Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.02.22 City ofBiUY1)7gaMC BV RLINGAME CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 (650)558-7200 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting - Tuesday February 22, 2005 Page 1 of 2 (Microphone check) 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES - Regular meeting of February 7, 2005 Approve 5. PRESENTATION a. Presentation of Proclamation to the American Heart Presentation Association b. Update by PG&E on the Reliability Data for 2004 Presentation 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. a. Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 6.40 to clarify regulations Hearing/Action governing massage, spa, and bathing establishments b. Consider renewal of amusement permit- Fanny & Alexander, Hearing/Action 1108 Burlingame Avenue and 303-305 California Drive 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. 2005-06 Budget Direction and Council Goals Discuss/Confirm 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Authorize contribution to complete study of EMF exposure limits from Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line along Skyline Boulevard in Burlingame b. Application to C/CAG for Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program C. Resolution awarding the 2005 sidewalk maintenance program to Spencon Construction, Inc. d. Resolution accepting the Almer Bellevue storm drain City OfBurlingame BURUNGAME CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD t BURLTNGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010 (650)558-7200 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Regular Meeting - Tuesday February 22, 2005 Page 1 of 2 improvement project to Harty Pipelines Construction e. Request to send a Burlingame Police Officer to Tonga for cultural awareness and sensitivity training f. Warrants &Payroll 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library, January 112005; Beautification,February 3, 2005; Planning,February 14, 2005 b. Department Reports: Finance, January, 2005; C. Letter from Burlingame School District denying the City of Burlingame's request for contribution for expenses associated with the Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line issue 14. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Monday, March 7, 2005 CIT 7 0 BURLINOAME e Wco' o0 $FwT[u uN[6• BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of February 7, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Michelle Thompson. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan,Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. PRESENTATION Shelley Kilday, Outreach Coordinator of Sustainable San Mateo County gave a presentation on their organization and presented slides on energy savings, air quality, traffic congestion, and the economic, social and environmental health of the community. Clem Molony, an advisor for Sustainable San Mateo County, gave a presentation on various statistics on energy use, water use, housing affordability, crime, and education in Burlingame. 5. MINUTES Vice Mayor Baylock asked that an addendum be added to the minutes of January 18, 2005, to insert a sentence under Item 5a, paragraph 6. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 18, 2005 Council meeting; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Coffey abstained). 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS There were no Public Hearings. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Lara Lighthouse, 87 Loma Vista, spoke on the Jefferson-Martin power line project and requested a donation of$500 from the City to help with the funding of an independent assessment report. Lara Lighthouse also spoke about the businesses on California Drive. The following spoke concerning parking issues, automobile dealers and conditional use permits on and around California Drive and the Burlingame train station: Gary 1 Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005 Unapproved Minutes Doss, 214 California Drive; Scheferezade & Farrokh Sharabianlou, 226 Lorton Avenue; Russ Cohen, 605 Lexington; Ron Carter, 211 West Lane; Rudy Horak, 1332 Edgehill; Ken Schrum, 260 East Lane; Budi Leonardi, 220 California; Sam Samson, CPA for the owners of 210-218 California Drive; Shaun Walter, 400 Primrose, Coldwell Banker Realtor for the owners of PIP Printing; Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater; Sonya Hong, 216 California Drive; Al Heriz, 218 California Drive; Margrita Heriz, 210 California Drive; Karen Allen, 217 West Lane. Charles Voltz, 725 Vernon Way, spoke on the significant amount of revenue to the City from the automobile dealers over the years and the vision of auto row. Annamarie Holland Daniels, 515 Howard Avenue, spoke about conditional use permits, sewer projects, proposed City Hall relocation, Teen Center, and trees on Easton. Derek spoke and asked that the Pez Museum and Sweet Treats not be closed. Mike Harvey, 200 California Drive, spoke on the parking issue based on Caltrain's proposed improvement plan for the Burlingame Avenue train station and the proposed Broadway interchange project's impact on the automobile dealers. Katie O'Brien, 2204 Poppy Drive, spoke about Council treating everyone with equal value. John Root, 1550 Bayshore, spoke about the value of more town meetings and study sessions. There were no further comments from the floor. 8. STAFF REPORTS a. WEST LANE LEASED PARKING—CALTRAIN BURLINGAME AVENUE TRAIN STATION IMPROVEMENTS DPW George Bagdon said that at the last Council meeting Council directed staff to recalculate leased parking for auto-related uses on West Lane based on the ratio of square footage of auto-related uses to the square footage of the overall building complex north of Mike Harvey's property. Staff presented two quantitative approaches to consider, both of which result in an allocation of two parking spaces for auto- related business use. Councilwoman Nagel reiterated her motion from the previous Council meeting to designate four parking spaces for the small businesses; motion failed by voice vote 2-3 (Coffey, Galligan & O'Mahony dissented). Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion for approval of two parking spaces for auto-related businesses; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved by voice vote, 4-1 (Nagel dissented). b. DISCUSSION OF SUBAREA D (AUTO ROW) OF THE BURLINGAME COMMERCIAL AREA AND DIRECT STAFF AS TO FOLLOW UP CA Anderson requested Council discuss the vision of the future of Subarea D and provide direction to staff and/or Planning Commission on follow-up steps. The development of new platforms at the Burlingame Train Station has provided the opportunity to discuss the City's vision of Subarea D. The City's General Plan and the implementation of zoning has been directed to sustaining the automobile businesses along California Drive, while allowing residential and non auto-related uses through a conditional use permit. Staff recommended redrafting the Zoning Code, subsection (25.38.03)(a)) regarding Subarea D to ensure that it is clear and redrafting the ordinance that was adopted in 1982. The discussion by Council Members included the following items: Conditional use permits continue to be reviewed by the Planning Commission; area should not be limited to auto-related uses; envision a plan for the area surrounding the Burlingame Avenue train station and consider different uses there; possible tax incentives to encourage the car dealers to move to Adrian Road; an economic feasibility study; the significant impact on parking if stand-alone office buildings were allowed in that area; having auto row located where it is provides the best flow of traffic that would not be feasible on Adrian, David or Rollins Roads; consider having time limits on conditional use permits; assured businesses they were in those locations for as long as they wanted; recommended that studying the economic viability of the auto industry 2 Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005 Unapproved Minutes by itself would be better done as part of the Specific Area Plan encompassing the entire Burlingame Avenue area. c. RECOMMENDATION TO SELECT APRIL 18TH FOR A JOINT COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO CANCEL THE FEBRUARY 26 1H BUDGET MEETING, TO CHANGE THE JUNE 8 1H BUDGET STUDY SESSION MEETING TIME, AND TO APPROVE THE AMENDED 2005 CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR Councilman Coffey stated that he would not be available for the April 18th joint Council and Planning Commission meeting. Councilwoman O'Mahony recommended that joint meeting be changed to June 13tH as there was another date given in the staff report. Mayor Galligan recommended that CP Monroe check with the Planning Commission for the June 13th date. Mayor Galligan made a motion to approve the amended Council Calendar, seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved by voice vote 5-0. d. INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.40 TO CLARIFY REGULATIONS GOVERNING MASSAGE, SPA, AND BATHING ESTABLISHMENTS CA Anderson stated that the State of California does not get around to regulating massage practitioners so it is up to the individual cities and counties to regulate them. CA Anderson said it is necessary to update the ordinance in terms of definitions for a massage technician permit. CA Anderson suggested a phase-in for those individuals currently practicing massage under one of the exemptions who now need to obtain a permit. The proposed ordinance would increase the hours of training from 70 hours to 500 hours in a recognized school within twelve (12) months of the date of issuance of the conditional permit. Vice Mayor Baylock requested the term, massage technician, be changed to massage practitioner. Mayor Galligan requested DCC Kearney read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 6.40 to more clearly regulate massage, spa, and bathing establishments. Councilwoman O'Mahony waived further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Vice Mayor made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Nagel, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Galligan requested DCC Kearney to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR a. RESOLUTION NO. 10-2005 APPROVING A RESOLUTION ADOPTING PURCHASING AND CONTRACTING PROCEDURES CA Anderson requested Council approve Resolution No. 10-2005 adopting City Purchasing and Contracting procedures. 3 Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005 Unapproved Minutes b. RESOLUTION NO. 11-2005 ACCEPTING EASTON LIBRARY RECONSTRUCTION BY D. L. FALK CONSTRUCTION DPW Bagdon recommended that Council approve Resolution No. 11-2005 accepting the Easton Library reconstruction by D. L. Falk Construction in the amount of$970,000. c. RESOLUTION NO. 12-2005 ACCEPTING STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM FOR 2004 BY O'GRADY PAVING, INC. DPW Bagdon recommended that Council approve Resolution No. 12-2005 accepting the Street Resurfacing Program 2004 by O'Grady Paving, Inc. in the amount of$1,162,825. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 10. OLD BUSINESS Councilwoman O'Mahony expressed concern that the Burlingame School District Board is refusing to contribute for expenses associated with the Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line. Councilwoman O'Mahony asked Mayor Galligan to pursue it since during her term as Mayor last year she was led to believe they were willing to participate. Mayor Galligan directed staff to check on what was said at the meeting where someone from the school made comments on this subject. Councilwoman O'Mahony received a phone call from a parent at Washington School concerning the new smoke shop on Broadway. Councilwoman Nagel asked Police Commander Mike Matteucci for an update on the smoke shop. Cmdr. Matteucci said code enforcement conducted an inspection and found several code violations which were reported to the owner in a letter dated February 3, 2005. The owner was given until February 11, 2005, and February 18, 2005, to comply. The Police are continuing to monitor this location. Mayor Galligan said he had written a letter to the leasing agent expressing concern that this type of business brings a bad element to Broadway and would like follow up with the building owner on the building code violations. Mayor Galligan also had discussions with several business owners on Broadway who are very upset about this type of business and asked that the City be very diligent in coming to a resolution. In response to a letter the Council received from Parca concerning Raji House on Palm, Mayor Galligan stated that he had spoken to a concrete contractor about the sidewalk repair in front of Raji House; and the contractor would be more than happy to perform the work without charge except for the City fees and cost for cement. Councilwoman O'Mahony spoke about the need to have the auxiliary lane project completed from Third Avenue to Millbrae Avenue. She requested Mayor Galligan, as a member of the Transportation Authority, try to obtain the additional funding for that project in the form of a loan which would be repaid when funds are available from Sacramento. 4 Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005 Unapproved Minutes CA Anderson spoke about the letter from Kent Putnam requesting consideration of a rental car location in or next to the Mazda dealership. CA Anderson suggested that Mr. Putnam's request be a part of the Subarea D discussion. 11. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library,November 16, 2004; Beautification, January 6, 2005; Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, January 13, 2005; Parks & Recreation, January 20, 2005; Planning, January 24, 2005 b. Department Reports: Building, January, 2005 c. Letter from Kent Putnam to the City Manager requesting consideration of a rental car location at Mazda dealership. 13. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 9:56 p.m. in memory of Susan Caldwell and her daughter,Nina Garrison. Respectfully submitted, Mary Ellen Kearney Deputy City Clerk 5 Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005 Unapproved Minutes CO P R O C L A M A T I O N Honoring American Heart Month -C o ,Rd Eor'Womett- Whereas, theAmericanYfeartAssociation launcheda "Go 'RedForWomen"initiative in an effort to help educate the public on the relationship of women and heart disease. In keeping with their tradition of raising awareness, they will dedicate time and effort to this cause declaring, Fe6ruary, 2005 as Go R,edfor'Women Month, and; Whereas, heart attach stroke an other cardiovascular diseases claim the lives of more than half a million women each year, and nearly twice as many as all forms of cancer, including breast cancer, and; Whereas, the cost of cardiovascular diseases and stroke in the V S. is estimated at$368.4 billion; and Whereas, approximately one out of every 2.4 women's deaths results from Heart disease, stroke and other cardiovascular disease; and Whereas, every yearfor the past 20 years, more women than men have diedof heart disease, stroke and other cardiovascular diseases; and Whereas, the women from our community and beyond the borders of Burlingame appreciate and commend theA.merican Yfeart Association for their tireless efforts;and Now, therefore I, ,doe Galligan, Mayor of the city of Burlingame, in recognition of the importance of the ongoing fight against heart disease and stroke, do hereby proclaim'February, 2005 as "Wear Red For Women"month. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the city of Burlingame to be aff)ced this, the 22nd day of Fe6ruary 2005. ,doe Galligan, Mayor Pacific Gas and Bob Fredianelli Electric Company Director Operations, 2225 Folsom Street Maintenance and San Francisco, CA Construction, 94110 Area 1 February 22, 2005 Honorable Joseph Galligan, Mayor Mr. James Nantell, City Manager City of Burlingame City Hall 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mayor Galligan and Mr. Nantell: PG&E is pleased to submit the following summary of service reliability for Y2004. As review will show, we can state with certainty that overall reliability on the 5 circuits previously identified as "problem circuits" has significantly improved. In fact, Y2004 statistics show reductions in the frequency, duration and number of customers affected by any given outage. This is a reduction over and above the reduction achieved in Y2003. The following key projects have and will result in measurably increased reliability in Burlingame: o Establishment of remote control capability at several switch locations by mid 2004 Completed o Installing of a new Burlingame circuit in October 2004 to re-configure the San Mateo 2102 circuit Completed Nov 16, 2004 o Installing underground mainline on Tartan Trail to reinforce the San Mateo 2102 tie by end of 2004 Completed Dec 2004 o Extending underground mainline in downtown Burlingame in 2005 for improved service reliability on the Bay Meadows 2101 circuit — Had meeting w/City Engineers and will proceed with engineering the job. Completion Date: Dec 2005 We continue to look for opportunities to identify items which may impact reliability in Burlingame and to take action to correct them before they become an issue. Honorable Joseph Galligan, et al. February 22, 2005 Page 2 Attached to this letter are the latest outage statistics through year end 2004 for the five- targeted Burlingame circuits which, we are pleased to report, show significant improvements in circuit reliability both in the frequency and duration of outages. We continue to encourage customers to report sustained outages and to get updated outage information by calling 1-800-PGE-5002. More information on outages and outage safety tips can be found at www.pge.com. While it is not possible to prevent every outage, we have and will continue to take steps to address issues as they are identified in Burlingame and every other city we serve. Though February 22nd will be our final regular presentation to City Council, any concerns that the City may have going forward regarding reliability or other issues can be communicated and will be addressed via Burlingame's established relationships with Stephanie Isaacson, PG&E Government Relations and Kathy Lavezzo, PG&E Account Services. We are fully committed to continued reliability and strong communications with Burlingame officials, businesses, and residents. Sincerely, Attachments Burlingame Update Service Reliability Overview : Service Reliability Measurement • Sustained Outage — Power outage to one or more customers exceeding 5 minutes in duration • Frequency — The average number of sustained outages experienced per customer • Duration — Average length of sustained outages (average outage-minutes per customer) • Typically measured over a one year period and excluding major storm events Average Sustained Outages Experienced Per Customer 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 ■ 2001 1.00 ■ 2002 0.80 ❑ 2003 0.60-/' El 0.40 0.20 0.00 PG&E System Peninsula Div Burlingame Sustained Outage Duration (Average Outage-Minutes Per Customer) 250" 200 f 150 02001 02002 100-Z ❑ 2003 ❑ 2004 50 0 PG&E System Peninsula Div Burlingame Average Sustained Outages/Customer (Comparison By Circuit) 6.00- 5.00- 4.00-' .005.004.00 ■ 2001 3.00 ■ 2002 ❑ 2003 2.00 ❑ 2004 1.00 0.00 Bur 405 Mil 1101 Mil 1107 BM 2101 SM 2102 Outage Duration By Circuit (Average Outage-Minutes/Customer) 700- 600- 50V 00600500 400 ■ 2001 ■ 2002 300 ❑ 2003 200 ❑ 2004 100 0 Bur 405 Mil 1101 Mil 1107 BM 2101 SM 2102 Service Reliability Summary (Burlingame Customers) 2003 versus 2002 comparison — Overall lower customer outages — Lower average outage duration 2004 YTD versus 2003 comparison — Continuing overall lower customer outages and average outage duration 2004 & 2005 Service Reliability Work • Established remote control capability at several switch locations by mid 2004 — Completed • Installing a new Burlingame circuit in October 2004 to re- configure the San Mateo 2102 circuit — Completed Nov 1692004 • Installing underground mainline on Tartan Trail to reinforce the San Mateo 2102 tie by end of 2004 — Completed Dec 2004 • Extending underground mainline in downtown Burlingame in 2005 for improved service reliability on the Bay Meadows 2101 circuit — Had meeting w/City Engineers and will proceed with Engineering the job. Completion Date: Dec 2005 . Burlingame Area (5 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages Total # of # of Affected Maximum DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage affected Customers Minutes 01/01/04 BM-2101 Recloser9022 Momentary An EON @ 9:19. 1312 1312 Momentary 01/01/04 Millbrae 1107 Recloser 2030 Sustained At 9:47 Tree branch fell onto line IRO 1635 Rollings Rd. 537 537 485 At 14:05 a 3rd party Dig in. Affected 76 Burlingame 01/14/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Recloser S80 Sustained customers because of a switched configuration (SS13 1499 76 155 closed, 2313 open that temporarily transferred 76 Burlingame customer to Bay Meadows 2102) 01/25/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Momentary At 13:36 a squirrel across leads of a transformer IRO 725 7289 4191 Momentary Breaker Patricia in San Mateo. 02/17/04 San Mateo 2102 Recloser A80 Momentary An EON @ 18:37. 849 849 Momentary 02/25/04 Millbrae Substation Transmission Momentary At 21 :56 transmission trouble caused a momentary 3156 2823 Momentary trouble outage. 02/25/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Recloser 9022 Momentary An EON @ 18:37. 1313 1313 Momentary 02/25/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 11325 Sustained At 22:57 blown fuse. Undetermined cause (may be storm 229 229 188 related). 03/02/04 Burlingame 405 Fuse 13561 Sustained At 9:15 blown fuse. Undetermined cause. 69 69 65 03/15/04 Millbrae 1107 Fuse 11465 Sustained At 9:54 opened 11465 for the repair of a leaking 20 20 99 transformer. 04/18/04 Millbrae 1101 Transfomer j Sustained At 5:55 power pot of an open delta TX @ 1356 Marsten 1 1 165 tripped possibly due to OL. At 17:00, TX T2822 failed. Required switching and de- 04/27/04 ' Bay Meadows 2101 Transformer Sustained energization of UG line affected 40 Burlingame 40 40 517 - customers. (T2822 has only 5 customers) 05/09/04 San Mateo 2102 Transmission Sustained At 16:31 , a 115KV down guy wire broke caused CB 562 to 2226 1310 64 trouble open. 05/21/04 MillbraeSubstation Transmission Momentary At 7:33, a transmission trouble caued a momentary 5996 2823 Momentary trouble outage. 05/27/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 8144 Sustained At 2:37 blown elbow @ T-927 cause the fuse to blow. 1075 1075 567 At 7:46, tree bark fell onto line cause center phase of 3937 05/28/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 3937 Sustained to blow. Affected less than 134 Burlingame customers < 134 < 134 89 (only one of three fuses blown) 06/07/04 San Mateo 2102 Transformer Sustained At 16:18, tree branch fell onto line. 6 6 286 06/15/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Station Sustained At 15:31 , blown UG cable @ J-107. 3126 253 441 Breaker 06/16/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Momentary At 05:42. a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 7351 4191 Momentary Breaker cause. 107/21/041 Burlingame 405 Transformert Sustained At 10:30 a car pole caused TX too en. 10 10 15 Page 1 of 2 Burlingame Div - Y2004.xls Burlingame Area (5 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages Total # of # of Affected Maximum DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage affected Customers Minutes 08/28/04 San Mateo 2102 Recloser A82 Sustained At 13:44,A large black bird on TX. 189 189 401 08/28/041 San Mateo 2102 Recloser A80 Momentary An EON @ 18:37. 851 851 Momentary 09/04/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 8156 Sustained At 17:53 one blown fuse @ 8156. Affected less than 86 < 86 <86 40 Burlingame customers (only one of three fuses blown) 09/23/04 San Mateo 2102 Station Momentary At 19:11 A TX (in SM) on ML blown. 1405 456 Momentary Breaker At 9:33, a momentary outage occurred. It is judged that 09/24/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Momentary the trouble at Amphlett & Folkstone was the cause. The 8241 5045 Momentary Breaker trouble had subsequently resulted in pole fire and a sustained outage 09/24/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Sustained At 10:56, a pole fire at Amphlett & Folkstone. 8241 5045 130 Breaker 10/05/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 3937 Sustained At 11:02, a squirrel caused fuse to blow. 134 134 33 10/17/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Recloser 8996 Sustained During storm Tree branch fell onto line @ 14:24. 3136 3136 276 10/17/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Transformer Sustained At 11:06 a transformer @ 819 Walnut Ave in Burlingame 8 8 41 tripped. 10/17/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Recloser 9022 Momentary An EON @ 9:19. 1314 1314 Momentary 11/08/04 San Mateo 2102 OCB Momentary At 07:38. a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 2338 1310 Momentary cause. 11/21/04 Burlingame 405 Transformer Sustained JAt 18:04 a tree fell onto line. 20 20 394 11/28/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 2651 Sustained At 10:25 a squirrel caused fuse to trip. 48 48 15 11/28/04 Burlingame 2101 Fuse 10167 Sustained At 12:52 a squirrel caused fuse to blow. 4 4 33 11/29/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Fuse 13342 Sustained At 18:39 a erroneous temporary configuration caused fuse 1052 253 98 to be overloaded. 12/07/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 3363 Sustained At 08:37 tree bark fell onto line. 1 1 92 12/08/04 Millbrae 1107 Fuse 4425 Sustained At 18:49 tree branch fell onto line. 1 1 15 12/30/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Transformer Sustained At 07:41 a transformer @ 507 California Dr.tripped. 24 24 11 12/31/04 Burlingame 2101 Recloser A-82 Momentary At 07:15 a squirrel crossed phases of the transformer @ 189 189 Momentary 2872 Adeline caused a momentary outage. As of 12131/2004 Page 2 of 2 Burlingame Div- Y2004.x1s Burlingame Area (other 8 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages Total # of # of Affected Maximum DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage affected Customers Minutes 01/01/04 Burlingame 403 Transformer Sustained At 7:17 Tree branch fell onto line IRO 932 Linden. 4 4 548 01/05/04 Millbrae 1102 Station Momentary At 10:53, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 2809 1070 Momentary Breaker cause. 01/21/04 Burlingame 401 Station Momentary At 9:28 station breaker opened and closed during a routine 1605 1175 Momentary Breaker switching causing a momentary. 01/24/04 Burlingame 404 SW 2551 Sustained At 6:16 a car pole at Bellview & Floribunda. Open 2551 485 87 638 for repair. At 7:41 Bump sleeve @ ECR& Oakgrove caused a 01/30/04 Burlingame 404 Station Momentary momentary outage for 1001 Burlingame customers. 1614 1001/112 Momentary/170 Breaker !& Sustained Needed to open 2555 for the repair. The sustained outage affected 112 Burlingame customers. Station At 10:57, 3rd party tree trimmers in line @ Helen & 02/13/04 Millbrae 1104 Breaker Sustained Banbury caused an outage. 5084 721 156 02/17/04 Millbrae 1106 Station Momentary At 14:22 a momentary outage occurred. Cause unknown. 372 145 Momentary Breaker 02/19/04 Millbrae 1106 Station Momentary At 1:03 a momentary outage occurred. Cause unknown. 372 145 Momentary Breaker 03/04/04 Millbrae 1106 Transformer Sustained At 19:54 a secondary mainline neutral down IRO 850 7 7 231 Mitten in Burlingame. 03/18/04 Millbrae 1102 Transformer Sustained At 7:30 a transformer fuse blew. Cause unknown. 2 2 69 04/05/03 Burlingame 404 Bump Sleeve Sustained At 17:52. A bump sleeve on 1 phase failed. 684 684 311 04/07/04 Burlingame 401 Fuse 1211 Sustained At 17:56 a tree top came down @ 1900 Willow in 292 154 88 Hillsborough. 04/08/04 Burlingame 401 Fuse 1211 Sustained At 10:30 PG&E opened 1121 to de-energize a line to 292 154 88 repair 6907 connection (only two strands were remained). 05/19/04 Burlingame 401 Transformer Sustained At 1:10 PG&E de-energized a line in order to remove a 7 7 18 tree that fell into line. 06/06/04 Burlingame 402 Station Sustained At 14:00 metallic balloon caused OCB to trip. 1212 1212 50 Breaker 06/17/04 Burlingame 401 Station Sustained At 11:35, OCB tripped. Undetermined cause. 2300 1175 17 Breaker 07/02/04 Burlingame 403 Fuse 6878 Sustained AT 10:45 primary neutral blown. 30 30 102 09/09/04 Millbrae 1106 Transformer Sustained At 18:35, TX leaked. 2 2 495 10/30/04 Millbrae 1104 Station Momentary At 08:50, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 5246 721 Momentary Breaker cause. 11/03/04 Millbrae 1104 Station Momentary At 08:50, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 5246 721 Momentary Breaker cause (lightning strike was a likely cause) Page 1 of 2 Burlingame other 8 fdrs - Y2004.x1s Burlingame Area (other 8 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages Total # of # of Affected Maximum DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage affected Customers Minutes 11/11/04 Burlingame 404 Transformer Sustained At 13:17 tree bark fell onto line 39 39 122 - 11/13/04 Burlingame 404 Station Momentary At 07:38, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 2583 1113 Momentary Breaker cause. 404 holding 405 load. 11/27/04 Burlingame 404 Station Sustained At 04:44 tree bark fell onto line 1618 1113 515 Breaker 11/29/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 07:38, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary Breaker cause. 12/01/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 17:15, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary Breaker cause. - 12/05/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 17:50, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary Breaker cause. 12/05/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 18:03, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary Breaker cause. 12/05/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary !At 19:26, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary Breaker cause. 12/06/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 09:37, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary Breaker cause. 12/06/04 Carolands 403 Transformer Sustained At 22:56 a transformer failed _ 4 4 199 12/07/04 Burlingame 401 Station Sustained At 01:16 tree branch fell onto line & caused wire down 1477 1175 384 Breaker 12/07/04 Carolands 403 Fuse 3295 Sustained At 07:27 tree branch fell onto line. 10 10 39 12/25/04 Millbrae 1102 SW 5962 Sustained At 10:40 UG cable failure. Opened 5962 for repair 243 243 344 12/29/04 Burlingame 404 Station Momentary At 21:34, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1617 1113 Momentary Breaker cause. 12/29/04 Burlingame 404 Station Sustained At 23:17 tree branch fell onto line. 1617 1113 84 Breaker _ 12/30/04 Burlingame 404 Transformer Sustained At 15:03 a carpole caused an outage 37 37 - 67 12/30/04 Burlingame 404 Transformer Sustained At 16:26 a transformer failed 37 37 239 As of 12131/2004 Page 2 of 2 Burlingame other 8 fdrs - Y2004.xls CAGENDA ITY 6a �d 0 ITEM# BURLINGAME MTG. : STAFF REPORT DATE 2,22,2005 \eo � 6 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED BY DATE: February 11, 2005 APPROVE BY FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: ADOPT ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.40 TO CLARIFY REGULATIONS GOVERNING MASSAGE, SPA,AND BATHING ESTABLISHMENTS RECOMMENDATION Adopt proposed ordinance amending Chapter 6.40 regarding massage, spa, and bathing establishments and instruct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. DISCUSSION The City adopted an extensive set of regulations regarding massage and bathing establishments in 1993. Those have worked quite well in preventing the operation of brothels under the guise of a massage studio. However,the regulations are in need of updating and clarification, so that definitions are complete and permit requirements are effective. Nearby cities, Belmont, Millbrae, and San Mateo, have updated their regulations in the past few years, and this amendment builds on—and in the main, is consistent with—their work as well as the 1993 adoption. The principal change will be to require employees and contractors in barbershops and beauty salons to obtain a massage technician permit unless the employee or contractor is only working within the scope of the employee's or contractor's license or registration with the State. The proposed ordinance also increases the application and renewal fees to account for the Police time involved in reviewing the application; the fees have not been increased since 1993. The ordinance was introduced at the Council's meeting on February 7, 2005. At that time, Council directed that "massage technician"be changed to "massage practitioner,"and that a phase-in time be given in Section 3 of the ordinance to allow currently exempt persons giving massage in the City to obtain the necessary training for a permit over a 12-month period. Distribution Chief of Police Finance Director I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 6.40 TO MORE CLEARLY REGULATE MASSAGE, SPA, AND BATHING 3 ESTABLISHMENTS 4 5 The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows: 6 Section 1. In 1993, the City extensively amended its municipal code regulations 7 governing the operation and conduct of massage and bathing establishments in the City. Those 8 amendments have been largely successful in ensuring that legitimate massage practitioners are 9 able to continue their work,while at the same time minimizing illicit and illegal conduct by 10 others. This ordinance is intended to update those provisions and to ensure that any practice of 11 massage is conducted in accordance with either State or City laws. These amendments make 12 the City's provisions largely consistent with regulations in nearby cities, so that massage 13 practitioners will be able have some certainty and consistency in the manner in which their 14 businesses are regulated. 15 16 Section 2. Chapter 6.40 is amended to read as follows: 17 Chapter 6.40 18 MASSAGE, SPA, AND BATHING ESTABLISHMENTS 19 Sections: 20 6.40.010 Purpose. 6.40.020 Permit required. 21 6.40.030 Definitions. 6.40.035 Corporations and partnerships. 22 6.40.040 Application for permit. 6.40.050 Exemptions from operator's permit requirements. 23 6.40.055 Exemptions from massage practitioner permit requirements. 6.40.060 Permit fee and investigation. 24 6.40.070 Business license. 6.40.080 Issuance or denial of permit. 25 6.40.090 Appeal. 6.40.100 Operating and sanitation requirements. 26 6.40.105 Maintenance of insurance. 6.40.110 Inspection by officials. 27 6.40.115 Surety bond. 6.40.120 Sale or transfer of establishment. 28 6.40.130 Revocation or suspension of permits. 2/7/2005 1 1 6.40.140 Display of signs and permits. 6.40.150 Notice of changes. 2 6.40.160 Renewal of permits. 3 4 Section 6.40.010 Purpose. 5 It is the purpose and intent of the city council that the operation of massage, spa, bathing 6 and other similar establishments and persons offering services therein, wherein the principal 7 function is giving of massages and baths, as defined in this chapter, should be regulated in the 8 interests of public health, safety and welfare by providing minimum building sanitation and 9 health standards for such establishments, and to insure that persons offering services therein 10 shall possess the minimum qualifications necessary to operate such businesses and to perform 11 such services offered. It is further intended that these provisions provide a framework that is 12 consistent with regulations imposed by nearby communities on similar businesses. 13 14 Section 6.40.020 Permit required. 15 (a) It is unlawful for any person to operate, engage in, conduct, carry on, or permit to be 16 operated, engaged in, conducted or carried on(as the owner of the business premises or in any 17 other capacity) in or upon any premises within the city, the business of a massage, spa, bathing 18 or other similar establishment, or an out call massage service, having massage or baths as their 19 principal function, all as defined herein, unless the person has first obtained an operator's 20 permit for such a business from the city and the permit remains in effect in accordance with the 21 provisions of this chapter. 22 (b) It is unlawful for any person to act as a massage practitioner unless that person has 23 first obtained a massage practitioner's permit from the city and the permit remains in effect in 24 accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 25 26 Section 6.40.030 Definitions. 27 For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the 28 meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: 2/7/2005 2 1 (a) "Health officer" means the health officer of the County of San Mateo or the health 2 officer's authorized representative. 3 (b) "Massage" means any method of treating the external parts of the human body by 4 bathing, rubbing,pressing, stroking, kneading, tapping,pounding, vibrating or stimulating with 5 the hands or any instrument. 6 (c) "Massage, spa,bathing or other similar establishment" or"massage establishment" 7 means any establishment having a fixed place of business where massages, baths or health 8 treatments, involving massage,hot tubs, saunas, or baths as the principal function, are given, 9 engaged in or carried on, or permitted to be given, engaged in or carried on in any manner 10 described in Section 6.40.030(b). 11 (d) "Massage practitioner"means any person who administers a massage,bath or 12 health treatment involving massage or baths as a principal function to another person for any 13 consideration whatsoever. 14 (e) "Operator"means any person who owns or operates a massage, spa,bathing or 15 similar establishment or an out call massage service. 16 (f) "Out call massage service" means any business, in which the primary function of 17 such business is to engage in or carry on massage treatments at a location designated by the 18 customer or client and not at a fixed location. 19 (g) "Person" means any individual,copartnership, firm, association, corporation,joint 20 venture, or combination of individuals. 21 (h) "Recognized school' means any school or institution of learning which has been 22 approved pursuant to division 7.5 of title 5 of the California Code of Regulations or an 23 equivalent out-of-state school and which has for a purpose the teaching of a resident course of 24 study of not less than five hundred (500) hours of theory, ethics, practice,methods,profession 25 or work of massage, or baths or health practice with relation thereto, and which provides a 26 diploma or certificate of graduation upon successful completion of such a course of study or 27 learning. Schools offering a correspondence course not requiring attendance or courses taught 28 solely by video tape or other electronic means shall not be deemed a recognized school. 2/7/2005 3 I Section 6.40.035 Corporations and partnerships. 2 If an applicant is a corporation, the name of the corporation shall be set forth exactly as 3 shown in its articles of incorporation together with the names and residence addresses of each 4 of the officers, directors and each stockholder holding more than ten percent of the stock of the 5 corporation. Each officer of the corporation or each partner in a partnership must submit an 6 application and comply with 6.40.040. If one or more of the partners is a corporation, the 7 provisions above pertaining to a corporate applicant apply 8 9 Section 6.40.040 Application for permit. 10 Any person, except as herein otherwise provided, desiring a permit to operate a 11 massage, spa, bathing or similar establishment or an out call massage service, having massage 12 or baths as their principal function, or to engage in the practice of giving massages or baths 13 shall first make application therefor for permit under this chapter by filing with the license 14 collector a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the license collector which 15 shall give the following information; an operator-massage practitioner may make a single 16 application and pay a single fee: 17 (a)Name,residence, and telephone number; 18 (b) The previous address of the applicant for the ten(10) years immediately prior to the 19 present address of the applicant; 20 (c) Social Security number and driver's license number, if any; 21 (d) Birth certificate or other written proof acceptable to the police department that the 22 applicant is at least eighteen(18) years of age; 23 (e) Fingerprints (taken by the police department for criminal history investigation) and 24 three (3)portrait photographs at least two inches by two inches, taken within the last sixty(60) 25 days immediately prior to the date of the filing of the application, showing the head and 26 shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinct manner; 27 (f)Applicant's height,weight, color of eyes and hair; 28 (g) Business, occupation or employment of the applicant for the ten (10) years 2/7/2005 4 I immediately preceding the date of application; 2 (h) The business license and permit history of the applicant for massage or similar 3 businesses, whether individually or as a member or part of a corporation,partnership, or other 4 business,wherever located. The history shall include a statement as to whether any previous 5 permit or license in which the applicant was involved was revoked or suspended or any 6 revocation or suspension is pending, and the reasons for the previous or proposed revocation or 7 suspension. 8 (i) If the application is for a massage practitioner permit, the name and address of the 9 establishment where the applicant is to be employed and the name of the operator of the same; 10 0) Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any crime, except misdemeanor 11 traffic violations. For each such conviction, a statement shall be made giving the place and 12 court in which the conviction occurred, the specific charge under which the conviction was 13 obtained and the sentence imposed as a result of the conviction; 14 (k) Whether any previous employer or person while employed by or with the applicant 15 has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of an offense involving conduct which 16 requires registration under California Penal Code subsection 290, or a violation of subsections 17 266(1), 311 through 311.7, 314, 315, 316, 318, 318.5, 318.6, or 647(a), (b), (d), (h), (i), or(k) of 18 the Penal Code; 19 (0 A statement as to whether the applicant has applied to the city or any other city in 20 the County of San Mateo for a massage establishment permit, operator's permit, out call 21 massage permit, or massage practitioner permit in the past five (5) years, the date of the 22 application, and each name under which the application was made; 23 (m) A copy of a diploma or certificate of graduation from a recognized school 24 demonstrating the applicant's successful completion of a resident course of study of at least five 25 hundred (500) hours of theory, ethics,practice, methods, profession, or work of massage, or 26 baths or health practice with relation thereto ;provided, however, that an applicant for an 27 operator's permit who will have no physical contact with customers or clients need not possess 28 such a diploma or certificate; 2/7/2005 5 I (n) Such other identification and information necessary to discover the truth of matters 2 hereinbefore specified as required to be set forth in the application; 3 (o) A certificate executed under penalty of perjury from a medical doctor stating that 4 the applicant has, within thirty(30) days immediately prior to the filing of the application, been 5 examined and found to be free from any infectious, contagious or communicable disease 6 capable of being transmitted through therapeutic massage; 7 (p) A separately signed waiver and release authorizing the city and its authorized 8 agents,and employees to obtain information and to conduct an investigation into the truth of 9 the statements made on the application and the qualifications and record of the applicant; 10 (q) A certificate from a medical practitioner appointed by the city that confirms the 11 applicant's knowledge of physiology, anatomy, and technique relating to the field of massage 12 therapy. The applicant's knowledge shall be tested in an examination and demonstration 13 process provided that an applicant for an owner's permit who will have no physical contact with 14 customers or clients need not possess such diploma or certificate; 15 (r) If the application is for an operator's permit,proof of current errors and omissions or 16 malpractice insurance in the amount of not less than five hundred thousand dollars 17 ($500,000.00), either as to the establishment or through membership in a professional massage 18 association that provides automatic malpractice insurance as a membership benefit; 19 (s) Current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid from the 20 American Heart Association or the American Red Cross. 21 (t) If the application is for an operator's permit, the name and address of the owner and 22 lessor of the real property upon or in or from which the business is to be conducted. If the 23 applicant is not the owner of the real property, the owner of the real property must sign and 24 acknowledge the application. 25 (u) If the application is for an operator's permit, a safety plan including, but not limited 26 to, exterior lighting,parking lot security, and emergency access to the establishment. 27 28 2/7/2005 6 1 Section 6.40.050 Exemptions from operator's permit requirements. 2 The permits required by this chapter for operators shall not apply to hospitals, nursing 3 homes, sanitariums, or other healthcare facilities duly licensed by the State of California.. 4 5 Section 6.40.055 Exemptions from massage practitioner permit requirements. 6 The massage practitioner permit required by this chapter shall not apply to the 7 following: 8 (a) Physicians, surgeons, chiropractors, osteopaths, acupuncturists, and physical 9 therapists duly licensed to practice in the State of California,but only when engaged in the 10 practice for which they are so licensed and in accordance with the terms of the licensing. 11 (b)Nurses duly registered by the State of California, but only when engaged in the 12 practice for which they are so registered and in accordance with the terms of the registration. 13 (c) Employees of hospitals, nursing homes, sanitariums, or other health care facilities 14 duly licensed by the State of California,but only when engaged in the scope of their 15 employment, and only at their place of employment at the health care facility, and only within 16 the scope of and in conformance with the State license. 17 (d) Cosmetologists or barbers who are licensed by the State of California,but only 18 when engaged in the practice for which they are so registered and in accordance with the terms 19 of the registration. 20 (e)Accredited elementary school,high school, or college coaches and trainers employed 21 by a elementary, high school, or college,but only while acting within the scope of employment 22 to the school. 23 (f) Trainers of semi-professional or professional athletic teams, but only while acting 24 within the scope of employment to the team. 25 26 Section 6.40.060 Permit fee and investigation. 27 (a) All applications for initial permits shall be accompanied by an investigation fee in 28 the sum of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), no part of which is refundable. Additional fees may 2/7/2005 7 1 be charged to cover costs of processing the applicant's fingerprints by the State of California 2 and for the medical examiner's competency examination. 3 (b)Upon receipt of a complete operator's application, the license collector shall refer the 4 application to the city planner,building official, the fire department and the police department, 5 each of which within a period of thirty(30) days from the date of filing the application shall 6 inspect the premises proposed to be used as a massage establishment, interview the applicant or 7 any other person and make any other investigation necessary to make a written recommendation 8 to the police department; provided that the thirty(30) days may be extended for such period as 9 may be necessary to obtain fingerprint records from the appropriate state agency. 10 (c) Applications for massage practitioner permits shall be referred only to the police 11 and planning departments. The planning department shall provide its findings to the police 12 department within thirty(30) days of the filing of a complete application. 13 14 Section 6.40.070 Business license. 15 At the time of an initial application for an operator's permit, applicant shall also apply 16 for and furnish the information necessary to obtain a business license as required by Chapter 17 6.04 of this code. No business license shall be issued until the investigation under this chapter 18 is completed and the permit to operate is approved. The business license shall then be issued 19 upon payment of the business license fee as provided in Chapter 6.04 of this code. 20 21 Section 6.40.080 Issuance or denial of permit. 22 (a) Upon receipt of the investigation reports from each of the departments to whom the 23 application has been referred, the police department shall issue the requested permit if all 24 required information, including diplomas or certificates, has been furnished and the reports 25 filed find that: 26 (1) The character of the applicant is satisfactory; 27 (2) If the application is for an operator's permit, the establishment as proposed would 28 comply with all and not violate any applicable laws, including,but not limited to, the city's 2/7/2005 8 I building, fire, health and zoning regulations; 2 (3) The applicant has not been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of an 3 offense involving: 4 (A) Conduct that requires registration under Penal Code section 290; or 5 (B) Violations of Penal Code sections 266(1), 311, 311.1, 311.2, 311.3, 311.4, 6 311.5, 311.6, 311.7, 311.10, 311.11, 314, 315, 316, 318, 318.5, 318.6, 459, 518, or 7 647(a), (b), (d) or(h), or comparable provisions of the laws of any other state, the 8 United States, or any other country; or 9 (C) Any other offense involving sexual misconduct with a child. 10 (4) The applicant has not been convicted of the use of force or violence upon another; 11 (5) The applicant has not knowingly and with intent to deceive made any false, 12 misleading or fraudulent oral or written statements in the permit application or to any person 13 investigating the application. 14 (6) The applicant does not have an infectious, contagious or communicable disease, and 15 is not in violation of any federal, state or local health law or regulation. 16 (7) The applicant for a massage practitioner permit has satisfactorily passed the 17 competency examination. 18 (8) The city has not denied a previous application by the applicant for an operator's or 19 massage practitioner permit within the twelve (12)months immediately preceding the date of 20 the application. 21 (b) The permit shall be denied if all of the above findings cannot be made or if all of the 22 information required is not supplied to the city. If denied, the reasons therefor shall be 23 endorsed upon the application, and the police department shall notify the applicant of the 24 disapproval with a copy of the application upon which the reasons have been endorsed by first 25 class mail. 26 27 Section 6.40.090 Appeal. 28 If a permit is denied, applicant has ten(10) days from the date of mailing the notice 2/7/2005 9 I within which to appeal to the city council by filing a written application for a public hearing 2 with the clerk of the city. Notice and a public hearing shall be given as follows: 3 (a) Upon receipt of the appeal, the city clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the 4 council, at a regular meeting thereof, within thirty(30) days from the date of filing the appeal, 5 and shall give written notice of the hearing to the applicant at the applicant's address set forth in 6 the appeal by first class mail at least ten(10) days prior to the hearing date. 7 (b) On the date set, the council shall hear the matter, and may continue it from time to 8 time before reaching a decision. If the council finds that the applicant has satisfactorily met all 9 of the requirements of this chapter, it shall order the issuance of the permit and business license. 10 If it finds that the requirements have not been met satisfactorily, it shall deny the permit. 11 (c) All findings of the council shall be final and conclusive upon the applicant 12 13 Section 6.40.100 Operating and sanitation requirements. 14 All massage, spa,bathing or other similar establishments and out call massage services 15 shall comply with the following operating and sanitation requirements: 16 (1)Advertising. No massage establishment or out call massage service granted a permit 17 under this chapter shall place, publish or distribute or cause to be placed,published or 18 distributed, any advertising matter that describes or depicts any portion of the human body in a 19 manner, or with the use of descriptive language, which would reasonably suggest to prospective 20 patrons that any service is available other than those services described in Section 6.40.030(a) 21 of this chapter. 22 (b) Out Call Massage Service. Any person granted a permit pursuant to this chapter 23 who provides services described in Section 6.40.030(a) at any hotel or motel, shall first notify 24 the owner, manager or person in charge of the hotel or motel that the permittee intends to 25 provide a massage service to a person or persons registered at the hotel or motel and give a 26 copy of the person's permit to the owner, manager or person in charge. 27 (c) List of Services. A massage establishment shall post a list of services in readily 28 understood language in an open, public place on the premises of the establishment. No owner, 2/7/2005 10 I operator, responsible managing employee, manager, employee, contractor, or permittee shall 2 permit nor offer any massage services on the premises other than those posted on the list. 3 (d) Sanitation and Conduct. All establishments shall comply with the following 4 minimum sanitation requirements: 5 (1) Employees and Massage Practitioners. All employees in a massage establishment 6 and massage practitioners shall perform their work fully clothed, be clean and wear clean outer 7 garments whose use is restricted to the establishment. Doors to dressing rooms,bathing rooms, 8 and treatment rooms shall open inward, and shall not be locked. Draw drapes, curtain 9 enclosures, or accordion-pleated closures are acceptable on all inner dressing and treatment 10 rooms in lieu of doors. Separate dressing rooms and toilet facilities complying with the city 11 building codes shall be provided for each sex. 12 (2) Linens. All establishments shall be provided with clean, laundered sheets and 13 towels in sufficient quantity and shall be laundered after each use thereof and stored in closed, 14 sanitary cabinets. Heavy white paper may be substituted for sheets provided that such paper is 15 used only once for each person and then discarded into a sanitary receptacle. Sanitary approved 16 receptacles shall be provided for the storage of all soiled linens. 17 (3) Facilities. At least one entrance door allowing access to the establishment and any 18 building it may be in, shall remain unlocked during business hours; notwithstanding this 19 provision, the facility shall also comply with exiting and entrance requirements of other 20 applicable laws and regulations. All premises and facilities shall be maintained in a clean and 21 sanitary condition, and shall be thoroughly cleaned each day of operation. The premises and 22 facilities shall meet all code requirements of the city as to safety of the structure, adequacy of 23 plumbing, heating, ventilation and waterproofing of rooms where showers, water or steam baths 24 are given. 25 (4) Patron Facilities. Patrons of the establishments shall be furnished with securable 26 locker facilities, for which the patron has the control of the key, and security deposit facilities 27 for the protection of their valuables. 28 (5) Hours. Massage establishment operations shall be carried on or conducted, and the 2/7/2005 11 I premises shall be open, only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. 2 (6) Disabled Access. Each massage establishment shall be disabled accessible with 3 restrooms available with disabled access. 4 (7) Changing Rooms. Each massage establishment shall provide separate restroom and 5 changing rooms for male and female patrons. 6 (8) Lighting. Minimum lighting shall be at least one sixty(60)watt light in each 7 enclosure where massage services are performed. The light switch for the interior lights in each 8 enclosure will be within the enclosure. There shall be no light in the enclosure that is operated 9 from outside the enclosure. There shall be no sound device (i.e., buzzer or bell) than can be 10 operated from outside the massage enclosure. 11 (9) Records. Each massage establishment shall keep a written record of the date and 12 hour of each treatment; the name and address of each patron; the name of the massage therapist 13 administering the treatment; and the type of treatment administered recorded on a patron release 14 form. Such written record shall be open to inspection only by officials charged with the 15 enforcement of this chapter and for no other purpose. Such records will be kept on the 16 premises of the massage establishment for a period of two years from the date of service. 17 (10) No Residential Use. No part of the massage establishment shall be used for 18 residential or sleeping purposes. No cooking or food preparation will be allowed on the 19 premises unless a full service kitchen is installed. Such kitchen will be for the sole use of 20 employees, and will be installed in an employees-only area. The full service kitchen will have a 21 minimum of a sink with hot and cold running water, a refrigerator, a stove, and sufficient 22 cabinets to store cooking utensils. 23 (11)Physical Contact. No employee, contractor, or massage practitioner shall make any 24 intentional, occasional, or repetitive contact with the genitals, anus, or areola(nipple) of another 25 person in the massage establishment or while providing massage services. 26 27 Section 6.40.105 Maintenance of insurance. 28 The operator of a massage establishment shall maintain the insurance required pursuant 2/7/2005 12 I to subsection 6.40.040(r) at all times that the massage establishment is open for business. If at 2 any time no such insurance is in effect for the establishment, the establishment shall close for 3 business and establishment's permit shall be automatically suspended. 4 5 Section 6.40.110 Inspection by officials. 6 The investigating officials of the city, including the health officer, shall have the right to 7 enter the premises from time to time during regular business hours for the purpose of making 8 reasonable inspections to observe and enforce compliance with the provisions of this chapter 9 and building, fire, electrical,plumbing or health regulations. 10 11 Section 6.40.115 Surety bond. 12 (a) Each applicant for an operator's permit shall post with the city clerk, a surety in the 13 principal sum amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) either in cash or executed as surety by a 14 good and sufficient corporate surety authorized to do a surety business in the state of California 15 and as principal by the applicant. The form of the bond shall have been approved by the city 16 attorney and shall provide that should the applicant be issued a permit under this chapter which 17 is subsequently suspended or revoked, the city shall be reimbursed from said bond for all costs 18 of any investigation or other proceedings related to said suspension or revocation. 19 (b) If a holder of an operator's permit under this chapter successfully completes 20 twenty-four(24), consecutive months in actual operation under the permit without any 21 suspension of the permit or the filing of any criminal or civil complaint regarding operations 22 under the permit by either a city attorney, a district attorney, the California Attorney General, or 23 a United States Attorney, the permitholder may request the city to release the surety bond, 24 which the city shall do upon verification that no such suspension or complaint filing has 25 occurred during the period. However, if at any time following such a release of the surety bond, 26 the city determines that the permitholder is conducting its operations in violation of this 27 chapter, the chief of police may order the posting of a surety bond in accordance with 28 subsection (a) above as a condition of continued operations under the permit. 2/7/2005 13 I Section 6.40.120 Sale or transfer of establishment. 2 (a) Upon sale, transfer or relocation of a massage, spa, bathing or similar establishment, 3 the permit shall not be transferable without the written approval of the chief of police and the 4 finance director. An application for such a change shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable 5 investigation fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) and provide all of the information required 6 in Section 6.40.040. 7 (b) A permit for an out call massage service or a massage practitioner is not transferable. 8 9 Section 6.40.130 Revocation or suspension of permits. 10 (a) Any massage, spa, bathing or similar establishment permit, out call permit, or 11 massage practitioner permit issued under this chapter shall be subject to suspension or 12 revocation by the city manager for violation of, or for causing or permitting violation of, any. 13 provision of this chapter or for any grounds that would warrant the denial of such permits in the 14 first instance. 15 (b) Prior to the suspension or revocation of any permit issued under this chapter, the 16 permittee shall be entitled to a hearing before the city manager or the manager's designated 17 representative, at which time evidence will be received for the purpose of determining whether 18 or not the permit shall be suspended or revoked or whether the permit may be retained. In the 19 event the permit is suspended or revoked, the notification of the reasons for such suspension or 20 revocation shall be set forth in writing and sent to the permittee by means of first class mail. 21 The manager may impose conditions or restrictions on the permit in lieu of suspension or 22 revocation to attempt to eliminate violations or nuisances that have been found. 23 (c) In the event of suspension or revocation of any permit, the permittee may appeal to 24 the city council in the manner as provided in Section 6.40.090. 25 26 Section 6.40.140 Display of signs and permits. 27 No person granted an operator's permit pursuant to this chapter shall begin operations 28 until a recognizable and legible sign has been posted at the main entrance to the permit 2/7/2005 14 I premises. All permits granted shall bear the picture of the permittee and shall be posted within 2 the establishment in a location immediately available for inspection for representatives of the 3 city, including the permits for out call massage and massage practitioners. Out call massage 4 permittee must have their permit bearing their pictures available for inspection at all times 5 while providing out call massage services. No person granted a permit pursuant to this chapter 6 shall operate under any other name or at any other location than that specified in the permit. 7 8 Section 6.40.150 Notice of changes. 9 All persons granted permits pursuant to this chapter shall report immediately to the city 10 finance department and the police department all changes of residence or business address or 11 change of ownership of the establishment or service. Failure to give such notice within fifteen 12 (15) days of the event shall render the permit null and void. 13 14 Section 6.40.160 Renewal of permits. 15 Each permit shall be renewed annually, no less than ninety(90) days prior to the 16 anniversary date of its issuance. Any permit not renewed shall be null and void on such 17 anniversary date. The investigation fee for renewals shall be one hundred dollars ($100), no 18 part of which is refundable. Additional fees may be charged to cover costs such as processing 19 fingerprints. Prior to permit renewal being granted the permittee shall: 20 (1)Provide two photographs of passport size at least two inches by two inches showing 21 the head and shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinct manner taken with the sixty(60) 22 days immediately prior to filing the renewal application and current information concerning any 23 changes to the facts set forth in the initial or immediately prior renewal application; 24 (2) Obtain a new certificate, dated within thirty(30) days of the renewal, from a medical 25 doctor stating that the licensee is free from infectious, contagious or communicable diseases 26 capable of being transmitted through therapeutic massage; 27 (3) Obtain clearance from the police department that the permittee has had no arrests or 28 convictions for violations listed in subsection 6.40.080(a)(3) or(4) above since the permit was 2/7/2005 15 I issued or last renewed. 2 Upon complete submission of this information together with the required filing fee, the permit 3 shall be renewed. 4 5 Section 3. The provisions of Section 6.40.040(m) contained in this ordinance shall 6 apply as follows until October 1, 2005: 7 (a) Any person who can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the chief of police that the 8 person has been practicing massage in the City of Burlingame for a continuous period of six (6) 9 months before March 1, 2005, under the exemptions contained in Section 6.40.050 as it existed 10 on February 1, 2005, need only provide proof that the person has successfully completed 11 seventy(70) hours of training in a Recognized School in order to be granted a conditional 12 massage technician's permit under chapter 6.40. As a condition of such a permit, the person 13 shall be required to complete the required 500 hours of training at a Recognized School within 14 twelve (12)months of the date of issuance of the conditional permit. 15 (b) This conditional permit process shall not apply to any permit application received 16 after October 1, 2005. 17 (c) The requirements of section 6.40.040(m) shall not apply retroactively to any massage 18 permit that was approved by the City of Burlingame before the effective date of this ordinance. 19 20 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 21 22 Mayor 23 24 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that 25 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7"' 26 day of February, 2005, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on 27 the_day of , 2005, by the following vote: 28 2/7/2005 16 I AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 2 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 3 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 City Clerk 5 C:\FILES\ORDINANC\massage2005.bpd.wpd 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2/7/2005 17 CITYAGENDA 6b °�\ ITEM# GAM BURLINE MTG. .�.., �� STAFF REPORT DATE 2,22,2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED BY DATE: February 16. 2005 APPROVE BY— FROM: Y FROM: Lam E. Anderson, Cijy Attorney SUBJECT- CONSIDER RENEWAL OF AMUSEMENT PERMIT–FANNY& ALEXANDER, 1108 BURLINGAME AVENUE AND 303-305 CALIFORNIA DRIVE At the January 18, 2005, Council meeting, the City Council continued review of the Fanny&Alexander amusement permit, so that the Police Department could meet with the owners and discuss improvements to security, particularly at closing hour. Those meetings have occurred. The owners continue to be cooperative and willing to make every effort to make the establishment as safe as possible.. The Police Department requests the Council to add the following conditions to the amusement permit, and the owners have agreed to the conditions: –Participate with the ABC LEADS program for refresher bartender and waitress training. –Meet with the police department once a month(or as requested by the police department or business) to address policing issues or problems. –Upgrade the patron dress code with the approval of the police department; consideration should be given to the following restrictions: no athletic gear,no tennis shoes, no head gear, and no t-shirts. –Insure that all business employees fully cooperate with the police department when asked to provide witness statements, contact information, and requests to return telephone calls. –Insure that designated employees remain at the door/sidewalk until 0230 hrs or later as needed to assist in dispersing patrons of the establishment at closing. The Police Department believes that this is a first step in a more comprehensive approach to working with the entertainment venues in the Burlingame Avenue area. The permit will return to the Council for review in June or July of this year. In addition, staff will be working on an amended entertainment ordinance over the next few months so that it is in place for the June-July review cycle. Mayor and Council Re: Renewal of Fanny&Alexander Amusement Permit February 16, 2005 Page 2 Attachment Proposed Revised Conditions for Fanny&Alexander Distribution Chief of Police City Planner PROPOSED CONDITIONS FOR AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR FANNY & ALEXANDER, 1108 BURLINGAME AVENUE/303-305 CALIFORNIA DRIVE Permit allows: Permit allows live music and dancing from 11 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., seven nights a week; a cover charge may be charged at the door after 9:00 p.m., but this operation shall not be conducted in such a way as to obstruct the public sidewalk or street.. 1. All alcohol beverage laws shall be strictly enforced. 2. Any violations of the law or threatened violations shall be immediately reported to the Police Department and full cooperation shall be given by employees and management of the business. 3. No variance from the permitted entertainment shall occur without obtaining an amendment to the permit. 4. No part of the business shall be subleased without notification to the Police Department. 5. The amusement permit shall be non-transferable. 6. Any fight, ejection of customer, thefts from customers, or any other criminal act occurring at the establishment shall be reported to the Burlingame Police as soon as any establishment employee is aware of such an incident. 7. Any request by anyone in the establishment for an employee to contact the Police shall be honored immediately, without question. 8. Last call for alcohol service shall be no later than 1:10 a.m. on nights when entertainment is offered, and no alcohol shall be served after 1:20 a.m. on those nights. 9. Labor Code Section 6404.5 regulating smoking shall be enforced at all times. 10. No minors are to be allowed on the premises during hours when there is no food service, unless they are there on lawful business, and no minors shall be allowed in the business after 10 p.m. when entertainment is being offered. 11. Loudspeakers for the business shall be directed toward the interior of the business; and The business shall not violate Section 10.40.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code; and The entertainment shall not be audible outside the premises; and The establishment shall measure the current 24-hour ambient noise levels(L 10)at the exterior of the property along Burlingame Avenue and at the rear of the patio area using a methodology approved by the City Planner before opening for business; and Upon request by the City,the establishment shall conduct noise measurements to determine whether the noise from the establishment is exceeding the 5 dBA standard for increases in noise from the baseline as provided in the Burlingame General Plan, and shall report the measurements to the City; and The establishment shall ensure that the 5 dBA standard is not exceeded. 12. The establishment shall be operated as a single entertainment venue. No ingress or egress shall be allowed from California Drive during business hours, except for emergencies. 13. Advertising for the entertainment shall conform to the requirements of the City Code. 14. No patrons will be admitted after 1:00 a.m. 15. Beverages will only be served in plasticware after 10 p.m. on Friday and Saturday nights. The exceptions to this are closed, private parties and beverages served in stemware. 16. The establishment will provide additional security outside the establishment between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights;this condition may be met by a paid detail officer. 17. Upon closing on evenings when entertainment is offered,the establishment shall pick up all litter within 50 feet of the premises on the pubic street and sidewalk. This does not include the area in front of Left at Albuquerque unless the litter came from Fanny&Alexander activity. 18. Participate with the ABC LEADS program for refresher bartender and waitress training. 19. Meet with the police department once a month(or as requested by the police department or business)to address policing issues or problems. 20. Upgrade the patron dress code with the approval of the police department; consideration should be given to the following restrictions: no athletic gear,no tennis shoes, no head gear,and no t-shirts. 21. Insure that all business employees fully cooperate with the police department when asked to provide witness statements, contact information, and requests to return telephone calls. 22. Insure that designated employees remain at the door/sidewalk until 0230 hrs or later as needed to assist in dispersing patrons of the establishment at closing. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If anyone wishes to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction,they must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. ITY STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM# 8a MTG. DATE 2/22/05 n TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: February 15,2005 APPROVED FROM: Jim Nantell 558-7205 BY suB.IEcr: 2005-06 Budget Direction and Council Goals RECOMMENDATION: That the Council review and confirm the Budget Direction and Council Goals for inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2005-0006 Proposed Budget. BACKGROUND: On Saturday,January 29`I'the Council held a study session to discuss staff direction relative to preparation of the 2005-2006 Budget that will be presented to the Council in June. Staff has transcribed the notes from the meeting and is asking the Council to confirm that we have accurately captured the Council consensus direction. Although the proposed budget will include funding for the Council Goals as stated in Attachment A, as part of the Council's review of the Budget in June the Council will have another opportunity to make modifications of the Council Goals for 2005-2006. ATTACHMENTS: A. Budget Direction and Council Goals for 2005-2006 Attachment A BUDGET DIRECTION AND COUNCIL GOALS FOR FY 2005-06 Budget Direction • Project 5%revenue growth in FY 05-06 • Increase Capital Improvements Funding to $1.1 million • Project 3% increase in employee costs • Project the use of$1.6 million in General Fund reserves • Develop a simple, standard form to solicit information from Community Groups - Attempt to identify issues and problems prior to adoption of budget and let community group representatives know about if there are any known issues prior to the Council's budget hearing. - Work with Vice-Mayor Baylock in formulating funding solicitation letter - Publish a deadline for community or citizens to provide input on the community funding requests. • Restore travel funding to City Clerk's Office • Leave Tier 4 cuts in City Council budget as presented • Evaluate additional contribution to Centennial Reserve at the end of the fiscal year City Council Goals For FY 2005-06 1. Balance the FY 05-06 budget with minimal impacts on existing employees 2. Complete the development and adoption of a"Tree View Ordinance/Policy"that would protect the ability of property owners to maintain views that were associated with the property when they purchased it. (P&R) 3. Complete the development of the implementation ordinances associated with the recently completed advanced planning for the North End and the Shoreline Specific Area Plans (Planning) 4. Complete the assessment of the structural stability of the Eucalyptus trees on Easton Drive. Work with Beautification Commission to explore the advisability of developing a Broader Plan for managing our urban forest of Eucalyptus trees.(P&R) 5. Finalize a decision by the City Council relative to review of financing options for funding the public facilities Master Plan(consider including storm drainage needs). As a subset of this goal decide about desirability of investing in new sound system in the Council Chambers. (PW) 6. Look at forming a Centennial Planning Committee and solicit volunteers through the City's list-serve. (Clerk) 7. Have Police and Fire Department evaluate new ways of communicating with citizens during disasters and emergencies. (Fire) 8. Provide clear direction to Safeway on development(CM,Planning) 9. Communicate the Council's vision that the Chamber of Commerce and Business Improvement Districts develop partnership to enhance their long-term success and efficiency of operation. (CM) a. Include a"Buy Burlingame" campaign b. Joint Web site(possibly in cooperation with the City's web site.) 10. Explore mixed-use development concepts for the Donnelly Parking Lot site. (Planning) Attachment A 11. Have City Clerk use City list-serve to send information to community(Clerk) 12. Continue to explore and pursue shared services opportunities with other near by cities, including Recreation and Police Dispatch. (Police) Other goals that were discussed and will come back for further consideration: 1. Look at possible partnerships between the Chamber of Commerce and Business Improvements Districts to improve the City's website and bring back to the Council for additional funding as part of the June Budget approval process. 2. Consider developing an Amazon.com account, which would allow library users to buy books online and four percent of the purchase price would be donated to the library circulation fund. (Some concern was expressed relative to competing with a recently attracted bookstore in the downtown retail area. Council's decision was to refer this to the library Board for their consideration and recommendation.) 3. During budget review meetings in June revisit need for and ability to provide additional funding for an improved web site. 4. As part of the June Budget review revisit the development of a Downtown Burlingame Specific Area Plan(SAP)that could provide a clear vision for downtown. a. Check workload of the Planning Department b. Include California Auto Row as part of plan c. Possibly borrow from other fund i.e. parking fund d. If we can't fund the specific area plan now consider supporting a Charette for the downtown area to open up the discussion and thinking as a precursor to the SAP 5. Improve TV broadcast for Council meetings and the microphone system in the Lane Room. (Next steps on Council Chamber sound will be considered as part of the follow up to the Public Facilities Master Plan.) 6. Have Public Works report back on their efforts to implement WiFi in Burlingame business district. Other goals that were discussed but were not included as priority goals for the next fiscal year were: 1. Refine the regulations and design review guidelines relative to creek side and reemerging lots. 2. Hold public forums-workshops on key community issues. (It was suggested that council members and member of the public,that may be interested in seeing a specific workshop sponsored, should let the council know at one of its public comment periods at regularly scheduled council meetings. 3. Create a citizen's academy. (Council like the idea, however felt given current cutbacks it was not a priority. But should be considered when and if funding improved significantly. 4. Work with auto dealers to explore the potential of a long-term plan to transition their location from California Drive Auto Row to property adjacent to the freeway north of Broadway. 5. Mayor should hold annual Town Hall Meeting. Attachment A BUDGET DIRECTION AND COUNCIL GOALS FOR FY 2005-06 Budget Direction • Project 5%revenue growth in FY 05-06 • Increase Capital Improvements Funding to $1.1 million • Project 3% increase in employee costs • Project the use of$1.6 million in PERS reserves • Develop a simple, standard form to solicit information from Community Groups - Attempt to identify issues and problems prior to adoption of budget and let community group representatives know about if there are any known issues prior to the Council's budget hearing. - Work with Vice-Mayor Baylock in formulating funding solicitation letter - Publish a deadline for community or citizens to provide input on the community funding requests. • Restore travel funding to City Clerk's Office • Leave Tier 4 cuts in City Council budget as presented • Evaluate additional contribution to Centennial Reserve at the end of the fiscal year City Council Goals For FY 2005-06 1. Balance the FY 05-06 budget with minimal impacts on existing employees 2. Complete the development and adoption of a"Tree View Ordinance/Policy"that would protect the ability of property owners to maintain views that were associated with the property when they purchased it. (P&R) 3. Complete the development of the implementation ordinances associated with the recently completed advanced planning for the North End and the Shoreline Specific Area Plans (Planning) 4. Complete the assessment of the structural stability of the Eucalyptus trees on Easton Drive. Work with Beautification Commission to explore the advisability of developing a Broader Plan for managing our urban forest of Eucalyptus trees.(P&R) 5. Finalize a decision by the City Council relative to review of financing options for funding the public facilities Master Plan (consider including storm drainage needs). As a subset of this goal decide about desirability of investing in new sound system in the Council Chambers. (PW) 6. Look at forming a Centennial Planning Committee and solicit volunteers through the City's list-serve. (Clerk) 7. Have Police and Fire Department evaluate new ways of communicating with citizens during disasters and emergencies. (Fire) 8. Provide clear direction to Safeway on development(CM, Planning) 9. Have City Clerk continue to implement creative ways to encourage citizens to register on the City list-serve as a means to increase our outreach to the community. (Clerk) 10. Continue to explore and pursue shared services opportunities with other near by cities, including Recreation and Police Dispatch. (Police) Attachment A Other goals that were discussed and will come back for further consideration: 1. Look at possible partnerships between the Chamber of Commerce and Business Improvements Districts to improve the City's website and bring back to the Council for additional funding as part of the June Budget approval process. 2. Consider developing an Amazon.com account, which would allow library users to buy books online and four percent of the purchase price would be donated to the library circulation fund. (Some concern was expressed relative to competing with a recently attracted bookstore in the downtown retail area. Council's decision was to refer this to the library Board for their consideration and recommendation.) 3. During budget review meetings in June revisit need for and ability to provide additional funding for an improved web site. 4. As part of the June Budget review revisit the development of a Downtown Burlingame Specific Area Plan (SAP) that could provide a clear vision for downtown. a. Check workload of the Planning Department b. Include California Auto Row as part of plan c. Possibly borrow from other fund i.e. parking fund d. If we can't fund the specific area plan now consider supporting a Charette for the downtown area to open up the discussion and thinking as a precursor to the SAP 5. Improve TV broadcast for Council meetings and the microphone system in the Lane Room. (Next steps on Council Chamber sound will be considered as part of the follow up to the Public Facilities Master Plan.) 6. Have Public Works report back on their efforts to implement WiFi in Burlingame business district. Other follow up direction from the meeting: 1. Communicate the Council's vision.that the Chamber of Commerce and Business Improvement Districts develop partnership to enhance their long-term success and efficiency of operation. (CM) a. Include a"Buy Burlingame" campaign b. Joint Web site (possibly in cooperation with the City's web site.) 2. Requested that staff share public record information about the City owned Donnelly Parking Lot site with Mr. Ionescu. (Public Works) Other goals that were discussed but were not included as priority goals for the next fiscal year were: 1. Refine the regulations and design review guidelines relative to creek side and reemerging lots. 2. Hold public forums-workshops on key community issues. (It was suggested that council members and member of the public, that may be interested in seeing a specific workshop sponsored, should let the council know at one of its public comment periods at regularly scheduled council meetings. 3. Create a citizen's academy. (Council like the idea however felt given current cutbacks it was not a priority. But should be considered when and if funding improved significantly. Attachment A 4. Work with auto dealers to explore the potential of a long-term plan to transition their location from California Drive Auto Row to property adjacent to the freeway north of Broadway. 5. Mayor should hold annual Town Hall Meeting. CITY AGENDA 9a °�'. ITEM# BURLINGAME S T A F F REPORT MTG. DATE 2/22/2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTE / BY -- - -- DATE: February 16, 2005 APPROVE BY - FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE CONTRIBUTION TO COMPLETE STUDY OF EMF EXPOSURE LIMITS FROM JEFFERSON-MARTIN TRANSMISSION LINE ALONG SKYLINE BOULEVARD IN BURLINGAME RECOMMENDATION: Authorize contribution of up to $500 to complete study of EMF exposure limits from Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line along Skyline Boulevard in Burlingame. DISCUSSION: Over the past two years, citizens' groups, the City, and other local governments have worked to make the proposed Jefferson-Martin transmission line as good a project as possible under the constraints of State law and competitive interests. Late last year,the California Public Utilities Commission authorized PG&E to proceed with construction of an underground route along Skyline Boulevard, and Commission staff approved the "EMF mitigation"plan developed by PG&E. PG&E's contractor has now submitted tentative plans to the City for review for a City encroachment permit. City staff has requested a number of revisions, which are being made by the contractor. After some discussion, PG&E has also agreed to attend an informational meeting held by the City for City residents living along Skyline. That meeting will probably be held in late March or early April. On February 7, 2005, Lara Lighthouse, representing the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens, requested the Council to consider a contribution of$500 so that the 280 CCC's retained expert could complete his analysis of the potential EMF exposures from the route at the varying depths and distances that are proposed. While PG&E provided some of this information, it was fairly generic and dealt with exposures at right-of-way, rather than at homes. Therefore, staff believes that this contribution would be a worthwhile piece of information for citizens in the area, so that they can make their own evaluations of risks and concerns. cc: Lara Lighthouse, Director of Public Works, City Planner CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA ITEM# 9b MTG. °RATED J NE 0 DATE 2.22.05 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 2004 APPROVED FROM: CITY PLANNER BY SUBJECT: APPLICATION TO C/CAG FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should consider adopting a resolution authorizing staff to submit an application for transportation grant funding under the Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program. BACKGROUND: The City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG)has issued a call for projects to all communities in San Mateo County for its Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program. The purpose of this program is to encourage communities to develop high density housing near transit stations. The incentive is awarded to communities for development projects built at a density greater than 40 units per acre within one-third mile of a BART or Caltrain station. The incentive to communities consists of funds of up to $2000 per bedroom built to be used by the community in a transportation related project. The transportation project to be funded does not have to be directly related to the development project,but will have to be an eligible project under one of three funding sources identified by C/CAG. Burlingame staff has not yet identified the transportation project on which these funds will be spent. However, for this funding cycle, C/CAG is encouraging communities to submit applications based on projects which are in the early phases of the development process,but which are expected to be built within the next two years. The transportation project does not need to be identified until the eligible housing project is under construction. As you know, the recently adopted North Burlingame Specific Plan is encouraging higher density residential development near the Millbrae BART/Caltrain Station. Planning Department staff has had preliminary discussions with the owner of the property located at 1875 California Drive regarding a proposed four-story, 22-unit condominium building(see attached preliminary site plan). This proposal would qualify for this program because it is about 1/4 mile from the Millbrae BART/Caltrain Station and, as it is now designed, is about 60 units per acre. The North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan allows for multiple family residential development up to 50 units per acre, or 18 units on this site which would also qualify. It is important to note that this residential project has not yet been reviewed for compliance with the City's zoning regulations, nor has it been through the environmental review or public hearing process. Changes may be made to the project based on any or all of these review processes. However, the project concept is generally consistent with the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan and meets the criteria for this program. Staff is now requesting that the Council authorize City staff to submit an application for funding so that we may compete for this round of funding. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Letter from Mayor Galligan to C/CAG Application Form Preliminary Site Plan Council Resolution CITY G BURL INGAME AAn JUNE'" JOE GALLIGAN,MAYOR nG//—w L CATHY BAYLOCK,VICE MAYOR &/ y ��u// TEL: (650)558-7200 MIKE COFFEY FAX: (650)342-8386 TERRY NAGEL CITY HALL–501 PRIMROSE ROAD www.budingame.org ROSALIE M.O'MAHONY BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 February 22, 2005 Richard Napier, Executive Director City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County 555 County Center, Fifth Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 RE: Application for Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program Dear Mr. Napier, On behalf of the Burlingame City Council, it is requested that C/CAG accept the application for the Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program which was submitted to C/CAG by the Planning Department on January 31, 2005. It is our understanding that the purpose of the program is to encourage housing near transit. The incentive offered by C/CAG could be used by the City of Burlingame to fund an eligible transportation project if an eligible housing project is constructed within two years of application submittal. To be eligible, the housing project must be within one-third mile of a BART or Caltrain Station,be built at a density greater than 40 units per acre, and be constructed within two years of the date of application. The City's request is based on a proposed project on property located at 1875 California Drive in Burlingame. Planning Department staff has had preliminary discussions with the owner of the property located at 1875 California Drive regarding a proposed four-story, 22-unit condominium building(see enclosed preliminary site plan). The density of the project as it is now designed is about 60 units per acre. The North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan allows for multiple family residential development up to 50 units per acre, or 18 units on this site. The site is located on the northwest corner of California and Murchison Drives, about 1/4 mile from the Millbrae Intermodal Station, with BART, Caltrain and SamTrans connections. In September of 2004, the City Council adopted the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan,which encourages residential and mixed use development in this area. In addition, this area is identified as appropriate for multiple family residential development in the City's Housing Element, adopted by the City Council in 2002. The City Council has also adopted an inclusionary zoning ordinance,which requires that at least ten percent of multiple family residential units built shall be affordable to moderate income residents. Additional incentives are offered for projects which include units affordable to low income residents. Richard Napier, Executive Director C/CAG February 22, 2005 Page 2 The project has not yet been reviewed for compliance with the City's zoning regulations, nor has it been through the environmental review or public hearing process. Changes may be made to the project based on any or all of these review processes. However, the project concept is generally consistent with the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. Based on the location and preliminary plans submitted, this project would qualify for the Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program. We respectfully request that you consider this application for incentive funding. The application to the Planning Commission will be submitted within the next few months, and if approved, it is expected that construction would begin within the next two years. Thank you for considering this request. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Margaret Monroe, City Planner, at(650) 558-7250. Sincerely, Joe Galligan Mayor C/CAG TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT HOUSING INCENTIVE APPLICATION APPLICANT City or County: City of Burlingame Address: 501 Primrose Road ZIP Code: Burlingame, CA 94010 Contact Person: Margaret Monroe Telephone Number: (650)558-7250 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Project Name or Developer: Otto Miller Location: 1875 California Drive (Southwest corner of California and Murchison) Caltrain or Bart Station: Caltrain X BART X Distance from Station: < 1/4 Mile (Note: Must be less than one third of a mile to be eligible) Density in Units Per Acre: 60 units/acre Per Cent of Units Low to Moderate Income: 10% Status of Review Process: Preliminary Review—no formal application submitted General Description of Proposed Project: Four-story, 22-unit condominium project with underground parking on a 0.36 acre site located at the northwest corner of California and Murchison Drives, Burlingame (1875 California Drive) Project is less than 1/4 mile to the Millbrae Intermodal Station and the City requires that a minimum of ten percent of the units are affordable to moderate income households The project would include a total of 38 bedrooms. Attach Rough Site Plan and Architectural Renderings if available: a�.a� nrio T� 205 Park Road,Su Burlingame,Califon FAX 650.579.0 _ 650.579.576: E-Mail: trgarchirects( Architect: VVELIVERY PARKING Cs-.,% consultant: I 1 W ^ Project Title: rol o `rl Z _:�: X1r C" 0 O XXX Znew condomfm w = � N V °° APN: aoac m-i �I 'mr Z g Budingame,CA 9 Sheet Title: i Site Algh I b lu NOTM a ii Baa,: TIM - • D DRAFT .. RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2005 CRY OF BMA"ff IL2 PLAIVMW DEPT s>f lor - Q-1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame has authority under the California Government Code §§ 34000 and following for the exercise of the powers of a city government; and WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC) and the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County are offering an incentive program to encourage housing near transit facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame has adopted a current Housing Element in its General Plan and a recent Specific Plan for the North Burlingame/Rollins Road area of the City that encourages and facilitates housing near the City's transit hubs; and WHEREAS, the property at 1875 California Drive is classified for use as multi-family housing and is in close proximity to the multi-modal transit facility in Millbrae, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute a letter on behalf of the City of Burlingame applying to C/CAG for the Transit Oriented Housing Incentive Program for the property at 1875 California Drive. 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute on behalf of the City such additional documents as may be necessary to complete the application for the Incentive Program. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK a AGENDA STAFF REPORT ITEM# 9C MTG_ 02/22/05 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2005 BY /4, w APPROVED FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2005 SIDEWALK MAINT ANCE PROGRAM-CITY PROJECT NO. 80960 RECOMMENDATIONS:It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding a contract for this project to SpenCon Construction,Inc. of Foster City in the amount of$202,045. It is also recommended that staff be authorized to issue change orders up to 50% of the construction work. DISCUSSION: Bids were opened on February 1,2005,and four bids were received. Bids ranged from$202,045 to $359,050. The low bid is approximately 33% below the engineer's estimate of$300,000. The low bidder, SpenCon Construction, Inc., has met all the requirements for the project. The project consists of the replacement of sidewalk, driveway, curb ramps, curb and gutter in the area of Burlingame Park No. 4 and 5 and Polo Field Subdivisions as well as portions of the Easton Addition No. 2 and Town of Burlingame Subdivisions as indicated on the attached map. Construction is expected to occur between March and July. This project marks the first implementation of the sidewalk program under the adopted Streets and Highways Code. The City has sent two notices to the residents in the areas noted above. Approximately 30%of the residents completed the required repairs through arrangements with private contractors. The remaining 70% will be completed with this contract. As a result of a very competitive bid, the cost of repairs quoted initially to the property owners is significantly lower. The average cost per property is $375, well below the original estimate of$625. In order to be able to extend the limits of curb ramp, curb and gutter replacement and maximize the use of available funds,it is requested that staff be authorized to issue change orders up to 50%of the construction award. There are sufficient funds in the budget to accommodate this change order amount. At the end of this project, staff will prepare a summary report for the cost of repairs in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code. A public hearing will be held for residents and Council to review these costs and to finalize the report. After Council approval,the costs will be forwarded to the County Assessor's Office for collection with the property taxes. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Bid Summary, Map BUDGET IMPACT: Estimated Construction Costs Available Funding: Construction $202,045 2003/04 CIP $266,150 Contingency(50%) $101,000 Property Owner Contributions $ 43,850 Engineering Administration (25%) $ 50,000 2004/05 CIP $ 81,000 Construction Inspection 37,955 TOTAL $391,000 TOTAL $391,000 Donald Chang, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Director of Finance, SpenCon Construction, Inc. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80960award.wpd RESOLUTION NO. - AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TO SPENCON CONSTRUCTION, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 80960 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITY PROJECT 80960 -CONTRACT FOR 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. WHEREAS, on FEBRUARY 1, 2005, all proposals were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS,SPENCON CONSTRUCTION,INC. ,submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of$202,045.00. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of SPENCON CONSTRUCTION, INC., for said project in the amount of$202,045.00, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work,and that the City Manager be,and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor I, DORIS J. MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk s:\apublicworksdir\projects\resolutionaward CITY OF BURLINGAME 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM CITY PROJECT NO. 80960 BID SUMMARY SPENCON CONSTRUCTION JJR CONSTRUCTION VANGUARD CONSTRUCTION SPOSETO ENGINEERING FOSTER CITY, CA SAN MATEO, CA OAKLAND, CA UNION CITY, CA ITEM UNIT AREA UNIT ENGINEER'S UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE QUANTITY SIZE ESTIMATE PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK $12.00 4,900 S. F. $58,800.00 $7.20 $35,280.00 $8.00 $39,200.00 $10.00 $49,000.00 $12.00 $58,800.00 2 REMOVE AND REPLACE DRIVEWAY $15.00 1,000 S. F. $15,000.00 $8.00 $8,000.00 $9.25 $9,250.00 $11.00 $11,000.00 $16.00 $16,000.00 3 REMOVE AND REPLACE 14" CURB AND GUTTER $35.00 2,480 L. F. $86,800.00 $26.50 $65,720.00 $30.50 $75,640.00 $32.00 $79,360.00 $33.00 $81,840.00 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE CURB $15.00 30 L.F. $450.00 $21.00 $630.00 $30.00 $900.00 $40.00 $1,200.00 $42.00 $1,260.00 5 ICROSS GUTTER $18.00 420 S. F. $7,560.00 $8.50 $3,570.00 $11.50 $4,830.00 $20.00 $8,400.00 $19.00 $7,980.00 6 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP $2,000.00 25 EACH $50,000.00 $1,175.00 $29,375.00 $1,800.00 $45,000.00 $1,900.00 $47,500.00 $2,800.00 $70,000.00 7 REMOVE SIDEWALK AND REPLACE WITH TOP SOIL $4.50 820 S.F. $3,690.00 $3.00 $2,460.00 $3.50 $2,870.00 $5.00 $4,100.00 $9.00 $7,380.00 8 AGGREGATE BASE $10.00 25 TONS $250.00 $25.00 $625.00 $50.00 $1,250.00 $50.00 $1,250.00 $106.00 $2,650.00 9 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BASE $4.50 5,150 S. F. $23,175.00 $3.00 $15,450.00 $3.75 $19,312.50 $4.00 $20,600.00 $9.00 $46,350.00 10 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE ONLY $45.00 5 TONS $225.00 $35.00 $175.00 $75.00 $375.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $118.00 $590.00 11 NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACING $160.00 240 TONS $38,400.00 $135.00 $32,400.00 $225.00 $54,000.00 $130.00 $31,200.00 $160.00 $38,400.00 12 REPAIR IRRIGATION SYSTEM $200.00 1 EACH $200.00 $875.00 $875.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,600.00 $5,600.00 13 SEWER CLEAN-OUT FRAME $2,500.00 1 L.S. $2,500.00 $75.00 $75.00 $100.00 $100.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $300.00 $300.00 14 REPAIR / REPLACE WATERLINE (10' MAX.) $1,000.00 2 EACH $2,000.00 $100.00 $200.00 $250.00 $500.00 $1,400.00 $2,800.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 15 ADJUST MANHOLES TO GRADE $750.00 1 EACH $750.00 $200.00 $200.00 $400.00 $400.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $900.00 $900.00 16 SIGN POST $100.00 1 EACH $100.00 $300.00 $300.00 $200.00 $200.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 17 PARKING METER POSTS $100.00 1 EACH $100.00 $150.00 $150.00 $200.001 $200.00 $500.00 $500.00 $300.00 $300.00 18 DRAINAGE INLET RELOCATION/MOD. AT CURB RAMP $4,000.00 1 EACH $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 19 CONCRETE CUTTING OR GRINDING $50.00 120 EACH $6,000.00 $38.00 $4,560.00 $50.00 $6,000.00 1 $100.00 $12,000.00 $60.00 $7,200.00 TOTAL $300,000.00 $202,045.00_ _.$280,,027_50 * _.$282,510_00 _$359.,050.00 * denotes mathemical errors; unit prices prevail per project specifications S'A PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'APROJECTS%MASUMMARY.tic PAGE 1 OF i 2/72005,3:58 PM 20. 05 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM VICINITY MAP G JQ - NC �Is t 4 A,`_- 1 ol �lrg 41)NZ ` \ / CITY OF BU.RLINGAME ' / \ SAN 11ATEO COUNTY ` CALIFORNIA REVISED:—11 s - .; l cf Af wC suar Agenda Item# 9d BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Meeting Date February 22,2005 SUBMITTED BY r APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 14, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ALMER BELLEVUE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, CITY PROJECT 80110 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the resolution accepting the Almer Bellevue Storm Drain Improvement, City Project No. 80110 in the amount of $160,925.00 BACKGROUND; On August 16, 2004 the project was awarded to Harty Pipelines Construction, Inc. for $138,660.00. A change order total of$22,265.78 was negotiated during the course of the work for lowering the pipeline grade to avoid unforeseen conflicting existing utilities. The Notice of Completion will be issued once the City receives the 10% maintenance bond as required by the project contract. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds for the project in the Storm Drain CIP budget (Project 80110). Douglas Be Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Finance, J.F. Pacific Liners, Inc. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80110AImer Bellvue Storm Drain Impr.doc RESOLUTION NO. - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ALMER BELLEVUE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT HARTY PIPELINES CONSTRUCTION, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 80110 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by HARTY PIPELINES CONSTRUCTION,INC.under the terms of its contract with the City dated AUGUST 16, 2004,has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 80110. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I, DORIS J. MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on February 22,2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80110\RES0LUTN.ACCEPT02.22.05.wpd Harty Pipeline Inc. CITY OF BURLINGAME DATE: 14-Feb-05 4085 19th Avenue PROGRESS PAYMENT NO.3(FINAL) For the month of: Dec San Francisco,CA 94132 Almer/Bellevue Storm Drain Improvement City PO#: 13,615 415.585.6023 Harty Job#259 City Project#80110 UNIT BID UNIT BID QUANTITY % AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY AMOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE QTY SIZE AMOUNT TO DATE PAID TO DATE PAID THIS PAYMENT Contract Bid Items 1 Install Bubbler Boz $ 1,800.00 6 FA $ 10,800.00 500 83% 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ - 2 Install 8-C 900 SD Pipe $ 100.00 141 LF $ 14,100.00 144.00 100% 14,400.00 $ 14,400.00 $ - 3 Install 12'C 900 SD Pipe S 130.00 682 LF $ 88,660.00 665.00 98% 86,450.00 $ 88,450.00 $ - 4 AC Paving for Dench $ 3.00 4200 SF $ 12,600.00 4027.00 96% 12,081.00 $ 12,081.00 $ - 5 Install SD Manhole $ 500.00 6 FA $ 3,000.00 4.00 0% 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ - 6 Connect 12'SD to exist box culvert $ 3,000.00 1 EA $ 3,000.00 1.00 100% 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ - 7 Remove and replace curb and gutter $ 30.00 200 EA $ 6,000.00 188.00 94% 5,640.00 $ 5,640.00 $ - 8 vater utility conflicts $ 10000 5 FA $ 500.00 5.00 100% 500.00 $ 500.00 $ - $ Total Original Contract $138,fi60.00 95.97% $133,071.00 $ 133,011.00 $ Total Change Orders $22,265.78 1.DD 100.00% 22,265.76 $22,265.78 $ - Total Contract(One.+CCOs) $160,925.78 195.97% 3155,316.78 $155,336.78 $ - $ $ TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT $1381660.00 $133,071.00 $133,071.00 $ - TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $22,265.78 $22,265.78 $22,265.78 $ CONTRACT TOTAL(Original Contract+Change Orders) $1601925.78 $155,336.78 $155,336.78 $ LESS RETENTION 0% $0.00 $0.00 ($7,766.84) $ 7,766.84 SUBTOTAL WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS 31fi0,925.76 $155,136.78 $147,569.94 $ 7,766.64 AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTRACTOR $0.00 $0.00 $ TOTAL THIS PERIOD $160,925.78 $155,336.78 $147,569.94 $ 7,766.84 PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER: APPROVED BY CONTRACTOR: CHARGED TO FUND ACCOUNT: 320-80110-220 Page 1 of 1 c17r AGENDA 10Z ITEM# 9e STAFF REPORT BUFaJHGAMMTG. � e DATE Fehmary22y2005 eo TO: Honorahle Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BYE Ch*ef of Police DATE: February 5, 2005 APPRO FROM: BY: �Y SUBJECT: Request to send a Burlingame Police Officer to Tonga fo Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity Training RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully request that the City Council approve allowing a designated police department employee to accompany an officer from the San Bruno Police Department to Tonga. This cultural experience will provide the basis for a better understanding of the culture and mores of the Tongan life-style, which will then be used for officer sensitivity training at the involved police departments of San Bruno, San Mateo and Burlingame. BACKGROUND During the calendar year, 2004, the Burlingame Police Department experienced a number of highly volatile and violent incidents in our bay front area involving young members of the Tongan Community. Several of these incidents developed into "riot" situations, requiring members from the Burlingame Police Department requesting an emergency response and immediate assistance from other law enforcement agencies in San Mateo County. Several of these incidents involved firearms (the discovery of a handgun in a vehicle and another case involving shots fired) and throwing bottles and other missiles at officers in other cases. Many of the individuals involved in our incidents appear to reside in, and come from the surrounding communities of San Mateo and San Bruno, where both cities are experiencing similar acts of violence involving rival Tongan gang members. San Bruno has even experienced a shooting that seriously injured and paralyzed a young Tongan man. In response to this violent trend, Police Chief Lee Violett from San Bruno, Police Chief Susan Manheimer from San Mateo and I have worked closely with Tongan faith based community leaders in central San Mateo County hoping that their outreach to troubled families might help to stop this violent trend in each of our communities. Several initiatives and training sessions are currently underway or planned for the near future, including: gang awareness training, presentations on the County Probation Department's Parenting Project and implementation of Project KLEAR (Kids Learning Empathy and Respect). Grants are currently being sought to provide funding for these "train the trainer" courses involving the various Tongan faith based community leaders. However, one of the missing elements to this comprehensive approach that addresses these problems is the need to provide law enforcement with a better understanding of the culture and mores of the Tongan Community. The police chiefs in the affected communities believe an exchange of information will help law enforcement understand the dynamics of the Tongan culture, and assist us with community outreach by acquiring the necessary sensitivity needed in these matters. With this goal in mind, the Burlingame Police Department would like to send an officer to Tonga to accompany an officer from San Bruno so that the involved cities can begin cultural sensitivity training for law enforcement personnel, and begin an exchange of information that will forge relationships of trust and credibility among members of the Tongan community. The officer selected would be expected to share what was learned with other members of the aforementioned police departments and to act as a key point of contact(for Burlingame)with the Tongan faith based community. A portion of the financial support to send an officer to Tonga has been obtained through donations from several service clubs in San Bruno. The Burlingame Police Department has also requested funding donations from two major service clubs in Burlingame to help off set some(or all of these costs). It is hoped that these donated funds($1,000.00)will cover the cost of air fare, lodging and meals. The police department would be responsible for payment of the regular salary of the officer going to Tonga for a period of 7 days(total).This salary cost will be absorbed through the current police department budget,as well as any cost shortages not obtained through donations. Attachments-Notes and proposed budget from December's Tongan,Police Community Relations and PCRC Meeting Tongan/Police Community Relations Meeting 12/20/04 Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (PCRC) Notes from the meeting Present: Kalatini Ahio, Pat Brown, PCRC, San Bruno Methodist, Noreen Hanlon, SBPD,Lea Loumoli, Falehufanga United Methodist Church,Susan Manheimer, SMPD, Etuate Sekona (Ed), LDS, Vika Sinipata, San Mateo, Maopa Temeifuna, SDA, Alex Tukumoeatu,San Carlos,Jack Van Etten, BPD After a prayer by Reverend Ahio and introductions, the group clarified the purpose for this meeting: We are continuing a collaborative effort to find resources/support to address and/or prevent juvenile delinquent behaviors and involvement with violence by Tongan youth. This work, which has been gathering momentum for about 6 months, depends on partnerships developing between the following groups: • Churches serving Tongan families • Law enforcement • City government officials • Schools • San Mateo County Probation • PCRC • Tongan media (Channel 28) • All media (Channel 57, Community Connections, Cop Talk) The task for this meeting was to discuss the elements of a proposal to secure funding from the FAITHS Initiative of the Peninsula Community Foundation. The guidelines for this funding ask proposals to address specific community needs. The group believes this project addresses two needs: 1. Community leadership 2. Strong families and individuals Draft I of Proposal to FAITHS Partnership Part I: Project Description 1. What is the principal objective of your project? This collaborative effort is aimed at providing support and education to Tongan families and youth at risk of involvement with destructive/delinquent behaviors. In an appropriate and sensitive manner that maintains cultural values, the group strives to: - provide parents with parenting education and support so they can work with their children in a productive manner to steer them into positive activities. - work directly with young people, ages 10-20 years, to help them become productive and responsible citizens and community members by providing educational opportunities - develop effective and ongoing partnerships among those groups involved in this effort so they can continue to work together for the benefit of Tongan youth, families and communities - promote the development of leaders within the Tongan community - enhance the understanding and sensitivity of law enforcement and educational professionals working with Tongan families and youth The members of this collaborative group have identified the following key strategies for use in the initial stages of work with Tongan youth and families: - parent training/education- using existing and proven models and adapting them for use with the Tongan community - one such model is The Parent Project, sponsored in San Mateo County by Juvenile Probation and Mental Health - the Kids Learning Empathy and Respect Program (KLEAR), currently operating as an alternative to suspension program in the San Mateo High School District and designed to teach youth about the impact of destructive language and behaviors and skills to replace the negative with positive behaviors. KLEAR has been designed to be replicated and adapted in various settings throughout the county. The planning group believes this model can be adapted to use with Tongan youth and parents and delivered from a congregational/ community setting with youth in late elementary grades through high school. - building bridges between the Tongan community and those public and private agencies that provide services to them. This strategy is being addressed already in the ongoing planning effort and will be strengthened by cultural awareness and sensitivity training to be delivered as a component of this grant. - leadership development - this proposal describes the beginning of ongoing efforts to identify and support emerging leaders in the Tongan community. Included in this category are project planners and those who will assist with designing and delivering training to Tongan families and youth training for service providers -will be delivered by members of the Tongan community and it will be designed to enhance understanding of and respect for cultural values of the Tongan community. The Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (PCRC) has worked with the Tongan community, law enforcement and the schools most recently as it addressed violent behavior between youth attending Aragon and Capuchino High Schools two years ago. PCRC's mission is closely aligned with the goals of this project. PCRC's role will be further defined as this effort develops, but at this point the agency is providing technical assistance with the development of the proposal, support for adapting the KLEAR Program and some meeting facilitation services. 2. What constituency will you serve? This project will serve Tongan families, with youth ages 10-20 years, who are living/worshipping in central San Mateo County (San Carlos (South) through San Bruno (North) and whose young people are at risk of engaging in destructive behaviors. In addition, the police, probation and educational professionals who work with this population, as well as leaders of the larger community, will be provided with education about the culture and values of the Tongan community. 3. Who is responsible for project leadership? Reverend Kalatini Ahio, of the San Bruno First United Methodist Church, is the president of the Tongan Community Leaders, a group of church leaders serving Tongan families. He will serve as project leader. Rev. Ahio and Rev. Lea Loumoli of the Falehufanga United Methodist Church in San Carlos are co-submitting this proposal. 4. What is the level of community involvement? Since July 20, 2004, Tongan and community leaders have been meeting with families to discuss and begin to address the issue of youth involvement with delinquent behavior. There have been 9 meetings during this period with attendance ranging from 18 to 40 participants. These meetings have been hosted by different congregations and a concerted effort has been made to include representatives from all of the denominations serving the Tongan Community (ex. Methodist, Catholic, Seventh Day Adventist, Latter Day Saints). More recently, City and Police representatives have begun to meet with the group to support its work and explore additional support. Police Chiefs from Burlingame, San Bruno and San Mateo are now regular attendees. The group has established a monthly meeting schedule starting on January 27, 2005. 5. What partner organizations/congregations are involved in the project's implementation? At this time the following groups/agencies have committed to involvement with this project's implementation: • Burlingame Police Department • Falehufanga United Methodist Church of San Carlos • First United Methodist Church of San Bruno • Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center • San Bruno Police Department • San Mateo County Probation? • San Mateo Police Department • San Mateo Union High School District 6. What is the anticipated time frame? This proposal is designed to fund the initial work of a larger ongoing effort to address this complex issue of Tongan youth involvement with destructive behavior. The group believes that the first phase of work that will be funded by this proposal can be completed in about 9 months. The first few months will be devoted to developing training capacity for parenting education and KLEAR and engaging parents and youth to participate in these opportunities. 7. What specific goals are you trying to achieve? During this first phase of work, this group hopes to accomplish the following: • Involve at 50-75 Tongan youth in positive community events jointly sponsored by project partners • Serve 35 selected at-risk youth in an adapted KLEAR (Kids Learning Empathy and Respect) program • Recruit and provide training for 1-2 Tongan parent educators who can in turn train other parent educators to deliver a culturally appropriate parenting education program. • Provide scholarships for at least 10 Tongan parents to attend the existing Parenting Project Series (10 weeks) • Involve 30-40 Tongan parents in a more informal, KLEAR model of parent support and education • Provide initial cultural sensitivity training to at least 150 law enforcement officers and administrators in the Burlingame, San Bruno and San Mateo Police Departments through roll call and training day presentations 8. How will you know if you are successful? • Our training goals (listed above) will be accomplished • Culturally appropriate curriculum and materials will be available for continuing use for both parent and youth education • Participants in the training will report increased knowledge and understanding • Tongan leaders will be trained to provide specialized educational opportunities to members of the Tongan community • School discipline records and probation statistics will begin to reflect decreasing negative behaviors by Tongan youth • Partners in the project will feel confidence in each other and commitment to ongoing collaborative efforts • Law enforcement professionals will have increased knowledge about the culture and values of the Tongan community Part II: Budget Revenue Peninsula Community Foundation- FAITHS Partnership $5,000 Expenses $710 • Training for 1 Trainer of Trainers for the Parenting Project $350 • Tuition for 10 parents to attend local Parenting Project classes ($35/parent) $300 • Funds to adapt/translate existing parent education curriculum (20 hours @ $15/hour) $300 • Funds to adopt KLEAR curriculum for community- based delivery (6 hours @ $50/hour) $500 • Training for Tongan KLEAR trainers (10 hours at$50/hour) $300 • Training supplies (paper/food) $1,100 • Event supplies (2 events for Tongan youth/families - to include food and entertainment $640 • Facilitation/consultation (support from PCRC for planning and implementation of project- 16 hours @ $40/hour) $800 • Community outreach (support for collaborative group to facilitate outreach and follow up between meetings -40 hours @ $20/hour) Total $5,000 In kind: Cultural Presentations to law enforcement, educator groups Project leadership Support for ongoing collaborative meetings $2,454,416.67 Ck.No.99438-10020 NOTE:New check sequence has begun Excludes Library Cks.99537-99564 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for January 2005. $2,385,158.62 Ck.No.161061-161369 INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION KIDn as Ej rt C Q on v v � 3 >J �1 S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS d CITY OF BURLINGAME 02-03-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 81,493.13 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 14,476.00 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 27,542.14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 65,072.47 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 51,588.09 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 43,276.83 WATER FUND 526 3,230.89 SEWER FUND 527 4,836.17 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5,341.77 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 115.16 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 150.00 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1,907.44 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 12,202.43 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 7,761.16 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,057.42 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,140.36 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 115.79 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 45,167.36 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8366,474.61 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99901 THROUGH 100020 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $366,474.61, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ....... . ...................... . ..... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ....... ..... ........................ .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 100012 ANTHONY CERVELLI 25201 3,978.59 MISCELLANEOUS 1,612.80 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546 MISCELLANEOUS 100.79 731 22518 MISCELLANEOUS 15.00 731 22550 100013 REMY SIJBRANT 25202 450.00 MISCELLANEOUS 450.00 101 22546 100014 DUTCH HOSMAN 25203 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 100015 PAUL DONATI 25204 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 100016 DAN DOBSON 25205 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 100017 KATARZYNA KUJAT 25206 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 100018 JAMS INC 25207 150.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 150.00 618 64520 210 100019 JACK OYHARCABAL 25208 655.00 MISCELLANEOUS 655.00 101 22546 100020 ASTRO BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES 25209 59.61 OFFICE EXPENSE 59.61 101 64150 110 /y TOTAL $366,474.61 1 0 r l CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99998 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,071.01 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,117.91 130 20021 MISCELLANEOUS 953.10 130 20025 99999 AD CLUB 24809 237.19 PUBLICATIONS 8 ADVERTISING 237.19 101 64420 150 100000 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 151.65 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 151.65 201 65200 200 100001 S AND S SUPPLIES 8 SOLUTIONS 24963 710.97 SMALL TOOLS 710.97 527 66520 130 100002 DENHAM LLC 24968 5,335.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,335.00 101 22546 100003 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 87.89 UTILITY EXPENSE 87.89 896 20281 100004 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 636.97 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33.37 101 65150 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 432.25 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220 100005 BEHZAD NASRE 25065 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 100006 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 520.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 520.00 101 68010 220 1349 100007 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 550.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 730 69583 220 100008 ERIC TURNER 25157 412.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 412.50 101 68010 220 1781 100009 HAWK SOLUTIONS 25161 680.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 680.40 101 68010 220 1372 100010 GASKET SPECIALTIES INC. 25183 380.63 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 380.63 201 65200 203 100011 EBERSOLE ENTERPRISES INC. 25200 741.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 741.88 320 81130 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99983 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 1,862.14 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,862.14 326 80910 210 99984 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 3,705.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,705.00 130 20016 99985 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00 UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080 99986 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 160.00 MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 130 20024 99987 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 580.00 MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 130 20024 99988 C.L.E.A. 24523 682.50 MISCELLANEOUS 682.50 130 20026 99989 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 476.00 UNION DUES 476.00 130 21091 99990 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 605.51 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 605.51 619 64460 210 5150 99991 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 6,746.44 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,746.44 326 80950 210 99992 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 892,89 COMMUNICATIONS 367.31 101 65100 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 525.58 896 20281 99993 JOHN BOLOGNA 24628 126.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.00 101 68010 220 1780 99994 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 551.15 UTILITY EXPENSE 551.15 896 20281 99995 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 578.10 MISCELLANEOUS 578.10 101 64420 030 99996 AETNA 24760 2,812.01 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,540.71 130 20022 MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028 99997 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 925.48 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 925.48 130 20014 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A NT R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99969 OFFICE MAX 23306 412.20 OFFICE EXPENSE 30.48 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 328.32 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 23.36 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 30.04 201 65200 110 99970 TAMMY MAK 23445 404.49 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 404.49 101 64250 210 99971 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 38,056.18 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,240.95 326 80722 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 29,448.53 326 81190 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,366.70 326 80931 210 99972 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 42,977.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42,977.88 327 81150 220 99973 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 4,970.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,970.00 101 68010 220 1330 99974 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 4,230.49 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,230.49 528 66600 210 99975 SBC/MCI 23728 143.70 COMMUNICATIONS 143.70 101 67500 160 99976 PENINSULA HARLEY DAVIDSON 23795 22.29 SUPPLIES 22.29 620 15000 99977 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 213.47 COMMUNICATIONS 213.47 101 68020 160 2200 99978 UBS 23951 248.47 MISC. SUPPLIES 248.47 101 68010 120 1114 99979 QUILL 24090 21.64 OFFICE EXPENSE 21.64 101 66100 110 99980 ELISE MILANO 24098 81.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81.00 101 68010 220 1645 99981 MIKE GARZOUZI 24128 907.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 907.50 101 68010 220 1781 99982 ALERT-ALL 24392 300.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 201 35220 000 7150 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99959 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,445.00 MISCELLANEOUS 595.00 201 35221 000 7100 MISCELLANEOUS 850.00 201 35220 000 7100 99960 LESCO INC. 22540 483.67 MISC. SUPPLIES 483.67 101 68020 120 2200 99961 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38.54 COMMUNICATIONS 38.54 101 68010 160 1101 99962 TURF STAR 22682 50.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 50.00 101 68020 250 2200 99963 FAILSAFE TESTING 22694 500.00 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 500.00 201 65200 203 99964 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 126.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.00 101 68010 220 1780 - 99965 THE INNOVATION GROUPS 23082 1,750.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,750.00 101 64560 220 99966 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.04 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.04 526 69020 210 99967 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 112.65 OFFICE EXPENSE 112.65 101 68010 110 1101 99968 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 2,958.06 OFFICE EXPENSE 13.95 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 4.70 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 26.01 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.85 101 65100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 437.10 101 65300 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 357.00 101 66210 120 SMALL TOOLS 85.52 101 65300 130 OFFICE EXPENSE -7.57 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 501.75 526 69020 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 105.51 620 66700 110 MISCELLANEOUS 1,422.24 621 64450 400 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99943 UTILITY AERIAL INC 19990 1,035.35 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,035.35 101 68020 200 2200 99944 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 99945 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 332.50 COMMUNICATIONS 332.50 621 64450 160 99946 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 66.43 OFFICE EXPENSE 86.43 101 64420 110 99947 JEFF DOWD 20779 85.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85.50 101 68010 220 1785 99948 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 885.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 885.00 101 68010 220 1330 99949 FRANK WEBER 21344 192.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 192.50 101 68010 220 1781 99950 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 108.78 COMMUNICATIONS 108.78 101 65300 160 99951 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 3,919.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3,919.00 101 64560 240 99952 DENISE LAUGESEN 21963 4,770.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,770.00 101 22546 99953 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT 21986 4,624.38 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,624.38 326 80770 210 99954 ALL PETROLEUM RECOVERY SERVICE, 22008 85.00 GAS, OIL & GREASE 85.00 201 65200 201 99955 JIM STOCKWELL 22048 852.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 852.50 101 68010 220 1781 99956 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 139.45 SUPPLIES 139.45 620 15000 99957 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 317.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 317.30 527 66520 120 99958 STEVE NELSON 22449 84.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99929 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 8.97 SMALL TOOLS 8.97 620 66700 130 99930 LINDA HOECK 16390 1,040.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,040.00 101 68010 220 1349 99931 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 1,467.10 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,467.10 527 66520 120 99932 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 89.16 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 89.16 101 65100 200 99933 COLORPRINT 17497 1,353.45 OFFICE EXPENSE 115.61 101 64250 110 MISCELLANEOUS 340.99 101 64100 115 MISC. SUPPLIES 298.95 326 80770 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 298.95 327 81010 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 298.95 526 69020 260 99934 STEVE GOLDBERG 17577 137.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 137.50 101 68010 220 1781 99935 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 235.64 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 235.64 101 65100 290 99936 HERTZ CORPORATION 18240 11,650.05 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 11,650.05 620 66700 800 99937 BAY ALARM 18854 376.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 178.50 619 64460 220 5210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198.00 619 64460 220 5190 99938 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 78.27 MISC. SUPPLIES 78.27 320 80960 120 99939 PRIORITY 1 19239 35.07 SUPPLIES 35.07 620 15000 99940 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 87.19 OFFICE EXPENSE 66.50 101 64250 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.69 620 66700 120 99941 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 1,057.42 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,057.42 625 65213 203 99942 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99923 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,474.47 MISCELLANEOUS 15.37 201 35220 000 7150 OFFICE EXPENSE 164.14 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 34.82 201 65200 111 SUPPLIES 109.07 201 65200 112 MISC. SUPPLIES 137.19 201 65200 120 COMMUNICATIONS 25.93 201 65200 160 VEHICLE MAINT. 100.00 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 8.50 201 65200 203 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 235.00 201 65200 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 175.00 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,469.45 201 65200 260 99924 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 313.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 313.45 527 66520 120 99925 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 6,516.47 OFFICE EXPENSE 894.50 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 698.05 101 65100 120 POLICE--SUPPLIES 124.43 101 65100 126 COMMUNICATIONS 285.95 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 406.40 101 65100 200 GAS, OIL & GREASE 100.88 101 65100 201 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 100.00 101 65100 210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 439.18 101 65100 220 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 253.00 101 65100 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 110.05 101 65100 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 18.13 101 65150 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,450.78 101 65100 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 41.40 101 65150 260 PRISONER EXPENSE 100.00 101 65100 291 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 25.98 101 65100 292 MISCELLANEOUS 112.58 101 65100 400 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 21.09 530 65400 140 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 94.07 530 65400 200 MISC. SUPPLIES 240.00 730 69530 120 99926 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO 13758 6,006.42 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 6,006.42 621 64450 200 99927 GWENN JONES 13824 43.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.00 101 68010 120 1661 99928 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 145.93 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 33.35 526 69020 230 MISC. SUPPLIES 112.58 619 64460 120 5150 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99914 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,963.83 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,963.83 101 65150 220 99915 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 12,111.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 599.37 101 68020 220 2300 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,512.55 320 76350 220 99916 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 94.01 MISC. SUPPLIES 94.01 619 64460 120 99917 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 - 48.71 OFFICE EXPENSE 48.71 526 69020 110 99918 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 17,754.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,754.00 201 65200 220 99919 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 2,424.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 2,424.00 101 65100 291 99920 OLE'S 09626 220.40 SUPPLIES 220.40 620 15000 99921 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 967.48 MISC. SUPPLIES -19.92 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 26.77 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 27.05 101 68020 120 2200 SMALL TOOLS 259.57 101 68020 130 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 101.97 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 165.55 526 69020 120 SMALL TOOLS 41.11 526 69020 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 37.91 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS 32.44 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES -19.93 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1.49 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 60.98 619 64460 120 5130 MISC. SUPPLIES 252.49 619 64460 120 99922 BARKER BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 09990 34.10 MISCELLANEOUS 34.10 101 64400 115 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 02/03/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Cheeks 99901 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01624 3,791.14 MISC. SUPPLIES 37.38 101 68010 120 1100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,403.40 101 68010 220 1212 MISC. SUPPLIES 350.36 730 69533 120 99902 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220 99903 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 98.12 MISCELLANEOUS 98.12 320 81100 192 99904 FEDEX 02160 225.72 OFFICE EXPENSE 18.72 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 84.93 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 84.% 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 37.11 101 64100 110 99905 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. - 02248 112.39 MISC. SUPPLIES 112.39 619 64460 120 99906 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 653.40 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 653.40 101 66210 226 99907 IRVINE 8 JACHENS INC. 02599 503.37 MISC. SUPPLIES 503.37 101 64100 120 99908 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 2,472.08 RENTS & LEASES 2,210.60 101 66210 180 MISC. SUPPLIES 177.37 619 64460 120 5130 MISC. SUPPLIES 84.11 619 64460 120 99909 P. G. & E. 03054 61,268.41 GAS & ELECTRIC 17,265.67 101 66100 170 UTILITY EXPENSE 44,002.74 896 20280 99910 DON PLAGMANN 03172 962.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 962.50 101 68010 220 1781 99911 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 49.94 MISC. SUPPLIES 49.94 619 64460 120 5130 99912 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT 03271 52,641.65 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 52,641.65 320 81070 800 99913 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 4,250.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,250.00 201 65200 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01-28-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 FUND RECAP 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 93,037.74 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 410.35 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 29,404.32 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 51,194.30 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 68,375.00 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 62,871.19 WATER FUND 526 3,038.62 SEWER FUND 527 280,820.45 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 20.10 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 174.21 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 10,313.39 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 711.88 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,204.52 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 959.38 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 3,058.31 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 489.89 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 151,360.58 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 19,784.96 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 10,930.67 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $788,159.86D,w Vvo10 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99804 THROUGH 99900 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $788,159.86, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../. ./. ................... . .. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .........................I.......... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE f CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 01/28/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99889 DHS OCP 24639 120.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 120.00 526 69020 260 99890 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 94.42 COMMUNICATIONS 94.42 101 65100 160 99891 JESS LICON 24732 100.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 100.00 101 66210 222 99892 COMPUTER & BUSINESS PRINTING 24741 479.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 479.92 101 65100 120 99893 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 17.90 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 17.90 625 65213 203 99894 BAY AREA SMART AUTO GLASS 24956 314.58 MISCELLANEOUS 314.58 618 64520 604 99895 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 87.41 TRAINING EXPENSE 87.41 101 66210 260 99896 COMERICA BANK 24970 1,194.30 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,194.30 320 80831 220 99897 MS-III CO. 25195 423.15 LIBRARY--PERIODICALS 423.15 101 67500 122 99898 BETTER ROADS 25196 24.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 24.00 101 66210 240 99899 KEN VALINOTI 25197 1,810.00 MISCELLANEOUS 810.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 99900 ADVANCED MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 25198 366.60 RADIO MAINT, 366.60 201 65200 205 TOTAL $788,159.86 _ (� 1131 � CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 01/28/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99874 SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES C 23533 - 65,900.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 65,900.00 326 80930 220 99875 PETERSON 23633 442.95 SUPPLIES 442.95 620 15000 99876 SBC/MCI 23728 8,166.41 COMMUNICATIONS 16.17 101 67500 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 8,150.24 896 20281 99877 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 99878 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 286.86 MISC. SUPPLIES 286.86 526 69020 120 99879 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 771.57 COMMUNICATIONS 771.57 201 65200 160 99880 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 23983 50,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,000.00 320 81310 220 99881 CAL CHIEF'S BOOKSTORE 23998 448.58 TRAINING EXPENSE 448.58 201 65200 260 99882 QUILL 24090 29.21 OFFICE EXPENSE 29.21 101 66100 110 99883 JOHNSON WOO 24137 417.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 417.82 619 64460 210 99884 AEP WORKSHOPS 24166 320.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 320.00 101 64420 250 99885 GEMPLERS, INC. 24196 275.80 MISCELLANEOUS -21.44 101 23611 SMALL TOOLS 297.24 101 66210 130 99886 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 576.00 MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233 99887 MARK PITRE 24472 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99888 WEST BAY STUMP REMOVAL 24482 276.25 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 276.25 526 69020 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 01/28/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99860 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION 22194 348.42 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 174.21 101 64250 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 174.21 530 65400 200 99861 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 22216 88.02 OFFICE EXPENSE 88.02 101 65100 110 99862. AUTO PRIDE CAR WASH 22278 101.35 VEHICLE MAINT.. 101.35 201 65200 202 99863 UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 22305 28,424.90 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 28,424.90 327 81010 210 99864 GERRY MURNANE 22343 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99865 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 17,994.23 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,878.43 736 64572 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,115.80 736 64571 220 99866 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22620 19,536.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,536.75 201 65200 220 99867 ALLIED IRON CO. 22855 64.63 VEHICLE MAINT. 64.63 201 65200 202 99868 THE INNOVATION GROUPS 23082 35.70 MISC. SUPPLIES 35.70 101 64150 120 99869 PITNEY BOWES 23128 548.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 548.00 621 64450 200 99870 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 80.54 OFFICE EXPENSE 80.54 101 68010 110 1101 99871 OFFICE MAX 23306 298.89 OFFICE EXPENSE -14.27 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 150.68 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 104.44 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 58.04 201 65200 110 99872 AMERICAN TRUCK AND TRAILER BODY 23381 164.27 SUPPLIES 164.27 620 15000 99873 PACE CONSULTING 23457 2,800.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,800.00 101 65100 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 01/28/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99845 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,790.73 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,790.73 736 64570 220 99846 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 411.38 COMMUNICATIONS 411.38 621 64450 160 99847 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORP. 20284 613.19 RENTS & LEASES 613.19 101 66210 180 99848 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 2,475.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,475.00 326 75170 210 99849 CCCSD 20515 170.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 170.00 101 66100 250 99850 PHIL SCOTT 20550 124.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 124.00 527 66520 250 99851 SPRINT PCS 20724 74.08 COMMUNICATIONS 35.17 101 64420 160 COMMUNICATIONS 38.91 101 64150 160 99852 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 886.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 886.38 101 66210 120 99853 MCCVB 21462 181.58 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 181.58 101 66100 250 99854 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 426.16 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 37.75 101 64350 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 37.75 101 64150 200 MISC. SUPPLIES 273.15 327 81010 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 77.51 526 69020 110 99855 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 3,200.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,200.00 101 64420 210 99856 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 9,617.58 MISCELLANEOUS 9,617.58 101 37010 99857 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 21832 199.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 199.00 101 66100 250 99858 VB GOLF LLC 21948 405.54 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 405.54 101 68010 200 1213 99859 MICHAEL GINN 21983 52.50 MISCELLANEOUS 52.50 101 36630 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 01/28/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99831 SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS 14643 135.31 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 135.31 101 68020 190 2200 99832 TEAM CLEAN 15827 219.97 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219.97 201 65200 220 99833 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 1,386.67 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,386.67 526 69020 120 99834 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 49,152.64 MISCELLANEOUS 49,152.64 101 22515 99835 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 501.00 MISCELLANEOUS 501.00 618 64520 234 99836 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 24.95 TRAINING EXPENSE 24.95 526 69020 260 99837 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 220.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 220.00 101 64420 121 99838 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,189.78 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 281.58 101 66210 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 290.38 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 281.57 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 20.10 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 118.85 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 197.30 620 66700 140 99839 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 48.47 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.47 101 66100 120 99840 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 9,307.81 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,307.81 618 64520 210 99841 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 264.93 MISC. SUPPLIES 264.93 201 65200 111 99842 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 474.13 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 195.14 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 278.99 625 65213 203 99843 MARY ASTURIAS 19648 450.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 450.00 101 64250 250 99844 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT INC 19697 198.67 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 198.67 101 68020 200 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 01/28/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99817 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 400.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 400.00 620 66700 260 99818 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 151,360.58 MISCELLANEOUS 151,360.58 731 22587 99819 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 03483 37,407.25 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 37,407.25 527 66530 270 99820 FRANK TEALDI 03743 251.44 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 251.44 130 20060 99821 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 300.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 300.00 101 65100 260 99822 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 379.69 PRISONER EXPENSE 158.91 101 65100 291 SUPPLIES 220.78 201 65200 112 99823 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 190.00 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 190.00 618 64520 601 99824 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 270.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 270.00 201 65200 220 99825 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 695.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 695.78 201 65200 111 99826 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 2,874,66 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 113.24 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,761.42 625 65213 203 99827 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 2,995.79 MISCELLANEOUS 2,995.79 527 66520 400 99828 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 11707 790.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 28.00 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 75.00 101 67500 120 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 676.00 101 67500 129 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 11.00 101 67500 190 99829 BOETHING TREELAND FARMS, INC. 13743 _ 489.89 MISC. SUPPLIES 489.89 730 69560 120 99830 3M COMPANY 13848 334.49 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 334.49 101 66210 222 C CITY OF BURLINGAME W R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 01/28/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99804 '" STATE OF CALIFORNIA 23460 158.91 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 158.91 130 21025 99805 BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 01190 13,778.94 LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 736.37 101 67500 124 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 13,042.57 101 67500 129 99806 SAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 76.96 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 76.96 201 65200 203 99807 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 335.00 RECREATION EXPENSES 335.00 101 10700 99808 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01745 500.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 500.00 101 66100 250 99809 VEOLIA WATER 02110 274,184.98 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 34,173.14 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 5,250.99 527 66530 190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,473.00 527 66530 220 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 35,287.85 527 66530 800 99810 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 128.41 MISCELLANEOUS 128.41 101 68020 192 2200 99811 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 2,780.43 MISCELLANEOUS 2,780.43 896 20282 99812 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 319.35 MISC. SUPPLIES 144.14 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 58.01 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 117.20 619 64460 120 5150 99813 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 392.30 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 147.08 101 66210 129 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 245.22 101 66210 226 99814 RONDA CAINE ALCANTARA 02873 45.95 COMMUNICATIONS 45.95 101 65100 160 99815 SBC 03080 154.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 52.15 101 65100 110 COMMUNICATIONS 102.12 101 65100 160 99816 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 8,083.91 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,083.91 101 66100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,000.00 201 65200 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01-20-2005 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 13 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 93,859.88 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 7,957.14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 105,625.18 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 123,760.94 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 298,557.28 WATER FUND 526 17,945.95 SEWER FUND 527 42,932.88 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,883.00 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,060.02 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 14,961.77 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,355.03 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 315.42 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 28,678.98 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,491.15 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,038.53 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,837.73 STATE GRANTS FUND 734 1,789.31 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 684.90 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8748,735.09 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 13 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99666 THROUGH 99803 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8748,735.09, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE ► 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 12 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 99802 CHESTER WILLIAMS RICE 25193 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99803 GREEN BANKER 25194 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 TOTAL 4748,735.09 vt 1p� CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99786 DRAIN PATROL 24985 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99787 PLAY WELL TEKNOLOGIES 25013 4,048.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,048.00 101 68010 220 1349 99788 L.J. KRUSE 25131 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99789 OAKSTONE CONSTRUCTION 25153 2,400.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,400.00 101 22546 99790 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. 25180 619.04 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 619.04 101 65100 220 99791 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. 25181 3,249.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,249.63 101 65100 220 99792 CHARLOTTE VI 25182 115.33 MISCELLANEOUS 115.33 526 22502 99793 D&L FOUNDRY 25184 746.93 MISC. SUPPLIES 746.93 527 66520 120 99794 BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL INC. 25185 5,068.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 5,068.27 201 65200 110 99795 DAVID JAMSHIDNEJAD 25186 1,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,000.00 101 22520 99796 606 BLANCHARD 25187 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99797 THE ZEKA GROUP INC. 25188 1,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,000.00 101 22520 99798 CAMBRIA ENVIRONMENTAL TECH 25189 2,300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,300.00 101 22520 99799 ABOUT PLUMBING 25190 150.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520 99800 ERNIE SODEN 25191 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 99801 S&R SPORT 25192 153.46 MISC. SUPPLIES 153.46 101 68010 120 1114 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99779 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 5,873.10 OFFICE EXPENSE 604.04 101 65100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 20.38 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 142.54 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 117.14 101 64420 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 121.33 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 194.99 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 506.00 101 68010 120 1423 MISC. SUPPLIES 44.87 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.37 101 64100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 631.17 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 225.00 101 69537 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 129.58 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 654.11 101 68010 120 1422 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 21.23 101 64420 121 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 80.44 101 67500 129 SMALL TOOLS 303.88 101 68020 130 2200 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 272.19 101 64420 150 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 389.34 101 67500 200 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 58.30 101 64150 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 517.70 101 64150 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 194.45 101 64420 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 25.00 101 67500 251 STAFF & MEETINGS 34.00 101 67500 252 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 75.64 101 64100 290 OFFICE EXPENSE 264.74 526 69020 110 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 205.20 527 66520 250 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 19.47 530 65400 200 99780 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 1,399.56 MISC. SUPPLIES 122.10 730 69533 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 137.65 730 69583 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,139.81 734 65195 120 99781 AD CLUB 24809 836.69 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 836.69 101 64420 150 99782 LAURETTA PRINTING & COPY CENTER 24908 623.88 MISCELLANEOUS 623.88 101 64400 115 99783 CAPORICCI & LARSON 24920 7,115.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,115.00 101 64560 210 99784 PLAZA GOURMET 24928 176.25 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 176.25 101 64420 250 99785 BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY 24943 11,419.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 11,419.00 526 69020 240 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99772 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 5,519.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,519.00 326 80950 210 99773 SWRCB FEES 24588 40,868.00 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 7,406.00 527 66520 270 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 33,462.00 527 66530 270 99774 JOHN BOLOGNA 24628 294.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 294.00 101 68010 220 1780 99775 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 252.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1780 99776 GOODIN,MACBRIDE,SOUERI,RITCHIE & 24638 137.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 137.50 101 64350 210 99777 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 75.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 619 64460 220 5120 99778 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 578.10 MISCELLANEOUS 578.10 101 64420 030 l 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99759 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 1,568.65 BANKING SERVICE FEES 528.10 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,040.55 530 65400 120 99760 UBS 23951 1,637.67 MISC. SUPPLIES 118.53 101 68010 120 1114 MISC. SUPPLIES 143.90 101 68010 120 1112 MISC. SUPPLIES 729.24 101 68010 120 1111 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 175.00 619 64460 220 5150 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 471.00 619 64460 220 5130 99761 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 730 69533 220 99762 CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE 24030 66.71 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 66.71 201 65200 200 99763 KIERAN WOODS 24058 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99764 QUILL 24090 258.50 OFFICE EXPENSE 258.50 621 64450 110 99765 NOR CAL SIGNS 24152 335.58 MISC. SUPPLIES 167.79 101 68010 120 1422 MISC. SUPPLIES 167.79 730 69533 120 99766 FLORA ROBELET 24167 40.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 101 68010 220 1521 99767 DOUG BELL 24189 89.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 27.54 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 62.21 320 80900 210 99768 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,134.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,134.00 101 68010 120 1644 99769 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 343.13 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 343.13 101 68010 220 1661 99770 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 2,902.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,902.50 101 68010 220 1661 99771 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 276,013.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 276,013.00 327 79480 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99748 OFFICE MAX 23306 630.23 OFFICE EXPENSE 36.50 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 349.51 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 117.06 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 127.16 201 65200 110 99749 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 3,569.88 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 3,569.88 101 68010 200 1286 99750 DATASAFE 23410 82.65 OFFICE EXPENSE 31.90 101 66100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 50.75 101 64350 120 99751 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105.00 MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518 99752 IBM CORPORATION 23425 303.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 303.00 101 65300 120 99753 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200 99754 ZEIGER ENGINEERS 23450 1,740.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,740.00 320 81060 220 99755 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 94,619.43 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 28,902.71 326 81190 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 30,255.39 326 81200 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 14,281.42 326 81190 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 18,159.18 326 73171 210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,020.73 526 69020 220 99756 NORCAL MUNICIPAL PERSONNEL MANAG 23861 75.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 75.00 101 64420 260 99757 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5150 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5160 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5180 99758 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 - 1,904.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,840.00 101 23620 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A.N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99734 CUTTERS EDGE 22407 38.17 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 38.17 201 65200 203 99735 STEVE NELSON 22449 84.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780 99736 CUMMUTER CHECK CORP-SF BAY AREA 22485 42.00 MISCELLANEOUS 42.00 101 15400 99737 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 520.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 520.00 896 20281 99738 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 252.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1780 99739 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 516.99 MISCELLANEOUS 516.99 526 69020 233 99740 CALFEST 22809 375.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 375.00 101 68010 250 1101 99741 JENKINS/ATHENS INS 22851 9,184.00 CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,184.00 618 64520 225 99742 BAY AREA LIGHTS AND SIRENS 23083 337.50 RADIO MAINT. 337.50 201 65200 205 99743 WING TAM 23109 3,160.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,160.00 101 22520 99744 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 49.00 COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 201 65200 160 99745 NADINE RONSON 23195 317.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 317.63 101 68010 220 1661 99746 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 6,720.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,881.60 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,620.80 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,217.60 327 79400 210 99747 ALLIANCE GAS PRODUCTS 23245 37.32 GAS, OIL & GREASE 37.32 201 65200 201 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99720 CONTROL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. 20421 61,596.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 17,246.88 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 24,022.44 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 20,326.68 327 79400 210 99721 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 70.82 OFFICE EXPENSE 70.82 101 64420 110 99722 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 2,096.37 DEPOSIT REFUND 2,096.37 101 22590 99723 J. SNELL & CO., INC. 20571 232.31 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 232.31 101 68010 220 1101 99724 JEFF DOWD 20779 313.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 313.50 101 68010 220 1785 99725 FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA, INC. 20967 103.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.92 101 65100 220 99726 MELANIE MARANI 21132 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1331 99727 CIR 21211 226.10 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 226.10 527 66520 220 99728 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 221.64 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221.64 619 64460 220 5130 99729 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 1,638.75 TRAINING EXPENSE 491.63 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 491.63 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 491.61 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 163.88 619 64460 260 99730 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 160.83 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.83 621 64450 190 99731 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 21,311.00 MISCELLANEOUS 21,311.00 101 37010 99732 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 674.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 674.80 526 69020 120 99733 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 68,290.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 68,290.00 320 80520 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99705 KELLEHER & ASSOCIATES 18239 5,142.03 PROFESSIONAL& SPECIALIZED S 5,142.03 618 64520 210 99706 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 18713 1,110.99 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,110.99 730 69560 120 99707 LYNNE FIRESTONE 18746 602.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 602.00 101 68010 220 1331 99708 DEAN'S AUTO BODY & 18795 635.74 MISCELLANEOUS 635.74 618 64520 604 99709 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 77.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 77.45 320 80900 120 99710 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 176.65 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 176.65 625 65213 203 99711 WILSEY & HAM 19397 1,650.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,650.00 320 80520 210 99712 WINGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 19471 450.00 MISCELLANEOUS 450.00 101 22525 99713 WESTERN STAR NURSERIES 19865 810.03 MISCELLANEOUS 810.03 731 22560 99714 DAVID F. O'KEEFE 19905 773.68 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 773.68 101 68020 190 2200 99715 WILLIAM ROMAN PE 19989 500.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 500.00 101 22520 99716 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 1,239.35 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,239.35 101 68010 120 1423 99717 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75 OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101 99718 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 310.00 COMMUNICATIONS 310.00 621 64450 160 99719 CENTRAL GARDEN CENTER 20300 573.05 MISC. SUPPLIES 573.05 101 68020 120 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99693 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 362.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.06 101 65100 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 151.54 201 65200 190 VEHICLE MAINT. 41.12 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 118.66 201 65200 203 99694 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 1,790.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220 MISCELLANEOUS 649.50 320 80250 400 MISCELLANEOUS 649.50 734 65195 400 99695 CAL-STEAM 10557 1,386.50 MISCELLANEOUS 60.01 101 68020 192 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 365.36 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 350.31 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 316.43 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 290.92 619 64460 120 5210 MISC. SUPPLIES 3.47 619 64460 120 5150 99696 DOROTHY O'GRADY 11020 351.81 MISC. SUPPLIES 351.81 101 66210 120 99697 WINGF00T COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,290.05 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,290.05 625 65213 203 99698 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 107.26 OFFICE EXPENSE 67.00 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.26 527 66520 120 99699 DAY-TIMERS, INC. 14411 28.12 SMALL TOOLS 28.12 527 66520 130 99700 RECHARGE-EM 14523 120.16 OFFICE EXPENSE 120.16 201 65200 110 99701 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 1,727.70 MISCELLANEOUS 1,727.70 731 22594 99702 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 675.47 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 675.47 101 68020 140 2200 99703 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 17224 91.66 MISC. SUPPLIES 91.66 619 64460 120 5130 99704 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING 17534 634.80 OFFICE EXPENSE 634.80 320 80960 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99680 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 02880 1,025.42 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,025.42 526 69020 120 99681 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23 GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170 99682 SBC 03080 200.86 COMMUNICATIONS 35.96 101 67500 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 164.90 896 20281 99683 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 424.52 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 84.65 201 65200 203 SUPPLIES 315.42 620 15000 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 24.45 625 65213 203 99684 SANDRA POBE 03175 2,095.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 535.50 101 68010 120 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,560.00 101 68010 220 1644 99685 MARGARET PRENDERGAST 03179 1,167.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,167.75 101 68010 220 1641 99686 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 11,912.48 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,912.48 320 76350 220 99687 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 414.23 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 414.23 101 64350 210 99688 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 240.89 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 240.89 101 68020 220 2200 99689 CALIFORNIA FIRE MECHANICS ACAD. 09187 750.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 750.00 201 65200 260 99690 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 890.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 890.00 320 80831 210 99691 OCE 09493 857.34 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210 99692 MARGARET KRAMER 09612 3,160.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,160.50 101 68010 220 1661 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 01/20/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99666 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 117.67 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 117.67 101 68020 190 2200 99667 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 165.53 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 165.53 201 65200 203 99668 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 68.95 MISC. SUPPLIES 68.95 101 66210 120 99669 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01624 2,150.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 250.00 101 68010 120 1423 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,600.00 101 68010 220 1212 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22548 99670 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 282.29 OFFICE EXPENSE 135.69 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 75.73 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 10.83 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 38.24 101 68020 110 2200 MISC, SUPPLIES 21.80 101 68020 120 2200 99671 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 25,389.50 COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 25,089.50 621 64450 220 99672 COMPUTER TECHNICIANS, INC., 01987 987.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 987.00 621 64450 200 99673 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 261.74 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 261.74 201 65200 140 99674 GENE EVANS 02149 99.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.75 101 68010 220 1644 99675 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 562.72 MISCELLANEOUS 562.72 320 81100 192 99676 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 1,883.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,883.00 528 66600 210 99677 HEWLETT PACKARD 02457 2,142.30 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,142.30 101 65100 220 99678 IRVINE & JACHENS INC. 02599 48.61 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 48.61 201 65200 140 99679 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 432.46 MISC. SUPPLIES 432.46 619 64460 120 5120 r ! � CITY OF BURLINGAME 01 -13-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 9 FUND RECAP 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 103,686.07 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,290.23 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 5,848.70 WATER FUND 526 2,957.74 SEWER FUND 527 5,478.02 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5, 147.28 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 26.95 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND ' 619 15,710.84 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 14,621 .20 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 11263.56 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 50,479. 15 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 282.21 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $208,791 .95 � 50,00� Vo ID wig HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99565 THROUGH 99665 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $208,791 .95, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99662 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 776.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 776.25 101 68010 220 1644 99663 SUSAN WASSERMAN 25177 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99664 JOHN PAROLA 25178 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99665 SESAC 25179 441.00 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 441.00 101 68010 240 1101 TOTAL $208,791.95 �y�o� CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 99647 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 135.83 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 135.83 619 64460 210 5180 99648 SHIELDS,HARPER & CO. 24597 184.50 SUPPLIES 184.50 620 15000 99649 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER, INC. 24637 3,486.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,486.00 101 68010 220 1372 99650 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 282.21 UTILITY EXPENSE 282.21 896 20281 99651 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 382.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 382.50 619 64460 210 5120 99652 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 24700 372.04 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 372.04 101 65100 220 99653 JENNIFER VARNI 24798 634.00 MISCELLANEOUS 634.00 101 22546 99654 MARY PIAZZA 24807 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661 99655 T MOBILE 24846 30.88 COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160 99656 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 212.18 TRAINING EXPENSE 212.18 527 66520 260 99657 CENVEO 25003 118.70 OFFICE EXPENSE 118.70 101 68010 110 1101 99658 WESCO GRAPHICS INC 25007 4,225.20 MISCELLANEOUS 4,225.20 101 68010 115 1101 99659 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 669.32 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 438.02 101 65150 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 231.30 201 65200 220 99660 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 1,193.75 MISCELLANEOUS -818.75 101 39800 MISCELLANEOUS 2,012.50 731 22556 99661 JAMES MURPHY 25080 423.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 423.75 101 68010 220 1661 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 99634 VENTURE BUILDERS 23824 1,830.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,830.00 101 22546 99635 CHERINICHOL 23901 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661 99636 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 2,530.00 RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 2,530.00 527 66520 218 99637 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 13,629.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,195.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 619 64460 220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,036.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,671.00 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,836.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 397.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 855.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 964.00 619 64460 220 5210 99638 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 509.16 COMMUNICATIONS 218.72 101 68020 160 2200 COMMUNICATIONS 290.44 619 64460 160 99639 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 99640 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 364.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 364.00 101 68010 220 1521 99641 JESUS NAVA 24204 1,047.82 MISCELLANEOUS 1,047.82 101 64250 031 99642 PERRY WU 24268 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 99643 FASTLANE TEX INC. 24304 800.00 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 800.00 526 69020 290 99644 THE GALLERY COLLECTION 24398 98.00 MISCELLANEOUS -7.18 526 23611 OFFICE EXPENSE 105.18 526 69020 110 99645 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 247.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 247.50 101 68010 220 1644 99646 ASCAP 24470 268.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 268.00 101 68010 240 1101 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S. T E R PAGE 5 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99622 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 2.05 SUPPLIES 2.05 620 15000 99623 JOHN FUNGHI 22347 2,272.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,272.00 101 22520 99624 ANZA ENGINEERING 22634 54,731.00 DITCH & CREEK CLEANING EXPEN 54,731.00 101 66210 223 99625 MIKE COFFEY 23009 90.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 90.00 101 64100 250 99626 PENINSULA BATTERY INC. 23045 450.30 SUPPLIES 450.30 620 15000 99627 OFFICE MAX 23306 253.90 OFFICE EXPENSE 18.86 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 111.55 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 123.49 621 64450 110 99628 DATASAFE 23410 169.64 OFFICE EXPENSE 37.30 101 64200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 101.54 101 64350 120 BANKING SERVICE FEES 30.80 101 64250 120 99629 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 23424 239.36 COMMUNICATIONS 239.36 526 69020 160 99630 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 92.01 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.42 101 66210 120 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 40.59 101 66210 226 99631 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 964.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 46.33 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 458.93 619 64460 120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 459.04 619 64460 210 5170 99632 AT&T 23661 24.96 COMMUNICATIONS 24.96 621 64450 160 99633 KEITH MARTIN 23788 128.73 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 14.62 101 66210 250 OFFICE EXPENSE 92.77 526 69020 110 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 7.00 526 69020 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 7.05 619 64460 250 SUPPLIES 4.29 620 15000 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3.00 620 66700 250 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99607 D J DOWLING 19368 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99608 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 5,147.28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,147.28 528 66600 210 99609 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220 99610 BURLINGAME LIB. FOUNDATION 20561 750.63 MISCELLANEOUS 36.50 101 36320 MISCELLANEOUS 714.13 731 22551 99611 FERMA CORP. 20568 85.00 MISCELLANEOUS 85.00 526 22502 99612 SPRINT PCS 20724 72.34 COMMUNICATIONS 38.71 101 64150 160 COMMUNICATIONS 33.63 101 64420 160 99613 H.V. CARTER CO., INC. 20876 7.34 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 7.34 101 68020 200 2200 99614 K-119 OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 20924 62.95 MISC. SUPPLIES 62.95 101 68020 120 2200 99615 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 526.25 MISC. SUPPLIES 526.25 527 66520 120 99616 CIR 21211 852.12 MISC. SUPPLIES 852.12 527 66520 120 99617 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 1,056.72 OFFICE EXPENSE 91.61 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 965.11 621 64450 110 99618 MIKE JALILIE 21589 2,407.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,407.00 101 22546 99619 HILLYARD 21658 454.65 MISC. SUPPLIES 454.65 101 68020 120 2200 99620 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 923.74 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 923.74 101 66210 222 99621 AT&T 22138 103.54 COMMUNICATIONS 103.54 101 68010 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99592 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 86.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 86.60 620 66700 120 99593 DHL EXPRESS 14958 26.95 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 26.95 530 65400 200 99594 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 60.34 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 43.13 101 68020 190 2200 VEHICLE MAINT. 17.21 101 65200 202 99595 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 9,863.47 SUPPLIES 9,863.47 620 15000 99596 SUPERIOR ALUMINUM BODY CORP. 16229 1,035.94 SUPPLIES 1,035.94 620 15000 99597 STEVE'S CHRISTMAS TREES 16767 678.82 MISCELLANEOUS 678.82 526 22502 99598 BROADWAY BUSINESS 16849 1,087.50 MISCELLANEOUS 1,087.50 731 22555 99599 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16919 1,098.90 SUPPLIES 1,098.90 620 15000 99600 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 16.04 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.04 526 69020 120 99601 COLORPRINT 17497 86.06 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 86.06 101 64560 210 99602 PACE GLASS COMPANY 17937 118.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 118.80 101 68020 120 2100 99603 O'GRADY PAVING 18184 5,848.70 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,848.70 320 80831 220 99604 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 66.40 COMMUNICATIONS 39.84 526 69020 160 COMMUNICATIONS 26.56 527 66520 160 99605 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 327.19 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 327.19 101 64200 150 99606 SIX FLAGS MARINE WORLD 19119 2,640.64 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,640.64 101 68010 220 1212 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99579 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 52.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.85 101 64350 120 99580 STATE OF CA/CONSERVATION DEPT 09073 1,108.64 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,108.64 731 22520 99581 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 818.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 129.90 101 68020 120 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 364.05 101 66210 219 MISC. SUPPLIES 162.52 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 162.38 527 66520 120 99582 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210 99583 NOEL L. MILLER, INC, 09499 260.00 VEHICLE MAINT. 130.00 201 65200 202 SUPPLIES 130.00 620 15000 99584 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 554.14 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 220.02 101 68020 200 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 334.12 526 69020 120 99585 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 631.10 MISC. SUPPLIES 143.97 101 66210 120 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 340.99 101 66210 222 TRAINING EXPENSE 146.14 526 69020 260 99586 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 3,612.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,612.00 101 68010 220 1644 99587 3 T EQUIPMENT CO. 10077 430.94 MISC. SUPPLIES 430.94 527 66520 120 99588 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 2,650.11 RADIO MAINT. 2,650.11 201 65200 205 99589 DOROTHY O'GRADY 11020 140.73 MISC. SUPPLIES 140.73 526 69020 120 99590 STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 11637 450.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 450.00 101 64350 240 99591 BURLINGAME LIBRARY 14228 303.00 MISCELLANEOUS 36.50 101 36320 MISCELLANEOUS 266.50 731 22552 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 01/13/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99565 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 84.22 MISC. SUPPLIES 44.87 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.35 619 64460 120 5120 99566 BURLINGAME ELEM. SCHOOL DIST. 01500 27,253.58 SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 27,253.58 731 22563 99567 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 2,106.00. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,106.00 101 68010 220 1644 99568 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTS, INC., 01992 725.28 MISC. SUPPLIES 725.28 527 66520 120 99569 FEDEX 02160 143.53 OFFICE EXPENSE 67.77 101 64420 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.71 101 64400 120 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 59.05 101 64560 290 99570 N.N. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 117.40 TRAINING EXPENSE 117.40 526 69020 260 99571 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 196.15 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 196.15 101 66210 226 99572 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 217.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 143.11 619 64460 120 5150 MISC. SUPPLIES 74.39 619 64460 120 5180 99573 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 595.06 MISC. SUPPLIES 72.99 101 66210 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 459.30 101 68020 190 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 50.46 201 65200 190 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.31 527 66520 120 99574 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 7,779.57 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,779.57 101 66100 220 99575 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 18,036.30 SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 18,036.30 731 22562 99576 SNAP ON TOOLS 03587 1,762.15 SMALL TOOLS 1,762.15 620 66700 130 99577 TAP PLASTICS 03739 103.92 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 103.92 101 68020 190 2200 99578 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 150.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 150.00 621 64450 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01-06-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 FUND RECAP 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 84,503.92 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 18,520.64 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 10,729.89 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 441.38 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 6,052.62 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 11,276.50 WATER FUND 526 186,803.41 SEWER FUND 527 1,957.00 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 2,622.50 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 17.97 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 9,761.15 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 4,813.26 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,606.34 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 22.21 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 240.60 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 4,185.47 DEBT SERVICE FUND 930 3,450.30 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $347,005.16 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99438 THROUGH 99536 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $347,005.16, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../.... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G 1 S T E R PAGE 7 01/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99521 HAWK SOLUTIONS 25161 1,247.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,247.40 101 68010 220 1372 99522 SUTTER HEALTH iJ WORK 25162 100.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 100.00 101 30700 99523 JASON ISSA 25163 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99524 BERMAN MOVING AND STORAGE 25164 420.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 420.00 201 65200 200 99525 KAUSHIK BHAUMIK 25165 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 99526 MICHAEL GONG 25166 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 99527 JACOB NGUYEN 25167 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22525 99528 KENDRICK LI 25168 250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22525 99529 JOHN AILAND 25169 29.15 MISCELLANEOUS 29.15 526 22502 99530 DRAIN BUSTERS 25170 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99531 JAMES BABCOCK 25171 29.50 MISCELLANEOUS 29.50 526 22502 99532 GARY VIELBAUM 25172 1,450.00 MISCELLANEOUS 850.00 101 36630 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 101 22525 99533 CCAPA 25173 25.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 25.00 101 64400 120 99534 SEA CONSTRUCTION 25174 1,200.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,200.00 101 22520 99535 MERIT CONSTRUCTION 25175 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99536 THE COBBLER 25176 4,492.43 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 4,492.43 201 65200 140 TOTAL $347,005.16 ,/�� CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 01/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99506 THE BERKELEY CHESS SCHOOL 24287 2,541.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,541.00 101 68010 220 1349 99507 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 3,705.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,705.00 130 20016 99508 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00 UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080 99509 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 160.00 MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 130 20024 99510 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 580.00 MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 130 20024 99511 C.L.E.A. 24523 682.50 MISCELLANEOUS 682.50 130 20026 99512 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 476.00 UNION DUES 476.00 130 21091 99513 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6.96 130 21015 MISCELLANEOUS 313.64 130 21092 99514 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 333.22 COMMUNICATIONS 333.22 101 65100 160 99515 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 275.28 COMMUNICATIONS 275.28 101 66100 160 99516 W.L. BUTLER 24697 10,400.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 10,400.00 101 22520 99517 AETNA 24760 2,875.61 MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,604.31 130 20022 99518 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 3,554.82 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,554.82 130 20014 99519 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,222.11 MISCELLANEOUS 1,031.90 130 20025 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,190.21 130 20021 99520 AD CLUB 24809 150.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 150.00 101 64420 150 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 01/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT "' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99492 OFFICE MAX 23306 887.33 OFFICE EXPENSE 539.77 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 221.87 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 20.99 10166100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE -81.62 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 186.32 101 66100 110 99493 BANK OF NEW YORK 23553 3,450.30 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 3,450.30 930 66850 763 99494 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 11,154.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,154.50 327 81150 210 99495 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,622.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,622.50 528 66600 210 99496 SBC/MCI 23728 22.21 COMMUNICATIONS 22.21 621 64450 160 99497 SFPUC WATER DUALITY BUREAU 23846 2,915.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,915.00 526 69020 233 99498 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 140.00 619 64460 210 5180 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 40.00 619 64460 210 5120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 110.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 140.00 619 64460 210 5110 99499 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 285.74 COMMUNICATIONS 285.74 101 68020 160 2200 99500 UBS 23951 409.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 409.88 619 64460 220 5110 99501 PRESTON PIPELINES 23974 3,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,000.00 101 22520 99502 KIERAN WOODS 24058 4,724.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,724.00 -101 22546 99503 SPANGLE ASSOCIATES 24113 4,262.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 4,262.00 101 22590 99504 DOUG BELL 24189 136.63 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 136.63 320 79400 210 99505 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS 24247 451.30 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 451.30 201 65200 203 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R EG I S T E R PAGE 4 01/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99481 HILLYARD 21658 530.97 MISC. SUPPLIES 530.97 101 68020 120 2200 99482 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 104.22 COMMUNICATIONS 104.22 101 65300 160 99483 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 22216 158.83 OFFICE EXPENSE 25.92 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 61.67 101 65100 120 COMMUNICATIONS 71.24 101 65100 160 99484 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 977.50 MISCELLANEOUS 977.50 201 35220 000 7100 99485 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38.36 COMMUNICATIONS 38.36 101 68010 160 1101 99486 MILLER DEVELOPMENT 22629 10,716.00 MISCELLANEOUS 10,716.00 101 22546 99487 TURF STAR 22682 159.68 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 159.68 101 68020 200 2200 99488 JIM NANTELL 22762 1,956.64 MISCELLANEOUS 786.00 101 64150 031 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.00 101 64150 120 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 51.80 101 64150 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 310.02 101 64150 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 792.82 101 69537 250 99489 PENINSULA FORD OF SAN BRUNO 22894 225.74 VEHICLE MAINT. 225.74 201 65200 202 99490 WEST COAST TURF 23069 389.70 MISC. SUPPLIES 389.70 101 68020 120 2200 99491 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.04 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.04 526 69020 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 01/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 99466 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 753.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 753.60 101 64400 120 99467 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 20.69 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.69 620 66700 120 99468 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 74.63 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 74.63 201 65200 203 99469 WINGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 19471 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 731 22525 99470 GETTLER RYAN INC 19641 2,400.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,400.00 101 22520 99471 A.D. TROYER AND ASSOC. 19685 2,490.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,490.00 619 64460 210 5240 99472 REDWOOD CITY-SAN MATEO COUNTY 19698 435.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 435.00 101 64100 250 99473 MONICA OLSEN 19832 144.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 144.00 101 68010 220 1661 99474 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 4,036.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 122.00 327 81010 120 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 99475 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 589.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 589.75 101 68010 120 1521 99476 PACIFIC COAST TRANE SERVICE 20818 950.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 950.00 619 64460 210 5120 99477 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 6,052.62 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6,052.62 326 75170 800 99478 CEO 21210 83.89 MISC, SUPPLIES 83.89 101 64350 120 99479 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 151.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 151.00 101 64400 120 99480 MONICA EHLERS 21627 229.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 229.50 101 68010 220 1661 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 01/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99452 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 92.66 MISC. SUPPLIES 92.66 619 64460 120 99453 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 3,049.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 287.49 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 354.03 201 65200 120 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 110.52 201 65200 203 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 215.00 201 65200 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 98.93 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,874.41 201 65200 260 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 108.92 625 65213 203 99454 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 86.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 86.60 620 66700 120 99455 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 147.59 MISC. SUPPLIES 147.59 619 64460 120 5140 99456 DHL EXPRESS 14958 17.97 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 17.97 530 65400 200 99457 IZMIRIAN ROOFING 15573 227.33 MISCELLANEOUS 227.33 618 64520 604 99458 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,435.47 MISCELLANEOUS 3,435.47 731 22594 99459 COSTCO WHOLESALE 17465 275.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 275.00 101 68010 240 1101 99460 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 553.00 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 553.00 201 65200 203 99461 SELF INSURANCE PLANS 18051 9,533.82 CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,533.82 618 64520 225 99462 GCS SERVICE, INC 18250 168.46 SUPPLIES 168.46 620 15000 99463 RUHIYYIH MAGHZI 18334 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99464 TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH 18419 880.00 MISCELLANEOUS 880.00 130 20018 99465 PENINSULA CONFLICT 18633 7,262.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,262.50 101 64560 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 01/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 99438 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 390.62 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 390.62 201 65200 203 99439 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1,666.56 SMALL TOOLS 11.36 201 65200 130 VEHICLE MAINT. 12.97 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 179.96 201 65200 203 SUPPLIES 1,330.59 620 15000 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 131.68 625 65213 203 99440 BURLINGAME GARDEN CENTER 01559 366.47 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 366.47 101 67500 190 99441 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220 99442 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 613.00 RECREATION EXPENSES 613.00 101 10700 99443 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION 01726 130.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 101 68010 240 1100 99444 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 304.75 MISCELLANEOUS 304.75 320 80110 192 99445 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 491.70 MISC. SUPPLIES 467.80 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.90 619 64460 120 5130 99446 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 944.27 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 944.27 101 66210 226 99447 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 269.23 MISC. SUPPLIES 269.23 619 64460 120 99448 P. G. & E. 03054 16,840.28 GAS & ELECTRIC 16,840.28 101 66100 170 99449 SBC 03080 52.03 COMMUNICATIONS 52.03 101 65100 160 99450 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 181,680.72 WATER PURCHASES 181,680.72 526 69020 171 99451 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,963.83 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,963.83 101 65150 220 BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY Burlingame Public Library Board of Trustees Minutes . January 11 , 2005 I. Call to Order President Herman called the meeting to order at 4 : 30pm. II. Roll Call Trustees Present: David Carr, Mary Herman, Katie McCormack, Carol Rossi and Pat Toft Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian Sidney Poland, Recorder III . Warrants and Special Funds The Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants. M / S/ C (Carr/ Rossi), IV. Minutes The Trustees unanimously approved the minutes of the November 16, 2004 meeting. M / S / C (Carr/Toft) V. Correspondence and Attachments Correspondence and Attachments were noted. Item 5e: Budget Document and Item 5h. Art in Public Places Policy were moved to Item 7 Reports and Item 8 Unfinished Business for discussion. VI. From the Floor None VII . Reports A. City Librarian's Report Highlights of Report 1 . New Library Directors - Vickey Johnson is the new County Librarian; Ben Ocon will be the City Librarian at San Mateo Library. KG Ouye will remain on staff at San Mateo to oversee the construction of the'new library. 2 . Employee Appreciation Event - Attendance at this event was the highest since the tradition of honoring the staff at a special awards dinner began. Employee achievements awards were given to Karen Kott, Dan Alvarez and Ann Langendorf. Trustee McCormack mentioned that a suggestion had been made to her in regards to moving the event to Friday night. The City Librarian noted that the staff could be polled by e-mail. 48o Primrose Road • Burlingame • CA 94010-4o83 Phone (650) 558-7474 ' Fax (650) 342-6295 3. New Integrated Library System - Integrated Interfaces has been designated by PLS to replace our present Dynix system. Training of staff is scheduled to take 6 months with July 1st being the target date to have the system operating at public desks. Staff will train the public on the necessary operational procedures that pertain to their usage. B. Foundation Report 1. Wish List - The City Librarian noted that a new projector in the Lane Room and the rebuilding and future development of the Library's collection are the most necessary items for the Foundation to consider funding. 2. Foundation Board Members - Don Roberts and Stephanie Lucas will leave the Board effective as of the January 13th annual meeting. Officers for the year 2005 are as follows: Kris Cannon, President; Stephen Hamilton, First Vice-President; Jim Cannon, Second Vice President; Lauren Rosen, Secretary and Mary Blythe, Treasurer. 3. Development Committee - The Development Committee met November 18th to discuss future fund raising programs and a possible membership drive. C. Budget Status - 1. Shortfall - At present, the City Manager believes that the budget shortfall will be in the range of$ 1.1 M which will result in the implementation of Tier 4 cuts. 2. Library Losses - Library cuts will be mostly operational such as loss of adult programming, further depletion of the periodical collection and perhaps discontinuing the Literacy Program. Losing the benefited full time position in Technical Services is also a possibility. 3. Trustee Funding - Trustee Herman suggested that the Trustees consider funding the Library's portion of the Literacy Program at a total cost of$8,000 per year. Cost of program is based on cost per learner which is $750. VIII. Unfinished Business - Public Art Acceptance - Location Toft/McCormack - With the adoption of the Public Art Policy by the City Council on December 6, 2004, the Trustees began to implement the approval process for acceptance of the bronze statue which the friends of Gloria Barton wish to present to the library. A. Motion I - Trustee McCormack made a four part motion to initiate the acceptance of the statue. M/S/C (McCormack/Toft) 1. Begin process of accepting statue by reviewing the application and criteria at the February 15th Trustees meeting. Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2 January 11,2004 2. Begin the required review period for the art object immediately to allow for the required 30 day review period. 3. Make arrangements to hold a public hearing at the March 15, 2005 Trustees meeting. 4. Direct library staff to notice the date and time of the public hearing in a local newspaper at least 15 days prior to the public hearing. B. Motion II - Trustee McCormack made a motion for the Trustees to appoint a sub-committee which would recommend the location for the statue. M/S/C (McCormack/Rossi) Dave Carr, Pat Toft, and Sue Reiterman, Children's Librarian, will serve on the sub-committee. Trustee McCormack agreed to serve on the sub- committee if one of the members could not meet at the appointed time. IX. New Business A. CALTAC Renewal - The Trustees agreed to renew their CALTAC memberships. B. Easton Project Close-out Costs - The Trustees unanimously approved the City Librarian's request to ask the Peninsula Community Foundation to award $36,100 from the Duncan Trust Fund to cover cost overruns on the Easton project. M/S/C (Rossi/McCormack) X. Announcements A. Trustee McCormack noted the following PLS activities: 1. February 26th - System Advisory Board workshop to be held at San Francisco Public Library. The Topic is "Friends and Foundation Merging"; Deborah Doyle will be the speaker. 2. March 19th Breakfast - Possible topics include volunteer programs and library campaigns. 3. April 23rd Legislative Breakfast - Susan Hildreth, State Librarian may be the speaker. Xl. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 5:30pm. The next meeting of the Library Board of Trustees will be held February 15, 2005 in the Library Conference Room. Respectfully Submitted, /0� Alfred H. Escoffier- City Librarian Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3 January 11,2004 C ;t Gierklea lnej BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION February 3, 2005 Chairperson Hesselgren called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Hesselgren, Commissioners Carney, Grandcolas, Lauder, McQuaide, O'Connor, Absent: Commissioner Webb Staff: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz, Parks Superintendent Richmond, Supervisor Disco, Secretary Harvey Guests: Phil Scott (PW Superintendent), Vince Falzon (Asst. Street and Sewer Superintendent), Jo Ellen Ellis MINUTES The minutes of the January 6, 2005 Beautification Commission meeting were approved as submitted. CORRESPONDENCE Copy of Internet Research on Tree Ordinances (with regard to views [submitted by Commissioner McQuaide]), that summarizes problems with the lack of enforcement and inequalities of complaints. Notes from Beautification Commission files regarding the Commission's consideration of establishing a View Ordinance in 1979. (Submitted by Commissioner McQuaide.) FROM THE FLOOR- There were no comments from the floor. Chairperson Hesselgren changed the order of the Agenda to accommodate the appellants requesting the removal of the Eucalyptus tree at 1800 Easton Drive. NEW BUSINESS Request for Removal of a City-owned Eucalyptus Tree at 1800 Easton Drive — Superintendent Richmond stated that for several years City Arborist Porter has been reviewing this particular Eucalyptus tree with the Public Works Department. Arborist Porter observed the large buttress root when it was exposed and determined that severing the root to accomplish a flatter street grade would be inadvisable, that the root was too significant and could end up destablizing the tree. Superintendent Richmond reported that an Independent Arborist had evaluated the Monterey Cypress and Eucalyptus trees lining Easton Drive. A boring (drilling) method and a mallet were used on this particular Eucalyptus to detect rot. Based on the procedures used, the report indicated that the tree appears to be healthy. The report stated that further testing with a Resistograph on the root crown might be advisable because Resistographs more accurately measure the presence of decay. Superintendent Richmond concluded that the health of the tree is not in dispute, but repairs to the roadside, the clay sewer main, and traffic safety are at issue. The Commission discussed the tree's health and suggestions such as re-routing of the roadside, adding road signage, lowering the speed limit, and making Easton Drive a one-way street. Following the discussion, Chairperson Hesselgren recognized Superintendent Scott and Asst. Superintendent Falzon. Supt. Scott thanked the Commission for scheduling the hearing. Asst. Superintendent Falzon stated over the years, street repair near this tree has been a challenge and that the tree causes traffic hazards because the buttress root extends so far into the road and doesn't allow for traffic to safely pass. Request for Removal of a City-owned Eucalyptus Tree at 1800 Easton— (Contd.) Supt. Scott showed a Power Point presentation showing street damage, root growth, drainage problems, sewer damage, grade issues, and vehicular and traffic hazards. Alternatives to removal that have been considered are: trimming the roots, covering the roots with more asphalt, re-aligning the street, and making the street one-way travel. Supt. Scott stated that the City Arborist believes trimming or shaving the buttress root could cause the tree to be unstable and covering the root with more asphalt could damage the root system. Supt. Scott added that covering the root with more asphalt would also make the hump even higher. Re-aligning the street would not only mean other trees would need removing, but is cost prohibitive (up to $100k). Re-alignment of the street would affect all 4 corners and would also require removal and construction of various new sections of curb, gutter, and roadway, as well as utility pole relocation. Supt. Scott concluded that making the street one-way travel is not feasible in residential areas because it pushes traffic onto smaller streets. It would confuse the driving public, is costly, would make library access difficult, and Easton Drive is the only street that provides direct access for residents in the Canyon Road area. Following the presentation the Commission discussed the various issues. Commissioner Grandcolas asked if the tree was mature and had it stopped growing. Superintendent Richmond stated that the tree is mature in top growth but would assume that the root would continue to grow. Commissioner McQuaide stated that other cities have one way streets or use less costly alternatives such as signage (Caution Tree Cross/Caution Slow), and that the sewer could be moved to the other side of the street. Commissioner Grandcolas stated that he slows down when approaching the area, that if accidents were occurring or residents were complaining he would be more inclined to consider removal as a solution but both cases are absent. He added that these trees are part of the character and charm of a Tree City USA. Commissioner Carney stated that it is a traffic hazard for cars coming in opposite directions, particularly if you are not totally aware. She added when it rains, the roadside puddles up making it more difficult to see the hump. Commissioner O'Connor stated she frequents the area; accessibility is an issue and has been for many years. Chairperson Hesselgren commented that she is torn, having all the Eucalyptus trees removed on Easton Drive would change the whole character of the neighborhood, however, this particular tree is presenting substantial liabilities and danger. The tree is causing damage to curbs, sidewalk, drainage; an 8' root extending into the street causing a grade ncline of 2', and if left to remain, will end up causing ongoing future costs and liabilities to the City. Commissioner Lauder responded that she agreed with Chairperson Hesselgren, that this tree is causing significant liabilities to the City. She stated that removal of this tree would not take away from the purpose and intent of the Urban Reforestation and Tree Protection ordinance but if removal is granted, she would like it to be replaced with a fast growing tree . . . that it should be a"grand tree". Director Schwartz informed the Commissioners that the City Council, at it's January 29h budget and goal study session, agreed to ask the Beautification Commission to develop a long range reforestation plan for the Eucalyptus trees on Easton Drive. He stated that any decision made regarding this tree or a possible replacement, should be made in consideration of the long term plan. Following the discussion, Commissioner Lauder moved to uphold the appeal and grant removal of the City-owned Eucalyptus tree at 1800 Easton Drive due to safety hazards, damage to the sewer main, drainage problems, traffic flow problems, and accessibility issues But with the recommendation, that the tree be replaced with a sizeable specie to be determined by the Commission at a future meeting; seconded, Carney. Motion carried 5—I (McQuaide) —I absent(Webb). OLD BUSINESS - Tree View Ordinance — Commissioner Grandcolas stated the draft for a policy has yet to be developed by the Committee, but that Commissioners McQuaide and Lauder would present what they had researched on their own. Superintendent Richmond stated that City Planner Monroe has agreed to come to the March Commission meeting to discuss what the Planning Department considers with regard to views for new construction. OLD BUSINESS -Tree View Ordinance- (Contd.) Commissioner McQuaide submitted Internet Research on Tree Ordinances and stated she conducted an Internet research of legal journals pertaining to view ordinances. She stated that what she found mostly was that tree view ordinances more often than not lead to nasty disputes between neighbors, generally satisfies only a few people, and does not protect the interests of the community as a whole. She noted three themes that kept surfacing in her research were: 1) In California, no one has a"right"to a view, air, sunlight, etc. 2) A personal view cannot be guaranteed. 3) The advantages of trees (clean air, reducing landslides, etc.) outweigh the disadvantages. She concluded that an ordinance or a policy should be unique to the community, that if the City of Burlingame were to adopt an ordinance or policy it should have clear, specific goals, it should specifically designate responsibility, allow for flexibility, and most importantly, should have community support. Commissioner McQuaide then submitted her notes from department files of 1979 Beautification Commission meetings with regard to past considerations for establishing a view ordinance in the City of Burlingame. After reviewing the information, Commissioner O'Connor suggested that the Commission receive updated case laws. Commissioner Grandcolas stated he did not find the Berkeley ordinance helpful as a model, and that the Committee needs more direction, whether to consider nothing, consider an ordinance, or consider a policy, as well as the pros and cons of establishing a policy. He commented that he would like to provide a mechanism for property owners, but the more this issue is researched, the more it appears to be a real can of worms. Chairperson Hesselgren stated battles between neighbors could create even more problems. Commissioner Lauder stated it would be very important to consider the words of wisdom from past Commissions. Director Schwartz suggested that along with the City Planner attending next month's meeting, the City Attorney might provide the Commission with information, comments, or updates on existing case law. Street Tree Removal Policy — Superintendent Richmond asked the Commission for feed back on the Criteria for City Street Tree Removal form. The Commission agreed that the form was easy to understand and useful. Chairperson Hesselgren asked the Commission to further review, try to use the form, and be prepared to make a recommendation to Council at the next meeting. Arbor Day Ceremonies — Monday, March 7, 2005—Bayside Park— Superintendent Richmond reminded the Commission of this upcoming event; correspondence has gone out to schools, agencies, newspapers, and Council, announcing the event. Commissioner's Dinner - Superintendent Richmond reminded the Commission of Friday nights Commissioners Dinner at the Doubletree Hotel REPORTS— Director Schwartz— 1. At the Council Budget Study Session it was announced that the economic indicators are up and the trends are progressing nicely; 1.6 million of reserves will be used to reduce impacts to employees and the Parks & Recreation Department will be able to add back a Tree Worker position. Superintendent Richmond - 1. Tree planting is now occurring. 2. Sycamore Pruning is continuing in the SE section of the City. 3. A Eucalyptus fronting the Rec Center will be removed in the near future. It has been in decline through the last two pruning cycles. It now has significant die back in the canopy. 4. The irrigation system for the street channels at City Hall was improved and sod/seed was added after the sidewalk replacement. 5. Final acceptance of the new landscaping to screen the BART tail tracks will be recommended to Council. Cost reimbursement from BART will be the next step. REPORTS—(Contd.) Hesselgren—Chairperson Hesselgren reported that she attended the Mayor's Meeting. She asked that the Commission think about and respond back at the next meeting, questions they may want to ask other Commissions. These questions would pertain to the work of this Commission and would clarify the work of the other Commissions, as well as how the Commissions work might intersect. The next Mayor's Meeting will be in April and Chairperson Hesselgren will share with the other Commissions thoughts from the Beautification Commission. O'Connor — Commissioner O'Connor stated she would be interested in working on urban reforestation as an ongoing endeavor, like a tree planting program, or a replacement program to stagger tree replanting, etc. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 7:25 pm. Respectfully submitted, Karlene Harvey Recording Secretary CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA February 14, 2005 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Osterling called the February 14,2005,regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. IL ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Bojues, Keighran and Osterling Absent: Commissioners: Brownrigg and Vistica Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Catherine Barber; City Attorney,Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer; Doug Bell III. MINUTES The minutes of the January 24, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The presentation by Sustainable San Mateo County was continued to the March 28,2005,meeting. To facilitate the meeting because just a quorum of the Commission was sitting and a member present was ill, the order of the agenda was changed to place the action calendar first, followed by design review and finally the study items. V. FROM THE FLOOR Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, commented on her neighbor's construction which was exempt from design review and the need to extend the residential design review process to more projects, so neighbors have input on the project earlier in the process; would benefit neighbor relations. Commissioner clarified that the project which did not go through design review was located at 1449 Balboa. Rick Demming,729 Lexington Way, submitted letter to be included in the record for his project which was on the study calendar, listing additional hardships for the variance. There were no further comments from the floor. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. 8. 149 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT TO MAKE CHANGES TO CONDITIONS REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE REAR FENCE (KURT STEIL, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CHU, DESIGNER) (55 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Chair Osterling asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. CA noted that there was a request to take 149 Occidental Avenue off the consent calendar. Chair Osterling moved 149 Occidental Avenue to the first item on the action calendar. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 8. 149 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT TO MAKE CHANGES TO CONDITIONS REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE REAR FENCE(KURT STEIL,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CRU, DESIGNER) (55 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Reference staff report February 14, 2005, with attachments. Plr Barber presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Kurt Steil, 911 North Amphlett, commented that he built the house as speculation.The buyer asked him to move the fence at the rear of the garage back an additional 4 feet to increase the flat area in the backyard,as currently approved there is 11 feet of their property behind the fence, with the currently proposed relocation there would be 7 feet instead of 11 feet of their property behind the fence in the creek, in any event the fence would still be on the property at 149 Occidental; the new buyers have made the relocation of the fence a contingency of the sale of the house; the owners on Chapin Lane of the property behind 149 Occidental would like access to the rear 11 feet of 149 Occidental since they have installed irrigation and planted this area and need access to maintain it;the buyer's attorney and the attorney of the property owner behind are close to agreement,the developer is staying out of it since he does not want to bound;he is requesting a continuance of this item until the two attorneys have arrived at a mutual agreement,hopefully the next Planning Commission meeting. Commission asked applicant: Did the owner behind ask for an added buffer at the rear of 149 Occidental which included the flat area? Yes. Would the applicant need new plans to show the fence at the location agreed to by the two attorneys? Yes. Feel that this item can be placed on consent if the attorneys and potential buyers and property owner behind reach agreement. David Igard, 150 Chapin Lane,property owner behind. Want this issue resolved,thought reached agreement with the previous action, fence located 11 feet from rear property line on 149 Occidental,now developer is reneging; he and neighbors at 146 and 156 Chapin Lane supported the original project because of the location of the fence;their concern is the impact on their privacy and preservation of the creekside setting; think an appropriate compromise is possible but not without a written agreement. Commission asked,it is unclear why you object to him moving the fence within his own property. Problem is the large house built and the need to preserve the natural sense of the creekside setting, submitted pictures of the creek with the old fence,set back 11 feet,from their side they want to hide the fence and screen the view of the new house. March 8, 2004, letter from the neighbors details the issues. Commission asked if the top elevation of the fence changed whether it was 11 feet or 7 feet from rear property line? The issue is not the height but the ability to plant landscape to screen the fence and the problems behind it,they reclaimed the area along the creek,built walls and landscaped,thought the area was theirs. What are the pictures of? They are pictures of the previous fence which was 1.5 feet further away than the one originally approved(at 11 feet);greater issue is that the side yard fences have been built already but not the rear, so fear they were planning on seeking a change to this fence location all along. Applicant noted that the fence was up before could get a final,not hiding anything; reason Igard's want fence 11 feet back is so that they can access the flat area to install plants and maintain them,trying to take over part of this property which is not theirs,new owner does -� not want people at rear of property looking over the fence, if fence back 4 feet further it would block the view of his property more. Have neighbors irrigation system on his property,if not work out developer will remove. Is it safe to move the fence down slope?Fence will still be located on flat area above creek when 7 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 feet behind property line. Igard, goal is to reach agreement with developer and buyer through a binding agreement,think that is in everyone's interest. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Keighran noted it is in the best interest that they figure this out among themselves and come to compromise, concerned about someone else on another's property to do maintenance, can see why new neighbor is concerned; move to place this on the action calendar when a compromise has been achieved. Motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on the motion: No problem with relocating fence as applicant proposes,fine as long as they keep the fence off the slope, new location adds several feet of valuable area to the back yard,if need a taller fence put it down slope or on the other side of the creek,need to respect property owners rights. C.Keighran amended motion to place this item on the consent calendar if a compromise has been achieved and to place it on the action calendar if a compromise is not achieved. Second C. Auran agreed to the amendment. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when an agreement had been agreed to or on the regular action calendar if no agreement is achieved. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2(C.Brownrigg&Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:35 p.m. 9. 3028 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (ED WEBB, FORMAT, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; ANGELINA BRUNO, PROPERTY OWNER) (28 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Reference staff report February 14, 2005, with attachments. Plr. Barber presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve conditions were suggested for consideration. Staff was asked to read to criteria for a hillside area construction permit into the record. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Angelina Bruno,property owner,and Ed Webb,architect, 248 LaVilla,La Jolla, represented the project. Ray and Barbara Forest, 6 La Mesa Court, spoke in opposition. Commission had no questions of applicant. Neighbors,lived on La Mesa 30 years,feel project is obstructive to the area, should have a shed roof,will see a stark building blocking view of green belt;the height at the rear to the front does not flow with the hillside,is 35 feet tall,design is stark and not necessary. Live to west of 3028 Hillside,look down on;not disagree with the benefit of remodel,problem is the height of the middle section of the proposed project,now the house is nestled into the canyon,remodel will make it stand out;fire hydrant serving this area does not work,will it be fixed,if not this will increase the risk to other residents, this site is next to Mills Canyon wildlife area,want to keep the natural setting. Applicant noted: fire hydrant has not worked for a number of years,city decided not to fix,told that could use the fire lane in the Canyon for access or come down from the street above,house will be fully sprinklered, tried to mitigate roof,put fake shakes on it,roofing material is what will face the neighbor. Commissioner noted visited properties on both La Mesa Court and Lane,house has a strong vertical element,there is a better way to blend the house into area, add more hip roof, move it up the slope like the houses on La Mesa. Applicant noted vertical element is there to provide view,could reduce some but the house is designed within the current parameters. `-- Neighbor noted that Fire Department would not take equipment on fire road below,cannot go down road to 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14,2005 cul-de-sac,its too steep;will need to drag hose. There were no further comments from the floor.The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion: visited Fishers,looked out kitchen window,proposed roof would cut heavily into the distant view, feel that there is a loss of view,also two conflicting stories about the Fire Department, need clarification. CA noted that the reason the house is required to be sprinklered is so that it is not dependent on a fire hydrant. Agree that there is a view blockage. C.Keighran noted agree from site visit although do not feel that the view from the Forest home is blocked, the vertical element of this house is unnecessary,but the Freeman view is blocked,think house does need remodeling,concerned about the view obstruction on La Mesa so move to deny without prejudice to give the applicant the opportunity to revise the design so that it blends better with house and addresses the view blockage from the Freeman house on La Mesa. The motion was seconded by C.Auran. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2(C.Brownrigg&Vistica absent).Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:50 p.m IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 10. 2515 POPPY DRIVE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(JOHNNY DAROSA,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;ALFRED AND PINKY PONG,PROPERTY OWNERS)(71 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:ERICA STROHMEIER Plr. Barber briefly presented the project description. Commissioner asked if staff requires existing elevations drawings to be submittal with the plans. Staff responded that yes,it is a listed requirement of submittal given to all applicants. There were no further questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Johnny Darosa,Darosa Associates,475 EI Camino Real#308, Millbrae,project designer was available to answer questions.Commission asked why there were no existing elevations provided,disappointed these were not part of plan set. Mr.Darosa explained that there were no changes to the front elevation,and there were pictures provided of the house. Commissioner noted that new trees proposed are Redwoods to match the existing trees on-site,however in years to come this will create a dark and shady property, should consider making a different selection of trees, use street tree list. Commissioner asked if the new windows will match the existing windows or will they all be replaced. Mr. Darosa explained that some of the windows in the house have recently been replaced with new windows already so the new windows will match the existing windows. Commission clarified that all will be double glaze vinyl frame windows,and the applicant confirmed that all will be double glaze vinyl frame windows. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C.Auran made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following revisions have been made and plan checked: • Provide existing elevation drawings for all elevation; • Select a different species than the proposed Redwoods for planting on-site to avoid creating a dark shady property in years to come; • Add more detail to the drawings and provide elevations of all side of the house,existing and proposed-side by side arrangement. 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Comment on motion: this is a modest addition; proposal will match existing style of the house. Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg & Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 7:55 p.m. 11. 1414 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BASEMENT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (RICK SANDOR AND LISA GOOZE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; PHIL HYLAND, DESIGNER) (57 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Phil Hyland, JPH Design, 585 Quarry Road, San Carlos, was available to answer questions, noted that owners were not available to attend meeting. Proposing a new house, pretty much the same footprint, but new garage will be pushed back to the rear of the lot. Commission asked staff if there really was only one covered and one uncovered space required for this new house. CP Monroe noted that there were four bedrooms proposed, therefore only one covered space is required, two covered spaces are required for five or more bedrooms. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Bojues made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg & Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m. 12. 1309 MILLS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHRIS AND PEGGY PEDERSEN, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (78 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Chris and Peggy Pedersen, property owners, 1309 Mills Avenue, were available to answer questions. Jeanne Mehran, 1305 Mills Avenue, nice from the front, concerned with North elevation seen from her house, they are bordered by a one story house on one side and a two story house on the other side, sun comes in from side of one story house and the addition will eliminate the sun and sky view they have; there is one portion of addition that has a two story wall straight up that is not set back at all, what will the roof be made or. Jerry Deal, JD & Associates, 1228 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame, responded that the roof will be composition shingle which is typical for this style of house now a days; there is a driveway on the neighbors side, and this property is only 50 feet wide and also has a driveway on the side, so the buildable width of the property is only about 36-37 feet; there is one place that is two stories, with a dormer; cutting back two feet won't 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 change the effect of the shadow on the adjacent property;when you build a two-story house there is some impact on sunlight. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Bojues made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Comment on motion: nice job, preserving character of the existing house, nice example of a bungalow restored and remodeled; nice job of mixing old and new. Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg & Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:06 p.m. 13. 270 CHAPIN LANE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE(YAT-CHEONG AND ANN AU, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (53 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Plr. Barber briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Yat-Cheong,property owner,270 Chapin Lane,was available to answer questions. He stated that he was very happy with plans that Jerry Deal prepared. The new two-car garage will fit well with the neighborhood. There were no other comments from the floor and the public .� hearing was closed. C.Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C.Bojues. Comment on motion: fine design,will blend well with existing. Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2(C.Brownrigg&Vistica absent)The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:10 p.m. 14. 2707 MARTINEZ DRIVE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST REMODEL AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (GILL AND JANE YEE, TRS, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS JD &ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (37 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN Plr. Barber briefly presented the project description. Commission asked staff if there was a limit on tree planting and regulations for tree trimming developed for the hillside area, thought this was brought up by City Council. CA Anderson noted that there has not been a formal policy adopted yet, but that staff can work with the Parks Department and the City Arborist on a condition of approval. There were no further questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Gill Yee,property owner, 2707 Martinez Drive,has been a -� resident of Burlingame for 25 years,has done nothing to his house,there is a lot of construction work goin€ on in the area, now he wants to improve his property. Mr. Yee passed forward letters of support for his project to the Planning Commission. Commissions asked if this project was o.k. with his three uphill 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 neighbors. Mr. Yee responded that yes,the three neighbors above him are o.k.with the project,but he has an agreement with the neighbor directly next door. Commissioner clarified that this is the neighbor at 2711 Martinez,because the letter from this neighbor says that approval of the project is pending City approval and provided that it doesn't block his bridge and bay views,need to install story poles to determine ifproject will meet neighbor's criteria. Mr.Yee noted that in response to the neighbor's concerns he has worked on three revisions with Jerry Deal,his designer. There are three houses under construction for additions and remodel right now,he has lived in a construction zone for a year now.He is the only single story house on his side of the block,wants to improve this house. Got six letters of support from neighbors,tried to talk to everyone, but didn't get them all. Jerry Deal,JD&Associates, 1228 Paloma,Burlingame,project designer,noted that the written document from the neighbor is not a good document. The neighbor at 2711 Martinez Drive provided a document with a line that he thought the project should not cross(shown in red),he said if Mr.Yee adds to the inside side of the line it is o.k.,just don't go to the left of the line. If you look at the left elevations,the left hand portion of the second floor is one foot within the line demarcated by the neighbor. Karlyn Schneider, 2705 Arguello Drive, Burlingame; Lena Hwang, 2716 Martinez Drive, Burlingame, speaking on behalf of her parents;Hera Kostekoglu,2708 Arguello Drive,Burlingame: lives in back and up hill from 2707 Martinez,has lived here since 1962. Went to the Planning Department because it seems like they are asking for a large variance.There is a second story on the house below and the neighbor next door is doing a big remodel, think they need story poles, not sure what this project will do to view, may impact uphill neighbors. It is a nice design,but doesn't fit in with the other houses in the neighborhood, nothing else around like this; first notice they got about this project was blue card from the City, didn't see plans before, concern with addition, don't know what 8 foot increase will do to the view, all four bedrooms windows are located at the front of their house, father likes bay views, wish neighbor talked with them before,tall trees located on 2707 Martinez that are already a huge impact on the view;does not live within effected area,but there is a lot of remodeling going on in the area,bought in this neighborhood twenty years ago because of the hillside ordinance that protected views,concerned that if this project is approved it will set a precedent and other projects will be building in the area resulting in loss of views in this neighborhood. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commission clarified to members of the public that the request for height is not a variance,which requires that the Planning Commission find an exceptional hardship on the property,but a special permit which gives the Planning Commission the discretion to approve. Commission had the following comments and concerns: • Need storypoles surveyed at proposed envelope of addition,will give better perspective of addition, concern with impact on distant views; • Applicant should explore trimming the existing black acacia and eucalyptus trees on the property to possibly offset the impact of the addition on views; and • Can staff provide addresses and phone numbers of neighbors that spoke tonight so that when the story poles go up the Planning Commission can view them from inside each neighbor's house. Comment on motion: story poles will be a benefit to surrounding neighbors, a lot of construction in this areas, not opposed to addition on this property but concerned with impact on distant views. C.Boju6s made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the above revisions have been made and the story poles are up and documented. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2(Cern.Brownrigg&Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:32 p.m. VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 1329 DRAKE AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A NEW DETACHED GARAGE AND STORAGE AREA (ALAN OLIN, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; YANNA ABECASSIS AND MATTHEW MALONEY,PROPERTY OWNERS)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER C.Auran recused himself from this item because he lives within 500 feet of the subject property. He left the Council Chambers. CA Anderson noted that the Commission was now in recess due to lack of a quorum, but that the remaining Commissioners could comment on the project. CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Is this just a storage area with sink or will there be other uses/things added? • Will the drain line be limited to 2 inches? and • Can support the layout of this proposal, with the garden in the back, keeps good spacing behind garage. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed --� by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:40 p.m. C. Auran returned to the dias. 2. 729 LEXINGTON AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION (JORGE MAEZONO, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; LIZA G. DEMINEY, PROPERTY OWNER)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Large lot coverage variance 45.1%,what is exceptional hardship on this property; • Applicant provided information on family hardships, but is there a possibility to convert the first floor office to a bedroom and add an office upstairs to avoid lot coverage variance;applicant needs to look at other options to address family hardship; • Commission is required to find a physical hardship on this property or other design to avoid the variance; • Without physical hardship have to go with rules; • Floor area is close to maximum, reduce by 50 SF or so; • Japanese maples proposed in rear yard, may not be best choice for privacy, look at selecting tall shrubs or trees from street tree list to address privacy. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:45 p.m. 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14,2005 3. 16 DAVIS COURT, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (DALE MEYER, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; ANDREW JUROW AND BARBIE BARRETT, PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Plr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Can the Commission have access to the accessory structure during their site visit? During the last review there was bed in the accessory structure. CP Monroe stated that staff will provide the Planning Commission with contact information for the property owner to arrange access to the structure. This item was set for the consent calendar. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m. 4. 1120 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION(CHECK CASHING)(REZA RAZAVI, APPLICANT; CLAIRE CONSTANTINO TR ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Plr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: �-- • Is there is a peak,time or times when customers come to this business,for example are there more at noon verses two in the afternoon? • What will the peak hours of activity be in two to five years? • Do more customers come at lunch time and after work? • Application says that they have businesses in other cities,where are the other locations? • Is there parking provided at the other locations? • Will staff check what applications were required at the locations in other cities and if there have been any issues at the locations in the other cites; • Application notes that the number of customers per day will be 30,and this number is anticipated to triple in five years,will this create a parking issue; • Previous use at this site was a real estate office,how many employees worked in that office and what was the hours of operation; and • Plans note four offices in the back,what and how will they be used,please provide details. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:55 p.m. 5. 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE,ZONED C-2,SUBAREA D-APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NON-AUTO RELATED USE (PRINTING BUSINESS) (SCHEHEREZADE SHARABIANLOU, APPLICANT; BUDI LEONARDI, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Plnr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report. 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 Commissioners asked: • Why is this business moving from the current Lorton site to the California site? '1 • How long has a retail use been in the building at 220 California Drive? • How long have retail uses been in the spaces at 210-218 California Drive? • How does the existing square footage at the Lorton Avenue site compare to the new square footage at the 220 California site?Please provide square footage of existing site; • How much on-site parking is provided for the existing Lorton Avenue site and the other three PIP sites that the delivery vehicle serves ? • Have there been parking complaints about this use at the Lorton location filed with the City? and How does the business operate with only three employees and the few customers that come to this site. This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m. 6. 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4 —APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO OPERATE A "PARK AND FLY" PROGRAM FROM AN EXISTING HOTEL (BRUCE CARLTON,DOUBLETREE HOTEL,APPLICANT;TODAY'S III INC.,PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Will there be signage in the parking area to designate the location for the park and fly patrons? • What is the vacancy rate of parking on the hotel site; provide average vacancy count twice a day (once at peak time) for three to four days to make sure there is adequate parking spaces on-site for proposed use; 0 Application says 30 cars maximum for the park and fly program,will that number grow in time? • Should monitor program and if successful how will hotel make sure cars are kept out of upper lot? • Approval should be limited to two or three years; and • 53% of customers are airline crew which use the shuttle to the hotel, can park and fly approval be tied to the number or proportion of airline crew usage? CA Anderson noted that conditions of approval can place a cap on the maximum number of cars allowed for the park and fly program, and can require review of the approval every two years or upon complaint. This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m. 7. 1275 ROLLINS ROAD, ZONED M-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR AUTOMOBILE SALES(JIM GLOVER,APPLICANT;PETER BRAUN& ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER; FRANK MURPHY, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 Commissioners asked: • How much inventory will this business carry on-site at any one time? • Will vehicles in inventory be new or used? • Why will people buy these cars on-line and not just come to the site to look at them? • Why are there six offices,but there will only be one to three employees? What will the other offices be used for? • Provide a better description of how this business will function? Describe how cars will go in and out? • How will cars be brought in,where will they come from,how will they be delivered,where will they be loaded and unloaded? and • How will cars be sold? Viewed on-site or on-line, then picked up on-site? This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 9:15 p.m. X. PLANNER REPORTS - Review of City Council regular meeting of February 7, 2005. CP Monroe reviewed the actions at the Council meeting. She noted that the Council discussed moving the date for the Joint session with the Planning Commission to April, but a full council was not available, so Council asked if the Commission could make the June 13 date,for a one hour meeting before the regularly scheduled Commission meeting; Chair directed staff to e-mail the commissioners to see if they would all be available June 13,2005. It was noted that Council directed staff to bring some intermediate clarifications for the Subarea D regulations to the commission for immediate consideration. FYI: Revisions to an approved commercial design review project at 1101 Burlingame Avenue,Zoned C-1, Subarea A,Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area. Commission reviewed this item and set it to design review study when there was space on an agenda. FYI: Peninsula Hospital Replacement Project — Landscape Plan for New Emergency Entrance on Trousdale (Increment One) The conditions of approval require that the Planning Commission be informed of the applicant's submittals and conformance with landscaping requirements for each phase of the project. This report was on the first phase of landscaping. Commission noted that Redwoods close to the street could become view obstacles for adjacent uphill properties in the future, so should be confined to the existing grove area. Future view blockage should be considered in reviewing other phases of the landscaping. - FYI: Update on the Food Establishment Regulations in the Broadway Commercial Area. Commissioner asked that this be put on the agenda for comment. Received a number of calls about a bakery on Broadway, with current regulations can have but without any on-site seating; presently have the maximum number on Broadway; realize that changing the regulations may not result in adding a bakery. Question is should the commission re-evaluate the current food establishment regulation and allow the number to expand for a time. What kind of bakery was interested? Not a full service like Copenhagen. Used to be a number of bakeries on Broadway, good to have one. CA noted that many businesses can call themselves a bakery, Subway sandwiches for example bake their breads on site, location of a bakery on Broadway is to a considerable extent up to the property owners to seek out. Staff suggested that the Commissioners may wish to speak to some of the property owners on Broadway about how they feel about 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 the current food establishment regulations and their effect on the business district. Commission directed staff to prepare a staff report on the alternatives to regulating food establishments XI. ADJOURNMENT Chair Osterling adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ann Keighran,Acting Secretary 12 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2005 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. LAIF&County Pool 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 73.36 1 1 2.586 2.622 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 8,000,000.00 7,932,730.00 8,000,000.00 26.64 982 680 2.860 2.900 Investments 30,025,165.46 29,957,895.46 30,025,165.46 100.00% 262 182 2.659 2.696 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 67,494.12 459,405.61 Average Daily Balance 29,105,497.66 29,222,264.68 Effective Rate of Return 2.73% 2.67% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and availability of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). i SUS NAV ,FINANCE DIR./TREASURER Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date LAIF&County Pool SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 8,104,075.82 8,104,075.82 8,104,075.82 2.264 2.264 1 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 13,921,089.64 13,921,089.64 13,921,089.64 2.830 2.830 1 Subtotal and Average 21,105,497.66 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 2.622 1 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 992,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 3.500 871 06/22/2007 3128X1 6Q5 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,988,120.00 2,000,000.00 2.300 2.300 289 11/17/2005 3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,965,110.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 728 01/30/2007 3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 990,940.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 3.100 815 04/27/2007 3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 996,560.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 989 10/18/2007 Subtotal and Average 8,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 7,932,730.00 8,000,000.00 2.900 680 Total and Average 29,105,497.66 30,025,165.46 29,957,895.46 30,025,165.46 2.696 182 Portfolio CITY Run Dale:02/11/2005-09:10 CP PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept V6.21 I Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Activity BY Type e Page 3 January 1, 2005 through January 31, 2005 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 2.264 3,317,537.94 1,000,000.00 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 2.830 574,544.53 3,300,000.00 Subtotal 22,433,082.99 3,892,082.47 4,300,000.00 22,025,165.46 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon Subtotal 8,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 Total 30,433,082.99 3,892,082.47 4,300,000.00 30,025,165.46 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM3)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 4 Activity Summary January 2004 through January 2005 Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity January 2004 4 27,400,432.25 2.663 2.700 2.696 1 0 174 168 February 2004 4 27,499,689.16 2.557 2.592 2.564 0 0 174 163 March 2004 4 29,579,440.12 2.512 2.547 2.512 0 0 161 146 April 2004 5 31,824,022.87 2.373 2.405 2.318 1 0 184 165 May 2004 5 32,351,524.97 2.412 2.445 2.368 0 0 181 157 June 2004 5 32,705,947.05 2.452 2.486 2.420 0 0 180 150 July 2004 5 31,221,968.21 2.561 2.597 2.553 0 0 188 151 August 2004 5 31,242,288.45 2.603 2.639 2.605 0 0 188 145 September 2004 5 25,250,564.07 2.625 2.662 2.624 0 0 232 172 October 2004 6 28,964,592.72 2.629 2.666 2.618 1 0 240 181 November 2004 6 25,300,063.99 2.661 2.698 2.653 0 0 275 198 December 2004 7 30,433,082.99 2.695 2.732 2.673 1 0 259 188 January 2005 7 30,025,165.46 2.659 2.696 2.622 0 0 262 182 Average 5 29,522,983.25 2.569% 2.605% 2.556 0 0 208 167 Portfolio CITY CP Run Dale:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM4)SynnRept V6.21 'Report Ver.5.00 I ' CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 5 Distribution of Investments By Type January 2004 through January 2005 January February March April May June July August September October November December January Average Security Type 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005 by Period LAIF&County Pool 81.8 81.8 83.1 81.2 81.5 81.7 80.8 80.8 76.2 75.8 72.3 73.7 73.4 78.8% _ ........................._ ....._ ......... .........._ Certificates of Deposit-Bank ....... ....... ....... ........._ Certificates of Deposit-S&L Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln Negotiable CD's-Bank ........... . __ ...... .........................._......... ............ ........ ................ ... .. . ......... ........... ... ..... ........ ................... .. ................... ....... . _... CORP NOTES Bankers Acceptances Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing ........... . ............... .... ................................................................................................................ .............. .. . ...._................................. ..... ............ .................................... ................................... ... ......... ........._... _..... Commercial Paper-Discount Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 18.3 18.2 16.9 18.9 18.6 18.4 19.2 19.2 23.8 24.2 27.7 26.3 26.6 21.2% _ ....... .... ........ ......... ......... . . ....._.................................................................. ............ . .. ......... ....... ............... . ........ ........... ........ _... .. _....._ Federal Agency Issues-Discount _..._.__._11.1................._..._ _._.._....... _.__._........................................_......_.................................................................................._....................................................................._......................................................................... ...... Treasury Securities-Coupon TreasurySecurities-Discount _ ......... .. ......... ......... .. .. ..... .._....... ........ .. .......... ..................................... .............. ........ . ........... ... ....... . ......_......... Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon ...........................................................__............._..........._......................._......_111.1..............................................................................._............._................................................................................................_....................................... . Miscellaneous Securities-Discount _.._ .......... ........ . ......... . ........ ........... . .. .......... ...................................... .. Non Interest Bearing Investments ................... ... - .. ....... . .............. .. ........... ................................................. .. ... ....................... .. ............ ... ..... . ....... .................. ..._. .._ . _ Mortgage Backed Securities ..... ...................... .................._....... ..........................._......___...................................................................................................................................................._...................................................._........................................._... ... .. Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2 _ _ _.. _._ .......... ............. ....... . . ............................... Miscellaneous Discounts At Cost 3 . _. .._ _ ......_. .. ..... ... ........ ............... ........................................................ . .. ................................................................. . ......... .. .. ..... ................ .... Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF PM5)SymRepl V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 6 Interest Earnings Summary January 31, 2005 January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest Collected 45,000.00 128,500.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 30,175.00 30,175.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 55,841.66) ( 48,883.33) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 19,333.34 109,791.67 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 19,333.34 109,791.67 Pass Through Securities: Interest Collected 0.00 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: Interest Collected 140,154.97 453,825.76 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 278,248.34 278,248.34 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 370,242.53) ( 382,460.16) Interest Earned during Period 48,160.78 349,613.94 Total Interest Earned during Period 67,494.12 459,405.61 Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Total Earnings during Period 67,494.12 459,405.61 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF PM6)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2005 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. No Active Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.000 0.000 Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0 0 0.000 0.000 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 134.53 3,011.38 Average Daily Balance 74,223.37 285,384.05 Effective Rate of Return 2.13% 1.79% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months.Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is restri d by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). t2:11 Finance Director/Treasurer Portfolio 03BD CP Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM1)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS82 82 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.264 2.233 2.264 1 Subtotal and Average 74,223.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0 Total and Average 74,223.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0 Portfolio 03BD CP Run Date:02/1112005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept V6.21 .Ver.5.00 04BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2005 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 100.00 1 1 2.233 2.264 Investments 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 100.00% 1 1 2.233 2.264 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 30,500.14 187,094.61 Average Daily Balance 16,795,197.64 16,921,587.40 Effective Rate of Return 2.14% 1.88% i �I Ldr� sus Nave, 'nance Dir./Treasurer Portfolio 04BD CP Run Date:02/11/2005-09:11 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 04BD Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS85 85 Local Agency Investment Fund 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 2.264 2.264 1 Subtotal and Average 16,795,197.64 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 2.264 1 Total and Average 16,795,197.64 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 2.264 1 Portfolio 04BD CP Run Date:02/1112005-09:11 PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept V6.21 1 I i Ver.5.00 FEB o 2, 2005 January 24, 2005 BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT Mr. Jim Nantell City Manager City of Burlingame City Hall 501 Primrose Road Board of Trustees Burlingame, CA 94010 Michael Barber Dear Jim: Marc J. Friedman Dave Pine Linda Lees Dwyer Thank Y Y you and the Cit Council for the efforts extended on behalf of the Alison Van Dyke Burlingame's concerned citizens about the proposed route of the Jefferson-Martin transmission line down Trousdale Drive. District Administration At their January 18, 2005 meeting, the Board of Trustees discussed the Sonny H. Da Marto, Ed.D. request from Rosalie O'Mahony, former Mayor of Burlingame, that the Superintendent Burlingame School District contribute towards the expenses for attorneys Suzanne Hall, Ed.D. and expert fees regarding this issue. Unfortunately, budget constraints Assistant Superintendent, Curriculum&Instruction prevent the Board of Trustees from approving this request. The 280 Jing-Jing Wang Corridor Group previously asked the Board for financial assistance Assistant Superintendent, regarding this matter and the Board of Trustees found it necessary to Chief Business Official reject their request as well. Pamela McCabe Director, Special Education& The Board of Trustees would however, like to express appreciation to the Categorical Programs Cit for City its support of community members and for the collaborative relationship that has been established with the Burlingame School District. We look forward to continuing to work with you. Sincerely, M . b. rl Sonny H. Da Marto, Ed. D. Superintendent SHD/ef Cc: Burlingame School District Board of Trustees 1825 Trousdale Drive Burlingame, CA 94010 (650)259-3800 Fax: (650)259-3820 www.burlingameschools.com