Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet - CC - 2006.04.17
1104 m, E BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame "a Regular Meeting—Monday,April 17, 2006 501 Primrose Road o Burlingame,CA 94010 "�•��'��� Page 1 of 3 650 558-7200 CLOSED SESSION 6:45 p.m. Conf Room A a. Threatened Litigation(Government Code § 54956.9(b)(1),(3)(C)) Claim of Christie West Claim of Linda Tachis Claim of Gerald Posey 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES—Regular Council Meeting of April 3, 2006 Approve 5. PUBLIC HEARING The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each a. Consider adoption of change in assessments for the Hearing/Action Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District and proposed assessments and programs/activities for 2006-2007 in the District by: (i) Hold a Public Meeting to receive public comments on proposals; and (ii) Introduce Ordinance amending Chapter 6.54 to balance the assessment basis b. Public Hearing and action on an Ordinance for proposed Hearing/Action zoning for the Anza Point North Zoning District to implement the Bayfront Specific Plan c. Six month evaluation of temporary stop signs on Cortez Discuss/Update Avenue at Sherman Avenue 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law prohibits council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a "request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Resolution approving North Bayside System Unit (NBSU) agreement BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame BURLJNGAME Regular Meeting—Monday, April 17, 2006 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 �°••��6'e,, Page 2 of 3 650 558-7200 b. Resolution approving amended maintenance agreement with Caltrans c. Tentative condominium map and tentative final parcel map for lot combination of portions of Lot 14, Block 10, atl441-1445 Bellevue Avenue d. Resolution authorizing the collection of sidewalk repair costs by the San Mateo County Assessor's Office for the 2005 Sidewalk Maintenance Program e. Resolution awarding Airport Boulevard resurfacing project to G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. f. Warrants& Payroll 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 10. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law prohibits council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS a. Set hearing for 1416 Balboa Avenue Set Hearing 13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Traffic, Safety & Parking , January 12 & February 9, 2006; Library, February 21, 2006 and March 1, 2006; Planning, April 10, 2006 b. Department Reports: Police, February, 2006; Building, March, 2006; Finance, March, 2006 c. Rollins Road Zoning and Anza North Point Zoning Study Session minutes of March 29, 2006 d. Memorandum from Fire Chief Bill Reilly to City Council concerning local radio station for disaster information CITY euRUNcae BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting—Monday, April 17,2006 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 •,.•.,,.�•''m Page 3 of 3 650 558-7200 14. ADJOURNMENT Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall 501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlin ag me.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Monday, May 1, 2006 CITY BURLJNGAME m MwTCD./uta[6. BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of April 3, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Cathy Baylock called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Katie O'Brien. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Cohen, Keighran, Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. MINUTES Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 20, 2006 regular Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 18, 2006 Joint Planning Commission and Council meeting; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. PRESENTATION a. PRESENTATION ON TREE PLANTING BY PENINSULA TEMPLE SHOLOM AT CUERNAVACA PARK PR&D Schwartz introduced Rabbi Raiskin who spoke about Arbor Day as celebrated by the Jewish faith. To commemorate the event, members of Peninsula Temple Sholom planted 40 trees in Cuernavaca Park on February 12th. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. ADOPTION OF BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION SETTING 2006-2007 ASSESSMENTS FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council to hold a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 17-2006 setting 2006-07 assessments. 1 Burlingame City Council April 3, 2006 Unapproved Minutes Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 17-2006 establishing 2006-07 assessments for the Broadway Area Business Improvement District; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. (i) ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1779 AMENDING THE EXISTING CITY MUNICIPAL CODE (SECTION 13.40) TO ALLOW FOR A PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM ON SPECIFIED PUBLIC STREETS AND (ii) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 19-2006 APPROVING THE PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM IN LONG TERM CITY PARKING LOTS COP Van Etten reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance No. 1779 amending the City Municipal Code to allow for a parking permit program on specified public streets and to adopt Resolution No. 19-2006 approving the parking permit program in long term City parking lots. Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 1779 to provide a parking permit program on specified blocks where long term parking meters are located in the Burlingame Avenue area; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 19-2006 approving issuance of parking permits in the Burlingame Avenue area; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. C. (i) INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AND (ii) APPROVE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO AMEND THE CONTRACT FOR POLICE EMPLOYEES WITH THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CAPERS) AND THE CITY OF BURLINGAME HRD Dolan reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance and approve the Resolution of Intention to amend the contract for Police employees with CalPERS and the City of Burlingame. Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen to read the title of the proposed ordinance authorizing an amendment to contract between the City of Burlingame and the California Public Employees' Retirement System (Ca1PERS) to provide Section 21362.2 Benefits (3% at 50 full formula) to local Police members. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. 2 Burlingame City Council April 3,2006 Unapproved Minutes Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 22-2006, Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City of Burlingame; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the floor. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN CP Monroe reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance for proposed zoning for the Anza Point North Zoning District to implement the Bayfront Specific Plan. Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Title 25 to adopt the Anza Point North District and establish classification determination. Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. b. UPDATE ON THE PLANS FOR BURLINGAME'S CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report and provided an update on the structure and progress of the Centennial Steering Committee and its three standing committees: Finance, Events and Marketing which together will facilitate four major citywide events starting in June 2007 to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Burlingame Fire Department and ending with a Centennial Gala on June 6, 2008, which is the City's 100th anniversary. C. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF THE ANNUAL ALARM PERMIT FEES AND FALSE ALARM CHARGES COP Van Etten reviewed the staff report and provided Council information on alarm permit fees and false alarm charges and requested Council to provide direction on any action or changes to be taken by staff. After Council discussion of the various options suggested by staff, Council majority favored reducing annual permit fees and requested that false alarm fees be tiered so that City funds would maintain a revenue-neutral status. Vice Mayor Nagel suggested the following fees: the first false alarm, No Charge; 2-3 false alarms - $50 each; 4-5, $100 each; and 6 or more, $150 each. Mayor Baylock suggested a higher fee for false alarms occurring at non-permitted sites. Staff will return to Council in the near future with a formal request to amend the fees as discussed. 3 Burlingame City Council April 3,2006 Unapproved Minutes 9. CONSENT CALENDAR a. APPROVE ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-06 AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO CHANGE AND IMPOSE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006- 2007 FinDir Nava requested Council approve the Burlingame Avenue Area BID's 2005-06 Annual Report and adopt Resolution No. 21-2006, Resolution of Intention to adopt an ordinance that would increase certain assessment levels in the Burlingame Avenue BID to establish 2006-07 assessments for the BID and approving 2005-06 Annual Report. b. EMPLOYER PICKUP RESOLUTION—PRE-TAX PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR SERVICE CREDIT PURCHASES HRD Dolan requested Council approve Resolution No. 20-2006, Employer Pickup resolution Pre-tax Payroll Deduction Plan for service credit purchases (Contribution Code 14). C. APPROVAL FOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ART & JAZZ FESTIVAL, AUGUST 12 AND 13, 2006 EA Shinday requested Council approve the Chamber of Commerce Art & Jazz Festival event to be held on the weekend of August 12 and 13, 2006. d. RESOLUTION NO. 18-2006 ACCEPTING SANCHEZ CREEK BOX CULVERTS CLEANING FROM CAROLAN AVENUE TO SANCHEZ LAGOON BY JMB CONSTRUCTION DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 18-2006 accepting Sanchez Creek Box Culvert Cleaning from Carolan Avenue to Sanchez Lagoon by JMB Construction. e. AMEND 2006 CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR TO ADD A REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 22, 2006,AT 6 :00 P.M. CA Anderson requested Council approve amending the 2006 City Council Calendar by adding a regular City Council meeting on May 22, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. in the Lane Community Room at the Library. Councilman Cohen recused himself from voting on Item a. of the Consent Calendar. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Items b. through e. of the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Item a. of the Consent Calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Cohen abstained). 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 4 Burlingame City Council April 3, 2006 Unapproved Minutes 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, reminded the public to turn off automatic water sprinklers during wet weather. She also suggested an underground pedestrian tunnel for Burlingame Train Station. There were no further comments from the floor. 12. OLD BUSINESS a. RESOLUTION NO. 16-2006 APPROVING EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH VB GOLF II TO OPERATE THE BURLINGAME GOLF CENTER P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report to reconsider Resolution No. 16-2006 approving extension of the agreement with VB Golf II to operate the Burlingame Golf Center. After discussion and confirmation that Resolution No. 16-2006 extended the agreement to June 30, 2013, with direction for a 3-year checkpoint on performance in 2009, Council agreed that there was no need for further reconsideration of the agreement extension. 13. NEW BUSINESS a. OUTLINE OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATIONS FOR DISCUSSION CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council to direct staff whether to return for further discussion following decisions in pending cases in the U.S. Supreme Court. Vice Mayor Nagel stated that there should be a limit on loans by a candidate to a campaign to prevent special interest groups from establishing a foothold in the process. She would also like to impose limits on the amount an individual or a political action committee could contribute and would like to see campaign disclosure forms (Fair Political Practices Commission Form 460)posted on the City's website in the future. Councilman Cohen suggested removal of the matching funds option from further discussion. Vice Mayor Nagel would like this item to be scheduled for further discussion in June. b. REMOVAL OF CAMPAIGN SIGNS Councilman Cohen asked about the process to ensure removal of campaign signs after an election and recommended adopting a fee if there is a cost to the City. CA Anderson stated that the current policy is for the City to remove signs that remain posted after an election. Staff will present a recommended fee structure to Council in the near future. c. NEW SPEED LIMITS POSTED Vice Mayor Nagel asked for a rundown of the recent changes in speed limits. COP Van Etten advised that as a result of recently completed speed surveys by Engineering, speed limits have been reduced from 35 to 30 mph on California Drive, Rollins Road and Airport Boulevard. 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Parks &Recreation, February 16, 2006; Planning, March 27, 2006 5 Burlingame City Council April 3,2006 Unapproved Minutes b. Letter from Comcast concerning programming changes c. Burlingame Avenue Train Station Study Session minutes of March 28, 2006 15. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Baylock adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 6 Burlingame City Council April 3,2006 Unapproved Minutes CITY AGENDA 5a ITEM# BURLJNGAME MAG. aF9 DATE 4/17/2006 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED BY DATE: April 11, 2006 APPROVE BY FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF CHANGE IN ASSESSMENTS FOR THE BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS AND PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES FOR 2006-2007 IN THE DISTRICT BY: 1. HOLDING PUBLIC MEETING TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSALS; AND 2. INTRODUCING ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.54 TO BALANCE THE ASSESSMENT BASIS RECOMMENDATION: 1. Hold public meeting to receive public comments on proposed change in assessments in the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District and proposed assessments and programs/activities for 2006-2007; and 2. Introduce ordinance to change assessment basis for District by: a. Request City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. b. Waive further reading of the ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. d. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 5 days before proposed adoption. DISCUSSION: On April 3, 2006, the Council adopted a resolution of intention to consider changes in the assessment basis in the Burlingame Avenue Area BID and to establish 2006-2007 assessments. Following that meeting, the resolution together with a notice indicating the proposed assessment for the each addressee business was mailed to each business in the District. The resolution is also being published in the San Mateo Times. At this meeting, the Council will receive comments and testimony and will decide whether to introduce the proposed ordinance making the proposed changes in the assessments. The changes in assessments would generally increase the assessments on larger stores and restaurants in the District and reduce the assessments on the smaller service and professional operations. A comparison is attached to this report. Mayor and Council Re: First Public Meeting on Burlingame Avenue Area BID Assessment Changes, 2006-2007 Assessments, and Ordinance Introduction April 11, 2006 Page 2 Any protests that are made to the proposed changes, the proposed assessments, or the proposed programs and activities will have to be filed in writing by the start of the public hearing on May 22, 2006, at approximately 6:00 p.m. The projected assessments would raise about $140,00 per year. A majority of the assessed amount is required in order to constitute a majority protest as to the proposed changes in assessments, the proposed improvements or activities, or the proposed 2006-2007 assessments. Therefore, each protesting business' value is correlated to the proposed assessment. Attachments Proposed ordinance Projected assessments spreadsheet Comparison of assessments Letter of March 29, 2006, from Quent Cordair Distribution Burlingame Avenue Area BID Finance Director I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 6.54 (BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT 3 DISTRICT) TO BALANCE ASSESSMENT BASIS 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1. Chapter 6.54 was adopted in May 2004 to form the Burlingame Avenue Area 8 Business Improvement District pursuant to the provisions of the Parking and Business 9 Improvement Area Law of 1989, as codified in California Streets and Highways Code sections 10 36500 and following. The District Advisory Board has requested the City to amend the ordinance 11 to rebalance the maximum assessments allowed in the District. The proposed changes reflect the 12 experience of two years in the District and where the benefits from the expenditures seem to be best 13 identified, including parking improvements, advertising, and shuttle services. 14 15 Section 2. Section 6.54.040 is amended to read as follows: 16 Section 6.54.040 Establishment of Benefit Assessments. 17 All businesses located within the District boundaries shall pay an annual benefit assessment 18 to the district for each fiscal year as levied by the city council. The annual amount for each type 19 of business shall not exceed the following amount without adoption of an ordinance amendment 20 pursuant to state law: 21 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT 22 BUSINESS TYPE NO. OF STAFF ** SUBAREA A SUBAREA B 23 RETAIL & 10+ $1,000 $750 ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------ 24 RESTAURANT & 5 - 9 $600 $400 ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------ 25 FINANCIAL 1 - 4 $350 $250 26 SERVICE & ---------1 10+----------- ---------$1,000--------------- -------$500$500 ------ 27 ---------5--9--------- ---------$350--------- -------$200------ PROFESSIONAL 28 1 - 4 $100 $50 4/17/2006 1 I Section 3. A new subsection Section 6.54.010(i) is added to read as follows: 2 (i)"Staff'means any persons working(full time or full time equivalency)including owners, 3 partners, managers, employees, family members, or otherwise in the business location. 4 5 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 6 7 8 Mayor 9 10 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the I I foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council held on the day of 12 , 2006, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on 13 the day of , 2006, by the following vote: 14 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 15 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 16 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 17 18 City Clerk 19 20 U:TILE S\B[DBGAMEAV\reassessment2006.ord.wpd 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4/1712006 2 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 19182 A6 350.00 FIREWHITE CONSULTING INC MARCIA KADANOFF _ 1105 BURLINGAME AVE 15113 Al 350.00 FGF HOLDINGS LLC DBA FOUR GREEN FIELDS JAMES P CURLEY 1107 BURLINGAME AVE 21179 Al 350.00 CLEAR MOBILE INC ERIC SHIEH 1109 BURLINGAME AVE 06119 A5 100.00 BALMACARA PRODUCTIONS INC JAMES I FORDWOOD 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#205 07201 A5 100.00 DON SNIDER&ASSOCIATES DON G.SNIDER _ 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#304 11907 A5 100.00 HEALTHY HORIZONS SHEILA DUKAS-JANAKOS,M.P.H. 1110 BURLINGAME AVE.#106 13925 A5 100.00 ANNIE'S NAIL SALON ANNIE LEUNG 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#108 16038 AS 100.00 BURLINGAME PILATES STUDIO KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#102 17133 A5 100.00 CRARY ENTERPRISES LLC JOHN CRARY 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#204 17452 A5 100.00 SEABURY VENTURE PARTNERS MICHAEL J FITZPATRICK 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#300 19420 A5 100.00 DIAMONDS A FINE HAND&FEET SPA DUNG HOANG DU/NHU THUY NGUYEN 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#103 19677 A5 100.001 SALON 212-ERICA SAVAGE ERICA SAVAGE 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#212 20711 A5 100.00 LOOPNET,INC DBA BIZBUYSELL MARIA VALLES 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#202 21036 Al 350.00 JOANA'S EXCLUSIVE FASHIONS JOANA GUTIERREZ 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#105 21076 A5 100.00 SKIN ENVY JENNIFER LEE 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#107 34961 A5 100.00 THE ZEKA GROUP INC. LOUISA ZEE KAO 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#400 35078 A5 100.00 MURPHY WOOD INCORPORATED LORENZ KAO 1110 BURLINGAME AVE#503 21292 A2 600.00 LULULEMON ATHLETICA DENNIS WILSON 1111 BURLINGAME AVE. 20172 Al 350.001 HAZARD SHOES WOO JIN KANG 1112 BURLINGAME AVENUE 17705 A2 600.00 CHICO'S#274 CHICO'S#274 1113 BURLINGAME AVE 19708 Al 350.00 SW BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS/CINGULAR WIRELESS SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYS 1118 BURLINGAME AVE 12355 A3 1,000.00 LA SALSA FRESH MEXICAN GRILL#74 ATTN HILDA SANDOVAL LA SALSA HOLDING CO 1125 BURLINGAME AVE 20892 Al 350,00 DESIGN WITHIN REACH WAYNE BADOVINUS 1150-52 BURLINGAME AVE 09357 A3 1,000.00 STARBUCKS COFFEE CO#523 STARBUCKS COFFEE/D GRIFE MGR 1160 BURLINGAME AVE 18920 Al 350.00 THE LUGGAGE CENTER LUGGAGE&LEATHER INC 1200 BURLINGAME AVE 14409 A3 1,000.00 THE GYMBOREE STORES INC#409 THE GYMBOREE STORES INC 1202 BURLINGAME AVE 20055 A3 1,000.00 GYMBOREE STORES DBA JANIE&JACK#938 GYMBOREE STORES INC 1202 BURLINGAME AVE 05931 A5 100.00 KAREL CAPITAL,INC. JAMES F. KAREL 1204 BURLINGAME AVE#3 08872 A5 100.00 PAMELA RUDD PHD. DR.PAMELA RUDD 1204 BURLINGAME AVE.#5 09281 A5 100.00 ROBERT E PISANO,ATTORNEY AT LAW ROBERT PISANO 1204 BURLINGAME AVE#4 11245 A5 100.00 CALIFORNIA CANDY COMPANY CHERYL J.ENRIGHT 1204 BURLINGAME AVE#6 20903 A5 100.00 HRH ARCHITECTURE HAMID HEKMAT,AIA 1204 BURLINGAME AVE#7 21358 AS 100.00 RANDOM ACCESS DESIGN LLC ELLEN MINER/TIM STEPHENSON 1204 BURLINGAME AVE#8 18989 A3 1,000.00 SEPHORA USA LLC SEPHORA USA LLC 1205 BURLINGAME AVE 19088 A3 1,000.00 ROUND TABLE PIZZA ROUND TABLE DEVELOPMENT CO 1207 BURLINGAME AVE 18133 A2 600.00 LUCY ACTIVEWEAR,INC.DBA LUCY _ LUCY.COM INC 1208 BURLINGAME AVE#37 05891 A5 100.00 R-SLICE LTD. RONALD M KARP 1209 BURLINGAME AVE 45088 A5 100.00 KARP COMPANIES/CALIF.REALTY JOSEPH KARP 1209 BURLINGAME AVE 15141 Al 350.00 KUPFER JEWELRY CENTER KONSTANTIN KUPFER 1211 BURLINGAME AVE 09477 Al 350.00 KING YUAN RESTAURANT YUH MING WANG 1213 BURLINGAME AVE 17981 A5 100.00 SERENE MICHELLE SAUNDERS 1214 BURLINGAME AVE 17991 Al 350.00 JACADI WON HYUNG LEE 1215 BURLINGAME AVE 48991 A3 1,000.00 COPENHAGEN BAKERY&COFFEE SHOP RALPH M NEILSON 1216 BURLINGAME AVE 17561 A5 100.00 L'ESCAPE SPA JENNIFER 0 PHAM 1217 BURLINGAME AVE 20940 A5 100.00 L'ESCAPE SPA SALON-DEMETRIO CAHAPISAN JR DEMETRIO CAHAPISAN JR 1217 BURLINGAME AVE 12867 A3 1,000.00 POTTERY BARN#281 WILLIAMS SONOMA STORES,LLC 1218 BURLINGAME AVE 13701 A3 1,000.00 BANANA REPUBLIC#8274 BANANA REPUBLIC LLC 1218 BURLINGAME AVE 08297 A3 1,000.00 LA SCALA LA SCALA CORP 1219 BURLINGAME AVE 05602 A2 600.00 THE BOMBAY COMPANY#475 THE BOMBAY COMPANY CORP 1223-1225 BURLINGAME AVE 10862 A2 600.00 PAPER PANACHE ITINA ARMSTRONG 1227 BURLINGAME AVE BID Burlingame EFILE.xls 1 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BIDRATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 10054 A5 100.001MARIE COCHRAN STUDIOS MARIE COCHRAN _ 1229 BURLINGAME AVE#15 10828 AS 100.00 MPSF INC DBA PENINSULA SPEAKERS BRUCE R VOGEL,PRESIDENT 1229 BURLINGAME AVE#9 _ 17040 A6 350.00 WILLIAM PATCHETT INC DBA TREESCAPE WILLIAM J PATCHETT 1229 BURLINGAME AVE#17 12486 Al 350.00 MR.Z'S STAMPS&COINS PHIL&PAM VOGT 1231 BURLINGAME AVE. 15447 A3 1,000.00 GRACE HOLMES INC DBA J CREW RETAIL GRACE HOLMES INC DBA J CREW 1232 BURLINGAME AVE 20226 A3 1,000.00 GYMBOREE STORES DBA JANEVILLE ST#3004 GYMBOREE STORES INC 1235 BURLINGAME AVE 48371 Al 350.00 MACGERAGHTY'S EDNA MACGERAGHTY 1241 BURLINGAME AVE 42733 A3 1,000.00 GAP 1 THE GAP INC 1294 BURLINGAME AVE 16521 Al 350.00 PRESTIGE WINES&LIQUORS GURDIAL SINGH JOHAL 1300 BURLINGAME AVE 19573 A3 1,000.00 APPLE COMPUTER INC APPLE COMPUTER INC 1301 BURLINGAME AVE 16381 A2 600.00 WESTERN POLO RETAILERS,LLC FASHIONS OUTLET OF AMERICA 1304 BURLINGAME AVE 14322 A3 1,000.00 THE CAKERY HILMAR MAIER/ROBERT MCMONIGLE 1308 BURLINGAME AVE 11589 A3 1,000.00 PEET'S COFFEE&TEA ATTN WINNIE LEUNG PAT ODEA,CEO 1309 BURLINGAME AVE 19198 A3 1,000.00 THE CREPEVINE SULEIMAN FAKHOURI&SONS 1310 BURLINGAME AVE 21244 Al 350.001 LEELA INC ANNA LEVINE 1314 BURLINGAME AVE 10419 A3 1,000.00 ARBY OF MERCED/TOPPER JEWELERS RUSSELL CAPLAN,VICE PRES. 1315 BURLINGAME AVE 17792 A5 100.00 KEN BRADLEY HAIR STUDIO KEN BRADLEY 1316 BURLINGAME AVE 41253 A2 600.00 PENINSULA BEAUTY SUPPLY INC LORI S SILVERSTEIN 1316 BURLINGAME AVE 21225 Al 350.00 MEDITERRANEAN KEBAB MURAT VURAL 1318 BURLINGAME AVE 19839 A3 1,000.00 ESTYLE INC DBA BABYSTYLE LAURA MCCARTNEY 1319 BURLINGAME AVE 18632 A2 600.00 BURLINGAME STATIONERS R BRUCE BISHOP 1320 BURLINGAME AVE 15666 A2 600.00 ANN TAYLOR RETAIL,INC.#497 ANN TAYLOR INC 1325 BURLINGAME AVE 15693 Al 350.00 DBA ENZO ANGIOLINI#8097 JONES RETAIL CORPORATION 1325 BURLINGAME AVE#1325 18698 A2 600.00 LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES STORES INC LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES STORES 1344 BURLINGAME AVE 09504 Al 350.00 LOFT INC ANKI MALETIC 1348 BURLINGAME AVE 19593 A2 600.00 MIMI MATERNITY#1107 MOTHERS WORK INC 1350 BURLINGAME AVE 16144 A2 600.00 BEBE STORE#108 BEBE STORES INC 1354 BURLINGAME AVE 08587 A5 100.00 ELITE TAILORING KAREN TZENG 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 09040 Al 350.00 WATCH GALLERY PETER LEE 1375 BURLINGAME AVE#202 12577 Al 350.00 ENCORE' FARIDE KAZEMI 1375 BURLINGAME AVE#200 15360 A5 100.00 JOUVENCE SKIN REJUVENATION CENTER LYDIA HWANG 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 17149 Al 350.00 ROBERTA SALMA STUDIO ROBERTA SALMA 1375 BURLINGAME AVE-2ND FL 17485 A3 1,000.00 BOOKS INC BOOKS INC 1375 BURLINGAME AVE#101 17502 A5 100.00 RITUALS AESTHETIC SKIN CARE GINA BARRON 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 19493 Al 350.00 NATURE AT PLAY ADELE GALVAN 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 19728 A2 600.00 THE SHARPER IMAGE THE SHARPER IMAGE CORP 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 19891 Al 350.00 TOO CUTE ISABELLE A CHRISTOPHER 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 19905 Al 350.00 SLEEP OUTLET SHOP HOWARD ATKINS 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 20050 A7 1,000.00 MONDI HAIR SALON CATRIONA J BIVENS 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 20882 A5 100.00 DIANE EVANS DIANE EVANS 1375 BURLINGAME AVE. 46400 Al 350.00 AIDA OPERA CANDIES TONY BASQUES 1375 BURLINGAME AVE 24653 Al 350.00 BURLINGAME OPTICAL STUART BRICKMAN 1380 BURLINGAME AVE 07720 A3 1,000.00 GAP KIDS#9614 THE GAP INC. 1390 BURLINGAME AVE 17799 Al 350.00 BURLINGAME SMOKE SHOP PATEL,ASHOK&ANILA 1400 BURLINGAME AVE 18857 A3 1,000.00 TOWLES CAFE LLC MARGARET PATT 1401 BURLINGAME AVE 20006 Al 350.00 WILLA ELENA DUGGAN 1402 BURLINGAME AVE 14674 A3 1,000.00 SUSAN OF BURLINGAME SUSAN FOSLIEN 1403 BURLINGAME AV 12277 Al 350.00 BURLINGAME TOBACCONISTS CRUZNVILLOUGHLEY/UMLAND 1404 BURLINGAME AVE _ 06799 Al 350.00 FIORI I ROGER NETTLE 1406 BURLINGAME AVE 13422 Al 350.001 HOUSE OF COFFEE 1 HENRY AND ROSALIE KALEBJ IAN 11407 BURLINGAME AVE BID Burlingame EFILE.xIs 2 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 10168 A3 1,000.00 ALANA'S CAFE T LINDHARTSEN/F TASHJIANF 1408 BURLINGAME AVE 17621 Al 350.00 BASKIN-ROBBINS 31 FLAVORS STORE VICTORIA P MONTALVO 1409 BURLINGAME AV _ 10738 Al 350.00 BEAUTY IMAGE CLINIC JOY YUNGHI LEE 1410 BURLINGAME AVE 14381 A5 100.00 CRYSTAL VISION-CATHY J ADAMS CATHY J ADAMS 1410 BURLINGAME AVE#B 19263 A7 1,000.00 UK HAIR JEFFEREY LEE SILVERMAN 1410 BURLINGAME AV 20795 Al 350.00 MADKAT BEAUTY MAHER MUHAWIEH 1411 BURLINGAME AVE 20853 Al 350.00 ZENY'S BOUTIQUE CUSTODIO INVESTMENTS 1412 BURLINGAME AVE 20291 Al 350.00 WILLA HOME ELENA M DUGGAN 1414 BURLINGAME AVE 05041 A5 100.00 FELICE BARBARA SICILA 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#V 07723 A5 100.00 THE TRIMM-WAY KAREN KELLEY 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#Y 07948 A5 100.00 RMC PROPERTIES JOHN N.ROMERO 1419 BURLINGAME AVE. 09619 Al 350.00 NICKY'S NICKY HSIAO YIN FU 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#D 09809 A6 350.00 IALL CONTINENTS TRAVEL DBA PICASSO TR HUSEYIN OZYURTCU,OWNER 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#S 11720 A5 100.00 INCOGNITO IMAGE STUDIO KELLY O'DEA 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#V 12289 Al 350.00 ARYANA FLOOR DESIGN SASHA AMIR 1419 BURLINGAME AVE 12422 Al 350.00 ROBERTS JEWELERS ROBERT A COHN 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#1 13214 A5 100.00 MASTERPIECE PRODUCTS SHIRLEY C.WONG 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#T 14366 A6 350.00 BEAUTY CENTURY NGUYEN VUU 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#B 17970 Al 350.00 TREJERD MEMORIES DBA PAPER&PETALS JOANNE S HINN 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#G 18680 A5 100.00 TAZA INVESTMENTS&REALTY INC RIFAT R OTUS 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#P2 18762 A5 100.00 MICHAEL SULPIZIO,CPA MICHAEL SULPIZIO 1419 BURLINGAME AVE 18850 A5 100.00 SHOE DOCTOR&IRENE ALTERATION JIHAD ABI RAMIA 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#K 18963 A5 100.00 MONA KARAM HAUTE COIFFURE MONA KARAM 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#21 20161 Al 350.00 GOOGOO DIVA DBA THE GALA DEBBIE LIM/BERNIE CHONG 1419 BURLINGAME AVE 20438 A5 100.00 LAW OFFICES OF H.JASON TOLU H JASON TOLU 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#X 20839 Al 350.00 W&S JEWELRY&GIFT CO JUDY WANG,KEN SHU 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#A 29639 A5 100.00 KEN Y.TANISAWA,O.D. KEN Y.TANISAWA,O.D. 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#F 39803 A5 100.00 RESOURCE MORTGAGE CORP. JOHN N.ROMERO 1419 BURLINGAME AVE#R 21066 A2 600.00 ANN TAYLOR LOFT#1545 ANN TAYLOR RETAIL INC 1420 BURLINGAME AVE 20134 F3 350.00 CALIFORNIA SAVINGS BANK 1423 BURLINGAME AVE 21095 A3 1,000.00 PRIME ON THE AVENUE SALIM DAHUD 1425 BURLINGAME AVE 07953 A3 1,000.00 MALOUF'S JOHN B.MALOUF,INC. 1426 BURLINGAME AVE 31990 A5 100.00 DOERR STUDIOS BOB DOERR 1427 BURLINGAME AV j 18261 Al 350.00 PLAZA DEPAWS LORI SCHMALZ 1429 BURLINGAME AVE 11658 Al 350.00 HOLIDAY TRAVEL SERVICE OF BURLINGAME MRS.EDWARD TORELLO 1432 BURLINGAME AV 17370 Al 350.00 LES DEUX COPINES REBECCA FOGG 1433 BURLINGAME AVE 20140 F5 1,000.00 WELLS FARGO BANK 1435 BURLINGAME AVE 39649 A2 600.00 MORNING GLORY MAUREEN VICKERS/PAULETTE MUNROE 1436 BURLINGAME AVE 20509 Al 350.00 RABAT PATRICIA WOODY 1440 BURLINGAME AVE 14345 A2 600.00 PAPER CAPER C HARBAND/S HURST 1442 BURLINGAME AV 14443 Al 350.00 TRIBECA HOME LINDA&DOUG STUDEBAKER 1444 BURLINGAME AVE 20612 A3 1,000.00 WHITE HOUSE/BLACK MARKET#3137 MARJORIE ROSEWATER 1445 BURLINGAME AVE. 18352 A2 600.00 SAPORE ITALIANO DBA MAMME INC ELIO D'URZO/MARIO DI PAOLA 1447 BURLINGAME AVE 18437 A3 1,000.00 HOLAI MEXICAN RESTAURANT&CANTINA RIMARDEN LLC 1448 BURLINGAME AVE 19161 A3 1,000.00 ISOBUNE BURLINGAME MIEKO IMANAKA 1451 BURLINGAME AVE 19868 A3 1,000.00 PANDA EXPRESS PANDA EXPRESS INC 1453 BURLINGAME AVE 07939 A5 100.00 BIJOU HAIR&NAIL STUDIO T V TRAN/H TRUONG/L TRAN 1454 BURLINGAME AVE _ 13413 Al 350.00 POT-POURRI _ CHRISTOPHER DIEZ 1460 BURLINGAME AVE _ 17383 A6 350.00 FOX AVENUE SALON KATHY FOX/BEVERLY ABORDO 1461 BURLINGAME AVE 19201 A3 1 1,000.001 THE TALBOTS SARAH JENKINS,MGR. 1462 BURLINGAME AV BID Burlingame EFILE.xIs 3 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS UC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 14103 Al 350.00 GENEVE JEWELERS-GOLDSMITHS EVA M PIANO 1465 BURLINGAME AVE 15588 Al 350.00 D MUSIC CORP DBA COLTON PIANO&ORGAN DAVID J GATT 1471 BURLINGAME AVE 15387 A5 100.00 THE SKIN CARE CLINIC/CLAUDIA PANITTO CLAUDIA PANITTO 1475 BURLINGAME AVE#D 17451 A5 100.00 PRIMROSE TAILOR CLEANERS JONG CHA Y00/SU NAM Y00 1475 BURLINGAME AVE 40766 A7 1,000.00 PACIFIC BELL-ATTN SBC TAX DEPT PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP 1480 BURLINGAME AV 19521 131 250.00 GILMAN SCREENS&KITCHENS LARRY LOWENTHAL 217 CALIFORNIA DR 16937 B1 250.00 FINE CONSIGN LINDA LEWIS 233 CALIFORNIA DR 20848 B1 250.00 CALIFORNIA BAR&GRILL ANTHONY KOZAK 241 CALIFORNIA DR 35410 B1 250.00 CHRISTIE'S BASIM S AZAR 245 CALIFORNIA DR 16995 B5 50.00 LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN J WERNER JONATHAN J WERNER 247 CALIFORNIA DR 19983 B5 50.00 VALET ORGANIZERS,INC LARRY FOX 247 CALIFORNIA DRIVE 09609 B5 50.00 AUTO MOBILE CARE DAVE FANUCCHI 251 CALIFORNIA DR 18361 B1 250.00 REDLINE MOTORSPORTS BENJAMIN MARTINEZ 251 CALIFORNIA DR 18765 1 B5 50.00 THE BENZ DOCTOR RAYMOND VALDEZ 251 CALIFORNIA DR#B 19959 B3 750.00 BLUSH ROBERT DOSS 261 CALIFORNIA DR 17735 A5 100.00 ACC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC ANDREW CHARLES CATTANO III 301 CALIFORNIA DR#9 21254 Al 350.00 DOLSOFT INCORPORATED TRUING DOAN 301 CALIFORNIA DR.#5 48162 A5 100.00 VICTORIA SEDAN&LIMOUSINE SERVICE MOSTAFA MAJLESSI 301 CALIFORNIA DR#10 21021 A3 1,000.00 DEL MAR DAVE SHEPARD 303 CALIFORNIA DR. 26093 A6 350.00 SHEAR MAGIC ALAN&LORRAINE MARAVIGLIA 311 CALIFORNIA DR 11328 1 B3 750.001 BURLINGAME STATION BREWING CO GOLDEN STATE BREWING CO 321 CALIFORNIA DR. 07392 B5 50.00 UTTERLY GUTTERS ANDREW J.FJELD 345 CALIFORNIA DR#106 21353 B1 250.00 BOB'S SPORTS COLLECTIBLES LARRY J ISRAEL 345 CALIFORNIA DR 44611 B5 50.00 J C CARPET&UPHOLSTERY SPEC JUNE GAIL DARRAH 345 CALIFORNIA DR#161 20651 B1 250.00 BELLA BOTTEGA LYNN ENEA 347 CALIFORNIA DR, 20813 B5 50.00 ELEGANCE NAILS LE M.LY 349 CALIFORNIA DR 28971 B5 50.00 VIVAAA FOR HAIR VIVA SARKISIAN 355 CALIFORNIA DR 09278 1 B3 750.00 STACKS RESTAURANT GEOFF SWENSON/TOM DUFFY 361 CALIFORNIA DR. 13869 B5 50.00 TIP N TOE SALON DONNA TRUONG 1401 CHAPIN AVE 16071 B5 50.00 ALL CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE INC BRUCE FONAROW 1408 CHAPIN AVE 20791 B5 50.00 BR COMMERCIAL STEVE COHN 1408 CHAPIN AVE#4 20904 B5 50.00 LAW OFFICES OF MAUREEN MCQUAID MAUREEN MCQUAID 1408 CHAPIN AVE#5 20905 B5 50.00 COLLEGE FOCUS MAUREEN MCQUAID 1408 CHAPIN AVE#5 19713 B7 500.00 B&N INDUSTRIES INC BRAD SOMBERG 1409 CHAPIN AVE 19925 B5 50.00 RED OAK CAPITAL BOB STAMATATOS 1409 CHAPIN AVE 20138 F7 400.00 OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPANY 1409 CHAPIN AVE 18906 B3 750.00 FIDELITY BROKERAGE-FIDELITY INVESTMENTS FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERV.LLC 1411 CHAPIN AVE 11985 B6 200.00 CASHIN COMPANY CASHIN REALTY GROUP INC. 1412 CHAPIN AVE 20293 B5 50.00 KEVIN MCPHEE AND ASSOCIATES KEVIN MCPHEE/STEPHEN REILLY 1419 CHAPIN AVE#2 _ 12091 B5 50.00 PAGANO&MCKINNEY,LLP WILLIAM F PAGANO 1424 CHAPIN AVE 20139 F8 750.00 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 1430 CHAPIN AVE 10887 B5 50.00 CMA CONSOLIDATED INC NEAL D CRISPIN 1440 CHAPIN AVE#310 11003 B7 500.00 JETFLEET MANAGEMENT CORP NEAL CRISPIN 1440 CHAPIN AVE#310 14567 B5 50.00 BAER MANAGEMENT INC NEAL D CRISPIN 1440 CHAPIN AVE#310 15026 B7 500.00 ARES CORPORATION ARES CORPORATION 1440 CHAPIN AVE#390 15544 B5 50.00 PASSPORT HOLDING INC CAROL A PETRAREA 1440 CHAPIN AVE#330 16952 B5 50.00 ATTRACTOR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC ATTRACTOR INVESTMENT MGMT INC 1440 CHAPIN AVE#201 17774 B5 50.00 RE/MAX DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE#1 INC 1440 CHAPIN AVE#360 17925 B5 50.00 MILLENNIUM STAR LLC ANTHONY M L LUI 1440 CHAPIN AVE#385 19849 B6 I 200.00 ALAIN PINEL REALTORS PAUL L HULME 1440 CHAPIN AVE#200 BID Burlingame EFILE.xIs 4 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 20137 F8 750.00 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY ___ 1440 CHAPIN AVE _ 15994 B5 50.00 LENA LENA HAMROL 1445 CHAPIN AVE 15161 B5 50.00 PAMELA G KRELL PH.D. PAMELA G KRELL _ 1450 CHAPIN AVE#6 08676 B5 50.00 CHAPIN COURT-MICHELE HERRERA MICHELE HERRERA _ 1465 CHAPIN#13 18826 B1 250.00 BISCHOFF'S MEDICAL SUPPLIES ED BISCHOFF 1465 CHAPIN AVE#B 15913 B3 750.00 ALBECO INC DBA MOLLIE STONE'S MARKET DAVID M BENNETT 1477 CHAPIN AVE 20631 B2 400.00 SMITH&HAWKEN,LTD WAYNE ROSS 1208 DONNELLY 16594 B5 50.00 RENDA ZA'AROUR SALON RENDA ZA'AROUR 1210 DONNELLY AVE 19251 B1 250.00 GALLERY 1212 MARY ELLEN DURKA 1212 DONNELLY AVE 08729 B6 200.00 TURNER DALE ASSOCIATES INC DA TURNER DALE ASSOC-CALIF CORP 1214 DONNELLY AVE 12777 Al 350.00 ST CLAIR'S WILLIAM HARRIS _ 1215 DONNELLY AVE 06397 A5 100.00 TU SALON CAROL DE LA ROSA 1221 DONNELLY AVE 20671 Al 350.00 401 CLOTHING BOUTIQUE EDWINA SCHEID SMITH 1223 DONNELLY AVE 11116 A3 1,000.00 CURRIES CHEVRON CURRIES AUTOMOTIVE INC 260 EL CAMINO REAL 20132 F8 750.00 BANK OF AMERICA 400 EL CAMINO REAL 08373 B6 200.00 H.E.R.E.UNION LOCAL 340 HARRY YOUNG,SECTY TREAS 209 HIGHLAND AVE. 06352 B6 200.00 COTTONG&TANIGUCHI BRENT COTTONG 215 HIGHLAND AVE 42079 B1 250.00 SAM'S ITALIAN SANDWICH CO. RINO BETTI 1080 HOWARD AVE 12748 B6 200.001 MAISON SALON ERICA CARR ERICA CARR 1100 HOWARD AVE#C 15724 B2 400.00 CALICO CORNERS EVERFAST INC 1100 HOWARD AVE#A 18710 B1 250.00 TEA PLUS NOODLE MICHAEL CHEN 1100 HOWARD AVE#D 13046 B3 750.00 TOMOKAZU JAPANESE CUISINE YOSIZONO JAPANESE CORP 1101 HOWARD AVE 12041 B2 400.00 ARCHIPELAGO GRANDVIEW BISTRO SHIWEI USA ENTERPRISES 1107 HOWARD AVE 19882 85 50.00 LUSCIOUS DESIGN&RESEARCH INC FELICIA KARBO/NELSON HO 1111 HOWARD AVE#A _ 20549 B5 50.00 CURVES LISA R.ANTER 1115 HOWARD AVE 20961 B5 50.00 1 QUIET MIND THERAPY DEBBIE DE MARCO 1115 HOWARD AVE 16673 B5 50.00 BEVERLEY B CONRAD PH.D. BEVERLEY B CONRAD PH.D. 1131 HOWARD AVE#201 17929 B6 200.00 STERLING CLEANERS,INC. DAVID M PLACK 1140 HOWARD AV 20318 B1 250.00 SOLO BAMBINI ELIZABETH A MOORE 1150 HOWARD AVE 14823 250.00 NUANCE DESIGN JEWELERS RICHARD B WEINER 1152 HOWARD AVE 13561 B1 250.00 GRAY'S PAINT&WALLPAPER ROBERT A GRAY/JEAN M GRAY 1166 HOWARD AVE 06228 65 50.00 SALON 1199 MAGGIE SMITH 1199 HOWARD AVE#103 07267 B5 50.00 TH GROUP INC RICHARD B STEIN PRES. 1199 HOWARD AVE#300 19262 B5 50.00 ETHAN ALLEN TRAVEL,INC ED PHILLIPS 1199 HOWARD AVE#101 19924 B5 50.00 KIDZMOUSE INC KIDZMOUSE INC 1199 HOWARD AVE SUITE 350_ 20074 B5 50.00 CHARTERED FINANCIAL INVESTMENT CORP KATRINA HARTWELL 1199 HOWARD AVE#200 49495 B5 50.00 LITE FOR LIFE INC MAUREEN SULLIVAN 1199 HOWARD AVE#102 05189 B5 50.00 CAPITAL REALTY GROUP BRETT BARRON 1200 HOWARD AVE#204 08309 B6 200.00 ICHINYOSHA INTERNATIONAL U.S.A.,INC. ICHINYOSHA INTERNATIONAL 1200 HOWARD AVE#203 13833 B5 50.00 1 MARLINDA'S SKIN&BODY CARE MARLINDA V WILSON 1200 HOWARD AVE#106 14999 B5 50.00 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA APPRAISAL KELLY KEMP 1200 HOWARD AVE#204 16868 B5 50.00 DAVID LARSON EA DAVID F LARSON 1200 HOWARD AVE#204 19034 B6 200.00 JKC&BEAUTY MARKET INC EDWARD L BANK 1200 HOWARD AVE#102 20328 B5 50.00 HARLOW'S JEANETTE GIVEN 1200 HOWARD AVE#103 21171 7 500.00 SYLVAN LEARNING CENTER SLC CALIFORNIA,LLC 1200 HOWARD AVE. 21323 B5 50.00 HARLOW'S-ELLEN MOROZOFF ELLEN MOROZOFF 1200 HOWARD AVE#103 21371 B5 50.00 HARLOW SALON-UNIQUE ESTHETICS JENNIFER CHANG 1200 HOWARD AVE 16084 B5 50.001MARDOLLA MORTGAGE DOJI C LLAMAS 1201 HOWARD AVE#208 17265 B5 50.00 1 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN G CLARK JOHN G CLARK 11201 HOWARD AVE#202 18149 B5 50.00 1 SOUTH BAY HEARING AIDS GREGIR&JULIE GANNAM 11201 HOWARD AVE#103 BID Burlingame EFILE.xIs 5 Of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 19218 B7 500.00 M H PODELL CO MICHAEL H PODELL _ 1201 HOWARD AVE 25431 B5 50.00 BURLINGAME CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC DR.GREGORY CAMERON 1201 HOWARD AVE#101A 29571 85 50.00 EDIE L SWITZER&ASSOCIATES EDIE L SWITZER 1201 HOWARD AVE#101 38467 B5 50.00 QUEST REAL ESTATE VAL SHEVELYOV INC 1201 HOWARD AVE#304_ 19394 B5 50.00 SHOUT CREATIVE INC DAVE RICHANBACH 1205 HOWARD AVE 18746 B5 50.00 PHYSIFIX BODY THERAPY GINA LA ROCCA 1209 HOWARD AVE#202 33467 B3 750.00 THE UNIQUE BRIDE PEGGY ANDREWS 1209 HOWARD AVE. 08953 B5 50.00 HOLIDAY EXPRESS RALPH SELIGMAN 1220 HOWARD AVE 11511 B5 50.00 CHASE BERENSTEIN&MURRAY-LAW LISA R MURRAY 1220 HOWARD AVE#250 15029 B5 50.00 LAW OFFICES OF MARK FRIEDLAND MARK FRIEDLAND 1220 HOWARD AVE#250 16448 B5 50.00 LAW OFFICE OF JAMES C HAIGH JAMES C HAIGH 1220 HOWARD AVE#250 17966 B5 50.00 ROLANDO PASQUALI,ATTORNEY AT LAW ROLANDO PASQUALE 1220 HOWARD AVE#230 18525 B5 50.00 HARRIS&FRASER ELAINE RYZAK FRASER 1220 HOWARD AVE#250 19257 B5 50.001 PACIFIC AUTO FLEET LANCE MATEKEL 1220 HOWARD AVE#209 20105 B5 50.00 AP CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANTHONY&MICHELE PONTERIO 1220 HOWARD AVE#209 21154 B5 50.00 EFLEXERVICES INC EFLEXERVICES INC 1220 HOWARD AVE#220 21337 B5 50.00 NURSES4US NURSES4US LLC 1220 HOWARD AVE#220 _ 24937 B5 50.00 BIANLOU GROUP,INC DBA PIP PRINTING FARROKH SHARABIANLOU 1234 HOWARD AVE 10282 B1 250.00 HOUSE OF COFFEE HENRY KALEBJIAN 1243 HOWARD AVE 15445 B5 50.00 ROCKY COLOGNE'S COMEDY TRAFFIC SCHOOL RAPHAEL ROCKY COLON 1243 HOWARD AVE 08197 B5 50.00 WINGES ARCHITECTS INC JERRY L.WINGES 1290 HOWARD AVE#311 14373 B5 50.00 LAW OFFICES OF HAITHAM E BALLOUT HAITHAM E BALLOUT 1290 HOWARD AVE#302 16269 B5 50.00 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL D LIBERTY MICHAEL LIBERTY 1290 HOWARD AVE#333 16290 B5 50.00 SAM FERDOWS-ATTORNEY AT LAW SAM FERDOWS 1290 HOWARD AVE#309 18528 B5 50.00 FRANK A BRANSON INC FRANK BRANSON 1290 HOWARD AVE#323 17321 1 82 400.00 COCONUT BAY RESTAURANT RICK CHEN 1300 HOWARD AVE 17368 B1 250.00 LERNER TAMBOR BLACK DBA FLOORCRAFT TERRY BLACK 1304 HOWARD AVE 17494 B5 50.00 SCOTT DESIGN ASSOCIATES LINDA K SCOTT 1319 HOWARD AVE 17546 B5 50.00 SCHEINHOLTZ ASSOCIATES NANCY SCHEINHOLTZ 1319 HOWARD AVE 10644 B5 50.00 THE UPS STORE#2354 NAVNIT&NEELAM BHALLA 1325 HOWARD AVE 11079 B5 50.00 SAVVY TRAVEL MARIE J BRIDGHAM 1325 HOWARD AVE#416 14359 B6 200.00 J.HOWARD ENGINEERING,INC JOSEPH HOWARD 1325 HOWARD AVE#265 14375 B7 500.00 THORENFELDT CONSTRUCTION INC BO THORENFELDT 1325 HOWARD AVE#506 14966 B5 50.00 N SQUARE INCORPORATED NEELAM BHALLA 1325 HOWARD AVE#528 15564 B5 50.00 TOM C.DRYDEN INVESTIGATIONS TOM C.DRYDEN 1325 HOWARD AVE#519 16091 B5 50.00 Z-COM TECHNICAL SERVICES JOHN ZIMMERMAN 1325 HOWARD AVE#131 16176 B5 50.00 THE IMPRINT AGENCY TIMOTHY B EARLE 1325 HOWARD AVE#104 16499 B5 50.00 APOGEE VENTURE GROUP LLC CONWAY RULON-MILLER 1325 HOWARD AVE.#706 18874 B5 50.00 ROBERT LOUTH ROBERT LOUTH 1325 HOWARD AVE#106 19466 B5 50.00 SULLIVAN GROUP KATHLEEN NELSON 1325 HOWARD AVE#922 20295 B5 50.00 OCCUCOM INC DR CHARLES W SHERROD 1325 HOWARD AVE#903 08634 B2 400.00 GENERAL APPLIANCE&KITCHEN CENTER,INC MICHAEL&ATHIA GIOTINIS 1333 HOWARD AVE 15185 B7 500.00 REAL PROPERTY SALES,INC. MR ROY BYERS 1345 HOWARD AVE 21334 B5 50.00 KATHY NAIL SANG CHAU 1345 HOWARD AVE#101 13501 B3 750.00 BROTHERS DELI GUYS N GALS CORPORATION 1351 HOWARD AVE 17272 B3 750.00 WAL REEN'S 0086 WALGREEN'S 1420 HOWARD AV 42048 B3 750.00 SAFEWAY STORES,INC.#948 SAFEWAY STORES,INC. 1450 HOWARD AV 20402 Al 350.00 LORTON AVE LLC DAHI,BEILEN,BAALBAKI 214-216 LORTON AVE 15043 A5 100.00 THE CUT ANTHONY D RAMIREZ 218 LORTON AVE 14021 A2 600.00 1 THE ALIBI EVELYN&ALEX TANG 220 LORTON AVE BID Burlingame EFILE.xls 6 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 20164 A5 100.00 SALON 222-ROXANNE PARKER ROXANNE PARKER 1222 LORTON AVE_ _ 18553 A5 100.00 RENNER GROUP/SURVEY'G&ENGINEER'G ERNEST RENNER 226 LORTON AVE__ 21087 Al 350.00 THE GREEN FASHION MARIA HEREDIA 226 LORTON AVE 13863 A6 350.00 BC&D/BBC RAY BRAYER 228 LORTON AVE 15653 1 A7 1,000.00 VALET BY THE BAY ROY NICKOLAI 228 LORTON AVE#8 24300 A5 100.00 S L GRIFFITHS INC ALLAN T MEYERHOFFER 228 LORTON AVE 06032 Al 350.00 RADIO SHACK#3891 RADIOSHACK CORP 236 LORTON AVE 12057 Al 350.00 PADDY FLYNN'S PATRICK FLYNN 246 LORTON 19828 Al 350.00 ZEYNO MEDITERRANEAN GRILL LEVENT ESEN&MUHAMMET CULHA 250 LORTON AVE 07819 A6 350.00 RACHEL&CO RACHEL GROFFMAN 256 LORTON AVE 17780 Al 350.00 HOUSE OF BAGELS ARNULFO SANCHEZ 260 LORTON AVE 21264 Al 350.00 THERAPY STORES,INC J.CHEN/W.WHELAN 264 LORTON 40451 Al 350.00 MANIJE MANIJE FERDOWS 264 LORTON AV 20901 A2 600.00 TRAPEZE RESTAURANT H TOSUN/Y AKOGLU 266 LORTON AVE 43864 Al 350.00 WHITE DOVE JEWELRY EXCH. JOHN MOODIE 274 LORTON AVE 20975 Al 350.00 TEA PLUS PEARLS _ MICHAEL CHEN 283 LORTON AVE 21402 Al 350.00 TEA CELSIUS K LIAO/P CHEN 283 LORTON AVE 20473 A5 100.00 SIDDH GROUP LLC _ SIDDH GROUP LLC 287 LORTON AVE 05974 A2 600.00 MEYER-BUNJE,LLC FRANCES J.MEYER 308 LORTON AVE 21055 Al 350.00 PLATFORM JACQUELINE JIMENEZ 310 LORTON AVE 06108 Al 350.00 BURLINGAME PAINT&WALLPAPER JOHN W CREECH 311 LORTON AVE 12283 Al 350.00 PATRONIK DESIGNS _ NICHOLAS&CHRISTINE KOSTUROS 314 LORTON AVE 19408 A5 100.00 CLASSIC KIDS LLC RUNA MCGOWAN 315 LORTON AVE 20009 Al 350.00 KEYHAN INC DBA SOLEMATES FEREIDOUN KEYHAN 318 LORTON AVE 21256 Al 350.00 ABIGAIL MORGAN ABIGAIL/ANDREW PIRON 318 LORTON AVE 41804 A2 600.00 1 ECCO TOORAJ AGHA SHARIF 322 LORTON AV 11903 B3 750.00 IL FORNAIO IL FORNAIO AMERICA CORP. 327 LORTON AVE _ 15553 B5 50.00 LUCAS PARKING CORP NICK/FRANK LUCAS 327 LORTON AVE 09233 1 B7 500.00 TRIO SALON NIKO LONGMOR 333 LORTON AVE 09579 B5 50.00 PARTEE CONSTRUCTION GARY PARTEE 340 LORTON AVE#211 09996 B5 50.00 ESTATE MORTGAGE GROUP BRYAN R STEIN 340 LORTON AVE#202 14588 B5 50.00 EDU-THERAPY DARLENE ROSE DE MARIA,M.A. 340 LORTON AVE#204 15581 B5 50.00 DRAKE REALTY DEAN ASIMOS 340 LORTON AVE#215 19212 B5 50.00 DANLI CHIROPRACTIC&WELLNESS TARA R DANLI,DC 340 LORTON AVE#203 19505 B5 50.00 LITTLE SCHOLARS JESSICA HSU 340 LORTON AVE#206 20354 B5 50.00 WARREN K WOO,ATTY AT LAW WARREN K WOO 340 LORTON AVE#214 21069 B5 50.00 MISSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC JAMES CAULDFIELD 340 LORTON AVE#213 34790 B5 50.00 JC INTERNATIONAL JANE CHANG 340 LORTON AV 207 17307 B1 250.00 ALL FIRED UP DONALD RICHARD CALKIN 344 LORTON AVE 09872 B5 50.00 NEAL LITMAN COMPANY NEAL H LITMAN 345 LORTON AVE#304 12861 B6 200.00 WINTERS,KRUG&DELBON WINTERS,KRUG&DELBON 345 LORTON AVE#101 13769 B6 200.00 MCGUIGAN&MCGUIGAN,CPA CHARLES B.MCGUIGAN/MICHAEL J.MCGUIGAN 345 LORTON AV 205 13876 B5 50.00 WILLIAM L NAGLE SPECIAL MASTER/MEDIATOR WILLIAM L NAGLE 345 LORTON AVE#204 14900 B5 50.00 PENINSULA PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE _ MILADA URBAN M.D. 345 LORTON AVE#104 _ 15422 B7 500.00 GALLI HERITAGE GARRY G LOSK 345 LORTON AVE _ 19031 B5 50.00 DONALD E NEWMAN MD DONALD E NEWMAN MD 345 LORTON AVE#104 _ 21305 B5 50.001 HIGH DESERT CURRENCY MANAGEMENT LLC RICHARD H KRAMER 345 LORTON AVE#303 _ 34365 B5 50.00 THE RIGGS COMPANY J J RIGGS 345 LORTON AV 301 37045 B5 50.001 LAW OFFICES OF HERMAN H FITZGERALD HERMAN H.FITZGERALD 1345 LORTON AVE#302 12146 1 81 250.00 1 QUENT CORDAIR QUENT CORDAIR 1346 LORTON AVE BID Burlingame EFILE.xIs 7 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 12381 B1 250.00 BLACK SEA GALLERY MUKEMMEL T SARIMSAKCI 350 LORTON AVE 21620 B5 50.00 BURLINGAME MASONIC HALL,INC. BERNARD SHEPARD,MGR 145 PARK RD 20133 F7 400.00 BANK OF THE WEST 149 PARK ROAD 22624 B5 50.00 DANIEL C MORENO CPA DANIEL C MORENO 180 PARK RD 35605 B5 50.00 YF INTERNATIONAL RALPH M HO,PRES. 180 PARK RD 09664 B6 200.00 TRAVEL WIZARDS INC MAGDA JOHNSON 200 PARK RD 18723 B5 50.00 B.J.TRAVEL BEVERLY OLDFIELD 200 PARK RD 05715 B5 50.00 KAMRAN EHSANIPOUR,AIA KAMRAN EHSANIPOUR 205 PARK RD#207 07251 B5 50,00 R.M.BARROWS,INC ROBERT M.BARROWS 205 PARK RD#208 14562 85 50.00 TRG ARCHITECTS RANDY GRANGE 205 PARK RD#203 20561 B5 50.00 MITRA EHSANIPOUR CPA MITRA M EHSANIPOUR 205 PARK RD#207 24266 B5 50.00 SHANNON GREEN TALENT AGENCY _ SHANNON GREEN 205 PARK RD#211 20322 B2 400.00 ROTI INDIAN BISTRO ROTI RESTAURANTS,LLC 209 PARK RD 17984 B6 200.00 EMILY'S NAILS SALON MOT HUU LE 211 PARK RD 48333 B7 500.00 CARR,MCCLELLAN,INGERSOLL,THOMPSON&HORN CARR,MCCLELLAN,INGERSOL,THOMPSON 216 PARK RD _ 18783 A5 100.00 TRAVEL QUEST DIANNE TATRO 220 PARK RD 20607 A2 600.00 ROCKETS A GREGORI/S JONSSON 221 PARK RD 17224 A5 100.00 BLU-WHITE CLEANERS HASSAN BEHZADI/SHAHAB TEHRANI 229 PARK RD 10595 Al 350.00 NARIN THAI CUISINE MARTIN KOMINDR 231 PARK RD 38854 A2 600,001 KERN JEWELERS W.GREGORY MENDELL 235 PARK RD 18578 A2 600.00 YVES DELOREM INC FRANCOIS HAOUR 238 PARK RD 11933 A2 600.00 SAKAE RESTAURANT HIROMITSU ENDO 240 PARK RD 18769 A5 100.00 JOY'S EUROPEAN TAILORING TATIANA N TAHMINJIAN 247 PARK RD _ 18938 A5 100.00 MIA'S PLACE MIALINDA WILSON 249 PARK RD#B 20693 A5 100.00 SYNERGY BODYCARE DIANE ACEVEDO 249 PARK RD#B 40999 A5 100.00 BRENDA P CURTIS BRENDA P CURTIS 249 PARK RD 15906 A5 100.00 FRANCO ASSOCIATES,ARCHITECTS JOSE FRANCO 251 PARK RD SUITE 900 17123 A5 100.00 HADIA MAKDISI HADIA MAKDISI 251 PARK ROAD#150 19887 A5 100.00 MAAK&SULLIVAN LINDA SULLIVAN&LORIE MAAK 251 PARK RD 20432 A5 100.00 TRENDY PROMOTIONS&GRAPHICS ROBERT TENG _ 251 PARK RD#250 21258 A5 100.00 DIMENSION'S SKINCARE STUDIO REGINA LYUBARSKY 251 PARK RD#600 38094 A5 100.00 CLAY HERMAN REALTOR,INC. BRUCE HERMAN 251 PARK RD#710 13372 Al 350.00 MICHAEL'S JEWELERS MICHAEL SAN FILIPPO 253 PARK RD 10521 A3 1,000.00 BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO#06332-A/P STORES BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO INC 261 PARK RD 20135 F8 750.00 CITIBANK WEST 210 PRIMROSE ROAD 09634 A5 100.00 A-1 CLEANERS A-1 CLEANERS INC 240 PRIMROSE RD 42839 A2 600.00 THE STUDIO SHOP JOHN&MARTHA BENSON 244 PRIMROSE RD 23022 A5 100.00 SHOE-CLINIC GEORGE PLAVJIAN 248 PRIMROSE RD 21219 Al 350.00 THE PERSONAL TOUCH LYNAE FOLKS-PARODI 257 PRIMROSE RD 19458 Al 350.00 MARGARET O'LEARY INC MARGARET O'LEARY 263 PRIMROSE RD 20327 Al 350.00 FORTEZZA LLC RICK LYONS 269 PRIMROSE RD 20831 Al 350.00 GUMSHOE LLC KATHRYN REGAN 275 PRIMROSE RD 16099 A5 100.00 THE STATUS THIMBLE SUSAN BRYANT 277 PRIMROSE RD 20115 Al 350.00 CJ'S GOURMET DELI MIKE OR YVONNE WINTERS 290 PRIMROSE RD 45184 Al 350.00 BARE NECESSITIES CHRISTINE J HOFFMAN 291 PRIMROSE RD 18852 Al 350.00 LET'S GO!WIRELESS S B ZAROUR/E D SAADEH 303 PRIMROSE RD 07786 A5 100.00 MORIZONO HAIR DESIGN JOHN MORIZONO 309 PRIMROSE RD 14837 Al 350.00 THE GROCERY STORE FOSLIEN/GARDNER/FRIEDMAN 311 PRIMROSE RD 09654 A5 100.00 DEANNE'S DESIGNS SALON DEANNE DOWNING 319 PRIMROSE RD#1 16739 A5 100.00 ADVANCED BEAUTY CARE AND HEALTH I MORTEZA HADJIMEHDI 319 PRIMROSE RD#A BID Burlingame EFILE.xis 8 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 17475 A5 100.00 COMME LA MER SKIN CARE DORRIS STEPHEN 319 PRIMROSE RD#1 09857 B5 50.00 CARSON ENGLISH INC CARSON ENGLISH 320 PRIMROSE RD 10429 BS 50.00 CARRICK&ENGLISH ASSOC.REAL ESTATE CARRICK&ENGLISH ASSOC R/E 320 PRIMROSE RD 18196 B5 50.00 RE/MAX TODAY VEE WALLACE,MANAGER 320 PRIMROSE RD 11459 Al 350.00 PIAZZA ITALIA CAFE FILOMENA&FRANCESCO CURCI 321 PRIMROSE RD 04979 A5 100.00 JOANNE'S PLACE JOANNE MARIE CASTELLINO 329 PRIMROSE RD#211 07332 A5 100.00 PUTTIN'ON THE RITZ MELISSA NELSON BROWN 329 PRIMROSE RD#203 07362 A5 100.00 JOAN RESTIVO JOAN RESTIVO 329 PRIMROSE RD#205 08460 A5 100.00 ROBIN MELLO ELECTROLYSIS ROBIN MELLO 329 PRIMROSE RD#204 13137 A5 100.00 DE COLORES HAIR STUDIO-NANCY LOPEZ NANCY LOPEZ 329 PRIMROSE RD#216 15510 A5 100.00 RUBEN'S RUBEN H MORRIS 329 PRIMROSE RD#200 15680 A5 100.00 SALON SANFORD/WILLIAM S LOGAN/W BOUDREAU 329 PRIMROSE RD#206 16519 A5 100.00 HELEN MARLO PH.D. HELEN MARLO,PH.D. 329 PRIMROSE RD#208 17041 A5 100.00 NAILS BY DENISE DESOTO DENISE DESOTO 329 PRIMROSE RD#107 18740 Al 350.00 APROPOS PROMOTIONS LLC ANN AUELMANN 329 PRIMROSE RD#202 18949 A5 100.00 SKIN BASICS STUDIO SHERRY LOPEZ-SCARDINO 329 PRIMROSE RD#214 20000 A5 100.00 GLAD ON PARIS SOFIA GONZALEZ 329 PRIMROSE RD#104 23046 A5 100.00 CART LENAHAN MFT,ANN ROONEY MFT CART LENAHAN 329 PRIMROSE RD#210 36623 1 A5 100.00 VISAGE DENISE M SPANEK 329 PRIMROSE RD#109 37336 Al 350.00 THE GALLERY MANNING-HINTON 329 PRIMROSE RD 41513 A5 100.00 BARBARA'S NAILS BARBARA RYCHLIK 329 PRIMROSE RD#212 42339 Al 350.00 ALL THAT GLITTERS ISABELLE DE PAZ 329 PRIMROSE RD#111 05900 B6 200.00 ALLIED LOMAR,INC DBA INTL BEVERAGE MARCI PALATELLA 330 PRIMROSE RD#402 06990 B1 250.00 LYNN HILL&CO LYNN HILL&CO 330 PRIMROSE RD#302 08778 B5 50.00 OLDE ST.NICK DISTILLERY INC MARCI PALATELLA 330 PRIMROSE RD#402 08841 B5 50.001 PAZCO FUNDING DANIEL H.PASIECZNIK 330 PRIMROSE RD#208 08890 B5 50.00 O'CONNOR MORTGAGE COMPANY ROBERT H.O'CONNOR 330 PRIMROSE RD#201 09161 65 50.00 EHRNEST E.BALLAGH III ACCT CORP EHRNEST E.BALLAGH III 330 PRIMROSE RD#204 11772 B5 50.00 ON CAMERA PRODUCTIONS LEE D THOMPSON 330 PRIMROSE RD#216 12512 B5 50.00 OUTSELL INC GREGORY P CHAGARIS 330 PRIMROSE RD#510 12614 B5 50.00 PENINSULA FINANCIAL PLANNING P MCCAMBRIDGE 330 PRIMROSE RD#408 12922 B5 50.00 SCHREURS&SCHREURS J SCHREURS/C SCHREURS 330 PRIMROSE RD#660 14238 B5 50.00 STRATEGIA INVESTORS,INC KME MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 330 PRIMROSE RD#502 14636 B5 50.00 JDF ASSOCIATES JOE FOSTER 330 PRIMROSE RD#305 15142 B6 200.00 BAYWOOD CAPITAL CORPORATION MICHAEL W WOODS 330 PRIMROSE RD#606 16267 B5 50.00 LANDCO-A REAL ESTATE SERVICES CORP MARK LESTER,PRESIDENT 330 PRIMROSE RD#210 16314 B5 50.00 DOYLE&BOISSIERE LLC WM DOYLE JR/L BOISSIERE JR 330 PRIMROSE RD#500 16491 B5 50.00 ADHESIVE COATINGS CO ADHESIVE COATINGS CO 330 PRIMROSE RD#500 17141 B5 50.00 GEORGE S YOUNGLING LAW OFFICE GEORGE S YOUNGLING 330 PRIMROSE RD#407 18380 B5 50.00 WOODSTOCK DEVELOPMENT INC WOODSTOCK DEVELOPMENT INC 330 PRIMROSE RD#203 19547 B5 50.00 FIRST COMMUNITY MORTGAGE CO FIRST ASIA MORTGAGE INC 330 PRIMROSE RD#308 19643 B5 50.00 JOEDON INC DBA MORTGAGE SERVICES JOE LANAM 330 PRIMROSE RD#202 19971 B5 50.00 LAURENCE M MAY A PROFESSIONAL CORP LAURENCE M MAY 330 PRIMROSE RD#406 20131 F7 400.00 ALLIANCE TITLE COMPANY 330 PRIMROSE ROAD 20994 B5 50.00 KIPOR OF NORTH AMERICA JOHN SHU 330 PRIMROSE RD#409 21033 B5 50.00 BHENTON FINANCIAL BRADFIELD THOMPSON 330 PRIMROSE RD#211 21034 B5 50.00 REALTY WORLD PROP&INVESTMENT CO BRADFIELD THOMPSON 330 PRIMROSE RD#216 21060 B5 50.00 EXTEND BENEFITS GROUP LLC BRYCE WILLIAMS 330 PRIMROSE RD#206 29146 B3 750.00 NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO NORTH AMERICAN TITLE CO 330 PRIMROSE RD#600 38741 B6 200.00 CHRISMAN&ASSOCIATES PAUL H CHRISMAN 330 PRIMROSE RD#400 BID Burlingame EFILE.xls 9 Of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS LIC# CODE BID RATE I BUSINESS NAME REGISTERED BUSINESS OWNER BUSINESS ADDRESS 39714 B6 200.001 LEE MENDELSON FILM PRODUCTIONS,INC LEE MENDELSON FILM PRODUCTIONS,INC 330 PRIMROSE RD#215 44022 B5 50.00 A.W.DEVELOPMENT ALBERT K WONG 330 PRIMROSE RD 409B 44628 B5 50.00 PREMIERE PROPERTIES,INC. GIL MARINO 330 PRIMROSE RD#614 46126 B5 50.00 ROBERT J.LOVEJOY,CFP ROBERT J LOVEJOY,CFP 330 PRIMROSE RD#408 20722 Al 350.00 DIRTY LAUNDRY P BOC,A CALLEJO,M POLASEK 337 PRIMROSE RD 13777 A5 100.00 PRIMROSE CLEANERS JAMES LEE 339 PRIMROSE RD 20767 Al 350.00 GREENS AND THINGS BY DARINA DARINA 1.VASSILEVA 341 PRIMROSE RD 20071 A3 1,000.00 BARRACUDAIBARRACUDA SUSHI JPN REST NAM SUK KIM 347 PRIMROSE RD#B 21166 A5 100.00 COLOR ME COCOA LLC JENNIFER A PFEIFFER 347 PRIMROSE RD#A 38847 Al 350.00 KENTZLER FINE JEWELRY WALTER G.E.KENTZLER 347 PRIMROSE RD#A 20136 F7 400.00 CITY NATIONAL BANK 350 PRIMROSE ROAD 21320 A5 100.00 RVN ENTERPRISES VLADIMIR RODSKI 355 PRIMROSE RD. 28495 Al 350.00 WHISTLING SWAN ANTIQUES LAWRENCE/ARLENE BRUEGGEMAN 359 PRIMROSE RD 20124 Al 350.00 EVES JIMMY&YVONNE LEE 363 PRIMROSE ROAD 18992 A5 100.00 FRINGE LLC TRISH NOVAK/PAMELA RENNERT 371 PRIMROSE RD 11922 B6 200.00 COLDWELL BANKER/FOX&CARSKADON-NRT VALLEY OF CA DBA COLDWELL BA 400 PRIMROSE RD#100 09444 B5 50.00 BAY COUNTIES FINANCIAL RUSSELL MARINELLO/KENT FLORY 401 PRIMROSE RD#B 12234 B5 50.00 SUNKISSED TANNING SALONS GINA MARIE LENA 401 PRIMROSE 14105 B5 50.00 RICHARD OF BURLINGAME RICHARD G CLEVELAND 401 PRIMROSE RD#J 17545 B5 50.00 MODA SALON RANA AWWAD 401 PRIMROSE RD#A 18778 B5 50.00 STUDIO 401 JONNA DOLLOSSO JONNA DOLLOSSO 401 PRIMROSE RD#K 18802 B5 50.00 NAJWA-S BEAUTY SALON NAJWA MALOUF 401 PRIMROSE RD#A 20794 B2 400.00 ISTELLA ALPINA OSTERIA/MATTED IN YOUR KITCHEN A.M.FERRARI CORP 401 PRIMROSE RD 20927 F7 400.00 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY _ FIDELITY NATIONAL FIN,INC 401 PRIMROSE RD#F 05192 B5 50.00 PAULA ZIMMERMAN,MFCC PAULA ZIMMERMAN 405 PRIMROSE RD#306 05246 B5 50.00 KAREN S ROBSON MA KAREN S ROBSON MA 405 PRIMROSE RD#309 05894 B5 50.00 JAN E PERRY _ JAN E PERRY 405 PRIMROSE RD#307 07029 B5 50.00 HEALTHY LIFESTYLES PLUS BARBARA&ELIO MARTIN 405 PRIMROSE RD 10435 B5 50.00 KATHERINE L MAYER M.A.,M.F.C.C. KATHERINE MAYER M.A.,M.F.C.C. 405 PRIMROSE RD#308 11762 B5 50.00 BARBARA SEIFER,L.M.F,T, BARBARA SEIFER 405 PRIMROSE RD#301 12321 B6 200.00 PARTNERS MORTGAGE J S CAMPAGNA/CHIEF OPER OFF. 405 PRIMROSE RD#300 ! 17007 B5 50.00 GAIL M SHAK PHD GAIL M SHAK PHD 405 PRIMROSE RD#205 17011 B5 50.00 LEONARD M MATESKY INSURANCE SERVICES _ _ LEONARD MATESKY 405 PRIMROSE RD#324 17090 B5 50.00 MARSHA JURASIN&ASSOC _ MARSHA JURASIN 405 PRIMROSE RD#209 19717 B5 50.00 MELISSA HAZEN PSYCHOTHERAPY OFFICE _ MELISSA HAZEN 405 PRIMROSE RD#312 21366 B5 50.00 ALICE M.MCCARTY,M.A.CAREER COUNSELOR ALICE MCCARTY 405 PRIMROSE RD.#317 24824 85 50.00 1 HENRY HORN&SONS,INC. _ TERRY,STEVE&SUSAN HORN 405 PRIMROSE RD#300 20190 1 B5 50.001 UNITED STATES CARBON CORPORATION J F BLUMBERG 407 PRIMROSE RD 20224 B5 50.00 1 JONATHAN D.BROWN,ESQ. JONATHAN D.BROWN 407 PRIMROSE RD 17025 B5 50.00 HARMONIOUS HOUSING INC BARBARA L KOHN 409 PRIMROSE RD 38378 B5 50.00 HORN APPRAISAL SERVICE LORI L HORN 409 PRIMROSE RD 10660 Total B5 50.00 LEONARD MA,O.D. LEONARD MA,O.D. 411 PRIMROSE RD Assessments: $137300 BID Burlingame EFILE.xIs 10 of 10 4/10/2006 BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT BASIS ANNUAL ASSESSMENT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT BUSINESS NO. OF 2004-2005 NO. OF 2006 -2007 TYPE STAFF STAFF SUBAREA A SUBAREA B SUBAREA A SUBAREA B 10+ $1,000 $750 ------------------------------------------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- RETAIL& 6+ $600 $500 5 - ) $600 $400 RESTAURANT ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------------------------------------------c 1 - 5 $350 $250 1 - 4 $350 $250 6+ $400 $300 10+----- $1,000 $500 ------------ --------------- --------------- ---------- --------------- --------------- SERVICE 3 - 5 $300 $200 5 - 9 $350 $200 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 1 - 2 $200 $100 1 - 4 $100 $50 6+ $350 $250 10+ $1,000 $500 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- PROFESSIONAL 3 - 5 $250 $150 5 - 9 $350 $200 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 1 - 2 $200 $100 1 - 4 $100 $50 10+ $1,000 $750 FINANCIAL 5 - 9 $600 $400 1+ $550 $550 1 - 4 $350 $250 * ----- Amount shown is annual total ** --- Staff means any persons working (full time or full time equivalency) including owners, partners, managers, employees, family members, etc. U:\FILES\BIDBGAMEAV\assessbasCOMPARE.bid.wpd March 29, 2006 Burlingame City Council Members: Please find enclosed the notice of potential class action should the City Council and the DBID Advisory Board persist in attempting to levy assessments against off-Avenue business owners. In addition to violation of the Brown Act prior to the new assessments levied in 2004-2005, the off-Avenue businesses continue to suffer demonstrable adverse effect from the continuation of DBID assessments and from the events and programs funded by same. The continued inclusion and attempted assessment of off-Avenue businesses in the Burlingame Avenue BID, despite majority protest votes submitted in 1992 and 2005, is contrary to the letter and spirit of the requirements for inclusion in the district as delineated in state law and is at variance with previous precedent set by the City in the establishment of the Broadway Avenue BID. Should the City and the DBID continue on the present course, assessments will be even more vigorously opposed this year, and based on sample polling in the neighborhood, opponents are going forward with the sound expectation that assessments will once again be defeated. Opponents of the DBID will promote a transition to the traditional form of merchants' association for the Burlingame Avenue area, on the model of the highly successful Greater North Michigan Avenue Association(please reference enclosed brochure). Over its 93-year existence,the GNMAA has earned the trust and participation of its neighborhood businesses and can now count over 700 voluntarily contributing members, who voluntarily participate on 30 active committees, supporting programs which reflect the diverse needs and interests of a diverse membership. Members include every type and size of small business that we have here in Burlingame, and the GNMAA enjoys the support and voluntary sponsorship of large corporations such as those we have here, including Apple, Banana Republic, Gap, Jacadi, Pottery Barn, Radio Shack and Starbucks. Implementation of a voluntary-membership business association, if under trustworthy, respected leadership,can serve to heal the deep distrust and anger in our business community and can serve as Downtown Burlingame's mutually respectful, cooperative organization of merchants,professionals, personal-service providers, restaurateurs and property owners with shared interests, an association which can work with the City, the Chamber of Commerce and other agencies as we seek the optimal path for maintaining, promoting and improving the community we already enjoy. In its promise to be so much to so many, with the predictable result of being too little to too few,the DBID is a liability to all. Downtown Burlingame deserves better. Indeed, Downtown Burlingame deserves the best. It should be noted that Downtown Burlingame attracts the very best and most astute business people. In order to succeed in a such a unique,high-end neighborhood as ours, we as business owners must be keenly attuned to optimal value and must be highly selective, rejecting mediocre systems which others in other communities might accept by default. The voluntary-membership business association on the GNMAA model is the longstanding,proven, flexible, effective, superior system of business-community organization. In contrast, BID organizations, with their inherently detached, tax-and- spend oligarchic leadership model, serve as a poor, artificial substitute for what has proven can be accomplished with a genuine organization of a community of peers. One of the City's thirteen statedog als to guide its 2006-2007 work program is to "explore ways for the City to attract and retain businesses." We look forward to the day when the City is ready to respect the needs of its business community and support the preferred form of business association that our community deserves. Regards, Quent Cordair Quent Cordair Fine Art 346 Lorton Avenue Burlingame p.s. The City should anticipate that protests representing the majority of assessment dollars will be submitted again this year should the City continue with the resolution as planned. If the City wishes to avoid wastefully spending another unrecoverable $8,000- $10,000 in the printing and postage costs for mailing the resolution to the 500-plus businesses, we respectfully suggest that it might be wise this year for the City to secure from the DBID, in advance of the mailing, the monies for the printing and postage. • • 9R Myya { r� YMaq�l 7�1' aC * NY 9 1 IV y XMn i¢ f aXihi' syy a ' �.v Awa ? ._ ,r•`-.�..�� p4} � r _ k,P S � ma:v. r r k a r 1Y en »m IA r. rn mrb � .. ow.' ... a,.,....r . SERVICE BOUNDARIES The Greater North Michigan Avenue Association In 1913, services a square mile area, including The business and industry leaders Magnificent MileTM district. on North Michigan Avenue formed the North Central N Association. Influenced by WON WES i Nh Ave. 0 N the great Burnham Plan for Chicago,members committed to developing a boulevard of grandeur unlike any other in the world.The Avenue was a distinguished by world-class architecture,lavish landscapes = _ and use of open space that took full advantage of its physical attributes. NAVY DIFF It was here that the political, ■s/ economic and cultural base ■ , - was formed for the North R-doiph 150, Michigan Avenue standard of prestige and quality. The GNMAA service area boundaries are: In 1947,the boundaries of North Avenue on the North;Randolph Street on the South; service were extended and Lake Shore Drive/Navy Pier on the East; the original name was The North Branch of the Chicago River on the West changed to The Greater Nort Michigan Avenue Association The neighborhoods served within GNMAA boundaries are: 1Gt1 AA The Gold Coast-CMront Center-Illinois Center Chicago's Magnificent Mile•The North BridgeT"District r River North•River East•Streeterville 1 I'i gb€a ® lµi� .s" THE GREATI'?R NORTII - MICHIGAN AVENUE ASSOCIATION AN INVITATION TO MEMBERSHIP ° tll rr #p t##ff# et�ae sxlt## � #rc s•s##st# Committed to the standards of quality set forth by our founders in 1913, The Greater North Michigan Avenue Association(GNMAA)continues to so r. impact the built environment and economic success of Chicago'slift Near North Side. ,x We enjoy a diverse membership—property owners,world class retailers, prominent hotels,outstanding restaurants,entertainment attractions, r 1111 professional services,residential properties and varied health,educational it o ll More than 30 1 active 66 11 ! committees offer and cultural institutions.The broad spectrum of members provides a vast 1 body of knowledge and collaborative influence that guides our activities. to g o members opportunities t*> to identify specific goals, articulatei Through membership,GNMAA has become an assertive force inconcerns and plan r determining policy,effecting change,creating opportunities and activities to in luence preparing our business district for the future. the growth and environment of the GNMAA members are continually presented with opportunities to GNMAA business expand their community knowledge,enhance marketing exposure and create powerful business relationships. We encourage you to explore what we have to offer.We invite you to become a member of The Greater North Michigan Avenue Association. u , The Greater North Michigan Avenue Association services members through active leadership and strong partnerships. Over 700 business members operate through four Divisions i and Advisory Councils to build quality, build business and build relationships. 171 I ORGANIZATIONAL CHART M.T0119 Orel :•.•. .• STANDING COMMITTEES & COUNCILS ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNING& MARKETING MEMBER PROGRAMS ADVISORY DIVISION ADVOCACY DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION COUNCILS ADMINISTRATION PLANNING& MAGNIFICENT MILE MEMBERSHIP RETAIL ---------------------- ZONING UGHTS FESTIVAL ---------------------- MERCHANTS FINANCE/ -------------------- --------------------- ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP COUNCIL TREASURER SIGN&URBAN GARDENS OF MEETING ---------------------- -------------------- DESIGN CHICAGO'S --------------------- DINING& SECRETARY/ ---------------------- MAGNIFICENT MILE CULTURAL EVENT NIGHTUFE CORPORATE BEAUTIFICATION ---------------------- ---------------------- COUNCIL RECORDS TASK FORCE LIGHT NIGHTS ON BOAT CRUISE ---------------------- ----—------- -----------------•-------------- ---------------------- THE MAGNIFICENT MILE --------------------- HOTEL GENERAL NOMINATING RESEARCH ---------------------- GNMAA GOLF OUTING MANAGERS ---------------------- ---------------------- WEB SITE --------------------- COUNCIL CORPORATE TRAFFIC& themagniFicentmile.com ANNUAL GALA ---------------------- SPONSORSHIPS TRANSPORTATION ---------------------- -•-------------------- COMMERCIAL& --------------------- ---------------------- CHICAGO'S THE GNMAA RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY/ SECURITY MAGNIFICENT MILE FOUNDATION PROPERTY CMC AFFAIRS TASK FORCE VISA CARD ---------------------- MANAGERS ........ --•------------------ COMMUNITY COUNCIL LEGAL MAGNIFICENT MILE SERVICE PROJECT COUNSEL PUBLICATIONS --------------------- HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL ® Operations— 'hii riistratioti Board of Directors Finance GNMAA appoints specially skilled business leaders to represent Legal Counsel member interests.Board members are active internally through Nominating committee leadership and externally through civic involvement. Civic Affairs In addition,our staff of ten full-time association professionals Secretary& Corporate Records assists members in facilitating association initiatives expeditiously. Sponsorship BUilding Quality— Planning & Advocacy Division GNMAA provides a forum for members and real estate developers to collaborate in promoting and supporting thoughtful development,attractive architecture and enhancement of the public way.All members benefit from e the aesthetic integrity maintained in Chicago's Magnificent Mile,,district Planning&zoning and surrounding communities. Sign&Urban Design GNMAA Member Benefits: Members may take advantage of Beautification the following Planning&Advocacy Task Force • Keeps members informed of relevant Traffic&Transportation developments in the area events and publications: Research •Continually shapes an environment • GNMAA Security Fair Security Task Force positioned to provide a quality guest •GNMAA Beautification Awards experience by managing the • Michigan Avenue by the Numbers standards of design,accessibility, economic offerings and physical Membe maintenance of the area as `# BUilding Business— .` T;irkctMg Divisiot GNMAA GNMAA is continually focused on promoting Chicago's Magnificent Mile''brand to all markets through special events,promotions,publications and publicity. * ' rV GNMAA Members Benefit from: Members may take advantage Mil n ML=1 • Increased awareness of Chicago's of the following marketing events The Magnificent Mile Magnificent Mile neighborhood and publications: Lights Festival locally,nationally and internationally • The Magnificent Mile Lights FestivaP"" Awl \, themagnif centmile.com • Large-scaled special events draw (1 million visitors) � . 00 • s Light Nights on national media attention and high • Light Nights on The Magnificent Mile MV fiC?dlt M& The Magnificent Mile volume of visitors (60,000 brochures distributed annually) Chicago's , Magnificent Mile Complimentary listings in consumer • The Magnificent Mile Area Guide tr 4 VISA Card publications focus on residential and (500,000 distributed annually) '° °^'mai Q Gardens of Chicago's visitor markets • The Magnificent Mile Neighborhood lights fe$lioa� Magnificent Mile - Web presence through a complimentary Directory(30,000 distributed annually) listing on The Magnificent Mile web site, www.themagnificentmile.com • The Magnificent Mile Lights Festival Holiday Activity Guide • Business alignment with Chicago's (100,000 distributed annually) Magnificent Mile visitor experience and authorized use of trademarks and logos 'Gardens of Chicago's Magnificent Mile (100,000 brochures distributed annually) II Member ProgramsBuildin Relationships— & Services Division GNMAA anticipates,meets and exceeds member expectations through an array of • programs,services and information-sharing designed to unite the business community. Membership These activities offer GNMAA members a fertile environment for developing important Annual Membership business and personal relationships. Meeting Annual Gala GNMAA Members Benefit from: Member Activities: Annual Boat Cruise • Interaction with influential members • Annual Membership Meeting of business and civic communities • Quarterly Membership Luncheons GNMAA Golf Outing • Access to information and events shared • The Membership Connections Human Resources exclusively with GNMAA members • Annual Gala Council Annual • Participation in community • Annual Boat Cruise on events represent Cultural Event sponsored by GNMAA Chicago's First Lady. • GNMAA Job Fair from ovW Community • Improved leadership skills and business . Annual Cultural Event Service Project acumen through committee involvement r • Community Service Project The GNMAA Foundation • The GNMAA Foundation activeli • Human Resource Council MEMBERSHIP GNMAA Golf Outing BREAKDOWN in assr 23%-Real Estate 21%-Retail and ev N, %-Individuals 3%-Non-Profit r ss � 4%-Financial i I 13%-Hotels .'` 7%-Professional Services 13%-Dining/Nightlife/Attractions —� 15%-Service&Vendor • Retail Merchants Advisory Councils Council Representing some of the larger categories of GNMAA's membership, ' Commercial Property the advisory councils meet one to two times per year.The councils' Hotel General critical duties are to critique,forecast and prepare association leaders Managers Council for future initiatives and improvements.Often day-to-day issues are resolved and Dining,Nightlife and neighboring business executives make connections and shape decision making. Attractions Council Fostering Partnerships The success of GNMAA can be attributed in part to the collaborative efforts of our many partners.GNMAA fosters vital relationships that facilitate our ability to host major events # �� and address critical issues for members.We work closely with many organizations,elected c • officials and government agencies,some of which are listed below. CITY OF CHICAGO • Chicago Fire Department •Office of the Alderman,420°Ward DEPARTMENTS OF— • Chicago Police Department • Office of the Mayor • Chicago Workforce Board • Planning and Development • Consumer Services • Streets&Sanitation • Cultural Affairs •Tourism • General Services •Transportation • Mayor's Convention Task Force •Water • Mayor's Office of Special Events •Zoning MembershfIli off ers STATE OF ILLINOIS • Commerce&Community Affairs •Tourism opportunities DEPARTMENTS OF— • State Representatives •Transportation for business • State Senators and personal PARTNER • Central Michigan Avenue Association • Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authoritygrowth throughr ORGANIZATIONS • Chicago Area Transportation Study • Metropolitan Planning Commissionnetworking at = • Chicago Central Area Committee • Metropolitan Water Reclamation District events and • Chicago Convention& •Oak Street Council involvement on Tourism Bureau • Regional Transit Authority committees • Chicago Transit Authority • River North Association • Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce • SOAR • Greater State Street Council • Streeterville Chamber of Commerce • Hotel Motel Association of Illinois • Visit Illinois • Illinois Restaurant Association • METRA tells Joining The Greater North Michigan Avenue Association Membership offers you an experience that will help shape the destiny of a vibrant,diverse community,as �} well as,opportunities for personal and business growth.We invite you to take advantage of these valuable F benefits and become a member of The Greater North Michigan Avenue Association. ` We will be happy to further discuss membership and dues investment.Please contact our membership department at 312-642-3570,e-mail us at gnmaa@gnmaa.com or visit us at www.themagnificentmile.com. A Valuable 3 . R# Membership Experience r 9P. ♦ t a Missioll Stated entf I ..-. E#,<I 7e+� e The Greater North Michigan Avenues .+ Pt. Association is the community organization •• ;: i which represents and informs the many r , and diverse interests within its '. geographical bounds' � Ir i I` g #Y + +: Our Our mission is to pr to all of our constituencies in planning for growth and development that will enhance the area's quality of life. The Association seeks to preserve, promote t I y 4 and enhance a vibrant,growing and stable `" ` : Jc community by identifying,articulating and serving the needs of its membership. off R Lf .`. t 625 North Michigan Avenue * i Suite 401 Chicago,Illinois 60611 =r . TEL 312.642.3570 A FAX 312.642.3826 - E-MAIL gnmaa@gnmaa.com www.themagnificentmile.com ' - Concept&Design: Graphic-Link,Inc.,Chicago I t 1 March 29, 2006 To the City of Burlingame Council Members: The City of Burlingame risks class action should the City Council attempt to burden off-Avenue business owners with the imposition of further assessments under the Downtown Burlingame Improvement District(hereinafter the "DBID"). Damages requested could include compensation for legal fees and the refundment of district assessments previously collected in 2004-2005. The establishment, boundaries, funding and continued conduct of the"DBID"are subject to the State of California Code Sections 36500-36551,the "Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989." In addition to procedural violations of the Brown Act prior to the new assessments levied in 2004-2005, assessed off-Avenue businesses continue to suffer substantive and demonstrable adverse effect from the continuation of DBID assessments and the events and programs funded by same, incurring liabilities inversely proportional to the benefits gained by on-Avenue merchants. The continued inclusion and assessment of off-Avenue businesses in the Burlingame Avenue BID, despite majority protest votes submitted in 1992 and 2005, is contrary to the letter and spirit of the requirements for inclusion in the district as delineated in the 1989 Code and are, additionally, in variance with previous precedent set by the City in the establishment of the Broadway Avenue BID. I. INSUPPORTABLE VARIANCE BETWEEN BROADWAY AND BURLINGAME AVENUE BID DISTRICT CONFIGURATIONS. In 1992,the City set a reasonable precedent for non-inclusion of off-Avenue businesses in the establishment of the Broadway Avenue BID. In the Broadway Avenue area, off-Avenue businesses were surveyed prior to the BID establishment and were found to disfavor inclusion in the district. Conversely, Burlingame Avenue area businesses were never surveyed regarding the perceived value of being included in a Burlingame Avenue BID, and yet were included in the district when it was established by the City, with less than thirty days notice. There exists no defensible support for the inconsistency and the resultant unequal treatment of off-Avenue businesses in the Burlingame Avenue area. II. VIOLATION OF BROWN ACT PRELIMINARY TO 2004-2005 NEW ASSESSMENTS. Section 36523.5 states, "Notwithstanding Section 36523,prior to adopting any new or increased assessment, the city council shall give notice pursuant to Section 54954.6 of the Government Code in lieu of publishing notice pursuant to subdivision(a) of Section 36523." According to Section 54954.6(2)of the Brown Act referenced: "The legislative body shall provide at least 45 days public notice of the public hearing at which the legislative body proposes to enact or increase the general tax or assessment..." Prior to the initial assessments charged subsequent to the BID establishment in 2004, less than 30-days notice was provided by the City Council prior to the new assessment, falling substantially short of providing the 45-day notice prescribed 2 by state law to allow for sufficient consideration and response by those to be assessed. The City has since acknowledged the applicability of Section 54954.6(2) for new and increased assessments in its current planned scheduling for notification prior to raising assessments for the 2006-2007 year. III. INSUPPORTABLE AND PROBATIVELY CONTRADICTABLE "FINDING OF FACT"BY CITY COUNCIL. Section 36527(i) states that the City Council must include in any ordinance to establish a proposed business improvement area, or to increase or continue assessments therefore, "A finding that the businesses and the property within the business and improvement area will be benefited by the improvements and activities funded by the assessments proposed to be levied. In the case of an area formed to promote tourism, only businesses that benefit from tourist visits may be assessed." A) As stated in Section I above, contrary to the actions prior to the establishment of the Broadway Avenue BID, no survey or study of off-Avenue businesses was conducted prior to the establishment of the Burlingame Avenue BID to appraise any benefit or perceived value to the outlying, off-Avenue businesses. B) Any claim of benefit to off-Avenue businesses is wholly arbitrary, insupportable and in contradiction to subsequent written testimony submitted to the City Council by the majority of assessed businesses responding: 1)A survey of affected business owners conducted subsequent to the establishment of the BID and submitted to City Council on April 2, 2005,provided written proof(of which copies have been maintained) of 79.4%of respondents disagreeing with the value of the district, and 71.5% demanding refundment; 2) On May 2, 2005, a majority of all 525 businesses assessed submitted written protests of the assessments to the City Council; 3) Preliminary surveys in 2006 indicate that the majority of those assessed will continue to protest further DBID assessments, notwithstanding proposed revisions thereof, and will continue to strongly disagree with and dispute any council "finding"that the sum total of activities promoted by the DBID is more beneficial than not to the respective businesses assessed, in consideration for the amount assessed. C) A principal, stated goal of the DBID is the promotion, draw and transportation of tourist traffic from the Airport Boulevard hotels, supported subsequently by substantial DBID expenditures on the "Burlingame Trolley"(which in the Burlingame Avenue area travels the Avenue only), in placed advertising in hotel shopping guides, and the stated goal of hiring a marketing coordinator to interact with hotel concierges. As only a minority percentage of businesses assessed under the DBID can benefit from tourist visits to Burlingame Avenue,the assessment of all area businesses for expenditures towards same is in direct violation of Section 36527(i). D) The DBID's mission statement explicitly references the promotion of a"Main Street experience,"and numerous statements and records exist reflecting the DBID's initial and continued focus on the promotion of the Avenue as the primary concern. Events promoted by the DBID and representing a significant budgetary expenditure, such as"Art& Jazz on the Avenue"and the "Holiday Open House,"primarily benefit only on- Avenue retailers. Such on-Avenue events create significant inconvenience and income loss to off-Avenue retailers and professionals, in the location of public toilets,generators, etc. in front of side-street stores,the blocking of city streets and the saturation of already limited parking facilities. Numerous off-Avenue businesses close entirely due to the 3 inconveniences caused by the on-Avenue events, creating further financial hardship. The assessment of off-Avenue businesses in the support of on-Avenue events violates both the letter and spirit of 36527(i). E) The length of Burlingame Avenue, which in itself moves and holds retail traffic flow by its extended line-of-sight attractiveness comprising the parallel lines of trees, flower-boxes and A-list retail establishments, already holds three times the competitive advantage over off-Avenue spaces, as evidenced by lease rates three-times higher for the former than for the latter. The existing superiority of the Avenue, by comparison of its amenities and attractiveness, strongly discourages diversion and turning of customer traffic down the less-attractive and shorter side streets. Any spending towards added or enhanced amenities, beautification, maintenance, improvements and marketing of Burlingame Avenue proper, which is already the most enhanced,premier traffic destination of the neighborhood in which it is located, adversely weighs against the competitiveness of retailers and restaurants on the less attractive side- and off-Avenue locations in their ongoing challenge to draw attention and to turn retail traffic from the designed draw of continued motion along the Avenue. With Burlingame Avenue's already existing and great competitive advantages over the off-Avenue streets, the only justifiably allocated expenditures of off-Avenue assessment dollars would entail a complete cessation of spending on the Avenue itself until all off-Avenue streets were raised to an equal level of improvement, beautification and traffic draw(of which equal lease rates would be indicative). Short of such an inversion of the DBID's established goals and spending priorities, any spending towards on-Avenue beautification and conveniences only creates greater competitive disadvantage for off-Avenue businesses, causing liability in inverse proportion to the benefit experienced on-Avenue. That some off-Avenue businesses may be assessed at a lower rate than on-Avenue businesses, or that some DBID spending is alleged to also benefit off-Avenue businesses, is immaterial to the exacerbation of comparative competitive disadvantage caused by spending on and for the already superior Avenue. F) Any additional retail traffic drawn by the additional marketing and beautification of the Burlingame Avenue retail area creates further burden on the already stressed and maximized parking availability in the area, causing further inconvenience and burden to already frustrated off-Avenue professionals, service providers and their existing clientele. The DBID's promotion of parking permits for employees using outlying long-term parking lots provides only the most cosmetic relief of inconvenience, allowing some employees who already use the long-term lots to not have to carry quarters on a daily basis. In that there is no cost savings in purchasing the parking permit over the current cost of parking in the long-term lots for a full work week,the permit program cannot be expected to in any way improve the dire lack of availability of convenient parking near businesses. Contrarily,the convenience of using the parking permits, particularly if the program is expanded as desired and planned by the DBID, could result in even more local employees driving to work rather than using alternate public transportation, further stressing the available parking. IV. APPEAL TO AN INDEPENDENT COURT FOR RELIEF AND COMPENSATION. It is the firm and studied opinion of downtown-area business owners that an independent court would agree with expert testimony, maintained written 4 and video records, and the testimony of as many local business owners as the court would require for sufficient evidence and proof of the above violations of state law, in letter and in spirit, should the City Council attempt to burden the off-Avenue business owners with the imposition of further assessments in support of the DBID. Damages requested could include compensation for legal fees and the refundment of district assessments previously collected in 2004-2005. o��CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA 5b ITEM# MTG. wo� DATE 4.17.06 �FATEG JVNE 6 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: APRIL 5,2006 APPROVED FROM: CITY PLANNER BY SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN Introduction: City Council should hold a public hearing on the proposal to amend the zoning regulations to establish the Anza Point North zoning district in the Bayfront planning area. Following the public hearing the City Council should take action on the ordinance. If the action on the ordinance is in the affirmative, the regulations would become effective May 17, 2006. The public hearing was noticed in the San Mateo Times on April 7, 2006, also notice was mailed to the property owners within the proposed Anza Point North district and within 500 feet of the district boundry on April 7, 2006. General Plan Compliance: The Anza Point North zoning district is part of the implementation phase of the Bayfront Specific Plan adopted by the City Council and amended to the Burlingame General Plan in April 2004. The provisions in the ordinance are consistent with the plan because they are taken from the land use element and design guidelines in that adopted plan supplemented with provisions from the existing C-4 district for the Anza Point North district which currently regulate development in this area. The C-4 zoning has been fundamental in implementing the 1969 General Plan, the 1981 Bayfront Specific Plan and in establishing the existing land use pattern for this area. The Anza Point North (APN) district includes the northern portion of the Anza Point subarea of the Bayfront Specific Plan. The APN district includes the undeveloped area adjacent to San Francisco Bay and Sanchez Channel. The proposed provisions of the district are consistent with the directives of the Specific Plan they are intended to implement. CEQA Compliance: Negative Declaration ND531-P was prepared and adopted for the Bayfront Specific Plan in April 5, 2004. Since this zoning action is an implementation of that adopted plan and is consistent with the provisions of that plan, this zoning action to adopt the implementing regulations for the Anza Point North district is determined to be covered by ND531-P. PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN April 17,2006 Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission held several public hearings on the proposed Anza Point North regulations. (See PC Minutes August 22, 2005 and September 12, 2005) At their conclusion the Commission referred several items back to the Commission Subcommittee for further comment. These items included: ■ how height was to be regulated; ■ requirements for minimum lot size and for minimum lot frontage; and ■ regulation of particular land uses: 'time share properties', extended stay hotels, medical clinics and health services. The Subcommittee met twice, discussed these issues and directed staff with amendments to the originally proposed regulations. (See Working Paper: Revision to Anza Point North Zoning District, February 2, 2006) On March 13, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended the proposed Anza Point North (APN) district regulations to the City Council for action. No changes were made by the Planning Commission to the draft ordinance as proposed by the Subcommittee. City Council Study Session and Introduction: On March 29, 2006, the City Council held a study session to review the proposed regulations for the Anza Point North zoning district. Following study the consensus of the Council was that the proposed draft was ready for Council action. Discussion focused on land use modifications including the appropriateness of allowing health services, medical clinics and extended stay hotels in this area; and the height of buildings, how height is measure and the community wind standard. On April 5 2006, at Introduction the City Council reviewed the proposed Anza Point North regulations. No changes were suggested. Council directed staff to set the proposed Anza Point North regulations for public hearing on April 17, 2006 and to post the required public notices. BACKGROUND Proposed Anza Point North Zoning Regulations: When the Anza Point North regulations were initially heard by the Planning Commission, there was general consensus about most of the proposed standards. However, there were a few areas where questions were raised at the public hearing. (See PC Minutes September 12, 2005 and correspondence) Commission referred these items back to the Bayfront Zoning Subcommittee who met and made specific recommendations on each of these items follows. (The background on each of these issues is found in the Working Paper: Revision to Anza Point North Zoning District and a summary of the reasons for changes made are included in the Annotated Ordinance attached to this staff report). ■ Permitted Uses. o Recommended adding health services and medical clinics up to a maximum of 5,000 SF in office buildings 20,000 SF or larger, with no additional parking required. (Same regulation used for this use in the Inner Bayshore zoning district). (CS 25.48.020 (c)) Subcommittee felt that if this area becomes an employment center, health services and/or medical clinic uses at the size proposed would serve the employees in the area in the same fashion envisioned in the Inner Bayshore subarea. CS 25.48.025 (i) allows an applicant to request a conditional use permit to have more than 5,000 SF of health service and medical clinics in the APN zone. Such 2 PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN April 17,2006 expansion would be discretionary and parking requirements would need to be considered as a part of that application. ■ Conditional Uses o Extended stay hotels, recommend that this use be retained as a conditional use in the Anza Point North area because it is a type of hotel not represented in Burlingame's hotel market, because the extended stay industry notes that the majority of stays are less than 29 days those are subject to Transient Occupancy Tax, and this use can be conditioned never to be converted to a multi-family residential use. o Separated park and fly programs to promote room occupancy from the hotel use, and provide that they be separately reviewed. This change was made because park and fly programs usually are requested after a hotel has been in operation and more is known about the actual use of the on-site parking and effectiveness of the hotels shuttle service to the airport. ■ Prohibited Uses o The Subcommittee reviewed the question about 'time share property' and determined that it was a residential use and therefore prohibited by the Specific Plan in the entire Bayfront planning area. To make this clear, they recommended adding a definition for'timeshare property' to the definitions section of the zoning code (CS 25.08.649) and listed'time share property' on the prohibited uses list in the APN district. For more information on the residential determination of the 'time share property'use see the annotation for CS 25.40.030 (q) attached. Also in the zoning code if a use is not listed as permitted or conditional it is prohibited. So by adding a definition of the use 'time share property, it is prohibited in all of the zoning districts in the Bayfront area even though it is not listed on the prohibited uses list for each district. ■ Height and Bulk of Buildings o One of the issues raised at public hearing was the presentation in the design guidelines in the plan which shows the intended gradation of height expressed in'stories' across the properties in the Anza Point North area. The gradation is required to meet the community wind standards. Elsewhere in the building design criteria(Bayfront SAP V-33) this gradation is expressed in terms of feet, 30 feet, two story; 35 feet, three story; and 50 feet, four story. The zoning regulation was based on the height as measured in feet. (CS 25.48.042 (a)) The subcommittee recommended that the development (zoning) standard should be expressed in feet and that the plan diagram figures on page Bayfront SAP V-26 and V-27 should be revised to show feet as expressed in the building design criteria not in stories. This will require an amendment to the Bayfront Specific Plan, but represents no change to the proposed height regulations. o Subcommittee did note that the zoning was unclear about how the height should be measured in this area given the unique wind conditions, e.g. how are mechanical penthouses addressed . They recommend that height be measured in the same way it is in the rest of the city, to the top of the parapet if the mechanical equipment is not taller than 10 feet and does not cover more than 5% of the roof area. If the mechanical equipment exceeds either of these standards the height will be measured from the average top of curb at the front of the site to the top of the mechanical equipment. o The third height issue raised was related to requiring a conditional use permit for structures taller than the 30'to 50' allowed in CS 25.48.042 (a) height and bulk of buildings. This 3 PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN April 17,2006 conditional use provision CS 25.48.025 (a)provides that a developer may ask for a maximum of 10 additional feet over the height allowed on his site,but must undertake a wind study and demonstrate via that study that the additional height will be consistent with the community wind standard. The Subcommittee felt that this was a reasonable and prudent provision, and that it should not be changed. Concern was expressed that the construction of one building could have a dramatic negative impact on the development of adjacent sites and on valued community recreation areas, if a broader based study is not done for the additional height. It was also noted that the maximum height number was appropriate because the only way to exceed the community wind standard (which is an environmental standard not a zoning standard)would be to redo the environmental document for the Specific Plan and amend the plan by adopting a new community wind standard. Certainly such an action would require a wind study. (See also Annotated Ordinance page 14 attached) ■ Minimum lot size and street frontage o The Subcommittee recommended that the minimum lot size be changed from 4 acres to 2 acres. The issue was raised that the recommended lot size of 4 acres was too large and that given the size and shape the property could not be evenly divided into 4 acre parcels, thus forcing them to leave some land undeveloped. The Subcommittee noted that the minimum lot size is just that, a minimum; and future development,particularly given the design guidelines would have a variety of lot sizes. The objective of a minimum lot size is to insure that new lots created would be large enough to be reasonably developed within the design guidelines requirements and not so small that it would thwart future changes in land use consistent with the development standards and design guidelines. One of the issues in the Inner Bayshore area is that many lots are very small, and current uses demand larger parcels in an environment where lot combination is very difficult given ownership patterns and land prices. o Minimum street frontage was recommended by the Subcommittee to be changed from 250 feet to 150 feet, based on the fact that 150 feet is the minimum street frontage required in the adjacent Anza Point South zoning district and is 'typical' of the development in that area. (See Annotated Ordinance page 15, CS 25.48.045) o The subcommittee did not recommend a change to the requirement that no variance be granted for lot size or street frontage. They felt that this area is essentially undeveloped and there are many ways to subdivide the area within the standards now proposed. The Subcommittee did note that commercial condominium developments are still possible because in a condominium, the underlying parcel is jointly owned by all the condominium owners, so is not divided. ■ Parking Requirements o Since health services and medical office uses are restricted to 5,000 SF in office buildings larger than 20,000 SF so that they are oriented to serve employees in the area, the Subcommittee felt that the same parking standards used in the Inner Bayshore district should apply. In the Inner Bayshore district when health services of less than 5,000 SF went in to a larger office building, the city discovered that there was sufficient parking on site to cover the higher parking demand caused by the 5,000 SF of health services use. This is so in part because of the large amount of parking for the office building and the fact that all office users are rarely on the site at one time. (See annotated ordinance page 20, CS 25.48.080) 4 PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN April 17,2006 ■ New Definition "Time Share Property" o To clarify what a 'time share property' is and that it is a land use, the Subcommittee recommended that the following definition be added to the zoning code: "Time share property" or "interval ownership" or "condominium hotel" means a "time share property" as defined in Business and Professions Code Section 11212 without regard to any minimum number of time share interests or minimum of years used." (CS 25.08.649) As noted in the Annotated Ordinance (page 21) 'time share property' is a relatively new ownership concept and is not addressed in the city's current zoning ordinance. Because the concept raises issues about land use and it has become a type of ownership/use, it is appropriate to add a definition to the city's zoning code. Because this particular type of ownership is emerging, it seemed best to use in our definition the definition used by the State of California(Business and Professions Code section 11212)which is attached at the end of the annotated ordinance for your reference. This means that as the state definition is changed our definition will be changed as well to stay current with the law. The state definition has been supported by case law which has defined 'time share properties' as residential in terms of ownership and use because the ownership entitles the owner to live in the unit for a given period of time. For this reason such uses are not treated as hotels and are usually exempt from Transient Occupancy Tax to the city. These recommendations have been included in the general summary of the ordinance provisions below in italics. All these revisions were included in the ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission to the City Council on March 13, 2006. General Summary of the proposed Anza Point North zoning regulations with changes from C-4 noted: ➢ Permitted uses: o Hotel densities are increased from 65 to 85 rooms. o Office uses are permitted at a lower FAR(0.6) as recommended by the plan based on factors learned from previous project review. Office uses include research and development facilities and laboratories including biotechnology; health services and medical clinics as a conditional use (see below). Training facilities which are associated with research and development also are allowed. o Privately funded recreation(commercial recreation) is distinguished from public recreation. Commercial recreation has a limit of 0.5 FAR limit and 1,500 SF of support retail; to do more would require a conditional use permit. o Restaurants/food establishments continue to be allowed at the same 0.15 FAR. ➢ Conditional uses: o Extended stay hotels at a density of 85 rooms to the acre. o A CUP is required if the height of a building violates the community wind standards adopted in the plan, heights 10 feet over the maximum allowed by the plan are prohibited. However, text has been clarified so that mechanical penthouse equipment/areas which do not exceed a height of 10 as measured from the adjacent roof surface and do not cover more than 5% of the roof area will be exempt. o Commercial recreation facilities including gyms with more than 0.5 FAR. 5 PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN April 17,2006 o Commercial parking lots (including park and fly) are listed as an interim use, which was recommended by the Specific Plan; the current performance criteria were carried forward, including a maximum 5 years for a permit. o Education and technical schools will continue to be allowed in buildings with greater than 20,000 SF, can occupy no more than 10,000 SF of such a building, and the trip generation must be within the allocation for the planned use of the site. o Day care facilities for children to support employees in the area is called out as a conditional use. o Automobile rental desks with supporting on site parking at hotels are added as a CUP. o Health services and medical clinics are allowed as a conditional use in office buildings larger than 20,000 SF, if they do not exceed 5,000 SF. (These are the same regulations placed on health services and medical clinics in the Inner Bayshore zoning district.) o Any exception to the design guidelines requires a CUP, this same provision exists in the current zoning. ➢ Prohibited uses are the same in the AA, APN and APS zoning districts. However, "time share property"is called out as a prohibited use in the Anza Point North district. Since timeshare property is not noted as a permitted or conditional use in any of the other Bayfront zoning districts, the use is prohibited in those districts as well. It should be noted that any use which is not permitted or conditional, is prohibited. The prohibited uses section is included to respond to the most frequent questions asked staff. Other uses not listed or as permitted or conditional uses on this list are also prohibited. ➢ Setbacks: o The current plan requires that new development create a "street wall". The plan requires an average setback of 15 feet on each property, however, this is translated in the zoning to mean that 40% of a new structure must meet the maximum setback of 15 feet. Setbacks in this area previously were based on the width and height of the proposed structure. o To insure a visual connection between the street and the bay or estuary 20 feet is required between buildings on the same site and minimum side setbacks are established at 10 feet. o Rear setbacks are established at 10 feet, however, setbacks from shoreline (which on many properties is the rear setback) follow the BCDC guidelines which range from 75 feet along San Francisco Bay to 65 feet along the edges of the estuaries (Sanchez Channel) o Parking is discouraged in the front setbacks,particularly between any structure and the lot front. o Height is varied across the area based on the prevailing winds going from 50 feet on the Sanchez Channel side to 30 feet on the eastern San Francisco Bay side. However, the additional IO feet with a conditional use permit and wind study is also recommended by the Subcommittee; and the text has been amended to exempt from the height measurement roof top equipment which is not taller than 10 feet from the surface of the roof and covers no more than 5% of the roof area. o Mass and bulk regulation is based on the land use FAR's and design guidelines in the plan. ➢ Lot size. o Because of the existing large parcels and the economics of efficient development in this area, the minimum lot size recommended is 2 acres. This has changed from the 4 acres previously shown. The Subcommittee felt that in this area the minimum lot size should be bigger than in other areas because of the size of the existing lots. Also a larger lot provides the developer 6 PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE FOR PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN April 17,2006 with more flexibility to meet the development requirements and the design guidelines adopted for the area. Two acres achieves these objectives while giving the developer more flexibility in his layout and overall development design. ➢ Street frontage. o The proposed 150 foot street frontage is the same requirement as used in the adjacent Anza Point South district, so the pattern of development in the Anza Point subarea will be consistent. This is a change from 250 feet previously suggested. The subcommittee felt the reduction was justified on the basis of the consistency with the adjacent Anza Point South area. ➢ Landscaping and design review. o Landscaping requirements are taken from the BCDC guidelines and design criteria set out in the Specific plan. They are consistent with the current requirements of the C-4 zone which are also taken from the BCDC guidelines and have been in effect since 1982. o The design review criteria are the same ones used in the Shoreline area, with the same emphasis on integrating development with the Bay Trail, recreation and water features in the area. ➢ Public Access. These standards are also based on the 1982 BCDC guidelines and represent no change to development standards for the area. ➢ Parking requirements. As in the C-4 zone the specific parking requirements for food establishments and instructional uses in office buildings exceeding 20,000 SF are the same. In addition the parking requirements for health services and medical clinics in office buildings over 20,000 SF used in the Inner Bayshore area have been added. New parking requirements are added for one on site space for the airport shuttle at hotels. The fact that Bay Trail parking is included in the required parking count for any use and must simply be designated is clarified. ATTACHMENTS: Map: Burlingame Bayfront Specific Plan, amendment to Zoning District Map, Adopting July 5, 2005 Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Amending Title 25 to Adopt the Anza Point North District and Establish Classification Determination Annotated Anza Point North (APN) District Planning Commission Minutes August 22, 2005 and Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2005 City Council Minutes, April 3, 2006 included in Council Packet Also refer to Anza Point North section of the Background Binder. 7 BURL INGAME BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN Ni IA-1 I Amendment to Zoning District Map Gso Ordinance No. 1759 oreline Adopted by the City Council on July 5, 2005 � 6 Legend �• Poiht Inner Bayshore :. •••• O-M to 113 a3� ;;;• ® Shoreline ���° •••• C-4 to SL Anza Extension Unclassified ® Anza Area Anza C-4 to AA Point Anza Point North South C-4 to APN Anza Point South "" O-M to APS I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING TITLE 25 TO ADOPT THE ANZA POINT NORTH DISTRICT AND 3 ESTABLISH CLASSIFICATION DETERMINATION 4 5 Section 1. In 2004, the City Council adopted a revised Bayshore Specific Plan to guide 6 development and use of the Bayshore Area of the City. Among the subareas in the Plan is the Anza 7 Point area,which includes a variety of uses and lot sizes. This ordinance implements the Specific Plan 8 for the northern portion of this subarea. 9 10 Section 2. A new Chapter 25.48 is added as follows: 11 Chapter 25.48 12 Anza Point North (APN) 13 Sections: 25.48.010 Scope and purpose of regulations. 14 25.48.020 Permitted uses. 25.48.025 Conditional uses. 15 25.48.030 Prohibited uses. 25.48.040 Setbacks. 16 25.48.042 Height and bulk of buildings. 25.48.045 Minimum lot size and street frontage. 17 25.48.048 No variance for lot size and street frontage. 25.48.050 Landscaping. 18 25.48.052 Design review. 25.48.060 Public access. 19 25.48.080 Parking requirements. 20 21 25.48.010 Scope and purpose of regulations. 22 It is the purpose and policy of this chapter to establish and maintain land uses for the northern 23 portion of the area designated as the Anza Point subarea in the Bayshore Specific Area Plan.The Anza 24 Point subarea lies east of Sanchez Channel, is bounded on two sides by San Francisco Bay and by US 25 101 on the south side. The Anza Point subarea is divided into two sections: the northern one of 26 currently vacant land served by Airport Boulevard.These provisions address the Anza Point North area 27 which include all the properties north of Beach and Lang Road with frontage on Airport Boulevard. 28 The purpose of these regulations is to direct the siting and development of structures which adhere to 4/3/2006 1 ANZA POINT NORTH I the development policies and adopted design guidelines of the Bayfront Plan in general and to the 2 properties in the north portion of the Anza Point subarea specifically. The intention is to attract 3 development which will benefit from the proximity to the open water areas of San Francisco Bay and 4 its estuaries,will support public recreation and access along San Francisco Bay, and will protect this 5 irreplaceable natural and recreation resource.Future development consistent with the Bayfront Specific 6 Plan will create a viable transition from the heavy commercial uses along US 101 to the visitor oriented 7 and office uses with Bay orientation to be developed on the vacant land at the north end of the Anza 8 Point subarea, establish a bayside gateway to Burlingame on its eastern end, and contribute to the 9 revenue base of the city. In creating this district, the city asserts that economic as well as aesthetic 10 advantages accrue to the land, its occupants and the public from the required controls and regulations. 11 12 25.48.020 Permitted uses. 13 The following uses are permitted in the Anza Point North district: 14 (a) Motels and hotels with a maximum density of eighty-five(85)rooms to the acre and a floor 15 area ratio of 1.0 or less;facilities provided on site may include such retail sales and personal service uses 16 as meal and beverage services,barber and beauty shops, smoke shops,and shuttle bus service to serve 17 only hotel guests so long as the operation does not use parking required for primary hotel use, 18 convention and meeting facilities, and similar services which are clearly incidental and accessory to 19 provision of lodging accommodations; and no more than one dwelling unit within the motel or hotel 20 structure that is used exclusively by the owner or manager of the motel or hotel; 21 (b) Restaurants with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.15; 22 (c) Office uses with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6, including research and development 23 facilities and laboratories;however,manufacturing is not allowed,and health services or medical clinics 24 are only allowed pursuant to section 25.48.025 below; 25 (d) Training facilities associated with and related to a primary activity of research and 26 development facilities located in the Anza Area,Anza Point North, or Anza Point South district; 27 (e) Commercial recreation facility with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5; these facilities may 28 include the sale ofinerchandise and items which are related to the principal use that do not exceed a total 4/3/2006 2 ANZA POINT NORTH I of one thousand five hundred(1,500) square feet of support retail sales area located within the facility; 2 (f) Publicly owned recreation areas; 3 (g) Adult oriented businesses that meet all of the requirements of chapters 25.76 and 10.58 of 4 this code; 5 (h) Accessory uses which are necessary for the permitted uses under this section. 6 7 25.48.025 Conditional uses. 8 The following are uses requiring a conditional use permit: 9 (a) All structures that are taller than the maximum height allowed pursuant to section 25.48.042 10 below, if wind studies demonstrate that the additional height is consistent with the community wind 11 standards;but in no event shall any structure be taller than ten(10) feet above those maximum heights 12 allowed pursuant to section 25.48.042; 13 (b) Commercial recreation facilities including gymnasiums with a floor area ratio of more than 14 0.5 or that include a total space of more than one thousand five hundred(1,500)square feet ofrecreation 15 business related merchandise which are related to the principal use in the facility; 16 (c) Commercial parking lots as an interim use as is described in the Bayfront Specific Plan as 17 adopted by the City Council,which comply with at least the following criteria: 18 (1) The sole purpose of the use is the parking for one day or longer of vehicles of persons using 19 San Francisco International Airport; and 20 (2)A minimum lot size of three (3) acres; and 21 (3) Permit term limited to five(5)years; and 22 (4) No more peak hour vehicle trips are generated than allowed by the traffic analyzer for the 23 use designated for the site in the general plan; 24 (d) Day care with on-site drop-off and parking as required by chapter 25.70; 25 (e) Educational institutions, trade and technical schools in buildings with twenty thousand 26 (20,000)or more gross square footage,with all educational uses in a single building occupying no more 27 than a total of ten thousand(10,000)gross square feet and whose trip generation as calculated using the 28 Bayfront traffic analyzer is no greater than that of a use permitted on the same site; 4/3/2006 3 ANZA POINT NORTH I (f) Extended stay hotels; 2 (g) Motels and hotels with more than eighty-five(85) rooms to the acre or with a floor area ratio 3 of more than 1.0; facilities provided on site may include such retail sales and service uses as meal and 4 beverage services, barber and beauty shops, smoke shops, and shuttle bus service to serve only hotel 5 guests so long as the operation does not use parking required for primary hotel use, convention and 6 meeting facilities,and similar services which are clearly incidental and accessory to provision of lodging 7 accommodations including park and fly programs associated with the letting of hotel rooms which does 8 not impact the availability of on site parking for guests and the use and parking for any on site meeting 9 facilities;and no more than one dwelling unit within the motel or hotel structure that is used exclusively 10 by the owner or manager of the motel or hotel; 11 (h) As part of a hotel or motel use, an automobile rental desk or a park and fly program 12 associated with renting of rooms and that does not affect the availability of on-site parking for hotel or 13 motel guests and the use and parking for any on-site meeting facilities; 14 (i) Health services and medical clinics that do not exceed five thousand(5,000)square feet total 15 in office structures over twenty thousand(20,000)gross square feet,with parking as set forth in section 16 25.48.080 below; 17 0) Any building,structure or site plan that does not comply with the adopted Design Guidelines 18 in the Bayshore Specific Plan for the Anza Point subarea as established by resolution of the city council; 19 (k) Incidental food sales and sale of convenience amenities to support on-site office employees 20 in office buildings of twenty thousand(20,000) square feet or more,whose total area shall not exceed 21 a maximum of one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet and without exclusive access to the 22 outside; 23 (0 Drive-in services or take out services associated with permitted and conditional uses; 24 (m) Any use similar in nature to one which is permitted or for which a permit is required in this 25 district that is: 26 (1) Consistent with planned land uses in the Anza Point subarea; and 27 (2)At a density determined not to exceed the trip generation for the planned use of the site using 28 the adopted Bayfront traffic analyzer. 4/3/2006 4 ANZA POINT NORTH 1 25.48.030 Prohibited uses. 2 Uses not listed as permitted or conditional shall be prohibited, including: 3 (a) Automobile rental uses; 4 (b) Automobile dealers and sales lots; 5 (c)Automobile wrecking and junk yards,storage or baling of scraps,paper rags,sacks,or metals, 6 including recycling facilities for green waste and other materials; 7 (d) Commercial parking lots except as expressly allowed pursuant to section 25.48.025(c); 8 (e) Retail sales uses except as expressly allowed within the uses designated in section 25.48.020 9 or 25.48.025; 10 (f) Service businesses, except as expressly allowed within the uses designated in section 11 25.48.020 or 25.48.025; 12 (g)Personal services,except as expressly allowed within the uses designated in section 25.48.020 13 or 25.48.025 14 (h) Air courier, delivery or other trans-shipment services, including freight forwarding; 15 (i) Free standing specialty food establishments or any specialty food establishment with direct 16 external access within any building; 17 0) Warehouse, storage and distribution of goods, materials, liquids and equipment; 18 (k) Outdoor storage of materials including contractors storage yards; 19 (0 Health services and medical clinics, except as expressly allowed under section 25.48.025; 20 (m)Industrial and manufacturing uses; 21 (n)Massage,bathing or similar establishments; 22 (o) Residential uses and buildings, except for an owner/manager residence in a hotel or motel 23 as expressly allowed under section 25.48.020 or 25.48.025; 24 (p)Gasoline service stations and major and minor automobile repair,including auto body work; 25 (q) Time-share property; 26 (r) Any use determined to be obnoxious or offensive. 27 28 // 4/3/2006 5 ANZA POINT NORTH 1 25.48.040 Setbacks. 2 The following minimum setbacks shall apply to all parcels, buildings and structures or any 3 enlargement thereof located in the district: 4 (a) Front setback. There shall be an average front setback of fifteen(15)feet,with at least forty 5 (40)percent of the structure at the maximum setback of fifteen(15) feet; 6 (b) Side setback. There shall be a ten (10) foot side setback. 7 (c) Distance between buildings. To provide useable wind-sheltered outdoor area and to provide 8 a visual connection to the Bay Trail, there shall be a distance of at least twenty (20) feet between 9 buildings on the same lot. 10 (d) Rear setback. Structures shall be set back at least ten(10) feet from rear property line. 11 (e) Setbacks from shoreline. In any event, structures shall be set back an average of sixty-five 12 (65)feet from Sanchez Channel and seventy-five(75)feet from San Francisco Bay and the shoreline as 13 defined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; in addition, for any building that is 14 forty(40) feet or taller,then the setback of the building to the shoreline shall be equal to or greater than 15 the height of the building. 16 (f) In addition to the setbacks set forth above, there shall be a fifteen (15) foot setback from 17 Airport Boulevard for all below grade construction. 18 (g) No parking spaces shall be provided within the ten (10) foot minimum setback across the 19 lot front on any property. Driveways are allowed in the setback, but the driveways shall not be 20 considered as landscaped area. No parking areas shall be located between any structure and the lot front, 21 except for loading zones. Placement of parking shall be consistent with the design guidelines for the 22 Anza Point subarea. 23 24 25.48.042 Height and bulk of structures. 25 (a) Maximum height shall be determined by impact on the prevailing wind and shall be 26 staggered with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet along the eastern side of the lot, increasing in a 27 graduated manner to a maximum of fifty(50) feet along the western, or Sanchez Channel, side of the 28 lot,as established in the Anza Point subarea design guidelines and consistent with the community wind 4/3/2006 6 ANZA POINT NORTH I standards. The maximum height may be exceeded by a mechanical penthouse with a maximum height 2 of ten(10) feet as measured from the adjacent roof surface and covering no more than five(5)percent 3 of the roof area. 4 (b) Maximum bulk and mass shall be determined by the floor area ratio established in the 5 Bayfront Specific Plan for the land uses in the Anza Point subarea. Where no floor area ratio is 6 provided,mass and bulk shall be based on the adopted design guidelines,the development constraints 7 documented in the Bayfront Specific Plan, and the zoning regulations where the property is located. 8 9 25.48.045 Minimum lot size and street frontage.. 10 There shall be a minimum lot size of two(2)acres and a minimum street frontage of one hundred 11 fifty(150)feet. No property in the district maybe divided or subdivided into a lot with less area or less 12 street frontage. 13 14 25.48.048 No variance for lot size or street frontage. 15 Notwithstanding any other provision of this code,no variance for lot size or street frontage shall 16 be granted to any property within this district. 17 18 25.48.050 Landscaping. 19 The following landscaping requirements shall apply to all lots: 20 (a) The landscape requirements of the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea of the 21 Bayfront Specific Plan as adopted by the city council shall be met; and 22 (b) A minimum of ten (10)percent of the parking area shall be landscaped; and 23 (c) A minimum of eighty(80)percent of the front setback shall be landscaped; and 24 (d) A minimum of forty (40) percent of the lot area within the Bay Conservation and 25 Development Commission jurisdiction shall be landscaped. 26 27 25.48.052 Design Review. 28 Construction and alterations including substantial construction or change to more than fifty(50) 4/3/2006 7 ANZA POINT NORTH I percent of the front fagade or change to more than fifty (50) percent of any fagade facing a public or 2 private street, parking lot, or the Bay Trail shall be subject to design review based on the design 3 guidelines for the Anza Point North subarea of the Bayfront Specific Plan and shall be processed as 4 provided in section 25.57.030. 5 (a) A design review application in the APN district shall be reviewed by the planning 6 commission for the following considerations: 7 (1) Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles as defined in the design guidelines for 8 the Anza Point subarea and the role of the shoreline in creating a network of interconnected open spaces; 9 (2) Respect and promotion of the streetscape by the placement of buildings to maximize the 10 commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces , and by locating parking so that it does 11 not dominate street frontages, and for properties fronting on Airport Boulevard, that the design is 12 sensitive to the surrounding bodies of water,physical and visual presence of the Bay Trail, orientation 13 of the prevailing winds and to the Coyote Point recreation area. 14 (3) On visually prominent and sites with shoreline as defined by the Bay Conservation and 15 Development Commission, the design shall fit the site, support the Bay Trail and its park and 16 recreational uses,provide for maximum user access and support recreational use by those who work in 17 the area as well as those who visit;and the design is compatible with the surrounding development and 18 consistent with the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea; 19 (4) Compatibility of the architecture and landscaping with the design guidelines for the Anza 20 Point subarea including materials used in existing development,location and use ofplant materials,and 21 compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; 22 (5) Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is 23 consistent among primary elements of the structure(s) and consistent with the directives of the design 24 guidelines for the Anza Point subarea; and 25 (6) Provision of site features identified in the design guidelines such as orientation to minimize 26 wind obstruction on San Francisco Bay, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation which enriches and 27 enhances the existing recreation opportunities of the area, including extension of the Bay Trail. 28 (b) When any part of a commercial structure is subject to design review, any awnings on the 4/3/2006 8 ANZA POINT NORTH I commercial structures shall be included in the design review. 2 (c) Exemptions from design review: 3 (1) Applications for building permits or planning approvals for development in the Anza Point 4 North district filed before 5 (2) Any amendment to a project exempt from design review pursuant to subsection(1) above 6 shall be subject to design review if the project involved would have otherwise been subject to design 7 review under subsection (a) above, the project has not been completed, and the amendment would 8 extend any structure involved in the application outside the envelope of the structure for which the 9 approval was granted or sought in the underlying application or would change a facade. Changes to, 10 additions of, or deletions of awnings as an amendment to a project shall not trigger design review under this 11 subsection. 12 13 25.48.060 Public access. 14 Public access shall be maintained and developed based on the city-adopted and Bay Conservation 15 and Development Commission-approved Public Access Guidelines for Burlingame based on the 16 applicable water frontage as follows: 17 (a) On San Francisco Bay proper: An average setback of seventy-five (75) feet of the lot as 18 measured from the shoreline as defined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; in no 19 case shall the area as measured from the top of bank be less than the minimum width for the Bay Trail 20 as required by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; and 21 (b) On Sanchez Channel: An average setback of sixty-five (65) feet as measured from the 22 shoreline as defined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; in no case shall the area 23 as measured from the top of bank be less than the minimum width for the Bay Trail as required by the 24 Bay Conservation and Development Commission. 25 (c) All areas improved for public access within the jurisdiction of the Bay Conservation and 26 Development Commission shall be maintained by the property owner and shall be available to the public 27 in perpetuity as determined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; 28 4/3/2006 9 ANZA POINT NORTH 1 25.48.080 Parking requirements. 2 All uses shall provide parking in accordance with the applicable provisions of chapter 25.70 of 3 this code with the following changes or additions: 4 (a) Food establishments. 5 (1) Food establishments that are the primary use of the lot shall provide the following: 6 (A) Customer parking shall be provided on-site at the rate of one parking space for each one 7 hundred(100) square feet of gross floor area; and 8 (B) In addition, employee parking shall be provided on-site or within reasonable proximity, in 9 the judgment of the city planner,at the rate of one parking space for each one thousand(1,000) square 10 feet of gross floor area; 11 (2)Food establishments that are located in an office building of 20,000 square feet or more or 12 that are not the primary use of the lot shall provide parking on-site at the rate of one parking space for 13 each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area of food establishment. 14 (b) Instructional uses. Instructional uses related to a permitted or conditional use shall provide 15 parking on-site at the rate of one space for each three hundred(300) square feet of gross floor area; 16 (c) Health services and medical clinics. Health services and medical clinic uses shall provide 17 parking on-site at the rate of one parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor 18 area occupied by the uses. 19 (d) Bay Trail parking. On sites with frontage on San Francisco Bay and its estuary including 20 Anza Lagoon, Sanchez Channel, and Burlingame Lagoon, the Bay Conservation and Development 21 Commission shall determine the number of on-site parking spaces to be designated for public Bay Trail 22 Access parking;these on-site spaces shall be designated from the required parking for the site, shall be 23 available to the public without charge during the hours that the Bay Trail is open, and shall be posted 24 as public access parking by the property owner as required by the Bay Conservation and Development 25 Commission. 26 (e)Hotels. A hotel shall provide one additional, designated parking space for a shuttle bus. 27 28 Section 3. A new Section 25.16.145 is added to read as follows: 4/3/2006 10 ANZA POINT NORTH 1 25.16.145 Ambiguity of use. 2 If any ambiguity arises concerning the appropriate classification of a particular use within the 3 meaning and intent of this title, any person may apply to the city planner for a determination of the 4 ambiguity, and the planner's shall be subject to appeal pursuant to this chapter. 5 6 Section 4. A new Section 25.08.649 is added to read as follows: 7 25.08.649 Time-share property. 8 "Time-share property" or"interval ownership" or"condominium hotel"means a "time-share 9 property" as defined in Business & Professions Code section 11212 without regard to any minimum 10 number of time-share interests or minimum of years of use. 11 12 Section 5. Section 25.36.050 is deleted. 13 14 Section 6. Section 25.38.050 is deleted. 15 16 Section 7. Section 25.43.050 is deleted. 17 18 Section 8. Section 25.44.050 is deleted. 19 20 Section 9. This ordinance is to be published according to law. 21 22 Mayor 23 24 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 25 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the Yd day of April, 2006, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 26 , 2006, by the following vote: 27 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 28 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 4/3/2006 11 ANZA POINT NORTH I ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 2 City Clerk C:\FILES\ORDINANC\AnzaPointNorth42006.ord.wpd 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4/3/2006 12 ANZA POINT NORTH Draft 7 Date: February 21,2006 as Recommended by the Planning Commission March 13, 2006 (revisions bold face based on Subcommittee direction February 2006) Annotated Anza Point North (APN) District Chapter 25.48 Anza Point North(APN) Zoning District Regulations Sections: 25.48.010 Scope and purpose of regulations. 25.48.020 Permitted uses. 25.48.025 Conditional uses. 25.48.030 Prohibited uses. . 25.48.040 Setbacks. 25.48.042 Height and bulk of buildings. 25.48.045 Minimum lot size and street frontage. 25.48.048 No variance for lot size and street frontage. 25.48.050 Landscaping. 25.48.052 Design review for proposed and existing structures. 25.48.060 Public access. 25.48.080 Parking requirements. Section 25.48.010 Scope and purpose of regulations. It is the purpose and policy of this chapter to establish and maintain land uses for all areas designated as the Anza Point subarea in the Bayshore Specific Area Plan. The Anza Point subarea lies east of Sanchez Channel, is bounded on two sides by San Francisco Bay and by US 101 on the south side. The Anza Point subarea is divided into two sections: the northern one of currently vacant land served by Airport Boulevard. These provisions address the Anza Point North area which include all the properties north of Beach and Lang Road with frontage on Airport Boulevard. The purpose of these regulations is to direct the siting and development of structures which adhere to the development Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 policies and adopted design guidelines of the Bayfront Plan in general and to the properties in the north portion of the Anza Point subarea specifically. The intention is to attract development which will benefit from the proximity to the open water areas of San Francisco Bay and its estuaries ,will support public recreation and access along San Francisco Bay, and will protect this irreplaceable natural and recreation resource. Future development consistent with the Bayfront Specific Plan will create a viable transition from the heavy commercial uses along US 101 to the visitor oriented and office uses with Bay orientation to be developed on the vacant land at the north end of the Anza Point subarea, establish a bayside gateway to Burlingame on its eastern end, and contribute to the revenue base of the city. In creating this district, the city asserts that economic as well as aesthetic advantages accrue to the land, its occupants and the public from the required controls and regulations. Annotation: This section establishes the link between the Bayfront Specific Plan adopted as a part of the Burlingame General Plan and the zoning for the northern, presently vacant, portion of the Anza Point subarea. The purpose establishes that the intention of the zoning regulations is to implement the policies, land use designations and densities, and design direction of the Bayfront Specific Area Plan which was amended by the City Council to the Burlingame General Plan on April 5, 2004 . This section is the key legal link between the more subjective aesthetic and economic objectives of the plan and the specific development regulations. This section also defines the location of the Anza Point subarea and the Anza Point North (APN) area within the Anza Point subarea. 25.48.20 Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in the Anza Point North district: (a) Motels,hotels and extended stay hotels with a maximum density of eighty-five (85)rooms to the acre and a floor area ratio of 1.0 or less; facilities provided on site may include such retail sales and personal service uses as meal and beverage services,barber and beauty shops, smoke shops, and shuttle bus service to serve only hotel guests so long as the operation does not use parking required for primary hotel use, convention and meeting facilities, and similar services which are clearly incidental and accessory to provision of lodging accommodations; and no more than one dwelling unit within the motel or hotel structure that is used exclusively by the owner or manager of the motel or hotel; Annotation: This is the same definition for motel and hotel used in the Inner Bayshore, Shoreline and Anza subareas with two differences. The land use for the Anza Point subarea allows a maximum density of 85 rooms to the acres and extended stay hotels are included since they are allowed in this subarea. For the Anza point subarea it is suggested that automobile rental desks on site at hotels be allowed only as a conditional use; so hotels, motels and extended stay uses 2 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 will appear as a conditional use in the Airport Blvd. portion of this subarea. The adopted land use for the Anza Point subarea does not allow hotels and motels in the Beach and Lang Road area. (b) Restaurants with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.15; Annotation: Destination restaurants or food establishments are allowed with the current zoning of these properties at an FAR of 0.15. The adopted land use for the subarea allows destination restaurants with the same density as the 1981 plan. This provision does not change the current regulation. Special parking requirements are included at the end in this section. They are the same as in 1981, e.g. 1:100 GSF plus 1:1000 SF for each employee. The specific plan does not allow free standing restaurants in the Beach and Lang Road area. (c) Office uses with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6,including research and development facilities and laboratories;however, manufacturing is not allowed and health services or medical clinics are only allowed pursuant to section 25.48.025 below;provided that no Annotation: On their second review the subcommittee felt that small (5,000 SF or less) health services and medical clinics should be allowed as conditional uses in the APN zone, since they were as likely to be needed as support services for the concentration of employees in this area as they were in the Inner Bayshore area where they are allowed as a conditional use. In addition these uses would be supported by the employees in the adjacent Anza Point South area where health services and medical clinics are not allowed. However, the subcommittee thought that the same limitations should be placed as in the Inner Bayshore area e.g. that the health service or medical clinic should be located only in an office building larger than 20,000 SF with the same benefit of a parking compensation. Because of the size of the office building the on-site parking requirement for the health service drops from 1:250 SF to 1:300 SF. This revision is shown in the parking section below. First Revision: The subcommittee felt it was important to make it clear that health services were not included as a permitted or conditional office use in the Anza Point North area. Adequate area for such uses was included in other subareas of the Bayfront and close to Peninsula Hospital in the North Burlingame area. Original Annotation: The Bayfront plan encourages office uses at a 0.6 FAR in the Anza Point subarea. However, the plan is not so detailed that it dictates the "type" of office. Given the size of the vacant parcels in this area, their unique location close to the 3 Anza Point North (APN) Zoning District Regulations February 21, 2006 Draft 7 Bay, and the environmental constraints on developing these parcels , these sites are an ideal location for a company office campus . For that reason this provision is written to make it clear that the full range of corporate office functions , including research and development are allowed . Since the biotech industry is one that is growing in our area and the city has defined laboratories as a type of office use in other areas , this provision makes it clear that laboratories associated with product development would be allowed as an office use . However , laboratories or other structures whose purpose is to manufacture product or support the manufacture of product on- site , are not allowed in this subarea . (d) Training facilities associated with and related to a primary activity of research and development facilities located in the Anza Area, Anza Point North, or Anza Point South district; Annotation : This provision addresses schools or education facilities used regularly for training or instruction which support permitted uses but are not " freestanding" . For example this provision would allow Virgin Airlines to have a flight simulator facility for training pilots ; but probably would not allow a UC Berkeley Extension Campus . (e) Commercial recreation facility with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5; these facilities may include the sale of merchandise and items which are related to the principal use but do not exceed a total of 1,500 square feet of support retail sales area located within the facility; Annotation : This is the same definition with the same limitations for commercial recreation use allowed in the Shoreline subarea . The only change is the floor area ratio limitation . Since the lots are larger and the potential for a major commercial recreation use greater as a result , the specific plan places a maximum FAR for this type of development in the Anza Point subarea . (f) Public Recreation areas; (g) Accessory uses which are necessary for the permitted uses under this section. 25.48.025 Conditional uses. The following are uses requiring a conditional use permit: (a) All structures that are taller than the maximum height allowed pursuant to section 25.48.042 below, if wind studies demonstrate that the additional height is consistent with the community wind standards; but in no event shall any structure be taller than ten (10) feet above those maximum heights allowed pursuant to section 25.48.042; 4 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 Annotation: The Anza Point North subarea is the area in the city where development is most vulnerable to blockage of the prevailing winds across bay waters and the subsequent affect on the adjacent recreational uses at Coyote Point Park. Previous studies of the area indicate that buildings 30 feet or less in height, anywhere in this area are unlikely to have a wind blockage impact . However taller structures may have an impact, dependent upon where they are located on the site. So requiring a CUP will insure that the wind impact of all structures over 30 feet in height is evaluated as a part of the project review process . If a wind study finds no impact, that becomes the finding for the permit . (b) Commercial recreation facilities including gymnasiums with a floor area ratio of more than 0.5 or that include a total space of more than one thousand five hundred(1,500) square feet of recreation business related merchandise which are related to the principal use in the facility; Annotation: The subcommittee felt that it was important, because this area may develop principally as an office area, that it be clear that gyms which would serve the people who worked in the area were an appropriate commercial recreation use. Original Annotation: Commercial recreation facilities including 1, 500 SF or less of retail sales area permitted. However, if a developer' s proposal exceeds 0 . 5 FAR or includes more than 1, 500 SF, this provision allows him to request a conditional use permit for the excess. If this provision was not included in this way, a variance would be required for more than 1, 500 SF of retail sales area or 0 . 5 FAR. (c) Commercial parking lots as an interim use as is described in the Bayfront Specific Plan as adopted by the City Council, which comply with at least the following criteria: (1) The sole purpose of the use is the parking for one day or longer of vehicles of persons using San Francisco International Airport; and (2) A minimum lot size of three(3) acres; and (3) Permit term limited to five (5) years; and (4) No more peak hour vehicle trips are generated than allowed by the traffic analyzer for the use designated for the site in the general plan. 5 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 Annotation: In the Shoreline subarea zoning the Subcommittee decided to broaden the idea of "long term airport parking" to commercial parking lots to address other privately operated, pay for parking uses. Since for planning purposes in the Bayfront area such parking lots have always been seen as "place holders" until a higher and use more compatible with the long term development goals comes along, the use is included as an interim use in the Anza Point area. Key for this provision is to let the developer know before he commits to the site improvements required by NPDES, BCDC and others that the maximum time for the permit is 5 years. (d) Day care with on site drop off and parking as required by Ch.25.70. Annotation: The Subcommittee felt that if this area became an employment center in the future, day care might well be an important support service for employees and should be allowed. The provision includes performance criteria which emerged as important when a large day care facility was considered for the Beach/Lang Road area in the past. (e) Educational institutions,trade and technical schools in buildings with twenty thousand (20,000)or more gross square footage,with all educational uses in a single building occupying no more than a total often thousand(10,000)gross square feet and whose trip generation as calculated using the Bayfront traffic analyzer is no greater than that of a use permitted on the same site; Annotation: The concern about the area being taken over by educational uses in a campus form, focused primarily on the loss of tax revenue to the city. Should such an institution be public, there would be a cost to the city who would have to provide services with no compensating tax income. For this reason the Subcommittee suggested that while the use may be appropriate it should be regulated and limited in size—so it would be more attractive to the "private" kinds of schools which support experienced employees. Original Annotation: The Planning Commission in their review of the Shoreline subarea discussed the appropriate location for educational uses arranged as a campus. It was suggested that educational campuses would be an appropriate use for the Anza Point subarea. This provision allows free standing educational uses, so long as the number of a.m. and p.m. hour trips generated does not exceed the maximum trips generated by the most intense use permitted on the site as determined by the Bayfront traffic analyzer. 6 Anza Point North (APN)Zoning District Regulations February 11,2006 Draft 7 (f) Extended stay hotels; Annotation: The question was raised at the public hearings on the Anza Point zoning that extended stay hotels should not be allowed in the Anza Point North area because they tend toward residential uses (longer stay) which are prohibited in the Bayfront area. In reviewing this issue the Subcommittee noted that while during the planning process there was considerable debate about the location of extended stay hotels in the Bayfront area, the debate was resolved in the adopted Bayfront Specific Plan when it recommended that extended stay hotels, a product now absent from the hotel mix on the Bayfront, should be allowed in the Anza Area (Bayfront Plan pg. III-6-8) and Anza Point area (Bayfront Plan pg. III 8-10) . This proposed change to the zoning makes it clear that extended stay hotels are allowed as a conditional use in the Anza Point North zone as shown on the adopted land use map Figure III-6 . (g) Motels and hotels with more than eighty-five(85)rooms to the acre or with a floor area ratio of more than 1.0; facilities provided on site may include such retail sales and service uses as meal and beverage services, barber and beauty shops, smoke shops, automobile rental desks and shuttle bus service to serve only hotel guests so long as the operation does not use parking required for primary hotel use, convention and meeting facilities; and ..:w.:'.,_sen4ees .,.,,:,a, a,,,ailability of en site park4ng for guests and the use and parking for any ofi site meetin r eland no more than one dwelling unit within the motel or hotel structure that is used exclusively by the owner or manager of the motel or hotel; Annotation: The use of on-site parking facilities for promotional programs such as park and fly to promote room occupancy, has been separated from the definition of hotel in order to call out the fact that in zoning such use is considered a separate/different use. (see provision (h) below. Original Annotation: Hotels area included here as a conditional use so that if an applicant wishes to build more than a 1 . 0 FAR, to add more meeting rooms for example, he may do so with findings for a conditional use rather than findings for a variance. It should be noted that the conditional use for hotels, motels and extended stay hotels includes park and fly programs which are not in the permitted use . So a park and fly program can only occur on a hotel site as a conditional use . All of the other support uses area allowed as described, but would require a conditional use if they wished to exceed the requirements listed in the definition. For example, if the hotel wanted to add a automobile rental desk they would need a 7 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 CUP if the cars to be rented were to be parked in any of the on site required parking for the hotel and other uses permitted. (h) As part of a hotel or motel use, an automobile rental desk or park and fly program associated with renting of rooms and that does not affect the availability of on- site parking for hotel or motel guests and the use and parking for any on-site meeting facilities; (i) Health services and medical clinics not to exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet total in office structures over twenty thousand (20,000) gross square feet,with parking as set forth in section 25.48.080 below; Annotation: The Subcommittee recommended that health services and medical clinic were a use which was compatible with biotechnological research (an allowed use) in the Anza Point North district, as conditional uses in the same way that these two uses are allowed in the Inner Bayshore district. These provisions would allow both health services (e.g. doctors, dentists, acupressurist, chiropractor, etc . uses providing they are located in a large (more than 20, 000 SF) office building. It has been determined in other zoning districts, and experience has confirmed, that if the office building is 20, 000 SF or larger and parked to city office standards, the parking can absorb the impact of conversion of 5, 000 SF to an health service use without causing landscaping to be removed to provide for health service parking requirements (e.g. 1:300 SF for office, 1:250 SF for health service) . If the office building had received a parking variance at the time of construction and a health service wished to move into to it later, the health service would require a parking variance because the code requirements for an office use were not met on the site and a health service is an intensification of use. (j) Any building, structure or site plan that does not comply with the adopted Design Guidelines in the Bayshore Specific Plan for the Anza Point subarea as established by resolution of the city council; Annotation: This provision makes all exceptions to the design guidelines not incorporated as measurable standards in the zoning regulations a conditional use rather than a variance. This is the approach which was used in implementing the 1981 Bayfront design guidelines . (k) Incidental food sales and sale of convenience amenities to support on-site office employees in office buildings of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet or more,whose total area shall not exceed a maximum of one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet and without exclusive access to the outside; 8 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 Annotation: Because office users will be isolated from secondary support services in the Anza Point area since retail uses are not allowed, the Subcommittee felt that it would be appropriate to allow other small scale retail support services which might include sale of newspapers, magazines and books, shoe repair and dry cleaning pick up/delivery. However, to avoid the support services taking over the office uses, this activity was limited to a total of 1, 500 square feet in any single building. Original Annotation: Given the size of the existing parcels, if office uses are ever built in the North Anza Point area they will be in a campus setting. Since free standing retail uses are not allow in this zoning district, the office users may need some limited support services. In the Shoreline are this provision would allow both food and services. As written here this provision would only allow food sales. (1) Drive-in services or take out services associated with permitted and conditional uses; (m) Any use similar in nature to one which is permitted or for which a permit is required in this district which is: (1) Consistent with planned land uses in the Anza Point subarea; and (2) At a density determined not to exceed the trip generation for the planned use of the site using the adopted Bayfront traffic analyzer. Annotation: This provision is a catch all which will allow flexibility for future uses interim and permanent which may be appropriate in this area, consistent with the concepts of the plan, but not listed. The criteria set out the basic parameters required for compliance with the plan. 25.48.030 Prohibited uses. Uses not listed as permitted or conditional shall be prohibited, including: Annotation: In the case of the Anza Point subarea there are two distinct areas. The Beach-Lang Road area which is fully developed with an established land use pattern and the northern portion of the subarea which is undeveloped and vacant. Since the Bayfront plan proposes very different land use patterns for each of the two areas, it is important to establish that many of the uses being promoted in the Beach and Lang Road area are not allowed in the undeveloped area to the north. The prohibited uses section below is driven by this concept, and may appear to be either repetitive or contradictory. 9 Anza Point North (APN) Zoning District Regulations February 21, 2006 Draft 7 (a) Automobile rental uses; (b) Automobile sales lots; (c) Automobile wrecking and junk yards, storage or baling of scraps, paper rags, sacks, or metals, including recycling facilities for green waste and other materials; (d) Commercial parking lots except as expressly allowed pursuant to section 25.48.025(c); (e) Retail uses except as expressly allowed within the uses designated in section 25.48.020 or 25.48.025; (f) Retail service businesses, except as expressly allowed within the uses designated in section 25.48.020 or 25.48.025; (g) Personal services, except as expressly allowed within the uses designated in section 25.48.020 or 25.48.025; (h) Air courier, delivery or other trans-shipment services, including freight forwarding; (i) Free standing specialty food establishments or any specialty food establishment with direct external access within any building; 0) Warehouse, storage and distribution of goods, materials, liquids and equipment; (k) Outdoor storage of materials including contractors storage yards; (1) Health services and medical clinics, except as expressly allowed under section 25.48.025; Annotation : This provision would allow health services and medical clinics up to 5 , 000 SF in office buildings which are over 20 , 000 SF with a conditional use permit ( see CS 25 . 48 . 025 above) ; but would not allow, with a variance, more than 5 , 000 SF in a given building . (m) Industrial and manufacturing uses; (n) Massage, bathing or similar establishments; (o) Residential uses and buildings, except for an owner/manager residence in a hotel or motel as expressly allowed under section 25.48.020 or 25.48.025; (p) Gas stations and major and minor automobile repair, including auto body work; (q) Time share property; and Annotation : After discussion with the City Attorney regarding recent legal determinations regarding " time share" developments , and noting that such development has been most often interpreted as a residential kind of use , the Subcommittee recommended that " time share developments" not be allowed in the Bayfront and particularly in the Anza Point North zoning district . Their opinion was based on the fact that the Bayfront Specific Plan prohibits residential land uses in the Planning Area and that the zoning, by law, must be consistent with the adopted land use policy . It was also noted in the discussion about time share property use that one reason that they were seen as residential is that this use is not required by law to pay Transient Occupancy Tax on the same basis as hotels . To clarify, if a time share owner exchanges the use of his unit with another owner he cannot be required to pay TOT . However if the time share owner does not use his time it reverts to the corporation 10 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 which owns the facility and they may rent the unused property to people with no interest in the property. This rental may be subject to TOT. At this point the legal issue is still being resolved. The problem for the city is one of accurate accounting by the operator, enforcing payment and collection, the significant possibility of expensive audits; together which represent a management nightmare. The developer advocating placing this use in the Anza Point North area noted that they would agree to pay an "equivalent" to TOT to the City. While such a fee could be required as a condition of approval, providing the developer volunteered to pay it, the enforcement of the condition would fall to the city, and the enthusiasm to pay by the developer may wane over time making collection a management and enforcement headache for the city over time. Moreover, residential developers building condominiums or time share properties on the west side of US 101 in Burlingame might be concerned about the unusual precedent established both in terms of volunteering to pay overtime and basing the general plan policy and land use determination of hotel on the fact a voluntary TOT is paid. (r) Any use determined to be obnoxious or offensive. Annotation: While the subcommittee felt that allowing small food and retail support services in office buildings, they did not feel that "fast food" type restaurants were appropriate or consistent with the design guidelines set on the plan for this subarea. Annotation: The ambiguity of use provisions which were at this location in the C-4 zoning district have been added to the procedures section of Chapter 25 since they apply to all zoning districts in the city. See section 3 below. Section 25.48.040 Setbacks. The following minimum setbacks shall apply to all parcels,buildings and structures or any enlargement thereof located on a lot with lot frontage on Airport Boulevard or on any new street in the Anza Point subarea: (a) Front setback: There shall be an average front setback of fifteen(15) feet,with at least forty(40)percent of the structure at the maximum setback of fifteen(15) feet; (b) Side setback: There shall be a ten(10) foot side setback. 11 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 Annotation: The Subcommittee felt that there was a strong similarity between the "grand boulevard" vision for Bayshore Highway to support the new uses anticipated there and the development of the vacant land in the Anza Point North area. For that reason they suggested that the same setback requirements be used in both areas. The revisions reflect the changes to make the setback requirements the same. Original Annotation: The design guidelines do not suggest a standard for separation between structures or along side property lines for development on the large vacant parcels in the Anza Point subarea. However, the design guidelines do require that there be enough space between structures to provide a view corridor to the Bay Trail e.g. so people on the site are always aware of the proximity of the Bay Trail and how to get there. In the Shoreline subarea it was established that 20 feet between buildings was an adequate distance to provide a sense of the presence of San Francisco Bay. However, those guidelines also provided for larger "view" corridors by requiring that buildings not block more than 50% of the street frontage. In the case of the Anza Point area a 20 foot separation between buildings is suggested to establish view corridors to the Bay Trail. (c) Distance between buildings. To provide useable wind-sheltered outdoor area and to provide a visual connection to the Bay Trail,there shall be a distance of at least twenty(20) feet between buildings on the same lot. Annotation: The proposed change to this provision is to include a reason for the requirement for a minimum distance between buildings. Both are objectives of the adopted plan for this area. Original Annotation: One objective for design expressed in the plan for the Anza Point is to preserve the view through buildings to the Bay Trail and the adjacent water bodies. This provision is to insure that there is at least 20 feet between buildings where no side setback is required. (d) Rear setback: Structures shall be set back at least ten(10)feet from rear properly line. Annotation: The subcommittee suggested that the rear setback requirement be taken from the Shoreline subarea, which is 10 feet. However in the Shoreline area there are also setbacks required when a property is has frontage on the bay. Since the existing lots in the Anza Point North area have bay frontage these provisions have been added below. Original Annotation: As with side setbacks the guidelines for the Anza Point subarea provide no measurable direction. However the guidelines encourage and promote provision of "parking internalized 12 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 and should have interior courts with open space to provide protection from the wind" . It seems appropriate that these open space areas would be shared between the rears of buildings e.g. SO feet . (e) Setbacks from shoreline. In any event, structures shall be set back an average of sixty- five(65)feet from Sanchez Channel and seventy-five(75) feet from San Francisco Bay and the shoreline as defined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; in addition, for any building that is forty(40) feet or taller,then the setback of the building to the shoreline shall be equal to or greater than the height of the building. Annotation: The subcommittee recommended adding the same shoreline setback provisions in the Anza Point North area as established for the Shoreline area. IN the Anza Point North area there are two types of bay frontage, San Francisco Bay proper and Sanchez Channel Greek. The BCDC guidelines treat these two waterways differently in terms of required setback. These different requirements are reflected in the provision. (f) In addition to the setbacks set forth above,there shall be a fifteen(15) foot setback from Airport Boulevard for all below grade construction. Annotation: The subcommittee wanted the standards for the Anza Point North area to be similar to those for the Inner Bayshore overlay zone along Bayshore Highway. In that area below grade garages and other below grade construction are required to be held back 15 feet from the property line along the street to insure that there is enough dirt to support viable landscaping and trees along the street . The same provision is added here for the same reason. (g) No parking spaces shall be provided within the ten(10)foot minimum setback across the lot front on any property. Driveways are allowed in the setback,but the driveways shall not be considered as landscaped area. No parking areas shall be located between any structure and the lot front, except for loading zones. Placement of parking shall be consistent with the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea. Annotation: A design objective for the Anza Point North area is to establish a green edge along the paved street . Allowing parking within this area increases the dominance of the automobile. Because they address the interface of street, building and landscaping, the provisions of the Shoreline zoning were incorporated here. 13 Anza Point North (APN) Zoning District Regulations February 21, 2006 Draft 7 Section 25.48.042 Height and bulk of buildings. (a) Maximum height shall be determined by impact on the prevailing wind and shall be staggered with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet along the eastern side of the lot, increasing in a graduated manner to a maximum of fifty (50) feet along the western, or Sanchez Channel, side as established in the Anza Point subarea design guidelines and consistent with the community wind standards. The maximum height may be exceeded by a mechanical penthouse with a maximum height of ten (10) feet as measured from the adjacent roof surface and covering no more than five (5) percent of the roof area. Annotation : In response to questions asked at the public hearing, the Subcommittee pointed out that the community height standards could not be exceeded with out amending the General Plan . The amendment to the General Plan would need to be based on completing a new area wide wind study to establish justification for a new community wind standard and which would be amended to the environmental study adopted with the Specific Plan . In addition the Subcommittee noted that the recreational opportunities being protected by the current community wind standard were an important community asset and of value to the future development and to the use of the Bay Trail in this now vacant area . However, the Subcommittee did recognize the need to clarify the height regulations as set out in this provision, by noting that the height standard (e . g . 30 feet or 50 feet) did include an additional allowance for roof top mechanical equipment , the same as any other commercial or industrial building in the city ( e . g . coverage of up to 5% of the roof surface area with mechanical equipment no taller than 10 feet as measured from the adjacent surface of the roof . ) Larger roof top mechanical installations would be counted in the height of the building and could affect the overall height and number of floors allowed . For this reason the Subcommittee recommended that the figures on pages Bayfront SAP V- 26 and V-27 be revised to show maximum building heights rather than number of stories since number of stories might be misleading to future developers . This change would take a General Plan amendment which will be considered for the Bayfront area when all the zoning districts have been approved . (b) Maximum bulk and mass shall be determined by the floor area ratio established in the Bayfront Specific Plan for the land uses in the Anza Point subarea. and Where no floor area ratio is provided, mass and bulk shall be based on the adopted design guidelines, the development constraints documented in the Bayfront Specific Plan, and the zoning regulations where the property is located. Annotation : The subcommittee discussed the problems of letter FAR determine mass and bulk without limiting lot coverage . They concluded that since 14 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 the minimum lot size is 4 acres in this area with real landscape requirements, even with the strict height limits, it is unlikely that a minimum lot size would be a necessary regulation. Original Annotation: The specific plan recognizes that the environmental constraints on the vacant northern portion of the Anza Point subarea are different from the developed Beach and Lang Road area. The primary difference is the importance of wind to the recreation uses immediately adjacent in the Coyote Point Recreation Area. For this reason, the plan establishes particular height restrictions for future development in the northern portion of the Anza Point subarea. This section documents and establishes as regulations those height restrictions. Section 25.48.045 Minimum lot size and street frontage.. There shall be a minimum lot size of€euf(4) two(2)acres and a minimum street frontage of one hundred fifty(150)two yundreA��feet. No property in the district maybe divided or subdivided into a lot with less area or less street frontage. Annotation: The Subcommittee expressed concern that in the future the large parcels which now compose the APN zone would be divided, in order to promote immediate sale, into small parcels which could not be developed or maintained over time in a manner consistent with the design guidelines in the Bayfront Plan. The Subcommittee felt that 2 acre parcels (minimum) with required street frontage the same as exists in the Anza Point South district was appropriate. First, the 2 acre minimum would give the future developer flexibility in size and shape while retaining sufficient area on the site to address the required design guidelines and development requirements. Often use drives the size of parcel in the sense hotel developers usually look for a minimum parcel size as do other users. Because there are 16 acres in one site and about 9 acres on the other a mix of uses would dictate division into a variety of sized lots, many larger than two acres. So to organize the division to have a remainder site of two acres, which is a viable size for a number of uses based on past experience in the Bayfront area, does not appear to be unreasonable. The minimum street frontage requirement proposed is the same as the size adopted in the Anza Point South district, immediately west of the Anza Point North district. Using this minimum frontage should provide a consistency of pattern and equity between the development in the two areas, although the uses promoted in each district are different. Finally, it should be noted that the minimum parcel size does not affect commercial condominium development because with condominiums the ownership of the land is joint, while the ownership 15 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 of the unit is individual e.g. condominium ownership does not require the further subdivision of the underlying property. Original Annotation: This is the same minimum lot size requirement used in the Inner Bayshore and Shoreline subareas . As written it would apply to the entire Anza Point subarea. The two vacant parcels in the Anza Point subarea are 15 and 9 acres. They are among the last of the larger parcels in the city. Section 25.48.048 No variance for lot size and street frontage. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, no variance for lot size or street frontage shall be granted to any property within this district. Annotation: Based on the fact that the Anza Point North area contains the largest vacant land area in the city and one purpose of the Specific Plan is to see that this area is developed in a manner which is consistent with the image of Burlingame as defined in the adopted design guidelines for the area, the Subcommittee felt that the minimum lot size and street frontage established for the APN should not be eligible for variance. The city's past experience with creating and developing smaller parcels (see Inner Bayshore and Shoreline area) is that it is very difficult to achieve the community goals of consistent visual and pedestrian access to the bay and unified, attractive and quality design in new development. Moreover, because consolidation of small parcels is cost prohibitive 20 years later new development opportunities which would upgrade older development do not occur. For these reasons, the Subcommittee felt that the minimum lot size and street frontage established for the APN should not be eligible for variance. Moreover, because commercial condominium ownership which can occur in office buildings or biotech office space does not cause the division of the underlying property, the Subcommittee felt that the needs of individual small users could be met without variance to either lot size or street frontage. Original Annotation: Same requirement as in other Bayfront subareas . Purpose of this provision is to keep smaller lots that will be inefficient to develop in a manner consistent with the design guidelines from being further subdivided. Existing nonconforming lots, those smaller than the minimum, are not affected and may be developed, they just can' t be further divided. Section 25.48.050 Landscaping. The following landscaping requirements shall apply to all lots: 16 Anza Point North (APN) Zoning District Regulations February 21, 2006 Draft 7 (a) The landscape requirements of the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea of the Bayfront Specific Plan as adopted by the city council shall be met; and (b) A minimum of ten (10) percent of the parking area shall be landscaped; and (c) A minimum of eighty (80) percent of the front setback shall be landscaped; and (d) A minimum of forty (40) percent of the lot area within the Bay Conservation and Development Commission jurisdiction shall be landscaped. Annotation : The measurable standards are taken from the design guidelines as adopted for the Anza Point subarea . This section is intended to include the design standards which are more subjective as well e . g . the purpose of (a) . Section 25.48.052 Design review for proposed and existing stFuetuF Construction and alterations including substantial construction or change to more than fifty (50) percent of the front fagade or change to more than fifty (50) percent of any fagade facing a public or private street, parking lot, or the Bay Trail shall be subject to design review based on the design guidelines for the Anza Point North subarea of the Bayfront Specific Plan and shall be processed as provided in section 25.57.030. (a) A design review application in the APN district shall be reviewed by the planning commission for the following considerations: (1) Support of the pattern of diverse architectural styles as defined in the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea and the role of the shoreline in creating a network of interconnected open spaces; (2) Respect and promotion of the streetscape by the placement of buildings to maximize the commercial use of the street frontage, off-street public spaces , and by locating parking so that it does not dominate street frontages, and for properties fronting on Airport Boulevard, that the design is sensitive to the surrounding bodies of water, physical and visual presence of the Bay Trail, orientation of the prevailing winds and to the Coyote Point recreation area; (3) On visually prominent and sites with shoreline as defined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission, the design shall fit the site, support the Bay Trail and its park and recreational uses, provide for maximum user access and support recreational use by those who work in the area as well as those who visit; and the design is compatible with the surrounding development and consistent with the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea; (4) Compatibility of the architecture and landscaping with the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea including materials used in existing development, 17 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 location and use of plant materials, and compatibility with transitions where changes in land use occur nearby; (5) Architectural design consistency by using a single architectural style on the site that is consistent among primary elements of the structure(s) and consistent with the directives of the design guidelines for the Anza Point subarea; and (6) Provision of site features identified in the design guidelines such as orientation to minimize wind obstruction on San Francisco Bay, landscaping, and pedestrian circulation which enriches and enhances the existing recreation opportunities of the area, including extension of the Bay Trail. Annotation: The Subcommittee felt that especially in this subarea where water bounds three sides, that emphasis on the bay trail and access should be included in the design criteria. So the criteria have been amended to increase the emphasis on visual and physical access to the bay trail and noting that the design should support the trail . Original Annotation: Three criteria have been derived from the adopted design guidelines. There are to be used as the basis for findings for design review. (b) When any part of a commercial structure is subject to design review, any awnings on the commercial structures shall be included in the design review. (c) Exemptions from design review: (1) Applications for building permits or planning approvals for development in the Anza Point North district filed before (2) Any amendment to a project exempt from design review pursuant to subsection(1) above shall be subject to design review if the project involved would have otherwise been subject to design review under subsection above, the project has not been completed, and the amendment would extend any structure involved in the application outside the envelope of the structure for which the approval was granted or sought in the underlying application or would change a fagade . Changes to, additions of, or deletions of awnings as an amendment to a project shall not trigger design review under this subsection. Annotation: This section was added as a precaution. There are no structures in the Anza Point North area at this time. However, should any be built before these zoning regulations area adopted this would apply. It was noted that in the design review regulations there is a provision which addressed existing structures and established a base line for when they would be subject to design review under the 18 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 provisions of this current code amendment . If a new structure includes awnings as a design feature they are subject to design review, but if an owner wants to replace or add awnings to an existing structure, the awnings will not trigger design review, as these provisions are proposed above. Section 25.48.060 Public access. Public access shall be maintained and developed based on the city-adopted and Bay Conservation and Development Commission-approved Public Access Guidelines for Burlingame based on the applicable water frontage as follows: (a) On San Francisco Bay proper: An average setback of seventy-five (75) feet of the lot as measured from the shoreline as defined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; in no case shall the area as measured from the top of bank be less than the minimum width for the Bay Trail as required by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; and (b) On Sanchez Channel: An average setback of sixty-five (65) feet as measured from the shoreline as defined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission; in no case shall the area as measured from the top of bank be less than the minimum width for the Bay Trail as required by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission. Annotation: There are two "bay frontages" in the Anza Point subarea, San Francisco Bay on the north and east sides and Sanchez Channel and Burlingame Lagoon on the west side. The access guidelines jointly adopted by the city and BCDC in 1982 set a different standard for the portion of the BCDC 100 foot jurisdiction which must be set aside to support the Bay Trail . All properties with frontage on San Francisco Bay proper are required to leave an average of 75 feet along their water frontage in open space to support the Bay Trail . All properties with frontage on Burlingame Lagoon and Sanchez Channel are required to leave an average of 65 feet along the channel in open space. These areas are measured from the water side from the BCDC jurisdiction line e.g. the highest, high tide line . (c) All areas improved for public access within the jurisdiction of the Bay Conservation and Development Commission shall be maintained by the property owner and shall be available to the public in perpetuity as determined by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission. Annotation: This provision is included to inform developers and provide property owners that it is their responsibility to install, maintain and allow the public unlimited use of the Bay Trail and the open space portion of the site which includes the bay trail . 19 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 Section 25.48.080 Parking requirements. All uses shall provide parking space in accordance with the applicable provisions of chapter 25.70 of this code, with the following changes or additions: (a) Food establishments. (1)Food establishments that are the primary use of the lot shall provide the following: (A) Customer parking shall be provided on-site at the rate of one parking space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area; and (B) In addition, employee parking shall be provided on-site or within reasonable proximity, in the judgment of the city planner, at the rate of one parking space for each one thousand(1,000) square feet of gross floor area; (2) Food establishments that are located in an office building of 20,000 square feet or more or that are not the primary use of the lot shall provide parking on-site at the rate of one parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area of food establishment. However, food establishments located within a hotel or motel are not required to provide the additional parking required under this subsection unless the food establishment has a public entrance that opens directly to the exterior of the building. (b) Instructional uses. Instructional uses related to a permitted or conditional use shall provide parking on-site at the rate of one space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area; (c) Health services and medical clinics. Health service and medical clinic uses shall provide parking on-site at the rate of one (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area occupied by the uses; Annotation: Since health services and medical clinics are allowed in the Anza Point North district because they are compatible with biotech uses and support other employee-intensive office uses. This is the same basis used for allowing health services and medical clinics in the Inner Bayshore district and the same parking provision is proposed. Experience has supported that if an office building is over 20, 000 SF and parking on site meets the City' s parking requirement of 1:300 SF for office, up to 5, 000 SF of health service in the building will have little impact on the availability of parking. (c) Bay Trail parking. On sites with frontage on San Francisco Bay and its estuary including Anza Lagoon, Sanchez Channel, and Burlingame Lagoon, the Bay Conservation and Development Commission shall determine the number of on-site parking spaces to be designated for public Bay Trail Access parking; these on-site spaces shall be designated from the required parking for the site, shall be available to 20 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 the public without charge during the hours that the Bay Trail is open, and shall be posted as public access parking by the property owner as required by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission. (d)Hotels. A hotel shall provide one additional, designated parking space for a shuttle bus. Annotation: Because they are destinations and the only access to the area is by car, food establishments in the Bayfront area are required to provide more on-site parking(1:100 GSF plus 1:1000 GSF)than food establishments downtown. As written here the on-site parking requirement for a food establishment in with a separate entrance in a hotel is 1:200 GSF,the same as downtown. Presently, and with these provisions,no additional parking beside that required for the hotel (1 space per room) is required for a restaurant which does not have its own exterior entrance. When the subcommittee expanded the support retail uses in large office buildings, they felt that limiting the total to 1,500SF would keep such uses from becoming a destination and generating additional parking at the site. Moreover, there are economies of scale in the usage of parking in large buildings because not all the employees who work there are there every day. As a result this lower parking ratio has worked well when used similarly in the O-M district. The same economies of scale in use of parking as experienced for employee serving food sales have been found to work for instructional uses, so long as the educational use does not take over the entire building. In the case of these zoning provisions the greatest amount of school use allowed would be 10,000 SF in a building which is at least 20,000 SF. Section 3. A new Section 25.16.145 is added to the Zoning Code to read as follows: 25.16.145 Ambiguity of use. If any ambiguity arises concerning the appropriate classification of a particular use within the meaning and intent of this title, any person may apply to the city planner for a determination of the ambiguity, and the planner's shall be subject to appeal pursuant to this chapter. Annotation: This will place this general provision in Chapter 25 . 16 replacing individual provisions in various zoning districts, and apply the process to all of the City' s zoning districts. Section 4. A new definition to be added "Time Share Property" CS 25.08.649 "Time share property" or interval ownership" or "condominium hotel" means a "time- share property as defined in Business and Professions Code section 11212 without regard to any minimum number of time-share interests or minimum of years of use. Annotation: Time share property is a relatively new ownership concept which has emerged since the last major revision to the zoning ordinance in 21 Anza Point North(APN)Zoning District Regulations February 21,2006 Draft 7 1954. It has been called by a number of names including 'interval ownership' and 'condominium hotel' . Because the use raises issues about land use and it has become a common type of ownership/use, it is appropriate to add a definition to the city's zoning code. Because of the 'morphing' of this use, it operation and the terminology used to define it, it seemed most appropriate to reference its definition in our code to the one used by the State of California (Business and Professions Code section 11212) . This means that as the State definition is refined by legislation the city's definition will automatically be amended. A copy of the State code section is attached for your reference and documents the complexity created as this use concept evolves along with the evolution of the methods of operation. This state definition is supported by case law which has defined time share properties' as residential in terms of ownership and use, e.g. your participation entitles you to live in the "unit" for a given period of time. For this reason, such uses are usually exempt from paying Transient Occupancy Tax to the city. (See also the annotation on page 10-11 above) . 03/17/06 22 BUS & PROF § 11212, Definitions Page 1 *26320 West's Ann.Cal.Bus. & Prof.Code § in a time-share plan. 11212 (d) "Assessment" means the share of funds WEST'S ANNOTATED required for the payment of common expenses CALIFORNIA CODES which is assessed from time to time against each BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS purchaser by the managing entity. CODE DIVISION 4. REAL ESTATE (e) "Commissioner" means the Real Estate Commissioner. PART 2. REGULATION OF TRANSACTIONS (f) "Component site" means a specific CHAPTER 2. THE VACATION geographic location where accommodations that OWNERSHIP AND TIME- are part of a multisite time-share plan are located. SHARE ACT OF 2004 Separate phases of a time-share property in a ARTICLE 1. GENERAL specific geographic location and under common PROVISIONS management shall not be deemed a component site. Current with all 2005 laws, Governor's (g) "Conspicuous type" means either of the Reorganization Plans No. 1 & 2, and all following: propositions appearing on the Nov. 8 2005 ballot (1) Type in upper and lower case letters two § 11212. Definitions point sizes larger than the nearest nonconspicuous type, exclusive of headings, on the page on which As used in this chapter, the following it appears but in at least 10-point type. definitions apply: *26321 (2) Conspicuous type may be utilized in (a) "Accommodation" means any apartment, contracts for purchase or public permits only condominium or cooperative unit, cabin, lodge, where required by law or as authorized by the hotel or motel room, or other private or commissioner. commercial structure containing toilet facilities therein that is designed and available, pursuant to (h) "Department" means the Department of Real applicable law, for use and occupancy as a Estate. residence by one or more individuals, or any unit or berth on a commercial passenger ship, which is (i) "Developer" means and includes any person included in the offering of a time-share plan. who creates a time-share plan or is in the business of selling time-share interests, other than those (b) "Advertisement" means any written, oral, or employees or agents of the developer who sell electronic communication that is directed to or time-share interests on the developer's behalf, or targeted to persons within the state or such a employs agents to do the same, or any person who communication made from this state or relating to succeeds to the interest of a developer by sale, a time-share plan located in this state and contains lease, assignment, mortgage, or other transfer, but a promotion, inducement, or offer to sell a time- the term includes only those persons who offer share plan, including, but not limited to, time-share interests for disposition in the ordinary brochures, pamphlets, radio and television scripts, course of business. electronic media, telephone and direct mail solicitations, and other means of promotion. (j) "Dispose" or "disposition" means a voluntary transfer or assignment of any legal or equitable (c) "Association" means the organized body interest in a time-share plan, other than the consisting of the purchasers of time-share interests transfer, assignment, or release of a security © 2006 Thomson/West. No claim to original U.S. Govt. works. BUS&PROF § 11212,Definitions Page 2 interest. owners of time-share interests in the time-share plan is limited to a term of not more than three (k) "Exchange company" means any person years, subject to renewal or extension. The term owning or operating, or both owning and shall not include an offer of the use of the operating,an exchange program. accommodation, product, service, discount, or other benefit on a free or discounted one-time (1) "Exchange program" means any method, basis. arrangement, or procedure for the voluntary exchange of time-share interests or other property (n) "Managing entity" means the person who interests. The term does not include the undertakes the duties, responsibilities, and assignment of the right to use and occupy obligations of the management of a time-share accommodations to owners of time-share interests plan. within a single site time-share plan. Any method, arrangement, or procedure that otherwise meets (o) "Offer" means any inducement, solicitation, this definition in which the purchaser's total or other attempt, whether by marketing, contractual financial obligation exceeds three advertisement, oral or written presentation, or any thousand dollars ($3,000) per any individual, other means, to encourage a person to acquire a recurring time-share period, shall be regulated as a time-share interest in a time-share plan, other than time-share plan in accordance with this chapter. as security for an obligation. For purposes of determining the purchaser's total contractual financial obligation, amounts to be (p) "Person" means a natural person, paid as a result of renewals and options to renew corporation, limited liability company, shall be included in the term except for the partnership,joint venture, association,estate,trust, following: (1) amounts to be paid as a result of government, governmental subdivision or agency, any optional renewal that a purchaser, in his or her or other legal entity,or any combination thereof sole discretion may elect to exercise, (2) amounts to be paid as a result of any automatic renewal in (q) "Promotion" means a plan or device, which the purchaser has a right to terminate including one involving the possibility of a during the renewal period at any time and receive prospective purchaser receiving a vacation, a pro rata refund for the remaining unexpired discount vacation, gift, or prize, used by a renewal term, or(3)amounts to be paid as a result developer, or an agent, independent contractor, or of an automatic renewal in which the purchaser employee of any of the same on behalf of the receives a written notice no less than 30 nor more developer, in connection with the offering and sale than 90 days prior to the date of renewal of time-share interests in a time-share plan. informing the purchaser of the right to terminate prior to the date of renewal. Notwithstanding (r) "Public report" means a preliminary public these exceptions, if the contractual financial report, conditional public report, final public obligation exceeds three thousand dollars ($3,000) report, or other such disclosure document for any three-year period of any renewal term, authorized for use in connection with the offering amounts to be paid as a result of that renewal shall of time-share interests pursuant to this chapter. be included in determining the purchaser's total contractual financial obligation. (s) "Purchaser" means any person, other than a developer, who by means of a voluntary transfer *26322 (m) "Incidental benefit" is an for consideration acquires a legal or equitable accommodation, product, service, discount, or interest in a time-share plan other than as security other benefit, other than an exchange program, for an obligation. that is offered to a prospective purchaser of a time- share interest prior to the end of the rescission (t) "Purchase contract" means a document period set forth in Section 11238, the continuing pursuant to which a developer becomes legally availability of which for the use and enjoyment of obligated to sell, and a purchaser becomes legally ©2006 Thomson/West.No claim to original U.S.Govt.works. BUS&PROF § 11212,Definitions Page 3 obligated to buy, a time-share interest. (2) A "time-share use," which is the right to occupy a time-share property, which right is (u) "Reservation system" means the method, neither coupled with a freehold interest, nor arrangement, or procedure by which a purchaser, coupled with an estate for years with a future in order to reserve the use or occupancy of any interest,in a time-share property. accommodation of a multisite time-share plan for one or more time-share periods, is required to (y) "Time-share period" means the period or compete with other purchasers in the same periods of time when the purchaser of a time-share multisite time-share plan, regardless of whether plan is afforded the opportunity to use the the reservation system is operated and maintained accommodations of a time-share plan. by the multisite time-share plan managing entity, an exchange company, or any other person. If a (z) "Time-share plan" means any arrangement, purchaser is required to use an exchange program plan, scheme, or similar device, other than an as the purchaser's principal means of obtaining the exchange program, whether by membership right to use and occupy accommodations in a agreement, sale, lease, deed, license, right to use multisite time-share plan, that arrangement shall agreement, or by any other means, whereby a be deemed a reservation system. When an purchaser, in exchange for consideration, receives exchange company utilizes a mechanism for the ownership rights in or the right to use exchange of use of time-share periods among accommodations for a period of time less than a members of an exchange program, that utilization full year during any given year, on a recurring is not a reservation system of a multisite time- basis for more than one year, but not necessarily share plan. for consecutive years. A time-share plan may be either of the following: *26323 (v) "Short-term product" means the right to use accommodations on a one-time or (1) A "single site time-share plan," which is the recurring basis for a period or periods not to right to use accommodations at a single time-share exceed 30 days per stay and for a term of three property. years or less, and that includes an agreement that all or a portion of the consideration paid by a (2) A "multisite time-share plan," which person for the short-term product will be applied includes either of the following: to or credited against the price of a future purchase of a time-share interest or that the cost of a future (A) A "specific time-share interest," which is purchase of a time-share interest will be fixed or the right to use accommodations at a specific time- locked-in at a specified price. share property, together with use rights in accommodations at one or more other component (w) "Time-share instrument"means one or more sites created by or acquired through the time-share documents, by whatever name denominated, plan's reservation system. creating or governing the operation of a time-share plan and includes the declaration dedicating (B) A "nonspecific time-share interest," which accommodations to the time-share plan. is the right to use accommodations at more than one component site created by or acquired through (x) "Time-share interest" means and includes the time-share plan's reservation system, but either of the following: including no specific right to use any particular accommodations. (1) A "time-share estate," which is the right to occupy a time-share property, coupled with a *26324 (aa) "Time-share property" means one freehold estate or an estate for years with a future or more accommodations subject to the same time- interest in a time-share property or a specified share instrument, together with any other property portion thereof. or rights to property appurtenant to those accommodations. ©2006 Thomson/West.No claim to original U.S.Govt.works. BUS&PROF§ 11212,Definitions Page 4 CREDIT(S) Debts for assessments that arise on and after Jan. 1, 2006, collection of delinquent assessments, see Civil (Added by Stats.2004, c. 697 (A.B.2252), § 14, eff. July 1, Code§ 1367.4. 2005) Multisite time-share plans, applicants for public reports, certification requirements, see Business and <General Materials (GM) - References, Professions Code§ 11226. Annotations,or Tables> CODE OF REGULATIONS REFERENCES HISTORICAL NOTES "Developer"defined,see 10 Cal.Code of Regs. §2805. HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY Reservation rights,see 10 Cal.Code of Regs.§2805.9. NOTES RESEARCH REFERENCES 2006 Electronic Pocket Part Update Encyclopedias Derivation: Former § 11003.5, added by Stats.1980, c. 601, p. 1654, § 6, amended by Stats.1996, c. 541 CA Jur.3d Hotels and Motels§ 18,Licenses and Taxes. (A.B.2530),§ 10; Stats.2000,c.522(A.B.935),§ 1. CA Jur. 3d Pollution and Conservation Laws § 298, REFERENCES Exemptions and Exclusions from Permit Requirements. CROSS REFERENCES CA Jur.3d Property Taxes§ 131,Time-Share Projects. CA Jur.3d Property Taxes§ 156,Overview. Common interest developments, notice of assessments, see Civil Code§ 1367.1. Current through Ch. 729 (end) of 2005 Reg.Sess. Common interest developments, notice to members of urgency legislation & Governor's Reorganization association prior to beginning of fiscal year, see Plans No. 1& 2 of 2005, and all Initiative Civil Code§ 1365.1. Measures Appearing on Nov. 8,2005 ballot C 2006 Thomson/West.No claim to original U.S.Govt.works. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes August 22, 2005 Commissioners discussion: It is a good point that this zoning should be kept moving however,would like to look at this as a complete district,so should consider continuing until the Group Residential facility issues can be resolved;not see a problem to carve out that piece and move the rest on;what about the other issues think parish houses and convents OK but no financial institutions in the Marco Polo overlay area;CA noted that a parish house or convent was like an apartment house. C.Osterling made a motion to continue this item for two weeks so that staff could bring back the issue of the separation of convalescent facilities and group residential facilities for the elderly. The motion died for want of a second. Comment on the motion: endorse sending this forward, think solution is simple, assisted living provides different kinds of services with a different impact on parking. C.Brownrigg made a motion to move the TW district regulations forward without CS 25.40.050(4)group residential facilities and convalescent facilities and with the recommendation that financial institutions be deleted from the Marco Polo overlay and that parish houses and convents be allowed in the district. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend the ordinance to the City Council for adoption with the amendments proposed. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C.Vistica absent)voice vote. This item will be taken forward to the City Council. This item concluded at 9:00 p.m. 8. BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE ANZA AREA, ANZA POINT NORTH AND ANZA POINT SOUTH DISTRICTS — CITY PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE (NEWSPAPER NOTICE AND 40 NOTICED) (REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON THE ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT) Reference staff report August 22,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report noting that this public hearing was noticed for three zoning districts Anza Area, Anza Point North and Anza Point South. Attached to the packet is a request to continue the hearing on Anza Point North district. The Commission may decide to continue the hearing on the Anza Point North district, any testimony on that district this evening will be carried over to the continued hearing. CP noted that an Errata for the Bayfront zones was placed at the Commissioner's desks tonight. The errata includes minor edits to make language in the six new zoning districts in the Bayfront consistent. These edits should be considered at the public hearing on the zoning districts tonight. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; Nikki Zito, 615 Airport Blvd; spoke. Last April when the plan was approved it was determined that there would be no residential uses in the Bayfront area,do not recall extended stay hotels being allowed,concerned that given their design,if one of these hotels should close it could easily be converted to some kind of residential use; the plan states on pages 4-5 that hotel density was increased for extended stay hotels;in TW district extended stay hotels are allowed because they are compatible with the residential district, should consider dropping the idea of extended stay hotels in these proposed zoning districts. What is an "apartment hotel"? CP noted that this term has been dropped from the code;she referred to the errata sheet of corrections. CA noted that extended stay and time share condominiums were discussed during the planning process. Council determined that extended stay hotels were appropriate in part because they are a hotel product meeting a special customer 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes August 22, 2005 need not currently provided in the city's hotel market. Time share condominiums, even if built as hotels, were determined at that time by City Council to be residential uses and excluded from the Bayfront area. Commissioners discussed the 29 day limitation on occupancy caused by the Transient Occupancy Tax,and how that would be affected by extended stay hotels. CP noted that at the time the plan was being approved the hotel industry provided information which documented that not many of the hotel stays in an extended stay hotel exceeded 29 days. Would like to know how the revised zoning will affect the future uses of properties in the Anza Area. CP suggested that she sit down with Mrs.Zito and review the provisions of the new zoning district along with her particular property interests. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner comment: how would a limitation on rooms affect an extended stay hotel? CA noted probably not much since the characteristic of an extended stay hotel is the configuration of the room;how is an extended stay hotel differentiated from an apartment building?CA noted given the density of the hotel, the cost of land would prohibit the hotel from becoming an apartment complex. Could extended stay hotels be made a conditional use so that appropriate limitations could be placed on them to keep them from becoming residential uses?Suggest that extended stay hotels be shifted to only a conditional use in the Anza Area and Anza Point North districts. C.Keighran moved to recommend the Anza Area and Anza Point South zoning districts to the City Council for approval with the amendment of the errata sheet corrections and that extended stay hotels be made a conditional use only in the Anza Area and Anza Point North zoning districts. The motion was seconded by Ralph Osterling. Chair Auran noted that the public hearing on the Anza Point North district is continued to the Commission meeting of September 12,2005,including the direction that extended stay hotels be made a conditional use in the Anza Point North district. Tonight's action will not include the Anza Point North district. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend the Anza Area and Anza Point South zoning districts to the City Council for approval with the errata sheet corrections and making extended stay hotels a conditional use in the Anza Area district. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Vistica absent)voice vote. There is no appeal this item will be set for City Council action. This item concluded at 9:20 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 9. 379 LEXINGTON WAY, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(CHRISTOPHER MAFFEI,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;HERMANN DIEDERICH, ARCHITECT) (63 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER ZT Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public comment. Hermann Diederich,architect and Christopher Maffei,property owner and applicant,represented the project. They stated they wanted to stay within the lines of the existing roof, wanted to stay within design of existing neighborhood; set back front addition; changed siding to shingle cedar siding so that house has uniformity to it. Commission stated:front porch post is small in scale, trellis in rear has small scale posts, and living room lacks window area. Applicant responded that post in front could be made larger and more decorative,trellis posts also could be made larger and more decorative and that windows could be added to the living room area. Commission asked what will the second floor 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes September 12,2005 to any retail or other use, a food establishment shall not be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become void; 14)that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's, Fire Marshal's and Recycling Specialist's June 28, 2004, memos shall be met; and 15)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 4-0-2-1 (Cers.Cauchi and Keighran absent,Vistica abstained). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m. C. Vistica took his seat on the dias. J(I 7. BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: ANZA POINT NORTH ZONING DISTRICT r ' —CITY PLANNER.MARGARET MONROE(40 NOTICED)(CONTINUED FROMA UGUST22,2005 MEETING) Reference staff report September 12,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the staff report noting that this item was continued from the previous meeting at the request of the representative of the property at 301/309 Airport,because of the wish to discuss issues relating to height,minimum lot size,minimum street frontage and land use(allowing medical clinics/health service uses) Only one change was proposed from the previous meeting and that was to shift extended stay hotels from a permitted to a conditional use. Commissioners asked that there has been a lot of concern about wind,observe fewer wind surfers in this area today than two years ago, there are other locations in the county to serve wind surfers, might it be wise to increase the limit for height covered by a conditional use permit. CP noted that the wind standards which are driving the height regulations as proposed for this area are established in the adopted plan,community wind standard section;if they are substantially exceeded the specific plan will need to be amended and that could trigger a new environmental document on the specific plan. Wasn't the part of the 16 acre site on Beach Road subdivided off in the past?CP noted that was her understanding,however all the acreage is still in one ownership. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, 216 Park Road, and Jim Madden and Tom Gilman DES Architecture represented the property at 301/309 Airport Blvd.;Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue;John Ward,representing the property owners at 350 Airport Blvd.;Tom Baluchi, 114 Stanley Road;all spoke on the zoning proposal. Owner at 309 Airport wants a development of signature buildings on this site that will cause people in airplanes and on 101 to want to come and see what's there, need good mix of buildings, biotech and hotel,market is competitive for these uses in this area today, regulations should say"come to Burlingame to invest",not much city can do now but maximize flexibility for development,50 feet too short, barely 4 stories for Class A office building, minimum 4 acre lot size too big, never seen so large a requirement in this area-sending a message that cannot optimally divide. Did studies of various lot sizes and arrangements within 309 Airport parcel,need to sell off buildings individually so need smaller parcels,need enough flexibility for economic success;biotech buildings have 17'floor to floor,Class A office tight with 12.5'floor to floor;biotech also requires 15 foot penthouse for equipment which can cover 30%to 85%of the roof area and at grade service areas for gases and other storage of 2,500 to 3,000 SF for each building, there are covered loading areas and enclosures for trash recycling needed. So want building height and lot size kept flexible--only way to meet master plan goals. Other communities have minimum lots sizes of 20,000 SF with 100 foot frontages, in order to finance developers have to be able to sell buildings independently,the market in this area is not for 100,000 SF buildings but for 30,000 SF,so need to be able to do for economics. Commissioner asked how FAR's worked, Architect noted that smaller the site the harder to maximize FAR allowed because of other requirements such as parking and open space. Generally 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2005 2 to 3 story buildings have FAR of 0.6 with parking at grade. What is the ideal footprint for biotech? Generally 25,000 SF to 30,000 SF per floor,labs need more space,research and development fits in 25,000 SF. How tall is Gilliard, is it typical? One and two stories, and yes its typical, although Genintech is 5 stories of mixed use. Developer is proposing 3 and 4 stories in order to keep people in the same building; west coast has taken longer to get people into taller buildings. Commissioner noted that 16 acres provides a campus opportunity with many small users. Owner wants option to subdivide later for multiple users. Additional public comment:remember at workshop Buddhist group want to buy 301 Airport and put a hotel on it, seems like someone tore down the drive-in too soon; wind surfing is a seasonal sport and dependent upon winds strongest in the Spring and in October,three places to do sport in San Mateo county,County put in Seal Point Park for wind surfers but behind a hill and no wind,this site attracts development,benefit from open water,support recreation activities on the bay;not sure want a deadly virus in Burlingame;do not want taller buildings,am a bicyclist, affected by wind as well;remember that the runway extension closer to our shores will happen one day as well, this could affect building height; like 4 acre parcels, keep from subdividing so it will not look like the Beach and Lang Road area,part of taller buildings could be put under ground, medical uses are not allowed in this area now, does biotech open the door to medical uses? Represent the 9 acre parcel at 350 Airport,may remember during public hearing on plan owner asked City Council to consider "time share" ownership; innovative approach to continue strong growth in hospitality industry,something like extended stay hotel,does not give rise to residential uses average stay is 1-2 weeks; no plan presently for development on this site,would like to include time share with CUP for extended stay. Resident recalled public hearing in 1960's and 1970's which called out a vision for the area similar to South San Francisco, was concerned that the commission did not realize what opportunity the city has on the Bayfront,there are plenty of places for the wind surfers to go, eventually the runways are going to be built, have a gold mine at this location, allow developers to do what they want.There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: compelling issues, need to think more about minimum size and time share; CA noted that City Council directed staff to look at time share,were waiting for input property owner said was going to provide, there is no definition or status of ownership known at this time, Council specifically deferred action at the time of adopting the plan. Height issue is that the specific plan has been adopted, standard was based on specific site studies and on careful technical analysis by most qualified wind people in area,from this came the community wind standard,if change is needed,will need to amend the specific plan (and general plan)and open the current plan document to further environmental analysis. Would like to give the property owners some leeway over the 50 foot maximum.CA like a maximum number,without have to do an EIR because of cumulative impact(e.g. effect of wind on water and at grade on adjacent properties), these wind studies are very expensive,the purpose of the plan standard is to avoid these costly studies and define what will work. Can revise height over 50 feet that requires a conditional use permit? CA noted could go to 20 feet maximum and stay within range. Height is based on community standards where did stories come from? CP noted that the number of stores was put in the design guidelines to illustrate how the gradient in height caused by the wind standard was to work for development on the site. If wanted to illustrate height gradient in another way in the plan beside stories that would require a general plan amendment. Commission noted taking out the stories restriction might be one less restriction. Also need to look at minimum lot size,4 acres seems to reduce flexibility,could a Planned Unit Development concept be used?CA noted that the city does not have a Planned Unit Development ordinance,CP noted that have done similar in the past(301 Airport office project example)with a phased development plan at approval,actually gives a longer time frame than a PUD. With PUD the city would have no control over how or what size parcels would be sold off,but could have more uniform development. Subcommittee focused on a narrower line of thinking,options within the height,work with the developer, focus on the issues raised. Difficult to 14 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2005 ask developer because he will always want a bigger building,more FAR. Should refer back to subcommittee for one review;need to appoint third member of subcommittee. Subcommittee might also consider PUD and its use;need to refer to subcommittee. C. Vistica moved to continue this item and to refer it back to the subcommittee for further review of the items raised at this hearing. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Keighran absent). voice vote. Chair Auran appointed C.Vistica to the Bayfront Subcommittee. This action is not appealable. This item concluded at 10:30 p.m. 8. NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE TROUSDALE WEST DISTRICT—DENSITY FOR GROUP RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES CITY PLANNER:MARGARET MONROE(NEWSPAPER NOTICE AND 212 NOTICED) Reference staff report September 12, 2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report noting that the Commission at their last meeting forwarded the Trousdale West regulation to the City Council without the provisions for convalescent hospitals and group residential facilities for the elderly. Tonight the hearing is on separating the regulation of convalescent hospitals from group residential facilities and establishing different standards for determining density for each,based on the nature of the services offered,the needs of the clients,and the differing number of employees required for each type of service. Commission asked if parking numbers shown in letter from Sunrise are similar to city's experience.CP indicated that the proposed Sunrise project meets city on site parking requirements and we have had no problems with other similar facilities built in the city based on these on-site parking requirements. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Pat Giomi, 1445 Balboa Avenue, noted that with current demographics more people are going to need the service of these facilities and they will not be driving,using parking to establish density for group residential facilities for the elderly is the right direction to go; don't think family members visiting will affect the neighbors a lot. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Osterling made a motion to recommend the amendment as proposed in the staff report to the Trousdale West zoning district regulations for convalescent hospitals and group residential facilities for the elderly to city council for action. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Comment on the motion: using the current on site parking requirements to determine the density of the group residential facility for the elderly is logical since it is based on the way multiple family residential densities are established in the R-3 and R-4 zoning districts,it is a standard the city has used overtime with success and no complaints, and, in this area,the proximity to BART insures that some employees will use mass transit to work rather than bring their cars. This action will facilitate the development of convalescent hospitals and group residential care facilities for the elderly within this zoning district as support uses to the hospital, consistent with the specific plan. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to the Council for approval the amendment for group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent hospitals to the Trousdale West zoning district regulations. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Keighran absent). This item will go forward to City Council for action. This item concluded at 10:40 p.m. 15 Agenda Item # 5c Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: April 17 2006 o , C; SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BYJ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 5, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: SIX-MONTH EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY STOP SIGNS ON CORTEZ AVENUE AT SHERMAN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council provide direction regarding the temporary stop signs on Cortez Avenue at Sherman Avenue. The Traffic Engineer will be making a brief presentation to Council. BACKGROUND: The Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission (TPSC) held several public meetings regarding installation of stop signs on Cortez Avenue at Sherman Avenue. The Commission's decision was to deny the request for stop signs as they did not meet warrants. At its September 19, 2005 meeting, Council reviewed a presentation by staff and heard from several residents of the Cortez Avenue area on this issue. Council approved installation of temporary stop signs for a six-month trial period. Attached is the Council staff report and TSPC minutes as background information. During this time, staff was instructed to conduct traffic volume and speed studies on Cortez Avenue and parallel streets to determine any impacts, and return to Council with its findings. DISCUSSION: Traffic volume and speed data were collected in March. The information was compared to base-line data collected in October before the temporary stop signs were installed. Speed Analysis — A comparison of the pre-installation and post-installation data shows the following: • 1-mile per hour decrease in average vehicle speeds on Cortez Avenue (4%). • 1-mile per hour increase in average vehicle speeds on Balboa Avenue (3%) • No change in average vehicle speeds on Cabrillo Avenue. S:W Public Works Directory\Staff Repo rts\Cortez-S herm an Stop Signs 4-06.doc These differences in average speed are considered negligible. Based on the data collected, the presence of stop signs had little measurable effect on slowing traffic speeds. It is interesting to note that the average speed over the two block segment, from Easton to Broadway, is nearly the same after adding the stop signs in the middle of that segment(at Sherman Avenue). In order for this to occur,the drivers must have accelerated between the stop signs. Traffic Volume Analysis—A comparison of the pre-installation and post-installation data showed the following: • 22-vehicle decrease in average traffic along Cortez Avenue(5%). • 1-vehicle increase in average traffic along Balboa Avenue(0.3%). • 40-vehicle decrease in average traffic along Cabrillo Avenue (14%) — The size of the vehicle decrease cannot be explained from the data. It is most likely that these vehicles diverted to parallel streets outside of the study area. Council may wish to consider other factors such as increased noise from accelerating and decelerating vehicles, increased air pollution, the potential for accidents due to rolling stops, and setting a precedent for additional requests for unwarranted stop signs. Staff continues not to recommend installing unwarranted stop signs, as their primary function is to clarify right-of-way assignment rather than for speed control. However, if Council elects to make the stop signs permanent,staff will return with an ordinance for future introduction and adoption. If the Council chooses to remove the temporary stop signs, staff will implement Level 1 and Level 2 traffic calming measures such as additional signage, regular/periodic speed enforcement, and neighborhood speed watch type programs. In order to be effective, these measures would also have to be considered for Balboa and Cabrillo Avenues. Similar measures have been used in various neighborhoods throughout the City with success. BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in the Public Works Department operating budget to maintain or remove the stop signs. EXHIBITS: Map of Cortez Avenue and adjacent streets City Council Staff Report(September 19,2005) Traffic,Safety and Parking Commission Meeting Minutes a /i rc L /A g a tine Chou Traffic Engineer c: City Clerk S:W Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Cortez-Sherman Stop Signs 4-06.doc EXHIBIT A MAP OF CORTEZ AVENUE AND ADJACENT STREETS Easton Dr. Sherman AI e. Broadway BALBOA Before: 281 cars After. 282 cars AVE. 28.5 mph 29.5 mph CORTEZ Before:412 cars After: 390 cars AVE. 28 mph 27 mph CABRILLO Before: 290 cars After: 250 cars AVE. 28 mph 28 mph Easton Dr.F Sherman Ave. Broadway Agenda Item # Meeting BURLfNGAME STAFF REPORT Date: September 19, 2005, SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS AT CORTEZ AVENUE, AT SHERMAN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider adopting an ordinance to install stop signs on Cortez Avenue, at Sherman Avenue. Due to the interest from the public on this matter, the Traffic Engineer will make a presentation at the Council meeting. BACKGROUND: At their February 12, 2004 and March 11 , 2004 meetings, the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission reviewed a request for stop signs at the intersection of Cortez and Sherman Avenues. Currently, there are stops at Sherman Avenue. This request would result in making the intersection into a 4-way stop. Staff conducted a stop sign warrant study to evaluate accident history as well as vehicular and pedestrian volume counts. Based on the data collected and reviewed, the intersection did not meet the minimum requirements to warrant stop signs and the request was denied. Through discussions, staff and the Commission established that vehicle speeds were the primary concern. As a response, Police enforcement was increased on Cortez Avenue, near Sherman Avenue for a period of two months. On November 10, 2004, a second request was made of the Commission to reconsider the installation of stop signs. The Commission reviewed the request again, and determined that there was no change in the current conditions to warrant stop signs. The Commission did recommend that the neighborhood investigate the use of traffic calming techniques to address their main concern of speeding vehicles. A petition to reverse the Commission decision was presented to Council at their April 41 2005 meeting. Council determined that staff and neighborhood representatives should meet to discuss possible alternatives. As a result, a neighborhood meeting was held on July 26, 2005. At that meeting, various traffic calming techniques were presented which had been previously identified by the Commission. The following techniques will be elaborated on by the Traffic Engineer in his presentation: • City/neighborhood funded roadway obstruction installations such as bulb- outs. • Neighborhood traffic watch program. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Cortez-Sherman Stop SignsRev.doc • Radar speed signage. • Portable pedestrian warning signs. The six neighborhood representatives of Cortez Avenue listened to a presentation by the Traffic Engineer and felt that the speeding issue could only be addressed by stop signs. DISCUSSION: Staff has carefully evaluated the technical criteria for warranting stop signs, as set forth in the City Municipal Code and State Traffic Manual. Two criteria are used to evaluate whether stop signs are appropriate. First, the average of the highest 8-hour traffic volume counts for a typical day (24- hours) was calculated for all four intersection approaches. An average of 117 vehicles was calculated as opposed to the 300-vehicle average minimum warrant requirement. Second, the number of traffic accidents over a 12-month period was found to be zero, as opposed to the 3-accident minimum warrant requirement. Stop signs are used when there is confusion on the roadway over right-of-way assignment for drivers. Staff believes that the primary concern of the residents is speeding vehicles, for which stop sign installation is not appropriate. Staff further believes that speeding can be more appropriately addressed by the traffic calming techniques indicated above. As the warrants for stop signs have not been met, staff cannot support the approval of their installation on Cortez Avenue, at Sherman Avenue. In the event that Council wishes to proceed with stop sign installation, the following steps should be taken: A. Requesting City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waiving further reading of the ordinance. C. Introducing the proposed ordinance. D. Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. BUDGET IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the City would be the cost of labor and material to install stop signs and STOP roadway legends on Cortez Avenue. There is sufficient funds in the Public Works streets operating budget to cover these costs. EXHIBITS: Ordinance - Stops signs at Cortez Avenue and Sherman Avenue Excerpts of TSPC Minutes - February 12, 2004 March 11, 2004 November 10, 2004 Map of Cortez Avenue XZU idne Chou Traffic Engineer c: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Cortez-Sherman Stop SignsRev.doc The City of Burlingame CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.budingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - EXCERPTS Minutes Excerpts (Thursday, Februaly 12, 2004): 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS. 6.1 Request for 4-way Stop sign at the intersection of Sherman Avenue and Cortez Avenue From the floor, Mr. Lipscomb stated that there are a lot of speeders through this area.He stated that there are two blocks between the stop signs; and since Cortez is a connector to Hillside Drive, speeding occurs most in the mornings and afternoons. Mr. Lipscomb said that there are 16 children on his block. He also said that the radar trailer was set up during the summer, but that it was not as effective now. Vice Chair Warden stated that staff will look at the warrants for this intersection. Officer Witt will provide limited enforcement at school times. This will be a Discussion item next month. Minutes Excerpts (Thursday,March 11, 2004): 4. CURRENT BUSINESS. 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS. 4.2.3 Request for 4-way Stop sign at the intersection of Sherman Avenue and Cortez Avenue Mr. Chou reported that there were no accidents at this site in the past two years, and that based on the City's approved Stop Sign Warrant study, recommended to deny the request for a 4-way stop at Sherman and Cortez. From the floor, Mr. Lipscomb stated that the volume is not the issue; but that speed is the issue. He said that drivers go for two blocks before they have to stop. Sgt. Cutler stated that enforcement could be increased on the street on a rotational basis since the officers also have other enforcement locations to focus on. It was moved and seconded(Comms. Condon/Warden)to make this an Action item; it was then moved and seconded(Comms. The City of Burlingame Page 1 of 1 Warden/Condon)to deny this request. Unanimously approved by the Commission. Minutes Excerpts(Thursday.November 11. 2004,E 5. CURRENT BUSINESS 5.1 ACTION ITEMS 5.1.2 Request for review of stop signs at Cortez Avenue and Sherman Avenue. Mr. Chou stated that a 4-Way stop warrant study was performed a few months ago for the original request; and.that,this intersection did not meet the warrant conditions at that time. He added that the Cortez Avenue residents have come back to the City because they are concerned that additional enforcement actions from the Police Department have been ineffective. Mr. Chou explained that the residents have requested that the Commission re-consider their past decision to deny the original request. Chair Cohen requested audience feedback, but since there was none he closed public hearing and brought the discussion back to the Commission. Commissioner Condon stated that based on his numerous investigations, that peak traffic times in this area is between 7:45 to 8:30 AM and 3:00 to 3:30 PM,which coincides with the school commute traffic. To him, all other hours of the day are relatively calm. Commissioner Condon concluded that he didn't feel this location warranted a 4-way stop. Chair Cohen agreed, but did support the idea of the neighborhood considering a traffic calming device; and,that the neighborhood should be added to the waiting list for future funding of the program. Motion: To deny the request to reconsider a 4-way stop signs at Cortez Avenue and Sherman Avenue. M/S/C: Warden, Condon, 4/0/1 (Commissioner Conway abstained.) The City of Burlingame Page 2 of 1 Agenda Item # 8a Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: April 17, 2006 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY � 421ry W, TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 5, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING NBSU (NORTH BAYSIDE SYSTEM UNIT) AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached NBSU agreement. BACKGROUND: The NBSU consists of five member agencies including Burlingame, Millbrae, San Bruno, South San Francisco, and San Francisco that utilize the South San Francisco's wastewater treatment plant facility for de-chlorinating and discharging effluent to the bay. In 1972, an agreement was entered into by South San Francisco, San Bruno, and San Francisco for the construction and maintenance of an effluent outfall force main, as well as a de-chlorination system. In 1973, Burlingame and Millbrae constructed the Burlingame- Millbrae joint outfall system to transport their effluent to the South San Francisco wastewater treatment plant facility for a final de-chlorination and discharge to the bay. In 1977, Burlingame and Millbrae joined the three other cities to form the NBSU, for providing an equitable sharing of the costs and benefits to handle the effluent for all five agencies. DISCUSSION: The purpose of the new agreement is to include current system and facilities improvements. It also delineates the responsibilities of the member agencies including the basis of cost sharing for the operations, maintenance, capital improvements, and management of the facilities at the South San Francisco wastewater treatment plant. The term of the new agreement is for twenty years and provides a withdrawal provision with a two year advance notice. BUDGET IMPACT: Burlingame's share of the cost is included in the wastewater treatment plant's operations budget. The agreement does not result in added costs to the budget. EXHIBITS: Resolution and Agreement %ed MuC.P.E. Assistant irector of Public Works c: Jim Nantell, City Manager; Larry Anderson, City Attorney; Doris Mortensen, City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\NBSU.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING NORTH BAYSIDE SYSTEM UNIT (NBSU) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF BURLINGAME,MILLBRAE, SAN BRUNO,AND SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, for almost thirty years,the Cities of Burlingame, Millbrae, San Bruno, and South San Francisco and the City & County of San Francisco have participated in the sharing of the costs and benefits of the North Bayside System Unit(NBSU) for a sewage effluent outfall force main and de-chlorination system to serve the five cities and San Francisco International Airport; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to revise the existing agreement and replace with it a new agreement that better specifies the cost bases of the five agencies; and WHEREAS,the revised agreement and the continued sharing of services of the NBSU will serve the communities and the well-being of San Francisco Bay, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute the NBSU Joint Powers Agreement as contained in Exhibit A hereto. 2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Mayor. MAYOR 1, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO OWNERSHIP OF CAPACITY, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND CAPITAL PROJECTS COST SHARING OF THE SOUTH SANFRANCISCO EFFLUENT PUMP STATION, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OUTFALL FORCE MAIN, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SUBMARINE OUTFALL, SWITCHGEAR BUILDING, AND THE DECHLORINATION FACILITY (KNOWN AS THE NBSU FACILITIES) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of 2006, by and between the members of the North Bayside System Unit (NBSU) that includes the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ("South San Francisco"), the CITY OF SAN BRUNO ("San Bruno"), the CITY OF BURLINGAME ('Burlingame"), the CITY OF MILLBRAE ("Millbrae") and the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, acting by and through its AIRPORT COMMISSION (the "Airport"). The members of the NBSU are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Agencies". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, pursuant to a joint powers agreement entered into on April 17'h, 1972, by and between the City of South San Francisco, the City of San Bruno, the City and County of San Francisco, acting by and through its Airport Commission, said cities provided for the joint construction, use and ownership of an Outfall Force Main ("South San Francisco Outfall Force Main"), a Submarine Bay Outfall, Flow Meter ("South San Francisco Submarine Bay Outfall"), and Switchgear Building; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a joint powers agreement executed in April 1973, between Burlingame and Millbrae, said agencies provided for the construction and operation of the Burlingame-Millbrae Central Bay Outfall System, designed to transport treated Burlingame and Millbrae plant effluent to the South San Francisco Effluent Pump Station for pumping through the South San Francisco Outfall Force Main and the South San Francisco Submarine Bay Outfall for ultimate bay disposal; and 1 WHEREAS, Burlingame, Millbrae and South San Francisco, on June 23, 1973, entered into an Agreement, entitled "Joint Powers Agreement Relating to Acquisition of Capacity in Effluent Pump Station, Outfall Force Main, Submarine Outfall and Appurtenant Facilities", that provided for the Cities of Burlingame and Millbrae to purchase capacity rights in the South San Francisco Outfall Force Main and the South San Francisco Submarine Bay Outfall, and Appurtenant Facilities; and WHEREAS, a Joint Powers Agreement dated September 12th, 1977, wherein the Cities of Millbrae and Burlingame joined with the aforementioned three agencies to construct a Dechlorination Facility and form the North Bayside System Unit(NBSU) which provided for the equitable sharing of the benefits and costs of the NBSU among the five cities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to these Agreements, the City of South San Francisco has been, and will continue to be, the administering agency responsible for operating the facilities on behalf of the parties to said agreements; and WHEREAS, said NBSU Facilities have been modified as part of a Water Quality Control Plant Improvement and Modification Project completed in 2001, the costs of which are shown in Exhibit A-1, Facilities whenever used hereinafter shall refer to: 1 —South San Francisco Effluent Pump Station 2 —South San Francisco Outfall Force Main 3 —South San Francisco Submarine Outfall 4—Switchgear Building 5 —Dechlorination Facility WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid facts and authorities, the agencies desire to define ownership of capacity, establish cost sharing for administration, operation & maintenance, define cost sharing of capital projects for the Facilities by the Agencies, and supercede all existing Joint Powers Agreements, and to establish conditions related thereto; 2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, as follows: 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agreement is to define the North Bayside System Unit (NBSU), replace all existing Joint Powers Agreements relating to said facilities, and delineate responsibilities and cost sharing for operations, maintenance, capital projects, and administration of the Facilities. 2. NORTH BAYSIDE SYSTEM UNIT (NBSU) DEFINED: The North Bayside System Unit (NBSU) is defined as the parties to the Agreement. They include: the City of South San Francisco ("South San Francisco") which is responsible for administering the NBSU, the City of San Bruno ("San Bruno"), the City of Burlingame ('Burlingame"), the City of Millbrae ("Millbrae") and the City and County of San Francisco acting by and through its Airport Commission (the "Airport"). 3. OWNERSHIP OF CAPACITY: NBSU member agencies shall have ownership of capacity, in accordance with Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. No agency shall discharge effluent into the Facilities exceeding such capacity rights. However, temporary or permanent adjustments may be made with written approval of all owners of capacity in the Facilities. South San Francisco has sole ownership of the land on which the Facilities are located. 4. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: The City of South San Francisco shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the Facilities. South San Francisco shall operate and maintain the Facilities in good repair and working order in accordance with sound engineering practices and in accordance with all applicable laws, statutes and regulations of governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Facilities. Neither an NBSU agency, nor any officer, employee or agent of an NBSU agency shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by actions solely done or omitted to be done by the City of South San Francisco in connection with the operation or maintenance of the Facilities. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, the City of South San Francisco shall fully indemnify and hold the NBSU and each agency, harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of actions solely done or 3 omitted to be done by the City of South San Francisco in connection with the operation or maintenance of the Facilities. This indemnity does not extend to any NBSU member agency which has exceeded its allocated capacity of flow through the system. 5. COST SHARING OF OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, CAPITAL PROJECTS & ADMINISTRATION: The costs of operating and maintaining the Facilities shall be borne by the parties hereto in accordance with their respective annual average daily flow to the Facilities. The cost of capital projects shall be borne by the parties hereto in accordance with their capacity rights as shown in Exhibit "A". a. Costs of Operation: Shall include costs of labor, including social security, unemployment and other taxes and employee benefits, materials, chemicals, power, supplies, sampling, testing, monitoring, and preventative maintenance. b. Costs of Maintenance: Shall include costs of labor, including social security, unemployment and other taxes and employee benefits, new and replacement process equipment costing less than $100,000, engineering, and non emergency repairs. Extraordinary and emergency repairs are defined in Section 7. C. Cost of Capital Improvement Projects: Shall be reviewed at the annual NBSU meeting to be held on the second Monday in March at the Water Quality Control Plant. Capital improvement and replacements to NBSU facilities exceeding $100,000 will not be undertaken without the consent of the NBSU members; which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. d. Administration Costs: Shall include the management cost of day to day operation and maintenance, and the costs of administering the NBSU as lead agency. Each agency's share, CAd,,,, of the administration cost shall be determined by dividing each agency's total costs, CAg, for the NBSU programs, listed in Exhibit "B", by the sum of the total costs, CT, for the NBSU programs and the South San Francisco-San Bruno WQCP programs, listed in Exhibit `B", then multiplying the resulting ratio by the SSF-SB WQCP administration program costs less depreciation and debt service, Adm: 4 Agency CAdm = (CAg/CT)x Adm Example Calculation NBSU Combined Effluent Monitoring Cost($): C1 NBSU Receiving Water Monitoring Cost($): Cz NBSU Effluent Pumping Station Cost($): C3 NBSU Dechlorination Cost($): C4 Total NBSU Programs Costs($): C5=C1+Cz+C3+C4 Total SSF-SB WQCP Programs Costs($): C6 Total NBSU and SSF-SB WQCP Costs($): CT=C5+C6 Agency's annual average daily flow(mgd): q Total NBSU annual average daily flow(mgd): Q Agency's Fraction of Total NBSU flow: q/Q Agency's Share of Total NBSU Program Costs($): CAg=(q/Q)x C5 Total of NBSU Programs and SSF-SB WQCP Programs Cost($): CT Administration Costs(less depreciation and debt service)($): Adm Agency's Fractional Share of Administration Costs: CAg /CT Agency's Share of Administration Costs: CAdm=(CAg/CT)x Adm 6. PAYMENT OF COSTS: On or prior to May 1 in each year of the term of this Agreement, the City of South San Francisco shall provide each NBSU member agency an estimate, properly substantiated, of their respective shares of the costs of operation, maintenance, capital projects, and administration of the Facilities for the succeeding fiscal year. Quarterly thereafter in such fiscal year commencing on July 1, each agency shall pay to the City of South San Francisco one-fourth (1/4) of the amount of such estimate. Any balance owed to the City of South San Francisco over thirty (30) days past due shall bear interest at the Local Agency Investment Fund rate. Any difference between such estimates and amounts actually expended by the City of South San Francisco for the payment of the costs of operation, maintenance and administration of the Facilities shall be adjusted to actual expenditures. Fiscal year means the period commencing on July 1 in each year and ending on the succeeding June 30. A check for overpayment or an invoice for underpayment shall be sent to member agencies thirty (30) days after close of the annual fund audit. 7. EXTRAORDINARY REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT: Except for budgeted annual capital improvements, costs of extraordinary/emergency repairs to and replacements for the Facilities, exceeding One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) dollars shall not be undertaken, except in an emergency, by the City of South San Francisco without the written consent of each and all NBSU member agencies, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Each NBSU 5 member's respective shares of such costs shall be prorated in accordance with the capacity rights shown in Exhibit "A" and shall be due and payable within forty five (45) days of billing therefor by the City of South San Francisco. a. Definition of Emergency: An emergency, for the purposes of this Section and Section 5, shall be defined as any NBSU facility failure that, if not corrected immediately, causes or will cause an NPDES Permit violation. The parties hereto shall maintain reserves therefore in a reasonable amount during the term hereof. South San Francisco shall make every effort to notify NBSU members in case of an emergency. 8. RECORDS: The City of South San Francisco shall maintain records of its expenditures for the costs of operation and maintenance of the Facilities, including extraordinary repairs and replacements, and of the funds received from the NBSU member agencies therefor, which shall at all times be open to inspection by the NBSU member agencies, and which shall be kept for a minimum of five (5) years. The City of South San Francisco on or before January 31 following each fiscal year shall file with each participating agency an annual report of said expenditures and funds received. 9. MODIFICATIONS: Improvements, extensions and additions to the Facilities shall be made from time to time on terms and conditions agreed to in writing prior to commencement of the work by the parties hereto. 10. WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS: The agencies shall at all times strictly comply with all statutes, regulations, and rules and orders of governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Facilities. The agencies shall keep and maintain records of the flow and sampling and testing data that describes the composition of their discharge of effluent into the Facilities, which shall be made available for inspection by the parties hereto. 11. REGULATORY FINES AND CIVIL PENALTIES: Any costs associated with regulatory fines and civil penalties incurred during the term of this Agreement shall be borne by the NBSU members per ownership of capacity as shown in Exhibit "A"; except if such costs are 6 due to the sole negligence of the City of South San Francisco, in which case The City of South San Francisco shall pay all costs. 12. HOLD HARMLESS: Any agency failing to strictly comply with any statute, regulation, rule or order of any governmental agency having jurisdiction thereover relating to the Facilities shall hold harmless the other agencies hereto from any penalty, damages or liability whatsoever resulting therefrom, including costs of suit. 13. LIMITED RIGHTS: Except as expressly provided herein, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to give any party hereto any ownership rights or any other right, title or interest in or to the respective sanitary sewerage systems of the other parties hereto, or any part thereof. 14. INSURANCE: The City of South San Francisco shall maintain such casualty and other insurance relating to the Facilities as sound insurance practices dictate. The NBSU agencies shall be named as additional insureds thereunder as their respective interests appear. The premiums therefore shall be a cost of operation and maintenance of the Facilities. An insurance certificate shall be provided to each NBSU agency annually. If such insurance is not available or premium costs are unreasonable, the City of South San Francisco shall give notice to the parties and the parties shall either provide for coverage of their respective liability or establish a self-insurance program. 15. DELINQUENT PAYMENTS: In the event that any party hereto fails to make any payment provided within the time herein specified, interest at the rate of return for Local Agency Investment Funds shall apply to the unpaid balance. 16. BREACH OF COVENANTS: In case of a breach or alleged breach on the part of any party hereto in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder, not less than forty-five (45) days notice thereof shall be given said party by the other parties hereto, and said party shall have forty-five (45) days from the date thereof to cure said breach (provided that if cure cannot be completed within said period, it shall be sufficient that said party commence said cure within said period and complete the same with due diligence). In the event any party hereto shall fail to cure, or commence to cure, a breach within said forty-five (45) days as provided in 7 this Section, the injured party or parties may file and prosecute to judgment a suit to recover damages, or in mandate, or in mandatory or prohibitory injunction, or other legal or equitable remedy. 17. BINDING ARBITRATION: In case any dispute should arise between the parties regarding the construction, meaning, or effect of this Agreement or any of its provisions, or the rights, privileges, duties or obligations of the parties hereto, or any of them, then upon written notice of an intention to arbitrate, given by one party to the other, such dispute shall be arbitrated and decided by arbitrators pursuant to the provisions of Section 1280, et seq., of the California Code of Civil Procedure, as amended, unless an action or suit is filed by the other party within fifteen (15) days after said notice is given. The persons appointed shall be trained and qualified in the matter to be passed upon. If the matters principally involve engineering, the arbitrators shall be registered civil engineers. If they involve accounting, the persons appointed shall be certified or licensed public accountants. If the matters involve law, they shall be passed upon by duly licensed attorneys. Where problems in controversy are complex in nature, to the extent practicable they shall be divided and the separate matters assigned to persons qualified. The arbitrators appointed shall be notified in writing, as well as the parties hereto, by the appointing party. If an arbitrator shall refuse to act or shall resign, another shall be appointed in his place by the party making the original appointment. If there is a failure or refusal to appoint an arbitrator for thirty (30) days after written demand, a party or arbitrator may apply to the Superior Court for San Mateo County and said Court shall designate and appoint such arbitrator or arbitrators. 18. CUMULATIVE: No remedy conferred hereby or by the law is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, but each such remedy is cumulative and in addition to every other remedy and may be exercised without exhausting and without regard to any other remedy conferred hereby or by law. 19. WAIVER: No waiver of any default or breach of duty or contract shall extend to or shall affect any subsequent default or breach of duty or contract, or shall impair any rights or remedies herein. 8 20. DELAYS: No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver of any such default. 21. TERM: This Agreement shall commence upon the date hereof and may terminate as to any party hereto at any time after twenty (20) years, provided that such party has tendered to the other parties hereto written notice of withdrawal not less than two (2) years preceding the date of termination, and on such termination pursuant hereto, any interests or rights herein, shall be negotiated and approved by all NBSU members. 22. NOTICES: Notices hereunder shall be given in writing and served personally or by registered mail upon the parties hereto, as follows: To South San Francisco: City Manager City Hall 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 To San Bruno: City Manager City Hall 567 El Camino Real San Bruno, CA 94066 To Burlingame: City Manager City Hall 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 To Millbrae: City Manager City Hall 621 Magnolia Avenue Millbrae, CA 94030 To Airport: Airport Director San Francisco International Airport P. O. Box 8097 San Francisco, CA 94128 9 23. SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors or assigns of any party hereto, but no party hereto shall assign its rights hereunder to any party other than a duly formed public entity organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. 24. INTEGRATION: This Agreement integrates the complete understanding of the parties. No warrants or representations have been made by any party to the others except as specifically set forth in this Agreement. There shall be no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or waiver or addition to this Agreement, unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties hereto. 25. HEADINGS: The headings in each paragraph herein are merely for convenience, and shall, under no circumstances, be used to interpret or otherwise construe this Agreement. 26. JOINT POWERS: Members of the NBSU will appoint a representative with knowledge of the operations of the system to attend an annual meeting for the purposes of review of the performance of the system and any issues that may have arisen during the year. The members will review the financial status of operations for purposes of providing input for the next fiscal year budget. Members are welcome to visit the site at anytime during normal daytime operational hours for the purpose of reviewing operations of the system. The annual meeting will take place in the month of March on the second (2❑d) Monday. 27. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto duly authorized have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. 10 Signature Page 3 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF BURLINGAME ATTEST By: By: By: 13 Signature Page 1 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ATTEST By: By: By: 11 Signature Page 2 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF SAN BRUNO ATTEST By: By: By: 12 Signature Page 4 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF MILLBRAE ATTEST By: By: By: 14 Signature Page 5 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ATTEST AIRPORT COMMISSION By: By: By: 15 EXHIBIT "A"* OWNERSHIP OF CAPACITY 1. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO EFFLUENT PUMP STATION MGD(`) PERCENT South San Francisco 21.0 32.36 San Bruno 14.0 21.57 Burlingame 16.0 24.65 Millbrae 9.0 13.87 Airport 4.9 7.55 TOTAL 64.9 100.00 2. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OUTFALL FORCE MAIN South San Francisco 21.0 32.36 San Bruno 14.0 21.57 Burlingame 16.0 24.65 Millbrae 9.0 13.87 Airport 4.9 7.55 TOTAL 64.9 100.00 3. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SUBMARINE BAY OUTFALL South San Francisco 30.0(a) 40.60 San Bruno 14.0 18.94 Burlingame 16.0 21.65 Millbrae 9.0 12.18 Airport 4.9 6.63 TOTAL 73.9 100.00 4. SWITCHGEAR BUILDING South San Francisco 21.0 32.36 San Bruno 14.0 21.57 Burlingame 16.0 24.65 Millbrae 9.0 13.87 Airport 4.9 7.55 TOTAL 64.9 100.00 5. DECHLORINATION FACILITY South San Francisco 37.1 (b) 40.46 San Bruno 24.7(b) 26.94 Burlingame 16.0 17.45 Millbrae 9.0 9.81 Airport 4.9 5.34 TOTAL 91.7 100.00 * A Technical Memoranda dated 10-29-1999 from Carollo Engineers to John Gibbs of South San Francisco describing a cost sharing methodology is attached to and made part of this Exhibit as Exhibit"A-1".Exhibit A-1 describes costs and unit process modifications at the Water Quality Contol Plant that were completed in 2001. NBSU facilities were part of this project and the cost sharing methodology provides source data for this Agreement. (a) Per an agreement between South San Francisco and the Marine Magnesium Company of South San Francisco,South San Francisco acquired the company's 9.0 mgd capacity right. (b) The facility was designed and built for additional peak wet flows from South San Francisco and San Bruno as projected in the Wet Weather Management Program for the two cities. The facility provides for dechlorination of effluent overflows to Colma Creek for flows that exceed the capacity of the Effluent Pump Station. (c) Maximum Flow Rate in millions of gallons per day. 16 EXHIBIT "B" DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAMS NBSU PROGRAMS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO-SAN BRUNO WQCP PROGRAMS Combined Effluent Monitoring (1) Shaw Road Pump Station S F Bay Monitoring (2) San Mateo Ave Pump Station Effluent Pump Station (3) Industrial Pump Stations Dechlorination (4) Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Disinfection SSF-SB Source Control Buildings and Grounds Maintenance Sludge Processing Sludge Dewatering and Disposal Process Monitoring Engineering Support (1) The sampling and testing of the NBSU combined effluents as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board or other governmental agencies. (2) The sampling and testing of the San Francisco Bay water in and around the NBSU combined effluent discharge point as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board or other governmental agencies. (3) The operation and maintenance of the NBSU combined effluents pumping station, including pumps, motors, controllers, valves, flow meters, switchgear, standby generator, and other related equipment. (4) The operation and maintenance of the NBSU combined effluents dechlorination facility, including metering pumps, controllers, recorders, valves, and other related equipment. 17 Agenda Item # 8b Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: A ril 17,200 1 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 5, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution for an amended agreement to provide maintenance services on EI Camino Real. BACKGROUND: EI Camino Real is a State Highway owned and regulated by Caltrans. However, certain road maintenance responsibilities have been delegated to the City by Caltrans through a maintenance agreement. Under the current agreement, Burlingame is responsible for street sweeping, sidewalk repair, litter pickup, weed control, and lighting safety at street intersections. The agreement specifies the amount that Caltrans pays the City for these services which are performed in their right-of-way. DISCUSSION: It came to staff's attention last year that the lighting along EI Camino Real is actually maintained by PG&E. Caltrans has indicated to the City that they do not have clear records as to how or why the lighting was installed. It is therefore not certain what delegation might be made or what standard of maintenance might apply. For those reasons, staff requested Caltrans to delete the street lighting maintenance from the existing agreement; however there has been no response to date. Staff believes that the street lighting creates a needless liability issue for the City and Caltrans has not indicated any willingness to cooperate in addressing the matter. The attached amended agreement would remove street lighting from the City's maintenance responsibilities. Upon approval, staff will pursue having Caltrans execute the amended agreement. BUDGET IMPACT: None EXHIBITS: Amended Agreement, Resolution c: Jim Nantell, City Manager Larry Anderson, City Attorney Doris Mortensen, City Clerk Will Kempton, Caltrans SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Caltrans ECR Agrmt Amendment.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR SPECIFIED CITY MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS WITHIN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation(Caltrans) and the City have agreed to have the City provide some routine maintenance on El Camino Real, because Caltrans does not have the funding or personnel to perform the level of maintenance and upkeep on local State highways that citizens expect and that the City wishes; and WHEREAS,the street lighting along El Camino Real was originally assigned to the City for routine maintenance, but the City has learned that PG&E provides this maintenance and Caltrans does not have any standards for maintenance for most of the lighting along the highway in Burlingame; and WHEREAS, the City no longer has staffing to provide street lighting maintenance of this nature, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the amended Agreement for Maintenance of State Highways with the City of Burlingame contained in Attachment A hereto. 2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager. MAYOR I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2006,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS WITH THE CITY OF BURLINGAME THIS AGREEMENT is made effective this 1St day of January 2006, by and between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE", and the City of Burlingame, hereinafter referred to as "CITY". I. The parties desire to provide that CITY perform particular maintenance functions on the STATE highways within the CITY as authorized in Section 130 of the Streets and Highways Code. II. This Agreement shall supersede any previous agreement for maintenance of the identified portion of the STATE highways in the CITY and/or amendments thereto with the CITY. III. The CITY will perform such maintenance work as is specifically delegated to it on the identified STATE highway routes or portions thereof, all as described in Exhibit A hereof. Said Exhibit may be subsequently modified with the consent of the parties hereto, acting by and through their authorized representatives. IV. The degree or extent of maintenance work to be performed, and the standards therefore, shall be in accordance wit the provisions of Section 27 of the Streets and Highways Code and the then current edition of the State Maintenance Manual (a copy of which has been provided to the CITY), or a may be prescribed from time to time in writing by the District Director and agreed to by the CITY in writing. "District Director", as used herein, means the District Director of the Department of Transportation assigned to the territory in which the CITY is located, or an authorized representative. Maintenance is defined in Section 27 of the Streets and Highways Code including any of the following: Section 27 (a) The preservation and keeping of rights-of-way, and each type of roadway, structure, safety convenience or device,planting, illumination equipment, and other facility, in the safe and usable condition to which it has been improved or constructed, but does not include reconstruction, or other improvement. (b) Operation of special safety convenience and devices, and illuminating equipment. Burl DMA Effective: January 1, 2006 (c) The special or emergency maintenance or repair necessitated by accidents or by storms or other weather conditions, slides, settlements, or by other unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway, structure, or facility. An encroachment permit will be required for third parties when maintenance work is re-delegated. Such re-delegated work shall be performed at the same levels of service as spelled out herein. V. The functions and levels of maintenance service delegated to the CITY in the attached Exhibit A, Delegation of Maintenance, has been considered in setting authorized total dollar amounts. The CITY may perform additional works if desired, but the STATE will not reimburse the CITY for any work in excess of the authorized dollar limits established herein. VI. The STATE will reimburse the CITY for the actual cost of all routine maintenance work performed by the CITY as delegated under EXHIBIT A of this Agreement. It is agreed that during any fiscal year, the maximum expenditure for each function on each route shall not exceed the amount as shown in Exhibit A of this Agreement unless such expenditure has revised by an Amendment or otherwise adjusted or modified as hereinafter provided for. The expenditure per designated route for routine maintenance works, as referred to above, may be increased or decreased, redistributed between routes, or, additional expenditures for specific projects may be made when such adjustment of expenditures for routine maintenance or such specific work is authorized in writing by the District Director or his authorized representative. Additional expenditures or adjustments of expenditures, once authorized, shall apply during the fiscal year designated therein and shall not be deemed to permanently modify or change the basic maximum expenditure per route as hereinafter specified. An adjustment of any said maximum expenditure, either an increase or decrease, shall not affect other terms of the Agreement. 2 Burl DMA Effective: January 1, 2006 VII. A new Exhibit A, DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE, will be reviewed annually by the STATE for the ensuing fiscal year, if requested by the CITY, to ensure an equitable annual cost allocation. VIII. The CITY shall submit bills in a consistent periodic sequence (monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually). Bills for less than $500 shall not be submitted more than once each quarter. Bills shall be submitted within six months of the close of the STATES fiscal year on each June 30`' and should be coded according to the Caltrans HM Program Code as outlined in this Agreement. Bills submitted for work performed in periods prior to any preceding fiscal year will be deemed waived and will not be honored. Maintenance services provided by contract or on a unit-rate basis with overhead costs included shall not have these above-mentioned charges added again. An actual handling charge by the CITY for the direct cost of processing this type of bill will be allowed. IX. Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties to this contract, or to affect the legal liability of either party to the contract by imposing any standard of care respecting the maintenance of State highways different form the standard of care imposed by law. X. It is understood and agreed that neither the STATE nor any officer or employee is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this agreement. It is understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless the State of California and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injuries to or death of any person or damage to property resulting form anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this Agreement. XI. It is understood and agreed that neither the CITY nor any officer or employee is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the STATE under or in connection with any work, authority, 3 Burl DMA Effective: January 1,2006 or jurisdiction delegated to the STATE under this agreement. It is understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless the CITY and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injuries to or death of any person or damage to property resulting form anything done or omitted to be done by the STATE under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to the STATE under this Agreement. XII. Costs and expenses authorized to be incurred by the STATE, and the commensurate performance by the CITY, under the terms of this Agreement are conditioned upon the passage of the annual State of California Budget by the Legislature, the allocation of funding by the California Transportation Commission as appropriate, and the encumbrance of funding to the District Office of the STATE to pay the billings of the CITY. XIII. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until amended by the mutual consent of the parties thereto or terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days notice to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. CITY OF BURLINGAME STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WILL KEMPTON Director of Transportation By Mayor Date 4 Burt DMA Effective:January 1,2006 Attest: City Clerk City Attorney 5 Burl DMA Effective: January 1, 2006 EXHIBIT A DELEGATION OF MAINTENANCE The specific maintenance function indicted below is hereby delegated to the CITY. This delegation of maintenance function set forth herein does not include the control and maintenance areas and functions which rest with the CITY under the terms of executed Freeway Agreements and/or Freeway Maintenance Agreements. Maximum Annual Route Length Program Authorized No. Miles Description of Routing Delegated Expenditure 82 2.88 El Camino Real, from southeast HM2C $1000.00 city limits at Barroilhet Avenue HM2D 15,000.00 to the northwest city limits 750 feet south of Millbrae Avenue; a length of 2.88 miles of which half width, from city limits at Barroilhet avenue to Peninsula Avenue (a length of 0.06 mile), and a half width, from Bellevue Avenue to a point near Oak Grove Avenue (a length of 0.21 mile), lies within the CITY Total authorized expenditure Route 82 $259000.00 101 2.70 Bayshore Freeway, from southeast None city limits at Humboldt Avenue to northwest city limits 750 feet south of Millbrae Avenue; a length of 2.71 miles 280 0.00 Northbound on-ramp to Junipero None Serra Freeway from Trousdale Drive TOTAL AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE $25,000.00 6 Burl DMA Effective: January 1,2006 EXHIBIT A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FUNCTIONS HM2C SLOPES/DRAINAGENEGETATION CONTROL This provides for cleaning, maintaining, and repairing culverts, ditches, drains, structures, fences, curbs, sidewalks and other appurtenances between the roadbed and the outer highway right-of-way boundary line. It also includes weed and brush control by chemical, biological or mechanical methods, trimming and removal of trees and pest control. The following problems are delegated to the CITY: Weed Control BushNegetation (Excluding trees) Sidewalk Repair STATE will maintain trees The City may follow the same policy and procedure generally practiced regarding CITY sidewalks by requiring repairs and control of vegetation to be made by or at the expense of abutting owners, who are under legal obligation to perform such work. The Maximum Annual Authorized Expenditure for repair of sidewalks damaged by trees which are the responsibility of the STATE shall not exceed $10,000.00. HM2D LITTER/DEBRIS This provides for removal of litter and debris from roadway surfaces and roadsides. The following problems are delegated to the CITY: Debris/Litter Pickup Sweeping Litter Pickup Graffiti The length of Route 82 to be swept is 3.8 curb miles. 7 Burl DMA Effective: January 1,2006 Unless CITY itself is negligent, the STATE will, not withstanding the provisions of Section IX, defend, indemnify and save harmless the CITY against claims for this function (HM2D Litter/Debris) if work meets the following criteria: Work will be performed at seven (7) day intervals. Call-outs will be responded to within a reasonable time or the STATE Maintenance Manager will be notified. _ 8 Agenda Item # 8c Meeting April 17-2006 BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY �� - ✓ �z TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 3, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP AND TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT COMBINATION OF PORTIONS OF LOT 14, BLOCK 10, BURLINGAME LAND CO. MAP NO. 2 SUBDIVISION, 1441-1445 BELLEVUE AVENUE, PM 05-02 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council concur with the Planning Commission and approve the subject Tentative and Final Map with the following conditions: • A final parcel map for a lot merger shall be filed by the applicant within the two year time period allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's subdivision ordinance and, if necessary, an extension of up to one year may be filed. • All property corners shall be set and shown on the final parcel map. • The final map shall show the width of the right-of-way for Bellevue Avenue, Almer Road and EI Camino Real, including the centerline of the right-of-way, bearings and distance of the centerline and any existing monuments in the roadway. • All sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new. • During construction, the project developer shall maintain the existing street in good condition to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. If the construction activity results in street damage, the developer shall re-pave the street frontage to City standards. The developer shall take photographs of the street condition prior to and after construction to document any damage caused by the project construction. The street reconstruction shall be a minimum of 2 inches of asphalt concrete removal and replacement. BACKGROUND: At their meeting of November 28, 2005, the Planning Commission reviewed the attached tentative parcel map and recommended Council approval with the conditions listed above. The parcel map should be considered as both the tentative and final parcel map to facilitate processing. Staff will ensure that the proper map is recorded. EXHIBITS: Tentative Parcel Map; Staff Memorandum; November 28, 2005 Planning Commission Minutes c: City- Jerk,Applicant Vi 6r V Assis nt En ineer SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\05-02.doc TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ,Aa•Y 0 33 CHATEAU BELLEVUE SCALE- 1" • 10' 1441 & 1445 BELLEVUE AVE. Q Q � � a BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 PDSIp wAta mfIOL � �� wATAOaIw PREMIIl1011 � 9h � t m .°EMioKwrw v �i7 swrARr SERER AMCTIDw eox o I� VICINITY MAP ACCEPT P. .n a 9wNwAaL auHH((YDY.Ft."M(!)siwO uuR q g ly ra SC#lF _ R AT sAAurAIE OTE. ,0E-750-,ea PARCEL 9 .3 FORY ADT. BUIdING E' '0' ~e� I Ivil •_'>4..« ,Ab BEl1EwE YE DOwD01Mw R5 PNB TO OF ROOF 65.9e \ M XwEr euRuwoANE,cAAaAo10 ` ¢¢ •� �� I LP MiiwE�rna oEpUrtn 10-17- 77 19 o. u. I ,o uvEL sew PUW.-tYP ..ra'I5-fr—F14� -- 1aDfp' - esFEFlr mew. LL`._ trill `s I PROPERTY INFORMATION ` um .a DoI _ 3W CAUFCeAA ST RDE( slormy 1R ss ` j; t ` til" \ .{.,,, .N, �°" i:iAH I ew FRA =).DA aIle W u 0 3x cawrt �.vil' yA \ ' ,:NEEPtt a S Aw NC ✓ ro 2YOAJ-P Ad lJAA DA F Z . F. (510)W7-10eE W FY y r ` .4. . yx * i 4 iii,-m o g P�� 3. ) I•.,yN'; "� ...), 1. 8 �7 lA7 AwG ote-m-DIO: am A aQ (PM ,) rd rr�s L� AT q �\ 1, igPoi 0]a-131TuAi 6w KRS(PMCR 1) li r--- �, l .. •�:.• ^ e \ � Y •. .{f� TOTI.L 0.500 AOw3(1EA�D) II a mee , 'N o R 97 087.197 1:. • c 30wHG EASRwa(IROY ASSESSORS wEWbE} ail ��... `^' MPf A iI�J1i �\u� • 2 a3s-13,-M0. RNRVO 1 - R RAAt4.! LAf boles) . a3a-is-o5¢ RVDDaa E.. ... . ..�0.� •`' 91,A .l. �Pa .�.11TILTIES SERVICES _ r, wAm mr a ewK� c .df PN �N f i7t�f+ Ald) (Pow §I u°'�i•,worr AMC w.K�uwuu01� 6..' P ET,7 N GONDGAS A,43 OXCIll,C � lrz V ✓� 5 ,1E:9� UNITrtI eae. 4rp Rw4r,wrAp• ><w � ' K, . � �F� $3 .� W F l "•� �RwAM fLoa ErR SSS 2 5t0 RAfs LLw14.s A:-TYP: I `' �`� m\ h�TS 11)� �9MVhLY OY Ti aomsa. - I �. OMALE IFVd t 21. wit. .. .'b' AGE�p2 1 Ay .. SS ..d( VyL (�" 14 I M'i11l a 1,145 MVP AOAMITtlI IIAIr 1KklJN0A E. CALF0100A a O W 4 .imn'.. .. . W I� MM a 9A DART SMVEY 0Y Y �}LpWw.' 168wM •i9 �' .w�i.+u i � e DA�/E•N PRDOwEENA1�t�NC M wm lOT A SSdI y ww oma+. O �MbNI[CRXtAL PIAw er D/1E 1EYER a .�.' IP....'^ 1 /]/,�� m.n.. � X110 ✓nr MV. EO _ 4 y 2 4 I",I a IMO EE11EMlE A�£y. � 1�a g �9 �I BUgAKiAIE CNII]MA WMO ti PAROFL 1 (POR LOT DE G[ ) f MW 4-M. ahE p �� ^ � I~ !' r- O 2.STORY ADT Bloc. .. ..7.,b.w.P. ILEG'E' LOT MERGER EXHIBIT (,1 a s to m SC 1441 � 1445 BELLEVUE AVE. _Q Q BURLINGAME, CA. 94010 I� VICINITY MAP ' " ^ tOe-150-teo PARCEL / :;SraRY APT.BUlLgINb ry (,-n� "'°�1uw /JS 9EUEwE AK W1°owww 35 PMR -CP OF ROOF+�D.94 I 8 W 8? 'y "II y I I w,•, euauNCAwE.cA.sato f0-17-1977 'y �w I gytla IW D goo 'il' SPii I I_' y5cn M��...•, �uw 1J1�_.) WI w.Wp JI 3� 4� PROPERTY INFORMATION ;Riii! sEeo CKIEGWA 1-7 sT Roe iE- l,�`,�`p `l \\ \' .•e.N. „yw sAx RRANasw,u vette L>:] YRS I .-w.n. yq „� •• \ l \, �`` J° JV' ETM IEDt LFA s AMe EntlnEEl°NG MG '�d - 2A NWSIRIAL PAPofWAY N6i d a NAYwARO, Y om-tm-aso � I \ 6 � Y Lm AaeA, ms-,st-oEo:na.Ta Acts(PARra t W""' tom asw IAORS C.R.97-087397 �.i, p' _.�w•.�\ =awn Ewsnuc 0Rw Assess aEcams): Lia U 2-STORY APT BLDG \ \ °2 aze to o o RYRAPo r. ova .31Tn rTIES / SERVICES L) \ i( i II WATER alY of BN16NpALlE O lY® '.K.° l SEMEA aTY aF eIMl1M0A4E Qi ,+ k. __......_.....-- _ \CT 1\ �.-- •; b OAe PA(>Fic O.Le AIO EL—(P-) (� = EEErnaaTY PAaF,c aAs Aro ETLCTPIc(PoeE) rl e�wunOAUE FW DEPArt..T t (R) !Rj 2-STORY APT BLDG my nd 1TRR,FW#iFNA <Ta �s a •~� 14(R) r '. gg 1)IOPDavAMRC AMVEY er RAVuua ET,0RIEEAIN0. �, i X50 a �__ 3 I Eer Lq Ylt 5 ` > � ..,.K +t Ayy 'TOPOaIAP,RC YAv°xuaLrna xw- W .a n Y euuNowC LAl1Fpe4A N0,O I .a - —w eY w3� ss-FT- ��) x I o IY WiATMe aRa—EYiao0 W • aaw°z� 2f�L k"�r?°�L'§( L-w,� „I Le � wie w PRoacss _ �---— X.- A— .�O PARCEL 1 QGw n w•» LEGEND 2-STORY APT BLDG X-ow E-L W I ♦ ver I (p) O.R.97-011556 "�"(p) I"o(R) (�♦e�_ `'.` I PRaPostD oEvptv/gn O W M&OY fir z ---5— —TARY YMA I+LE � o••Wu /"t:° 4 —W WATER UNE - - '__ ^^'L�•' e+ Tr APT =uIDISo. E� ' YNNNb g —.rt— .,owT Myl , 00 9 (bCEL 17 Zyyq � ^! EARRW]L SYALE IJY\1 E� TOP ROOF E.89 PAfi MAPS 35-41 /`l §f euRun K a wmo 2-29-1984 ■s CATW eA9N REwsas er EASEMENTS AREA auWL +Oe No; mmTSR BENCHMARK TMs MMLty is NOT AN A.tT.A s,MVEY. .___ TOPOGRAPHIC LEGEND ____ •An oAa: ,o-st-os EA4]IFN19 OF REWND gIOWN a M PWI O SEf nu9 w ASMVyT cont E I STREET Stan ,,TY THE TTLE RMRT SUPPLED eYOAS NAT O CLLW OW E/0 EaCTRR:OVCRNEAc 9<wF: ,•.,Q BENdYARN 0107 TT,caMEEO By ROELTr •gf.F�E Y� YETER a iLUw LLE 3Q9. =A—AT TIE HORl11FA5i ME LTTLE—Y.DA,1]T DE—14 Ie W, W W.M VALVE(Wv),0R IRRICAT- '/A PIAMED ARU FPOr f1EVA11a 0ElCN eT K WNEA R R1IEVUE AVENUE G CO . L VALVE(ICV),AS NOIID TC i0P W CURB pRAl1N 9Y A141 d f.NlINO REAL 5 ° iP TOP OF NENi —'� FLOW DME•Iql EUEv.—2PAVE NOTE A v w•rzR uNE w P a"-E sNm ND. eFNOYAIef MiORYAl1O11 TAI°N eM+ -aC- SPnOPR1"SEWER 155)LINE wll TER NETCR iTOY IUVANAa E1WWiEFAY1O O1R0wK iCPOIMAPIK SUaLEY ST+Ia' 100 rFH WA`CR SURFALE 1CPCIMAARL YM ANO Opgllta MAN eY RAVANAa EN°MDIwC uOe YDme ,1Oe/0019.OAIEp AUaIeT mO0 DA—IU4VST mO3 OI t 9WFlE BURLINGAME r R MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT November 22, 2005 To: Planning Department From: Engineering Division Subject: Planning Review for 1441-1445 Bellevue Avenue Staff has completed the preliminary review for the project and comments are as follows; I. GENERAL: 1. Show proposed drainage system and indicate that all roof and site drainage shall go to street frontage and/or be designed to connect with the existing storm drain system. Hydraulic calculations shall also be provided to identify any adverse impacts to existing creek as well as the upstream and downstream of the creek. Show direction of drainage on adjacent property to confirm that no drainage enters this site or else that drainage needs to be included in the on- site system. 2. Since this whole site is to be developed below street or adjacent grade, approvals will be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump system; and the sump pump system shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dual pumps, controls, level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators must be so housed that they meet the City's noise requirement - see attached plan check sheet. Proposed pumps and generators are to be shown. 3. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for this project to identify the project's impacts to the existing sanitary sewer system and the associated mitigation measures. 4. If large trees are to be removed, plans shall show new proposed plantings to help ameliorate the tree removals. 5. Show required seven foot(7') minimum clearances at parking garage floor areas not just floor to floor. Provide room for all pipings, ducts and fire sprinklers. Disabled parking shall have access and parking area at eight feet two inches (8'2")clear. 6. All utilities to this site must be installed underground. Any transformers needed for this site must be installed underground or behind the front setback on this site. 7. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. Indicate that new curb, gutter and sidewalk fronting this site shall be designed by a civil engineer, approved by the City Engineer. U:\VICTOR\Projects\Private\1441 Bellevuel mpd 8. Provide sewer capacity study to determine if garage water discharge (contaminated) can be pumped into sewer system. 9. Water demand study for domestic and fire protection needs will require a pressure model study to verify water needs are available. 10. The clean ground water discharge point at the creek needs to be protected as not to cause erosion of the stream bank. 11. Approval needs to be obtained from Fish and Game, Army Corp. Of Engineers for any stream bed alterations and work in the creek. 12. All de-watering procedures must meet Regional Water Quality Control Board standards. 13. If poured-in-place method for piers is used, water that comes in contact with uncured concrete cannot be discharged directly into creek(R.W.Q.C.B. Standards). 14. The back of wall drainage system will require a pump and back-up pump power system. 15. Sand bags located in box culvert section of creek need to be checked as to why there appears to be a settled spot in the middle of wall. II SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS: 1. All transformers needed for this project shall be indicated on project plans and installed underground on this site or behind the front setback. 2. All irrigation systems and planting shall follow City's water conservation guidelines. 3. Rear landscape area shall drain to street or to a storm drainage system without pumping. 4. Show route of piping from drainage inlets. 5. Show the location for the fire sprinkler connection that is proposed. All fire system work shall conform to the City's current procedures for underground water systems. 6. All on site catch basins and drainage inlets shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction so no debris will be dumped into them. The City will provide a stencil. 7. Grading and drainage plans need to submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a Building permit. III PARKING: 1. Show underground and at-grade parking slab elevations. Maximum slope in any parking space is 5%. Show drainage pattern. UNICTOMProjectsTrivate\1441 Bellevue l.wpd 2. Provide all on site drainage inlets or the sump pump basin for the underground garage with a petroleum absorbent system for treating all drainage flows from the automobile parking areas. 3. Dimension the structural columns and dimensions with respect to parking stalls. Columns that are on the side of parking spaces are to be clear of vehicle's side door access and should be at least two feet(2') clear of the rear of the stalls to facilitate maneuvering. 4. The underground garage walls are near property lines with little clearances. Show how excavation is to be made on property with room also for back of wall drainage or propose alternate system. Also show the type of foundation proposed for this building. 5. A geotechnical report will be required to determine any adverse effects to the existing creek as a result of this development and identify mitigation measures. This development proposes two levels of parking below the street grade. Because the lower level may be below the groundwater table, the report shall address how this development is to sustain the resulting hydrostatic pressure. 6. Show callbox/intercom system to all units from driveway in front of security gate and at the top of the driveway so guests may have access to guest parking spaces. If no gate is planned, install conduit to all units so that if gate is installed in the future, the system may be easily installed. 7. Provide driveway profile with 2% from top of curb (6" high minimum) to back of sidewalk and transition to a high point, on. site or at property line, at 12" above flow line of street. Transitions at top of driveway and at bottom required to the approval of the City Engineer. Project plans currently show a driveway slope of 18.24% which exceeds the maximum driveway slope of 15%. The driveway shall be revised to meet the maximum allowed slope of 15%. .8. Project plans show two new driveways on Bellevue Avenue which may adversely affect the parking spaces available on Bellevue Avenue. The project shall indicate net effect to existing parking spaces due to the two new driveways and as compared with the net effect of one 24' wide driveway. Driveways for adjacent properties shall be shown on projects plans. 9. Underground garage area vents shall be shown on the project plans. 10. Show which parking spaces belong to which unit. IV ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: 1. Show design of trashroom and indicate size of receptacles, including receptacles for recycling. Confirm sizes needed with BFI. 2. On the two parking level plans and first floor (site) plan, show adjacent site and street elevations for reference. 3. Elevator sump drainage shall go to sanitary sewer and be shown on project plans. A backwater valve shall be installed for elevator sump drainage below the sanitary sewer. U:\VICT0R\Projects\Private\1441 Bellevuet mpd Elevator sump drainage shall also be separate from groundwater system which is to go to the storm drainage system. 4. The sewer ejection system shall be shown in garage plans and indicate the pit,ventilation, etc. Sewer ejection system must also be on the emergency generator. 5. Individual unit climate controls as well as separate shutoffs for gas, electric and water.are required. V TRAFFIC STUDY: 1. The traffic circulation plan within the project plans does not appear to provide adequate turning radius for turning movements. Cc: Syed Murtuza, City Engineer Doug Bell, Senior Civil Engineer UNICTOMProjects\Private\1441 Bellevuel mpd BURLING_AME MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PUBLIC WORKS -ENGINEERING DATE: NOVEMBER 22,2005 RE: TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP AND TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT COMBINATION OF PORTIONS OF LOT 14, BLOCK 10, BURLINGAME LAND CO. MAP NO. 2 SUBDIVISION, 1441-1445 BELLEVUE AVENUE, PM 05-02 This application is to combine two (2) existing lots into one (1) lot at 1441-1445 Bellevue Avenue. The applicant is proposing an on-site improvement which will require a lot combination in order to meet the zoning code. There are no comments from the Building Department and Planning Department. There will be no new easements created by this map. The map application is complete and therefore may be recommended to the City Council for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. A final parcel map for lot merger must be filed by the applicant within the time period as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Action on this map should be considered as both the tentative and final map to facilitate processing. 2. All property corners shall be set and shown on the final parcel map. 3. The final map shall show the widths of the right-of-way for Bellevue Avenue, Almer Road, and El Camino Real, including the centerline of right-of-way, bearing and distance of centerline and any existing monuments in the roadway. 4. All sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter shall be replaced with new. 5. All conditions attached to the condominium permit shall be met. 6. The conditions, covenants and restrictions for the map shall be approved by the City Attorney and conform to all approved conditions and City Codes. Exhibit: Tentative Map&Assessor's Map Vic or Assi nt Eng er U:(VICTOR1Projects\Private1PM05.02.wpd J •44 190 vo TAX CODE AREAZIN _ 1400 64' BB' `wE. EVUE 10 8 s103 r� L 1 SEE o �+ / a C ,BK. 406 . - o � �, e• C E 0 - 74 /7 M, t `�. °`3� ss• 12 17775' 35' 7.7 /3 53' .7. 60.54' � 53.25• 56' SG.7S' 3:.. _ G 1 `55 S3' 10 51' ri 52 N PARCEL A o O 5o': sill 43 V M n e' So (!94 R:IB45 A. ;r,54• 2 Q i35�' c HAP!N � •/400 I• 1 a0 N W — W K 4�.8�' (07* _ ssoa ss.oa' ss" s i20 P 1 4 0 r m 49.7W - PT & T CO- o o N ~ •n � m S B.E. 279-41-6 r - O a PARCEL 4 p o O O O ® 25 O 23 C �� 9B 92' - : BURL/NGAME A VE. CRR of rturlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005 requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on motion: great project;will help the street;what are the proposed changes to the landscaping? Will the rose bushes be affected due to lack of light?That two new large scale shrubs be planted in the front yard to help frame the house,one on the right hand side in the lawn area relatively close to the house and one next to the driveway; the rose bushes will barely get up to the level of the porch, there should not be too much shade for them;current proposed landscaping is not in keeping with the bulk of the house;could plant shrub more towards the left to avoid shade on the roses. Comments concerning the garage will really enhance the project. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the added conditions. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Keighran abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m. 4. 1441 & 1445 BELLEVUE AVENUE,ZONED R-4—APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP,TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT COMBINATION, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FRONT SETBACK LANDSCAPING FOR A NEW FOUR-STORY 17-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DALE MEYER, AIA, DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; BELLEVUE ASSOCIATES, LLC C/O LITKE PROPERTIES, PROPERTY OWNERS) (140 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS Reference staff report November 28, 2005, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Ninety-four conditions which include the mitigations from the Mitigated Negative Declaration were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Dale Meyer, architect, represented the project; Michael Callan, landscape architect for the project, 1400 Rollins Road; Abraham Landis, 1547 Bellevue Avenue; Mark Engleman, 1435 Bellevue,# 105,Redwood Crest Homeowners Association,spoke. Applicant summarized the revisions made to the plans in response to the Commission's comments at study; Commissioners noted regarding revised plans that there is no closet in the bedroom in unit 5;that because of the orientation of the sun and the project, the depth of the fourth floor deck on the rear of the building will have a big impact on the light access to the building next door;clarified that what looks like balconies on the front of the building are actually decorative wrought iron grills; concern about the survival of the redwood tree at the rear, commissioner noted that with removal of the Cypress growing next to the redwood, the redwood will fill out;for safety,outdoor fire place should not be wood burning nor should a shed for storing wood be located in the public open space, gas with timed turn-off valves for grill and fireplace would be safer and more practical; feel that the structure is not placed correctly on the site, too close to the building on the right, driveway should be reversed and building moved to the left,this is so serious cannot support the project; common open space has a real sense of space but needs a sink with running water, a toilet, and the bridge needs to remain central to the open space and building but also should not be built against the redwood tree, be sure foundation of bridge protects redwood roots;two story below grade parking garage located next to a creek raises serious questions about sump pumps running 24 hours a day,where the water is pumping to so creek will not be contaminated, not want to see fossil pillows used to clean water; CP noted that the mitigations from the Mitigated Negative Declaration address these drainage and water quality issues, including various sump pumps, back up generators and drainage receptors, and the mitigations are implemented as conditions of approval;important that the sump pumps and emergency generators are sound baffled so that they cannot be heard by the neighbors or by the residents of the project;on the balconies on 5 City oflsurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005 the southwest elevation the balconies are cantilevered from the cornice and look awkward, they should be moved to align with the balconies below and corbels added below the upper most balconies to visually attach them to the structure;the window pattern still seems monotonous,could be more interesting;the plans show the roof to be real slate, would not like to have a revision from this material later; SE Bell noted that it is important that the excavation for the garage and the parking is built in one season because of the creek, otherwise the hole should be properly shored to insure that it will not fail because of the proximity of the creek and adjacent development,the project should be bonded to insure this;there is limited opportunity to install big trees,would be nice to replace the Liquid Ambers on the street with a bigger,evergreen species, but that is up to the City; on the right side elevation should install "forest scale" tree to establish proper screening,Podocarpus on the left side should also be replaced with two"forest scale"evergreen trees,these would hide the limited space between buildings;Pittosporum along the right side property line should not be trimmed in order to provide the highest screen possible for residents in the adjacent building; check with Department of Fish and Game about what should be planted along the creek bank to stabilize it,at least filter fabric should be put on the bank and material planted through it,concerned about erosion during and after construction. Continued public comment: part of this building faces his condominium,will be all that is visible from all windows, now sees greenery; will reduce the value of his condominium; studies show this kind of change can have an effect on the mental health of older people; bought condominium 10 years ago, three story building,not expect visual impact of four story building next door. Redwood Crest Condominium would like to work with the developer on selecting the fence between the two properties, would like to leave existing vegetation at the front and start fence back some;concerned about the crooked telephone pole in the right-of-way at the front,would like it installed so it is up right now and in the future would like the service placed underground. Applicant noted they would work with the homeowners association on the selection of the fence between the two properties. Also noted that there is considerable existing vegetation on the property to the right side of the lot, plan to plant single trunk tree form Pittosporum along the shared property line on the right, it can grow up to 20 to 25 feet if it is not trimmed. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner's discussion: In their discussion the commissioner identified the following items to be included as conditions of approval on the project: • excavation of the garage, construction of the parking structure or proper stabilization of the excavated hole and all drainage facilities shall be completed in one season and a bond shall be required to insure that all this work is accomplished; • balconies on the southwest side shall be lined up,causing the fourth floor balcony to be shifted and corbels shall be placed below the upper most balcony to tie it to the structure, this modification should be reviewed by the Planning Commission to insure that the proportions work and the balconies are properly integrated into the design prior to issuance of the building permit; • the property owner or his representative shall meet with the home owners association at 1435 Bellevue and agree on a commonly beneficial fence design separating the two properties,it shall be the responsibility of the project to install and maintain this fence; • a sink with running water,a toilet,a gas grill and gas fire place shall be installed in the common open space for the convenience and enjoyment of the residents on site,for safety the gas fixtures shall be placed on timers,the use common open space shall be managed and maintained by the homeowners association; 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005 • the landscape plan shall include the addition of two forest scale evergreen trees on the right side and one forest scale evergreen tree on the left side at the rear of the site beyond the edge of the below grade parking garage; • there shall be a closet added to the bedroom in unit 5; • that the applicant and the City Attorney shall work to determine if a program can be developed to reserve the two affordable dwelling units in the project for economically qualified teachers in the Burlingame schools,including a ten percent reduction in the established rent because the tenants are teachers in the Burlingame schools,should a program be possible the applicant shall be required to implement the program; • that landscaping along the right property line shall be predominantly single trunk tree form Pittosporum and that these plants shall be allowed to grow to their natural form at a height of 20 to 25 feet; • that the entry from the building to the common open space shall be maintained at its central location as it is designed and shall be built around the existing redwood tree and in a manner approved by a licensed arborist to protect and maintain the roots of the redwood tree; • that no permits including demolition shall be issued for this project until the developer and contractor have prepared a traffic plan for trucks and parking for construction workers for all phases of the project from demolition to interior finish and landscape installation. C. Osterling moved approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that it was an adequate disclosure of the potential impacts of the project and that the mitigations identified and included as conditions of approval would reduce to levels acceptable to the community any potentially adverse impacts identified by the report. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration as adequate. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C. Brownrigg dissenting)voice vote. C. Osterling moved to approve the condominium permit and special permit for font setback landscaping for the proposed project at 1441 and 1445 Bellevue Avenue with the 94 conditions of approval in the staff report, which include the mitigations from the Negative Declaration and the 10 conditions identified and added by the Planning Commission as noted in the minutes of the November 28,2005 meeting and incorporated into the conditions of approval on the project,by resolution, with the following conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 2,2005, sheets PI through PI 5,L1.0,Ll.l and L2.0,including the roofing material which shall be true slate;2)that the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 77.32'as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Floribunda Avenue(31.32')for a maximum height of 46-0", and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The second level garage floor finished floor elevation shall be elevation 11.32%garage level one finished floor elevation shall be elevation 21.32'; first floor finished floor shall be elevation 32.82';second floor finished floor shall be elevation 43.82';third floor finished floor shall be elevation 53.82';fourth floor finished floor shall be elevation 63.82';and the top of ridge elevation shall be no more than 77.32'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; 3)that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure,replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review;4)that the conditions of the City Engineer's November 22,2005,memo,the Chief Building Official's November 9,2005,memo, 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005 the Fire Marshal's November 18,2005,memo, and the Recycling Specialist's November 14, 2005,memo shall be met;5)that prior to issuance of a demolition and/or building permit,the property owner shall obtain all permits required or present notification from the agencies to the City that the permits are not required by State and Regional agencies including but not limited to the California Department of Fish and Game,the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the Regional Water Quality Control Board;6)that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited;7)that`guest parking stall'shall be marked on the five guest parking spaces and designated on the final map and plans,these stalls shall not be assigned to any unit,but shall be owned and maintained by the condominium association,and the guest stalls shall always be accessible for parking and not be separately enclosed or used for resident storage; and that in addition to the five guest parking stalls,37 parking spaces shall be available on site for owners,and none ofthe on-site parking shall be rented, leased or sold to anyone who does not own a unit on the site; 8) that the Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the condominium project shall require that the five guest parking stalls shall be reserved for guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents;9)that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 10)that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property,including but not limited to the roof,painting,common area carpets,drapes and furniture; 11)that the trash receptacles, furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; 12)that if a security gate system across the driveway is installed in the future,the gate shall be installed a minimum 20'-0'back from the front property line; the security gate system shall include an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows residents to communicate with guests and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; 13) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 14)that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 16) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self- contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 17) that this project shall comply with the state-mandated water conservation program,and a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 18) that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 19)that project approvals shall be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump system; and the sump pump shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dual pumps, controls, level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators shall be housed so that they meet the City's noise requirement; 20) that the excavation of the garage, construction of the parking structure or proper stabilization of the excavated hole and all drainage facilities shall be completed in one construction season and a bond shall be required to insure that all this work is accomplished within that time frame the money shall be spent to secure the site; 21)that the balconies on the southwest side shall be lined up,causing the fourth floor balcony to be shifted and that corbels shall be placed below the upper most balcony to tie it to the structure,this modification shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission to insure that the proportions work and the balconies are properly integrated into the design prior to issuance of the building permit;22) that the property owner or his representative shall meet with the home owners association at 1435 Bellevue 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005 and agree on a commonly beneficial fence design separating the two properties and that it shall be the responsibility of the project to install and maintain this fence;23)that a sink with running water,a toilet with sewer connection, a gas grill and gas fire place shall be installed in the common open space for the enjoyment of the residents on site and that for safety the gas fixtures shall be placed on timer; and that the use common open space shall be managed and maintained by the homeowners association; 24) that the landscape plan shall include the addition of two forest scale evergreen trees on the right side and one forest scale evergreen tree on the left side at the rear of the site beyond the edge of the below grade parking garage; 25)that there shall be a closet added to the bedroom in unit 5; 26)that the applicant and the City Attorney shall work to determine if a program can be developed to reserve the two affordable dwelling units in the project for economically qualified teachers in the Burlingame schools,including a ten percent reduction in the established rent because the tenants are teachers in the Burlingame schools,should a program be possible the applicant shall be required to implement the program;27)that landscaping along the right property line shall be predominantly single trunk tree form Pittosporum and that these plants shall be allowed to grow to their natural form at a height of 20 to 25 feet;28)that the entry from the building to the common open space shall be maintained at its central location as it is designed and shall be built around the existing redwood tree and in a manner approved by a licensed arborist to protect and maintain the roots of the redwood tree; 29) that no permits including demolition shall be issued for this project until the developer and contractor have prepared a traffic plan for construction trucks and parking for construction workers for all phases of the project from demolition to interior finish and landscape installation; 30)that prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and approval; 31)that all structural design shall conform to the City of Burlingame building codes and, at a minimum,to the most recent revision of the California Building Code(which incorporates the Uniform Building Code), the California Building Code specifically details design and construction practices for structures subject to significant earthquake hazards; 32) that utilities shall be designed to provide sufficient flexibility to withstand the expected ground shaking induced during an earthquake; 33) that structural designs and construction procedures for foundation construction shall be completed in conformance to City of Burlingame seismic regulations and project specific professional design recommendations for seismic hazards made by the project Structural Engineer; 34)that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the applicant shall submit GeoForensics' Geotechnical Investigation to the Chief Building Official and City Engineer for review and approval. The investigation has been undertaken to determine the presence and extent of expansive soil and provides foundation design,construction and grading recommendations. The recommendations in the report and any requirements imposed by the Chief Building Official and City Engineer shall be followed during construction; 35)that prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and approval that illustrate the mat foundation for deep basement parking,alternate foundation designs for near surface grade such as pier and grade beam systems with piers extending into underlying competent soils. Concrete slab-on-grade and walkways shall all be founded on properly compacted non-expansive fill; 36) that prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and approval that illustrate that pavement sections shall be properly designed to resist the effect of underlying expansive soils; 37) that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the applicant shall submit GeoForensics'Geotechnical Investigation to the Chief Building Official and/or City Engineer for review and approval. The Investigation shall include boreholes completed in the area of the proposed excavations. The Investigation shall be used to develop recommendations for retaining walls and shoring of soils during construction;38)that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the applicant shall submit a shoring plan to the Chief Building Official and/or City Engineer for review and approval based on the recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation required by the mitigation listed directly above; 39) that all surface stormwater run-off around the building shall be required to drain to the street into the storm drainage system; 40)that clean subsurface ground water encountered during excavation and pier drilling shall be discharged 9 City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005 into Ralston Creek,provided that discharge into the creek is approved by the Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board;41)that a subsurface drainage system shall be installed in the walls and/or foundation of the two-story below grade garage for the collection of ground water intrusion;this water shall be discharged into the creek,provided that it is approved by the Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board;42)that the finished parking area(garage)surface drainage and run-off shall be required to drain to the local sanitary sewer system because of the possibility of contamination from vehicles;this drainage system shall be connected to gas powered pumps connected to a self activating emergency generator; short floodwalls may also be required to prevent water from the creek spilling over into the below grade area;43)that biodegradable fertilizer shall be used on-site due to the close proximity to Ralston Creek;44)that minor stream flows shall be controlled by constructing a temporary dam in the creek bed and forcing the water to flow into a closed pipe,which shall extend past the dewatering zone of influence,also to be placed within the creek bed;dewatering of the basement and/or basement foundation excavations may be accomplished by installing pump(s)in shallow sump(s)in the excavation;water shall be directed to the streambed to flow into the diversion pipe;water discharge location will depend on the quality of the water; clean water obtained from the gravel drains located behind the garage retaining walls can be discharged into the creek where the creek channel is concrete lined; 45) that to minimize flooding and/or spillover of the creek during peak runoff, the existing concrete retaining walls beneath the apartment building at the southwest corner of the site, which will be exposed with the demolition of the apartment building spanning over the creek,shall be raised,as the western wall redirects the flow to a more northerly direction, and short floodwalls or earthen berms at the top of the open channel shall also be installed, as required, and the necessary permits shall be obtained for this work from the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 46) that water that comes into contact with concrete during pier drilling or pouring shall not be discharged into the creek, and shall be treated on-site with treatment approved by the City Engineer,and shall be discharged as approved by the City Engineer;47)that in order to minimize flooding in the excavation from shallow groundwater and spilling from the creek excavation for the below grade parking area shall be accomplished during the dry season, April 15th to October 15`}; 48)that prior to issuance of a demolition, grading or construction permit,the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs(Best Management Practices)to be used to prevent soil,dirt and debris from entering the creek and storm drain system;the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines,existing and proposed topography and slope;areas to be disturbed,locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures;watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 49)that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, silt fences, straw bale dikes, storm drain inlet protection such as soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established;50)that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way,clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods;51) that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-off,promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers,herbicides and pesticides; 52)that any site work including grading and landscaping shall be limited to the dry months,from April 15 to October 15;53)That prior to issuance of a demolition,grading or construction permit protective silt fences shall be installed along the open channel of the creek;the protective fence shall be installed between the top of the creek bank and at least two feet below the top of the areas to be graded, and also no lower than the ordinary high water line; 54) that prior to issuance of a demolition, grading and building permit the applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board,and shall provide a copy of these approval to the City of Burlingame; 55)that demolition ofthe existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to receive a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005 Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit from the Burlingame Building Division;and all requirements of the permit shall be complied with during construction; 56)that all active construction areas shall be watered at least twice daily, especially during the demolition and excavation phase of the project;57)that water that may run off the site due to the dust control measures required shall not be allowed to run-off into Ralston Creek or into the storm drain system;58)that sandbags shall be installed around the perimeter of the site to prevent water run off from the dust control activity from spilling onto the public right-of-way or on to adjacent properties;59)that trucks to and from the site hauling soil,sand or other loose material shall be covered or that a minimum of two feet of freeboard shall be maintained; 60)that during construction soil stabilizers shall be applied to unpaved access roads,parking areas and staging areas at the construction site;61)that at a frequency required by the Engineer,the paved access road,parking areas and staging areas at the construction site shall be sprayed with water to keep these areas from creating dust;62) that the public street shall be swept as required by the City Engineer with a water sweeper if visible soil materials are carried beyond the construction site; 63) that excavation and grading activities shall be suspended immediately if winds exceed 25 mph;64)that sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent silt runoff from the site to public roadways and into the creek;65)that any demolition on this site shall comply with BAAQ MD Regulation 11, Rule#2, which governs the handling of asbestos- containing materials;this rule requires that a survey be done of all the building materials to be removed prior to commencement of any demolition;the property owner shall be responsible for having a professional on- site that is familiar with the implementation of Regulation 11,Rule 2 of the BAAQMD to supervision the removal or demolition of an asbestos containing materials; 66)that during demolition and construction all hazardous materials shall be stored,handled and disposed of properly;and that any coating or sealant to be used shall comply with the BAAQMD Regulation 8,Rules3 and 51 for volatile organic compound(VOC) content,which governs the application of architectural coatings and adhesive and sealant products;67)That in order to reduce the occurrence of visitors in the below grade garage from entering a dead-end aisle with no maneuvering space to exit,a sign shall be posted near the guest parking spaces which directs visitors to the area designated for guest/visitor parking;all parking spaces in the below grade garage in the area of the dead end aisle shall be assigned directly to residential units on the site and shall be closely managed by the homeowners association; 68)that signs shall be posted at both ends of the ramp accessing the below grade parking warning pedestrians against the use of ramps for pedestrian travel; 69) that the proposed 30 foot driveway shall be reduced to 24 feet, or a size approved by the City Traffic Engineer,and shall be shifted east,as shown on revised plans date stamped November 2,2005; 70)that the circular driveway at the front shall have proper signage indicating that it is a one-way driveway with the entrance on the western driveway; 71) that the circular driveway at the front shall have yield signage at the end where it merges with the driveway that provides entrance and exit to the underground garage; 72)that the driveway elevation at the garage entrance shall be 12 inches above the gutter flow line on Bellevue Avenue or at an elevation approved by the City Engineer and the maximum driveway slope on the driveway shall not exceed 15 percent;73)that all dumpsters located on the public street shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits from the City of Burlingame Public Works Department prior to locating the dumpsters on the street; 74) that all personnel involved with the demolition and/or construction of the proposed project at this site shall be required to park in the public parking lots and garage in the immediate vicinity;75)that since all guest parking is provided in the below grade garage there shall be an intercom with a buzzer to each unit, and a keypad access shall be provided so each tenant can operate the security gate to the garage on demand(Transportation/Circulation); 76)that prior to issuance of a grading,demolition,or construction the project shall comply with the City's tree protection and urban reforestation requirements as approved by the City Arborist; 77)that the property shall apply for protected tree removal permits as per the City Arborist's August 26,2002 memo;78)that tree protection measures shall be installed under the supervision of a licensed arborist prior demolition or construction and shall be inspected by the City Arborist; 79)That prior to demolition or construction any trees that will likely suffer root loss or soil compaction as a result of this project shall be deeply irrigated and 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005 fertilized; and a long term maintenance plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City Arborist for approval; 80) that protected trees that will have soil fill or the construction of hardscape within their root zone as part of this project shall have a root aeration system installed prior to said fill or hardscape; and all hardscape shall be of pervious material; 81) that all trees which border any area where grading or soil compaction is likely to occur shall be mulched to depth of 8-16 inches or as required and approved by the City Arborist or as required and approved by the City Arborist; 82) that any trees located in areas where construction traffic is likely to occur shall be mulched to help reduced soil compaction as required by the City Arborist; 83) that soil siltation fences shall be installed and maintained to keep soil from disturbing areas out of the root zones of protected trees as required and inspected by the City Arborist; 84) that the applicant shall install fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station as required by the Fire Marshal prior to the final inspection for building permit;85)that any demolition on this site shall comply with BAAQMD Regulation 11,Rule 2,which governs the handling of asbestos-containing materials; this rule requires that a survey be done of all the building materials to be removed prior to commencement of any demolition;the property owner shall be responsible for having a professional on-site that is familiar with the implementation of Regulation 11, Rule 2 of the BAAQMD to supervision the removal or demolition of any asbestos containing materials; 86)that during demolition and construction all hazardous materials shall be stored,handled and disposed of properly;and that any coating or sealant to be used shall comply with the BAAQMD Regulation 8,Rules3 and 51 for volatile organic compound(VOC) content,which governs the application of architectural coatings and adhesive and sealant products;87)that all construction shall be done during the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code; these hours are between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. There shall be no construction on holidays; construction activity that will result in Llo noise levels of 85 dBA or higher shall be limited to the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; 88) that noise emission levels from construction and demolition on the site shall not exceed the values listed in table 4-6 of the City of Burlingame's General Plan Noise Element; 89) that at no time shall the noise levels due to construction exceed levels greater than 90dBA; 90) that ground vibration levels 3 feet from the nearest occupied residential structures shall not exceed 0.1 in./sec. and vibrations shall be monitored during the demolition of the existing structures when concrete is removed, during the pre-drilling of holes for piles and when excavation is done closer than 30 feet from neighboring properties;91)that a Construction Coordinator shall be appointed prior to issuance of demolition and building permits for this project; the name and phone number of this coordinator shall be provided to the neighbors and to the Planning and Public Works Departments;the Construction Coordinator shall be responsible to the most practicable extent possible to mitigate construction impacts; 92) that all internal combustion engines operating on this subject property shall be fitted with noise suppression mufflers;93)that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the interior noise level within the building and inside each unit does not exceed 45 dBA in any sleeping area;94)that the proposed 4d' floor shall include noise attenuation measures to achieve an interior CNEL of 45 dBA,these features would include some or all of the following: stucco exterior, acoustical lining in exterior walls, a minimum of STC-31 windows or greater(STC-33 or STC-34),and proper mechanical ventilation;95)that the contractor shall submit the "Recycling and Waste Reduction" form plan to the Burlingame Building Division that demonstrates how 60 percent of construction demolition material will be diverted from the waste stream to be approved by the Chief Building Official and the applicant shall be required to document implementation of the recycling before a final inspection can be scheduled;96)that all surface storm water runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)standards as adopted by the City of Burlingame and shall be directed as required by the Department of Public Works;97)that sewer laterals from the site to the public sewer main shall be checked and shall be replaced to city standards as required by the Public Works Department;98)that all abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed as directed by the City Engineer; 12 -City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005 99)that storm water run-off shall drain from the site to the street into the storm drain system; 100)that clean subsurface ground water into the depressed parking area shall be pumped to discharge into Ralston Creek, provided that this is approved by the Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board; 10 1)that drainage and run-off into the two-story below grade garage shall drain to the local sanitary sewer system due to the lower elevation of the parking areas and the possibility of contamination from vehicle drainage; 102)that the applicant shall prepare a water demand study for the proposed building prior to obtaining a building permit to determine the adequacy of the existing domestic water line to supply the proposed condominium building as well as the required fire sprinkler system for the building; if it is determined that the domestic water line needs to be increased the applicant shall replace the water line in the street to city standards as required by the City Engineer; 103)that this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; 104) that should any cultural resources be discovered during construction,all work shall be halted until they are fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified by the City Planner and the recommendations of the expert have been executed to the satisfaction of the City. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the condominium permit and special permit for front setback landscaping for the project including the 94 conditions in the staff report and the 10 conditions added by the Planning Commission following the public hearing. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C. Brownrigg dissenting)voice vote. C. Osterling made a motion to recommend the tentative condominium map and the tentative and final parcel map to the City Council for action. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the tentative condominium map and the tentative and final parcel map. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m. 5. 1504,1508,1512,1600,1604,1608&1612 DAVIS DRIVE,1701 &1704-1706 ALBEMARLE WAY— FENCE EXCEPTION FOR AN EIGHT-FOOT HIGH FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINES SHARED WITH THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT AT 1783 EL CAMINO REAL(CHRIS FOLEY,ANTHONY BRUNO,WILFRED&NANCY HUANG,ADAM PATTERSON,NADER ALMASI AND SIMOUN GHASEMIAN, STEVEN & LEONIE WOHL, ABDULDEYYAN & RUKIYE SAFA, LATTA TRUST,AND GEORGIA DELROSSO TRUST,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS)(9 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS Reference staff report November 28,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. She noted that seven of the nine property owners in this area adjacent to the hospital site have joined with the hospital project applicant in this request. If approved the fence exception will be recorded with their properties; also included in this fence exception are the city right-of-way at the end of Albemarle Way and at the rear of the San Francisco Water Line Parcel where the water main enters the hospital property. Four conditions to be recorded with each property were suggested for consideration. Commissioner asked if it was possible to grant in"advance" fence exceptions to two properties which did not participate so that they do not need to come back to the Commission at a later date. City Attorney Anderson noted that fence exceptions are legal actions which are recorded with the properties;a recordation cannot occur without the owner's permission and cannot be granted in advance. If the two property owners change their minds and work something out with the hospital for fence replacement, they could make a request of the city and come back to the Commission on the consent calendar. Commissioner asked if this proposed 8 feet was a minimum or a maximum. Staff noted that this would allow these property owners to 13 Agenda Item # 8d BURLIN . . ME STAFF REPORT Date: Aril 17, 2006 SUBMITTED BY of APPROVED BY y TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: April 3, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION OF SIDEWALK REPAIR COSTS BY THE SAN MATEO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE FOR THE 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM, CITY PROJECT NO. 80960 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the collection of sidewalk repair costs by San Mateo County in the 2006/2007 tax year. BACKGROUND: On October 17, 2005, Council approved the final report of sidewalk repairs and costs. On November 7, 2005, Council accepted the 2005 Sidewalk Maintenance Program (see attachments). Invoices were sent to 100 property owners and 62 have made payment for their sidewalk repairs. The remaining 38 properties can be assessed in accordance with the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code. DISCUSSION: Staff will send the repair costs for the 38 properties to the San Mateo County Assessor's Office for collection as part of 2006/2007 property tax bill (see attached property owner list). As part of the process, the County requires a resolution from City Council. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Staff Reports from October 17, 2005 and November 7, 2005, List of Property Owners and Charges Victor Voon Assist ngin er c: City Clerk, Finance, City Attorney SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80960county.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AFFIRMING APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT ON SIDEWALK REPAIRS PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1732 AND STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE SECTIONS 5600 AND FOLLOWING AND PLACING THE OUTSTANDING REPAIR COSTS ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLL RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City mailed notice to the property owners in the City for whom the City provided repair of the sidewalks pursuant to Streets& Highways Code § 5616 that notified the owners of the actual costs of repairs and of the date of the public hearing at which the owners might object or protest the repairs and the costs as well as notice that the City intended to place any unpaid costs for collection on the applicable owner's property tax bill; and WHEREAS,on October 17, 2005,at the noticed public hearing, the City Council received the City Engineer's report on the sidewalk repairs and costs, took testimony from all interested persons who appeared, approved the City Engineer's report, and confirmed the repairs and costs as contained in the City Engineer's report; and WHEREAS,the sidewalk repair process and program were duly conducted pursuant to Streets& Highways Code §§ 5600 and following; and WHEREAS,almost two-thirds of the property owners for whom the sidewalk repairs were performed have made full payment on the costs of the repairs; and WHEREAS, the repairs and costs to be assessed were properly allocated and calculated, and all protests and objections are hereby overruled, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The City Council hereby affirms its approval of the City Engineer's report of the repairs and costs for the 2005 Sidewalk Repair Program as presented on October 17, 2005. 2. The properties listed and the amounts of repair costs against each parcel as contained in Exhibit A hereto shall be placed upon the County of San Mateo Secured Property Tax Bill. 3. Any sums determined to be due and owing by this Resolution shall accrue simple interest at a rate not to exceed eight percent(8%) per annum. MAYOR 1 I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2006,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 2 2 Meeting jBU14LINGAME Date: October 17, 2005 : . . .o STAFF REPORT SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: HEARING ON AND CONFIRMATION OF REPORT OF REPAIRS AND COSTS FOR 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM; PROJECT NO. 80960 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council confirm the attached report of sidewalk- repairs and costs, as is, revised, corrected or modified after property owners have an opportunity to present any objections or protests. BACKGROUND: As a result of the economic downturn, Council adopted the attached ordinance in March 2004 which obligates the maintenance and repair of sidewalks to the adjacent property owners. This was done under the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code and was consistent with the practice in other Peninsula cities.. A second ordinance was adopted which made the original ordinance effective up to March 31,2009, unless earlier repealed by the Council. Staff implemented the ordinance in the 2004-05 sidewalk program which covered the area west of El Camino Real and south of Carmelita Avenue as well as the area south of Howard Avenue between EI Camino Real and California Drive per the attached map. Staff examined the sidewalk conditions in these areas and marked the concrete that needed to be removed and replaced. A letter was then sent to property owners with defective sidewalks which gave the option of the City performing the work or the owner hiring a licensed contractor to make the repairs. The letter included a sketch-showing the location and approximate area of repair along with the City's cost per square foot. Two additional letters were sent informing the property owners of their repair options and advising them of the date by which the City would perform the work. 40% of the repairs were completed by contractors hired by the property owners. The remaining 60% were included in the City project. Council approved a contract with SpenCon Construction, Inc. on February 7, 2005 and the sidewalk repairs were undertaken over the last six months. DISCUSSION: Notices were sent to all property owners regarding their assessment { and the timing of the hearing. Attached is a summary report of repairs and costs totaling $42,186.16. In accordance with the Streets and Highways Code, property owners have an opportunity to present any objections or protests at this hearing. Council may revise, correct or modify the report as deemed just. Decisions by L.oumm on air oojections::ana protests are nnai ana conclusive. uouncn snouia � w confirm the report with any revisions, corrections, and modifications as applicable r�r5; ' ^•r h After confirmation of the report, property owners have 30 days to pay for the repairs = xa . Jf a,ment is notreceived, the: cost of repairs .will be forwarded to "the Coun t As0e ors;Office for collection with property taxes due in December 2006.5 EXHIBITS: Report of sidewalk repairs and costs Ordinances Map _ c: City Clerk ),0_0�7 Ic_ for OOA an Engineer S:%Public Works DirectorylStaff Reports=960Hearing doc 2006 Sidewalk Program,Project No.80960 Report of Repairs and Costs Address Property Owner Notice Assessors Sidewalk Driveway Grinding Total Costs No. Parcel Number (Square Foot) (Square Foot) Each Carmelita 1801 H0 an Flake and Sall Downing5 026-184-010 114.2 4.0 $974.24 1815 James and Kathleen Yawn 14 026-184-140 1 25.01 1 1.0 $218.00 1915 JAnthony and Gail Mosse 12 026-185-100 1 179.51 1 1 $1,292.TO 2000 1 Bradley and Julie Wilson 11 026-163-140 1 111.01 12.0 $875.20 Bernal 1030 1 Margaret McMillan 13 026-185-090 1 117.01 1 1.0 $880.40 Drake 1001 lAnthony and Michelle Johnson 136026-185-120 22.0 $158.40 1008 Gilbert and Rita Deiz 135 026-184-100 1.0 38.00 1009 Andrea Ca ozzoli 1137 026-185-040 62.5 1.0 $488.00 1011 Jeanne Patterson 1138 026-185-030 35.0 39.5 $568.00 1012 Fred Bertetta III 1134 026-184-110 12.5 1 1.0 $128.00 1017 Kari Lopez 1139 026-185-020 12.0 $76.00 Cabrillo 1001 Stephen Fong and Christine Noma 16 026-184-050 1.0 $38.00 1008 Marina Plissak Ill 026-166-140 49.5 $356.40 1010 Thomas Mario Giorgi and Virginia Maire Weimers 1 12 026-166-150 15.0 60.0 2.0 $664.00 1011 Lar Guthrie and Grace Fon 7 026-184-040 8.0 1.0 $95.60 1015 Daniel Griffin 18 026-184-030 1 83.9 1.0 $641.72 1025 Leonid and Larisa Gesin 19 026-184-020 1 62.5 $500.00 Balboa 1000 lAnthony and Estela Madulara 115 026-164-140 36.5 l4.0 $376.80 1001 Russ and Yelena Maslenko 126 026-165-090 126.7 $1,026.24 1008 Gregory Hughes 116 026-164-150 37.0 $266.40 1011 Marina Plissak 125 026-165-080 11.5 48 $466.80 1032 James Chu 117 026-164-210 152.00 1040 Lana A enrocit 119 026-164-230 25.0 $218.00 1045 Daniel Griffin 123 026-165-020 $38.00 1047 Paul Roeder and Adelaide Roberts 1122 026-165-010 1 162.01 $1,166.40 S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80960\LlstofCosts.xls Sanchez 1513 Raul Besteiro 151 028-131-240 23.0 $184.00 1517 William and Nancy Koenig 150 028-131-230 12.5 16.5 1 .0 $260.00 1601 David Burlingame 149 028-131-210 2.0 $76.00 1604 Maria Corradino 145 026-165-100 42.5 2.0 $382.00 1608 Archie and Audrey Fabbri 144 026-165-110 31.5 2,0 $302.80 1609 Peter and Kim Utrata 148 028-131-190 37.5 $270.00 1616 David and Anne Hinckle 143 026-165-130 100.0 1 .0 $758.00 1704 Julia and Vitas Viskanta 142 026-166-100 1 .0 $38.00 1716 Marilynn Lehmann 141 026-166-130 138.0 $993.60 Forest View 1514 Jean Judson 15 028-131-060 . 62.5 12.0 $546.00 1516 Burt and Christina Toma 155 028-131-080 26.0 $187.20 1600 Mathew and Ellen Ng 16 028-131-100 47.0 338.40 1602 Edward and Julie Collantes 17 028-131-110 62.0 14.5 $562.40 1610 Dean and Tami Rally 18 028-131-120 25.5 $183.60 1614 Lori Anne and David Paul Zimmerman 119 1028-131-130 1 31.5 1 20.5 $390.80 1622 JAIannah McKeever Hurley 20 028-131-150 13.5 97.20 1624 IJerold and Paula Ru iero21 028-131-160 24.0 $172.80 Walnut 717 Peter and Roseann Mirosnkoff 46 028-142-060 45.5 $327.60 721 Michael and Christine Read 45 028-142-050 14.5 $104.40 742 Bruce and Jane Dobbs 47 028-141-340 2.0 $76.00 748 Marc J. and M.L. Friedman 24 028-141-350 2.0 $76.00 766 Michael and Leona Mullery 27 028-141-180 15.0 11.0 $196,00 816 lVictor Anderson 37 028-132-130 95.9 $767.04 819 Elizabeth Weber 43 028-133-130 26.5 38,8 $501 .02 822 Thomas and Joan Starkovich 36 028-132-120 32.1 $257.04 838 John and Eva Nowa Kowska Blan ied 33 028-132-190 37.5 $270.00 847 Renato and Luz Santiago 40 028-133-060 12.8 1 .0 $129.80 848 John and Barbara Glennon 32 028-132-210 44.0 $316.80 863 1 Emilio and Lolita Rossi 138 028-133-020 91 .3 $657,29 Willow 1612 1 Dale McCown 150 028-133-160 12.31 $88.20 Peninsula 1102 Warren and Julia Gibeson 152 029-241-150 2.0 $76.00 SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80960\LlstofCosts.xls Bayswater 1110 ITara Hi hlands Condominium Association 80 108-490-010/020/030/040/050 90.1 7.0 $914.43 1113 Winfred and Aurora Ru erto 73 029-241-030 16.6 $119.38 1155 Alan and Jeanne Alexander 75 029-241-010 11.6 7.0 $349.59 1305 Richard and Ronald Wachter 156 029-233-080 12.5 $90.00 1311 Richard and Ronald Wachter 77 029-223-060 43.5 6.5 1.0 $403.20 1207/1205/1 Bayswater Association 76 105-500-010/020/030/040 1.0 $38.00 1208 Jose and Linda Franco 79 029-224-160 1.0 $38.00 Park 2 Crosb-N-Gra 8 Co. 129 029-225-170 78.0 11.2 16.0 $727.58 12 John and Ellen Kruger 154 029-225-190 171.5 $1,234.80 16 Joseph and Carolyn Steil 130 029-225-200 27.0 194.40 19 Edward J.and M.L.Haslam 82 029-223-140 $38.00 33 Parkwood Townhouse 84 029-360-010-020-030-040-050 89.3 643.10 48 Investek Properties Company 161 029-225-010 94.4 4.0 $711.68 49 Richard and Ronald Wachter 85 029-223-090 11.4 388.8 $3 421.13 145 Burlin ame Masonic Hall Association 97 029-222-050 38.00 180 Ral h and Margaret Ho 162 029-224-290 39.0 $280.80 Lorton 1 lJoan Raqqhianti 166 029-225-150 1 16.01 4.0 $280.00 15/15A/15B Alois and Irene Stock 67029-225-120 24.5 $176.40 20 Steven and Ann Ma Stluka 71 029-241-230 80.0 $576.00 21 Jerry and Susanna Fong 168 029-225-100 27.51 1 1.0 $236.00 37 lWinifred Wilson 169 029-225-070 1 1 1.01 $38.00 Highland 11 Anna Dascoulias 60 029-241-130 12.5 $100.00 14 Mary Gerlach 86 029-242-160 62.5 $450.00 16 Allen and Linda Secrest 87 029-242-170 1.0 $38.00 20 Luke Wang 88 029-242-180 21.0 $168.00 22 ALESCO I LLC 89 029-242-190 63.0 24.5 $649.60 25 Clarke and Sarah Carrawa 61 029-241-090 25.0 1.0 $218.00 27 Steven Desantis 158 029-241-080 34.0 41.5 $576.80 32 Herbert and E.B.Williamson 90 029-242-200 25.0 $180.00 119 Richard and April Sofos 64 029-231-090 1.01 $38.00 California 200 Michael and Krystyna Harvey 104 029-213-040 134.0 $964.60 SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\60960\ListofCosts.xls Cortez 1008 Florenda and Adore Ancheta 108 026-165-140 12.5 11.5 1.0 $220.00 1011 Marna Plissak 113 029-166-080 51.0 49.5 1.0 $801.20 1015 Marina Plissak 114 029-166-070 102.0 50.0 $1,134.40 1020 W. C. and Gail G. Roberts III 109 026-165-160 76.0 2.0 $623.20 1032 Paul and Elfriede Jordan 110 026-165-190 36.0 $259.20 1033 Leonard J. and P.T. Saldanha 106 026-166-040 21.5 $154.80 1036 Ove and Ma Ann Anderson 111 026-165-200 11.5 2.0 $168.00 1037 Anna Traverso 105 026-166-030 39.5 19.5 2.0 $516.40 1040 Ma'orie Chahal 112 026-165-210 146.0 $1,051.20 1041 8elin Soloman 107 026-166-020 2.0 $76.00 Primrose 117 1 Emile A. and T. M. De Antoni 159 029-221-080 76.0 608.00 119 Primrose Gardens Home Owners Association 58 108-160-010/020/030/040/050/ 27.5 3.0 $312.00 123/125 Albert and Theresa Wong 157 029-221-050 11.41 34.0 $786.08 S:�A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\809601LlstofCosts.xis _ 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1732 (2) ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ESTABLISHING AN EXPIRATION 2 DATE FOR ORDINANCE NO. 173WHICH RESTORED THE OBLIGATION TO PROPERTY OWNERS FOR hIAINTENANCE`AND 3 PA1R OF SIDEWALKS PURSUANT TO STATE LAW 4 The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows: 5 6 Section 1. On March 15,-2004, the City Council adopted an ordinance amending the Municipal 7 Code to require property owners to maintain the sidewalks adjacent to their properties in a safe 8 condition. For single-family residential properties, this was a change in a policy that had been adopted 9 in 1990. The Council would like to ensure that this change is reviewed in the hope that economic 10 conditions will allow the policy to be reconsidered if the City is in a more advantageous position in 11 fmancial terms. 12 13 Sect_ 2. Ordinance No. 1732 shall be effective until March 311, 2009, unless earlier repealed, 14 and shall have no further force and effect beyond that date. If Ordinance No. 1732 ceases to be effective, 15 the provisions of Sections 12.12.005, 12.12.010., 12.12.015,and 12.12.020 in effect when Ordinance No 16 1732 was adopted shall be reinstated unless otherwise provided by an ordinance subsequent to this one. 17 18 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 19 20 21 Mayor 22 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hdreby certify that the 23 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting ofthe City Council held on the 5te day ofApril, 24 2004, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19'day of April, 2004, 25 by the following vote: 26 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, NAGEL, O'MAHONY 27 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 28 City Clerk .1 ORDINANCE NO. 1732 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF$URLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTERS 11.04 AND 12.12 TO RESTORE OBLIGATION TO PROPERTY OWNERS FOR MAINTENANCE 3 AND REPAIR OF SIDEWALKS PURSUANT TO STATE LAW 4 5 The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows: 6 - 7 Section 1. For the past ten to fifteen years, the City of Burlingame has been in the fortunate 8 position ofbeing able to provide for the routine maintenance andrepair ofpublic sidewalks in residential 9 neighborhoods without asking for contribution from the residential property owners in most cases. 10 However,the continued inability of the State government to develop a balanced and responsible budget I 1 and the State's insistence on seizing local monies to pay its own debts mean that the City cannot 12 continue the sidewalk funding for the time being. This ordinance returns the obligation to maintain and 13 repair sidewalks in residential neighborhoods to the adjacent property owners as provided in the Streets 14 & Highways Code and is consistent with the practice in other Peninsula communities. Commercial,--- 15 property owners will continue to be responsible for maintenance and repair as in the past. 16 17 Section 2. Section 12.12.005 is amended to read as follows: 18 12.12.005 Responsibility for damaged sidewalks. 19 The property owner shall be responsible for all sidewalk repairs. As used in this chapter, 20 "sidewalk" shall refer to curb,gutter,sidewalk or other such improvements within city right-of-way. 21 22 Section 3. Section 12.12.010 is amended to read as follows: 23 12.12.010 Notice to repair defective sidewalks. 24 When the city engineer determines that any portion of any sidewalk is in such a condition that 25 it may interfere with the convenient or safe use of the sidewalk by the public, the city engineer is 26 authorized to notify the owner or owners of any lot fronting on that portion of sidewalk, by notice 27 pursuant to the Streets & Highways Code to maintain and repair the.sidewalk If the sidewalk is not- 28 properly maintained or repaired,the city engineer may proceed under the procedures contained in the'4 3/1512004 I Streets&Highways Code to bring the maintenance or repair to completion. i 2 3 Section 4. Section 12.12.015 is repealed. 4 5 Section 5. Section 12.12.020 is amended to read as follows: 6 12.12.020 Cost of repair as lien on property and collection. 7 If any owner refuses or neglects to make such repair, or reconstruction, or improvement, as 8 hereinabove provided,when required and directed in conformity with the provisions of this chapter,the 9 city engineer may cause such repair,or reconstruction, or improvement to be made. Pursuant to-the 10 procedures contained in the Streets&Highways Code,the cost and any sum of money expended by the 11 city in, making such repair, or reconstruction, or improvement, may be.assessed as a lien upon the 12 property fronting on the sidewalk on which the maintenance or repair was made,and may be recovered 13 in an action brought therefor in the name of the city. The cost and expenditure may be reported tothe 14 tax collector and placed upon the tax bill and collected in the same manner and,at the same time as taxes 15 on the property are collected. 16 17 Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 18 19 20 Mayor 21 I,ANN T. MUSSO,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing 22 ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the V day of March,2004, 23 and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 15*day of March,2004, by 24 the following vote: 25 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY,GALLIGAN,NAGEL, O'MAHONY 26 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 27 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK 28 - City Clerk 311512004 i s r� tip e s ' r r I � J • Item# 9c BBURLINGAME STAFF REPORT. Date: November 7, 2005 � 1 SUBMITTED BY / APPROVED BY /U TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: October 25, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM, CITY PROJECT NO. 80960 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting the 2005 Sidewalk Maintenance Program in the amount of $206,758. DISCUSSION: On February 22, 2005, SpenCon Construction, Inc. was awarded the contract for repairing and replacing sidewalk, driveway, curb and gutter in the Burlingame Park No. 4 and 5, and Polo Field Subdivisions as well as portions of Easton Addition No. 2, and Town of Burlingame subdivisions as indicated on the attached map in the amount of $202,045. The project was successfully completed and is in compliance with project plans and specifications. BUDGET IMPACT: Expenditures: Construction (2005 Sidewalk Maintenance Program) $206,758 Construction (City Hall Improvements) 44,720 Miscellaneous (Supplies and Tools) 6,571 Engineering Administration 93,530 Total $351,579 Funds availability: 2003/04 CIP $266,150 2004/05 CIP 81,000 Property Owner Contributions 41,931 Total $389,081 SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports180960acceptance_doc The remaining $37,502 will be transferred to the 2006 Sidewalk Maintenance Program. EXHIBITS:. ReSO4,Aon, Project Map, Final Progress Payment Donald Chang, PE Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Finance, City Attorney SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80960acceptance.doc RESOLUTION NO. - ACCEPTING 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM SPENCON CONSTRUCTION INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 80960 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame,,California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by SPENCON CONSTRUCTION,INC.under the terms of its contract with the City dated FEBRUARY 23,2005 has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 80960. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Joe Galligan, Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Doris Mortensen,City Clerk SAA Public Works DralorykAmhor,By NamePcggy Adam LetterzYMOLUTN.ACC.wpd r � •, `•"CJI; raj a � � 1 1 1 t SPENCON CONSTRUCTION CITY OF BURLINGAME DATE: - October;-26-05 ADDRESS: 350 STAYSAIL COURT FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE MONTH OF: October FOSTER CITY, CA 94404 2005 BIDZWMX NAIMTENAWCE PROGRAM PURCHASE ORDER 8 131,61 TELEPHONE: (650) 574-4197 FAX (.650) 574-4137 - CITY PROJECT NO. 80960 - aaa♦ ••a•+aa•aaawaaa•a•«afr•aaaa•s w••arraraaaa•aaaa♦+aaaaaaa♦a+aaaaaw• a aaara+aaaa a w•r•aaaaaa aaaa�•aaaaaara a•awaaaaaaaaaw•w♦ ••••••••.rra••aaa•••a«aa a aaawr+aaaaaaaaa• •+aaaaaaaaa«ra.aa r raa••araaaa0 u• ITEM i UNIT BID UNIT ; BID t QUANTITY i AMOUNT i PREVIOUS AMOUNT 8 ITEM DESCRIPTION s PRICE QUANTITY SIZE AMOUNT TO DATE PAID TO DATE 'PAID t THIS PMT. aaaa •wa••«••c+aaa••••araaaraaaa••a•awaawaa•awa•waa•.+aaaaaa«a+a+a saa•a «.aaawwr«rasa•••«araaaa•a •+aa«arar•aaaa a•+•«aaaa•a ••• •waaaa•rara •aaaara+aaa •«+aaa a••awaaa•a ++aaa•a••aaaaa.r• waaawa•ra a A.TOWN OF BURUNGAME SUBDMSION 1 I REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK $7,20 4,900.0, S. F. $35,280.00 5,784.2 i 118,04% $41,646,24 $41,646,24 .$0.00 2 s REMOVE AND REPLACE DRIVEWAY $8.00 : 1,000.0; S. F. .$8,000.00 2,095,10 209.51% $16,760.80 $16,760.80 $0.00 3 :REMOVE AND REPLACE 14" CURB AND GUTTER $26.50 2,480.0: L. F. $65,720.00 s 1,346.60 : 54.30% $35,684.90 $35,684.90 $0.00 4 :REMOVE AND REPLACE CURB $21.00 30.0: S. F. $630.00 17.00 $6.67% : $357.00 $357.00 $0.00 5 :CROSS GUTTER $8.50 : 420.0: S. F. $3,570.00 .1,591.50 1 378,93% i $13,527.75 $13,527,75 $0.00 6 :CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP $1,175,00 25.0: EACH t $29,375.00 46.00 184.00% s $54,050.00 $54,050.00 $0.00 7 :REMOVE SIDEWALK AND REPLACE WITH TOP SOIL $3,00 820.0: EACH i $2,460.00 544.50 66.40% $1,633.50 $1,633.50 $0.00 8 :AGGREGATE BASE $25.00 25.0: EACH $625.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 9 :REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BASE t $3.00 5,150.0: S. F. $15,450.00 i 5,189.30 s 100.761 $15,567,90 t $15,567,90 $0.00 10 1 REMOVEIASPHALT CONCRETE ONLY $35.00 5.00: S. F. $175.00 0.00 0,00% t $0.00 : $0.00 $0.00 11 t NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACING $135.00 240.00: TONS $32,400.00 i 170.70 : 71.13% ; $23,044.50 $23,044,50 $0.00 12 REPAIR IRRIGATION SYSTEM .$875.00 : 1.0: L.S. $875.00 : 1.00 ; 100.00% $875.00 $875.00 $0.00 13 SEWER CLEAN-OUT FRAME $75.00 1.0: TONS $75.00 0.00 i 0.008 $0.00 : $0.00 $0,00 14 REPAIR / REPLACE WATERLINE (30' MAX,) t $100.00 2.0: EACH $200.00 0.00 : 0.00% $0,00 t $0.00 $0.00 15 :ADJUST MANHOLES TO GRADE $200.00 i 1.0: L. F. $200,00 ; 0.00 0.00% $0.00 ; $0.00 $0.00 16 ;SIGN POST $300.00 1.0: EACH $300.00 0.00 0.001 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 17 s PARKING METER POSTS $150.00 1.0: EACH $150.00 0.00 : 0.00% $0.00 s $0.00 1 $0.00 18 DRAINAGE INLET RELOCATION/MOD. AT CURB RAMP $2,000.00 1.0: EACH $2,000.00 : 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 19 :CONCRETE CUTTING OR GRINDING $38.00 120.0; L.S. $4,560.00 95..00 79.17% $3,610,00 $3,610.00 $0.00 CHANGE ORDERS: ORIGINAL BID $202,045.00 $206,757.59 $206,757.59 $0.00 • CO 1 CO 2 : CO 3 : i • CHANGE ORDERS $0.00 , .a.. ....... + u.a•w•.wa•••.u.a.a••t a++.•.w • sa«••...«+aa•.a..«+a u• ++.aaaa aw•+••aa a•a•u.aaa••a••• •auw•aa+aa •••++awaaw• aaa u•aa+a.••aw w aaaaaa.a+aaaa•a• +••aarw.a•aa••aa DATE aasaraa•«+ •aaa•+••• SUBTOTAL -••• ••••+••• • + $202,045.00 +aw uaaaa• ;•aawaa•••• $206,757,59 $206,757.59 $0.00 PREPARED BY: VICTOR VOONG 30-26-2005 LESS RETENTION • • ;+++••++++• ;++•••••+•+ $0.00 (910,337.88) $10,337,88 ••aaa•a«aw +ar•«awa+•••a+a a••a•a•a•a•••wa• ;aa••••araa ;a•••+••aaa i---------------- --------------- __-_- CHECKED BY; SUBTOTAL WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS ++••++••+ ;•••+•++••+AMOUN $206,757.59 9196,419.71 a 910,337.88 APPROVED BY - T DUE FROM CONTRACTOR +•++•+•• ••++++••*• $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY ENGINEER: wrra•aaaa• uraaaa•a aaa•aa ••a•aaa«aaa•aawa •arrwawaaa ;a•••awwaa• ------- ---------------- ;--_--_---------, APPROVED BY TOTAL THIS PERIOD ••••+•+••+•'w w+«• +++++++++ a••••.aara $206,757.59 $196,419.71 $10,337.88 CONSULTANT: .................. .. ....... ...... ........ ................ .............. ............... WA PUBLIC WORKS DIREOTORYIPROJECT816027(SUMMARYA,(SHEET•FINAL PAYMENT) 10R6R005,11:35 AM PAGE 1 OF 1 Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Alesco I LLC 029-242-190 $ 649.60 Anderson, Victor 028-132-130 $ 767.04 Appenrodt. Lana 026-164-230 $ 218.00 Besteiro, Raul 028-131-240 $ 184.00 Carrawa , Clarke and Sarah 029-241-090 $ 218.00 Chahal, Ma'orie 026-165-210 $ 1,051.20 Corradino, Maria 026-165-100 $ 382.00 Dascoulias, Anna 029-241-130 $ 100.00 De Antoni, Emile and T 029-221-080 $ 608.00 Deiz, Gilbert and Rita 026-184-100 $ 38.00 Flake, Hogan and Sally Downing 026-184-010 $ 974.24 Guthrie, Larry and Grace Fong 026-184-040 $ 95.60 Harvey, Michael and Krystyna 029-213-040 $ 964.80 Investek Properties Company 029-225-010 $ 711.68 Jordan, Paul and Elfriede 026-165-190 $ 259.20 Judson, Jean 028-131-060 $ 546.00 Kruger, John and Ellen 029-225-190 $ 1,234.80 Madulara, Anthonyand Estela 026-164-140 $ 376.80 Maslenko, Russ and Yelena 026-165-090 $ 1,026.24 McMillan, Margaret 026-185-090 $ 880.40 Mirosnkoff, Peter and Roseann 028-142-060 $ 327.60 Mosse, Anthonyand Gail 026-185-100 $ 1,292.40 Patterson, Jeanne 026-185-030 $ 568.00 Rally, Dean and Tami 028-131-120 $ 183.60 Read, Michael and Chrisitine 028-142-050 $ 104.40 Roeder, Paul and Adelaide Roberts 026-165-010 $ 1,166.40 Roberts, W C and Gail G 026-165-160 $ 623.20 Rossi, Emilio and Lolita 028-133-020 $ 657.29 Ru erto, Winfred and Aurora 029-241-030 $ 119.38 Soloman, Belin 026-166-020 $ 76.00 Starkovich, Thomas and Joan 028-132-120 $ 257.04 Stock, Alois and Irene 029-225-120 $ 176.40 Toma, Burt and Christina 028-131-080 $ 187.20 Utrata, Peter and Kim 028-131-190 $ 270.00 Wang, Luke 029-242-180 $ 168.00 Wilson, Bradley and Julie 026-183-140 $ 875.20 Wilson, Winifred 029-225-070 $ 38.00 Zimmerman, Lori Anne and David 028-131-130 $ 390.80 EXHIBIT A Agenda 8e Item Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: A ril 2006 SUBMITTED BY Z�5n, APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 10, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROGRAM — CIP 81120 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve the attached resolution awarding the resurfacing project to G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. in the amount of $339,387.55. It is also recommended that staff be authorized to issue change orders up to $60,306 of the construction work. DISCUSSION: Bids were opened on April 4, 2006 and four bids were received. Bids ranged from $339,388 to $359,012. The low bid was 9.7% higher than the Engineer's estimate of $309,328. The difference between the Engineers estimate and low bid is due to a recent substantial increase in paving material and labor costs. This price escalation occurred after the Engineer's estimate was made which was at the time of the grant application. The low bidder, G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. has met all the requirements of the project and has a past history of satisfactory work for the City as well as for other public agencies. The project consists of asphalt base-failure repair, asphalt overlay and pavement reconstruction along Airport Boulevard. BUDGET IMPACT: The following is a financial summary for the project: Expenditures: Funds Availability: Construction $339,388 Grant Funding $160,000 Contingencies $ 60,306 Gas Tax $290,000 Engineering Administration $ 50,306 Total: $450,000 Total: $450,000 EXHIBITS: Resolution, Agreement, Bid Summary, Map Donald . Chang, P. E. Senior Civil Engineer c: Jesus Nava, Finance Director; Doris Mortensen, City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81120 award.doc RESOLUTION NO. - AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO G. BORTOLOTTO& COMPANY, INC. FOR AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROGRAM FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPL - 5171 (014) CITY PROJECT NO. 81120 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROGRAM FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO.STPL-5171 (014),CITY PROJECT 81120. WHEREAS,on APRIL 4,2006,all proposals were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS,G.BORTOLOTTO&COMPANY,Inc.submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of$339,388.55. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of G. BORTOLOTTO&COMPANY, Inc. for said project in the amount of$339,388.55, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work,and that the City Manager be,and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Cathy Baylock, Mayor I, DORIS J. MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81120\misc\4.16.06_ResolutnAward.wpd AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROGRAM FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. SLPT-5171 CITY PROJECT NO. 81120 THIS AGREEMENT,made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California on, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation,hereinafter called"City",and G.Bortolotto&Company Inc. hereinafter called "Contractor," WITNESSETH : WHEREAS,City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the public work and improvements herein provided for and to authorize execution of this Contract; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State law and City requirements, a notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described; and WHEREAS,on April 17,2006,after notice duly given,the City Council of Burlingame awarded the contract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor, which the Council found to be the lowest responsible bidder for these improvements; and WHEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the construction of said improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. Contractor shall perform the work described in those Specifications entitled: AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROGRAM,FEDERAL AID PROGRAM NO. STPL-5171(014),CITY JOB NO. 81120. 2. The Contract Documents. The complete contract consists of the following documents: this Agreement,Notice Inviting Sealed Bids,the prevailing wage rates of the State of California applicable to this project by State law,the accepted Bid Proposal,the complete plans,profiles,detailed drawings and Standard Specifications,Special Provisions and all bonds,and are hereinafter referred to as the Contract Documents. All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents. All of the above described documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents. 3. Contract Price. The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in full,payment of the work above agreed to be done, the sum of Three Hundred Thirty--nine Thousand Three Hundred Eighty-seven and 551100 dollars ($339,387.55). This price is determined by the unit prices contained in Contractor's Bid. In the event authorized work is performed or materials furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and the Specifications,such work and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said amount shall be paid in progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents. 4. Provisions Cumulative. The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City. 5. Notices. All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage prepaid. Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows: Don Chang, Sr. Civil Engineer CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as follows: G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. 580 Bragato Road San Carlos, CA 94070-6227 6. Interpretation. As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the plural and vice versa. 7. Waiver or Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Contractor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting of three (3) pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of this Agreement,have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named on the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF BURLINGAME, "CONTRACTOR" a Municipal Corporation By By Jim Nantell, City Manager G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. Approved as to form: Larry Anderson, City Attorney ATTEST: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk BID SUMMARY AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROGRAM FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO.STPL-5171(014) CITY PROJECT NO.81120 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST, UNIT Engineer's Estimate G.Bortolotto&Co.,Inc. C.F.Archibald Paving,Co. O'Grady Paving Inc. Interstate Grading&Paving Co NO. QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS UNIT PRICE TOTALS GENERAL ITEMS 1 A.C.DIGOUT REPAIR 100 TON $ 90.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 70.00 $ 7,000.00 $120.00 $12,000.00 $155.00 $15,500.00 $ 100.00 $10,000.00 2 AGGREGATE BASE 20 TON $ 35.00 $ 700.00 $ 20.00 $ 400.00 $20.00 $400.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $ 50.00 $1,000.00 3 LEVELING COURSE 870 TON $ 80.00 $ 69,600.00 $ 83.00 $ 72,210.00 $88.00 $76,560.00 $80.00 $69,600.00 $ 88.00 $76,560.00 4 A.C.OVERLAY 1,945 TON $ 80.00 $ 155,600.00 $ 82.28 $ 160,034.60 $85.00 $165,325.00 $84.00 $163,380.00 $ 88.50 $172,132.50 5 COLD PLANE 1,476 C.Y. $ 32.00 $ 47,232.00 $ 43.74 $ 64,560.24 $38.00 $56,088.00 $47.00 $69,372.00 $ 44.00 $64,944.00 6 ENGINEERED PAVING MAT 6,187 S.Y. $ 2.00 $ 12,374.00 $ 3.11 $ 19,241.57 $3.50 $21,654.50 $3.14 $19,427.18 $ 2.70 $16,704.90 7 ADJUST MANHOLES 2 EACH $ 200.00 $ 400.00 $ 301.00 $ 602.00 $400.00 $800.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 1 $ 875.00 $1,750.00 8 ADJUST VLVES LAMPHOLES ETC. 2 EACH $ 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 301.00 $ 602.00 $400.00 $800.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $ 750.00 $1,500.00 9 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOP 14 EACH $ 400.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 436.00 $ 6,104.00 $500.00 $7,000.00 $450.00 $6,300.00 $ 450.00 $6,300.00 10 TYPE"A"&"AW PAVEMENT MARKERS 57 EACH $ 3.00 $ 171.00 $ 3.27 $ 186.39 $4.00 $228.00 $3.30 $188.10 $ 12.00 $684.00 11 TYPE"D"&BLUE PAVEMENT MARKERS 260 EACH $ 4.00 $ 1,040.00 $ 6.54 $ 1,700.40 $7.00 $1,820.00 $6.60 $1,716.00 $ 4.50 $1,170.00 12 6"SOLID LINE--PAINT 0 L.F. $ 1.00 $ $ 1.00 $ $3.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 $ 1.00 $0.00 13 8"SOLID LINE--PAINT 1 140 L.F. $ 1.00 $ 140.00 $ 2.18 $ 305.20 $3.00 $420.00 $2.20 $308.00 $ 1.65 $231.00 14 4"SOLID LINE--PAINT 6,005 L.F. $ 1.00 $ 6,005.00 $ 0.81 $ 4,864.05 $0.80 $4,804.00 $0.90 $5,404.50 $ 0.70 $4,203.50 15 12"SOLID LINE-PAINT 190 L.F. $ 1.00 $ 190.00 $ 3.27 $ 621.30 $4.00 $760.00 $3.30 $627.00 $ 3.25 $617.50 16 LEGENDS&ARROWS-PAINT 270 S.F. 1$ 2.50 $ 675.00 1$ 3.54 1$ 955.80 1 $4.00 1 $1,080.00 1 $3.60 $972.00 $ 4.50 $1,215.00 BID TOTAL $ 309,327.00 $ 339,387.55 $ 349,739.50 $ 356,994.78 $ 359,012.40 S:V+Public Works DirectorylProject80680181D SUMMARY 81120.xis,Sheed Page 1 of 1 13 A y SAN rgAN C 0111 LPG P gcva A�avoar gEALN,R� �o- 06 RW 'F��o PtiP �7 BAYShME F�EEWia1 OSTq (s L J-y VE �? C/FO.P Rear t�itetat Niq ar..c lFirl �P Q � SAN AtMEz \J < X7 P , R �2r � i o :, t CITY OF BURLINGAME SAN MATEO COUNTY town LIMt'C 0: WD9-+`{[ J \ CALIFORNIA l REVISED:JANUARY,1985 GRAPHIC SCALE . „_, ��R:, - � ...• i�..ai.+�h►.ii.i•`� • �° . 1f"'1''.�r iv'��+'�� .'Y r� s a a i -�s •- $2,701,291.47 Ck. No. 17448- 18054 Excludes Library Checks 17448-17490 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT J4Pe2ool,� Payroll for March 2006 $2,628,575.64 Ck. No. 165005- 165261 INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION CD Oq m m Fy Fy C Q on W Pp w0 °: =1 CD S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS CITY OF BURLINGAME 04-06-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 FUND RECAP 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 72,866.66 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 1 ,666. 29 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 13 ,646. 08 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 161 , 567. 23 WATER FUND 526 141 ,392 .97 SEWER FUND 527 24,380 .95 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 7, 123 .41 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 44 .36 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 8, 336. 15 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2, 193 . 22 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 23,641 .72 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 706.44 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 156.55 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 5 , 299.31 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 749.69 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $463, 771 . 03 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL : THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE , AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 17947 THROUGH 18054 INCLUSIVE , TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $463, 771 . 03, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON . RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED , . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / . . ./ . . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./ . . ./ . . . COUNCIL DATE CITY Of BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 18046 SHIZUE TANAKA 26450 22.00 MISCELLANEOUS 22.00 101 36330 000 1644 18047 VATEE PATTAROPONG 26451 64.00 MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 18048 SYLVIA AMBROSIO 26452 24.00 MISCELLANEOUS 24.00 101 36330 000 1521 18049 STACY COPPOLA 26453 150.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1213 18050 MARTHA ZARAGOSA 26454 81.00 MISCELLANEOUS 81.00 101 36330 000 1644 18051 ROBERT KOVACEVIC 26455 81.00 MISCELLANEOUS 81.00 101 36330 000 1644 18052 AUDREY ZENSIUS 26456 27.00 MISCELLANEOUS 27.00 101 36330 000 1644 18053 SEEMA CHAVAN 26457 200.00 MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 22593 18054 GURDIP GUJRAL 26458 60.00 MISCELLANEOUS 60.00 101 36330 000 1422 TOTAL $462,906.67 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 18032 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 541.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 106.13 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 106.12 101 64150 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.43 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 60.88 526 69020 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 123.53 619 64460 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 93.18 620 66700 110 18033 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 26143 61.02 MISC. SUPPLIES 61.02 101 64150 120 18034 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 26144 35.25 OFFICE EXPENSE 35.25 101 64150 110 18035 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26161 44.36 COMMUNICATIONS 44.36 530 65400 160 18036 CALIFORNIA POWER PARTNERS 26205 147,629.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147,629.92 327 81510 220 18037 MRS. OTSUKA 26288 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1422 18038 IES LANGUAGE FOUNDATION 26293 2,147.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,147.00 101 68010 220 1349 18039 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26373 117.99 COMMUNICATIONS 117.99 101 65100 160 18040 ADVANCED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 26376 900.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 900.00 101 67500 011 18041 ACTION TRAILER SALES 26391 5,369.71 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 5,369.71 620 66700 800 18042 BAY AREA' PAINTBALL 26446 305.00 MISCELLANEOUS 305.00 101 36330 18043 SAKA GROUP 26447 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 36330 18044 BEST,BEST &KRIEGER 26448 50.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 50.00 101 64400 261 18045 AMY SPENCER 26449 126.00 MISCELLANEOUS 126.00 101 36330 000 1331 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 18019 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 609.37 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220 18020 CAREY WELSH 25075 1,875.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,875.00 101 22546 18021 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 620.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 620.00 101 68010 220 1349 18022 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 155.75 OFFICE EXPENSE 155.75 101 65100 110 18023 JEFF TATEOSIAN 25320 375.00 MISCELLANEOUS 375.00 101 22593 18024 SC FUELS 25627 16,263.70 GAS, OIL 8 GREASE 16,263.70 101 65100 201 18025 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25731 749.69 UTILITY EXPENSE 749.69 896 20281 18026 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25775 140.29 COMMUNICATIONS 140.29 101 65100 160 18027 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25792 104.98 COMMUNICATIONS 104.98 201 65200 160 18028 HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC 25852 512.46 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 512.46 621 64450 200 18029 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTIN 25885 6,234.70 DSR"T REFUND 6,234.70 101 22590 18030 M.H-A.:ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 26017 519.38 DEPOSIT REFUND 519.38 101 22590 18031 MARSHA KUNZ 26061 252.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1660 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 18005 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI , INC. 23531 1 ,670.32 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,670.32 526 69020 220 18006 BANK OF NEW YORK 23553 2,800.00 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 1 ,857.52 526 69020 763 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 942.48 527 66520 763 18007 BRIAN FORTIN 23591 450.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 225.00 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 225.00 527 66520 120 18008 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 573.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 475.96 619 64460 120 SMALL TOOLS 97.82 619 64460 130 18009 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 617. 12 MISC. SUPPLIES 617.12 619 64460 120 5110 18010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 532.40 SMALL TOOLS 211 .32 101 68020 130 2200 COMMUNICATIONS 321 .08 101 68020 160 2200 18011 QUILL 24090 193.98 OFFICE EXPENSE 193.98 621 64450 110 18012 FLORA. ROBELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 18013 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 501 .60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 501 .60 101 68010 220 1521 18014 S&J -SALES 24194 941 .00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 941 .00 101 65150 200 18015 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 2,600.00 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 2,600.00 526 69020 290 18016 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 340.20 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 340.20 101 64420 121 18017 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 77.36 TRAINING EXPENSE 77.36 101 65300 260 18018 T MOBILE 24846 30.92 COMMUNICATIONS 30.92 101 65150 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT �•� Denotes Hand Written Checks 17990 CIR 21211 2,635.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,635.30 527 66520 120 17991 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 169.95 OFFICE EXPENSE 169.95 201 65200 110 17992 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 5,030.52 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 5,030.52 101 66210 222 17993 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 21741 2,060.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,060.80 101 68010 220 1349 17994 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 105.93 COMMUNICATIONS 105.93 101 65300 160 17995 REED EQUIPMENT CO 21980 168.53 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 168.53 101 68020 200 2200 17996 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 3,399.09 MISC. SUPPLIES 3,399.09 526 69020 120 17997 UNISOURCE WORLDWIDE INC. 22188 336.36 BLDG. &GROUNDS MAINT. 336.36 101 67500 190 17998 MICROFLEX 22276 79.57 MISC. SUPPLIES 79.57 101 65100 120 17999 AUTO PRIDE CAR WASH 22278 118.55 VEHICLE MAINT. 118.55 201 65200 202 18000 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 46.15 COMMUNICATIONS 46.15 101 68010 160 1101 18001 PAT HARDING 22690 1,546.00 LIBRARY EXPENSES 1,546.00 731 22531 18002 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 22927 63.05 DOES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 63.05 526 69020 240 18003 OFFICE MAX 23306 484.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 62.22 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 90.06 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 169.17 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE -32.99 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 195.81 101 64250 110 18004 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 553.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 553.60 101 68010 220 1661 Cr � C ' CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R _ PAGE 3 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17974 CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS 17141 13,860.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,860.00 101 68020 220 2200 17975 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 156.55 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 156.55 625 65213 203 17976 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 1,976.13 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,976.13 528 66600 210 17977 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 198.50 TRAINING EXPENSE 198.50 526 69020 260 17978 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 104.68 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 104.68 527 66520 140 17979 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 64.77 MISC. SUPPLIES 64.77 101 64400 120 17980 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 - 65.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 65.00 101 64420 250 17981 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 33.47 MISC. SUPPLIES 33.47 620 66700 120 17982 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 287.94 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 287.94 201 65200 203 17983 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 5,147.28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,147.28 528 66600 210 17984 CANTERBURY INTERNATIONAL 19721 2,964.86 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,964.86 101 66210 120 17985 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 55200 220 17986 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 13,937.31 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 13,937.31 327 81360 210 17987 JEFF DOWD 20779 228.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.00 101 68010 220 1785 17988 FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA, INC. 20967 103.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.92 101 65100 220 17989 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 915.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 915.00 101 68010 220 1331 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17962 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 8,336.15 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,486.00 618 64520 210 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 2,850.15 618 64520 601 17963 OLE'S 09626 313.72 SUPPLIES 313.72 620 15000 17964 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,597.07 MISC. SUPPLIES 54.00 201 65200 120 SMALL TOOLS 365.88 201 65200 130 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 15.08 201 65200 140 VEHICLE MAINT. 27.05 201 65200 202 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 135.00 201 65200 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS -42.25 201 65200 250 MISCELLANEOUS 1,859.31 731 22557 MISCELLANEOUS 183.00 731 22554 17965 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 1,534.51 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,534.51 527 66520 120 17966 MVP REPAIR SERVICE CO. 11739 1,020.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,020.00 526 69020 210 17967 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 1,412.57 COMMUNICATIONS 245.95 101 65100 160 GAS, OIL & GREASE 95.12 101 65100 201 TRAINING EXPENSE 996.50 101 65100 260 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 75.00 101 65100 292 17968 UNITED TRANSMISSION INC. 14760 2,108.50 SUPPLIES 2,108.50 620 15000 17969 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 694.67 MISC. SUPPLIES 694.67 619 64460 120 5250 17970 ALFRED H. ESCOFFIER 15413 1,711.00 LIBRARY EXPENSES 1,711.00 731 22531 17971 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,109.86 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,109.86 101 65100 220 17972 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 15,637.20 SUPPLIES 15,637.20 620 15000 17973 MOSSRUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 673.64 MISCELLANEOUS 673.64 526 69020 233 C CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 04/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17947 EDWARD R. BACON CO. , INC. 01182 230.25 SMALL TOOLS 230.25 526 69020 130 17948 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 85.94 SUPPLIES 85.94 620 15000 17949 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301 .63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301 .63 101 64560 220 17950 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 370.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 320.18 101 68020 120 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 50.27 101 68020 192 2200 17951 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 136.95 MISC. SUPPLIES 136.95 619 64460 120 17952 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 119.51 MISC. SUPPLIES 119.51 101 66210 120 17953 P. G. & E. 03054 18,938.98 GAS & ELECTRIC 18,938.98 527 66520 170 17954 SBC 03080 52.03 COMMUNICATIONS 52.03 101 65100 160 17955 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 129,394.72 WATER PURCHASES 129,394.72 526 69020 171 17956 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1 ,913.42 COMMUNICATIONS 1 ,913.42 101 65150 160 17957 SNAP ON TOOLS 03587 30.40 SMALL TOOLS 30.40 201 65200 130 17958 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 13,646.08 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,646.08 320 76350 220 17959 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 371 .29 MISC. SUPPLIES 371 .29 101 64350 120 17960 JEAN BUCKS 09019 132.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 132.00 101 68010 220 1644 17961 B.E. I . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 47. 17 MISC. SUPPLIES 14.85 619 64460 120 5140 MISC. SUPPLIES 32.32 619 64460 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME 03-30-2006 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 15 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 76,230.52 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 14,939.21 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 6,785.84 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 20,316.34 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 2,106.49 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 398,508.17 WATER FUND 526 17,228.50 SEWER FUND 527 7,290.83 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 2,010.00 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,572.16 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 2,620.74 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 12,156.99 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 36,786.61 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 77.12 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,446.13 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,400.65 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 119,402.79 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,623.30 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 52,710.33 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $776,212.72 Vp t I' CtC. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 17763 THROUGH 17945 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF$776,212.72, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLI:GBUBMITTED, FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR°PAYMENT .../. COUNCIL ../... •••••••••.•• ...................... DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 14 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17932 MR/MRS ROBINSON 26430 64.00 MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 17933 EMMA BELL 26431 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1782 17934 MRS. LAURSEN 26432 174.00 MISCELLANEOUS 174.00 101 36330 000 1349 17935 NANCY C. BELL-GHARIB 26433 87.00 MISCELLANEOUS 87.00 101 36330 000 1349 17936 NORMA-RILVERIA 26435 41.00 MISCELLANEOUS 41.00 101 36330 000 1644 17937 ANNE E. DUNCAN 26436 37.00 MISCELLANEOUS 37.00 101 36330 000 1644 17938 CHRISTINA CALLAWAY 26437 64.00 MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 17939 RACHELE DIMEGLIO 26438 64.00 MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 17940 HELYN SOON 26439 128.00 MISCELLANEOUS 128.00 101 36330 000 1782 17941 PEGGY PEDERSEN 26440 119.00 MISCELLANEOUS 119.00 101 36330 000 1331 17942 ELAINE YUTAN 26441 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 17943 PHILLIP SUTTON 26442 300.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593 17944 ERIN ROBINSON BRADLEY 26443 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 17945 CHARMAINE C. DAVID 26444 200.00 MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 22593 TOTAL $776,212.72 �3�p4 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 13 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hard Written Checks 17917 FRED FABER 26129 400.00 MISCELLANEOUS 400.00 101 22546 17918 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 190.04 OFFICE EXPENSE 12.07 101 65300 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 100.80 101 64420 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 66.26 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 10.91 620 66700 110 17919 SOLEM AND ASSOCIATES 26196 11,650.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,650.00 320 80760 210 17920 V&A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 26234 16,380.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,380.00 327 81440 210 17921 GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL STRATEGIES 26417 980.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 980.00 320 80760 210 17922 LINGULAR WIRELESS 26418 70.40 COMMUNICATIONS 70.40 101 66210 160 17923 AUTOMOTIVE RESOURCES INC 26419 36,125.86 MISCELLANEOUS -2,980.38 620 23611 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 39,106.24 620 66700 800 17924 DIANE SILVEN 26422 950.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 950.00 101 68010 220 1349 17925 LAWRENCE STONE•NILSEN 26423 200.19 MISCELLANEOUS 200.19 526 22502 17926 ORHAN'KURT 26424 1,650.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,650.00 101 22546 17927 CARLIN & KYNE INC 26425 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 17928 GEORGE RYAN 26426 2,775.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,775.00 101 22546 17929 THERESA HUYHN 26427 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 101 22546 17930 QUALITY POLYGRAPH SERVICES 26428 175.00. PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 175.00 101 64420 121 17931 ALEX'LEE 26429 12.00 MISCELLANEOUS 12.00 101 36330 000 1331 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 12 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17901 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 124.10 UTILITY EXPENSE 124.10 896 20281 17902 JAMES MURPHY 25080 1,032.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,032.00 101 68010 220 1661 17903 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 25084 346.37 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 346.37 201 65200 140 17904 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 540.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 540.00 730 69583 220 17905 JESSE MOORE 25104 110.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110.00 101 68010 220 1785 17906 DANIEL DOBSON 25205 5,625.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,625.00 101 22546 17907 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 73.32 OFFICE EXPENSE 73.32 201 65200 110 17908 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 15.41 OFFICE EXPENSE 15.41 101 65100 110 17909 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25727 55.01 COMMUNICATIONS 55.01 101 64250 160 17910 LARSON CONSULTING 25732 3,813.60 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 3,813.60 527 66520 210 17911 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25776 16.50 COMMUNICATIONS 16.50 201 65200 160 17912 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25777 613.20 COMMUNICATIONS 613.20 201 65200 160 17913 LINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25778 306.46 COMMUNICATIONS 306.46 101 66100 160 17914 MAYA TOGASHI 25940 60.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 60.00 101 68010 220 1644 17915 MARSHA KUNZ 26061 252.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1660 17916 GRAPHICS ON THE EDGE 26096 1,915.70 VEHICLE MAINT. 1,915.70 201 65200 202 CITY OF BURLINGAME N ARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 11 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17886 C.L.E.A. 24523 663.00 MISCELLANEOUS - 663.00 130 20026 17887 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 490.00 UNION DUES 490.00 130 21091 17888 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5.52 130 21015 MISCELLANEOUS 315.08 130 21092 17889 WATER SOLUTIONS 24532 750.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 750.00 526 69020 260 17890 PRESERVATION PAINTING 24552 400.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 400.00 619 64460 210 5180 17891 BURLINGAME ROTARY 24566 360.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 360.00 101 64150 240 17892 O'NEIL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INC. 24675 733.29 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 733.29 530 65400 200 17893 AETNA 24760 3,001.50 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,730.20 130 20022 MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028 17894 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,135.11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,145.96 130 20021 MISCELLANEOUS 989.15 130 20025 17895 MARY PIAllA 24807 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661 17896 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 24815 18.50 COMMUNICATIONS 18.50 201 65200 160 17897 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 47.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 47.92 625 69582 120 17898 FIX AIR 24841 222.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 222.30 619 64460 120 5150 17899 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 299.89 MISC. SUPPLIES 299.89 101 66210 120 17900 DENHAM LLC 24968 7,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 7,500.00 101 22546 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT • Denotes Hand Written Checks 17874 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180 17875 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 2,350.96 MISC. SUPPLIES 417.34 101 68010 120 1114 MISC. SUPPLIES 85.47 101 68010 120 1112 MISC. SUPPLIES 854.24 101 68010 120 1111 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 327.43 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 127.94 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.93 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 440.61 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5180 17876 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 1,300.39 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,300.39 320 80520 220 17877 DOUG BELL 24189 27.81 COMMUNICATIONS 27.81 101 66100 160 17878 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 586.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 586.50 101 68010 220 1661 17879 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 999.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 999.75 101 68010 220 1661 17880 COMPUCOM 24467 250.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 250.75 101 66100 120 17881 C.W. ROEN CO,� 24474 380,037.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 380,037.00 327 79480 220 17882 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,485.00 MISCELLANEOUS, 4,485.00 130 20016 17883 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00 UNION DUES 64.60 130 21080 17884 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00 MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024 17885 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 17863 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1641 17864 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 255.06 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 255.06 101 65100 140 17865 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 820.32 OFFICE EXPENSE 304.19 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 191.39 101 68010 110 1349 MISCELLANEOUS 324.74 101 68010 400 1111 17866 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 5,401.25 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,512.35 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,106.49 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,782.41 327 79400 210 17867 OFFICE MAX 23306 423.03 OFFICE EXPENSE 245.52 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 115.96 101 66,100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 61.55 101 66100 120 17868 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 933.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 493.62 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 440.36 619 64460 120 5240 17869 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 70.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 70.92 619 64460 120 17870 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 358.93 MISC. SUPPLIES 175.75 619 64460 120 5110 MISC. SUPPLIES 108.18 619 64460 120 5120 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 75.00 619 64460 250 17871 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,010.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,010.00 528 66600 210 17872 SBC/MCI 23728 7,955.43 UTILITY EXPENSE 7,955.43 896 20281 17873 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 2,915.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,915.00 526 69020 233 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17848 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 11602.36 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 945.47 101 66210 219 MISC. SUPPLIES 656.89 527 66520 120 17849 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 443.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 443.34 527 66520 120 17850 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 77. 12 OFFICE EXPENSE 77.12 621 64450 110 17851 MONICA EHLERS 21627 390.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 390.00 101 68010 220 1661 17852 HILLYARD 21658 376.33 MISC. SUPPLIES 376.33 101 68020 120 2200 17853 EILEEN P. GOLDENBERG 21846 1 ,340.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 690.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 650.00 101 68010 220 1644 17854 VB GOLF LLC 21948 924.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 924.00 101 68010 220 1784 17855 DIANE WIRGLER 21970 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 17856 EXPRESS PLUMBING 22092 541 .00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 MISCELLANEOUS 241 .00 101 36310 17857 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 457. 17 MISC. SUPPLIES 457.17 526 69020 120 17858 WRIGHT AND ASSOCIATES 22215 5,601 .86 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,601 .86 619 64460 210 17859 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1 ,520.00 MISCELLANEOUS 475.00 201 35221 000 7100 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,045.00 201 35220 000 7100 17860 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT 22529 154.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 154.38 101 68010 120 1114 17861 BURLINGAME GOLF CENTER 22582 223.94 GAS & ELECTRIC 223.94 101 68010 170 1286 17862 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 300.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22554 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '*1 Denotes Hand Written Checks 17835 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 63.25 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 63.25 101 64200 150 17836 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 441.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 441.00 101 64350 210 17837 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 92.58 OFFICE EXPENSE 92.58 101 64250 110 17838 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 1,440.81 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,440.81 201 65200 203 17839 DON DORNELL 19617 712.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 712.80 730 69585 120 17840 MONICA OLSEN 19832 232.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 232.80 101 68010 220 1661 17841 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 5,537.30 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,623.30 736 64570 220 17842 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75 OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101 17843 CWEA - CALIFORNIA WATER 20631 420.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 420.00 527 66520 260 17844 BRIDGE WIRELESS 20633 210.38 COMMUNICATIONS 210.38 526 69020 160 17845 GOLDEN STATE COMMUNICATIONS INC 20634 1,131.13 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,131.13 526 69020 120 17846 SPORTS CHOICE 20845 400.53 MISC. SUPPLIES 80.10 101 68010 120 1780 MISC. SUPPLIES 80.10 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 160.21 101 68010 120 1787 MISC. SUPPLIES 80.12 101 68010 120 1781 17847 MELANIE MARANI 21132 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1331 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 03/30/06 NUMBER NAMEVENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17819 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 13,446.74 MISCELLANEOUS 13,446.74 101 22515 17820 MIKE SMITH 16637 208.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.00 101 68010 220 1789 17821 HILTON, FARNKOPF &HOBSON 16656 3,640.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 3,640.00 526 69020 210 17822 PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION 17389 1,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 22546 17823 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 1,169.10 COMMUNICATIONS 1,169.10 101 65100 160 17824 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 250.99 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 250.99 625 65213 203 17825 OCT INC 17944 1,450.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,450.00 526 69020 260 17826 GEORGE MASTALIR 18088 208.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.00 101 68010 220 1789 17827 STADAM&ASSOCIATES 18275 2,368.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,368.00 101 68010 120 1781 17828 MANUEL BROS INC 18386 562.76 MISCELLANEOUS 562.76 526 22502 17829 BAY ALARM 18854 800.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 800.00 619 64460 220 5130 17830 UNITROL 18939 53.25 SUPPLIES 53.25 620 15000 17831 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 450.00 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 450.00 526 69020 240 17832 ACCESS UNIFORMS&EMBROIDERY 18990 1,094.31 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,094.31 101 64420 120 17833 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 211.20 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 211.20 101 64420 121 17834 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 19047 308.76 MISC. SUPPLIES 308.76 327 81470 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR -DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17804 LIFE ASSIST 09392 275.09 SUPPLIES 275.09 201 65200 112 17805 SAN!MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 1,040.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 1,040.00 101 65100 291 17806 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 849.76 MISC. SUPPLIES 849.76 101 68020 120 2200 17807 OCE 09493 1,714.68 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S . 1,714.68 101 66100 210 17808 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 2,620.74 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 2,620.74 618 64520 601 17809 GARY M. OLSON, PH.D. 09902 300.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 300.00 101 64420 121 17810 ANA FITZGERALD 09975 258.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 258.00 101 68010 220 1646 17811 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 508.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 508.78 201 65200 111 17812 PIP PRINTING 10620 146.14 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 146.14 101 64420 150 17813 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,133.35 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,133.35 625 65213 203 17814 3M COMPANY 13848 - 871.37 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 871.57 101 66210 222 17815 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 704.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 64.95 619 64460 120 5140 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 639.97 619 64460 210 5250 17816 DAILY JOURNAL CORP. 15626 200.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 200.00 101 64420 150 17817 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 2,177.13 MISC. SUPPLIES 187.41 526 69020 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,989.72 526 69020 260 17818 CUMMINS WEST, INC. 16414 1,270.82 MISCELLANEOUS 1,270.82 619 64460 804 C < < CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17799 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 61154.42 MISCELLANEOUS 23.00 101 36330 000 1660 MISCELLANEOUS 10.00 101 36330 000 1331 MISCELLANEOUS 411 .00 101 36330 000 1349 MISCELLANEOUS 10.00 101 36330 000 1321 OFFICE EXPENSE 47.20 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 54. 14 101 68010 110 1100 MISC. SUPPLIES 30.00 101 68020 120 2100 MISC. SUPPLIES 113.51 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 886.39 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 26.05 101 68010 120 1520 MISC. SUPPLIES 29.22 101 68010 120 1787 MISC. SUPPLIES 83.82 101 68010 120 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 82.51 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 3.00 101 68020 120 2200 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 315.95 101 68020 140 2300 COMMUNICATIONS 106.07 101 68010 160 1101 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 23.95 101 68010 200 1101 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 4.32 101 68020 200 2200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 152.00 101 68010 220 1641 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 325.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 756.00 101 68010 220 1644 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 411 .00 101 68010 220 1349 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1212 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1521 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 343.00 101 68010 220 1331 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1645 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 101 68010 220 1648 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 65.00 101 68020 240 2200 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 160.00 101 68010 250 1100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 84.44 101 68010 250 1101 .MISC. SUPPLIES 297.85 730 69583 120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 730 69546 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 730 69533 220 17800 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 586.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 586.50 101 68010 220 1891 17801 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 267.66 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 267.66 101 68020 210 2200 17802 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 100.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 100.00 101 68010 150 1101 17803 POM'' INC. 09248 838.87 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 838.87 530 65400 200 s- yµ r CITY Of BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17792 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 267.05 MISC. SUPPLIES 267.05 619 64460 120 5121 17793 P. G. & E. 03054 40,930.99 UTILITY EXPENSE 40,930.99 896 20280 17794 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 243.02 MISC. SUPPLIES 243.02 101 68010 120 1780 17795 STEPHEN J. PICCHI 03168 532.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 532.80 101 68010 220 1372 17796 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 570.00 MISCELLANEOUS 570.00 526 69020 233 17797 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 119,102.79 MISCELLANEOUS 119,102.79 731 22587 17798 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 4,873.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41873.60 320 76350 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17778 * PLASTYC, INC 26406 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 17779 * LISA A WERNER 26407 43.00 MISCELLANEOUS 43.00 101 36330 000 1660 17780 * EMILY DOTSON 26414 49.00 MISCELLANEOUS 49.00 101 36330 000 1891 17781 * DAVID LOECKE 26415 49.00 MISCELLANEOUS 49.00 101 36330 000 1891 17782 * ALAN ZHONG 26416 45.00 MISCELLANEOUS 45.00 101 36330 000 1781 17783 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 276.56 SUPPLIES 262.69 620 15000 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 13.87 625 65213 203 17784 WHITE CAP 01250 757.74 SMALL TOOLS 757.74 526 69020 130 17785 BRIDGES TIRE & WHEEL SERVICE 01403 333.90 SUPPLIES 333.90 620 15000 17786 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 1,539.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,539.00 101 68010 220 1644 17787 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 57.57 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 35.79 201 65200 140 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 21.78 201 65200 203 17788 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 105.29 MISCELLANEOUS 105.29 101 68020 192 2200 17789 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 3,699.81 MISCELLANEOUS 3,699.81 896 20282 17790 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 536.69 TRAINING EXPENSE 45.10 101 68020 260 2200 TRAINING EXPENSE 389.29 101 68020 260 2300 MISC. SUPPLIES 53.58 619 64460 120 5140 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.72 619 64460 120 5130 17791 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,629.39 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,629.39 101 66210 226 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 03/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17763 * RANDI GRANT 26178 383.00 MISCELLANEOUS 383.00 101 36330 000 1646 17764 * BETHEL CHURCH CALIFORNIA 26374 370.00 MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 120.00 101 36330 000 1213 17765 * RACHEL ZYGAREWICZ 26377 150.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1216 17766 * MR/MRS. KARANDY-WELLIVER 26394 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 36330 000 1331 17767 * KERRI BELLUOMINI 26395 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 17768 * CRAIG PLAGEMAN 26396 150.00 MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 36330 000 1349 17769 * MARIAN LOONEY 26397 46.00 MISCELLANEOUS 46.00 101 36330 000 1648 17770 * DIANE KOUNALAKIS 26398 140.00 MISCELLANEOUS 140.00 101 36330 000 1648 17771 * GAIL THOMAS 26399 64.00 MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 17772 * SHARON MALONEY 26400 64.00 MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 17773 * REGINA NOLAN 26401 64.00 MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 17774 * BARBARA DORNSEIF 26402 102.00 MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1644 17775 * MR/MRS BROWN 26403 190.00 MISCELLANEOUS 190.00 101 36330 000 1331 17776 * MONICA R.TABRIZI 26404 25.00 MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 101 36330 000 1660 17777 * SALLY BECK 26405 46.00 MISCELLANEOUS 46.00 101 36330 000 1331 CITY OF BURLINGAME 03-24-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 79,013.31 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 2,178.43 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,362.92 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 25,910.30 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 270,307.99 WATER FUND 526 10,989.95 SEWER FUND 527 207,664.86 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 11,281.52 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 2,530.69 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 22,707.26 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1,801.27 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 24,739.93 INFORMATION';SERVICES FUND 621 14,208.30 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,088.83 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 550.00 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1,074.45 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 20,819.87 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 658.23 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $700,888.11 <34.S.�c.��vc� HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 17629 THROUGH 17762 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $700,888.11, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ......... ...................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ..................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17753 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 1,278.77 OFFICE EXPENSE 219.69 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 143.26 101 65300 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 23.97 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.90 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 5.91 101 64150 110 MISC SUPPLIES 275.31 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 373.15 526 69020 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 155.83 527 66520 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 49.92 619 64460 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 19.83 621 64450 110 17754 BENEDICTO RODRIGUEZ 26322 150.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520 17755 HAPPY FEET DANCE CO 26392 2,300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,300.00 101 68010 220 1349 17756 SAMCAT 26393 2,000.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,000.00 101 64560 240 17757 JERRY KWAN 26408 9,500.00 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 9,500.00 618 64520 601 17758 VIKKI GARRETT 26409 185.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 185.00 101 64420 210 17759 ANDREW JORDAN 26410 1,435.00 MISCELLANEOUS 550.00 101 22525 MISCELLANEOUS 885.00 101 36630 17760 STEVEN IVERSEN 26411 2,610.00 MISCELLANEOUS 20610.00 101 22546 17761 TIM REGAN 26412 2,475.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,475.00 101 22546 17762 LORI`B'ROCK 26413 102.13 e'tSUPPLIES 102.13 326 81590 120 TOTAL $700,888.11 y CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17741 LARISA YAGLONITSER 25517 430.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 430.00 101 68010 220 1349 17742 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL H 25571 758.00 MISC SUPPLIES 758.00 528 66600 120 17743 NICHOLAS BELLAFATTO 25625 4,200.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,200.00 101 68010 220 1349 17744 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 25729 138.09 TRAINING EXPENSE 138.09 101 68020 260 2200 17745 KATHLEEN VON MAYRHAUSER 25771 205.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 205.00 130 20015 17746 J HOWARD ENGINEERING 25811 270,307.99 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 270,307.99 327 81150 220 17747 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 153.22 RENTS & LEASES 153.22 526 69020 180 17748 ED BARTON 25850 350.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 350.00 130 20060 17749 BARBARA WHITE 25992 108.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.00 101 68010 220 1644 17750 FEDEX KINKO'S 26021 63.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 63.34 101 65300 120 17751 SUMITA FLEMING 26105 481.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 481.50 101 68010 220 1349 17752 PETER BASSFORD 26116 950.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 950.00 101 68010 220 1349 i � .r CITY OF SURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17726 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 1,943.01 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 1,455.01 101 64420 121 MISCELLANEOUS 488.00 618 64520 234 17727 WORLDPOINT ECC, INC. 24619 138.64 SUPPLIES 138.64 201 65200 112 17728 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 875.00 :TRAINING EXPENSE 875.00 101 65300 260 17729 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 495.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 375.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 619 64460 Z20 5120 17730 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 41.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41.25 101 68010 220 1660 17731 FRED FIRESTONE 24866 117.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 117.00 101 68010 220 1331 17732 S AND S SUPPLIES&SOLUTIONS 24963 274.59 MISC. SUPPLIES 274.59 527 66520 120 17733 LAURA MARSH 24964 1,032.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,032.00 101 68010 220 1646 17734 PLAY WELL TEKNOLOGIES 25013 1,716.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,716.00 101 68010 220 1349 17735 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 2,968.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 285.00 101 68010 220 1644 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,683.00 101 68010 220 1349 17736 MICHAEL VONADA 25235 100.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060 17737 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 320.47 'OFFICE EXPENSE 320.47 101 65100 110 17738 SHARON OLDS 25301 334.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 334.00 130 20060 17739 CITY OF FOSTER CITY 25377 1,500.00 PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 1,500.00 101 64420 210 17740 JOYCE OUINN 25379 162.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 162.00 101 68010 220 1644 a CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '*' Denotes Hand Written Checks 17711 DAVE CREAMER 23876 1 , 183.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 , 183.50 101 68010 220 1644 17712 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1 ,231 .00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,167.00 101 23620 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210 17713 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,751 .61 BANKING SERVICE FEES 548.70 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,202.91 530 65400 120 17714 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 17715 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 434.22 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 434.22 619 64460 220 5240 17716 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 37.88 COMMUNICATIONS 37.88 101 65300 160 17717 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 146.65 SUPPLIES 146.65 620 15000 17718 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 550.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 730 69533 220 17719 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 2,165.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,165.00 326 80770 220 17720 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1 ,376.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,376.00 101 68010 220 1644 17721 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 648.00 MISCELLANEOUS 648.00 526 69020 233 17722 THErBERKELEY CHESS SCHOOL 24287 3,890.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,890.00 101 68010 220 1349 17723 DISPLAY SALES 24384 642.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 642.00 201 65200 111 17724 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 288.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 288.75 101 68010 220 1644 17725 WATER SOLUTIONS 24532 750.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 750.00 526 69020 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *1 Denotes Hand Written Checks 17698 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 137.26 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 137.26 530 65400 140 17699 DEAN WILLIAMS 22940 2,625.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,625.00 101 22546 17700 THE DAILY NEWS 22964 75.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 75.00 101 66100 120 17701 BONDLOGISTIX 23088 1,500.00 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 526 69020 764 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 527 66520 764 17702 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 194.84 MISCELLANEOUS 194.84 101 68010 400 1111 17703 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 17704 BOB MALLAMO 23173 135.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 135.00 130 20015 17705 OFFICE MAX 23306 504.88 OFFICE EXPENSE 124.29 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 310.36 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE -12.02 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 82.25 201 65200 110 17706 PETERSON 23633 83.91 SUPPLIES 83.91 620 15000 17707 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 10,920.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,920.00 101 68010 220 1331 17708 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 13.54 OFFICE EXPENSE 13.54 527 66520 110 17709 KEITH MARTIN 23788 89.23 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 10.00 101 66210 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 11.46 526 69020 260 SUPPLIES 30.35 620 15000 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 37.42 620 66700 250 17710 KAREN LIU 23823 756.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 430.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 326.00 101 68010 220 1645 � 1 � 6 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17683 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 1,075.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,075.00 101 68010 220 1331 17684 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 635.28 MISC. SUPPLIES 635.28 527 66520 120 17685 JACKIE COOPER 21469 752.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 752.50 101 68010 220 1646 17686 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 1,375.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,375.00 101 64420 210 17687 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 3,640.17 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,640.17 326 80770 210 17688 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC. 22034 1,399.82 MISCELLANEOUS -96.66 101 23611 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 1,496.48 620 66700 800 17689 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 8,898.86 MISC. SUPPLIES 6,746.28 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,152.58 527 66520 120 17690 YEV PHILOPOVITCH 22217 20,003.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 20,003.00 326 80770 210 17691 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 1,556.49 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 1,556.49 620 66700 800 17692 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 20,819.87 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,963.25 736 64572 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,856.62 736 64571 220 17693 BURLINGAME GOLF CENTER 22582 2,500.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,500.00 528 66600 210 17694 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 435.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281 17695 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 101.76 MISC. SUPPLIES 101.76 101 65100 120 17696 JONES AND MAYER 22818 1,125.07 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,125.07 101 64350 210 17697 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 10,122.00 CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 10,122.00 618 64520 225 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17671 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,265.73 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 231.06 101 66210 140 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.16 201 65200 220 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 274.83 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 231.05 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 57.52 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 56.91 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 214.20 620 66700 140 17672 MARY JANNEY 19042 95.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 95.00 130 20015 17673 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 76.94 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 76.94 101 64200 150 17674 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 341.52 OFFICE EXPENSE 10.02 101 64200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 10.02 101 64350 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 10.02 101 64150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 10.02 101 64420 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 280.86 201 65200 111 OFFICE EXPENSE 20.58 621 64450 110 17675 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 791.23 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 443.56 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 347.67 625 65213 203 17676 DON DORNELL 19617 847.90 MISCELLANEOUS 847.90 731 22557 17677 KATHY KARAS 19812 264.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 264.00 101 68010 220 1644 17678 S & C FORD 20190 17,052.71 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 17,052.71 620 66700 800 17679 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 500.83 COMMUNICATIONS 500.83 101 68010 160 1100 17680 CWEA - CALIFORNIA WATER 20631 745.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 745.00 527 66520 260 17681 SPRINT PCS 20724 66.28 COMMUNICATIONS 66.28 101 64420 160 17682 JEFF DOWD 20779 228.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.00 101 68010 220 1785 CITY OF BURR NGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17657 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO 13758 6,186.62 .CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 6,186.62 621 64450 200 17658 HDL"COREN&CONE 14750 2,047.71 :MISCELLANEOUS 2,047.71 101 30400 17659 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 599.51 MI SC. SUPPLIES 53.71 619 64460 120 5250 MISC. SUPPLIES 545.80 619 64460 120 5150 17660 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 1,900.47 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,900.47 101 65100 220 17661 MOSS RUBBER&EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 335.61 SUPPLIES 335.61 620 15000 17662 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 3,247.50 SMALL TOOLS 3,247.50 620 66700 130 17663 LINDA HOECK 16390 4,590.00 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,590.00 101 68010 220 1349 17664 HILTON, FARNKOPF&HOBSON 16656 720.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 720.00 526 69020 210 17665 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 675.23 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 675.23 101 68020 140 2200 17666 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 973.17 COMMUNICATIONS 94.99 101 65100 160 RADIO MAINT. 878.18 201 65200 205 17667 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 7,966.00 .PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 7,966.00 528 66600 210 17668 CALBO TRAINING INSTITUTE 18697 215.00 -'DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 215.00 101 65300 240 17669 LYNNE FIRESTONE 18746 344.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 344.00 101 68010 220 1331 17670 ACCESS UNIFORMS&EMBROIDERY 18990 212.65 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 212.65 527 66520 140 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17644 FRANK ERBACHER 09195 112.50 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 112.50 130 20015 17645 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 817.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 817.00 101 65100 220 17646 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 389.70 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 389.70 101 68020 190 2200 17647 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 2,597.26 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 2,597.26 618 64520 601 17648 OLE'S 09626 226.55 MISCELLANEOUS 226.55 731 22582 17649 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1 ,249.24 MISC. SUPPLIES 167. 13 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 75.64 101 66210 120 SMALL TOOLS 62.19 101 68020 130 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 42.34 101 68020 190 2200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 116.39 101 68020 200 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 14.20 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 563.01 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 165.07 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS 43.27 527 66520 130 17650 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 1 ,806.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11806.00 101 68010 220 1644 17651 3 T EQUIPMENT CO. 10077 45.45 SUPPLIES 45.45 620 15000 17652 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491 .00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491 .00 201 65200 220 17653 PIP PRINTING 10620 190.52 MISC. SUPPLIES 190.52 530 65400 120 17654 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 877.87 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 136.71 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 741 .16 625 65213 203 17655 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 3.78 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 3.78 101 65100 292 17656 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 69.56 VEHICLE MAINT. 69.56 201 65200 202 CITY OF BURLINGAME ' W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 03/24/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17629 ALAN STEEL&SUPPLY CO. 01059 113.66 SUPPLIES 113.66 620 15000 17630 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 9.94 SUPPLIES 9.94 620 15000 17631 VEOLIA WATER 02110 202,286.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 202,286.00 527 66530 220 17632 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 165.71 MISC. SUPPLIES 85.30 619 64460 120 5121 MISC. SUPPLIES 80.41 619 64460 120 17633 HEWLETT PACKARD 02457 7,981.27 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 7,981.27 621 64450 800 17634 SBC 03080 223.23 ....UTILITY EXPENSE 223.23 896 20281 17635 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 369.56 SUPPLIES 369.56 620 15000 17636 SANDRA POBE 03175 459.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 459.00 101 68010 220 1646 17637 RANDY SCHWARTZ 03518 508.76 MISCELLANEOUS 508.76 101 68010 031 17638 SYMPRO, INC. 03705 2,499.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 2,499.00 101 64250 200 17639 FRANK TEALDI 03743 846.93 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 846.93 130 20060 17640 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 350.00 101 65100 260 17641 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 2,800.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,800.00 101 68010 114 1101 17642 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 548.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 47.63 101 64350 120 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 501.29 101 64350 210 17643 JULLE COHN 09122 369.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 369.00 101 68010 220 1644 CITY OF BURLINGAME 03-16-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 13 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 69,472.38 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 7,635.14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 29,148.65 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 403,473.33 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 90,092.08 WATER FUND 526 7,000.03 SEWER FUND 527 74,393.76 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5,542.50 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 577.34 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 1,267.75 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 24,864.95 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 377.91 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 35,350.84 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 3,334.99 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,288.97 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 6,024.84 FEDERAL GRANTS FUND 737 599.31 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 785.80 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $761,230.57 0 -0 VO I D 1-734S7 I t5u,ooh vo I D HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: 1 c* I oL{ r . 1 7 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 13 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 17491 THROUGH 17628 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $761,230.57, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................. .../. ./. COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 12 03/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17625 BUS & EQUIPMENT REPAIR 26386 2,661 .66 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,661 .66 625 65213 203 17626 CHRIS SUTTON 26387 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 17627 JOHN SPIERS 26388 4, 192.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4, 192.00 101 22546 17628 DAN MCAULIFFE 26389 1 ,020.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,020.00 101 22525 TOTAL $761 ,230.57 40' `pV CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S,T E R PAGE 11 03/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17609 DENISE MARTIN 26366 208.00 MISCELLANEOUS 208.00 101 36330 000 1423 17610 LUCY DE ANDA 26367 438.00 MISCELLANEOUS 438.00 101 36330 000 1646 17611 KIMBERLEY MINCEY 26368 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1891 17612 JILL STEPHENS 26369 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1891 17613 JENNIFER BERNARDO 26370 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1331 17614 ADELA CASTILLO 26371 150.00 MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593 17615 MAXINE YEE 26372 125.00 MISCELLANEOUS 125.00 101 22593 17616 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26373 279.95 COMMUNICATIONS 279.95 101 65100 160 17617 LORNA BECCARIA 26378 1,020.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525 17618 ANDREW JUROW 26379 1,020.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525 17619 ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 26380 8,788.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 8,788.00 101 22590 17620 ELISABETH LANG 26381 1,875.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,875.00 101 22546 17621 MARY'S DELI 26382 193.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 193.00 101 69537 120 17622 CATHERINE BLAIR 26383 356.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 356.25 101 68010 220 1644 17623 MICHAEL YUROVITSKY 26384 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 17624 CAL CHIEFS NORTHERN EMS SECTION 26385 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 731 22554 C CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 03/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17593 EAC 26296 33.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 33.00 101 64420 250 17594 AKOP VETSIKYAN 26305 260.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 260.00 101 68010 220 1780 17595 JIMMY FOCHETTI 26306 47.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 47.50 101 68010 220 1780 17596 CHRIS FORD 26347 125.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 101 68010 220 1780 17597 ANN ROONEY 26354 35.00 MISCELLANEOUS 35.00 101 36330 000 1645 17598 ROSE GARCIA 26355 30.00 MISCELLANEOUS 30.00 101 36330 000 1660 17599 CAROLYN HERLIHY 26356 30.00 MISCELLANEOUS 30.00 101 36330 000 1660 17600 KAREN RING MCGEE 26357 30.00 MISCELLANEOUS 30.00 101 36330 000 1660 17601 LORI BERESFORD 26358 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1422 17602 ANN BOLAND 26359 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1422 17603 ROSLYN J . HOLTZCLAW 26360 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1422 17604 MIMI PHUNG 26361 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1422 17605 KATHY PAPPAGEORGE 26362 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1422 17606 PATRICE ROSSI 26363 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1422 17607 CAROLYN DICENZO 26364 70.00 MISCELLANEOUS 70.00 101 36330 000 1648 17608 NANCY HUANG 26365 95.00 MISCELLANEOUS 95.00 101 36330 000 1349 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 03/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 17579 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 236.35 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 236.35 530 65400 220 17580 HARRY BEILIN 25296 690.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,380.00 101 22546 MISCELLANEOUS -690.00 101 31510 17581 CITY OF FOSTER CITY 25377 1,500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,500.00 201 65200 220 17582 LORAL LANDSCAPING 25394 160.00 BLDG. &GROUNDS MAINT. 160.00 619 64460 190 17583 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25731 860.79 COMMUNICATIONS 74.99 526 69020 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 785.80 896 20281 17584 SARAH CHEYETTE 25750 1,020.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525 17585 EDMOND'S PLAZA FLORIST 26041 186.74 MISC. SUPPLIES 186.74 101 65100 120 17586 NATHAN FABEL 26113 47.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 47.50 101 68010 220 1780 17587 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 412.03 OFFICE EXPENSE 246.56 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.32 101 68010 120 1330 OFFICE EXPENSE 64.11 201 65200 110 MISCELLANEOUS 53.04 731 22557 17588 SYSKA HENNESSEY 26142 6,480.00 MISCELLANEOUS 6,480.00 619 64460 804 17589 CAL SIERRA CONSTRUCTION 26187 68,960.81 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 68,960.81 527 66520 210 17590 SOLEM AND ASSOCIATES 26196 6,080.49 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 6,080.49 320 80760 210 17591 ALEXANDRA SHAPIRO 26236 168.00 MISCELLANEOUS 168.00 101 36330 000 1370 17592 NICOLA HOOBYAR 26284 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1891 The City of Burlingame CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.burlingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday - January 12, 2006 Commissioners Present: Stephen Warden, Chair Eugene Condon, Vice-Chair Victor James Dan Conway Michael Bohnert Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: Traffic Sergeant Don Shepley, Police Department Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer, Public Works Lori Brock, Secretary, Public Works Staff Absent: None Visitors: Ann Keighran, 231 Vancouver Avenue Joseph Cowan, South San Francisco Megan Bohnert, Burlingame Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue Alex Veech, 1800 Adeline Drive Police Chief Jack Van Etten TRAFFIC,SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes-Approved -� Thursday,January 12,2006 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. INTRODUCTION OF NEW COMMISSIONER 3.1 Michael Bohnert introduced himself and provided some background information. 4. ROLL CALL 5 of 5 Commissioners present. 5. CURRENT BUSINESS 5.1 ACTION ITEMS 5.1.1 Minutes for September 8,2005 and November 10,2005 Motion:To accept the minutes. M/S/C:Condon,Conway;5/0/0 5.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 5.2.1 Cowan Road/Mahler Road/Gilbreth Road - Height, overnight parking, and limited-time parking restrictions Traffic Engineer Chou informed the Commission that shortly after their facilities consolidation, LSG Sky Chefs was able to make adjustments to all three work shifts which enabled them to accommodate their employee's parking needs on-site as well as on the street. He added that no modifications to the on-street parking time limits appeared necessary at this time. He added that because of these modifications,the prior parking concerns in that area seemed to have been addressed. He further stated that staff did not see any additional need for a second meeting regarding the southern part of the commercial district because making adjustments to The City of Bur ingame Page 2 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -Approved Thursday, January 12, 2006 that area might conflict with the idea of trying to address area-wide adjustments, which included both the northern, and southern part of the commercial area. Commissioner Condon stated that he still perceived parking problems in the area. He said that it wasn't just with Sky Chefs, but also with the limousine companies, and people dropping off their cars and leaving the area. Commissioner Condon said that he would like to continuing to pursue 2-hour or 4-hour parking on the east/west side streets, and 8-hour parking on Gilbreth Road. He was also concerned about a recurrence of overnight or long-term parking in the area. Mr. Chou said that while the Sky Chefs parking problem might be resolved, there was indeed still concern over parking issues related to hotel parking on the side streets around the Bayshore Highway area. He said that this particular issue might be dealt with separately focusing on the incidences occurring on the eastern ends of Cowan and along Mahler. He said that the problems seemed less prevalent on Stanton, Mitten, Malcolm, and Hinkley Roads. Mr. Chou also noted that Mr. Al Lovotti has already expressed concerns over the consideration to change Gilbreth from the current 4-hours to 8-hours. Commissioner Condon said that he wanted to avoid the past approach of addressing parking issues individually and without consideration to the "global" picture. He said that the current approach to problem solving were more effective at resolving issues for a whole area. Chair Warden stated that a second public meeting should be offered; and, if the City received no response from the public, then the Commission could close the matter. He suggested bringing the issue back to the Commission as a Discussion Item to discuss the feasibility of 2-hour, 4- hour, and/or 8-hour parking for the entire area. If no feedback is received from the community, the Commission would then concentrate on specific offending vehicles such as the limousine services and moving companies. He asked that this matter be continued for next month. 5.2.2 Cabrillo Avenue/Cortez Avenue - Traffic flow through Our Lady of Angels School Traffic Engineer Chou explained that the new principal at Our Lady of Angels school (OLA), changed the existing traffic plan, which was only implemented last year, back to the "old" 2004 plan. This "new" plan has The City o/Burlingame Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -Approved Thursday, January 12, 2006 parent/drivers entering from Cabrillo again (from Easton Drive), circulating within the school yard, then leaving back out onto Cabrillo (towards Hillside Drive). Mr. Chou reiterated that this plan was almost identical to the 2004 plan, and that the school had only implemented the "new" plan last year after meetings between the Commission, the school, and the neighbors. Mr. Chou stated that he and police staff met with the new principal, Ann Stovall, and determined that there were modifications to the student pickup times; and, while the traffic pattern was similar to that of the 2004 plan, the pickup and exiting had run fairly smoothly based on several of his field visits. He said that the reason for going back to the 2004 plan was because of Ms. Stovall's concern over vehicles traveling all the way through the school property with dismissed children present. With cars circulating in only from Cabrillo, the passenger side of the vehicle would be where the children could load in, and there would be no vehicles traveling through the school property between Cortez and Cabrillo. Mr. Chou stated that the City had not received resident complaints regarding this latest change; and, that the only remark received dealt with letting the City know that there was a change. Mr. Chou stated that based on his observations, the school yard gates were opened at 2:45 PM, with pickup starting at approximately 2:55 - 3:00 PM. He said that vehicles would begin queuing up 7-10 vehicles on Cabrillo just before the gates opened; and, that this congestion was still a concern for staff. He also stated that the queuing situation seemed to be more intermittent and less regular in the current plan than with the 2004 plan. Commissioner Condon expressed his concern that if the school were to consider using last year's plan, but in the reverse-direction, visibility concerns might arise because of a storage container by the gate on Cortez. He also noted that the neighbors might start complaining again about the current plan because it was back to where we started two years ago. Pat Giorni stated that the City should discourage the idea of picking up children in the playground area and move the pickup to Hillside Drive. She also stated that the school should have the teachers walk their students out of the school and supervise the pickup. The City o/Burlingame Page 4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, January 12, 2006 Ann Keighran informed the Commission that morning drop-off was not a problem, and has been improved due to the various plans. She said that afternoon pick-up, however, continued to be a problem because parents had to wait for the school's dismissal. Ms. Keighran also said that vehicles often traveled in two different directions when entering and leaving the school property, and that southbound cars should not be allowed after exiting onto Cabrillo. Chair Warden concluded that this item would be on the agenda for further discussion next month. 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS 6.1 Primrose Road/Howard Avenue - Designation of 24-minute Green Zones Mr. Chou informed the Commission that for next month, they would be receiving a staff report regarding a request to install green zones on Primrose and on Howard, by the Primrose CALL Center. He said this item was the result of a request to the City Council by parents of the daycare center next to the Primrose CALL Center for some short-term parking. 6.2 Ray Drive/Quesada Way - Request for Stop signs or other speed controls. Mr. Chou informed the Commission that they would be receiving a staff report regarding a request from a resident concerning vehicle speeds at this location. He added that staff would be providing stop sign warrant data and other studies at that time. T FROM THE FLOOR 7.1 Resident Alex Veech asked the Commission about who and how to contact appropriate authorities regarding poor traffic roadway markings on EI Camino Real, south of Trousdale. Mr. Veech was informed that EI Camino Real was within the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and that he should make contact with Caltrans via a letter about his concerns. The City of Burlingame Page 5 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -Approved Thursday, January 12, 2006 8. INFORMATION ITEMS 8.1 Bicycle Safety Issues in Burlingame Pat Giorni spoke to the Commission on the following items: • She would be willing to serve on a bike committee. • "Bike to Work Day" is scheduled for May and she would like the City to participate by providing informational banners and setting up an energizing station at the Burlingame train station. Ms. Giorni is also willing to serve as a volunteer at such a station. • Grand jury report issued this year concerning SamTrans and the Joint Powers Board. She said that San Mateo County has primary jurisdiction for what it builds, such as a proposed bike path on California Drive, from Broadway to the Millbrae border. Ms. Giorni stated that California Drive was not an adequate street for the route due to the amount of traffic. • Broadway overpass - Approximately five years ago, after they changed the bridge, Caltrans failed to replace the pedestrian crosswalk lines and she would like the City to demand this be fixed along with a traffic signal. • Approximately one year ago, she called Caltrans about increasing the signal timing on the cross streets along EI Camino Real, especially at Floribunda Avenue and Ray Drive. She said that Caltrans provided four additional seconds, which were great, and allowed the bicyclist to get across the four lanes. Chair Warden informed Ms. Giorni that the Commission had not received notification that the signal timings were changed back to their original setting. 8.2 From Council to Commission/Staff None. 8.3 From Staff to Commission 8.3.1 Traffic Engineer's Report Traffic Engineer Chou reported that countdown pedestrian signal heads would be installed by the contractor, Republic Electric, some time in the beginning of February. He said that installation was not expected to go beyond two weeks. Locations included all of the downtown signals along Burlingame Avenue and at Broadway. He added that the City would be The City of Burlingame Page 6 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, January 12, 2006 talking to Caltrans regarding their signals on EI Camino Real at these locations. Mr. Chou also reported that the lighted crosswalk project at Carolan and Morrell was anticipated to commence in late February. He added that the system would be the same as the one currently installed across Bayshore Highway and also across California Drive. Finally, Mr. Chou reported that the US101/13roadway Interchange Project Study Report (PSR) has been completed and signed off by Caltrans. He said the $54-million project now needed an environmental study. The anticipated construction date was to be 2012. 8.3.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report Sergeant Shepley reported that December was a busy month for the Police Department. He stated that the 2005 "AVOID" holiday enforcement program results were available on the web at www.californiaavoid.org Chief Van Etten was present and invited members of the Commission to a demonstration of American Traffic Solutions' (ATS) photo red light traffic enforcement technology, on January 25`h at 1:00 PM in City Hall Conference Room A. Sgt. Shepley updated the Commission on the following areas: • Traffic officer coverage. • Joint PEO/DBID meetings to improve the reputation of the Parking Division. • Employee parking permit program. • Council approved engineering changes to the parking system. 8.4 From Commission to Staff 8.4.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests. Commissioner James asked about a discussion or presentation by staff on the City's major disaster plan for the next meeting's agenda. Mr. Chou and Sgt. Shepley suggested that the City's Emergency Services Coordinator, John Parkin, should be invited for the next meeting. The City of Burlingame Page 7 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved --� Thursday, January 12, 2006 Commissioner Condon provided an update on the crosswalk at Ray Drive and Lassen Drive, where the Lincoln School children cross. He said that the visual impact was dramatically improved with the red zone, and pedestrians can see clearly for both directions. Chair Warden reported the following: • California Drive continued to have trucks and RV's parking overnight. He asked that this matter be placed on the next meeting agenda under "Overnight Parking Restrictions on the east side of California Drive - 700 block". • Someone had trimmed the juniper bushes in the City parking lot on Paloma, north of Broadway on the eastside. He had a concern about who the City was allowing to trim bushes on city property. Mr. Chou said that he would speak with the Parks Department. • Continued long-term trailer parking by a contractor who was parking his trailer at the Old Baptist Church. The contractor seemed to be parking his trailer and truck on the street for up to two weeks in front of someone's house. • The City Council adopted the ordinance against spectators in street racing. He commended the Commissioners for a good job and thanked them for their support. 8.5 Comments and communications None. 8.6 Next meeting: February 9, 2006 There are no anticipated absences from either staff or the Commission. 9. INACTIVE ITEMS 9.1 Easton Drive - Eucalyptus tree at Easton and Cabrillo Traffic Engineer Chou explained that no traffic counts could be conducted due to the on-going construction work in the area regarding the Easton Creek Sewer reconstruction project. The City o/Budingame Page 8 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -Approved Thursday, January 12, 2006 9.2 Mercy High School - Traffic Studies Traffic Engineer Chou explained that a community/neighborhood meeting still needed to be scheduled; and, that speed surveys and traffic volume counts were to be conducted around the end of January. 10. AGENDUM ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING - February 9, 2006 • City of Burlingame's Emergency Disaster Program • California Drive (700 block) Overnight Parking 10.1 Items Requiring Staff Reports • Item 5.2.1 - Cowan/Mahler/Gilbreth Parking Limits • Item 5.2.2 - Cabrillo-OLA School Traffic Circulation • Item 6.1 - Primrose/Howard Green Zones • Item 6.2 - Ray/Quesada Stops or Speed Control 11. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR FOR 2006 Commissioner Gene Condon as Chairperson. M/S/C: Warden, James, 5/0/0 Commissioner Victor James as Vice-Chair. M/S/C: Condon, Warden, 5/0/0 12. ADJOURNMENT 8:08 p.m. The City of Burlingame Page 9 " `�� The City of Burlingame RLIN1 � . CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.burlingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday - February 9, 2006 Commissioners Present: Eugene Condon , Chair Victor James, Vice-Chair Michael Bohnert Stephen Warden , Commissioners Absent: Dan Conway Staff Present: John Parkin , Disaster Preparedness Coordinator Augustine Chou , Traffic Engineer, Public Works Lori Brock, Secretary, Public Works Staff Absent: Traffic Sergeant Don Shepley, Police Department Visitors: Larissa Stone, 1588 Gilbreth #224 Scott McWhirter, 865 Hinkley Road Gabrielle Jones, 875 Stanton Road Leslie Ragsdale, 1509 Los Montes Drive Annette Hart, 1112 Peninsula Avenue Al Lovotti, 1499 Bayshore TRAFFIC,SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes-Approved Thursday, February 9,2006 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 5 of 5 Commissioners present. 4. CURRENT BUSINESS 4.1 ACTION ITEMS 4.1.1 Minutes for January 12,2006 Motion:To accept the minutes. M/S/C:Warden,James;4/0/0 4.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 4.2.1 Cowan Road/Mahler Road/Gilbreth Road-Height,overnight parking,and limited-time parking restrictions Traffic Engineer Chou recapped for the Commission the parking situation in the commercial area by Bayshore, Cowan, and Gilbreth and Mahler. He explained that a neighborhood meeting was held in October 2005, at Sky Chefs'facilities and all of the businesses of the northern area were invited. In January 2006, the City was informed by Sky Chefs, that the parking situation was not significantly impacted, as was expected with the Sky Chefs facility consolidation. Staff determined that the best course of action was not to change the parking times in that area. It still left a question on whether or not to consider action on the southern portion of the same The City of Burlingame Page 2 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved L Thursday, February 9, 2006 commercial area (Stanton, Hinkley, Mahler, and Gilbreth). At the January meeting, the Commission instructed staff to proceed with a second public meeting to hear if there were any desires or needs to change the existing conditions of parking on those streets. Staff conducted a mass mailing to all the businesses in the southern area. Mr. Chou stated that in general, the City and specifically the Commission, would need to evaluate the concerns of the businesses to determine if a change in the current parking situation would be improved. Parking restrictions on these side streets are 24- minute green and red No-Parking zones. To deal with long-term storage of inactive trucks, Gilbreth has a 4-hour parking restriction from Mahler to Cowan. Mr. Chou stated that the City had plans to examine the parking situation for the entire commercial area. Based on Sky Chefs current parking conditions, the City was focusing on the southern portion. Gabrielle Jones, representative of Community Gate Path, 875 Stanton Road, a county agency serving people with disabilities spoke. She stated, current traffic and parking is fine, but her main concern was policing of the parking lot if the City were to implement any new restrictions on the street Ms. Jones concluded by asking the Commission to consider blue zone parking for easy access for their clients and visitors. Scott McWhirter, General Manager, COIT Services, Inc., 865 Hinkley said that COIT, Inc. took an in-depth look at their parking situation, and sent letters to the Commission informing them of the inconveniences that 4-hour parking restrictions would cause them. Mr. McWhirter stated that with 160 employees, 102 service trucks, 85 spaces in their lot, they still have many employees who have to park their vehicles on the street. 4-hour parking would not allow them to return and move their vehicles. Mr. McWhirter finished by stating, he requests at this time, the area remains open and unrestricted. Larissa Stone, 1588 Gilbreth Road requested height limitations for trucks, and no over-night parking. She stated that she was not in favor of 4-hr. parking because they would have to move their cars every 4-hrs. Also, she said that changing Gilbreth Road to 8-hr. parking with 4-hr. parking on the side streets would mean other parkers overflowing to Gilbreth Road. Ms. Stone said that they only need height limitation for the trucks, and no over- night parking. The City or Burlingame Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 Al Lovotti, 1499 Bayshore was under the impression that this subject matter was previously approved. He stated that most businesses have adequate parking. He was worried about trucks and limousines returning to this area, and believed overnight regulation was the best answer. Chair Condon updated Mr. Lavotti with respect to the steps the Commission took to review all aspects/impacts of parking on the subject streets. Commissioner Warden inquired if 8-hr. restrictions on Gilbreth with height restrictions would negatively affect the neighborhood. Commissioner James spoke and acknowledged that height limitations were approved on Mahler, and asked if Sky Chefs was present at this meeting. He said that since this was no longer an issue with Sky Chefs, any additional changes would cascade back and create problems that was no longer a problem. Commissioner James believes staff recommendation should be accepted. Commissioner Warden spoke in favor of changing Gilbreth to 8 hr. parking. He said if height and or length restrictions were instituted, they would not be easy to enforce, but would eliminate trucks parking days at a time. Mr. Chou explained to the Commission, that the City has a height limitation ordinance for safety purposes (ability to see vehicles from driveways), however, the City does not have an ordinance to use in terms of length restrictions. He said the Commission would have to fall back onto existing Building and Planning Departments codes dealing with conditions of use. Chair Condon would like to look into 8 hr. parking on Gilbreth and a height restrictions, and keep the rest as-is. Mr. Chou informed the Commission that coordination with the City's police department is necessary because previous enforcement was difficult. Motion: To move this to action. M/S/C: Warden, James; 4/0/0 The City o/Burlingame Page 4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 Motion: To deny parking changes regarding time limitations for this area, and ask staff to consult with the police department as far as Gilbreth Road being changed to 8 hr. parking with height restrictions. M/S/C: Warden, James; 4/0/0 4.2.2 Cabrillo Avenue/Cortez Avenue - Traffic flow through Our Lady of Angels School Mr. Chou stated that parents currently come down Cabrillo into the first driveway and out onto Hillside. Staff and Commissioners Bohnert and Condon met with OLA staff to review the situation. Staff noticed that parents were not observing the school's request to come down Cabrillo, circulate within the lot, and exit the northern driveway. At times, parents drive down Hillside and enter through the northern driveway, resulting in a traffic jam in the parking lot. Staff noticed parents parking in the white zone which use to be for active pickup and drop-off. Mr. Chou stated his concern was that emergency vehicles would not be able to get into the any of the driveways during this time. He said Staff's recommendation is to have the Commission provide a letter to the church's administration which would then be passed down to the school administration, and down to the parents. The letter would state three recommendations, 1) recommends the school put in signage on the two driveways stating the south driveway is for entrance only, and the north driveway signage for exit only. 2) The school formally implement a traffic direction program within their lot, and 3) The City notify the administration, that it will enforce the white zone. Commissioner James suggested a letter from the Commission would help with the transition, and Mr. Chou agreed that the school would like the City's assistance with this matter. Commissioner Bohnert spoke and recommended a periodic review over the next six months. Mr. Chou informed the Commission that this is a private school, but the City could respond back if complaints were received from the neighborhood. The City o/Burlingame Page 6 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 Chair Condon suggested that the school's traffic designator be present at the school 15 minutes before the bell rings. He also stated that on Cortez Avenue, if drivers follow the rules for the appropriate curb color, then traffic will flow nicely. Motion: To move to action. M/S/C: Warden, James; 4/0/0 Motion: To accept staff recommendation and ask Our Lady of Angels school to provide personnel with safety vests, present 15 minutes prior to the end of the school day. M/S/C: Warden, James; 4/0/0 4.2.3 Primrose Road/Howard Avenue - Designation of 24 minute Green Zones Mr. Chou stated in October 2005, the Council received a request from Ms. Ragsdale to consider designating several parking spaces in City Lot G for short-term/24-minute parking to accommodate the parents of the United Methodist Nursery School, at the Burlingame United Methodist Church. He said the request was submitted shortly before the Council was to vote on specific short-term issues identified in the long running downtown Burlingame Parking Study. Due to the short notice of the request, data to the Council for immediate action could not be provided. As a result, Council referred the request to staff for review along with a directive to work with Ms. Ragsdale in establishing the parent's parking needs and a possible solution. Mr. Chou reported that staff met with Ms. Ragsdale on November 22, 2005 to discuss possibilities and limitations. On-street parking is permitted on both sides of Primrose, south of Howard, and there is 10-hr. meters posted on the east side and no meters on the west side. There is meter parking on the south side of Howard along the Church's frontage (10 hr. parking). Mr. Chou stated that short-term parking was needed along Primrose, due to the daycare center. Currently, on-street parking spaces did get occupied quickly along the west portion of Primrose. Parents with children used Lot G and crossed the street mid block. He said this was a concern of the City. Mr. Chou stated that the church also had a private lot The City of Burlingame Page 6 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 which could be used for daycare parking. Another option was possibly using Howard Avenue, which are 10-hr. meters. Mr. Chou cautioned that the meter rates could change from 25 cents to 75 cents. Ms. Ragsdale said that parents need to park anywhere from five minutes to two hours, usually with two or more children to walk to the facility or church. The daycare's hours of operation vary from day-to-day, opening and closing anywhere from 8:50 to 3:00 or 3:30. Other parents also drop their children for church activities, and it would be helpful to stop Lot G enforcement at 5:30. She said this way, parents wouldn't have to pay $1.00 to drop off their kids. She encourages the Commission to visit the site when it is busier to get a true picture of the situation. Chair Condon believes 24-minute parking will lead to a faster turnover, and note City businesses currently have long-term parking available to them for their employees. Mr. Chou informed the Commission that with green zone parking, the police department wouldn't know which cars arrived at what time. Commissioner Warden stated that the church lot was under utilized. He also said he had no problem with 24-minute parking at the proposed area. He suggested the Commission considers limiting this area to five minute parking, Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 5 PM. He added that this would eliminate the need to cross streets. He concluded by saying that a determination needed to be made regarding the existing white zone on Howard, and what could be done in the church parking lot. Tabled to next meeting. (Condon/James) 4.2.4 Ray Drive/Quesada Way Traffic Engineer reported that warrant data was still being collected. He said that the Commission might have to consider other options if the problem is actually speed related. He added that staff would be providing alternatives to the Commission if the warrant standards were not meet. The City o/Burlingame Page 7 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 4.2.5 California Drive - Overnight parking issues on 700 block Traffic Engineer Chou stated that "No Overnight Parking" signs would be installed along the eastside of this part of California Drive. 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS 5.1 No new items. 6. FROM THE FLOOR 6.1 No public comment. The City of Burlingame Page 8 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes -Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 7. INFORMATION ITEMS 7.1 Bicycle Safety Issues in Burlingame Mr. Chou reported that Council was looking to put together a bicycle sub- committee to explore possible future projects. He said that the current agenda item was designed as a venue to hear about maintenance issues to existing bikeways facilities. He added that this newly formed subcommittee would meet twice a year, and would be responsible for developing ideas for potential bikeways projects for which the City could submit grant applications. Mr. Chou concluded by saying that at this point, Council has not yet approved such a subcommittee, but additional information about the establishment would be forthcoming. 7.2 From Council to Commission/Staff No new items. 7.3 From Staff to Commission 7.3.1 Traffic Engineer's Report Mr. Chou provided updated information on the TDA grants. • Signals for the downtown areas of Broadway and Burlingame should be installed soon, staff was waiting for the contractor to confirm a start date. • Lighted crosswalk for Morrell - staff was waiting for bids. Contract documents still needed about one to two week's work before a construction contractor could be named. • The locations for the bikeway signs were currently being laid out throughout the City. Installation should begin in the summer. 7.3.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report No new items to report. The City o/Burlingame Page 9 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 7.3.3 Other City Staff Reports John Parkin, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator provided information to the Commission regarding the City's emergency preparedness. He said that training with City employees was provided on a regular basis, and that there were a lot of projects he was currently working on. Commissioner James inquired if there was an official City of Burlingame emergency plan, and if it entailed plans for a national or local disaster. Mr. Parkin informed the Commission that the City did have an emergency plan, which was adopted by Council in 1999. He also stated that the plan was subsequently revised to standards set under the direction of the Standard Emergency Management System (SEMS). He said SEMS was implemented after the Oakland Hills fire. Mr. Parkin said that California was way ahead of the rest of the United States in emergency planning and preparedness. He added that the plan would probably be adopted in the summer of 2006. An overall educational meeting would take place to explained what was being done in the City. In July, at the Recreation Center, staff was hoping this would generate interest with our citizens. Commissioner James asked if something was set in place to specifically address individual residential needs during a large-scale disaster. He cited handicapped or elderly residents as examples. Mr. Parkin stated that programs involving citizen and residential help was done in the past, but that it was difficult to maintain citizens' interest and commitment over years. He cited the problems of waning involvement and the cost of retraining as reasons such programs are no longer done. Mr. Parkin then said that if there was interest again, he would investigate implementing these types of programs or find ways to address such concerns in the existing SEMS program. 7.4 From Commission to Staff 7.4.1 Reports of citizen complaints or requests. The City of Burlingame Page 10 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 Commissioner Warden asked about a situation for southbound California Drive, turning left as Oak Grove. He said that (if a train was coming), the railroad arms would come down and the east/west traffic would proceed with a green signal. Afterwards, the northbound and southbound traffic would get green signal, but the left turn signals would remain red. Were these tied together? Commissioner Warden also asked about the signals for eastbound Broadway. He wanted to know why eastbound left-turners got a red signal when opposing left-turners for westbound Broadway still received a green light for 4-5 seconds. Finally Commissioner Warden announced that March 91h was the set date for a dinner for former Commissioner, now Councilmember, Russ Cohen. An e-mail would follow with additional information. Traffic Engineer Chou informed the Commission that the signals at California Drive and Oak Grove Avenue worked the way they did because of the railroad preemption. On Broadway and California, he said there was only one controller that controlled both intersections. He added that the controller was trying to work both intersections at the same time, so there were some vehicle clearing issues that were involved in the timing sequence. Chair Condon commented on a landscape business at 231 Victoria Road. He said at least a half dozen pieces of equipment was spread out between Burlingame and San Mateo. He had reports of employees unloading and loading trucks around 7:30 AM. He also said that commercial vehicles were left and tagged by the police. Chair Condon was concerned that the business owner was using Victor Park as a private parking lot for his truck and trailers. Chair Condon also stated that Autohaus might appear to be getting special treatment. Mr. Chou informed the Commission that the complaint on 231 Victoria Road should be handled on a staff level. He said that Chair Condon and himself would be talking to the residents. Regarding Autohaus, Mr. Chou said that existing enforcement regulations were established regarding vehicle storage. He added coordination with Planning and Code Enforcement would be necessary since there was an overlap of responsibilities. The City of Burlingame Page 11 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday, February 9, 2006 Commissioner Warden said that the Commission should offer Council a document outlining how auto-service businesses should provide off-street parking for vehicles that they need to store. 7.5 Comments and communications No new items to report. 7.6 Next meeting: March 9, 2006 No anticipated absences from staff or Commission is expected. 8. INACTIVE ITEMS 8.1 Eucalyptus Trees at Easton and Cabrillo • Traffic Engineer Chou explained that with a backlog of traffic volume studies, the work had not yet been done. Commissioner Warden added that a new Commissioner was needed to fill the vacancy left by Russ Cohen for this subcommittee. Commissioner Bohnert volunteered for this position. • OLA-Cabrillo School Traffic Circulation 9. AGENDUM ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING - March 9, 2006 9.1 Items Requiring Staff Reports • Item 4.2.3 - Primrose/Howard Green Zones • Item 4.2.4 - Ray/Quesada Stops or Speed Control • Item 8.2. - Adeline Drive/Mercy High School - Traffic Studies 10. ADJOURNMENT 8:54 p.m. The City of Burlingame Page 12 BURL I NOAME Board of Trustees Minutes February 21, 2006 I. Call to Order President McCormack called the meeting to order at 5:30pm II. Roll Call Trustees Present: Nancy Brock, Bruce Carlton, Deborah Griffith, Katie McCormack Trustee Absent: Pat Toft Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian Sidney Poland, Recorder III. Warrants and Special Funds The Trustees approved the warrants for February 14, 2006. M/S/C (Griffith/Carlton) IV. Minutes The Trustees approved as written the minutes of the January 17, 2006 meeting. M/'S/C (Carlton/Griffith) V. Correspondence and Attachments Correspondence and Attachments were noted highlighting the following subjects. - A. Godbe Central Coast Library Survey 2005 - This survey on library usage in the central coast area of California showed that whereas the 2000 survey indicated that the public emphasized speed over accuracy, the public now puts more importance on accuracy. The increase of inaccuracies contained in information from online services probably contributed to this change. B. System Reference - This system provides a second level of reference services for the public. C Trustee Special Fund Quarterly Report- These funds are used for special needs of the Library that are not included in the City budget. Although these funds are invested along with City funds, disbursements cannot be made without the approval of the Library Trustees. It was noted that by California law, the Trustees can hold property and funds. 48o Primrose Road Burlingame• California 94010-4083 Phone (650) 558-7474 ' Fax (650) 342-6295 • www.burlingame.orq/librar� VI. From the Floor ~ No one from the public attended the meeting. VIL Reports A. City Librarian's.Report-Highlights of Report 1. City Goals Session-The first goals session held on t January 28th resulted in the Council selecting 60 of the 260 goals and activities that were submitted by Burlingame citizens to be considered for the next budget year..The next goals session will be held February 25th and will be similar in - format to the first session. March lit will be the first public budget session and the Library budget requests will be discussed. 2. One Book/One Community-'Staff participating in this partnership project of all libraries in PLS is now in the process of selecting a book written by a living California author for the entire community to read. -Jan Eustis is assisting the City Librarian on the,task force committee' 3. Adopt a Library Program-The Burlingame Library has adopted the St.Tammany Parish Library which had two branches destroyed by Katrina. Presently,we have a$1,000 donation that will be given to St.Tammany,as soon as we have been appraised by the director of its needs. There is a possibility the Library may be able-to partner with the Burlingame Rotary Club in this endeavor. 4. Personnel Issues-•T6vo of our workers who were out on worker's compensation have now returned,one to full time and one to half time status. This brings our"number of staff hours down to 50(1.25 FTE). B. Foundation Report The Foundation Board will meet on March 9th. Two Foundation events will be held in April.The book sale dates are April 21st, 22nd and 23rd. Jim-Cannon will be asking-for volunteers to staff the event.Sunday,April 2nd a book club exchange will be held from 2:00-4:00pm in the Lane Room. VIII. Unfinished Business A. Recommendation to City Council The Trustees unanimotisly passed a motion recommending to the City Council,that Library service be increased by 4 hours on Friday,night from 5:00-9:00pm and that the Library receive 14%additional funding for collection development. M/S/C(Griffith/Carlton) Library Board of Trustee Mutes- 2 February 21.,2006 ' IX. New Business A Trustee[Council Counterparts The pairings for the Trustee/Council Counterparts are as follows: Rosalie M. O'Mahony Pat Toft r Russ Cohen_ -Bruce Carlton Nancy Brock Ann Keighran Kathy Baylock Katie McCormack Terry Nagel Deborah Griffith B. Financial Support for Conference Attendance The Trustees approved the City Librarian's request to fund travel'and hotel expenses in the amount of $2,667 for two staff members to attend the PLA Conference March 21 st-25th, 2006 in Boston. , M/S/C (Griffith/McCormack) X. Announcements _ A. Bay Area Library 8a Information System, Peninsula Library System, Silicon Valley Library System - This event about creative ideas for fund "raising will be held at the San Francisco Public Library on April 1, 2006. B. Legislative Breakfast - The date for this event is March 25th from 8:30am- 1 1 :00am at the Stanford-Park Hotel, Menlo Park. City Council counterparts should be reminded of this event. Council person Terry Nagel is planning to attend. C. Baynet - This event to be held-on February 24th at the San Francisco Public Library will feature California State Librarian Susan Hildreth who will speak on the value of libraries and the California Libraries Catalog. D. March Meeting Change - The Trustees agreed to hold a - special meeting on March 1, 2006 at 5:45pm to officially change the , ' March meeting date from March 21 , 2006 to March 28, 2006. E. Employee Achievement Award Dinner - This event has been scheduled for Sunday, December 3, 2006 at the Doubletree Hotel. XI. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:30pm. The next meeting will be held March 1 , 2006 at 5:45PM in the Conference Room. Respectfully Submitted, Alfred H. Escoffier City Librarian Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3 February 21; 2006 BURL NOAMI Board of Trustees Minutes March 1, 2006 I. Call to Order Secretary Pat Toft called the meeting to order at 5:50pm II. Roll Call Trustees Present: Nancy Brock, Bruce Carlton, Deborah Griffith, Katie McCormack Pat Toft Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian Sidney Poland, Recorder III. New Business A. Change of March 21 st Meeting Date The Trustees unanimously approved the motion to change their meeting date scheduled for.March 21, 2006 to March 28, 2006. (Griffith/Carlton) IV. From the Floor No one from the public attended the meeting. V. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:00pm. 1 48o Primrose Road Burlingame•California 94010-4o83 Phone(650) 558-7474•Fax(650)342-6295•www.burlingame.org/library CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA April 10, 2006 Council Chambers L CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the April 10, 2006, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:02 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: Brownrigg and Terrones Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Maureen Brooks; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer, Doug Bell. III. MINUTES The minutes of the March 27, 2006 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 433 CHATHAM ROAD, ZONED UNCLASSIFIED — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AN EXISTING TENNIS CLUB (JEFFREY TSU, APPLICANT;PENINSULA TENNIS CLUB,PROPERTY OWNER;AND GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP, ARCHITECT)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER C.Vistica noted that he is a member of the tennis club and asked the City Attorney if he is required to recuse himself from discussion. CA Anderson advised that as a member of the club, he does not have to recuse himself, but can if he chooses to. CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Staff report notes that three pools are to be replaced and the site plan only shows two, is the third not to be replaced; • Show more detail on the landscape plan,what species are proposed; • The tennis club uses 10 parking spaces on the Burlingame High School property, there is no formal agreement between Burlingame High School and the Tennis Club about the use of this parking, this would be the time to enter into an agreement; • Provide a plan for parking and access during construction; and • Lot of grading for this project, provide a construction schedule and NPDES plan including dust abatement, would like to limit the noise and dust impacts of construction on the neighborhood. This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:12 p.m. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 2. 345 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA BI - APPLICATION FOR CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AMENDMENT,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM BUILDING(ANGELINF~ ASKHAM, BRAYTON, NUGHES AND SMITH, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; VAL VADEN, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER (RESUBMITTAL OF A PROJECT WHICH WAS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE) CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Concerned with the architecture,the way the glass box is fitted on the fourth floor is not consistent with the style throughout the building,don't think the radius proposed in either Option A or B will work in the same way as the existing glass areas on the building; • It is noted that the building uses post and beam construction,does not appear that this is being used for the addition, why is this construction type not being used; • Don't like the flat roof on the glass addition; • Applicant makes reference to the International Building Code,Burlingame uses the California Building Code (CBC), explain how the project works with the CBC; • Check with the Chief Building Official to see what seismic upgrades would be triggered by this addition; • On scheme B, a reference is made to an open trellis on one sheet, but trellis is not shown on the drawings, clarify; • This is a prominent building at the entrance to downtown Burlingame, it is important that the addition maintain the architectural integrity of the existing design; • Covering of the balconies as proposed eliminates the valuable transitions in height in the original building design; and • Option B would lower the ceiling and somewhat diminishes the bulk, but it would still re-weight the building upwards and diminish the cascading beauty of the original design. Commissioners discussed the in lieu parking fee,asking if this is an appropriate use of the in-lieu parking fee to help make a project like this work;however,the staff report notes this fee is based on the cost per space of adding a deck to Lot J,which is the least expensive and most feasible option,why was this cost basis chosen. CP Monroe noted that when the downtown parking study was done,Lot J was identified as the most logical space to put a structure because of its central location and the lot's size and shape,it was the assumption in this study that this lot is the first lot where the City would spend the money. Commissioners noted that the Consumer Price Index is used to determine increases in the costs for construction, seems like this provides for a low estimate, should look at a change in policy to index the fee to Construction costs using the Engineering index. CP noted presently use the Engineering index;Commissioners noted think construction costs have increased more than this in the past five years, should check. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:28 p.m. 3. 1427 CHAPIN AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA B — PROPOSED TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ADDITION(FRED BERTETTA,OLYMPIAN JV,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; FARRO ESSALAT, ARCHITECT) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS a. application for mitigated negative declaration and commercial design review to construct a two-story office addition to an existing two-story building; and 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 b. application for tentative and final parcel map for lot combination of portions of Lots D & E, Block 10, Burlingame Park No. 2 Subdivision, 1427 Chapin Avenue, PM 06-04 SP Brooks presented a summary of the staff report,reviewed the actions required and outlined the process thus far, noting that as a part of the environmental review process, the existing structure to remain, the George Farrell house,was evaluated for its historic significance and was determined to be eligible for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources;she outlined the planning review process used to this point with a design review subcommittee and summarized the changes made to the project based on the historic analysis and the subcommittee and Commission's design review comments. Commissioners noted that the project looks great, like seeing the rendering for a perspective view, compliment the architect and the property owner for designing such a beautiful building,the courtyard and the contrast of the addition help the Farrell House to stand out; this will be a beautiful addition to Burlingame,would like to compliment and thank all who spent the time participating in the process so far. Commissioners asked about the future potential driveway access along the west side of the building,will one or two parking spaces be lost if a driveway is installed there in the future. CP Monroe noted that the parking lot at the rear of the site would be reconfigured so the trash enclosure would be located near the new driveway, but the remaining parking could be shifted and only one space would be lost. Commissioners asked: • Would like to see a formal landscape plan to include more detail on the landscape plan, including detailed information on plant materials and species to be used. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:40 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. 4B. 2501 HALE DRIVE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND VARIANCES FOR SECOND FLOOR SIDE SETBACK,LOT COVERAGE AND FLOOR AREA FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(PAUL R. SCHAUER JR. AND GAIL D. SCHAUER, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND ROBERT ALLEN WILLIAMS,ARCHITECT)(66 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN 4D. 1541 BURLINGAME AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(KAREN AND JAKE ODDEN,PROPERTY OWNERS;AND MCCOPPIN STUDIOS,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER) (55 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER 4E. 1801 RAY DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (BO AND KAREN PARKER, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER (52 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMElER 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 4F. 2385 TROUSDALE DRIVE,ZONED R-1—DETERMINATION OF GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY FOR PURCHASE BY THE CITY OF BURLINGAME OF A 1500 SF PORTION OF THE FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROPERTY TO EXPAND THE EXISTING PUMP STATION AT 250 --� TROUSDALE DRIVE(CITY OF BURLINGAME PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,APPLICANT AND BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, PROPERTY OWNER) (80 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS 4G. 347-A PRIMROSE ROAD,ZONED C-1,SUBAREA B—APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR REAL ESTATE USE(THOMAS NEEL, APPLICANT; AND NICK NELIS COMPANY INC., PROPERTY OWNER) (34 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar there were no requests. Chair noted that staff would like to discuss item 4c, 2209 Hillside Drive and a Commissioner asked to review item 4a,2115 Roosevelt Avenue. C.Deal noted that he would have to recuse himself on 2115 Roosevelt Avenue and 1801 Ray Drive because of business relationships with the owners. C. Osterling noted that he would recuse himself on 2209 Hillside Drive because he lives within 500 feet of the property. The projects at 2115 Roosevelt Avenue and 2209 Hillside were set for the action calendar. Commissioner expressed a concern about the fact that on the Roosevelt project the garage was not relocated 2 feet from property line,he had recently heard about serious problems from three different property owners caused by their not being enough space between their garage and their neighbors property line.Feel that the Commission needs to be consistent in this side setback requirement, would like to see two feet here for maintenance since this is a new garage. Commissioner expressed concerns about the impact on the useable,---, area in the rear yard and the existing circumstances in the rear yard, less than one foot would require property line survey which is an added expense, located at one foot or less does give the neighbor a wall to use. C. Osterling moved approval of the consent calendar, items 4b, 2501 Hale Drive, 4d 1541 Burlingame Avenue,4 e 1801 Ray Drive,4f 2385 Trousdale Drive,and 4g 347-A Primrose Road,based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion on 4e 1801 Ray Drive passed on a 4-0-1-2 voice vote (C. Deal abstained, Cers. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). The voice vote on items 4b, 2501 Hale Drive; 4d, 1541 Burlingame Avenue; 4e 1801 Ray Drive; 4f, 2385 Trousdale Drive; and 4g, 347-A Primrose Road. The motion passed 5-0-2 (C. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 4A. 2115 ROOSEVELT AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE AND GARAGE LENGTH FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE. (JD & ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;AND MIKE&MERRISA HUTCHISON, PROPERTY OWNERS)(52 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER C. Deal recused himself because he has a business relationship with the property owner, and remained outside of the Council Chambers. 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 Reference staff report April 10,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Mike Hutchinson, 2115 Roosevelt represented the project. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue spoke. Commented that he wanted to keep the garage where the original was located, on property line,but was told needed to move one foot, concern that moving it more would affect the retaining wall,because of the condition of the current garage,need a new garage. Commissioner noted could build on property line but would need a side property line survey,how do you feel? Applicant noted that now there is no fence, the neighbor uses the side of his garage,neighbor would like the garage on the property line. Commissioner asked staff if a property line fence is required. Staff responded no. Problem with garages without enough setback is that they impinge on the neighbor's property,and the neighbor may not let the new owner on the property to fix;this is a nice remodel and applicant has good relations with his neighbor, can put on property line because good relations will probably continue. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: issue is consistency vs.maintenance;if not for the three problems saw first hand by chance, would not think this is a problem, look at the garage behind Walgreen's on Broadway not maintained,looks awful,nothing Walgreens can do; applicant is willing to build on property line;staff noted that a property line survey would be required. C.Vistica moved for approval of this application by resolution with the revised condition that after a survey the garage should be moved to the side property line and the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 17,2006,sheets 1- 6 and L-1, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; except that there shall be a survey of the side and rear property lines and that, based on the survey, the side and rear walls of the new detached garage shall be located at the side and rear property lines;2)that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 4) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 5)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;6)that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7)that the conditions of the Chief Building Official, Fire Marshal, City Engineer,NPDES Coordinator, and Recycling Specialist's December 16,2005,memo, shall be met; 8)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 9) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of a structure,interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit;and 10)that the 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: can go along with the location of the garage on property line, see the need for consistency,but don't want to saddle the property owner with having to do a survey;a lot of times a survey is needed as a part of the application. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the amended condition to relocate the garage to the side and rear property lines. The motion passed on 4-0-1-2(C.Deal abstain; Cers.Brownrigg and Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m. C. Deal returned to his seat on the dais. 4C. 2209 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT AND DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; MILLER DEVELOPMENT,PROPERTY OWNER)(63 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER C. Osterling announced that he would recuse himself from this item because he lives within 500 feet of the property. CA Anderson noted that he would recuse himself from this action because he could be involved in a possible code enforcement regarding this property. C. Osterling and the City Attorney left ..� the council chambers. Reference staff report April 10,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair noted that is has come to the city's attention that the existing structure on the site was demolished without a demolition permit,an option is to continue this item to a date certain so the city can determine what happened. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Randy Grange, architect, was present and Cliff Raines,Redwood City, construction manager for 2209 Hillside Drive represented the project. Staff commented that it was requested that this item be removed so that the city could unravel the events which resulted in the house on this property being removed recently without a demolition permit,and determine if or how this might affect the proposed project. The architect noted he just found out about the demolition this afternoon. Construction manager noted that he came to the city department where he gets encroachment permits, misunderstood,thought had all the paper work,unaware that the city has a new process;will provide all the appropriate documents. Commissioner noted that this appears to be a Public Works demolition permit,not a Building Division permit.Applicant notes that he misread the permit.Commissioners noted should continue the action to straighten out what happened and the effects. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Cauchi moved to continue the item to the next agenda providing we have documentation which can be evaluated. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item to the next agenda when the documentation has been reviewed. The motion passed on a 4-0-1-2 (C. Osterling abstaining, Cers. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). This action is not appealable. This item concluded at 8:05 p.m. C. Osterling and CA Anderson returned to the chambers and took their seats. 5. 1351 HOWARD AVENUE,ZONED C-1, SUBAREA B—APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION(COMERICA BANK, APPLICANT; STANLEY LO, PROPERTY OWNER; AND POLLACK ARCHITECTURE, ARCHITECT) (27 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Reference staff report April 10,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioner asked if the 1,500 SF area was to be leased separately and would a parking variance be required. Staff noted that the applicant has no tenant for this space at this time and when calculating the parking demand for the site with the bank, staff assumed a food establishment in this space because it has the highest required parking ratio; the combination of uses did not require more parking than was granted by variance for the current restaurant use. There were no other questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak,Park Road,represented the project;he noted that the architect for Comerica bank was also present. Comerica is only a tenant at this site, they plan on doing interior remodel but have limited opportunity to change the exterior; don't know how the 1, 500 SF will be used,but noted that the staff s assumptions are the worst case when it comes to parking,so whatever the use it will not increase the parking burden. Commission asked if the applicant would like to adjust the hours of operation? Applicant responded that the request covers the typical hours for this type of bank,do not want �— to over state. Commission asked if applicant knows what happened to the restaurant,it has been there a long time. Don't know. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Deal made a motion to approve this project by resolution with the following condition from the staff report: 1)that the financial institution shall be limited to 3,138 SF at 1351 Howard Avenue,as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped February 23, 2006, site plan, floor plan and building elevations; 2)that should the remodel of this structure exceed 50%of the value of the structure it shall be considered new construction and shall be subject to Commercial Design Review; 3) that the financial institution may not be open for business except during the hours of 8:00 a.m.to 5:30 p.m.Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Friday, closed on Saturday and Sunday;4)that the maximum number of employees shall be limited to five full-time employees; 5) that any changes in operation, floor area,use,or number of employees,which exceeds the maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this use permit; 6)that the conditions of the Chief Building Official, City Engineer,Fire Marshal, and NPDES Coordinator's February 24, 2006, memos shall be met; 7) that the use and any improvements for the use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 8)that this conditional use permit shall be reviewed upon complaint. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on 5-0-2(C. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:15 p.m. 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 6. 1199 BROADWAY#1,ZONED C-1,BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA-APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR NEW FOOD ESTABLISHMENT. (DANA KERN, APPLICANT; AND GARBIS BEZDJIAN, PROPERTY OWNER) (60 NOTICED PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN C. Deal recused himself because he lives within 500 feet of this property. He stepped down from the dais and left the Council Chambers. Reference staff report April 10,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fourteen conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioner asked if the parking variance for this tenant space was conditioned to expire if the use changed in the future. CP Monroe said yes, Condition No. 3. Commission noted that one of the findings for the parking variance is that the City Council adopted Ordinance 1758 expanding the number of food establishments on Broadway by 5,they were aware that food establishments have a higher parking ratio than other retail uses and that many of the buildings on Broadway have little on-site parking or none so felt that the available parking would accommodate these additional food establishments. There were no further comments from the Planning Commission. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Joe Kern and Dana Kern, Chocolate Mousse Bakery and Bagels, represented the project.Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, spoke. Commissioners thanked the applicant for redoing the plans,they are much clearer. What are the racks with numbers on them for? Those are wire racks and are for dry storage.Will there be an exhaust hood or fan? All the baking and cooking is done off site in San Carlos,have just added a bread baker there so a wider variety of goods will be available here. Will there be only one delivery a day? Deliveries will be made as needed. This building has been empty a long time; pleasure to see new business,good for the neighborhood. There were no further comments from the floor.-1 The public hearing was closed. C.Vistica noted that the Broadway neighborhood has wanted a bakery for a long time and this business will be a good addition, so moved approval of the application,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped March 28,2006,sheets A-1 and A-2;2)that all exterior venting and mechanical equipment required for this business shall be combined on the roof and not visible from the street;3)that the parking variance shall only apply to this 1,104 SF tenant space and the food establishment use with 200 SF of on-site seating and shall become void if the tenant space or food establishment use is ever expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe or natural disaster or for replacement;4)that this business location to be occupied by a limited food service food establishment, with 200 SF of seating area, may change its food establishment classification only to a full service food establishment or bar upon approval of a conditional use permit amendment for the establishment, and the criteria for the new classification shall be met in order for a change to be approved; 5) that the 200 SF area of on-site seating of the limited food service food establishment shall be enlarged or extended to any other areas within the tenant space only by an amendment to this conditional use permit;6)that the limited food service food establishment may be open seven days a week,from 5:00 a.m.to 9:00 p.m.,with a maximum of two full-time and four part-time employees on site at any one time,including the business owner and manager;7)that this food establishment shall provide trash receptacle(s) as approved by the city consistent with the streetscape improvements and maintain all trash receptacle(s)at the entrances to the building and at any additional locations as approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department; 8)that the business shall provide litter control along all frontages of the business and within fifty(50) feet of all frontages of the business; 9) that an amendment to this conditional use permit -. shall be required for delivery of prepared food from this premise; 10) that there shall be no food sales allowed at this location from a window or from any opening within 10' of the property line; I I)that if this 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 site is changed from any food establishment use to any retail or other use, a food establishment shall not be replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become void; 12) that seating on the sidewalk outside shall conform to the requirements of any encroachment permit issued by the city; 13) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 30 and January 24, 2006, memos, the City Engineer's April 3 and January 27, 2006, memos, the Recycling Specialist's January 30, 2006, memo, and NPDES Coordinator's April 3 and January 30,2006,memos shall be met; and 14)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame,and that failure to comply with these conditions or any change to the business or use on the site which would affect any of these conditions shall require an amendment to this use permit. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the condition that should this use change from food establishment in the future,the parking variance would be voided. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (C. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:30 p.m. C. Deal returned to the chambers and took his seat on the dais. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 7. 1535 LOS MONTES DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT AND ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (GEOMEN AND ELIZABETH Liu TRUST, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;AND JERRY DEAL,JD&ASSOCIATES,DESIGNER) (48 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN .� C. Deal noted that he has a business relationship with the applicant and recused himself, he then left the chambers. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. All commissioners present had visited the site, and two commissioners noted that they had viewed the story poles from inside the neighbor's house to the right of the project. Chair Auran opened the public comment. Joe,Elizabeth and Eric Liu, 1535 Los Montes Drive,applicants, were available to answer questions. Barbara Wullschleger, 1537 Los Montes Drive;and Chuck Mink, 1541 Los Montes Drive, spoke regarding the project. Live next door to the right of the project,main concern is request for increased height of 5'4",have five windows on that side of my house facing the addition, story poles indicate that four of the five windows will be blocked by the addition;also concerned about chimneys, they are higher than the roof ridge, happy to have a nice house next door but would like to see the height addressed;submitted pictures taken from windows;this project should be sent to a design review consultant, this is a five bedroom house on a narrow street with a lot of traffic,will be a problem with five bedrooms and a two car garage need to have enough on-site parking;the amount of water running through the hillside this year is not unusual, will affect the construction requirements of the house. Commissioners made the following comments regarding the design: • Concerned with architectural style, this doesn't fit in on this block, the design is bulky and has course texture compared with neighboring houses; design is inconsistent with neighborhood, balustrades are very bold, foreign looking with rest of architecture on the block, heavy, stark elements don't blend in; 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 • This is a typical two-story house which may not be appropriate in this case,should be shaped according to neighbor views and the slope of the lot; • Roof as proposed has a 5/12 pitch, should be reduced to 4/12; • A prairie style house with a flat roof may be appropriate on this site, should consider. • Second floor balconies on right elevation appear too heavy to cantilever over the porch which is less substantial and lightly framed, elements that appear to have that much weight are not typically cantilevered; • To lighten look, heavy stucco brackets should be changed to painted wood; • For a project this size,the drawings are minimal,need to see site sections to show how the house fits on the site, including a longitudinal section to show how it fits into the hillside, also an elevation to scale showing how it fits in with two houses on either side; • Important to have civil engineering information on the site because there will have to be retaining walls, don't want to have problems with adjoining properties regarding retaining and drainage; • Perspective drawing makes it look like it is set back further on the lot than it will be,also the landscaping shown on the rendering does not match what is shown on the landscape plan, should be consistent; • Landscape plan should be revisited,a row of Cypress trees is shown along the side,will be a solid green wall next to neighbor, and will block light and will be messy,Redwood tree proposed in rear is three to four feet from the patio and fireplace, will create a lift problem for the patio because the tree is fast growing; • Three chimneys proposed,air quality standards prefer to see gas fireplaces,could put in one chimney for a wood burning fireplace and direct vent the others. • This is in a hillside area and think there is an issue with blockage of distant views, this needs to be addressed, view ordinance does not only address bay views,but to distant views of hills as well; There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Osterling made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-1-2 (C. Deal recused and C. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:45 p.m. C. Deal returned to the dais. 8. 1505 BALBOA AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE (MICHAEL AND AMY GONG,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;AND JOHN STEWART,AIA,ARCHITECT) (53 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public comment. John Stewart, 1351 Laurel, San Carlos, project architect, and Michael Gong, 1325 Howard Avenue,#221,property owner,were available for questions. James Cacciato, 1600 Adeline Drive; Christine Habelt, 1509 Balboa Avenue; and Pat Giomi, 1445 Balboa Avenue; spoke regarding the project.- Have a corner lot,all of my living space borders this property,although it appears tha*-- it meets all the zoning requirements,it is massive;has there been an asbestos inspection? Will there be dus. control during demolition? What is the duration of the project? Have seen projects take from eight to 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 eighteen months;will the house be owner occupied? Will the parking requirement for a five bedroom house be met, especially during construction, this is one block off El Camino Real, there will be no room for construction vehicles on the street;will there be grading when the house is removed,how much? What will the base elevation of the house be,the property line fence is called out as six feet,would like to see six foot fence with one foot of lattice;would like to see additional landscaping along side and consideration of my windows for placement of window openings; there is an existing sewer problem in the area, the current system is old and beyond capacity,understand there will be infrastructure improvements in the future,but don't know when,the volume generated by a house with four bathrooms should be considered in capacity; should look at the impervious surface areas and impacts on drainage,there are no storm drain inlets in this area; the size and character of the house is much bigger than the existing house, there are no homes of this size in this area, it will be imposing; the survey does not accurately depict the house and garage on the adjoining property. Public comment continued: very concerned with plans,size and scale ofproject is out ofproportion with the block,most houses are single story or split level,how will the property be graded, especially the right side elevation; this property is three to six feet higher then neighboring property, will be tall; concerned with drainage, will have runoff from the driveway and garage, have sewer problems already; concerned with privacy, the master bedroom windows will look into our master bedroom; concerned with parking, this house will be 200 feet away from apartments on El Camino Real and the Adeline Market,there is already parking problem on our street; hope the driveway will accommodate the additional cars on site;this is not about property values it is about quality of life; this is another case of a house being built to the maximum allowed; will only be four foot side setback, the front will be flat faced, this will make it look bigger, unfortunate that there will not be a front porch, chimneys are massive, looks like Taco Bell, too big, not consistent design with any other structure on the block;is survey accurate?Should take plate height down a foot to reduce mass. The applicant noted that the issues with drainage and sewer will be addressed as part of `- the building permit. Commissioners made the following comments regarding the design: • There is one area on the front elevation above the front window on second floor that looks barren,could put some Spanish detail there to enhance it; • Plans are lacking dimension in the details,there is no sizing shown of the rafter tails,does the front door open to the left or right; • Not happy with the flat roof,the overall height is below 30',propose a 10'plate height on the first floor, should be reduced to 9'which will give the opportunity to eliminate the flat portion of the roof; • Not much articulation on the right side elevation,would like to see more articulation and more windows to give it character; • The chimney is six feet high and the top cap is 3'by 3', appears very massive, should reduce size; • Right side elevation reads like a two story wall the full length of the house,with 10'plate height and the mass close to property line it will have impact on neighbor, needs to be addressed; o inconsistency with neighborhood, o two story wall on right side and front adjacent to houses that are no where near that tall; o has big impact on neighbors, look at the location of windows and patterns next to adjoining houses; • Consider adding vines and shrubs along sides to break up the mass; • Concerned with piece on left side of front elevation, doesn't read well with the rest of the house looks like added on a one story element, is house Spanish style or not; .� • Like the single-story battered section on the left side front, adds character to the front; 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 • There is an 8'difference in elevation between the front and back of the lot,this slope does not seem to be reflected in the elevations, they are drawn as if the lot is flat; • Exposed rafter tails look like 3x material, but not labeled, need to clarify, should be at least 3x. • Consider putting in an automatic gate across the driveway so that two cars can park in driveway,make sure it is far enough back so a car can also park in front of the gate and not encroach on sidewalk; • Elevations need refinement to show the true location of slope of the property; • Needs some work to reduce mass and bulk, needs to be better articulated; and • Vary the roof lines at the second floor so that there is not a straight line that runs around the perimeter. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Cauchi made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (C. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:40 p.m. 9. 1625 LASSEN WAY,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, AND SECOND FLOOR SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (JERRY DEAL, JD & ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND TOM BRUNO, PROPERTY OWNER) (71 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN C. Deal noted that he has a business relationship with the applicant and recused himself, he then left thf chambers. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public comment. Tom and Jennifer Bruno, 1625 Lassen Way, were available to respond to questions. Commissioners noted that the house is designed well,it is difficult to put additions on this style of house, in this case the mass and bulk is in the right place, the plate heights are the right height and the design is stylistically consistent. Commissioners made the following comments regarding the design: • Concerned with landscaping, there is a particular style of landscaping in area, low level, trim lawns, which will be inadequate with the added height of the addition,need to mitigate the mass of the second story, need to add something that gives height, there is room to add planting with larger scale shrubs, • Should also add tall trees,refer to the approved tree list available at the Planning Department,Bay Laurel or English Laurel would work, should also keep in mind that the landscaping needs to tie in to the planting patterns on the properties on either side; • Can put in a larger tree near the driveway to break up the mass; and • Problem with the curve windows in the garage doors, inconsistent with the rest of the house, could change to rectangular style more typical of the house design. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C.Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the above-noted revisions -� have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica. 12 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (C. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m. 10. 608 CONCORD WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (JESSE GEURSE, GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND CHRIS AND KERRIE RONAN, PROPERTY OWNER) (65 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER C. Cauchi recused himself from the discussion on this item because he lives within 500 feet of the project and left the chambers. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public comment. Jesse Geurse,405 Bayswater,project applicant was available to answer questions. Commissioners noted that this is a difficult type of house to add on to and the applicant had done a nice job. Commissioners requested the following revisions: • There is a long flat wall on the left side,would like to see more detail or articulation on that wall; • Declining height envelope is not drawn correctly,don't think it will make a difference,project will meet requirement, but should be drawn accurately; and • Take a look at the landscaping,there are opportunities to add taller shrubs,come back with a landscape plan. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C.Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the above noted revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (C. Brownrigg and Terrones absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:50 p.m. C.Cauchi returned to his seat on the dais. X. PLANNER REPORTS - Review of City Council regular meeting of April 3, 2006. CP Monroe reviewed the City Council meeting of April 3, 2006. She noted that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the Anza Point North zoning on April 17. CA discussed briefly the article on the Turlock Wal-Mart decision. Noted too in the absence of the vice-chair the in coming secretary should sign the resolutions for the projects on tonight's agenda on which the secretary had to recuse himself. - FYI— 1512-1516 Floribunda Avenue—changes to approved residential condominium project. Commissioners looked at the proposal to add windows on the corner of the building where the applicant had proposed removing the windows. Suggested that the new windows would work, but felt that the 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 10, 2006 window closest to the street under the balcony should be called out with a tile surround and sill like the windows above. This window can be seen from the sidewalk. - FYI— 1818 Trousdale Drive—progress of redesign of Sunrise Assisted Living Facility C. Osterling noted that the applicant had had a brief conversation with him about this revision. Noted that the building has been moved closer to Ogden and Trousdale, also like the cut in for loading and unloading on Ogden.Concerned about how many people visit this site using the front door,the proposed entry location is where there will be a lot of traffic. Note that there is a card reader with intercom on the driveway,people can gain entry to the below grade garage and drop off and pick up residents,reduces the impact on the street entry. Don't see a clear way to get from the first floor into the open space provided on the site.This should be clarified. Entry design should be extended more toward the second floor so that it"thinks entry",as it is it does not look resolved;why did you choose to put the entry across the corner, makes the formal auto drop off appear to be a gesture. Staff noted that the City Traffic engineer has not reviewed this proposal and its impact on the corner of Trousdale and Ogden;and staff has not plan checked the parking or setbacks. Xl. ADJOURNMENT Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jerry Deal, Secretary --� S:\MINUTES\unapproved.04.10.06.doc 14 r � 03-17-06 SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES PAGE: 1 FOR: FEBRUARY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD Crime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change $ Change Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 Manslaughter by Negligence 0 0 0 0 0 Rape By Force 1 0 2 0 2 Attempt to Commit Forcible Rape 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery Firearm 1 1 1 1 0 0.00 Robbery Knife 1 0 1 0 1 Robbery Other Dangerous Weapon 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Robbery Strong-Arm 2 2 2 3 -1 -33.33 Assault - Firearm 0 0 0 0 0 Assault - Knife 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Assault - Other Dangerous Weapon 1 1 3 1 2 200.00 Assault - Hands,Fists,Feet 0 1 2 1 1 100.00 Assault - other (Simple) 10 23 34 35 -1 -2.86 Burglary - Forcible Entry 7 4 12 17 -5 -29.41 Burglary - Unlawful Entry 4 7 18 13 5 38.46 Burglary - Attempted Forcible Entry 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Purse-Snatching 0 0 1 0 1 Larceny Shoplifting 3 0 8 2 6 300.00 Larceny From Motor Vehicle 29 18 51 40 11 27.50 Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories 10 6 22 25 -3 -12.00 Larceny Bicycles 1 1 1 3 -2 -66.67 Larceny From Building 10 2 13 2 11 550.00 Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine 3 3 4 8 -4 -50.00 Larceny All Other 4 19 15 43 -28 -65.12 Motor Vehicle Theft Auto 7 9 14 18 -4 -22.22 Motor Vehicle Theft Bus 0 0 1 0 1 Motor Vehicle Theft Other 0 0 2 0 2 94 97 207 214 94 97 207 214 03-17-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 1 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD Crime Classification................. ... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change All Other Offenses 41 47 73 85 -12 -14.12 Animal Abuse 0 0 0 0 0 Animal Nuisance 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Arson 4 0 4 0 4 Assists to Outside Agencies 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Bigamy 0 0 0 0 0 Bomb Offense 0 0 0 0 0 Bomb Threat 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Bribery 0 0 0 0 0 Check Offenses 1 0 2 1 1 100.00 Child Neglect/prot custody 5 2 12 6 6 100.00 Computer Crime 0 0 0 0 0 Conspiracy 0 0 0 0 0 Credit Card Offenses 0 0 1 0 1 Cruelty to Dependent Adult 0 2 0 2 -2 -100.00 Curfew and Loitering Laws 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 Death Investigation 1 4 5 11 -6 -54.55 Disorderly Conduct 3 2 5 6 -1 -16.67 Driver's License Violations 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 Driving Under the Influence 6 6 13 16 -3 -18.75 Drug Abuse Violations 5 2 7 4 3 75.00 Drug/Sex Registrants/Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Drunkeness 3 5 7 8 -1 -12.50 Embezzlement 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 Escape 0 0 0 0 0 Extortion 0 0 0 0 0 False Police Reports 0 0 0 0 0 False Reports of Emergency 0 0 2 0 2 Fish and Game Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Forgery and Counterfeiting 6 6 8 10 -2 -20.00 Found Property - 6 9 9 16 -7 -43.75 Fraud 5 4 5 11 -6 -54.55 Gambling 0 0 0 0 0 Harrassing Phone Calls 1 1 5 5 0 0.00 03-17-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 2 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD Crime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change I Hit and Run Accidents 3 3 6 5 1 20.00 Impersonation 0 2 0 2 -2 7100.00 Incest 0 0 0 0 0 Indecent Exposure 0 0 1 0 1 Intimidating a Witness 0 0 0 0 0 Kidnapping 0 0 0 0 0 Lewd Conduct 0 0 0 0 0 Liquor Laws 0 0 0 0 0 Littering/Dumping 0 0 0 0 0 Marijuana Violations 1 0 4 0 4 Mental Health Cases 7 8 16 16 0 0.00 Missing Person 3 4 9 9 0 0.00 Missing Property 9 6 16 7 9 128.57 Municipal Code Violations 15 6 22 6 16 266.67 Narcotics Sales/Manufacture 0 0 0 0 0 Offenses Against Children 1 0 3 0 3 Other Assaults 10 23 34 35 -1 -2.86 Other Juvenile Offenses 0 0 0 0 0 Other Police Service 8 6 12 9 3 33.33 Pandering for immoral purposes 0 0 0 0 0 Parole Violations 0 0 1 0 1 Perjury 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of Burglary Tools 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Possession of drug paraphernalia 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of obscene literature;picture 0 0 0 0 0 Probation Violations 0 0 2 1 1 100.00 Prostitution and Commercial Vice 0 0 2 0 2 Prowling 1 0 2 0 2 Resisting Arrest 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 Restraining Orders 0 3 0 7 -7 -100.00 Runaways (Under 18) 0 0 0 0 0 Sex Offenses 0 0 2 1 1 100.00 Sex Offenses against Children 1 0 1 0 1 Sodomy 0 0 0 0 0 Stalking 0 0 0 0 0 03-17-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 3 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD Crime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change Statutory Rape 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 Stolen Property;Buying;Receiving;Possess 1 0 2 2 0 0.00 Suspended License 3 1 7 2 5 250.00 Tax Evasion 0 0 0 0 0 Terrorist Threats 0 0 2 1 1 100.00 Towed Vehicle 23 42 44 80 -36 -45.00 Trespassing 2 3 4 6 -2 -33.33 Truants/Incorrigible Juvs 0 0 0 0 0 US Mail Crimes 0 0 0 0 0 Vagrancy 0 0 0 0 0 Vandalism 13 17 30 33 -3 -9.09 Vehicle Code Violations 0 5 0 10 -10 -100.00 Violation of Court Order 0 2 2 3 -1 -33.33 Warrants - Felony 0 1 2 1 1 100.00 Warrants - Misd 5 5 11 9 2 22.22 Weapons;Carrying,Possessing 1 1. 1 1 0 0.00 Welfare Fraud 0 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ ------- ------- 194 232 398 437 ------- ------ ------- 194 232 398 437 03-17-06 SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES PAGE: 1 FOR: FEBRUARY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD Crime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 Manslaughter by Negligence 0 0 0 0 0 Rape By Force 1 0 2 0 2 Attempt to Commit Forcible Rape 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery Firearm 1 1 1 1 0 0.00 Robbery Knife 1 0 1 0 1 Robbery Other Dangerous Weapon 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Robbery Strong-Arm 2 2 2 3 -1 -33.33 Assault - Firearm 0 0 0 0 0 Assault - Knife 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Assault - Other Dangerous Weapon 1 1 3 1 2 200.00 Assault - Hands,Fists,Feet 0 1 2 1 1 ,100.00 Assault - Other (Simple) 10 23 34 35 -1 -2.86 Burglary - Forcible Entry 7 4 12 17 -5 -29.41 Burglary - Unlawful Entry 4 7 18 13 5 38.46 Burglary - Attempted Forcible Entry 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny Purse-Snatching 0 0 1 0 1 Larceny Shoplifting 3 0 8 2 6 300.00 Larceny From Motor Vehicle 29 18 51 40 11 27.50 Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories 10 6 22 25 -3 -12.00 Larceny Bicycles 1 1 1 3 -2 -66.67 Larceny From Building 10 2 13 2 11 550.00 Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine 3 3 4 8 -4 -50.00 Larceny All Other 4 19 15 43 -28 -65.12 Motor Vehicle Theft Auto 7 9 14 18 -4 -22.22 Motor Vehicle Theft Bus 0 0 1 0 1 Motor Vehicle Theft Other 0 0 2 0 2 94 97 207 214 94 97 207 214 03-17-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS PAGE : 1 CITY REPORT FOR: FEBRUARY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual Crime Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current Year. . YTD. . YTD. . Parking Citations 2394 3 , 287 4 , 489 6 , 781 Moving Citations 228 106 436 179 ------- ------ ---- - -- --- ---- 2622 3 , 393 4 , 925 6 , 960 2622 3 , 393 4 , 925 6 , 960 BURLINGAME Officer Productivity. . . . generated on 03/17/2006 at 11 : 00 : 15 AM Reported On: All Officers Report Range: 02/01/2006 to 02/28/2006 Data Type Reported on: PARKING Valid % All Voids All % Officer: ID: Cnt Valid Cnt Voids Valid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ALVISO 355 886 37.42 9 34.62 98.99 FEITELBERG 508 981 41.43 8 30.77 99.19 GARRETT 501 237 10.01 5 19.23 97.93 KIRKPATRICK 502 161 6.80 3 11.54 98.17 MORAN 201 103 4.35 1 3.85 99.04 Total 2368 26 Page 1 of 1 City of Burlingame MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY March 2006 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF F. Y. 2006 F. Y.2005 DIFF Permit Type # # % # # % WATER HEATER 8 9,777 10 0 43 38,290 47 0 0 SWIMMING POOL 3 83,800 5 103,800 4 19,000 446 SIGN 3 10,040 3 19,000 -47 22 58,637 20 64,600 -9 ROOFING 13 149,144 14 118,120 26 177 2,194,588 176 2,204,100 0 RETAINING WALL 5 169,017 2 0 0 PLUMBING 21 76,035 10 5,000 1,421 295 1,038,811 412 143,010 626 NEW SFD 13 4,660,000 9 3,461,079 35 NEW COMMERCIAL 1 15,000,000 NEW 5 UNIT APT OR CO 1 $5,000 MECHANICAL 2 18,500 2 0 31 131,865 37 112,000 18 KITCHEN UPGRADE 5 124,000 11 233,075 -47 20 506,594 3 45,000 1,026 FURNACE 3 8,650 7 20,000 -57 26 96,801 22 0 0 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 6 65,400 ELECTRICAL 12 36,915 7 0 50 183,617 138 14,000 1,212 City of Burlingame MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY March 2006 THIS MONTH THUS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF F. Y. 2006 F. Y.2005 DIFF Permit Type # # % # # % BATHROOM UPGRADE 4 70,000 8 78,400 -11 34 602,363 5 44,500 1,254 ALTERATION RESIDENTI 32 1,318,353 41 2,068,770 -36 244 10,095,445 280 7,620,640 32 ALTERATION NON RES S 2,238,811 9 162,780 1,275 56 4,367,666 61 5,567,963 -22 Totals: 111 4,060,225 125 2,708,945 46 1,029 39,397,894 1,216 19,295,892 104 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31, 2006 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. LAIF&County Pool 16,865,253.49 16,865,253.49 16,865,253.49 58.43 1 1 3.670 3.721 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 12,000,000.00 11,857,080.00 12,000,000.00 41.57 868 462 3.862 3.916 28,865,253.49 28,722,333.49 28,865,253.49 100.00% 361 192 3.750 3.802 Investments Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 88,958.56 716,286.11 Average Daily Balance 27,633,215.24 27,794,949.13 Effective Rate of Return 3.79% 3.43% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and availability of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). J S IZ}AVA, NANCE DIR.lfREASURER Reporting period 03/01/2006-03/31/2006 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:04/12/2006.09:08 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2006 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date LAIF&County Pool SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 9,398,911.24 9,398,911.24 9,398,911.24 4.142 4.142 1 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 7,466,342.25 7,466,342.25 7,466,342.25 3.190 Aaa 3.190 1 Subtotal and Average 16,988,053.95 16,865,253.49 16,865,253.49 16,865,253.49 3.721 1 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 980,940.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 Aaa 3.500 447 06/22/2007 3133XARN9 518 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/08/2005 1,000,000.00 993,130.00 1,000,000.00 3.390 Aaa 3.390 160 09/08/2006 3133XDGM7 519 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2005 1,000,000.00 992,810.00 1,000,000.00 4.450 Aaa 4.450 937 10/24/2008 3133XDNL1 520 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/17/2005 1,000,000.00 992,190.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 961 11/17/2008 3133XE2W8 521 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/28/2005 1,000,000.00 995,940.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 636 12/28/2007 3133XEUE 522 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/22/2006 2,000,000.00 1,998,120.00 2,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 265 12/22/2006 3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,944,890.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 Aaa 3.000 304 01/30/2007 3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 979,060.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 Aaa 3.100 391 04/27/2007 3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 980,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.820 Aaa 3.547 565 10/18/2007 Subtotal and Average 10,645,161.29 12,000,000.00 11,857,080.00 12,000,000.00 3.916 462 Total and Average 27,633,215.24 28,865,253.49 28,722,333.49 28,865,253.49 3.802 192 Portfolio CITY Run Dale:04/12/2006•09:08 CP r PM(PRF PM2)SyrnRept 6.41.202a ,,urt Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 3 YY YP Activit B Type March 1, 2006 through March 31, 2006 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 4.142 1,800,000.00 800,000.00 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 3.190 428,717.72 1,800,000.00 Subtotal 17,236,535.77 2,228,717.72 2,600,000.00 16,865,253.49 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133XEUE 522 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.000 03/22/2006 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 10,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 12,000,000.00 Total 27,236,535.77 4,228,717.72 2,600,000.00 28,865,253.49 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:04/12/2006-09:08 PM(PRF_PM3)SyrnRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 4 Activity Summary March 2005 through March 2006 Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity March 2005 8 27,632,224.41 2.824 2.863 2.819 1 0 305 199 April 2005 8 28,872,808.56 2.864 2.903 2.880 0 0 292 181 May 2005 8 31,478,082.19 2.976 3.018 3.043 0 0 268 158 June 2005 8 31,826,904.29 3.006 3.048 3.085 0 0 265 147 July 2005 8 30,880,702.93 3.045 3.087 3.141 0 0 273 143 August 2005 8 29,380,702.93 3.048 3.091 3.151 0 0 287 141 September 2005 8 25.480,702.93 3.125 3.168 3.285 0 0 330 151 October 2005 9 26,721,256.73 3.268 3.313 3.406 1 0 356 175 November 2005 9 26,614,225.47 3.484 3.532 3.521 1 1 344 206 December 2005 10 27,741,871.03 3.594 3.644 3.613 1 0 356 214 January 2006 10 29,203,493.47 3.692 3.743 3.767 0 0 338 192 February 2006 10 27,236,535.77 3.734 3.786 3.836 0 0 363 196 March 2006 11 28,865,253.49 3.750 3.802 3.721 1 0 361 192 Average 9 28,610,366.48 3.262% 3.308% 3.328 0 0 318 177 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:04/12/2006.09:08 PM(PRF_PM4)SyrnRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 5 Distribution of Investments By Type March 2005 through March 2006 March April May June July August September October November December January February March Average Security Type 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 by Period LAIF&County Pool 67.4 68.8 71.4 71.7 70.9 69.4 64.7 62.6 66.2 64.0 65.8 63.3 58.4 66.5% Certificates of Deposit-Bank _ __ ......................... .. .......... ..................................................................... . _ Certificates of Deposit-S&L Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln ......... Negotiable CD's-Bank ........ I ......,... ... . ....... ............._. CORP NOTES Bankers Acceptances Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing ......... _ Commercial Paper-Discount Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 32.6 31.2 28.6 28.3 29.1 30.6 35.3 37.4 33.8 36.1 34.2 36.7 41.6 33.5% Federal Agency Issues-Discount Treasury Securities-Coupon Treasury Securities-Discount Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon ........... ......... .. . ...... ... ......... Miscellaneous Securities-Discount Non Interest Bearing Investments ...... . ............ ... . ..... ........... .. ........ Mortgage Backed Securities Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2 Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:04/12/2006-09:08 PM(PRF_PM5)SymRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 6 Interest Earnings Summary March 31, 2006 March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest Collected 16,950.00 194,900.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 111,032.77 111,032.77 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 94,432.77) ( 66,482.49) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 33,550.00 239,450.28 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 33,550.00 239,450.28 Pass Through Securities: Interest Collected 0.00 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0,00 Cash/Checking Accounts: Interest Collected 0.00 473,440.30 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 428,038.77 428,038.77 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 372,630.21) ( 424,643.24) Interest Earned during Period 55,408.56 476,835.83 Total Interest Earned during Period 88,958.56 716,286.11 Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Total Earnings during Period 88,958.56 716,286.11 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:04/12/2006-09:08 PM(PRF_PM6)SyrnRept 6.41.202a 1 Report Ver.5.00 PFM Asset PROGRAM Investment Portfolio Information For CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00) Portfolio# 12510150 Section/Report Title A. Account Summary B. Detail of Securities Held C. Fair Market Values&Analytics D. Security Transactions&Interest E. Cash Transactions Report F. Realized Gains&Losses G. Cash Balance Report For The Month Ending March 31, 2006 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME CA PFM Asset Management LLC*One Keystone Plaza*North Front&Market Streets,Suite 300*Harrisburg,PA 17101-2044*(717)232-2723 For more information,please contact your client manager: NSESA KAZADI (415)982-5544 KAZADIN@pftn.com PFM Asset Management LL C- ♦ PROGRAM Account Summary: 12510150 CAMP-CITYOF BURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED March 31 2006 MARKET%OF YTM AT YTM AT DURATION SECURITY TYPE PAR VALUE AMORTIZED COT MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO COST MARKET TO WORST FED AGY BOND/NOTE 3,800,000.00 3,792,751.27 3,780,937.50 37.060 3.987 4.944 0.301 FED AGY DN 6,560,000.00 6,436,991.28 6,421,238.08 62.940 4.304 4.935 0.414 TOTAL SECURITIES 10,360,000.00 10,229,742.55 10,202,175.58 100.000 4.187% 4.938% 0.372 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 10,360,000.00 10,229,742.55 10,202,175.58 100.000% ACCRUED INTEREST 28,668.05 28,668.05 TOTAL PORTFOLIO $10,360,000.00 $10,258,410.60 $10,230,843.63 Disclosure Statement: PFM's monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes(i.e.settles)all investment transactions.The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.Only the client has the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian and to direct the movement of securities.Clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies,implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.PFM recognizes that our clients may use these reports to facilitater rd keeping,therefore the custodian bank statement and the PFM statement should bonciled and differences resolved.PFM's market prices are derived from closing bid pricf-of the last business day of the th as supplied by F.T.Interactive Data,Bloomberg or Telerate.Prices that fall betwez- .a points are interpolated, Non-negotiable FDIC insured bank certificates of deposit are A at par. A-1 I PROGRAM I / I Detail of Securities Held: 12510150 CAMXCITYOFBURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: March 31,2006 SECURITY TYPE MATURITY S&P TRADE SETTLE ORIGINAL YTM ACCRUED AMORTIZED MARKET CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE RATING DATE DATE COST AT COST INTEREST COST VALUE FED AGY BOND/NOTE 31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5.250 06/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,011,340.00 3.958 15,458.33 1,002,603.55 1,000,312,50 31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 991,682.00 3.991 6,597,22 997,547.54 994,687.50 3133X85Z1 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,778,891.40 4,002 6,612.50 1,792,600.18 1,785,937.50 ' 000 5 ,75 7,50 FED AGY DN 313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 A-l+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 972,276.89 3.830 0.00 998,758.67 998,308.38 313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 A-1+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 969,260.50 3.844 0.00 995,756.50 994,507.80 313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 A-l+ 09/22/05 09/22/05 1,498,508.27 4.081 0,00 1,530,952.80 1,523,725.55 313589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 A-I+ 11/17/05 11/18/05 958,077.78 4.593 0.00 974,455.56 971,477.39 313397P47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/14/06 A-1+ 12/21/05 12/21/05 959,246.00 4,663 0.00 971,795.25 968,979.08 313589T60 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/18/06 A-1+ 03/22/06 03/22/06 963,941.94 4.969 0.00 965,272.50 964,239.88 6,560,000 6,321,311.38 4.304 0.00 6,436,991.28 6,421,238.08 TOTAL SECURITIES $10,360,000 $10,103,224.78 4.187% $28,668.05 $10,229,742.55 $10,202,175.58 Issuers by Market Value Ratings by Market Value Q FMB 51,785 110% Sfi,d21,231 82.9% .938 17. 0 A-1� a■FIiAAC $1,185.527 AAA 53,780,938 37.1% FMM $3 930 717 38.5%.5% Total: $70,202,176100.0 B-I PFM Asset I PR- - O I / Fair Market Values & Analytics: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: March 31,2006 SECURITY TYPE MATURITY FIRST CALL MARKET MARKET UNREAL G/(L) UNREAL G/(L) DURATION YTM CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE DATE PRICE VALUE ON AMORT COST ON COST TO WORST AT MKT FED AGY BOND/NOTE 31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5.250 06/15/06 100.031 1,000,312.50 (2,291,05) (11,027.50) 0.203 4.952 31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 99.469 994,687.50 (2,860.04) 3,005.50 0.285 4.910 3133X85Z1 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 99.219 1,785,937.50 (6,662.68) 7,046.10 0.366 4.958 FED AGY DN 313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 99.831 998,308.38 (450.29) 26,031.49 0.035 4,692 313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 99.451 994,507,80 (1,248.70) 25,247.30 0.112 4.734 313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 97.675 1,523,725.55 (7,227.25) 25,217.28 0.460 4.983 313589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 97.148 971,477.39 (2,978.17) 13,399.61 0.561 5.033 313397P47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/14/06 96.898 968,979.08 (2,816.17) 9,733.08 0.609 5.055 313589T60 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/18/06 96.424 964,239.88 (1,032.62) 297.94 0.700 5.096 SUBTOTALS $10,202,175.58 ($27,566.97) $98,950.80 0.372 4.938 % ACCRUED INTEREST ON INVESTMENT 28,668.05 TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF INVESTMENTS $10,230,843.63 G1 PROGRAM Security Transactions & Interest: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: March 31,2006 S&P MATURITY PRINCIPAL ACCRUED TRADE SETTLE TRAN TYPE SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP RATING PAR COUPON DATE AMOUNT INTEREST TOTAL 03/22/06 03/22/06 BUY FNMA DISC NOTE 313589T60 A-1+ 1,000,000 0.000 12/18/06 (963,941.94) 0.00 (963,941.94) 1,000,000 (963,941.94) 0.00 (963,941.94) 03/15/06 03/15/06 MATURITY FHLMC DISC NOTE 313397UG4 A-1+ 1,000,000 0.000 03/15/06 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 TOTAL SECURITY TRANSACTIONS 36,058.06 D-1 PFM Management LLC- I PROGRAM I / I Cash Transactions Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) MONTH ENDED: March 31 2006 CASH DATE TRANSACTION CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT 03/22/06 CC CONTRIB 963,941.94 963,941.94 03/15/06 CW WITHDRAW (1,000,000,00) (1,000,000.00) NET CASH CONTRIBUTIONS/(WITHDRAWS) ($36,058.06) \ E-1 PFM Asset M(ma"entedOUC- CAMP PROGRAM Realized Gains and Losses: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: March 31 2006 TRADE SETTLE PRINCIPAL REALIZED REALIZED DATE DATE TRAN TYPE SALE METHOD SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP PAR VALUE COUPON PROCEEDS G/(L)COST G/(L)AMORT CST 03/15/06 03/15/06 MATURITY FHLMC DISC NOTE 313397UG4 1,000,000 0.000 1,000,000.00 24,729.86 0.00 TOTAL GAINS AND LOSSES $24,729.86 $0.00 F-1 PFMAsset MamagententI PROGRAM I / I Cash Balance Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) MONTH ENDED: March 31,2006 CASH BALANCE: $0.00 Earnings Calculation Templates Current Month-End Book Value + Add Coupon Interest Received + Current Month-End Accrued Interest + Less Purchased Interest Related to Coupons Less Purchases Add/Subtract Gains or Losses on Cost For The Mth +/_ Less Purchased Interest _ Total Cost Basis Earnings For The Month Add Disposals(Sales,Maturities,Paydowns,Sinks,etc.) + Add Coupon Interest Received + Less Previous Month-End Book Value Less Previous Month-End Accrued Interest Total Accrual Basis Earnings For The Month Economic Calendar 04/07/06 Change in Nonfarm Payrolls 04/20/06 Leading Indicators 04/07/06 Unemployment Rate 04/25/06 Existing Home Sales 04/13/06 Advance Retail Sales 04/26/06 Durable Goods Orders 04/18/06 Producer Price Index 04/28/06 GDP Annualized 04/18/06 Housing Starts 04/28/06 Personal Consumption 04/19/06 Consumer Price Index 04/28/06 Chicago Purchasing Manager Market Commentary The Fed increased the overnight lending rate another 25 basis points in March to 4.75%,its highest level since March 2001. The door to future rate hikes was left wide open. In their policy statement released immediately at the close of the FOMC meeting,the Fed said that"further policy firming may be needed".The Fed further stated that"economic growth has rebounded strongly but appears likely to moderate". The economy seems to be doing well with I st quarter GDP expected by some to be as high as 5.5%. Although this would be a good rate of growth,few predict that it will continue throughout 2006. Despite higher commodity prices inflation still appears to be in check.The largest unknown is the housing market.Several indicators seem to point to a slower market.For example,the time it takes to sell a home has increased as has the supply of houses on the market. There are also reports of price moderation in some areas. A slowdown in the housing market could lead to slower consumer spending which in turn could slow economic growth. Yields across the curve reached multi-year highs in the days after the Fed meeting. The yield curve also changed shape as a slight inversion at the beginning of the month was replaced by a flat curve with all yields being roughly equal. The next FOMC meeting is May 10. \ l G-1 CITY OF BURLINGAME Special Meeting Burlingame Main Library 480 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA March 29, 2006 6:30 p.m. CLOSED SESSION CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following: Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8: Property: Access to 1427 Chapin Avenue across City Parking Lot B-1 Agency Negotiators: Jim Nantell and George Bagdon Negotiating Parties: Bertetta Family Trust Under Negotiation: Revocable easement or other access STUDY SESSION CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Baylock called the study session to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Lane Room of the Burlingame Main Library, 480 Primrose Road. All Council members were present. a. Presentation and Discussion of Proposed Zoning for Anza Point North Zoning District to comply with Bayfront Specific Plan CP Monroe presented an overview of the process for developing the Anza Point North regulations thus far and focused on the changes to the ordinance in the most recent version. She noted that the Council members were given binders which contained all previous meeting minutes and public comments received on the proposed zoning changes both for Anza Point North and Rollins Road. Council discussion focused on land use modifications including the appropriateness of allowing health services, medical clinics, extended stay hotels and time shares in this area; and the height of buildings, how height is measured and how it relates to the community wind standard. Public Comment: Al Guibara, 1400 Marsten Road; and Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke regarding setting limits on building height, and whether to allow extended stay hotels. Following study and public comment, the consensus of the Council was that the proposed draft of the Anza Point North zoning regulations was ready for Council Action. b. Presentation and discussion of Proposed Zoning for Rollins Road Zoning District to comply with North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan CP Monroe gave an overview of how the proposed Rollins Road zoning regulations have developed, and reviewed the specific issues which have changed since the last time the zoning was studied by the City Council and it was referred to the Planning Commission subcommittee to review these specific issues. Discussion focused on these issues, which include clarification of the definitions of veterinary hospital, adding a definition for animal shelter and rescue center, and adding performance criteria for these uses; adding performance criteria for large scale building material and garden centers, clarifying parking standards, landscaping and size of facility; removing properties on Adrian Court from the Auto Row overlay; clarifying uses allowed in the drainage easement, noting that its main function is as a detention basin; and clarification of the uses allowed in the Southern Gateway Entrance area, incentives for providing a gateway feature, and creation of this area as an overlay with all industrial uses allowed with a conditional use permit. Public Comment: John Ward, 792 Willborough Place; Al Guibara, 1400 Marsten Road; Dave Moutoux, 1400 Rollins Road; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; and Herman Christensen, 1429 Rollins Road; spoke regarding uses allowed in the Southern Gateway Entrance area, building height; request change to allowing animal rescue center, will not be compatible with surrounding land uses and with the plan; and support of animal shelter because the use can be made compatible with proper design. There were no further comments and the public comment was closed. Following study and public comment, the consensus of the Council was to bring the proposed Rollins Road zoning forward for action as proposed. Mayor Baylock adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. Bill Reilly, Fire Chief Central County Fire 1399 Rollins Road ' Burlingame, CA 94010 (650) 558-7601 breiliy@centralcountyfd.org Memorandum To: Burlingame City Council CC: Jim Nantell,City Manager; Jesus Nava, Finance Director From: Bill Reilly, Fire Chief Date: April 6, 2006 Re: Local Radio Station for Disaster Related Information I propose that we do not spend the 2005/2006 budgeted funds allocated to establish a local radio station. Last year Council approved$25,500 for capital outlay in the Disaster Preparedness budget to install a local radio station to be used to inform citizens of disaster related information. Since that time we have been working with the San Mateo County Office of Emergency Services to secure a grant for early warning equipment to be used to inform our citizens. We were successful and will be part of a county wide system that we will be able to program to our local needs. This Dialogic Early Warning System is being used successfully throughout the country and will be funded almost entirely by a Homeland Security Grant. Our only costs will be for local programming and maintenance which should not exceed$3,000 the first year and$500 per year thereafter. We will also be able to use this program to notify residents of non-emergency information and noticing; notify employees individually or by group,etc. The system is GIS compatible and can notify by multiple means of communication including phone,cell phone,email,and text page. It is my recommendation that we do not spend the budgeted$25,500 this year and evaluate what I believe to be the greater potential of the digital notification system that has been purchased through the ODP grant. Please let me know if you agree with this recommendation. 1