HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.02.22 City ofBiUY1)7gaMC
BV RLINGAME
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010
(650)558-7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting - Tuesday February 22, 2005
Page 1 of 2
(Microphone check)
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES - Regular meeting of February 7, 2005 Approve
5. PRESENTATION
a. Presentation of Proclamation to the American Heart Presentation
Association
b. Update by PG&E on the Reliability Data for 2004 Presentation
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
a. Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 6.40 to clarify regulations Hearing/Action
governing massage, spa, and bathing establishments
b. Consider renewal of amusement permit- Fanny & Alexander, Hearing/Action
1108 Burlingame Avenue and 303-305 California Drive
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the
agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State
local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda.
It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are
requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The
Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. 2005-06 Budget Direction and Council Goals Discuss/Confirm
9. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve
a. Authorize contribution to complete study of EMF exposure
limits from Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line along Skyline
Boulevard in Burlingame
b. Application to C/CAG for Transit Oriented Development
Housing Incentive Program
C. Resolution awarding the 2005 sidewalk maintenance program
to Spencon Construction, Inc.
d. Resolution accepting the Almer Bellevue storm drain
City OfBurlingame
BURUNGAME
CITY HALL-501 PRIMROSE ROAD
t
BURLTNGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010
(650)558-7200
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Regular Meeting - Tuesday February 22, 2005
Page 1 of 2
improvement project to Harty Pipelines Construction
e. Request to send a Burlingame Police Officer to Tonga for
cultural awareness and sensitivity training
f. Warrants &Payroll
10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
11. OLD BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library, January 112005;
Beautification,February 3, 2005; Planning,February 14, 2005
b. Department Reports: Finance, January, 2005;
C. Letter from Burlingame School District denying the City of
Burlingame's request for contribution for expenses associated
with the Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line issue
14. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558-7203 at
least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's
office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the
City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site.
NEXT MEETING—Monday, March 7, 2005
CIT 7 0
BURLINOAME
e
Wco' o0
$FwT[u uN[6•
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of February 7, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Michelle Thompson.
3. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan,Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. PRESENTATION
Shelley Kilday, Outreach Coordinator of Sustainable San Mateo County gave a presentation on their
organization and presented slides on energy savings, air quality, traffic congestion, and the economic, social
and environmental health of the community. Clem Molony, an advisor for Sustainable San Mateo County,
gave a presentation on various statistics on energy use, water use, housing affordability, crime, and education
in Burlingame.
5. MINUTES
Vice Mayor Baylock asked that an addendum be added to the minutes of January 18, 2005, to insert a
sentence under Item 5a, paragraph 6. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of
the January 18, 2005 Council meeting; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved by voice vote, 4-0-1
(Coffey abstained).
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no Public Hearings.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Lara Lighthouse, 87 Loma Vista, spoke on the Jefferson-Martin power line project and requested a donation
of$500 from the City to help with the funding of an independent assessment report. Lara Lighthouse also
spoke about the businesses on California Drive. The following spoke concerning parking issues, automobile
dealers and conditional use permits on and around California Drive and the Burlingame train station: Gary
1
Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
Doss, 214 California Drive; Scheferezade & Farrokh Sharabianlou, 226 Lorton Avenue; Russ Cohen, 605
Lexington; Ron Carter, 211 West Lane; Rudy Horak, 1332 Edgehill; Ken Schrum, 260 East Lane; Budi
Leonardi, 220 California; Sam Samson, CPA for the owners of 210-218 California Drive; Shaun Walter, 400
Primrose, Coldwell Banker Realtor for the owners of PIP Printing; Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater; Sonya
Hong, 216 California Drive; Al Heriz, 218 California Drive; Margrita Heriz, 210 California Drive; Karen
Allen, 217 West Lane. Charles Voltz, 725 Vernon Way, spoke on the significant amount of revenue to the
City from the automobile dealers over the years and the vision of auto row. Annamarie Holland Daniels, 515
Howard Avenue, spoke about conditional use permits, sewer projects, proposed City Hall relocation, Teen
Center, and trees on Easton. Derek spoke and asked that the Pez Museum and Sweet Treats not be closed.
Mike Harvey, 200 California Drive, spoke on the parking issue based on Caltrain's proposed improvement
plan for the Burlingame Avenue train station and the proposed Broadway interchange project's impact on the
automobile dealers. Katie O'Brien, 2204 Poppy Drive, spoke about Council treating everyone with equal
value. John Root, 1550 Bayshore, spoke about the value of more town meetings and study sessions. There
were no further comments from the floor.
8. STAFF REPORTS
a. WEST LANE LEASED PARKING—CALTRAIN BURLINGAME AVENUE TRAIN
STATION IMPROVEMENTS
DPW George Bagdon said that at the last Council meeting Council directed staff to recalculate leased
parking for auto-related uses on West Lane based on the ratio of square footage of auto-related uses to the
square footage of the overall building complex north of Mike Harvey's property. Staff presented two
quantitative approaches to consider, both of which result in an allocation of two parking spaces for auto-
related business use. Councilwoman Nagel reiterated her motion from the previous Council meeting to
designate four parking spaces for the small businesses; motion failed by voice vote 2-3 (Coffey, Galligan &
O'Mahony dissented). Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion for approval of two parking spaces for
auto-related businesses; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved by voice vote, 4-1 (Nagel dissented).
b. DISCUSSION OF SUBAREA D (AUTO ROW) OF THE BURLINGAME COMMERCIAL
AREA AND DIRECT STAFF AS TO FOLLOW UP
CA Anderson requested Council discuss the vision of the future of Subarea D and provide direction to staff
and/or Planning Commission on follow-up steps. The development of new platforms at the Burlingame
Train Station has provided the opportunity to discuss the City's vision of Subarea D. The City's General
Plan and the implementation of zoning has been directed to sustaining the automobile businesses along
California Drive, while allowing residential and non auto-related uses through a conditional use permit.
Staff recommended redrafting the Zoning Code, subsection (25.38.03)(a)) regarding Subarea D to ensure that
it is clear and redrafting the ordinance that was adopted in 1982.
The discussion by Council Members included the following items: Conditional use permits continue to be
reviewed by the Planning Commission; area should not be limited to auto-related uses; envision a plan for
the area surrounding the Burlingame Avenue train station and consider different uses there; possible tax
incentives to encourage the car dealers to move to Adrian Road; an economic feasibility study; the
significant impact on parking if stand-alone office buildings were allowed in that area; having auto row
located where it is provides the best flow of traffic that would not be feasible on Adrian, David or Rollins
Roads; consider having time limits on conditional use permits; assured businesses they were in those
locations for as long as they wanted; recommended that studying the economic viability of the auto industry
2
Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
by itself would be better done as part of the Specific Area Plan encompassing the entire Burlingame Avenue
area.
c. RECOMMENDATION TO SELECT APRIL 18TH FOR A JOINT COUNCIL AND
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO CANCEL THE FEBRUARY 26 1H BUDGET
MEETING, TO CHANGE THE JUNE 8 1H BUDGET STUDY SESSION MEETING TIME,
AND TO APPROVE THE AMENDED 2005 CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR
Councilman Coffey stated that he would not be available for the April 18th joint Council and Planning
Commission meeting. Councilwoman O'Mahony recommended that joint meeting be changed to June 13tH
as there was another date given in the staff report. Mayor Galligan recommended that CP Monroe check
with the Planning Commission for the June 13th date.
Mayor Galligan made a motion to approve the amended Council Calendar, seconded by Vice Mayor
Baylock, approved by voice vote 5-0.
d. INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.40 TO CLARIFY
REGULATIONS GOVERNING MASSAGE, SPA, AND BATHING ESTABLISHMENTS
CA Anderson stated that the State of California does not get around to regulating massage practitioners so it
is up to the individual cities and counties to regulate them. CA Anderson said it is necessary to update the
ordinance in terms of definitions for a massage technician permit. CA Anderson suggested a phase-in for
those individuals currently practicing massage under one of the exemptions who now need to obtain a
permit. The proposed ordinance would increase the hours of training from 70 hours to 500 hours in a
recognized school within twelve (12) months of the date of issuance of the conditional permit.
Vice Mayor Baylock requested the term, massage technician, be changed to massage practitioner.
Mayor Galligan requested DCC Kearney read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 6.40 to
more clearly regulate massage, spa, and bathing establishments. Councilwoman O'Mahony waived further
reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote,
5-0.
Vice Mayor made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman Nagel,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
Mayor Galligan requested DCC Kearney to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days
before proposed adoption.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. RESOLUTION NO. 10-2005 APPROVING A RESOLUTION ADOPTING PURCHASING
AND CONTRACTING PROCEDURES
CA Anderson requested Council approve Resolution No. 10-2005 adopting City Purchasing and Contracting
procedures.
3
Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
b. RESOLUTION NO. 11-2005 ACCEPTING EASTON LIBRARY RECONSTRUCTION BY D.
L. FALK CONSTRUCTION
DPW Bagdon recommended that Council approve Resolution No. 11-2005 accepting the Easton Library
reconstruction by D. L. Falk Construction in the amount of$970,000.
c. RESOLUTION NO. 12-2005 ACCEPTING STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM FOR 2004
BY O'GRADY PAVING, INC.
DPW Bagdon recommended that Council approve Resolution No. 12-2005 accepting the Street Resurfacing
Program 2004 by O'Grady Paving, Inc. in the amount of$1,162,825.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilman
Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City.
10. OLD BUSINESS
Councilwoman O'Mahony expressed concern that the Burlingame School District Board is refusing to
contribute for expenses associated with the Jefferson-Martin Transmission Line. Councilwoman O'Mahony
asked Mayor Galligan to pursue it since during her term as Mayor last year she was led to believe they were
willing to participate. Mayor Galligan directed staff to check on what was said at the meeting where
someone from the school made comments on this subject.
Councilwoman O'Mahony received a phone call from a parent at Washington School concerning the new
smoke shop on Broadway. Councilwoman Nagel asked Police Commander Mike Matteucci for an update on
the smoke shop. Cmdr. Matteucci said code enforcement conducted an inspection and found several code
violations which were reported to the owner in a letter dated February 3, 2005. The owner was given until
February 11, 2005, and February 18, 2005, to comply. The Police are continuing to monitor this location.
Mayor Galligan said he had written a letter to the leasing agent expressing concern that this type of business
brings a bad element to Broadway and would like follow up with the building owner on the building code
violations. Mayor Galligan also had discussions with several business owners on Broadway who are very
upset about this type of business and asked that the City be very diligent in coming to a resolution.
In response to a letter the Council received from Parca concerning Raji House on Palm, Mayor Galligan
stated that he had spoken to a concrete contractor about the sidewalk repair in front of Raji House; and the
contractor would be more than happy to perform the work without charge except for the City fees and cost
for cement.
Councilwoman O'Mahony spoke about the need to have the auxiliary lane project completed from Third
Avenue to Millbrae Avenue. She requested Mayor Galligan, as a member of the Transportation Authority,
try to obtain the additional funding for that project in the form of a loan which would be repaid when funds
are available from Sacramento.
4
Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
CA Anderson spoke about the letter from Kent Putnam requesting consideration of a rental car location in or
next to the Mazda dealership. CA Anderson suggested that Mr. Putnam's request be a part of the Subarea D
discussion.
11. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library,November 16, 2004; Beautification, January 6, 2005; Traffic, Safety &
Parking Commission, January 13, 2005; Parks & Recreation, January 20, 2005; Planning, January 24,
2005
b. Department Reports: Building, January, 2005
c. Letter from Kent Putnam to the City Manager requesting consideration of a rental car location at Mazda
dealership.
13. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 9:56 p.m. in memory of Susan Caldwell and her daughter,Nina
Garrison.
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Ellen Kearney
Deputy City Clerk
5
Burlingame City Council Date: February 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
CO
P R O C L A M A T I O N
Honoring American Heart Month
-C o ,Rd Eor'Womett-
Whereas, theAmericanYfeartAssociation launcheda "Go 'RedForWomen"initiative in an
effort to help educate the public on the relationship of women and heart disease.
In keeping with their tradition of raising awareness, they will dedicate time and
effort to this cause declaring, Fe6ruary, 2005 as Go R,edfor'Women Month, and;
Whereas, heart attach stroke an other cardiovascular diseases claim the lives of more than
half a million women each year, and nearly twice as many as all forms of cancer,
including breast cancer, and;
Whereas, the cost of cardiovascular diseases and stroke in the V S. is estimated at$368.4
billion; and
Whereas, approximately one out of every 2.4 women's deaths results from Heart disease,
stroke and other cardiovascular disease; and
Whereas, every yearfor the past 20 years, more women than men have diedof heart disease,
stroke and other cardiovascular diseases; and
Whereas, the women from our community and beyond the borders of Burlingame appreciate
and commend theA.merican Yfeart Association for their tireless efforts;and
Now, therefore I, ,doe Galligan, Mayor of the city of Burlingame, in recognition of the
importance of the ongoing fight against heart disease and stroke, do hereby
proclaim'February, 2005 as "Wear Red For Women"month.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the seal of the city of
Burlingame to be aff)ced this, the 22nd day of
Fe6ruary 2005.
,doe Galligan, Mayor
Pacific Gas and Bob Fredianelli
Electric Company Director
Operations, 2225 Folsom Street
Maintenance and San Francisco, CA
Construction, 94110
Area 1
February 22, 2005
Honorable Joseph Galligan, Mayor
Mr. James Nantell, City Manager
City of Burlingame
City Hall
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mayor Galligan and Mr. Nantell:
PG&E is pleased to submit the following summary of service reliability for Y2004. As review
will show, we can state with certainty that overall reliability on the 5 circuits previously identified
as "problem circuits" has significantly improved. In fact, Y2004 statistics show reductions in
the frequency, duration and number of customers affected by any given outage. This is a
reduction over and above the reduction achieved in Y2003.
The following key projects have and will result in measurably increased reliability in
Burlingame:
o Establishment of remote control capability at several switch locations by mid
2004
Completed
o Installing of a new Burlingame circuit in October 2004 to re-configure the San
Mateo 2102 circuit
Completed Nov 16, 2004
o Installing underground mainline on Tartan Trail to reinforce the San Mateo 2102
tie by end of 2004
Completed Dec 2004
o Extending underground mainline in downtown Burlingame in 2005 for improved
service reliability on the Bay Meadows 2101 circuit — Had meeting w/City
Engineers and will proceed with engineering the job.
Completion Date: Dec 2005
We continue to look for opportunities to identify items which may impact reliability in
Burlingame and to take action to correct them before they become an issue.
Honorable Joseph Galligan, et al.
February 22, 2005
Page 2
Attached to this letter are the latest outage statistics through year end 2004 for the five-
targeted Burlingame circuits which, we are pleased to report, show significant improvements in
circuit reliability both in the frequency and duration of outages.
We continue to encourage customers to report sustained outages and to get updated outage
information by calling 1-800-PGE-5002. More information on outages and outage safety tips
can be found at www.pge.com.
While it is not possible to prevent every outage, we have and will continue to take steps to
address issues as they are identified in Burlingame and every other city we serve. Though
February 22nd will be our final regular presentation to City Council, any concerns that the City
may have going forward regarding reliability or other issues can be communicated and will be
addressed via Burlingame's established relationships with Stephanie Isaacson, PG&E
Government Relations and Kathy Lavezzo, PG&E Account Services. We are fully committed
to continued reliability and strong communications with Burlingame officials, businesses, and
residents.
Sincerely,
Attachments
Burlingame Update
Service Reliability
Overview : Service Reliability Measurement
• Sustained Outage — Power outage to one or
more customers exceeding 5 minutes in duration
• Frequency — The average number of sustained
outages experienced per customer
• Duration — Average length of sustained outages
(average outage-minutes per customer)
• Typically measured over a one year period and
excluding major storm events
Average Sustained Outages
Experienced Per Customer
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20 ■ 2001
1.00 ■ 2002
0.80 ❑ 2003
0.60-/'
El
0.40
0.20
0.00
PG&E System Peninsula Div Burlingame
Sustained Outage Duration
(Average Outage-Minutes Per Customer)
250"
200 f
150 02001
02002
100-Z ❑ 2003
❑ 2004
50
0
PG&E System Peninsula Div Burlingame
Average Sustained Outages/Customer
(Comparison By Circuit)
6.00-
5.00-
4.00-'
.005.004.00
■ 2001
3.00 ■ 2002
❑ 2003
2.00 ❑ 2004
1.00
0.00
Bur 405 Mil 1101 Mil 1107 BM 2101 SM 2102
Outage Duration By Circuit
(Average Outage-Minutes/Customer)
700-
600-
50V
00600500
400 ■ 2001
■ 2002
300 ❑ 2003
200 ❑ 2004
100
0
Bur 405 Mil 1101 Mil 1107 BM 2101 SM 2102
Service Reliability Summary
(Burlingame Customers)
2003 versus 2002 comparison
— Overall lower customer outages
— Lower average outage duration
2004 YTD versus 2003 comparison
— Continuing overall lower customer outages and
average outage duration
2004 & 2005 Service Reliability Work
• Established remote control capability at several switch
locations by mid 2004 — Completed
• Installing a new Burlingame circuit in October 2004 to re-
configure the San Mateo 2102 circuit — Completed Nov
1692004
• Installing underground mainline on Tartan Trail to
reinforce the San Mateo 2102 tie by end of 2004 —
Completed Dec 2004
• Extending underground mainline in downtown
Burlingame in 2005 for improved service reliability on the
Bay Meadows 2101 circuit — Had meeting w/City
Engineers and will proceed with Engineering the job.
Completion Date: Dec 2005 .
Burlingame Area (5 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages
Total # of # of Affected Maximum
DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage
affected Customers Minutes
01/01/04 BM-2101 Recloser9022 Momentary An EON @ 9:19. 1312 1312 Momentary
01/01/04 Millbrae 1107 Recloser 2030 Sustained At 9:47 Tree branch fell onto line IRO 1635 Rollings Rd. 537 537 485
At 14:05 a 3rd party Dig in. Affected 76 Burlingame
01/14/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Recloser S80 Sustained customers because of a switched configuration (SS13 1499 76 155
closed, 2313 open that temporarily transferred 76
Burlingame customer to Bay Meadows 2102)
01/25/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Momentary At 13:36 a squirrel across leads of a transformer IRO 725 7289 4191 Momentary
Breaker Patricia in San Mateo.
02/17/04 San Mateo 2102 Recloser A80 Momentary An EON @ 18:37. 849 849 Momentary
02/25/04 Millbrae Substation Transmission Momentary At 21 :56 transmission trouble caused a momentary 3156 2823 Momentary
trouble outage.
02/25/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Recloser 9022 Momentary An EON @ 18:37. 1313 1313 Momentary
02/25/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 11325 Sustained At 22:57 blown fuse. Undetermined cause (may be storm 229 229 188
related).
03/02/04 Burlingame 405 Fuse 13561 Sustained At 9:15 blown fuse. Undetermined cause. 69 69 65
03/15/04 Millbrae 1107 Fuse 11465 Sustained At 9:54 opened 11465 for the repair of a leaking 20 20 99
transformer.
04/18/04 Millbrae 1101 Transfomer j Sustained At 5:55 power pot of an open delta TX @ 1356 Marsten 1 1 165
tripped possibly due to OL.
At 17:00, TX T2822 failed. Required switching and de-
04/27/04 ' Bay Meadows 2101 Transformer Sustained energization of UG line affected 40 Burlingame 40 40 517
-
customers. (T2822 has only 5 customers)
05/09/04 San Mateo 2102 Transmission Sustained At 16:31 , a 115KV down guy wire broke caused CB 562 to 2226 1310 64
trouble open.
05/21/04 MillbraeSubstation Transmission Momentary At 7:33, a transmission trouble caued a momentary 5996 2823 Momentary
trouble outage.
05/27/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 8144 Sustained At 2:37 blown elbow @ T-927 cause the fuse to blow. 1075 1075 567
At 7:46, tree bark fell onto line cause center phase of 3937
05/28/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 3937 Sustained to blow. Affected less than 134 Burlingame customers < 134 < 134 89
(only one of three fuses blown)
06/07/04 San Mateo 2102 Transformer Sustained At 16:18, tree branch fell onto line. 6 6 286
06/15/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Station Sustained At 15:31 , blown UG cable @ J-107. 3126 253 441
Breaker
06/16/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Momentary At 05:42. a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 7351 4191 Momentary
Breaker cause.
107/21/041 Burlingame 405 Transformert Sustained At 10:30 a car pole caused TX too en. 10 10 15
Page 1 of 2 Burlingame Div - Y2004.xls
Burlingame Area (5 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages
Total # of # of Affected Maximum
DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage
affected Customers Minutes
08/28/04 San Mateo 2102 Recloser A82 Sustained At 13:44,A large black bird on TX. 189 189 401
08/28/041 San Mateo 2102 Recloser A80 Momentary An EON @ 18:37. 851 851 Momentary
09/04/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 8156 Sustained At 17:53 one blown fuse @ 8156. Affected less than 86 < 86 <86 40
Burlingame customers (only one of three fuses blown)
09/23/04 San Mateo 2102 Station Momentary At 19:11 A TX (in SM) on ML blown. 1405 456 Momentary
Breaker
At 9:33, a momentary outage occurred. It is judged that
09/24/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Momentary the trouble at Amphlett & Folkstone was the cause. The 8241 5045 Momentary
Breaker trouble had subsequently resulted in pole fire and a
sustained outage
09/24/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Station Sustained At 10:56, a pole fire at Amphlett & Folkstone. 8241 5045 130
Breaker
10/05/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 3937 Sustained At 11:02, a squirrel caused fuse to blow. 134 134 33
10/17/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Recloser 8996 Sustained During storm Tree branch fell onto line @ 14:24. 3136 3136 276
10/17/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Transformer Sustained At 11:06 a transformer @ 819 Walnut Ave in Burlingame 8 8 41
tripped.
10/17/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Recloser 9022 Momentary An EON @ 9:19. 1314 1314 Momentary
11/08/04 San Mateo 2102 OCB Momentary At 07:38. a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 2338 1310 Momentary
cause.
11/21/04 Burlingame 405 Transformer Sustained JAt 18:04 a tree fell onto line. 20 20 394
11/28/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 2651 Sustained At 10:25 a squirrel caused fuse to trip. 48 48 15
11/28/04 Burlingame 2101 Fuse 10167 Sustained At 12:52 a squirrel caused fuse to blow. 4 4 33
11/29/04 Bay Meadows 2102 Fuse 13342 Sustained At 18:39 a erroneous temporary configuration caused fuse 1052 253 98
to be overloaded.
12/07/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Fuse 3363 Sustained At 08:37 tree bark fell onto line. 1 1 92
12/08/04 Millbrae 1107 Fuse 4425 Sustained At 18:49 tree branch fell onto line. 1 1 15
12/30/04 Bay Meadows 2101 Transformer Sustained At 07:41 a transformer @ 507 California Dr.tripped. 24 24 11
12/31/04 Burlingame 2101 Recloser A-82 Momentary At 07:15 a squirrel crossed phases of the transformer @ 189 189 Momentary
2872 Adeline caused a momentary outage.
As of 12131/2004
Page 2 of 2 Burlingame Div- Y2004.x1s
Burlingame Area (other 8 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages
Total # of # of Affected Maximum
DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage
affected Customers Minutes
01/01/04 Burlingame 403 Transformer Sustained At 7:17 Tree branch fell onto line IRO 932 Linden. 4 4 548
01/05/04 Millbrae 1102 Station Momentary At 10:53, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 2809 1070 Momentary
Breaker cause.
01/21/04 Burlingame 401 Station Momentary At 9:28 station breaker opened and closed during a routine 1605 1175 Momentary
Breaker switching causing a momentary.
01/24/04 Burlingame 404 SW 2551 Sustained At 6:16 a car pole at Bellview & Floribunda. Open 2551 485 87 638
for repair.
At 7:41 Bump sleeve @ ECR& Oakgrove caused a
01/30/04 Burlingame 404 Station Momentary momentary outage for 1001 Burlingame customers. 1614 1001/112 Momentary/170
Breaker !& Sustained Needed to open 2555 for the repair. The sustained
outage affected 112 Burlingame customers.
Station At 10:57, 3rd party tree trimmers in line @ Helen &
02/13/04 Millbrae 1104 Breaker Sustained Banbury caused an outage. 5084 721 156
02/17/04 Millbrae 1106 Station Momentary At 14:22 a momentary outage occurred. Cause unknown. 372 145 Momentary
Breaker
02/19/04 Millbrae 1106 Station Momentary At 1:03 a momentary outage occurred. Cause unknown. 372 145 Momentary
Breaker
03/04/04 Millbrae 1106 Transformer Sustained At 19:54 a secondary mainline neutral down IRO 850 7 7 231
Mitten in Burlingame.
03/18/04 Millbrae 1102 Transformer Sustained At 7:30 a transformer fuse blew. Cause unknown. 2 2 69
04/05/03 Burlingame 404 Bump Sleeve Sustained At 17:52. A bump sleeve on 1 phase failed. 684 684 311
04/07/04 Burlingame 401 Fuse 1211 Sustained At 17:56 a tree top came down @ 1900 Willow in 292 154 88
Hillsborough.
04/08/04 Burlingame 401 Fuse 1211 Sustained At 10:30 PG&E opened 1121 to de-energize a line to 292 154 88
repair 6907 connection (only two strands were remained).
05/19/04 Burlingame 401 Transformer Sustained At 1:10 PG&E de-energized a line in order to remove a 7 7 18
tree that fell into line.
06/06/04 Burlingame 402 Station Sustained At 14:00 metallic balloon caused OCB to trip. 1212 1212 50
Breaker
06/17/04 Burlingame 401 Station Sustained At 11:35, OCB tripped. Undetermined cause. 2300 1175 17
Breaker
07/02/04 Burlingame 403 Fuse 6878 Sustained AT 10:45 primary neutral blown. 30 30 102
09/09/04 Millbrae 1106 Transformer Sustained At 18:35, TX leaked. 2 2 495
10/30/04 Millbrae 1104 Station Momentary At 08:50, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 5246 721 Momentary
Breaker cause.
11/03/04 Millbrae 1104 Station Momentary At 08:50, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 5246 721 Momentary
Breaker cause (lightning strike was a likely cause)
Page 1 of 2 Burlingame other 8 fdrs - Y2004.x1s
Burlingame Area (other 8 feeders) - Year 2004 - detail list of unplanned outages
Total # of # of Affected Maximum
DATE FEEDER DEVICE TYPE DESCRIPTION Customers Burlingame Outage
affected Customers Minutes
11/11/04 Burlingame 404 Transformer Sustained At 13:17 tree bark fell onto line 39 39 122 -
11/13/04 Burlingame 404 Station Momentary At 07:38, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 2583 1113 Momentary
Breaker cause. 404 holding 405 load.
11/27/04 Burlingame 404 Station Sustained At 04:44 tree bark fell onto line 1618 1113 515
Breaker
11/29/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 07:38, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary
Breaker cause.
12/01/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 17:15, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary
Breaker cause. -
12/05/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 17:50, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary
Breaker cause.
12/05/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 18:03, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary
Breaker cause.
12/05/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary !At 19:26, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary
Breaker cause.
12/06/04 Burlingame 402 Station Momentary At 09:37, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1345 1345 Momentary
Breaker cause.
12/06/04 Carolands 403 Transformer Sustained At 22:56 a transformer failed _ 4 4 199
12/07/04 Burlingame 401 Station Sustained At 01:16 tree branch fell onto line & caused wire down 1477 1175 384
Breaker
12/07/04 Carolands 403 Fuse 3295 Sustained At 07:27 tree branch fell onto line. 10 10 39
12/25/04 Millbrae 1102 SW 5962 Sustained At 10:40 UG cable failure. Opened 5962 for repair 243 243 344
12/29/04 Burlingame 404 Station Momentary At 21:34, a momentary outage occurred. Undetermined 1617 1113 Momentary
Breaker cause.
12/29/04 Burlingame 404 Station Sustained At 23:17 tree branch fell onto line. 1617 1113 84
Breaker _
12/30/04 Burlingame 404 Transformer Sustained At 15:03 a carpole caused an outage 37 37 - 67
12/30/04 Burlingame 404 Transformer Sustained At 16:26 a transformer failed 37 37 239
As of 12131/2004
Page 2 of 2 Burlingame other 8 fdrs - Y2004.xls
CAGENDA
ITY 6a
�d 0 ITEM#
BURLINGAME MTG.
: STAFF REPORT DATE 2,22,2005
\eo � 6
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: February 11, 2005 APPROVE
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
ADOPT ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.40 TO CLARIFY REGULATIONS
GOVERNING MASSAGE, SPA,AND BATHING ESTABLISHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt proposed ordinance amending Chapter 6.40 regarding massage, spa, and bathing establishments and
instruct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption.
DISCUSSION
The City adopted an extensive set of regulations regarding massage and bathing establishments in 1993. Those
have worked quite well in preventing the operation of brothels under the guise of a massage studio.
However,the regulations are in need of updating and clarification, so that definitions are complete and permit
requirements are effective. Nearby cities, Belmont, Millbrae, and San Mateo, have updated their regulations in
the past few years, and this amendment builds on—and in the main, is consistent with—their work as well as
the 1993 adoption. The principal change will be to require employees and contractors in barbershops and
beauty salons to obtain a massage technician permit unless the employee or contractor is only working within
the scope of the employee's or contractor's license or registration with the State. The proposed ordinance also
increases the application and renewal fees to account for the Police time involved in reviewing the application;
the fees have not been increased since 1993.
The ordinance was introduced at the Council's meeting on February 7, 2005. At that time, Council directed that
"massage technician"be changed to "massage practitioner,"and that a phase-in time be given in Section 3 of the
ordinance to allow currently exempt persons giving massage in the City to obtain the necessary training for a
permit over a 12-month period.
Distribution
Chief of Police
Finance Director
I ORDINANCE No.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING
CHAPTER 6.40 TO MORE CLEARLY REGULATE MASSAGE, SPA, AND BATHING
3 ESTABLISHMENTS
4
5 The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows:
6 Section 1. In 1993, the City extensively amended its municipal code regulations
7 governing the operation and conduct of massage and bathing establishments in the City. Those
8 amendments have been largely successful in ensuring that legitimate massage practitioners are
9 able to continue their work,while at the same time minimizing illicit and illegal conduct by
10 others. This ordinance is intended to update those provisions and to ensure that any practice of
11 massage is conducted in accordance with either State or City laws. These amendments make
12 the City's provisions largely consistent with regulations in nearby cities, so that massage
13 practitioners will be able have some certainty and consistency in the manner in which their
14 businesses are regulated.
15
16 Section 2. Chapter 6.40 is amended to read as follows:
17
Chapter 6.40
18 MASSAGE, SPA, AND BATHING ESTABLISHMENTS
19 Sections:
20 6.40.010 Purpose.
6.40.020 Permit required.
21 6.40.030 Definitions.
6.40.035 Corporations and partnerships.
22 6.40.040 Application for permit.
6.40.050 Exemptions from operator's permit requirements.
23 6.40.055 Exemptions from massage practitioner permit requirements.
6.40.060 Permit fee and investigation.
24 6.40.070 Business license.
6.40.080 Issuance or denial of permit.
25 6.40.090 Appeal.
6.40.100 Operating and sanitation requirements.
26 6.40.105 Maintenance of insurance.
6.40.110 Inspection by officials.
27 6.40.115 Surety bond.
6.40.120 Sale or transfer of establishment.
28 6.40.130 Revocation or suspension of permits.
2/7/2005 1
1 6.40.140 Display of signs and permits.
6.40.150 Notice of changes.
2 6.40.160 Renewal of permits.
3
4 Section 6.40.010 Purpose.
5 It is the purpose and intent of the city council that the operation of massage, spa, bathing
6 and other similar establishments and persons offering services therein, wherein the principal
7 function is giving of massages and baths, as defined in this chapter, should be regulated in the
8 interests of public health, safety and welfare by providing minimum building sanitation and
9 health standards for such establishments, and to insure that persons offering services therein
10 shall possess the minimum qualifications necessary to operate such businesses and to perform
11 such services offered. It is further intended that these provisions provide a framework that is
12 consistent with regulations imposed by nearby communities on similar businesses.
13
14 Section 6.40.020 Permit required.
15 (a) It is unlawful for any person to operate, engage in, conduct, carry on, or permit to be
16 operated, engaged in, conducted or carried on(as the owner of the business premises or in any
17 other capacity) in or upon any premises within the city, the business of a massage, spa, bathing
18 or other similar establishment, or an out call massage service, having massage or baths as their
19 principal function, all as defined herein, unless the person has first obtained an operator's
20 permit for such a business from the city and the permit remains in effect in accordance with the
21 provisions of this chapter.
22 (b) It is unlawful for any person to act as a massage practitioner unless that person has
23 first obtained a massage practitioner's permit from the city and the permit remains in effect in
24 accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
25
26 Section 6.40.030 Definitions.
27 For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the
28 meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section:
2/7/2005 2
1 (a) "Health officer" means the health officer of the County of San Mateo or the health
2 officer's authorized representative.
3 (b) "Massage" means any method of treating the external parts of the human body by
4 bathing, rubbing,pressing, stroking, kneading, tapping,pounding, vibrating or stimulating with
5 the hands or any instrument.
6 (c) "Massage, spa,bathing or other similar establishment" or"massage establishment"
7 means any establishment having a fixed place of business where massages, baths or health
8 treatments, involving massage,hot tubs, saunas, or baths as the principal function, are given,
9 engaged in or carried on, or permitted to be given, engaged in or carried on in any manner
10 described in Section 6.40.030(b).
11 (d) "Massage practitioner"means any person who administers a massage,bath or
12 health treatment involving massage or baths as a principal function to another person for any
13 consideration whatsoever.
14 (e) "Operator"means any person who owns or operates a massage, spa,bathing or
15 similar establishment or an out call massage service.
16 (f) "Out call massage service" means any business, in which the primary function of
17 such business is to engage in or carry on massage treatments at a location designated by the
18 customer or client and not at a fixed location.
19 (g) "Person" means any individual,copartnership, firm, association, corporation,joint
20 venture, or combination of individuals.
21 (h) "Recognized school' means any school or institution of learning which has been
22 approved pursuant to division 7.5 of title 5 of the California Code of Regulations or an
23 equivalent out-of-state school and which has for a purpose the teaching of a resident course of
24 study of not less than five hundred (500) hours of theory, ethics, practice,methods,profession
25 or work of massage, or baths or health practice with relation thereto, and which provides a
26 diploma or certificate of graduation upon successful completion of such a course of study or
27 learning. Schools offering a correspondence course not requiring attendance or courses taught
28 solely by video tape or other electronic means shall not be deemed a recognized school.
2/7/2005 3
I Section 6.40.035 Corporations and partnerships.
2 If an applicant is a corporation, the name of the corporation shall be set forth exactly as
3 shown in its articles of incorporation together with the names and residence addresses of each
4 of the officers, directors and each stockholder holding more than ten percent of the stock of the
5 corporation. Each officer of the corporation or each partner in a partnership must submit an
6 application and comply with 6.40.040. If one or more of the partners is a corporation, the
7 provisions above pertaining to a corporate applicant apply
8
9 Section 6.40.040 Application for permit.
10 Any person, except as herein otherwise provided, desiring a permit to operate a
11 massage, spa, bathing or similar establishment or an out call massage service, having massage
12 or baths as their principal function, or to engage in the practice of giving massages or baths
13 shall first make application therefor for permit under this chapter by filing with the license
14 collector a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the license collector which
15 shall give the following information; an operator-massage practitioner may make a single
16 application and pay a single fee:
17 (a)Name,residence, and telephone number;
18 (b) The previous address of the applicant for the ten(10) years immediately prior to the
19 present address of the applicant;
20 (c) Social Security number and driver's license number, if any;
21 (d) Birth certificate or other written proof acceptable to the police department that the
22 applicant is at least eighteen(18) years of age;
23 (e) Fingerprints (taken by the police department for criminal history investigation) and
24 three (3)portrait photographs at least two inches by two inches, taken within the last sixty(60)
25 days immediately prior to the date of the filing of the application, showing the head and
26 shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinct manner;
27 (f)Applicant's height,weight, color of eyes and hair;
28 (g) Business, occupation or employment of the applicant for the ten (10) years
2/7/2005 4
I immediately preceding the date of application;
2 (h) The business license and permit history of the applicant for massage or similar
3 businesses, whether individually or as a member or part of a corporation,partnership, or other
4 business,wherever located. The history shall include a statement as to whether any previous
5 permit or license in which the applicant was involved was revoked or suspended or any
6 revocation or suspension is pending, and the reasons for the previous or proposed revocation or
7 suspension.
8 (i) If the application is for a massage practitioner permit, the name and address of the
9 establishment where the applicant is to be employed and the name of the operator of the same;
10 0) Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of any crime, except misdemeanor
11 traffic violations. For each such conviction, a statement shall be made giving the place and
12 court in which the conviction occurred, the specific charge under which the conviction was
13 obtained and the sentence imposed as a result of the conviction;
14 (k) Whether any previous employer or person while employed by or with the applicant
15 has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of an offense involving conduct which
16 requires registration under California Penal Code subsection 290, or a violation of subsections
17 266(1), 311 through 311.7, 314, 315, 316, 318, 318.5, 318.6, or 647(a), (b), (d), (h), (i), or(k) of
18 the Penal Code;
19 (0 A statement as to whether the applicant has applied to the city or any other city in
20 the County of San Mateo for a massage establishment permit, operator's permit, out call
21 massage permit, or massage practitioner permit in the past five (5) years, the date of the
22 application, and each name under which the application was made;
23 (m) A copy of a diploma or certificate of graduation from a recognized school
24 demonstrating the applicant's successful completion of a resident course of study of at least five
25 hundred (500) hours of theory, ethics,practice, methods, profession, or work of massage, or
26 baths or health practice with relation thereto ;provided, however, that an applicant for an
27 operator's permit who will have no physical contact with customers or clients need not possess
28 such a diploma or certificate;
2/7/2005 5
I (n) Such other identification and information necessary to discover the truth of matters
2 hereinbefore specified as required to be set forth in the application;
3 (o) A certificate executed under penalty of perjury from a medical doctor stating that
4 the applicant has, within thirty(30) days immediately prior to the filing of the application, been
5 examined and found to be free from any infectious, contagious or communicable disease
6 capable of being transmitted through therapeutic massage;
7 (p) A separately signed waiver and release authorizing the city and its authorized
8 agents,and employees to obtain information and to conduct an investigation into the truth of
9 the statements made on the application and the qualifications and record of the applicant;
10 (q) A certificate from a medical practitioner appointed by the city that confirms the
11 applicant's knowledge of physiology, anatomy, and technique relating to the field of massage
12 therapy. The applicant's knowledge shall be tested in an examination and demonstration
13 process provided that an applicant for an owner's permit who will have no physical contact with
14 customers or clients need not possess such diploma or certificate;
15 (r) If the application is for an operator's permit,proof of current errors and omissions or
16 malpractice insurance in the amount of not less than five hundred thousand dollars
17 ($500,000.00), either as to the establishment or through membership in a professional massage
18 association that provides automatic malpractice insurance as a membership benefit;
19 (s) Current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and first aid from the
20 American Heart Association or the American Red Cross.
21 (t) If the application is for an operator's permit, the name and address of the owner and
22 lessor of the real property upon or in or from which the business is to be conducted. If the
23 applicant is not the owner of the real property, the owner of the real property must sign and
24 acknowledge the application.
25 (u) If the application is for an operator's permit, a safety plan including, but not limited
26 to, exterior lighting,parking lot security, and emergency access to the establishment.
27
28
2/7/2005 6
1 Section 6.40.050 Exemptions from operator's permit requirements.
2 The permits required by this chapter for operators shall not apply to hospitals, nursing
3 homes, sanitariums, or other healthcare facilities duly licensed by the State of California..
4
5 Section 6.40.055 Exemptions from massage practitioner permit requirements.
6 The massage practitioner permit required by this chapter shall not apply to the
7 following:
8 (a) Physicians, surgeons, chiropractors, osteopaths, acupuncturists, and physical
9 therapists duly licensed to practice in the State of California,but only when engaged in the
10 practice for which they are so licensed and in accordance with the terms of the licensing.
11 (b)Nurses duly registered by the State of California, but only when engaged in the
12 practice for which they are so registered and in accordance with the terms of the registration.
13 (c) Employees of hospitals, nursing homes, sanitariums, or other health care facilities
14 duly licensed by the State of California,but only when engaged in the scope of their
15 employment, and only at their place of employment at the health care facility, and only within
16 the scope of and in conformance with the State license.
17 (d) Cosmetologists or barbers who are licensed by the State of California,but only
18 when engaged in the practice for which they are so registered and in accordance with the terms
19 of the registration.
20 (e)Accredited elementary school,high school, or college coaches and trainers employed
21 by a elementary, high school, or college,but only while acting within the scope of employment
22 to the school.
23 (f) Trainers of semi-professional or professional athletic teams, but only while acting
24 within the scope of employment to the team.
25
26 Section 6.40.060 Permit fee and investigation.
27 (a) All applications for initial permits shall be accompanied by an investigation fee in
28 the sum of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), no part of which is refundable. Additional fees may
2/7/2005 7
1 be charged to cover costs of processing the applicant's fingerprints by the State of California
2 and for the medical examiner's competency examination.
3 (b)Upon receipt of a complete operator's application, the license collector shall refer the
4 application to the city planner,building official, the fire department and the police department,
5 each of which within a period of thirty(30) days from the date of filing the application shall
6 inspect the premises proposed to be used as a massage establishment, interview the applicant or
7 any other person and make any other investigation necessary to make a written recommendation
8 to the police department; provided that the thirty(30) days may be extended for such period as
9 may be necessary to obtain fingerprint records from the appropriate state agency.
10 (c) Applications for massage practitioner permits shall be referred only to the police
11 and planning departments. The planning department shall provide its findings to the police
12 department within thirty(30) days of the filing of a complete application.
13
14 Section 6.40.070 Business license.
15 At the time of an initial application for an operator's permit, applicant shall also apply
16 for and furnish the information necessary to obtain a business license as required by Chapter
17 6.04 of this code. No business license shall be issued until the investigation under this chapter
18 is completed and the permit to operate is approved. The business license shall then be issued
19 upon payment of the business license fee as provided in Chapter 6.04 of this code.
20
21 Section 6.40.080 Issuance or denial of permit.
22 (a) Upon receipt of the investigation reports from each of the departments to whom the
23 application has been referred, the police department shall issue the requested permit if all
24 required information, including diplomas or certificates, has been furnished and the reports
25 filed find that:
26 (1) The character of the applicant is satisfactory;
27 (2) If the application is for an operator's permit, the establishment as proposed would
28 comply with all and not violate any applicable laws, including,but not limited to, the city's
2/7/2005 8
I building, fire, health and zoning regulations;
2 (3) The applicant has not been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of an
3 offense involving:
4 (A) Conduct that requires registration under Penal Code section 290; or
5 (B) Violations of Penal Code sections 266(1), 311, 311.1, 311.2, 311.3, 311.4,
6 311.5, 311.6, 311.7, 311.10, 311.11, 314, 315, 316, 318, 318.5, 318.6, 459, 518, or
7 647(a), (b), (d) or(h), or comparable provisions of the laws of any other state, the
8 United States, or any other country; or
9 (C) Any other offense involving sexual misconduct with a child.
10 (4) The applicant has not been convicted of the use of force or violence upon another;
11 (5) The applicant has not knowingly and with intent to deceive made any false,
12 misleading or fraudulent oral or written statements in the permit application or to any person
13 investigating the application.
14 (6) The applicant does not have an infectious, contagious or communicable disease, and
15 is not in violation of any federal, state or local health law or regulation.
16 (7) The applicant for a massage practitioner permit has satisfactorily passed the
17 competency examination.
18 (8) The city has not denied a previous application by the applicant for an operator's or
19 massage practitioner permit within the twelve (12)months immediately preceding the date of
20 the application.
21 (b) The permit shall be denied if all of the above findings cannot be made or if all of the
22 information required is not supplied to the city. If denied, the reasons therefor shall be
23 endorsed upon the application, and the police department shall notify the applicant of the
24 disapproval with a copy of the application upon which the reasons have been endorsed by first
25 class mail.
26
27 Section 6.40.090 Appeal.
28 If a permit is denied, applicant has ten(10) days from the date of mailing the notice
2/7/2005 9
I within which to appeal to the city council by filing a written application for a public hearing
2 with the clerk of the city. Notice and a public hearing shall be given as follows:
3 (a) Upon receipt of the appeal, the city clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the
4 council, at a regular meeting thereof, within thirty(30) days from the date of filing the appeal,
5 and shall give written notice of the hearing to the applicant at the applicant's address set forth in
6 the appeal by first class mail at least ten(10) days prior to the hearing date.
7 (b) On the date set, the council shall hear the matter, and may continue it from time to
8 time before reaching a decision. If the council finds that the applicant has satisfactorily met all
9 of the requirements of this chapter, it shall order the issuance of the permit and business license.
10 If it finds that the requirements have not been met satisfactorily, it shall deny the permit.
11 (c) All findings of the council shall be final and conclusive upon the applicant
12
13 Section 6.40.100 Operating and sanitation requirements.
14 All massage, spa,bathing or other similar establishments and out call massage services
15 shall comply with the following operating and sanitation requirements:
16 (1)Advertising. No massage establishment or out call massage service granted a permit
17 under this chapter shall place, publish or distribute or cause to be placed,published or
18 distributed, any advertising matter that describes or depicts any portion of the human body in a
19 manner, or with the use of descriptive language, which would reasonably suggest to prospective
20 patrons that any service is available other than those services described in Section 6.40.030(a)
21 of this chapter.
22 (b) Out Call Massage Service. Any person granted a permit pursuant to this chapter
23 who provides services described in Section 6.40.030(a) at any hotel or motel, shall first notify
24 the owner, manager or person in charge of the hotel or motel that the permittee intends to
25 provide a massage service to a person or persons registered at the hotel or motel and give a
26 copy of the person's permit to the owner, manager or person in charge.
27 (c) List of Services. A massage establishment shall post a list of services in readily
28 understood language in an open, public place on the premises of the establishment. No owner,
2/7/2005 10
I operator, responsible managing employee, manager, employee, contractor, or permittee shall
2 permit nor offer any massage services on the premises other than those posted on the list.
3 (d) Sanitation and Conduct. All establishments shall comply with the following
4 minimum sanitation requirements:
5 (1) Employees and Massage Practitioners. All employees in a massage establishment
6 and massage practitioners shall perform their work fully clothed, be clean and wear clean outer
7 garments whose use is restricted to the establishment. Doors to dressing rooms,bathing rooms,
8 and treatment rooms shall open inward, and shall not be locked. Draw drapes, curtain
9 enclosures, or accordion-pleated closures are acceptable on all inner dressing and treatment
10 rooms in lieu of doors. Separate dressing rooms and toilet facilities complying with the city
11 building codes shall be provided for each sex.
12 (2) Linens. All establishments shall be provided with clean, laundered sheets and
13 towels in sufficient quantity and shall be laundered after each use thereof and stored in closed,
14 sanitary cabinets. Heavy white paper may be substituted for sheets provided that such paper is
15 used only once for each person and then discarded into a sanitary receptacle. Sanitary approved
16 receptacles shall be provided for the storage of all soiled linens.
17 (3) Facilities. At least one entrance door allowing access to the establishment and any
18 building it may be in, shall remain unlocked during business hours; notwithstanding this
19 provision, the facility shall also comply with exiting and entrance requirements of other
20 applicable laws and regulations. All premises and facilities shall be maintained in a clean and
21 sanitary condition, and shall be thoroughly cleaned each day of operation. The premises and
22 facilities shall meet all code requirements of the city as to safety of the structure, adequacy of
23 plumbing, heating, ventilation and waterproofing of rooms where showers, water or steam baths
24 are given.
25 (4) Patron Facilities. Patrons of the establishments shall be furnished with securable
26 locker facilities, for which the patron has the control of the key, and security deposit facilities
27 for the protection of their valuables.
28 (5) Hours. Massage establishment operations shall be carried on or conducted, and the
2/7/2005 11
I premises shall be open, only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
2 (6) Disabled Access. Each massage establishment shall be disabled accessible with
3 restrooms available with disabled access.
4 (7) Changing Rooms. Each massage establishment shall provide separate restroom and
5 changing rooms for male and female patrons.
6 (8) Lighting. Minimum lighting shall be at least one sixty(60)watt light in each
7 enclosure where massage services are performed. The light switch for the interior lights in each
8 enclosure will be within the enclosure. There shall be no light in the enclosure that is operated
9 from outside the enclosure. There shall be no sound device (i.e., buzzer or bell) than can be
10 operated from outside the massage enclosure.
11 (9) Records. Each massage establishment shall keep a written record of the date and
12 hour of each treatment; the name and address of each patron; the name of the massage therapist
13 administering the treatment; and the type of treatment administered recorded on a patron release
14 form. Such written record shall be open to inspection only by officials charged with the
15 enforcement of this chapter and for no other purpose. Such records will be kept on the
16 premises of the massage establishment for a period of two years from the date of service.
17 (10) No Residential Use. No part of the massage establishment shall be used for
18 residential or sleeping purposes. No cooking or food preparation will be allowed on the
19 premises unless a full service kitchen is installed. Such kitchen will be for the sole use of
20 employees, and will be installed in an employees-only area. The full service kitchen will have a
21 minimum of a sink with hot and cold running water, a refrigerator, a stove, and sufficient
22 cabinets to store cooking utensils.
23 (11)Physical Contact. No employee, contractor, or massage practitioner shall make any
24 intentional, occasional, or repetitive contact with the genitals, anus, or areola(nipple) of another
25 person in the massage establishment or while providing massage services.
26
27 Section 6.40.105 Maintenance of insurance.
28 The operator of a massage establishment shall maintain the insurance required pursuant
2/7/2005 12
I to subsection 6.40.040(r) at all times that the massage establishment is open for business. If at
2 any time no such insurance is in effect for the establishment, the establishment shall close for
3 business and establishment's permit shall be automatically suspended.
4
5 Section 6.40.110 Inspection by officials.
6 The investigating officials of the city, including the health officer, shall have the right to
7 enter the premises from time to time during regular business hours for the purpose of making
8 reasonable inspections to observe and enforce compliance with the provisions of this chapter
9 and building, fire, electrical,plumbing or health regulations.
10
11 Section 6.40.115 Surety bond.
12 (a) Each applicant for an operator's permit shall post with the city clerk, a surety in the
13 principal sum amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) either in cash or executed as surety by a
14 good and sufficient corporate surety authorized to do a surety business in the state of California
15 and as principal by the applicant. The form of the bond shall have been approved by the city
16 attorney and shall provide that should the applicant be issued a permit under this chapter which
17 is subsequently suspended or revoked, the city shall be reimbursed from said bond for all costs
18 of any investigation or other proceedings related to said suspension or revocation.
19 (b) If a holder of an operator's permit under this chapter successfully completes
20 twenty-four(24), consecutive months in actual operation under the permit without any
21 suspension of the permit or the filing of any criminal or civil complaint regarding operations
22 under the permit by either a city attorney, a district attorney, the California Attorney General, or
23 a United States Attorney, the permitholder may request the city to release the surety bond,
24 which the city shall do upon verification that no such suspension or complaint filing has
25 occurred during the period. However, if at any time following such a release of the surety bond,
26 the city determines that the permitholder is conducting its operations in violation of this
27 chapter, the chief of police may order the posting of a surety bond in accordance with
28 subsection (a) above as a condition of continued operations under the permit.
2/7/2005 13
I Section 6.40.120 Sale or transfer of establishment.
2 (a) Upon sale, transfer or relocation of a massage, spa, bathing or similar establishment,
3 the permit shall not be transferable without the written approval of the chief of police and the
4 finance director. An application for such a change shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable
5 investigation fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) and provide all of the information required
6 in Section 6.40.040.
7 (b) A permit for an out call massage service or a massage practitioner is not transferable.
8
9 Section 6.40.130 Revocation or suspension of permits.
10 (a) Any massage, spa, bathing or similar establishment permit, out call permit, or
11 massage practitioner permit issued under this chapter shall be subject to suspension or
12 revocation by the city manager for violation of, or for causing or permitting violation of, any.
13 provision of this chapter or for any grounds that would warrant the denial of such permits in the
14 first instance.
15 (b) Prior to the suspension or revocation of any permit issued under this chapter, the
16 permittee shall be entitled to a hearing before the city manager or the manager's designated
17 representative, at which time evidence will be received for the purpose of determining whether
18 or not the permit shall be suspended or revoked or whether the permit may be retained. In the
19 event the permit is suspended or revoked, the notification of the reasons for such suspension or
20 revocation shall be set forth in writing and sent to the permittee by means of first class mail.
21 The manager may impose conditions or restrictions on the permit in lieu of suspension or
22 revocation to attempt to eliminate violations or nuisances that have been found.
23 (c) In the event of suspension or revocation of any permit, the permittee may appeal to
24 the city council in the manner as provided in Section 6.40.090.
25
26 Section 6.40.140 Display of signs and permits.
27 No person granted an operator's permit pursuant to this chapter shall begin operations
28 until a recognizable and legible sign has been posted at the main entrance to the permit
2/7/2005 14
I premises. All permits granted shall bear the picture of the permittee and shall be posted within
2 the establishment in a location immediately available for inspection for representatives of the
3 city, including the permits for out call massage and massage practitioners. Out call massage
4 permittee must have their permit bearing their pictures available for inspection at all times
5 while providing out call massage services. No person granted a permit pursuant to this chapter
6 shall operate under any other name or at any other location than that specified in the permit.
7
8 Section 6.40.150 Notice of changes.
9 All persons granted permits pursuant to this chapter shall report immediately to the city
10 finance department and the police department all changes of residence or business address or
11 change of ownership of the establishment or service. Failure to give such notice within fifteen
12 (15) days of the event shall render the permit null and void.
13
14 Section 6.40.160 Renewal of permits.
15 Each permit shall be renewed annually, no less than ninety(90) days prior to the
16 anniversary date of its issuance. Any permit not renewed shall be null and void on such
17 anniversary date. The investigation fee for renewals shall be one hundred dollars ($100), no
18 part of which is refundable. Additional fees may be charged to cover costs such as processing
19 fingerprints. Prior to permit renewal being granted the permittee shall:
20 (1)Provide two photographs of passport size at least two inches by two inches showing
21 the head and shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinct manner taken with the sixty(60)
22 days immediately prior to filing the renewal application and current information concerning any
23 changes to the facts set forth in the initial or immediately prior renewal application;
24 (2) Obtain a new certificate, dated within thirty(30) days of the renewal, from a medical
25 doctor stating that the licensee is free from infectious, contagious or communicable diseases
26 capable of being transmitted through therapeutic massage;
27 (3) Obtain clearance from the police department that the permittee has had no arrests or
28 convictions for violations listed in subsection 6.40.080(a)(3) or(4) above since the permit was
2/7/2005 15
I issued or last renewed.
2 Upon complete submission of this information together with the required filing fee, the permit
3 shall be renewed.
4
5 Section 3. The provisions of Section 6.40.040(m) contained in this ordinance shall
6 apply as follows until October 1, 2005:
7 (a) Any person who can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the chief of police that the
8 person has been practicing massage in the City of Burlingame for a continuous period of six (6)
9 months before March 1, 2005, under the exemptions contained in Section 6.40.050 as it existed
10 on February 1, 2005, need only provide proof that the person has successfully completed
11 seventy(70) hours of training in a Recognized School in order to be granted a conditional
12 massage technician's permit under chapter 6.40. As a condition of such a permit, the person
13 shall be required to complete the required 500 hours of training at a Recognized School within
14 twelve (12)months of the date of issuance of the conditional permit.
15 (b) This conditional permit process shall not apply to any permit application received
16 after October 1, 2005.
17 (c) The requirements of section 6.40.040(m) shall not apply retroactively to any massage
18 permit that was approved by the City of Burlingame before the effective date of this ordinance.
19
20 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
21
22
Mayor
23
24 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that
25 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7"'
26 day of February, 2005, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on
27 the_day of , 2005, by the following vote:
28
2/7/2005 16
I AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
2 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
3 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
4
City Clerk
5 C:\FILES\ORDINANC\massage2005.bpd.wpd
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2/7/2005 17
CITYAGENDA 6b
°�\ ITEM#
GAM
BURLINE MTG.
.�.., �� STAFF REPORT DATE 2,22,2005
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: February 16. 2005 APPROVE
BY—
FROM:
Y FROM: Lam E. Anderson, Cijy Attorney
SUBJECT-
CONSIDER RENEWAL OF AMUSEMENT PERMIT–FANNY& ALEXANDER,
1108 BURLINGAME AVENUE AND 303-305 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
At the January 18, 2005, Council meeting, the City Council continued review of the Fanny&Alexander
amusement permit, so that the Police Department could meet with the owners and discuss improvements to
security, particularly at closing hour.
Those meetings have occurred. The owners continue to be cooperative and willing to make every effort to make
the establishment as safe as possible..
The Police Department requests the Council to add the following conditions to the amusement permit, and the
owners have agreed to the conditions:
–Participate with the ABC LEADS program for refresher bartender and waitress training.
–Meet with the police department once a month(or as requested by the police department or business)
to address policing issues or problems.
–Upgrade the patron dress code with the approval of the police department; consideration should be
given to the following restrictions: no athletic gear,no tennis shoes, no head gear, and no t-shirts.
–Insure that all business employees fully cooperate with the police department when asked to provide
witness statements, contact information, and requests to return telephone calls.
–Insure that designated employees remain at the door/sidewalk until 0230 hrs or later as needed to
assist in dispersing patrons of the establishment at closing.
The Police Department believes that this is a first step in a more comprehensive approach to working with the
entertainment venues in the Burlingame Avenue area. The permit will return to the Council for review in June
or July of this year.
In addition, staff will be working on an amended entertainment ordinance over the next few months so that it is
in place for the June-July review cycle.
Mayor and Council
Re: Renewal of Fanny&Alexander Amusement Permit
February 16, 2005
Page 2
Attachment
Proposed Revised Conditions for Fanny&Alexander
Distribution
Chief of Police
City Planner
PROPOSED CONDITIONS FOR AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR
FANNY & ALEXANDER, 1108 BURLINGAME AVENUE/303-305 CALIFORNIA DRIVE
Permit allows: Permit allows live music and dancing from 11 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., seven nights a week; a
cover charge may be charged at the door after 9:00 p.m., but this operation shall not be
conducted in such a way as to obstruct the public sidewalk or street..
1. All alcohol beverage laws shall be strictly enforced.
2. Any violations of the law or threatened violations shall be immediately reported to the Police
Department and full cooperation shall be given by employees and management of the business.
3. No variance from the permitted entertainment shall occur without obtaining an amendment to the
permit.
4. No part of the business shall be subleased without notification to the Police Department.
5. The amusement permit shall be non-transferable.
6. Any fight, ejection of customer, thefts from customers, or any other criminal act occurring at the
establishment shall be reported to the Burlingame Police as soon as any establishment employee is
aware of such an incident.
7. Any request by anyone in the establishment for an employee to contact the Police shall be honored
immediately, without question.
8. Last call for alcohol service shall be no later than 1:10 a.m. on nights when entertainment is offered,
and no alcohol shall be served after 1:20 a.m. on those nights.
9. Labor Code Section 6404.5 regulating smoking shall be enforced at all times.
10. No minors are to be allowed on the premises during hours when there is no food service, unless they are
there on lawful business, and no minors shall be allowed in the business after 10 p.m. when
entertainment is being offered.
11. Loudspeakers for the business shall be directed toward the interior of the business; and
The business shall not violate Section 10.40.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code; and
The entertainment shall not be audible outside the premises; and
The establishment shall measure the current 24-hour ambient noise levels(L 10)at the exterior of the
property along Burlingame Avenue and at the rear of the patio area using a methodology approved
by the City Planner before opening for business; and
Upon request by the City,the establishment shall conduct noise measurements to determine whether the
noise from the establishment is exceeding the 5 dBA standard for increases in noise from the
baseline as provided in the Burlingame General Plan, and shall report the measurements to the City;
and
The establishment shall ensure that the 5 dBA standard is not exceeded.
12. The establishment shall be operated as a single entertainment venue. No ingress or egress shall be
allowed from California Drive during business hours, except for emergencies.
13. Advertising for the entertainment shall conform to the requirements of the City Code.
14. No patrons will be admitted after 1:00 a.m.
15. Beverages will only be served in plasticware after 10 p.m. on Friday and Saturday nights. The
exceptions to this are closed, private parties and beverages served in stemware.
16. The establishment will provide additional security outside the establishment between 10 p.m. and 2
a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights;this condition may be met by a paid detail officer.
17. Upon closing on evenings when entertainment is offered,the establishment shall pick up all litter
within 50 feet of the premises on the pubic street and sidewalk. This does not include the area in front
of Left at Albuquerque unless the litter came from Fanny&Alexander activity.
18. Participate with the ABC LEADS program for refresher bartender and waitress training.
19. Meet with the police department once a month(or as requested by the police department or
business)to address policing issues or problems.
20. Upgrade the patron dress code with the approval of the police department; consideration
should be given to the following restrictions: no athletic gear,no tennis shoes, no head gear,and
no t-shirts.
21. Insure that all business employees fully cooperate with the police department when asked to
provide witness statements, contact information, and requests to return telephone calls.
22. Insure that designated employees remain at the door/sidewalk until 0230 hrs or later as needed
to assist in dispersing patrons of the establishment at closing.
The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6. If anyone wishes to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction,they must do so within
90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law.
ITY STAFF REPORT
AGENDA
ITEM# 8a
MTG.
DATE 2/22/05
n
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: February 15,2005
APPROVED
FROM: Jim Nantell 558-7205 BY
suB.IEcr: 2005-06 Budget Direction and Council Goals
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council review and confirm the Budget Direction and Council Goals for
inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2005-0006 Proposed Budget.
BACKGROUND: On Saturday,January 29`I'the Council held a study session to discuss staff direction
relative to preparation of the 2005-2006 Budget that will be presented to the Council in June. Staff has
transcribed the notes from the meeting and is asking the Council to confirm that we have accurately captured
the Council consensus direction. Although the proposed budget will include funding for the Council Goals
as stated in Attachment A, as part of the Council's review of the Budget in June the Council will have another
opportunity to make modifications of the Council Goals for 2005-2006.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Budget Direction and Council Goals for 2005-2006
Attachment A
BUDGET DIRECTION AND COUNCIL GOALS FOR FY 2005-06
Budget Direction
• Project 5%revenue growth in FY 05-06
• Increase Capital Improvements Funding to $1.1 million
• Project 3% increase in employee costs
• Project the use of$1.6 million in General Fund reserves
• Develop a simple, standard form to solicit information from Community Groups
- Attempt to identify issues and problems prior to adoption of budget and let
community group representatives know about if there are any known issues prior
to the Council's budget hearing.
- Work with Vice-Mayor Baylock in formulating funding solicitation letter
- Publish a deadline for community or citizens to provide input on the community
funding requests.
• Restore travel funding to City Clerk's Office
• Leave Tier 4 cuts in City Council budget as presented
• Evaluate additional contribution to Centennial Reserve at the end of the fiscal year
City Council Goals For FY 2005-06
1. Balance the FY 05-06 budget with minimal impacts on existing employees
2. Complete the development and adoption of a"Tree View Ordinance/Policy"that would
protect the ability of property owners to maintain views that were associated with the
property when they purchased it. (P&R)
3. Complete the development of the implementation ordinances associated with the recently
completed advanced planning for the North End and the Shoreline Specific Area Plans
(Planning)
4. Complete the assessment of the structural stability of the Eucalyptus trees on Easton
Drive. Work with Beautification Commission to explore the advisability of developing a
Broader Plan for managing our urban forest of Eucalyptus trees.(P&R)
5. Finalize a decision by the City Council relative to review of financing options for funding
the public facilities Master Plan(consider including storm drainage needs). As a subset of
this goal decide about desirability of investing in new sound system in the Council
Chambers. (PW)
6. Look at forming a Centennial Planning Committee and solicit volunteers through the
City's list-serve. (Clerk)
7. Have Police and Fire Department evaluate new ways of communicating with citizens
during disasters and emergencies. (Fire)
8. Provide clear direction to Safeway on development(CM,Planning)
9. Communicate the Council's vision that the Chamber of Commerce and Business
Improvement Districts develop partnership to enhance their long-term success and
efficiency of operation. (CM)
a. Include a"Buy Burlingame" campaign
b. Joint Web site(possibly in cooperation with the City's web site.)
10. Explore mixed-use development concepts for the Donnelly Parking Lot site. (Planning)
Attachment A
11. Have City Clerk use City list-serve to send information to community(Clerk)
12. Continue to explore and pursue shared services opportunities with other near by cities,
including Recreation and Police Dispatch. (Police)
Other goals that were discussed and will come back for further consideration:
1. Look at possible partnerships between the Chamber of Commerce and Business
Improvements Districts to improve the City's website and bring back to the Council for
additional funding as part of the June Budget approval process.
2. Consider developing an Amazon.com account, which would allow library users to buy
books online and four percent of the purchase price would be donated to the library
circulation fund. (Some concern was expressed relative to competing with a recently
attracted bookstore in the downtown retail area. Council's decision was to refer this to
the library Board for their consideration and recommendation.)
3. During budget review meetings in June revisit need for and ability to provide additional
funding for an improved web site.
4. As part of the June Budget review revisit the development of a Downtown Burlingame
Specific Area Plan(SAP)that could provide a clear vision for downtown.
a. Check workload of the Planning Department
b. Include California Auto Row as part of plan
c. Possibly borrow from other fund i.e. parking fund
d. If we can't fund the specific area plan now consider supporting a Charette for the
downtown area to open up the discussion and thinking as a precursor to the SAP
5. Improve TV broadcast for Council meetings and the microphone system in the Lane
Room. (Next steps on Council Chamber sound will be considered as part of the follow
up to the Public Facilities Master Plan.)
6. Have Public Works report back on their efforts to implement WiFi in Burlingame
business district.
Other goals that were discussed but were not included as priority goals for the next fiscal year
were:
1. Refine the regulations and design review guidelines relative to creek side and reemerging
lots.
2. Hold public forums-workshops on key community issues. (It was suggested that council
members and member of the public,that may be interested in seeing a specific workshop
sponsored, should let the council know at one of its public comment periods at regularly
scheduled council meetings.
3. Create a citizen's academy. (Council like the idea, however felt given current cutbacks it
was not a priority. But should be considered when and if funding improved significantly.
4. Work with auto dealers to explore the potential of a long-term plan to transition their
location from California Drive Auto Row to property adjacent to the freeway north of
Broadway.
5. Mayor should hold annual Town Hall Meeting.
Attachment A
BUDGET DIRECTION AND COUNCIL GOALS FOR FY 2005-06
Budget Direction
• Project 5%revenue growth in FY 05-06
• Increase Capital Improvements Funding to $1.1 million
• Project 3% increase in employee costs
• Project the use of$1.6 million in PERS reserves
• Develop a simple, standard form to solicit information from Community Groups
- Attempt to identify issues and problems prior to adoption of budget and let
community group representatives know about if there are any known issues prior
to the Council's budget hearing.
- Work with Vice-Mayor Baylock in formulating funding solicitation letter
- Publish a deadline for community or citizens to provide input on the community
funding requests.
• Restore travel funding to City Clerk's Office
• Leave Tier 4 cuts in City Council budget as presented
• Evaluate additional contribution to Centennial Reserve at the end of the fiscal year
City Council Goals For FY 2005-06
1. Balance the FY 05-06 budget with minimal impacts on existing employees
2. Complete the development and adoption of a"Tree View Ordinance/Policy"that would
protect the ability of property owners to maintain views that were associated with the
property when they purchased it. (P&R)
3. Complete the development of the implementation ordinances associated with the recently
completed advanced planning for the North End and the Shoreline Specific Area Plans
(Planning)
4. Complete the assessment of the structural stability of the Eucalyptus trees on Easton
Drive. Work with Beautification Commission to explore the advisability of developing a
Broader Plan for managing our urban forest of Eucalyptus trees.(P&R)
5. Finalize a decision by the City Council relative to review of financing options for funding
the public facilities Master Plan (consider including storm drainage needs). As a subset of
this goal decide about desirability of investing in new sound system in the Council
Chambers. (PW)
6. Look at forming a Centennial Planning Committee and solicit volunteers through the
City's list-serve. (Clerk)
7. Have Police and Fire Department evaluate new ways of communicating with citizens
during disasters and emergencies. (Fire)
8. Provide clear direction to Safeway on development(CM, Planning)
9. Have City Clerk continue to implement creative ways to encourage citizens to register on
the City list-serve as a means to increase our outreach to the community. (Clerk)
10. Continue to explore and pursue shared services opportunities with other near by cities,
including Recreation and Police Dispatch. (Police)
Attachment A
Other goals that were discussed and will come back for further consideration:
1. Look at possible partnerships between the Chamber of Commerce and Business
Improvements Districts to improve the City's website and bring back to the Council for
additional funding as part of the June Budget approval process.
2. Consider developing an Amazon.com account, which would allow library users to buy
books online and four percent of the purchase price would be donated to the library
circulation fund. (Some concern was expressed relative to competing with a recently
attracted bookstore in the downtown retail area. Council's decision was to refer this to
the library Board for their consideration and recommendation.)
3. During budget review meetings in June revisit need for and ability to provide additional
funding for an improved web site.
4. As part of the June Budget review revisit the development of a Downtown Burlingame
Specific Area Plan (SAP) that could provide a clear vision for downtown.
a. Check workload of the Planning Department
b. Include California Auto Row as part of plan
c. Possibly borrow from other fund i.e. parking fund
d. If we can't fund the specific area plan now consider supporting a Charette for the
downtown area to open up the discussion and thinking as a precursor to the SAP
5. Improve TV broadcast for Council meetings and the microphone system in the Lane
Room. (Next steps on Council Chamber sound will be considered as part of the follow
up to the Public Facilities Master Plan.)
6. Have Public Works report back on their efforts to implement WiFi in Burlingame
business district.
Other follow up direction from the meeting:
1. Communicate the Council's vision.that the Chamber of Commerce and Business
Improvement Districts develop partnership to enhance their long-term success and
efficiency of operation. (CM)
a. Include a"Buy Burlingame" campaign
b. Joint Web site (possibly in cooperation with the City's web site.)
2. Requested that staff share public record information about the City owned Donnelly
Parking Lot site with Mr. Ionescu. (Public Works)
Other goals that were discussed but were not included as priority goals for the next fiscal year
were:
1. Refine the regulations and design review guidelines relative to creek side and reemerging
lots.
2. Hold public forums-workshops on key community issues. (It was suggested that council
members and member of the public, that may be interested in seeing a specific workshop
sponsored, should let the council know at one of its public comment periods at regularly
scheduled council meetings.
3. Create a citizen's academy. (Council like the idea however felt given current cutbacks it
was not a priority. But should be considered when and if funding improved significantly.
Attachment A
4. Work with auto dealers to explore the potential of a long-term plan to transition their
location from California Drive Auto Row to property adjacent to the freeway north of
Broadway.
5. Mayor should hold annual Town Hall Meeting.
CITY AGENDA 9a
°�'. ITEM#
BURLINGAME S T A F F REPORT
MTG.
DATE 2/22/2005
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTE /
BY -- - --
DATE: February 16, 2005 APPROVE
BY -
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZE CONTRIBUTION TO COMPLETE STUDY OF EMF EXPOSURE LIMITS
FROM JEFFERSON-MARTIN TRANSMISSION LINE ALONG SKYLINE BOULEVARD IN
BURLINGAME
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize contribution of up to $500 to complete study of EMF exposure limits from Jefferson-Martin
Transmission Line along Skyline Boulevard in Burlingame.
DISCUSSION:
Over the past two years, citizens' groups, the City, and other local governments have worked to make the
proposed Jefferson-Martin transmission line as good a project as possible under the constraints of State law and
competitive interests. Late last year,the California Public Utilities Commission authorized PG&E to proceed
with construction of an underground route along Skyline Boulevard, and Commission staff approved the "EMF
mitigation"plan developed by PG&E.
PG&E's contractor has now submitted tentative plans to the City for review for a City encroachment permit.
City staff has requested a number of revisions, which are being made by the contractor.
After some discussion, PG&E has also agreed to attend an informational meeting held by the City for City
residents living along Skyline. That meeting will probably be held in late March or early April.
On February 7, 2005, Lara Lighthouse, representing the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens, requested the Council
to consider a contribution of$500 so that the 280 CCC's retained expert could complete his analysis of the
potential EMF exposures from the route at the varying depths and distances that are proposed. While PG&E
provided some of this information, it was fairly generic and dealt with exposures at right-of-way, rather than at
homes.
Therefore, staff believes that this contribution would be a worthwhile piece of information for citizens in the
area, so that they can make their own evaluations of risks and concerns.
cc: Lara Lighthouse, Director of Public Works, City Planner
CITY o� STAFF REPORT
BURLINGAME AGENDA
ITEM# 9b
MTG.
°RATED J NE 0
DATE 2.22.05
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 2004
APPROVED
FROM: CITY PLANNER BY
SUBJECT: APPLICATION TO C/CAG FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT HOUSING
INCENTIVE PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should consider adopting a resolution authorizing staff to submit
an application for transportation grant funding under the Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive
Program.
BACKGROUND: The City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG)has issued a call for projects to
all communities in San Mateo County for its Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program.
The purpose of this program is to encourage communities to develop high density housing near transit
stations. The incentive is awarded to communities for development projects built at a density greater than 40
units per acre within one-third mile of a BART or Caltrain station. The incentive to communities consists of
funds of up to $2000 per bedroom built to be used by the community in a transportation related project. The
transportation project to be funded does not have to be directly related to the development project,but will
have to be an eligible project under one of three funding sources identified by C/CAG. Burlingame staff has
not yet identified the transportation project on which these funds will be spent. However, for this funding
cycle, C/CAG is encouraging communities to submit applications based on projects which are in the early
phases of the development process,but which are expected to be built within the next two years. The
transportation project does not need to be identified until the eligible housing project is under construction.
As you know, the recently adopted North Burlingame Specific Plan is encouraging higher density residential
development near the Millbrae BART/Caltrain Station. Planning Department staff has had preliminary
discussions with the owner of the property located at 1875 California Drive regarding a proposed four-story,
22-unit condominium building(see attached preliminary site plan). This proposal would qualify for this
program because it is about 1/4 mile from the Millbrae BART/Caltrain Station and, as it is now designed, is
about 60 units per acre. The North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan allows for multiple family
residential development up to 50 units per acre, or 18 units on this site which would also qualify.
It is important to note that this residential project has not yet been reviewed for compliance with the City's
zoning regulations, nor has it been through the environmental review or public hearing process. Changes
may be made to the project based on any or all of these review processes. However, the project concept is
generally consistent with the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan and meets the criteria for this
program. Staff is now requesting that the Council authorize City staff to submit an application for funding so
that we may compete for this round of funding.
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Letter from Mayor Galligan to C/CAG
Application Form
Preliminary Site Plan
Council Resolution
CITY G
BURL INGAME
AAn JUNE'"
JOE GALLIGAN,MAYOR nG//—w L
CATHY BAYLOCK,VICE MAYOR &/ y ��u// TEL: (650)558-7200
MIKE COFFEY FAX: (650)342-8386
TERRY NAGEL CITY HALL–501 PRIMROSE ROAD www.budingame.org
ROSALIE M.O'MAHONY BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010-3997
February 22, 2005
Richard Napier, Executive Director
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County
555 County Center, Fifth Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
RE: Application for Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program
Dear Mr. Napier,
On behalf of the Burlingame City Council, it is requested that C/CAG accept the application for the
Transit Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program which was submitted to C/CAG by the
Planning Department on January 31, 2005. It is our understanding that the purpose of the program is to
encourage housing near transit. The incentive offered by C/CAG could be used by the City of
Burlingame to fund an eligible transportation project if an eligible housing project is constructed within
two years of application submittal. To be eligible, the housing project must be within one-third mile of
a BART or Caltrain Station,be built at a density greater than 40 units per acre, and be constructed
within two years of the date of application.
The City's request is based on a proposed project on property located at 1875 California Drive in
Burlingame. Planning Department staff has had preliminary discussions with the owner of the property
located at 1875 California Drive regarding a proposed four-story, 22-unit condominium building(see
enclosed preliminary site plan). The density of the project as it is now designed is about 60 units per
acre. The North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan allows for multiple family residential
development up to 50 units per acre, or 18 units on this site.
The site is located on the northwest corner of California and Murchison Drives, about 1/4 mile from
the Millbrae Intermodal Station, with BART, Caltrain and SamTrans connections. In September of
2004, the City Council adopted the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan,which encourages
residential and mixed use development in this area. In addition, this area is identified as appropriate
for multiple family residential development in the City's Housing Element, adopted by the City Council
in 2002. The City Council has also adopted an inclusionary zoning ordinance,which requires that at
least ten percent of multiple family residential units built shall be affordable to moderate income
residents. Additional incentives are offered for projects which include units affordable to low income
residents.
Richard Napier, Executive Director
C/CAG
February 22, 2005
Page 2
The project has not yet been reviewed for compliance with the City's zoning regulations, nor has it
been through the environmental review or public hearing process. Changes may be made to the project
based on any or all of these review processes. However, the project concept is generally consistent
with the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan.
Based on the location and preliminary plans submitted, this project would qualify for the Transit
Oriented Development Housing Incentive Program. We respectfully request that you consider this
application for incentive funding. The application to the Planning Commission will be submitted
within the next few months, and if approved, it is expected that construction would begin within the
next two years.
Thank you for considering this request. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact Margaret Monroe, City Planner, at(650) 558-7250.
Sincerely,
Joe Galligan
Mayor
C/CAG
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
HOUSING INCENTIVE APPLICATION
APPLICANT
City or County: City of Burlingame
Address: 501 Primrose Road
ZIP Code: Burlingame, CA 94010
Contact Person: Margaret Monroe
Telephone Number: (650)558-7250
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Project Name or Developer: Otto Miller
Location: 1875 California Drive (Southwest corner of California and Murchison)
Caltrain or Bart Station: Caltrain X BART X
Distance from Station: < 1/4 Mile
(Note: Must be less than one third of a mile to be eligible)
Density in Units Per Acre: 60 units/acre
Per Cent of Units Low to Moderate Income: 10%
Status of Review Process: Preliminary Review—no formal application submitted
General Description of Proposed Project:
Four-story, 22-unit condominium project with underground parking on a 0.36 acre site
located at the northwest corner of California and Murchison Drives, Burlingame (1875
California Drive) Project is less than 1/4 mile to the Millbrae Intermodal Station and the
City requires that a minimum of ten percent of the units are affordable to moderate
income households The project would include a total of 38 bedrooms.
Attach Rough Site Plan and Architectural Renderings if available:
a�.a� nrio
T�
205 Park Road,Su
Burlingame,Califon
FAX 650.579.0
_ 650.579.576:
E-Mail: trgarchirects(
Architect:
VVELIVERY PARKING Cs-.,%
consultant:
I
1
W
^ Project Title:
rol o
`rl Z _:�: X1r
C" 0
O XXX
Znew condomfm
w = �
N V °° APN: aoac m-i
�I 'mr
Z g Budingame,CA 9
Sheet Title:
i Site Algh
I
b lu NOTM
a
ii Baa,: TIM
-
• D DRAFT ..
RECEIVED
JAN 2 8 2005
CRY OF BMA"ff IL2
PLAIVMW DEPT s>f
lor - Q-1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame has authority under the California Government Code
§§ 34000 and following for the exercise of the powers of a city government; and
WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC) and the City/County
Association of Governments of San Mateo County are offering an incentive program to encourage
housing near transit facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame has adopted a current Housing Element in its General
Plan and a recent Specific Plan for the North Burlingame/Rollins Road area of the City that
encourages and facilitates housing near the City's transit hubs; and
WHEREAS, the property at 1875 California Drive is classified for use as multi-family
housing and is in close proximity to the multi-modal transit facility in Millbrae,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute a letter on behalf of the City of
Burlingame applying to C/CAG for the Transit Oriented Housing Incentive Program for the
property at 1875 California Drive.
2. The City Manager is authorized to execute on behalf of the City such additional
documents as may be necessary to complete the application for the Incentive Program.
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
a
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
ITEM# 9C
MTG_ 02/22/05
DATE
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2005 BY
/4, w
APPROVED
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2005 SIDEWALK MAINT ANCE PROGRAM-CITY PROJECT NO.
80960
RECOMMENDATIONS:It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding a contract for
this project to SpenCon Construction,Inc. of Foster City in the amount of$202,045. It is also recommended that
staff be authorized to issue change orders up to 50% of the construction work.
DISCUSSION: Bids were opened on February 1,2005,and four bids were received. Bids ranged from$202,045
to $359,050. The low bid is approximately 33% below the engineer's estimate of$300,000. The low bidder,
SpenCon Construction, Inc., has met all the requirements for the project.
The project consists of the replacement of sidewalk, driveway, curb ramps, curb and gutter in the area of
Burlingame Park No. 4 and 5 and Polo Field Subdivisions as well as portions of the Easton Addition No. 2 and
Town of Burlingame Subdivisions as indicated on the attached map. Construction is expected to occur between
March and July.
This project marks the first implementation of the sidewalk program under the adopted Streets and Highways
Code. The City has sent two notices to the residents in the areas noted above. Approximately 30%of the residents
completed the required repairs through arrangements with private contractors. The remaining 70% will be
completed with this contract. As a result of a very competitive bid, the cost of repairs quoted initially to the
property owners is significantly lower. The average cost per property is $375, well below the original estimate
of$625.
In order to be able to extend the limits of curb ramp, curb and gutter replacement and maximize the use of
available funds,it is requested that staff be authorized to issue change orders up to 50%of the construction award.
There are sufficient funds in the budget to accommodate this change order amount.
At the end of this project, staff will prepare a summary report for the cost of repairs in accordance with the Streets
and Highways Code. A public hearing will be held for residents and Council to review these costs and to finalize
the report. After Council approval,the costs will be forwarded to the County Assessor's Office for collection with
the property taxes.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Bid Summary, Map
BUDGET IMPACT:
Estimated Construction Costs Available Funding:
Construction $202,045 2003/04 CIP $266,150
Contingency(50%) $101,000 Property Owner Contributions $ 43,850
Engineering Administration (25%) $ 50,000 2004/05 CIP $ 81,000
Construction Inspection 37,955
TOTAL $391,000 TOTAL $391,000
Donald Chang, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
c: City Clerk, City Attorney, Director of Finance, SpenCon Construction, Inc.
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80960award.wpd
RESOLUTION NO. -
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE
PROGRAM TO SPENCON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 80960
WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITY PROJECT
80960 -CONTRACT FOR 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, on FEBRUARY 1, 2005, all proposals were received and opened before the City
Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS,SPENCON CONSTRUCTION,INC. ,submitted the lowest responsible bid for the
job in the amount of$202,045.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and
Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of SPENCON CONSTRUCTION, INC., for said
project in the amount of$202,045.00, and the same hereby is accepted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful
bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work,and that the
City Manager be,and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said
contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be
furnished by the contractor.
Mayor
I, DORIS J. MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day
of , 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
s:\apublicworksdir\projects\resolutionaward
CITY OF BURLINGAME
2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
CITY PROJECT NO. 80960
BID SUMMARY SPENCON CONSTRUCTION JJR CONSTRUCTION VANGUARD CONSTRUCTION SPOSETO ENGINEERING
FOSTER CITY, CA SAN MATEO, CA OAKLAND, CA UNION CITY, CA
ITEM UNIT AREA UNIT ENGINEER'S UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID
NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE QUANTITY SIZE ESTIMATE PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
1 REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK $12.00 4,900 S. F. $58,800.00 $7.20 $35,280.00 $8.00 $39,200.00 $10.00 $49,000.00 $12.00 $58,800.00
2 REMOVE AND REPLACE DRIVEWAY $15.00 1,000 S. F. $15,000.00 $8.00 $8,000.00 $9.25 $9,250.00 $11.00 $11,000.00 $16.00 $16,000.00
3 REMOVE AND REPLACE 14" CURB AND GUTTER $35.00 2,480 L. F. $86,800.00 $26.50 $65,720.00 $30.50 $75,640.00 $32.00 $79,360.00 $33.00 $81,840.00
4 REMOVE AND REPLACE CURB $15.00 30 L.F. $450.00 $21.00 $630.00 $30.00 $900.00 $40.00 $1,200.00 $42.00 $1,260.00
5 ICROSS GUTTER $18.00 420 S. F. $7,560.00 $8.50 $3,570.00 $11.50 $4,830.00 $20.00 $8,400.00 $19.00 $7,980.00
6 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP $2,000.00 25 EACH $50,000.00 $1,175.00 $29,375.00 $1,800.00 $45,000.00 $1,900.00 $47,500.00 $2,800.00 $70,000.00
7 REMOVE SIDEWALK AND REPLACE WITH TOP SOIL $4.50 820 S.F. $3,690.00 $3.00 $2,460.00 $3.50 $2,870.00 $5.00 $4,100.00 $9.00 $7,380.00
8 AGGREGATE BASE $10.00 25 TONS $250.00 $25.00 $625.00 $50.00 $1,250.00 $50.00 $1,250.00 $106.00 $2,650.00
9 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BASE $4.50 5,150 S. F. $23,175.00 $3.00 $15,450.00 $3.75 $19,312.50 $4.00 $20,600.00 $9.00 $46,350.00
10 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE ONLY $45.00 5 TONS $225.00 $35.00 $175.00 $75.00 $375.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $118.00 $590.00
11 NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACING $160.00 240 TONS $38,400.00 $135.00 $32,400.00 $225.00 $54,000.00 $130.00 $31,200.00 $160.00 $38,400.00
12 REPAIR IRRIGATION SYSTEM $200.00 1 EACH $200.00 $875.00 $875.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,600.00 $5,600.00
13 SEWER CLEAN-OUT FRAME $2,500.00 1 L.S. $2,500.00 $75.00 $75.00 $100.00 $100.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $300.00 $300.00
14 REPAIR / REPLACE WATERLINE (10' MAX.) $1,000.00 2 EACH $2,000.00 $100.00 $200.00 $250.00 $500.00 $1,400.00 $2,800.00 $600.00 $1,200.00
15 ADJUST MANHOLES TO GRADE $750.00 1 EACH $750.00 $200.00 $200.00 $400.00 $400.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $900.00 $900.00
16 SIGN POST $100.00 1 EACH $100.00 $300.00 $300.00 $200.00 $200.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $300.00
17 PARKING METER POSTS $100.00 1 EACH $100.00 $150.00 $150.00 $200.001 $200.00 $500.00 $500.00 $300.00 $300.00
18 DRAINAGE INLET RELOCATION/MOD. AT CURB RAMP $4,000.00 1 EACH $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
19 CONCRETE CUTTING OR GRINDING $50.00 120 EACH $6,000.00 $38.00 $4,560.00 $50.00 $6,000.00 1 $100.00 $12,000.00 $60.00 $7,200.00
TOTAL $300,000.00 $202,045.00_ _.$280,,027_50 * _.$282,510_00 _$359.,050.00
* denotes mathemical errors; unit prices prevail per project specifications
S'A PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'APROJECTS%MASUMMARY.tic
PAGE 1 OF i
2/72005,3:58 PM
20. 05 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
VICINITY MAP
G JQ
- NC �Is t
4
A,`_- 1
ol
�lrg
41)NZ
`
\ /
CITY OF BU.RLINGAME
' / \ SAN 11ATEO COUNTY
` CALIFORNIA
REVISED:—11
s -
.; l
cf Af wC suar
Agenda
Item# 9d
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Meeting
Date February 22,2005
SUBMITTED BY
r
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 14, 2005
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ALMER BELLEVUE STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENT, CITY PROJECT 80110
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the resolution accepting the
Almer Bellevue Storm Drain Improvement, City Project No. 80110 in the amount of
$160,925.00
BACKGROUND; On August 16, 2004 the project was awarded to Harty Pipelines Construction,
Inc. for $138,660.00. A change order total of$22,265.78 was negotiated during the course of the
work for lowering the pipeline grade to avoid unforeseen conflicting existing utilities.
The Notice of Completion will be issued once the City receives the 10% maintenance bond as
required by the project contract.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment
BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds for the project in the Storm Drain CIP budget
(Project 80110).
Douglas Be
Senior Civil Engineer
c: City Clerk, Finance, J.F. Pacific Liners, Inc.
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80110AImer Bellvue Storm Drain Impr.doc
RESOLUTION NO. -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ALMER BELLEVUE
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT
HARTY PIPELINES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 80110
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council
does hereby find, order and determine as follows:
1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by HARTY
PIPELINES CONSTRUCTION,INC.under the terms of its contract with the City dated AUGUST 16,
2004,has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council
and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 80110.
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
Mayor
I, DORIS J. MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on February 22,2005,
and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80110\RES0LUTN.ACCEPT02.22.05.wpd
Harty Pipeline Inc. CITY OF BURLINGAME DATE: 14-Feb-05
4085 19th Avenue PROGRESS PAYMENT NO.3(FINAL) For the month of: Dec
San Francisco,CA 94132 Almer/Bellevue Storm Drain Improvement City PO#: 13,615
415.585.6023
Harty Job#259 City Project#80110
UNIT BID UNIT BID QUANTITY % AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY AMOUNT
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE QTY SIZE AMOUNT TO DATE PAID TO DATE PAID THIS PAYMENT
Contract Bid Items
1 Install Bubbler Boz $ 1,800.00 6 FA $ 10,800.00 500 83% 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ -
2 Install 8-C 900 SD Pipe $ 100.00 141 LF $ 14,100.00 144.00 100% 14,400.00 $ 14,400.00 $ -
3 Install 12'C 900 SD Pipe S 130.00 682 LF $ 88,660.00 665.00 98% 86,450.00 $ 88,450.00 $ -
4 AC Paving for Dench $ 3.00 4200 SF $ 12,600.00 4027.00 96% 12,081.00 $ 12,081.00 $ -
5 Install SD Manhole $ 500.00 6 FA $ 3,000.00 4.00 0% 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ -
6 Connect 12'SD to exist box culvert $ 3,000.00 1 EA $ 3,000.00 1.00 100% 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ -
7 Remove and replace curb and gutter $ 30.00 200 EA $ 6,000.00 188.00 94% 5,640.00 $ 5,640.00 $ -
8 vater utility conflicts $ 10000 5 FA $ 500.00 5.00 100% 500.00 $ 500.00 $ -
$
Total Original Contract $138,fi60.00 95.97% $133,071.00 $ 133,011.00 $
Total Change Orders $22,265.78 1.DD 100.00% 22,265.76 $22,265.78 $ -
Total Contract(One.+CCOs) $160,925.78 195.97% 3155,316.78 $155,336.78 $ -
$
$
TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACT $1381660.00 $133,071.00 $133,071.00 $ -
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $22,265.78 $22,265.78 $22,265.78 $
CONTRACT TOTAL(Original Contract+Change Orders) $1601925.78 $155,336.78 $155,336.78 $
LESS RETENTION 0% $0.00 $0.00 ($7,766.84) $ 7,766.84
SUBTOTAL WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS 31fi0,925.76 $155,136.78 $147,569.94 $ 7,766.64
AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTRACTOR $0.00 $0.00 $
TOTAL THIS PERIOD $160,925.78 $155,336.78 $147,569.94 $ 7,766.84
PREPARED BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER:
APPROVED BY CONTRACTOR:
CHARGED TO FUND ACCOUNT: 320-80110-220
Page 1 of 1
c17r AGENDA
10Z ITEM# 9e
STAFF REPORT
BUFaJHGAMMTG.
� e DATE Fehmary22y2005
eo
TO: Honorahle Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED
BYE Ch*ef of Police
DATE: February 5, 2005
APPRO
FROM: BY: �Y
SUBJECT: Request to send a Burlingame Police Officer to Tonga fo Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity
Training
RECOMMENDATION:
Respectfully request that the City Council approve allowing a designated police department employee to accompany an
officer from the San Bruno Police Department to Tonga. This cultural experience will provide the basis for a better
understanding of the culture and mores of the Tongan life-style, which will then be used for officer sensitivity training at
the involved police departments of San Bruno, San Mateo and Burlingame.
BACKGROUND
During the calendar year, 2004, the Burlingame Police Department experienced a number of highly volatile and violent
incidents in our bay front area involving young members of the Tongan Community. Several of these incidents developed
into "riot" situations, requiring members from the Burlingame Police Department requesting an emergency response and
immediate assistance from other law enforcement agencies in San Mateo County. Several of these incidents involved
firearms (the discovery of a handgun in a vehicle and another case involving shots fired) and throwing bottles and other
missiles at officers in other cases.
Many of the individuals involved in our incidents appear to reside in, and come from the surrounding communities of San
Mateo and San Bruno, where both cities are experiencing similar acts of violence involving rival Tongan gang members.
San Bruno has even experienced a shooting that seriously injured and paralyzed a young Tongan man.
In response to this violent trend, Police Chief Lee Violett from San Bruno, Police Chief Susan Manheimer from San
Mateo and I have worked closely with Tongan faith based community leaders in central San Mateo County hoping that
their outreach to troubled families might help to stop this violent trend in each of our communities. Several initiatives and
training sessions are currently underway or planned for the near future, including: gang awareness training, presentations
on the County Probation Department's Parenting Project and implementation of Project KLEAR (Kids Learning Empathy
and Respect). Grants are currently being sought to provide funding for these "train the trainer" courses involving the
various Tongan faith based community leaders.
However, one of the missing elements to this comprehensive approach that addresses these problems is the need to
provide law enforcement with a better understanding of the culture and mores of the Tongan Community. The police
chiefs in the affected communities believe an exchange of information will help law enforcement understand the
dynamics of the Tongan culture, and assist us with community outreach by acquiring the necessary sensitivity needed in
these matters.
With this goal in mind, the Burlingame Police Department would like to send an officer to Tonga to accompany an
officer from San Bruno so that the involved cities can begin cultural sensitivity training for law enforcement personnel,
and begin an exchange of information that will forge relationships of trust and credibility among members of the Tongan
community. The officer selected would be expected to share what was learned with other members of the aforementioned
police departments and to act as a key point of contact(for Burlingame)with the Tongan faith based community.
A portion of the financial support to send an officer to Tonga has been obtained through donations from several service
clubs in San Bruno. The Burlingame Police Department has also requested funding donations from two major service
clubs in Burlingame to help off set some(or all of these costs). It is hoped that these donated funds($1,000.00)will cover
the cost of air fare, lodging and meals. The police department would be responsible for payment of the regular salary of
the officer going to Tonga for a period of 7 days(total).This salary cost will be absorbed through the current police
department budget,as well as any cost shortages not obtained through donations.
Attachments-Notes and proposed budget from December's Tongan,Police Community Relations and PCRC Meeting
Tongan/Police Community Relations Meeting
12/20/04
Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (PCRC)
Notes from the meeting
Present: Kalatini Ahio, Pat Brown, PCRC, San Bruno Methodist, Noreen Hanlon,
SBPD,Lea Loumoli, Falehufanga United Methodist Church,Susan Manheimer,
SMPD, Etuate Sekona (Ed), LDS, Vika Sinipata, San Mateo, Maopa Temeifuna,
SDA, Alex Tukumoeatu,San Carlos,Jack Van Etten, BPD
After a prayer by Reverend Ahio and introductions, the group clarified the
purpose for this meeting:
We are continuing a collaborative effort to find resources/support to address
and/or prevent juvenile delinquent behaviors and involvement with violence by
Tongan youth.
This work, which has been gathering momentum for about 6 months, depends
on partnerships developing between the following groups:
• Churches serving Tongan families
• Law enforcement
• City government officials
• Schools
• San Mateo County Probation
• PCRC
• Tongan media (Channel 28)
• All media (Channel 57, Community Connections, Cop Talk)
The task for this meeting was to discuss the elements of a proposal to secure
funding from the FAITHS Initiative of the Peninsula Community Foundation.
The guidelines for this funding ask proposals to address specific community
needs. The group believes this project addresses two needs:
1. Community leadership
2. Strong families and individuals
Draft I of Proposal to FAITHS Partnership
Part I: Project Description
1. What is the principal objective of your project?
This collaborative effort is aimed at providing support and education to
Tongan families and youth at risk of involvement with
destructive/delinquent behaviors. In an appropriate and sensitive
manner that maintains cultural values, the group strives to:
- provide parents with parenting education and support so they can
work with their children in a productive manner to steer them into
positive activities.
- work directly with young people, ages 10-20 years, to help them
become productive and responsible citizens and community
members by providing educational opportunities
- develop effective and ongoing partnerships among those groups
involved in this effort so they can continue to work together for the
benefit of Tongan youth, families and communities
- promote the development of leaders within the Tongan community
- enhance the understanding and sensitivity of law enforcement and
educational professionals working with Tongan families and youth
The members of this collaborative group have identified the following key
strategies for use in the initial stages of work with Tongan youth and
families:
- parent training/education- using existing and proven models
and adapting them for use with the Tongan community - one such
model is The Parent Project, sponsored in San Mateo County by
Juvenile Probation and Mental Health
- the Kids Learning Empathy and Respect Program (KLEAR),
currently operating as an alternative to suspension program in the
San Mateo High School District and designed to teach youth about
the impact of destructive language and behaviors and skills to
replace the negative with positive behaviors. KLEAR has been
designed to be replicated and adapted in various settings
throughout the county. The planning group believes this model
can be adapted to use with Tongan youth and parents and
delivered from a congregational/ community setting with youth in
late elementary grades through high school.
- building bridges between the Tongan community and those public
and private agencies that provide services to them. This strategy is
being addressed already in the ongoing planning effort and will be
strengthened by cultural awareness and sensitivity training to be
delivered as a component of this grant.
- leadership development - this proposal describes the beginning of
ongoing efforts to identify and support emerging leaders in the
Tongan community. Included in this category are project planners
and those who will assist with designing and delivering training to
Tongan families and youth
training for service providers -will be delivered by members of
the Tongan community and it will be designed to enhance
understanding of and respect for cultural values of the Tongan
community.
The Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (PCRC) has worked with the
Tongan community, law enforcement and the schools most recently as it
addressed violent behavior between youth attending Aragon and
Capuchino High Schools two years ago. PCRC's mission is closely
aligned with the goals of this project. PCRC's role will be further defined
as this effort develops, but at this point the agency is providing technical
assistance with the development of the proposal, support for adapting the
KLEAR Program and some meeting facilitation services.
2. What constituency will you serve?
This project will serve Tongan families, with youth ages 10-20 years, who
are living/worshipping in central San Mateo County (San Carlos (South)
through San Bruno (North) and whose young people are at risk of
engaging in destructive behaviors. In addition, the police, probation and
educational professionals who work with this population, as well as
leaders of the larger community, will be provided with education about
the culture and values of the Tongan community.
3. Who is responsible for project leadership?
Reverend Kalatini Ahio, of the San Bruno First United Methodist Church,
is the president of the Tongan Community Leaders, a group of church
leaders serving Tongan families. He will serve as project leader. Rev.
Ahio and Rev. Lea Loumoli of the Falehufanga United Methodist Church
in San Carlos are co-submitting this proposal.
4. What is the level of community involvement?
Since July 20, 2004, Tongan and community leaders have been meeting
with families to discuss and begin to address the issue of youth
involvement with delinquent behavior. There have been 9 meetings
during this period with attendance ranging from 18 to 40 participants.
These meetings have been hosted by different congregations and a
concerted effort has been made to include representatives from all of the
denominations serving the Tongan Community (ex. Methodist, Catholic,
Seventh Day Adventist, Latter Day Saints). More recently, City and Police
representatives have begun to meet with the group to support its work
and explore additional support. Police Chiefs from Burlingame, San
Bruno and San Mateo are now regular attendees. The group has
established a monthly meeting schedule starting on January 27, 2005.
5. What partner organizations/congregations are involved in the project's
implementation?
At this time the following groups/agencies have committed to
involvement with this project's implementation:
• Burlingame Police Department
• Falehufanga United Methodist Church of San Carlos
• First United Methodist Church of San Bruno
• Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center
• San Bruno Police Department
• San Mateo County Probation?
• San Mateo Police Department
• San Mateo Union High School District
6. What is the anticipated time frame?
This proposal is designed to fund the initial work of a larger ongoing
effort to address this complex issue of Tongan youth involvement with
destructive behavior. The group believes that the first phase of work that
will be funded by this proposal can be completed in about 9 months. The
first few months will be devoted to developing training capacity for
parenting education and KLEAR and engaging parents and youth to
participate in these opportunities.
7. What specific goals are you trying to achieve?
During this first phase of work, this group hopes to accomplish the
following:
• Involve at 50-75 Tongan youth in positive community events jointly
sponsored by project partners
• Serve 35 selected at-risk youth in an adapted KLEAR (Kids
Learning Empathy and Respect) program
• Recruit and provide training for 1-2 Tongan parent educators who
can in turn train other parent educators to deliver a culturally
appropriate parenting education program.
• Provide scholarships for at least 10 Tongan parents to attend the
existing Parenting Project Series (10 weeks)
• Involve 30-40 Tongan parents in a more informal, KLEAR model of
parent support and education
• Provide initial cultural sensitivity training to at least 150 law
enforcement officers and administrators in the Burlingame, San
Bruno and San Mateo Police Departments through roll call and
training day presentations
8. How will you know if you are successful?
• Our training goals (listed above) will be accomplished
• Culturally appropriate curriculum and materials will be available
for continuing use for both parent and youth education
• Participants in the training will report increased knowledge and
understanding
• Tongan leaders will be trained to provide specialized educational
opportunities to members of the Tongan community
• School discipline records and probation statistics will begin to
reflect decreasing negative behaviors by Tongan youth
• Partners in the project will feel confidence in each other and
commitment to ongoing collaborative efforts
• Law enforcement professionals will have increased knowledge
about the culture and values of the Tongan community
Part II: Budget
Revenue
Peninsula Community Foundation- FAITHS Partnership $5,000
Expenses
$710
• Training for 1 Trainer of Trainers for the
Parenting Project
$350
• Tuition for 10 parents to attend local Parenting
Project classes ($35/parent)
$300
• Funds to adapt/translate existing parent education
curriculum (20 hours @ $15/hour)
$300
• Funds to adopt KLEAR curriculum for community-
based delivery (6 hours @ $50/hour)
$500
• Training for Tongan KLEAR trainers
(10 hours at$50/hour)
$300
• Training supplies (paper/food)
$1,100
• Event supplies
(2 events for Tongan youth/families - to include
food and entertainment
$640
• Facilitation/consultation
(support from PCRC for planning and
implementation of project- 16 hours @ $40/hour)
$800
• Community outreach (support for collaborative
group to facilitate outreach and follow up between
meetings -40 hours @ $20/hour)
Total $5,000
In kind:
Cultural Presentations to law enforcement, educator groups
Project leadership
Support for ongoing collaborative meetings
$2,454,416.67
Ck.No.99438-10020
NOTE:New check sequence has begun
Excludes Library Cks.99537-99564
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Payroll for January 2005.
$2,385,158.62
Ck.No.161061-161369
INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
PERS HEALTH
PERS RETIREMENT
FEDERAL 941 TAX
STATE DISABILITY TAX
STATE INCOME TAX
PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP
SECTION 125 DEDUCTION
KIDn
as
Ej
rt C
Q
on v
v
� 3
>J �1
S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS
d
CITY OF BURLINGAME
02-03-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11
FUND RECAP - 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 81,493.13
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 14,476.00
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 27,542.14
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 65,072.47
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 51,588.09
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 43,276.83
WATER FUND 526 3,230.89
SEWER FUND 527 4,836.17
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5,341.77
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 115.16
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 150.00
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1,907.44
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 12,202.43
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 7,761.16
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,057.42
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,140.36
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 115.79
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 45,167.36
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8366,474.61
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99901 THROUGH 100020 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $366,474.61, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
....... . ...................... . ..... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
....... ..... ........................ .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
100012 ANTHONY CERVELLI 25201 3,978.59
MISCELLANEOUS 1,612.80 101 31510
MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS 100.79 731 22518
MISCELLANEOUS 15.00 731 22550
100013 REMY SIJBRANT 25202 450.00
MISCELLANEOUS 450.00 101 22546
100014 DUTCH HOSMAN 25203 1,015.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525
100015 PAUL DONATI 25204 1,015.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525
100016 DAN DOBSON 25205 1,015.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525
100017 KATARZYNA KUJAT 25206 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
100018 JAMS INC 25207 150.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 150.00 618 64520 210
100019 JACK OYHARCABAL 25208 655.00
MISCELLANEOUS 655.00 101 22546
100020 ASTRO BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES 25209 59.61
OFFICE EXPENSE 59.61 101 64150 110 /y
TOTAL $366,474.61
1 0
r l
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99998 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,071.01
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,117.91 130 20021
MISCELLANEOUS 953.10 130 20025
99999 AD CLUB 24809 237.19
PUBLICATIONS 8 ADVERTISING 237.19 101 64420 150
100000 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 151.65
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 151.65 201 65200 200
100001 S AND S SUPPLIES 8 SOLUTIONS 24963 710.97
SMALL TOOLS 710.97 527 66520 130
100002 DENHAM LLC 24968 5,335.00
MISCELLANEOUS 5,335.00 101 22546
100003 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 87.89
UTILITY EXPENSE 87.89 896 20281
100004 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 636.97
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33.37 101 65150 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 432.25 101 65100 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220
100005 BEHZAD NASRE 25065 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
100006 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 520.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 520.00 101 68010 220 1349
100007 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 550.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 730 69583 220
100008 ERIC TURNER 25157 412.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 412.50 101 68010 220 1781
100009 HAWK SOLUTIONS 25161 680.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 680.40 101 68010 220 1372
100010 GASKET SPECIALTIES INC. 25183 380.63
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 380.63 201 65200 203
100011 EBERSOLE ENTERPRISES INC. 25200 741.88
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 741.88 320 81130 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99983 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 1,862.14
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,862.14 326 80910 210
99984 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 3,705.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,705.00 130 20016
99985 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00
UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080
99986 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 160.00
MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 130 20024
99987 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 580.00
MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 130 20024
99988 C.L.E.A. 24523 682.50
MISCELLANEOUS 682.50 130 20026
99989 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 476.00
UNION DUES 476.00 130 21091
99990 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 605.51
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 605.51 619 64460 210 5150
99991 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 6,746.44
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,746.44 326 80950 210
99992 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 892,89
COMMUNICATIONS 367.31 101 65100 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 525.58 896 20281
99993 JOHN BOLOGNA 24628 126.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.00 101 68010 220 1780
99994 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 551.15
UTILITY EXPENSE 551.15 896 20281
99995 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 578.10
MISCELLANEOUS 578.10 101 64420 030
99996 AETNA 24760 2,812.01
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,540.71 130 20022
MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028
99997 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 925.48
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 925.48 130 20014
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A NT R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99969 OFFICE MAX 23306 412.20
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.48 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 328.32 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 23.36 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.04 201 65200 110
99970 TAMMY MAK 23445 404.49
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 404.49 101 64250 210
99971 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 38,056.18
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,240.95 326 80722 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 29,448.53 326 81190 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,366.70 326 80931 210
99972 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 42,977.88
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42,977.88 327 81150 220
99973 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 4,970.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,970.00 101 68010 220 1330
99974 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 4,230.49
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,230.49 528 66600 210
99975 SBC/MCI 23728 143.70
COMMUNICATIONS 143.70 101 67500 160
99976 PENINSULA HARLEY DAVIDSON 23795 22.29
SUPPLIES 22.29 620 15000
99977 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 213.47
COMMUNICATIONS 213.47 101 68020 160 2200
99978 UBS 23951 248.47
MISC. SUPPLIES 248.47 101 68010 120 1114
99979 QUILL 24090 21.64
OFFICE EXPENSE 21.64 101 66100 110
99980 ELISE MILANO 24098 81.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81.00 101 68010 220 1645
99981 MIKE GARZOUZI 24128 907.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 907.50 101 68010 220 1781
99982 ALERT-ALL 24392 300.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 201 35220 000 7150
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99959 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,445.00
MISCELLANEOUS 595.00 201 35221 000 7100
MISCELLANEOUS 850.00 201 35220 000 7100
99960 LESCO INC. 22540 483.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 483.67 101 68020 120 2200
99961 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38.54
COMMUNICATIONS 38.54 101 68010 160 1101
99962 TURF STAR 22682 50.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 50.00 101 68020 250 2200
99963 FAILSAFE TESTING 22694 500.00
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 500.00 201 65200 203
99964 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 126.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.00 101 68010 220 1780 -
99965 THE INNOVATION GROUPS 23082 1,750.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,750.00 101 64560 220
99966 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.04
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.04 526 69020 210
99967 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 112.65
OFFICE EXPENSE 112.65 101 68010 110 1101
99968 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 2,958.06
OFFICE EXPENSE 13.95 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 4.70 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 26.01 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 11.85 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 437.10 101 65300 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 357.00 101 66210 120
SMALL TOOLS 85.52 101 65300 130
OFFICE EXPENSE -7.57 526 69020 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 501.75 526 69020 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 105.51 620 66700 110
MISCELLANEOUS 1,422.24 621 64450 400
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99943 UTILITY AERIAL INC 19990 1,035.35
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,035.35 101 68020 200 2200
99944 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180
99945 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 332.50
COMMUNICATIONS 332.50 621 64450 160
99946 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 66.43
OFFICE EXPENSE 86.43 101 64420 110
99947 JEFF DOWD 20779 85.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85.50 101 68010 220 1785
99948 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 885.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 885.00 101 68010 220 1330
99949 FRANK WEBER 21344 192.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 192.50 101 68010 220 1781
99950 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 108.78
COMMUNICATIONS 108.78 101 65300 160
99951 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 3,919.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3,919.00 101 64560 240
99952 DENISE LAUGESEN 21963 4,770.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,770.00 101 22546
99953 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT 21986 4,624.38
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,624.38 326 80770 210
99954 ALL PETROLEUM RECOVERY SERVICE, 22008 85.00
GAS, OIL & GREASE 85.00 201 65200 201
99955 JIM STOCKWELL 22048 852.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 852.50 101 68010 220 1781
99956 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 139.45
SUPPLIES 139.45 620 15000
99957 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 317.30
MISC. SUPPLIES 317.30 527 66520 120
99958 STEVE NELSON 22449 84.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99929 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 8.97
SMALL TOOLS 8.97 620 66700 130
99930 LINDA HOECK 16390 1,040.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,040.00 101 68010 220 1349
99931 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 1,467.10
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,467.10 527 66520 120
99932 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 89.16
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 89.16 101 65100 200
99933 COLORPRINT 17497 1,353.45
OFFICE EXPENSE 115.61 101 64250 110
MISCELLANEOUS 340.99 101 64100 115
MISC. SUPPLIES 298.95 326 80770 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 298.95 327 81010 120
TRAINING EXPENSE 298.95 526 69020 260
99934 STEVE GOLDBERG 17577 137.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 137.50 101 68010 220 1781
99935 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 235.64
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 235.64 101 65100 290
99936 HERTZ CORPORATION 18240 11,650.05
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 11,650.05 620 66700 800
99937 BAY ALARM 18854 376.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 178.50 619 64460 220 5210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198.00 619 64460 220 5190
99938 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 78.27
MISC. SUPPLIES 78.27 320 80960 120
99939 PRIORITY 1 19239 35.07
SUPPLIES 35.07 620 15000
99940 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 87.19
OFFICE EXPENSE 66.50 101 64250 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 20.69 620 66700 120
99941 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 1,057.42
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,057.42 625 65213 203
99942 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99923 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,474.47
MISCELLANEOUS 15.37 201 35220 000 7150
OFFICE EXPENSE 164.14 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 34.82 201 65200 111
SUPPLIES 109.07 201 65200 112
MISC. SUPPLIES 137.19 201 65200 120
COMMUNICATIONS 25.93 201 65200 160
VEHICLE MAINT. 100.00 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 8.50 201 65200 203
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 235.00 201 65200 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 175.00 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,469.45 201 65200 260
99924 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 313.45
MISC. SUPPLIES 313.45 527 66520 120
99925 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 6,516.47
OFFICE EXPENSE 894.50 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 698.05 101 65100 120
POLICE--SUPPLIES 124.43 101 65100 126
COMMUNICATIONS 285.95 101 65100 160
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 406.40 101 65100 200
GAS, OIL & GREASE 100.88 101 65100 201
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 100.00 101 65100 210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 439.18 101 65100 220
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 253.00 101 65100 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 110.05 101 65100 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 18.13 101 65150 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 2,450.78 101 65100 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 41.40 101 65150 260
PRISONER EXPENSE 100.00 101 65100 291
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 25.98 101 65100 292
MISCELLANEOUS 112.58 101 65100 400
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 21.09 530 65400 140
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 94.07 530 65400 200
MISC. SUPPLIES 240.00 730 69530 120
99926 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO 13758 6,006.42
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 6,006.42 621 64450 200
99927 GWENN JONES 13824 43.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 43.00 101 68010 120 1661
99928 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 145.93
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 33.35 526 69020 230
MISC. SUPPLIES 112.58 619 64460 120 5150
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99914 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,963.83
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,963.83 101 65150 220
99915 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 12,111.92
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 599.37 101 68020 220 2300
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,512.55 320 76350 220
99916 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 94.01
MISC. SUPPLIES 94.01 619 64460 120
99917 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 - 48.71
OFFICE EXPENSE 48.71 526 69020 110
99918 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 17,754.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,754.00 201 65200 220
99919 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 2,424.00
PRISONER EXPENSE 2,424.00 101 65100 291
99920 OLE'S 09626 220.40
SUPPLIES 220.40 620 15000
99921 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 967.48
MISC. SUPPLIES -19.92 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 26.77 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 27.05 101 68020 120 2200
SMALL TOOLS 259.57 101 68020 130 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 101.97 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 165.55 526 69020 120
SMALL TOOLS 41.11 526 69020 130
MISC. SUPPLIES 37.91 527 66520 120
SMALL TOOLS 32.44 527 66520 130
MISC. SUPPLIES -19.93 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 1.49 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 60.98 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 252.49 619 64460 120
99922 BARKER BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 09990 34.10
MISCELLANEOUS 34.10 101 64400 115
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
02/03/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Cheeks
99901 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01624 3,791.14
MISC. SUPPLIES 37.38 101 68010 120 1100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,403.40 101 68010 220 1212
MISC. SUPPLIES 350.36 730 69533 120
99902 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220
99903 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 98.12
MISCELLANEOUS 98.12 320 81100 192
99904 FEDEX 02160 225.72
OFFICE EXPENSE 18.72 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 84.93 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 84.% 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 37.11 101 64100 110
99905 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. - 02248 112.39
MISC. SUPPLIES 112.39 619 64460 120
99906 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 653.40
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 653.40 101 66210 226
99907 IRVINE 8 JACHENS INC. 02599 503.37
MISC. SUPPLIES 503.37 101 64100 120
99908 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 2,472.08
RENTS & LEASES 2,210.60 101 66210 180
MISC. SUPPLIES 177.37 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 84.11 619 64460 120
99909 P. G. & E. 03054 61,268.41
GAS & ELECTRIC 17,265.67 101 66100 170
UTILITY EXPENSE 44,002.74 896 20280
99910 DON PLAGMANN 03172 962.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 962.50 101 68010 220 1781
99911 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 49.94
MISC. SUPPLIES 49.94 619 64460 120 5130
99912 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT 03271 52,641.65
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 52,641.65 320 81070 800
99913 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 4,250.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,250.00 201 65200 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
01-28-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
FUND RECAP 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 93,037.74
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 410.35
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 29,404.32
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 51,194.30
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 68,375.00
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 62,871.19
WATER FUND 526 3,038.62
SEWER FUND 527 280,820.45
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 20.10
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 174.21
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 10,313.39
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 711.88
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,204.52
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 959.38
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 3,058.31
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 489.89
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 151,360.58
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 19,784.96
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 10,930.67
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $788,159.86D,w Vvo10
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99804 THROUGH 99900 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $788,159.86, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../. ./.
................... . ..
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.........................I.......... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
f
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
01/28/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99889 DHS OCP 24639 120.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 120.00 526 69020 260
99890 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 94.42
COMMUNICATIONS 94.42 101 65100 160
99891 JESS LICON 24732 100.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 100.00 101 66210 222
99892 COMPUTER & BUSINESS PRINTING 24741 479.92
MISC. SUPPLIES 479.92 101 65100 120
99893 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 17.90
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 17.90 625 65213 203
99894 BAY AREA SMART AUTO GLASS 24956 314.58
MISCELLANEOUS 314.58 618 64520 604
99895 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 87.41
TRAINING EXPENSE 87.41 101 66210 260
99896 COMERICA BANK 24970 1,194.30
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,194.30 320 80831 220
99897 MS-III CO. 25195 423.15
LIBRARY--PERIODICALS 423.15 101 67500 122
99898 BETTER ROADS 25196 24.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 24.00 101 66210 240
99899 KEN VALINOTI 25197 1,810.00
MISCELLANEOUS 810.00 101 36630
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
99900 ADVANCED MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 25198 366.60
RADIO MAINT, 366.60 201 65200 205
TOTAL $788,159.86 _ (�
1131 �
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
01/28/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99874 SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES C 23533 - 65,900.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 65,900.00 326 80930 220
99875 PETERSON 23633 442.95
SUPPLIES 442.95 620 15000
99876 SBC/MCI 23728 8,166.41
COMMUNICATIONS 16.17 101 67500 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 8,150.24 896 20281
99877 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292
99878 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 286.86
MISC. SUPPLIES 286.86 526 69020 120
99879 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 771.57
COMMUNICATIONS 771.57 201 65200 160
99880 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 23983 50,000.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,000.00 320 81310 220
99881 CAL CHIEF'S BOOKSTORE 23998 448.58
TRAINING EXPENSE 448.58 201 65200 260
99882 QUILL 24090 29.21
OFFICE EXPENSE 29.21 101 66100 110
99883 JOHNSON WOO 24137 417.82
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 417.82 619 64460 210
99884 AEP WORKSHOPS 24166 320.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 320.00 101 64420 250
99885 GEMPLERS, INC. 24196 275.80
MISCELLANEOUS -21.44 101 23611
SMALL TOOLS 297.24 101 66210 130
99886 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 576.00
MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233
99887 MARK PITRE 24472 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99888 WEST BAY STUMP REMOVAL 24482 276.25
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 276.25 526 69020 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
01/28/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99860 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION 22194 348.42
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 174.21 101 64250 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 174.21 530 65400 200
99861 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 22216 88.02
OFFICE EXPENSE 88.02 101 65100 110
99862. AUTO PRIDE CAR WASH 22278 101.35
VEHICLE MAINT.. 101.35 201 65200 202
99863 UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 22305 28,424.90
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 28,424.90 327 81010 210
99864 GERRY MURNANE 22343 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99865 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 17,994.23
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,878.43 736 64572 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,115.80 736 64571 220
99866 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22620 19,536.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,536.75 201 65200 220
99867 ALLIED IRON CO. 22855 64.63
VEHICLE MAINT. 64.63 201 65200 202
99868 THE INNOVATION GROUPS 23082 35.70
MISC. SUPPLIES 35.70 101 64150 120
99869 PITNEY BOWES 23128 548.00
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 548.00 621 64450 200
99870 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 80.54
OFFICE EXPENSE 80.54 101 68010 110 1101
99871 OFFICE MAX 23306 298.89
OFFICE EXPENSE -14.27 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 150.68 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 104.44 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 58.04 201 65200 110
99872 AMERICAN TRUCK AND TRAILER BODY 23381 164.27
SUPPLIES 164.27 620 15000
99873 PACE CONSULTING 23457 2,800.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,800.00 101 65100 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
01/28/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99845 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,790.73
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,790.73 736 64570 220
99846 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 411.38
COMMUNICATIONS 411.38 621 64450 160
99847 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORP. 20284 613.19
RENTS & LEASES 613.19 101 66210 180
99848 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 2,475.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,475.00 326 75170 210
99849 CCCSD 20515 170.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 170.00 101 66100 250
99850 PHIL SCOTT 20550 124.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 124.00 527 66520 250
99851 SPRINT PCS 20724 74.08
COMMUNICATIONS 35.17 101 64420 160
COMMUNICATIONS 38.91 101 64150 160
99852 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 886.38
MISC. SUPPLIES 886.38 101 66210 120
99853 MCCVB 21462 181.58
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 181.58 101 66100 250
99854 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 426.16
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 37.75 101 64350 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 37.75 101 64150 200
MISC. SUPPLIES 273.15 327 81010 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 77.51 526 69020 110
99855 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 3,200.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,200.00 101 64420 210
99856 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 9,617.58
MISCELLANEOUS 9,617.58 101 37010
99857 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 21832 199.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 199.00 101 66100 250
99858 VB GOLF LLC 21948 405.54
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 405.54 101 68010 200 1213
99859 MICHAEL GINN 21983 52.50
MISCELLANEOUS 52.50 101 36630
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
01/28/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99831 SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS 14643 135.31
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 135.31 101 68020 190 2200
99832 TEAM CLEAN 15827 219.97
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219.97 201 65200 220
99833 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 1,386.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,386.67 526 69020 120
99834 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 49,152.64
MISCELLANEOUS 49,152.64 101 22515
99835 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 501.00
MISCELLANEOUS 501.00 618 64520 234
99836 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 24.95
TRAINING EXPENSE 24.95 526 69020 260
99837 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 220.00
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 220.00 101 64420 121
99838 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,189.78
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 281.58 101 66210 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 290.38 526 69020 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 281.57 527 66520 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 20.10 528 66600 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 118.85 619 64460 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 197.30 620 66700 140
99839 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 48.47
MISC. SUPPLIES 48.47 101 66100 120
99840 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 9,307.81
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,307.81 618 64520 210
99841 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 264.93
MISC. SUPPLIES 264.93 201 65200 111
99842 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 474.13
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 195.14 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 278.99 625 65213 203
99843 MARY ASTURIAS 19648 450.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 450.00 101 64250 250
99844 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT INC 19697 198.67
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 198.67 101 68020 200 2200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
01/28/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99817 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 400.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 400.00 620 66700 260
99818 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 151,360.58
MISCELLANEOUS 151,360.58 731 22587
99819 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 03483 37,407.25
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 37,407.25 527 66530 270
99820 FRANK TEALDI 03743 251.44
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 251.44 130 20060
99821 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 300.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 300.00 101 65100 260
99822 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 379.69
PRISONER EXPENSE 158.91 101 65100 291
SUPPLIES 220.78 201 65200 112
99823 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 190.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 190.00 618 64520 601
99824 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 270.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 270.00 201 65200 220
99825 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 695.78
MISC. SUPPLIES 695.78 201 65200 111
99826 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 2,874,66
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 113.24 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,761.42 625 65213 203
99827 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 2,995.79
MISCELLANEOUS 2,995.79 527 66520 400
99828 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 11707 790.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 28.00 101 67500 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 75.00 101 67500 120
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 676.00 101 67500 129
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 11.00 101 67500 190
99829 BOETHING TREELAND FARMS, INC. 13743 _ 489.89
MISC. SUPPLIES 489.89 730 69560 120
99830 3M COMPANY 13848 334.49
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 334.49 101 66210 222
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
01/28/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99804 '" STATE OF CALIFORNIA 23460 158.91
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 158.91 130 21025
99805 BAKER & TAYLOR BOOKS 01190 13,778.94
LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 736.37 101 67500 124
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 13,042.57 101 67500 129
99806 SAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 76.96
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 76.96 201 65200 203
99807 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 335.00
RECREATION EXPENSES 335.00 101 10700
99808 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01745 500.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 500.00 101 66100 250
99809 VEOLIA WATER 02110 274,184.98
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 34,173.14 327 79480 210
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 5,250.99 527 66530 190
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,473.00 527 66530 220
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 35,287.85 527 66530 800
99810 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 128.41
MISCELLANEOUS 128.41 101 68020 192 2200
99811 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 2,780.43
MISCELLANEOUS 2,780.43 896 20282
99812 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 319.35
MISC. SUPPLIES 144.14 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 58.01 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 117.20 619 64460 120 5150
99813 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 392.30
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 147.08 101 66210 129
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 245.22 101 66210 226
99814 RONDA CAINE ALCANTARA 02873 45.95
COMMUNICATIONS 45.95 101 65100 160
99815 SBC 03080 154.27
OFFICE EXPENSE 52.15 101 65100 110
COMMUNICATIONS 102.12 101 65100 160
99816 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 8,083.91
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,083.91 101 66100 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,000.00 201 65200 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
01-20-2005 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 13
FUND RECAP - 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 93,859.88
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 7,957.14
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 105,625.18
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 123,760.94
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 298,557.28
WATER FUND 526 17,945.95
SEWER FUND 527 42,932.88
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,883.00
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,060.02
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 14,961.77
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,355.03
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 315.42
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 28,678.98
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,491.15
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,038.53
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,837.73
STATE GRANTS FUND 734 1,789.31
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 684.90
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8748,735.09
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 13
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99666 THROUGH 99803 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF 8748,735.09, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
► 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 12
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
99802 CHESTER WILLIAMS RICE 25193 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99803 GREEN BANKER 25194 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
TOTAL 4748,735.09
vt 1p�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99786 DRAIN PATROL 24985 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99787 PLAY WELL TEKNOLOGIES 25013 4,048.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,048.00 101 68010 220 1349
99788 L.J. KRUSE 25131 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99789 OAKSTONE CONSTRUCTION 25153 2,400.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,400.00 101 22546
99790 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. 25180 619.04
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 619.04 101 65100 220
99791 HEWLETT PACKARD CO. 25181 3,249.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,249.63 101 65100 220
99792 CHARLOTTE VI 25182 115.33
MISCELLANEOUS 115.33 526 22502
99793 D&L FOUNDRY 25184 746.93
MISC. SUPPLIES 746.93 527 66520 120
99794 BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL INC. 25185 5,068.27
OFFICE EXPENSE 5,068.27 201 65200 110
99795 DAVID JAMSHIDNEJAD 25186 1,000.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,000.00 101 22520
99796 606 BLANCHARD 25187 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99797 THE ZEKA GROUP INC. 25188 1,000.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,000.00 101 22520
99798 CAMBRIA ENVIRONMENTAL TECH 25189 2,300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,300.00 101 22520
99799 ABOUT PLUMBING 25190 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
99800 ERNIE SODEN 25191 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
99801 S&R SPORT 25192 153.46
MISC. SUPPLIES 153.46 101 68010 120 1114
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99779 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 5,873.10
OFFICE EXPENSE 604.04 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.38 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 142.54 101 67500 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 117.14 101 64420 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 121.33 101 68010 120 1370
MISC. SUPPLIES 194.99 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 506.00 101 68010 120 1423
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.87 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 20.37 101 64100 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 631.17 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 225.00 101 69537 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 129.58 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 654.11 101 68010 120 1422
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 21.23 101 64420 121
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 80.44 101 67500 129
SMALL TOOLS 303.88 101 68020 130 2200
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 272.19 101 64420 150
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 389.34 101 67500 200
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 58.30 101 64150 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 517.70 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 194.45 101 64420 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 25.00 101 67500 251
STAFF & MEETINGS 34.00 101 67500 252
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 75.64 101 64100 290
OFFICE EXPENSE 264.74 526 69020 110
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 205.20 527 66520 250
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 19.47 530 65400 200
99780 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 1,399.56
MISC. SUPPLIES 122.10 730 69533 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 137.65 730 69583 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,139.81 734 65195 120
99781 AD CLUB 24809 836.69
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 836.69 101 64420 150
99782 LAURETTA PRINTING & COPY CENTER 24908 623.88
MISCELLANEOUS 623.88 101 64400 115
99783 CAPORICCI & LARSON 24920 7,115.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,115.00 101 64560 210
99784 PLAZA GOURMET 24928 176.25
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 176.25 101 64420 250
99785 BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY 24943 11,419.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 11,419.00 526 69020 240
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99772 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 5,519.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,519.00 326 80950 210
99773 SWRCB FEES 24588 40,868.00
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 7,406.00 527 66520 270
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 33,462.00 527 66530 270
99774 JOHN BOLOGNA 24628 294.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 294.00 101 68010 220 1780
99775 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 252.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1780
99776 GOODIN,MACBRIDE,SOUERI,RITCHIE & 24638 137.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 137.50 101 64350 210
99777 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 75.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 619 64460 220 5120
99778 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 578.10
MISCELLANEOUS 578.10 101 64420 030
l 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99759 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 1,568.65
BANKING SERVICE FEES 528.10 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,040.55 530 65400 120
99760 UBS 23951 1,637.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 118.53 101 68010 120 1114
MISC. SUPPLIES 143.90 101 68010 120 1112
MISC. SUPPLIES 729.24 101 68010 120 1111
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 175.00 619 64460 220 5150
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 471.00 619 64460 220 5130
99761 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 500.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 730 69533 220
99762 CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE 24030 66.71
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 66.71 201 65200 200
99763 KIERAN WOODS 24058 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99764 QUILL 24090 258.50
OFFICE EXPENSE 258.50 621 64450 110
99765 NOR CAL SIGNS 24152 335.58
MISC. SUPPLIES 167.79 101 68010 120 1422
MISC. SUPPLIES 167.79 730 69533 120
99766 FLORA ROBELET 24167 40.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 101 68010 220 1521
99767 DOUG BELL 24189 89.75
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 27.54 320 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 62.21 320 80900 210
99768 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,134.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,134.00 101 68010 120 1644
99769 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 343.13
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 343.13 101 68010 220 1661
99770 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 2,902.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,902.50 101 68010 220 1661
99771 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 276,013.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 276,013.00 327 79480 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99748 OFFICE MAX 23306 630.23
OFFICE EXPENSE 36.50 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 349.51 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 117.06 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 127.16 201 65200 110
99749 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 3,569.88
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 3,569.88 101 68010 200 1286
99750 DATASAFE 23410 82.65
OFFICE EXPENSE 31.90 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 50.75 101 64350 120
99751 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105.00
MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518
99752 IBM CORPORATION 23425 303.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 303.00 101 65300 120
99753 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200
99754 ZEIGER ENGINEERS 23450 1,740.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,740.00 320 81060 220
99755 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 94,619.43
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 28,902.71 326 81190 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 30,255.39 326 81200 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 14,281.42 326 81190 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 18,159.18 326 73171 210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,020.73 526 69020 220
99756 NORCAL MUNICIPAL PERSONNEL MANAG 23861 75.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 75.00 101 64420 260
99757 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5150
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5160
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5170
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5180
99758 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 - 1,904.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,840.00 101 23620
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A.N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99734 CUTTERS EDGE 22407 38.17
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 38.17 201 65200 203
99735 STEVE NELSON 22449 84.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780
99736 CUMMUTER CHECK CORP-SF BAY AREA 22485 42.00
MISCELLANEOUS 42.00 101 15400
99737 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 520.00
UTILITY EXPENSE 520.00 896 20281
99738 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 252.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1780
99739 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 516.99
MISCELLANEOUS 516.99 526 69020 233
99740 CALFEST 22809 375.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 375.00 101 68010 250 1101
99741 JENKINS/ATHENS INS 22851 9,184.00
CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,184.00 618 64520 225
99742 BAY AREA LIGHTS AND SIRENS 23083 337.50
RADIO MAINT. 337.50 201 65200 205
99743 WING TAM 23109 3,160.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,160.00 101 22520
99744 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 49.00
COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 201 65200 160
99745 NADINE RONSON 23195 317.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 317.63 101 68010 220 1661
99746 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 6,720.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,881.60 320 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,620.80 326 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,217.60 327 79400 210
99747 ALLIANCE GAS PRODUCTS 23245 37.32
GAS, OIL & GREASE 37.32 201 65200 201
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99720 CONTROL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. 20421 61,596.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 17,246.88 320 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 24,022.44 326 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 20,326.68 327 79400 210
99721 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 70.82
OFFICE EXPENSE 70.82 101 64420 110
99722 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 2,096.37
DEPOSIT REFUND 2,096.37 101 22590
99723 J. SNELL & CO., INC. 20571 232.31
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 232.31 101 68010 220 1101
99724 JEFF DOWD 20779 313.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 313.50 101 68010 220 1785
99725 FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA, INC. 20967 103.92
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.92 101 65100 220
99726 MELANIE MARANI 21132 688.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1331
99727 CIR 21211 226.10
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 226.10 527 66520 220
99728 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 221.64
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221.64 619 64460 220 5130
99729 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 1,638.75
TRAINING EXPENSE 491.63 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 491.63 526 69020 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 491.61 527 66520 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 163.88 619 64460 260
99730 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 160.83
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.83 621 64450 190
99731 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 21,311.00
MISCELLANEOUS 21,311.00 101 37010
99732 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 674.80
MISC. SUPPLIES 674.80 526 69020 120
99733 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 68,290.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 68,290.00 320 80520 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99705 KELLEHER & ASSOCIATES 18239 5,142.03
PROFESSIONAL& SPECIALIZED S 5,142.03 618 64520 210
99706 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 18713 1,110.99
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,110.99 730 69560 120
99707 LYNNE FIRESTONE 18746 602.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 602.00 101 68010 220 1331
99708 DEAN'S AUTO BODY & 18795 635.74
MISCELLANEOUS 635.74 618 64520 604
99709 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 77.45
MISC. SUPPLIES 77.45 320 80900 120
99710 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 176.65
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 176.65 625 65213 203
99711 WILSEY & HAM 19397 1,650.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,650.00 320 80520 210
99712 WINGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 19471 450.00
MISCELLANEOUS 450.00 101 22525
99713 WESTERN STAR NURSERIES 19865 810.03
MISCELLANEOUS 810.03 731 22560
99714 DAVID F. O'KEEFE 19905 773.68
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 773.68 101 68020 190 2200
99715 WILLIAM ROMAN PE 19989 500.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 500.00 101 22520
99716 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 1,239.35
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,239.35 101 68010 120 1423
99717 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101
99718 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 310.00
COMMUNICATIONS 310.00 621 64450 160
99719 CENTRAL GARDEN CENTER 20300 573.05
MISC. SUPPLIES 573.05 101 68020 120 2200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99693 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 362.38
MISC. SUPPLIES 51.06 101 65100 120
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 151.54 201 65200 190
VEHICLE MAINT. 41.12 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 118.66 201 65200 203
99694 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 1,790.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220
MISCELLANEOUS 649.50 320 80250 400
MISCELLANEOUS 649.50 734 65195 400
99695 CAL-STEAM 10557 1,386.50
MISCELLANEOUS 60.01 101 68020 192 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 365.36 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 350.31 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 316.43 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 290.92 619 64460 120 5210
MISC. SUPPLIES 3.47 619 64460 120 5150
99696 DOROTHY O'GRADY 11020 351.81
MISC. SUPPLIES 351.81 101 66210 120
99697 WINGF00T COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,290.05
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,290.05 625 65213 203
99698 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 107.26
OFFICE EXPENSE 67.00 526 69020 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 40.26 527 66520 120
99699 DAY-TIMERS, INC. 14411 28.12
SMALL TOOLS 28.12 527 66520 130
99700 RECHARGE-EM 14523 120.16
OFFICE EXPENSE 120.16 201 65200 110
99701 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 1,727.70
MISCELLANEOUS 1,727.70 731 22594
99702 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 675.47
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 675.47 101 68020 140 2200
99703 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 17224 91.66
MISC. SUPPLIES 91.66 619 64460 120 5130
99704 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING 17534 634.80
OFFICE EXPENSE 634.80 320 80960 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99680 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 02880 1,025.42
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,025.42 526 69020 120
99681 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23
GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170
99682 SBC 03080 200.86
COMMUNICATIONS 35.96 101 67500 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 164.90 896 20281
99683 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 424.52
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 84.65 201 65200 203
SUPPLIES 315.42 620 15000
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 24.45 625 65213 203
99684 SANDRA POBE 03175 2,095.50
MISC. SUPPLIES 535.50 101 68010 120 1646
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,560.00 101 68010 220 1644
99685 MARGARET PRENDERGAST 03179 1,167.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,167.75 101 68010 220 1641
99686 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 11,912.48
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,912.48 320 76350 220
99687 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 414.23
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 414.23 101 64350 210
99688 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 240.89
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 240.89 101 68020 220 2200
99689 CALIFORNIA FIRE MECHANICS ACAD. 09187 750.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 750.00 201 65200 260
99690 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 890.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 890.00 320 80831 210
99691 OCE 09493 857.34
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210
99692 MARGARET KRAMER 09612 3,160.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,160.50 101 68010 220 1661
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
01/20/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99666 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 117.67
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 117.67 101 68020 190 2200
99667 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 165.53
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 165.53 201 65200 203
99668 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 68.95
MISC. SUPPLIES 68.95 101 66210 120
99669 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01624 2,150.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 250.00 101 68010 120 1423
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,600.00 101 68010 220 1212
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22548
99670 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 282.29
OFFICE EXPENSE 135.69 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 75.73 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 10.83 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 38.24 101 68020 110 2200
MISC, SUPPLIES 21.80 101 68020 120 2200
99671 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 25,389.50
COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 25,089.50 621 64450 220
99672 COMPUTER TECHNICIANS, INC., 01987 987.00
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 987.00 621 64450 200
99673 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 261.74
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 261.74 201 65200 140
99674 GENE EVANS 02149 99.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.75 101 68010 220 1644
99675 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 562.72
MISCELLANEOUS 562.72 320 81100 192
99676 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 1,883.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,883.00 528 66600 210
99677 HEWLETT PACKARD 02457 2,142.30
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,142.30 101 65100 220
99678 IRVINE & JACHENS INC. 02599 48.61
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 48.61 201 65200 140
99679 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 432.46
MISC. SUPPLIES 432.46 619 64460 120 5120
r ! �
CITY OF BURLINGAME
01 -13-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 9
FUND RECAP 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 103,686.07
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,290.23
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 5,848.70
WATER FUND 526 2,957.74
SEWER FUND 527 5,478.02
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5, 147.28
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 26.95
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND ' 619 15,710.84
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 14,621 .20
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 11263.56
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 50,479. 15
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 282.21
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $208,791 .95
� 50,00� Vo ID
wig
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99565 THROUGH 99665 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $208,791 .95, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . .
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . .
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99662 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 776.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 776.25 101 68010 220 1644
99663 SUSAN WASSERMAN 25177 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99664 JOHN PAROLA 25178 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99665 SESAC 25179 441.00
DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 441.00 101 68010 240 1101
TOTAL $208,791.95
�y�o�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
99647 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 135.83
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 135.83 619 64460 210 5180
99648 SHIELDS,HARPER & CO. 24597 184.50
SUPPLIES 184.50 620 15000
99649 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER, INC. 24637 3,486.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,486.00 101 68010 220 1372
99650 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 282.21
UTILITY EXPENSE 282.21 896 20281
99651 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 382.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 382.50 619 64460 210 5120
99652 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 24700 372.04
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 372.04 101 65100 220
99653 JENNIFER VARNI 24798 634.00
MISCELLANEOUS 634.00 101 22546
99654 MARY PIAZZA 24807 688.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661
99655 T MOBILE 24846 30.88
COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160
99656 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 212.18
TRAINING EXPENSE 212.18 527 66520 260
99657 CENVEO 25003 118.70
OFFICE EXPENSE 118.70 101 68010 110 1101
99658 WESCO GRAPHICS INC 25007 4,225.20
MISCELLANEOUS 4,225.20 101 68010 115 1101
99659 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 669.32
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 438.02 101 65150 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 231.30 201 65200 220
99660 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 1,193.75
MISCELLANEOUS -818.75 101 39800
MISCELLANEOUS 2,012.50 731 22556
99661 JAMES MURPHY 25080 423.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 423.75 101 68010 220 1661
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
99634 VENTURE BUILDERS 23824 1,830.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,830.00 101 22546
99635 CHERINICHOL 23901 688.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661
99636 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 2,530.00
RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 2,530.00 527 66520 218
99637 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 13,629.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,195.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 619 64460 220 5230
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 619 64460 220 5121
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,036.00 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,671.00 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,836.00 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 397.00 619 64460 220 5170
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 855.00 619 64460 220 5190
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 964.00 619 64460 220 5210
99638 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 509.16
COMMUNICATIONS 218.72 101 68020 160 2200
COMMUNICATIONS 290.44 619 64460 160
99639 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521
99640 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 364.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 364.00 101 68010 220 1521
99641 JESUS NAVA 24204 1,047.82
MISCELLANEOUS 1,047.82 101 64250 031
99642 PERRY WU 24268 3,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546
99643 FASTLANE TEX INC. 24304 800.00
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 800.00 526 69020 290
99644 THE GALLERY COLLECTION 24398 98.00
MISCELLANEOUS -7.18 526 23611
OFFICE EXPENSE 105.18 526 69020 110
99645 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 247.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 247.50 101 68010 220 1644
99646 ASCAP 24470 268.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 268.00 101 68010 240 1101
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S. T E R PAGE 5
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99622 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 2.05
SUPPLIES 2.05 620 15000
99623 JOHN FUNGHI 22347 2,272.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,272.00 101 22520
99624 ANZA ENGINEERING 22634 54,731.00
DITCH & CREEK CLEANING EXPEN 54,731.00 101 66210 223
99625 MIKE COFFEY 23009 90.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 90.00 101 64100 250
99626 PENINSULA BATTERY INC. 23045 450.30
SUPPLIES 450.30 620 15000
99627 OFFICE MAX 23306 253.90
OFFICE EXPENSE 18.86 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 111.55 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 123.49 621 64450 110
99628 DATASAFE 23410 169.64
OFFICE EXPENSE 37.30 101 64200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 101.54 101 64350 120
BANKING SERVICE FEES 30.80 101 64250 120
99629 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 23424 239.36
COMMUNICATIONS 239.36 526 69020 160
99630 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 92.01
MISC. SUPPLIES 51.42 101 66210 120
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 40.59 101 66210 226
99631 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 964.30
MISC. SUPPLIES 46.33 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 458.93 619 64460 120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 459.04 619 64460 210 5170
99632 AT&T 23661 24.96
COMMUNICATIONS 24.96 621 64450 160
99633 KEITH MARTIN 23788 128.73
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 14.62 101 66210 250
OFFICE EXPENSE 92.77 526 69020 110
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 7.00 526 69020 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 7.05 619 64460 250
SUPPLIES 4.29 620 15000
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3.00 620 66700 250
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99607 D J DOWLING 19368 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99608 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 5,147.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,147.28 528 66600 210
99609 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220
99610 BURLINGAME LIB. FOUNDATION 20561 750.63
MISCELLANEOUS 36.50 101 36320
MISCELLANEOUS 714.13 731 22551
99611 FERMA CORP. 20568 85.00
MISCELLANEOUS 85.00 526 22502
99612 SPRINT PCS 20724 72.34
COMMUNICATIONS 38.71 101 64150 160
COMMUNICATIONS 33.63 101 64420 160
99613 H.V. CARTER CO., INC. 20876 7.34
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 7.34 101 68020 200 2200
99614 K-119 OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 20924 62.95
MISC. SUPPLIES 62.95 101 68020 120 2200
99615 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 526.25
MISC. SUPPLIES 526.25 527 66520 120
99616 CIR 21211 852.12
MISC. SUPPLIES 852.12 527 66520 120
99617 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 1,056.72
OFFICE EXPENSE 91.61 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 965.11 621 64450 110
99618 MIKE JALILIE 21589 2,407.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,407.00 101 22546
99619 HILLYARD 21658 454.65
MISC. SUPPLIES 454.65 101 68020 120 2200
99620 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 923.74
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 923.74 101 66210 222
99621 AT&T 22138 103.54
COMMUNICATIONS 103.54 101 68010 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99592 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 86.60
MISC. SUPPLIES 86.60 620 66700 120
99593 DHL EXPRESS 14958 26.95
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 26.95 530 65400 200
99594 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 60.34
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 43.13 101 68020 190 2200
VEHICLE MAINT. 17.21 101 65200 202
99595 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 9,863.47
SUPPLIES 9,863.47 620 15000
99596 SUPERIOR ALUMINUM BODY CORP. 16229 1,035.94
SUPPLIES 1,035.94 620 15000
99597 STEVE'S CHRISTMAS TREES 16767 678.82
MISCELLANEOUS 678.82 526 22502
99598 BROADWAY BUSINESS 16849 1,087.50
MISCELLANEOUS 1,087.50 731 22555
99599 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16919 1,098.90
SUPPLIES 1,098.90 620 15000
99600 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 16.04
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.04 526 69020 120
99601 COLORPRINT 17497 86.06
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 86.06 101 64560 210
99602 PACE GLASS COMPANY 17937 118.80
MISC. SUPPLIES 118.80 101 68020 120 2100
99603 O'GRADY PAVING 18184 5,848.70
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,848.70 320 80831 220
99604 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 66.40
COMMUNICATIONS 39.84 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 26.56 527 66520 160
99605 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 327.19
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 327.19 101 64200 150
99606 SIX FLAGS MARINE WORLD 19119 2,640.64
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,640.64 101 68010 220 1212
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99579 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 52.85
MISC. SUPPLIES 52.85 101 64350 120
99580 STATE OF CA/CONSERVATION DEPT 09073 1,108.64
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,108.64 731 22520
99581 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 818.85
MISC. SUPPLIES 129.90 101 68020 120 2200
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 364.05 101 66210 219
MISC. SUPPLIES 162.52 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 162.38 527 66520 120
99582 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210
99583 NOEL L. MILLER, INC, 09499 260.00
VEHICLE MAINT. 130.00 201 65200 202
SUPPLIES 130.00 620 15000
99584 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 554.14
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 220.02 101 68020 200 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 334.12 526 69020 120
99585 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 631.10
MISC. SUPPLIES 143.97 101 66210 120
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 340.99 101 66210 222
TRAINING EXPENSE 146.14 526 69020 260
99586 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 3,612.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,612.00 101 68010 220 1644
99587 3 T EQUIPMENT CO. 10077 430.94
MISC. SUPPLIES 430.94 527 66520 120
99588 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 2,650.11
RADIO MAINT. 2,650.11 201 65200 205
99589 DOROTHY O'GRADY 11020 140.73
MISC. SUPPLIES 140.73 526 69020 120
99590 STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 11637 450.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 450.00 101 64350 240
99591 BURLINGAME LIBRARY 14228 303.00
MISCELLANEOUS 36.50 101 36320
MISCELLANEOUS 266.50 731 22552
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
01/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99565 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 84.22
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.87 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 39.35 619 64460 120 5120
99566 BURLINGAME ELEM. SCHOOL DIST. 01500 27,253.58
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 27,253.58 731 22563
99567 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 2,106.00.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,106.00 101 68010 220 1644
99568 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTS, INC., 01992 725.28
MISC. SUPPLIES 725.28 527 66520 120
99569 FEDEX 02160 143.53
OFFICE EXPENSE 67.77 101 64420 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.71 101 64400 120
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 59.05 101 64560 290
99570 N.N. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 117.40
TRAINING EXPENSE 117.40 526 69020 260
99571 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 196.15
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 196.15 101 66210 226
99572 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 217.50
MISC. SUPPLIES 143.11 619 64460 120 5150
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.39 619 64460 120 5180
99573 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 595.06
MISC. SUPPLIES 72.99 101 66210 120
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 459.30 101 68020 190 2200
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 50.46 201 65200 190
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.31 527 66520 120
99574 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 7,779.57
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,779.57 101 66100 220
99575 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 18,036.30
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 18,036.30 731 22562
99576 SNAP ON TOOLS 03587 1,762.15
SMALL TOOLS 1,762.15 620 66700 130
99577 TAP PLASTICS 03739 103.92
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 103.92 101 68020 190 2200
99578 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 150.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 150.00 621 64450 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
01-06-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
FUND RECAP 04-05
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 84,503.92
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 18,520.64
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 10,729.89
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 441.38
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 6,052.62
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 11,276.50
WATER FUND 526 186,803.41
SEWER FUND 527 1,957.00
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 2,622.50
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 17.97
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 9,761.15
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 4,813.26
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,606.34
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 22.21
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 240.60
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 4,185.47
DEBT SERVICE FUND 930 3,450.30
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $347,005.16
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99438 THROUGH 99536 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $347,005.16, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../....
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G 1 S T E R PAGE 7
01/06/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99521 HAWK SOLUTIONS 25161 1,247.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,247.40 101 68010 220 1372
99522 SUTTER HEALTH iJ WORK 25162 100.00
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 100.00 101 30700
99523 JASON ISSA 25163 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99524 BERMAN MOVING AND STORAGE 25164 420.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 420.00 201 65200 200
99525 KAUSHIK BHAUMIK 25165 1,015.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525
99526 MICHAEL GONG 25166 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525
99527 JACOB NGUYEN 25167 100.00
MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22525
99528 KENDRICK LI 25168 250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22525
99529 JOHN AILAND 25169 29.15
MISCELLANEOUS 29.15 526 22502
99530 DRAIN BUSTERS 25170 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99531 JAMES BABCOCK 25171 29.50
MISCELLANEOUS 29.50 526 22502
99532 GARY VIELBAUM 25172 1,450.00
MISCELLANEOUS 850.00 101 36630
MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 101 22525
99533 CCAPA 25173 25.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.00 101 64400 120
99534 SEA CONSTRUCTION 25174 1,200.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,200.00 101 22520
99535 MERIT CONSTRUCTION 25175 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99536 THE COBBLER 25176 4,492.43
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 4,492.43 201 65200 140
TOTAL $347,005.16 ,/��
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
01/06/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99506 THE BERKELEY CHESS SCHOOL 24287 2,541.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,541.00 101 68010 220 1349
99507 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 3,705.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,705.00 130 20016
99508 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00
UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080
99509 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 160.00
MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 130 20024
99510 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 580.00
MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 130 20024
99511 C.L.E.A. 24523 682.50
MISCELLANEOUS 682.50 130 20026
99512 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 476.00
UNION DUES 476.00 130 21091
99513 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6.96 130 21015
MISCELLANEOUS 313.64 130 21092
99514 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 333.22
COMMUNICATIONS 333.22 101 65100 160
99515 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 275.28
COMMUNICATIONS 275.28 101 66100 160
99516 W.L. BUTLER 24697 10,400.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 10,400.00 101 22520
99517 AETNA 24760 2,875.61
MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,604.31 130 20022
99518 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 3,554.82
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,554.82 130 20014
99519 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,222.11
MISCELLANEOUS 1,031.90 130 20025
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,190.21 130 20021
99520 AD CLUB 24809 150.00
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 150.00 101 64420 150
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
01/06/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
"' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99492 OFFICE MAX 23306 887.33
OFFICE EXPENSE 539.77 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 221.87 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.99 10166100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE -81.62 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 186.32 101 66100 110
99493 BANK OF NEW YORK 23553 3,450.30
BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 3,450.30 930 66850 763
99494 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 11,154.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,154.50 327 81150 210
99495 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,622.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,622.50 528 66600 210
99496 SBC/MCI 23728 22.21
COMMUNICATIONS 22.21 621 64450 160
99497 SFPUC WATER DUALITY BUREAU 23846 2,915.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,915.00 526 69020 233
99498 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 140.00 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 40.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 110.00 619 64460 210 5150
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 140.00 619 64460 210 5110
99499 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 285.74
COMMUNICATIONS 285.74 101 68020 160 2200
99500 UBS 23951 409.88
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 409.88 619 64460 220 5110
99501 PRESTON PIPELINES 23974 3,000.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,000.00 101 22520
99502 KIERAN WOODS 24058 4,724.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,724.00 -101 22546
99503 SPANGLE ASSOCIATES 24113 4,262.00
DEPOSIT REFUND 4,262.00 101 22590
99504 DOUG BELL 24189 136.63
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 136.63 320 79400 210
99505 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS 24247 451.30
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 451.30 201 65200 203
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R EG I S T E R PAGE 4
01/06/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99481 HILLYARD 21658 530.97
MISC. SUPPLIES 530.97 101 68020 120 2200
99482 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 104.22
COMMUNICATIONS 104.22 101 65300 160
99483 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 22216 158.83
OFFICE EXPENSE 25.92 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 61.67 101 65100 120
COMMUNICATIONS 71.24 101 65100 160
99484 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 977.50
MISCELLANEOUS 977.50 201 35220 000 7100
99485 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38.36
COMMUNICATIONS 38.36 101 68010 160 1101
99486 MILLER DEVELOPMENT 22629 10,716.00
MISCELLANEOUS 10,716.00 101 22546
99487 TURF STAR 22682 159.68
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 159.68 101 68020 200 2200
99488 JIM NANTELL 22762 1,956.64
MISCELLANEOUS 786.00 101 64150 031
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.00 101 64150 120
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 51.80 101 64150 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 310.02 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 792.82 101 69537 250
99489 PENINSULA FORD OF SAN BRUNO 22894 225.74
VEHICLE MAINT. 225.74 201 65200 202
99490 WEST COAST TURF 23069 389.70
MISC. SUPPLIES 389.70 101 68020 120 2200
99491 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.04
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.04 526 69020 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
01/06/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
99466 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 753.60
MISC. SUPPLIES 753.60 101 64400 120
99467 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 20.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 20.69 620 66700 120
99468 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 74.63
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 74.63 201 65200 203
99469 WINGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 19471 750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 731 22525
99470 GETTLER RYAN INC 19641 2,400.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,400.00 101 22520
99471 A.D. TROYER AND ASSOC. 19685 2,490.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,490.00 619 64460 210 5240
99472 REDWOOD CITY-SAN MATEO COUNTY 19698 435.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 435.00 101 64100 250
99473 MONICA OLSEN 19832 144.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 144.00 101 68010 220 1661
99474 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 4,036.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 122.00 327 81010 120
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180
RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180
99475 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 589.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 589.75 101 68010 120 1521
99476 PACIFIC COAST TRANE SERVICE 20818 950.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 950.00 619 64460 210 5120
99477 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 6,052.62
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6,052.62 326 75170 800
99478 CEO 21210 83.89
MISC, SUPPLIES 83.89 101 64350 120
99479 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 151.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 151.00 101 64400 120
99480 MONICA EHLERS 21627 229.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 229.50 101 68010 220 1661
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
01/06/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
99452 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 92.66
MISC. SUPPLIES 92.66 619 64460 120
99453 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 3,049.30
MISC. SUPPLIES 287.49 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 354.03 201 65200 120
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 110.52 201 65200 203
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 215.00 201 65200 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 98.93 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,874.41 201 65200 260
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 108.92 625 65213 203
99454 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 86.60
MISC. SUPPLIES 86.60 620 66700 120
99455 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 147.59
MISC. SUPPLIES 147.59 619 64460 120 5140
99456 DHL EXPRESS 14958 17.97
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 17.97 530 65400 200
99457 IZMIRIAN ROOFING 15573 227.33
MISCELLANEOUS 227.33 618 64520 604
99458 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,435.47
MISCELLANEOUS 3,435.47 731 22594
99459 COSTCO WHOLESALE 17465 275.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 275.00 101 68010 240 1101
99460 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 553.00
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 553.00 201 65200 203
99461 SELF INSURANCE PLANS 18051 9,533.82
CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,533.82 618 64520 225
99462 GCS SERVICE, INC 18250 168.46
SUPPLIES 168.46 620 15000
99463 RUHIYYIH MAGHZI 18334 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
99464 TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH 18419 880.00
MISCELLANEOUS 880.00 130 20018
99465 PENINSULA CONFLICT 18633 7,262.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,262.50 101 64560 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
01/06/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
99438 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 390.62
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 390.62 201 65200 203
99439 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1,666.56
SMALL TOOLS 11.36 201 65200 130
VEHICLE MAINT. 12.97 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 179.96 201 65200 203
SUPPLIES 1,330.59 620 15000
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 131.68 625 65213 203
99440 BURLINGAME GARDEN CENTER 01559 366.47
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 366.47 101 67500 190
99441 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220
99442 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 613.00
RECREATION EXPENSES 613.00 101 10700
99443 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION 01726 130.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 101 68010 240 1100
99444 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 304.75
MISCELLANEOUS 304.75 320 80110 192
99445 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 491.70
MISC. SUPPLIES 467.80 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 23.90 619 64460 120 5130
99446 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 944.27
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 944.27 101 66210 226
99447 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 269.23
MISC. SUPPLIES 269.23 619 64460 120
99448 P. G. & E. 03054 16,840.28
GAS & ELECTRIC 16,840.28 101 66100 170
99449 SBC 03080 52.03
COMMUNICATIONS 52.03 101 65100 160
99450 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 181,680.72
WATER PURCHASES 181,680.72 526 69020 171
99451 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,963.83
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,963.83 101 65150 220
BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY
Burlingame Public Library
Board of Trustees
Minutes .
January 11 , 2005
I. Call to Order
President Herman called the meeting to order at 4 : 30pm.
II. Roll Call
Trustees Present: David Carr, Mary Herman, Katie
McCormack, Carol Rossi and Pat Toft
Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian
Sidney Poland, Recorder
III . Warrants and Special Funds
The Trustees unanimously agreed to approve the warrants. M / S/ C
(Carr/ Rossi),
IV. Minutes
The Trustees unanimously approved the minutes of the November
16, 2004 meeting. M / S / C (Carr/Toft)
V. Correspondence and Attachments
Correspondence and Attachments were noted. Item 5e: Budget
Document and Item 5h. Art in Public Places Policy were moved to
Item 7 Reports and Item 8 Unfinished Business for discussion.
VI. From the Floor None
VII . Reports
A. City Librarian's Report Highlights of Report
1 . New Library Directors - Vickey Johnson is the new
County Librarian; Ben Ocon will be the City Librarian at San
Mateo Library. KG Ouye will remain on staff at San Mateo to
oversee the construction of the'new library.
2 . Employee Appreciation Event - Attendance at this
event was the highest since the tradition of honoring the staff at a
special awards dinner began. Employee achievements awards
were given to Karen Kott, Dan Alvarez and Ann Langendorf.
Trustee McCormack mentioned that a suggestion had been made
to her in regards to moving the event to Friday night. The City
Librarian noted that the staff could be polled by e-mail.
48o Primrose Road • Burlingame • CA 94010-4o83
Phone (650) 558-7474 ' Fax (650) 342-6295
3. New Integrated Library System - Integrated
Interfaces has been designated by PLS to replace our present
Dynix system. Training of staff is scheduled to take 6 months with
July 1st being the target date to have the system operating at
public desks. Staff will train the public on the necessary
operational procedures that pertain to their usage.
B. Foundation Report
1. Wish List - The City Librarian noted that a new
projector in the Lane Room and the rebuilding and future
development of the Library's collection are the most necessary
items for the Foundation to consider funding.
2. Foundation Board Members - Don Roberts and
Stephanie Lucas will leave the Board effective as of the January
13th annual meeting. Officers for the year 2005 are as follows:
Kris Cannon, President; Stephen Hamilton, First Vice-President;
Jim Cannon, Second Vice President; Lauren Rosen, Secretary and
Mary Blythe, Treasurer.
3. Development Committee - The Development
Committee met November 18th to discuss future fund raising
programs and a possible membership drive.
C. Budget Status -
1. Shortfall - At present, the City Manager believes that
the budget shortfall will be in the range of$ 1.1 M which will result
in the implementation of Tier 4 cuts.
2. Library Losses - Library cuts will be mostly
operational such as loss of adult programming, further depletion of
the periodical collection and perhaps discontinuing the Literacy
Program. Losing the benefited full time position in Technical
Services is also a possibility.
3. Trustee Funding - Trustee Herman suggested that the
Trustees consider funding the Library's portion of the Literacy
Program at a total cost of$8,000 per year. Cost of program is
based on cost per learner which is $750.
VIII. Unfinished Business - Public Art Acceptance - Location
Toft/McCormack - With the adoption of the Public Art Policy by
the City Council on December 6, 2004, the Trustees began to
implement the approval process for acceptance of the bronze
statue which the friends of Gloria Barton wish to present to the
library.
A. Motion I - Trustee McCormack made a four part motion to
initiate the acceptance of the statue. M/S/C (McCormack/Toft)
1. Begin process of accepting statue by reviewing the
application and criteria at the February 15th Trustees
meeting.
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2
January 11,2004
2. Begin the required review period for the art object
immediately to allow for the required 30 day review
period.
3. Make arrangements to hold a public hearing at the
March 15, 2005 Trustees meeting.
4. Direct library staff to notice the date and time of the
public hearing in a local newspaper at least 15 days
prior to the public hearing.
B. Motion II - Trustee McCormack made a motion for the
Trustees to appoint a sub-committee which would recommend the
location for the statue. M/S/C (McCormack/Rossi) Dave Carr, Pat
Toft, and Sue Reiterman, Children's Librarian, will serve on the
sub-committee. Trustee McCormack agreed to serve on the sub-
committee if one of the members could not meet at the appointed
time.
IX. New Business
A. CALTAC Renewal - The Trustees agreed to renew their
CALTAC memberships.
B. Easton Project Close-out Costs - The Trustees
unanimously approved the City Librarian's request to ask the
Peninsula Community Foundation to award $36,100 from the
Duncan Trust Fund to cover cost overruns on the Easton project.
M/S/C (Rossi/McCormack)
X. Announcements
A. Trustee McCormack noted the following PLS activities:
1. February 26th - System Advisory Board workshop to
be held at San Francisco Public Library. The Topic is "Friends and
Foundation Merging"; Deborah Doyle will be the speaker.
2. March 19th Breakfast - Possible topics include
volunteer programs and library campaigns.
3. April 23rd Legislative Breakfast - Susan Hildreth,
State Librarian may be the speaker.
Xl. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 5:30pm. The next
meeting of the Library Board of Trustees will be held February 15,
2005 in the Library Conference Room.
Respectfully Submitted,
/0�
Alfred H. Escoffier-
City Librarian
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3
January 11,2004
C ;t Gierklea lnej
BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
February 3, 2005
Chairperson Hesselgren called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission to order
at 5:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson Hesselgren, Commissioners Carney, Grandcolas, Lauder, McQuaide, O'Connor,
Absent: Commissioner Webb
Staff: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz, Parks Superintendent Richmond, Supervisor Disco,
Secretary Harvey
Guests: Phil Scott (PW Superintendent), Vince Falzon (Asst. Street and Sewer Superintendent), Jo
Ellen Ellis
MINUTES
The minutes of the January 6, 2005 Beautification Commission meeting were approved as submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE
Copy of Internet Research on Tree Ordinances (with regard to views [submitted by Commissioner
McQuaide]), that summarizes problems with the lack of enforcement and inequalities of complaints.
Notes from Beautification Commission files regarding the Commission's consideration of establishing a
View Ordinance in 1979. (Submitted by Commissioner McQuaide.)
FROM THE FLOOR-
There were no comments from the floor.
Chairperson Hesselgren changed the order of the Agenda to accommodate the appellants requesting the
removal of the Eucalyptus tree at 1800 Easton Drive.
NEW BUSINESS
Request for Removal of a City-owned Eucalyptus Tree at 1800 Easton Drive — Superintendent
Richmond stated that for several years City Arborist Porter has been reviewing this particular Eucalyptus
tree with the Public Works Department. Arborist Porter observed the large buttress root when it was
exposed and determined that severing the root to accomplish a flatter street grade would be inadvisable,
that the root was too significant and could end up destablizing the tree.
Superintendent Richmond reported that an Independent Arborist had evaluated the Monterey Cypress and
Eucalyptus trees lining Easton Drive. A boring (drilling) method and a mallet were used on this particular
Eucalyptus to detect rot. Based on the procedures used, the report indicated that the tree appears to be
healthy. The report stated that further testing with a Resistograph on the root crown might be advisable
because Resistographs more accurately measure the presence of decay. Superintendent Richmond
concluded that the health of the tree is not in dispute, but repairs to the roadside, the clay sewer main, and
traffic safety are at issue.
The Commission discussed the tree's health and suggestions such as re-routing of the roadside, adding
road signage, lowering the speed limit, and making Easton Drive a one-way street.
Following the discussion, Chairperson Hesselgren recognized Superintendent Scott and Asst.
Superintendent Falzon. Supt. Scott thanked the Commission for scheduling the hearing. Asst.
Superintendent Falzon stated over the years, street repair near this tree has been a challenge and that the
tree causes traffic hazards because the buttress root extends so far into the road and doesn't allow for
traffic to safely pass.
Request for Removal of a City-owned Eucalyptus Tree at 1800 Easton— (Contd.)
Supt. Scott showed a Power Point presentation showing street damage, root growth, drainage problems,
sewer damage, grade issues, and vehicular and traffic hazards. Alternatives to removal that have been
considered are: trimming the roots, covering the roots with more asphalt, re-aligning the street, and
making the street one-way travel. Supt. Scott stated that the City Arborist believes trimming or shaving
the buttress root could cause the tree to be unstable and covering the root with more asphalt could damage
the root system. Supt. Scott added that covering the root with more asphalt would also make the hump
even higher. Re-aligning the street would not only mean other trees would need removing, but is cost
prohibitive (up to $100k). Re-alignment of the street would affect all 4 corners and would also require
removal and construction of various new sections of curb, gutter, and roadway, as well as utility pole
relocation. Supt. Scott concluded that making the street one-way travel is not feasible in residential areas
because it pushes traffic onto smaller streets. It would confuse the driving public, is costly, would make
library access difficult, and Easton Drive is the only street that provides direct access for residents in the
Canyon Road area.
Following the presentation the Commission discussed the various issues. Commissioner Grandcolas
asked if the tree was mature and had it stopped growing. Superintendent Richmond stated that the tree is
mature in top growth but would assume that the root would continue to grow. Commissioner McQuaide
stated that other cities have one way streets or use less costly alternatives such as signage (Caution Tree
Cross/Caution Slow), and that the sewer could be moved to the other side of the street. Commissioner
Grandcolas stated that he slows down when approaching the area, that if accidents were occurring or
residents were complaining he would be more inclined to consider removal as a solution but both cases
are absent. He added that these trees are part of the character and charm of a Tree City USA.
Commissioner Carney stated that it is a traffic hazard for cars coming in opposite directions, particularly
if you are not totally aware. She added when it rains, the roadside puddles up making it more difficult to
see the hump. Commissioner O'Connor stated she frequents the area; accessibility is an issue and has
been for many years. Chairperson Hesselgren commented that she is torn, having all the Eucalyptus trees
removed on Easton Drive would change the whole character of the neighborhood, however, this particular
tree is presenting substantial liabilities and danger. The tree is causing damage to curbs, sidewalk,
drainage; an 8' root extending into the street causing a grade ncline of 2', and if left to remain, will end up
causing ongoing future costs and liabilities to the City. Commissioner Lauder responded that she agreed
with Chairperson Hesselgren, that this tree is causing significant liabilities to the City. She stated that
removal of this tree would not take away from the purpose and intent of the Urban Reforestation and Tree
Protection ordinance but if removal is granted, she would like it to be replaced with a fast growing tree . .
. that it should be a"grand tree". Director Schwartz informed the Commissioners that the City Council, at
it's January 29h budget and goal study session, agreed to ask the Beautification Commission to develop a
long range reforestation plan for the Eucalyptus trees on Easton Drive. He stated that any decision made
regarding this tree or a possible replacement, should be made in consideration of the long term plan.
Following the discussion, Commissioner Lauder moved to uphold the appeal and grant removal of the
City-owned Eucalyptus tree at 1800 Easton Drive due to safety hazards, damage to the sewer main,
drainage problems, traffic flow problems, and accessibility issues But with the recommendation, that
the tree be replaced with a sizeable specie to be determined by the Commission at a future meeting;
seconded, Carney. Motion carried 5—I (McQuaide) —I absent(Webb).
OLD BUSINESS -
Tree View Ordinance — Commissioner Grandcolas stated the draft for a policy has yet to be developed
by the Committee, but that Commissioners McQuaide and Lauder would present what they had
researched on their own.
Superintendent Richmond stated that City Planner Monroe has agreed to come to the March Commission
meeting to discuss what the Planning Department considers with regard to views for new construction.
OLD BUSINESS -Tree View Ordinance- (Contd.)
Commissioner McQuaide submitted Internet Research on Tree Ordinances and stated she conducted an
Internet research of legal journals pertaining to view ordinances. She stated that what she found mostly
was that tree view ordinances more often than not lead to nasty disputes between neighbors, generally
satisfies only a few people, and does not protect the interests of the community as a whole. She noted
three themes that kept surfacing in her research were: 1) In California, no one has a"right"to a view, air,
sunlight, etc. 2) A personal view cannot be guaranteed. 3) The advantages of trees (clean air, reducing
landslides, etc.) outweigh the disadvantages. She concluded that an ordinance or a policy should be
unique to the community, that if the City of Burlingame were to adopt an ordinance or policy it should
have clear, specific goals, it should specifically designate responsibility, allow for flexibility, and most
importantly, should have community support.
Commissioner McQuaide then submitted her notes from department files of 1979 Beautification
Commission meetings with regard to past considerations for establishing a view ordinance in the City of
Burlingame. After reviewing the information, Commissioner O'Connor suggested that the Commission
receive updated case laws. Commissioner Grandcolas stated he did not find the Berkeley ordinance
helpful as a model, and that the Committee needs more direction, whether to consider nothing, consider
an ordinance, or consider a policy, as well as the pros and cons of establishing a policy. He commented
that he would like to provide a mechanism for property owners, but the more this issue is researched, the
more it appears to be a real can of worms. Chairperson Hesselgren stated battles between neighbors could
create even more problems. Commissioner Lauder stated it would be very important to consider the words
of wisdom from past Commissions. Director Schwartz suggested that along with the City Planner
attending next month's meeting, the City Attorney might provide the Commission with information,
comments, or updates on existing case law.
Street Tree Removal Policy — Superintendent Richmond asked the Commission for feed back on the
Criteria for City Street Tree Removal form. The Commission agreed that the form was easy to
understand and useful. Chairperson Hesselgren asked the Commission to further review, try to use the
form, and be prepared to make a recommendation to Council at the next meeting.
Arbor Day Ceremonies — Monday, March 7, 2005—Bayside Park— Superintendent Richmond reminded
the Commission of this upcoming event; correspondence has gone out to schools, agencies, newspapers,
and Council, announcing the event.
Commissioner's Dinner - Superintendent Richmond reminded the Commission of Friday nights
Commissioners Dinner at the Doubletree Hotel
REPORTS—
Director Schwartz—
1. At the Council Budget Study Session it was announced that the economic indicators are up and
the trends are progressing nicely; 1.6 million of reserves will be used to reduce impacts to
employees and the Parks & Recreation Department will be able to add back a Tree Worker
position.
Superintendent Richmond -
1. Tree planting is now occurring.
2. Sycamore Pruning is continuing in the SE section of the City.
3. A Eucalyptus fronting the Rec Center will be removed in the near future. It has been in decline
through the last two pruning cycles. It now has significant die back in the canopy.
4. The irrigation system for the street channels at City Hall was improved and sod/seed was added
after the sidewalk replacement.
5. Final acceptance of the new landscaping to screen the BART tail tracks will be recommended to
Council. Cost reimbursement from BART will be the next step.
REPORTS—(Contd.)
Hesselgren—Chairperson Hesselgren reported that she attended the Mayor's Meeting. She asked that the
Commission think about and respond back at the next meeting, questions they may want to ask other
Commissions. These questions would pertain to the work of this Commission and would clarify the work
of the other Commissions, as well as how the Commissions work might intersect. The next Mayor's
Meeting will be in April and Chairperson Hesselgren will share with the other Commissions thoughts
from the Beautification Commission.
O'Connor — Commissioner O'Connor stated she would be interested in working on urban reforestation
as an ongoing endeavor, like a tree planting program, or a replacement program to stagger tree replanting,
etc.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 7:25 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Karlene Harvey
Recording Secretary
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
February 14, 2005
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Osterling called the February 14,2005,regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:05 p.m.
IL ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Bojues, Keighran and Osterling
Absent: Commissioners: Brownrigg and Vistica
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Catherine Barber;
City Attorney,Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer; Doug Bell
III. MINUTES The minutes of the January 24, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were approved as mailed.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The presentation by Sustainable San Mateo County was continued to the
March 28,2005,meeting. To facilitate the meeting because just a quorum of
the Commission was sitting and a member present was ill, the order of the
agenda was changed to place the action calendar first, followed by design
review and finally the study items.
V. FROM THE FLOOR Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, commented on her neighbor's construction which
was exempt from design review and the need to extend the residential design
review process to more projects, so neighbors have input on the project
earlier in the process; would benefit neighbor relations. Commissioner
clarified that the project which did not go through design review was located
at 1449 Balboa. Rick Demming,729 Lexington Way, submitted letter to be
included in the record for his project which was on the study calendar,
listing additional hardships for the variance. There were no further
comments from the floor.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
8. 149 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT
TO MAKE CHANGES TO CONDITIONS REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE REAR FENCE
(KURT STEIL, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CHU, DESIGNER) (55 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
Chair Osterling asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the
consent calendar. CA noted that there was a request to take 149 Occidental Avenue off the consent calendar.
Chair Osterling moved 149 Occidental Avenue to the first item on the action calendar.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
8. 149 OCCIDENTAL AVENUE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW
AMENDMENT TO MAKE CHANGES TO CONDITIONS REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE
REAR FENCE(KURT STEIL,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JAMES CRU, DESIGNER)
(55 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
Reference staff report February 14, 2005, with attachments. Plr Barber presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Twelve conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions
of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Kurt Steil, 911 North Amphlett, commented that he built the
house as speculation.The buyer asked him to move the fence at the rear of the garage back an additional 4
feet to increase the flat area in the backyard,as currently approved there is 11 feet of their property behind
the fence, with the currently proposed relocation there would be 7 feet instead of 11 feet of their property
behind the fence in the creek, in any event the fence would still be on the property at 149 Occidental; the
new buyers have made the relocation of the fence a contingency of the sale of the house; the owners on
Chapin Lane of the property behind 149 Occidental would like access to the rear 11 feet of 149 Occidental
since they have installed irrigation and planted this area and need access to maintain it;the buyer's attorney
and the attorney of the property owner behind are close to agreement,the developer is staying out of it since
he does not want to bound;he is requesting a continuance of this item until the two attorneys have arrived at
a mutual agreement,hopefully the next Planning Commission meeting.
Commission asked applicant: Did the owner behind ask for an added buffer at the rear of 149 Occidental
which included the flat area? Yes. Would the applicant need new plans to show the fence at the location
agreed to by the two attorneys? Yes. Feel that this item can be placed on consent if the attorneys and
potential buyers and property owner behind reach agreement.
David Igard, 150 Chapin Lane,property owner behind. Want this issue resolved,thought reached agreement
with the previous action, fence located 11 feet from rear property line on 149 Occidental,now developer is
reneging; he and neighbors at 146 and 156 Chapin Lane supported the original project because of the
location of the fence;their concern is the impact on their privacy and preservation of the creekside setting;
think an appropriate compromise is possible but not without a written agreement. Commission asked,it is
unclear why you object to him moving the fence within his own property. Problem is the large house built
and the need to preserve the natural sense of the creekside setting, submitted pictures of the creek with the
old fence,set back 11 feet,from their side they want to hide the fence and screen the view of the new house.
March 8, 2004, letter from the neighbors details the issues. Commission asked if the top elevation of the
fence changed whether it was 11 feet or 7 feet from rear property line? The issue is not the height but the
ability to plant landscape to screen the fence and the problems behind it,they reclaimed the area along the
creek,built walls and landscaped,thought the area was theirs. What are the pictures of? They are pictures
of the previous fence which was 1.5 feet further away than the one originally approved(at 11 feet);greater
issue is that the side yard fences have been built already but not the rear, so fear they were planning on
seeking a change to this fence location all along. Applicant noted that the fence was up before could get a
final,not hiding anything; reason Igard's want fence 11 feet back is so that they can access the flat area to
install plants and maintain them,trying to take over part of this property which is not theirs,new owner does -�
not want people at rear of property looking over the fence, if fence back 4 feet further it would block the
view of his property more. Have neighbors irrigation system on his property,if not work out developer will
remove. Is it safe to move the fence down slope?Fence will still be located on flat area above creek when 7
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
feet behind property line. Igard, goal is to reach agreement with developer and buyer through a binding
agreement,think that is in everyone's interest. There were no further comments from the floor. The public
hearing was closed.
C. Keighran noted it is in the best interest that they figure this out among themselves and come to
compromise, concerned about someone else on another's property to do maintenance, can see why new
neighbor is concerned; move to place this on the action calendar when a compromise has been achieved.
Motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Comment on the motion: No problem with relocating fence as applicant proposes,fine as long as they keep
the fence off the slope, new location adds several feet of valuable area to the back yard,if need a taller fence
put it down slope or on the other side of the creek,need to respect property owners rights.
C.Keighran amended motion to place this item on the consent calendar if a compromise has been achieved
and to place it on the action calendar if a compromise is not achieved. Second C. Auran agreed to the
amendment.
Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when an
agreement had been agreed to or on the regular action calendar if no agreement is achieved. The motion
passed on a voice vote 4-0-2(C.Brownrigg&Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item
concluded at 7:35 p.m.
9. 3028 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (ED WEBB,
FORMAT, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; ANGELINA BRUNO, PROPERTY OWNER) (28
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
Reference staff report February 14, 2005, with attachments. Plr. Barber presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Twelve conditions were suggested for consideration. Staff was asked to read to
criteria for a hillside area construction permit into the record. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Angelina Bruno,property owner,and Ed Webb,architect, 248
LaVilla,La Jolla, represented the project. Ray and Barbara Forest, 6 La Mesa Court, spoke in opposition.
Commission had no questions of applicant. Neighbors,lived on La Mesa 30 years,feel project is obstructive
to the area, should have a shed roof,will see a stark building blocking view of green belt;the height at the
rear to the front does not flow with the hillside,is 35 feet tall,design is stark and not necessary. Live to west
of 3028 Hillside,look down on;not disagree with the benefit of remodel,problem is the height of the middle
section of the proposed project,now the house is nestled into the canyon,remodel will make it stand out;fire
hydrant serving this area does not work,will it be fixed,if not this will increase the risk to other residents,
this site is next to Mills Canyon wildlife area,want to keep the natural setting. Applicant noted: fire hydrant
has not worked for a number of years,city decided not to fix,told that could use the fire lane in the Canyon
for access or come down from the street above,house will be fully sprinklered, tried to mitigate roof,put
fake shakes on it,roofing material is what will face the neighbor. Commissioner noted visited properties on
both La Mesa Court and Lane,house has a strong vertical element,there is a better way to blend the house
into area, add more hip roof, move it up the slope like the houses on La Mesa. Applicant noted vertical
element is there to provide view,could reduce some but the house is designed within the current parameters.
`-- Neighbor noted that Fire Department would not take equipment on fire road below,cannot go down road to
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14,2005
cul-de-sac,its too steep;will need to drag hose. There were no further comments from the floor.The public
hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: visited Fishers,looked out kitchen window,proposed roof would cut heavily into
the distant view, feel that there is a loss of view,also two conflicting stories about the Fire Department,
need clarification. CA noted that the reason the house is required to be sprinklered is so that it is not
dependent on a fire hydrant. Agree that there is a view blockage.
C.Keighran noted agree from site visit although do not feel that the view from the Forest home is blocked,
the vertical element of this house is unnecessary,but the Freeman view is blocked,think house does need
remodeling,concerned about the view obstruction on La Mesa so move to deny without prejudice to give the
applicant the opportunity to revise the design so that it blends better with house and addresses the view
blockage from the Freeman house on La Mesa. The motion was seconded by C.Auran.
Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice. The motion passed on a
voice vote 4-0-2(C.Brownrigg&Vistica absent).Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at
7:50 p.m
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
10. 2515 POPPY DRIVE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION(JOHNNY DAROSA,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;ALFRED AND
PINKY PONG,PROPERTY OWNERS)(71 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:ERICA STROHMEIER
Plr. Barber briefly presented the project description. Commissioner asked if staff requires existing
elevations drawings to be submittal with the plans. Staff responded that yes,it is a listed requirement of
submittal given to all applicants. There were no further questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Johnny Darosa,Darosa Associates,475 EI Camino Real#308,
Millbrae,project designer was available to answer questions.Commission asked why there were no existing
elevations provided,disappointed these were not part of plan set. Mr.Darosa explained that there were no
changes to the front elevation,and there were pictures provided of the house. Commissioner noted that new
trees proposed are Redwoods to match the existing trees on-site,however in years to come this will create a
dark and shady property, should consider making a different selection of trees, use street tree list.
Commissioner asked if the new windows will match the existing windows or will they all be replaced. Mr.
Darosa explained that some of the windows in the house have recently been replaced with new windows
already so the new windows will match the existing windows. Commission clarified that all will be double
glaze vinyl frame windows,and the applicant confirmed that all will be double glaze vinyl frame windows.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C.Auran made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following
revisions have been made and plan checked:
• Provide existing elevation drawings for all elevation;
• Select a different species than the proposed Redwoods for planting on-site to avoid creating a dark
shady property in years to come;
• Add more detail to the drawings and provide elevations of all side of the house,existing and
proposed-side by side arrangement.
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
This motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Comment on motion: this is a modest addition; proposal will match existing style of the house.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg & Vistica absent).
The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 7:55 p.m.
11. 1414 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR BASEMENT FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND
DETACHED GARAGE (RICK SANDOR AND LISA GOOZE, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS; PHIL HYLAND, DESIGNER) (57 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Phil Hyland, JPH Design, 585 Quarry Road, San Carlos, was
available to answer questions, noted that owners were not available to attend meeting. Proposing a new
house, pretty much the same footprint, but new garage will be pushed back to the rear of the lot.
Commission asked staff if there really was only one covered and one uncovered space required for this new
house. CP Monroe noted that there were four bedrooms proposed, therefore only one covered space is
required, two covered spaces are required for five or more bedrooms.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Bojues made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C. Auran.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion
passed on a voice vote 4-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg & Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m.
12. 1309 MILLS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION (CHRIS AND PEGGY PEDERSEN, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (78 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA
STROHMEIER
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Chris and Peggy Pedersen, property owners, 1309 Mills
Avenue, were available to answer questions. Jeanne Mehran, 1305 Mills Avenue, nice from the front,
concerned with North elevation seen from her house, they are bordered by a one story house on one side and
a two story house on the other side, sun comes in from side of one story house and the addition will
eliminate the sun and sky view they have; there is one portion of addition that has a two story wall straight
up that is not set back at all, what will the roof be made or.
Jerry Deal, JD & Associates, 1228 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame, responded that the roof will be composition
shingle which is typical for this style of house now a days; there is a driveway on the neighbors side, and this
property is only 50 feet wide and also has a driveway on the side, so the buildable width of the property is
only about 36-37 feet; there is one place that is two stories, with a dormer; cutting back two feet won't
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
change the effect of the shadow on the adjacent property;when you build a two-story house there is some
impact on sunlight. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Bojues made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C.
Keighran.
Comment on motion: nice job, preserving character of the existing house, nice example of a bungalow
restored and remodeled; nice job of mixing old and new.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion
passed on a voice vote 4-0-2 (Cers. Brownrigg & Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:06 p.m.
13. 270 CHAPIN LANE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION AND A NEW DETACHED GARAGE(YAT-CHEONG AND ANN AU,
APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (53 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
Plr. Barber briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Yat-Cheong,property owner,270 Chapin Lane,was available
to answer questions. He stated that he was very happy with plans that Jerry Deal prepared. The new two-car
garage will fit well with the neighborhood. There were no other comments from the floor and the public .�
hearing was closed.
C.Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar. This motion was seconded by C.Bojues.
Comment on motion: fine design,will blend well with existing.
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion
passed on a voice vote 4-0-2(C.Brownrigg&Vistica absent)The Planning Commission's action is advisory
and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:10 p.m.
14. 2707 MARTINEZ DRIVE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST REMODEL AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION (GILL AND JANE YEE, TRS, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS JD &ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (37 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN
Plr. Barber briefly presented the project description. Commission asked staff if there was a limit on tree
planting and regulations for tree trimming developed for the hillside area, thought this was brought up by
City Council. CA Anderson noted that there has not been a formal policy adopted yet, but that staff can
work with the Parks Department and the City Arborist on a condition of approval. There were no further
questions of staff.
Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Gill Yee,property owner, 2707 Martinez Drive,has been a -�
resident of Burlingame for 25 years,has done nothing to his house,there is a lot of construction work goin€
on in the area, now he wants to improve his property. Mr. Yee passed forward letters of support for his
project to the Planning Commission. Commissions asked if this project was o.k. with his three uphill
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
neighbors. Mr. Yee responded that yes,the three neighbors above him are o.k.with the project,but he has
an agreement with the neighbor directly next door. Commissioner clarified that this is the neighbor at 2711
Martinez,because the letter from this neighbor says that approval of the project is pending City approval and
provided that it doesn't block his bridge and bay views,need to install story poles to determine ifproject will
meet neighbor's criteria. Mr.Yee noted that in response to the neighbor's concerns he has worked on three
revisions with Jerry Deal,his designer. There are three houses under construction for additions and remodel
right now,he has lived in a construction zone for a year now.He is the only single story house on his side of
the block,wants to improve this house. Got six letters of support from neighbors,tried to talk to everyone,
but didn't get them all.
Jerry Deal,JD&Associates, 1228 Paloma,Burlingame,project designer,noted that the written document
from the neighbor is not a good document. The neighbor at 2711 Martinez Drive provided a document with
a line that he thought the project should not cross(shown in red),he said if Mr.Yee adds to the inside side of
the line it is o.k.,just don't go to the left of the line. If you look at the left elevations,the left hand portion of
the second floor is one foot within the line demarcated by the neighbor.
Karlyn Schneider, 2705 Arguello Drive, Burlingame; Lena Hwang, 2716 Martinez Drive, Burlingame,
speaking on behalf of her parents;Hera Kostekoglu,2708 Arguello Drive,Burlingame: lives in back and up
hill from 2707 Martinez,has lived here since 1962. Went to the Planning Department because it seems like
they are asking for a large variance.There is a second story on the house below and the neighbor next door is
doing a big remodel, think they need story poles, not sure what this project will do to view, may impact
uphill neighbors. It is a nice design,but doesn't fit in with the other houses in the neighborhood, nothing
else around like this; first notice they got about this project was blue card from the City, didn't see plans
before, concern with addition, don't know what 8 foot increase will do to the view, all four bedrooms
windows are located at the front of their house, father likes bay views, wish neighbor talked with them
before,tall trees located on 2707 Martinez that are already a huge impact on the view;does not live within
effected area,but there is a lot of remodeling going on in the area,bought in this neighborhood twenty years
ago because of the hillside ordinance that protected views,concerned that if this project is approved it will
set a precedent and other projects will be building in the area resulting in loss of views in this neighborhood.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
Commission clarified to members of the public that the request for height is not a variance,which requires
that the Planning Commission find an exceptional hardship on the property,but a special permit which gives
the Planning Commission the discretion to approve.
Commission had the following comments and concerns:
• Need storypoles surveyed at proposed envelope of addition,will give better perspective of addition,
concern with impact on distant views;
• Applicant should explore trimming the existing black acacia and eucalyptus trees on the property to
possibly offset the impact of the addition on views; and
• Can staff provide addresses and phone numbers of neighbors that spoke tonight so that when the
story poles go up the Planning Commission can view them from inside each neighbor's house.
Comment on motion: story poles will be a benefit to surrounding neighbors, a lot of construction in this
areas, not opposed to addition on this property but concerned with impact on distant views.
C.Boju6s made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the above revisions
have been made and the story poles are up and documented. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans
had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2(Cern.Brownrigg&Vistica absent).
The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:32 p.m.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1. 1329 DRAKE AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMITS FOR A NEW
DETACHED GARAGE AND STORAGE AREA (ALAN OLIN, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;
YANNA ABECASSIS AND MATTHEW MALONEY,PROPERTY OWNERS)PROJECT PLANNER:
ERICA STROHMEIER
C.Auran recused himself from this item because he lives within 500 feet of the subject property. He left the
Council Chambers. CA Anderson noted that the Commission was now in recess due to lack of a quorum,
but that the remaining Commissioners could comment on the project. CP Monroe presented a summary of
the staff report.
Commissioners asked:
• Is this just a storage area with sink or will there be other uses/things added?
• Will the drain line be limited to 2 inches? and
• Can support the layout of this proposal, with the garden in the back, keeps good spacing behind
garage.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed --�
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:40 p.m.
C. Auran returned to the dias.
2. 729 LEXINGTON AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR
A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION (JORGE MAEZONO, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; LIZA G.
DEMINEY, PROPERTY OWNER)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report.
Commissioners asked:
• Large lot coverage variance 45.1%,what is exceptional hardship on this property;
• Applicant provided information on family hardships, but is there a possibility to convert the first
floor office to a bedroom and add an office upstairs to avoid lot coverage variance;applicant needs
to look at other options to address family hardship;
• Commission is required to find a physical hardship on this property or other design to avoid the
variance;
• Without physical hardship have to go with rules;
• Floor area is close to maximum, reduce by 50 SF or so;
• Japanese maples proposed in rear yard, may not be best choice for privacy, look at selecting tall
shrubs or trees from street tree list to address privacy.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:45 p.m.
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14,2005
3. 16 DAVIS COURT, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR
EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (DALE MEYER, APPLICANT AND
ARCHITECT; ANDREW JUROW AND BARBIE BARRETT, PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT
PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER
Plr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report.
Commissioners asked:
• Can the Commission have access to the accessory structure during their site visit? During the last
review there was bed in the accessory structure.
CP Monroe stated that staff will provide the Planning Commission with contact information for the property
owner to arrange access to the structure.
This item was set for the consent calendar. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m.
4. 1120 BROADWAY, ZONED C-1, BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA — APPLICATION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION(CHECK CASHING)(REZA RAZAVI,
APPLICANT; CLAIRE CONSTANTINO TR ET AL, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER:
RUBEN HURIN
Plr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report.
Commissioners asked:
�-- • Is there is a peak,time or times when customers come to this business,for example are there more at
noon verses two in the afternoon?
• What will the peak hours of activity be in two to five years?
• Do more customers come at lunch time and after work?
• Application says that they have businesses in other cities,where are the other locations?
• Is there parking provided at the other locations?
• Will staff check what applications were required at the locations in other cities and if there have been
any issues at the locations in the other cites;
• Application notes that the number of customers per day will be 30,and this number is anticipated to
triple in five years,will this create a parking issue;
• Previous use at this site was a real estate office,how many employees worked in that office and what
was the hours of operation; and
• Plans note four offices in the back,what and how will they be used,please provide details.
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:55 p.m.
5. 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE,ZONED C-2,SUBAREA D-APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR A NON-AUTO RELATED USE (PRINTING BUSINESS) (SCHEHEREZADE
SHARABIANLOU, APPLICANT; BUDI LEONARDI, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER:
CATHERINE BARBER
Plnr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report.
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
Commissioners asked:
• Why is this business moving from the current Lorton site to the California site? '1
• How long has a retail use been in the building at 220 California Drive?
• How long have retail uses been in the spaces at 210-218 California Drive?
• How does the existing square footage at the Lorton Avenue site compare to the new square footage at
the 220 California site?Please provide square footage of existing site;
• How much on-site parking is provided for the existing Lorton Avenue site and the other three PIP
sites that the delivery vehicle serves ?
• Have there been parking complaints about this use at the Lorton location filed with the City? and
How does the business operate with only three employees and the few customers that come to this
site.
This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the
Planning Department. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m.
6. 835 AIRPORT BOULEVARD, ZONED C-4 —APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT TO OPERATE A "PARK AND FLY" PROGRAM FROM AN EXISTING HOTEL
(BRUCE CARLTON,DOUBLETREE HOTEL,APPLICANT;TODAY'S III INC.,PROPERTY OWNER)
PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report.
Commissioners asked:
• Will there be signage in the parking area to designate the location for the park and fly patrons?
• What is the vacancy rate of parking on the hotel site; provide average vacancy count twice a day
(once at peak time) for three to four days to make sure there is adequate parking spaces on-site for
proposed use;
0 Application says 30 cars maximum for the park and fly program,will that number grow in time?
• Should monitor program and if successful how will hotel make sure cars are kept out of upper lot?
• Approval should be limited to two or three years; and
• 53% of customers are airline crew which use the shuttle to the hotel, can park and fly approval be
tied to the number or proportion of airline crew usage?
CA Anderson noted that conditions of approval can place a cap on the maximum number of cars allowed for
the park and fly program, and can require review of the approval every two years or upon complaint.
This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the
Planning Department. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m.
7. 1275 ROLLINS ROAD, ZONED M-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
PARKING VARIANCE FOR AUTOMOBILE SALES(JIM GLOVER,APPLICANT;PETER BRAUN&
ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER; FRANK MURPHY, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER:
CATHERINE BARBER
CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report.
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
Commissioners asked:
• How much inventory will this business carry on-site at any one time?
• Will vehicles in inventory be new or used?
• Why will people buy these cars on-line and not just come to the site to look at them?
• Why are there six offices,but there will only be one to three employees? What will the other offices
be used for?
• Provide a better description of how this business will function? Describe how cars will go in and
out?
• How will cars be brought in,where will they come from,how will they be delivered,where will they
be loaded and unloaded? and
• How will cars be sold? Viewed on-site or on-line, then picked up on-site?
This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed
by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 9:15 p.m.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
- Review of City Council regular meeting of February 7, 2005.
CP Monroe reviewed the actions at the Council meeting. She noted that the Council discussed moving the
date for the Joint session with the Planning Commission to April, but a full council was not available, so
Council asked if the Commission could make the June 13 date,for a one hour meeting before the regularly
scheduled Commission meeting; Chair directed staff to e-mail the commissioners to see if they would all be
available June 13,2005. It was noted that Council directed staff to bring some intermediate clarifications
for the Subarea D regulations to the commission for immediate consideration.
FYI: Revisions to an approved commercial design review project at 1101 Burlingame Avenue,Zoned
C-1, Subarea A,Burlingame Avenue Commercial Area.
Commission reviewed this item and set it to design review study when there was space on an agenda.
FYI: Peninsula Hospital Replacement Project — Landscape Plan for New Emergency Entrance on
Trousdale (Increment One)
The conditions of approval require that the Planning Commission be informed of the applicant's submittals
and conformance with landscaping requirements for each phase of the project. This report was on the first
phase of landscaping. Commission noted that Redwoods close to the street could become view obstacles for
adjacent uphill properties in the future, so should be confined to the existing grove area. Future view
blockage should be considered in reviewing other phases of the landscaping.
- FYI: Update on the Food Establishment Regulations in the Broadway Commercial Area.
Commissioner asked that this be put on the agenda for comment. Received a number of calls about a bakery
on Broadway, with current regulations can have but without any on-site seating; presently have the
maximum number on Broadway; realize that changing the regulations may not result in adding a bakery.
Question is should the commission re-evaluate the current food establishment regulation and allow the
number to expand for a time. What kind of bakery was interested? Not a full service like Copenhagen.
Used to be a number of bakeries on Broadway, good to have one. CA noted that many businesses can call
themselves a bakery, Subway sandwiches for example bake their breads on site, location of a bakery on
Broadway is to a considerable extent up to the property owners to seek out. Staff suggested that the
Commissioners may wish to speak to some of the property owners on Broadway about how they feel about
11
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005
the current food establishment regulations and their effect on the business district. Commission directed
staff to prepare a staff report on the alternatives to regulating food establishments
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Osterling adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ann Keighran,Acting Secretary
12
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31, 2005
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
LAIF&County Pool 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 73.36 1 1 2.586 2.622
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 8,000,000.00 7,932,730.00 8,000,000.00 26.64 982 680 2.860 2.900
Investments 30,025,165.46 29,957,895.46 30,025,165.46 100.00% 262 182 2.659 2.696
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 67,494.12 459,405.61
Average Daily Balance 29,105,497.66 29,222,264.68
Effective Rate of Return 2.73% 2.67%
Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and
availability of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds).
i
SUS NAV ,FINANCE DIR./TREASURER
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
January 31, 2005
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
LAIF&County Pool
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 8,104,075.82 8,104,075.82 8,104,075.82 2.264 2.264 1
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 13,921,089.64 13,921,089.64 13,921,089.64 2.830 2.830 1
Subtotal and Average 21,105,497.66 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 22,025,165.46 2.622 1
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 992,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 3.500 871 06/22/2007
3128X1 6Q5 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,988,120.00 2,000,000.00 2.300 2.300 289 11/17/2005
3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,965,110.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 728 01/30/2007
3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 990,940.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 3.100 815 04/27/2007
3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 996,560.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 989 10/18/2007
Subtotal and Average 8,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 7,932,730.00 8,000,000.00 2.900 680
Total and Average 29,105,497.66 30,025,165.46 29,957,895.46 30,025,165.46 2.696 182
Portfolio CITY
Run Dale:02/11/2005-09:10
CP
PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept V6.21
I Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Activity BY Type
e Page 3
January 1, 2005 through January 31, 2005
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary)
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 2.264 3,317,537.94 1,000,000.00
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 2.830 574,544.53 3,300,000.00
Subtotal 22,433,082.99 3,892,082.47 4,300,000.00 22,025,165.46
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
Subtotal 8,000,000.00 8,000,000.00
Total 30,433,082.99 3,892,082.47 4,300,000.00 30,025,165.46
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM3)SyrnRept V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 4
Activity Summary
January 2004 through January 2005
Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number
Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average
End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity
January 2004 4 27,400,432.25 2.663 2.700 2.696 1 0 174 168
February 2004 4 27,499,689.16 2.557 2.592 2.564 0 0 174 163
March 2004 4 29,579,440.12 2.512 2.547 2.512 0 0 161 146
April 2004 5 31,824,022.87 2.373 2.405 2.318 1 0 184 165
May 2004 5 32,351,524.97 2.412 2.445 2.368 0 0 181 157
June 2004 5 32,705,947.05 2.452 2.486 2.420 0 0 180 150
July 2004 5 31,221,968.21 2.561 2.597 2.553 0 0 188 151
August 2004 5 31,242,288.45 2.603 2.639 2.605 0 0 188 145
September 2004 5 25,250,564.07 2.625 2.662 2.624 0 0 232 172
October 2004 6 28,964,592.72 2.629 2.666 2.618 1 0 240 181
November 2004 6 25,300,063.99 2.661 2.698 2.653 0 0 275 198
December 2004 7 30,433,082.99 2.695 2.732 2.673 1 0 259 188
January 2005 7 30,025,165.46 2.659 2.696 2.622 0 0 262 182
Average 5 29,522,983.25 2.569% 2.605% 2.556 0 0 208 167
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Dale:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM4)SynnRept V6.21
'Report Ver.5.00
I '
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 5
Distribution of Investments By Type
January 2004 through January 2005
January February March April May June July August September October November December January Average
Security Type 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005 by Period
LAIF&County Pool 81.8 81.8 83.1 81.2 81.5 81.7 80.8 80.8 76.2 75.8 72.3 73.7 73.4 78.8%
_ ........................._ ....._ ......... .........._
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
....... ....... ....... ........._
Certificates of Deposit-S&L
Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln
Negotiable CD's-Bank
........... . __ ...... .........................._......... ............ ........ ................ ... .. . ......... ........... ... ..... ........ ................... .. ................... ....... . _...
CORP NOTES
Bankers Acceptances
Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing
........... . ............... .... ................................................................................................................ .............. .. . ...._................................. ..... ............ .................................... ................................... ... ......... ........._... _.....
Commercial Paper-Discount
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 18.3 18.2 16.9 18.9 18.6 18.4 19.2 19.2 23.8 24.2 27.7 26.3 26.6 21.2%
_ ....... .... ........ ......... ......... . . ....._.................................................................. ............ . .. ......... ....... ............... . ........ ........... ........ _... .. _....._
Federal Agency Issues-Discount
_..._.__._11.1................._..._ _._.._....... _.__._........................................_......_.................................................................................._....................................................................._......................................................................... ......
Treasury Securities-Coupon
TreasurySecurities-Discount
_ ......... .. ......... ......... .. .. ..... .._....... ........ .. .......... ..................................... .............. ........ . ........... ... ....... . ......_.........
Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon
...........................................................__............._..........._......................._......_111.1..............................................................................._............._................................................................................................_....................................... .
Miscellaneous Securities-Discount
_.._ .......... ........ . ......... . ........ ........... . .. .......... ......................................
..
Non Interest Bearing Investments
................... ... - .. ....... . .............. .. ........... ................................................. .. ... ....................... .. ............ ... ..... . ....... .................. ..._. .._ . _
Mortgage Backed Securities
..... ...................... .................._....... ..........................._......___...................................................................................................................................................._...................................................._........................................._... ... ..
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2
_ _ _.. _._ .......... ............. ....... . . ...............................
Miscellaneous Discounts At Cost 3
. _. .._ _ ......_. .. ..... ... ........ ............... ........................................................ . .. ................................................................. . ......... .. .. ..... ................ ....
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF PM5)SymRepl V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 6
Interest Earnings Summary
January 31, 2005
January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
CD/Coupon/Discount Investments:
Interest Collected 45,000.00 128,500.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 30,175.00 30,175.00
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 55,841.66) ( 48,883.33)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 19,333.34 109,791.67
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 19,333.34 109,791.67
Pass Through Securities:
Interest Collected 0.00 0.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00
Cash/Checking Accounts:
Interest Collected 140,154.97 453,825.76
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 278,248.34 278,248.34
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 370,242.53) ( 382,460.16)
Interest Earned during Period 48,160.78 349,613.94
Total Interest Earned during Period 67,494.12 459,405.61
Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Total Earnings during Period 67,494.12 459,405.61
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF PM6)SyrnRept V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
03BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31, 2005
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
No Active Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.000 0.000
Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0 0 0.000 0.000
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 134.53 3,011.38
Average Daily Balance 74,223.37 285,384.05
Effective Rate of Return 2.13% 1.79%
Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months.Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is
restri d by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds).
t2:11
Finance Director/Treasurer
Portfolio 03BD
CP
Run Date:02/11/2005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM1)SyrnRept V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
03BD
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
January 31, 2005
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
SYS82 82 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.264 2.233 2.264 1
Subtotal and Average 74,223.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0
Total and Average 74,223.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0
Portfolio 03BD
CP
Run Date:02/1112005-09:10 PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept V6.21
.Ver.5.00
04BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31, 2005
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Managed Pool Accounts 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 100.00 1 1 2.233 2.264
Investments 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 100.00% 1 1 2.233 2.264
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 30,500.14 187,094.61
Average Daily Balance 16,795,197.64 16,921,587.40
Effective Rate of Return 2.14% 1.88%
i
�I Ldr�
sus Nave, 'nance Dir./Treasurer
Portfolio 04BD
CP
Run Date:02/11/2005-09:11
PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept V6.21
Report Ver.5.00
04BD
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
January 31, 2005
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
SYS85 85 Local Agency Investment Fund 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 2.264 2.264 1
Subtotal and Average 16,795,197.64 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 2.264 1
Total and Average 16,795,197.64 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 16,812,887.61 2.264 1
Portfolio 04BD
CP
Run Date:02/1112005-09:11
PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept V6.21
1 I i Ver.5.00
FEB o 2, 2005
January 24, 2005
BURLINGAME
SCHOOL DISTRICT Mr. Jim Nantell
City Manager
City of Burlingame
City Hall
501 Primrose Road
Board of Trustees Burlingame, CA 94010
Michael Barber Dear Jim:
Marc J. Friedman
Dave Pine
Linda Lees Dwyer Thank Y Y you and the Cit Council for the efforts extended on behalf of the
Alison Van Dyke Burlingame's concerned citizens about the proposed route of the
Jefferson-Martin transmission line down Trousdale Drive.
District Administration At their January 18, 2005 meeting, the Board of Trustees discussed the
Sonny H. Da Marto, Ed.D. request from Rosalie O'Mahony, former Mayor of Burlingame, that the
Superintendent Burlingame School District contribute towards the expenses for attorneys
Suzanne Hall, Ed.D. and expert fees regarding this issue. Unfortunately, budget constraints
Assistant Superintendent,
Curriculum&Instruction prevent the Board of Trustees from approving this request. The 280
Jing-Jing Wang Corridor Group previously asked the Board for financial assistance
Assistant Superintendent, regarding this matter and the Board of Trustees found it necessary to
Chief Business Official reject their request as well.
Pamela McCabe
Director, Special Education& The Board of Trustees would however, like to express appreciation to the
Categorical Programs Cit for
City its support of community members and for the collaborative
relationship that has been established with the Burlingame School District.
We look forward to continuing to work with you.
Sincerely,
M . b. rl
Sonny H. Da Marto, Ed. D.
Superintendent
SHD/ef
Cc: Burlingame School District Board of Trustees
1825 Trousdale Drive
Burlingame, CA 94010
(650)259-3800
Fax: (650)259-3820
www.burlingameschools.com