass transit and non -motorized include at least the following items and requirements to travel and relevant components of the circulation system, reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, traffic and including, but not limited to, intersections, streets, parking congestion during construction: highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? a. A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck trips and Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation deliveries to avoid peak traffic hours, detour signs if Incorporated required, lane closure procedures, signs, cones for drivers, and designated construction access routes; b. Identification of haul routes for movement of construction vehicles that would minimize impacts on motor vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, circulation and safety, and specifically to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible on streets in the project area; c. Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel regarding when major deliveries, detours, and lane closures would occur; d. Provisions for monitoring surface streets used for haul routes so that any damage and debris attributable to the haul trucks can be identified and 14 15 corrected by the project applicant.; e. A construction parking plan to provide worker parking off site and generally off neighborhood streets, with shuttles or other transportation as needed to transport workers to the site; and f. Designation of a readily available contact person for construction activities who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding traffic or parking. This coordinator would determine the cause of the complaint and, where necessary, would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. Impact Transportation -4: Would the project MM TRAFFIC -2: Driveway Safety Enhancements substantially increase hazards due to a design feature The project applicant and its construction (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or contractor(s) shall implement the following safety incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? enhancements: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation a. Flashing light sensors shall be placed within the Incorporated project parking garage and rear surface parking areas to alert motorists outbound from the project parking areas that vehicles are inbound from Douglas Avenue (these could be video or loop detected); b. Signs shall be placed at the proposed project's Douglas Avenue entrances that indicate: "Caution— Watch For Outbound Vehicles'; a c. The project design shall be modified to allow for 12 - foot access on the eastern -most driveway, except as necessary to avoid impact to the two significant trees. Toward the rear of the lot, that would require either loss of landscaping, further setback for the building (at least on the first floor), and/or loss of a parking space. Impact Transportation -5: Would the project MM HAZ-3: Project -specific Emergency Access Plan result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated 15 Transportation and Traffic Impact Utilities -8: Would the proposed project impact MM NOISE -1: Prepare a Relocation Plan and Obtain residents through shutoff of electrical utilities? Approval from the City for Historic House Relocation Outside of Permitted Construction Hours Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation incorporated iW EXHIBIT B Conditions of approval for Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Front Setback Landscape Variance, Parking Variance, and Tentative Parcel Map to merge the existing two parcels at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue; and conditions of approval for Design Review and Front Setback Variance at 524 Oak Grove. CONDITIONS: Conditions of Approval for 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped April 14, 2017, sheets A0.0 through A5.1, C1, AR1.0, L1.1, L1.2, and GP -1: 2. that as a community benefit freely offered by the applicant, the project shall include one one -bedroom unit and one two-bedroom unit set aside for a period of twenty-five (25) years for households with incomes of 110% of the Area Median Income (AMI) for the County of san Mateo. The City Manager shall be authorized to execute an agreement memorializing this provision; 3. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 4. that at all points along the length of the shared driveway located along the easterly side of the property, a minimum 9' driveway width at grade shall be maintained along the path of vehicular travel; 5. that the maximum elevation to the top of the parapet and roof shall not exceed elevation 80.96' and 77.71', respectively, as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Douglas Avenue (24.20') for a maximum height of 56-10" to the top of the parapet; the garage floor finished floor elevation shall be elevation 13.30'; and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; 6. that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 17 7. that prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the applicant shall pay the first half of the public facilities impact fee in the amount of $58,138.50, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Division; 8. that prior to scheduling the final framing inspection, the applicant shall pay the second half of the public facilities impact fee in the amount of $58,138.50, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Division; 9. that the guest/delivery parking stall shall be marked and designated on the plans, this stall shall not be assigned to any unit and shall always be accessible for parking and not be used for resident storage; 10. that if a security gate system across the driveway is installed in the future, the gate shall be installed a minimum 20'-0' back from the front property line; the security gate system shall include an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows residents to communicate with guests and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; 11. that the trash receptacles, furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; 12. that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 13. that all construction shall abide by the construction hours established in the municipal code; 14. that during construction, the applicant shall provide fencing (with a fabric screen or mesh) around the project site to ensure that all construction equipment, materials and debris is kept on site; 15. that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right- of-way shall be prohibited; 16. that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 17. that if construction is done during the wet season (October 1 through April 30), that prior to October 1 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoff by inspecting, maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding, mulching in matting, or tarping; rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored construction materials, fuels and other chemicals; 18. that this project shall comply with the state -mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 19. that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 20. that this proposal shall comply with all the requirements of the Tree Protection and Reforestation Ordinance adopted by the City of Burlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department; complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted at the time of building permit application and the street trees will be protected during construction as required by the City Arborist; 21. that project approvals shall be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump system; and the sump pump shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dual pumps, controls, level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators shall be housed so that they meet the City's noise requirement; 22. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 23. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 24. that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 25. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2016 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 24. that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; In consultation with the Community Development Director and where feasible, surface parking spaces at the rear of the property shall be assigned to residents of individual apartments within the development. 25. Directional signage shall be placed on the property to promote use of the circular driveway at the front of the property for pick-ups and deliveries. 19 26. The landscape planter at the northeasterly portion of the building, adjacent to the driveway shall be reduced in depth in order to permit widening of the driveway within that area. 27. The surface parking space at the northeast corner of the property shall be designed and marked as a compact parking space. The following four (4) conditions shall be met during the Building Inspection process prior to the inspections noted in each condition: 28. that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 29. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Division; 30. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; 31. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; Mitigation Measures from Environmental Impact Report: Aesthetics 32. MM AES -1: Design Review of the Proposed Project: The applicant shall submit revised plans for the proposed building at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue to the City of Burlingame for design review. The Planning Commission as the responsible body for design review shall review the proposed project for compatibility with the City's guidelines for a residential apartment building in the Downtown Specific Plan R-4 Base District. 33. MM AES -2: Exterior Lighting Plan: Prior to issuance of a building permit, a detailed Exterior Lighting Plan shall be provided. The lighting plan shall utilize the following standards: a) Control stray light through use of low -brightness fixtures with optical controls. b) Fully block all exterior light sources from off-site views. 20 c) Do not permit any uplighting from any outdoor light fixture. d) Employ on -demand exterior lighting systems where feasible. Area lighting and security lighting shall be controlled by the use of timed switches and/or motion detectors. e) Use tinted windows in all buildings to reduce glare from interior lights. 34. MM AES -3: Use of Non -reflective Exterior Paint: Flat, non -reflective paint or integrated coloring shall be used in all exterior building materials throughout the project. Air Quality 35. MM AIR -1: Construction Equipment Emissions Reduction: The construction contractor shall implement the BAAQMD Enhanced Exhaust Emissions Reduction Measures for Project Construction Equipment measure that requires project off-road equipment greater than 25 horsepower (hp) that operates for more than 20 total hours over the entire duration of construction activities to meet the following requirements: a) All backhoes engines shall meet CARB Tier 4 off-road emission standards. b) All other equipment engines shall meet or exceed CARB Tier 3 off-road emission standards or be retrofitted with a CARB Level 2 diesel particulate filter (DPF). 36. MM AIR -2: Air Filtration: A standard house heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system with a permanent filter of a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 13 or greater shall be installed at the relocated residence at 524 Oak Grove Avenue. The MERV13 filter shall provide one air exchange per hour if the air source is outside/unfiltered air or four air exchanges per hour if the air source is inside/recirculated air to provide an 80 percent or greater reduction of outdoor fine particulate matter (including DPM). Biological Resources 37. MM BIO -1: Pre -construction Bat Surveys The applicant shall implement the following measures during demolition of structures and tree removal or tree pruning. Structures. Before demolition of existing structures, a qualified bat specialist shall conduct a day time search for potential roosting habitat and evening emergence surveys to determine if the structure is being used as a roost. Biologists conducting surveys for roost sites shall use naked eye, binoculars, and a high power spotlight to inspect buildings features that could house bats. The surfaces of the structure and the ground around the structure shall be surveyed for bat signs, such as guano, staining, and prey remains. Evening (i.e., dusk) emergence surveys shall consist of at least one bat specialist positioned at different vantage points from the structure, watching for emerging bats from a half hour before sunset to 1 to 2 hours after sunset for a minimum of 2 nights 21 within the season that construction will be taking place. Night vision goggles or full spectrum acoustic detectors should be used during emergence surveys to assist in species identification. All emergence surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions (i.e., calm nights with temperatures conducive to bat activity [55° F and above] and no precipitation predicted). If roosting, special -status bats are present, measures developed by the bat specialist shall be implemented, as needed. Measures to protect the bats may include postponing demolition until after the May 1st through October 1st roosting period. Measures may include monitoring roosting to determine if the roost site is a maternal roost by either a visual inspection of the roost bat pups, or monitoring the roost after the adults leave for the night and listening for bat pups. Eviction of a maternal roost cannot occur because bat pups are not mature enough to leave the roost. If a roost is determined not to be a maternal roost, eviction of bats shall be conducted using bat exclusion techniques developed by Bat Conservation International and in consultation with CDFW that allow the bats to exit the roosting site, but prevent re-entry to the site. This work shall be completed by a BCI -recommended exclusion professional. The exclusion of bats shall be timed and carried out concurrently with any scheduled bird exclusion activities. Each roost lost (if any) shall be replaced in consultation with the CDFW and may include construction and installation of BCI - approved bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement shall be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the structures may be removed or sealed. Tree Removal. A qualified bat specialist shall examine trees to be removed or trimmed for suitable bat roosting habitat. High quality habitat features (large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark, larger snags, etc.) shall be identified and the area around these features searched for bats and bat sign (guano, culled insect parts, staining, etc.). The qualified bat specialist shall conduct evening visual emergence surveys of the source habitat feature, from a half hour before sunset to 1 to 2 hours after sunset for a minimum of two nights within the season that construction will be taking place. If it is found that roosting, special -status bats are present, measures developed by the bat specialist shall be implemented, as needed. 38. MM 13I0-2: Tree Protection Measures: Tree protection specifications were developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. for the protected trees surveyed at the Douglas Avenue and Oak Grove Avenue project sites. The applicant shall implement the following tree protection measures developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. and approved by the Arborist for protected trees. The Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. reports shall be included on the demolition and construction plans of the project. Mulching. A 6 -inch layer of coarse mulch woodchips shall be placed beneath the dripline of protected trees. Mulch is to be kept 12 inches from the trunk. Protective Barrier. A protective barrier or 6 -foot chain link fence shall be installed around the dripline of protected trees. The fencing can be moved within the dripline if WA authorized by the Project Arborist or the City Arborist, but no closer than 2 feet from the trunk of any tree. Fence posts shall be 1.5 inches in diameter and are to be driven 2 feet into the ground. The distance between posts shall not be more than 10 feet. This enclosed area is the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Moveable barriers or chain link fencing secured to cement blacks can be substituted for "fixed" fencing if the Project Arborist and City Arborist agree that the fencing would have to be moved to accommodate certain phases of construction. The applicant may not move the fence without authorization from the Project Arborist or City Arborist. Construction Restrictions. During construction, the following restrictions shall be implemented: a) Runoff or spillage of damaging materials to the area below any tree canopy shall not be allowed. b) Storing materials, stockpiling soils, or parking/driving vehicles within the TPZ is not allowed. c) Cutting, breaking, skinning, or bruising roots, branches, or trunks of protected trees is prohibited without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist. d) Fires shall not be allowed under and adjacent to trees. e) Discharging exhaust into foliage shall be prohibited. f) Securing cables, chains, or ropes to trees or shrubs is prohibited. g) Trenching, digging, or excavating within the dripline of the TPZ of trees is prohibited without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist. h) Applying soils sterilants under pavement near existing trees is prohibited. i) Machine trenching is prohibited within the driplines of trees, only excavation by hand or compressed air is allowed. Avoiding injury to roots. When a ditching machine, which is being used outside of the dripline of trees, encounters roots smaller than 2 inches, the wall of the trench adjacent to the street shall be hand trimmed, making clear, clean cuts through the roots. All damaged, torn, and cut roots shall be given a clean cut to remove ragged edges, which promote decay. Trenches shall be filled within 24 hours, but, where, this is not possible, the side of the trench adjacent to the trees shall be shaded with four layers of dampened, untreated burlap, wetted as frequently as necessary to keep the burlap wet. Roots 2 inches or larger, when encountered, shall be reported immediately to the Project Arborist, who will decide whether the applicant may cut the roots as mentioned above or shall excavate by hand or with compressed air under the root. The root is to be protected with dampened burlap. In addition, the top 2 feet of the foundation closest to trees shall 23 be air spaded or hand dug under supervision of a licensed arborist to locate and evaluate any significant roots prior to mechanical excavation. The licensed arborist shall be required to submit a report to the City regarding the findings of the excavation and recommend any additional actions needed to protect the roots to preserve the health and structure of both the redwood and oak trees. Routing pipes. To avoid conflict with routes, pipes shall be routed outside of an area, ten times the diameter of a protected tree. In addition, where it is not possible to reroute pipes or trenches, the applicant shall bore beneath the dripline of the tree. The boring shall take place not less than 3 feet below the surface of the soil in order to avoid encountering feeder roots. Reporting. The City Arborist, or his designee, shall be present when any digging occurs in the vicinity of the narrowest portion of the proposed shared driveway in the vicinity of the root ball of the adjacent protected tree to ensure that all appropriate measures are taken to protect the tree roots, If a protected tree is damaged, the applicant shall follow any remedial actions deemed necessary by the City Arborist, such as planting additional trees, consistent with Chapter 11.06.090. Cultural Resources 39. MM CUL -1: Compatible Cladding for Historic House: New construction on the relocated historic house shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, to protect the integrity of the property and its environment consistent with the Secretary of Interior's standards for rehabilitation. The choice of materials shall be submitted to the City for approval as part of the design review process. Geology and Soils 40. MM GEO-1: Implementation of Geotechnical Recommendations: The Applicant and their contractors shall implement the measures outlined and recommended in the Geotechnical Investigation Report Chapters 5 through 10 for the proposed construction at 1128-1132 Douglas Avenue. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 41. MM HAZ-1: Preparation of a Site-specific Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan: The applicant shall prepare a site-specific Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan that will identify spill prevention and response measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs). The plan will emphasize site specific physical conditions to improve hazard prevention (e.g., identification of flow paths to nearest drains) and reduce effects of accidental spills if they occur. The Applicant shall designate a representative to ensure that all hazardous materials and safety plans are followed throughout the construction period. BMPs identified in SPCC Plan shall be implemented during project construction to minimize the risk of an 24 accidental release and to provide the necessary information for emergency response. A copy of the project SPCC shall be submitted to the City for approval at least 30 days prior to construction. All construction personnel shall be required to attend SPCC training prior to conducting any work on the project site. 42. MM HAZ-2: Soils Test: Prior to construction, the applicant shall evaluate shallow soils at the structure locations for the possible presence of lead and pesticides. If lead or pesticides are found within the tested soils, the applicant shall dispose of the soils, consistent with federal, state and local laws regarding disposal of hazardous materials. Hydrology and Water Quality 43. MM HAZ-3: Project -specific Emergency Access Plan: The Applicant shall develop and implement a Project specific Emergency Access Plan. The applicant shall submit the plan to the City and all emergency services within the city, including the fire department and police department, at least 30 days prior to construction. The Emergency Access Plan shall require provisions for the: a) Implementation of standard safety practices, including installation of appropriate barriers between work zones and transportation facilities, placement of appropriate signage, and use of traffic control devices. b) Use of flaggers and/or signage to guide vehicles through or around construction zones using proper techniques for construction activities, including staging yard entrance and exit. c) Traffic detours for any road or lane closures with appropriate signage marking the detours. d) Timing of worker commutes and material deliveries to avoid peak commuting hours. e) Timing of lane and road closures. f) Plans for construction worker parking and transportation to work sites. g) Methods for keeping roadways clean. h) Storage of all equipment and materials in designated work areas in a manner that minimizes traffic obstructions and maximizes traffic sign visibility. i) Limiting vehicles to safe speed levels according to posted speed limits, road conditions, and weather conditions. j) Coordination with public transit providers. 25 k) Repair of asphalt and other road damage (e.g., curb and gutter damage, rutting in unpaved roads) caused by construction vehicles. 1) Detours for cyclists and pedestrians when bike lanes or sidewalks must be closed. The Emergency Access Plan must at a minimum comply with the requirements of the City and must be submitted to the City for approval prior to commencing construction activities. Hydrology and Water Quality 44. MM HYDRO -1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Best Management Practices: The applicant will implement the following best management practices during construction of the proposed project: a) Preserve existing vegetation where feasible. b) Limit disturbance to the work site. c) Install silt fences around the perimeter of the project site. Noise 45. MM NOISE -1: Prepare a Relocation Plan and Obtain Approval from the City for Historic House Relocation Outside of Permitted Construction Hours: The Applicant shall prepare a Relocation Plan and obtain approval from the City under Municipal Code Section 18.07.110 for historic house relocation. The Relocation Plan shall include: 1. Exact procedure for cutting and dismantling the historic house, and loading on trucks. 2. Specific routes for movement of the historic house from its existing location to 524 Oak Grove Avenue. 3. Exact procedure for setting the house in its new location. 4. Estimated duration for the various activities involved in the cutting, dismantling, loading, and setting of the House. 5. Coordination procedures with utilities, Caltrain, and appropriate City Departments. 6. Advance Notice to residents at each project site and along the route regarding the start and duration of power interruption. 7. Measures to reduce impacts of power outage on residents such as: a) Power interruption phasing to reduce amount of time houses are affected. 26 b) Offering affected parties dry ice for freezers and refrigerators. c) Offering generators for life support equipment. d) Security lighting. Approval from the City for relocating the historic house outside of permitted construction hours would be contingent on abiding by all the best management practices required under Condition of Approval 19, and the measures included in the Noise Management Plan for the project. 46. MM NOISE -2: Compliance with Title 24: Prior to issuance of a building permit, a qualified acoustical consultant shall review the final building plans to calculate expected interior noise levels. The building permit shall not be issued until the qualified acoustical consultant has reviewed the acoustical test report of all sound rated windows and doors and confirmed that the proposed building treatments will adequately reduce interior noise levels to 45 dBA or below. 47. MM NOISE -3: Noise Management Plan: The applicant shall prepare a noise management plan that includes: a. Identified routes for movement of construction -related vehicles and equipment developed in conjunction with the Burlingame Community Development Department so that noise -sensitive areas, including residences and schools, are avoided as much as possible. b. A designated "Community Liaison" for construction activities. The Community Liaison would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise and vibration. The Community Liaison would determine the cause of the noise or vibration complaint and would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. c. Sending advance notice to neighborhood residents within 50 feet of the project site regarding the construction schedule and including the phone number for the disturbance coordinator. A notice with the name and phone number of the Community Liaison shall be posted at the project site. In the event that construction noise complaints are not resolved by scheduling, the applicant shall install temporary sound absorption barriers, such as noise control blankets, in addition to the standard noise barriers around the construction site required under Condition of Approval 19, best management practices. These additional barriers would be specifically designed for exterior use and would reduce the noise level beyond the fence line by at least 3 dBA. If noise complaints continue, the applicant shall install a temporary sound absorption barrier that would reduce the noise level beyond the fence line an additional 2 dBA, for a total noise reduction of 5 dBA beyond the fence line. 27 Transportation and Traffic 48. MM TRAFFIC -1: Construction Management Plan: The project applicant and its construction contractor(s) shall develop a construction management plan for review and approval by the City of Burlingame. The plan must include at least the following items and requirements to reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, traffic and parking congestion during construction: a. A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck trips and deliveries to avoid peak traffic hours, detour signs if required, lane closure procedures, signs, cones for drivers, and designated construction access routes; b. Identification of haul routes for movement of construction vehicles that would minimize impacts on motor vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, circulation and safety, and specifically to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible on streets in the project area; c. Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel regarding when major deliveries, detours, and lane closures would occur; d. Provisions for monitoring surface streets used for haul routes so that any damage and debris attributable to the haul trucks can be identified and corrected by the project applicant.; e. A construction parking plan to provide worker parking off site and generally off neighborhood streets, with shuttles or other transportation as needed to transport workers to the site; and f. Designation of a readily available contact person for construction activities who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding traffic or parking. This coordinator would determine the cause of the complaint and, where necessary, would implement reasonable measures to correct the problem. 49. MM TRAFFIC -2: Driveway Safety Enhancements: The project applicant and its construction contractor(s) shall implement the following safety enhancements: a. Flashing light sensors shall be placed within the project parking garage and rear surface parking areas to alert motorists outbound from the project parking areas that vehicles are inbound from Douglas Avenue (these could be video or loop detected); b. Signs shall be placed at the proposed project's Douglas Avenue entrances that indicate: "Caution—Watch For Outbound Vehicles'; and W c. The project design shall be modified to allow for 12 -foot access on the eastern -most driveway, except as necessary to avoid impact to the two significant trees. Toward the rear of the lot, that would require either loss of landscaping, further setback for the building (at least on the first floor), and/or loss of a parking space. Conditions of Approval for 524 Oak Grove Avenue: 1. that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Division date stamped December 22, 2014, sheets A0.0 through A5.1, AR1.0, L1.1, L1.2, and GP1; 2. that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, windows, architectural features, roof height or pitch, and amount or type of hardscape materials shall be subject to Planning Division or Planning Commission review (FYI or amendment to be determined by Planning staff); 3. that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), shall require an amendment to this permit; 4. that any recycling containers, debris boxes or dumpsters for the construction project shall be placed upon the private property, if feasible, as determined by the Community Development Director; 5. that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 6. that prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the project, the project construction plans shall be modified to include a cover sheet listing all conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; which shall remain a part of all sets of approved plans throughout the construction process. Compliance with all conditions of approval is required; the conditions of approval shall not be modified or changed without the approval of the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal; 7. that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8. that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 29 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2013 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET DURING THE BUILDING INSPECTION PROCESS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTIONS NOTED IN EACH CONDITION: 10. that prior to scheduling the framing inspection the applicant shall provide a certification by the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, that demonstrates that the project falls at or below the maximum approved floor area ratio for the property; 11. prior to scheduling the framing inspection the project architect or residential designer, or another architect or residential design professional, shall provide an architectural certification that the architectural details shown in the approved design which should be evident at framing, such as window locations and bays, are built as shown on the approved plans; architectural certification documenting framing compliance with approved design shall be submitted to the Building Division before the final framing inspection shall be scheduled; 12. that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Division; and 13. that prior to final inspection, Planning Division staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans. Mitigation Measures from Environmental Impact Report Air Quality 14. MM AIR -2: Air Filtration: A standard house heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system with a permanent filter of a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 13 or greater shall be installed at the relocated residence at 524 Oak Grove Avenue. The MERV13 filter shall provide one air exchange per hour if the air source is outside/unfiltered air or four air exchanges per hour if the air source is inside/recirculated air to provide an 80 percent or greater reduction of outdoor fine particulate matter (including DPM). Biological Resources 15. MM BIO -2: Tree Protection Measures: Tree protection specifications were developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. for the protected trees surveyed at the Douglas Avenue and Oak Grove Avenue project sites. The applicant shall implement the following tree protection measures developed by Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. and 0 approved by the Arborist for protected trees. The Mayne Tree Expert Company Inc. reports shall be included on the demolition and construction plans of the project. Mulching. A 6 -inch layer of coarse mulch woodchips shall be placed beneath the dripline of protected trees. Mulch is to be kept 12 inches from the trunk. Protective Barrier. A protective barrier or 6 -foot chain link fence shall be installed around the dripline of protected trees. The fencing can be moved within the dripline if authorized by the Project Arborist or the City Arborist, but no closer than 2 feet from the trunk of any tree. Fence posts shall be 1.5 inches in diameter and are to be driven 2 feet into the ground. The distance between posts shall not be more than 10 feet. This enclosed area is the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Moveable barriers or chain link fencing secured to cement blacks can be substituted for "fixed" fencing if the Project Arborist and City Arborist agree that the fencing would have to be moved to accommodate certain phases of construction. The applicant may not move the fence without authorization from the Project Arborist or City Arborist. Construction Restrictions. During construction, the following restrictions shall be implemented: a) Runoff or spillage of damaging materials to the area below any tree canopy shall not be allowed. b) Storing materials, stockpiling soils, or parking/driving vehicles within the TPZ is not allowed. c) Cutting, breaking, skinning, or bruising roots, branches, or trunks of protected trees is prohibited without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist. d) Fires shall not be allowed under and adjacent to trees. e) Discharging exhaust into foliage shall be prohibited. f) Securing cables, chains, or ropes to trees or shrubs is prohibited. g) Trenching, digging, or excavating within the dripline of the TPZ of trees is prohibited without first obtaining authorization from the City Arborist. h) Applying soils sterilants under pavement near existing trees is prohibited. i) Machine trenching is prohibited within the driplines of trees, only excavation by hand or compressed air is allowed. Avoiding injury to roots. When a ditching machine, which is being used outside of the dripline of trees, encounters roots smaller than 2 inches, the wall of the trench adjacent to the street shall be hand trimmed, making clear, clean cuts through the roots. All 31 damaged, torn, and cut roots shall be given a clean cut to remove ragged edges, which promote decay. Trenches shall be filled within 24 hours, but, where, this is not possible, the side of the trench adjacent to the trees shall be shaded with four layers of dampened, untreated burlap, wetted as frequently as necessary to keep the burlap wet. Roots 2 inches or larger, when encountered, shall be reported immediately to the Project Arborist, who will decide whether the applicant may cut the roots as mentioned above or shall excavate by hand or with compressed air under the root. The root is to be protected with dampened burlap. In addition, the top 2 feet of the foundation closest to trees shall be air spaded or hand dug under supervision of a licensed arborist to locate and evaluate any significant roots prior to mechanical excavation. The licensed arborist shall be required to submit a report to the City regarding the findings of the excavation and recommend any additional actions needed to protect the roots to preserve the health and structure of both the redwood and oak trees. Routing pipes. To avoid conflict with routes, pipes shall be routed outside of an area, ten times the diameter of a protected tree. In addition, where it is not possible to reroute pipes or trenches, the applicant shall bore beneath the dripline of the tree. The boring shall take place not less than 3 feet below the surface of the soil in order to avoid encountering feeder roots. Reporting. Any damage due to construction activities shall be reported to the Project Arborist or City Arborist within 6 hours. If a protected tree is damaged, the applicant shall follow any remedial actions deemed necessary by the City Arborist, such as planting additional trees, consistent with Chapter 11.06.090. Cultural Resources 16. MM CUL -1: Compatible Cladding for Historic House: New construction on the relocated historic house shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, to protect the integrity of the property and its environment consistent with the Secretary of Interior's standards for rehabilitation. The choice of materials shall be submitted to the City for approval as part of the design review process. Noise 17. MM NOISE -1: Prepare a Relocation Plan and Obtain Approval from the City for Historic House Relocation Outside of Permitted Construction Hours: The Applicant shall prepare a Relocation Plan and obtain approval from the City under Municipal Code Section 18.07.110 for historic house relocation. The Relocation Plan shall include: 1. Exact procedure for cutting and dismantling the historic house, and loading on trucks. 32 2. Specific routes for movement of the historic house from its existing location to 524 Oak Grove Avenue. 3. Exact procedure for setting the house in its new location. 4. Estimated duration for the various activities involved in the cutting, dismantling, loading, and setting of the House. 5. Coordination procedures with utilities, Caltrain, and appropriate City Departments. 6. Advance Notice to residents at each project site and along the route regarding the start and duration of power interruption. 7. Measures to reduce impacts of power outage on residents such as: a) Power interruption phasing to reduce amount of time houses are affected. b) Offering affected parties dry ice for freezers and refrigerators. c) Offering generators for life support equipment. d) Security lighting. Approval from the City for relocating the historic house outside of permitted construction hours would be contingent on abiding by all the best management practices required under Condition of Approval 19, and the measures included in the Noise Management Plan for the project. 33