HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2006.02.22 ITY
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame
ORKE
Regular Meeting—Wednesday, February 22, 501 Primrose Road
• 2006 Burlingame,CA 94010
t-•� •°' 650 558-7200
Pae 1 of 3
CLOSED SESSION 5:45 p.m.
Library Board Room
a. Claim of Georgia Fie pursuant to Government Code
§54956.9(b)(1),(3)(C) (Threatened Litigation)
b. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to
Government Code §54956.6:
City Negotiators: Jim Nantell, Deidre Dolan, Glenn
Berkheimer;
Labor Negotiators: Police Officers Association; Police
Administrators
STUDY SESSION 6:00 p.m. Lane Room
a. Study Session for a presentation on the water and sewer
systems
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES—Regular Meeting of February 6, 2006 Approve
5. PRESENTATION
a. South Lane Street Closure/Broadway Train Platform Presentation
6. PUBLIC HEARING The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each
a. Caltrain presentation and Resolution closing the South Hearing/Action
Lane crossing of the railroad corridor to vehicular and
pedestrian traffic for the Burlingame Train Station
improvements and usage
b. Amendment to Chapter 8.18 of the Municipal Code to
adopt an Ordinance regulating smoking at City sports Hearing/Action
activities and events and to prohibit smoking in City
vehicles
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak
on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council.
The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law prohibits council
from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a
"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor
may limit speakers to three minutes each.
���CITY O�
euw,N a-A BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame
""C?" Regular Meeting—Wednesday, February 22, 501 Primrose Road
k I z2006 Burlingame,CA 94010
Page 2 of 3 650 558-7200
8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Adopt Resolution adopting amendments to the expense Approve
reimbursement portion of the City's purchasing and
contracting procedures
b. Information on the Parks for the future proposal to fund Presentation/Discussion
Parks Agencies within San Mateo County
c. Council Goal Setting Round II-Confirming the Discuss/Confirm
scheduling of Council Study Session, February 25, 2006
9. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve
a. Approve Out-of-State travel for four City employees to
Emmitsburg, Maryland
b. Resolution accepting California Drive storm drain
improvements to JMB Construction, Inc.
c. Warrants & Payroll
10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
11. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may
speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the
Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law prohibits
council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to
fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff.
The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
12. OLD BUSINESS
13. NEW BUSINESS
14. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
a. Department Reports: Building, January, 2006; Finance,
January, 2006
b. Commission Minutes: Parks & Recreation, January 19,
2006; Beautification, February 3, 2006; Planning,
February 13, 2006
15. ADJOURNMENT
Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650 558-7203 at least 24
hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall 501
Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at
www.burlin2ame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site.
NEXT MEETING—Saturday, February 25,2006
Agenda
Item STUDY SESSION
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: Februaw 22 2006
SUBMITTED BY
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2006
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION FOR A PRESENTATION ON THE WATER AND
SEWER SYSTEMS
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council provide feedback on future
water and sewer rate adjustments after a presentation of both systems by staff.
DISCUSSION: The City owns and operates approximately 105 miles of water mains
and 100 miles of sewer lines with five water reservoirs and seven pump stations. Both
systems serve Burlingame citizens as well as customers in San Mateo County. The
sewer system also serves two-thirds of the citizens of Hillsborough.
The water and sewer systems are nearly 100 years old and need rehabilitation. In
addition, there are an increasing number of State and Federal regulations that dictate
how the City operates and maintains the systems. As a result, the City has needed to
raise rates over the last five years to address condition and regulatory issues.
Prior to starting the public process to adjust the rates for 2006-07, staff would like to
give Council a better understanding of the water and sewer systems. The presentation
will include a discussion of the needs and issues of each system with examples of rate
adjustment scenarios and corresponding funding levels for the capital improvement
program. A copy of the presentation will be available at the study session.
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Study Session on Sewer and Water_Feb06.doc
CITY 0
BURLINGAME
a
�Rwteo��e 6
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of February 6, 2006
STUDY SESSION
a. STANDARD EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS) TRAINING
Fire Chief Reilly and John Parkin, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator, trained Council on the Standard
Emergency Management System.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Cathy Baylock called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Bobbi Benson.
CLOSED SESSION
CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following:
a. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government code §54957.6:
City Negotiator: Jim Nantell
Labor Organization: Police Officers Association
b. Threatened Litigation (Government Code §54956.9(b)(1),(3)(c)):
Claim of Shelley Nielsen
C. Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code §54956.8:
Property: A 1500 square foot portion of Franklin School, 1825 Trousdale Drive
Agency Negotiators: Jim Nantell, George Bagdon, Larry Anderson
Negotiating Parties: Burlingame Elementary School District
Under Negotiation: Purchase of property portion
3. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Cohen, Keighran, Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None
1
Burlingame City Council February 6, 2006
Unapproved Minutes
4. MINUTES
Councilman Cohen made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 17, 2006 regular Council meeting;
seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. Approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Regarding Item l La.,
Councilwoman Keighran requested a copy of the final list of community members interviewed as part of the
downtown Economic Study.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
a. PUBLIC HEARING TO APPROVE EXPENDITURE OF SUPPLEMENTAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUNDS ALSO REFERRED TO AS COPS (CITIZENS
OPTIONS FOR POLICE SPENDING)
COP Van Etten reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and approve
Resolution No. 6-2006 for the expenditure of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds.
Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 6-2006, approving the plan of the
Chief of Police for expenditure of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds (COPS); seconded by
Councilwoman Keighran. Approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bobbi Benson, 550 El Camino Real, spoke on Mills Canyon's location and proposed improvements. Charles
Voltz, 725 Vernon Way, spoke on various types of railroad grade crossings and encouraged cities to
collaborate on a unified position. John Root, 728 Crossway Road, spoke on Council's Goals Study Session
and made suggestions. Stephen Hamilton, 105 Crescent Avenue, spoke on the downtown design forum
sponsored by Citizens for a Better Burlingame. There were no further comments from the floor.
Mayor Baylock announced various events in response to public comments: A Caltrain presentation for the
February 22, 2006 Council meeting on Burlingame's train station platforms; Council's Goals Setting Session
II would be on February 25, 2006; Council's Budget Study Session would be on March 1, 2006; and Arbor
Day planting at Mills Canyon(Arguello entrance) would be on March 7, 2006.
7. STAFF REPORTS
a. WALK OF FAME COMMUNITY RECOGNITION PROGRAM PROCESS
P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report and requested Council to direct staff on the Walk of Fame
component of the Community Recognition Program.
Council discussed several portions of the Community Recognition Policy and suggested the following for the
Walk of Fame component: to reduce the number of inductees to two per year; to require four affirmative
votes by Council for approval of nominees; to combine event with Lions Club's Citizen of the Year event
and to consider Citizen of the Year as an inductee to the Walk of Fame; to determine location after goals
session; to change the timeline to September for nominations, November for Committee recommendations,
2
Burlingame City Council February 6, 2006
Unapproved Minutes
and January for the Recognition Ceremony. For Unnamed Components, it was suggested that only one
organization be required to nominate an individual.
P&RD Schwartz would return to Council with the revised policy for approval.
b. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8.18 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE TO REGULATE SMOKING AT CITY SPORTS ACTIVITIES AND EVENTS AND
TO PROHIBIT SMOKING IN CITY VEHICLES
P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance amending Chapter
8.18 of the Municipal Code to regulate smoking at City sports activities and events and to prohibit smoking
in City vehicles.
Council discussed enforcement issues of the proposed ordinance.
Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 8.18 of
the Municipal Code to regulate smoking at City sports field, activities, and events and to prohibit smoking in
City vehicles. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance;
seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. Approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor
Nagel. Approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days
before proposed adoption.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 8-2006 ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR HANDLING DISPUTES
RELATING TO THE LOSS OF BAY VIEWS DUE TO TREE GROWTH
P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report and requested Council approve Resolution No. 8-2006 adopting
Guidelines for resolution of Bay view disputes.
Mayor Baylock opened comments from the floor. Mike Stallings, 1512 Alturas Drive, spoke from personal
experience in trying to effect mediation with neighbors. He suggested adding to Item C.6. of the guidelines:
"...to either remove or replace or..." There were no further comments from the floor.
Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to approve Resolution No. 8-2006 adopting amended Guidelines for
resolution of Bay view disputes with the suggested addition to Item C.6.; seconded by Councilwoman
O'Mahony. Approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Councilwoman Keighran requested that a copy of the
amended guidelines be sent to the Planning Commission.
d. DISCUSS POTENTIAL AIA CHARRETTE FOR DOWNTOWN AREA
CM Nantell reviewed the staff report and requested Council direct staff in making a commitment to do a
Charrette this year.
Council agreed to: set goal for doing a Charrette, commit to do a Charrette this year; focus on one or two
areas—Howard Avenue area and train station vicinity were discussed with a request for input from the
Planning Commission on what area(s) to focus on; and lastly to schedule the Charrette in the fall.
3
Burlingame City Council February 6,2006
Unapproved Minutes
e. CONSIDER BOARD APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SAN
MATEO COUNTY, INC.
CC Mortensen reviewed the staff report and requested Council appoint Harumitsu Inouye to the Board of
Directors of the Community Action Agency of San Mateo County, Inc.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to appoint Harumitsu Inouye to the Board of Directors of the
Community Action Agency of San Mateo County, Inc.; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. Approved
unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. ADOPT BY RESOLUTION NO. 7-2006 THE LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION ANNEX
DPW Bagdon requested Council adopt Resolution No. 7-2006 approving the ABAG Report "Taming
Natural Disasters" as the City of Burlingame's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.
b. FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR A 4-UNIT CONDO AT 535 ALMER ROAD, PORTION
OF LOT 13, BLOCK 8, MAP OF BURLINGAME LAND COMPANY
DPW Bagdon requested Council approve the Final Condominium Map with conditions listed in the staff
report for a 4-unit condo at 535 Almer Road.
C. APPROVAL FOR OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR FINANCE DIRECTOR TO NORWALK,
CONNECTICUT
FinDir Nava requested Council approve his out-of-state travel to Norwalk, Connecticut to attend the Spring
Meeting of the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council March 8-10, 2006.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilman
Cohen. Approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mayor Baylock congratulated Councilwoman O'Mahony on being elected to the Transportation Authority.
Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City.
10. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Stephen Hamilton, 105 Crescent Avenue, announced that the Shakespeare play, The Two Gentlemen of
Verona, would be presented by the Parks &Recreation Department on February 11, 2005. Charles Voltz,
725 Vernon Way, spoke on consequences of a smoking ordinance and announced that Burlingame Parents
Group's Taste of the Town would be on February 26, 2005, and Rotary's Burlingame Goes Hollywood event
on March 5, 2006. There were no further comments from the floor.
11. OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
4
Burlingame City Council February 6,2006
Unapproved Minutes
12. NEW BUSINESS
a. DISCUSS PROPOSED PENINSULA AVENUE INTERCHANGE IN SAN MATEO
Mayor Baylock requested current information from DPW Bagdon in response to a recent news article on the
effects this proposal would have in the Peninsula Avenue area. DPW Bagdon clarified that there are two
separate projects: the auxiliary project and the interchange project. The auxiliary lane project is expected to
start this year and is unaffected by the interchange project. The auxiliary lane project will provide for a new,
wider bridge at Peninsula Avenue with a separate pedestrian sidewalk on both sides and enough width to
accommodate bicycles. The new bridge will accommodate the future interchange on the west side, although
it does not require that the interchange be built. The interchange project involves a fairly long review
process. The development of the Project Scope Report will provide Burlingame with several opportunities to
comment on possible traffic impacts to Burlingame streets such as Rollins Road, Peninsula Avenue and
Broadway especially since the Poplar interchange would be permanently closed as a result of building the
interchange. The City of San Mateo is sensitive to our concerns because of their previous study to close
Amphlett Boulevard at the Poplar Interchange, which would cause traffic to be diverted onto Burlingame
neighborhood streets.
13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, January 5, 2006; Planning, January 23, 2006
b. Department Reports: Police, December 2005; Finance, December 2005
14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Baylock adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m. in memory of Phyllis Whiteside, the 1999 Citizen of the
Year, Dick Minderman, former Parks and Recreation Commissioner, Marty Lieberman and Bill Richmond,
Park Superintendent Tim Richmond's father.
Respectfully submitted,
Doris J. Mortensen
City Clerk
5
Burlingame City Council February 6,2006
Unapproved Minutes
i
d .
I'
3
$ 3
z
i
'v, sxm' rs
k
s `k
Proposed Burlingame Station Improvements -
Closure of South Lane ; Broadway Station Status
Presentation to Burlingame City Council —
February 22 , 2006
Overview
• History
• Burlingame
South Lane Closure
Broadway
Future Actions
V0
w
�I A
;`J
History
July 2004: Initiated design — presented
concepts to City Council
• July/August 2004 : Community meeting
presentations to Broadway and Burlingame
Merchants (35% Design Completed)
Oct 2004: Presented findings to City Council
Jan 2005: Presentation re: South Lane Closure
(65% Design Completed)
• July 2005: 85% Design Completed
• Dec 2005: 100% Design Completed
Burlingame Station Project Goa s
• Primary Improvements --
Enhance Safety
Eliminate Hold-Out Rule
Secondary Improvements
— ADA Compatibility
ee J Y
— Platforms & Amenities
— Readily identifiable crossings w/ 4
gates/signals ' e
— Grade Crossings
— Morrell Ave Pedestrian
Crossing (lighted, signalized
and gated) , J
}
Streetsc pea & Landsca in oto
,
— Fencing
• 500 feet north of North Lane to
Bayswater Avenue
— Track & Ballastfl v
' — Drainage
Outside Boarding Platform
• Increases safety with center �x
fence and gates/warning - --
6Al[(TTP) CAR¢.AN AVENUE
devices R
Eliminates hold-out rule
�.
:L^^.LLt�44LL�G^-C.:«tI4'I�litp"r .yn� .._./14UL'll:11:- m�LlSttpC
PLAmoNN -.s�
• Reduces vehicular gate downtime by 32%
Som STREETS
Wi[T+sTowmc
— 125 to 69 minutes at NorthO ` �� -
ud�T(TW)
CALFCRNA AV111UE
111M. y; Lane
95 to 67 minutes at Howard
Ave; South Lane closed
°�T� •
Clearly delineates pathways =-
and crosswalksEARNA
rausE scum uNE - -_. jt
NEw rnossnc swEAGE � _.__-___ g
Revised Parking: New lot ..
Northbound Platform; Public
REHAB J
wNb(N6 Lgy�pEp J 3 SiAi%M `
PLA7— '�¢� m LN1E E%hW
N5 W PEO
GATE(11P.) — _._..___ GATE
Parking along West Lane; new
lease agreements p
CALIfWMA AVENUE
M1
a'
G
-
�"•` � � �f��I�..>�• - w ems ����� �► ■■sem �y�
�' �Ci��A<Bd. iRST;a♦iA9AL�� � 4�1®®®® Im"�' `...aaiwi�-.a
0
m�
� 0�®io�■�■■■�b„�� �7 [�LJINIIYY N■®■■■®■�■■■�ik��a lsi� �HWfI
w
PlansLandscaping
FA',,-:nar
.._
'��• .mom ` � Y\ �� W
[ J
corn cxtwn oa:vE
Landscaping
— Landscaping along parking areas and platforms
— Landscaping at North Lane and Howard Avenue
w
• Combination of trees (34) , shrubs, and
groundcovers
• 9•
X
South Lane Closure R
•
Legal Description/Plat �1. / ` '�44 i'
/ I Xr= 3
Map C� �� � / �'' ,�~������
y
Utility concurrences [�
':,INTY G SAN rv�AT�O vas 20,1 670 roc BAST av a'
• Traffic Study [� - � OF� ` � ' ``=~� z - -
a rPGfl nA4 iw, i 6CX 1(�0 C& C15
• Environmental -
fte.WAAW 9WION
i
Aran 519,E R.Go.
Clearance
a s 96 M5 PA2 214
Public Notices [� ��5� °
. *. ca,res 12 �3�
21 >5YM1)� f w�sr�n
T V` • • E9 SAND SG
�''"` y • Council Resolution cl KEVN GRAY �o / * Y — — _ ✓
NO,7018 P(X P0gT a t� Nr
Schedule: Closed upon ���ra �A�,��� N XGK16 � Pr �
start of construction 1 EAI SURVEYORS & PLAT EGALDEACCOMPANYPIDate oonr:
ENGINEERS, INC, LEGAL DESCRIPTION
10MaeC—tyR-1 PARCELJP8. SM W32
a W-1,CA 94002 A)eet wa. 26F2
f
M
New Pathway/Crosswalk
New sidewalk
along Carolan
w Ave/East Lane
v
,
Cleary defined
'�, (� _- 35 34 t33. 32 31 28 27 IIB Y3 21 2� 2
1
=r - crosswalk along
North Lane
New
SKE streetsca e
design along
g
plaza area
CAUFFQRNIA DRIVE
A
�r
Traffic Circulation
Summary of Level of Service Analysis -
With CTX Improvements and South Lane Closure
Accounting for Gate Down Delay. Counts taken 9/2002
Intersection LOS
(average delay per vehicle in seconds)
Intersection Peak
Hour With CTX With South Lane
Existing Closure and CTX
Improvement Only
Improvement
North Ln / Carolan Ave AM B (12.0) B (12.0) A (6.7)
PM B (12.9) B (12.9) A (7.0)
South Ln / Carolan Ave AM D (29.0) D (29.0) out Lane Closed)
PM D (27.9) D (27.9)
S t✓"
Howard Ave/ Carolan Ave AM B (14.2) A (8.4) A (8.7)
PM C (15.3) A (9.1) A (9.2)
North Ln /California Dr AM
1.000
A (9.5) A (9.5) A (4.7)
PM A (7.2) A (7.2) A (4.7)
South Ln /California Dr AM A (2.8) A (2.8) (South Lane Closed)
PM A (2.9) A (2.9)
Howard Ave/California Dr AM B (13.1) B (12.4) B (12.5)
PM B (14.2) B (13.4) B (13.6)
Conceptual - lookingSouth
fr0 m North Lane
Before
w
�y t
�r
4 After
MAIVIII,
ANy "
Ar
r s
w+w
t-
.r
Conceptual Rendering - looking North
from Howard Ave
Before
AA
..........
I I IRA:
'a
IS
After
� r
F
t
�s
F�
f
Burlingame Station Status
• Design
— Finalizing Plans &
Specifications
— Due March 2006
• Construction
Initiate bid process Apr
2006
— Expect NTP approx.
Oct 2006
r
— Construction start
(Burlingame) Summer
440 2007
a +'
Summary and Action Items
• Summary:
— Safety enhanced
— Hold out rule eliminated
— Traffic improved
— Readily identified pedestrian crossings
Action Items:
— South Lane Closure
Finalize Designs
4
Yt 1
7
r
.cF
s
j+
Grade SConfiguration Studies
• Proceeding with four studies including Broadway
• Notice to Proceed given Feb 8, 2006
• Looking at 2 , 3 , and 4 track alignments
Results available within three (3) months
• Future phases will be development of vertical
alignments and determining budget estimates with
the viable horizontal alignments
• Estimated completion is August 2006
• Alignment will need coordination with the
interchange study and any land acquisition and
construction impacts
R
Broadway Station Project
TO 101
• Staggered platforms, NERCHE
signalized/gated pedestrian s „4
crossing and center fence
— Reduction in Broadway U°T(FrP)
Ave. gate down time
from 63 minutes to 31
minutesa��r� _,I��u�_�n�
�N� o
— Elimination of "holdout" C FMMB A9 E
rule o o
*yaw New/upgraded station
amenities (public address N
R�
system , lighting, etc.)
• Access from Broadway Ave
to Platforms _ FFl wro
�k. Landscaping --------
:Y
w
5(�GCfPID RlAlF01Y R. ,.R
. . -CE
• ADA compatibleN, ,
Octxi[x rax¢ cR�No 3�-�irui, �
'�� � cwFgMn nKNUE
r
0 � 0
vk°r
Broadway Design Status
•
Design proceeding on staggered platforms
— 100% due Feb 2006
— Final due April 2006
id.
P
av'
Agenda
Item # 6a
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: Februa 22 2006
/Z.,ie�
SUBMITTED BY
APPROVED BY ��
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2006
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: CALTRAIN PRESENTATION AND RESOLUTION CLOSING THE
SOUTH LANE CROSSING OF THE RAILROAD CORRIDOR TO
VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC FOR THE BURLINGAME
TRAIN STATION IMPROVEMENTS AND USAGE. CITY PROJECT NO.
74230
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached
resolution authorizing the closure of South Lane for the Burlingame train station
improvements. Staff from the Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) will make a presentation
on the entire Burlingame train system and respond to questions prior to Council
taking this action (refer to the attached February 9, 2006 e-mail agenda from Al Fung,
Caltrain Project Manager).
DISCUSSION: Caltrain made a presentation to Council on the Train Station
Improvements Project at their February, 2005 meeting. Council reviewed the
improvements for pedestrian and vehicular safety including landscaping, street
closure, traffic circulation, parking, and streetscape improvements. Council
commented on the need for enhanced pedestrian access and additional landscaping
at the Burlingame train station, and to maintain the public parking lot at the corner of
North Lane and California Drive.
At their December, 2005 meeting, Council directed staff to negotiate the closure of
South Lane with Caltrain. The closure is necessary in order to construct new longer
platforms at the Burlingame train station. Per Council direction, Caltrain has agreed
to pay for the restoration of South Lane in the event that the tracks are either
elevated or depressed, or if the train station is closed in the future. South Lane
access to West Lane from California Drive will be maintained with the street closure.
BUDGET IMPACT: Caltrain and the Joint Powers Board will finance the construction
of the train station improvements including the closure of South Lane
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\74230 South Lane Closure.doc
EXHIBITS: February 9,2005 Caltrain e-mail regarding presentation outline
Resolution with Exhibit A(legal description of South Lane closure with
plat map),
Caltrain notice posted on the site
Delclaration of Posting of Notices
Caltrain letter mailed to property owners within 300 feet of project.
a e Gom
Rrbgram Manager
c: Jim Nantell,City Manager
George Bagdon, Director of Public Works
Larry Anderson,City Attorney
Meg Monroe,City Planner
Doris Mortensen,City Clerk
Ian McAvoy,Caltrain
Brian Fitzpatrick,Caltrain
Al Fung,Caltrain
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\74230 South Lane Closure.doc
Page 1 of 1
MENG-Gomery, Jane
From: Fung, Allan [funga@samtrans.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:42 PM
To: jgomery@burlingame.org
Subject: Feb 22 Presentation Outline
Jane-
This is what is envisioned in the presentation:
Quick overview history of what has occurred to date
Burlingame Station improvements & status
Outboard Platform — Elimination of Hold-Out Rule
Parking/Leases
Landscaping/Streetscape
ADA Compatible
South Lane Closure Resolution
Traffic Analysis
Broadway Station Status
Staggered Outboard Platform — Elimination of Hold-Out Rule
Landscaping
ADA Compatible
Global Issues:
Grade Separation
Broadway Interchange
High Speed Rail
Overall future work in the City
Broadway Future Status
I should be able to get a draft copy to you next week. It won't be final as Ian will be gone until next Friday and may have
some tweaks, but I would like to get any input from you before then.
Thanks,
-Al
2/9/2006
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME CLOSING
SOUTH LANE CROSSING OF THE RAILROAD CORRIDOR TO VEHICULAR AND
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC FOR BURLINGAME TRAIN STATION IMPROVEMENTS AND
USAGE
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) is planning a project to
upgrade the Burlingame Caltrain Station(the "Station")platforms and boarding area (the
"Project"); and
WHEREAS, as part of the Project, the JPB will undertake improvements to increase the
safety of the Station platforms and eliminate the "hold-out rule", by converting the station from
center boarding to outboard boarding, providing a center track fence and installing new signalized
pedestrian crossings; and
WHEREAS, the Project will bring the Station to current Caltrain standards, similar to other
recently re-constructed Caltrain stations, and will increase the efficiency of Burlingame's roadway
system; and
WHEREAS,the modernization of the Station to Caltrain's current standard will vastly
improve JPB's ability to serve the Station; and
WHEREAS, JPB plans to continue to operate a passenger train schedule that regularly stops
at the Station; and
WHEREAS, as part of the Project, JPB will construct new street and pedestrian
improvements, to be constructed in accordance with Burlingame's Downtown Streetscape
Guidelines, at North Lane and Howard Avenue, provide improved grade crossings and associated
safety improvements, and create approximately 14 new City-controlled parking spaces along West
Lane; and
WHEREAS, the construction and operation of these improvements require the closure of
the South Lane where it crosses the railroad corridor generally as shown in Exhibit A (Sheets 1-3);
and
WHEREAS, construction of the Project and closure of South Lane is expected to increase
the efficiency of the City's roadway system by 45% at North Lane and 30% at Howard Avenue;
WHEREAS, in the event an elevated or depressed rail line is constructed or in the event of
1213617.1
a station closure, the JPB will re-open South Lane and restore the roadway to its condition before
the South Lane closure by removing the platforms and other necessary improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 22, 2006, to consider this
closure, and received all comments and testimony submitted by any interested person; and
WHEREAS, the City would not consent to and approve the closure of the South Lane
crossing if JPB were planning to close or suspend operations to the Burlingame Caltrain Station, or
if the platform improvements were not going to be constructed in the manner presented by the JPB
to the City at the City Council meeting of February 22, 2006; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and convenience to close the South Lane rail
crossing to vehicle and pedestrian traffic, subject to the understandings stated above.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. Pursuant to Streets & Highways Code § 1920, the closure of the South Lane rail crossing
to vehicle and pedestrian traffic is approved, subject to the understandings stated in this Resolution.
2. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to constitute or approve an abandonment or
vacation of South Lane in any way or at any point, nor an abandonment of the rights of any existing
utility to continue to operate within South Lane.
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board October 7,2005
Sheet 1 of 3
EXHIBIT A
SOUTH LANE-EAST LANE CLOSURE—BURLINGAME
PARCEL JPB—SM-0032
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property situate in the City of Burlingame,County of San Mateo,State of California,being a portion
of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Southern Pacific Railroad Company,recorded July 19,
1903,in Book 96 of Deeds,Page 214,in the Office of the County Recorder,County of San Mateo and
being a portion of that certain parcel of land described first in the Decree of Condemnation had on March 4,
1904,in Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Mateo,recorded March 5,
1904,in Book 100 of Deeds,Page 435,in the Office of the County Recorder,County of San Mateo,
described as follows:
PARCEL ONE (South Lane):
Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly line of that certain 60 foot wide strip of land described in
said deed(96 of Deeds 214),with the southeasterly line of that certain parcel of land described second in
said Decree(100 of Deeds 435),said southeasterly line also being the northwesterly line of South Lane(50
feet wide)as shown on that map entitled"Supplementary Map to Map No.l of the Town of Burlingame,
San Mateo County,California", filed August 10,1905,in Volume 3 of Maps,Page 71,in the Office of the
County Recorder,County of San Mateo;
Thence,along the easterly prolongation of said northwesterly line,North 49°30'00"East, 107.02 feet to the
northeasterly line of said parcel described first in said Decree(100 of Deeds 435),said northeasterly line
also being the northwesterly prolongation of the southwesterly line of East Lane(40 feet wide)as said Lane
is shown and so designated on said map(Vol.3 Maps 71);
Thence,along said northeasterly line,South 61'22'19"East,53.51 feet to the northeasterly prolongation of
the southeasterly line of said South Lane;
Thence,along said prolongated line,South 49130'00"West, 107.02 feet to the southwesterly line of said
60.00 foot wide strip deed(96 of Deeds 214),said southwesterly line also being the northeasterly line of
West Lane(40 feet wide)as said Lane is shown and so designated on said map (Vol.3 Maps 71);
Thence along said southwesterly line North 61'22'19"West,53.51 feet to the Point Of Beginning;
Containing 5,351 square feet,more or less.
Sheet 2 of 3
PARCEL TWO (East Lane):
Commencing at the intersection of the southwesterly line of that certain 60 foot wide strip of land described
in said deed(96 of Deeds 214),with the southeasterly line of that certain parcel of land described second in
said Decree(100 of Deeds 435),said southeasterly line also being the northwesterly line of South Lane(50
feet wide) as shown on that map entitled"Supplementary Map to Map No.1 of the Town of Burlingame,
San Mateo County,California",filed August 10,1905,in Volume 3 of Maps,Page 71,in the Office of the
County Recorder,County of San Mateo;
Thence,along the northeasterly prolongation of said northwesterly line of South Lane,North 49°30'00"
East,99.83 feet to the southeasterly prolongation of the southwesterly line of East Lane(50 feet wide)as
said lane is shown and so designated on said map(Vol.3 Maps 71)and the True Point Of Beginning;
Thence,along said prolongated southwesterly line,North 40°30'00"West, 18.86 feet to the northeasterly
line of said parcel described first in said Decree(100 of Deeds 435);
Thence,along said northeasterly line, South 61'22'19"East,20.18 feet to said northeasterly prolongation
of the northwesterly line of South Lane;
Thence,along said prolongated northwesterly line,South 49°30'00"West,7.19 feet to the True Point Of
Beginning;
Containing 67.8 square feet,more or less.
And as shown on Sheet 2 attached and made a part hereof.
KEVIN C. GRAY A
�rep`ared :Kevin C. Gray
P.L.S.No. 7018 0
N®.70� ��
� .
G ��-�v
C1,np�� nor
s
3 ,
0 kip 7
lVly
CITY OF PUPI MAMA LfP
COUNTY OF 5AN MP90 NgOo 2018' PtWU� Two �A5T LANF o
51�A� 0F CA�IFOr?NIA 3°00,,� (6��8 Sa, �T, -� >
5 61`22'1911 �
- -
1886 5F RI. CO.
TP06 PMC�L TW GOOK 100 MP5 PAGE
oma, � C Plt?51" n�SC�l��n)
PuFlINGAM� 5TATION
AP.�A opo U �0 5PRRI, CO.
GOOK 96 MP5 PACZ 214
P06 PAPUL ONS
POC PAPUC TWO
S,P p p CO. N 61'22'1911 W
600
K 100 MP5 PAM 4�5
(5�CONn P�5CpMn) / WP5T I ANS o
O �ANp
S
GML s°
<v KEVIN C.GRAY
FCJFD FFOpcl?TY UNC
Exp 30/off / I,�GAL C7�5Cf;ipTION I.IN�
P06 POINT OF P�QNNING
NO.70L18 * POC POINT OF COMM�NCEM�NT
sT�TF �F° 61.00K f 6 70P TPU POINT Or GUNNING
OF CAO
Date: 10/07/05
L11
RAIL SURVEYORS & PLAT TO ACCOMPANY
ENGINEERS, INC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Scale: 1"=40'
1075 Old County Road PARCEL J PB - SM - 0032 Drawn By: T.L.
IN Belmont,CA 94002
Sheet No.: 10,11
OF3
Public Hearing on South lane Closure
Caltrain Construction at Burlingame Station to Require Road Closure
Dear Caltrain Neighbor:
Caltrain will be doing construction at the Burlingame Caltrain Station to improve safety,
pedestrian access and make train service more efficient. In order to make necessary
platform improvements at this station, South Lane will be closed permanently at the
railroad crossing.
The City of Burlingame will hold a public hearing on Feb. 22 at 7 p.m., at city hall, 501
Primrose Road, in Burlingame, to receive comments on the street closure. South Lane
will remain open until early summer 2007.
Project Description
The current Burlingame station configuration only allows one train to be in the station
at a time, which delays service and requires crossing gates at adjoining streets to be
down for a prolonged period of time.
This project will replace the current center-boarding platform with outside boarding
platforms on both sides of the tracks. A new center-fence between the train tracks,
will improve safety, by preventing pedestrians from crossing the tracks, except at
designated crossing areas, which will be protected with pedestrian crossing arms,
bells and lights.
When construction is complete, passenger safety will be improved, trains will no
longer block North Lane, and traffic delay-time at tracks near the station will be
reduced.
Approximately 60 percent of the traffic that uses South Lane will be redirected to
Howard Avenue, while the rest will cross the tracks at North Lane. Both West and East
lanes will remain open, allowing traffic access along either side of the tracks.
Construction is tentatively scheduled to begin during the summer of 2007 and will last
approximately one year. The street closure will be conducted under Chapter 3 of the
Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easement Vacation Law (Streets& Highways
Code §§8300 et seg).
Questions about this can be directed to Caltrain Project Manager Al Fung,
650.508.7790.
Please refer to the map on the back for an overview of changes. Calf
2/9/06
DECLARATION OF POSTING OF NOTICES
PURSUANT TO STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 8323
I, Martin Ruiz, declare as follows and that I would be competent to testify
thereto if called as a witness:
• I am employed by the San Mateo County Transit District as
Distribution Supervisor.
• On Feb. 9, 2006, I posted notice of the proposed vacation of South
Lane by doing the following:
- Posted the notice and map of the project area at the
Burlingame Caltrain Station in the rail agency's information
boards.
- Posted the notice and map of the project area on utility and
light poles along West Lane from Howard Avenue to the
Burlingame Caltrain Station.
- Posted the notice and map of the project area on utility and
light poles along East Lane from Howard Avenue to
Burlingame Avenue.
- Posted the notice and map of project area on utility and light
poles along South Lane from California Drive to the rail line.
A copy of the posting is attached.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and
that this was executed on Feb. 9, 2006 in San Carlos, California
(headquarters of the San Mateo Cou�nntny Transit District).
Distribution Super4or, Martin Ruiz
RECEIVED
FEB 9 2006
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Burlingame Caltrain Station Proposed Improvements
J�
HIGH SCHOOL
AUTO
>s DEALERSHIP
QA1$ (717') '. CARQLAN AGENUE CLOSE SOUTH Lam; o
NEW CROSSING SURFACE.
PARIONC
_x NEW PLATFORM CENTER FENCE Z�
i 1 tU U IITtt7 VIP-
till tl
MEN=
IP-t7tiUtllt2UIILtltltttUtMEN= UrlillIttJlrl tttittllttlllWttifirill *itt#tiUltlltttll2Urtf tflr�Ttlil7it[Tt
uuarrrncrrtrrrcctrtrtururuurcmrrcurFcu}uuUuuuuT ttunluuuuuurrurtYrmrtrnTrrrcxcruru rutxruuuntuTcmTnr
._-_EXISTING PiATTdRu---_""
REHAB
PARKING NEW PED J - STATIONPLATFORM ,CVt , SOUTH'LANE' EXIENSION NEW PED
GATE (TVP.) w, � — ----------_--- GATE (TYP.)
.'
Auto
DEALERSHIP
NGRTH TO SFTRAFFIC
LIGHT (TtP) � CALIFORMA AWNUE ►'
I WILE TO BROADWAY STATION '
MUM 0=1
J�
I
HJOH 5CH00'.
AUTO
DEALERSHIP /
PARKING
SIDING tea.
tttttutitittcttttnttttlrutrItnictt#tlkiuttxlrtrttt#U11, mrrummuu►tuutuunututtsuttut rutttutruuurtcmruuctu _._
rartuitcnmunGartttuutttttrtr�uatt-tuuzuttttuuruuuruattrustttutu�ztutu�utrtrtuitnttuuut?t�tuatrrurtt�uuuttuuar�rrtsrruuruwumuiurt►u:ccctuuuansuu�tsa:�uru
IttttHtlftittttt#Ultttftttttttttttttit#tftttti tttttttttttttttttftUtititlltttttltIfItttittttiittillttitttttttttttttt:atli #ttttttttttilllttitttltttttltNttittttttttttttittttttttgttttiiltlllttiittllttttttttrar
PLAWVft L
PARKNG STATION !` .. .
PARKING -i
DEALMSHIP
iRAlf<5 BLOgf".
NORM tII TO sF \—TRAFFIC ((( ��� 111�q��U114LL111����
LIGHT (TYP) %
_
,`Y' GAt�'dlNlil AVEHUE
( 1MI�OAUWAY STATION
J�
0
BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2006
KEN YEAGER,CHAIR
Cairl JOSE NETT VICE CHAIR
DON GAGE
JIM HARTRTNETT
ARTHUR L.LLOYD
® JOHN MCLEMORE
SOPHIE MAXWELL
STUART SUNSHINE
MICHAEL J. SCANLON
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
February 7, 2006
APN 029-213-040
Dear Property Owner,
Caltrain is planning to construct platform improvements at the Burlingame Avenue train
station. As part of the improvements, South Lane is proposed to be closed at the railroad
crossing. Attached for your reference is a sketch of the proposed street closure.
The project construction is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2007 and it will take
approximately one year to complete the project. A public hearing is planned to be held
February 22, 2006 at the City of Burlingame City Hall. Meeting will begin at 7 p.m.
If you would like more information regarding this project prior to the Public Hearing,
please contact JPB Project Manager Al Fung at (650) 508-7790. For information
regarding the City's street closure process, please contact Augustine Chou, Burlingame
Traffic Engineer. He can be reached at (650) 558-7230.
Sincerely,
Cassandra G. Clomon
Real Estate Department Specialist
(650) 508-6304
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD
1250 San Carlos Ave, — P.O. Box 3006
San Carlos, CA 94070-1306 (650)508-6269
f
Existing Conditions
w0i Smom
AUTO
DEALERStWa . .
PARXING
SiD s` .
11tttltlitttllttttltitttttttititfitittttttlttttttttttttt4itAf11tit1ttSttltillittJttlt� ��—'?--
$tUtlilltll#Jtl!{t�tttttltitttJfJ# ftititt!#ttttgttt iigf 1 ttJ_ ttit#tttkiU�111014111tttt1ti1ti1tti11itt1titt3S TtY•tl1U
ITT
c. p
lttitttUltttttttttttt!!lttttmttrttmrrmm uttnmtttmtmrmimur"ttt tti' Ittttittt>ldlttkfttttttttttttttttttttttlttittntttttttlStittttttlttsttsstttl..a:
u e
PARKRIG .. STATSUH
AUTO tJJ
O£AiF7tStfP
WmD4 STOPPM
� Sl- \-TRAMC ftitJlH 70 aJ
UGHT (YYP) CA1 fVWA AVEMM --�
uaf T4 BROADWAY STATION
13
Proposed Improvements
(station area only shown lure)
J�
HIGH SCHOOL
• AUTO
pEALCRSFIIP
,r t
MvuiE
NEW CROSSING SURFACE PARANC
HAW PL.AWORL4 Z
•- CENTER FENCE
Tltt##tlltlt�glfi22SiK#SSltit� .'
IIITtSitt12kt11 tIItIItI3IiItII � a� IM=
«;r
i"ttAW MM=StEtt�ItTttttStt#1.t#titxtittll(1lSItf22ttttt# N1S� �. a--
TlS4G STA _ - �—
x— - REHAB
PARKKO NEW PED STATK7NM NEW PED
GATE (TYP.)
GATE (TYP.)
ALIMO
DEALMSHIP
NdYHH TO 5F _ \-:MAFFIC
( ) �
IJCM7 7�P
Cl1l*'GR1rt'A AVENUE �� � � �
T
1 ME TO OROADMAY STATION
m
____�___ __ _ - __ _-- _ _. _ _ , _. _ _._Cal►
14
BURLE STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM# 6b
MTG. 2/22/06
DATE
To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL sus TED
BY �� 4 -sem_—"�_.
DATE: February 12,2006
APPR
FROM: Parks& Recreation Director(558-7307) BY
suBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 8.18 OF THE MUN IPAL CODE TO
REGULATE SMOKING AT CITY SPORTS ACT TIES AND EVENTS
AND TO PROHIBIT SMOKING IN CITY VEHICLES
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance
regulating smoking in City parks and prohibiting smoking in City vehicles by:
A. Adopting proposed ordinance and directing City Clerk to publish a summary of
the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
BACKGROUND: Smoking is currently prohibited in any playground areas per State law and at
the Golf Center and Murray Field by Council action when those facilities were developed.
Smoking is also prohibited on all elementary and secondary school properties. At the City
Council's February 6, 2006 meeting,the Council unanimously approved the introduction of the
ordinance recommended by the Parks &Recreation Commission extending those regulations to
other sections of City parks. The ordinance is now before Council for adoption.
The Commission's recommendation is based upon(1) smoking being counter-productive to the
health benefits associated with the activities conducted on the City's athletic fields and other
parks areas and(2)the dangers of second-hand smoke. The ordinance would prohibit smoking:
• Within twenty(20) feet of any bleachers, playing field, grandstand, or dugouts of any
City owned sports field commonly used for activities such as baseball, softball, soccer,
lacrosse or football
• Within twenty(20) feet of the players' benches or spectator gathering areas during any
city-conducted or-sponsored activity
• On courts used for activities such as basketball and tennis
• During City conducted events, such as Music in the Park concerts, except in designated
sections
Additionally, this ordinance also prohibits smoking in any City-owned vehicles, formalizing a
practice that is currently in place in most of the City's departments.
BUDGET IMPACT: Funds for new signage could be used from the Parks &Recreation
Department's 2005-06 budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Amending Chapter 8.18 of the Municipal Code to
Regulate Smoking at City Sports Activities and Events and to Prohibit Smoking in City
Vehicles
1 ORDINANCE No.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING CHAPTER 8.18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE
3 SMOKING AT CITY SPORTS FIELD,ACTIVITIES,AND EVENTS AND TO
PROHIBIT SMOKING IN CITY VEHICLES
4
5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
6
7 Section 1. Since 1987, the City of Burlingame has had a strong ordinance limiting the
8 smoking of tobacco products in enclosed places in the City. People participating in sports should
9 not be subjected to tobacco smoke, and in particular, spectators and young people at City events
10 that are held outdoors should not be forced to bear the discomfort,annoyance,and possible health
11 risks of tobacco smoke. These general locations provide many alternative places to smoke if one
12 chooses without affecting others'enjoyment. In addition,City vehicles should be kept smoke-free
13 for both health and aesthetic reasons as they are shared by many different drivers and passengers
14 over time. This ordinance reasonably limits smoking near sports fields,activities,and other City
15 events.
16
17 Section 2. Section 8.18.030 is amended to read as follows:
18
19 8.18.030 Smoking limitations in city-owned or-controlled facilities and vehicles.
20
21 (a) Enclosed facilities. Smoking is prohibited in all enclosed facilities owned by the city.
22 For the purpose of this chapter, the building known as the Burlingame Lions Hall shall not be
23 considered a city-owned building.
24 (b)Sports fields and courts. Smoking is prohibited at all times within twenty(20)feet of
25 the following:
26 (1) Any bleachers, grandstands,playing fields, or dugouts of any city-owned sports field
27 commonly used for activities such as baseball, softball, soccer, lacrosse, or football; and
28 (2)Any city-owned sports courts commonly used for activities such as tennis or basketball;
1 2/7/2006
I and
2 (3)Players'benches or spectator gathering areas during any city-conducted or-sponsored
3 activity.
4 (c) City events. Smoking is prohibited during the performance or conduct of any city-
5 conducted or -sponsored event, including but not limited to sports, entertainment, plays,
6 ceremonies,pageants,fairs,or training in any location that is close enough to the event that smoke
7 is traveling to or over participants or spectators of the event. The director of parks &recreation
8 is authorized, however, to designate smoking areas at such an event where smoking is to be
9 allowed notwithstanding this subsection. This subsection does not apply to smoking by a person
10 who is passing through the area to another destination, or to smoking by actors in a theatrical
11 production if smoking is an integral part of the production.
12 (d)Specific areas. Smoking is prohibited in the following locations:
13 (1) Burlingame Golf Center;
14 (2) Murray Field;
15 (3) Burlingame School District property, including fields and courts; and
16 (4) San Mateo Union High School District property, including fields and courts.
17 (e)Posted areas. In addition to the facilities described above, the city manager and the
18 director of parks&recreation are authorized to post additional city-owned or-controlled facilities
19 for"no smoking,"and smoking is prohibited in any such facility that is so posted.
20 (f) City vehicles. Smoking is prohibited in any city-owned or-controlled vehicle.
21
22 Section 3. Section 8.18.060 is amended to read as follows:
23 8.18.060 Where smoking not regulated.
24 (a)Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter to the contrary,the following areas
25 shall not be subject to the smoking restrictions of the chapter:
26 (1) Bars;
27 (2)Private residences,except when used as a child care or a health care facility; provided
28 that common areas or areas normally open to the public within residential apartments,residential
2 2/7/2006
I co-ops,residential hotels, senior citizen projects,or other communal or similar facilities housing
2 12 or more persons shall be subject to smoking restrictions;
3 (3) Sixty-five percent of the guest room accommodations in a hotel, motel, or similar
4 transient lodging establishment;
5 (4) Areas of the lobby in a hotel, motel, or similar transient lodging establishment
6 designated for smoking by the establishment. Such an establishment may permit smoking in a
7 designated lobby area that does not exceed 25 percent of the total floor area of the lobby or,if the
8 total area of the lobby is 2,000 square feet or less,that does not exceed 50 percent of the total floor
9 area of the lobby. For the purposes of this paragraph, "lobby"means the common public areas of
10 such an establishment in which registration and other similar or related transaction, or both, are
11 conducted and in which the establishment's guests and members of the public typically congregate;
12 (5) Meeting and banquet rooms in a hotel, motel, other transient lodging establishment
13 similar to a hotel or motel,restaurant,or public convention center, except while food or beverage
14 functions are taking place, including setup, service, and cleanup activities, or when the room is
15 being used for exhibit purposes. At times when smoking is not permitted pursuant to this
16 paragraph, the establishment may permit smoking in corridors and prefunction areas adjacent to
17 and serving the meeting or banquet room if no employee is stationed in that corridor or area on
18 other than a passing basis;
19 (6) Theatrical production sites,but only in a theatrical production itself when smoking is
20 an integral part of the story in the theatrical production;
21 (7) Cabs of motortrucks, as defined in Section 410 of the Vehicle Code, or truck tractors,
22 as defined in Section 655 of the Vehicle Code, if no nonsmoking employees are present;
23 (8)Retail tobacco stores;
24 (9)Medical research or treatment sites,if smoking is integral to the research and treatment
25 being conducted. Such a site must have not less than 16 air changes per hour;
26 (10) Patient smoking areas in long-term health care facilities, as defined by section 1418
27 of the Health and Safety Code. Such an area shall have not less than 16 air changes per hour.
28 (b)The exception to smoking prohibitions contained in subsection(a)(7)above do not apply
3 2/7/2006
I to city-owned or-controlled vehicles or equipment.
2
3 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
4
5
Mayor
6
7 I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the
8 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 6th day
9 of February, 2006, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_
10 day of by the following vote:
11 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
12 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
13 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
14
City Clerk
15 C:\FLES\ORDINANC\smokevents.wpd
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4 2/7/2006
CITY G AGENDA 8a
�1 ITEM#
Bl1RL,NGAME STAFF REPORT DMTG
AT
q DATE 2/22/2006
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMI
BY
C�7- V
DATE: February 13, 2006 APPROV
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
ADOPT RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPENSE
REIMBURSEMENT PORTION OF THE CITY'S PURCHASING AND CONTRACTING
PROCEDURES
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution adopting two amendments to the expense reimbursement of the City's Purchasing and
Contracting Procedures.
DISCUSSION:
In 2003, the Council adopted an Expense Reimbursement Procedure. This procedure was revised and
incorporated in the City's Purchasing and Contracting Procedures in February 2005.
The California Legislature adopted Chapter 700 in the 2005 Session that required agencies to have
reimbursement procedures. The new law requires the City to make two changes to the City's procedures:
1) To have a maximum travel rate as the group airfare rate offered through the League of California
Cities. The City has used the maximum IRS vehicle mileage rate in the past for travel of 200 miles or less. This
change will provide a second prong on that 200-mile cap.
2) To have a maximum lodging rate as the conference/education sponsor group rate. The City has used
the Federal per diem rate for the specified city, while allowing lodging at the conference hotel at the group rate.
The language will ensure that the maximum lodging reimbursement will be the conference rate.
Attachment
Resolution adopting Amendments to the Reimbursement of Expenses Portion of Purchasing&
Contracting Procedures
Attached Reimbursement of Expenses
Distribution
Finance Director
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING
AMENDMENTS TO THE REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES PORTION OF THE
CITY'S PURCHASING AND CONTRACTING PROCEDURES
RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, in 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution 28-2003 establishing procedures
for the reimbursement of expenses; and
WHEREAS, in 2005,the City Council adopted Resolution 10-2005 incorporating and
revising procedures for reimbursement of expenses in the City's Purchasing and Contracting
Procedures; and
WHEREAS, in 2005, the California Legislature adopted Government Code § 53232.2,
which sets certain maximums on lodging and travel rates that can be reimbursed to members of a
legislative body; and
WHEREAS, it is most efficient to make those maximums applicable to reimbursements to
all City employees as they will have little effect on the existing City policies,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The amendments to the Purchasing and Contracting Procedures contained in Exhibit A
hereto are approved.
MAYOR
I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
X. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES
A. Purpose: The City of Burlingame is obligated to ensure that expenditures made by the
City are for clearly public purposes and the City is accountable to taxpayers and citizens
of the City to be prudent and wise in making those expenditures. The purpose of these
procedures is to provide the process by which a City officer or employee may seek
reimbursement for expenses that the officer or employee has incurred in the conduct of
City business as authorized by the employee's supervisor or manager or other action. All
such reimbursements are to be made in accordance with the budget for that expense.
Officers and employees should ensure that their proposed expenses are reimbursable
before incurring the expenses. Either the officer or employee seeking the reimbursement
and the person approving the reimbursement are personally responsible for the integrity
of the reimbursement process.'
B. General Policy Statement. Reimbursement for expenses are made in order to advance
the public, corporate purposes of the City of Burlingame. The California Constitution,
the Government Code, the Burlingame Municipal Code, and the administrative
procedures of the City govern the expenses that can be lawfully incurred and reimbursed
on behalf of the City. City Council pre-approval for travel outside the State of California
is required. Expenses cannot be used for personal benefit to the officer or employee. All
expenses claimed for reimbursement are subject to audit.'
Before making a personal expenditure that will result in a claim for reimbursement,
officers and employees should consider the use of a purchase order or prepayment by the
City. While this will not always be possible given time constraints or the nature of the
vendor, direct payment by the City will often result in cost savings to the City and avoid
the necessary delay involved in any reimbursement.
' "Officers and employees" as used in these procedures include all volunteers.
"Department head" as used in these procedures with regard to reimbursement payable to a
department head means the City Manager. "Department head" as used in these procedures with
regard to a board member or commissioner means the department head liaison to that board or
commission. "Department head" as used in these procedures with regard to a Councilmember
means the City Manager. "Department head"with regard to the City Manager means the Finance
Director.
' An officer or employee may also be audited by the Internal Revenue Service and should
ensure that the officer or employee keeps any necessary personal records, such as unreimbursed
business expenses for a sufficient period of time.
21 Approved_/ 12006
C. Travel Expenses
Travel expenses incurred while on City business or at the direction or authorization of the
City are subject to reimbursement as follows:
1. Length of travel.
a. No reimbursement for meals will be made for any travel/business totaling
less than six (6)hours. Meals are often included as an integral part of a
seminar or conference, and the included meal(s)will be reimbursed as part
of the seminar or conference registration fee. If a meal is not included as
part of a single-day conference, seminar, or training, an employee may be
reimbursed for the cost of a meal.
b. Unless expressly authorized in advance in writing by the City Manager
based on exceptional travel circumstances, no reimbursement for lodging
will be made for any of the following trips:
i. A single-day conference, training, or business that is less than 180
miles road distance, one-way, from Burlingame and that ends or is
over by 6:00 p.m. However, if the single-day conference, training,
or business is 100 miles or more road distance, one-way, from
Burlingame and begins at 9:00 a.m. or before, reimbursement for
lodging for the evening before the conference can be approved
even though the conference, training, or business may end before
6:00 p.m.
ii. Any multiple day conference, training, or business that is less than
65 miles road distance, one-way, from Burlingame.
2. Transportation/Transit
a. The maximum reimbursement for transportation expenses, such as vehicle
mileage, airfare, or train fare, will be at the lesser of the following: 1)the
vehicle standard mileage rate allowed by the Internal Revenue Service or
2) the group airfare rate for League of California Cities travel, if available.
http://w,�vw.ofa.dgs.ca gov/Travel+Programs/AirFares_CityPairs.htm_.
b. If the travel is to a location that is more than 200 miles road distance, one-
way, from Burlingame, the City will reimburse that employee for either the
lowest commercial fare to that location based on the proposed itinerary or
the vehicle standard mileage rate,whichever is less.
22 Approved_/ 12006
C. The City will not reimburse an official or employee for any travel
insurance of any kind.
d. In addition to reimbursement at an airfare or mileage rate, the City will
reimburse an officer or employee for the actual costs of any tolls for
bridges or roadways actually paid.
e. If an officer or employee believes that the limitations imposed by this
subsection will actually cost the City more because of the travel time that
may be involved, the officer or employee may seek the written approval of
the City Manager for alternate travel.
3. Parking
a. Parking fees incurred at either a hotel or at a parking facility are
reimbursable. However, unless the official or employee can demonstrate
that no other reasonable alternative existed, valet parking costs will not be
reimbursed beyond that incurred for a normal parking fee.
b. Parking fees incurred at an airport parking lot during the time that the
officer or employee is on travel are reimbursable to the extent that the total
cost of the travel is within the limits established in subsection B(1) and (2)
above, and do not exceed the cost of reasonable transportation to and from
the airport.
4. Other Transportation
a. Transportation to and from an airport, train station, or other transit facility
is reimbursable. Public officials and employees are encouraged to use
public transit whenever feasible, and determination of the reasonableness
of the transportation used will be based on the availability, usability, and
itinerary. As with parking fees, the total cost of travel is subject to the
maximum amounts set forth in Subsection B(1) and (2) above.
b. Transportation while at a conference, training, or business event is judged
on a reasonableness standard. Unless the rental car and taxi expenses are
within the total amount allowed under Subsection B(1) and(2) above,
rental car, taxi or other transportation expenses will only be approved
when the official or employee demonstrates that there was no reasonable
alternative to the use of that mode of transportation at the location
involved or the mode was required by the nature of the trip or event.
Rental car expense will be approved if the rental car is being used to
transport other City employees or public employees and the financial
23 Approved_/ 12006
benefit from the sharing of transportation results in an actual reduction in
the net cost to the City.
5. Lodging
a. Officers and employees are expected to use the most cost effective lodging
reasonably available. Government lodging rates are almost always
available and should be sought. Conference hotel rates are usually
negotiated by the organizations hosting the conference and may be used
even though other lodging might be less expensive. The City will provide
a transient occupancy tax exemption certificate if the host city permits
such an exemption and requires back-up as Burlingame does.
b. Lodging reimbursement approval will be based on no more than the
maximum lodging rate allowed by the U.S. General Services
Administration for that location. The current rates are available on the
GSA Website at
http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentld=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC
If government facilities are made available at a cost-effective rate, the
official or employee is expected to make use of those facilities. However,
if the lodging is in connection with a conference,training, or other
education activity, l+ dgin reimbursement shall not exceed the maximal
group rate published by the conference,;mining,or activity sponsor,
provided that lodging at the group rate is available at the time of booking.
If the group,:rate,is not available,the GSA per,diem rate will govern.
6. Meals and incidental expenses
a. Daily meal allowance and allowance for incidental expenses, such as
laundry, tips, and similar expenses, are based on the maximum Meal and
Incidental Expense Rate established by the U.S. General Services
Administration for that location. The current rates are available on the
GSA Website at
http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentld=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC
Partial meal and incidental expense allowances can be paid for multiple
day conferences, seminars, and business that require partial day travel.
b. No meal allowance will be provided if meals are included in the
conference or training package; if only some meals are included, the
following deductions from the daily rate will be made for included meals:
$7 for breakfast; $14 for lunch; and $20 for dinner.
24 Approved_/ 12006
7. Telephones
a. Telephone usage for City business purposes while away from the City is
reimbursed on the reasonable costs of such calls. Cellular phones are
often more cost-effective than using hotel phones directly. Collect calls
should be avoided.
8. Conference/Training Registration
a. It is expected that most conference, seminar, or training registration will be
done in advance. This avoids the need for reimbursement claims for this
expense. It also tends to insure the best rates, which are often given for
advance registration. The City may disallow reimbursement for the
additional costs incurred when advance registration is not used, unless the
officer or employee can demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances or
City needs compelled the late registration.
9. Advances
a. The City recognizes that officers and employees may not be able to use
their own funds or credit to pay for necessary expenses. An officer or
employee may request an advance to pay for transportation, lodging, and
meals if a written check request accompanied by a copy of the registration
confirmation is filed with the Finance Department no later than ten (10)
days before the travel is to commence. In an emergency situation, this
time requirement may be waived by the Finance Director.
b. In order to be eligible for approval of an advance, the Advance Request
form attached to these procedures shall be completed and approved by the
officer or employee's department head. A written estimate of the lodging
expense and reservation shall be provided. The applicant shall also
provide a statement as to the form of transportation to be used and a copy
of the transportation reservation, if any.
C. Advances shall be made by check payable to the officer or employee.
d. Within five (5) days of the completion of travel, the officer or employee
shall file documentation as required for reimbursements below that
demonstrate the expenses incurred. If overpayment has been made by the
advance, the officer or employee shall repay the City for the overpayment
within ten (10) days of the determination by the Finance Director that an
overpayment has occurred under the these procedures.
25 Approved_/ 12006
D. Entertainment
Payment of any expenses for hosting of non-City officers or employees is generally not
done on an individualized, reimbursement basis,but rather as a department expense. This
type of expense is to be approved by the City Manager in advance. When a City officer or
employee entertains on behalf of the City, the entertainment activity must be directly
related to City business and should not personally benefit the host or other officers or
employees. Elected officials of the City are currently barred by California Attorney
General opinion from reimbursement for entertainment costs incurred with regard to
persons who are not officers or employees of the City.
1. Administrative meetings. Reimbursement for the cost of light refreshments
served during an administrative meeting if the meeting is directly related to City
business can be reimbursed. The cost of a meal can be reimbursed if the meal is
an integral and scheduled part of the meeting, such as a working lunch.
Note: When two or more officers and employees choose to dine together in order
to continue business, reimbursement for the meal is not allowable.
2. Host to official guest(s) of the City. The cost of light refreshments or meals
incurred when acting as a host to official guests of the City can be reimbursed.
Examples of such guests are:
Visitors from other governments, government agencies or organizations
Members of the community
Prospective employees
Meetings of an organization of which the City is a member or for which
the City sponsors membership of an officer or employee, such as
the League of California Cities
3. Receptions/Luncheons. The cost of light refreshments and food served as part of
a reception or luncheon. Receptions may be held in conjunction with conferences
(receptions that are not included in the registration fee), meetings of an
organization of which the City is a member or for which the City sponsors
membership of an officer or employees; employee recognition; length-of-service
awards or retirement presentations; employee, staff, or volunteer picnics; rotation
of officers.
Employee birthdays, weddings, anniversaries, or farewell gatherings (other than
retirement) are not considered official entertainment.
E. Other expenses
1. Officers and employees may find that some day-to-day expenses require
26 Approved_/ 12006
purchasing directly without using normal purchasing procedures or petty cash.
These should be used very sparingly and only when they have been authorized by
a department head. If they are not authorized in advance, the claim for
reimbursement may not be honored.
F. Documentation
1. A claim for reimbursement is submitted through the appropriate department
approval process to the Finance Department.
2. Original receipts are required for all of the following:
—Conferences and seminars
—Lodging
—Rental Cars
—Parking and tolls
—Other transportation
—Other purchases
Credit card receipts are generally acceptable.
3. Original receipts are not required for telephone bills for use of personal
telephones, such as cell phones. Copies of the applicable charge sheets may be
substituted.
4. Original receipts are not required for meals if the officer or employee is only
seeking reimbursement within the meal and incidental expense rate described in
Travel Subsection F above.
5. The required travel expense report for claiming reimbursement for travel expenses
is attached. For reimbursement of other expenses, the claim form attached shall
be used.
6. If an original receipt has been lost, the officer or employee may submit a
declaration in the form attached seeking approval of the affected expense.
G. Time for submittal
1. Any claim for reimbursement for non-travel expenses must be submitted within
ninety(90) days of the purchase for which the reimbursement is sought. A claim
filed after the ninety(90) day period will not be paid except in case of an
intervening emergency or catastrophe that has prevented the submittal from being
timely.
27 Approved_/ 12006
H. Prohibited reimbursements
1. No reimbursement for expenses incurred pursuant to this policy will be made for
the following expenditures:
a. Alcohol, except with the express approval of the City Council for a
particular event.
b. Tobacco products or illegal substances of any kind.
C. Expenses incurred by or because of a spouse or companion, who is not on
City business (72 California Attorney General Opinion 20 (1992)) unless
approved as part of a reasonable accommodation pursuant to the
Americans with Disabilities Act.
28 Approved_/ 12006
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM# 8b
MTG.
DATE 2/22/06
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL sUB TED
BY
DATE: February 12, 2006
APPROVE
FROM: Parks & Recreation Director(558-7307) BY
suBiEcr: INFORMATION ON THE PARKS FOR THE FUTURE PROPOSAL TO
FUND PARKS AGENCIES WITHIN SAN MATEO COUNTY
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive the report regarding
Parks for the Future, an effort to secure dedicated tax-based revenues to support the parks and
recreation agencies within San Mateo County, including city parks departments, special districts
and the County's Parks Department.
BACKGROUND:
Warks for the Future is an effort to secure dedicated tax-based revenues to support the parks and
recreation related activities of San Mateo County, the cities located within the County, the
Ladera and Highlands recreation districts and Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District by
placing a measure to increase sales tax by1/8t'cent on a future ballot. The legislative permission
required to place a 1/8t' cent increment on the ballot was secured in 2005 with the approval of
SB 203. The revenue, projected to be between $13 and $16 million per year, would be allocated
to jurisdictions per a formula and may be used for park and recreation related functions such as
maintenance, operations, activities and programs, capital improvements and acquisition.
The attached report is provided by San Mateo County Parks Foundation staff and includes
information on the need for dedicated funding, the process to date for the Parks for the Future
proposal, a proposed timeline to take the proposal to the electorate, a list of the items that still
need to be addressed and a sample distribution of sales tax revenues.
BUDGET IMPACT: There is no budget impact associated with this report. If the Parks for the
Future initiative is passed by the voters of San Mateo County, the City of Burlingame should
receive approximately $300,000 per year in new fees that would be dedicated to Parks
maintenance, capital improvements, land acquisition or associated recreation programs.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Parks for the Future Executive Report prepared by San Mateo County Parks
Foundation staff
Parks for the Future Attachment"A"
Executive Summary
Parks for the Future is an effort to secure dedicated tax-based revenues to support the parks and
recreation related activities of San Mateo County, the cities located within the County, the
Ladera and Highlands recreation districts and Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by
placing a measure to increase sales tax byl/8th cent on a future ballot. The legislative permission
required to place a 1/8th cent increment on the ballot was secured in 2005 with the approval of
SB 203. The revenue, projected to raise between$13-16 million per year, would be allocated to
jurisdictions per a formula and may be used for park and recreation related functions such as
maintenance, operations, activities and programs, capital improvements and acquisition.
This report outlines:
• the need for the measure;
• the Parks for the Future process to date;
• recommendations from the Parks for the Future participants, including the distribution
of funds;
• the possible timeline.
While this item is presented as information only,Parks for the Future representatives are using it
as an opportunity to receive feedback from council/commission members and the public.
Need
Today's parks and associated recreation programs play a significant role in communities. Parks
are where we gather with our family and friends. The open spaces offer us solitude, and their
beauty and quiet nourish our soul. The wild places provide habitat for native plants and animals,
and provide critical functions in water supply and flood control. Well maintained parks, urban
tree programs and community landscaping improve neighborhood aesthetics and property values.
Recreation programming supports healthy lifestyles and youth and senior programs, resulting in
improved public safety. Teen after-school programs provide sports and healthy socializing.
Senior programs prevent social isolation and support senior health through age-appropriate
nutrition programs and physical exercises. Sports and other physical fitness programs now play
a critical role in combating California's low rates of physical fitness and high rates of obesity—
among youth and adults alike.
While parks and recreation programs are important to our communities they have not been
funded at an optimal level for many years. As a non-mandated service, they are one of the few
areas that can be and have been reduced during budget crises. The results are staffing reductions,
reduced gardening and landscaping services, longer intervals between litter pick-up and
bathroom cleaning, deferred maintenance,and removal or closure of facilities that need repair or
do not meet safety standards.
San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Division alone has an unfunded deferred maintenance
and capital improvement need of over$100 million and has had its budget reduced by
approximately 40% since FY 02/03. Staffing levels have been reduced from 94.3 FTE in 1990 to
65 FTE in 2005. Meanwhile visits to the County Parks has increased by 250,000. The cuts in
June 2004 resulted in staff reduction precipitating the closure of numerous facilities within the
2.9.06 rev 3 page 1
facilities were lifted after the Board of Supervisors increased funding for the County Parks
division the following September,budget related problems like staff shortages and safety issues
created by deferred maintenance persist.
Cities within the County have similar funding needs.
Process
Parks for the Future is a wide-ranging group of local leaders that includes representatives from
nonprofits, cities,the County, special districts and park advocates. Over the past year,Parks for
the Future participants have been discussing a variety of issues in a workshop format. A
feasibility study and a voter survey(poll) were also conducted.
The group has reached consensus on the following items so far during this process:
• Pursue 1/8th-cent sales tax
• Pursue the enabling legislation required to place the measure on the ballot
• Do not form a special district, instead utilize CCAG as the fiduciary agent
• Governance responsibilities of the managing board include distribution of funds, auditing
and reporting functions
• Funds can be used for a variety of park and recreation related needs including
maintenance, operations, activities and programs, capital improvements and acquisition.
• The formula for distributing funds to County, cities& districts
• Use population and a base amount to cities as the method for distributing funds to cities
(Determined we could not use other methods such as acreage, programs or budgets as
there was no consistent measurement).
• Use Department of Finance annual projections to adjust allocations.
• How to ensure that funds supplement, not supplant,parks and recreation budgets.
Items that have been discussed but additional information, including voter opinion polls, is
required prior to final decision:
• Length of measure.
• Exactly when the item will be placed on the ballot.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was a one-eight cent sales tax chosen?
This approach was taken because of the strong level of support for a one-eight cent sales tax,the
amount of revenue that would be raised though the tax and the desire to not create another
special district or level of bureaucracy to administer the tax.
The information from the poll conducted in early January 2005 showed that 67% of voters
indicated that they would support or likely support a one-eighth cent increase in the sales tax
compared to 56%would support or likely support one-quarter cent increase. The poll also
showed that only a small parcel tax would garner 2/3rds support by voters and only yield$4
million verses the $13-16 million projected from the one-eight cent sales tax increases.
2.9.06 rev 3 page 2
What will this cost per person and how does our tax rate compare?
Estimated Revenue&Annual Cost Current
Sales Tax Annual Annual Cost/Pemon Sales Tax Rate Comparison
Revenue County Sales Tax
0.125% $16,074,486 $18.10 Alameda 8.75%
Assumes 25%of income is spent of taxable items Contra Costa 8.25%
Based on 2002 median per capita income of$57,906 San Francisco 8.50%
San Mateo 8.25%
•*Average personal spending multiplied by#of county residents Santa Clara 8.25%
Santa Cruz 8.00%
Why was special legislation required and what is the status of the legislation?
Counties possess the authority for levying sales taxes in one-quarter cent increments under
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285,the general provision for one-quarter or one-half cent
sales tax increases. However,there is no general provision for counties—or cities—to impose a
one-eight cent sales tax, other than for the purposes of funding libraries.
SB 203 was introduced to provide San Mateo County with this authority. It received bipartisan
support from the legislature and was signed by the Governor. While this law now gives San
Mateo County the authority to place a measure on a ballot in 2006, if deemed appropriate,the
authority is not limited to 2006 and carries over to future years. The authority in this law is
limited to placing a measure on the ballot that raises funds for parks.
Has a Governance Board been chosen?
The goal is to minimize bureaucracy by utilizing an existing dependent board for governance
responsibilities such as distribution of funds, auditing and reporting functions. The group
recommends that CCAG serve in this role. This item is on CCAG's March agenda.
How can the revenue be spent?
The revenue would be dedicated to supporting functions relating to the parks and recreation
departments of the cities, county, and special districts. Revenues from the sales tax are flexible
so it can be spent on operations, maintenance and recreation activities and programs, although
local jurisdictions would have latitude to spend the funds on capital improvements and
acquisition. The poll found the voters placed a high value on funding operations and
maintenance.
How will the sales tax revenues be distributed?
The group looked at various criteria to allocate funds. It was determined that methods such as
acreage, programs or budgets could not be used as there was no consistent measurement. An
allocation to the County, allocations to the special districts and an allocation to the cities, divided
through a formula that included a base amount to smaller cities and population was chosen as the
approach to distributing funds
Through a negotiated process that involved the representatives from the City Managers' group,
the County and the San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Foundation, a distribution formula
was determined. The table below assumes that administration is taken off the top. Note that the
State Board of Equalization charges 5%to administer the tax and the amount for the governing
2.9.06 rev 3 page 3
agency's activities has not been determined. However, for draft calculations purposes we are
using 1% for local administration.
Amount of annual Percentage Recipient
allocation
$8,008,309 52% cities
$6,497, 307 42% county
$755,501 6% special districts
$15,110,017 100%
Annual growth of sales tax revenues equal to or less than 4% will be distributed on a
pro-rata basis. Cities and special districts only will benefit from annual growth in
excess of 4%.
The City of Burlingame's base distribution is $300,681.
The distribution chart for all cities is attached at end of document.
How will Maintenance of Effort work?
Discussions in the workshops identified that cities may be reluctant to tie their hands,
particularly as it relates to potential future reductions in funding for their parks and recreation
departments. On the other hand,it was agreed that no maintenance of effort would probably
doom the measure as the voters want accountability and want this money to supplement park and
recreation budgets.
Proposed Concept: Each city in San Mateo County will establish a general fund base line Parks
and Recreation (P&R) budget in Fiscal Year 2006/07. Cities must maintain their general fund
base line P&R budget or insure that any reductions to their P&R budgets are no greater than
any other non-safety city departments to receive their full share of sales tax measure proceeds.
Cities that reduce their P&R budget greater than any other non-public safety departments will
receive a reduced amount of sales tax measure proceeds, consistent with the percentage that the
P&R budget is reduced beyond that of any non-public safety department.
Comments on the specific maintenance of effort wording included:
• Concern that indexing needs to be added to prevent erosion of the value of the general
funds dollars in future budget years.
• Concern that it does not include "Increasing" budgets in good years.
• Language in ballot measure and materials should be understandable by the voters
2.9.06 rev 3 page 4
Time Line
Note: This schedule assumes a November 2006 election. That date had not been determined It
is just the earliest the measure would go to the ballot. The measure maybe delayed if sufficient
progress towards the ballot language has not been made or ifpolling and other factors
determine that November 2006 is not a good ballot for the measure.
• March 2004—Idea of collaborating on a dedicated funding source first presented.
• March 2004-May 2004—First legislative effort focused on formation of special district.
Effort dropped in favor of more process first
• November 2004—Workshop#I
• December 2004— Survey of likely voters to evaluate support levels for benefit
assessment, parcel tax and sales tax
• January 2005—Workshop#2. Presentation of survey results.
• February 2005 —Workshop#3
• March 2005 —Workshop#4
• August 2005 —Workshop#5
• September 2005— SB 203 receives legislative approval
• October 2005—Governor approves SB 203
• Fall 2005—Reports to City Councils and Park Commissions
• February 2006—Workshop#6
• March 2006—Take the comments of Parks Commissions/City Councils and Workshops
#5 and#6 to CCAG.
• March-April 2006—Preparation of ballot language by subcommittee
• May, June and July 2006—Opportunity to take positions on ballot measure
• August 8, 2006—County Board of Supervisors places measure on ballot
• November 7, 2006—Election
Items that still need to be addressed
While most key elements of a parks and recreation funding structure have been sketched out,
additional input is required for some decisions. In particular, additional information on a
proposed sunset date is required.
Sunset and Process for Renewal
The duration of the tax and the renewal process has not been determined.
Many have suggested 25 or 30 years while others have suggested 15 years. The use of these
funds to pay bond debt by cities with major capital or acquisition needs is one consideration for
length.
It was suggested that a report be provided to the public every two years for both accountability
and to build support for renewal. This would be included in the Governance Responsibilities
services covered by that administrative fee. A citizen oversight committee should also be
considered.
2.9.06 rev 3 page 5
Next Steps
Preparation of Ballot Measure Language
A subcommittee with a City Attorney, County Counsel and a representative of Trust for Public
Land will prepare the language. Interim drafts will be distributed to City Managers.
Public Education
A general public information campaign highlighting the benefit of parks for our health and our
communities will occur in spring 2006.
Political Campaign
A community based campaign committee will be formed to champion the ballot measure. As
part of their effort,they will conduct additional polls and focus groups, prepare campaign
literature and engage in a grassroots effort to pass the measure.
2.9.06 rev 3 page 6
Base year distribution assuming sales tax at 2002 level
and with administrative costs deducted
Base Amount
County $6,497,307
Special Districts $755,501
Atherton $205,000
Belmont $268,272
Brisbane $205,000
Burlingame $300,681
Colma $205,000
Daly City $1,106,502
East Palo Alto $315,076
Foster City $307,569
Half Moon Bay $205,000
Hillsborough $205,000
Menlo Park $328,733
Millbrae $221,234
Pacifica $409,942
Portola Valley $205,000
Redwood City $805,169
San Bruno $428,896
San Carlos $295,983
San Mateo $987,556
South San Francisco $646,596
Woodside $205,000
Total $15,110,017
2.9.06 rev 3 page 7
r -
CITY o� STAFF REPORT
BURL INGAME AGENDA
o a r o • w
ITEM # 8c
MTG.
�Tm JYS O'
DATE 2/22/06
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
DATE: Feb rua 15 2006 BY
AP
FROM: dim Nantell 558-7205 BY
BY ��.!!
SUBJECT: Council Goal Setting Round II — Confirming the scheduling o Council Study Session 2/25/06
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council confirm it's intention to hold a second study session to review
Council Goals for fiscal year 2006-2007 on Saturday Feb 25th from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon in the Lane Room.
BACKGROUND: The Council reviewed 231 suggested goals that had been received from the community
and council at your Saturday January 28th study session. At that time the Council identified those suggested
goals that were related to budget decisions and referred them to your budget study session on Wednesday
March 1St. You also identified some that where referred to Boards and Commissions for their consideration
as
they prepare for their work programs for next fiscal year. In addition about 75 of the original 231 goals were
grouped into broader goals relative to subject areas such as Economic Development, Downtown SAP, Civic
Engagement, Police Enforcement Priorities, and Mills Canyon.
Staff has previously distributed three drafts of the regrouping of the goals to the Council and asked the
Council to identify their first take of their top 15 goals from the restructured list of 61 possible Council Go
by Friday 2/17/06. Staff will be pulling those response together in preparation for your 2/25 stud sessio als
provide the Council with a "first take" on what emerged as the Council's top priorities. y n to
We would expect that some where between five and ten goals will likely be common to all five Council
members and as a group you will probably agree to include them in your 2006-2007. We would intend to
have the Council members discuss the goals that were selected by one or more Council members as
their top 15 goals. The idea would be to give your colleagues a sense of whyoal p of
important for inclusion in next year's priorities. After taking some public comment we would gthen wosrk to
identify those goals for which there is support for including in next years list by three or more Council
members.
One element of the discussion will need to also consider the availability of staff resource to successful)
accomplish the goals. For example many of the ideas that were suggested in the planning area ended u
having a relationship to the downtown specific area plan. The downtown Charrette and the SAP wi11 vp
likely max out our planning resource for 2006-2007 so it may be difficult to attempt to do more than those
ry
items next year. What ever comes out of the goals discussion relative to planning we will plan to include
the discussion at the joint meeting of the Council and Planning Commission later this spring. If it turns i
n
that the goals are fairly well distributed across the departments, availability of resources will be less
out
problematic. One additional element we feel is important for the Council to consider is the capacity of both
the community and the council as a whole to be able to engage in the public/council activities associated
with
p ty
the goals. As we have seen with some of our advance planning initiatives, if we over tax the public and/or
d/or the
board, commission and council then the product may not be as well developed or receive community support
necessary to implement it successfully.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. 2/15/07 Memo re: Council Goal Setting Round II
B. Council 2006-2007 Goal Options Round 11 February 25, 2006
C. Council Study Session 1/28/06—Items/Suggestions Referred Elsewhere
U:\Council\Goals\Staff report on scheduling 2nd study session.doc
Attachment A
CITY OF BURLINGAME
TO: Mayor Baylock and City Council
DATE: February 15, 2006
FROM: Jim Nantell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Council Goal Setting Round II
Attached you should find two documents. The first is the new list of potential council goals for
2006-2007. The good news is that your work of two weeks ago reduced the number from 231 to
61 suggested goals, so the next step will not be as difficult as trying to select 30 top goals from a
list of 231 goals.
To help us get a first cut as to which goals resonate for the Council as a whole, we would like to
ask each of you to select your top 15 goals off the list of suggested goals. At this point it is not
necessary to rank order your top 15,just select 15 out of the attached list which you feel are the
ones you would like to see addressed by the Council in 2006-2007. Then by next Friday 2/17
please drop me an e-mail message with the numbers of the goals that make up your top 15.
Prior to your Saturday the 2/25 meeting we will pull together a list showing how the council's
first cut lines up. That will be the starting point for our discussion on the February 25'. The
idea would be to then have the Council discuss the levels of agreement where three or more
Council members listed a goal on their list of 15. Then allow for one or more Council
member(s)to advocate for other goals that had received votes but did not have a majority(3 or
more votes). After which we would hope the Council could reach a majority consensus on your
goals for the new fiscal year.
The second document is a listing of suggested goals that were referred to the budget discussion,
a future study session, or a Commission. If you don't find a goal that you recall from our
February 28 meeting please check this list to see if it is listed there. If you still feel you can't
find it let me know.
After reviewing the attachments you may wonder why the total of goals on both documents is
only 154 when the original lists had 231 goals. If you look at all the bulleted items that are now
listed under the new broader goals, such as civic engagement or the SAP, you will find that there
are about 75 original goals that are now grouped under the those new goals. You will also recall
that our original listing of 231 ended up having some repeats and we add a few new ones that
were suggested by the Council and the public after the original list was distributed on January
28th. Therefore the grand total of items suggested is different than the 231 presented to the
Council on 1/28/06.
One caution as you select your top 15 goals. Please be aware that each department has a limit of
what they can accomplish without some impact on the normal services and activities provided
each year. So even though you may like to do all the planning policy and advance planning
issues on the goals list,we are not staffed to be able to accomplish all of them next year. A lot
of the ideas that were suggested in the planning area ended up having a relationship to the
downtown specific area plan. I am concerned that the downtown Charrette and the SAP will
very likely max out our planning resource for 2006-2007 so it may be difficult to attempt to do
more than those items next year.
Attachment B
Council 2006-2007 Goal Otions - Round II February25, 2006
Goals/ideas Cate o Comment
1 . Re-examine mix uses on Broadway Broadway Study session
Planning
2. Consider Guidelines for Business signage on Broadway Broadway The Sign Code is being worked on
Planning already and the Council may want to
address this through that effort.
3. Make signage more uniform and attractive Broadway The Sign Code is being worked on
Planning already and the Council may want to
4. Get stores to do a better job of keeping sidewalks cleaner Broadway address this through that effort.
Upkeep
5. Visually upgrade the Broadway entrance sign (arch) at Calif. Dr. Broadway
Upkeep
6. Improve sidewalk and area cleanliness especially outside Burlingame Ave Area
restaurants Upkeep
7. Get stores to do a better job of keeping sidewalks cleaner Burlingame Ave Area
U kee
8. Initiate a historic resources survey as a part of our Downtown Burlingame Ave. Area
Specific Plan process. We need to have a process in place to
deal with historic properties which has been very apparent as we
deal with the Burlingame Garden Center property. We need to
protect this community asset and we have no tools available to
assist the property owners in their quest to improve this
extremely important community landmark.
9. New and/or renovated Safeway Business Promotion
Econ. Dev
10. Following the downtown economic study, encourage Safeway to Business Promotion
submit plans for a new store. Econ. Dev.
11 . Create a policy to evaluate impact of all decisions on social Civic Engagement
capital cost recovery vs. impact on people).
Last printed 2/15/2006 11 :39:00 AM 1
Council 2006-2007 Goal O tions - Round II February 25, 2006
Goals/ideas Category Comment
12. Develop a Civic engagement action plan with consideration of the Civic Engagement Discuss as a unit all of the civic
following suggestions submitted by members of the community: engagement suggestions
• Define solution to create more usable council chambers
• Make Council chambers available for additional uses
• Upgrade TV and audio systems in council chambers to make it
easier for public to follow and participate in proceedings; update
facilities
• Host city-sponsored seminars and workshops on topics of
interest to citizens.
• Offer citizens' academy to help residents understand how city
departments operate; include informal meals.
• Offer workshops and handouts on emergency preparedness for
business owners and residents.
• Promote public art and community recognition programs and
city's "wish list."
• Review shuttle operations and investigate new ways to
encourage drivers to get out of their cars, particularly elderly
drivers.
• Improve community outreach: newsletter/kiosk
• Encourage more community events like the Pet Parade
• Town Hall meetings with Council and Department Heads one to
two times a year; allows residents to bring up concerns and
questions they may have; allows residents to gain a better
understanding of what the various departments roles are
• Provide forums on city issues
• Have community involvement when discussing vision for our
downtown area
• Add opportunities for public comment at Council meetings
Change procedure and add to public comment
• Encourage school participation at City Hall meetings; various
schools represented throughout the year at City Hall; opportunity
to express their accomplishments and fundraising needs;
verbalize volunteer opportunities; include BCE representation
and include superintendent and school board members
• More study sessions
• Link DBID, BBID, and Chamber to City website
• Redesign the city's Web site with interactive information for
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 2
Council 2006-2007 Goal Options - Round 11 February25, 2006
Goalslideas Cate o Comment
residents, visitors, businesses, city employees, and prospective
residents and businesses.
• WiFi for all of Burlingame
• Voicemail hotlines for outgoing information on power outages
• Create inventory of spaces available in Burlingame for meetings
and performances and make available to public.
• Establish department voicemail hotlines for outgoing information
on work or citywide projects
• Voicemail hotlines—outgoing message for roads to avoid during
paving (align with recording)
• Televise all or selected planning commission meetings
• Televise council study sessions
• Inform public of available meeting spaces and make it easier to
book
• Need to provide a stage/platform for public events
• Need a community performing space
• Recreation Dept. should reserve some space for community
meeting vs. classes
• Need large public gathering space
• Create easily accessed disaster information-i.e. what to do
• Train citizens in disaster planning
• Improve disaster planning-need to prepare for SF residents
fleeing to Peninsula
• Encourage school participation at City Hall meetings; various
schools represented throughout the year at City Hall; opportunity
to express their accomplishments and fundraising needs;
verbalize volunteer opportunities; include BCE representation
and include superintendent and school board members
• Do an intensive outreach campaign to educate residents and
local workers about the philosophy of our parking policies (e.g.,
you only need to walk a minute or two longer to park for
free/cheaply all day).
• Do an intensive outreach campaign to get more people to sign up
for the city's listsery
• Publicize numbers people can call to get rid of excess trash,
furniture, etc., dumped on sidewalks.
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 3
Council 2006-2007 Goal Otions - Round II February25, 2006
Goals/ideas Cate o Comment
13. Improvements to Mills Canyon Parks and Recreation Combine into one goal
• Raise community awareness of Mills Canyon nature area
• Make renovation/maintenance of Mills Canyon a priority
• Keep the Ed Taylor trail open
14. Mills Canyon pursue the possibility of shifting to open space Parks and Recreation
district.
15. Improve the look of Washington Park near the carnage house Parks and Recreation
where the park yard materials are stored
16. Provide Bike paths to BART Station Pedestrian Safety May want to have Bike Committee
address this if you agree with it's
reformation as suggested in goal #56
17. Meet with Police Chief to discuss enforcement priorities relative Police Enforcement Group as new goal "review police
to the following issues identified by the community response: enforcement priorities with Chief'
• Explore parking permit program for residents to park
anywhere in the downtown area
• PD ticket illegal left turns (ECR/Ralston) (Big problem
at ECR/Broadway)
• Ticket citizens who park across sidewalks
• Don't allow double parking on Burlingame Ave.
• Stop long term out of town parking in neighborhoods
• Enforce long term parking violations in residential
areas
• Monitor traffic in residential areas to address
excessive speed by SUVs and other vehicles
• PD proactive w/Nightclubs
• Discourage bar patrons from out of town who abuse
Burlingame Ave
18. Volunteer patrols to supplement PD Police
Police Presence
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 4
Council 2006-2007 Goal Options - Round 11 February25, 2006
Goals/ideas Category Comment
19. Undertake SAP for Downtown area consider the following Regulations
suggestions: Planning
• Provide height/density incentives in the periphery of the
downtown Area under study. Encourage building up to 50
feet provided that (1)for every 2 units displaced, 3 are built;
(2)that there is no parking variance. The intent is to create
more housing within walking distance to downtown
Units>2000 sq ft. defeat the purpose of greater density in the
area.
• Add facility improvements with downtown SAP (some small
streetscape projects may be desirable to do sooner)
• Build a multi story parking structure in the Burlingame Ave
commercial area
• Close Burlingame Ave. to cars and make it pedestrian
oriented
• Get a movie theater downtown behind retail shops
• Work on the historical museum as a possible focal point for
the downtown area
• Develop public plaza in front of train station as an anchor for
downtown
• Eliminate Parking on Burlingame Ave. and make sidewalks
wider for outdoor dining.
• To strongly encourage underground parking in our downtown
area to accommodate increased density and alleviate parking
shortage.
• Look at regulating size of stores
• Increase regulations on downtown bars
• Don't allow any more nightclub/bars on Burlingame Ave
• Limit clothing retail shops on Burlingame Ave.
20. Conduct a Charrette focused on Downtown area Planning Input
21. When there are new businesses coming in that are going in front Regulations
of the Planning Commission have blue notification cards sent to Planning
both the landlord and the tenant. not just landlords
22. Create a list of historic properties Regulations
Planning
23. Create Standards for churches in residential areas Re ulations
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 5
Council 2006-2007 Goal Options - Round 11 Februa 25, 2006
Goals/ideas Cgnory Comment
Planning
24. Evaluate effectiveness of floor area ration in R-1 zone Regulations
Plannin
25. Control posting signs Regulations
Planning
26. Stop abandoned shopping carts in residential areas and on Regulations
Rollins road Planning
27. Establish a clear policy that seeks to prevent the onslaught of Regulations
sameness. Establish a mechanism by which the distinguishing Planning
visual (and underlying functional) aspects of Burlingame are
identified and understood to the point that city policies and
upcoming development trends do not further reduce these
qualities.
28. To evaluate how we can better utilize city property to build Regulations
attainable housing. Planning
29. Medium Density Policy-The city should develop an explicit, Form Regulations
Based, medium density policy that shapes how increased density Planning
occurs in our neighborhoods.
30. Development Coding Policy- The city should pursue policies that Regulations
will reduce conflicts between departments and between adopted Planning
codes in relation to development. Focused attention should be
paid to the areas where a project that is approved by Planning
with favorable support is diminished by the subsequent (or
concurrent) requirements of other departments.
31. Circulation and Access Policy- Policies should be developed that Regulations
define the way Traffic and Parking Analyses are performed in the Planning
city and to set goals for consideration of all means of access.
32. Form Based Coding-the City should investigate the concept of Regulations
Form Based Coding to help implement important planning Planning
policies.
33. Reduce airport noise Regulations
Planning
34. Require that future underground utilities be provided for with Regulations
demolition permit Public works
35. Require stores on Burlingame Ave. to install hose bibs for Regulations
irrigation Public works
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 6
Council 2006-2007 Goal Options - Round II February 25, 2006
Goals/ideas Category Comment
36. One stop(central) for architects and developers for permits and Regulations
tans Public works
37. Provide way to appeal Bldg Dept. decisions that contradict other Regulations Code already allows an appeal of
depts. Public works Bldg. Official's decisions
38. Improve maintenance of streets; establish a developer fee that Regulations
can be used toward upkeep of our streets. With all the Public Works
development that is happening in Burlingame with continual
heavy machinery being used, it takes its toll on our streets.
39. Review building demolition policy Regulations
Public Works
40. Get cars off street on street sweeping days by issuing tickets Regulations
Public Works/Police
41. Evaluate amusement permits and implement stricter conditions Regulations Council already made changes to allow
such as mandatory security and larger establishments Police for required security last Fall.
responsible to hire police for security
42. Regulate business on Burlingame Ave whose patrons urinate on Regulations
the Ave. and abuse police Police
43. Host citywide cleanup day that includes pickup of large items and Solid Waste
electronic recycling.
44. Increase city diversion rate to 50% or better; concentrate work Solid Waste
with commercial businesses to reduce their waste reduction
process.
45. Combine all Household rec clables in one bin Solid Waste
46. Increase frequency of recycling ick up Solid Waste
47. Like large garbage pick up twice a year Solid Waste
48. Stop illegal dum in in residential area along Rollins Road Solid Waste
49. Do something about litter and upkeep along EI Camino Real Streets
(Look into how to educate residents and property owners about Maintenance
their responsibility)
50. Police need to monitor traffic in residential areas to address Traffic
excessive speeding by SUV's and other vehicles
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 7
Council 2006-2007 Goal Options - Round II February 25, 2006
Goals/ideas Category Comment
51. Re-constitute the Bicycle Subcommittee as a permanent fixture Traffic
to come up with a current list of projects that might be eligible for Bicycles/Pedestrians
funding. We did not have any projects in a state of readiness this
round and will not be applying for BPAC funds. We also need to
replace Councilman Cohen's seat on the committee. (Existing
committee not meeting regularly need to be a standing
committee so we can be more competitive for funding
52. Provide Bike racks on Burlingame and Broadway Avenues Traffic
Bicycles/Pedestrians
53. Work for platform installation + Broadway re-opening for service. Transportation
(a) Track findings on grade-separation for Broadway; (b) update
the TA's Strategic Plan to prioritize projects that impact the most
people e.g. Broadway Interchange.
54. Begin planning now for grade.separation of railroad Transportation
55. Make sure there is a plan to replant trees on an ongoing basis Trees
Tree maintenance/planting
56. Investigate fee-for-parking passes for all residents (along with Parking
neighborhood parking permits for those impacted by cars from
nearby businesses
57. Reactivate Neighborhood Watch program for emergency Police
coordination and community communications as well as crime
prevention. As in Santa Rosa, these groups could identify people
with medical skills, ham radio operators and others in each
neighborhood who would be helpful during emergencies.
58. Ask the Planning Commission to give serious consideration to Planning
the "faceprint" idea to assess plans in neighborhoods, as outlined
in the article that Martin Dreiling sent to us
59. Encourage more mass transit options for residents and local Transportation
workers, including reinstatement of train service at Broadway
station, and make sure Caltrain and Caltrans improvements
integrate with our vision for the future of our business areas.
60. Investigate new ways to build family-friendly policies into our Planning
planning processes (for example, on-site child care facilities,
playgrounds, laundry rooms, etc., in buildings with X number of
units).
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 8
Council 2006-2007 Goal Options - Round II February25, 2006
Goals/ideas Category Comment
61. Explore ways to enhance city's ability to attract and retain desired Business Promotion
businesses. Suggestions to consider include: Econ. Dev.
• Provide an Economic Development Contact Person
• Form a Committee Pursue Businesses to come to Burlingame
• Develop Small Business Ambassador Program
• Explore a proposal which can become a prototype for the future of downtown
Burlingame and an example of Public/Private enterprise
• Advertise on the shuttle
• Make Broadway the One stop shopping district
• Get more shopping opportunities for Broadway
• Have Farmers market on Broadway
• Broadway BID should hire a marketing person or resource
• Keep Pet Parade on Broadway
• City should cover the cost for the Police support of the Pet Parade
• Make/Advertise Broadway as Pet Friendly
• BIDs and Chamber work together to jointly promote commerce and attract new
businesses
• Avoid Duplication of Services between BIDs and Chamber
• Chamber should promote commerce
• Develop a task force that looks into the partnership of BID, and DBID with the
Chamber of Commerce: look at where there is replication; common goal is to
promote and retain business; have an economic development component and
establish a focus on bringing in new businesses resulting in increased revenue
• Strengthen the Chamber of Commerce
• Investigate offering WiFi on Broadway and Burlingame Avenue or citywide. (I
thought we decided to do this last year.)
• Form Economic Advisory Commission to creatively look for new revenues
• Encourage collaboration between Chamber of Commerce and Business
Improvement Districts so that they work together on Specific Area Plan,
encourage new businesses to come to Burlingame and promote those already
here, educate shoppers and employees about parking availability, and use new
city Web site to full advantage.
• Establish a link on the city website that provides commercial/retail properties
that are for sale and/or for lease
• Look at marketing opportunities like the freeway exposure of the Golf Driving
Range hill side.
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:39:00 AM 9
Attachment C
Council Stud Session 1/28/06 – Items/Su estions Referred Elsewhere
Goals/ideas Cate o Comment Lead Dept.
1. Increase sidewalk and street cleaning, especially Broadway Cost out with an option using * PW
around business areas. Upkeep volunteers
2. Remove ugly newspaper racks that block store fronts Broadway Refer to Public Works
on Broadway Upkeep
3. Council must involve a wide spectrum of citizens on Burlingame Ave Area Agree
what will happen to any public land in Burlingame's
downtown Areas A, B,C,D
4. Increase steam cleaning of sidewalks on Burlingame Burlingame Ave Area Cost out * Ply
Ave. Upkeep
5. Increase frequency of sidewalk sweeper on Burlingame Burlingame Ave Area Cost out *Pw
Ave. Upkeep
6. Increase frequency of cleaning downtown parking lots Burlingame Ave Area Cost out *PW
Upkeep
7. Increase sidewalk and street cleaning, especially Burlingame Ave Area Cost out *PW
around business areas. Upkeep
8. Proposals for mixed-use development on public land in Business Promotion Agree
the Downtown Area of Study should not be accepted for Econ. Dev
processing until completion of its SAP.
9. Any proposal for development on public property has to Business Promotion Agree
be done by a public bidding process and upon adoption Econ. Dev
of the SAP outcomes.
10. Establish an annuity to guarantee the jobs of crossing City Management Discuss at Budget Meeting
guards
11. Allocate property taxes to better help schools City Management Discuss at Budget Meeting *Finance
12. Find out what school districts charge for parcel taxes City Management Eliminate (will be addressed as part
now& in future of any future decision to place an
item on the ballot
13. Coordinate infrastructure-projects City Management Eliminate (staff to address in future
--Public education
14. Continue to look for new efficiencies, don't necessarily City Management Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
restore lost 'obs
15. Don't increase pensions for public safety employees— —City Management Discuss at Budget Meeting *Finance
16. Offer only defined contribution pensions to new City Management Eliminate as goal as it requires
employees State I islation
Note: *in column four indicates those items that will be referred to Council's Budget Study Session 1
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:42:00 AM
Council Study Session 1/28/06 — Items/Suggestions Referred Elsewhere
Goals/ideas I Category Comment Lead Dept.
17. Would like to see Commission interviews done in City Management Eliminate (to be discussed further by
public.; all council members to be involved in the the Council)
interview process; public gets better understanding of
how council members reach their conclusion
18. Balance the FY2006-07 budget with minimal impacts on City Management Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
employees and substantial investments in infrastructure
improvements and city reserves
19. Make investment in "social capital" a budget priority Civic Engagement Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
20. Have community involvement when discussing vision Civic Engagement Agree (SAP)
for our downtown area Citizen Input
21.Add opportunities for public comment at Council Civic Engagement Eliminate as a separate goal Agree
meetings Change procedure and add to public Citizen Input
comment
22. More study sessions Civic Engagement Discuss as a unit all of the civic
Citizen Input engagement suggestions
23. Link DBID, BBID, and Chamber to City website Civic Engagement Eliminate as a separate goal Agree
Website/WiFi
24. Create inventory of spaces available in Burlingame for Civic Engagement Agree request made of P&R Director
meetings and performances and make available to Voice Mail/Public Info. to pursue now
public.
25. Establish department voicemail hotlines for outgoing Civic Engagement Discuss as a unit all of the civic
information on work or citywide projects Voicemail/Pub. info engagement suggestions
26. Voicemail hotlines—outgoing message for roads to Civic Engagement Discuss as a unit all of the civic
avoid during paving (align with recording) Voicemail/Pub. info engagement suggestions
27. Televise all or selected planning commission meetings Civic Engagement Eliminate as separate goal-Part of * Finance
Television Council Chamber modification
discussion
28.Televise council study sessions Civic Engagement Eliminate as separate goal-Part of
Television Council Chamber modification
discussion
29. Recreation Dept. should reserve some space for Civic Engagement Refer to P& R Commission
community meeting vs. classes Meeting space
30. Eliminating block party permit fees if budget permits Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting *PW
less full cost recovery)
31. Reducing solar power permit fees if budget permits Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting *PW
Note: *in column four indicates those items that will be referred to Council's Budget Study Session 2
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:42:00 AM
Council Study Session 1/28/06 - Items/Suggestions Referred Elsewhere
L.Goals/ideas Category Comment Lead Dept.
32. Update Master-Fee Schedule to increase costs for Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting *Planning/Fin.
condominium permits.
33. Water rates are too high Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting *PW on 2/22
96a. House alarm fees are maybe too high Water& Sewer rates/fees
34. Subsidize those who can't afford high water bills Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting PW on 2/22
Water& Sewer rates/fees
35. Look at the revenues/expenditures on water bills Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting PW on 2/22
Water& Sewer rates/fees
36. Will Hetch-Hetchy improvements increase water bills Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting PW on 2/22
Water& Sewer rates/fees
37. Pay down water bond to reduce fees Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting PW on 2/22
Water& Sewer rates/fees
38. Sewer rates are too high Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting PW on 2/22
Water& Sewer rates/fees
39. Encourage solar energy by reducing permit fees Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting PW on 2/22
Public works fees
40. Stop block party fees Fees and Rates Discuss at Budget Meeting
Public works fees
41. Increase funds reserved for CIP Infrastructure Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
42. Create an annual dedicated fund for CIP Infrastructure Discuss at Budget Meeting_ *Finance
43. Dedicating the (199 1) extra 2% TOT or$2 million per Infrastructure Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
annum, whichever is larger
44. Traffic calming program (DPW will present to the Infrastructure Discuss at Budget Meeting *PW 3/22
Council in March
45. Pursue buying property along railroad right of way, (SF Infrastructure Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
Water Dept. land
46. Consider ways to acquire 50 foot right that is in the Infrastructure Discuss at Budget Meeting *PW-CIP
ownership of SF PUC. Possibly include in surrey re:
public facilities
47. Look at possible ways Burlingame can go back to Infrastructure Discuss at Budget Meeting *PW-CIP
paying for sidewalk repair especially when damage is
caused by trees.
48. Increasing library hours if budget permits Library Discuss at Budget Meeting * Libra
ry
49. Restore Libra collection budget Library Discuss at Budget Meeting * Libra
ry
50. Restore Library hours on Friday nights Library Discuss at Budget Meeting * Library
Note: *in column four indicates those items that will be referred to Council's Budget Study Session 3
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:42:00 AM
Council Stud Session 1/28/06 — Items/Su estions Referred Elsewhere
Goals/ideas Category Comment Lead Dept.
-51. One community-one book program Library Refer to Library Board *Library Bd.
52. Library donate books to Mississippi Gulf instead of an Library Refer to Library Board
annual book sale
53. Support teaming with Burlingame High School to Parks and Recreation Discuss at Budget Meeting * Parks &Rec
provide drainage & install artificial surface on the Schools
backfield when school construction is complete.
54. Improve signage in the Mills Canyon area Parks and Recreation Refer to P& R Commission
Mills Canyon
55. Need signs directing people to Mills Canyon Parks and Recreation Refer to P& R Commission
Mills Canyon
56. Park facilities at Washington Park Parks and Recreation Refer to P& R Commission
Washington Park
57. Drop the idea of a teen center few if any teens have Parks and Recreation Eliminate as a separate goal will be
said they want it Teen Center considered as part of follow up to
facilities master plan
58. Build a teen center Parks and Recreation Eliminate as a separate goal will be
Teen Center considered as part of follow up to
facilities master plan
59. More lap hours at pool Parks and Recreation Refer to P& R Commission
Pool
60. Add sidewalk at Airport Blvd Broadway Over crossing Pedestrian Safety Cost out *PW-CIP
61. More flashing crosswalks (like the one outside of Pedestrian Safety Cost out * PW-CIP
Stacks). Put one of both ends of Broadway and
Burlingame Ave.; and Burlingame Ave, to Washington
Park. Should pay for themselves quickly with increased
foot traffic and sales tax revenue.
62. City should carry crossing-guards costs. Pedestrian Safety Eliminate as a separate goal *Finance
Already Assumed In Budget
63. TSP commission needs to investigate lighted walkway Pedestrian Safety Suggest this be referred to
installation on Broadway by Walgreen's (requested by TSP Commission
merchants on 1100 block) and at Adeline and Balboa.
Neighbors on Devereaux near Lincoln School need help
with the amount and speed of traffic there.
64. Cross walk at Carmelita and Vancouver Pedestrian Safety Refer to TSP Commission
65. Make Broadwa Crosswalks more visible Pedestrian Safety Refer to TSP Commission
66. Improve Bike& Pedestrian Access to Bayfront and Pedestrian Safety Eliminate as a separate goal
Coyote Point area (Repeat of 127 above
Note: *in column four indicates those items that will be referred to Council's Budget Study Session 4
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:42:00 AM
Council Study Session 1/28/06 — Items/Suggestions Referred Elsewhere
Goals/ideas Category Comment Lead Dept.
67. Improve customer service at counter in Police Police Eliminate as a separate goal Chief
De artment was to look at it now
68. Increase level of PD staffing Police Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
Police Presence
69. Develop a neighborhood watch program Police Cost out with use of volunteers * Police
Police Presence
70. More police in downtown Police Discuss at Budget Meeting * Finance
Police Presence
71. Install cameras for traffic surveillance Police Discuss at Budget Meeting Under * Police
Police Presence review by Police Dept
72. PD response to Lions Club-House events Police Eliminate as a separate goal (Police
Police Presence already does respond)
73. Concerned about seeing PD officers relaxing under Police Eliminate as a separate goal
trees Police Presence Comment not a goal—good item for
Pub. Info
74. Create a parking permit program for the City's lots and Police Already underway
arking meters Parking Enforcement
75. Investigate incorporating the Vista Lane Community (at Regulations Eliminate as separate goal City
the request of one if its residents) Planning Attorney will bring back to Council at
a future meeting for further
discussion
76. Expand over the counter building permits from the Regulations Eliminate as separate goal standard * PW in budget
current goal of 60%to a consistent 70% level. Public works will be changed in new budget document
77. Better use of cable franchise agreement Specifically Regulations Eliminate as a separate goal
look into senior discounts Finance Finance Director will follow u
78. Improve lighting around parking lots, train stations and Streets Lighting Cost out * PW-CIP
schools
79. Improve level of street lighting near Recreation center Streets Cost out * PW-CIP
and High School Lighting
80. Increase street resurfacing Streets Discuss at Budget Meeting * PW—
Maintenance Pavement
81. Remove dips in streets (Howard Ave.) Streets Eliminate as a goal Discuss at Management
Maintenance Budget Meeting item for community
education
82. Upgrade and repair street lights Streets Discuss at Budget Meeting * PW- CIP
Maintenance
Note: *in column four indicates those items that will be referred to Council's Budget Study Session 5
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:42:00 AM
Council Study Session 1/28/06 - Items/Suggestions Referred Elsewhere
Goals/ideas Category Comment Lead Dept.
83. Correct Street (root intrusion) at Easton and Cabrillo (in Streets Eliminate as a new goal already
front of Easton Library Maintenance beinq considered
84. Resurface Broadway to make it more attractive for Streets Discuss at Budget Meeting * PW-Pavement
Business Maintenance Management
85. Resurface Adeline and other streets where sewer/storm Streets Discuss at Budget Meeting * PW-Pavement
drain work was done. Maintenance Management
86. Make infrastructure improvements to address flooding Storm Drainage Discuss at Budget Meeting * PW-Pavement
problems Management
87. Correct Signage at Adeline & Hoover Streets Refer to TSP Commission
Directional Signs
88. Correct Signage top of Hillside Drive Streets Refer to TSP Commission
Directional Signs
89. Stop Sign at Broadway& Paloma Traffic Refer to TSP Commission
Broadway
90. Slow Traffic on Broadway for child safety Traffic Refer to TSP Commission
Broadway
91. Place Yield Sign at Broadway Traffic Refer to TSP Commission
Broadway
92. Look into tree trimming maintenance in business areas. Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
Many trees are blocking signage on stores.
93. Don't remove eucalyptus trees on Easton because they Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
act asspeed bumps to slow traffic Tree maintenance/planting
94. Keep Caltrans from removing trees on El Camino Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
Tree maintenance/planting
95. Broadway tree should be trimmed more often for Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
uniform look Tree maintenance/planting
96. Maintain trees next to sidewalks better Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
Tree maintenance/planting
97. Enforce beautification ordinances Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
Tree Regulation
98. City requires 1-2 trees in front of every residence but Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
residents cannot modify, spray, or cut the tree Tree Regulation
99. Comprehensive tree planting program on Residential Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
streets Tree Planning-
100. Evaluate streets without trees Trees Refer to Beautification Commission
Tree Plannin
Note: "in column four indicates those items that will be referred to Council's Budget Study Session 6
Last printed 2/15/2006 11:42:00 AM
cITY STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM# 9a
Bl1RLI4GAME FIRE DEPARTMENT MEETING DATE: 2/22/06
a,
9$Ratm.iur,e l
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBMITTED BY:
FROM: Fire Department APPROVED BY: /!!
SUBJECT: Out of State Travel
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve out of state travel for Vince Falzon(Public Works, Jim
Ford (Police), John Parkin (Fire) and Bill Reilly(Fire) to attend the Emergency Management Institute in
Emmitsburg, Maryland.
BACKGROUND:
San Mateo County Area Office of Emergency Services has received a grant through FEMA that will
provide emergency management training(FEMA Course E930: IEMC Specific) for a team of up to 75
city and county employees and officials in emergency management. We were able to secure four(4)
positions for Burlingame. The team will consist of representatives from various disciplines within the
cities and county. The course is designed to meet the specific needs of those attending. The course
exercises that are being developed will be specific to San Mateo County.
The personnel from Burlingame that will be attending are very involved in the development of our
emergency plan and procedures. This is an excellent opportunity to learn, train, and exercise with many
of those from throughout the county that we will be expected to work with when a disaster occurs.
The training will take place at the National Emergency Management Institute in Emmitsburg, Maryland.
All costs for the course, travel, and lodging will be paid by FEMA. The only cost to local government
will be for the meals of the attendees ($93.00 per person).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funds are available to pay for the meals in the existing Disaster Preparedness training budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
EMI Specific Course Information—FY 2006, E930: IEMC Specific
March 6—10,2006 EMI SPECIFIC COURSE INFORMATION—FY 2006
E930: IEMC Specific
CANCELLATIONS: Fax to the Admissions Office,(301)447-1441,or email to nett-admissions(&Ahs.2ov
If you do not notify Admissions in writing at least 30 days prior to the course start date,you may be restricted from
attending EMI—or NFA—sponsored classes for 2 years.
"NETC Welcome Packet": As the applicant,you are responsible for reading the EMI Welcome Packet and other
information contained on the website below be ore you make any travel plans. Otherwise,you may incur additional
expenses which may not be reimbursable. This website also includes important security information that you should
review before your arrival at the National Emergency Training Center(NETC). To access this and other required
information,click on the file by your course code/name on the following web site page:
http://training.fema.gov/emiweb/welcomepkg.htmi
If you have any problems getting the materials from this site or you do not have access to a computer,please call
Admissions at(301)447-1035 and we will fax the materials to you.
MEAL AMOUNT: $93.00 (Meals include Sunday dinner through Friday lunch)
TRAVEL: Travel days are SUNDAY before the class start date and FRIDAY of the class end date for this course.
ARRIVAL: NETC provides a bus shuttle from the following airports and departs:
Ronald Reagan National Airport(DCA)promptly at 2:00 p.m. and 6:30 p.m.
Pick up is near the Travelers' Aid Desk in Terminal `B' (Lower Level,between gates 5 & 6). Buses and vans depart from
the outside lane. If you arrive in Terminal `A' please take the Economy/Rental Car airport bus shuttle to Terminal `B',
lower level, or walk across the terminal connector and go downstairs to exit door number 5, on your left.
Baltimore Washington International(BWI)promptly at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Pickup is near the Lower Level Baggage Areas 13 & 14. There is not a Travelers' Aid Desk in this location. Buses
and vans depart from the outside lane. Please be aware that BWI Airport is undergoing construction. If you have any
questions or concerns,please contact the NETC Transportation Office or visit the BWI website at:
http://www.bwiairport.com/customer—assistance/lower—level—terminal—map
Dulles International(IAD)Airport promptly at 6:00 p.m.
There is a Travelers' Aid Desk between Baggage Claim Areas 4& 5 on the baggage level, located at the east end of
the terminal. Go up the ramp and out exit door number 6.
If you need bus transportation to NETC from the airports,plan to arrive at least 1 hour before bus departure time.
Follow the bus reservations guidelines on the reverse side of this page to ensure a seat on the shuttle bus. If you do not
follow the guidelines,transportation to NETC shall be at your own expense.
Our transportation will be either a motor coach/charter bus identified with NETC signage in the front window/door,or
a maroon passenger van with the FEMA signage on the side doors. You may contact the NETC Transportation Office
a day before your arrival to inquire as to which vehicle will be used. For security reasons,our drivers cannot leave
their vehicles SO YOU WILL NEED TO LOOK FOR THE BUS OR VAN. If you do not see the carrier 5 minutes
prior to the pickup time,please call the NETC Transportation Office for guidance.
If you are scheduled to use NETC transportation and your flight is delayed for other than weather-related reasons,the
airline is responsible for your transportation to NETC. If they will not transport you,please call the Transportation Office
(301)447-1113 when you arrive at the airport.
DEPARTURE: Transportation departs NETC at 9:30 a.m.on Friday to the three airports.
✓ TRANSPORTATION DEPARTURE REQUESTS CANNOT BE ACCOMMODATED FOR ANY
OTHER TIMEFRAME!
✓ DO NOT SCHEDULE RETURN FLIGHTS BEFORE 1:30 p.m.
-----OVER-----
IEMC Travel Memo
Participants who are traveling direct to Emmitsbur_g within the course travel dates of
March 5-10, 2006
Contact: preferably via email
W. Brent Shimozono, Senior Corporate Travel Counselor
bshimozono(a�ethanallen.net
Ethan Allen & Meridian World Travel/American Express
2120 Broadway Street, Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone:650-688-3576, Fax: 650-688-3504Hours: Monday - Fridays 730AM - 430PM
State that you are making reservations for the OES Training at Emmitsburg. They will check your
name against an authorized class roster. There will be no advance air travel expenses incurred by
you.
Participants who are traveling outside the course travel dates of March 5-10, 2006
Make your own travel arrangements through Ethan Allen, another travel agency, or airline direct.
You will be reimbursed by the federal government as outlined in your welcome package. The
maximum reimbursement for a Saturday stayover is $450 and $500 for a no Saturday stayover.
All participants
FEMA requires at least a 21 day advanced non-refundable airfare purchase which would need to be
completed by February 10.
All participants assume responsibility for their travel commitment. If a student does not travel on a
ticket purchased individually and attend the course the airfare will not be reimbursed by FEMA. If the
ticket was provided through County funds and the student does not attend the course the County will
collect the airfare from the student or their respective agency.
Meals are not funded by FEMA. Reimbursement for meals is at the discretion and policy of each
agency and department. The purchase of a dining hall meal ticket is mandatory at $93.00 for the
week. Payment is by credit card, traveler's checks, or government checks made to the food service
vendor. No personal checks will be accepted.
Pre-course training will be provided during the week of February 20th. Details to follow.
See link below for additional information about travel and residency at the Emergency Management
Institute. For questions call Jim Begansky 650-363-4955 or Bill O'Callahan at 650-5991294.
www.training.fema.gov/EMlweb/NETCEMIWelcome.html
Agenda
Item # 9b
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: February 22 2006
.o
r
1
SUBMITTED BY
or-
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 2006
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA DRIVE STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS TO JMB CONSTRUCTION INC. CITY PROJECT NO.
80880
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached
resolution accepting $257,220 in improvements to the California Drive Storm Drain
Project at 945 California Drive by JMB Construction.
DISCUSSION: On August 17, 2004, Council awarded a contract to JMB Construction
for construction of the California Drive Storm Drain Improvements Project. The work
included removal of a damaged corrugated metal culvert and replacement with a
concrete box culvert at the Sanchez Creek crossing of California Drive. The
replacement culvert will provide an increased storm water flow capacity and reduce
flooding in the Laguna Avenue area.
There was an additional cost of $35,220 for installation of the headwall due to
unforeseen water pipeline and utility conflicts, and removal of unforeseen hazardous
excavated material. The project's final cost is 15.8% above the awarded contract.
BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in CIP 80880 for this contract.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Invoice
Doug BefC
Senior Engineer
c: Larry Anderson, City Attorney
George Bagdon, Director of Public Works,
Jesus Nava, Director of Finance
Mary Asturias, Financial Service Manager
Doris Mortensen, City Clerk
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80880Feb2006.doc
RESOLUTION NO. -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA DRIVE STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS TO JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 80880
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council
does hereby find, order and determine as follows:
1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by JMB
CONSTRUCTION, INC. under the terms of its contract with the City dated AUGUST 17, 2004 has
been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 80880.
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
Cathy Baylock, Mayor
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day of , 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Doris Mortensen, City Clerk
SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80880\Resolution Accepting.wpd
JMB CONSTRUCTION CALIFORNIA DRIVE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
132 South Maple Avenue BOX CULVERT AT 945 CALIFORNIA DRIVE DATE:January 26th,2006
South San Francisco,CA 94080 CITY OF BURLINGAME FOR THE MONTH OF:Jan'06
TELEPHONE (650)267-5300 PROGRESS PAYMENT.NO#4 FINAL
CITY PROJECT NO.80880
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT BID BID QTY THIS QTY TO %AGE $AMOUNT PREVIOUS $AMOUNT
PRICE SIZE QTY TOTAL PERIOD DATE TO DATE TO DATE PAID THIS PERIOD
1 Mobilization(not to exceed 10%of total) $10,000.00 LS 1 $10,000.00 25.00% 100.00% 100% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00
2 Traffic Control $10,000.00 LS 1 $10,000.00 25.00% 100.00% 100% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00
3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program $10,000.00 LS 1 $10,000.00 25.00% 100.00% 100% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00
4 Cofferdam and Temp Pump Bypass $6,000.00 LS 1 $6,000.00 25.00% 100.00% 100% $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $0.00
5 Clearing,Grubbing,Demo,and Removals $10,000.00 LS 1 $10,000.00 25.00% 100.00% 100% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00
6 Structural Excavation(approx.450 CY) $60,000.00 LS 1 $60,000.00 0.00% 100.00% 100% $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $0.00
7 4x10 Precast Reinforced Concrete Box(City $500.00 LF 85 $42,500.00 0.0 85 100% $42,500.00 $42,500.00 $0.00
Furnished materials)
8 Class 2 Premeable Drain Rock(3/4") $30.00 Tons 79 $2,370.00 70.0 70 89% $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $0.00
9 Structural Backfill(Class 2 AB) $30.00 Tons 501 $15,030.00 501.0 501 100% $15,030.00 $15,030.00 $0.00
10 Asphalt Concrete Pavement $250.00 Tons 24 $6,000.00 37.0 37 154% $9,250.00 $9,250.00 $0.00
11 Pavement Reinforcing Fabric $10.00 SY 130 $1,300.00 159.0 159 122% $1,590.00 $1,590.00 $0.00
12 Structural Concrete,Transition Structure, $1,800.00 CY 16 $28,800.00 21.0 30 188% $54,000.00 $54,000.00 $0.00
Wingwalls,Apron,Parapet,and Misc Conc.
13 Slope protection,Rock rip-rap $300.00 TONS 15 $4,500.00 0.0 0 0% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
14 Drainage Inlet Type GO,with Frame and Grate $5,000.00 EACH 1 $5,000.00 1.0 1 100% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00
(entrance,top section)
15 Concrete Curb,Gutter and Sidewalks $300.00 CY 35 $10,500.001 11.0 11 31%1 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $0.00
16 Sheering,Bracing,and Shoring $0.00 0% $0.00 $0.00 1 $0.00
TOTAL CONTRACT $222,000.00 $238,770.00 $238,770.00 $0.00
'Required by Sections 6700-6708 of the Labor Code with pricing included in items 1 through 11 above.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS
CRD CREDIT
ADD C.C.O.#1:Analytical Testing $2,425.00 L.S. 1 $2,425.00 1 1 100% $2,425.00 _ $2,425.00 $0.00
ADD C.C.O.#2:Dirt Off haul $13,000.00 L.S. 1 $13,000.00 1 1 100% $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $0.00
ADD C.C.O.#3:Conflict with ductbank $1,525.00 L.S. 1 $1,525.00 1 1 100% $1,525.00 $1,525.00 $0.00
ADD C.C.O.#4:Steel Casing $1,500.00 L.S. 1 $1,500.00 1 1 100% $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $0.00
$18,450.00 $18,450.00 $0.00
PREPARED BY: SUBTOTAL `*""'"'''- $257,220 $257,220 $0
Z/O/O,�; LIQUIDATED DAMAGES(DEDUCTION) """""""' $0 $0 $0
CHECKED BY: RELEASE RETENTION(10%) ***"**'******** $0 ($25,722) $25,722
SUBTOTAL WITH DEDUCTIONS """""""' $257,220 $231,498 $25,722
CON f'RACTOR:
TOTAL THIS PERIOD """""*'*****'**'**"*'**" $257,220 $231,498 $25,722
APPROVEL)By:/
CITY ENGINEE _ RECEIVED,
FEB 9 2006
Printed:2/7/2006 WAMCWMB-AM TI* �\ RNIA19012806
CITA
1
$3,187,178.10
Ck. No. 16226- 16905
Excludes Library Cks.16340-16360
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
i
Payroll for January 2006
$2,544,120.57
Ck. No. 164540- 164770
INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
PERS HEALTH
PERS RETIREMENT
FEDERAL 941 TAX
STATE DISABILITY TAX
STATE INCOME TAX
PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP
SECTION 125 DEDUCTION
CD m
m �
�• n
oc �
o m
CD 3
N
N
S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS N
m
CITY OF BURLINGAME
02-10-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 12
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 90,579.33
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 11,088.49
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 158,523.20
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 245,246.52
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 380,274.75
WATER FUND 526 7,377.98
SEWER FUND 527 3,583.15
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,111.28
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 5,070.08
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 5,748.52
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 16,971.44
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 2,583.30
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,856.42
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,679.20
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 900.00
FEDERAL GRANTS FUND 737 16,651.09
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 778.92
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8951,023.67
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS 1S TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 12
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 16756 THROUGH 16905 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $951,023.67, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.... . . ........ . . ...... . . . ..... . . . .. . . ../.../. . .
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
. ..... . . ......... . ..... . . ..... . .... . .../.. ./. . .
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 11
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
16897 SALLY BECK 26261 69.00
MISCELLANEOUS 69.00 101 36330 000 1331
16898 ALLISON ABBO 26262 117.00
MISCELLANEOUS 117.00 101 36330 000 1331
16899 MR BUSHNEFF 26263 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1331
16900 ADELE GALVIN 26264 204.00
MISCELLANEOUS 204.00 101 36330 000 1331
16901 BARBARA MALEY 26265 102.00 -
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1331
16902 TERESA SILVESTRI 26266 500.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 101 68010 220 1349
16903 CONTINENTAL TEXTILE CO 26267 550.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 275.00 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 275.00 527 66520 120
16904 ANCHOR AUDIO INC 26268 33.66
MISC. SUPPLIES 33.66 101 68010 120 1101
16905 PAUL BOGATSKY 26269 312.00
MISCELLANEOUS 312.00 101 36310
TOTAL 8951,023.67
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T REG I ST ER PAGE 10
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16881 JUDITH BOTTGER 26245 41.00
MISCELLANEOUS 41.00 101 36330 000 1644
16882 GLORIA MUELLER 26246 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1644
16883 JENNY MURPHY 26247 150.00
MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593
16884 MR TOM 26248 119.00
MISCELLANEOUS 119.00 101 36330 000 1331
16885 CAROLINE BOWERS 26249 119.00
MISCELLANEOUS 119.00 101 36330 000 1331
16886 KENT LIAO 26250 142.00
MISCELLANEOUS 142.00 101 36330 000 1331
16887 AMY WELCH 26251 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1331
16888 JENNIFER PARKER 26252 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1331
16889 NANCY LEE 26253 200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 22593
16890 CATHY STANNARD-STOCKTON 26254 840.00
MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593
MISCELLANEOUS 690.00 101 36330 000 1213
16891 KRISS SILVA 26255 119.00
MISCELLANEOUS 119.00 101 36330 000 1331
16892 NANCY CAMPANA 26256 88.00
MISCELLANEOUS 88.00 101 36330 000 1784
16893 LINDA BATT 26257 167.00
MISCELLANEOUS 167.00 101 36330 000 1660
16894 MR RIDDER 26258 69.00
MISCELLANEOUS 69.00 101 36330 000 1331
16895 MR GOODROW 26259 69.00
MISCELLANEOUS 69.00 101 36330 000 1331
16896 MICHAEL CURRIER 26260 69.00
MISCELLANEOUS 69.00 101 36330 000 1331
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
"' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16867 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 1,307.71
OFFICE EXPENSE 223.85 101 65300 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.05 101 66210 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 97.19 527 66520 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 338.48 619 64460 110
SMALL TOOLS 623.14 619 64460 130
16868 GLENN SAITO 26200 446.00
MISCELLANEOUS 352.00 101 36330 000 1331
MISCELLANEOUS 94.00 101 36330 000 1330
16869 CALIFORNIA POWER PARTNERS 26205 98,340.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 98,340.75 327 81510 220
16870 RYAN SAN JUAN 26227 315.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 315.00 101 68010 220 1780
16871 REDENTOR SAN JUAN 26231 120.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1780
16872 ALEXANDRA SHAPIRO 26236 44.00
MISCELLANEOUS 44.00 101 36330 000 1646
16873 PEGGY REID 26237 60.00
MISCELLANEOUS 60.00 101 36330 000 1660
16874 MARY ANN WEISBERG 26238 33.00
MISCELLANEOUS 33.00 101 36330 000 1660
16875 PAUL NOUNOU 26239 110.00
MISCELLANEOUS 110.00 101 36330 000 1781
16876 CAROL ALEXANDER 26240 17.00
MISCELLANEOUS 17.00 101 36330 000 1660
16877 VIOLA KUCHLENZ 26241 80.00
MISCELLANEOUS 80.00 101 36330 000 1648
16878 HELEN CHRISTIAN 26242 119.00
MISCELLANEOUS 119.00 101 36330 000 1331
16879 NICOLE LYCETT 26243 149.00
MISCELLANEOUS 149.00 101 36330 000 1660
16880 JOHN FISKE 26244 39.00
MISCELLANEOUS 39.00 101 36330 000 1641
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16854 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 17.52
TRAINING EXPENSE 17.52 527 66520 260
16855 A2Z BUSINESS SYSTEMS 25020 72.45
OFFICE EXPENSE 72.45 101 66210 110
16856 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 171.35
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220
16857 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 563.22
OFFICE EXPENSE 583.22 101 65100 110
16858 REBECCA JUDD 25308 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1331
16859 NETVERSANT SILICON VALLEY 25422 2,416.01
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,903.51 619 64460 210 5272
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 332.50 619 64460 210 5273
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 180.00 619 64460 210 5272
16860 LARISA YAGLONITSER 25517 48.00
MISCELLANEOUS 48.00 101 36330 000 1646
16861 CINGULAR WIRELESS-ATLYS 25730 55.79
COMMUNICATIONS 55.79 101 65100 160
16862 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25731 1,178.91
COMMUNICATIONS 399.99 526 69020 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 778.92 896 20281
16863 J HOWARD ENGINEERING 25811 281,934.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 281,934.00 327 81150 220
16864 GOODPARENTS, INC. 25981 900.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 900.00 730 69587 120
16865 MARGARET MCDONNELL 26040 55.00
MISCELLANEOUS 27.00 101 36330 000 1644
MISCELLANEOUS 28.00 101 36330 000 1521
16866 NATHAN FABEL 26113 76.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.00 101 68010 220 1780
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16839 CHEMSEARCH 23864 293.20
MISC. SUPPLIES 293.20 527 66520 120
16840 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 357.38
MISC. SUPPLIES -55.41 101 68010 120 1111
MISC. SUPPLIES 99.86 101 68010 120 1112
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.77 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 28.16 619 64460 220 5240
16841 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 436.26
COMMUNICATIONS 436.26 101 68020 160 2200
16842 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 7,533.56
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,533.56 326 80770 220
16843 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 218.56
OFFICE EXPENSE 218.56 101 64250 110
16844 AUDREY TSE 24193 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1331
16845 BRIAN WACHHORST 24372 250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 618 64520 604
16846 WATER SOLUTIONS 24532 1,500.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,500.00 526 69020 260
16847 PRESERVATION PAINTING 24552 8,500.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8,500.00 320 80790 210
16848 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1780
16849 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 582.80
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 582.80 101 64420 210
16850 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 187.92
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 187.92 201 65200 203
16851 T MOBILE 24846 30.88
COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160
16852 LAURETTA PRINTING & COPY CENTER 24908 390.60
MISCELLANEOUS 390.60 101 64400 115
16853 CAPORICCI & LARSON 24920 7,185.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,185.00 101 64560 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16826 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 315.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 315.00 101 68010 220 1780
16827 SAY AREA LIGHTS AND SIRENS 23083 300.00
RADIO MAINT. 300.00 201 65200 205
16828 T. RANDOLPH GRANGE 23112 900.00
MISCELLANEOUS 900.00 731 22525
16829 NADINE LEWANDOWSKI 23163 238.00
MISCELLANEOUS 238.00 101 36330 000 1331
16830 OFFICE MAX 23306 367.94
OFFICE EXPENSE 65.89 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 63.54 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 78.33 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 64.10 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 96.08 201 65200 110
16831 MARCO CAVALIERI 23340 358.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 358.00 101 65300 200
16832 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 1,080.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,080.00 526 69020 260
16833 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200
16834 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 21,839.86
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,437.07 326 80931 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 14,402.79 326 81480 210
16835 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 44.90
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.90 619 64460 120 5180
16836 AT&T 23661 27.17
COMMUNICATIONS 27.17 621 64450 160
16837 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 54.12
TRAINING EXPENSE 27.06 526 69020 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 27.06 527 66520 260
16838 SBC/MCI 23728 138.56
COMMUNICATIONS 22.98 101 64150 160
COMMUNICATIONS 42.35 101 68020 160 2200
COMMUNICATIONS 35.95 101 67500 160
COMMUNICATIONS 14.30 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 22.98 621 64450 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16811 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 - 839.10
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 839.10 326 80910 210
16812 PHIL SCOTT 20550 238.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 238.00 527 66520 250
16813 BAYSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS INC. 20650 477.38
MISC. SUPPLIES 477.38 101 66210 120
16814 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 960.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 960.00 101 68010 220 1331
16815 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 77.19
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 77.19 101 64350 200
16816 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 612.52
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 612.52 625 65213 203
16817 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 142.92
SUPPLIES 142.92 620 15000
16818 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 11,695.50
MISCELLANEOUS 11,695.50 101 37010
16819 GARY ROBB 22101 2,249.09
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,249.09 101 64420 210
16820 BETTS TRUCK PARTS 22111 1,096.33
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,096.33 201 65200 203
16821 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 2,313.31
MISC. SUPPLIES 991.57 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,321.74 527 66520 120
16822 STEVE NELSON 22449 84.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780
16823 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,210.00
MISCELLANEOUS 340.00 201 35221 000 7100
MISCELLANEOUS 870.00 201 35220 000 7100
16824 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 70.32
COMMUNICATIONS 23.44 101 66210 160
COMMUNICATIONS 23.44 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 23.44 527 66520 160
16825 CSUS FOUNDATION INC. 22615 88.26
TRAINING EXPENSE 88.26 526 69020 260
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16796 STADAM & ASSOCIATES 18275 125.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 101 68010 220 1780
16797 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 18565 20,883.48
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,883.48 101 64540 220
16798 PENINSULA CONFLICT 18633 7,480.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,480.50 101 64560 220
16799 DEAN'S AUTO BODY & 18795 649.50
MISCELLANEOUS 649.50 618 64520 604
16800 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 71.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 71.00 526 69020 240
16801 WESTERN RIGGING PRODUCTS INC 18976 275.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00 320 81060 220
16802 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 475.58
MISC. SUPPLIES 475.58 526 69020 120
16803 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 117.37
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 117.37 101 64200 150
16804 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 389.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 220.00 101 64350 210
TRAINING EXPENSE 169.00 101 64420 262
16805 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 194.10
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 78.72 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 115.38 625 65213 203
16806 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210
16807 MCCUNE AUDIO/VISUAL/VIDEO 19621 1,779.20
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,779.20 730 69547 120
16808 CASEY CONSTRUCTION 19820 129,616.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129,616.00 320 80570 220
16809 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 800.00
COMMUNICATIONS 800.00 621 64450 160
16810 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 273.05
OFFICE EXPENSE 273.05 101 64420 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16781 ELECTRO-MOTION INCORPORATED 14007 3,174.44
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 953.97 101 66210 230
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,220.47 -526 69020 120
16782 THE PAIGE COMPANY, INC. 14138 325.73
OFFICE EXPENSE 325.73 101 64200 110
16783 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 358.00
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 358.00 527 66520 230
16784 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS 14414 16,651.09
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 16,651.09 737 65120 140
16785 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 1,094.94
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 910.76 527 66520 230
MISC. SUPPLIES 184.18 619 64460 120 5160
16786 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORP. 15055 15.10
MISCELLANEOUS 15.10 201 22585
16787 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 50.00
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 50.00 101 64420 121
16788 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,109.86
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,109.86 101 65100 220
16789 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 - 17,282.20
GAS, OIL & GREASE 2,481.35 201 65200 201
SUPPLIES 14,800.85 620 15000
16790 TEAM CLEAN 15827 371.14
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 371.14 201 65200 220
16791 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 136.62
SUPPLIES 136.62 620 15000
16792 MIKE SMITH 16637 182.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 182.00 101 68010 220 1789
16793 JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. 17299 215,034.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 215,034.00 326 80770 220
16794 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 326.79
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 326.79 201 65200 203
16795 DON CHESNEY 18143 1,131.23
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,131.23 201 65200 260
,
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16769 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 - 20,132.20
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,132.20 320 76350 220
16770 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 3,160.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 64250 114
OFFICE EXPENSE 160.00 621 64450 110
16771 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210
16772 LIFE ASSIST 09392 919.67
SUPPLIES 919.67 201 65200 112
16773 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 2,367.58
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 666.50 618 64520 210
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 1,701.08 618 64520 601
16774 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 465.85
MISC. SUPPLIES 465.85 201 65200 111
16775 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 853.20
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT.. 853.20 625 65213 203
16776 IDEAL RESTORATIVE DRYING, INC. 11352 1,803.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,803.00 618 64520 210
16777 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 275.32
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 275.32 625 65213 203
16778 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 3,093.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 300.00 101 65100 110
COMMUNICATIONS 391.82 101 65100 160
GAS, OIL & GREASE 109.46 101 65100 201
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 75.00 101 65100 210
TRAINING EXPENSE 2,217.47 101 65100 260
16779 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13753 9,034.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,034.00 101 64420 210
16780 AMERON 13880 1,261.75
MISCELLANEOUS 1,261.75 619 64460 400
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
02/10/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16756 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 82.71
MISC. SUPPLIES 27.02 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 20.02 619 64460 120 5170
MISC. SUPPLIES 35.67 619 64460 120 5120
16757 SAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 1,891.05
SUPPLIES 1,891.05 620 15000
16758 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 21.24
MISC. SUPPLIES 21.24 527 66520 120
16759 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220
16760 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 360.87
OFFICE EXPENSE 208.75 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 31.12 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.19 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 90.81 101 68020 120 2200
16761 CRAFT PRINTERS 01842 38.97
OFFICE EXPENSE 38.97 101 64100 110
16762 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 2,158.15
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 1,422.59 201 65200 140
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 735.56 201 65200 203
16763 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 1,471.12
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,471.12 101 68020 120 2200
16764 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 501.98
MISC. SUPPLIES 37.80 101 68010 120 1788
TRAINING EXPENSE 464.18 101 68020 260 2200
16765 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,000.92
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,000.92 101 66210 226
16766 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 484.42
MISC. SUPPLIES 484.42 619 64460 120
16767 SNAP ON TOOLS 03587 78.81
SMALL TOOLS 78.81 201 65200 130
16768 TAP PLASTICS 03739 211.31
MISC. SUPPLIES 211.31 526 69020 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
02-02-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 161,357.34
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 19,279.77
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 26,469.07
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 -19,480.28
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 544.05
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 215,260.51
WATER FUND 526 5,144.02
SEWER FUND 527 40,168.69
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 955.02
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 10,511.00
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,161.47
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,908.53
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 643.56
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,446.70
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 3,167.00
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 200.04
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 52,556.75
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8523,293.24
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 16618 THROUGH 16755 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF 8523,293.24, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
........................I........... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16746 DAVID TILLMAN 26224 1,015.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525
16747 GARY O'GRADY 26225 1,020.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525
16748 NC AUTO PARTS 26226 2,251.65
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,251.65 625 65213 203
16749 RYAN SAN JUAN 26227 100.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 101 68010 220 1780
16750 RANDY HAAG 26228 267.00
MISCELLANEOUS 267.00 101 36330 000 1422
16751 KERA BURDICK 26229 267.00
MISCELLANEOUS 267.00 101 36330 000 1422
16752 JULIE MIYACHI 26230 267.00
MISCELLANEOUS 267.00 101 36330 000 1422
16753 REDENTOR SAN JUAN 26231 80.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80.00 101 68010 220 1780
16754 MARGUERITE CHOLAKIAN 26232 90.00
MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1780
16755 JANIE DONNELLY 26233 202.00
MISCELLANEOUS 202.00 101 36330 000 1331
TOTAL $523,293.24
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16730 RICHARD HOLTZ 26208 239.15
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 239.15 101 64420 210
16731 GILSON MECHANICAL 26209 11,800.00
MISCELLANEOUS 11,800.00 101 22546
16732 FLUID POWER TRAINING ASSOC 26210 350.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 350.00 620 66700 260
16733 TIARA WOODS DEVELOPMENTS 26211 570.40
MISCELLANEOUS 570.40 526 22502
16734 ROBERT GOMEZ 26212 210.00
MISCELLANEOUS 210.00 101 31510
16735 SIYU FU 26213 630.00
MISCELLANEOUS 630.00 101 22593
16736 JOE EANDI 26214 150.00
MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593
16737 RMR CONSTRUCTION 26215 7,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 7,500.00 101 22546 `
16738 WILLIAM INSLEY 26216 2,250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546
16739 SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP 26217 65.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 65.00 101 66100 250
16740 ALLES COMPANY 26218 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
16741 EXCELLENT TECHNICAL ROOFING 26219 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
16742 GSA CONSTRUCTION 26220 2,000.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,000.00 101 22520
16743 TRC SOLUTIONS 26221 750.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 750.00 101 22520
16744 MILIKA VAAIVAKA 26222 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
16745 ARKADY ZLOBINSKY 26223 450.00
MISCELLANEOUS 450.00 101 22525
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16716 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25777 713.84
COMMUNICATIONS 713.84 201 65200 160
16717 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25778 310.02
COMMUNICATIONS 310.02 101 66100 160
16718 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25792 118.98
COMMUNICATIONS 118.98 201 65200 160
16719 HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC 25852 512.46
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 512.46 621 64450 200
16720 M.H.A. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 26017 1,781.91
DEPOSIT REFUND 1,781.91 101 22590
16721 IMPACT SCIENCES 26099 15,058.69
DEPOSIT REFUND 15,058.69 101 22590
16722 NATHAN FABEL 26113 76.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.00 101 68010 220 1780
16723 PACIFIC SOD 26136 220.61
MISC. SUPPLIES 220.61 101 68020 120 2200
16724 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 332.16
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.84 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 4.28 101 65150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 18.22 101 64200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 93.77 101 66210 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 195.05 619 64460 110
16725 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 26143 76.25
MISC. SUPPLIES 76.25 101 64150 120
16726 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 26144 42.55
COMMUNICATIONS 42.55 101 64100 160
16727 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26161 44.37
COMMUNICATIONS 44.37 530 65400 160
16728 SHILOG LTD. 26195 70.30
MISC. SUPPLIES 70.30 101 65100 120
16729 J.P. COOKE CO. 26207 252.60
OFFICE EXPENSE 232.02 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.58 101 64150 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16702 AETNA 24760 2,905.34
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,634.04 130 20022
MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028
16703 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 4,934.55
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,934.55 130 20014
16704 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,097.28
MISCELLANEOUS 989.15 130 20025
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,108.13 130 20021
16705 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 26.80
VEHICLE MAINT. 23.49 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 3.31 201 65200 203
16706 LAURETTA PRINTING 8 COPY CENTER 24908 840.88
MISCELLANEOUS 840.88 101 64400 115
16707 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 438.02
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220
16708 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 135.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 135.00 530 65400 220
16709 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 387.74
OFFICE EXPENSE 104.21 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 49.20 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 234.33 201 65200 120
16710 HEATHER CALK 25451 45.00
MISCELLANEOUS 45.00 101 36330 000 1422
16711 LARRY NEJASMICH 25458 415.00
MISCELLANEOUS 415.00 101 22525
16712 KEITH GOOD 25478 1,108.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,108.00 101 22546
16713 CINGULAR WIRELESS-ATLYS 25730 63.08
COMMUNICATIONS 63.08 101 65100 160
16714 LINGULAR WIRELESS 25775 221.87
COMMUNICATIONS 221.87 101 65100 160
16715 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25776 92.19
COMMUNICATIONS 92.19 201 65200 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16686 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 550.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 730 69533 220
16687 RUSS COHEN 23985 460.87
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 460.87 101 64150 250
16688 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 1,545.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,545.00 320 80520 220
16689 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521
16690 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 388.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 388.00 101 68010 220 1521
16691 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 2,250.00
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 2,250.00 526 69020 290
16692 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 215,260.51
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 215,260.51 327 79480 220
16693 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,095.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,095.00 130 20016
16694 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00
UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080
16695 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00
MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024
16696 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 600.00
MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024
16697 C.L.E.A. 24523 663.00
MISCELLANEOUS 663.00 130 20026
16698 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 420.00
UNION DUES 420.00 130 21091
16699 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5.52 130 21015
MISCELLANEOUS 315.08 130 21092
16700 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24607 254.50
UTILITY EXPENSE 254.50 896 20281
16701 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 84.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16674 OFFICE MAX 23306 505.65
OFFICE EXPENSE 452.50 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 5.24 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 47.91 621 64450 110
16675 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 249.14
MISC. SUPPLIES 249.14 619 64460 120
16676 DATASAFE 23410 123.40
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.40 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 50.75 101 64420 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 42.25 101 64350 120
16677 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. 23462 592.97
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 592.97 530 65400 200
16678 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 392.43
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 392.43 326 73171 210
16679 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 62.25
MISC. SUPPLIES 62.25 619 64460 120 5120
16680 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 882.97
TRAINING EXPENSE 294.32 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 294.32 526 69020 260 -
TRAINING EXPENSE 294.33 527 66520 260
16681 SBC/MCI 23728 8,055.95
UTILITY EXPENSE 8,055.95 896 20281
16682 KEITH MARTIN 23788 251.98
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 100.00 101 66210 250
OFFICE EXPENSE 3.85 526 69020 110
MISCELLANEOUS 16.25 526 69020 233
TRAINING EXPENSE 52.20 526 69020 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 34.00 527 66520 260
OFFICE EXPENSE 17.68 619 64460 110
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 28.00 620 66700 250
16683 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 663.40
MISC. SUPPLIES 663.40 619 64460 120
16684 NORCAL MUNICIPAL PERSONNEL MANAG 23861 75.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 75.00 101 64420 250
16685 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 211.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 211.00 619 64460 220 5121
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16658 GEORGE BAGDON 21174 371.95
MISCELLANEOUS 371.95 101 64420 031
16659 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 227.14
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 227.14 619 64460 220 5120
16660 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 83.19
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 83.19 621 64450 190
16661 RICOH CORPORATION 21630 16.58
OFFICE EXPENSE 16.58 101 68010 110 1101
16662 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 102.60
COMMUNICATIONS 102.60 101 65300 160
16663 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 5,580.39
MISCELLANEOUS 5,580.39 101 37010
16664 SEWER RAT 21821 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
16665 AT&T 22138 6,37
COMMUNICATIONS 6.37 101 65100 160
16666 STEVE NELSON 22449 84.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780
16667 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22620 19,557.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,557.25 201 65200 220
16668 TURF STAR 22682 50.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 50.00 101 68020 200 2200
16669 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYST 22730 200.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 200.00 101 64420 210
16670 MAXIMUS, INC 22746 2,750.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,750.00 101 64560 210
16671 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 147.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147.00 101 68010 220 1780
16672 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 10,511.00
CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 10,511.00 618 64520 225
16673 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 1,567.11
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 1,567.11 201 65200 140
1 l
}
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16644 GRAFIX SHOPPE 17687 492.25
MISCELLANEOUS -39.60 101 23611
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 367.77 101 65100 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 164.08 530 65400 200
16645 GEORGE MASTALIR 18088 76.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.00 101 68010 220 1780
16646 DOUG'S MOTORCYCLE SERVICE 18337 1,036.69
SUPPLIES 1,036.69 620 15000
16647 ESPOSTO'S RED CARPET CATERING 18385 151.62
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 151.62 326 81470 250
16648 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 18713 1,412.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,412.69 730 69560 120 2300
16649 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 138.67
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 138.67 101 64200 150
16650 JAMES CACCIA PLUMBING 19320 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
16651 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 103.74
MISC. SUPPLIES 79.47 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 24.27 620 66700 120
16652 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 136.09
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 214.81 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. -78.72 625 65213 203
16653 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180
16654 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 212.08
SUPPLIES 212.08 620 15000
16655 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 183.04
OFFICE EXPENSE 183.04 101 64420 110
16656 J. SNELL & CO., INC. 20571 214.17
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 214.17 101 68010 220 1101
16657 SPRINT PCS 20724 33.14
COMMUNICATIONS 33.14 101 64150 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
* ' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16632 SNAP ON TOOLS 03587 21 .57
SMALL TOOLS 21 .57 620 66700 130
16633 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 974.72
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 974.72 320 76350 220
16634 B.E. I . ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 34.59
MISC. SUPPLIES 34.59 619 64460 120
16635 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF ' S OFC. 09433 1 ,702.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11494.00 101 65100 220
PRISONER EXPENSE 208.00 101 65100 291
16636 ALERT DOOR SERVICE, INC. 10059 1 ,045.00
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT . 1 ,045 .00 101 68020 190 2300
16637 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 270.00
RADIO MAINT. 270.00 201 65200 205
16638 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 273.77
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 273.77 625 65213 203
16639 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,722.54
MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 201 35230 000 7120
OFFICE EXPENSE 10.81 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 6.46 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 45.59 201 65200 120
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 609.45 201 65200 140
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 339. 19 201 65200 203
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 201 65200 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 175.00 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 1 ,051 .00 201 65200 260
MISCELLANEOUS 200.04 731 22554
16640 BOETHING TREELAND FARMS, INC. 13743 1 ,204.31
MISC. SUPPLIES 1 ,204.31 730 69560 120 2300
16641 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 93.81
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 25.61 527 66520 230
MISC. SUPPLIES 68.20 619 64460 120 5250
16642 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 16247 243.55
TRAINING EXPENSE 243.55 101 65100 260
16643 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP 17456 6,460.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,460.00 101 68020 220 2100
l
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
02/02/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16618 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 177.69
SUPPLIES 177.69 620 15000
16619 BURLINGAME GLASS COMPANY 01533 195.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 195.00 619 64460 120 5150
16620 L. N. CURTIS&SONS 02027 918.38
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 566.73 201 65200 140
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 351.65 201 65200 203
16621 D &M TOWING, INC. 02029 45.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.00 101 65100 200
16622 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 67.31
MISCELLANEOUS 67.31 101 68020 192 2200
16623 FEDEX 02160 46.32
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 27.72 101 65100 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 18.60 530 65400 200
16624 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 2,957.79
MISCELLANEOUS 2,957.79 896 20282
16625 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 238.02
MISC. SUPPLIES 85.12 619 64460 120
SMALL TOOLS 152.90 619 64460 130
16626 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 858.59
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 858.59 101 66210 226
16627 P. G. &E. 03054 59,464.63
GAS&ELECTRIC 18,176.12 101 66100 170
UTILITY EXPENSE 41,288.51 896 20280
16628 SEC 03080 52.03
COMMUNICATIONS 52.03 101 65100 160
16629 PUTNAM BUICK PONTIAC GMC 03206 58.23
SUPPLIES 58.23 620 15000
16630 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 46,654.57
BLDG. &GROUNDS MAINT. 68,654.57 101 68010 190 1114
MISCELLANEOUS -22,000.00 320 35538
16631 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 03483 37,857.75
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 37,857.75 527 66530 270
CITY OF BURLINGAME
O1-27-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 8
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 47,646.38
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 3,397.00
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 999.92
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 10,490.06
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 62,735.04
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 143,041.30
WATER FUND 526 25,223.88
SEWER FUND 527 206,459.33
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 6,982.65
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 1,000.00
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,699.72
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,445.89
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 2,228.36
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 138,575.27
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,785.63
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 688.33
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $656,398.76 \/DI
�`(Ii.OL
(oss,4g 3.7co
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 16522 THROUGH 16617 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $656,398.76, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
..................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
01/27/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16606 THOMAS ANGELO 26193 6,040.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,040.00 101 64350 210
16607 SHAKESPEARE SAN FRANCISCO 26194 629.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 629.00 101 68010 220 1212
16608 SHILOG LTD. 26195 95.85
MISC. SUPPLIES 95.85 101 65100 120
16609 PFSA 26197 30.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 30.00 620 66700 240
16610 CHRISTINE THORSTEINSON 26198 127.00
MISCELLANEOUS 127.00 101 36330 000 1349
16611 MR/MRS EVERSON 26199 127.00
MISCELLANEOUS 127.00 101 36330 000 1349
16612 GLENN SAITO 26200 240.00
MISCELLANEOUS 240.00 101 36330 000 1331
16613 VERONICA MONTES 26201 300.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593
16614 MIKE RUSSELL 26202 200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 22593
16615 RAFAT SHAHEEN 26203 1,240.32
UTILITY BILL REFUND 1,240.32 526 36710
16616 KAREN BRESLIN 26204 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782
16617 RANDY SCHWARTZ 26206 105.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1892
TOTAL 8656,398.76
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
01/27/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16591 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 74.28
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.28 101 66210 120
16592 NEOPOST 24987 1,937.77
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,937.77 621 64450 200
16593 JOHN CHILCOTT 25032 1,516.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,516.00 130 20015
16594 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 82.56
UTILITY EXPENSE 82.56 896 20281
16595 STEVE IVERSON 25091 200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 22525
16596 POLLARDWATER.COM-EAST 25115 290.82
MISCELLANEOUS -22.87 526 23611
MISC. SUPPLIES 313.69 526 69020 120
16597 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 17.84
OFFICE EXPENSE 17.84 201 65500 110
16598 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 332.78
OFFICE EXPENSE 332.78 101 65100 110
16599 SHARON OLDS 25301 602.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 602.00 130 20060
16600 JOANNA RUTH GERRY 25371 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782
16601 KATHLEEN VON MAYRHAUSER 25771 415.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 255.00 130 20060
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 160.00 130 20015
16602 J HOWARD ENGINEERING 25811 141,873.30
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 141,873.30 327 81150 220
16603 PRISTINE AUTO DETAIL 26046 30.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 30.00 101 65100 200
16604 MARISSA JOHNSTON 26107 47.00
MISCELLANEOUS 47.00 101 36330 000 1660
16605 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 126.14
OFFICE EXPENSE 126.14 101 65300 110
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
01/27/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16577 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 19,703.88
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,981.45 326 80931 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 60.26 326 73171 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,662.17 326 81480 210
16578 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 319.17
MISC. SUPPLIES 319.17 619 64460 120 5240
16579 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 5,120.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,120.00 101 68010 220 1331
16580 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 6,982.65
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,982.65 528 66600 210
16581 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 2,840.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,840.00 526 69020 233
16582 DLT SOLUTION, INC 23873 3,688.29
MISC. SUPPLIES 3,688.29 101 66100 120
16583 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,791.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,727.00 101 23620
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210
16584 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 603.82
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 186.73 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 231.98 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 185.11 619 64460 220 5130
16585 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 42.46
COMMUNICATIONS 42.46 101 65300 160
16586 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 2,027.41
SUPPLIES 2,027.41 620 15000
16587 QUILL 24090 245.59
OFFICE EXPENSE 245.59 621 64450 110
16588 J&L CONSTRUCTION,INC. 24256 3,680.14
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,680.14 320 80790 210
16589 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 34,539.58
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 34,539.58 326 80950 210
16590 DORIS MORTENSEN 24871 221.15
OFFICE EXPENSE 221.15 101 64100 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
01/27/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16563 BURLINGAME LIB. FOUNDATION 20561 558.62
MISCELLANEOUS 5.00 731 22552
MISCELLANEOUS 553.62 731 22551
16564 JEFF DOWD 20779 171.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.00 101 68010 220 1785
16565 AUTOMATIC CONTROLS 21336 33.05
MISC. SUPPLIES 33.05 619 64460 120 5120
16566 GARY MISSEL 21677 605.50
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 605.50 130 20060
16567 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 11,845.00
MISCELLANEOUS 11,845.00 101 37010
16568 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 8,491.58
PROFESSIONAL& SPECIALIZED S 8,491.58 326 80770 210
16569 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 3,296.02
MISC. SUPPLIES 3,296.02 526 69020 120
16570 WRIGHT AND ASSOCIATES 22215 97.01
MISC. SUPPLIES 97.01 101 68010 120 1785
16571 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 225.36
GAS, OIL & GREASE 225.36 101 65100 201
16572 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22559 2,310.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,310.00 320 81350 220
16573 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 735.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22554
UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281
16574 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 101.76
MISC. SUPPLIES 101.76 101 65100 120
16575 OFFICE MAX 23306 251.13
OFFICE EXPENSE 251.13 101 68010 110 1101
16576 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 700.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 200.00 101 64420 262
TRAINING EXPENSE 500.00 526 69020 260
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
01/27/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16548 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 47.38
MISC. SUPPLIES 47.38 619 64460 120 5110
16549 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 1,382.16
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,382.16 101 65100 220
16550 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 43.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 10.83 101 68020 120 2200
VEHICLE MAINT. 32.86 201 65200 202
16551 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 173.19
SMALL TOOLS 173.19 526 69020 130
16552 HILTON, FARNKOPF & HOBSON 16656 5,457.92
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,728.96 526 69020 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,728.96 527 66520 210
16553 STEVE'S CHRISTMAS TREES 16767 43.00
MISCELLANEOUS 43.00 526 22502
16554 GALL'S, INC. 17304 833.32
TRAINING EXPENSE 833.32 101 65100 260
16555 COLORPRINT 17497 251.68
OFFICE EXPENSE 251.68 101 64100 110
16556 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 192.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 96.00 101 65100 200
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 96.00 101 65100 292
16557 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 250.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.40 201 65200 220
16558 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 269.40
OFFICE EXPENSE 61.58 101 64250 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 207.82 201 65200 111
16559 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,785.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,785.63 736 64570 220
16560 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 45.00
COMMUNICATIONS 45.00 621 64450 160
16561 LONGS DRUGS 20453 25.69
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 25.69 101 65100 292
16562 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 900.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 900.00 327 75170 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
01/27/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16537 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 728.00
PRISONER EXPENSE 728.00 101 65100 291
16538 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 194.25
PRISONER EXPENSE 194.25 101 65100 291
16539 OCE 09493 1,714.68
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,714.68 101 66100 210
16540 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 1,000.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 1,000.00 618 64520 601
16541 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,459.94
MISC. SUPPLIES 69.24 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 189.40 101 68020 120 2200
SMALL TOOLS 185.37 101 68020 130 2200
SMALL TOOLS 73.36 101 66210 130
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 93.13 101 68020 190 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 65.30 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 32.79 526 69020 120
SMALL TOOLS 490.03 526 69020 130
MISC. SUPPLIES 170.79 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 6.15 619 64460 120 5190
MISC. SUPPLIES 64.82 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 19.56 619 64460 120 5130
16542 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220
16543 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 11707 286.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 4.53 101 67500 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 79.26 101 67500 120
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 164.29 101 67500 125
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 25.72 101 67500 129
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 12.20 101 67500 190
16544 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 77.91
MISC. SUPPLIES 34.63 101 65100 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 43.28 527 66520 120
16545 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 497.95
OFFICE EXPENSE 497.95 101 65100 110
16546 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 230.02
MISC. SUPPLIES 230.02 620 66700 120
16547 DAY-TIMERS, INC. 14411 30.30
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.30 527 66520 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
01/27/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16522 EDWARD R. BACON CO., INC. 01182 3,139.26
MISCELLANEOUS 3,139.26 101 66210 400
16523 BRIDGES TIRE & WHEEL SERVICE 01403 158.46
SUPPLIES 158.46 620 15000
16524 VEOLIA WATER 02110 202,286.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 202,286.00 527 66530 220
16525 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,117.09
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,117.09 101 66210 226
16526 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 1,427.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 47.55 619 64460 120
MISC, SUPPLIES 220.84 619 64460 120 5250
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,159.36 619 64460 210 5210
16527 KAVANAGH ENGINEERING 02665 1,200.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,200.00 527 66520 120
16528 SBC 03080 170.77
UTILITY EXPENSE 170.77 896 20281
16529 ALFRED J. PALMER 03085 258.50
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 258.50 130 20060
16530 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 178.02
MISC. SUPPLIES 178.02 619 64460 120 5170
16531 BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY 03361 13,588.75
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 13,588.75 526 69020 240
16532 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,913.42
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,913.42 101 65150 220
16533 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 137,716.65
MISCELLANEOUS 137,716.65 731 22587
16534 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 6,160.96
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,661.04 101 68020 220 2300
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,499.92 320 76350 220
16535 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 370.79
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 370.79 101 64350 210
16536 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 268.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 268.00 327 81150 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
01-19-2006 WARRANT REG I S T ER PAGE 15
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 89,239.90
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,454.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 67,083.91
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 130,824.05
WATER FUND 526 172,486.57
SEWER FUND 527 3,008.49
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,001.71
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 2,471.78
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 251,121.91
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 5,049.76
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,581.93
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 44,685.64
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 113.10
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,403.03
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 41,598.99
STATE GRANTS FUND 734 344.91
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 21,422.30
PUBLIC TV ACCESS FUND 738 4,592.03
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $843,484.01
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 15
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 16361 THROUGH 16521 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $843,484.01, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 14
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16506 CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE WARR 26175 50.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50.00 101 65100 240
16507 DATABANK IMX 26176 3,044.13
MISCELLANEOUS 3,044.13 101 22518
16508 KRISTEN KELLY 26177 250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22593
16509 RANDI GRANT 26178 106.00
MISCELLANEOUS 106.00 101 36330 000 1372
16510 TERESA POST 26179 137.00
MISCELLANEOUS 137.00 101 36330 000 1349
16511 ELENA ESPADA 26180 137.00
MISCELLANEOUS 137.00 101 36330 000 1349
16512 LISA CONNORS 26181 7.00
MISCELLANEOUS 7.00 101 36330 000 1330
16513 LISA WILLIAMSON 26182 7.00
MISCELLANEOUS 7.00 101 36330 000 1330
16514 CHRISTINE ENOS 26183 286.00
MISCELLANEOUS 286.00 101 36330 000 1661
16515 PATRICIA EATON 26184 52.00
MISCELLANEOUS 52.00 101 36330 000 1661
16516 JILL GOLDSMITH 26185 125.00
MISCELLANEOUS 125.00 101 36330 000 1349
16517 APPIAN ENGINEERING 26186 182.22
MISCELLANEOUS 182.22 526 22502
16518 CAL SIERRA CONSTRUCTION 26187 750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502
16519 EUGENE LAI 26188 105.00
MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 36330
16520 NICOLE BROWNER 26189 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
16521 JAMES SHIN 26190 1,530.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,530.00 101 22546
TOTAL 8843,484.01 A, 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 13
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16491 PLAY WELL TEKNOLOGIES 25013 768.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 768.00 101 68010 220 1349
16492 JAMES MURPHY 25080 1,138.87
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,138.87 101 68010 220 1661
16493 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 720.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 720.00 730 69583 220
16494 SESAC 25179 463.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 463.00 101 68010 240 1101
16495 KIM BULLOCK-UTRATA 25333 106.00
MISCELLANEOUS 106.00 101 36330 000 1349
16496 LORAL LANDSCAPING 25394 160.00
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.00 526 69020 190
16497 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25727 121.84
COMMUNICATIONS 121.84 101 64250 160
16498 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 153.22
RENTS & LEASES 153.22 526 69020 180
16499 MARIBETH VALERIO 25914 89.00
MISCELLANEOUS 89.00 101 36330 000 1349
16500 ERIKA PIANIM 26002 127.00
MISCELLANEOUS 127.00 101 36330 000 1349
16501 ADCOM/BHS 26024 344.91
MISCELLANEOUS 344.91 734 65198 400
16502 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 252.06
OFFICE EXPENSE 91.47 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 24.51 101 65300 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 5.43 101 64150 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 48.39 101 66210 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 82.26 527 66520 110
16503 SHAUN ANDERSON-AHN 26166 150.00
MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 36330 000 1349
16504 COIN TECH 26173 149.52
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 149.52 530 65400 200
16505 INFOMOTION 26174 127.28
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 127.28 101 65100 292
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME '
WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 12
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16486 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 13,131.54
OFFICE EXPENSE 120.06 101 67500 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 53.41 101 64250 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 564.27 101 68010 120 1423
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,534.30 101 64420 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 53.26 101 68010 120 1370
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.69 101 65300 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 9.50 101 68010 120 1781
MISC. SUPPLIES 69.26 101 68010 120 1520
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.47 101 68010 120 1890
MISC. SUPPLIES 70.28 101 68010 120 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 185.00 101 68010 120 1891
MISC. SUPPLIES 607.63 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 4,246.60 101 68010 120 1216
MISC. SUPPLIES 100.00 101 68010 120 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 18.78 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 19.00 101 68010 120 1890
MISC. SUPPLIES 216.91 101 64100 120
SMALL TOOLS 106.11 101 68020 130 2200
COMMUNICATIONS 5.08 101 65100 160
COMMUNICATIONS 54.11 101 65150 160
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 68.44 101 67500 190
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,552.91 101 65100 210
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 428.00 101 67500 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 101.57 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 24.54 101 69537 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 495.00 101 64100 250
STAFF & MEETINGS 38.75 101 67500 252
SUPPLIES 981.43 201 65200 112
SMALL TOOLS 330.35 326 80770 130
TRAVEL & MEETINGS -48.75 526 69020 250
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 162.40 527 66520 240
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 338.00 620 66700 210
MISC. SUPPLIES 464.26 730 69583 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 69.92 730 69533 120
16487 MARY PIAllA 24807 709.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 709.50 101 68010 220 1661
16488 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 24815 19.80
COMMUNICATIONS 19.80 201 65200 160
16489 TOM DONNELLY 24830 703.96
TRAINING EXPENSE 703.96 201 65200 260
16490 WILSON TRUJILLO 24961 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 11
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16481 ASCAP 24470 280.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 280.00 101 68010 240 1101
16482 TOM DUNCAN 24497 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
16483 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 105.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1780
16484 CENTER HARDWARE 24656 19.39
MISC. SUPPLIES 19.39 619 64460 120 5150
16485 DAN FLERES 24703 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 10
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16468 D&M TRAFFIC SERVICES, INC. 24027 45.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.00 101 65100 200
16469 C.F. ARCHIBALD 24094 52,474.18
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 52,474.18 320 81350 220
16470 LITHIA CHRYSLER JEEP 24171 74.24
VEHICLE MAINT. 74.24 201 65200 202
16471 JEFF OSSERG 24187 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
16472 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 2,428.10
OFFICE EXPENSE 122.66 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 46.31 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 1,627.57 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 232.53 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 115.70 101 64420 110
MISCELLANEOUS 218.95 101 64400 115
OFFICE EXPENSE 64.38 621 64450 110
16473 S&J SALES 24194 1,092.55
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 546.28 101 65100 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 546.27 101 65150 200
16474 CHRISTINE GRANUCCI 24197 2,703.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,703.00 101 64420 210
16475 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,155.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,155.00 101 68010 220 1644
16476 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 576.00
MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233
16477 ART OF CONSTRUCTION 24413 432.22
MISCELLANEOUS 414.80 101 31510
MISCELLANEOUS 17.42 101 22518
16478 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 545.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 545.63 101 68010 220 1661
16479 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 483.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 483.75 101 68010 220 1661
16480 JOE DITO 24460 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hard Written Checks
16456 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. 23462 13,964.25
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 13,964.25 320 80480 800
16457 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 195.06
MISC. SUPPLIES 195.06 619 64460 120
16458 CLARE EVANS 23645 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
16459 JOSE REALYVASQUEZ 23718 2,250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS -750.00 101 31510
MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546
16460 KAREN LIU 23823 166.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 166.50 101 68010 220 1646
16461 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 537.29
MISC. SUPPLIES 537.29 619 64460 120
16462 DAVE CREAMER 23876 567.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 567.00 101 68010 220 1644
16463 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160
16464 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,870.96
BANKING SERVICE FEES 548.70 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,322.26 530 65400 120
16465 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 500.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 500.00 101 65100 292
16466 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 2,901.22
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,031.91 101 68010 120 1114
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 160.31 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 424.00 619 64460 220 5210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,285.00 619 64460 220 5180
16467 RONALD AUGUST FAATZ 24004 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks -
16441 MARK MEYERS 22051 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
16442 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 920.13
MISC. SUPPLIES 920.13 527 66520 120
16443 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION 22194 356.49
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 356.49 101 64250 200
16444 YEV PHILOPOVITCH 22217 2,040.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,040.00 326 80770 210
16445 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 128,205.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 128,205.00 326 80950 220
16446 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 21,422.30
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,311.41 736 64572 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,110.89 736 64571 220
16447 HAR-BRO 22575 792.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,800.00 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS •1,008.00 101 31510
16448 TURF STAR 22682 12.42
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 12.42 101 68020 200 2200
16449 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 105.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1780
16450 CARL DEQUANT 22842 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
16451 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 909.46
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 909.46 201 65200 140 -
16452 PAUL WEBB 23292 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
16453 OFFICE MAX 23306 235.13
OFFICE EXPENSE 208.18 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 26.95 101 64400 110
16454 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 235.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 235.00 619 64460 120
16455 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16425 BRIAN BLANTON 20950 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
16426 FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA, INC. 20967 103.92
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.92 101 65100 220 -
16427 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 1,449.21
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 1,449.21 101 66210 219
16428 ON CAMERA PRODUCTIONS 21177 4,592.03
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,592.03 738 64580 220
16429 CEB 21210 331.62
MISC. SUPPLIES 331.62 101 64350 120
16430 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 447.85
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 214.29 619 64460 220 5120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 233.56 619 64460 220 5130
16431 OLEN SIMON 21477 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
16432 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 148.18
MISC. SUPPLIES 148.18 201 65200 111
16433 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 925.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 925.00 101 64420 210
16434 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 173.00
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 173.00 621 64450 190
16435 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 945.97
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 945.97 101 66210 222
16436 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 21741 689.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 689.50 101 68010 220 1349
16437 GREG BARNES 21885 1,400.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,400.00 101 68010 220 1781
16438 IEDA 21981 2,426.32
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,426.32 101 64420 240
16439 MODULAR INFORMATION SYSTEMS 22005 795.64
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 795.64 621 64450 200
16440 JIM STOCKWELL 22048 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks - -
16412 VER120N WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 63.64
COMMUNICATIONS 21.22 101 66210 160
COMMUNICATIONS 21.21 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 21.21 527 66520 160
16413 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 211.20
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 211.20 101 64420 121
16414 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,306.80
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 283.78 101 66210 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 284.08 526 69020 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 283.76 527 66520 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 42.66 528 66600 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 70.04 619 64460 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 342.48 620 66700 140
16415 BPS REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 19047 248.70
MISC. SUPPLIES 248.70 326 81470 120
16416 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 44.56
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.56 101 64400 120
16417 MONICA OLSEN 19832 216.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216.00 101 68010 220 1661
16418 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 422.10
MISC. SUPPLIES 422.10 101 68010 120 1423
16419 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101
16420 LINDA GRAHAM 20483 860.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 860.00 101 68010 120 1521
16421 KAWANN SUMMERVILLE 20502 1,200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,200.00 101 68010 220 1781
16422 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 4,514.76
DEPOSIT REFUND 4,514.76 731 22590
16423 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 152.00
MISCELLANEOUS 152.00 101 64350 031
16424 SPORTS CHOICE 20845 707.41
MISC. SUPPLIES 707.41 101 68010 120 1787
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hard Written Checks
16398 CON BROSNAN 16126 3,008.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,610.00 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS -1,479.50 101 31510
MISCELLANEOUS 1,707.50 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS -6,242.50 101 31510
MISCELLANEOUS 7,412.50 101 22546
16399 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 623.86
TRAINING EXPENSE 623.86 526 69020 260
16400 CELSOC 16802 71.35
MISC. SUPPLIES 71.35 101 66100 120
16401 BROADWAY BUSINESS 16849 1,387.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,387.00 731 22555
16402 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 892.20
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 892.20 101 68020 140 2200
16403 ITRON 16913 293.29
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 293.29 621 64450 200
16404 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16919 1,178.64
SUPPLIES 1,178.64 620 15000
16405 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 43.35
MISC. SUPPLIES 43.35 526 69020 120
16406 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 705.62
COMMUNICATIONS 299.18 101 65100 160
RADIO MAINT. 406.44 201 65200 205
16407 STEVE GOLDBERG 17577 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
16408 KELLEHER & ASSOCIATES 18239 8,821.91
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8,821.91 618 64520 210
16409 STADAM & ASSOCIATES 18275 6,016.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,016.00 101 68010 220 1781
16410 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 225.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 225.00 101 64420 210
16411 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 959.05
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 959.05 528 66600 210
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16387 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 253.59
OFFICE EXPENSE 32.97 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 2.15 201 65200 120
SMALL TOOLS 201.97 201 65200 130
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 6.37 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 10.13 625 65213 203
16388 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 1,806.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,806.00 101 68010 220 1644
16389 3 T EQUIPMENT CO. 10077 2,570.11
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,570.11 526 69020 120
16390 CAL-STEAM 10557 1,547.15
MISCELLANEOUS 230.89 101 68020 192 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 266.59 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 249.75 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 678.74 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 18.21 619 64460 120 5120
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 102.97 625 65213 203
16391 GWENN JONES 13824 86.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 86.00 101 68010 120 1661
16392 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHINES 14252 159.31
OFFICE EXPENSE 159.31 101 68010 110 1101
16393 SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS 14643 720.48
SMALL TOOLS 720.48 101 68020 130 2200
16394 CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE 14682 153.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 153.00 101 65100 200
16395 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 849.76
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 849.76 527 66520 230
16396 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 124.50
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 124.50 101 64420 121
16397 MICHAEL LENNON 15302 1,400.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,400.00 101 68010 220 1781
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT -
'*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
16383 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 6,364.97
MISCELLANEOUS 435.00 101 36330 000 1330
OFFICE EXPENSE 108.78 101 68010 110 1100
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.32 101 68010 110 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.00 101 68020 120 2100
MISC. SUPPLIES 65.00 101 68010 120 1787
MISC. SUPPLIES 23.50 101 68010 120 1372
MISC. SUPPLIES 452.36 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.80 101 68010 120 1114
MISC. SUPPLIES 140.33 101 68010 120 1520
MISC, SUPPLIES 51.69 101 68010 120 1891
MISC. SUPPLIES 5.00 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 23.50 101 68010 120 1781
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 151.81 101 68020 140 2200
COMMUNICATIONS 99.11 101 68010 160 1101
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 136.92 101 68020 200 2300
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 345.00 101 68010 220 1331
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 101 68010 220 1646
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 640.00 101 68010 220 1422
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.00 101 68010 220 1645
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 161.00 101 68010 220 1349
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 152.00 101 68010 220 1641
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 796.00 101 68010 220 1212
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 120.00 101 68020 240 2200
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 210.00 101 68020 240 2100
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 310.00 101 68010 240 1100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 50.00 101 68020 250 2300
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 210.00 101 68020 250 2100
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.23 730 69547 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 612.62 730 69583 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 420.00 730 69533 120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 730 69533 220
16384 JEAN BUCKS 09019 407.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 407.25 101 68010 220 1644
16385 STATE OF CA/CONSERVATION DEPT 09073 628.77
MISCELLANEOUS 628.77 731 22550
16386 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 1,111.76
SMALL TOOLS 1,026.97 101 68020 130 2200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 70.01 101 68020 200 2300
SUPPLIES 14.78 620 15000
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Nand Written Checks
16376 MEG MONROE 02936 1,920.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,920.00 101 64400 031
16377 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23
GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170
16378 SANDRA POBE 03175 2,732.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,120.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 612.00 101 68010 220 1646
16379 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 164,421.52
WATER PURCHASES 164,421.52 526 69020 171
16380 BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY 03361 2,500.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,500.00 526 69020 120
16381 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 14,389.46
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 14,389.46 731 22562
16382 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 350.00 101 65100 260
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
01/19/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16361 * CRISAFI PROPERTY CLEANUP ACCOUNT 26191 72,300.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 72,300.00 618 64520 601
16362 * CRISAFI PROPERTY CLEANUP ACCOUNT 26192 170,000.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 170,000.00 618 64520 601
16363 BURLINGAME ELEM. SCHOOL DIST. 01500 20,679.00
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 20,679.00 731 22563
16364 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION 01726 130.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 101 68010 240 1101
16365 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 525.30
SUPPLIES 525.30 620 15000
16366 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 41,343.56
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 645.48 320 81300 210
COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 9,692.96 621 64450 200
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 30,705.12 621 64450 220
16367 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 1,166.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,166.25 101 68010 220 1644
16368 COMPUTER TECHNICIANS, INC., 01987 1,088.10
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,088.10 621 64450 200
16369 GENE EVANS 02149 24.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24.00 101 68010 220 1644
16370 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 167.97
MISCELLANEOUS 167.97 101 68020 192 2200
16371 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 307.68
MISC. SUPPLIES 307.68 101 68020 120 2200
16372 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,474.25
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,474.25 101 66210 120
16373 CHARLES J. HAPP 02360 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
16374 PENINSULA BATTERIES 02625 182.73
SUPPLIES 182.73 620 15000
16375 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 1,227.61
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,227.61 619 64460 120
C C C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
01-13-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 74,894.90
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 8,759.78
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 8,644.01
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 45,507.44
WATER FUND 526 10,729.36
SEWER FUND 527 3,560.90
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5,147.28
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 288.26
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 2,598.55
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 17,592.11
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 17,983.74
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 9,802.51
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 29.90
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 554.40
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 6,393.58
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 1,362.70
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $2! ,849.42
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 16226 THROUGH 16339 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $213,849.42, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16332 DEBORA ALLAN 26165 180.00
MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 101 36330 000 1422
16333 SHAUN ANDERSON-AHN 26166 267.00
MISCELLANEOUS 267.00 101 36330 000 1349
16334 AFE 26167 185.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 185.00 619 64460 250
16335 CHRISTINA SOONG 26168 804.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,200.00 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS -396.00 101 31510
16336 KIRSTEN GAREN 26169 98.00
MISCELLANEOUS 98.00 101 36330 000 1349
16337 SIONE'S CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 26170 800.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 800.00 101 22520
16338 KATHRYN TANAKA 26171 2,163.38
MISCELLANEOUS 2,163.38 526 36730
16339 CARR, MCCLELLAN,INGERSOLL,THOMPS 26172 685.00
MISCELLANEOUS 685.00 101 36330
TOTAL 8213,849.42
��oc�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16316 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 142.23
OFFICE EXPENSE 92.98 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 49.25 201 65200 111
16317 MERCY MARTIN 25270 194.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 194.00 101 68010 220 1661
16318 NETVERSANT SILICON VALLEY 25422 375.00
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 375.00 619 64460 210 5270
16319 JAMES FERRARO 25676 1,020.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525
16320 LIONEL RECIO 25751 41.00
MISCELLANEOUS 41.00 101 36330 000 1370
16321 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTIN 25885 6,134.30
DEPOSIT REFUND 6,134.30 101 22590
16322 STEWART THOMPSON 25918 267.00
MISCELLANEOUS 267.00 101 36330 000 1349
16323 M.N.A. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 26017 10,942.16
DEPOSIT REFUND 10,942.16 101 22590
16324 EDMOND'S PLAZA FLORIST 26041 64.95
MISC. SUPPLIES 64.95 101 65100 120
16325 IMPACT SCIENCES 26099 4,970.03
DEPOSIT REFUND 4,970.03 101 22590
16326 JAMES SHANNON 26125 2,163.38
MISCELLANEOUS 2,163.38 526 36730
16327 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 72.80
OFFICE EXPENSE 72.80 101 65300 110
16328 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26161 128.51
COMMUNICATIONS 128.51 530 65400 160
16329 BRIAN MCMANUS 26162 267.00
MISCELLANEOUS 267.00 101 36330 000 1349
16330 ARLENE RESIDE 26163 250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22593
16331 CHRISTINA CRAIG 26164 411.00
MISCELLANEOUS 411.00 101 36330 000 1349
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16304 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 422.48
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 323.48 101 68020 200 2300
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 99.00 619 64460 210 5120
16305 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 625.50
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 625.50 101 64420 121
16306 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24607 1,362.70
UTILITY EXPENSE 1,362.70 896 20281
16307 CITY OF PALO ALTO 24627 400.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 400.00 526 69020 260
16308 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 75.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 619 64460 220 5121
16309 SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY MANAGERS A 24699 100.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 101 64150 240
16310 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 585.15
MISCELLANEOUS 585.15 101 64420 030
16311 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 8,544.20
MISCELLANEOUS 104.88 201 35220 000 7150
OFFICE EXPENSE 445.07 201 65200 110
SUPPLIES 30.95 201 65200 112
SMALL TOOLS 40.25 201 65200 130
COMMUNICATIONS 27.05 201 65200 160
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 1,158.30 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,797.68 201 65200 260
MISCELLANEOUS 4,604.96 731 22557
MISCELLANEOUS 335.06 731 22554
16312 THE COHEN GROUP 24776 1,381.25
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,381.25 326 73171 210
16313 WESCO GRAPHICS INC 25007 5,213.60
MISCELLANEOUS 5,213.60 101 68010 115 1101
16314 ALINE BIER 25089 3,595.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,595.00 526 36730
16315 BAY CITIES DRIVING SCHOOL 25220 2,448.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,448.00 101 68010 220 1422
, 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hard Written Checks
16292 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 13,676.92
MISC. SUPPLIES 117.92 101 68010 120 1114
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 874.00 619 64460 220 5190
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 145.00 619 64460 220 5230
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,802.00 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .958.00 619 64460 220 5210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 465.00 619 64460 220 5121
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,176.00 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 358.00 619 64460 220 5170
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,807.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,974.00 619 64460 220 5180
16293 NE%TEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 186.98
SMALL TOOLS 186.98 619 64460 130
16294 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 19,998.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,998.75 326 80770 220
16295 T&B SPORTS 24035 276.90
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 276.90 101 68010 190 1106
16296 ABE KIRSCHENBAUM 24136 500.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 500.00 619 64460 260
16297 FLORA ROBELET 24167 40.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 101 68010 220 1521
16298 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 182.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 182.40 101 68010 220 1521
16299 LITHIA CHRYSLER JEEP 24171 42.78
VEHICLE MAINT. 42.78 201 65200 202
16300 J&L CONSTRUCTION,INC. 24256 6,502.65
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,502.65 320 80790 210
16301 MAYSELLE PINSON 24419 358.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 358.00 101 68010 220 1644
16302 DPR CONSTRUCTION 24429 3,750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,750.00 101 22546
16303 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 24466 252.88
MISC. SUPPLIES 217.31 619 64460 120
SMALL TOOLS 35.57 619 64460 130
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16278 YEV PHILOPOVITCH 22217 17,920.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 17,920.00 326 80770 210
16279 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 2,295.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,125.00 201 35220 000 7100
MISCELLANEOUS 170.00 201 35221 000 7100
16280 HOLDEN DANIELS 22687 689.44
TRAINING EXPENSE 689.44 201 65200 260
16281 CALIFORNIA NEVADA SECTION, AWWA 22787 315.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 315.00 526 69020 250
16282 LANDS' END, INC. 22854 122.88
OFFICE EXPENSE 122.88 101 64100 110
16283 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 229.50
MISC. SUPPLIES 91.10 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 99.55 527 66520 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 38.85 620 66700 110
16284 OFFICE MAX 23306 391.30
OFFICE EXPENSE 83.38 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE -8.42 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 233.54 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 82.80 101 64400 110
16285 TAMMY MAK 23445 638.27
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 638.27 101 64420 210
16286 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 74.70
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.70 101 66210 120
16287 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 194.08
SMALL TOOLS 194.08 619 64460 130
16288 AT&T 23661 23.79
COMMUNICATIONS 23.79 621 64450 160
16289 SBC/MCI 23728 274.52
COMMUNICATIONS 274.52 621 64450 160
16290 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 81.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 81.67 619 64460 120
16291 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 2,733.00
RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 2,733.00 527 66520 218
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16264 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 2,130.74
MISC. SUPPLIES 959.42 101 68010 120 1423
MISC. SUPPLIES 636.16 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 535.16 101 68010 120 1423
16265 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 220.00
COMMUNICATIONS 220.00 621 64450 160
16266 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 20335 3,314.97
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,657.48 320 80790 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,657.49 326 73171 220
16267 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 281.25
SUPPLIES 281.25 620 15000
16268 SPRINT PCS 20724 293.56
MISCELLANEOUS 293.56 731 22554
16269 JEFF DOWD 20779 133.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 133.25 101 68010 220 1765
16270 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 7,951.64
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 7,951.64 621 64450 800
16271 NICHOLS DIAMOND TOOL, INC. 21018 375.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 375.00 101 66210 120
16272 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 579.68
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 579.68 101 66210 226
16273 UNITY BUSINESS SERVICE 21364 1,192.36
MISCELLANEOUS 1,192.36 101 22515
16274 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 1,140.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,140.00 619 64460 260
16275 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 625.91
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 625.91 101 66210 222
16276 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 4,549.95
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,549.95 326 80770 210
16277 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 964.74
MISC. SUPPLIES 668.99 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 295.75 527 66520 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Cheeks
16250 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORP. 15055 16.24
MISCELLANEOUS 16.24 201 22585
16251 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 1,727.70
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,727.70 101 65100 220
16252 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 15,709.36
SUPPLIES 15,709.36 620 15000
16253 TEAM CLEAN 15827 352.73
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 352.73 201 65200 220
16254 ACTION SPORTS 16167 1,564.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,564.00 101 68010 220 1781
16255 COLORPRINT 17497 1,917.65
OFFICE EXPENSE 101.21 101 64100 110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 483.88 320 80470 220
OFFICE EXPENSE 1,332.56 621 64450 110
16256 GOODWAY TECHNOLOGIES CORP 18370 100.28
MISC. SUPPLIES 100.28 527 66520 120
16257 DEAN'S AUTO BODY & 18795 200.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 200.00 527 66520 120
16258 S M COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT 18808 75.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 75.00 101 65100 260
16259 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 5,444.19
MISC. SUPPLIES 5,444.19 101 68010 120 1780
16260 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 37.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 37.69 620 66700 120
16261 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 5,147.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,147.28 528 66600 210
16262 DON DORNELL 19617 554.40
MISC. SUPPLIES 554.40 730 69585 120
16263 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 125.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 125.00 527 66520 240
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16236 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 662.58
MISC. SUPPLIES 398.41 101 66210 120
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 26.13 101 68020 190 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 166.16 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 57.02 619 64460 120 5180
MISC. SUPPLIES 14.86 619 64460 120
16237 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 03002 567.79
MISC. SUPPLIES 567.79 101 66210 120
16238 MARGARET PRENDERGAST 03179 1,362.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,362.00 101 68010 220 1641
16239 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 6,092.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,092.00 101 68020 220 2300
16240 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 959.09
MISC. SUPPLIES 959.09 101 64350 120
16241 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 362.77
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 133.70 101 66210 219
MISC. SUPPLIES 229.07 526 69020 120
16242 POM INC. 09248 159.75
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 159.75 530 65400 200
16243 LIFE ASSIST 09392 249.74
SUPPLIES 249.74 201 65200 112
16244 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 1,248.00
PRISONER EXPENSE 1,248.00 101 65100 291
16245 ABAG . LIABILITY 09518 2,598.55
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,098.03 618 64520 210
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 1,500.52 618 64520 601
16246 MARGARET KRAMER 09612 3,225.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,225.00 101 68010 220 1661
16247 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 398.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 398.69 101 66210 120
16248 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 41.24
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 41.24 201 65200 203
16249 RECHARGE-EM 14523 70.36
OFFICE EXPENSE 70.36 201 65200 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
01/13/06
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
16226 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 200.09
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 25.92 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 70.86 619 64460 120 5150
MISC. SUPPLIES 103.31 619 64460 120 5110
16227 EDWARD R. BACON CO., INC. 01182 4,274.82
MISC. SUPPLIES 118.01 101 66210 120
MISCELLANEOUS 3,128.43 101 66210 400
SMALL TOOLS 1,028.38 526 69020 130
16228 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 1,160.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,160.00 731 22582
16229 BRIDGES TIRE & WHEEL SERVICE 01403 68.00
SUPPLIES 68.00 620 15000
16230 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 2,631.09
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 15.54 101 66210 222 -
SMALL TOOLS 20.88 201 65200 130
GAS, OIL & GREASE 271.07 201 65200 201
VEHICLE MAINT. 198.67 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 239.12 201 65200 203
MISC. SUPPLIES 7.32 527 66520 120
SUPPLIES 1,848.59 620 15000
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 29.90 625 65213 203
16231 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 66.37
OFFICE EXPENSE 38.97 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 10.83 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.57 101 68020 120 2200
16232 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 526.10
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 526.10 201 65200 140
16233 FEDEX 02160 20.02 .
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.02 101 64420 110
16234 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 697.45
MISC. SUPPLIES 145.38 619 64460 120 5110
MISC. SUPPLIES 485.32 619 64460 120
SMALL TOOLS 66.75 619 64460 130
16235 HAINES & COMPANY, INC. 02326 353.32
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 353.32 101 65100 220
r'
City of Burlingame
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY
January 2006
THIS MONTH F. Y. 2006 F. Y.2005
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF TO DATE TO DATE DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
WATER HEATER 10 115100 6 0 42 37,390 41 n/a
SWIMNIING POOL 1 1,000 5 1032800 3 n/a
SIGN 1 59000 19 53,037 19 602300 -12
ROOFING 15 173,215 13 15009 15 167 2,069,583 166 2,076,600 0
RETAINING WALL 1 0 5 169,017 2 n/a 0
PLUMBING 12 609096 118 30,300 98 276 992,853 401 128,010 676
NEW SFD 12 41345,000 7 215619079 70
NEW COMMERCIAL
NEW 5 UNIT APT OR CO
MECHANICAL 3 91935 3 10,000 -1 27 102,020 29 106,700 -4
KITCHEN UPGRADE 2 27,000 2 357000 -23 19 4875594 3 4500 984
FURNACE 3 185670 4 0 22 80,365 21 n/a
ELECTRICAL SERVICE 5 61,200
ELECTRICAL 3 221500 27 0 45 138,017 90 141000 886
City of Burlingame
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY
January 2006
THIS MONTH F. Y. 2006 F. Y.2005
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF TO DATE TO DATE DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
BATHROOM UPGRADE 5 104,400 3 24,500 326 27 526,863 3 24,500 2,050
ALTERATION RESIDENTI 21 438,821 29 697,253 -37 225 9,366,020 254 6,029,530 55
ALTERATION NON RES 5 387,500 6 579,280 -33 48 4,211,965 48 2,866,534 47
Totals: 79 1,253,237 214 1,533,002 -18 945 22,829,724 1,087 13,917,253 64*
*The FY05 total was compared with the FY 04 total
to calculate the total difference
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31, 2006
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
LAIF&County Pool 19,203,493.47 19,203,493.47 19,203,493.47 65.76 1 1 3.715 3.767
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 10,000,000.00 9,865,260.00 10,000,000.00 34.24 986 560 3.648 3.699
29,203,493.47 29,068,753.47 29,203,493.47 100.00% 338 192 3.692 3.743
Investments
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 87,867.78 543,552.47
Average Daily Balance 28,421,986.58 27,765,497.61
Effective Rate of Return 3.64% 3.32%
Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and
availability of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds).
S NAVA, INANCE DIR./TREASURER
Reporting period 01/01/2006-01/31/2006
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/10/2006.-10:58 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
January 31, 2006
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
LAW&County Pool
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD, 8,398,911.24 8,398,911.24 8,398,911.24 3.955 3.955 1
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 10,804,582.23 10,804,582.23 10,804,582.23 3.620 Aaa 3.620 1
Subtotal and Average 18,421,986.58 19,203,493.47 19,203,493.47 19,203,493.47 3.767 1
Federal Agency Issues•Coupon
3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 982,190.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 Aaa 3.500 506 06/22/2007
3133XARN9 518 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/08/2005 1,000,000.00 992,190.00 1,000,000.00 3.390 Aaa 3.390 219 09/08/2006
3133XDGM7 519 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2005 1,000,000.00 994,380.00 1,000,000.00 4.450 Aaa 4.450 996 10/24/2008
3133XDNL1 520 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/17/2005 1,000,000.00 995,940.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 1,020 11/17/2008
3133XE2W8 521 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/28/2005 1,000,000.00 998,440.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 695 12/28/2007
3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,938,680.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 Aaa 3.000 363 01/30/2007
3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 979,380.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 Aaa 3.100 450 04/27/2007
3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 984,060.00 1,000,000.00 3.820 Aaa 3.547 624 10/18/2007
Subtotal and Average 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 9,865,260.00 10,000,000.00 3.699 560
Total and Average 28,421,986.58 29,203,493.47 29,068,753.47 29,203,493.47 3.743 192
Portfolio CITY
Run Date:02/10/2006-10:58 CID
PM(PRF PM2)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
1 / ort Ver.5.00
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 3
Activity By Type
January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2006
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary)
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCYINV.FD. 3.955 2,652,191.73 0.00
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 3.620 1,409,430.71 2,600,000.00
Subtotal 17,741,871.03 4,061,622.44 21600,000.00 19,203,493.47
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
Subtotal 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00
Total 27,741,871.03 4,061,622.44 2,600,000.00 29,203,493.47
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/10/2006•10:56 PM(PRF_PM3)SynnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 4
Activity Summary
January 2005 through January 2006
Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number
Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average
End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity
January 2005 7 30,025,165.46 2.659 2.696 2.622 0 0 262 182
February 2005 7 30,076,952.25 2.728 2.766 2.717 0 0 262 174
March 2005 8 27,632,224.41 2.824 2.863 2.819 1 0 305 199
April 2005 8 28,872,808.56 2.864 2.903 2.880 0 0 292 181
May 2005 8 31,478,082.19 2.976 3.018 3.043 0 0 268 158
June 2005 8 31,826,904.29 3.006 3.048 3.085 0 0 265 147
July 2005 8 30,880,702.93 3.045 3.087 3.141 0 0 273 143
August 2005 8 29,380,702.93 3.048 3.091 3.151 0 0 287 141
September 2005 8 25,480,702.93 3.125 3.168 3.285 0 0 330 151
October 2005 9 26,721,256.73 3.268 3.313 3.406 1 0 356 175
November 2005 9 26,614,225.47 3.484 3.532 3.521 1 1 344 206
December 2005 10 27,741,871.03 3.594 3.644 3.613 1 0 356 214
January 2006 10 29,203,493.47 3.692 3.743 3.767 0 0 338 192
Average 8 28,918,084.05 3.101% 3.144% 3.158 0 0 303 174
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/10/2006-10:58 PM(PRF_PM4)SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 5
Distribution of Investments By Type
January 2005 through January 2006
January February March April May June July August September October November December January Average
Security Type 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 by Period
LAW&County Pool 73.4 73.4 67.4 68.8 71.4 71.7 70.9 69.4 64.7 62.6 66.2 64.0 65.8 68.4%
......... ......................._.............
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
_
Certificates of Deposit-S&L
Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln
Negotiable CD's-Bank
CORP NOTES
Bankers Acceptances
_ ....... ............. _ ..... ... ......
Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing
................._...._............_.._........................................... _._._...___......... ..........._..___..._.__.._....................._-....................._..._._........ ........._. .
Commercial Paper-Discount
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 26.6 26.6 32.6 31.2 28.6 28.3 29.1 30.6 35.3 37.4 33.8 36.1 34.2 31.6%
............ ....... . ..................... ................................. ....._............................................._ .. .. .. .. ............. ..-_ .... . ............-....................... ._........
Federal Agency Issues-Discount
...... . .........................._._.._. ..............................................................._..........._........_......_..........._..__..............._....._............................ .:...... ............................._.................................................... ... .................... . ._. ......... .
Treasury Securities-Coupon
__ _ .. .. ........ ................................. _
Treasury Securities-Discount
.. . .......... .. ...... ..... . ........ .. ........ ........ .. ................. .. .... . . .... _
Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon
............. ........................................._..........._.........__...........................................................__....__....._......__............................................._....................._......................................................................................... ....... .
Miscellaneous Securities-Discount
Non Interest Bearing Investments
_.._..... _._ ..................... ......... ...._...__... .. ........... ........_.... ............. _....................._ ........
Mortgage Backed Securities
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2
_ ...... .. ..... .._
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3
.... ..............,.......,,.,...... ........ . ........... ........................ ....
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/10/2006-10:58 PM(PRF PM5)SymRept 6.41.2023
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 6
Interest Earnings Summary
January 31, 2006
January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
CD/Coupon/Discount Investments:
Interest Collected 45,000.00 177,950.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 63,382.77 63,382.77
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 77,332.77) ( 66,482.49)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 31,050.00 174,850.28
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 31,050.00 174,850.28
Pass Through Securities:
Interest Collected 0.00 0.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00
Cash/Checking Accounts:
Interest Collected 148,464.34 473,440.30
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 319,905.13 319,905.13
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 411,551.69) ( 424,643.24)
Interest Earned during Period 56,817.78 368,702.19
Total Interest Earned during Period 87,867.78 543,552.47
Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Total Earnings during Period 87,867.78 543,552.47
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/10/2006-10:58 PM(PRF PM6)SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
I i CAMP PROGRAM
Investment Portfolio Information For
CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00)
Portfolio #
12510150
Section/Report Title
A. Account Summary
B. Detail of Securities Held
C. Fair Market Values&Analytics
D. Security Transactions&Interest
E. Cash Transactions Report
F. Realized Gains&Losses
G. Cash Balance Report
For The Month Ending
January 31, 2006
CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME
CA
PFM Asset Management LLC*One Keystone Plaza*North Front&Market Streets,Suite 300*Harrisburg,PA 17101-2044*(717)232-2723
For more information,please contact your client manager: NSESA KAZADI (415)982-5544 KAZADIN@pfm.com
I Management LLC- I PROGRAM I , I
Account Summary: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF B URLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: January 31,2006
MARKET%OF YTM AT YTM AT DURATION
SECURITY TYPE PAR VALUE AMORTIZED COST MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO COST MARKET TO WORST
COMMERCIAL PAPER 1,000,000.00 998,541.67 998,111.11 8.919 3.834 4.542 0.040
FED AGY BOND/NOTE 3,800,000.00 3,790,149.19 3,777,875.00 33.757 3.987 4.647 0.461
FED AGY DN 6,560,000.00 6,430,599.22 6,415,361.46 57.324 4.130 4.660 0.459
TOTAL SECURITIES 11,360,000.00 11,219,290.08 11,191,347.57 100.000 4.055% 4.645% 0.422
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 11,360,000.00 11,219,290.08 11,191,347.57 100.000%
ACCRUED INTEREST 31,959.72 31,959.72
TOTAL PORTFOLIO $11,360,000.00 $11,251,249.80 $11,223,307.29
Disclosure Statement: PFM's monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes(i.e.settles)all investment transactions.The custodian
statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.Only the client has the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian and to direct the movement of securities.Clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies,implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.PFM recognizes that our clients may use these
reports to facilitate record keeping,therefore the custodian bank statement and the PFM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.PFM's market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last
business day 0( -month as supplied by F.T.Interactive Data,Bloomberg or Telerate.Prices that fall bet( data points are interpolated. Non-negotiable FDIC insured bank certificates of deposit •riced at par.
PFM Asset ManagemeiWLC- CAMP
PROGRAM 1 , i
Detail of Securities Held: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: January 31,2006
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY S&P TRADE SETTLE ORIGINAL YTM ACCRUED AMORTIZED MARKET
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE RATING DATE DATE COST AT COST INTEREST COST VALUE
COMMERCIAL PAPER
36959JBF9 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 1,000,000 02/15/06 A-1+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 978,020,83 3.834 0.00 998,541.67 998,111.11
1,000,000 978,020.83 3.834 0.00 998,541.679777-1-7
FED AGY BOND/NOTE
31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5.250 06/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,011,340.00 3.958 6,708.33 1,004,714.54 1,002,187.50
31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 991,682.00 3.991 1,388.89 996,132.65 993,125.00
3133X85Z1 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,778,891.40 4.002 23,862.50 1,789,302.00 1,782,562.50
3,800,000 3,781,913.40 3.987 31,959.72 3,790,149.19 3,777,875.00
FED AGY DN
313397UG4 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 03/15/06 A-l+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 975,270,14 3.819 0.00 995,654.17 994,697.17
313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 A-I+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 972,276.89 3.830 0.00 992,655.44 991,059.94
313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 A-l+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 969,260.50 3.844 0.00 989,650.00 987,300.01
313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 A-l+ 09/22/05 09/22/05 1,498,508.27 4.081 0.00 1,520,930.67 1,513,785.00
`313589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 A-I+ 11/17/05 11/18/05 958,077.78 4,593 0.00 967,244.44 965,407,85
313397P47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/14/06 A-1+ 12/21/05 12/21/05 959,246.00 4.663 0.00 964,464.50 963,111.49
6,560,000 6,332,639.58 4.130 0.00 6,430,599.22 6,415,361.46
TOTAL SECURITIES $11,360,000 $11,092,573.81 4.055% $31,959.72 $11,219,290.08 $11,191,347.57
Issuers by Market Value Ratings by Market Value
FHLB $1,782,563 15.9%
FHLMC $5.449,954 48.7% A-1+ $7,413.473 66.2%
FNdA
$2,960,720 28.5% I AAA $3,777,875. 33.8%
f3 N RA .TRI. coo8111 8 4% Total: $11,191,348 100.0%
Total: 511,191,348 100.0%
B-I
PFM Asset Management LL C- CAMP PROGRAM
Fair Market Values & Analytics: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash)
MONTH ENDED; January 31,2006
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY FIRST CALL MARKET MARKET UNREAL G/(L) UNREAL G/(L) DURATION YTM
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE DATE PRICE VALUE ON AMORT COST ON COST TO WORST AT MKT
COMMERCIAL PAPER
36959JBF9 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 1,000,000 02/15/06 99,811 998,111.11 (430.56) 20,090.28 0.040 4,542
FED AGY BOND/NOTE
31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5.250 06/15/06 100.219 1,002,187.50 (2,527.04) (9,152.50) 0.367 4.587
31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 99,313 993,125.00 (3,007.65) 1,443.00 0.448 4.631
3133X85Z1 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 99.031 1,782,562.50 (6,739.50) 3,671.10 0.522 4.690
FED AGY DN
313397UG4 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 03/15/06 99.470 994,697.17 (957.00) 19,427.03 0.115 4.463
313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 99.106 991,059.94 (1,595.50) 18,783.05 0.193 4.510
313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 98.730 987,300.01 (2,349.99) 18,039.51 0.270 4.585
313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 97.038 1,513,785.00 (7,145.67) 15,276.73 0.618 4,758
`313589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 96.541 965,407.85 (1,836.59) 7,330.07 0.720 4.795
313397P47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/14/06 96.311 963,111.49 (1,353.01) 3,865.49 0.768 4.804
SUBTOTALS $11,191,347.57 ($27,942.51) $98,773.76 0.422 4.645 %
ACCRUED INTEREST ON INVESTMENT 31.959.72
TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF INVESTMENTS $11,223,307.29
PFM Asset .
• - CAMP PROGRAM
Security Transactions & Interest: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: January 31,2006
S&P MATURITY PRINCIPAL ACCRUED
TRADE SETTLE TRAN TYPE SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP RATING PAR COUPON DATE AMOUNT INTEREST TOTAL
01/15/06 01/15/06 INTEREST FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 31359MVP5 AAA 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 0.00 15,625.00 15,625.00
1,000,000 0.00 15,625.00 15,625.00
01/13/06 01/13/06 MATURITY FHLB DISC NOTE 313385RT5 A-1+ 1,000,000 0.000 01/13/06 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000,00
TOTAL SECURITY TRANSACTIONS 1,015,625.00
D-1
PFMAsset CAMP
PROGRAM/ ,
Cash Transactions Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00)
MONTH ENDED: January 31 2006
CASH DATE TRANSACTION CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
01/13/06 CW CASH WITHDRAW
(1,000,000.00)
01/15/06 CW CASH WITHDRAW (15,625.00)
(1,015,625.00)
NET CASH CONTRIBUTIONS/(WITHDRAWS) ($1,015,625.00)
( � � E-1
PROGRAM
Realized Gains and Losses: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: January 31,2006
TRADE SETTLE PRINCIPAL REALIZED REALIZED
DATE DATE TRAN TYPE SALE METHOD SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP PAR VALUE COUPON PROCEEDS G/(L)COST G/(L)AMORT CST
01/13/06 01/13/06 MATURITY FHLB DISC NOTE 313385RT5 1,000,000 0.000 1,000,000.00 17,800.00 0.00
TOTAL GAINS AND LOSSES $17,800.00 $0.00
F-1
PFMAsseLLC- CAMP t ManagementPROGRAM
Cash Balance Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00)
MONTH ENDED: January 31,2006
CASH BALANCE: $0.00
Earnings Calculation Templates
Current Month-End Book Value + Add Coupon Interest Received +
Current Month-End Accrued Interest + Less Purchased Interest Related to Coupons
Less Purchases Add/Subtract Gains or Losses on Cost For The Mth +/.
Less Purchased Interest
Total Cost Basis Earnings For The Month
Add Disposals(Sales,Maturities,Paydowns,Sinks,etc.) +
Add Coupon Interest Received +
Less Previous Month-End Book Value
Less Previous Month-End Accrued Interest
Total Accrual Basis Earnings For The Month
Economic Calendar
02/02/06 Initial Jobless Claims 02/17/06 Producer Price Index
02/03/06 Change in Nonfarm Payrolls 02/21/06 Minutes of FOMC Meeting
02/03/06 Unemployment Rate 02/22/06 Consumer Price Index
02/07/06 ABC Consumer Confidence 02/24/06 Durable Goods Orders
02/09/06 Initial Jobless Claims 02/28/06 Chicago Purchasing Manager
02/16/06 Initial Jobless Claims 02/28/06 GDP
Market Commentary
The month ended with Alan Greenspan serving as Chairman at his last FOMC meeting, Mr.Greenspan began his tenure as Chairman some 18 years ago. Ben Bernanke will assume the role of Chairman at the next
FOMC meeting to be held on March 28.The market has reacted well to Mr.Bernanke's appointment and subsequent confirmation as head of the FOMC.Mr.Greenspan's term ended with one final 25 basis point
rate hike bringing the closely watched overnight rate to 4.5%. The FOMC has indicated in several statements that the end of their tightening campaign may be near,The market,defined by Fed Funds Futures,
believes the FOMC will increase the overnight rate an additional 25 basis points and pause at that level.4th quarter GDP was reported at 1.1%in January.Although most economists had revised their estimate for
4th quarter growth down,the number was still disappointing.Even though the number was lower than expected there were some indications the weakness was a result off some temporary conditions,such as lower
defense spending.Most economists predict that 1 st quarter 2006 GDP will grow at a rate closer to 3%.The two year Treasury closed the month at a 4,52%yield,its highest yield in almost five years.The yield
curve has remained very flat as the yields on the two and ten year Treasuries are within a basis point of each other.
\ 1 G-1
MEETING MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, January 19, 2006
The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by
Chairman Heathcote at 7:00 pm at Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road,Burlingame.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Dittman ,Heathcote,Hesselgren, Muller, Schreurs, Shanus
Commissioners Absent: Larios
Staff Present: Randy Schwartz,Parks &Recreation Director;
Joleen Butler,Account Clerk II
Others Present: Tricia Pinney, Parks &Recreation Supervisor
Bobbi Benson, 550 El Camino Real, 4103
David Koffman,Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates
MINUTES
The minutes of the November 17, 2005 regular Commission meetings were approved as
submitted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bobbi Benson is the new chairperson of the non-profit organization, Friends of Mills Canyon.
She reported the work being done such as replanting of trees, annuals, trail conditions and plans
to obtain grant monies for improvements to the trails. Commissioner Heathcote suggested
contacting the Boy Scouts for volunteers to help with the cleanup on the trials. Benson also
mentioned that several eucalyptus trees at the Arguello entrance to the Canyon fell during the
recent storms. These trees will be replanted during the March 7t' Arbor Day Celebration. Ms.
Benson also mentioned that she will be hosting a free Rose pruning clinic on Jan 21'` (8am-2pm)
at the Park Road Rose Garden
OLD BUSINESS
A. Communitv Recognition Program — The Commission discussed the format of the
Walk of Fame Application drawn up by the subcommittee for approval to present to
City Council.
Motion by Hesselgren (seconded by Shanus): To recommend the Walk of Fame
application and procedure to the City Council at their February meeting. The
motion was approved 6-0.
January 19, 2006 minutes
Continued-page 2
B. No Smoking in Sections of City Parks - The Commission discussed approval of the
draft of the No Smoking Ordinance. Commissioner Shanus questioned if smoking
debris was part of the issue. Commissioner Dittman said the initial purpose for
bringing forth the issue was to be able to ask someone to stop smoking if necessary
and be backed up by an ordinance and suggested the ordinance be worded so that
smoking never be permitted at any time in the parks and facilities. After much
discussion, Commissioner Schreurs moved to approve the ordinance with the
following changes: 1) "At all times" added to the end of line 26 Section 2(b)(1); 2)
"at any time" added to the end of line 27 in Section 2(b)(2). Motion was seconded
by Shanus. Motion accepted 6-0.
Motion by Schreurs (seconded by Shanus): To approve the ordinance with the
following changes: 1)prohibit smoking on each of the listed athletic facilities at all
times;2) add tennis and basketball courts to the list The motion was approved 6-0.
C. Shared Recreation Services Update - Director Schwartz reported the findings
regarding shared services and the presentation made to City Council at the January
17, 2006 meeting. Council had questions and debated the matter, deciding to hold off
on steps to merge the recreation departments of Burlingame and Millbrae. Council
would like to see continued work of combined services on the program levels such as
sharing softball leagues, golf tournament,etc.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Presentation for Senior Mobility— David Koffman with Nelson/Nygaard Consulting
Associates presented the San Mateo County Senior Mobility Action Plan. The plan is
organized thru SamTrans with the cooperation of county-wide groups to provide
transportation for seniors. Census data shows increasing growth in the senior
population. The plan consists of 7 areas:
1) Community transit services
2) Community based transportation
3) Encouraging use of transit
4) Safe driving and driving retirement
5) Taxicabs
6) Information and referral
7) Walking and pedestrian safety
Commissioner Heathcote asked if pool cars were an option. Koffman replied that
Portland, Maine is the only city currently using that type of program. It was started
with grant funding and is now self-supporting due to contributions from local
businesses. Director Schwartz asked if taxicab vouchers were available. Koffinan
said that taxicab vouchers are not available as there currently is no funding to support
a taxicab voucher system.
January 19, 2006 minutes
Continued—page 3
Schwartz also asked if Redi Wheels had a wait list system. Koffman said that there is
no waiting list and participants cannot be turned down. However, the program does
not meet all the current transportation needs of the senior community.
B. Parks for the Future — Schwartz described a County-wide 1/8th cent sales tax
proposal that would allow for a funding source to each parks agency in the County to
create new parks, maintain or improve existing parks or purchase new land for parks
development. This proposal will have to go to Sacramento for approval before the
proposal can be taken to the voters of San Mateo County. A full presentation of the
proposal and details will be presented to the Parks & Recreation Commission at the
February 16, 2006 meeting as to whether or not to give a recommendation of
approval of the proposal to the City Council.
C. Summer Recreation Registration — Schwartz explained how the new recreation
registration process with the new internet component has been restructured. Instead
of having a designated start date and start time, registration will begin as soon as the
brochures are received in the mail by the public. For Fall and Spring registrations,
residents and non-residents can now register at the same time. However, for Summer
registration, due to the increased demand of classes, there will be a 3 day span
between the beginning of resident registration and non-resident registration. The
city's list serve will be utilized to send out an email to current registrants when the
brochure goes out in the mail.
REPORTS/HAND-OUTS
A. Parks &Recreation Department Reports
1. Monthly Report (see attached)
2. 2004-5 FY Revenue Report (see attached)
B. Commissioners
1. Commissioner Schreurs asked about the tree planting schedule on Park Road.
Schwartz said he would make sure Schreurs will receive a schedule.
2. Commissioner Dittman asked if it was time to re-do the Senior Resouce
Handbook as it has been 2 years since the last one was put together. The item
will be placed on the Commission's February agenda.
3. Dittman also asked the status of the Murray field redesign. Schwartz reported
that the proposal was brought to the City by CYSA representatives. Staff
worked with Callander Associates to develop a proposal. The representatives
said they would look for funding, but have not contacted the City in the past
year.
4. Commissioner Muller asked if there was still a representative from the Youth
Advisory Committee. Schwartz reported the he would check with the current
Coordinator to find out who would be the YAC representative this year.
January 19, 2006 minutes
Continued-page 4
5. Commissioner Muller expressed the possibility of providing information and
advice to parents of middle school age children regarding MySpace.com, an
internet chat room site which middle school age children access frequently.
Muller said she attended an excellent seminar given by a San Francisco Police
Officer who worked undercover investigating the site. She said she would see
if she could obtain the police officers name and telephone number and contact
her for a possible presentation.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday,
February 16, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. at Burlingame City Hall.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at
9:02 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, 1
Joleen Butler
Parks &Recreation Account Clerk H
City ®f Burlingame - Parks & Recreati®n De t.
sa, A
850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 N� 4�
06`31G phone: (650) 558-7300 - fax: (650) 696-7216 Z
recreationAburlingame.ori
Date: January 18, 2006
To: Parks &Recreation Commissioners
City Council
From: Randy Schwartz
Re: Monthly Report
Parks Division
1. Sycamore pruning in SE sector
2. TreeKeeper software installed
3. Natural turf fields closed until March I"
4. Met w/representatives of youth sports leagues to schedule fields for spring
5. Tree Crew began clearing Arguello entrance to Mills Canyon of trees that fell in the New Year's
Day storm. This area will be the site for 2006 Arbor Day ceremony.
6. Parks Division had successful annual audit of its pesticide application program
7. Division continued selective turf renovation at Murray Field and the lower Bayside Soccer field
Recreation Division
1. Emeritus lectures had approximately 50 seniors on hand for"Music of the 60's"
2. Contracted with Pacific Fine Arts for the 2006 Art in the Park festival. PFA to supply artists,
marketing,maintenance and security
3. Burlingame Aquatic Center was closed for 4.5 days for annual maintenance
4. Winter camp had 50 participants
5. Teen Drivers Training class was held during winter break
6. November's all-City Teen Dance had over 300 7t'/8 h graders in attendance
7. Registration has begun for spring classes
8. Annual Holiday Tree Lighting ceremony at City Hall was well attended
9. Playschool Villagers hosted"Make a Gingerbread House with Your Dad", with 22 of the 26
students attending this fun& sugary evening event
10. Elementary basketball started is in full swing with a total of 25 Burlingame teams.
11. Adult Softball Managers' meeting will be held on January 20' and play will begin March 20`x'.
Facilitv Improvements
1. Field lights on Bayside #1 have been repainted, rewired and new lights installed—relighting
project is 95% complete
2. Auditorium to be painted in January
3. Bayside Snack Shack/Restroom project in approval process; on schedule for summer construction
Upcoming Events
1. "Two Gentlemen From Verona", Shakespeare production—Recreation Center— Sat,February 11,
2:00pm. Tickets are available at the Recreation Center.
2. "Parents, Teens and Drinking" workshop—Recreation Center—Thurs, February 16, 7-9pm. Free.
BURLINGAME PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Collection Report
December 2005
Recreation Division 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04
COLL.YTD COLL.YTD COLL.YTD
Key Acc Program Gross Refunds Current Net Notes
25 01 Misc.Admin. 306.60 - 306.60 6,492.42 2,484.96 2,567.90
1 10 Advertising - - - 1,124.50 365.50
26 12 Tix/Bks/ArtSls 4,558.60 - 4,558.60 39,883.85 30,504.40 26,075.60
2 13 Bldg.Rental 5,472.00 - 5,472.00 31.943.00 30,035.50 25,712.00
27 Rental Deposits 1,100.00 1,125.00 (25.00) 2,425.00 (11275.00) (732.50)
3 16 Park Permit - - - 2,775.00 1,900.00 2,300.00
28 1294PoolRental - - - 21,013.00 11,548.16 4,445.25
4 20 ISr.Lunch - - - - 478.00
29 21 Sr.Activities 1,087.00 - 1,087.00 12,037.00 11,004.00 11,647.00
5 22 Teens 5,331.00 40.00 5,291.00 14,976.00 6,788.00 3,681.00
30 23 Jr.Teen Camps - - - 6,648.75 8,399.25 9,638.00
8 24 PFRN - - - - 150.00 60.00
6 30 Pre-school 20.00 - 20.00 51,350.97 34,612.50 35,224.00
31 31 Pre-Sch.Class 266.00 - 266.00 45,413.50 35,920.20 29,116.77
32 41 Lang.Arts - - - 3,953.50 3,286.00 5,676.00
9 44 Adult Art 98.00 243.00 (145.00) 36,649.00 39,214.50 39,553.50
34 45 Culinary 42.00 - 42.00 2.687.50 2,051.00 4,036.00
10 46 Youth Art 221.00 46.00 175.00 10,067.25 12,268.50 10,345.25
35 47 Misc.Art - - - 42.00 407.75 253.00
12 48 IComputers - - - 169.00 1,347.00 399.00
7 49 IlEnrichment 41,454.00 165.00 41,289.00 70,913.75 37,476.50 21,375.20
11 50 Art in Park - - - 20.00 460.00 100.00
37 60 Special Classes - - - 8,199.00 5,166.00 5,342.70
13 61 Fitness - - - 20,827.50 26.064.00 30,655.86
38 62 Sport Classes 87.00 - 87.00 7,358.00 6,597.50 9,468.00
14 70 Youth Camps/Trips 2.970.00 - 2.970.00 16.242.60 26,149.75 31,999.00
15 72 lContract Sprts 795.00 - 795.00 49,234.20 37,172.00 24,872.00
40 80 1 Elem.Sports 1,237.00 - 1,237.00 28,038.00 27,433.50 25,855.00
16 81 IBIS Sports 330.00 165.00 165.00 55,692.00 55,688.50 57,161.00
41 82 ITennis Lessons (67.00) 128.00 (195.00) 15,755.50 13.896.00 16,074.00
17 83 ITennis Courts 166.00 - 166.00 6,087.75 4,108.25 4,233.00
42 84 IGoIf Classes (11.50) - (11.50) 7,001.50 3,432.00 3,879.00
18 85 Misc.Sports - - - 6,661.00 6,933.00 7,092.22
43 86 Field Lgts/Rent 1,780.00 - 1,780.00 16,429.50 16,234.00 14,222.00
19 67 ISoftball 188.35 - 188.35 12,032.99 21,580.67 14,709.50
44 88 113asketball - - - 2,077.00 2,920.00 4,995.00
20 89 lVolleyball 235.00 - 235.00 6,574.00 1,784.00 2,621.00
21 90 IYth A'u.Class (40.00) - (40.00) 19.561.00 12,913.19 3,636.25
45- 91 IAdlt Aqu.Class - - - 5,885.00 7,072.50 3,969.00
46 92 ILap Swim @Rec 1,689.50 - 1,689.50 10,564.00 2,318.00 2,352.50
22 93 IRec Swim - - - 6,163.65
24 Yth Scholarship Fnd 150.00 - 150.00 408.00 295.00
L.ap Swim @Pool 1,559.50 1,559.50 15,340.05
Totals $ 71.025.05 71,025.05 $ 676,717.23 $ 547,184.58 $ 494,610.00
Less Refunds $ 1,912.00 $ 1,912.00
Net $ 71,025.05 69,113.05 $ 676,717.23 $ 547,184.58 $ 494,610.00
47 Parks Revenue $ - $ - - -
48 Field Prep Fees $ - $ - - -
23 95 Golf Cards -
Totals $ 71,025.05 $ 1,912.00 69,113.05 $ 676,717.23 $ 547,184.58 $ 494,610.00
[Aquatics Surpma,y, 3,249.00 - 00 $ 78, 26.70 $ 33;851. 35 $ 14;403.00
Incl. {Pool;. Classes,Lap
BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
February 2, 2006
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5:35 p.m. by
Chairperson McQuaide.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson McQuaide, Carney, Ellis, Grandcolas, Lahey, Lauder,and O'Connor
Staff: Parks &Recreation Director Schwartz, Supervisor Disco, and Secretary Harvey
Guests: Mr. and Mrs. Gilson and Tim Auran
MINUTES
The minutes of the January 5, 2006 Beautification Commission meeting were corrected to read under:
New Businesss/Appeal of the Denial to Remove a Protected Deodar Cedar Tree cnie 1480 Vancouver
Avenue (Paragraph #3/Tim Auran's comment) " . . that, information he found on the Internet
indicates that a Deodar Cedar's life expectancy is 25-50 years . . .". Minutes were approved as
corrected.
CORRESPONDENCE
Letter from Superintendent Richmond to Mr. and Mrs. Gilson, 1480 Vancouver Avenue, informing them
that their appeal of the denial for the removal of the Deodar Cedar tree on their property had been tabled
to the February meeting so the Commission could ask questions and receive clarification from Arborist
Porter before rendering a decision.
Flyer announcing Commissioner's Workshop, Saturday,February 25h.
Status Report: Easton Reforestation
Copy of emailed questions from Commissioners Lauder and McQuaide to Arborist Porter, regarding the
appeal of the denial to remove a protected Deodar Cedar tree @ 1480 Vancouver Avenue.
Copy of letter (submitted during meeting by Mr. and Mrs. Gilson) from Dolores Burnett, 1477 Bernal
Avenue, (also bearing a handwritten note from Sue and Herb Wei, 1470 Vancouver Avenue, agreeing
with comments in the letter), requesting the Deodar Cedar tree at 1480 Vancouver Avenue be removed
because the tree is . . . "enormous", "blocks sunlight", "plugs gutters; dirties yard" . . . ,and fears the tree
will fall.
FROM THE FLOOR-
There were no comments from the floor.
OLD BUSINESS
_Appeal of the Denial to Remove a Protected Deodar Cedar Tree(a, 1480 Vancouver Avenue-
Arborist Porter submitted copies of the questions emailed to him from Commissioners Lauder and
McQuaide and verbalized his answers to the Commission. Arborist Porter stated: He could not speculate
as to whether the broken limb was the result of the current construction or not, but no more than one third
of the foliage had been removed to repair/remove the fallen limb and the tree was still viable. All the tree
protection measures required during construction have now been re-installed as well as the protective
fencing. Any tree limb that has never been trimmed may, in fact, be heavy enough to cause the same sort
of damage that was caused to the new construction. The only thing that makes this tree potentially
dangerous is that it is in need of pruning. For every uninformed comment on the web regarding the life
expectancy of this particular tree species, there are many more that claim life expectancy for the Deodar
Cedar to be 100 yrs. plus; even that of a documented case of a Deodar Cedar tree on an island in Japan to
be over 5000 yrs old!
1
OLD BUSINESS -
_Anpeal of the Denial to Remove a Protected Deodar Cedar Tree na, 1480 Vancouver Avenue -
Contd.
In conclusion Arborist Porter stated that winter is the best time to do any trimming on trees because there
is less bug and disease activity. The tree is stable and only needs pruning; and if proper tree pruning is
performed, and the overall condition of its structure is maintained, this tree will live for many years to
come.
The Commission then asked Arborist Porter questions pertaining to structure and stability of the tree.
Arborist Porter stated that the roots of this tree flair out (as with most other trees), are healthy, and will
not be impacted by the construction. He reiterated that routine trimming of the tree every 4-5 years will
many maintain the health and integrity of this tree.
Following the Commission's comments, Chairperson McQuaide invited the appellants to comment.
Mrs. Gilson commented that P.G.&E. have "hacked"the Cedar tree over the years as well as the number
of Cable companies that are now in the City. The previous owner of the property was "scared to death"
of the tree but had never maintained the tree. Mrs. Gilson stated that she and her husband are concerned
about the neighbors complaints and then submitted a letter to the Beautification Commission, from
Dolores Burnett (1477 Bernal), (bearing a note from Sue and Herb Wei [1470 Vancouver]) which
requests permission for the Deodar Cedar tree be removed because the tree is . . . "enormous", "blocks
sunlight", "plugs gutters; dirties yard", and fears the tree will fall. Mrs. Gilson concluded that she and her
husband are happy to keep the tree and that now all are aware of the dangers of the tree, and "we've
tried". Mr. Gilson added that he had spoken to the City Attorney and was told that if something should
happen to the tree (if removal was not approved)the City would be liable.
Chairperson McQuaide closed the hearing and stated that she believes the tree would be safe if it was
maintained.
Commissioner Ellis noted that on the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) website, the Deodar
Cedar tree is reported to be one of the hardier and disease resistant varieties of this specie. In addition, the
information also noted that trees with a 70% rating (as to condition and health) could be returned to an
excellent condition; this tree was given a 70% rating on the Mayne Tree report. Commissioner Ellis also
pointed out that the Mayne Tree report showed all the trees on the property that were recommended for
removal and the Deodar Cedar tree was not one of them.
Commissioner Grandcolas noted that he has a large Cedar in his front yard and sometimes has concerns,
particularly during storms, about the tree falling over. Arborist Porter stated that this tree is not in danger
of falling over and explained that trees do not have a "tap root" like some people believe. He stated this
tree's roots, as with other trees, flair out from the tree and are anchored within the top 12 to 18 inches of
the soil; the roots are not and have not been impacted and there are no indications that this tree is
susceptible to falling over. To make the tree safe, this tree only needs to be pruned (reducing the end
weight of the heavy limbs) and shaped by someone who is qualified.
Commissioner Lahey stated that this is the last large tree on the block, will provide a nice canopy and
shade in the summer and, that good pruning would help with the neighbors sunlight concerns as well as
the other concerns expressed.
Commissioner Lauder commented that the tree enhances the neighborhood, and routine pruning and
maintenance should allow for this tree to go on for many years.
2
OLD BUSINESS-
Appeal of the Denial to Remove a Protected Deodar Cedar Tree (a, 1480 Vancouver Avenue —
Contd. -
Following the Commissioner's comments, Commissioner Grandcolas moved to deny the appeal to
remove the Deodar Cedar at 1480 Vancouver Avenue, because pruning the tree will improve the health
and safety of the tree,seconded(Lauder). Motion carried unanimously.
Chairperson McQuaide thanked the applicant's and informed the applicants that they would be notified in
writing of the Commission's decision and that the decision could be appealed to the City Council for
further consideration.
Chairperson McQuaide then changed the order of the Agenda and requested the Long Range
Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive item be discussed at the end of the business items so Commissioner
Lahey could leave and would not be present during that business item.
OLD BUSINESS—
Arbor Day na,Areuello Drive Entrance to Mills Canyon Park
Supervisor Disco stated that two Valley Oaks, two Blue Oaks, two Black Oaks, and 2 Redbuds will be
planted in the area to replace trees that were damaged and subsequently removed due to the storm in
December. Correspondence inviting the elementary and intermediate schools as well as City Officials
will be sent soon. [Due to State Exams in the public elementary school system, the date of the Arbor
Day Celebration has been changed to:Monday,March 6`"@ 10:00 am.]
NEW BUSINESS—
P.G.&E.Prunins Practices in the City of Burlineame—Committee Report
Commissioner Carney reported that she contacted Frank Reagan, P.G.&E. representative, regarding the
practice of"topping" of the trees to clear lines and was told that it is P.G.&E.'s prerogative;that property
owners are notified for permission to access property, but if no response, P.G.&E.'s contractors have
permission to access the property to trim the trees. When Mr. Reagan was asked about "tunneling" he
responded that it would depend on the tree's condition and safety issues as to whether that type of pruning
could be done. When she asked about the tree trimmers qualifications, Mr. Reagan responded that the
trimmers are certified. Commissioner Lahey reported that while recently in the Portola Valley/Woodside
area, she noticed that the trees near lines are trimmed nicely and would be willing to take pictures and
contact other cities regarding P.G.&E. pruning practices in their cities.
Commissioner Grandcolas stated that the P.G.&E. tree trimming contractors do not take the time to
properly prune the trees and the current practice is ruining the health of the trees in the City of
Burlingame. Commissioner O'Connor noted that prior to P.G.&E. filing Chapter 11, trees under lines
were trimmed appropriately. She suggested that the Commission follow the example of BULB. P.G.&E.
responds to public pressure and the Commission could ask the Council if they would agree to support the
Commission's endeavor to work on developing a plan of trimming that is healthy for the trees.
Commissioner Grandcolas that noted that P.G.&E. and SBC put money aside every year for
undergrounding lines in well traveled thoroughfares, and suggested that "tunneling" and undergrounding
lines be part of the discussion and plan development.
Following the discussion, Commissioner Grandcolas volunteered to draft a proposal to be presented to
Council enlisting their support as the Commission prepares to dialog with P.G.&E. to discuss options to
improve current pruning practices and methods on trees under utility lines in the City of Burlingame.
Commissioner Lahey stated she would take pictures of trees trimmed under utilities in Portola
Valley/Woodside and comparable pictures of trees in Burlingame; other Commissioners agreed to take
pictures as well.
Commissioner Lahey excused herself from the meeting at 7:05 pm.
3
OLD BUSINESS—
Lone Range Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive—Committee Report
After reviewing the Easton Reforestation summary submitted by Superintendent Richmond, the
Commission discussed options for presenting a Community forum for Easton area residents. Chairperson
McQuaide submitted a draft of a letter that could be sent to the residents inviting their input in the
reforestation plan on Easton and stated she would check with OLA Catholic Church and/or the First
Presbyterian Church to arrange for a possible meeting site. After a date is set, staff will send the letter to
Easton Drive residents inviting them to the forum and the public will be notified and encouraged to come.
REPORTS—
Parks & Recreation Director — Director Schwartz reported that at the Council's Annual Goal Setting
Session the public had opportunity to comment on areas of concern within the community. Council has
asked staff to review and respond to concerns expressed in their particular area. Director Schwartz stated
that this item will be agendized for the March 2nd meeting.
Superintendent—
1. Tree planting will begin shortly.
2. The three Monterey Cypresses on Forestview were successfully removed.
3. PG&E's District Vegetation Management Supervisor, was extremely helpful in preventing the
City from being charged for the power shut down on the Forestview project. She also arranged
for her crews to remove a hazardous 30' stem on a eucalyptus tree on Burlingame Avenue at
Myrtle. Our contractor would have required a crane, which would have been extraordinarily
expensive.
4. February 25 Commissioners'Workshop in San Mateo; we will send in a single registration check
for our group. RSVP deadline is Thursday,February 9h. Call or e-mail Karlene.
5. Crews from the California Conservation Corps are performing emergency repairs to portions of
the Ed Taylor Trail in Mills Canyon that were washed out in the recent storms.
Lauder—
Commissioner Lauder reported that she and former Commissioner Nancy Locke continue to meet and
clean the 101 triangle at Broadway, and have recently begun propagating the ice plant in the area.
There being no further business, Chairperson McQuaide adjourned the meeting at 7:30 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Lene Harvey
Recording Secretary
4
CITY o CITY OF BURLINGAME Yoram&
BU E
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
RLINGAM �
v,,, 850 Burlingame Avenue,Burlingame, California 94010-2899
Telephone (650) 558-7300 - Parks/Trees(650)558-7330
OHpOgATEO Fax (650) 696-7216 - E-mail: recreation@burlingame.org
CITY OF BURLINGAME
ARBOR DAY CEREMONIES
ARGUELLO ENTRANCE TO MILLS CANYON PARK
(Across for 3000 Arguello Avenue)
REVISED DATE
MONDAY, MARCH 6TH , 2006 x, 10:00 A.M.
Due to California State Exams in the public elementary school system, it has been
necessary for the Arbor Day Ceremony in the City of Burlingame to be celebrated on
Monday, March 6th, beginning at 10:00 A.M.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused in your scheduling to attend
in this event, and sincerely hope that the change will not affect your ability to celebrate
this meaningful day with us.
If you should have any further questions with regard to this year's Arbor Day
celebration, please feel free to contact me at (650) 558-7330.
Sincerely,
Karlene Harvey
Administrative Secretary
�F Ldp C O
C / S
c
N 1
e *�
r \ gAr�I�S YAC xw
&IY57tje5FkIE War /
�"
41
��
RL
�OL ""
ARBOR DAY CEREMONIES CITY OF BURLINGAME
sss MA COUNTY
MONDAY MARCH 6 , 2006 - 10:00 a.m. CALIFORNIAO
! — MILLS �`.,/// }t reav,.tn:aeewnrtv,isea
ARGUELLO ENTRANCE TO M_LLS CANYON PARK
(Across from 3000 Arguello)
c�a
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
February 13, 2006
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the February 13, 2006, regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling,
Terrones and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: None
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner, Maureen
Brooks; City Attorney, Lang Anderson; Senior Engineer; Doug Bell
III. MINUTES The minutes of the January 23, 2006 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were approved as mailed with C. Osterling abstaining because
he was not at the meeting.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1. 1124 ROSEDALE AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR VARIANCES FOR SIDE AND
REAR SETBACK, LOT COVERAGE AND PARKING FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION. (JEFF AND
EMILY SCHLEINING, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; RAY BRAYER, DESIGNER)
PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners noted that from the aerial a lot of the
properties in this block appear to have nonconforming rear yards, could staff measure lot coverage and rear
setbacks from the aerials for the next meeting in order to provide some documentation on the existing
conditions. It was noted that because of the size and type of remodel this project was not subject to design
review and public comment at this time. The project will be noticed to the neighbors when it returns for
action.
Commissioners asked: the applicant needs to more clearly address the extraordinary circumstances on his
property to establish hardship for the variances requested, particularly lot coverage and rear setback; need
hardship on the property clarified and context of existing conditions; if going to agree to variances need
more information for findings; noted that to make a decision the Commission needs to see the "real' house
so the plans need to be corrected, the roof ridge is not correct and the left and right elevations are incorrect
compared to what is currently in place; there is a problem related to the front porch structure, on the right
elevation the window is high and the porch low, saw double hung windows on the existing house but they
are not shown on the plans; problem with back porch roof framing, is it being replaced or modified because
the pitch on the new porch is different from the existing could result in needless reframing of the roof when
`- it is not needed, look at dashed line; indicate different front and garage doors on the plans, they change the
character, what is intended; hardship identified is the lights from traffic on Meadow day and night, Meadow
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
is a dead end not a through street,how is the traffic volume unusual for a dead end street? Plans call for a
Poplar tree in the rear yard, urge applicant to choose a different tree species from the City's street tree list, _
will do better in this environment.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the questions have been answered, information
has been submitted, reviewed by the Planning Department, and there is space on a Commission agenda.
This item concluded at 7:15 p.m.
2. 1818 TROUSDALE DRIVE, ZONED TW — APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCES FOR FRONT SETBACK AND
BUILDING HEIGHT AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES OF THE NORTH
BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A NEW FOUR-STORY ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY.(BILL LINDSTROM,SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT,INC.,APPLICANT;MICHAEL KITSUN,
MITHUN ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT; AND TROUSDALE PROPERTIES, PROPERTY OWNER)
PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report including the Mitigated Negative Declaration and noted
this project was submitted before the TW zoning district was adopted so it is being reviewed under the C-
3/R-4 zoning that was on the property at the time the project was submitted.However,the project is required
to comply with the General Plan including the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan,and the design
guidelines are the expression of the plan for this project. Table 2 in the staff report which compares the
project to the design guidelines in the specific plan, outlines the compliance of the project with the plan,
even though the zoning requirements are not those of the TW district. Staff noted that the guidelines express
the General Plan consistency which is required,so can be considered to over rule the zoning requirements. —
Commission noted that there seem to be some inconsistencies between the design guidelines and the zoning
regulations of the C3/R4 districts,staff noted that they would add another column to the table to compare the
project to the TW zoning regulations;
After noting that the comments this evening should be on the adequacy of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the design of the project, the Commissioners commented on the following items:
• Responses to Conditional Use Permit Requests: Cannot read the handwritten CUP responses please
have the application type them so that they are legible; applicant expressed concern at previous meeting
about needing a buffer between the road and the doorway for safety but that was not discussed in the
setback variance request.
• Mitigated Negative Declaration: think that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is complete in its
analysis; it is a good report, have no comments.
• Land Use: Group residential facilities is a good use for this area;
• Zoning Regulations:not clear what code is used for design,does not meet the intention of either C-3/R-
4 or TW;
• Design Guidelines: project does not meet the design guideline direction regarding street wall,build to
lines,require only a percentage of the frontage to comply,none of the frontage of this building complies,
why should it be exempt? Commission has done a lot of work on the planning and zoning for this area
and this project did not take the guidelines to heart,the transparent trellis wall does not meet the build-to
line intention; problem is with compliance with the design guidelines, want to send a strong message,
want the project to comply with all the design guidelines; agree want to pull the buildings up to the _
build-to line and begin the change to the whole streetscape in this area as planned; pull forward th
elements of the ground floor-build to the TW zoning requirements, provide a buffer to the interior of
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13,2006
the building in another way;could create a pull in/driveway in front of the front door,could use a
structure like a port cochere and give up the patio area,increase the sense of the building being built at
the sidewalk;Would note that the design guidelines require 60%of the building to be built to the build-
to line,that leaves 40%of the area for landscaping buffer or drop off;build-to line makes good sense,
provides a wall which can be enhanced by nice landscape features along the street,can support good
architecture,look at San Mateo project,it is attractive with landscaping at the front.
• Building Design:Need to encourage a new design for this building which is different from the others,
can rearrange inside and move the front entry desk to the Ogden side. Think it is correct to move
entrance to Ogden,if this is done,will want to avoid large institutional wall look on Trousdale side.
Think wall on Trousdale can be articulated and broken up without the front entrance there; revise the
window treatment so that it looks less like an office building,soften it and make it look more residential
with different window and smaller mullions sizes,reduce the repetitiveness which will look tedious
when built;compliance with the build-to line would provide more articulation along the Trousdale side
of the building. There are options like a Porte Cochere on Trousdale,shift building 15 feet closer to
Ogden in order to increase the rear yard so the van access can be put back there,the rear yard would be
75 feet wide with the move.
• Entrance off Ogden: if main entrance off Ogden would be good to look at,provides the facility with
needed safety for residents,single entry for guests and residents is important;could consider Ogden as
an alternate. On Ogden side inset the sidewalk so that vehicles are placed off the street,experience is
that when transit parks for this type of use,it is there a long time to load and unload;side entrance needs
to be more grand.Safest and best way appears to be in/out on Ogden as far from Trousdale as possible.
Agree Ogden better,if stranger sees entrance on Trousdale will be encouraged to park in front.Need to
make the entrance on Ogden more visible.
• Parking: the parking for this use is appropriate.
• Height: four stories works;
• Sign Placement: feel that the approach to signage(monument sign)is suburban,is what was done in
the are in the past,and is not consistent with the design guideline intentions for this subarea,want to
increase the urban sense;
• Resident Pick Up/Drop Off: if the building were shifted closer to Ogden there would be more space at
the rear for resident shuttle drop off/pick up from the delivery area and the east side off Trousdale.
Concerned about the pick up/drop off and the safety of pedestrian access into a dead end driveway off
Trousdale,can't support. Staff noted that the Negative Declaration pointed out that the access to the
service area on Trousdale which is generally opposite the entrance to the hospital on the south side of the
street was difficult and would work principally because of its infrequent use.Safer to drop people offon
Ogden side rather than on Trousdale side; advantage to placing passenger loading area on Ogden,could
be enhanced by landscaping on the northeast corner,should be revised.
• More Information: would like addresses for the pictures of other facilities in the staff report and
addresses of facilities in this area so that we can visit them;would like to visit a couple of these
facilities,could staffprovide addresses in the Bay Area;would staffe-mail the list to the Commissioners
so can visit early.
C.Auran noted that since this was a study item with a Mitigated Negative Declaration he directed that it
come back to the commission on the regular action calendar when the issues identified had been addressed,
the Mitigated Negative Declaration revised,if necessary,and staffhad reviewed all the changes,at a meeting
where there was room on the agenda. This item is not appealable. The item concluded at 7:50 p.m.
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unles.
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
3A. 1199 BROADWAY, SUITE 2, ZONED C-1,BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA—APPLICATION
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
(TOMMY NGAI AND DANNY KUALA, APPLICANTS, TRG ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT, AND
GARBIS AND MAIDA BEZDJIAN, TRS., PROPERTY OWNERS) (59 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
3B. 821 PALOMA AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK
VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT AND DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A
FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JD ASSOCIATES,
APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND DANIEL MCAULIFFE, PROPERTY OWNER) (75 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
3C. 16 DAVIS COURT, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING (DALE MEYER, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND ANDREW JUROW
AND BARBIE BARRETT, PROPERTY OWNERS) (37 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA
LEWIT
Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consen
calendar. There were no requests. C. Deal noted that he would abstain from the vote on 821 Paloma
because he has a business relationship with the applicant and he would abstain from the vote on 1199
Broadway because he lives within 500 feet on the project site.
C. Terrones moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners'
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion
and it passed for 3a, 1199 Broadway, and 3b, 821 Paloma Avenue, on a 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining) voice
vote and for 3c, 16 Davis Court, on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded
at 7:52 pm.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
4. 2412 HALE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND A SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING (JAMES WONG, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT, ALVIN YANG, PROPERTY OWNER)
(70 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
Reference staff report February 13, 2006, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. James Wong, 207 Northwood Avenue, San Francisco, project
architect, Susan May, 2408 Hale Drive, and Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke regarding the project.
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13,2006
Grateful for the most recent revisions regarding the hip roof,have concerns with protecting our house during
construction,concerned with the drainage from the site,now there are times when water runs onto our
property,the bulk of the structure is six to ten feet from our house,will be excavating the lower level along
�- that side,side yard is narrow,how will excavation be done. The applicant noted that the excavation will be
done by bucket method,e.g.by hand. It was noted that the architect made a good attempt to meet all
requirements,this house is difficult to remodel,like that the walkway is reduced,but the front door is
double,makes the entry look massive,why not have one door with lights on each side;note that the design is
better with single arched windows. The applicant noted that the door does not face the front porch,that is a
window,the door is on the side facing the side property line.
Commissioners noted that the project has gotten to a point where it looks good,would like to comment on
the pathway to the front door,has been reduced to six feet wide,would like to see it reduced to five feet to
provide more space between the driveway and walkway,concerned with mixed vocabulary of roof forms
between the east and west elevation;changed roof form to hip on east side,why not on west;would look
better if all hip. The applicant noted that the roof was hipped on the east elevation because of concerns
raised by the neighbor,the west side is next to a driveway,not affect neighbor and decided that without the
hip roof,it reduced the mass of the building,see less of the wall on second floor. Commissioners asked if
the corbels will be made of wood,yes. Commissioners asked what the applicant plans to do for subsurface
drainage during excavation? Will construct a French drain along the perimeter. There were no further
comments and the public hearing was closed.
C.Deal moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following amended conditions to address
retention of the fence covered with vegetation during construction,installation of a subsurface perimeter
drainage system along the right side of the property,and reduction of the front walkway from six feet to five
feet with additional landscaping in the foot added between the driveway and the walkway: 1)that the
project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped January 27,
sheets A1.00 to A3.01,with wood windows with simulated true divided lites and traditional wood stucco
mold throughout(both new and existing windows)to match the style shown on cut sheets A to E(attached),
and that any changes to building materials,exterior finishes,footprint or floor area of the building shall
require an amendment to this permit; 2)that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,first or
second floors, or garage,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing
windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning
Commission review; 3)that the existing non-protected size shrub at the front right side property line shall
remain and be protected during construction;the fence and plantings along the right side property line shall
be protected during construction;4)that a subsurface perimeter drainage system shall be developed to keep
water from going on to the neighbor's property,to be approved by the City Engineer;5)that the front
walkway shall be reduced to five feet in width and the one foot added to the landscaped area between the
driveway and the entrance walkway;6)that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,
engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details
such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed
professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under
penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 7)that prior to final
inspection,Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim
materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and
Building plans; 8)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the
height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9)that all air
ducts,plumbing vents,and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and installed on
the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13,2006
approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10)that the conditions of the Chief
Building Official's August 12, 2005 memo and the Fire Marshal's, the City Engineer's, the Recycling,
Specialist's,and the NPDES Coordinator's August 15,2005,memos,shall be met; 11)that the project shal
meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by
the City of Burlingame; 12) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris
Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit
a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 13) that the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The
motion was seconded by C. Vistica.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0-voice vote.
Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:10 p.m.
5. 1125 CLOVELLY LANE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SIDE
SETBACK AND PARKING VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (SATISH AND MEENU DUTT, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS;AND MARK SANO,DESIGNER) (78 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
Reference staff report February 13, 2006, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Sateesh Dutt, 1125 Clovelly Lane, was available for questions.
Commissioners asked about the Magnolia trees proposed, the plans note that an existing tree will be
relocated, please clarify. The applicant noted that it is not being moved, it is a new tree. Commissioners
asked that one tree is proposed too close to the right property line,would you object to moving it toward the
driveway?No. It appears there maybe more than one appliance venting through the chimney,if the chimney
is eliminated, may need to provide new vent for water heater.
Commissioners noted that the garage is coming forward too far on the property, would be better if the
appliances located there were moved inside the house, then the front of the garage could be pushed back;
would move the garage back by at least three feet; now it comes out farther than it has to,too close to the
sidewalk and prominent,the scale also seems strange in relationship to the rest of the front;the water heater,
washer and dryer could go a lot of places inside the house;like the porch change;overall the massing is done
well, especially at the rear, if going to use stucco mold, should be shown properly on the plans, what is
shown is too thick; existing windows have wood sill, should match throughout, show that on the plans.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Deal moved to continue the application to the consent calendar when the following changes have been
made and have been plan checked. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
• Move the water heater,washer and dryer out of the garage,and move the front of the garage back by four
to five feet and retain a legal covered parking space;
• Rework elevations for consistency,especially consistent use of stucco mold and wood sills on windows;
• Move the Magnolia tree in the front yard inward, about seven feet in from the inner edge of the.
driveway; and
• The sun tunnel skylight should be tinted.
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item until plans have been revised, plan
checked and there is space on an agenda. This item will be renoticed when it is returned to the action
calendar. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at
- 8:25 p.m.
6. 317 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO AN
APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO
INCREASE THE HEIGHT BY 15 INCHES. (JAMES CHU, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND
GARY PARTEE, PROPERTY OWNER) (50 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
Reference staff report February 13, 2006, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Fourteen conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners noted
that they had met the applicant at the site, he has explained that a couple of other homes had been built at
grade as was originally proposed and they flooded, did not want to have potential flooding.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Gary Partee, 340 Lorton Avenue, property owner, Con Brosnan,
applicant, and Rebecca Knudsen, 315 Occidental Avenue, spoke regarding the project. Commissioners
asked if it weren't for the requirements for declining height envelope, would the siting have stayed the same
and would you have just raised the height? Yes. Resident to left of site, have no problems with the changes.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the
project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped January 23,
2006 sheets A.1 through A.5, and date stamped July 7, 2005, sheet L1.0, site plan, floor plans, building
elevations, landscape plan and site survey; that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall
require an amendment to this permit; and that the proposed landscaping in the side yard to the right side of
the house shall cover the entire 5'-9" setback area; 2) that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or
second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and
architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 3) that prior to
scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide
architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown
on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or
contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the
Building Department; 4) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note
compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; all new windows shall be true divided light
wood windows and shall contain a wood stucco-mould trim to match the existing trim as close as possible;
5) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and
installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 6) that prior to
scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide
certification of that height to the Building Department; 7) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection
a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 8) that prior to
underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the
various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 9) that during demolition of the existing residence,
site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best
management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site
sedimentation of storm water runoff; 10) that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13,2006
grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work
shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;
11)that the conditions of the City Engineer,Recycling Specialist,Chief Building Official,and Fire Marshal's
July 8,2005 memos shall be met; 12)that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition
Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to
submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of a structure,
interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit; 13)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance
1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance;and 14)that the
project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code,2001
edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C.Vistica.
Commissioners noted that it is unfortunate that the articulation on the left side was lost to avoid the special
permit for declining height envelope,would have just as soon given the special permit;unfortunate to lose
the step,the fireplace and the dining room articulation.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:33 p.m.
7. 1655 SEBASTIAN DRIVE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION OF ROOFTOP PANEL ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT CABINETS
ON THE GROUND FLOOR AT THE EXISTING PENINSULA TEMPLE SHOLOM(TASHA SKINNER,
APPLICANT;AND PENINSULA TEMPLE SHALOM,PROPERTY OWNER)(66 NOTICED)PROJECT
PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report February 13,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staffcomments. Five conditions were suggested for consideration from the staffreport,and CP
suggested a sixth condition that the project should be reviewed for compliance with conditions of approval
in five years or upon complaint. Commissioners asked if this is one of the antenna locations where we need
to reserve space for police and fire antennas?CA Anderson replied that no,that regulation applies to the flat
area where building height becomes an obstacle. Commissioners suggested a seventh condition that the
antennas shall continue to be screened with healthy vegetation and that the landscaping shall be maintained
with an automatic irrigation system.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Tasha Skinner,185 Berry Street,San Francisco,representing the
applicant;Dane Ericksen,470 Third Street West,Sonoma,Hammett&Edison Consulting Engineers;Tony
Sava,2901 Arguello;Mary Cotter,2847 Arguello;Joseph Dees,2909 Arguello;Mary Ann Saba,2901
Arguello;Nancy Dees,2909 Arguello;spoke regarding the project. Applicant noted that letters had been
sent to the two neighbors who had requested the public hearing,the antennas themselves are 4 feet tall,not 8
feet tall,the structure supporting and enclosing the antennas is 8 feet tall;received letter regarding effect on
property values,we have not encountered any evidence that demonstrates property values decrease when
antennas like this are installed;to the contrary homeowners are choosing where they live based on adequate
coverage by wireless service;the five-year master plan notes that there will be one future site in Burlingame
this year,near Burlingame Avenue and Bloomfield Road; the applicant is in Concord and does not live
across the street from the proposed antennas,applicant made statement that is not true,don't believe what
they say about radio frequency is true;have been experiencing traffic congestion in the neighborhood from
the activities at the Temple Sholom,used to be a right tum only sign from the parking lot,the sign is nov
removed and the threat of accident is greater,cars cannot see around corner,visitors to the site are not aware
of this situation,now have to deal with heavy traffic and garbage,don't need to add this to our list of
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13,2006
concerns; last time the Temple did renovations, had no qualms, every car that goes from Escalante down
Sebastian to Arguello goes past these antennas,it will be an eyesore,maps are not accurate,how much noise
is it going to make; somebody is making money from this; property overlooks the Temple, this is a
�— residential area, what is proposed is a profit venture, will be an eyesore and depreciate property values;
health effects are unknown,concerned that signal will interfere with satellite dishes,phones,radios;unhappy
about antennas,there is a lot of equipment,should take a ride up here and see this,there is a lot of equipment
on the roof of the Temple now resulting from classroom additions,the towers would add to this and would
be ugly; regarding comment about impact on satellite and telephone reception,there would be no impact,
this signal is vastly removed in spectrum, low power signals, FCC has regulations to make sure that the
frequencies do not interfere with one another, purpose of the installation is to provide improved service,
meets the requirements of the antenna regulations, generally would require nine panel antennas at this
location, heard concerns of neighbors so the footprint was reduced as much as possible and now three
antennas are proposed.
Commissioner's comments: appreciate the photo simulations that show that the new wall will match
existing; how will the emissions from this antenna compare to emissions from a home wireless network?
The applicant noted that the antennas will have different frequencies than home operations, the emissions
would be 1.1%of the maximum permitted by federal standards, this is 100 times below the federal limit.
What is the power level?Maximum is 400 watts, compared to a radio signal which is 50,000 watts and a
television signal which is 5 million watts;FCC does not allow frequency interference. What is the diameter
of the cylinder? 20 inches,the purpose of the cylinder is to conceal the antenna from public view. There
were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions to
make sure the existing screening vegetation on the Temple site is maintained and to require that the
application is reviewed in five years or upon complaint for compliance with the conditions of approval: 1)
that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department and date stamped
February 6, 2006, sheets T-1 and T-2,A-1 through A-8, S-1 and E-1 through E-6;2) that the antennas and
its supporting structure shall be located a minimum of 4'4" from the roof edge and that the height of the
antenna, including its supporting structure, shall not exceed 8'-0" above the closest portion of the roof on
which is it mounted;3) that the antennas,supporting structures and cable trays shall be painted with a non-
reflective paint and shall be painted to mach the color of the building; 4) that the new CMU wall for the
proposed equipment enclosure on the ground floor shall match the existing equipment enclosure in color,
texture coursing and grouting;that any noise from the operation of the generators will not increase the noise
level at the property line by more than 3 dBA;the new CMU wall shall not exceed 9'-6"above grade and the
equipment enclosure area shall not exceed 12'-0"x 18'-0";5) that the project shall meet all the requirements
of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;6)
that the property owner shall be responsible for maintaining the existing healthy vegetative screen for the
antennas and around the equipment enclosure and shall insure that the vegetation is served at all times by an
automatically operated irrigation system as approved by the City Arborist; and 7)that the project shall be
reviewed for compliance with conditions of approval in five years or upon complaint. The motion was
seconded by C. Deal.
Comment on the motion: think with added conditions for screening and review,although this is a residential
neighborhood,the screening is such that it will blend,know that emissions from this type of facility are very
low,not concerned;was involved in the industry for twelve years,these installations are not hazardous,well
below federal regulations, applicant has done a good job screening the site from view, there won't be an
increase in traffic,after construction,a technician will come out about once a month;Commissioners do go
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
out to look at the projects,from every view applicant has done a good job of negating the negative aesthetic
impacts,there will be more requests for these,hope other applicants do it as well;it is unfortunate that the -�
sample which was put up is bright orange but that is the purpose of story poles, when the antennas and
structures are painted will blend so it is not nearly as visible, with hillside area construction permit
applications we are looking at obstruction to distant views,in this case there aren't any,this has a great value
to the community,the community became concerned when PG&E proposed very high power lines through
neighborhoods, this is not the same impact, the emissions are low, 1% of the federal limit,not invasive.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
8. 2115 ROOSEVELT AVENUE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE. (JD & ASSOCIATES,
APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; AND MIKE&MERRISA HUTCHISON,PROPERTY OWNERS) (52
NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWTT
C.Deal noted that he had a business relationship with the applicant and recused himself from the discussion
on this item, and stepped down from the dais and left the Council Chambers.
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. The applicant, Mike Hutchison, 2115 Roosevelt Avenue, was
available to answer questions. Commissioners asked about the existing driveway width of 8.5 feet,one foot
short of the required width,can the curb be relocated to gain the extra foot in width? The existing basement
plan shows an external staircase,can it be made into an internal stair?Makes it difficult to access the washer
and dryer. The applicant noted that the curb could be moved; Planning staff clarified that since this is an
existing nonconforming condition on the site, a variance is not required for the driveway width. The
external stair to the basement area will remain,however,the washer and dryer will be moved upstairs. The
applicant noted that he would like to move the location of the new garage so that it is on the property line.
Planning staff noted that this would require a property line survey for side and rear, and eave and design
details for the structure would have to be revised because of California Building Code and Engineering
requirements. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions
have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica.
• Would like to see the landscape plan revised to beef it up with appropriate tree species,taking out the
palm trees;
• Encourage to keep the garage setbacks as proposed, if the garage is pushed closer to the property line,
will substantially affect the design details such as the eaves;
• Would like to see a 2 foot setback on the garage to both side and rear property lines, to avoid future
problems with maintenance of the exterior of the structure.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had beer
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Deal recused). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:25 p.m.
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
C. Deal returned to the dais.
�— 9. 755 PALOMA AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMITS
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING AND FOR A NEW OFFICE IN AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. (JONATHAN
FELDMAN, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND ANN STOWE &MICHAEL CELICEO,PROPERTY
OWNERS) (70 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Jonathon Feldman, 29 Park Hill Avenue, San Francisco, project
architect, Michael Celicio, 755 Paloma Avenue, property owner, and Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, spoke
regarding the project. Commissioners noted that the existing house is nice looking, will the existing shingles
be kept, it is not clear on the drawings. The architect noted that the existing shingles will remain and the
new addition will be shingled. The applicant noted that there are similar accessory structures in the
neighborhood, at 1401 Palm there is an accessory structure that is the entire length of the lot with a
bathroom, stairs and balcony, if they can do it, why not us; appreciate the comments made, but these are a lot
of cosmetic concerns; we should have some choice on certain things, think that sometimes homeowner's
choices should be allowed, contemporary style is our choice. Commissioners asked how the accessory
structure would be used, and when would the office space be used? The applicant noted that it would be his
home office and would work there as many as 18 hours a day. Commissioners noted that the property at
1401 Palm is a different situation, that accessory structure has been there since before the current code was
adopted, the property is used as a residential care facility for developmentally disabled persons. It was noted
that design review was put in place because this is an older, established community with a lot of architectural
jewels; in the recent past, bungalows were being replaced with two story monster homes next to existing
homes; the regulations have evolved over time to provide a balance between existing neighborhood and new,
and to make sure the new fits in with the existing neighborhood.
Commission comment on the project:
• Bathrooms in accessory structures are very strongly discouraged because we don't want to create a
situation where it can be turned into a rental unit, this has been a policy for many years;
• Don't see any hardship or overriding consideration to take a use that would usually be found in main
dwelling and put it in an accessory structure particularly when the house is being remodeled;
• there are very large skylights in the accessory structure proposed close to the property line, it will light
up the area to the rear, affect adjoining properties, where the rear yard area is supposed to be for outdoor
recreation;
• The proposed addition to the house looks too much like an addition, needs to be made to blend with the
existing character of the house;
• There are awfully large skylights proposed on the front fagade of the house, goes against the character of
the house, could be replaced with dormers;
• The drawings do not reflect many of the existing elements of the house such as the shingles, it looks like
a stucco house in the plans, need to show how it will look;
• The barge rafter tails shown on the north elevation need to be shown as they will actually look, need to
show design detail;
• The front of the house has a lot of character, this is not carried through on the west and south elevations,
�.. when you get to the back, the character of the front of the house is completely gone.
• Not sure of the details of the trellis, posts look spindly;
11
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13,2006
• A lot of the details where the existing and new are tied together are missing;
• On the west elevation,it appears that the second floor window in the shed roof area encroaches into the
roof structure,needs to be shown accurately;
• The large shed dormer which extends across the full width of the house screams that it is an addition,it
should be made subordinate to the main roof,
• Roof deck is out of character with the rest of the house,put roof over lower first floor,play with second
floor roof,
• The new"fixed and awning"wood windows shown on the west elevation are too contemporary and out
of character with the existing window pattern;
• Commend that roof over porch is being extended,but don't see how it is supported,that depth can't be
cantilevered, need column pairs like existing columns, should harmonize with the other pairs of
columns;
• Regarding the accessory structure,the skylights should be eliminated;if the accessory structure is to
remain,also need to eliminate the window on the back;
• The accessory structure is intended to be shingled,but it is not shown on the drawings;
• When this comes back for action,could staff provide phone numbers to contact for site visit for both the
applicant and the neighbor to the left;
• On Sheet A4.2,the area off the living/dining rooms is called out as patio,should be porch;on Sheet
A4.0,the declining height envelope is labeled as"reclining height envelope",please correct;and
• The second floor deck is generally a place where people congregate,is large,could affect adjacent
neighbors,should be modified.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C.Vistica made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motior
was seconded by C.Deal. Commissioners asked that the design review consultant listen to the tapes to get
the gist of the comments made. It was also noted that the accessory structure may be okay if it is revised;
can be done in such a way that the home office doesn't overly impact the neighbor to the left.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant. The motion
passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item
concluded at 9:50 p.m.
10. 701 VERNON WAY,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,SPECIAL PERMIT AND
PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION WITH AN ATTACHED
GARAGE. (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; JEFFREY
BASHAW,PROPERTY OWNER)(77 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN
C.Cauchi recused himself from the discussion on this item because he lives within 500 feet of the project;
he stepped down from the dais and left the Council Chambers.
SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Commissioners noted
that they visited the site on Sunday and met the owner;originally had a concern about the lack of an off-
street uncovered parking space,but when you look at the area,there are other homes on Bloomfield with the
same garage configuration,if the uncovered parking space were put beside the garage,would have to put in a
wider curb cut,which would take away street parking. This pattern seemed to occur at many comer lots in
the area.
12
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Randy Grange, 205 Park Road, project architect, noted that this is
a deceptively tricky project, it is a modest addition, the allowable floor area is reduced both by attaching the
garage and because it is a corner lot; are proposing to remove an "L" shaped portion of the existing garage,
the owners are asking to keep the existing garage configuration, there won't be an intensification of use, one
bedroom is being added, but there are still two cars in the household; looked at the other options to push the
garage back to create an off-street parking space in the driveway or a new detached garage, but either of
these options would have a significant impact on the available yard space in the rear; this is the dominant
pattern in the neighborhood for corner houses.
Commissioners noted that the plate height in the garage is 9.5 feet, explain; are the proposed French doors
going to be T-6" tall; there is a planter shown on the stairwell, will that window be operable to access the
planter? The vertical element at the stairwell seems prominent, did you look at ways to reduce the mass?
The existing house has a couple of pieces which have gutters, will there be gutters on the new house, will
obscure some of the character provided by the nice rafter tails. The architect responded that the 9.5' plate
height was done to tie in the garage proportionally with the rest of the house; the floor level of the main
house is three feet above grade, so the higher plate height in the garage makes it look proportional. The
French doors were not drawn to scale; they will have a typical door height. The window at the stairwell will
be operable. Commissioners noted that this is a great job on a very difficult addition. Looked at putting a
shed roof over the stairwell, but think the gable roof ties it together better. There will be gutters on the new
portions. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions
have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
• On the existing front elevation, two different window patterns are shown, plans note that existing
windows are to remain, but shows different mullions, will the existing windows be changed, clarify.
• Look at scale of window in the stairwell, look at changing to three separated vertical panels, the large
window proposed contribute to the large mass of the stairwell;
• Might want to consider adding a window in the dining room facing the neighbor on Vernon, would be
nice for the dining area and break up the wall for the neighbor; and
• Should consider putting a gated fence for the kids to put their bikes in the back yard.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Cauchi abstaining). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:04 p.m.
C. Cauchi returned to the dais.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of February 6, 2006.
CP Monroe briefly noted the actions taken by the City Council. She noted that the Council had
discussed having a charrette in the downtown area in the Fall, and had suggested that the Commission
might assist in determining appropriate areas for study. She will bring this item back to the Commission
as an FYI at a later date.
13
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
Review of FYI items:
Commission noted that in the future the FYI items could be reviewed in a more collective manner as a
consent calendar would be reviewed. In that spirit the Commissioners noted that they had no problem
with the requests for 716 Howard Avenue and 1553 Drake Avenue. However they would like to discuss
1101 Burlingame Avenue and the status report on the hospital.
FYI—716 Howard Avenue—changes to approved design review.
Approve as submitted.
FYI— 1553 Drake Avenue—changes to approved design review.
Approve as submitted.
- FYI— 1101 Burlingame Avenue—changes to approved commercial design review.
Commissioners noted that the elevations submitted with this application are not the elevations originally
approved, including that the awning is a different shape and the windows extend to the floor in some
areas,reducing the tile area on the face of the building. Before action on this item, staff should provide
commission with a history of the approved project and the action on any previously requested revisions;
what standards does the city have for hanging heaters on exterior walls focused down to heat sidewalk
areas;how far can such heaters extend into the public right of way area. Noted that not think the plans
show the tile area and shape of the awning correctly,confirm with approved elevation. Needs to be set
for the action calendar when the information is available.
- FYI—Status of Peninsula Hospital Replacement Project: Fire Lane and Street Light Design.
CP Monroe reported on the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Implementation subcommittee's public
meeting regarding the fire lane pavement and street light fixtures on and along the hospital site. She
noted that a brushed concrete and asphalt pattern was approved for the fire lane. Two commissioners
who attended the meeting volunteered to help reduce the number of light standard options to a workable
number. CP Monroe pointed out that in San Mateo the city has a steel base designed with an El Camino
Bell on it which might work well as an add on to achieve street level consistency and amenity along El
Camino. Commissioners who participated in the meeting noted that the neighbors had given in put on
the fire lane paving but the commissioners did not understand this was the final review. Wanted the
Commission to review the landscape drawings which would have more,and accurate detail. The sketch
reviewed at the meeting was not to scale so the proportions of the mix of materials was unclear,as was
the relationship of the materials to the adjacent landscaping.
- FYI—Subcommittee Assignments
CP Monroe reviewed the current subcommittee assignments, noting that members of the commission
had changed and some of the assignments are coming to an end. The Chair suggested a new
subcommittee be formed to address the implementation of the hospital conditions. This would free up
the North Burlingame/Rollins Road subcommittee to finish up the El Camino North zoning. The Chair
appointed Cers. Terrones and Brownrigg to the subcommittee on the implementation of the hospital
project. In discussion the commissioners directed staff to make note of the need to review office uses in
accessory structures in residential areas,to set a defining policy on the placement of garages relative to -�
side and rear property lines, and to establish regulations for skylights including that they be tinted,no
placed on the front of the house and establish a maximum size. Finally, it was noted that the
condominium guidelines should be revised for the higher density areas, including the Burlingame
14
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 13, 2006
Avenue downtown area. CP Monroe noted that revision of the condominium guidelines for the
Burlingame Avenue downtown area would flow out of the policy and design decisions made in
developing the Specific Plan for the area, so might be delayed until that planning program was
�-- completed.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry Deal, Secretary
S:Vv1INL1TES\unapproved.02.13.06.doc
15