Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.04.18 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BURLINGAME City of Burlingame Regular Meeting - Monday, April 18, 2005 CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 1 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 (Microphone check) CLOSED SESSION: 6:30 Conference Room A Threatened litigation (Government Code § 54956.9(b)(91),(3)) a. Claim of Alyce Denke b. Claim of Gloria& Clayton Burnell C. Claim of Carole Pena C. Claim of Egidio Bertola 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 4, 2005 Approve 5. PRESENTATION a. Proclamation to declare West Nile Virus and Mosquito and Presentation Vector Control Awareness Week b. Introduce Central County Fire Department Division Chief Introduction C. California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Financial Presentation Reporting Award 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. a. Appeal of the Planning Commission approval of a Hearing/Action conditional use permit for a non-auto related use (Printing Service) at 220 California Drive, Zoned C-2, Subarea D 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Library Board Vacancies Discuss b. Report back on direction to Safeway Update/Discuss 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Resolution accepting Hyatt Pump Station Improvement Project to W. R. Forde Construction, Inc. b. File retention BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BURL'- M City of Burlingame Regular Meeting - Monday, April 18, 2005 CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 2 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 C. Approve out-of-state travel for Financial Services Manager and Administrative/Information Services Manager d. Update on Burlingame Avenue Business Improvement District e. Warrants & Payroll 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Traffic, Safety& Parking, March 10, 2005; Beautification, April 7, 2005 Planning, April 11, 2005 b. Department Reports: Building, March, 2005; Finance, March, 2005 14. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558- 7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Monday, May 2, 2005 CITY O� BURLINGAME aF J�-e- BURLINGAME -CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of April 4, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. CLOSED SESSION CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following: a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8: Property: Discussion of possible access across Parking Lot B-1 to 1421 Chapin Avenue Agency Negotiators: Jim Nantell and George Bagdon Negotiating Parties: Bertetta Family Under Negotiation: Access Mayor Galligan requested a moment of silence in memory of Pope John Paul II who passed away on April 2, 2005. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Mike McCaffery. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan, Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None Mayor Galligan requested Council agree to hear public comments on Items 8.a. and 8.b. before Item 7. Council agreed. 4. MINUTES Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 21, 2005 Council meeting; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 1 Burlingame City Council April 4,2005 Unapproved Minutes 5. PRESENTATION a. BURLINGAME AQUATIC CLUB UPDATE P&RD Schwartz introduced Todd Arris, President of the Burlingame Aquatic Club. Dave Myers, Executive Director, provided an update on the club's activities. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None. 8. STAFF REPORTS a. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION, NO. 24-2005, BROADWAY AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT—SETTING 2005-06 ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVAL OF ANNUAL REPORT Ross Bruce, President of the Broadway Area Business Improvement District, reviewed their Annual Report. There were no comments from the floor. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 24-2005, Declaring the City of Burlingame's Intention to Establish 2005-06 Assessments for the Broadway Area Business Improvement District and Approving the 2004-05 Annual Report; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION,NO. 25-2005, BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SETTING 2005-06 ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVAL OF ANNUAL REPORT Cheryl Enright, Co-Chair of the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District (BID), reviewed their Annual Report which is also available online at www.downtownburlingame.com. Council commended BID's efforts for their first year. Specific suggestions by Council members were: Councilwoman O'Mahony noted she had spoken to several Advisory Board members and many business members and found that some members felt they had received no benefit from the BID. She suggested more outreach to the membership. She referred to a list of questions she prepared and asked the BID to respond to the following issues: number in attendance at the annual BID meeting in November; allocation of more funds for streetscape improvements; how to outreach to those businesses without email access; identified some budget items which were not included affecting the total. She asked who does the art design work for the Art &Jazz Festival? There were 20 T-shirts made for the festival for$450: How were the shirts used? Invoices should be provided for every expense. Regarding parking issues: At Councilwoman O'Mahony's request, DPW Bagdon advised that the parking study update was just completed; and that the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission had scheduled a public hearing on April 28t to discuss the study. Councilwoman O'Mahony stated she would accept the Annual Report with the understanding that the Advisory Board will bring back answers on the items identified by May 2. It was suggested that the Advisory Board meet bi-weekly in the interim to review and to accept or revise the BID objectives for 2005-06; and that the Advisory Board become conversant with the process and communicating with fellow merchants, as well as purchasing marketing services; to amend the bylaws making the Advisory Board the decision maker; 2 Burlingame City Council April 4, 2005 Unapproved Minutes and to reconsider the rate structure of the membership for those businesses located above or below street level. Vice Mayor Baylock stated that she likes the banner and the planter programs. Both programs show the human element of action by the district. Councilwoman Nagel suggested the BID do some advertising to further promote the businesses. Councilman Coffey was concerned about the 16%voter turnout; suggested looking at a voting structure based on member contribution; suggested the BID work with the Chamber of Commerce since their goals overlap; expenditures should be audited; and each time an event is mentioned in the report, the event should be specifically named. Mayor Galligan stated he had reviewed the financial statement and suggested an informal audit process. For May 2nd, he requested the BID advise of the direction of both the elected Advisory Board and the non-elected Board of Directors; recommended that there be no more than one representative per business on the board; asked whether the Advisory Board or the Board of Directors is going to approve the rest of expenditures to be paid out; asked how the BID plans to reach out to those businesses without computer access; requested the BID list more complete information for each business, including telephone numbers. Council discussed the status of the existing contract with the Downtown Burlingame BID, Inc. and decided to wait to see what the response was on merging the two boards. The following spoke on the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District: John Root, 728 Crossway Road, stated that cooperation is necessary between the BID, the Chamber of Commerce, the City and the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau. Ann Keighran, 1531 Vancouver Avenue, commended the BID for the work they accomplished. She requested information be available at the May 2nd meeting about what services overlap between the BID and the Chamber of Commerce. Rich Grogan, 1450 Columbus Avenue, commended the BID for the work they accomplished. He stated that one of the cost factors for the planter program is a result of the neglected water system. Annamarie Holland Daniels, 515 Howard Avenue, commended the BID for the work they accomplished. There were no further comments from the floor. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 25-2005, Declaring the City of Burlingame's Intention to Establish 2005-06 Assessments for the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District and Approving the 2004-05 Annual Report; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Vice Mayor Baylock requested a short break. Mayor Galligan called for a break at 8:41 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:49 p.m. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jeffrey Carter, 1720 Adeline Drive, spoke on opposing closure of the Broadway Train Station. Gene Condon, 1308 Mills Avenue, spoke on opposing closure of the Broadway Train Station. Mark Simon, Special Assistant to the CEO of Caltrain, announced the next Caltrain public hearing regarding the Broadway Train Station will be on Thursday, April 7 at 10 a.m. in San Carlos. The following requested Council adopt an anti- war, anti-occupation resolution on the war in Iraq: George Polisner, Peace Action of San Mateo County; Michael Maloney, 1701 El Camino Real, San Mateo; Patricia Gray, 1616 Adeline Drive; Debra Hubert, 740 3 Burlingame City Council April 4,2005 Unapproved Minutes Linden Avenue; Don Havis, 439 Grand Blvd., San Mateo. Charles Voltz, 725 Vernon Way, spoke on the presentation by Sustainable San Mateo County as it relates to Burlingame. The following spoke in favor of a stop sign at Sherman and Cortez: Andrew Sutton, 1268 Cortez Avenue, and Mel Lipscomb, 1227 Cortez Avenue. John Root, 728 Crossway, announced the next Redwood City Forum on Wednesday, April 9, entitled The High Cost of Free Parking. There were no further comments from the floor. Traffic Engineer Augustine Chou stated that there are alternatives to adding a stop sign at Sherman and Cortez. The stop sign warrant study data at this time does not support installation of a stop sign. Stop signs are used for right-of-way assignments, not reducing speed. He discussed other traffic calming solutions since police enforcement is not always available. This item will be agendized for future consideration by Council. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR a. RESOLUTION NO. 26-2005 AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION P&RD Schwartz requested Council adopt Resolution No. 26-2005 amending the Master Fee Schedule for appeals from decisions of the Beautification Commission. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 11. OLD BUSINESS a. REPORT BACK ON BROADWAY TRAIN STATION CLOSURE Councilwoman Nagel encouraged the public to attend the next Caltrain hearing on Thursday, April 7, at 10 a.m. in San Carlos. You can also email Caltrain at chap esgcaltrain.com or send a letter to 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos. Councilwoman O'Mahony stated that Caltrain also has plans to cut back service to the Burlingame Train Station. 12. NEW BUSINESS a. SET HEARING DATE FOR PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL OF 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE Council set April 18, 2005, as the hearing date for the Planning Commission appeal of 220 California Drive. 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library, February 15, 2005; Parks &Recreation, March 17, 2005; Planning, March 28, 2005 b. Department Reports: Police, February 2005. 4 Burlingame City Council April 4,2005 Unapproved Minutes C. Letter from Mel Lipscomb concerning additional stop signs on Cortez and Sherman d. Letter from David Carr resigning from the Library Board effective in June 2005 e. Letter from PG&E responding to Councilwoman Nagel's inquiring concerning customer power outages f. Letter from Stephen Barisone and Police Chief Van Etten's reply concerning the disturbances at the Lions Club Hall on weekend nights 13. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 9:55 p.m. in memory of John Vincent O'Brien and Miss Anna Maria Kakis. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 5 Burlingame City Council April 4,2005 Unapproved Minutes IL 0 7 R M 7 M 1"Mm RU u A E COO P R O C L A M A T I O N Declaring April 25 through May 1, 2005 West Nile Virus and Mosquito and Vector Control Awareness Week `tl hereas, West NIe virus kPd 27 people in California and sickened over 800 people in 2004; and Whereas, California State Department of ifealth Services and the Centers for Disease Control predict West Nile virus poses agrave public health threat in California in 2005,particularly in the Central valley and Northern California;and Whereas, Adequately fundedmosquito andvector control, disease surveillance andpublic awareness programs are the best way to prevent outbreaks of West Nile virus and other diseases borne by mosquitoes andothervectors;and Whereas, 9Kosquitoes that are commonly found within California are known vectors of the West Nde virus, which has struckwith deadly force throughout the VnitedStates in recent years;and Wliereas, Educationalprograms have been developedto include schools, civicgroups,private industry, antigovernment agencies, in order to meet the public's need/or information about West Nile virus, other diseases and mosquito and vector biology and control;and Wier'eas, "?Nest Nile Virus and Mosquito and vector ControlAwareness Week"will increase the public's awareness of the threat of West Nile virus and other diseases and the activities of the various mosquito and vector research and controlagencies working to minimize the health threat within California, andwid highlight the educational programs currently available;and Whereas, San 911ateo County%osquitoA6atement District works with mosquito andvector controldistricts throughout California, the vnitedStates Environmental2rotectionAgency, and the State(Department of 9fealth Services to reduce pesticide risks to humans, animals, and the environment while protecting human health from mosquito andvector-borne diseases and nuisance attacks;and 4NFiereas, The Wosquito and Vector Control Association of California has designated the weekof April25 through Way 1, 2005, as "West Nile Virus andWosquito andVectorControlAwareness Week"in the State of California; now gfimfore, I,,doe Gallagan, Mayor of the City of Budingame, do hereby proclaim that the weekof April25 through Way 1, 2005, be designatedas West Nile virus andifosquito andVector Control Awareness Weekin Burlingame. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my handand caused the seal of the City of Burlingame to be affixed this, the 18th day ofApriC 2005. L___ trE c2Xi� P J e 99Jga ayor I CITY o4 STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA ` " ITEM # 6a I'll 1b MTG. Ytj'06*W.,. 61 DATE 04.18.05 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED ByryXA4 DATE: APRIL 5, 2005 APPROVED FROM: CITY PLANNER BY SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPRO AL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NON-AUTO RELATED USE (PRINTING SERVICE) AT 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA D Action: City Council should hold a public hearing and take action on the request for a conditional use permit for a non-auto related use (printing service) in the C-2, Subarea D zone. Affirmative action should include findings based on the criteria for a conditional use permit; and affirmative action should be taken by resolution. The reasons for any action should be stated clearly for the record. City Council has three action alternatives: a. to uphold the Planning Commission and approve the application; b. to reverse the Planning Commission and deny the application; or C. to deny the request without prejudice and return it to the Planning Commission with comments. A detailed description of the action alternatives and the criteria for a conditional use permit are included at the end of the staff report. Conditions on the project recommendation by the Planning Commission: 1 . that this printing business shall occupy the 4, 163 SF building located at 220 California Drive as shown on the plans date stamped January 10, 2005 and January 31 , 2005, floor plan and building elevations; and that no physical changes (other than an awning and signage at the front of the store) will be made to the exterior of the building without an amendment to this use permit; 2. that a separate sign and building permit shall be required for awnings or signage at this location; 3. that no more than 1 ,625 square feet of this business (currently closest to the California entrance) shall be accessible for customers and used for self-service activities; copying, assembling or computer usage; 4. that the 875 SF (approximately) mezzanine level shall only be used for storage and shall not be used as retail or production space, and shall not be accessible to the public without an amendment to this conditional use permit; APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE,ZONED C-2,SUBAREA D APRIL 18,2005 5. that the hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., closed on Saturday and Sunday, with a total of 3 employees, including the business owner; 6. that any changes to the floor area, use, hours of operation, or number of employees which exceeds the maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit; 7. that the property owner or tenant shall not obliterate or change any historically recognized or designated painting on the walls of this structure or change any existing fagade material or architectural feature without amendment to this use permit; 8. that the conditions of the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, and Recycling Specialist's memos dated January 12, 2005 shall be met; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, and as amended by the City of Burlingame. Planning Commission Action: At their meeting on March 14, 2005, the Planning Commission held a public hearing an voted 5-0-1-1 (C. Deal abstaining and C. Osterling absent) to approve the request for a conditional use permit for a printing service in the C-2 Subarea D Auto Row zone. In their action the Commissioners noted that there are not too many copy shops downtown and the foot traffic for this business is limited, but it is a convenient for people and businesses downtown. The Commission also noted that the General Plan specifically allows this use in the area generally, that this business has existed at the Lorton Avenue location (Subarea A), as a retail use for quite some time and that they would like to see the business stay in the area. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Scherezade Sharabianlou, is proposing to operate a copy printing business at 220 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D Auto Row. Any retail use other than those related to automobile sales, service, and storage are allowed only with a conditional use permit (special permit) in Subarea D. The proposed business PIP Printing is currently is located at 226 Lorton Avenue where it has been since 1985. The previous tenant in the building at 220 California was Anugrah, a retail store that sold home and garden gifts. The property is a through lot with frontage on California Drive on the west side and West Lane on the east side at the rear. The railroad tacks and right-of-way abut the east side of West Lane. The adjacent uses along California Drive (210-218) include a rug store, a computer store, and the Pez Museum which is a part of the computer store space and a wholesale bakery. The adjacent businesses at the rear of the parcel along West Lane include a pet salon(217 West Lane) and a car stereo and alarm store (211 West Lane). The proposed business will occupy the entire building, which is approximately 4,163 SF. Other than a new awning and sign, which will be reviewed under a separate permit, there are no exterior changes proposed, so Commercial Design Review is not required for this project. On the north facing wall of this structure is an ad for a milk delivery company originally painted in the 1950's, and recently restored. There are no interior alterations proposed other than installing counters and shelving, and relocating the equipment currently at the business' Lorton site. There is an existing storage mezzanine in the building that is approximately 875 SF 2 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OFA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE,ZONED G2,SUBAREA D APRIL 18,2005 accessed by a flight of stairs on the right hand side at the front and a circular stair at the back, which will be used for storage only. As requested by the applicant, the copy printing business will be open Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., closed on Saturday and Sunday. There will be a total of three employees working from this site, including the business owner. The employees do not have specific shifts and each generally works between twenty to thirty hours a week. The applicant notes that there are times when they need to work overtime, but they try to complete most of the projects during normal business hours. Because this business has been in operation for quite some time, the number of employees is not anticipated to increase in the next two to five years. The applicant notes that the majority of her business is by phone, e-mail or fax. Of the orders done by phone, e-mail or fax, 80% are delivered from the site directly to the customer, with the remainder picked up at the business. There is one company vehicle that is used for deliveries. The delivery vehicle is a Cadillac SRX SUV. This vehicle is shared by four PIP Printing stores, including Burlingame, San Mateo, Milpitas and Sunnyvale. Therefore it will not be parked at the Burlingame store for a long period of time. Usually the items for delivery are picked up from this store in the early morning hours, and the delivery vehicle is there for no more than 10 minutes. Sometimes it may return in the early afternoon and there are some days when it does not come to the Burlingame location. The application material notes that there are not more than 3 walk-in customers per hour, including customers that are picking up orders that were phoned, e- mailed or faxed in. There are some hours during the day where there are no walk-in customers. The maximum number of customers per day will be no more 18. It is estimated that there will be a maximum of 5 people on the site at any given time, including the employees and business owner. Ninety eight percent of the products and supplies (paper, etc.) necessary for the business are picked up by the business owner in the mornings in either South San Francisco or San Carlos. The other 2% of the products are delivered by either United Parcel Service or Federal Express, with one delivery per week. The building is non-conforming, with no on-site parking provided because it was built prior to the code requirements for on-site parking. The parking requirement for retail use is 1 parking space per 400 SF, one space per 800 SF for production, 1 space per 300 SF of office and 1 space per 1,000 SF for storage. Based upon the plans provided with this application, staff determined that if parking were required this use would have a parking requirement of 7 spaces. The previous use at this site, Anugrah, was a retail use and would have a parking requirement of 9 spaces, if on-site parking were provided. However, because the print shop use is a replacement of an existing retail/service business (furniture store) a parking variance is not required. Currently public parking is available on the street and in Lot V, in front of the train station, and in Lot M, across California Drive from the site. All day employee parking is available between Bayswater and Howard about 2 to 3 blocks way in the public parking lots. Currently the railroad right-of-way at the rear of 220 California Drive is leased from Caltrain by the property owners at 210-218 California Drive. At this time the business at 220 California Drive is not entitled to use any of the right-of-way parking. If any of the right-of-way area is converted to public metered parking as a part of the platform relocation project it would be available to customers and/or employees of PIP Printing on a first come first serve basis. However, during the interim Mr. Gary Doss, along with the other business owners of 210-218 California Drive, have offered the proposed printing business at 220 California Drive the use of up to 6 of the spaces in the railroad right-of-way until such time as Caltrain cancels their lease for the platform project. (Gary Doss letter February 15, 2005) 3 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE,ZONED C-2,SUBAREA D APRIL 18,2005 The applicant is requesting the following: • Conditional use permit for a non-auto related use (printing service) in the C-2 Subarea D zone. Staff Comments: Attached to the Planning Commission staff report are comments from the Fire Marshall, January 13, 2005; Recycling Specialist, January 14, 2005; and City Engineer, January 14, 2005. ATTACHMENTS: Action Alternatives and Code Required Findings for a Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Minutes, March 14, 2005 Joseph Karp letter to City Council, March 22, 2005, requesting appeal Meg Monroe, City Planner, letter to Ms. Scherezade Sharabianlou, March 22, 2005, notice of appeal Meg Monroe, City Planner, letter to Ms. Scherezade Sharabianlou, April 5, 2005, appeal hearing date Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater Avenue, letter, March 28, 2005, with photos of subject property and vicinity Planning Commission Staff Report, March 14, 2005, with attachments Plans- 2 sheet, proposed elevation& floor plan for 220 California Drive Notice of Appeal Hearing, mailed April 8, 2005 Resolution 4 Action Alternatives and Code Required Findings for a Conditional Use Permit for 220 California Drive ACTION ALTERNATIVES 1. City Council may vote in favor of the applicant's request. If the action is a conditional use permit, the Council must make findings as required by the code. Findings must be particular to the given property and request. A majority of the Council members seated during the public hearing must agree in order to pass an affirmative motion. 2. City Council may deny an applicant's request. The reasons for denial should be clearly stated for the record. 3. City Council may deny a request without prejudice. This action should be used when the application made by the City Council is not the same as that heard by the Planning Commission; when a Planning Commission action has been justifiably, with clear direction, denied without prejudice; or when the proposed project raises questions or issues on which the Council would like additional information or additional design work before action on the project. Direction about additional information required to be given to staff, applicant and Planning Commission/City Council for further consideration should be made very clear. Council should also direct whether any subsequent hearing should be held before `,. the City Council or Planning Commission. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CS 25.52.020) (a) the proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass, bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes March 14, 2005 4G. 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, ZONED C-2, SUBAREA D - APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A NON-AUTO RELATED USE (PRINTING BUSINESS) (SCHEHEREZADF--, SHARABIANLOU, APPLICANT; BUDI LEONARDI, PROPERTY OWNER) (30 NOTICED) PROJEC', PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Reference staff report March 14,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Four conditions were suggested for consideration. CP Monroe noted that there is a memo at the Commissioner's desks in response to a question raised about parking issues at the Lorton address of the business, it notes that correspondence had been exchanged in 1996 and a letter submitted from the applicant's attorney regarding people using the parking lot for the business as a short cut to Hatch Lane. It appears that this item may have been discussed by the Traffic,Safety and Parking Commission,but staff was unable to retrieve the minutes; the City Attorney noted that this was a private property matter. Commissioners asked staff how is a differentiation made between a pedestrian friendly business and a printing business which does not get a lot of foot traffic,how do we define this business? CP Monroe noted that the interpretation is up to the Commission, this issue has also come up in the Rollins Road area where a larger scale printing operation has a retail component,it is something that has to be looked at business by business. Commissioners noted that there are not too many copy shops downtown, foot traffic is limited,but it is a convenience for people downtown,and noted that the General Plan specifically allows this use in the area,the business has existed on Lorton as a retail use for quite some time,would like to see it stay in the area. Acting Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Scheherezade and Farrokh Sharabianlou,applicants,Gary Doss, 214 California Drive,Annamarie Holland Daniels and Derrick and Diana Daniels spoke regarding the project. Asked the Commission to make a decision on the application, indicating that they just want to move their business,it is not a new business,been in Burlingame for over 20 years,the project won't have a major impact on parking because a lot of the business is done over the computer and internet; there will be space for custome service and an area for production. Represents six businesses on California Drive,wants to express support anL. endorsement for this project and for the applicant being in the neighborhood,sent a letter on February 15,2005, on behalf of the businesses on West Lane indicating that as long as their lease with Caltrain is active,they will share the leased parking spaces with this business. Expressed support for the business,noting that we need to support the small businesses as much as the larger businesses. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners noted that at the study meeting, the Commission had placed this item on the consent calendar because they felt it was a routine matter, it was called off consent by the neighbors wishing to express their support. C.Brownrigg made a motion to approve the application,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped December 22, 2004,site plan,demolition plan,proposed floor plan,proposed and existing elevations and a separate landscape plan with color renderings,date stamped February 3,2005,and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2) that the conditions of the City Engineer's, Chief Building Official's and Recycling Specialist's November 1, 2004,memos shall be met; 3)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;and 4)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Acting Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-1-1 voice vote e (C.Deal abstaining and C.Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:20 p.r 7 O aIr p Companlies N RECEIVED March 22,Zoos RECENED MAR 2 2 2005 MAR 2 S 2005 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Attn:City Council CrFY OF BURLINGAME City of Burlingame orr`(OF euaoAAAe 501 Primrose Road KAWING DEFT. Burlingame,CA 94010-3997 Re: 22Q California Drive,Burlingame,CA 94010 The purpose of this letter is to appeal the Planning Commissions approval for a use permit at the above referenced property for Sherezade Sharabianlou dba PIP Printing. I own the property at 110 Howard Avenue which fronts Highland,California and Howard. I believe that the parking and traffic in this area is and always has been a severe problem and this use permit in my opinion will exacerbate the problem. I will be out of town until April 4,2005,I would ask that you set your hearing after the above- mentioned date so that I may address the council. Sincerely, Honorable Mayor and City Council Please schedule an appeal hearing o �hap for 220 California Drive to be heard at the April 18, 2005 Council meeting. City Clerk 1209 Burlingame Ave. P.O.Box 271 Burlingame,CA 94011-0271 (650)348-3055 FAX:(650)342-1121 rtp3055@aol.com SURLINCAbAE ✓ D• 3,f ;Az The City of Burlingame CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650) 5584250 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650) 696-3790 March 22, 2005 Scherezade Sharabianlou PIP Printing 226 Lorton Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Ms. Sharabianlou, The decision made by the Planning Commission at their March 14, 2005 meeting, for a printing service at 220 California Drive has been appealed to the City Council for review. At the upcoming City Council meeting on April 4, 2005, the Council will schedule the date for the appeal hearing on this project. Itis not -� necessary that you attend this meeting. We will notify you in writing about the date of the appeal hearing. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Mar aret Monroe City Planner c: City Clerk BURLINGMINE The City of Burlingame CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650)558-7250 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650)696-3790 April 5,2005 PIP Printing Scheherezade Sharabianlou 226 Lorton Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Ms. Sharabianlou At the City Council meeting of April 4,2005,the Council scheduled an appeal hearing on your project at 220 California Drive,zoned C-2,Subarea D. A public hearing will be held on April 18,2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA. We look forward to seeing you there to present your project. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, Margaret Monroe City Planner c: City Clerk Budi Susetyo Leonardi,property owner P.O. Box 33 Burlingame, CA 94011 David Hyman c/o Ritchie Commercial - 1818 Gilbreth Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Jennifer Pfaff 615 Bayswater Avenue Burlingame, CA Mayor Joe Galligan 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Monday, March 28, 2005 Dear Honorable Mayor and honorable Councilmembers: I am a regular customer of Heriz music store, Mike Harvey Honda repair, Calico Corner, and Gray's paint. I happened to have my camera with me on Thursday,March 3rd, and decided to take some shots of the traffic and parking situation in that area, as I have heard this issue brought up numerous times in the past few months. The pictures were taken at approximately 10:45 in the morning, and I believe they speak for themselves. I returned at 3:30 to survey the area in the afternoon. There was virtually no change;there were even more empty spots. This is my neighborhood, and I am very familiar with parking habits and traffic there. I have never had any problem parking on either Howard, or California Drive. -� Respectfully submitted, RECEIVED Jennifer Pfaff APR - 6 2005 CITY OF BURUNGAME PLANNING DEPT. cc: City Council Members City Manager / DISTRIBUTION: fit) Council _please respond arty Manager (/'City Attorney No Response Required yir.Finance City Planner Dir.Public Works Human Resources Police Chief Fire Chief On Next Agenda Parks&Rec Librarian PLEASE SEND A COPY OF YOUR 1 RESPONSE TO THE CITY CLERK low L'��'r •p7Gb ^ wr 4 r imy rsmk ,� n F ! • I 4 4 ILII ri iii+� �V 1 i w��i .Ili II" ../ •;\ `IIT '�G�, C',5 � S r✓ t, 4 a r i 4 : r�•i Iv�. M.,» .ut.)x Jv },... „'. :,, mfttt t _ ,. � �. } '"Bd"Y"�,.S w+ald y, r j•;y t� �i r�W t3 #,r A �,'Y"1s hF E ^'rs.1���3+� r ": s Wr ..;e,. <.-!e° ,� i x �„ .,• .�, •, .,, �3 .;•a,k P� �" ti ^?3 �� w��� xGE.r � rc �� N�aB �`�'��v�^e, �a h" gg f fl V �1M tl+b a .p, „� •,,, g'rr u �� a �w'up y 3 `t � 'e ,1 a '�+ 'k.�! :�,� ro a "' m m ,�w ° kaF';W'• rf t �j?,,',6,r U °�' s �""`��. k27 1 �, °t. n cl HIM=n'yiE V Y y 04 Y w„ F up it rV���at?��rl 1 Y +', P 1 d � t}(•.i''puykk i ;: e mk p+� �a {5 $ pVVU i1 4 3 4t91&d Wk^ n:h. r 1 tit`er4N'�\COrJq�. `f:. 9 1� C7tAdW'U6 CdrYSF1,1 i11ES@fl ZEN MSSN }A7 �ej •. rly;r�lpy, r i J %eva�r�it�uem ansrva i "x"h�Sir�yfrn,Y}••,� f 1 1 ; � � � ���%� .,a , m. Y d'" a u -:S, f,'� �-r,a:V"d ,.f:.x:.k 3$ .."; 1. ,a°" d'"Y :G`V'.k' �* 1_ .,>4� i S } { �{:_t 5 f 1 7 �1 V^�y.? Y f Y�-- { 4, �J.kr ���.�. '.�`Ykv � ���'} �,{i`,s°'ri r�A �.;t�� t '.�e 'r W Fa 4 n T q' �•fi i i�`•G yet �` fir' w j n,�o-� A`�"��.��'.�" �' ��k i� �� f y�� � y' 1 �" �%' �• K ti r � d r'dtA r+ � r;,.: s c,;rvp, 7 r�i f�+ �, 1 i �' a ' ,.: � � �. � 'r u '^ i 1 ,:a. � ,E�r :' e . ,r.: .. ��, � � .X` �3j,. r�, }, r � �'Y<.,. f� �` ftt .i% �I '�fPt i ���i N j.. ' F r �� .�: R• i�i� � vY�r �, at�. � �w�u41 W�yY�'� � 1��,,� � .;.+��I �� 3 `' d � ..' r.,. 3sP,�.. +ql`�x � t ,�'., s`s dui ��,, tt '� j ?• f4��� r ��' y r� r pp,��6, �rt}N 1/l IR'i} • K�r���N� ,yy � � ,.; `l f rf, y �» �� ;3. ,� �, � I '` �� r " $ r: ` £aj, �.. �'M��.'sr.iakh.1 �4 {a' e ij`: �:, �. 3 �:�. � (°, i f, � n �.'- �, �. r„ � k � i ..��► _ � S ,� � � r ��c.r �t ,. +t a �� . d 4 tiwy� ��.*'°a�1. �t� t� � � ��� t U� �4 t �� T �� T Y� � �� � d a 4 +r u , r f � k '= .� n`� 4 �'f7 .r�ir��..ff d�' �: � x'/�'nt�4 wAoi �� `A ,t kT '^� r7i P� � +i �c � T .i?,�,��;,� -�T^,..pn r�'c, ..�. � R� %'��� d� � ��� ti � � MI ,aF �Y gg �"�`v;,,`.�, `� �s xF , � � , v. � � .. � �. �asa�. �, v ,o.a S� .�luu�:,�:� �: ;' .y;' .�.. ,. 5�"'' Item# Consent Ca endar City of Burlingame Conditional Use Permit for a Printing Service (Non Auto Related Use) in Subarea D Address: 220 California Drive Meeting Date: 3/14/05 Request: Conditional use permit for a printing service(non-auto related use)in Subarea D at 216 California Drive, C-2, Subarea D- Auto Row(C.S. 25.38.031(2)). Applicant: Scheherezade Sharabianlou,PIP Printing APN:029-213-020 Property Owner: Budi Leonardi Lot Area:3,288 SF General Plan: Service& Special Sales Zoning: C-2, Subarea D CEQA Status: Article 19.Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 -Existing facilities,Class 1(a),interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions,plumbing, and electrical conveyances. Previous Use: Retail Home Furnishings Proposed Use: Printing Service Allowable Use: Automobile Sales, Service, and Storage Summary: The applicant is proposing to operate a copy printing business at 220 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D.Any retail use other than those related to automobile sales, service, and storage are allowed only with a conditional use permit (special permit) in Subarea D. The proposed business PIP Printing has been serving Burlingame since 1985 and is currently located at 226 Lorton Avenue. The previous tenant in this building was Anugrah, a retail store that sold home and garden gifts (copy of Anugrah's conditional use permit is attached). The property is a through lot with frontage on California Drive on the west side and West Lane on the east side, at �.- the rear. The railroad tacks and right-of-way abut the east side of West Lane. The adjacent uses along California Drive include a rug store,a computer store, and the Pez Museum which is a part of the computer store space and a wholesale bakery. The businesses at the rear of the parcel along West Lane include a pet salon and a car stereo and alarm store. The proposed business will occupy the entire building space,which is approximately 4,163 SF. Other than a new awning and sign, which will be reviewed under a separate permit, there are no exterior changes proposed, so Commercial Design Review is not required for this project. There are no interior alterations proposed other than installing counters and shelving, and relocating the equipment currently at the business' Lorton site. There is an existing mezzanine in the building that is approximately 875 SF accessed by a flight of stairs on the right hand side at the front and a circular stair at the back, which will be used for storage only. The copy printing business will be open Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m.to 5:30 p.m.,closed on Saturday and Sunday. There will be a total of three employees working from this site, including the business owner. The employees do not have specific shifts and each generally works between twenty to thirty hours a week. The applicant notes that there are times when they need to work overtime,but they try to complete most of the projects during normal business hours. Because this business has been in operation for quite some time, the number of employees is not anticipated to increase in the next two to five years. _. The applicant notes that the majority of her business is by phone,6-mail or fax. Of the orders,done by phone,e-mail or fax, 80% are delivered directly to the customer, with the remainder picked up at the business. There is one ompany vehicle that is used for deliveries. The delivery vehicle is a Cadillac SRX SW. This vehicle is shared by a total of four PIP Printing stores, including Burlingame, San Mateo, Milpitas and Sunnyvale. Therefore it is not 1 Conditional Use Permit 220 California Drive parked at this particular store for a long period of time. Usually the items for delivery are picked up from this stor in the early morning hours, and the delivery vehicle is there for no more than 10 minutes. Sometimes it may return in the early afternoon and there are some days when it does not come to the Burlingame location. The application material notes that there are not more than 3 walk-in customers per hour, including customers that are picking up orders that were phoned, e-mailed or faxed in. There are some hours during the day where there are no walk-in customers. The maximum number of customers per day will be no more 18. It is estimated that there will be a maximum of 5 people on the site at any given time, including the employees and business owner. Ninety eight percent of the products and supplies(paper,etc.) necessary for the business are picked up by the business owner in the mornings in either South San Francisco or San Carlos. The other 2% of the products are delivered by either United Parcel Service or Federal Express,with one delivery per week. The building is non-conforming with no on-site parking provided because it was built prior to the code requirements for on-site parking. The parking requirement for retail use is 1 parking space per 400 SF, 1 space per 800 SF for production, 1 space per 300 SF of office and 1 space per 1,000 SF for storage. Based upon the plans provided with this application, staff determined that if parking were required this use would have a parking requirement of 7 spaces. The previous use at this site,Anugrah,was a retail use and would have a parking requirement of 9 spaces if on-site parking were provided. However,because the print shop use is a replacement of an existing retail/service business(furniture store)a parking variance is not required. Currently public parking is available on the street and in Lot V, in front of the train station, and in Lot M, across California Drive from the site. Currently the railroad right-of-way at the rear of 220 California Drive is leased from Caltrain by the property owners at 210-218 California Drive. The business at 220 California Drive is not entitled to use any of the right-of-way--, parking. If any of the right-of-way area is converted to public metered parking as a part of the platform relocatioi project it would be available to customers and/or employees of PIP Printing on a first come first serve basis. Proposed Existing Allowed/Req'd. Use: *Printing Business Anugrah- Auto Related Sales, Service, and home and garden gifts Storage- all non-auto related uses require a Conditional Use Permit Parking 0 0 7 spaces- No change (non-conforming) (1 space per 400 SF of retail) (1 space per 300 SF office) (1 space per 800 SF of production) (1 space per 1,000 SF of storage) * Conditional Use Permit required for all non-auto related uses in the C-2, Subarea D zoning district Staff comments: See attached project comments from Chief Building Official, Recycling Specialist, and City Engineer. Planning staff would note this time was scheduled for the March 14, 2005 meeting at the applicant's request. Note that a conditional has been added limiting direct service to defined areas based on submitted plans since this service business is oriented to off-site customer service rather than retail copying With heavy pedestrian traffic. ^� 2 Conditional Use Permit 220 California Drive Study Meeting: At the February 14,2005 Planning Commission study meeting,the Planning Commission placed �-- this item on the consent calendar,but had the following questions. The applicant submitted a response letter dated February 15,2005,that is attached for reference. After each question below the applicant's response is summarized in italics. The two questions regarding use of the site and adjacent spaces were responded to by staff and are noted as such. • Why is this business moving from the current Lorton site to the California site? The rent at the current location is being increased by 30%. The applicant notes that the mortgage payment will be less than the rent amount they would have to pay if they stay at the Lorton site. • How long has a retail use been in the building at 220 California Drive? Staff Response: City records indicate that Anugrah Home and Garden Gifts has occupied this site since 1997, when their special permit for a non—auto related use was approved. Prior to 1997 this site was occupied by Kustom Car Stereo, a car stereo equipment company. There is no data available before this time. • How long have retail uses been in the spaces at 210-218 California Drive? Sta f Res op nse:Summarized below is the information found in City records for the tenants and uses at the spaces at 210-218 California Drive. 210 California Drive Dave Dornlas Photography photography studio 1983-1999 Liselle Fashion clothing retailer 2002-2003 Heriz Music Center instrument repair&rug sales 2003-current 214 California Drive Car&Home Stereo Shop car audio 1983 Jo Jolene's Boutique retail sales/boutique 1984 Tool Supply Company considered auto related use 1985 Computer Spectrum/ computer service/sales& 1987-current Pez Museum gallery 216 California Drive Ercolini's Pasta Bravo food establishment 1982-1999 Racing Support.com motor vehicle parts 1999-2000 Tricked Out motorcycle parts 2000-2002 XS Motor Sports motorcycle parts &access. 2000-2002 Chapter 11 auto supply 2001-2003 Butterfly Cakes catering kitchen/specialty 2004-current cakes-by appt. only 218 California Drive Universal Office Equipment office equipment sales 1984 California Futon &Furnitureretail furniture sales 1997-2000 Heriz Rugs retail rug sales 2000-current 3 Conditional Use Permit 220 California Drive -"t 220 California Drive Kustom Car Stereo car stereo equipment prior to 1997 Anugrah Home& Garden Gifts retail home furnishings 1997-2005 • How does the existing square footage at the Lorton Avenue site compare to the new square footage at the 220 California site? Please provide square footage of existing site; The existing square footage at the Lorton Avenue site is about 3,000 SF, where the proposed location at 220 California Drive would be approximately 4,000 SF. • How much on-site parking is provided for the existing Lorton Avenue site and the other three PIP sites that the delivery vehicle serves ? The current location on Lorton Avenue has no on-site parking. The applicant notes that there are spaces located alongside of the building but they are only temporary and are not official spaces. The owner of the Radio Shack building currently allows passage through his property, however if this is prohibited the spaces are not usable. The applicant notes and has provided an email from a Mr. Gary Doss, that the proposed location at 220 California Drive will be eligible to use up to 6 of the existing 20 parking spaces located at the rear of the property. These spaces are currently leased by the owners of 210-218 California Avenue from Caltrain. When this lease expires it is presumed that these spaces will become metered parking spaces for us on a first come first serve basis. But until that time Mr. Doss has offered the proposed printing business at 22/'—, California Drive use of up to 6 of the existing spaces.. • Have there been parking complaints about this use at the Lorton location filed with the City? And StaffResponse: There are no parking or traffic complaints on record with the Police Department for the PIP Printing location on Lorton Avenue. • How does the business operate with only three employees and the few customers that come to this site. The applicant notes that a majority of their business is conducted through email,fax or by telephone, they do not encourage walk-ins. Of the three employees that work for the applicant one resides in Burlingame and catches public transit to work, the second one uses the train and the applicant lives within walking distance and usually walks to work. Staff called and visited other PIP Printing locations to see what type of parking situation they have. The PIP Printing at 74588 El Camino Real in Daly City has no on-site parking. They either have patrons park in the adjacent Wendy's parking lot, or at the rear of the shop where there are 20 spaces that are shared parking spaces for the businesses that front on El Camino Real. The Foster City location at 1163 Chess Drive,Suite G,is located within an office complex, where there is a shared on-site parking lot provided for the entire building. The San Mateo PIP Printing located at 219 South San Mateo Drive does not have on-site parking. There is on-street metered parking available, and two spaces at the rear of the shop that appear to be for service vehicles only. There is an adjacent parking lot,however it is separated by a fence,and clearly indicated that it is for use by Walgreen's customers only. 4 Conditional Use Permit 220 California Drive Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: In order to grant a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission must find that the following conditions exist on the property(Code Section 25.52.020 a-c): (a) the proposed use,at the proposed location,will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; (b) the proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Burlingame general plan and the purposes of this title; (c) the Planning Commission may impose such reasonable conditions or restrictions as it deems necessary to secure the purposes of this title and to assure operation of the use in a manner compatible with the aesthetics, mass,bulk and character of existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity. Findings:Based on the fact that this business will be a relocation of an existing business that is currently located in Burlingame only a few blocks away from the proposed site and that the use will continue to provide a service to businesses located in Burlingame; that the proposed use receives work from off-site electronically and delivers product to customers and does not have a high volume of walk-in customers, so has a lower parking demand than the existing retail use thus a lesser impact on the auto related uses in the area than the former retail use and that the proposed use will cause no change to the exterior of the structure thus preserving the sign located on the north face of the structure; designated as historically significant, the use is found to be compatible with the required findings for a conditional use permit. Tanning Commission Action: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing. Affirmative action should be taken by resolution and should include conditional use findings. The reasons for any action should be clearly stated. At the public hearing the following conditions should be considered: Conditions: 1. that this printing business shall occupy the 4,163 SF building located at 220 California Drive as shown on the plans date stamped January 10,2005 and January 31,2005,floor plan and building elevations;and that no physical changes(other than an awning and signage at the front of the store)will be made to the exterior of the building without an amendment to this use permit; 2. that a separate sign and building permit shall be required for awnings or signage at this location; 3. that no more than 1,625 square feet of this business (currently closest to the California entrance) shall be accessible for customers and used for self-service activities; copying, assembling or computer usage; 4. that the 875 SF (approximately) mezzanine level shall only be used for storage and shall not be used as retail or production space,and shall not be accessible to the public without an amendment to this conditional use permit; 5. that the hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m.to 5:30 p.iii.,closed on Saturday and Sunday,with a total of 3 employees, including the business owner; 5 Conditional Use Permit 220 California Drive 6. that any changes to the floor area, use, hours of operation, or number of employees which exceeds tf -� maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit; 7. that the property owner or tenant shall not obliterate or change any historically recognized or designated painting on the walls of this structure or change any existing fagade material or architectural feature without amendment to this use permit; 8. that the conditions of the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, and Recycling Specialist's memos dated January 12, 2005 shall be met; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, and as amended by the City of Burlingame. Catherine Barber Planner c: Scheherezade Sharabianlou, PIP Printing, applicant&business owner i 6 Project Comments Date: 01/12/2005 To: ❑City Engineer ❑ Recycling Specialist X Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ City Arborist ❑ NPDES Coordinator ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for conditional use permit for a non-auto related use (service/retail business) at 220 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D,APN:029-213-020 Staff Review: 01/18/2005 1) All construction must comply with the 2001 California Building Codes(CBC), the Burlingame Municipal and Zoning Codes,and all other State and Federal requirements. 2) Provide guardrails at all landings. 3) Provide handrails at all stairs where there are more than two risers. 4) Provide lighting at all exterior landings. 5) Provide fully dimensioned plans. 6) On your plans provide a table that includes the following: a. Occupancy group for each area of the building b. Type of construction c. Allowable area d. Proposed area e. Indicate sprinklered or non-sprinklered 7) Provide an exit plan showing the paths of travel 8) Specify the total number of parking spaces on site 9) Show compliance with all accessibility regulations found in the 2001 CBC, Chapter 11,for existing buildings including: a. Accessible paths of travel b. Accessible countertops c. Accessible bathrooms d. Accessible parking 10)Illustrate compliance with the minimum plumbing fixture requirements described in the 2001 CBC Appendix Chapter 29,Table A-29-A. Reviewe y: Date: Project Comments Date: 01/12/2005 To: U City Engineer X Recycling Specialist U Chief Building Official U Fire Marshal U City Arborist U NPDES Coordinator U City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for conditional use permit for a non-auto related use (service/retail business) at 220 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D , APN: 029-213-020 Staff Review: 01/18/2005 Applicant shall submit a Waste Reduction Plan and recycling deposit for this and all covered projects prior to construction or permitting. Reviewed by: Date: Project Comments Date: 01/12/2005 To: d City Engineer ❑ Recycling Specialist ❑ Chief Building Official ❑ Fire Marshal ❑ City Arborist ❑ NPDES Coordinator ❑ City Attorney From: Planning Staff Subject: Request for conditional use permit for a non-auto related use (service/retail business) at 220 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D , APN: 029-213-020 Staff Review: 01/18/2005 1 . New awning shall have a minimum of eight feet vertical clearance and not exceed the horizontal projection maximum of four feet over the sidewalk. Reviewed by: V V Date: 1/14/2005 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes February 14, 2005 VI. STUDY ITEMS 5. 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE,ZONED C-2,SUBAREA D-APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USL PERMIT FOR A NON-AUTO RELATED USE (PRINTING BUSINESS) (SCHEHEREZADE SHARABIANLOU, APPLICANT; BUDI LEONARDI, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Plnr. Barber presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Why is this business moving from the current Lorton site to the California site? • How long has a retail use been in the building at 220 California Drive? • How long have retail uses been in the spaces at 210-218 California Drive? • How does the existing square footage at the Lorton Avenue site compare to the new square footage at the 220 California site? Please provide square footage of existing site; • How much on-site parking is provided for the existing Lorton Avenue site and the other three PIP sites that the delivery vehicle serves ? • Have there been parking complaints about this use at the Lorton location filed with the City? and • How does the business operate with only three employees and the few customers that come to this site. This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m. a' 10 r , February 15, 2005 Re: 220 California, Burlingame, CA Dear Ms. Barber: Here are the response. 1. We have a 30% rent increase. Mortgage payment will be less than the rent amount. 2. The existing square footage at Lorton Avenue is about 3000. Bathrooms and kitchen are shared between all tenants at 226 Lorton and 228 Lorton. The new location has less square footage on the first floor.This floor will be used to conduct business.At this time the Mezzanine level is used for storage and record keeping.Total square footage of the new building for both floors combined is 4000. 3. The Lorton Avenue building does not have parking space. The spaces you see along side of the building are not real parking spaces. These spaces will not exist and are temporary if the owner of Radio Shack building prohibits cars go through his property.He has cooperated so far but this can be taken away. The new location will have 6 parking spaces made available to us by the merchants at 210-218. �.- 4. Our other three sites have nothing to do with this project.We Share one delivery truck because it is efficient and it cost less to operate.As I mentioned in my pervious letter, this vehicle does not stay in one location for a long time. City of Burlingame is less affected by our truck than if we were to use DHL, Fedex, UPS etc. Outside delivery services such as UPS, DHL, Fedex are some time used. 5. Majority of our business is conducted through email, fax or by telephone. See PIP.Com. Our business does not encourage walk-ins.We like them to go to kinkos!We have three employees.One resides in Burlingame and catches the public transit to work.The second one uses the train.I live about 5 minutes away from my business and usually walk to work unless it rains. It is true and I hope It Is Not Hard To Believe that we are running a very efficient Operation. Our business is grown to a level that we can now afford to purchase a building. Sincerely, Scheh d harabianlou RECEIVED FEB P S 2005 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. V1111 SBC Yahoo! Mail - eprints(gpacbell.net Page " S [ M A I LPrint- Close Willtlbw -� Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:52:14 -0800 From: "Gary Doss" <garyd'spectrumnet,com> To: pip1060@pip.com Subject: West Lane Parking ,... February 15, 2005 From: Gary Doss RE: parking on ;Vest Laze Dear Scheherezade Sharabianloiu: Por the remainder of the time we have a lease with Cal_rain for the parking area on West Lane, the Burlinga-ne Merchants who occupy 210-218 California Drive have agreed to snare this parking area with you and your business PIP Prirting. Of the 20 parking places currently available, up .to 6 will be made available to you for your business. When our lease expires with Caltrain, the City of Burlingame is planning to install metered parking. This area can be shared by all the local businesses. If you have a need for all day employee parking, the Mayor of Burlingame has already instructed us to use the City of Burlingame Parking Lots located a block away from the Lorton/Howard intersection. Very truly yours, Gary Doss No virus found ir. this outgoing message. Checked by AVG R--iti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/05 RECEIVED FEB 16 2005 CIN OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Primrose Road P(650)558-7250 F(650)696-3790 www.burlingame.org CITY G Ian E APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: Design Review Conditional Use Permit-�Zvariance Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address: C!A" Ck 24/,01'0 APPLICANT y� PROPERTY OWNER Name: ri-t� �/✓��j�/� Name: Address: Q4 6 G O/Q I01V 41i/2> Address: City/State/Zip: ,1,511RZrwems City/State/Zip: Phone(w): 6,5-,o — 3?jam— 11-7-1 o Phone(w): (h): 6d 65a �3o,-) - 6,6 �6 (h): ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Name: JAN 1 0 RECD 2e-f' Address: CITY OF BURUNGAME — City/State/Zip: Please indicate wit�'i anGas erisk Phone(w): the contact person for this project. (h): (fly LS� 7 c o 5 6,5-o-3-75- 11 -7-7 -30a - 6 6 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 09 AFFADAVIT/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Dater I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. Property owner's signature: Date: Date submitted: PCAPP.FRM Fax Dec 07 04:33 City of Burlingame Planning Npartment 501 Primrose Road P(650)$58-7250 P(650)696-3740 www.burling APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Type of application: Design Review Conditional Use Permit-t Variance, Special Permit Other Parcel Number: Project address:._ -O a&Net4 an.4 APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: r �ft 7 /.ZV c. Name: C �v ; Address• l oR7�n1 !2•. Address:,,I?n CAc i4r?z2U iA >>n'✓�� City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip: Phone{w}; Phone(w): (h): 64 i650 - 66 �6 (�)� Al<tCE MCT/DESIGNER Name: Address: City/State/Zip: AH Please indicate with an asterisk Phone(w): the contact person for this project (h): - %Z5` s G5a-3'75- 11'77 4& 6 6 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ea AFFADAVff/SIGNATURE: I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information given herein is true and correct the bast of my knowledge and belief. Applicant's signature: Date: a" I know about the proposed application and hereby authorize the above applicant to submit this application to the Planning Commission. j�t Property owner's signature: z Date: m Date submitted, RECEIVL"P.F, JAN 1 0 RECD t�vv CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. City of Burlingame Playing Department 501 Primrose Road P(650)558-7250 F(650)696-3790, , www.burlinpame or CEIVED CITY COND SE PERMIT y17If3 2005EJURLINCA E, t PLANNING DEPT. The Planning Commission is required by law to make findings as defined by the City's Ordinance(Code.' Section 25:52.020). Your answers to the following questions can assist the Planning Commission m; � making the decision as to whether the findings can be made for your request. Please type or write neatiy' r ,' in ink; Refer to the back of this'form for assistance with these questions: ` 1. Dxplain why the proposed use at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious property or improvements in the vicinity or to public health, safety, general-,welfare o "m w� convenience. We will not alter the face of the existing building.Our business is.a destination business.We offer free'-,,de pick up services. Our business will not create additional traffic or noise. There will be no effeet on.pub,w = safety or general welfare. The:supplies we use are all environmental friendly (paper, copier toner, etG.).,� store'or use hazardous materials. Our business is currently located'in Burlingame. We'have been se., community since 1985. Therefore,there is a needin this community,for our services. It is convenient public if we,continue to remain in the downtown area simply because our,clients will have one stop shopp xill be less traffic and parking requirements if everything they need is located in same area. kWnj 21— , How,will the proposed use be located and conducted in accordance with the Buringa»i General plan and Zoning Ordinance? Y There are existing retail businesses in'the immediate`area.Anugra,a reatil household goods is the current Our business will have less traffic and no impact on the public parking use than an auto related business z i � a« $ X 3. How will the proposed project be compatible with the aesthetics,mass, bulk and characterb = g *A� the existing and potential uses on adjoining properties in the general vicinity? Y Our business does not affect the aesthetics because we are not making changes to the existing structure.ThIM ter of the neighborhood will not change.Our business is consistent with the existing'uses of the enex e g � g g eighboring businesses are all retail. r :. r TING / ® World's Largest Business Printers RECEIVED January 26, 2005 Re: 220 California, Burlingame, CA JAN 3 1 7nP5 CITY OF8Ul'3UNf"; ,& Dear Ms. Barber: PLANNWG DEPT. I have received your notes regarding our application for conditional use permit. 1. Your office does not accept permit requests without complete package. It clear from your notes that your office had my application in their possession because there were some references to it! This application is lost in your office.A copy of that application is attached. 2. I have repeatedly noted on all and every plans that we are not making changes to the structural or the look of this building. Mezzanine level is used for storage and record keeping only. We are going to keep everything as is except put our name on the front and bring our furniture in. 3.The nature of our business is printing,copying and document management.We offer offset press as well as digital printing. Our hours of operations at the moment is 8:30 A.M. to 5:30 P.M. closed Satur- day and Sunday. 4. Like all businesses we may have to work overtime. We try to complete most of our projects by end of our business hours.There may be maximum three employees who may have to work in case of over time. These are the same employees who work during the normal business hours. There are no specific shifts and it is random. 5. Majority of our business are generated by phon, e-mail or fax. We have delivery and pick up service available which many of our customers use.We have walk ins but it is not more than 3 per hour.We have one company car which is shared with our other stores. It is never parked here for a long period of time.The parking use for this vehicle is very minimal and it is not more than what UPS and Fedex use with the exception that it is never parked illegally which UPS and Fedex trucks often do! The bottom line is that I am an existing business in Burlingame for almost 20 years. Our parking use of public facilities will not change.We have same number of employees,same hours of operation and we are not making changes to the existing building except the name change. If we don't buy this building we will be forced to close our doors simply because we can't afford to pay the new rent is being asked of us. Thank you, Scheherezade 'abianlou 226 Lorton Ave. • Burlingame, CA 94010 - ( 650) 375.1177 • Fax: (650) 375-0671 • E-mail: pip1060@aol.com 219 South San Mateo Dr. • San Mateo, CA 94401 • (650) 342.5122 • Fax: (650) 342-2256 • E-mail: pip0209@aol.com City of Burlingame Planning Department 501 Ptimrose Road P(650)558-7250 F(650)696-3790 www1w ingame.org COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM RECEIVED . �r 1. .Proposed use of the site_ ce, � � ice,,,' JAN 1 0 RECD i od ME 2. Da and hours of operation CITY N BURL E P T. Days pe � C�c� QL (p,�,��C PLANNING DEPT. v 3. Number of trucks/service vehicles to be parked at site(by type) 4. Current Erjoected maximum number of employees includin owner at this location: Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years Hours of AM to After 5:00 AM to After 5:00 AM to 'After 5:00 Operation PM PM PM PM PM' PM Weekdays 3 3 Full-time Part-time Weekends / -- Full-time Irk � Part time 5. Current andprojected maximum number of visitors/customers who may come to the site: Existing In 2 Years In 5 Years Hours of AM to After 5:00 AM to After 5:00 AM to After 5:00 Operation PM PM PM PM PM. PM . - weekdays 3 3 5 Weekends - 6. What is the maximum number of people expected on site at any one time (include owner, employees and_visitors/customers):_ 7. Where do/will the owner and employees park?_ C S f S. Where do/will the customers/visitors park?_ /'lf 9. .Present or most recent use of site hc4i�— -�o��-- 10. List of other tenants onproperty, their number of employees, hours of operation (attach list if necessary) w f� �/ RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITT RESOLVED,by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS, a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made fora conditional use permit for a printing service non-auto related use) in Subarea D at 220 California Drive, zoned C-2, Subarea D, Budi Susetyo Leonardi,property owner,APN: 029-213-020; WHEREAS,said matters were heard by the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame on March 14, 2005, at which time it reviewed and considered the staff report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Planning Commission that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this commission, it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment, and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19. Categorically Exempt per Section: 15301 -Existing facilities,Class 1(a),interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions,plumbing, and electrical conveyances. 2. Said conditional use permit is approved, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permit are set forth in the minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. CHAIRMAN I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of March, 2005 ,by the following vote: SECRETARY EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and conditional use permit. 220 California Drive effective March 24, 2005 1. that this printing business shall occupy the 4,163 SF building located at 220 California Drive as shown on the plans date stamped January 10,2005 and January 31,2005,floor plan and building elevations; and that no physical changes (other than an awning and signage at the front of the store)will be made to the exterior of the building without an amendment to this use permit; 2. that a separate sign and building permit shall be required for awnings or signage at this location; 3. that no more than 1,625 square feet of this business (currently closest to the California entrance) shall be accessible for customers and used for self-service activities; copying, assembling or computer usage; 4. that the 875 SF(approximately)mezzanine level shall only be used for storage and shall not be used as retail or production space, and shall not be accessible to the public without an amendment to this conditional use permit; 5. that the hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., closed on Saturday and Sunday,with a total of 3 employees, including the business owner; 6. that any changes to the floor area, use, hours of operation, or number of employees which exceeds the maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit; 7. that the property owner or tenant shall not obliterate or change any historically recognized or designated painting on the walls of this structure or change any existing facade material or architectural feature without amendment to this use permit; 8. that the conditions of the City Engineer,Chief Building Official,and Recycling Specialist's memos dated January 12, 2005 shall be met; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, and as amended by the City of Burlingame. i i CITY oc CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME,CA 94010 TEL:(650)558-7250 • FAX:(650)696-3790 ,�•�• www.burlingame.org Site: 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE i Application for a conditional use permit fora PUBLIC HEARING non-auto related use (printing business) at: 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE, zoned C-2, NOTICE _ Subarea D. (APN: 029-213-020). The City of Burlingame Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Monday, March 14,2005 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California. Mailed: March 4,2005 ' (Please refer to other side) CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the applic ande4TWPr0ject y be reviewed prior to the meeting Primrose Road, } Burlingame, C ' If you challe e u m be limited to raising only blic hearing, 1 described in he e 3AME e ed to the city at or prior to he pu c e af)n$• F -Ci R K I A t Property ow rs Aa respon ble r informing their tenants Lbouiio al infor -iatio , please call j (650) 558-7 0 y; ' Margaret Mo (? � City Planner '�• 0 " PU CE (Please refer to other side) , a► R_3 Noy°' C-2 a �� , ,. 60 r•. w Train Dep`o 4V# no } thi f {y*♦ F '� <, r r •jl�� �/1i 110 e , 76 , 16� `ass Sj 24 , �70 �- C-2, Subarea - 40, C-1- �� • - r .. ` 5111 No. 19 /C 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE t_ _ �� i.. � � �� tap �'' • - g� �"'� � - - , Ntl. • r CITY c CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPARTMENT �•• GAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME,CA 94010 TEL:(650)558-7250 • FAX:(650)696-3790 www.burtingame.org Site: 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE Appeal of the Planning Commission's PUBLIC HEARING` j decision on a conditional use permit for a non-auto related use(printing business) at: NOTICE 220 CALIFORNIA DRIVE,zoned C-2, Subarea D. (APN: 029-213-020). The City of Burlingame City Council announces the following public hearing on Monday, April 18, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose j Road, Burlingame,California. Mailed:April 8,2005 (Please refer to other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME ro ec y be reviewed prior A copy of the applic an p Primrose Road, to the meeting Burlingame,C t, m be limited to If you challe e t u blic hearing, raising only e d to the city described in he e e MAE at or prior to he pu c ea }nom F 0 R x I A Property ow rs a respon ble r informing their tenants bou io al info ati , please call (650) 558-7 Ol Margaret Mo �0 City Planner A0 P CE U (Please refer to other side) RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION APPROVING CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLVED,by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame that: WHEREAS,a categorical exemption has been proposed and application has been made for a conditional use permit for a non-auto related use(printing service)in the C-2 Subarea D zone at 220 California Drive,zoned C-2, Subarea D,Budi Susetyo Leonardi,property owner, APN:029-213-020; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on March 14,2005,at which time said application was approved; WHEREAS, this matter was appealed to City Council and a hearing thereon held on April 18,2005,at which time it reviewed and considered the staff'report and all other written materials and testimony presented at said hearing; NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby RESOLVED and DETERMINED by this Council that: 1. On the basis of the Initial Study and the documents submitted and reviewed, and comments received and addressed by this council,it is hereby found that there is no substantial evidence that the project set forth above will have a significant effect on the environment,and categorical exemption, per CEQA Article 19, Section: 15301 - Existing facilities, Class 1(a), interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances, is hereby approved. 2. Said conditional use permit is approved,subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit"A" attached hereto. Findings for such conditional use permit are as set forth in the staff report, minutes and recording of said meeting. 3. It is further directed that a certified copy of this resolution be recorded in the official records of the County of San Mateo. Mayor I,Doris Mortensen,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the April 18,2005, and adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of approval for categorical exemption and conditional use permit. 220 California Drive effective April 18, 2005 1. that this printing business shall occupy the 4,163 SF building located at 220 California Drive as shown on the plans date stamped January 10, 2005 and January 31, 2005, floor plan and building elevations; and that no physical changes (other than an awning and signage at the front of the store) will be made to the exterior of the building without an amendment to this use permit; 2. that a separate sign and building permit shall be required for awnings or signage at this location; 3. that no more than 1,625 square feet of this business (currently closest to the California entrance) shall be accessible for customers and used for self-service activities; copying, assembling or computer usage; 4. that the 875 SF (approximately) mezzanine level shall only be used for storage and shall not be used as retail or production space, and shall not be accessible to the public without an amendment to this conditional use permit; 5. that the hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., �-- closed on Saturday and Sunday, with a total of 3 employees, including the business owner; 6. that any changes to the floor area, use, hours of operation, or number of employees which exceeds the maximums as stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this conditional use permit; 7. that the property owner or tenant shall not obliterate or change any historically recognized or designated painting on the walls of this structure or change any existing fagade material or architectural feature without amendment to this use permit; 8. that the conditions of the City Engineer, Chief Building Official, and Recycling Specialist's memos dated January 12, 2005 shall be met; and 9. that the project shall meet all the requirements of the Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes, 2001 Edition, and as amended by the City of Burlingame. CITY AGENDA 8a °� ITEM # BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. DATE --April 18, 2005 A UTE . uE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMI BY -- - DATE: Y ---DATE: April 6, 2005 APPROVED FROM : Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY SUBJECT: Library Board Vacancies J RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council call for applications to fill three impending vacancies on the Library Board . The recommended due date is May 20, 2005. This will allow enough time for interviews and an orientation for new board members. The Mayor and Council should determine two-member committees to perform the interviews. BACKGROUND Our current commissioner appointment procedure calls for any commissioner desiring reappointment to apply in the same manner as all other candidates. The current commissioners will be invited to reapply if they wish to serve again . In addition , all past applicants on the two-year waitlist will be informed of the vacancies. The following Board Members' terms will expire as detailed below: Commissioner Term Expiration Terms Served David Carr June 30, 2006* 1 Mary Herman June 30 , 2005 4 Carol Rossi June 30, 2005 1 *Resigning early due to personal commitments Agenda Item Fb _ Meeting Date f o CITY OF BURLINGAME TO: City Council Members DATE: April 14, 2005 FROM: Mayor Galligan and Vice Mayor Baylock SUBJECT: Report Back on Direction to Safeway Backaround Mayor Galligan and Vice Mayor Baylock met with Meg Monroe and Jim Nantell to discuss just how best to respond to Safeway's December letter requesting direction from the Council on the redevelopment of their Burlingame store. At that meeting we identified a number of options and then decided to meet with Safeway representatives. On March 22, the Council subcommittee and city staff met with representatives of the Safeway Corporation. The purpose of meeting was to clarify the level of specificity they were looking for. As a result of the joint discussion we reached a number of conclusions Findings 1. Safeway and majority of stakeholders involved would like a new Safeway as soon as reasonably possible. 2. Understandably, given the denial of the Safeway project largely because of its size, Safeway representatives are hesitant to move forward to design a mixed use project with square footage far in excess of their last proposal without some assurances regarding the City's willingness to support a project which would maximize or exceed what current zoning code requirements and community standards would allow. 3. The Council is able to only give general direction regarding their willingness/interest to consider a mixed-use development that may require some exceptions to current codes and community standards. 4. The Council is not in a position before a project is submitted to provide more specific information on departures from existing zoning code requirements and community standards. such as allowing 25% less parking, accepting service level F at certain intersections, accepting noise levels at property line which exceed community standards, etc. 5. Undertaking a future planning effort which would educate the community and arrive at a common set of expectations and matching regulations like a downtown specific area plan would provide the level of specificity that Safeway is requesting. 6. It was recognized that a specific planning effort which would provide the level of direction which would make Safeway comfortable including zoning would take 2 to 3 years. Project submittal would probably follow the zoning action so the community would probably have to wait 6 to7 years before a new store would be open. This may disappoint many of the local residents. 7. If Council were to try to shorten the time frame for a new Safeway project, a key issue that requires resolution is whether a community priority is mixed use (residential/commercial)versus commercial only development at the gateway at Howard and El Camino Real. 8. If the community is committed to mixed use at this site, a first step would be to conduct an independent economic study to determine the intensity of use required for a viable mixed-use project at that location. The second step would be to make a generalized determination(initial study) of how the required density will measure up against the community's current standards, both regulatory and environmental. 9. The community has been outspoken about the use of this gateway site, so community involvement and confidence in the evaluation of the viability of a mixed use is a key consideration. Both the Council members and Safeway felt a better understanding of the community's desires regarding mixed use was paramount before they embarked on such a project. Generally it was felt that asking Safeway to undertake a preliminary analysis about the density of use that would be required to make a mixed use project work economically would not be perceived by the community with the same objectivity as one prepared by the City. Recommendation Product The City should undertake an economic feasibility analysis to determine the density of a mixed-use (residential/commercial)project, which would be an attractive investment at the gateway location at Howard and El Camino Real. Process 1. That the Council consider using Parking Fund balances in an amount sufficient to undertake an economic feasibility analysis of mixed use(residential/commercial) development on the Safeway site on Howard and El Camino Real, including the city owned parking lots that have been part of the previous proposals. 2. That the parameters for the analysis be developed by a team which includes representatives from the City Council,Planning Commission and citizens with divergent opinions who have been actively involved in the previous Safeway project review. 3. As a part of the economic feasibility study the team may wish, or the City Council could require, that a community wide meeting be incorporated into the development process for the RFP for the economic feasibility study. But certainly the RFP should include a community wide meeting to present the conclusions of the feasibility study. May e Galli n Vice Mayor Cathy Baylock ,m Direction, . or Mayor Galligan & Vice Mayor Baylock April 18, 2005 �� t • Mayor urges community & Safeway to find a workable solution • Mayor appoints subcommittee • Mixed Use Concept Presented way requests direction uss level of specificity needed gan/Baylock meet with Safeway Inctings 1 . Stakeholders would like an improved store as soon as reasonably possible, .. afewa representatives } y are hesitant 111�Xx o ve forward to design 'a mixed N x far in project with square footage q ; ss oftheir last proposal . nding Council can only general direction regarding g g your wi Un ness/intere g st to consider a m,i,X,ed=use development that may � re some exceptions to current 9 N uA 5 s and community standards f J 1. Int,ding, 1 y+' w Council is not in a position toprovide specific information on departures from existing zoning code requirements and community standards. ept � mples : allowing 25% less parking, epti ng service level F at certain ' � x _ ersections, accepting noise levels at m pert line which exceed community ndards, etc. ry , r Undertaking a future planning effort like a SAP would : k a. Educate the community u' b. provide a common set of expectations and matching regulations to the level of specificity that a developer needs 14-Inding 6 A specific planning effort would take 2 to 3 years. Resulting in a wait of 6+/- years before w store would be open. 4 7 Shortening the time frame would require addressingkey the issue of whether the community has apriority for-'l,residental/commerci al mixed use � q* t,$ lopment at thegatewaycorner........... 1 oward and EI Camino Real rxF 7 h M First step conduct an independent economic study to determine the intensit of use re required for a viable Y q rx ixed - use ' ct at that location . proje � (cond step would be an initial stud 4 4` how the required density will measure against the community's current ndards , both regulatory and ironmental . n F Findin 'Y+ d The community has been outspoken about the use of thisgatewaysite so community involvement and confidence in the evaluation of the ility of a mixed use is a key r , § 'ysideration . sf ,. j�11�1 Rhn, �T�'+ 'yJ� d yiri/F 4I F Recommendation, ....',,. The City should undertake an economic feasibility analysis to determine the density of a mixed-use (.residential/commercial) project, at the „gateway location at Howard and E�I :Camino Real . t P— The analysis could be conducted as part of the broader economic study for a future Downtown Specific Area Plan . Staff's recommendation t y x commend using ParkingFund g M nce to undertake an economic 3 y ibilityanalysis , 4 Y 7 k sj, I Fuuyier lli k . IIbuy 1! d Pli dli i. r 3' A v dx >4 Theparameters for the anal sis be Y developed by a team including representatives from Cit Council , " tannin Commission and I I 1 }v itizens with divergent opinions in the previous Safeway roject review. ui,,niity In . • The may wish design team or the CityY � Council could require, that a community meeting be incorporated into the develo ment process for the RFP for the onomic feasibility study. ................ F .............. f y}1 F 1 a zyr a RFP should include a community � de meeting to present the conclusions the feasibility study,. j nx , Conclusio }4 .r zrx;. • Mayor and Vice Mayor available to answer any questions the Council may have regarding joint their recommendation . Mega vailable to discuss the value of cin the analysis aspart of the broader J Y xrs s =a 2V eft onomic study. f f . a AGENDA STAFF REPORT ITEM# 9a MTG. 4/18/05 D E TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED DATE: April 8, 2005 BY AP4,ez FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING HYATT PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 9704 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommenced that Council accept the Hyatt Pump Station Improvement Project by resolution in the amount of $539,138.80. BACKGROUND: On October 20, 2003, the project was awarded to W.R. Forde Construction Inc. for $488, 941.00. The project included relocating and rebuilding an aging sewer pump station which serves an extensive portion of the City north of Broadway. Unforeseen groundwater from tidal infiltration required that the contractor directional bore the pipe rather than use a conventional open cut method. This accounted for change orders totaling $50,197.80 being negotiated during the course of the work. EXHIBITS: Resolution BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in the sewer budget to cover the project costs. /z/, ' !'J ,/,..,_. Philip onag an, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer 650-558-7230 S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\9704STAFFREPORT.WPD 3 RESOLUTION NO. - ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - HYATT PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BY W.R. FORDE CONSTRUCTION INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 9704 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by W.R. FORDE CONSTRUCTION INC. under the terms of its contract with the City dated OCTOBER 20, 2003, has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 9704. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Author,By NameTeggy Adam LettersTESOLUTN.ACC.wpd CITY AGENDA 9b M/1 &�, ITEM# e"!�4'"qAME MTG. 0, STAFF REPORT I. 1 DATE 4/18/05 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUB ITI D / BY DATE: April 11, 2005 APPROVED FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY SUBJECT: File Retention RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the file retention schedule for the Building Division and changes to the City Managers' file retention schedule. BACKGROUND: The Building Division has reviewed their files and completed a retention schedule in line with the City's recommended retention guidelines. The City Manager's office has revised their retention schedule so as not to duplicate electronic documents and files retained by other departments. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING SCHEDULE FOR RETENTION AND DESTRUCTION OF BUILDING DIVISION RECORDS AND AMENDMENT TO CITY MANAGER SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, Section 34090 provides that the City may destroy certain City records, documents, and papers pursuant to schedules adopted by the City Council and subject to approval by the City Attorney, without making a copy of the destroyed record, document, or paper; and WHEREAS, in 2003, the City Council adopted a master retention and destruction schedule for the City that did not include the Building Division; and WHEREAS, it is important to the efficient operation of the Building Division to allow certain preliminary documents to be destroyed after the passage of two years while ensuring preservation of the vital records in the Division; and WHEREAS, the City Manager's retention schedule has duplicate records on it that can be deleted, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Schedule for Retention and Destruction of Building Division Records attached hereto is approved. All previous retention schedules for the Building Division are repealed. 2. The revised Schedule for Retention and Destruction of City Manager records attached hereto is approved. 3. The City Attorney is directed to review the adopted schedules and requested to approve it pursuant to Government Code section 34090. 4. Nothing contained in this Resolution or the Schedules is intended to nor does it preclude destruction of records pursuant to Government Code section 34090.5 (reproduced or duplicated records). MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK Department BUILDING Title of Record Retention Comments Period Compact Disc (CD) Files Permanent Complaint logs and files 2 years From date of complaint Microfiche Plan Files Permanent Permit Tracking System Records Permanent Plan Check Documents for permits that have 2 years From date of final inspection or closure been issued Plan Check Documents for permit applications 2 years From date of expiration of application that have expired without issuance of a permit Approved: City Attorney Building - 1 4/18/2005 Department: MANAGER Title of Record Retention Comments Period City Manager Correspondence Files 5 years Departmental Files 3 years Alphabetical Subject Files 3 years Commissioner Files 2 years Budget Files 3 years Approved: City Attorney Manager—1 4/18/05 CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA 9c ITEM# m MTG. DATE 4/18/05 �AMTm JUNG 6 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITT BY DATE: April 11,2005 APPR D FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director By 558-7222 SUBJECT: APPROVE OUT OF STATE TRAVEL FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES MANAGER AND ADMINISTRATIVE/INFORMATION SERVICES MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve out-of-state travel for the Financial Services Manager and the Administrative/Information Services Manager. They are traveling to San Antonio, TX to attend the Annual Governmental Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Annual Conference, June 26—29, 2005. BACKGROUND: The City of Burlingame is a member of the GFOA. GFOA hosts the premier conference on governmental finance and accounting including information and training on upcoming Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) rules and pronouncements. The Finance Department has set training standards for all its employees. This conference is an excellent opportunity for professional development for Mary Asturias and Chris Rogers in an intensive 3-day program. ATTACHMENTS: GFOA Conference Brochure BUDGET IMPACT: Funds are available in the Finance Department budget to cover the costs associated with the travel. CITY AGENDA 9d OBWU � % ITEM# RlJNGAME STAFF REPORT MAG. DAAE 4/18/2005 Mint �[6�00 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED BY DATE: April 13, 2005 APPROVED BY FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: UPDATE ON BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT At the April 4 meeting, the City Council asked a number of questions of the Advisory Board for response at the May 2 meeting. The City Clerk has provided those questions in written form to the Board, and the Board will be providing responses as part of the next Council meeting. The Board is also working on the Council's request to explore a consolidation of the Advisory Board and the Board of Directors of Downtown Burlingame BID, Inc. As we discussed at the earlier meeting, the City has a contract with the Downtown Burlingame BID to deliver the programs and services to be funded by the BID assessments. If the City is not to provide the programs directly (and there is no staffing budgeted for any such services), then one or more contractors must be obtained to provide them. Consolidation of the two boards would simplify communications and oversight, and there would be no need to seek other contractors. In order to consolidate the boards, the corporate bylaws of the Downtown Burlingame BID probably require a specific process and may also require amendment. Distribution Burlingame Avenue Area BID Advisory Board $3,171,161.12 Ck.No.10445-11027 Excludes Library cks.10552-10589 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for March 2005 $2,404,515.15 Ck.No.161644-161916 INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION OrQn :J lD Ei C � Q OR d N (D E CD 0 V D C � S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS o ¢g CITY OF BURLINGAME 04-08-2005 WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 15 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 96,999.88 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 4,077.32 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 17,795.14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 108,874.84 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 17,747.25 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 94,812.90 WATER FUND 526 5,235.52 SEWER FUND 527 32,640.10 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 7,590.42 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,617.79 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 3,672.87 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 17,909.43 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 19,141.41 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 791.21 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,736.61 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 673.84 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 3,455.40 PUBLIC TV ACCESS FUND 738 4,349.64 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 4,273.17 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8443,394.74 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 15 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 10853 THROUGH 11027 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8443,394.74, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ... . . . .. . . . . ... . ... . . . ..... . . . . ..... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE - APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . ... . . . .. .. . . .. . .. . . ....... . . . . ... . . .. ./. . ./... COUNCIL - DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 14 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 11025 ABLE UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION 25277 720.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 720.00 527 66520 120 11026 MIKE FARSON 25278 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502 11027 A.T.S.S.A. 25279 313.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 40.00 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 273.00 527 66520 260 TOTAL 8443,394.74 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 13 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 11011 OAKSTONE CONSTRUCTION 25153 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 11012 S.E.A. CONSTRUCTION 25174 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 11013 CHARLOTTE VI 25182 683.95 MISCELLANEOUS 683.95 526 22502 11014 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 858.19 OFFICE EXPENSE 651.76 201 65200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 17.21 201 65500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 189.22 201 65200 111 11015 THE LIFEGUARD STORE 25261 740.00 MISCELLANEOUS -53.21 101 23611 MISCELLANEOUS 793.21 101 68010 400 1114 11016 HORTUS LANDSCAPING 25268 3,776.00 MISCELLANEOUS 312.00 101 36310 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,464.00 101 22520 11017 SEAMUS BUSBY 25269 2,175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,175.00 101 22546 11018 MERCY MARTIN 25270 623.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 623.50 101 68010 220 1661 11019 TRACE ANALYTICS, INC. 25271 286.00 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 286.00 201 65200 203 11020 VIA BUILDERS 25272 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 11021 MULDOUNEY CONSTRUCTION 25273 1,750.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,750.00 101 22520 11022 SARAH CHAN 25274 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 11023 SLAKEY BROTHERS 25275 1,428.97 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 1,428.97 619 64460 210 5240 11024 RGN CONSULTING 25276 4,935.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,000.00 101 65150 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 3,935.00 101 65100 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 12 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10997 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 1,055.53 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,055.53 201 65200 200 10998 PLAZA GOURMET 24928 324.29 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 324.29 101 64420 121 10999 RENE ARIAS 24950 1,710.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,710.00 101 22546 11000 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 265.37 SMALL TOOLS 88.52 101 66210 130 TRAINING EXPENSE 15.58 101 66210 260 SMALL TOOLS 89.17 527 66520 130 TRAINING EXPENSE 72.10 527 66520 260 11001 CHETCUTI & ASSOCIATES 25015 2,213.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,213.00 101 22546 11002 TOMASI-DUBOIS & ASSOCIATES 25021 1,007.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,007.50 320 80430 210 11003 NORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL 25045 720.00 SUPPLIES 720.00 620 15000 11004 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 617.94 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 438.02 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 179.92 201 65200 220 11005 QUALITY ENGINEERING 25068 6,700.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,700.00 320 80900 210 11006 JAMES MURPHY 25080 283.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 283.50 101 68010 220 1661 11007 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 795.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 795.50 101 68010 220 1349 11008 ALINE BIER 25089 1,615.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 101 36630 11009 JESSE MOORE 25104 110.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110.00 101 68010 220 1785 11010 GCC ENTERPRISES 25128 13,607.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 13,607.00 320 80960 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 11 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10983 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 1,425.65 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 1,316.00 101 64420 121 MISCELLANEOUS 109.65 618 64520 234 10984 WESTERN STATES SURFACING 24557 62,192.42 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62,192.42 320 81130 220 10985 BURLINGAME ROTARY 24566 180.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 180.00 101 64150 250 10986 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24607 761.49 COMMUNICATIONS 429.18 101 65100 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 332.31 896 20281 10987 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24640 870.47 COMMUNICATIONS 281.51 101 66100 160 COMMUNICATIONS 59.49 201 65200 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 529.47 896 20281 10988 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 169.28 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 169.28 201 65200 240 10989 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 495.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 619 64460 220 5120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 375.00 619 64460 220 5130 10990 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 578.10 MISCELLANEOUS 578.10 101 64420 030 10991 THE POWER SOURCE 24718 1,079.79 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,079.79 530 65400 200 10992 SMCFCA 24742 400.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 400.00 201 65200 240 10993 W.R. FORDE ASSOCIATES 24759 26,125.19 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 26,125.19 327 77040 220 10994 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 4,077.32 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,077.32 130 20014 10995 MARY PIAllA 24807 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1661 10996 T MOBILE 24846 30.88 COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65100 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10971 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 300.00 RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 300.00 101 66210 218 10972 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 10973 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 14,329.73 MISC. SUPPLIES 49.29 101 68010 120 1111 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 397.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,671.00 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,195.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,836.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 375.12 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 619 64460 220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 855.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 964.00 619 64460 220 5210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 276.32 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,036.00 619 64460 220 5130 10974 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 213,26 COMMUNICATIONS 213.26 101 68020 160 2200 10975 WINZLER 8 KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 21,031.48 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,945.98 320 80520 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,085.50 326 80770 220 10976 T8B SPORTS 24035 181.04 BLDG. 8 GROUNDS MAINT. 181.04 101 68010 190 1106 10977 QUILL 24090 198,21 OFFICE EXPENSE 198.21 621 64450 110 10978 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLU 24118 330.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 330.00 101 65300 260 10979 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 10980 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 484.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 484.00 101 68010 220 1521 10981 ATLAS AUTO GLASS 24319 600.00 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 600.00 625 65213 203 10982 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 1,419.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,419.00 101 68010 220 1661 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 10958 OFFICE MAX 23306 1,048.11 OFFICE EXPENSE 199.36 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 67.40 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 84.74 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 15.50 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 169.51 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 269.57 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 36.96 101 64400 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 166.71 101 68010 120 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 38.36 201 65200 110 10959 GREG MILANO 23346 584.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 584.50 101 68010 120 1422 10960 HOME DEPOT 23384 179.59 SMALL TOOLS 179.59 619 64460 130 10961 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 415.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 415.20 101 68010 220 1661 10962 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 249.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 249.60 101 68010 220 1762 10963 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 60.43 MISC. SUPPLIES 60.43 619 64460 120 5240 10964 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 23,828.08 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 23,828.08 327 81150 210 10965 JERRY PEIL 23709 1,050.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,050.00 101 22546 10966 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,737.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,737.50 528 66600 210 10967 SBC/MCI 23728 14.34 COMMUNICATIONS 14.34 526 69020 160 10968 RAYMOND BRAYER 23751 977.00 MISCELLANEOUS 977.00 101 22546 10969 KAREN LIU 23823 41.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41.63 101 68010 220 1645 10970 CHERI NICHOL 23901 301.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 301.00 101 68010 220 1661 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10946 TURF STAR 22682 227,37 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 227.37 101 68020 200 2200 10947 JIM KELLY 22703 584.24 MISC. SUPPLIES 584.24 327 75170 120 10948 FIRE SERVICE SPECIFICATION & SUP 22705 791.64 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 791.64 201 65200 203 10949 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 101.76 MISC. SUPPLIES 101.76 101 65100 120 10950 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1641 10951 LANDS' END, INC. 22854 130.51 OFFICE EXPENSE 130.51 101 64400 110 10952 ALLIED IRON CO. 22855 78,64 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 78.64 201 65200 203 10953 CPS 23005 448.50 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 448.50 101 64420 121 10954 MICHAEL BERMAN 23108 2,355.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,355.00 101 22546 10955 PITNEY BOWES 23128 548.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 548.00 621 64450 200 10956 NADINE RONSON 23195 216.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216.00 101 68010 220 1661 10957 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 6,825.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,911.00 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,661.75 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,252.25 327 79400 210 ) CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10931 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 6,347.34 MISCELLANEOUS 4,188.26 201 65200 400 MISCELLANEOUS 2,159.08 620 66700 400 10932 MELANIE MARANI 21132 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1331 10933 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 1,075.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,075.00 101 68010 220 1331 10934 ON CAMERA PRODUCTIONS 21177 3,745.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,745.00 738 64580 220 10935 FEHR AND PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC. 21289 1,200.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 1,200.00 101 22590 10936 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 98.16 SMALL TOOLS 98.16 101 65300 130 10937 D.L. FALK CONSTRUCTION INC. 21647 12,543.57 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,543.57 320 80370 220 10938 COLOR COPY PRINTING, INC. 21831 454.65 OFFICE EXPENSE 454.65 101 65300 110 10939 ALL PETROLEUM RECOVERY SERVICE, 22008 75.00 GAS, OIL & GREASE 75.00 201 65200 201 10940 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 73.33 SUPPLIES 73.33 620 15000 10941 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 945.51 MISC. SUPPLIES 151.63 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 793.88 527 66520 120 10942 AUTO PRIDE CAR WASH 22278 12.95 VEHICLE MAINT. 12.95 201 65200 202 10943 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 2,635.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,785.00 201 35220 000 7100 MISCELLANEOUS 850.00 201 35221 000 7100 10944 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 43.70 COMMUNICATIONS 43.70 101 68010 160 10945 CSUS FOUNDATION INC. 22615 364.65 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 364.65 527 66520 240 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•� Denotes Hand Written Checks 10917 JAMES CACCIA PLUMBING 19320 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 10918 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 22.27 MISC. SUPPLIES 22.27 620 66700 120 10919 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 1,057.95 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT, 196.18 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 861.77 625 65213 203 10920 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210 10921 ALL FENCE COMPANY, INC. 19710 590.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 590.00 527 66520 120 10922 MONICA OLSEN 19832 216.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216.00 101 68010 220 1661 10923 UTILITY AERIAL INC 19990 986.59 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 986.59 101 68020 200 2200 10924 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 10925 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 1,529.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,529.75 101 68010 120 1422 10926 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 649.64 COMMUNICATIONS 45.00 621 64450 160 COMMUNICATIONS 604.64 738 64580 160 10927 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 123.26 OFFICE EXPENSE 123.26 101 64420 110 10928 ARLETTE PETERSON 20547 716.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 716.50 101 68010 220 1349 10929 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 653.90 MISCELLANEOUS 653.90 101 64350 031 10930 JEFF DOWD 20779 114.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114.00 101 68010 220 1785 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10902 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 16,370.42 GAS, OIL & GREASE 912.71 201 65200 201 SUPPLIES 15,457.71 620 15000 10903 LINDA HOECK 16390 2,021.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,021.00 101 68010 220 1349 10904 PIONEER RANDUSTRIAL 17547 83.40 MISCELLANEOUS -6.88 101 23611 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 90.28 101 68020 190 2200 10905 STEVE GOLDBERG 17577 55.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 101 68010 220 1781 10906 STEWART AND STEVENSON 17983 42.96 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 42.96 625 65213 203 10907 MILLER PIPELINE CORPORATION 17999 4,020.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,020.00 320 80110 210 10908 NICK FLERES 18191 200.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1780 10909 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 18635 1,460.32 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,460.32 526 69020 210 10910 BAY ALARM 18854 168.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 619 64460 220 5180 10911 STATE OF CA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY 18857 1,800.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,800.00 201 65500 260 10912 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 211.20 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 211.20 101 64420 121 10913 PEGGY GUARALDI 19044 172.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 172.80 101 68010 220 1661 10914 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 1,984.55 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,984.55 101 68010 120 1787 10915 LIESERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 470.44 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 470.44 618 64520 210 10916 A-ABCO RENTS & SELLS 19114 414.10 MISC. SUPPLIES 414.10 101 68010 120 1950 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10890 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 3,092.78 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 951.05 618 64520 210 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 2,141.73 618 64520 601 10891 CRAIG W. REED 09881 196.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 154.00 101 68010 220 1787 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.00 101 68010 220 1785 10892 ANA FITZGERALD 09975 516.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1646 10893 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 137.16 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 137.16 625 65213 203 10894 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 3,230.47 SUPPLIES 168.73 201 65200 112 MISC. SUPPLIES 180.57 201 65200 120 7190 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.59 201 65200 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 607.53 201 65200 140 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 80.04 201 65200 203 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 544.97 201 65200 240 TRAVEL 8 MEETINGS 100.00 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 157.80 201 65500 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,342.24 201 65200 260 10895 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 130.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 130.85 527 66520 120 10896 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 154.60 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 154.60 201 65200 203 10897 NORTH VALLEY OIL 13815 92.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 92.00 620 66700 120 10898 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHINES 14252 295,79 OFFICE EXPENSE 295.79 101 68010 110 1101 10899 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 302.94 MISC. SUPPLIES 175.63 619 64460 120 5180 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.24 619 64460 120 SMALL TOOLS 111.07 619 64460 130 10900 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 92.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 92.00 101 64420 121 10901 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,455.40 MISCELLANEOUS 3,455.40 731 22594 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10879 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 3,080.82 MISC. SUPPLIES 198.78 101 68010 120 1890 MISC. SUPPLIES 86.64 101 68010 120 1422 MISC. SUPPLIES 234.28 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 369.00 101 68010 120 1891 MISC. SUPPLIES 6.00 101 68020 120 2300 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.28 101 68010 120 1787 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 168.00 101 68010 140 1893 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 520.00 101 68010 220 1422 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 179.00 101 68010 220 1644 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 78.00 101 68010 220 1660 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1641 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 380.00 101 68010 220 1331 TRAINING EXPENSE 24.00 101 68020 260 2300 . MISC. SUPPLIES 23.84 730 69533 120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 650.00 730 69533 220 10880 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 331.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 331.85 101 64350 120 10881 JEAN BUCKS 09019 694.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 694.50 101 68010 220 1644 10882 SHERRY'S/WESTERN CERAMICS 09061 74.29 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74.29 101 68010 220 1644 10883 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 110.27 MISC. SUPPLIES 110.27 619 64460 120 5180 10884 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 380.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 380.25 101 68010 220 1660 10885 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 41.96 OFFICE EXPENSE 41.96 527 66520 110 10886 POM INC. 09248 1,069.15 MISCELLANEOUS 531.15 320 80480 400 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 538.00 530 65400 200 10887 LIFE ASSIST 09392 223.64 SUPPLIES 223.64 201 65200 112 10888 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 1,818.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 1,818.00 101 65100 291 10889 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 1,189.67 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,189.67 101 68020 120 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10867 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 3,411.39 MISCELLANEOUS 3,411.39 896 20282 10868 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 306.94 SMALL TOOLS 52.89 201 65200 130 TRAINING EXPENSE 178.28 526 69020 260 MISC. SUPPLIES 63.72 619 64460 120 5240 SMALL TOOLS 12.05 619 64460 130 10869 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 328.29 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 328.29 101 66210 226 10870 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 3,741.64 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,741.64 528 66600 210 10871 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 529.29 MISC. SUPPLIES 529.29 619 64460 120 5120 10872 KAVANAGH ENGINEERING 02665 2,400.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,400.00 101 66100 210 3007 10873 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 103.62 SUPPLIES 103.62 620 15000 10874 MEG MONROE 02936 690.00 MISCELLANEOUS 690.00 101 64400 031 10875 P. G. & E. 03054 17,826.61 GAS & ELECTRIC 17,410.39 101 66100 170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 416.22 320 80370 220 10876 SANDRA POBE 03175 1,600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,600.00 101 68010 220 1644 10877 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 2,153.39 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,963.83 101 65150 220 COMMUNICATIONS 189.56 201 65200 160 10878 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 3,837.44 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,837.44 101 68020 220 2300 l CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 04/08/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *. Denotes Hand Written Checks - 10853 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 307.91 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 29.18 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 156.23 619 64460 120 5120 MISC. SUPPLIES 87.34 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 28.13 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 7.03 619 64460 120 5180 10854 ALPINE AWARDS, INC. 01052 171.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 171.60 101 68010 120 1781 10855 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 319.34 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 319.34 101 68020 190 2200 10856 EDWARD R. BACON CO., INC. 01182 513.40 SUPPLIES 513.40 620 15000 10857 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 94.72 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 94.72 625 65213 203 10858 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220 10859 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 661.50 RECREATION EXPENSES 661.50 101 10700 10860 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION 01726 53.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 53.00 101 68010 240 1101 10861 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 2,511.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,511.00 101 68010 220 1644 10862 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 206.83 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 206.83 201 65200 203 10863 D & M TOWING, INC. 02029 90.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 90.00 101 65100 292 10864 VEOLIA WATER 02110 69,630.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42,023.14 327 79480 220 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 6,863.49 527 66530 190 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 20,744.00 527 66530 210 10865 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 186.80 MISCELLANEOUS 186.80 101 68020 192 2200 10866 FEDEX 02160 40.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 40.00 101 64420 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME 03-31-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 4 FUND RECAP 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 18,114.65 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 14,220.53 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 41,980.60 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 1,181.93 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 52,564.47 WATER FUND 526 158,606.26 SEWER FUND 527 551,605.51 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 266.02 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 8,263.00 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 417.44 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 500.00 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 50,389.75 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $898,110.16 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 4 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 10815 THROUGH 10852 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $898,110.16, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ................ .../. ./. COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 03/31/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10839 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00 MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024 10840 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 580.00 MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 130 20024 10841 C.L.E.A. 24523 663.00 MISCELLANEOUS 663.00 130 20026 10842 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 476.00 UNION DUES 476.00 130 21091 10843 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 MISCELLANEOUS 315.08 130 21092 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5.52 130 21015 10844 PRESERVATION PAINTING 24552 8,600.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,100.00 320 76010 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,500.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,000.00 619 64460 210 5240 10845 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24607 54.02 COMMUNICATIONS 54.02 101 64250 160 10846 AETNA 24760 2,798.99 MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,527.69 130 20022 10847 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 4,937.94 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,945.44 130 20021 MISCELLANEOUS 992.50 130 20025 10848 FRED FIRESTONE 24866 621.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 621.00 101 68010 220 1331 10849 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 130.05 UTILITY EXPENSE 130.05 896 20281 10850 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 132.61 COMMUNICATIONS 51.44 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 81.17 101 65100 200 10851 KRAMER-WIESE 25250 1,242.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,242.50 101 64420 210 10852 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 25267 1,763.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,763.00 619 64460 210 5150 J TOTAL 8898,110.1611 /1I7ji �0�� CITY OF BURLINGAME ' W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 03/31/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10825 DHL EXPRESS 14958 24.95 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 12.00 101 65100 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 12.95 530 65400 200 10826 TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH 18419 310,155.00 MISCELLANEOUS 310,155.00 527 36751 10827 LYNNE FIRESTONE 18746 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1331 10828 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 10829 SPRINT PCS 20724 72,74 COMMUNICATIONS 33.83 101 64420 160 COMMUNICATIONS 38.91 101 65150 160 10830 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 2,210.56 MISCELLANEOUS 2,210.56 526 69020 400 10831 FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA, INC. 20967 103.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.92 101 65100 220 10832 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 104.54 COMMUNICATIONS 104.54 101 65300 160 10833 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 4,993.44 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,181.93 326 73171 210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,811.51 526 69020 220 10834 DRYCO CONSTRUCTION 23725 36,621.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 36,621.00 320 78490 220 10835 SBC/MCI 23728 8,338.97 COMMUNICATIONS 16.29 101 67500 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 8,322.68 896 20281 10836 COMPUCOM 24467 3,259.60 MISCELLANEOUS 3,259.60 320 80420 400 10837 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,200.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,200.00 130 20016 10838 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00 UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080 CITY OF BURLINGAME I ' W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 03/31/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10815 VEOLIA WATER 02110 292,057.98 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 52,564.47 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 25,008.20 527 66530 190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,473.00 527 66530 220 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 124.30 527 66530 270 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 14,888.01 527 66530 800 10816 P. G. & E. 03054 41,937.02 UTILITY EXPENSE 41,937.02 896 20280 10817 SBC 03080 52.15 OFFICE EXPENSE 52.15 101 65100 110 10818 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 150,627.19 WATER PURCHASES 150,627.19 526 69020 171 10819 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 5,766.48 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,766.48 101 68020 220 2300 10820 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 2,700.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,700.00 101 68010 114 1100 10821 OCE 09493 857.34 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210 10822 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 785.28 PETTY CASH DEPOSIT -5,000.00 101 10100 OFFICE EXPENSE 339.54 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 70.00 101 65150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 392.99 101 65100 120 COMMUNICATIONS 331.90 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 353.64 101 65150 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 935.24 101 65100 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 101 65400 220 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 105.00 101 65100 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 495.00 101 65100 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 821.92 101 65100 260 PRISONER EXPENSE 110.50 101 65100 291 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 559.04 101 65100 292 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 253.07 530 65400 200 MISC. SUPPLIES 417.44 730 69574 120 MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 731 22542 10823 AMERON 13880 4,026.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 4,026.21 101 66210 120 10824 HDL COREN&CONE 14750 2,050.08 MISCELLANEOUS 2,050.08 101 30400 CITY OF BURLINGAME 03-24-2005 WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 10 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 78,347.76 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 525.00 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 2,428.82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 5,758.05 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 737,882.45 WATER FUND 526 9,673.93 SEWER FUND 527 2,597.74 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 3,144.40 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 3,098.29 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 47,513.28 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 4,443.49 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 266.66 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,167.69 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 83,926.04 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 19,332.29 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 163.17 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 81,000,269.06 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 10711 THROUGH 10814 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 81,000,269.06, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../.. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10809 CHRIS PEDERSEN 25260 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 10810 THE LIFEGUARD STORE 25261 225.65 MISC. SUPPLIES 225.65 101 68010 120 1892 10811 ANDY CHAN 25262 175.66 MISCELLANEOUS 175.66 526 22502 10812 PRIMROSE FLORAL DESIGN 25263 48.07 MISCELLANEOUS 48.07 526 22502 10813 DR. NICOLE CHEROK 25264 13.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13.50 101 68010 220 1660 10814 RICK VELEZ 25265 172.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 172.00 130 20060 N TOTAL 81,000,269.06 /�I� CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10794 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 24700 993.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 993.00 101 65100 220 10795 SERENE LIM 24791 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 10796 FIX AIR 24841 287.24 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 287.24 619 64460 210 5150 10797 S AND S SUPPLIES 8 SOLUTIONS 24963 601.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 59.96 101 66210 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 270.62 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 270.63 527 66520 260 10798 SHIU TSUN TSAI 25039 2,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,000.00 101 22520 10799 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 730 69583 220 10800 JESSE MOORE 25104 110,00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110.00 101 68010 220 1785 10801 D&L FOUNDRY 25184 373,62 MISC. SUPPLIES 373.62 101 66210 120 10802 PITNEY BOWES SERVICE SOLUTIONS 25227 947.52 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 947.52 621 64450 200 10803 GEORGE PLAVJIAN 25230 2,650.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,650.00 101 22546 10804 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 310.23 OFFICE EXPENSE 310.23 101 65100 110 10805 TES 25256 170.88 SUPPLIES 170.88 620 15000 10806 MAR-LEN SUPPLY INC. 25257 112.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 112.50 619 64460 120 5130 10807 DON HOHL 25258 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 10808 RICH SANDOR 25259 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10782 KEITH MARTIN 23788 179.87 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 30.00 101 66210 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 23.82 526 69020 250 MISC. SUPPLIES 6.91 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 38.79 619 64460 120 5150 MISC. SUPPLIES 45.94 619 64460 120 5130 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 31.41 619 64460 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3.00 620 66700 250 10783 KAREN LIU 23823 99.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.00 101 68010 220 1645 10784 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180 10785 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,407.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,375.00 101 23620 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 32.00 101 64420 210 10786 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 53.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 53.00 619 64460 220 5110 10787 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 730 69533 220 10788 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 576.00 MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233 10789 SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER 24408 500.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 500.00 101 65100 292 10790 EASYLINK SERVICES CORP 24430 10.94 COMMUNICATIONS 10.94 101 65100 160 10791 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 347,908.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 347,908.00 327 79480 220 10792 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 187.63 COMMUNICATIONS 187.63 101 65100 160 10793 SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY MANAGERS A 24699 100.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 101 64150 240 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10770 D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC 23092 352,201.70 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 352,201.70 327 81010 220 10771 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.47 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.47 526 69020 210 10772 CITY OF SAN CARLOS _ 23225 43.62 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 43.62 101 64200 250 10773 LARRY NGAI 23231 2,400.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,400.00 101 22546 10774 T.T. TECHNOLOGIES 23279 6,236.48 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 6,236.48 526 69020 800 10775 OFFICE MAX 23306 675.24 OFFICE EXPENSE 4.27 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 57.56 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 8.13 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 32.77 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 25.14 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 25.14 101 64400 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 100.89 101 66100 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 421.34 201 65200 110 10776 DATASAFE 23410 251.60 OFFICE EXPENSE 142.60 101 64420 110 BANKING SERVICE FEES 109.00 101 64250 120 10777 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105.00 MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518 10778 KORALEEN ENTERPRISES 23510 1,417.70 MISCELLANEOUS 1,417.70 526 69020 233 10779 LIEBERT GLOBAL SERVICES 23551 630.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 630.00 621 64450 200 10780 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 36,023.03 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 36,023.03 327 81150 210 10781 DRYCO CONSTRUCTION 23725 1,320.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,320.00 101 22520 } ) CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT "' Denotes Hand Written Checks 10755 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 550.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 550.00 526 69020 210 10756 JEFF DOWD 20779 228.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.00 101 68010 220 1785 10757 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 1,410.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,410.00 619 64460 220 5120 10758 FRANK WEBER 21344 192.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 192.50 101 68010 220 1781 10759 MARCI STRANGE 21424 86.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.00 101 68010 220 1660 10760 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 4,806.92 MISCELLANEOUS 4,708.05 320 80420 400 6001 MISC. SUPPLIES 98.87 526 69020 120 10761 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 2,196.72 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 2,196.72 101 66210 222 10762 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 7,778.85 MISCELLANEOUS 7,778.85 101 37010 10763 F. FERRANDO 21861 720.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 720.00 101 22520 10764 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 16,287.50 MISCELLANEOUS 16,287.50 101 37010 10765 YAT-CHEONG AU 21906 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 10766 JIM STOCKWELL 22048 440.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 440.00 101 68010 220 1781 10767 AT&T 22138 34.65 COMMUNICATIONS 34.65 101 68010 160 10768 MORI CONSULTANTS 22209 1,050.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,050.00 320 79160 220 10769 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 17,775.12 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,176.61 736 64571 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,598.51 736 64572 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10743 LOS ALTOS TYPEWRITER 15853 855.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 45.00 101 64400 110 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.00 101 64200 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.00 101 64150 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 225.00 101 64250 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 90.00 101 66100 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 45.00 101 68020 220 2100 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 45.00 201 65200 200 OFFICE EXPENSE 45.00 526 69020 110 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 45.00 621 64450 200 10744 SYDNEY MALK00 16347 24.89 SMALL TOOLS 24.89 620 66700 130 10745 MIKE SMITH 16637 260.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 260.00 101 68010 220 1789 10746 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 96.74 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 96.74 101 65100 200 10747 GEORGE MASTALIR 18088 286.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 286.00 101 68010 220 1789 10748 DOUG'S MOTORCYCLE SERVICE 18337 23.71 SUPPLIES 23.71 620 15000 10749 MARY JANNEY 19042 92,00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 92.00 130 20015 10750 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 313.81 OFFICE EXPENSE 60.50 101 64250 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 253.31 201 65200 111 10751 R. FLANDERS 19570 520.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 520.00 101 22520 10752 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,557.17 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,557.17 736 64570 220 10753 S & C FORD 20190 46,270.56 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 46,270.56 620 66700 800 10754 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 3,445.97 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 625.00 101 65300 210 COMMUNICATIONS 2,820.97 621 64450 160 A CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G 15 T E R PAGE 3 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10733 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,331.78 OFFICE EXPENSE 64.15 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 421.90 101 68020 120 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 21.64 101 68020 190 2200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 47.19 101 68020 200 2200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 132.83 101 66210 220 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 17.23 101 66210 222 SUPPLIES 34.11 201 65200 112 SMALL TOOLS 30.39 201 65200 130 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 66.03 201 65200 190 VEHICLE MAINT. 42.47 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 16.57 201 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 129.81 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS 54.05 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 15.34 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 164.60 619 64460 120 5120 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.17 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 30.30 619 64460 120 5110 10734 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 3,612.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,612.00 101 68010 220 1644 10735 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220 10736 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 2,136.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,136.34 527 66520 120 10737 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 6.91 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 6.91 101 65100 200 10738 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 266.66 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 266.66 625 65213 203 10739 UNITED TRANSMISSION INC. 14760 860.24 SUPPLIES 860.24 620 15000 10740 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 428.14 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 39.24 526 69020 230 MISC. SUPPLIES 388.90 619 64460 120 10741 TRESSER'S TOW SERVICE 15543 160.00 SUPPLIES 160.00 620 15000 10742 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,109.86 MISCELLANEOUS 3,109.86 731 22594 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10727 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 3,020.44 OFFICE EXPENSE 25.98 101 68010 110 1100 OFFICE EXPENSE 7.12 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 211.00 101 68010 120 1891 MISC. SUPPLIES 19.98 101 68010 120 1100 MISC. SUPPLIES 385.32 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.88 101 68010 120 1520 MISC. SUPPLIES 167.48 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 284.68 101 68010 120 1781 MISC. SUPPLIES 30.00 101 68010 120 1892 MISC. SUPPLIES 11.78 101 68010 120 1422 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 37.87 101 68020 140 2200 COMMUNICATIONS 210.00 101 68020 160 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 27.00 101 68020 190 2200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 3.00 101 68020 200 2300 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 470.00 101 68010 220 1644 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 306.00 101 68010 220 1349 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 65.00 101 68010 220 1648 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 106.00 101 68010 220 1331 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.50 101 68010 220 1645 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00 101 68010 220 1422 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 35.00 101 68010 240 1100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 191.16 101 68020 250 2100 TRAINING EXPENSE 32.00 101 68020 260 2300 MISC. SUPPLIES 167.69 730 69533 120 10728 NEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 349.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 349.80 101 64350 120 10729 FRANK ERBACHER 09195 261.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 261.00 130 20015 10730 LIFE ASSIST 09392 380.74 SUPPLIES 380.74 201 65200 112 10731 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 300.48 SUPPLIES 300.48 201 65200 112 10732 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 389.70 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 389.70 101 68010 190 1787 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 03/24/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10711 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 118.53 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 118.53 101 65200 203 10712 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 397.00 RECREATION EXPENSES 397.00 101 10700 10713 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 305.27 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 305.27 201 65200 140 10714 VEOLIA WATER 02110 1,749.72 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,749.72 327 79480 210 10715 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 02174 140.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 140.00 101 64350 210 10716 N.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 15.71 SMALL TOOLS 15.71 619 64460 130 10717 IRVINE & JACHENS INC. 02599 42.11 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 42.11 201 65200 140 10718 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 31.39 MISC. SUPPLIES 31.39 619 64460 120 5180 10719 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 03002 554.40 MISC. SUPPLIES 554.40 528 66600 120 10720 SBC 03080 198.92 COMMUNICATIONS 35.75 101 67500 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 163.17 896 20281 10721 DON PLAGMANN 03172 742.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 742.50 101 68010 220 1781 10722 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 1,593.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,593.25 101 66100 220 10723 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 80,816.18 MISCELLANEOUS 80,816.18 731 22587 10724 SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS 03536 2,590.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,590.00 528 66600 210 10725 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 18,767.52 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,767.52 101 68020 220 2300 10726 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 300.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 300.00 101 65100 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME 03-17-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 69,154.74 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 8,303.17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 154,409.82 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 2,361.45 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 20,248.05 WATER FUND 526 6,570.61 SEWER FUND 527 8,260.78 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 2,466.00 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,709.90 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 18,297.21 _ FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 22,211.65 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 6,480.66 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 32,132.42 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,404.44 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 879.43 STATE GRANTS FUND 734 -269.66 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 435.00 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $358,055.67 VOIj� .Opp C't'- IDSgg IlgrjA \vo,ID lObk g 53 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 10590 THROUGH 10710 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $358,055.67, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .......... ... ......... .../. ./. .......... .... . .. COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 10 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10696 DE LACE LANDEN 25057 171.35 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220 10697 J.F. PACIFIC LINERS 25144 2,886.35 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,886.35 320 79390 220 10698 FERMIN SIERRA 25211 1,898.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,898.50 320 79390 210 10699 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 82.16 OFFICE EXPENSE 82.16 201 65200 110 10700 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 995.67 OFFICE EXPENSE 551.89 101 65100 110 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 443.78 101 65100 292 10701 WILL CHAVEZ 25246 144.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 144.00 101 68010 220 1422 10702 WILLIAM TSUKIDA 25247 240.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 240.00 101 68010 220 1789 10703 DISCOUNT PLUMBING 25248 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 10704 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL MACHINE REPAI 25249 1,224.88 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,224.88 619 64460 210 5130 10705 KRAMER-WIESE 25250 2,590.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 2,590.00 530 65400 200 10706 WATERPROOFING ASSOCIATES 25251 354.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 354.00 619 64460 210 5130 10707 FUEL FILTRATION WEST 25252 1,090.00 GAS, OIL & GREASE 1,090.00 101 65100 201 10708 MOTION PICTURE LICENSING CORP 25253 410.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 410.00 101 68010 240 1101 10709 BOTRUS ZAAROUR 25254 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 101 22546 10710 JOHN TROCCOE 25255 1,875.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,875.00 101 22546 TOTAL $358,055.67 � \ CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10689 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 5,641,71 OFFICE EXPENSE 36.98 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 53.58 101 64100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 35.94 101 68020 120 2300 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.40 101 68010 120 1787 MISC. SUPPLIES 193.10 101 68010 120 1422 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.45 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 81.54 101 68010 120 1101 MISC, SUPPLIES 50.00 101 69537 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.27 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 564.21 101 68010 120 1330 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 26.17 101 64420 121 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 388.10 101 67500 129 SMALL TOOLS 47.88 101 66100 130 COMMUNICATIONS 90.59 101 65100 160 VISUAL AIDS 46.96 101 65150 206 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 209.28 101 64420 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 43.80 101 64100 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 179.00 101 68020 250 2100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 501.48 101 64150 250 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 341.96 526 69020 290 COMMUNICATIONS 128.80 527 66520 160 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 1,860.00 527 66520 250 OFFICE EXPENSE 71.45 621 64450 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 511.82 730 69572 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.52 730 69533 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 315.09 730 69583 120 MISC. SUPPLIES -269.66 734 65195 120 10690 AD CLUB 24809 612.19 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 612.19 101 64420 150 10691 BATTERIES AND BUTTER 24889 335.15 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 335.15 201 65200 203 10692 JACOBSEN'S OF ADAIR 24919 35.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 35.50 526 69020 120 10693 PLAZA GOURMET 24928 150.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 150.00 101 64420 250 10694 LAURA MARSH 24964 602.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 602.00 101 68010 220 1646 10695 JACK TSAI 25039 3,350.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,350.00 101 22546 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10682 R.G. DEVELOPMENTS 24478 975.00 MISCELLANEOUS 975.00 101 22546 10683 JACK'S AUTO TOP AND UPHOLSTERY 24505 103.82 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 103.82 625 65213 203 10684 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 850.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 850.00 619 64460 210 5120 10685 JOHN BOLOGNA 24628 147.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147.00 101 68010 220 1780 10686 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 84.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780 10687 GOODIN,MACBRIDE,SDUERI,RITCHIE & 24638 1,072.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,072.50 101 64350 210 3100 10688 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 495.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 619 64460 220 5120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 375.00 619 64460 220 5130 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10671 DAVE CREAMER 23876 1,264.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 333.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 931.50 101 68010 220 1644 10672 MELISSA GINSBERG 23877 252.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1646 10673 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 1,648.00 BANKING SERVICE FEES 528.10 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,119.90 530 65400 120 10674 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 15,088.15 MISC. SUPPLIES 914.77 101 68010 120 1111 MISC. SUPPLIES 544.38 101 68010 120 1114 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 964.00 619 64460 220 5210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 855.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,195.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,836.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,671.00 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 397.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,036.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 619 64460 220 5121 10675 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 1,059.30 COMMUNICATIONS 216.10 101 68020 160 2200 COMMUNICATIONS 656.96 201 65200 160 COMMUNICATIONS 186.24 619 64460 160 10676 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 814.00 SUPPLIES 814.00 620 15000 10677 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 19,692.73 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 19,692.73 320 80520 210 10678 CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE 24030 66.71 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 66.71 201 65200 200 10679 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,376.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,376.00 101 68010 220 1644 10680 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 2,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 2,000.00 526 69020 290 10681 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 344.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 344.00 101 68010 220 1644 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10657 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 1,125.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,125.00 526 69020 233 10658 JENKINS/ATHENS INS 22851 9,184.00 CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,184.00 618 64520 225 10659 CHUCK CASTLE 22863 242.73 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 242.73 618 64520 210 10660 TRAILER HITCH CO. 22998 897.58 VEHICLE MAINT. 897.58 201 65200 202 10661 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 10662 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 32.67 COMMUNICATIONS 32.67 201 65200 160 10663 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 6,055.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,695.40 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,361.45 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,998.15 327 79400 210 10664 T.T. TECHNOLOGIES 23279 456.86 SMALL TOOLS 456.86 526 69020 130 10665 OFFICE MAX 23306 476.98 OFFICE EXPENSE 184.29 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 241.59 101 68010 120 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 51.10 201 65200 110 10666 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200 10667 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 94.56 MISC. SUPPLIES 94.56 619 64460 120 10668 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 11,624.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,624.00 101 68010 220 1330 10669 SBC/MCI 23728 318.29 COMMUNICATIONS 318.29 621 64450 160 10670 LANORI RAM 23752 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101. 22520 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T ER PAGE 5 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10642 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 11,408.85 OFFICE EXPENSE 143.40 101 64250 110 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 11,265.45 320 80420 800 10643 KURT STEIL 21550 3,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,000.00 101 22520 10644 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 5,248.75 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,574.62 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,574.63 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,574.62 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 524.88 619 64460 260 10645 MONICA EHLERS 21627 258.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 258.00 101 68010 220 1661 10646 GREG BARNES 21885 860.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 860.00 101 68010 220 1422 10647 VB GOLF LLC 21948 750.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 750.00 101 68010 220 1784 10648 UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 22305 18,249.90 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 18,249.90 327 81010 210 10649 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 114,773.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114,773.00 320 80520 220 10650 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING 8 CONSTRU 22435 1,282.14 MISCELLANEOUS 1,282.14 620 66700 400 10651 STEVE NELSON 22449 84.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.00 101 68010 220 1780 10652 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22559 1,801.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,801.25 320 80831 220 10653 TURF STAR 22682 158.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 158.00 101 68020 200 2200 10654 FAILSAFE TESTING 22694 500.00 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 500.00 625 65213 203 10655 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 435.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281 10656 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 105.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1780 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 10628 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 406.72 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 157.33 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 249.39 625 65213 203 10629 BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC 19588 95.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 24.90 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 20.57 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 49.80 101 65300 110 10630 GRAPHIC PRODUCTS 19691 115.20 OFFICE EXPENSE 115.20 101 68010 110 1101 10631 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220 10632 KATHY KARAS 19812 198.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198.00 101 68010 220 1644 10633 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 458.93 MISC. SUPPLIES 458.93 101 68010 120 1521 10634 CLAUDIO ARRIOLA 20435 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 101 68010 220 1789 10635 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 1,665.04 SUPPLIES 1,665.04 620 15000 10636 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 123.95 OFFICE EXPENSE 123.95 101 64420 110 10637 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 460.71 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 460.71 101 66210 219 10638 GEORGE BAGDON 21174 693.63 MISCELLANEOUS 693.63 101 66210 031 10639 CES 21210 103.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 103.38 101 64350 120 10640 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 2,215.96 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 667.93 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221.64 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,326.39 619 64460 220 5120 10641 JACKIE COOPER 21469 752.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES o 752.50 101 68010 220 1646 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10616 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 324.74 SMALL TOOLS 324.74 620 66700 130 10617 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 16,151.95 MISCELLANEOUS 16,151.95 101 22515 10618 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 176.65 SUPPLIES 176.65 620 15000 10619 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 548.92 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 548.92 101 68020 140 2200 10620 ITRON 16913 919.49 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 919.49 621 64450 200 10621 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 17224 27.99 MISC. SUPPLIES 27.99 619 64460 120 5210 10622 STANDARD REGISTER 17495 4,830.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 969.46 101 64250 110 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 529.32 621 64450 200 MISCELLANEOUS 3,331.22 621 64450 400 10623 CA-NV SECTION, AWWA 18218 700.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 700.00 526 69020 250 10624 SIERRA MORENO MERCANTILE CO. 18357 142.40 TRAINING EXPENSE 142.40 101 68020 260 2300 10625 PENINSULA PUMP & 18450 3,658.38 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 3,658.38 527 66520 230 10626 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,109.42 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 219.87 101 66210 140 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 181.36 201 65200 220 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 222.76 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 219.87 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 16.00 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 99.08 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 150.48 620 66700 140 10627 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 108.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 57.37 101 68010 120 1785 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.59 101 68010 120 1788 MISC. SUPPLIES 10.83 101 68010 120 1787 1 ` \ CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10603 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 944.66 MISC. SUPPLIES 263.22 619 64460 120 5120 MISC. SUPPLIES 681.44 619 64460 120 10604 P. G. & E. 03054 307.11 GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 101 66100 170 GAS & ELECTRIC 296.88 527 66520 170 10605 STEPHEN J. PICCHI 03168 355.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 355.20 101 68010 220 1372 10606 SANDRA POBE 03175 602.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 602.00 101 68010 220 1646 10607 SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS 03536 2,450.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,450.00 528 66600 210 10608 BARTLETT'S AUTO BODY 09079 140.00 VEHICLE MAINT. 140.00 201 65200 202 10609 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 666.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 291.50 101 68020 120 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 284.35 101 68010 190 1787 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 91.02 101 66210 219 10610 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210 10611 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 8,870.48 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8,870.48 618 64520 210 10612 CAL-STEAM 10557 706.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 218.05 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 25.87 619 64460 120 5170 MISC. SUPPLIES 414.27 619 64460 120 5180 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.15 619 64460 120 5120 10613 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 2,567.27 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,016.04 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,551.23 625 65213 203 10614 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 736.77 SMALL TOOLS 736.77 619 64460 130 10615 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 4,235.10 GAS, OIL & GREASE 4,235.10 201 65200 201 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 03/17/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10590 ALPINE AWARDS, INC. 01052 420.32 MISC. SUPPLIES 420.32 101 68010 120 1781 10591 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 1,900.74 SUPPLIES 1,900.74 620 15000 10592 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 175.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 175.85 101 66210 120 10593 BROADWAY HARDWARE 01435 12.33 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.33 201 65200 120 10594 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 463.44 OFFICE EXPENSE 26.03 101 68020 110 2200 OFFICE EXPENSE 29.44 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 10.83 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 397.14 320 80520 110 10595 CRAFT PRINTERS 01842 304.18 OFFICE EXPENSE 304.18 527 66520 110 10596 GCS WESTERN POWER & 01857 16.87 SUPPLIES 16.87 620 15000 10597 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 25,389.50 COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 25,089.50 621 64450 220 10598 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 38.97 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 38.97 201 65200 203 10599 D & M TOWING, INC. 02029 240.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 90.00 101 65100 292 SUPPLIES 150.00 620 15000 10600 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 86.60 MISCELLANEOUS 86.60 101 68020 192 2200 10601 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 454.24 SMALL TOOLS 113.90 526 69020 130 SMALL TOOLS 340.34 619 64460 130 10602 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,560.75 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,560.75 101 66210 226 CITY OF BURLINGAME 03.11.2005 WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 9 FUND RECAP - 04.05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 184,082.44 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE. 201 2,750.68 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 7,191.53 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 66,051.65 WATER FUND 526 171,280.72 SEWER FUND 527 5,846.47 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 729.00 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 508.87 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 25,011.32 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 762.18 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 5,298.91 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 186.27 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 376.97 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,133.10 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $472,210.11 CK. Loy(�} HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 10445 THROUGH 10551 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $472,210.11, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 10537 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 59.49 COMMUNICATIONS 59.49 201 65200 160 10538 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 530.43 OFFICE EXPENSE 530.43 101 64420 110 10539 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 24700 1,109.45 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,109.45 101 65100 220 10540 DAN FLERES 24703 300.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 101 68010 220 1780 10541 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 580.45 MISCELLANEOUS 580.45 101 64420 030 10542 AD CLUB 24809 265.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 265.00 101 64420 150 10543 T MOBILE 24846 30.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30.88 101 65150 220 10544 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 438.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 438.02 101 65100 220 10545 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 419.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 419.25 101 68010 220 1646 10546 STRAITS BURLINGAME LLC 25096 10,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 10,000.00 101 22520 10547 JESSE MOORE 25104 355.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 101 68010 220 1780 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 101 68010 220 1785 10548 D&L FOUNDRY 25184 2,917.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,917.34 527 66520 120 10549 JOE CYR 25213 738.24 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 738.24 101 65300 250 10550 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 25239 449.89 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 449.89 618 64520 601 10551 DFM ASSOCIATES 25240 46.12 OFFICE EXPENSE 46.12 101 64200 110 TOTAL 8472,210.11 Iq o � � f CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10522 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105.00 MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518 10523 CULVER GROUP 23448 28,841 .99 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 28,841 .99 326 80770 210 10524 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 415.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 415.20 101 68010 220 1661 10525 PETERSON 23633 106.34 SUPPLIES 106.34 620 15000 10526 AT&T 23661 25.44 COMMUNICATIONS 25.44 621 64450 160 10527 NORTRAX 23681 998.40 SUPPLIES 998.40 620 15000 10528 JANNETTE GREER 23769 468.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 468.00 101 68010 220 1648 10529 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1 ,596.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,596.00 101 23620 10530 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 101 65100 220 10531 DOUG BELL 24189 133.66 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 133.66 320 79400 210 10532 EASYLINK SERVICES CORP 24430 1 .05 COMMUNICATIONS 1 .05 101 65100 160 10533 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 37,209.66 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1 , 127.25 326 80950 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,672.30 326 81180 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,242.75 326 80950 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 28, 167.36 326 81180 210 10534 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 236.56 COMMUNICATIONS 236.56 101 65100 160 10535 JOHN BOLOGNA 24628 294.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 294.00 101 68010 220 1780 10536 BRYAN ROSENBERG 24631 126.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.00 101 68010 220 1780 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10511 STEVE NELSON 22449 147.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147.00 101 68010 220 1780 10512 WILLIAM DILLARD 11 22508 2,000.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 2,000.00 101 64420 210 10513 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38.54 COMMUNICATIONS 38.54 101 68010 160 1101 10514 MELISSA DATA CORP 22699 757.39 OFFICE EXPENSE 757.39 101 64250 110 10515 NFPA 22780 158.68 MISCELLANEOUS 158.68 201 35220 000 7150 10516 JAMES YARBOROUGH 22793 231.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 231.00 101 68010 220 1780 10517 PENINSULA UNIFORM&EQUIPMENT 22899 1,254.32 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 893.89 101 65100 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 360.43 530 65400 200 10518 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 76.99 OFFICE EXPENSE 76.99 101 68010 110 1101 10519 CITY OF SAN CARLOS 23225 143.62 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 101 64150 240 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 43.62 101 64200 250 10520 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 1,434.40 OFFICE EXPENSE 24.90 101 64100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 103.03 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 92.45 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 121.56 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 159.01 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 335.06 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 197.04 526 69020 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 373.25 619 64460 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 28.10 620 66700 110 10521 OFFICE MAX 23306 352.55 OFFICE EXPENSE 23.50 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 91.89 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 138.79 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 1.97 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 62.49 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 33.91 201 65200 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10497 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75 OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101 10498 SASE COMPANY, INC. 20639 125.20 SUPPLIES 125.20 620 15000 10499 JEFF DOWD 20779 199.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199.50 101 68010 220 1785 10500 K-119 OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 20924 19.49 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 19.49 101 68020 190 2200 10501 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 1,005.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,005.00 101 68010 220 1330 10502 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 1,647.45 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 1,647.45 101 66210 219 10503 JACK VAN ETTEN 21171 633.17 MISCELLANEOUS 633.17 101 65100 031 10504 CIR 21211 1,151.93 MISC. SUPPLIES 875.93 527 66520 120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 276.00 527 66520 220 10505 THE BANK OF NEW YORK 21439 1,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 32100 10506 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 2,219.42 OFFICE EXPENSE 71.70 101 64250 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 375.84 201 65200 120 MISCELLANEOUS 1,771.88 320 80420 400 10507 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 160.83 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.83 621 64450 190 10508 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 104.39 COMMUNICATIONS 104.39 101 65300 160 10509 EILEEN P. GOLDENBERG 21846 1,215.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 495.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 720.00 101 68010 220 1644 10510 AT&T 22138 2.91 COMMUNICATIONS 2.91 101 65100 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10483 COLORPRINT 17497 1,014.18 OFFICE EXPENSE 851.93 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 162.25 527 66520 120 10484 GORDON E. MC CLINTOCK 17702 1,707.04 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,707.04 618 64520 210 10485 DOUG'S MOTORCYCLE SERVICE 18337 257.14 SUPPLIES 257.14 620 15000 10486 DEESIGNS 18388 2,878.84 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,878.84 526 69020 120 10487 PENINSULA CONFLICT 18633 7,262.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,262.50 101 64560 220 10488 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 63.76 COMMUNICATIONS 21.26 101 66210 160 COMMUNICATIONS 21.25 526 69020 160 COMMUNICATIONS 21.25 527 66520 160 10489 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL 18915 145.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 145.00 101 64250 240 10490 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 197.58 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 54.22 527 66520 140 TRAINING EXPENSE 143.36 527 66520 260 10491 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 79.55 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 79.55 101 64200 150 10492 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 2,268.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,268.00 618 64520 210 10493 AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 19181 95.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 95.00 620 66700 120 10494 BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC 19588 34.64 OFFICE EXPENSE 34.64 201 65200 110 10495 MARY ASTURIAS 19648 571.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 571.00 101 64250 250 10496 RICH POLONSKY 19761 86.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.00 101 68010 220 1660 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10468 BERNARD EDWARDS 09548 1,376.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,376.00 101 68010 220 1762 10469 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 1,132.86 SMALL TOOLS 1,034.88 101 68020 130 2300 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 97.98 101 68020 200 2200 10470 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO-ANIMAL CONTR 11305 114,952.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114,952.00 101 64560 220 10471 SHAFFER'S AUTO SERVICE CENTER 11324 402.58 VEHICLE MAINT. 402.58 201 65200 202 10472 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 163.48 MISC. SUPPLIES 163.48 527 66520 120 10473 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 300.94 OFFICE EXPENSE 300.94 101 65100 110 10474 COAST OIL CO. 13818 16,660.76 GAS, OIL & GREASE 16,660.76 101 65100 201 10475 AMERON 13880 258.93 RENTS & LEASES 258.93 101 66210 180 10476 SAN MATEO LOCK WORKS 14643 12.02 VEHICLE MAINT. 12.02 201 65200 202 10477 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 288.54 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 288.54 526 69020 230 10478 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 1,943.66 MISCELLANEOUS 1,943.66 731 22594 10479 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 1,517.94 SUPPLIES 1,517.94 620 15000 10480 PARK-GILMAN CLINICS, INC. 15792 850.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 850.00 101 65100 291 10481 TEAM CLEAN 15827 294.27 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 294.27 201 65200 220 10482 ACTION SPORTS 16167 128.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 128.00 101 68010 220 1781 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10455 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 1,609.13 MISC. SUPPLIES 464.55 101 66210 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 35.72 101 6B020 190 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 205.86 101 66210 219 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 29.79 101 66210 226 TRAINING EXPENSE 727.18 201 65200 260 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.89 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 125.14 527 66520 120 10456 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 392.41 MISC. SUPPLIES 202.97 101 68020 120 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 189.44 731 22560 10457 P. G. & E. 03054 2,215.00 GAS & ELECTRIC 1,107.50 101 66210 170 GAS & ELECTRIC 1,107.50 527 66520 170 10458 .SBC 03080 52.93 OFFICE EXPENSE 52.93 101 65100 110 10459 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 667.91 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 371.10 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT 296.81 625 65213 203 li 10460 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 822.70 MISC. SUPPLIES 822.70 101 68010 120 1780 10461 DOROTHY RADYK 03235 558.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 558.00 101 68010 220 1644 10462 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 158,876.19 WATER PURCHASES 158,876.19 526 69020 171 10463 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 729.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 729.00 528 66600 120 10464 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 98.31 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.85 101 64350 120 BANKING SERVICE FEES 45.46 101 64250 120 10465 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES 09461 5,285.99 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,285.99 320 81090 210 10466 NOEL L. MILLER, INC, 09499 425.78 SUPPLIES 425.78 620 15000 10467 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 20,586.39 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 20,586.39 618 64520 210 r CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 03/11/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 10445 "' CARMEL VALLEY LODGE 25238 3,265.79 " TRAVEL & MEETINGS 148.44 101 65150 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,968.91 101 65100 260 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 148.44 530 65400 220 10446 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 175.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 131.93 619 64460 120 5230 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.28 619 64460 120 5120 10447 ALPINE AWARDS, INC. 01052 303.25 MISC. SUPPLIES - 303.25 101 68010 120 1781 10448 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 16.32 SUPPLIES 16.32 620 15000 10449 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1,992.09 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 131.51 101 68020 200 2200 SMALL TOOLS 97.21 201 65200 130 GAS, OIL & GREASE 10.80 201 65200 201 VEHICLE MAINT. 172.96 201 65200 202 MISC. SUPPLIES 24.20 619 64460 120 5130 MISC. SUPPLIES 134.94 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 54.58 619 64460 120 5150 SUPPLIES 1,270.60 620 15000 MISC. SUPPLIES 15.13 620 66700 120 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 80.16 625 65213 203 10450 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220 10451 GENE EVANS 02149 376.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 376.25 101 68010 220 1646 10452 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 258.29 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 258.29 101 66210 226 10453 PENINSULA BATTERIES 02625 442.96 SUPPLIES 442.96 620 15000 10454 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 02880 7,810.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 7,810.98 526 69020 120 The City of Burlingame CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.burlingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday - March 10, 2005 Commissioners Present: Stephen Warden, Chair Eugene Condon, Vice Chair Russ Cohen Dan Conway Victor James Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer, Public Works Sergeant Don Shepley, Police Department Lori Brock, Secretary, Public Works Staff Absent: None Visitors: Ruth and Clarence Metcalfe, 401 Occidental �.- Carol Bender, OLA, 1328 Cabrillo Avenue Rochelle Toland, 1609 Lassen Way Jim McIver, 2712 Summit Drive Laurie Kum, 1632 McDonald Teresa Post, 1617 Coronado Way Jennifer Ulrich, 1637 Coronado Way Jim Vangeles, 1640 Marco Polo Way George Atkinson, 1610 Ray Drive Margaret Lee Blunt, 1538 Burlingame Avenue Theresa Bain, 341 Occidental Avenue Frank Kelly, 321 Occidental Avenue TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 —e 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 5 of 5 Commissioners present. 4. PROCLAMATION PRESENTATION Jim McIver was presented with a proclamation for his service to the Commission. 5. CURRENT BUSINESS 5.1 ACTION ITEMS 5.1.1 Approval of Minutes There were no comments or amendments for the February 10, 2005 TSPC Minutes by the Commission. Motion: To approve Traffic Safety and Parking Commission Minutes for 2/10/05. M/S/C: Condon, Conway, 5/0/0 5.2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 5.2.1 Our Lady of Angels School -Traffic and parking at Cortez Avenue.. Traffic Engineer Chou briefly recapped for the Commission the work so far regarding the traffic situation at Our Lady of Angels School. Carol Bender,Principal of OLA School was present and provided the Commission with a status report of her work in resolving parking issues on Cortez and Cabrillo. Ms. Bender presented a diagram showing the current traffic circulation and pointed out that the school has implemented the Commission's suggestions. She also said that they have added school personnel (8-10 teachers) each morning and afternoon to help direct traffic. Ms. Bender stated that she met with Mr. Chou the following Tuesday after the The City of Burlingame Page 2 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 Commission's February 10, 2005 meeting. He received a walk-through of the school grounds and had recommended to her to put in writing the plans currently in place at the school. Ms Bender is also recommending that the Commission examine the curb area on Cortez, specifically the white zones, and consider marking them as No Parking zones just during the morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up times in order to alleviate the congestion on Hillside. A final recommendation from Ms. Bender was that the Commission address all correspondence to her at the school address as opposed to the 1721 Hillside Address (parish address). Commissioner Condon asked Ms. Bender which of the Commissions recommendations were working for the school. Ms. Bender said that she thought all the recommendations were easy to implement and worked. School parents were notified of the changes via the school's bulletin, teachers had been asked to park on the Cabrillo side of the school, the school opened the upper yard which has allowed for additional parking, and the lower yard when students are not in the present area(during recess and lunch). Ms. Bender stated that most neighbors now seem happy, and Commissioner Condon acknowledged that resident complaints were minimal. Mr. Chou acknowledges that Public Works had not received any new complaints. Ms. Bender also recommended that the parking restrictions along the white zone of Cortez could be at 7:45 AM- 8:15 AM, and 2:45 PM - 3:15 PM. Mr. Chou recommended that the restrictions be from 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM, and 2:30 PM - 3:30 PM. Ken Lewis, a school board member has been present for several meetings with the school, and informed the council of a current implementation with cones during school events, which helped alleviate traffic problems in the neighborhood. Chair Warden closed with recommending that we move this item off the agenda, and thanked the school for working with the City and the Traffic Engineer. 5.2.2 Franklin School - Crosswalk enhancements at Trousdale Drive and Quesada Way Traffic Engineer Chou stated the Commission received a request from a representative of the Franklin School Traffic Safety Committee regarding additional enhancements to the crosswalk at Trousdale Drive and Quesada Way. This enhancement was to paint the existing crosswalk into a ladder-type crosswalk. Mr. Chou stated that staff was able to recommend additional measures on-site to help with safer traffic flows. However,he stated that for the crosswalk, staff did not recommend any additional painting for enhancement. Mr. Chou said that this intersection was already fully controlled by stop signs, on all approaches. He added that such enhanced crosswalks were usually reservedfor uncontrolled crosswalks where drivers would not expect to stop, or expect pedestrians. Mr. Chou concluded that the closest similar situation was at Carolan Avenue and North Lane, near Burlingame High School, but in that case, not all the approaches to the intersection were �— controlled. The City of Burlingame Page 3 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 Commissioner Cohen asked whether knockdown delineators could be used at this location. Mr. Chou advised that currently, the City only uses the delineators at the uncontrolled, lighted crosswalks such as at Stacks on California Drive,or at the Hyatt Hotel on Bayshore. Commissioner Conway asked Sgt. Shepley about enforcement at school crosswalk locations. Sgt. Shepley replied that the Police staff do send officers out to school sites to enforce speeds and crosswalks, but that due to the high demand at all the schools and the limited number of officers available, they can only patrol a few schools. Motion: To move the item to Action Item. M/S/C: Cohen, Condon, 5/0/0 Commissioner Cohen then made a motion to paint the existing crosswalk with a ladder-type enhancement and other enhancements such as reflectorized markers. There on was no second, so the motion did not carry. Commission Cohen said that he would advocate the formation of a sub-committee to look into setting design guidelines for crosswalk enhancements on a city-wide basis. Motion: To form a sub-committee to examine establishment of design guidelines for crosswalk enhancements city-wide. M/S/C: Cohen, Condon, 5/0/0 Chair Warden said that he felt the intersection should be considered for traffic signals. He asked if staff could conduct a signal warrant study. Motion: To authorize staff to conduct a traffic signal warrant study at the intersection at Trousdale Drive and Quesada Way. M/S/C: Warden, Condon, 5/0/0 5.2.3 Four-way stop -Howard Avenue and Crescent Avenue Traffic Engineer Chou updated the Commission by describing the intersection configuration as a four-way intersection with four crosswalks, but with only stop signs at Crescent Avenue. He stated that he observed some drivers slowing or stopping along the Howard Avenue approach because they see crosswalks and stops on the other approach. Or, the drivers on Crescent assuming that the driver on Howard has a stop, again because of the crosswalks. -� Mr. Chou said that a stop sign warrant study was done and revealed that there were no reported accidents for a 12 month to 24 month period. He also said that the intersection was The City of Burlingame Page 4 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 approximately half a block from a park on Crescent Avenue. He concluded that the crosswalks may have been installed because of the park. He said that staff could not recommend installation of a four-way stop because the warrant conditions were not met. Mr. Chou said that the typical solution would be to remove the crosswalks across the uncontrolled leg of Howard;however,that was the also the direction that all the pedestrians traveled to the park. Another option might be to enhance the driver's awareness of the crosswalk by informing the driver that just because the crosswalk is there they should not assume there is also a stop. Chair Warden asked if it were possible to have the sub-committee established for crosswalks at schools also look at crosswalks at parks. Commissioner Condon said that these crosswalks not only served the park (Pershing Park), but also the former school that used to be there (Pershing School). He added that he agreed with Chair Warden that it would be a good idea to have the sub-committee look at this situation as well. Chair Warden asked whether there were additional signs that warned drivers on Crescent that cross traffic did not stop or that the intersection was only a two-way stop. Mr. Chou said there were no such signs, but that it would be a good idea to consider them. Commissioner Conway said that he recognized that cars are driven quickly down Howard, which exacerbates the confusion problem for drivers on Cresent. He also wanted to Commissioner Condon asked if the City should look at whether the uncontrolled crosswalks across Howard are still needed since the school no longer exists. Mr. Chou indicated a pedestrian volume count would be a good way to find out about the demand for the crosswalk for the park. Motion: To move this to Action Item. M/S/C: Cohen, Condon, 5/0/0 Motion: Deny the original request for a four-way stop sign at Howard and Crescent Avenue. M/S/C: Cohen, Condon, 5/0/0 Motion: To do a pedestrian volume count at the intersection of Howard Avenue and Cresent Avenue and return to the Commission with results. M/S/C: Cohen, Condon, 5/0/0 The City of Burlingame Page 5 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 5.2.4 Blue zone removal - 1423 Paloma Avenue Mr. Chou explained that this item was brought up by a Commissioner at the last meeting. The space was no longer being used since the property was sold, and the curb paint has not been maintained or repainted by the City in a long time. He recommended removal of the zone. Motion: To move this to an Action Item. M/S/C: Condon, Cohen, 5/0/0 Motion: To remove the old, unused blue zone at 1423 Paloma Avenue. M/S/C: Condon, Cohen, 5/0/0 5.2.5 Three-way stop signs -Ray Drive and Lassen Way Traffic Engineer Chou explained that the City received a letter requesting stop signs at the intersection of Ray Drive and Lassen Way. He reported that a stop sign warrant study was conducted and the intersection did not meet the minimum warrant requirements. Mr. Chou stated that there have been no accidents at this intersection and the traffic volume counts were below the warrant requirements. He stated that based on these results, staff could not recommend stop sign installation. But, staff did recommend the installation of ladder-type crosswalks and replacement of old "School Crossing" signs with new florescent signs, as well as the installation of additional arrow placards with the new signs warning drivers of the crosswalk at that location. He added that staff also recommended the installation of a new centerline along eastbound Ray Drive and repainting of the existing centerline for westbound Ray Drive to create a visual and narrowing effect which would slow drivers at the intersection. Commissioner Warden stated that there are similar situations at Quesada, Montecorveno, Coronado, and Marco Polo. He said that these areas also feed off the schools and suggested looking"globally" at this entire situation. Commissioner Cohen felt that there was a "blind" zone and that the fence heights also needed to be looked at since children are no higher than the fences themselves. Traffic Engineer Chou stated that the drivers needed to be adequately warned of the crosswalk, and from a technical point, the City needed to show consistency when dealing with similar situations, i.e., use of signs, lineators, markers, or paint at crosswalks near schools. Commissioner Conway asked that to increase visibility at the corner, could the existing red zone be repainted and extended farther to provide additional visibility at the corner. The City of Burlingame Page 6 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 Commissioner Cohen stated that he observed children coming from the alley along the picket fence, and that they were coming out from behind vehicles that are parked there. He added that on the other side of the street, large vehicles contributed to drivers not seeing the children in the crosswalks. Theresa Post spoke and requested stop signs because to poor visibility at the intersection due to parked trucks or vans at this intersection. She also said that the street bends and pedestrians are forced to walk ten feet into the intersection before they can see cars approaching. Ms.Post suggested being pro-active in creating a safer intersection at Ray and Lassen. She said that everyone should we look at this intersection as an extension of the school crossing at Devereux, one block away. George Atkinson said he did not believe stop signs alone were a valuable solution. He stated that he would like to see stop signs or a device(knockdown delineators)used to draw the driver's eyes to the level of the children, as well as repainting the curb red for better visibility on the corner. Jim Vangeles spoke and wanted to know if a pedestrian traffic count was done during the warm weather. He said that during the summer days and the summer evenings,there would be more children running across Lassen and Ray Drive. Mr. Vangeles said that stop signs would be of benefit to the neighborhood; and,that while they might not stop, drivers would at least slow down upon approaching the stop sign. Commissioner Cohen recommended this matter be looked at further by the sub-committee, which was established tonight and was tasked with reviewing school crosswalk conditions city-wide. He also said that he would support a move to also look at restricting parking at the corners during certain times. Commissioner Condon questioned whether imposing a parking restriction during certain times would be negatively impact the residents. He suggested that they be notified should the Commission choose to take action. Otherwise, this item should be continued as a discussion item or an item that would be inactive pending the sub-committee's evaluation. 5.2.6 Occidental Avenue-Temporary removal of 2-hr parking restrictions: 6-month final review. Mr. Chou explained that this was the six-month review for the parking situation on Occidental Avenue. Some residents support the removal of the 2-hour limit on a permanent basis, and others support the reinstatement of the limitations. Commissioner Condon commented that perhaps there should be a next phase of this experimental parking test. He suggested the 300 block of Occidental between Chapin and Ralston have no limit parking, and reinstate the 2-hour parking limit for the rest of the street. �. Frank Kelly stated that he has had no problems since the restriction was temporarily lifted and supported the permanent removal. Theresa Bain stated that she has had problems and The City of Burlingame Page 7 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 would like the restriction returned. Clarence Metcalfe stated that the rest of Occidental seemed to still have problems but that the people on the west side of the 300 block seemed not. Commissioner Cohen suggested that maybe the Commission should consider returning the limit back to the rest of the street, but exclude the west side of the 300 block. Motion: To move this to an Action Item. M/S/C: Cohen, James, 5/0/0 Motion: To reinstall 2-hour parking limit signs all along Occidental Avenue from Ralston Avenue to Floribunda Avenue for a six-month period; and, to exclude reinstallation of the signs on the west side of the 300 block of Occidental Avenue. M/S/C: Condon, Cohen, 5/0/0 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW ITEMS None 7. FROM THE FLOOR None 8. INFORMATION ITEMS 8.1 Bicycle Safety Issues in Burlingame None. 8.1.1 Funding application for Transportation Development Act(TDA)Article 3 projects Mr. Chou reported that two out of the three City's TDA applications scored high enough to receive approval and funding. The third application may still be funded if the City of Daly City receives additional funding from another grant source. Mr. Chou added that the City should be able to obligate funding for the two approved projects by July 1, 2005. Commissioners Warden and Condon expressed their gratitude to Traffic Engineer Chou and Senior Planner Maureen Brooks for their hard work and efforts with these projects. The City of Burlingame Page 8 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 8.2 From Staff to Commission 8.2.1 Traffic Engineer's Report Mr. Chou stated that at the March 7 City Council meeting, the Council heard from Public Works staff about a situation regarding the proposed removal of a large eucalyptus tree at Easton Drive and Cabrillo Avenue. The Council referred the matter to the Commission to conduct a technical evaluation in regards to traffic volumes and roadway reconfiguration. Mr. Chou also said that the final report of the Burlingame Downtown Parking Study was almost complete. He added that the parking consultant would have the final report ready for distribution by mid April. He said that the Commission should set up a public hearing so that the consultant could present the findings of the report. 8.2.2 Comments and communication Sergeant Shepley reported that staffing at the Police Department was down, resulting in a drop in enforcement duties. He clarified that three of his officers are on long term injury disability, and Parking Enforcement Officer Julie Davis was transferred to Central County Fire. Sgt. Shepley said that on the positive side,two new officers were in training and they hoped to be on duty by May. Regarding the towing of non-operative vehicles and "For Sale" signs on vehicles, Sgt. Shepley said that Code Enforcement Officer Sue Harris was working with this. 8.3 From Commission to Staff 8.3.1 Reports of citizen complains or requests None. 8.3.2 Comments and communication The Commission determined that two sub-committees should be formed to look into the school crosswalks issue and the Easton eucalyptus tree issue. Commissioners Condon and Conway would steer the school crosswalk sub-committee and Commissioners Cohen and Warden would steer the eucalyptus tree sub-committee. 8.3.3 Next Meeting: April 14, 2005 Mr. Chou stated that he would be absent for this meeting due to a conference. The City of Burlingame Page 9 TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Unapproved Thursday, March 10, 2005 ..1 9. INACTIVE ITEMS 9.1 Mahler Road - Height and overnight parking restrictions Mr. Chou explained that this item would be reviewed again by the Commission after the 120-day period. 10. AGENDIZED FOR THE NEXT MEETING -APRIL 14, 2005 • 5.2.2 -Trousdale Drive/Quesada Way(Inactive Item: pending sub-committee study) • 5.2.3 -Howard Avenue/Crescent Avenue (Inactive Item: pending pedestrian count study) • 5.2.5 -Ray Drive/Lassen Way(Inactive Item: pending sub-committee study) 11. ADJOURNMENT Motion: To adjourn. M/S/C: Warden, Condon, 5/0/0 8:57 p.m. SAA Public Works Directory\TSP Commission\Minutes\2005 Minutesl3-10-05 Minutes.wpd The City of Burfingame Page 10 BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION April 7, 2005 Chairperson Hesselgren called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Hesselgren, Commissioners Carney, Grandcolas, Lauder, and McQuaide Absent: Commissioners O'Connor and Webb Staff: Parks Superintendent Richmond, Supervisor Disco, Secretary Harvey Guests: Shari &Dennis Mayer(812 Laurel), Kevin Kielty(Mayne Tree Expert Co.),Mike Stallings (1512 Alturas) MINUTES The minutes of the March 3,2005 Beautification Commission meeting were approved as submitted. CORRESPONDENCE Planning Department Tree List for Residential Design Guidelines. City Ordinance 25.6 1, Additions to or Modifications of Residences in Hillside Areas. Letter to Shari Mayer, 812 Laurel Avenue, informing her that her appeal of the denial to remove a City owned Liquidambar tree in front of her address, would be placed on the agenda of the April 7t'Beautification Commission meeting. FROM THE FLOOR- There were no comments from the floor. Chairperson Hesselgren changed the order of the Agenda to accommodate the appellants requesting the removal of the City owned Liquidambar tree at 812 Laurel Avenue. NEW BUSINESS - Appeal of the Denial to Remove a City-owned Liquidambar Tree (aDD 812 Laurel Avenue — Park Supervisor Disco submitted the Tree Evaluation for the Liquidambar at 812 Laurel Avenue and stated that the tree is approximately 30 years old and is planted in a 3-4 foot planter strip; the tree suffered some storm damage in 2002; the sidewalk and curb have been damaged by roots and roots extend into the appellants front lawn. He stated that the request for removal was denied because the tree is healthy, trimming can improve the tree's appearance, and root pruning can be done at the time the sidewalk and curb are replaced. Chairperson Hesselgren asked what the life span is of Liquidambar trees and if and where root barriers could be placed. Supervisor Disco stated the Liquidambar's life span is approximately 60 years and root barriers could be placed on the homeowner's side of the sidewalk. Chairperson Hesselgren asked Supervisor Disco to elaborate on the type of pruning that could be done to improve the trees appearance. Supervisor Disco stated that the tree is lopsided and needs to be balanced, lowered, and shaped. Commissioner Lauder stated that she noted that there are no power lines above. Chairperson Hesselgren then asked the appellants for their comments. 1 Appeal of the Denial to Remove a City-owned Liquidambar Tree(a-,) 812 Laurel Avenue— (Contd.) Mr. Mayer stated that during heavy rains, and because the street elevation is higher in front of the house, water floods the gutter causing the water to run through the crack in the expansion gap, subsequently flooding his backyard. He stated that they are planning to relandscape and have discussed the tree and the flooding problem with Public Works. He was informed that the water table is high in this area and that the street needs to be leveled where the roots extend into the street. The sidewalk was replaced in 1991 but needs to be replaced again. Mr. Mayer concluded that if he needs to do all this work at his expense, he does not wish to address these issues again. They requested that the tree be removed so they can begin to address the sidewalk and gutter repairs but Public Works referred them to the Parks &Recreation Department to discuss the tree removal. Chairperson Hesselgren stated that the cost to repair the sidewalk and gutter does not seem extreme and curving the sidewalk around the tree along with the placement of root barriers could resolve future root problems. Commissioner Grandcolas stated that the water and the flooding is the larger problem; is this caused because of the slope of the street or is it caused by the damage caused by the tree roots? He added that something should be done to prevent the flooding that occurs in the front yard and the back yard but he questions as to whether the tree is the main cause of the flooding. Commissioner McQuaide stated that she owns property on Linden Avenue; during heavy rains, flooding occurs all the way up to the back steps of the house. She stated she questions whether removal of the tree would greatly affect the flooding in the area. Following further discussions with regard to flooding in the area, Commissioner Grandcolas moved that the Commission receive further input from Public Works as to whether the tree is causing the flooding or if the street grade is the cause; seconded, Lauder. Motion carried 5 - 0 — 2 (absent). Item will be placed on the April 7`f' agenda. Superintendent Richmond will contact Victor Voong of the Public Works Department for further information. OLD BUSINESS — Easton Drive Eucalyptus Trees - Review of Visual Survey (Kevin Kielty, Certified Arborist/Mayne Tree) from El Camino Real to Vancouver Avenue - Chairperson Hesselgren thanked Kevin Kielty for meeting with the Commission to discuss the visual survey. Mr. Kielty stated that he appreciates that the City of Burlingame continues to take care of their trees even in these difficult economic times. He stated that he performed maintenance work on the Eucalyptus trees 25 years ago and has observed over the years how they have been very well cared for. Chairperson Hesselgren noted from the survey that most of the trees condition are listed from 50-69% and asked what that rating meant. Mr. Kielty stated those percentages indicates that those trees are in fair condition. Mr. Kielty stated that no one really knows the life span. The Eucalyptus specie was brought to this country from Australia in the 1700-1800's. The Eucalyptus trees on El Camino exist in smaller planting areas and have been pruned inadequately over the years. This has caused decay and problems with those trees. However, the grove of Eucalyptus trees on Easton Drive have been planted in very large planter areas, have been maintained well, and are in no worse condition than they were 20 years ago; continued quality maintenance on the trees could allow the trees to live another 20-40 years. Chairperson Hesselgren asked Mr. Kielty to explain the cabling on some of the trees and his suggestions for maintenance on the trees. Mr. Kielty stated that cabling has been done on trees that have a poor crotch formation; as the trees get larger those formations can push themselves apart. Cabling has about a 20 year life span and will keep weight off the leverage. Mr. Kielty suggested that the trees have a visual inspection every October. He stated that this can be conducted by City staff; inspections should focus on heavy limbs, heavy sail, etc. and should identify those trees that may need further inspection. 2 Easton Drive Eucalyptus Trees - Review of Visual Survey (Kevin Kielty, Certified Arborist/Mayne Tree) from El Camino Real to Vancouver Avenue— (Contd.) Superintendent Richmond asked what an estimated cost of cabling might be. Mr. Kielty stated that with a bucket truck, the cost would be about $300-$400 per cable; those that are not currently cabled should be trimmed and then cabled at the time of trimming. Chairperson Hesselgren asked when drill testing would be recommended. He stated that the Eucalyptus at 1800 Easton Drive was drill tested, but drill testing is typically recommended for trees that have mushrooms growing or suspected root problems. Long Range Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive/Discussion - Commissioner Lauder noted that there are only 5 trees that have been identified in the 50%category. Mr. Kielty stated that anything below 50% should be removed and cited conditions for that rating would be thin foliar canopies, cavities in trunks, root issues, and fungi growing on the root crown or trunk;those that are leaning should be removed first. Commissioner Lauder then asked what types of trees could be planted in areas where Eucalyptus trees once existed. Mr. Kielty said planting areas on Easton Drive seem to have little debris and that Redwoods, Deodar Cedars and others could be considered. Redwood trees don't fall down and have low maintenance requirements. He stated shade is not an issue because the existing trees are well spaced but that proper irrigation to initially establish the trees would be important. Chairperson Hesselgren asked if trees can be planted before removal occurs, is there enough room for the new tree roots to grow. Mr. Kielty stated "Yes", because the existing trees are well spaced. Commissioner Carney asked what would be the recommended planting size of the new tree. Mr. Kielty suggested that a 24" box size tree would be appropriate and the easiest to plant. Chairperson Hesselgren asked if there is a risk to planting new trees first before conducting the removals. Mr. Kielty responded that there would be no risk if those identified for removal were removed within the next 5-10 years. Chairperson Hesselgren asked Mr. Kielty what the evaluation does not tell. Mr. Kielty stated that the report is based on a "visual" inspection only; decays could possibly found up in the canopy and what's under the ground is unknown. But, when the trees are trimmed by the contractor, an assessment of the canopies and the overall condition of each tree can be made at that time. He concluded that generally, this stand of Eucalyptus trees look as good as any Eucalyptus trees that size that he has ever worked on. Chairperson Hesselgren thanked Mr. Kielty for reviewing his report with the Commission. Commissioner Grandcolas excused himself from the meeting and left at 6:45 pm. Tree View Ordinance— Committee Recommendation— Commissioner McQuaide stated that the Committee met and reviewed the information presented at last months meeting. Although the Committee acknowledges there is not a mechanism in place to protect long views, it is recommending that the Commission not promote an ordinance because there has not been a lot of public response to warrant a tree view ordinance. She added that research of other cities shows that an ordinance can become a burden. Previous attempts have become a"can of worms". The Committee believes the appropriate path for residents seeking view restoration (when the view is being blocked by a City tree)can be appealed to the Beautification Commission if denied by City staff. After a brief discussion, the Commission decided to table the item to the next meeting for further review of the Committee's recommendation. Chairperson Hesselgren then asked Mr. Stallings if he had any comments for the Commission. 3 Tree View Ordinance— Committee Recommendation— (Contd.) Mr. Stallings asked how many people does it take? He stated that he has been representing his neighbors rather than fill the room with people. A petition was submitted from another applicant with the same concerns, and the point of establishing an ordinance would be for the protection of long views. Chairperson Hesselgren thanked Mr. Stallings for his comments and told him to feel free to "fill the room" with people at the next Commission meeting. OLD BUSINESS Street Tree Removal Policy — Superintendent Richmond stated the Commission was asked to review the Criteria for City Street Tree Removal form and establish policy. He clarified that this policy is only for trees where there are sidewalk repair issues. Supervisor Disco commented that he has begun to use the form and believes it is a good start and changes can be made if necessary. Chairperson Hesselgren stated that she thought the form was very helpful. Commissioner Carney stated the form is concise and to the point and encompasses everything that is needed to determine justifiable removals and moved that the Commission accept the draft for the Criteria for Street Tree Removal policy; seconded, Lauder. Motion carried 4—0—3(absent). REPORTS— Superintendent Richmond- 1. Parks Division is in the process of hiring a Tree Maintenance Worker. Worker will likely be on duty by mid April. 2. Compost give away occurred last Saturday at the BHS parking lot;next distribution will be on May 7 in the same location. Quality of the compost is improving. 3. Adopt-a-Planter group plants the boxes on Burlingame Ave. this weekend. 4. Commission is scheduled to meet with Council before its May meeting. 5. Newspaper article about Bobbi Benson incorrectly stated that the Parks Division had gone from 21 to 7 workers. In fact, we were reduced by 7 workers, and are currently replacing one of the seven. 6. 25-30 Accolade Elms on Barroilhet between Brewer and Hillsborough Blvd. are beginning to leaf out. This is the variety that Jen Pfaff asked the Commission to consider adding to the planting list. Please look at them before the next meeting. 7. A Red Maple will be planted in the Back Park(WP)by Girl Scouts in honor of Burlingame resident and supporter. 8. Mr. Stallings of Alturas Drive submitted a request to have the City trees on La Mesa,which block his "long view,"reduced to restore his view. Lauder — Commissioner Lauder stated she was pleased to see more Redwood trees planted at Bayside Park during Arbor Day ceremonies and she enjoyed the children's original poems. Commissioner Lauder asked why the private Camphor tree at 712 Burlingame Avenue was removed. Administrative Secretary Harvey reported that the tree was multi-trunked, the root mass had significantly damaged the driveway and was very close to a support beam on the balcony of the house. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 7:10 pm. Respectfully submitted, Karlene Harvey Recording Secretary 4 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road,Burlingame, CA April 11, 2005 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Osterling called the April 11, 2005, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Keighran, Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: None Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Catherine Barber; City Attorney,Larry Anderson. III. MINUTES The minutes of the March 28, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. CP Monroe noted desk items received today at desk for item #1, 934 Paloma Avenue and #3a, 1408 Columbus Avenue. V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. VI. STUDY ITEMS 1. 934 PALOMA AVENUE, ZONED R-2 — APPLICATION FOR SIDE AND REAR SETBACK VARIANCES AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DIRECT EXIT FROM A BASEMENT FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JOHN MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT, ALINE BIER, PROPERTY OWNER)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Chair Osterling confirmed that all Commissioners had made site visits for all items being considered this evening. CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: • Drawings should clearly show location of sewer line and clarify all easements; • Extensive orchard of fruit trees on this property, applicant is 75 years old would like to know how orchard developed, could be reason for a variance; • Plans should clearly show relationship of rear property line to dwelling; • Are there other units on the rear property line in this neighborhood?; • Who owns easement at the rear?; • Would like clarification from Chief Building Official whether or not you can have an egress window on property line in this circumstance?; �-- • Can plans be revised to clearly delineate where side setback ends and rear setback begins; City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 11, 2005 • If this project is approved would like to see two conditions added: 1)no new square footage can be added without Planning Commission review;2)the opening between the living and the study must remain open,without a door, so that it can not become a bedroom in the future; • Don't see orchard as a hardship,it is a short term reason for a variance where a variance to construct is long term,what happens if orchard goes away and the Planning Commission granted as variance based upon something that is no longer there?; • Applicant should identify the hardship on this property, need hardship on the property to grant a variance; • Like the way the property is being used but is there a way to accommodate applicant's needs without so many exceptions to the zoning code; • Unique shape of this lot and the fact that there is no one immediately behind the property are unusual circumstance that could be justification for variance; • Because of the importance to this project and use of the site, need to provide a construction tree protection plan for all trees on the site, even for fruit trees; • What will cellar be used for, how will interior be finished?; and • Does 1,435 SF FAR total include the garage? This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:16 p.m. 2. 2750 ADELINE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A REMODEL AND ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SCHOOL GYM (LAURA HELD, PRINCIPAL, MERCY HIGH SCHOOL, APPLICANT; DES —• ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, ARCHITECT; MERCY HIGH SCHOOL, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report noting that because of the addition to the gym/pool area this use permit would include the entire Mercy School site; this information will be added when the item returns to the Planning Commission. Commissioners asked: • There is a path on this property that Sisters of Mercy allows the public to use, on sheet C2.1 annotated with location of wood path, will this path be disturbed? Please put note on the plans to ensure path will not be impacted; • Would like to see a tree protection plan during construction,should be limited to high school portion of the site; • Architecture and color scheme of the gym seems outdated,should consider making it more attractive and updated when doing this work. This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:23 p.m. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 11,2005 3A. 1408 COLUMBUS AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE FOR A FIRST FLOOR REMODEL AND ADDITION AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE(SHEILA YOUNG,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;JAMES CHU,CHU DESIGN&ENGR.,INC., DESIGNER)(63 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN 3B. 1440 DRAKE AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A NEW,TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (EDITH AND TONY LEUNG, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;JAMES CHU,CHU DESIGN&ENGR.,INC.,DESIGNER)(69 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:CATHERINE BARBER 3C. 1530 DRAKE AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(MARTIN AND THERESA DILLON,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD&ASSOCIATES,DESIGNER,)(49 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN Chair Osterling asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. C.Keighran noted that she would recuse herself from action on item#3c.1530 Drake Avenue because she lives within 500 feet of the project site. C.Deal noted that he would also recuse himself from action on item#3c.1530 Drake Avenue because of a business relationship with the property owner. C.Cauchi noted that he would recuse himself from action on all three consent items#3a-c.because he was not on the Planning Commission when these items were reviewed for design review study. C.Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report,commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C.Vistica. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion and item#3a.1408 Columbus passed 6-0-1(C.Cauchi abstaining);item#3b.1440 Drake Avenue passed 6-0-1(C.Cauchi abstaining);and item#3c.1530 Drake Avenue passed 4-0-3(Cers.Cauchi,Keighran and Deal abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM There were no regular action items for review IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 4. 1329 DE SOTO AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT AND DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A NEW,TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(CON BROSNAN,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MARK ROBERTSON, DESIGNER) (64 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Cers.Auran and Osterling noted that they would recuse themselves from action on this item because they both live within 500 feet of the project site. They left the dais and the Council Chambers. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 11, 2005 Plr. Barber briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Mark Robertson, 918 E. Grant Place, San Mateo, project designer. Noted that this is another development of Con Bronsnan's. He just finished a house at 1449 Cabrillo Avenue and had several bids on the house, is requesting to build basically the same house at this location. The original house was taken and modified, added wrap around deck; this house sit on a berm 12 feet above average top of curb elevation, thought that the porch would reduce mass. Special permits for height and declining height envelope are because of the slope on the lot. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. The Commission had the following comments and concerns: • Will columns be turned or square, please call out and make plans consistent; • Make sure window in bedroom #3 meets egress requirements; • Some windows sizes shown incorrectly, one size shown on plan, different size shown on elevation, please make consistent; • On east elevation roof is cut-off, section shows curve; either 1) apply for variance to finish roof; or 2) run roof off and back again with shingles; • Would like the height of proposed house in relations to the two adjacent; on this show finished floor of existing house; • Section at the driveway profile should be looked at closer; looks like there is a 5 foot difference from finished grade to finished floor elevations, then on the east elevation at the front, there is a 2'8" dimension from grade to the finished floor; why is there this difference; please clarify; want to make sure that the building won't look taller than it is drawn; • Nice massing and articulation at the rear, need to carry that over to the front and look at reducing the mass; the rear being more articulated than the front is opposite of what we like to see; • The mass is pulled forward, try to diminish the second story massing; • Want windows treatment upgraded, this design needs true divided light windows, not simulated; • Every other house on this block has stucco, this house has wood siding, but it does fit the design of the house; • Clearly call out type of windows and window trim and siding on plan; • Need to re-examine landscape plan, new big house needs larger scale trees, add two large trees in front of the house; • Cypress in the front doesn't seem appropriate, talk to landscape architect about a better option; • Driveway side has a solid block wall with ivy, try to keep soft condition, look at planting vines or something to grow in front, up and along the wall. C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the above revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Comment on motion: overall good job; nice design, will blend in well with wrap around porch, will add character; house to the north is single story, house to he south is 3 stories and will be 2 or 3 feet taller; porch is nice. Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (Cers. Auran and Osterlinj abstaining). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 7:45 p.m. 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 11, 2005 Cers. Auran and Osterling returned to the Council Chambers and took their seats in the dais. 5. 1109 BALBOA AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (IRENE AND FRANKIE GONZALEZ, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (72 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Plr.Barber briefly presented the proj ect description. Commissioner asked what on the porch counts in floor area and what is exempt? Staff noted that just the covered portion of the porch in the center counts in floor area,but is eligible for up to a 100 SF exemption. Sides are uncovered and do not count in floor area. There were no further questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Frank Gonzalez,property owner, 1109 Balboa Avenue, and Randy Whitney of JD &Associates were present to answer questions. Noted that they have two children and moved to Burlingame for the schools, lived in Burlingame Gables before moving to west side of El Camino Real,wanted to live in this neighborhood and raise family. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. The Planning Commission had the following comments and concerns: • Upper deck at the back of the house is not mirror of deck at the front of the house;stucco deck at the rear, and wood railing deck at the front, should be consistent, make back deck as elegant as front deck; • Discourage using solid stucco for front porch and upper deck; • Concerned with flower box off of master bedroom on west elevation,will become a maintenance �-- problem;if nothing is in there it will be a big stucco box;looks like box will be difficult to access for watering and planting,will they have to lean out of window?;if it is not able or intend to maintained regularly then just eliminate the planter box; • Front elevation is busy,house has a lot of mass and bulk at the front, not consistent throughout; • House is only 3 SF under the maximum floor area allowed; big house on a small lot; bring down floor area number or articulate better so it doesn't look so big; • Show how this house relates to adjacent houses on an elevation drawing; • Consider French doors out to front porch,will make it more usable and inviting; and • Add large scale trees at the front to create screening and separation from neighbors. C.Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the above revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on motion: roof is articulated well,steps down to second story;articulated nicely at the front,but busy; need to either maintain planter box or eliminate; several comments made tonight,need to make sure that the changes are what the Commission is looking for because project can be pulled off of the consent calendar if changes aren't made; very large house need to reduce size or articulate more. Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:03 p.m. C. Deal returned to the Council Chambers and took his seat on the dais. 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 11, 2005 6. 2509 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION (DANIEL BIERMANN, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; JOSHUA AND KIMBERLY GRATCH, PROPERTY OWNERS) (60 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Pier. Barber briefly presented the project description. Commissioner asked if staff has a drawing of the south elevations. Staff noted that it was on sheet A8. Commission asked if this project was subject to a hillside area construction permit. Staff stated that the subject property is not located within the designated hillside area and does not need a hillside area construction permit. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Dan Biermann, 1649 Laurel Street, San Carlos, project designer,was present to answer questions. Existing second floor constructed 20 to 30 years ago,stands on its own,tried to design second floor addition to blend in with the house, craftsman style The Planning Commission had the following comments and concerns: • Existing family room window on first floor, north elevation is being removed, will create a dark room,may want to reconsider; • Windows on the second floor are different in size and shape than the windows on the first floor; mullions are different, feels uncomfortable; • Left side nicely broken up but right side is just a long,tall wall;consider pursuing special permit for declining height envelope in order to break up right side to add architectural detailing; • Second floor,south elevation,don't want to match existing wall that doesn't look good,massing on this side is a problem, special permit for declining height envelope would add character; and • Need to articulate right side second floor wall; it adds to the massing that is already there; • Not that concerned with right side because there is a 6' fence and an 8' setback on that side,what about adding planting along that side, sheet A.1 shows no landscaping there now; • Existing second storyjumps out,what is being proposed is good but needs taller trees to soften,need landscaping to blend with vertical elements of design; large screening needs to grow 35' or more, need a landscape architect to select species and location; front, left and right elevations need screening added; • Second floor,north elevation has 3 shutters with 2 windows,looks odd,not comfortable,relationship is awkward, shutters not consistent throughout; • Second floor, east elevation,on the left where gables meet looks odd,no transition or difference in plane, long wall, doesn't work well; and • Knee braces don't make a craftsman, opportunity on right side to articulate, should be a shed roof doesn't have to be a gable. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. C. Osterling made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Osterling called for a vote on the motion to refer this project to a design reviewer. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:26 p.m. 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 11, 2005 7. 1524 VANCOUVER AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(GARY PARTEE,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; CHU DESIGN & ENGR., INC., DESIGNER) (66 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Cers. Keighran and Brownrigg noted that they would recuse themselves from action on this item because they both live within 500 feet of the project site. They left the dais and the Council Chambers. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. James Chu, designer, 39 W. 43rd Avenue, San Mateo, represented the project. Patricia Anderson, 1521 Vancouver,Janice Bokekus, 1511 Vancouver,Elizabeth Corkran, 1515 Vancouver, also spoke. He noted that the height of the house was affected by the fact that the top of curb was 5 feet lower than the finished floor;from adjacent grade the house is 25 feet tall. This is a house design built elsewhere which was very popular so the developer has made some modifications to the floor plan and entry,but reproduced basically the same house. This house sits on the same foot print as the house being removed. Commissioners noted that it was a nice design,was an asset to the neighborhood, style a little boxy but the design leaves a lot of yard space which is good. Neighbor comments: height is measured from the curb, and this house because of the rise is going to look taller than its one story,flat roofed Spanish styled neighbors;this house is a big rectangle with a tall peaked roof,it will loom over the street;attractive Colonial but will not fit in with the existing Spanish style of that side of the street;if declining height were not exceeded the project would not be such a problem,submitted a `-- picture of a house on Balboa built within the declining height and stepped back on one side;would like the street trees to be Red Horse Chestnut to match the ones across the street. This street is a charming cul-de- sac,the new proposal is inconsistent with the exiting street of Tudor or Mediterranean,it is set on a hill with two lower houses on each site which will increase the sense of its size,will take 7 months to build so will occur at same time the water meters are being replaced, too much construction on the street at once, can meter change over be delayed? Concerns are that the style does not fit because it is not in keeping with the predominant style in the area, concerned about the height because the lot is elevated, this is a tight neighborhood,would like the structure to be consistent with the spirit of the neighborhood. There were no further comments from the floor. The public comment was closed. Commission comments: understand concerns about the consistency of style where there are a few Spanish style houses in a row, this design is a good job, the style is consistent within the design, there are similar houses on the block across the street, the design leaves more yard; there are a peppering of Colonials throughout the city,no block is all Colonial,not unusual to see mix,this area is in transition to larger houses, design review is intended to make the new fit,this is a good example of what this block is trying to be. Commission identified the following items to be addressed: • Balcony at the rear is a little massive for this style of house, should be reduced; • The chimney at the rear is too massive, 5 feet wide at the top, should be reduced; • Tree 3E in the rear should be a taller tree,like a Bradford Pear,and on the left side the vines between the windows should be replaced with a narrow crown tree to provide a screen for the neighbors; • Right side windows are a little small could get a little bigger to add more light to the second floor; • Add some articulation on the left side of the house; and 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April ll,2005 • Revise street trees,consider street tree list including Bradford Pear or Grecian Laurel because they are tall and fast growing,or even Sycamore,landscape architect should recommend. C.Deal moved to place this item on the consent calendar when the issues identified by the commission had been addressed. The motion was seconded by C.Auran. Comment on the motion: the neighborhood is eclectic,the mix of styles is one of the most pleasurable aspects of Burlingame,there is a Colonial down the street;not easy to approve a house so close to the maximum FAR,it is relatively large given what is there,however through the design review process we have come a long way in terms of quality of design,neighbors need to appreciate that. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to place this project on the consent calendar after the revisions have been made and checked by staff. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers.Brownrigg and Keighran abstaining).The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. Chair noted that the neighbors would be noticed when this item returns for action,and if they continued to have concerns they could ask for a hearing at that time. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m. Cers.Brownrigg and Keighran returned to the Council Chambers and dais. 8. 1021 CORTEZ AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (FARSHID SAMSAMI, APPLICANT;SAMUEL KWONG,ARCHITECT;KWANG PAK,PROPERTY OWNER)(46 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Sam Kwong,architect,445 Grant Avenue,San Francisco, represented the project.Andrew Stypa,1045 Cortez. Applicant noted that the new design increases the yard area and moves the garage to the rear where it cannot be seen from the street;added stone veneer,horizontal siding,wooden brackets on roof line,recessed upper floor for less massing on front and sides, lot of articulation on ground level with bay windows,planters,balconies;new landscaping with fruit trees,shrubs and ground cover,long established neighborhood,try to blend in. Like the garage pushed back but don't like the front,should change the window treatment with molding and window. There were no further comments from the floor.The public comment was closed. Commissioners comments: • Style fits,detailing is the problem e.g.proportion and detail do not work; • 14 foot wide garage door will not accommodate two cars; • East elevation lacks interest,where is the front door,needs a porch,front looks like the rear of the house,prominence needs to be added; • left and rear projections,one on right is very small given size of one on left; • Window in stair is too large,needs to be reduced a lot; • Fireplace with stone and wood chimney does not work well,step back is too shallow; • 12 inch hardi plank siding is very large for this vertical house,need to reduce would increase the character; • Dormer and window at stairwell do not work; • West elevation projection and planter don't work; 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes April 11, 2005 • Plate heights are too tall, usually 9 feet on first floor and 8 feet on second; • 2x6 trim is pretty big, 1 x4 would work better; • Window sill treatment would be better wrapped with trim, increase texture and detail; • Balcony does not fit, the detail rail and upper part do not fit the style of the house; • South elevation, setback of second floor too little, looks awkward, should be increased; • Driveway is good, increases separation between houses; • Move balcony to rear, on side not right, see right into neighbor's yard; • Need good windows, wood frame, will still look good in 50 years; and • Concerned about landscaping, all small scale including fruit trees, need trees with height, can plant dwarf fruit trees elsewhere if wish, but need height to screen second floor at front and rear. C. Vistica noted that this was a good start, it is the right choice of style, but should be referred to the design reviewer for detail and massing. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on the motion: It's a good house, not sure needs to go to design reviewer, architect could try his hand at correction; think better not to search, but to provide guidance when a project has this number of issues, particularly if architect not familiar with detailing and proportion for this particular style this is the reason for design review. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to refer this project to a design reviewer. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C. Brownrigg dissenting) voice vote. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m. X. PLANNER REPORTS - Review of City Council regular meeting of April 4, 2005. CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of April 4, 2005. CP noted that the project at 220 California has been appealed. The hearing was set by City Council for April 18, 2005. - FYI: Revisions to an approved design review project at 1341 Laguna Avenue, zoned R-1. Planning Commission reviewed the staff memo which noted that on Planning inspection a window had been removed in the master bedroom and none of the windows included the mullions as shown on the approved plans. Commissioners noted that the applicant was aware that these items were changes from the approved plans but did not come to the commission to discuss prior to making the changes. Chair Osterling made a motion that this item return to the Planning Commission for a public hearing. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. The Building Division's final inspection will not be completed until the Commission has ruled on these changes. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chair Osterling adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Michael Brownrigg, Secretary S:\MINUTES\unapproved.04.11.05.doc 9 CITY OF BURLINGAME BUILDING INSPECTION MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY MARCH, 2005 F.Y. 2004 F.Y. 2003 SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF TO DATE TO DATE DIFF Permit type # Valuation # Valuation % # Valuation # Valuation % New Single Family 0 $0 1 $487, 000 100 . 0- 15 $5, 559, 767 8 $3 , 366, 560 65 . 1 New Multi-Family 0 $0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 0 $0 . 0 New Commercial 0 $0 0 $0 . 0 1 $1, 200, 000 2 $2 , 500, 000 52 . 0- Alterations-Res 53 $2 , 536, 605 30 $1, 875, 218 35 .3 260 $11, 847, 266 248 $12, 395, 301 4 .4- Alterations-NonRes 8 $152, 580 11 $1, 399, 500 89 . 1- 74 $8 , 374, 821 62 $7, 642, 750 9 . 6 Demolition 2 $450, 000 10 $0 . 0 32 $487, 500 51 $120, 800 303 . 6 Swimming Pool 3 $83 , 800 0 $0 . 0 3 $83 , 800 3 $80, 000 4 . 8 Sign Permits 3 $19, 000 3 $10, 000 90 . 0 25 $83 , 532 24 $97, 865 14 . 6- Fences 0 $0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 2 $9, 500 100 . 0- Reroofing 14 $118, 120 22 $276, 566 57 . 3- 193 $2, 419, 930 233 $2, 552 , 874 5 .2- Repairs 0 $0 4 $44, 800 100 . 0- 23 $287, 704 30 $338, 650 15 . 0- Window Repl 6 $48 , 311 4 $48, 500 .4- 46 $398 , 741 69 $678 , 528 41.2- Miscellaneous 4 $18, 529 2 $86, 100 78 . 5- 19 $292, 334 22 $329 , 501 11 .3- TOTALS . . . . . . 93 $3 , 426, 945 87 $4, 227, 684 18 . 9- 691 $31, 035, 395 754 $30, 112 , 329 3 . 1 4/01/05 8 : 45 : 17 � 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31 , 2005 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. LAW & County Pool 18,632,224.41 18,632,224.41 18,632,224.41 67.43 1 1 2.781 2.819 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 9,000,000.00 8,876,680.00 9,000,000.00 32.57 933 610 2.914 2.954 Investments 27,632,224.41 27,508,904.41 27,632,224.41 100.00% 305 199 2.824 2.863 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 66,049.99 589,192.10 Average Daily Balance 28,101,315.87 29,179,778.98 Effective Rate of Return 2.77% 2.69% Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and avails ' ' of some of these funds is restricted by law (e.g. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds). i 3 �Ivs J US NAVA, INANCE DIR./TREASURER Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 04/13/2005-09:21 PM (PRF_PM1) SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver. 5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date LAIF&County Pool SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 7,104,075.82 7,104,075.82 7,104,075.82 2.542 2.542 1 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 11,528,148.59 11,528,148.59 11,528,148.59 2.990 2.990 1 Subtotal and Average 19,327,122.32 18,632,224.41 18,632,224.41 18,632,224.41 2.819 1 Federal Agency Issues.Coupon 3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 985,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 3.500 812 06/22/2007 3133XARN9 518 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/08/2005 1,000,000.00 994,700.00 1,000,000.00 3.390 3.390 525 09/08/2006 3128X16Q5 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,985,620.00 2,000,000.00 2.300 2.300 230 11/17/2005 3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,942,610.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 669 01/30/2007 3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 981,250.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 3.100 756 04/27/2007 3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 987,500.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 930 10/18/2007 Subtotal and Average 8,774,193.55 9,000,000.00 8,876,680.00 9,000,000.00 2.954 610 Total and Average 28,101,315.87 27,632,224.41 27,508,904.41 27,632,224.41 2.863 199 Portfolio CITY Run Date:04/13/2005.09:21 CP PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept V6.21 ( ort Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Activity By Type e Page 3 March 1, 2005 through March 31, 2005 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 2.542 0.00 1,000,000.00 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 2.990 355,272.16 2,800,000.00 Subtotal 22,076,952.25 355,272.16 3,800,000.00 18,632,224.41 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133XARN9 518 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3.390 03/08/2005 1,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 8,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 9,000,000.00 Total 30,076,952.25 1,355,272.16 3,800,000.00 27,632,224.41 Portfolio CITY CP Run Dale:04/13/2005-09:21 PM(PRF PM3)SymRepl V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 4 Activity Summary March 2004 through March 2005 Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity March 2004 4 29,579,440.12 2.512 2.547 2.512 0 0 161 146 April 2004 5 31,824,022.87 2.373 2.405 2.318 1 0 184 165 May 2004 5 32,351,524.97 2.412 2.445 2.368 0 0 181 157 June 2004 5 32,705,947.05 2.452 2.486 2.420 0 0 180 150 July 2004 5 31,221,968.21 2.561 2.597 2.553 0 0 188 151 August 2004 5 31,242,288.45 2.603 2.639 2.605 0 0 188 145 September 2004 5 25,250,564.07 2.625 2.662 2.624 0 0 232 172 October 2004 6 28,964,592.72 2.629 2.666 2.618 1 0 240 181 November 2004 6 25,300,063.99 2.661 2.698 2.653 0 0 275 198 December 2004 7 30,433,082.99 2.695 2.732 2.673 1 0 259 188 January 2005 7 30,025,165.46 2.659 2.696 2.622 0 0 262 182 February 2005 7 30,076,952.25 2.728 2.766 2.717 0 0 262 174 March 2005 8 27,632,224.41 2.824 2.863 2.819 1 0 305 199 Average 6 29,739,064.43 2.595% 2.631% 2.577 0 0 224 170 Portfolio CITY CP Run Dale:04/13/2005-(14:21 PM(PRF PM4)SynnRept V6.21 ' Report Ver.5.00 I � I CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 5 Distribution of Investments By Type March 2004 through March 2005 March April May June July August September October November December January February March Average Security Type 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 by Period LAW&County Pool 83.1 81.2 81.5 81.7 80.8 80.8 76.2 75.8 72.3 73.7 73.4 73.4 67.4 77.0% _ ...... .......... ......... ... ...._ ......... ..._ ........ ._._ Certificates of Deposit-Bank Certificates of Deposit-S&L . ..... . . ... . Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln _ ......... -..... ......... .............. ................ ............ .. ... ................ . ..................... ........ ........ Negotiable CD's-Bank CORP NOTES ...._ ___ _ ......... .... ........ .......... ........ ._...._.......... ......... ....... .__.... Bankers Acceptances . .............................. ..... ...... . ................... ........._......................... .. .........._... ........................ ......................._...__.._............. ................... .... ................................._............................... _ .. ........... _.._ _...................................... _ __ .... Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing .. . ............... Commercial Paper-Discount ........ ........ . ......... ......... . . . ....... ........ Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 16.9 .18.9 18.6 18.4 19.2 .19.2 23.8 24.2 27.7 26 3 26.6 26.6 32.6 23.0% _... . .. ....... ..... .... ... ........ .................... .. ......... ........................ ............ .......................................... ................ .................... ... ... . .... ............................................. .. ...... . ..... . ........ _ Federal Agency Issues-Discount .........................................................................................................._...._._..__..........................._......_.........__........__._......................._............_._......._....._...._......._........................_........................._........._......._.................._.__..........................._.............._.....__._..._...._........__...___.........._............_......................................._._.................._....__......................................._.................._............._...................................._............................... Treasury Securities-Coupon ....... .. _ _ ...... ...... ... .. . . ._.... ._..... . .... ..................... . .. .. ... ._. _ Treasury Securities-Discount __._....._ ......... ..... ...... .. ..... .................... .................. .................... _._......................... .. .. .................. ... .... .................................................... ....._..... ...................................................... . _ _.... .... Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon Miscellaneous Securities-Discount Non Interest Bearing Investments _. ......... . ........... .... _.._ ..................... ............................................................................._.._......_.....____._......................._____ Mortgage Backed Securities .................................................................................................................................................._---._..__..._...._.............._........_.___.__.._....­_..._..__._.._..........._.............................._ _.._..._.........._...._._............_--_ ._._..._............_._...._.._ ...............__....._._....._.............._........._.............._._..._............_...--.........._..............................................................._...__.__....................................... _.. Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2 .... _. . _ __. ........... .............................................-..............I..... .......... ............................_......... ........ . .. .......... Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3 .................. . .......................................... ............ ................................................................................_................ .. ...................._. ..... ... .................................. ...... .... .................................... .... ... Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:04/13/2005-09:21 PM(PRF_PM5)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 6 Interest Earnings Summary March 31, 2005 March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest Collected 0.00 128,500.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 71,007.49 71,007.49 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 49,508.33) ( 48,883.33) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 21,499.16 150,624.16 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 21,499.16 150,624.16 Pass Through Securities: Interest Collected 0.00 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: Interest Collected 0.00 453,825.76 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 367,202.34 367,202.34 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 322,651.51) ( 382,460.16) Interest Earned during Period 44,550.83 438,567.94 Total Interest Earned during Period 66,049.99 589,192.10 Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Total Earnings during Period 66,049.99 589,192.10 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:04/13/2005-09:21 PM(PRF_PM6)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31, 2005 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. No Active Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.000 0.000 Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0 0 0.000 0.000 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 0.00 3,011.38 Average Daily Balance 0.00 Effective Rate of Return 0.00% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months.Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is restricts by law(e.g.Gas T ,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). Je tfs Nava, 'Hance Director/Treasurer Portfolio 03BD CP Run Dale:04/13/2005-09:21 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRepl V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio. Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS82 82 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.264 2.233 2.264 1 Subtotal and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0 Total and Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0 Portfolio 03BD CP Run Date:04/13/2005-09:21 PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept V6.21 mt Ver.5.00 04BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary March 31, 2005 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 100.00 1 1 2.507 2.542 Investments 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 100.00% 1 1 2.507 2.542 Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 32,707.29 248,738.70 Average Daily Balance 16,224,823.09 16,813,385.62 Effective Rate of Return 2.37% 1.97% r J us ave, inance Dir./Treasurer 41 Portfolio 04BD CP Run Date:04/13/2005-09:22 PM(PRF_PM1)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 04BD Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2005 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS85 85 Local Agency Investment Fund 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 2.542 2.542 1 Subtotal and Average 16,224,823.09 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 2.542 1 Total and Average 16,224,823.09 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 16,000,887.61 2.542 1 Portfolio 04BD CP Run Date:04/13/2005-09:22 PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept V6.21 ' art Ver.5.00