Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.01.03 BURLBURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting - Monday, January 3, 2005 CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 1 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 CLOSED SESSION: a. Pending Litigation of BFI Solid Waste Disposal 6:30 p.m. Conference Room A Agreement negotiations (Microphone check) 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of December 6, 2004 Approve 5. CEREMONIAL a. Swearing in of new Police Commander, Mike Matteucci Ceremonial b. Presentation to Burlingame High School Football Team for Presentation the Central Coast Section Championship 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. a. Resolution amending the Rotation Tow Truck Regulations Hearing/Action b. Consideration of an amusement permit for Straits Hearing/Action Restaurant at 1100 Burlingame Avenue C. Consider approval of an amusement permit for Rockets, Hearing/Action 221 Park Road, Burlingame d. Resolution to increase the fee for City Arborist to fund the Hearing/Action organizational change 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Introduction of an Ordinance to establish development fees Introduce for the North Burlingame and Rollins Road subareas of the North Burlingame Specific Area Plan b. Planning Commissioner resignation Discuss/direct C. Parks & Recreation Commissioner resignation Discuss/direct BURLINGAME BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting - Monday, January 3, 2005 CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page g BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Amendment No. 3 to the Cable System Franchise Agreement between the City of Burlingame and RCN Telecon Services, Inc. b. Resolutions approving change order No. 1 with D'Arcy and Harty Construction, Inc., and an agreement amendment with Underground Construction Managers for additional work on Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase 2 C. Adopt 2005 Investment Policy d. Recommendation to adopt 2005 City Council calendar dated December 14, 2004 e. Warrants & Payroll 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, December 2, 2004; Planning, December 13, 2004; Parks & Recreation, December 16, 2004 b. Department Reports: Building,November, 2004; Finance, November, 2004; Police, November, 2004 C. Letter from RCN Cable concerning increase in rates 14. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at(650)558- 7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Tuesday,January 18,2005 � ,Qtww� N-'��°W`y �� aw�a %�.l�r��+c y a awn'% ��. r''i „a.. s.,yy?�);• w a s�1`-�..yy!'f+1iSy' '.ufr�r s�mqup`f➢o �'"t: �•.�!"� �S 9n i' ,A i+ i '�.., \' 's'✓ �+ 'gr '� U% rs 1���{r' "^•`.(A� T2'�� gHgn,� ����' ��'� all q�-• fat. BURLINGAMEAV 3112 S V, � -D0CLAMA TION ° = Honoring Burlingame High School Panther's Footbaff Team t " c Whereas During the season, the Burlingame Pantfjer's Football Team recovered "The Paw" 6uring the 77� Annual Little Big Game with a 40-21 `ter r' victorp over the San Mateo Bearcats, Burlingame's 42win of the , series against onl�31 losses dna 4 ties;anD , off ; Whereas Tlje Central Coast Section is one o f Io sections of the California `° �, roc i Interscholastic Federation, which has administered athletic programs in A u public and private high schools throughout the state since 1914;and k>^, r Whereas, More than 115 schools are members of the Central Coast Section, which, i r has jurisdiction over the schools in five counties—San Mateo, Santa fes ; ruz,San Benito and Monterey and Clara,Santa C ,ti��-.-A Whereas, Burlingame High School's Football Team defeated both San Lorenzo valleys S and Santa Cruz in CCS Plalloff Games and Whereas, Burlingame High Schools Football Team captured its first ever Centrally;. u ' Coast Section's Championship with an exciting 37-34 victory over Seaside 4 ,Y on SaturaaN, December 4, 2oo4, in a game that featured "The PlaN,11 a } per f ect[N executed hook and lateral pf aN with less than one minute left in ; �} the game. - i the f h N p the h f �', Now, re ore i,Joe Galfigan,Mav�or o f the Citv�o f Burlingame,do ereb rodaim a onor of recognition to Burlingame High School Panther's Football Team �r In witness WlIereo f, I have hereunto set mN hand .mak and caused the seal of the CitN of Burlingame to be �� f y$� a f f ixea this 3"aaN of januarN 2o05. hn j s Joe Gaffigan,Marpor tr �;q•' . O� _;-'4�+s- a (x ..sem Po SII i.:' "e+ _y._�rar -.a u J `a ..' u :i ,>. -s' a r .'°° �¢ 0 9✓ `. `"`+'e4� _..ar gtlt•�A�.���a'"`4N,� i�" +�''ri.t 'N�µ, �tAY��Y:4'•Wli •�x' 't Y a'�y.1�� -..i' �ri' fi�� �aF� N�'�„- a.+,.s'^ _f CITY G BURLINGAME i 9q 9 0 Anr[o uc 6 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of December 6, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following: a. Threatened Litigation(Government Code §54956.9(b)(1),(3)(c)): Claim of Jeanne Vitrano; Claim of James Shawndi; Claim of Neita Farmer; Claim of Margit Lowenstein b. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code §54957.6: City Negotiators: Bob Bell, Jim Nantell; Labor Organizations: Teamsters Local 856; Burlingame Association of Middle Managers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Kirk Heathcote. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Coffey, Galligan,Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. MINUTES Mayor Galligan requested correction of Jo Ellen Galligan's name to JoEllen Galligan who led the pledge of allegiance. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the amended minutes of the November 15, 2004 Council meeting; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. PRESENTATION Police Sergeant Peter Tokarski presented Burlingame resident Robert Lingaas with a Certificate of Appreciation for repairing, at no charge, an elderly homeowner's house. The homeowner had been the victim of a scam artist who caused damage to the building. 1 Burlingame City Council December 6,2004 Unapproved Minutes 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1748 AMENDING TITLE 25 TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF CERTAIN BUSINESSES DURING LATE NIGHT AND EARLY MORNING HOURS CA Anderson requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance No. 1748 amending Title 25 to require a conditional use permit for operation of certain businesses during late night and early morning hours. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. Maribeth Halsey, 1142 Capuchino Avenue, spoke in favor of extending evening business hours to 10 p.m. There were no further comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilman Coffey requested that the operating hours extend to 10 p.m. from the recommended 9 p.m. PC Van Etten stated that the earlier closure time is a better tool in limiting operation of illegal businesses. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve, without change, Ordinance No. 1748 Amending Title 25 to Require a Conditional Use Permit for Operation of Certain Businesses During Late Night and Early Morning Hours; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved by voice vote, 4-1 (Coffey dissented). Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after adoption. b. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 106-2004 ASSESSMENTS FOR YEAR 2005 FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT CA Anderson requested Council hold a public hearing on the levy of assessments for 2005 and adopt Resolution No. 106-2004 adopting assessments for 2005 for the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 106-2004 establishing and levying Year 2005 assessments for the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District and approving district programs and activities for Year 2005; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. C. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1749 ADOPTING REVISIONS TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.04 (FIRE CODE) FC Reilly requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance No. 1749 adopting revisions to Municipal Code Section 17.04, Fire Code. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. 2 Burlingame City Council December 6, 2004 Unapproved Minutes Councilman Coffey made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 1749 amending Chapter 17.04—Uniform fire Code to Clarify Alarm, Fee and Sprinkler Provisions; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after adoption. d. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR ROTI INDIAN BISTRO, 209 PARK ROAD CA Anderson requested Council approve Amusement Permit for Roti Indian Bistro at 209 Park Road for live music during dinner hours for a period of six months. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Amusement Permit with standard conditions for Roti Indian Bistro at 209 Park Road; seconded by Councilman Coffey, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Tim Fanelli submitted a statement regarding Peninsula Hospital. Mike Spinelli, 1301 Mills Avenue, spoke in support of the Art in Public Places Policy. There were no further comments from the floor. S. STAFF REPORTS a. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 107-2004 APPROVING ART IN PUBLIC PLACES POLICY PR&D Schwartz requested Council adopt Resolution No. 107-2004 approving Art in Public Places Policy. Councilwoman Nagel requested the following changes for clarification: Section IV, last sentence, should read "...the site location is the decision of the City Council." Section V, second paragraph, should read "Three members of the City Council must vote affirmatively..." Councilwoman O'Mahony requested adding a statement that the donor include "Approximate Annual Maintenance Costs,"which will be added to the application form. Councilman Coffey made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 107-2004 approving Art in Public Places Policy with typographical changes and changes to Sections IV and V; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to reappoint Commissioners James Delia, Michael Lennon and Victor Richmond to fill three vacancies on the Civil Service Commission; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 3 Burlingame City Council December 6,2004 Unapproved Minutes 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Galligan requested Item 9.e. be removed from the Consent Calendar. a. REAPPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE TO SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES CC Mortensen requested Council reappoint Dennis Preger as Burlingame's representative to the San Mateo County Mosquito Abatement District Board of Trustees through December 31, 2008. b. RESOLUTION NO. 108-2004 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KENNEDY-JENKS CONSULTANTS FOR THE DESIGN OF WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS FOR THE BURLINGAME VILLAGE, BURLINGAME GATE AND BURLINGAME GROVE SUBDIVISIONS AND IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE BURLINGAME HILLS AREA DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 108-2004 approving the professional services agreement with Kennedy-Jenks Consultants for the design of water main replacements for the Burlingame Village, Burlingame Gate and Burlingame Grove subdivisions and in various locations in the Burlingame Hills Area. C. RESOLUTION NO. 109-2004 APPROVING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH CONTROL MANUFACTURING COMPANY TO PROVIDE PHASE 3 OF THE CITYWIDE SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION (SCADA) SYSTEM INTEGRATION DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 109-2004 approving Agreement Amendment No. 2 with Control Manufacturing Company to provide Phase 3 of the citywide SCADA System integration. d. RESOLUTION NO. 110-2004 APPROVING A REVISION TO A MUTUAL-AID POTABLE WATER TRANSFER AGREEMENT WITH THE TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 110-2004 approving a revision to a Mutual-Aid Potable Water Transfer Agreement with the Town of Hillsborough. f. APPROVE ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR CA Anderson requested Council approve the rotation list for offices of Mayor and Vice Mayor for the coming year. g. RESOLUTION NO. 111-2004 APPROVING CHANGES TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE BURLINGAME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE MANAGERS (BAMM) HRD Bell requested Council approve Resolution No. 111-2004 approving changes to the MOU between the City of Burlingame and BAMM. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Consent Calendar Items 9.a., b., c., d., f., and g.; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 4 Burlingame City Council December 6,2004 Unapproved Minutes e. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT 2005 CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR CC Mortensen requested Council approve adoption of the 2005 City Council Calendar. Mayor Galligan requested that the May 31S`Budget Study Session date be changed to June ls` at 5 p.m. Councilwoman Nagel requested the two City Manager's Review times be moved from 4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. on June 15`" and on December 7`". Mayor Galligan also requested to change the meeting time with the Civil Service Commission on September 19`h from 5 p.m. to 6 p.m., asking that the commission start their regular meeting at 5 p.m. instead of 4 p.m. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Consent Calendar Item 9.e.; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 11. OLD BUSINESS a. COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS Mayor Galligan stated that the newly revised list dated December 6, 2004, showed the separation of the Budget Chair assignment from the City Hall assignment. Mayor Galligan stated that Councilwoman Nagel is unable to meet the time commitments for the Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance and invited other council members to attend as available. The City is represented at this commission on a regular basis by Jane Gomery of the Public Works Department. Mayor Galligan offered to be the representative to the Housing Trust & Endowment if one is needed. CA Anderson will find out if a representative is needed on this commission. 12. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library, October 19, 2004; Beautification, November 4, 2004; Planning, November 22, 2004 b. Department Reports: Police, October 2004 c. Letter from Comcast concerning rate increase effective January 1, 2005 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 7:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 5 Burlingame City Council December 6,2004 Unapproved Minutes CITY- , AGENDA 6a ITEM# BURLIN. GAME STAFF REPORT .. .... MTG. DATE 01/03/2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ___ )dctte-n- llol�ice D�enartm�ent BY Chief.Tack Etten, Police Department DATE: December R, 2004 APPROVE FROM: Chief Jack Van Etten,Police Department BY SUBJECT: Resolution amending the Rotation Tow Truck Regulations RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should adopt a resolution amending the Rotation Tow Truck Regulations for the City of Burlingame. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The objective of the Rotation Tow Truck Regulations has been to provide 24 hour tow service to the public in the event of mechanical defect, disability of the driver or the removal of the vehicle(s)due to a traffic collision on public streets that are under the jurisdiction of the Burlingame Police Department.The police department has insured that all Rotation Tow Truck companies operating in Burlingame maintain proper equipment,that tow truck drivers are currently licensed and trained, and that safe and reasonable services are afforded to persons requiring assistance within Burlingame. The new and updated version of our Rotation Tow Truck Regulations policy is modeled after the policies of the California Highway Patrol and the San Mateo Police Department.This updated version of our policy will afford the Burlingame Police Department the ability to better regulate,control and hold accountable, existing tow truck companies operating in Burlingame,as well as new tow companies that desire to become a part of our rotation list.At the present time, all existing Rotation Tow Truck Companies operating in Burlingame are in compliance with the new policy.New tow companies intending to apply to become a part of our tow rotation would need to comply with the new regulations. There are no increases to the fee schedule included in the Rotation Tow Truck Regulations policy. The updated portions of the Rotation Tow Truck Regulations are noted in italics throughout the amended policy (attached)and address these main areas: 1.General Requirements and Conditions Area. Companies are required to have and maintain minimum levels of liability and workers' compensation insurance;requires a minimum of 3 years of verifiable tow experience for new companies that apply for rotation towing. 2.Facilities. Requires standards in signs and lighting. 3.Tow Trucks. Requires equipment and maintenance in accordance with California Vehicle Code Standards. 4.Tow Company Personnel. Regulates the age minimum for tow truck operators and addresses their required training and background checks(clear of certain specified criminal history violations); similar requirements on background checks for tow company owners. 5.Response Requirements and Prohibitions. Defines maximum response times for tow trucks(day and evening); requires police department contact regarding private property tows;regulates and requires safe tow truck loading and penalties for non compliance. 6. Records. Requires tow companies to maintain and make available for inspection(minimum of 3 years),records of tows, fees, tow driver records of certain training, etc. Tow records maintained by the police department can also be reviewed by the tow companies with permission of the Chief of Police. 7. Fee Schedule. Use of a dolly requires the initials of an officer at the tow scene for payment. 8. Failure to Obey. Outlines violations or actions that will result in tow company suspensions and removal from the rotational tow truck; also defines the hearing and grievance procedure to be used by tow companies. Attachments Amended Rotation Tow Truck Regulations (2004) BURLINGAME POLICE DEPARTMENT Rotation Tow Truck Regulations A. OBJECTIVE: To provide 24 hour service through the Burlingame Police Department to the public in the event of mechanical defect, disability of the driver, or the removal of vehicle(s) due to traffic collision on the streets that are under the jurisdiction of Burlingame Police Department; that the charges for these services are to be set by the Burlingame Police Department applicable to those tow truck companies who wish to be placed on the Burlingame Police Department Rotation List. B. POLICY: 1) Tow services under these Regulations shall be operated on rotation basis within the geographic boundary of the City of Burlingame. 2) Burlingame Police Department will establish one(1)rotation list.All accident, impound, abandoned, and traffic hazard vehicles will be entered on this list. 3) All requests for tow service with the exception of AAA,NAC,ALLSTATE, STATE FARM, or at owners request,will come from the top of this rotation list. Any tow - company that fails to respond in a reasonable time, or refuses a call will be rotated as if they had received and processed the call. That call will then go to the next company on the rotation list. 4) All tow companies on the rotation lists will make available for inspection the California Highway Patrol annual inspection form for each tow vehicle used within the City of Burlingame. All tow trucks and equipment shall be maintained in good working order. 5) All tow companies on the rotation list will immediately make written notification to Burlingame Police Department of any change of ownership or status, or change of address of the business and/or facilities. 6) It shall be the responsibility of the owner of the tow company to immediately notify the Chief of Police of the inclusion of a party(ies)not originally listed on the sale of the business. When the business is sold to a new owner, authorization for towing on the rotation list is canceled. A new application must be submitted for review by the Chief of Police. 7) Communications Division of Burlingame Police Department will keep a daily log of both rotation lists and all tow calls will be equally distributed to the tow companies on these lists. 10/5/2004 1 C. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS: 1) All tow companies on the Burlingame Police Department rotation list will provide 24-hour tow service, seven days a week, within the city limits of the City of Burlingame. It shall be the owner's responsibility to immediately notify the Burlingame Police Department if, at any time, they are unable to provide such services or any portion thereof. 2) 24-hour telephone numbers are required of tow companies. An answering service may be used but it shall be the responsibility of the tow company owner to see that such answering service complies with all regulations set forth herein. 3) All tow companies shall furnish and maintain current evidence of liability insurance to the Burlingame Police Department providing adequate protection of disabled vehicles while being towed and during storage period. Policy expiration dates and notice of cancellation shall also be provided upon request to the Burlingame Police Department. Insurance shall be as follows: a. Bodily injury,personal injury, and property damage with combined single limit of no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injufy,personal injury and property damage. b. Automobile liability insurance policy ensuring tow company and tow company's personnel to an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. C. On-hook coverage, insuring the vehicle in tow with limits of not less than $100,000. d. Garage liability, including premises and operations,for bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000. e. Garage keepers liability of not less than $500,000. f. In addition to these policies, each tow company shall have and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law and shall provide evidence of such policy to the Burlingame Police Department. 4) In order to be eligible to be placed on a rotation list, a tow company shall have a minimum of three (3) verifiable years for-hire towing experience. Experience will be investigated and determined by Burlingame Police Department. 5) Tow companies that are not on the police tow list shall be advised that non-acceptance by 10/5/2004 2 the Burlingame Police Department does not preclude their operation as a tow service. 6) No tow company or tow company officer or employee shall conspire, attempt to conspire, or commit any action of collusion with any other tow company for the purpose of secretly, or otherwise, establishing an understanding regarding the rotation or handling of calls that would prejudice the operation of the rotation list. 7) The Burlingame Police Department may conduct quarterly meetings to discuss issues regarding tow rotation. Any such meeting is mandatory for the tow company to attend through an authorized representative, and failure to attend shall be grounds for suspension from the rotation list. 8) No tow company shall display any language or engage in any representation or advertisement indicating an official or unofficial connection with the Burlingame Police Department or the City of Burlingame. 9) Each tow company warrants that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Tow company does not and shall not discriminate against persons employed or seeking employment on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry,physical or mental disability, national origin, religion or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment& Housing Act. In performing services under this Agreement, no tow company nor any company officer or employee shall discriminate against any person on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry,physical or mental disability, national origin, religion or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide safety limitation founded on manufacturer, Consumer Product Safety, and Department of Justice guidelines. D. FACILITIES 1) Any tow company on the rotation list must maintain a place of business within the City of Burlingame city limits. The facilities must include adequate storage area that is fenced, locked, and well-lighted. Location of these storage areas must have the approval of the Burlingame Police Department. At the time that a tow company requests approval of the Police Department, the tow company shall provide written evidence that the property use will be in conformance with Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Burlingame Municipal Code. 2) The premises of shall be equipped with signs and/or markings denoting the name of the tow company, address of business, and 24-hour telephone number that are clearly visible day or night. 10/5/2004 3 E. TOW TRUCKS 1) Each tow truck shall be clearly marked with the name of the tow company, address of business, and 24-hour telephone number. The lettering shall be a minimum of two and one half(2-1/2) inches in height, and the signs shall be placed on both the right and left front doors of all tow vehicles. 2) A tow company shall equip and maintain tow trucks in accordance with the provisions set forth in the California Vehicle Code, Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, and in a manner consistent with industry standards and practices. In particular: a. All tow trucks shall have recovery capabilities, wheel-lift capabilities, and a boom meeting the specifications contained in these regulations. Class D tow trucks used exclusively for salvage and recovery operations are not required to possess underlift capabilities. b. A tow company that has a car carrier is exempted for the recovery, wheel lift„ and boom capability requirements. However, the car carrier must have an additional unit. F. TOW COMPANY PERSONNEL 1) Tow companies shall maintain standard and ethical business practices; owners and/or their representatives shall be of good character and provide prompt, efficient, and courteous services to all concerned. Tow truck drivers shall be employees of the tow companies that dispatch the driver. Tow truck drivers shall be at least eighteen (I8)years of age. 2) Tow truck operators shall demonstrate sufficient knowledge of tow car operation to insure safe and proper discharge of their service responsibilities. a. Operators shall possess a proper class of driver license in accordance with Section 12520 of the California Vehicle Code endorsed to allow operation of special vehicle configurations and special cargoes. b. Operators shall have a knowledge of streets and primary locations within the City of Burlingame. 3) Tow companies shall provide and maintain a current list of its officers and drivers with the Burlingame Police Department. The list shall be updated within seven (7) days of any change. Each tow company officer and each tow company driver shall complete and 10/5/2004 4 file the information required by the Burlingame Police Department before undertaking any services related to the rotation list. Each driver and officer shall submit to fingerprinting by the Police Department, and the Police Department will check criminal background of the driver or officer before rendering services in connection with the rotation list. The submittal of false information to the Police Department regarding a driver is grounds for refusal to authorize the driver to provide services related to the rotation list. The submittal of false information to the Police Department regarding an officer is grounds for refusal to authorize or continue to authorize the tow company to participate on the rotation list. 4) Each tow company shall enroll its drivers in the Pull Notice Program of the Department of Motor Vehicles. Pull notices shall be kept on file, initialed, and dated by the tow company. 5) While involved in operations and related business dealings with the public and the Burlingame Police Department, tow company personnel shall refrain from any acts of misconduct, including but not limited to: a. Rude or discourteous behavior. b. Lack of service, selective service, or refusal to provide service that the tow company is capable of performing. C. Any act of sexual harassment or sexual impropriety. d. Unsafe driving practices. e. Exhibiting any objective symptoms of operating a vehicle or equipment while under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs. f. Appearing at the scene of a rotation list call with the odor of an alcoholic beverage emitting from the person's breath. The employee shall submit to a preliminary alcohol screening test upon demand of a Burlingame Police Department officer. 6) No officer or employee of any tow company shall be allowed to participate in any call or business activity related to the rotation list if the officer or employee has been convicted of any of the following within the previous five (5)years: a. A crime of violence or a crime of moral turpitude, including theft or embezzlement of property. b. Felony driving while under the influence of alcohol and/or a drug. 10/5/2004 5 7) No officer or employee of any tow company shall be allowed to participate in any call or business activity related to the rotation list if the officer or employee is a registered sex offender, is a registered arsonist, or has been convicted of any of the following at any time: a. Theft or embezzlement of a vehicle. b. Alteration or removal of a vehicle identification number. C. Fraud involving a vehicle. G. RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS AND PROHIBITIONS 1) Prompt and lawful response to calls shall be provided during daytime within ten (10) and no more than fifteen (15) minutes; during nighttime within fifteen(15)and no more than twenty(20) minutes. 2) Strict observance of Section 22513 of California Vehicle Code and County Ordinance Code Chapter 7.64 regulating tow cars is required. 3) Requests by drivers or owners of disabled vehicles for specific tow service shall be honored by members of this department except when such a situation exists that it is not practical to honor a specific request, in which instance the next in line tow service on the police rotation list shall be called. 4) If more than one (1) vehicle is involved in an accident,the company that is called from the rotation list will handle all of the vehicles involved (except as noted under Item#11) or except when the investigating officer and/or the officer's superior(s) shall deem it necessary to call for additional tow services to aid in prompt removal of disabled vehicles and/or clearing of roadways and/or elimination of hazardous situations; this shall be at the sole discretion of the investigating officer and/or the officer's superior(s) at which time the next company on the rotation list shall be called. 5) Tow drivers are responsible for sweeping and removing debris at the accident scene. 6) Any tow truck on the rotation list responding to any accident within the jurisdiction of the City of Burlingame without being called to the scene of the accident by a Burlingame Police Department dispatcher will be subject to Subsection K(Failure to Obey). 7) A violation of the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating(GVWR) and safe loading requirements of a tow truck may be cause for immediate suspension. This includes exceeding the tow trucks GVWR,front axle weight rating, rear axle weight rating, maximum tire weight ratings, or not maintaining fifty percent (50016) of the tow truck's unladen front axle 10/5/2004 6 weight on the front axle weight on the front axle when towing. 8) If service other than towing and recovery has begun and is canceled by the vehicle's owner or agent, the tow company may charge one-half of the regular hourly service charge for the time expended on the call. For purposes of cancellation, service begins When physical work on the vehicle has begun, not the response. No lien shall arise for the service unless the tow company has presented a written statement to the vehicle's owner or agent for the signed authorization of services to be performed. The tow company shall not attempt to take possession of the vehicle in order to establish a lien for any non-towing services performed, or begun and subsequently canceled, when not entitled to such a lien by law. Civil Code section 3068.1 establishes when a lien begins. 9) All claim(s) of overcharging by a tow company on the Rotation List will be given a thorough investigation by the Burlingame Police Department. If the claimant of overcharging can substantiate said claim, the responsible tow company will be subject to Subsection E (Failure to Obey). 10) AAA,NAC, and ALLSTATE tow trucks will not be charged for next in line if a member is involved in an accident, or is in need of service. This also will be the policy if a driver or owner requests a tow company that may be on this department's rotation list. 11) Tow truck operators shall not stop at a scene of an accident unless they have been summoned to render assistance. Tow truck operators shall notify the Burlingame Police dispatcher of the situation. The dispatcher will then send the next in line rotation tow, or if applicable, to AAA,NAC, or ALLSTATE tow service in the City's jurisdiction. 12) Tow company owners or operators shall not telephone or personally come to the police department to check with the dispatcher to find out their position on the rotation lists. Complaints regarding tow operations shall be directed to the Director of Traffic of the Burlingame Police Department. 13) Tow companies shall advise the police dispatcher of the description and license number or VIN, and location towed from,when towing from private property within thirty (30) minutes of initiating the tow, or as soon as practicable. H. STORAGE AND RELEASE 1) The tow companies on the Burlingame Police rotation system shall provide a receipt with a copy placed in the stored vehicle and a copy of same to the Police Department whenever any item is removed from a stored vehicle and taken to another place of storage. 2) All stored vehicles shall be released to their owners or representatives within thirty(30) 10/5/2004 7 minutes, 24 hours a day. All personal property within the vehicle shall be given to the owner or owner's authorized representative upon request regardless of the stored and/or held status of the vehicle, with the EXCEPTION OF IMPOUND vehicles. This can be ascertained by checking the Burlingame Impound Form. If the IMPOUND box is checked, then DO NOT RELEASE the vehicle or contents,but advise the owner or owner's representative to obtain a release from the Burlingame Police Department prior to release of the vehicle. I. RECORDS 1) Records shall be maintained by each tow company of all tow services furnished under the Burlingame Rotation List. Such records shall include,but are not limited to: description of vehicle towed,nature of tow services, time and location of call. Statement of services provided and fee for same shall be furnished to the motorist. These records and pull notices of all drivers shall be available for inspection at any time as requested by the Police Department. 2) Tow records maintained by the Burlingame Police Department can be reviewed by tow company owners with the permission of any of the following: the Chief of Police, Operations Division Commander, or Director of Traffic of the Burlingame Police Department. 3) All tow companies on the Burlingame Police rotation system will keep the maintenance of records of stored vehicles and notices as required by California Vehicle Code and Civil Code, in particular Sections 10650,10652, 10652.5, 10653, and 22851 of the Vehicle Code and Sections 3071, 3072, and 3073 of the Civil Code; to furnish a copy to the Chief of Police of the form that the tow company is required to furnish the Department of California Highway Patrol by registered mail of the storage of vehicles over thirty(30) days. 4) All records to be maintained by tow companies shall be maintained and available for at least three (3)years following time period reflected in the record. J. FEE SCHEDULE: 1) Towing of a disabled vehicle from the scene of an accident, day or night......... $150.00 This fee shall include: a) The use of a winch, torches or hydraulic jacks to right, separate, or pull vehicles at the scene of an accident. b) Disconnection and re-connection of drive shaft when required in towing. 10/5/2004 8 C) The use of a "cradle snatcher". 2) Towing of an unattended vehicle from a public street, or an abated vehicle when authorized by a police officer or other authorized employee; i.e.,tow-away zones, traffichazard, arrests ......................................................................................... $150.00 These charges shall include any charge for unlocking a vehicle when necessary 3) Use of dolly ........................................................................................................ $ 30.00 In order to be entitled to payment for dolly use, the need for use of the dolly must be documented on Form CHP 180 and initialed by the tow driver and a Burlingame police officer at the scene. The tow driver is responsible for obtaining an officer's initials. 4) Extraordinary services When, in connection with towing services, a person engaged in towing under these rules and regulations, incurs expenses or furnishes services that have not been provided for, and they appear to be reasonably necessary under the circumstances, (s)he may submit written application for higher fees to the Director of Traffic. 5) Storage for each twenty-four(24)hour period or fraction thereof in excess of the first eight (8)hours following towing to a place of storage. a) Enclosed or open storage ................................................................... $ 45.00 6) Exception for Heavy Vehicles For services or materials furnished in towing or storing vehicles over one ton load capacity based on difficulty and equipment required.................................................................... Not to exceed $250.00 7) Use of forklift to remove vehicles from storage (this does not apply during first 72 hours of storage .................................................................... $ 40.00 8) Gate fee ........................................................................................................ $ 40.00 A Gate Fee may be charged to an owner or his authorized agent,by the storing tow company, for providing after hours access to the storage yard for purposes of release of vehicle or other access, such as for retrieval of personal items or appraisal. "After hours" for purposes of the gate fee means between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m. on Mondays 10/5/2004 9 through Fridays, and any time on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. Holidays are January 1,the third Monday in January; the third Monday in February, the last Monday in May, July 4, the first Monday in September, the second Monday in October,November 11,the fourth Thursday in November, and December 25. 9) A copy of this fee schedule shall be prominently posted in the public area of the principal place of business of each person in the tow business that is on the Police Rotation List so as to be easily read by members of the public. K. FAILURE TO OBEY: 1) Failure to obey listed requirements, conditions, or fees: a. 1st offense within a calendar year,removal from rotation for 30 days. b. 2nd offense within (1) one year of the first offense,removal from rotation for 90 days. C. 3rd offense occurring within(1) one year of the first offense,removal from the rotation list. Business may reapply for placement on the rotation list after 12 months from date of suspension. 2) Notwithstanding the suspensions specified above, if the Burlingame Police Department determines that a tow company has violated B(_j above, the tow company shall be suspended from the rotation list for a period of three (3)years, at which time the tow company may apply for reinstatement. 3) A suspended tow company and its owners shall not be eligible for placement on the rotation list for the duration of the suspension. This provision applies to an owner working in any capacity within any tow company, and as to a tow company, even if operated under new owners. 4) In the event that the Burlingame Police Department determines that disciplinary action is appropriate, the Department shall provide notice of the proposed discipline to the tow company. The tow company may request a hearing within seven (7) calendar days by submitting a request in writing to the Chief of Police. The hearing shall be conducted by the Chief of Police or the Chiefs designee. The tow company shall be entitled to present testimony in support of the tow company's position. The Chief of Police or the Chief's designee shall notify the tow company of the decision on the appeal within ten (10) days of the completion of the hearing. The decision of the Chief of Police or the Chief's designee shall be final and conclusive on the tow company. 10/5/2004 10 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING ROTATION TOW TRUCK REGULATIONS FOR THE BURLINGAME POLICE DEPARTMENT ROTATION LIST RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS,the Burlingame Police Department uses a rotation list of qualified towing businesses to remove abandoned or disabled vehicles from public streets and rights-of-way in the City; and WHEREAS, the regulations need amendment to ensure consistency of language and practice, to clarify certain aspects of the practices, rates, and charges, and to provide additional screening tools of drivers and operators of towing businesses; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are generally consistent with regulations used by the California Highway Patrol and nearby communities; and WHEREAS, these changes are intended to provide a safer environment for the public, better procedures for police use, and increased certainty for tow operators, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The Rotation Tow Truck Regulations contained in Exhibit A hereto are approved. MAYOR I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK CITY O� AGENDA ITEM# 6b BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. DATE 1/3/2005 40 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTE BY DATE: December 20, 2004 APPROVED BY FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney v SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR STRAITS BURLINGAME AT 1100 BURLINGAME AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: Consider application for amusement permit for Straits Burlingame at 1100 Burlingame Avenue and if approved, permit to be subject to renewal in 6 months. DISCUSSION: Straits Burlingame took over this location in the fall. Left at Albuquerque had previously operated at this address. The owners would like to have live music and possibly a disc jockey for lounge music. However, no dancing is intended. Since Straits opened, there have not been any calls of disturbance. The proposed conditions are consistent with other restaurants offering entertainment on the Avenue. However, because of the representation that no dancing will be allowed, the condition regarding plasticware is not proposed; if the situation changes,the permit will be returned to the Council for consideration. If the Council approves the application, staff recommends a 6-month term that would allow review close to the annual review period for all amusement permits. Attachment Application of Straits Burlingame Proposed conditions Distribution Chief of Police Commander-elect Michael Matteucci Straits Burlingame Nathan Schmidt Straits Burlingame 1100 Burlingame Ave Burlingame, CA94010 RECEIVED November 30, 2004 DEC 6 20P4 CLERK'S OBURINGAME City Clerk's Office 501 Primose Road Burlingame, CA94010 RE : Submittal Of Proposed Amusement Permit Dear Officer, The purpose of this letter is to formally submit the proposed amusement permit for Straits Burlingame located at 1100 Burlingame Ave, Burlingame, CA 94010. Straits was the first San Francisco restaurant to feature Singaporean fusion cuisine founded in 1987. Straits has successfully positioned itself as a bastion of Singaporean Culture in the Bay Area, offering an authentic taste and stylish surroundings in San Francisco, Palo Alto, San Jose and Burlingame. All Straits restaurants offer an upscale fine dining ambiance with full bar service and background music. Straits Burlingame would like to continue the live jazz, DJ lounge music entertainment to best attract new and repeat clientele. We sincerely appreciate your consideration of the request and would strictly cooperate with the city regulations. Please feel free to call me at (650)340-9333 should you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, 1 Kelly Yeo :1/19/:004 17:27 4083770100 CTI BUILDERS PAGE 04 The City of Duriingame u°D Amusement permit Application City Clerk's Office 501 Primrose Road • Burlingame, CA 94010 • (650) 696 7200 NAME OF BUSINESS: `g�'('a1fS Duf"llrl QRIe, CA 94b t D STREET ADDRESS: l l 0 0 &f i n me �� Qayrl arYC' I (Ll4a MAILING ADDRESS: po11ins VA , &Hina me , C{}9,W1D pp TELEPHONE NUMBER: �11US3 r APPLICANT'S FULL NAME: "'-'ISt 41 Yap O STREET ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PREvious ADDRESS(IF LESS THAN ONE YEAR): DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER DRIVERS LICENSE NUMBER PROPERTY OWNER'S FULL NAME(IF DIFFERENT): 1, ( 0 M ADDRESS: I1 u13 TELEPHONE NUMBER: A pro rty owner,I tno�21*ulropored amfnemen�end here authorize fhe above appflcent fo rubmif fhlr aVnpplication. 1 1 I SLIGIA RE n DATE PRIMARY TYPE OF BUSINESS: ES'{'tEA.1"rAh� r gUN JWllam I0Om , WF D -1 s (lam-�f id nl�((,1 T f' �A T ll0. PARKING SP CES ON SITE HOURS OF OPERATION -(y� AMUSEMENT DEVICES,NUMBER,AND TYPE: RESTRICTIONS ON USE,AGE,HOURS: ... hours bet"i.yP.�n9p,. ENTERTAINMENT(BRIEF DESCRIPTION): DESCRIBE ANY OTHER RESTRICTIONS AND SECURITY MEASURES: Attach a letter further describing details of your business and the proposed amusement. Return this completed form with 5100 check,payable to Cify of Burlingame,for application fee to the City Clerk. You will be notified when the application is on the ity Council agenda., Signature of AdDlicant Date PROPOSED CONDITIONS FOR AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR STRAITS BURLINGAME, 1100 BURLINGAME AVENUE Permit allows: Live music and disc jockey music. from 11:00 a.m. to 10 p.m., Sunday thru Tuesday; 11:00 a.m. to midnight, Wednesday and Thursday; 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday. No dancing shall be allowed. 1. All alcohol beverage laws shall be strictly enforced. 2. Any violations of the law or threatened violations shall be immediately reported to the Police Department and full cooperation shall be given by employees and management of the business. 3. No variance from the permitted entertainment shall occur without obtaining an amendment to the permit. 4. No part of the business shall be subleased without notification to the Police Department. 5. The amusement permit shall be non-transferable. 6. Any fight, ejection of customer, thefts from customers, or any other criminal act occurring at the establishment shall be reported to the Burlingame Police as soon as any establishment employee is aware of such an incident. 7. Any request by anyone in the establishment for an employee to contact the Police shall be honored immediately, without question. 8. Last call for alcohol service shall be no later than 1:20 a.m. on nights when entertainment is offered, and no alcohol shall be served after 1:30 a.m. on those nights. 9. Labor Code Section 6404.5 regulating smoking shall be enforced at all times. 10. No minors are to be allowed on the premises during hours when there is no food service, unless they are there on lawful business. 11. Loudspeakers for the business shall be directed toward the interior of the business; and The business shall not violate Section 10.40.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code; and The entertainment shall not be audible outside the premises; and The establishment shall measure the current 24-hour ambient noise levels (L10) at the exterior of the property along Burlingame Avenue and at the rear of the establishment using a methodology approved by the City Planner before opening for business; and Upon request by the City, the establishment shall conduct noise measurements to determine whether the noise from the establishment is exceeding the 5 dBA standard for increases in noise from the baseline as provided in the Burlingame General Plan, and shall report the measurements to the City; and The establishment shall ensure that the 5 dBA standard is not exceeded. 12. If a cover charge is charged to enter the establishment, the establishment shall ensure that patrons in line to enter do not obstruct either the public sidewalk or the public street. 13. Any advertising concerning the entertainment shall conform to all requirements of the City Sign Code. 14. The business shall provide litter control along all frontages of the business and within fifty (50) feet of the business, and upon closing each evening that entertainment is offered, the business shall pick up all litter in front of the business. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If anyone wishes to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, they must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. CITYAGENDA 6C °c ITEM# BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. y; DATE 1/3/2005 Hnw[ `9 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED BY DATE: December 8, 2004 APPROVE * 1,7, BY FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR ROCKET'S AT 221 PARK ROAD, BURLINGAME RECOMMENDATION: Consider amusement permit for Rocket's at 221 Park Road for disc jockey and karaoke from 3:00 p.m. to 1:30 a.m., seven nights a week for six-month period. DISCUSSION: Dicey Riley's Irish Pub formerly occupied 221 Park Road. In July 2004, the Council approved an amusement permit for a replacement establishment named 221 Park road Cocktail Lounge to offer disc jockey and karaoke entertainment. The establishment has now been sold to Anthony Gregori, who is renaming it Rocket's. Mr. Gregori is planning on offering similar entertainment as the previous owner, but without video machines. During the past year, there have been few calls at the establishment. Dicey Riley's also had few complaints. The Police Department is recommending approval with standard conditions with a six-month review. Attachment Permit application from Anthony Gregori Proposed conditions for amusement permit Distribution Chief of Police City Planner Anthony Gregori N0,,-15-2004 1329 CITY OF BURL INOAME 650 342 8366 P.02,'02 ` The MY of Euriingame Amusement Permit Application City Clerk's Office Sol Primrose Road • Burlinptme, CA 94010 • (650) 696.7200 NAME OF BUSINESS: —C-ccIL 1 dl L LO-JtiI C—E STRFET AD DRESS. 2-2- 1 ��21L fZo oD hi4111Nc ADDRESA TEU:PHON!NUMBER: 5�2-4218 2 ©w werLS APPUCANT'S FULL NAME: ct STREET ADDREss: TE+�bHONE NsJMBIs: (APREVIOUS ADDRESS OF ONE YEAR): _ vrc b �1 s�za�s soti, Iz 24�s6� DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NU—WM DRIVERS LICENSE NUMBER PROMTY OWNERS FULL NAME OF DIFFERENTh 1y✓x,O,Ikna�` 4"1 � A ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBEPj (3 the proposed amure7en4 and hrreby audxvi2e the above appRcaot to rubm;t this appUcaflon. ATE PRIMARY T USINEBS: L_ T HOURS OF OPERATION \/ PARKING SPACES ON SITE AMUSEMENTDEVIM,NUMBER,AND TYPE: --� O L T O L-'1�)'E RESTRICTIONS ON USE,AGE,HOURS: ENTE1tTAiNMENT(BRIlPDBCRIPTIONk 1� �` �O 30 S, qOS 'A AC � d��. (rcoclC 1-rot\��1p TZ�.�p T'EC}},JO �2. IJew UJ tee. F1.�`-lE DESCRIBE ANY OTHER RESTRICTIONS AND SKURITY MEASURES: I�SE �O-�IC'E.12 l T'TI LIZEfl L�� S'EC 2\T�/�gX��ti C.E SZ Attach a letter further descrbin j details of your business and the proposed amusement Return this completed form with $100 check,payable to Uir o18urfinSame,for application fee to the City Clerk You will be notified when the application Is on t City Council aBendm. Signatureof Icant 0 Date TOTAL P.02 PROPOSED CONDITIONS FOR AMUSEMENT PERMIT FOR ROCKET'S, 221 PARK ROAD Permit allows: Disc jockey and karaoke from 3:00 p.m. to 1 :30 a.m., seven days a week. 1 . Admission to the establishment shall be limited to adults 21 years of age or older. 2. All alcoholic beverage control laws shall be strictly enforced. 3. Entertainment shall cease no later than 1 :30 a.m. 4. Any violations of the law or threatened violations shall be immediately reported to the Police Department and full cooperation shall be given by employees and management of the business. 5. No variance from the permitted entertainment shall occur without obtaining an amendment to the permit. 6. No part of the business shall be subleased without notification to the Police Department. 7. The amusement permit shall be non-transferable. 8. Any fight, ejection of customer, thefts from customers, or any other criminal act occurring at or in the establishment or in adjacent Parking Lot M shall be reported to the Burlingame Police as soon as any establishment employee or security personnel is aware of such an incident. 9. Any request by anyone in the establishment for an employee or security personnel to contact the Police shall be honored immediately, without question. 10. Labor Code Section 6404.5 regulating smoking shall be enforced at all times. IL The establishment shall ensure that patrons in line to enter do not obstruct either the public sidewalk or the public street. 12. Any advertising of the entertainment shall conform to the requirements of the City Sign Code. 13. Last call for alcohol service before closing shall be no later than 1 :20 a.m. on nights when entertainment is offered and no alcohol shall be served after 1 :30 a.m. on those nights. 14. No minors shall be allowed on the premises at any time that the establishment is open for business. 15. Any loudspeakers for the business shall be directed toward the interior of the business; and The business shall not violate Section 10.40.020 of the Burlingame Municipal Code; and The entertainment shall not be audible outside the premises; and Upon request by the City, the establishment shall conduct noise measurements to determine whether the noise from the establishment is exceeding the 5 dBA standard for increases in noise from the baseline as provided in the Burlingame General Plan, and shall report the measurements to the City; and The establishment shall ensure that the 5 dBA standard is not exceeded. 16. The business shall provide litter control along all frontages of the business and within fifty (50) feet of the business, and upon closing each evening that entertainment is offered, the business shall pick up all litter in front of the business. The decision of the Council is a final administrative decision pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. If anyone wishes to challenge the decision in a court of competent jurisdiction, they must do so within 90 days of the date of the decision unless a shorter time is required pursuant to state or federal law. �Il��-CE ITY o- STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA 6d ITEM# MTG. '4cDS doe Z G �A"ED JUNE6 1 DATE 1,03,0✓ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: DECEMBER 27, 2004 r APPROVEDI � FROM: CITY PLANNER BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR CITY ARBORIST TO FUND THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE RECOMMENDATION: City Council should hold a public hearing and take action on the resolution to increase fees to fund the City Arborist position. Should the Council adopt the resolution, the Building Division and Planning fees would become effective in 60 days (March 4, 2005) and the Park and Recreation Fee would become effective immediately. BACKGROUND: While the City has maintained trees on public property for many years, it was not until 1992 that the Urban Reforestation Ordinance was adopted and the city began to regulate trees on private property. With the requirement of a Protected Tree Removal Permit the job of the City Arborist expanded to involve working more closely with the Building and Planning departments to review private development applications and construction inspections. In March 2003, Building, Planning and Parks each established a fee for the City Arborist. This fee was raised, based on increase in wages, in 2004; but a full evaluation was not done at that time. Recently the Parks Department employee, Steve Porter, who had taken on the private tree regulation along with overseeing the tree crew which works on trees on public property, retired. Staff suggested that the title of City Arborist be continued and that the position redefined so that the City Arborist was responsible only for the review and protection of trees on private property. Steve Porter was willing to continue as City Arborist in this context; but the fees were not based on self-supporting the position. Because of the current budget constraints staff evaluated the revenues currently being generated for private tree review/protection against what it would cost to have Steve Porter continue as part time City Arborist. In order to cover the cost of the City Arborist the current fees charged would have to be increased as follows: Building Increase from 4% to 11% of Building and Plumbing permit fees. Planning Increase from$80 to $125 and place the fee on all residential and commercial applications RESOLUTION TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR CITY ARBORIST TO FUND THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE JANUARY 3,2005 Parks and Recreation Increase from $25 to $50 the Protected Tree Removal Permit fee Together it is projected that these new fees will raise $44,806 each year, and should fully fund the City Arborist's activities. Should the work load fall off along with the funding, it is understood that the City Arborist would work fewer hours. The shift in the organization with Steve Porter working part-time as City Arborist will occur in January 2005. The proposed change in fees will transition. The Building and Planning fee increases will be effective 60 days after Council's affirmative action. The Park and Recreation Protected Tree Removal Permit increase can become effective immediately. There is presently sufficient funding from the lower fees and from the FY 2004-2005 budget in the Parks and Recreation Department to cover the costs of the City Arborist until the new fees become effective. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Department Memo, Amendment to the City Arborist Fee to Address Organizational Change, December 27, 2004, with attachments Resolution a In the interest of keeping Protected Tree Removal Permits affordable so the public will continue to apply for them,the Parks Department fee will cover most of the City Arborist's time,but not the entire cost of processing the permit. See Amendment to the City Arborist Fee to Address Organizational Change memo,December 27,2004, attached. 2 CITY , PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04 B,R,NGAS MEMORANDUM o�q�s "R�rm�uue b DATE: December 27, 2004 TO: City Council FROM: Meg Monroe, City Planner RE: Amendment to the City Arborist Fee to Address Organizational Change For many years the City of Burlingame has had an active tree maintenance program for trees on public property e.g. in city parks and street trees. In 1992 the city adopted the Urban Reforestation Ordinance, and extended tree protection to trees of a given size on private property. The City Arborist,who supported the tree crew and maintenance of the trees on public property,also took on the responsibilities of inspecting and issuing tree removal permits for protected sized trees on private property. Because of a change in staffing in the Parks Department,resulting from the retirement of the senior staff person currently managing the public and private tree program, the Park Superintendent has taken over the responsibilities of maintenance of the city's trees on public property. With the reorganization of the tree maintenance operation in the Parks Department,Steve Porter,the City Arborist has agreed, in retirement, to continue with the private tree protection portion of his previous job. His retirement will allow him to work for the three departments(Parks,Planning,and Building) for a maximum of 960 hours a year. Working together the three departments have estimated the number of hours of City Arborist time that they will need each week. The proportion breaks out as follows: Building 8.0 hours (44.4%) Planning 6.0 hours (33.3%) Parks 4.0 hours (22.2%) Total each week 18.0 hours Steve Porter has agreed to work as City Arborist at his current hourly rate of$42.43. In addition there is a ten percent charge for part-time benefits. So the total annual expense for the part time City Arborist including required benefits is $44,806. Given the current financial problems of the city,each department proposes making the City Arborist fully supported by fees. Amendment to the City Arborist Fee to Address Organizational Change December 27,2004 Building Division At this time,the Building Division is charging 4%of selected portions of a building permit and on all plumbing permits in order to fund the building plan check and field inspection services of the City Arborist. This fee was adopted July 19, 2004, and became effective September 17, 2004. In the five months since its imposition the Building Division has collected$8,000. In order to cover their share of the City Arborist's funding,the Building Division would need to raise about$20,000 to $22,000 each year. They estimate that this would require increasing the charge from 4%to 11%on selected portions of building permits and on plumbing permits. Planning Department Currently the Planning Department is charging $80.00 for City Arborist review and any site inspections required. The fee is charged to each application which, when initially submitted, indicates that there is a private tree of protected size on the site'. So far this Fiscal Year we have raised$225.00 for the City Arborist. With our current plan review experience and Arborist fee, we have learned a number of things. First, protected tree issues often do not appear until long after the initial plan submittal and fee calculation. Second, almost every residential, and most commercial applications, have at least indirect protected tree issues associated with them e.g. impact on a neighbor's tree, location on a creek, replacement of street trees or significant impacts on them, etc. Finally, it would free up planning staff time if the City Arborist did the initial screening of all plans for tree issues,currently Planning staff is doing this screening and, in some cases, field checks. Based on our past experience and"typical"levels of applications,the Planning Department estimates that they would need 6 hours of City Arborist time each week. In order to fully fund this from application fees the department will need to charge a $125.00 arborist fee on all applications, including administrative permits e.g.minor modification and hillside area construction permits. This would represent an increase of about 33%on administrative permits and an increase of 5% to 15% on all other permits. It should be noted that the City Arborist arrangement is based on demand. If the volume of applications drops off, reducing the amount of work(and income), the hours of the City Arborist will be reduced accordingly. It is our intention in the second half of FY 2004-2005 to look at the actual demand on the City Arborist's time to be sure that our initial estimates of the hours for each of his activities are appropriate. If there is an error we can make an adjustment in July 2005. Parks and Recreation Department The Parks and Recreation Department charges homeowners$25 for a tree removal permit. Based 2 Amendment to the City Arborist Fee to Address Organizational Change December 27,2004 on current experience staff calculates that each permit consumes about 2 hours of the City Arborist's time. Because the Parks and Recreation Department wishes to encourage the private property owners to continue to request Protected Tree Removal permits, the department staff are not proposing a full recovery fee;rather they are proposing to increase the current fee by 100%from $25 to $50. On this basis they would raise an additional $2000 to fund the City Arborist's direct cost. Attachments: Spreadsheet for Part-Time City Arborist Breakout Joseph Cyr, e-mail, Re: New arborist's fees, December 16, 2004 Randy Schwartz, e-mail, Re: Protected Tree Application Fee, December 16, 2004 Resolution U:\Administration\Fee Updates\CityArboristFee FullFunding 12.20.04.doc 3 Spreadsheet for Part-Time City Arborist Breakout Pay for part-time City Arborist: $ 44,806 Hours per Annual Department week Hours Allocation Dept.Cost Building 8 x 52 = 416 44.44% 19,912 Planning 6 x 52 = 312 33.33% 14,934 Parks 4 x 52 = 208 22.22% 9,956 Totals 18 936 99.99% 44,802 Worksheet for part-time City Arborist's pay: 42.43 per hour x 960 maximum hours/year 40,733 40,733 + 10%part-time benefits 44,806 Page 1 of PLG-Monroe, Meg From: PW/BLG-Cyr, Joseph Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 5:07 PM To: PLG-Monroe, Meg Subject: New arborist's fees Meg: After reviewing the fees that are now collected for the Building Division's share of the arborist it is clear that our revenues will not match the expenditures unless the arborist fee is raised. We are now collecting an arborist's fee of 4% of the building permit fee. This amounts to $8,000 over the first five months of the fiscal year. We will need to raise a total of $22,000 a year to cover the Building Division's share of the arborist fees. To do this we will need to raise this fee to 11 %. Joe Cyr, CBO 12/17/2004 Page 1 of PLG-Monroe, Meg From: PARKS/REC-Schwartz, Randy Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:41 PM To: PLG-Monroe, Meg Subject: FW: Protected Tree App Fee Meg, In the ordinance to City Council, please increase the cost of the Protected Tree Application Fee from $25 to $50. This is in order to better recover the direct costs associated with this program. Staff costs associated with these applications include: City Arborist—2 hours $90 Support Staff— 1 hour _35 Total staff costs $125 Thank you, Randy Randy Schwartz Director of Parks & Recreation City of Burlingame 850 Burlingame Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 (650) 558-7307 12/17/2004 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR ARBORIST SERVICES WHEREAS,the City has established a master fee schedule for fees charged by the City for various services; and WHEREAS, arborists services are provided in connection with permit applications and approvals in the Planning, Building, and Parks & Recreation Departments; and WHEREAS,the fees should reflect the actual costs to the City at established payrates; and WHEREAS, the services rendered for tree removal permits will continue to be largely subsidized by the City in order to promote applications to better manage the community's trees, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Master Fee Schedule is amended to read as follows: a. For Building SERVICE CURRENT FEE NEW FEE PLAN REVIEW Arborist Review Additional 4%of Building Additional 11% of Permit Fee Building Permit Fee PLUMBING PERMIT FEES Arborist Review None Additional 1 I% of Plumbing Permit Fee These fees are effective March 4, 2005. b. Park& Recreation Fees: SERVICE CURRENT FEE NEW FEE Protected Tree Removal Applications $25.00 $50 Arborist's plan review for planning $80.00 $125.00 applications (See also planning fee schedule) Arborist check of construction plans and 4% of building permit 11% of building permit inspection of landscape requirements on fee fee building permit submittals The tree removal fee is effective immediately, and the other two fees are effective March 4, 2005. c. Planning: SERVICE CURRENT FEE NEW FEE Arborist Review $80.00 $125.00 This fee is effective March 4, 2005. Mayor 1, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk C:\FILES\RESO\masterfeeskedarboristamend.pin.wpd 2 ARBORIST FEE PROPOSAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT JAN 03,05 CURRENTFEE 1PROPOSED FEE IDIFFERENCE 4%OF BUILDING PERMITS 5%OF BUILDING PERMITS 1% AVERAGE FEE IS$33 PER PERMIT AVERAGE FEE WILL BE $8 $41 PER PERMIT PROJECTED ANNUAL REVENUE PROJECTED ANNUAL REVENUE $4,800 IS$19,200 IS$24,000 APPROXIMATELY 10%OF THE BUILDING PERMITS ARE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED INCREASE � CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA BURLINGAME ITEM # 8a MTG. ticDgA DATE 1/3/05 DNATED JYNE6 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED A� BY 1� DATE: DECEMBER 27, 2004 APPROVED FROM: CITY PLANNER BY ✓1 /vGtiG{ ^ SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLIS DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR THE NORTH BURLINGAME AND ROLLINS ROAD SUBAREAS OF THE NORTH BURLINGAME SPECIFIC AREA PLAN. Introduction: City Council should review the proposed ordinance and direct questions to staff. If the ordinance is ready for action this ordinance should be set for public hearing on Tuesday, January 18, 2005, and the City Council should do the following: A. Request City Clerk to read title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading of the ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. D. Direct the city clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. BACKGROUND: On September 20, 2004, the City Council adopted the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan and directed staff to commence implementation. A key component of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan is establishing a sense of Burlingame in each of these subareas. To achieve this the implementation section of the plan identifies a number of traffic, circulation, pedestrian and aesthetic improvements which will better integrate the North Burlingame and Rollins Road subareas into the ambiance of Burlingame. The plan requires the establishment of a development fee to be charged so that each property as it develops will contribute to the needed area wide improvements. Like the Bayfront Development fee, the city will share with the developers in the total cost of improvements identified in the plan. In the case of the North Burlingame and Rollins Road area the City will share the cost of the improvements with the developers on a 50-50 basis; with the development fee raising half the cost and the city contributing the other half. However, a key premise of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road plan is to provide incentives to reuse land presently developed with older office buildings for multiple family residential uses. In order to encourage this shift in land use, the development fee for multiple family and duplex residential uses is based on the developer paying a 40% share of the improvement costs with the city paying 60%. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR THE NORTH B URLINGAME AND ROLLINS ROAD SUBAREAS OF THE NORTH BURLINGAME SPECIFIC AREA PLAN JANUARY 3,2005 The development fee proposed for the North Burlingame and Rollins Road subareas is based on the square footage of structure to be built or square footage within a structure which changes use from an existing permitted use to a new conditional use. Since the cost of the improvements in each area is substantially different, the fee is different for each of the subareas. This fee formula also provides a reduced cost for the industrial area which will encourage the location of new commercial and industrial development which the plan supports. The proposed development fees are: North Burlingame Subarea: Multiple family dwelling or duplex $0.78 per sq. ft. of building Any other use $0.97 per sq. ft. of building Rollins Road Subarea: All uses $0.54 per sq. ft. of building The difference in fee between the two areas is based on the difference between the estimated costs of the improvements for each area included in the plan. The Specific Plan notes the costs of identified improvements in the North Burlingame subarea to be $2,720,000; and the costs of identified improvements in the Rollins Road subarea to be $990,000. The money accrued will be kept separately by subarea. Should a project exceed the matching money accumulated for the area, the city may front the money and be paid back by future development fees raised in the subarea. Since these projects will be built over time as the money becomes available, the cost will be adjusted annually based on the latest Engineering News Record Highway Construction Cost Index. This is the same procedure which has been used for the Bayfront Development Fee for over 20 years. Because this is a development fee, it will not be effective on all projects until 60 days after Council adoption of the ordinance establishing the fee. However, the hospital project, which was being processed in parallel with the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, has been required to pay the North Burlingame subarea development fee as a condition of approval; and will participate in the funding of the more broadly planned traffic, circulation,pedestrian and amenity improvements identified for the North Burlingame subarea. ATTACHMENTS: Figure 1-2 Specific Plan Area, North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, adopted September 20, 2004 North Burlingame/Rollins Road Planning Area—Basis for Development Fees, Planning Department, December 2004 Chapter 8, Implementation,North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, adopted September 20, 2004 Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Adopting Development Fees for Public Improvements in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Planning Area :: .it �: e � .:� ■■ �, AiWQ ���1���� l�upllnulturin _ . tlq���111111 IIIIIIIIIt11 ___. -� 11111111 ,s 1 gas `' ♦ a_������ii g� 11111111/1 � �� � ` ♦i�___�_�_i� _ O 11111111\� �� ��■ �IlIIIIIf►,AHII 11111 C. ����— MEEA!'s aln=�Q�i III►� ?:: __;::— - � h US g � _ �.�- ���_ : CIIIIIIIIIIII � � ► - �����: p_ —�_� -Ilillllltlll N X111 ,lnlilu,. y�I>1 _.__ =�wg _ -i1IIIIIIIINIII IIU,�QIIII►,,�Ijpill�C me as a= �1111111111111pti{ IaU n � 4inu1--- �o=- ==on = i tlllll IlT�, __FRO �� VIII 11111 11{11 ;_ .III ■ —== —_= c- �__■_:: �7 u -- --_ CJ� _� L -_____ 4 II tltil 11111 Ilill 1101.0__ Bug _-__ j 5. =: =111111111 Illlcm ll _ .. __ _-�� ��=� _� --�� ■I{1 IIIl11 111111 Iill , . _ __ __ —_ __ __ u•--� 1�1 �gam_, 11/1111 tl ==°■'UI '� 1n urn�_ ■rn um uul nut_ .�J .� `y am &R,1 �Jr�1111 ►1 11 -- — — ------ L__�____-_-___,_-_�___� :nl u■/111 . ■ __ __ _ ..�11`;Ill�/ .� 5110--— __ _��_- rr /�' �• �- 1111111 North Burlingame/Rollins Road Planning Area-Basis for Development Fees Anticipated New Uses EI Camino Real Area Use Area(Square Feet) Retail-Mixed Use 77,250 Multi-Family Residential 656,400 Hospital 442,000 Medical Office Building 151,032 Retail Additions 50,000 Office Add/Replacement 25,000 TOTAL 1,401,682 Total Cost of Streetscape Improvements $2,720,000 EI Camino Real Area= Cost per square foot of new building area= $1.94 50%of cost per square foot= $0.97 40%of cost per square foot= $0.78 Rollins Road Industrial Area Use Area(Square Feet) Industrial 810,750 Commercial-Auto Dealer 98,960 TOTAL 909,710 Total Cost of Streetscape Improvements Rollins Road Industrial Area= $990,000.00 Cost per square foot of new building area= $1.09 50%of cost per square foot= $0.54 Total Streetscape Costs Both Areas= $3,710,000.00 Costs for Basic Streetscape Improvements -Per Jane Gomery,PW,12/7/04 Curb&Gutter $40.00 per lineal foot Sidewalk(assume 10'width $100.00 per lineal foot Street Trees $200.00 per 15 gallon tree Tree Grates $1,000.00 each I i t i t } 8 IMPLEMENTATION 1 r } i This chapter describes the ways in which the City of Burlingame will implement this Specific Plan. It includes a summary of development incentives for private property owners that are i included in this Plan, a list of implementation actions for the City to undertake, and informa- tion on the creation of a development fee to pay for public improvements. i A. Development Incentives B. Implementation Actions This Specific Plan includes several develop- The City will undertake a number of actions ment incentives intended to spur the private to implement the vision included in this development community to implement the Specific Plan. ideas included in this Plan. These incentives `include the following: 1. Zoning Code Revisions ♦ A density bonus for parcels at the north and south ends of Rollins Road whose Once this Specific Plan is adopted, the City owners agree to develop or allow the will revise its Zoning Code to match the pro- City to develop gateway features along visions of the Specific Plan. This will include it the street, as approved by the City. the additions of provisions to allow automo- bile sales uses in portions of the M1 zone ♦ Allowance of automobile sales uses on along Adrian Road, as well as change s to var- parcels along Adrian Road where amalga- ious height and setback requirements and mated parcel size is over 5 acres. Thisi new provisions for density bonuses in gate- will encourage the combining of parcels way areas. The zoning code would also have in this area. to be amended to include residential uses in (i . ♦ A residential density bonus for coordi- the North of Trousdale subarea and portions nated development on multiple parcels in of the El Camino Real/Mills Peninsula Hospital Block subarea; and to address the the El Camino Gateway area. This will . encourage aggregation of parcels in this relationship between zoning regulations, area. review lines for height and aviation-required height limitations in subarea B-4, North of Trousdale. i I NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN f ' i CHAPTER 81 IMPLEMENTATION TABLE 8-I STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Street or Location Name Estimated Cost El Camino Real $1,220,000 Trousdale Drive $880,000 California Drive $100,000 Magnolia Drive $520,000 a Rollins Road Gateway $60,000 Rollins Road Streetscape $600,000 New Road between Rollins and Adrian Roads $330,000* Total $3,380,000 * This cost reflects construction of the entire street,including the road,sidewalks and streetscape,but does not include land costs. 2. A proposed s development P Streetsca�a Improvements new develo iin the area,the Chapter 5 describes a series of streetscape City will require that property owners make improvements in various parts of the North streetscape improvements along their Burlingame area that are intended to fulfill frontages consistent with this Plan. In some the vision outlined in this Specific Plan. The cases,the City may also make improvements City will ensure that these streetscape on its own, independent of development on improvements are made over time by levying adjacent parcels. When this occurs, the City a development fee on each project to contrib- may collect fees from benefiting property ute a fair share towards these improvements. owners in advance, or the City may pay for Table 8-1;shows an estimate of the total cost the improvements and collect costs from for the streetscape improvements on each property owners later as part of a develop- street, and for the Rollins Road gateway. ment fee charged to new development. Streetsca a improvements will be imple- mented P P mented in either of two ways. Whenever 112 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN CHAPTER S: IMPLEMENTATION 3. Rollins Road Trail and Open The abandonment of this residual land will Space Network result in additional value accruing to the adja- This Specific Plan envisions a new trail and cent property owners. Table 8-2 shows an open space network in the southern portion estimate of the value expected to be accrued of the Rollins Road area. This network will to each owner. This value will be considered be implemented incrementally through land in setting the Development Fee described in use regulations affecting new development Section C, below, and it will also be consid- that are included in Chapter 4 of this Plan. ered in negotiations around affordability of the residential units to be built on the prop- erties in question. The estimated values are 4. El Camino Real Residual Land based on square foot estimates of land values Disposition on El Camino Real compiled by Bay Area The streetscape improvements along El Economics as a part of this study,and should Camino Real will result in surplus land that be checked through an appraisal or other is currently in the City right-of-way on both means prior to setting final fee structures. sides of the street. The City will transfer this surplus property to the adjacent property owners at the time that it is abandoned by the 5. Sign Ordinance on Auto Row City. If, after a title search, it is determined Once this Specific Plan is adopted, the City that the underlying property is owned by the will amend its Sign Ordinance to include spe- adjacent property owners, title will revert to cial regulations for signs on Adrian Road these owners when the City right-of-way is belonging to businesses that engage in auto- abandoned. mobile sales. Chapter 6 gives some guidance for the architectural character of signs for However,this will only occur in conjunction these businesses and a revision of the Sign with agreements between the City and the Ordinance will assure that a minimum stan- affected property owners that will ensure dard is set for the aesthetic character of signs that the owners will immediately use the along the freeway frontage. abandoned property for development consis- tent with the vision in this Specific Plan and that adequate funding will be available to im- plement desired streetscape improvements on El Camino Real. NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 113 CHAPTER S: IMPLEMENTATION C. Development Fee A fee will be established for each subarea based on the benefit to each property of the streetscape program for the area. Each prop- erty owner would contribute a share of the cost for improvements at the time of develop- ment. The City will implement improve- ment projects based on a contiguous area where a substantial portion of the streetscape has been funded. 14 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN I ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS 3 ROAD SPECIFIC PLANNING AREA 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 5 6 Section 1. In September 2004,the City Council adopted the North Burlingame/Rollins 7 Road Specific Plan as an amendment to the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan identifies 8 a series of improvements that are necessary to improve the area so that the goals of the Specific 9 Plan, and in turn, the City's General Plan, can be accomplished as the area is developed. 10 The City Council of the City of Burlingame hereby finds and declares that it is necessary to 11 provide for future construction,improvement,and enhancement of public arterials and access, 12 and to impose charges to support and defer the costs of the benefits rendered to owners and 13 occupants of lands enjoying these improvements. 14 The City Council further finds and declares that such improvements are necessary to 15 safeguard and improve the life, health,property, and public welfare of the area served, and of 16 all persons occupying the properties of the Specific Plan Area. The specific improvements are 17 described in the Specific Plan adopted by the City Council in September 2004, setting the 18 proposed areas of benefit, the boundaries of which are specifically described in the Specific 19 Plan. The improvements for the Rollins Road area are different in type and intensity from those 20 proposed for the El Camino Real area;therefore,it is appropriate and fair to separate those areas 21 for purposes of valuation and benefit. In addition,the fees are calculated upon the basis that the 22 City will contribute fifty percent of the cost of the proposed improvements, and sixty percent 23 with regard to development of square footage of duplexes and multiple family dwellings as a 24 means of encouraging residential development. 25 The Council further finds and declares that the contribution of the above—described 26 improvements will enhance the economic value of the occupants, businesses, leaseholds and 27 landowners throughout the area by providing for traffic and pedestrian safety on or near the real 28 property in said area, thereby reducing the probability of bodily injury and property damage, 12/27/2004 I make said area more accessible to emergency services,such as fire and police,and enhance and 2 promote aesthetic and environmental quality on or near the occupants of the real and personal 3 property by making access to said properties quicker, more efficient, and more inviting. 4 It is the intention of the City Council that this ordinance be enacted pursuant to the 5 City's police power for the construction of effective,safe,and attractive transportation facilities 6 as stated hereinabove. 7 8 Section 2. Confirmation of Areas and Costs. 9 The North Burlingame/Rollins Road Area is hereby divided into two areas of benefit: 10 (a)The Rollins Road Area of Benefit is hereby created,being within the boundaries of 11 the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan Area located to the east of the railroad tracks 12 as shown in Figure 1-2 of the Specific Plan. It is determined that all property within this benefit 13 area will be benefitted by the construction of the public improvements set forth in the Rollins 14 Road Area of Benefit as described in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. The 15 estimated construction costs of these improvements of$990,000, as prepared by the Public 16 Works Department and as set forth in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, are 17 hereby confirmed. 18 (b) The North Burlingame El Camino Real Area of Benefit is hereby created, being 19 within the boundaries of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan Area located to the 20 west of the railroad tracks as shown in Figure 1-2 of the Specific Plan. It is determined that all 21 property within this benefit area will be benefitted by the construction of the public 22 improvements set forth in the North Burlingame El Camino Real Area of Benefit as described 23 in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. The estimated construction costs of these 24 improvements of$2,720,000, as prepared by the Public Works Department and as set forth in 25 the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, are hereby confirmed. 26 27 Section 3. Required Participation. 28 All persons constructing new buildings or adding more than one thousand(1,000)square 12/27/2004 -2 - I feet of gross floor area to existing buildings within said area of benefit are required to participate 2 in the system of regulatory charges hereinafter set forth to insure that all of the objectives set 3 forth in Section 1 are achieved. Additions shall only require the payment for the added square 4 footage of structure. Changes of use of or within existing buildings to a use requiring a higher 5 charge shall require payment for the floor area devoted to the new use. 6 7 Section 4. Fees. 8 Fees are hereby established for all property within the North Burlingame/Rollins Road 9 Areas of Benefit; one-half of said fees shall be deposited with submittal of the project 10 assessment for traffic allocation or planning application to the Planning Department and the 1 I remaining one-half shall be paid prior to the approval of final framing of buildings or additions 12 subject to this ordinance. In the case of a change of use within a building,the fee shall be paid 13 one-half at the time of application for a conditional use permit and one-half before scheduling 14 the final inspection of tenant improvements for the change in use; if no tenant improvements 15 are contemplated,the second one-half shall be paid within thirty 30)days of the approval fo the 16 conditional use permit. Any project which has submitted a project assessment or planning 17 application prior to the effective date of any amendment to this ordinance but has not received 18 a building permit,shall at the time of receiving the building permit,pay any difference between 19 the amount paid at the submittal of the project assessment or application and the amount of the 20 fee established by that amendment. These fees shall be in the following amounts: 21 22 (a) Rollins Road Area of Benefit------------------------- $0.54 per square foot of building 23 24 (b) North Burlingame El Camino Area of Benefit 25 (i) Multiple family dwelling or duplex use ---- $0.78 per square foot of building 26 (ii) Any use other than multiple family dwelling 27 or duplex ----------------------------------- $0.97 per square foot of building 28 12/27/2004 - 3 - I Determination as to the appropriate classification of a use shall be determined by the City 2 Planner, subject to an appeal to the City Council filed no later than ten (10) days following 3 determination by the City Planner. An appeal must be in writing and filed with the City Clerk 4 within the required time period. Fees shall be annually reviewed and adjusted to reflect the 5 increase or decrease in the latest Engineering News Record Highway Construction Cost Index, 6 as of July 1 of each year. If a project does not proceed to construction for reasons determined 7 by the City Planner to be beyond the control of the applicant,the portion of the development fee 8 on deposit with the City may be returned to the applicant. Planning and environmental fees will 9 not be returned. 10 11 Section 5. Use of Funds. 12 All charges collected pursuant to this ordinance shall be placed in one of two special 13 funds, either the Rollins Road Benefit Area Fund or the North Burlingame El Camino Real 14 Benefit Area Fund, as applicable under this ordinance. Payments from these funds shall be 15 limited to costs related to design,right of way acquisition,and roadway,pedestrian,landscaping, 16 and circulation improvements set forth in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan or 17 for reimbursement pursuant to the agreement of a property owner required to construct a portion 18 of said improvements, the construction costs of which exceed the charges which would 19 otherwise be required of said developer, and only for those improvements located in the 20 applicable area of benefit defined by this ordinance. Additionally, these funds may be used to 21 reimburse the City for any City funds advanced for improvement or developer reimbursement 22 purposes in connection with the completion of the improvement work in the area of benefit if 23 the advanced City funds exceed more than 50 percent of actual costs of the improvements. 24 25 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law and shall take effect 26 sixty(60) days after its adoption. 27 Mayor 28 12/27/2004 - 4 - 1 I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify 2 that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3 day of ,2005,and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council 4 held on the day of , 2005, by the following vote: 5 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 6 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 7 8 City Clerk 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12/27/2004 - 5 - CITY AGENDA 8b ITEM# B��""�aME STAFF REPORT MAG. c- ` DATE Januacy 3,2005 69 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE BY DATE: December 15, 2004 APPROVED FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY SUBJECT: Planning Commissioner Resignation RECOMMENDATION Take action on Planning Commission appointment to replace Christopher Keele. BACKGROUND Due to emerging personal and professional commitments, Christopher Keele has submitted his written resignation effective December 14, 2004. Council may choose one of the following, or other, options and direct staff accordingly: • Open the application period to the public and establish a filing deadline of Friday, February 4, 2005; and select a council interview subcommittee. • Open the application process to only applicants that have applied to City commissions in the last two years. RECEIVED S T O E L III Sutter Street,CaliforniaWIC700 Sat Francisco, ifforW 94104 RIVESDEC 1 4 2004 phone 415.617.8900 LLP fax 4LS.676.3000 rsww.stoel.com CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING DEPT. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CHR1s oPHER A.KEEL.E Direct(415)617-8907 cakeele@stoel.com December 14,2004 VIA E-MAIL The Honorable Joe Galligan,Mayor ooegalligan@aol.com) Cathy Baylock,Vice Mayor(cathy@baylock.com) Rosalie O'Mahony, Council Member(rosalieomahonyl@netzero.net) Mike Coffey, Council Member(mcoffey@aol.com) Terry Nagel, Council Member(terry@terrynagel.com) City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,California 94010-3997 Dear Mayor Galligan and Council Members: It is with much regret that I inform you of my decision to resign from the Planning Commission. Emerging personal and professional commitments prevent me from devoting the time and energy that are necessary to serve effectively on the commission. This has been a very difficult decision to make, as I love serving our community in this capacity. Nonetheless,as public servants we must give the citizens of Burlingame our undivided time,commitment and energy, and I have reluctantly come to the realization that,for the foreseeable future,I cannot give the City my 100%. It and you it deserve no less. I have been extremely honored to be able to serve the City as a planning commissioner the past several years. And I will truly miss the professionalism and camaraderie of working with Meg Monroe and her staff, Larry Anderson, each of you,and,most of all, Ralph, Stan,Ann,Joe,Tim and Michael. My fellow commissioners are incredibly talented and genuinely good people, and it has been my privilege to sit on the same panel with them. Oregon 3k' .sh.ni,to't Calf fnrnfa Utalt Idaho December 14,2004 Page 2 I cannot thank you enough for the opportunity to serve our community. Thank you too for your support and guidance. I wish you well in your efforts to keep Burlingame special and wonderful. I know its future is in good hands. Warm regards r S Christopher A.Kele cc: Ralph Osterling(ralph@ralphosterling.com) Tim Auran(timauran@worldnet.att.net) Michael Brownrigg(mbrownrigg@chinavest.com) Stan Vistica(vistica@mbtarch.com) Ann Keighran(ann@sjkdev.com) Joe Boju6s(bojues@bojues-mcswain.com) Meg Monroe(MMonroe@burlingame.org) Larry Anderson(LAnderson@burlingame.org) CITY 0_ AGENDA P ITEM# — SC-- ----- BURLINGAME MTG. STAFF REPORT DATE ,lama 2005 9a TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SYSMiTTE — Bl DATE: December 27, 2004 V APPROVED FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Commissioner Resignation RECOMMENDATION Take action on Parks and Recreation Commission appointment to replace Mara Khan. BACKGROUND Due to an impending relocation, Mara Khanhas submitted her written resignation effective January, 2005. Council may choose one of the following, or other, options and direct staff accordingly: • Open the application period to the public and establish a filing deadline of Friday, January 21, 2005; and select a council interview subcommittee. • Open the application process to only applicants that have applied to City commissions in the last two years. CITY 0 STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA ITEM# 9a 4,0 0 p0 MTG. 9 �AATED JUNEd DATE January 3,2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: January 3,2005 APPROV ��ff�� FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director/Treasurer BY "v ek'lw SUBJECT: Amendment No. 3 to the Cable System Franchise Agreement Between The City of Burlingame and RCN Telecom Services, Incorporated RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the third amendment the cable television franchise to allow for the itemization of PEG fees on subscriber bills. BACKGROUND: RCN has requested that the franchise language prohibiting them from "passing-through to Subscribers, by way of line itemization, surcharge or addition to an otherwise permissible rate or charge..."be amended to allow the itemization of the Public, Educational and Governmental (PEG) fees on customers monthly bills. The original franchise established, Exhibit C. Grantee Commitment To PEG Access Facilities and Equipment. Section 3 (b) of the exhibit created an annual grant to support PEG access. The grant is continued for the duration of the franchise and the grant funds are paid to the City of Burlingame on a quarterly basis together with the franchise fee payments. Exhibit C, Section 3 (d) also indicates that the City"shall not oppose the inclusion on Subscribers' bills of the access grants provided above, so long as said inclusion is done in a manner consistent with the provisions of Federal and State law and regulation." At the time that the franchise was approved, RCN agreed "that any included amount shall not be itemized separately on Subscriber bills." RCN funds the annual PEG access grant by assessing each customer$0.42 per month. The City Attorney has reviewed RCN's requests and has indicated that Federal and State law allow the itemized inclusion of the PEG fees on subscribers' bills. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Approving Amendment No. 3 to the Cable System Franchise Agreement Between The City of Burlingame and RCN Telecom Services, Incorporated, Allowing for the Itemization of PEG Fees Third Amendment To Cable System Franchise Agreement Between The City Of Burlingame And RCN Telecom Services, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND RCN TELECOM SERVICES, INC. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, RCN Telecom Service of California, Inc. (RCN of California) was granted a franchise to operate a cable television franchise pursuant to Chapter 6.48 of the Burlingame Municipal Code in 1999, which was assumed by its successor, RCN Telecom Services, Inc. (RCN); and WHEREAS, in Resolution No. 5-2004 adopted on January 5, 2004, the City Council approved amendments to the Franchise Agreement in Amendment No. 1 to allow RCN to seek additional financing and extend the build-out period; and WHEREAS, in Resolution No. 90-2004 adopted on October 4, 2004, the City Council approved amendments to the Franchise Agreement in Amendment No. 2 to allow RCN to delay buildout of its systems in the City; and WHEREAS, RCN is proposing that it be allowed to disclose where consumers payments will go for PEG Access as provided in Federal law, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1 . The amendment to the cable television franchise agreement with RCN contained in Exhibit A hereto is approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the Agreement by and on behalf of the City, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to witness the signature of the City Manager. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2004, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk THIRD AMENDMENT TO CABLE SYSTEM FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND RCN TELECOM SERVICES, INC. This Amendment No. 3 is entered into this 3rd day of January 2005,by and between the City of Burlingame ("City") and RCN Telecom Services, Inc. ("RCN") as an amendment to the Franchise Agreement between the City and RCN Telecom Services of California, Inc. dated August 7, 2000 ("Franchise Agreement"): I. Exhibit C. Section 3 (d) shall read as follows: (d) Grantor shall not oppose the inclusion on Subscriber's bills of the PEG access grants provided above, so long as said inclusion is done in a manner consistent with the provisions of Federal and State law and regulation. Any notice to subscribers detailing information regarding these grants shall be subject to prior Grantor review and approval. 2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment No. 3, all other terms and conditions of the Franchise Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Burlingame and RCN Telecom Service, Inc. have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Franchise Agreement. Jesus Nava Date David Hankin Date Finance Director/Treasurer RCN Vice-President David A.Hankin Vice President ,RCN Regulatory&Government 1400 Fashion Island Blvd., Suite 100 San Mateo CA 94404 (650)212-8010 Fax(650)212-8009 December 3, 2004 Jesus Nava, Finance Director City of Burlingame, City Hall 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010-3997 Re: Franchise Amendment Request Dear Mr Nava: This is in reference to Exhibit C, Grantee Commitment to PEG Access, Facilities and Equipment, contained in the cable television franchise between the City of Burlingame ("City") and RCN Telecom Services Inc, as amended. Exhibit C, Section 3 (b) provides for grants to support Public, Educational and Governmental Access. With regard to reflecting such Grants on subscriber's bills, Exhibit C, Section 3(d) states: "(d) Grantor shall not oppose the inclusion on Subscriber's bills of the Access grants provided above, so long as said inclusion is done in a manner consistent with the provisions of Federal and State law and regulation. Grantee agrees that any included amount shall not be itemized separately on Subscriber bills. Any notice to Subscribers detailing information regarding these grants shall be subject to prior Grantor review and approval." RCN hereby respectfully requests that Exhibit C. Section 3(d) be amended or modified to eliminate the second sentence. Accordingly, this Section is proposed to read as follows: "(d) Grantor shall not oppose the inclusion on Subscriber's bills of the Access grants provided above, so long as said inclusion is done in a manner consistent with the provisions of Federal and State law and regulation. Any notice to subscribers detailing information regarding these grants shall be subject to prior Grantor review and approval." RCN would like to itemize the PEG Access Grants separately on the subscribers bills in order (1) to bring all charges to light and pass-through appropriate charges as we proceed with the completion of our restructuring process and(2)to clearly inform our subscribers of those charges contained in their bills.Also,this request is consistent with Federal Law (Section 622 of the Communications Act of 1934),which permits a separate line item on the regular bill to reflect PEG Access support payments.Of course,any notice to subscribers itemizing the PEG Access support payments would still be subject to prior review and approval by the City. We appreciate your consideration of this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, David Hankin 2W AGENDA BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT _ ITEM k 9b MTG. 1/3/05 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITT BY DATE: December 14, 2004 APPROV D FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY ' SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WITH D'ARCY AND HARTY CONSTRUCTION INC., AND AN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT WITH UCM FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT PHASE 2, CITY PROJECT NO. 81010 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that Council approve the following: ► A resolution authorizing Change Order No. 1 with D'arcy and Harry Construction, Inc. in the amount of $600,000 to perform additional sewer pipe installation. ► A resolution for an agreement amendment with UCM in the amount of$100,000 for design and construction management services for the additional pipe installation. BACKGROUND: On July 19, 2004, Council awarded a $1,289,657 contract to D'arcy and Harry Construction for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project. The scope of work included sewer rehabilitation in the remaining portion of the Burlingame Park Subdivision and the 1400 block of Capuchino Avenue. The work is currently 70% complete. DISCUSSION: The City Hall area has a history of sewer back-ups. Staff believes it makes sense to extend the scope of the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project to cover the adjacent City Hall area. The contractor has performed exceptionally well working with the public and meeting proj ect specifications in a timely manner.By including this work within the current project instead of rebidding, staff estimates a savings of over $60,000. The scope of the change order will add one mile of new sewer main located along Almer Road, Bellevue Avenue, Douglas Avenue, Floribunda Avenue, and Primrose Road. The change order is consistent with the original request for bids, which required bid alternatives (dependent on available funding) on the general area covered by the proposed change order, and the change order amount is within the standard 25% variation from the bid alternatives. EXHIBITS: Resolutions, Change Order No. 1, Agreement Amendment BUDGET IMPACT: There are sufficient funds in the existing sewer capital improvement budget. Following is a financial summary of the project: Expenditures: Construction $ 1,290,000 Change Order No. 1 6005000 Contingency 130,000 Construction Management 250,000 Additional Design & CM 10000 Engineering Administration 100,000 Total $ 2,470,000 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO THE BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT PHASE 2 (CITY PROJECT NO. 81010) TO INCREASE THE PROJECT BUDGET AND CONTRACT WITH WARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION TO A TOTAL PROJECT OF$1,890,000 RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City is in the midst of a multi-year program to rehabilitate and improve the City's sanitary sewer system; and WHEREAS, in July 2004,the City awarded a contract for rehabilitation work in the Burlingame Park Subdivision area to D'Arcy& Harty, based on a base bid and the projected funding available at the time; and WHEREAS, since that time, funding for sewer rehabilitation work has become more certain, and it is now possible to add the bid alternates required in the original request for bids for the project, as well as an additional twenty-five percent on a unit basis; and WHEREAS,this will accelerate rehabilitation of the sewer system in this neighborhood at a favorable price to the City and its citizens; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is willing and agreeable to this Change Order No. 1, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 1 to the Agreement with D'Arcy& Harty for the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project in a total amount of up to $1,890,000 for the entire project. MAYOR I,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2005,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCII,MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON BURLINGAME PARK SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT PHASE 2 CITY PROJECT NO. 81010 RESOLVED,by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame,California and this Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement amendment cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature. Mayor I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES. COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk Funding: Project Authorization $ 1,770,000 Transfer from Eastern Creek Sewer Project 81150 700,000 Total $ 2,470,000 Donald Chang, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Finance Director, City Attorney CA\Documents and Settings\DCHANGTocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKEA\changeorderstaffrpt.ccr.wpd CITY OF BURLINGAME Project No:8 10 10 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Job Name: Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 2 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 Contractor: D'Arcy and Harty Construction Company 650/558-7230 CONTRACT CHANGE DATE: 12/08/04 ORDER NO: 1 Kindof Change —1 Engineer's Change...........................................................................................................................................X ExtraWork or Material...................................................................................................................................❑ Changes at Contractor's Request.....................................................................................................................❑ 1.Explain necessity for change NOTICE:This Change Order will not become effective until it has been signed by the City Engineer. 2.Describe work to be done The following streets are hereby added to this proiect: 3.Estimate quantities involved 1. Almer Road,Bellvue Road,Douglas Avenue,Floribunda Avenue,and Primrose Road.The total length of the sewer mains to be added is around 5200 linear feet. 2. The attached plans and Engineer's Estimate for quantity and cost estimates are included within this change order.All Unit Prices are based on the Bid Item unit prices for the project. 3. The following item unit price is added to the project: Asphalt Concrete Surface Repair at 6"depth: $6.00 per SF. The total estimated cost is approximately$600,000 Contractor Acceptance Agreed Total Cost of Change$600,000 By Reason of this Change, 60 working day extension of time will be allowed. By Date Contractor Title Approvals -4 Submitted Recommended Approved Date City Engineer Notice to Contractor —1 TO D'Arcy and Harty Contruction Co.,Contractor:You are hereby directed to make the above changes from the plans and specifications or do the above described work not included in the Plans and Specifications on your Job No.81010. City Engineer SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81010\CCO 1\cco#l.wpd BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PHASE 2 CITY PROJECT NO.81010 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ON ALTERNATE ITEMS ITEM EST. UNIT ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUAN UNIT PRICE TOTALS A GENERAL ITEMS 1 SIDEWALK RECONSTRUCTION 20 SF $9.00 $180.00 2 DRIVEWAY RECONSTRUCTION 10 SF $10.00 $100.00 CURB AND GUTTER RECONSTRUCTION WITH ASPHALT 3 REPLACEMENT 10 LF 40.00 $400.00 4 REPAIR SAG SECTION ON SEWER MAIN 20 LF $120.00 $2,400.00 5 POST TV INSPECTION 5,207 LF $1.00 $5,206.50 B ALTERNATE ITEM NO.1(ALMER,PRIMROSE ROAD AND BELLVUE AVE) REPLACE 6"SEWER MAIN WITH 8"SEWER MAIN BY 6 PIPEBURSTING 911 LF $75.00 $68,325.00 REPLACE 8"OR 10"DIAMETER SEWER MAIN WITH SAME SIZE 7 1193 LF SEWER MAIN $75.00 $89.475.00 8 REPLACE EXISTING SEWER MAIN WITH OPEN-CUT 56 LF $110.00 $6,160.00 9 REHABILITATE 4"SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 14 EA $900.00 $12,960.00 10 REHABILITATE 6"SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 23 EA $1,200.00 $27,600.00 REPLACE 4"OR 6"SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 11 BY OPEN CUT 2 EA $1,750.00 $2,800.00 12 INSTALL NEW MANHOLE 2 EA $3,000.00 $6,000.00 13 MANHOLE REPLACEMENT 7 EA $3,000.00 $21,000.00 ALTERNATE ITEM NO.1 TOTAL: $234,320.00 C ALTERNATE ITEM NO.2(FLORIBUNDA AVE) REPLACE 6"SEWER MAIN WITH 8"SEWER MAIN BY 14 PIPEBURSTING IN FLORIBUNDA AVE 1148 LF 75.00 $86.088.95 REPLACE 8"OR 10"DIAMETER SEWER MAIN WITH SAME SIZE 15 SEWER MAIN 244 LF 75.00 $18.300.00 16 REPLACE EXISTING SEWER MAIN WITH OPEN-CUT 129 LF $110.00 $14,151.53 17 HAND DIG AND REPLACE EXISTING SEWER MAIN 10 LF $100.00 $1,000.00 18 REHABILITATE 4" SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 24 EA $900.00 $21,375.00 19 REHABILITATE 6" SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 7 EA $1,200.00 $8,400.00 REPLACE 4"OR 6" SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 20 BY OPEN CUT 1 EA $1,750.00 $2,187.50 21 MANHOLE REPLACEMENT 4 EA $3,000.00 $12,000.00 22 MANHOLE REHABILITATION 1 EA $1,850.00 $1,850.00 ALTERNATE ITEM NO. 2 TOTAL: $165,352.99 D ALTERNATE ITEM NO. 3 (DOUGLAS AVE, PRIMROSE ROAD AND FLORIBUNDA AVE) REPLACE 6" SEWER MAIN WITH 8" SEWER MAIN BY 23 PIPEBURSTING IN PRIMROSE ROAD 271 LF 75.00 $20,325.00 REPLACE 10"SEWER MAIN WITH 10" SEWER MAIN BY 24 PIPEBURSTING IN DOUGLAS AVE AND FLORIBUNDA AVE 1245 LF 75.00 $93,375.00 25 REHABILITATE 4" SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 28 EA 900.00 $25,200.00 26 REHABILITATE 6" SEWER LATERALS INCLUDING CLEANOUT 13 EA $1,200.00 $15,600.00 27 MANHOLE REPLACEMENT 5 EA $3,000.00 $15,000.00 28 INSTALL NEW MANHOLE 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 ALTERNATE ITEM NO. 3 TOTAL: $172,500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE (A,B,C & D): $580,459.49 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT NO. 1 CONSULTING SERVICES TO THE BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT, PHASE 2 CITY PROJECT NO. 81010 THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into this day of 2005, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT", WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT have previously entered into an agreement for certain services, said agreement being dated JUNE 21 , 2004; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties to amend said agreement as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Amendment of Agreement Said agreement dated JUNE 21, 2004, is hereby amended to include those revisions in services and compensation set forth in EXHIBIT "A" attached. 2. In all other respects said agreement dated JUNE 21, 2004, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on the day and year first above written. CITY OF BURLINGAME A municipal corporation Approved as to form: By City Manager City Attorney ATTEST: City Clerk Consultant SAA Public Works Directory\Author,By Name\Peggy Adam Letters WGREEMENTAMENDMENT.wpd ��� CITY STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA ITEM # 9c 9,m MTG. FATED 1V.. DATE 1/3/05 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITT �— BY DATE: January 3, 2005 APPROV FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director/Treasurer BY 650-558-7222 f f. SUBJECT: Investment Policy for 2005 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City of Burlingame's investment policy for 2005. BACKGROUND: State law requires the City Council to annually review and approve the policy for investment of City funds. There are no major changes to the policy. The only change is in the requirements for financial institution that sell Certificates of Deposit. The following requirement is deleted: "Institutions must also carry an "A " rating from The Financial Directory. " The Financial Directory is no longer published. The City currently does not have any investments in Certificates of Deposits. ATTACHMENTS: 2005 Statement of Investment Policy CITY OF BURLINGAME, CA STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY January 2005 PURPOSE This statement contains guidelines for the prudent investment of the City's temporarily idle cash in accordance with Government Code sections 53600, et. seq. The ultimate goal is to protect the City's pooled cash while producing a reasonable return on investments. OBJECTIVES 1 . Accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues to insure investment of moneys to the fullest extent. 2. Invest in a range of instruments to insure diversification of the City's portfolio. 3. As a primary objective, safeguard the principal of funds. The secondary objective will be to meet the liquidity needs of the City. The third objective is to achieve a return on the investment of funds. 4. Investments will be in compliance with governing provisions of the law. ACCEPTABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS Acceptable investments authorized for purchase by the finance director/treasurer are: 1 . U.S. Government and Agency Securities (notes, bills or bonds of the U.S. Government and its agencies.) 2. Certificates of Deposit (deposits placed with commercial banks, savings and loan companies and/or thrift and loan companies, which meet the financial criteria established by the City.) 3. Bankers' Acceptances 4. Commercial Paper 5. Demand Deposits 6. Money Market Funds/Mutual Funds 7. Repurchase Agreements 8. Passbook Savings Accounts 9. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (deposits with commercial banks and/or savings and loan companies which meet the financial criteria established by the City.) 10. Local Agency Investment Funds (State Pool) 11 .County Investment Fund (San Mateo County Pool) 12.Guaranteed Investment Contracts (collateralized with Government Securities, physically delivered to an acceptable safekeeping account.) Page 1 of 3 The State pool and San Mateo County Pool invests in additonal Government Code authorized investments that are not approved for direct purchase by the finance director/treasurer. These pools shall provide a current investment policy and monthly reports for review by the finance director/treasurer. The finance director/treasurer is authorized to invest in these pools provided they reasonably appear to be in conformance with their investment policies, which are attached for reference to this policy. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS -TERM LIMIT AND SAFEKEEPING The City will require physical delivery of the securities backing the repurchase agreements to an acceptable safekeeping account of a third party in the City's name as stated in Code Section 53601(1). Repurchase agreements will be used solely as short term investments not to exceed 30 days. MATURITY LIMIT State law requires that the maturity of any given instrument should not exceed five years unless specifically approved by City Council. Those over two years will be confined to U.S. Government and Agency securities. RESTRICTION ON INVESTMENT POLICIES AND CITY CONSTRAINTS Section 53600 et. seq. of the State of California Government Code outlines the collateral requirements for certain types of investments and also limits the percentage of total investments which can be placed in certain classifications. Investments must meet the time schedules as indicated by the cash flow projections of the City. Investments will ordinarily be held until maturity unless an advantageous exchange or profit can be made. In such cases, a documented analysis will be prepared and approved by the Finance Director/Treasurer. Investment decisions will not be influenced by forecasts or speculation regarding interest rates. The actual level of interest rates at any given time weighed with the soundness of the institution or investment instrument will be the primary basis of consideration. CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: INSTITUTION FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS All institutions must have a minimum of $100 million in assets. Institutions have a demonstrated history of positive earnings and must carry a minimum 3.5% equity ratio and must hold that ratio for at least one year prior to the City's investment. All institutions must be located within the State of California. For collateralized or negotiable certificates of deposit, the institution must have a minimum $1 billion in assets, in addition to meeting the above criteria. The City requires physical delivery of all negotiable securities to an acceptable safekeeping account at a designated depository. Page 2 of 3 DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY Pursuant to Burlingame Municipal Code Section 3.13.040 and Government Code Section 53607, the Finance Director/Treasurer is authorized to invest and reinvest money of the City, to sell or exchange securities so purchased, and to deposit such securities for safekeeping in accordance with and subject to this investment policy. Approved by City Council on January 3, 2005. Jim Nantell City Manager Jesus Nava Finance Director/Treasurer ATTEST: Doris Mortensen City Clerk Page 3 of 3 CITY 0 STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA ITEM # 9d MTG. O'O�NATEU JYNF 6`9 DATE 1/3/05 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: December 14, 2004 APPROVED FROM: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk By � uL 650-558-7203 .' 0 SUBJECT: Recommendation to Adopt the 2005 City Council Calendar dated 12/14/2004 RECOMMENDATION: To review, make changes if necessary and approve the 2005 Burlingame City Council Calendar dated 12/14/2004. BACKGROUND: To ensure that appropriate staff members will be available for the Budget Study Session, we are requesting to shift that meeting from June 1, 2005, to June 8, 2005. EXHIBITS: 2005 Burlingame City Council Calendar dated 12/14/2004 BUDGET IMPACT: None MERIN BURUNGAME 2005 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR City Council meetings are held on the first and third Monday of each month. When Monday is a holiday,the meeting is usually held on Tuesday or Wednesday. Study meetings are held as scheduled. Meetings begin at 7:00 at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road,and are open to the public. Regular Council meetings are televised live via Burlingame's Cable Channel 27. For more information,please view the City's website at www.burl ingarne.org or call the City Clerk at 650-558-7203. REGULAR MEETINGS STUDY MEETINGS AND OTHER DATES January 3 Tuesday, January 18 Saturday, January 29—Consult with Council on Budget policy issues and input on goals for 2005/06, 9 a.m., Lane Room, Burlingame Library Friday, February 4— Commissioner's Dinner February 7 Thursday, February 17—Joint Meeting with Parks & Recreation Commission, 6 p.m. Tuesday, February 22 Saturday, February 26—Present Budget Balancing Recommendations and Department goals to City Council March 7 March 21 April 4 April 18 May 2 Thursday, May 5 —Joint Meeting with Beautification Commission, 5 p.m. May 16 June 6 Wednesday, June 8 —Budget Study Session, 5 p.m. Wednesday, June 15 —City Manager's mid-year review, 5:30 p.m. June 20 Tuesday, June 21 —Joint Meeting with Library Board, 5:30 p.m. Tuesday, July 5 July 18 (tentative) August 1 August 15 (tentative) Tuesday, September 6 September 19 Monday, September 19—Joint Meeting with Civil Service Commission, 6 p.m. October 3 Thursday, October 13 —Joint Meeting with Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission, 6 p.m. October 17 November 7 November 21 December 5 Wednesday, December 7 —City Manager's year end review, 5:30 p.m. December 19 (tentative) 12/14/2004 11:30 AM $3,275,137.23 Ck.No.98560-99099 Excludes Library cks.98560-98594 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for November 2004 $2,267,905.15 Ck.No.160384-160657 INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION m ou m m N io CN S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS �1 CITY OF BURLINGAME 12-09-2004 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 8 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 41,287.01 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 9,124.71 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 2,410.62 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 26,896.56 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 584,254.83 WATER FUND 526 4,996.03 SEWER FUND 527 9,447.19 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,338.95 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 11,145.44 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 17,390.23 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 15,091.87 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 2,411.63 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 455.02 PUBLIC TV ACCESS FUND 738 3,280.00 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 8,043.84 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $737,573.93 vo 1 73�s� .39 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 99006 THROUGH 99099 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $737,573.93, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ............................... . . . . . . . ./. ../. .. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ... .......... . ...... . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 12/09/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99085 T MOBILE 24846 30.88 COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160 99086 BATTERIES AND BUTTER 24889 88.59 MISCELLANEOUS -6.60 201 23611 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 95.19 201 65200 203 99087 NEOPOST 24987 1,955.07 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,955.07 621 64450 200 99088 A2Z BUSINESS SYSTEMS 25020 1,110.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,110.00 101 65100 220 99089 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 438.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 438.02 101 65150 220 99090 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 516.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1646 99091 LORTON AVENUE LLC 25138 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 99092 JONATHAN BRANDAN 25139 325.00 MISCELLANEOUS 325.00 101 37010 99093 MIKE TRIMBLE 25140 651.29 MISCELLANEOUS 651.29 101 22546 99094 BENDERS CONCRETE PUMPING CO 25141 496.00 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 496.00 101 66210 219 99095 RUTH ROBINSON 25142 1,600.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,600.00 101 22520 99096 JULIUS REIMCHE 25143 960.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 960.00 101 22520 99097 PACIFIC LINERS 25144 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502 99098 ROEBBELEN CONTRACTING INC. 25145 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99099 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ELE 25146 90.00 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 90.00 101 65300 240 TOTAL $737,573.93 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 12/09/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99070 QUILL 24090 191.03 OFFICE EXPENSE 191.03 621 64450 110 99071 FLORA ROSELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 99072 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 341.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 341.60 101 68010 220 1521 99073 DISPLAY SALES 24384 426.50 MISCELLANEOUS -35.19 201 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 461.69 201 65200 111 99074 C.N. ROEN CO. 24474 496,157.81 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 496,157.81 327 79480 220 99075 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 267.57 COMMUNICATIONS 267.57 201 65200 160 99076 STAR CELLULAR OF MILLBRAE 24611 167.79 COMMUNICATIONS 167.79 101 66100 160 99077 BANK OF WALNUT CREEK 24613 41,345.99 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41,345.99 327 79480 220 99078 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 73.93 COMMUNICATIONS 73.93 101 66100 160 99079 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 1,220.01 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,220.01 619 64460 210 5121 99080 PRIMROSE PLAZA PARTNERS 24743 10,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 10,000.00 101 22520 - 99081 AETNA 24760 2,858.70 MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,587.40 130 20022 99082 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 3,626.01 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,626.01 130 20014 99083 AD CLUB 24809 205.56 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 205.56 101 64420 150 99084 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 343.65 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 343.65 625 65213 203 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 12/09/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99060 OFFICE MAX 23306 210.73 OFFICE EXPENSE 111.30 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 91.78 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE -103.20 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.09 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 21.27 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 73.49 201 65200 110 99061 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 2,400.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,400.00 101 64420 262 99062 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 23424 865.46 MISC. SUPPLIES 865.46 526 69020 120 99063 TONY PONTERIO 23552 350.00 MISCELLANEOUS 350.00 101 22546 99064 SBC/MCI 23728 8,066.87 COMMUNICATIONS 23.03 621 64450 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 8,043.84 896 20281 99065 CHEMSEARCH 23864 251.90 GAS, OIL & GREASE 251.90 201 65200 201 99066 FIREMARK TOOL CO 23937 192.77 MISCELLANEOUS -14.85 201 23611 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 207.62 201 65200 203 99067 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 185.51 COMMUNICATIONS 185.51 619 64460 160 99068 UBS 23951 14,266.40 MISC. SUPPLIES 587.06 101 68010 120 1111 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.34 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,195.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,836.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 619 64460 220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,671.00 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 964.00 619 64460 220 5210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 855.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 397.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,036.00 619 64460 220 5130 99069 SANDRO MASCARENHAS 24051 267.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 267.75 101 68010 220 1762 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 12/09/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99046 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 242.50 COMMUNICATIONS 242.50 621 64450 160 99047 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 158.02 SUPPLIES 158.02 620 15000 99048 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 4,282.30 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 33.50 101 65100 200 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 4,248.80 101 65100 800 99049 ON CAMERA PRODUCTIONS 21177 3,280.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,280.00 738 64580 220 99050 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 58.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 58.85 527 66520 120 99051 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 165.71 MISC. SUPPLIES 90.48 101 68020 120 2200 OFFICE EXPENSE 75.23 201 65200 110 99052 MONICA EHLERS 21627 234.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 234.00 101 68010 220 1661 99053 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747. 134.70 COMMUNICATIONS 134.70 101 65300 160 99054 MODULAR INFORMATION SYSTEMS 22005 4,462.07 MISCELLANEOUS 4,462.07 320 80420 400 6001 99055 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 1,837.42 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,837.42 527 66520 120 99056 LESCO INC. 22540 231.84 MISC. SUPPLIES 231.84 101 68020 120 2200 99057 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 38.36 COMMUNICATIONS 38.36 101 68010 160 1101 99058 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 164.70 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 164.70 101 65100 140 99059 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.04 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.04 526 69020 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 12/09/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99032 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 53.22 MISC. SUPPLIES 53.22 201 65200 111 99033 CAL-STEAM 10557 849.65 MISCELLANEOUS 85.64 101 68020 192 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 420.23 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 105.75 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 6.37 619 64460 120 5140 MISC. SUPPLIES 231.66 619 64460 120 5120 99034 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 929.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 237.07 101 65100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 692.80 530 65400 120 99035 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 124.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 124.00 101 68010 220 1787 99036 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 13,459.18 SUPPLIES 13,459.18 620 15000 99037 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 27.05 SMALL TOOLS 27.05 620 66700 130 99038 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 612.51 COMMUNICATIONS 612.51 101 65100 160 99039 TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH 18419 2,640.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,640.00 130 20018 99040 RALF SINGER 18476 1,941.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,941.00 101 68010 220 1660 99041 BAY ALARM 18854 136.34 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 123.17 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13.17 619 64460 220 5210 99042 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 206.28 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 206.28 101 64200 150 99043 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 132.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 132.00 101 64420 262 99044 WILSEY & HAM 19397 10,955.15 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,424.15 320 80880 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,531.00 320 80900 210 99045 GE CAPITAL 20216 75.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 101 68010 220 1100 } CITY OF.BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 12/09/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99019 IRVINE & JACHENS INC. 02599 331.25 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 331.25 201 65200 140 99020 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 1,625.94 MISC. SUPPLIES 506.62 619 64460 120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,119.32 619 64460 210 5120 99021 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 02880 2,760.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,760.78 526 69020 120 99022 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 705.00 MISC, SUPPLIES 232.77 101 66210 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 212.25 101 68020 190 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 85.99 101 66210 219 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 86.06 201 65200 190 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 80.41 201 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 7.52 526 69020 120 99023 MARGARET PRENDERGAST 03179 255.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 255.00 101 68010 220 1641 99024 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 1,383.00 GAS, OIL & GREASE 864.00 101 65100 201 TRAINING EXPENSE 519.00 620 66700 260 99025 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 4,387.45 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,387.45 320 76350 220 99026 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 64250 114 99027 JEAN BUCKS 09019 486.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 486.75 101 68010 220 1644 99028 POM INC. 09248 646.15 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 646.15 530 65400 200 99029 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 1,976.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 520.00 320 80110 210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 676.00 320 80880 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 780.00 320 80520 220 99030 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 11,145.44 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,145.44 618 64520 210 99031 ANA FITZGERALD 09975 516.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1646 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 12/09/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99006 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 85.35 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 65.91 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 19.44 619 64460 120 5120 99007 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 483.63 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 483.63 201 65200 203 99008 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1,305.51 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 28.46 101 68020 200 2100 GAS, OIL & GREASE 38.84 101 65200 201 VEHICLE MAINT. 83.92 101 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 107.51 101 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 6.79 527 66520 120 SUPPLIES 899.36 620 15000 SMALL TOOLS 29.26 620 66700 130 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 111.37 625 65213 203 99009 BURLINGAME GLASS COMPANY 01533 165.58 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 165.58 619 64460 220 5180 99010 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220 99011 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01745 145.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 145.00 101 64200 240 99012 WACEK DENNAOUI 02044 645.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 645.00 101 68010 220 1660 99013 VEOLIA WATER 02110 54,189.41 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 46,751.03 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 7,438.38 527 66530 190 99014 GENE EVANS 02149 322.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 322.50 101 68010 220 1644 99015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 951.65 MISCELLANEOUS 951.65 101 68020 192 2200 99016 U.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 120.04 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.69 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 68.35 619 64460 120 5130 99017 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 255.83 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 255.83 101 66210 226 99018 HEWLETT PACKARD 02457 5,115.89 MISCELLANEOUS 5,115.89 320 80420 400 6001 CITY OF BURLINGAME 12-03-2004 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 9 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 43,941.22 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 11,240.17 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,449.60 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 200,632.19 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 136,497.40 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 35,033.03 WATER FUND 526 214,037.62 SEWER FUND 527 202,370.71 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5,279.28 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 28,539.24 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,406.88 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 734.09 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 3,116.12 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 500.00 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 3,109.86 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 50,773.40 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $941,660.81 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS 1S TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON. PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98911 THROUGH 99005 1NCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $941,660.81, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../-.. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 99001 BEVERLEY CHEN 25133 146.74 MISCELLANEOUS 6.99 101 22518 MISCELLANEOUS 139.75 101 31510 99002 SANDRA STEELE 25134 35.02 MISCELLANEOUS 33.35 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 1.67 101 22518 99003 ARTISANS LANDSCAPE INC. 25135 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 99004 REX LUDWIG 25136 400.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 400.00 101 22520 99005 PRESSURE GROUT CO. 25137 11,256.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,256.00 320 76010 220 TOTAL 8947,660.81 I� X11 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98989 THOMAS NICHOL 24874 37.54 MISCELLANEOUS 1.79 101 22518 MISCELLANEOUS 35.75 101 31510 98990 DENISE BALESTRIERI 24915 397.77 MISCELLANEOUS 152.34 101 22515 MISCELLANEOUS 42.32 101 36640 MISCELLANEOUS 169.25 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 25.39 101 36600 MISCELLANEOUS 8.47 101 22518 98991 MARGARET FARNEY 24934 42.31 MISCELLANEOUS 2;01 101 22518 MISCELLANEOUS 40.30 101 31510 98992 S AND S SUPPLIES 8 SOLUTIONS 24963 1,308.83 TRAINING EXPENSE 323.97 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 484.00 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 500.86 527 66520 260 98993 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 94.14 UTILITY EXPENSE 94.14 896 20281 98994 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 920.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 117.75 101 68010 220 1422 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 802.50 101 68010 220 1349 98995 PVP COMMUNICATIONS 25107 3,555.58 MISCELLANEOUS 3,555.58 101 65100 400 98996 GCC ENTERPRISES 25128 31,113.00 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 31,113.00 320 80960 210 98997 BRUCE KALDER 25129 3,130.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,130.00 101 22546 98998 DAVID GALLAGHER 25130 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 98999 L.J. KRUSE 25131 56.63 MISCELLANEOUS 33.35 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 21.61 101 22512 MISCELLANEOUS 1.67 101 22518 99000 MR. HULLFISH 25132 77.44 MISCELLANEOUS 73.75 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 3.69 101 22518 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98975 BURLINGAME FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00 UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080 98976 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 160.00 MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 130 20024 98977 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 580.00 MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 130 20024 98978 C.L.E.A. 24523 682.50 MISCELLANEOUS 682.50 130 20026 98979 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 476.00 UNION DUES 476.00 130 21091 98980 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6.96 130 21015 MISCELLANEOUS 313.64 130 21092 98981 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 29,485.48 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 29,485.48 326 80950 210 98982 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 1,032.15 COMMUNICATIONS 456.73 101 65100 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 575.42 896 20281 98983 AT&T WIRELESS 24640 594.25 COMMUNICATIONS 352.00 101 66100 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 242.25 896 20281 98984 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 615.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 619 64460 220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 540.00 619 64460 220 5130 98985 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 585.15 MISCELLANEOUS 585.15 101 64420 030 98986 GENSLER 24758 1,532.36 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,532.36 320 80760 210 98987 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,157.07 MISCELLANEOUS 1,033.60 130 20025 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,123.47 130 20021 98988 CAROLINE LEE 24799 102.91 MISCELLANEOUS 4.29 101 22518 MISCELLANEOUS 85.75 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 12.87 101 36600 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '*' Denotes Hand Written Checks 98963 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 79,198.54 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 26,679.52 326 80722 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,175.86 326 73171 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 22,506.20 326 80722 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 13,836.96 326 81200 210 98964 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,931.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,931.75 528 66600 210 98965 KEITH MARTIN 23788 186.47 OFFICE EXPENSE 42.61 526 69020 110 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 60.00 526 69020 250 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.12 527 66520 110 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 54.50 527 66520 250 MISC. SUPPLIES 10.00 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 3.24 620 66700 120 98966 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 499.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 351.69 619 64460 120 5110 MISC. SUPPLIES 148.10 619 64460 120 5210 98967 UBS 23951 751.02 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 75.00 527 66520 190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 130.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 507.02 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 39.00 619 64460 220 5240 98968 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 500.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 730 69533 220 98969 ROBERT SMITH 23991 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 98970 DOUG ULRICH 24160 2,250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546 98971 J&L CONSTRUCTION 24288 2,400.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,400.00 101 22520 98972 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 21,288.68 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 21,288.68 326 80910 210 98973 TOLL ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHICS 24476 165.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 165.00 619 64460 120 5110 98974 BURLINGAME FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 3,800.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,800.00 130 20016 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98949 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 624.06 SUPPLIES 624.06 620 15000 98950 SPRINT PCS 20724 72.34 COMMUNICATIONS 38.71 101 64150 160 COMMUNICATIONS 33.63 101 64420 160 98951 HARDISON KOMATSU IVELICH 8 20938 640.36 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 640.36 320 76010 210 98952 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 47.96 OFFICE EXPENSE 47.96 101 64250 110 98953 D.L. FALK CONSTRUCTION INC. 21647 8,157.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,157.75 320 80370 220 98954 CHRISSY HOLMES 21723 92.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 92.25 101 68010 220 1644 98955 MARTHA KOKES 21781 41.95 MISCELLANEOUS 39.95 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 2.00 101 22518 98956 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 22216 353.46 OFFICE EXPENSE 353.46 101 65100 110 98957 UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 22305 24,897.40 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 24,897.40 327 81010 210 98958 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. 22632 102.31 MISCELLANEOUS -7.72 201 23611 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 110.03 201 65200 203 98959 CHUCK CASTLE 22863 161.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 161.82 618 64520 210 98960 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 16,730.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,684.40 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,524.70 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,520.90 327 79400 210 98961 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC. 23311 21.05 MISC. SUPPLIES 21.05 619 64460 120 5110 98962 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 499.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 499.20 101 68010 220 1762 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98934 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 483.95 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 483.95 625 65213 203 98935 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT CO 17646 2,301.50 POLICE--SUPPLIES 2,301.50 101 65100 126 98936 GEORGE MASTALIR 18088 312.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 312.00 101 68010 220 1789 98937 AHR ENTERPRISES 18416 75.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 320 80370 220 98938 BAY ALARM 18854 242.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 137.00 619 64460 220 5140 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 619 64460 220 5180 98939 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 19131 580.09 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 580.09 201 65200 200 98940 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 43.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.79 620 66700 120 98941 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 2,710.73 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 78.56 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,632.17 625 65213 203 98942 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210 98943 ALL FENCE COMPANY, INC. 19710 250.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 250.00 527 66520 190 98944 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 98945 OFFICER JEFF DOWNS 20209 292.26 MISCELLANEOUS 292.26 618 64520 604 98946 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORP. 20284 616.83 RENTS & LEASES 616.83 101 66210 180 98947 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 20335 3,404.73 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,404.73 327 77040 220 98948 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 1,210.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,210.00 327 77040 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hard Written Checks 98925 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 28,085.16 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 28,085.16 618 64520 210 98926 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 840.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 135.88 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 61.08 101 68020 120 2200 SMALL TOOLS 90.84 101 68020 130 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 67.80 101 68020 190 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 38.47 101 66210 222 OFFICE EXPENSE 23.80 201 65200 110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 105.88 320 80370 210 MISCELLANEOUS 116.81 526 69020 233 MISC. SUPPLIES 22.02 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.21 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.17 619 64460 120 5120 SMALL TOOLS 81.18 619 64460 130 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 32.46 619 64460 140 98927 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 516.19 MISC. SUPPLIES 516.19 201 65200 111 98928 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,148.65 MISCELLANEOUS 327.79 201 35220 000 7150 OFFICE EXPENSE 112.37 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 111.85 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 42.26 201 65200 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 559.33 201 65200 140 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 14.06 201 65200 190 VEHICLE MAINT. 20.51 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 79.02 201 65200 203 RADIO MAINT. 32.46 201 65200 205 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 55.00 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 794.00 201 65200 260 98929 DHL EXPRESS 14958 110.07 OFFICE EXPENSE 110.07 101 65100 110 98930 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,109.86 MISCELLANEOUS 3,109.86 731 22594 98931 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 230.63 TRAINING EXPENSE 230.63 526 69020 260 98932 MIKE SMITH 16637 338.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 338.00 101 68010 220 1789 98933 JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. 17299 137,880.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 137,880.00 320 80880 220 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 12/03/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98911 ALPINE AWARDS, INC. 01052 61.16 MISC. SUPPLIES 61.16 101 64100 120 98912 WHITE CAP 01250 1,403.43 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,403.43 526 69020 120 98913 BRIDGES TIRE & WHEEL SERVICE 01403 63.00 SUPPLIES 63.00 620 15000 98914 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 47.85 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 47.85 101 65200 203 98915 VEOLIA WATER 02110 199,473.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,473.00 527 66530 220 98916 FEDEX 02160 118.80 OFFICE EXPENSE 44.80 101 64420 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.08 101 64400 120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 34.92 101 64350 210 98917 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 3,113.36 MISCELLANEOUS 3,113.36 896 20282 98918 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 1,236.25 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,236.25 528 66600 210 98919 P. G. & E. 03054 63,590.80 GAS & ELECTRIC 16,842.57 101 66100 170 UTILITY EXPENSE 46,748.23 896 20280 98920 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 209,743.14 WATER PURCHASES 209,743.14 526 69020 171 98921 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,963.83 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,963.83 101 65150 220 98922 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 5,187.44 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,187.44 320 76350 220 98923 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 22.21 OFFICE EXPENSE 22.21 527 66520 110 98924 OCE 09493 857.34 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME 11-24-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 71,332.38 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 9,512.18 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 139,280.60 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 17,690.93 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 337,496.94 WATER FUND 526 1,770.97 SEWER FUND 527 3,678.56 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 130,879.15 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 8,116.10 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 278.51 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 680.05 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 921.64 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 149,949.15 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 20,935.76 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 520.00 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 5893,042.92 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98812 THROUGH 98910 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8893,042.92, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ..... ........... .../. ./. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE _ APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 11/24/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98898 QUALITY ENGINEERING 25068 17,629.35 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,625.00 320 80880 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8,004.35 320 80900 210 98899 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 25084 3,393.60 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 3,393.60 201 65200 140 98900 K.C. PAVING 25117 752.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 752.00 101 22520 98901 INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 25118 998.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 998.00 619 64460 210 5240 98902 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. 25119 252.14 MISCELLANEOUS •20.04 526 23611 TRAINING EXPENSE 272.18 526 69020 260 98903 ANGAD SINGH 25120 1,950.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,950.00 101 22546 98904 TRACY CONNEALLY 25121 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 98905 PETER GAVALLOS ELECTRIC 25122 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 98906 WILSON CHAN CONSTRUCTION 25123 819.65 MISCELLANEOUS 819.65 101 22546 98907 T.C.B. BUILDERS 25124 840.00 MISCELLANEOUS 840.00 101 22546 98908 PRINTING CENTER USA 25125 809.91 OFFICE EXPENSE 809.91 201 65200 110 98909 CAMPUS WIRELESS LLC 25126 532.40 COMMUNICATIONS 532..40 201 65200 160 98910 ED CHUNG 25127 30.29 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30.29 320 80900 220 �y / TOTAL $893,042.92 �,�� CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 11/24/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98883 RICHARD HARBER 23928 2,600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,600.00 101 22546 98884 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 101 65100 220 98885 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 1,844.54 COMMUNICATIONS 1,844.54 201 65200 160 98886 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 22,408.71 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 20,458.71 320 80520 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,950.00 320 80600 210 98887 SPANGLE ASSOCIATES 24113 3,344.60 DEPOSIT REFUND 3,344.60 101 22590 98888 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 207.32 OFFICE EXPENSE 207.32 101 64250 110 98889 CWS UTILITY SERVICES 24249 576.00 MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233 98890 PETER CAMAROTO 24310 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 98891 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 48.86 COMMUNICATIONS 48.86 621 64450 160 98892 THE INVIRONMENTALISTS 24747 4,368.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,368.00 320 80790 210 98893 CALIFORNIA BMW TRIUMPH 24782 51.20 SUPPLIES 51.20 620 15000 98894 AD CLUB 24809 501.55 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 501.55 101 64420 150 98895 TOM DONNELLY 24830 1,320.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,320.00 201 65200 260 98896 GINA FORNESI 24903 1,910.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,910.00 101 22546 98897 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 547.70 MISC. SUPPLIES 454.99 101 66210 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 92.71 101 66210 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 11/24/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98871 PITNEY BOWES 23128 548.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 548.00 621 64450 200 98872 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 118.48 OFFICE EXPENSE 118.48 101 68010 110 1101 98873 OFFICE MAX 23306 453.43 OFFICE EXPENSE 88.67 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 26.61 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 151.04 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 154.83 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 32.28 201 65200 110 98874 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC. 23311 144.63 MISC. SUPPLIES 144.63 619 64460 120 98875 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 101.00 MISCELLANEOUS 101.00 101 22518 98876 ZEIGER ENGINEERS 23450 1,760.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,760.00 320 81060 220 98877 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 17,690.93 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 17,690.93 326 80870 210 98878 SCOTT WITH 23570 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 98879 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 ' 13.54 OFFICE EXPENSE 13.54 527 66520 110 98880 SBC/MCI 23728 16.03 COMMUNICATIONS 16.03 101 67500 160 98881 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 530.00 RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 100.00 101 66210 218 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170 98882 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 2,252.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,252.00 101 23620 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 11/24/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98856 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 141.81 MISC. SUPPLIES 141.81 527 66520 120 98857 THE BANK OF NEW YORK 21439 1,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 32100 98858 JACKIE COOPER 21469 720.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 645.00 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .75.00 101 68010 220 1644 98859 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 75,23 OFFICE EXPENSE 75.23 101 64400 110 98860 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 83.19 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 83.19 621 64450 190 98861 HILLYARD 21658 461.15 MISC. SUPPLIES 461.15 101 68020 120 2200 98862 JORGENSON, SIEGEL, MCCLURE & FILE 22144 1,428.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,428.75 101 64350 210 98863 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 538.55 MISCELLANEOUS 28.77 101 68020 192 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 290.28 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 219.50 527 66520 120 98864 PLANNERS BOOK SERVICE 22198 91.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 91.60 101 64400 120 98865 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT 22382 1,125.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,125.00 101 68010 220 1785 98866 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 19,300.74 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,300.74 736 64571 220 98867 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT 22529 514.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 514.79 101 68010 120 1114 98868 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 520.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 520.00 896 20281 98869 CPS 23005 593.55 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 593.55 101 64420 121 98870 D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC 23092 337,496.94 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 337,496.94 327 81010 220 l CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 11/24/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98841 JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. 17299 84,960.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84,960.00 320 80900 220 98842 CANDIS COMPANY 18145 177.80 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 177.80 101 64420 121 98843 BAY ALARM 18854 689.13 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 689.13 320 80790 210 98844 ENR 18930 39.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 39.00 101 66100 240 98845 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 237.60 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 237.60 101 64420 121 98846 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 120.12 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 120.12 101 64200 150 98847 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 2,622.20 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,622.20 618 64520 210 98848 GARY PARTEE 19249 7,100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,500.00 101 22546 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,600.00 101 22520 98849 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 438.42 OFFICE EXPENSE 133.72 101 64250 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 304.70 201 65200 111 98850 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,635.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,635.02 736 64570 220 98851 PACIFIC COAST TRANE SERVICE 20818 5,283.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,283.75 619 64460 210 5120 98852 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 526.03 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 526.03 101 66210 219 98853 GEORGE BAGDON 21174 147.37 MISCELLANEOUS 147.37 101 66210 031 98854 CEB 21210 108.62 MISC. SUPPLIES 108.62 101 64350 120 98855 CIR 21211 400.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 400.75 527 66520 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 11/24/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT ... Denotes Hand Written Checks 98827 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 127,806.95 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,806.95 618 64520 210 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 125,000.00 618 64520 601 98828 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 3,237.44 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 3,119.23 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 118.21 619 64460 120 5230 98829 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220 98830 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 666.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 666.00 201 65200 111 98831 3M COMPANY 13848 750.43 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 750.43 101 66210 222 98832 DOCUMENT PROCESSING SYSTEMS 13890 423.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 423.00 101 64250 200 98833 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 2,494.00 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 620.00 101 66210 230 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 310.00 526 69020 230 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 944.00 527 66520 230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 310.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 310.00 619 64460 220 5240 98834 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 98.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 98.00 101 64420 121 98835 IZMIRIAN ROOFING 15573 450.00 MISCELLANEOUS 450.00 618 64520 604 98836 AIR EXCHANGE, INC 15625 - 384.05 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 384.05 619 64460 210 5160 98837 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 172.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 172.50 101 68010 220 1787 98838 ACTION SPORTS 16167 246.81 MISC. SUPPLIES 246.81 101 68010 120 1781 98839 SYDNEY MALK00 16347 227.31 SMALL TOOLS 227.31 620 66700 130 98840 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 23,193.86 MISCELLANEOUS 12,866.36 101 22515 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,327.50 101 65300 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 11/24/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98812 ALPINE AWARDS, INC. 01052 493.18 MISC. SUPPLIES 493.18 101 68010 120 1781 98813 WHITE CAP 01250 1,948.49 MISCELLANEOUS 1,948.49 527 66520 400 98814 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDER 01312 330.58 MISC. SUPPLIES 330.58 101 64350 120 98815 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 480.01 TRAINING EXPENSE 342.55 526 69020 260 SMALL TOOLS 137.46 619 64460 130 98816 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,090.31 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,090.31 101 66210 226 98817 SBC 03080 155.65 COMMUNICATIONS 155.65 101 65100 160 98818 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT 03271 921.64 MISCELLANEOUS 921.64 730 69560 400 98819 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 149,949.15 MISCELLANEOUS 149,949.15 731 22587 98820 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 - 7,435.12 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,435.12 320 76350 220 98821 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 330.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 330.00 101 64350 210 98822 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 991.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 991.50 101 68010 220 1891 98823 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 10.47 OFFICE EXPENSE 10.47 527 66520 110 98824 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 3,232.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 3,232.00 101 65100 291 98825 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 117.75 SUPPLIES 117.75 201 65200 112 98826 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 324.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 324.75 101 68020 120 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME 11-19-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I 'S T E R PAGE 10 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 112,713.26 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 4,581.00 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 7,345.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 107,680.03 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 15,302.06 WATER FUND 526 14,372.57 SEWER FUND 527 2,652.85 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 336.89 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 2,895.41 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 1,880.00 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1,290.97 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,214.92 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 35,623.38 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 266.03 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,716.56 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 8,510.40 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 160.89 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 5318,542.37 1112.411 vo l e e,1c 9� 2 t,c� to 2- 0 I L)00 a0 VO HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98713 THROUGH 98811 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8318,542.37, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ..................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED. FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98800 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 4,875.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,875.00 731 22556 98801 RINA SHAPIRA 25061 195.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.75 101 68010 220 1644 98802 MARK GRANCOLAS 25076 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 98803 ILSE SAUERWALD 25108 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 98804 DAVID BERKE 25109 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22525 98805 ELLEN BYRD 25110 1,767.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,767.00 618 64520 210 98806 JOHN GIBBS 25111 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 98807 SOPHIE OBERSTEIN 25112 2,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,000.00 101 22520 98808 THOMAS FLAHERTY 25113 936.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 936.00 101 22520 98809 WILLIAMS USA, LLC 25114 541.66 RADIO MAINT. 541.66 201 65200 205 98810 POLLARDWATER.COM-EAST 25115 320.53 MISCELLANEOUS -25.37 201 23611 SMALL TOOLS 345.90 201 65200 130 98811 RAMONA BOADA 25116 315.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _ 315.00 130 20060 n \A TOTAL $318,542.37 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98793 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 9,635.46 OFFICE EXPENSE 186.92 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 133.69 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 75.17 101 67500 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 130.71 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 727.28 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 25.14 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 297.96 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.45 101 68010 120 1520 MISC. SUPPLIES 284.95 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 390.14 101 68010 120 1101 LIBRARY••BOOKS AND MAPS 2,046.42 101 67500 129 SMALL TOOLS 430.84 101 68020 130 2200 SMALL TOOLS 241.58 101 65300 130 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 2,228.09 101 67500 190 MISCELLANEOUS 119.90 101 67500 235 TRAVEL & MEETINGS - 26.00 101 68010 250 1101 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 47.67 101 64420 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 44.00 101 64150 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 42.67 101 64420 262 OFFICE EXPENSE 137.49 201 65200 110 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 790.00 526 69020 250 MISCELLANEOUS 397.05 526 69020 400 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 116.09 527 66520 250 MISC. SUPPLIES 84.41 619 64460 120 COMMUNICATIONS 43.00 621 64450 160 MISC. SUPPLIES 437.29 730 69533 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 130.55 730 69583 120. 98794 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 180.00 LIBRARY EXPENSES _ 180.00 731 22531 98795 SHIRLEY LADDY 24826 1,600.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,600.00 130 20015 98796 ELIZABETH WHITTEMORE 24860 65.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 65.00 130 20015 98797 DORIS MORTENSEN 24871 395.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 395.00 101 64200 250 98798 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 40.64 TRAINING EXPENSE 40.64 101 66210 260 98799 WATKINS AND BORTOLUSSI 25011 54,213.30 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 54,213.30 320 79300 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98783 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200 98784 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 9,660.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,660.00 101 68010 220 1331 98785 JANNETTE GREER 23769 79.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79.50 101 68010 220 1648 98786 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 5,925.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,925.00 526 69020 233 98787 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 1,599.55 BANKING SERVICE FEES 528.10 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,071.45 530 65400 120 98788 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 113.00 MISCELLANEOUS 113.00 618 64520 604 98789 THE BERKELEY CHESS SCHOOL 24287 3,900.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,900.00 101 68010 220 1349 98790 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 100.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 101 65300 240 98791 SAN MATEO COUNTY FORENSIC LAB 24700 1,507.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,507.00 101 65100 220 98792 THE POWER SOURCE 24718 1,704.94 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,704.94 530 65400 200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98770 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 22,326.50 MISCELLANEOUS 22,326.50 101 37010 98771 VB GOLF LLC 21948 4,558.16 GAS & ELECTRIC 4,276.91 101 68010 170 1286 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 281.25 101 68010 220 1784 98772 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT 21986 15,302.06 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 15,302.06 326 80770 210 98773 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,105.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,105.00 201 35220 000 7100 98774 HOLDEN DANIELS 22687 699.93 TRAINING EXPENSE 699.93 201 65200 260 98775 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 101.76 MISC. SUPPLIES 101.76 101 65100 120 98776 CALFEST 22809 120.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 120.00 101 68010 240 1100 98777 THE DAILY NEWS 22964 120.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 120.00 101 64400 120 98778 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 98779 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 49.00 COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 201 65200 160 98780 OFFICE TEAM 23256 952.00 MISCELLANEOUS 952.00 101 65300 010 98781 OFFICE MAX 23306 315.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.92 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 240.06 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 58.29 101 68010 110 1101 98782 DATASAFE 23410 1,026.08 OFFICE EXPENSE 173.22 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 254.00 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 92.86 101 64420 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 45.00 101 64400 120 BANKING SERVICE FEES 92.00 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 80.00 101 64350 120 BANKING SERVICE FEES 289.00 101 64250 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 98756 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 1,772.00 COMMUNICATIONS 702.25 101 68010 160 1101 COMMUNICATIONS 1,069.75 621 64450 160 98757 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 17,269.75 DEPOSIT REFUND 17,269.75 101 22590 98758 H.V. CARTER CO., INC. 20876 14.76 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 14.76 101 68020 200 2200 98759 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 6,569.88 MISCELLANEOUS 6,569.88 621 64450 400 6001 98760 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 810.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 810.00 101 68010 220 1331 98761 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 509.TB SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 509.78 101 66210 219 98762 CIR 21211 1,472.02 MISC. SUPPLIES 843.22 527 66520 120 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM 628.80 527 66520 221 98763 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 846.16 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 635.34 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 210.82 619 64460 220 5130 98764 MARCI STRANGE 21424 86.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.00 101 68010 220 1660 98765 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 978.10 OFFICE EXPENSE 978.10 621 64450 110 98766 JAMES LOCKE 21559 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 98767 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 2,470.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 741.00 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 741.00 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 741.00 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 247.00 619 64460 260 98768 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 10,132.99 MISCELLANEOUS 10,132.99 101 37010 98769 SEWER RAT 21821 150.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98744 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,271.75 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 313.54 101 66210 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 292.60 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 313.51 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 20.10 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 113.40 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 218.60 620 66700 140 98745 MARY JANNEY 19042 570.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 435.00 130 20060 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 135.00 130 20015 98746 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 - 65.86 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 65.86 101 64200 150 98747 PRIORITY 1 19239 536.44 SUPPLIES 536.44 620 15000 98748 BURTON'S FIRE APPARATUS 19366 360.63 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 360.63 201 65200 203 98749 WILSEY & HAM 19397 28,634.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,661.25 320 80900 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,112.63 320 80110 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,618.00 320 80880 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,700.01 320 80600 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,542.86 320 80880 210 98750 TOM AMES 19502 699.93 TRAINING EXPENSE 699.93 201 65200 260 98751 JOHN CAHALAN, ASLA 19561 665.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 665.00 320 79300 210 98752 BAY AREA BUSINESS CARDS INC 19588 141.27 OFFICE EXPENSE 141.27 101 64100 110 98753 CIUCCI CONSULTING GROUP INC 19791 180.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 180.00 101 65300 120 98754 EL CAMINO CHARTER LINES INC 20105 519.06 MISC. SUPPLIES 519.06 101 68010 120 1521 98755 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 20222 2,216.57 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,216.57 320 80520 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98736 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 237.32 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 28.12 101 65100 200 MISC. SUPPLIES. 134.48 201 65200 111 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 22.60 201 65200 190 VEHICLE MAINT. 11.18 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 12.28 201 65200 203 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 11.90 530 65400 140 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 16.76 530 65400 200 98737 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 1,617.00 RADIO MAINT. 1,617.00 201 65200 205 98738 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 163.26 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 163.26 201 65200 203 98739 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 5,138.49 OFFICE EXPENSE 861.61 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 305.29 101 65100 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 708.72 101 65100 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 257.64 101 65150 140 COMMUNICATIONS 383.93 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 626.30 101 65100 200 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 330.00 101 65100 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 260.00 101 65100 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 899.80 101 65100 260 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 173.87 101 65100 292 MISCELLANEOUS 90.93 101 65100 400 MISC. SUPPLIES 11.81 530 65400 120 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 78.55 530 65400 200 MISC. SUPPLIES 150.04 730 69574 120 98740 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,455.40 MISCELLANEOUS 3,455.40 731 22594 98741 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 873.31 GAS, OIL & GREASE 551.56 201 65200 201 SUPPLIES 321.75 620 15000 98742 PARK-GILMAN CLINICS, INC. 15792 400.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 400.00 101 65100 .291 98743 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 4,009.52 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 4,009.52 526 69020 140 . CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT. Denotes Hand Written Checks 98728 DOROTHY RADYK 03235 445.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 445.50 101 68010 220 1644 98729 RANDY SCHWARTZ 03518 545.10 MISCELLANEOUS 545.10 101 68010 031 98730 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 5,647.44 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,647.44 320 76350 220 98731 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 300.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 300.00 101 65100 260 98732 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 4,319.07 OFFICE EXPENSE 31.37 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 32.45 101 68010 120 1787 MISC. SUPPLIES 305.00 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 503.41 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.97 101 68010 120 1780 MISC. SUPPLIES 25.66 101 68010 1201520 MISC. SUPPLIES 575.53 101 68010 120 1781 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 360.00 101 68010 220 1349 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 96.00 101 68010 220 1645 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 178.00 101 68010 220 1331 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 352.00 101 68010 220 1644 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 135.00 101 68020 240 2300 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 101 68010 240 1100 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 60.00 101 68020 240 2100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 8.00 101 68010 250 1101 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 15.00 101 68020 250 2100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 440.00 101 68020 250 2300 TRAINING EXPENSE 60.00 101 68020 260 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 248.68 730 69533 120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 750.00 730 69533 220 98733 FRANK ERBACHER 09195 1,107.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,107.00 130 20015 98734 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210 98735 BERNARD EDWARDS 09548 1,591.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,591.00 101 68010 220 1762 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 11/19/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98713 * COUNTY CLERK SAN MATEO COUNTY 22558 875.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 875.00 101 22590 98714 * PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 20335 5,808.53 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,808.53 320 80520 220 98715 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 266.03 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 266.03 625 65213 203 98716 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 301.15 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 301.15 201 65200 203 98717 BURLINGAME RECREATION DEPT. 01663 849.00 RECREATION EXPENSES 849.00 101 10700 98718 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 35,883.94 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,494.44 320 80420 220 COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 25,089.50 621 64450 220 98719 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 268.46 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 268.46 201 65200 140 98720 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 320.59 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 320.59 201 65200 203 98721 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 02880 2,217.40 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,217.40 526 69020 120 98722 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 03002 316.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 316.79 528 66600 120 98723 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23 GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170 98724 SBC 03080 196.53 COMMUNICATIONS 35.64 101 67500 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 160.89 896 20281 98725 ALFRED J. PALMER 03085 924.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 924.00 130 20015 98726 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 - 166.55 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 28.42 201 65200 203 SUPPLIES 138.13 620 15000 98727 SANDRA POBE 03175 1,800.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,800.00 101 68010 220 1644 CITY OF BURLINGAME 11-10-2004 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 FUND RECAP - 04-05 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 62,028.45 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,506.81 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 42,159.89 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 168,571.36 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 2,801.93 WATER FUND 526 15,216.77 SEWER FUND 527 19,499.66 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,464.45 SELF INSURANCE FUND -' 618 576.00 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 15,378.69 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,451.90 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 687.07 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,636.04 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 26,997.73 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 3,435.47 STATE GRANTS FUND - 734 17,179.80 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,881.63 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $385,473.65 _ HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 98595 THROUGH 98712 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $385,473.65, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... ./. ./. .................... .. . .. FINANCE DIRECTOR - DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 98707 YANA MALONEY 25102 150.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.50 101 68010 220 1645 98708 JAMES MONSON 25103 396.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 396.00 101 68010 220 1780 98709 JESSE MOORE 25104 200.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1780 98710 RICHARD DWYER 25105 4,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,500.00 101 22546 98711 MAGGIE HUANG 25106 154.00 MISCELLANEOUS 154.00 101 22546 98712 PVP COMMUNICATIONS 25107 942.30 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 942.30 734 65198 800 TOTAL 8385,473.65 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98691 SWRCB FEES 24588 3,679.00 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 3,679.00 527 66530 270 98692 AT&T WIRELESS 24607 57.91 COMMUNICATIONS 57.91 621 64450 160 98693 DHS OCP 24639 60.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 60.00 526 69020 260 98694 DAN FLERES 24703 250.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 101 68010 220 1780 98695 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 - 778.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 778.50 101 68010 220 1660 98696 DOUG MCKEEVER 24805 150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 101 68010 220 1780 98697 FRED FIRESTONE 24866 108.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.00 101 68010 220 1331 98698 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 726.65 TRAINING EXPENSE 270.68 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 455.97 527 66520 260 98699 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 438.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 438.02 101 65100 220 98700 JENSEN PRECAST 25095 34,178.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 34,178.88 320 80880 220 98701 STRAITS BURLINGAME LLC 25096 1,395.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,395.00 101 22546 98702 ZOLL MEDICAL 25097 26,997.73 MISCELLANEOUS 26,997.73 730 69584 400 98703 MADDAUS WATER MANAGEMENT 25098 7,905.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,905.00 526 69020 210 98704 SHARON JACKSON 25099 79.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 79.00 101 64420 210 98705 PENINSULA IMAGING 25100 62.71 MISCELLANEOUS 62.71 526 22502 98706 IRENE AUDET 25101 215.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 215.00 101 68010 220 1349 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98679 SBC/MCI 23728 239.91 COMMUNICATIONS 239.91 621 64450 160 98680 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 4,719.00 RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 4,719.00 101 66210 218 98681 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 14,318.46 MISC. SUPPLIES 538.21 101 68010 120 1111 MISC. SUPPLIES 151.25 101 68010 120 1114 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,671.00 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 397.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,836.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 855.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 619 64460 220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,036.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 964.00 619 64460 220 5210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,195.00 619 64460 220 5110 98682 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 555.81 COMMUNICATIONS 555.81 619 64460 160 98683 KEN VIERRA 24040 3,800.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,800.00 101 22546 98684 QUILL 24090 204.70 OFFICE EXPENSE 204.70 621 64450 110 98685 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 98686 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 458.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 458.40 101 68010 220 1521 98687 GLOBAL DOCUGRAPHIX 24170 339.69 OFFICE EXPENSE 339.69 101 65100 110 98688 DOUG BELL 24189 302.30 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 237.72 320 78510 220 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.58 327 79400 210 98689 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 24466 1,448.03 MISC. SUPPLIES 798.64 101 66210 120 SMALL TOOLS 193.11 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 456.28 619 64460 120 98690 WATER SOLUTIONS 24532 4,725.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 4,725.00 526 69020 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98665 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT 22358 74.03 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 74.03 201 65200 203 98666 PITNEY BOWES RESERVE ACCOUNT 22624 5,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000.00 101 15500 98667 DATALUX CORPORATION 22638 681.75 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 681.75 101 65100 200 98668 CALIFORNIA NEVADA SECTION, AWWA 22787. 90.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 90.00 526 69020 260 98669 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL 22924 69.50 OFFICE EXPENSE 69.50 101 65100 110 98670 PENINSULA BATTERY INC. 23045 187.05 SUPPLIES 187.05 620 15000 98671 THE MOBILE STORAGE GROUP 23138 192.04 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 192.04 526 69020 210 98672 AT&T WIRELESS 23169 49.00 COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 201 65200 160 98673 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 8,295.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,322.60 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,235.05 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,737.35 327 79400 210 98674 OFFICE TEAM 23256 928.20 MISCELLANEOUS 928.20 101 65300 010 98675 OFFICE MAX 23306 664.24 OFFICE EXPENSE 265.43 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 152.36 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 221.39 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 25.06 101 64400 110 98676 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 276.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 276.80 101 68010 220 1661 98677 AT&T 23661 23.72 COMMUNICATIONS 23.72 621 64450 160 98678 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 923.57 TRAINING EXPENSE 307.86 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 307.85 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 307.86 527 66520 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98650 RACQUET SMITH 20339 1,459.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,459.20 101 68010 220 1782 98651 ARLETTE PETERSON 20547 203.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 203.25 101 68010 220 1349 98652 JODI YOUNG 20589 250.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 101 68010 220 1780 98653 SPORTS CHOICE 20845 547.47 MISC. SUPPLIES 547.47 101 68010 120 1780 98654 H.V. CARTER CO., INC. 20876 9.50 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 9.50 101 68020 200 2200 98655 LAWRENCE S. MOY 20954 - 900.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 900.00 101 68010 220 1762 98656 CEB 21210 144.51 MISC. SUPPLIES 144.51 101 64350 120 98657 CIR 21211 1,718.24 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,718.24 527 66520 120 98658 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 223.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 223.00 527 66520 120 98659 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 300.21 OFFICE EXPENSE 75.23 101 64250 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 207.51 101 65300 120 COMMUNICATIONS 17.47 101 66100 160 98660 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 160.83 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.83 621 64450 190 98661 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 1,964.44 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,964.44 101 66210 222 98662 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 129.05 COMMUNICATIONS 129.05 101 65300 160 98663 ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. 21749 1,438.92 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,438.92 530 65400 120 98664 O.C. JONES 22204 661.58 MISCELLANEOUS 661.58 526 22502 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT ... Denotes Hand Written Checks 98635 JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. 17299 165,336.31 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 165,336.31 326 80770 220 98636 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 142.81 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 142.81 625 65213 203 98637 HOUSE OF WRECKERS 18026 133.09 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 133.09 201 65200 203 98638 LYNNE FIRESTONE 18746 602.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 602.00 101 68010 220 1331 98639 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 64.98 COMMUNICATIONS 43.32 526 69020 160 COMMUNICATIONS 21.66 527 66520 160 98640 DEANS AUTO BODY & 18795 576.00 MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 618 64520 604 98641 REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM 18900 11,791.00 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 11,791.00 527 66530 270 98642 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 122.67 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 26.15 526.69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 48.80 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 47.72 619 64460 140 98643 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 115.40 MISC. SUPPLIES 115.40 619 64460 120 98644 TOM AMES 19502 630.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 630.00 201 65200 260 98645 JOHN CAHALAN, ASLA 19561 5,420.69 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,420.69 320 81070 210 98646 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220 98647 CIUCCI CONSULTING GROUP INC 19791 540.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 540.00 101 65300 120 98648 WOODWORKER'S SUPPLY INC 19816 137.87 MISCELLANEOUS -10.43 619 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 148.30 619 64460 120 98649 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,881.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,881.63 736 64570 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98619 ROMEO PACKING CO 11348 703.63 MISC. SUPPLIES 703.63 101 68020 120 2200 98620 MVP REPAIR SERVICE CO. 11739 1,110.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,110.00 526 69020 210 98621 ELECTRO-MOTION INCORPORATED 14007 259.00 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 259.00 527 66520 230 98622 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 390.89 MISC. SUPPLIES 175.53 101 66210 120 SMALL TOOLS 215.36 619 64460 130 98623 DHL EXPRESS 14958 25.53 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 25.53 530 65400 200 98624 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORP. 15055 235.38 SUPPLIES 235.38 201 65200 112 98625 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,435.47 MISCELLANEOUS 3,435.47 731 22594 98626 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 250.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.75 101 68010 220 1787 98627 HITECH SYSTEMS, INC. 15712 16,237.50 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 16,237.50 734 65198 800 98628 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 20.89 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.89 620 66700 120 98629 TEAM CLEAN 15827 204.24 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 204.24 201 65200 220 98630 CON BROSNAN 16126 4,360.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,360.00 101 22546 98631 SUPERIOR ALUMINUM BODY CORP. 16229 1,695.65 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,695.65 101 68020 200 2200 98632 LINDA HOECK 16390 2,021.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,021.00 101 68010 220 1349 98633 CUMMINS WEST, INC. 16414 775.41 MISC. SUPPLIES 775.41 527 66520 120 98634 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 578.37 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 578.37 101 68020 140 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Nand Written Checks 98607 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 92.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.62 101 66210 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 16.19 101 68020 190 2200 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 18.58 101 66210 226 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.28 201 65200 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 33.12 526 69020 120 98608 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 496.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 147.22 101 68010 120 1788 MISC. SUPPLIES 349.65 101 68010 120 1780 98609 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 52.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.85 101 64350 120 98610 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 100.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 100.75 619 64460 120 98611 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 193.81 MISC. SUPPLIES 124.49 101 68020 120 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 69.32 101 66210 219 98612 LIFE ASSIST 09392 635.43 SUPPLIES 635.43 201 65200 112 98613 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 379.96 MISC. SUPPLIES 379.96 101 68020 120 2200 98614 NOEL L. MILLER, INC, 09499 945.24 SUPPLIES 945.24 620 15000 98615 ALERT DOOR SERVICE, INC. 10059 350.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 350.00 101 68020 190 2200 98616 CAL-STEAM 10557 36.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 19.72 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.78 527 66520 120 98617 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN 10567 - 11,026.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,453.00 101 65100 010 MISCELLANEOUS 3,690.00 101 66210 010 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 5.00 101 67500 011 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 97.00 101 68010 011 1890 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 1,692.00 101 65100 011 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 89.00 101 67500 011 98618 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,493.23 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,493.23 625 65213 203 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N G I S T E R PAGE 1 11/10/04 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 98595 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 138.34 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 17.84 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.71 619 64460 120 5150 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.44 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 44.35 619 64460 120 5160 98596 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 87.87 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 87.87 101 68020 190 2200 98597 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 40.18 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.18 101 66210 120 98598 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 1,660.13 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 5.40 101 68020 190 2200 GAS, OIL & GREASE 38.84 101 65200 201 VEHICLE MAINT. 28.44 101 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 321.19 101 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 9.83 527 66520 120 SUPPLIES 1,248.86 620 15000 GAS, OIL & GREASE 7.57 620 66700 201 98599 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220 98600 GCS WESTERN POWER & 01857 42.29 SUPPLIES 42.29 620 15000 98601 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 1,305.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,305.00 201 65200 111 98602 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 292.86 MISCELLANEOUS 292.86 101 68020 192 2200 98603 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 67.50 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 67.50 101 68020 190 2200 98604 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 649.92 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 649.92 101 66210 226 98605 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 32.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 32.38 101 66210 120 98606 MAYNE TREE EXPERT CO., INC. 02872 875.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 875.00 101 68020 210 2300 r BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION December 2, 2004 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5 :30 p.m. by Vice Chair Carney. ROLL CALL Present: Vice Chair Carney, Grandcolas, Lauder, O'Connor Staff: Parks Superintendent Richmond, Arborist Porter, Secretary Harvey Guests: Bobbi Benson, Mike Stallings (1512 Alturas), Rajappan Balagopal (1815 Montecito Way) Vice Chair Carney welcomed and introduced new Commissioner O'Connor. Commissioner O'Connor stated that she has lived on Eastmoor Road in Burlingame for 11 years, enjoys gardening, is a Legislative District Director for Gene Mullen's office, and is delighted to be serving on the Beautification Commission. MINUTES The minutes of the November 4, 2004 Beautification Commission meeting were approved as submitted. CORRESPONDENCE Suggested additions of the Elm species to the Oficial Street Tree List as submitted by Jennifer Pfaff. Key Indicators for the Parks Division Tree Crew & Maintenance Crew and the Recreation Division submitted by Director Schwartz Draft of City of Burlingame - Art in Public Places Policy and Donation Application submitted by Director Schwartz. Article from the City of Santa Cruz Parks and Recreation Department "Growing an Urban Forest " The Benefits of Trees, submitted by Commissioner McQuaide. Criteria for Tree Removal due to Sidewalk Repair, submitted by Chairperson Hesselgren. City of Austin's formula for determining the relative value of a tree or group of trees, submitted by Commissioner Ellis. FROM THE FLOOR - Bobbi Benson, Master Gardener, stated she would like to recommend that information sent out every year telling residents not to touch the City trees not be sent out because it makes people afraid to trim the suckers and raise the small branches hanging too low over the sidewalk. When she sees the suckers, she trims them off. She stated that she knew of two warning letters that were sent to a resident warning of fines if they touched the trees. She suggested seminars and/or notices in the newspapers should be considered to inform residents that no heavy pruning is allowed, but that resident's are allowed to trim the suckers and shape the trees. She concluded that with reduced staff and the budget cuts, residents should be given a little more leeway. Rajappan Balagopal, 1815 Montecito Way stated that he had just finished settling a dispute with regard to trimming his downhill neighbors trees for his view and that view of his uphill neighbors. The trees have been regularly trimmed for view every two years with the uphill neighbors paying the cost. Mr. Balagopal submitted a petition with signatures from 13 of his neighbors and information from other tree view ordinances. They are requesting the Commission consider a long view ordinance allowing trees to be trimmed and opened up for the view and one that would also provide a process for the City to facilitate tree view disputes between neighbors. 1 r OLD BUSINESS Tree View Ordinance - Committee Report - Commissioner Grandcolas submitted the Progress Report on Tree View Ordinance Consideration from the Tree View Ordinance Committee. Commissioner Grandcolas stated that staff had suggested two options to the Commission: to recommend an ordinance or not to recommend an ordinance. The Committee was formed and has studied and reviewed view ordinances in other cities as well as cities in the bay area, few that have tree view ordinances, but most which do not. They found that the City of Belmont, which has a similar physical topology and bay view as Burlingame, has a "policy" in place with regard to managing tree view disputes. The Committee believed that a third option could be to consider establishing a "policy" rather than an ordinance that is similar to that of the City of Belmont. He stated, since Burlingame currently has no view ordinances, the Committee felt a good first step might be to initially begin with establishing a "policy", that could more easily be revised if necessary, and then later the policy could be adopted as an ordinance. Commissioner Grandcolas then reviewed the report focusing on the "good points" and the "bad points" of the Belmont view policy and how the policy might apply to Burlingame. The Commission reviewed and discussed the report. Commissioner Lauder wondered if hillside views should be considered also, not only bay views. Commissioner Grandcolas commented that the Committee thought the policy could be reviewed and re evaluated at some future point, but that for now, focusing initially only on the bay views will give time to monitor the policy and will avoid any radical deforestation to occur before further implementation. He added that the Committee felt it preferable to take the "walk before we run" approach. Commissioner O'Connor asked at what point the City Attorney would be involved in the process? Superintendent Richmond responded that the City Attorney would be involved at the point of drafting a policy or ordinance but would give direction to the Commission when requested. Commissioner O'Connor commented that the City Attorney could be helpful with regard to defining views. Commissioner Grandcolas agreed that the City Attorney could be very helpful in narrowly defining the view. Arborist Porter suggested defining appropriate tree species for view protection might be something to consider as well. Following the discussion, Vice-Chair Carney recognized Mr. Balagopal. Mr. Balagopal commented that he thought the Committee had done a good job; that other cities are more binding. This policy seemed to be a more reasonable approach. He added that other cities do have policies that limit the types of trees that can be planted with regard to view, for instance Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees cannot be planted because they grow to high. Mr. Balagopal also stated that most ordinances provide a time line in which disputes must happen, i.e., a 30-day, time period. Bobbi Benson stated that anyone appointed as mediator should have a gardening background; someone familiar with what can or can't be done, that trees can be thinned and opened up for the view without destroying the tree. She stated that it should be required that any trimming performed on the trees should be done by a Certified Arborist and a list of approved Certified Arborists could be provided to the property owners. Commission O'Connor added that a consultation could also be arranged with the City's Arborist. Mike Stallings of 1512 Alturas Way stated that he was happy that the process was moving forward, but that some people will be resistant to modifying the canopy in the City. The Commission decided to carry this item over to the next meeting for further discussion. Commissioner Grandcolas and Commissioner Webb will review the information provided by Mr. Balagopal. Commissioner O'Connor asked that the Commission also consider defining how broad the view definition should be. 2 OLD BUSINESS - (Contd.) - Street Tree Removal Policy - Superintendent Richmond summarized that the Council has requested the Commission to make determination when it might be appropriate for property owners to remove City trees at their cost, due to sidewalk or other tree related damage. The Commission is currently trying to create a model or guideline to assist in that decision-making process. Superintendent Richmond stated that previously the City paid 100% of sidewalk repairs for related damage caused by City trees, but with the budget cuts, property owners are now responsible for the cost of repairs to the sidewalks. He explained that each year the City assigns sidewalk repair section by section at which time property owners in any given section are notified of the necessary repairs and are informed of the new policy that requires the sidewalk to be repaired at their cost. It is anticipated that some property owners may request removal of the City street tree due to sidewalk/curb damage caused by the tree. Following a brief discussion, the Commission tabled this item to the next Commission meeting, when more Commission members will be present for comment. Arbor Day Ceremonies - Monday, March 7, 2005 - Superintendent Richmond stated that Arbor Day will be held at Bayside Park and Redwood trees will be planted to replace Monterey Pines that will need to be removed in the near future. Administrative Secretary Harvey reported that, due to budget cuts, a representative from California Department of Forestry may not be available for the flag ceremony. It was suggested that Doug Gettel, Eagle Scout, who updated the Trees of Washington Park map, may be able to participate. Commissioner O'Connor stated she also may be able to find a representative from CDF to attend the ceremonies. NEW BUSINESS - Additional Specie Selections to the Official Street Tree List - Superintendent Richmond noted a list of disease resistant Elms for inclusion on the Official Street Tree List had been submitted by Jennifer Phaff and is being considered. He stated that Jennifer Pfaff from the Historical Society, has been working with CalTrans to replace Eucalyptus trees (needing to be removed on El Camino) with disease resistant Elms in order to restore the historical intent of the highway. Ms. Pfaff has now asked that Elm species also be placed on the City's Official Street Tree list. The Commission briefly discussed the Elm species as an addition to the list and as replacement trees on El Camino Real. The Commission also discussed the disadvantages of planting only one specie of tree in an area; that disease or pest could destroy a complete grove, and that future discussions with regard to monocultures should be discussed and considered. Arborist Porter responded that the Elms are a great choice for El Camino at this time, but over time, further evaluation and discussions regarding alternating species could be considered. Superintendent Richmond commented that Director Schwartz would be making future contacts with CalTrans related to the replanting on El Camino and discussions of monocultures could be discussed at that time. Following the discussion, the Commission tabled this item to the next Commission meeting, when more members of the Commission would be present to comment. REPORTS - Superintendent Richmond - 1. Tree Lighting ceremony will be Friday night at City Hall, starting at around 5 p.m. 2. Tree Crew is pruning all the trees on lower Burlingame Avenue from Rollins to Anita. 3. Steve Porter will retire the end of this month; he will then work part time, handling PlanningBuilding issues, and Protected Tree Removal applications. 4. The Landscape Screen on north California Drive has been completed. The contractor is now in the 90 day maintenance period, as well as some debris removal responsibilities. 5. There may be an appeal for the removal by permit of a private tree at the January meeting. If the appeal goes forward the material will be included with the minutes, when they are sent out mid December. 6. Welcomed the new commissioner Geraldine O'Conner. 7. Thanked Jo-Ellen Ellis for her years of service on the Commission. 3 REPORTS - (Contd.) - Carney - Vice Chair Carney reported that there is a swing on a City street tree on Columbus Avenue. Superintendent Richmond responded a warning letter would be sent to the property owner, if Vice Chair Carney would call the address into the Parks Division office. Lauder - Commissioner Lauder thanked Director Schwartz, Superintendent Richmond, Supervisor Disco, Arborist Porter, and Secretary Harvey for the outstanding jobs they do for the City. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 6:55 pm. Respectfully submitted, i Karlene Harvey Recording Secretary 4 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road,Burlingame, CA December 13, 2004 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Osterling called the December 13, 2004, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran,Brownrigg(arrived at 8:00 p.m.),Keighran, Keele, and Osterling Absent: Commissioners: Bojues, Vistica Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Catherine Barber; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer; Doug Bell III. MINUTES The minutes of the November 22, 2004 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CP Monroe noted that Item #8 has been continued to the January 10, 2005 meeting,and that Item#2 will have to be pushed back on the agenda until the arrival of C. Brownrigg so there will be a quorum since C. Auran has to abstain because he lives within 500 feet of the subject property. V. FROM THE FLOOR Donald Corey, 833 Alpine Avenue, months ago talked to the Planning �-- Commission about apartment unit next to duplex at 730 Laurel Avenue,also approved a new building at 708 Laurel Avenue, if this were in Cleveland or Buffalo it would be called an abomination,block busting,there is no concern for R-2 zoned lots,these are oversized building on these lots,don't fit in with neighborhood, this is a 7,000 SF building, not a duplex. There were no further public comments. VI. STUDY ITEMS There are no study items for review. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. 1A. 1464 VANCOUVER AVENUE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MICHAEL GONG AND AMY LUI, PROPERTY OWNERS) (70 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN 111. 29 STANLEY ROAD,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A NEW,TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE `-- (TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; KAUSHIK AND SONALI BHAUMIK, PROPERTY OWNERS) (67 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13, 2004 1C. ADOPT PLANNING COMMISSION CALENDAR FOR 2005 - CITY PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE Chair Osterling asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioners comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution including the Commissioners 2005 calendar. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 4-0-3(C.Bojues,Brownrigg,and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM Item#2, 2108 Easton Drive was moved to the end of the Regular Action Calendar 3. 1637 WESTMOOR ROAD,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,SIDE SETBACK AND PARKING VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JACOB AND LESLIE NGUYEN, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; PETER SANG, DESIGNER) (53 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Reference staff report December 13, 2004,with attachments. Plnr. Barber presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. -1, Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Jake Nguyen,property owner, 1637 Westmoor Road,stated that he appreciated the Planning Commission's comments at the study meeting on October 12,2004,as a home owner, feels that the plans have significantly improved. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission comments: tremendous improvement with the design review process. C.Auran moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following amended conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 18, 2004 sheets 1 through 11, and L-1, site plan, floor plans and building elevations; 2) that should the primary structure on this lot ever be demolished for any reason, the variances granted for this remodel shall be voided; 3)that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement,first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 4)that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist,City Engineer,Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal's memos dated September 9,2004 shall be met; 5)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide to the Building Department certification of that height documenting that it is the same or less than the maximum height shown on the plans; 6)that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 7) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13, 2004 built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 8) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 9) that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 10)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,2001 edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;and 11)that two noble laurels shall be planted in the front yard to screen the new addition of the subject property, as approved by the City Arborist. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Commission discussion: for the parking variance,the existing garage is 8' wide by 20' deep, so there is no change to the existing configuration caused by chimney encroachment,the side setback variance is necessary to follow the line of the existing structure, can support based upon design; notice that property owner is planting noble laurels in the back yard, good choice, consider putting one of two in the front yard, will enhance the project,should add condition;much improved design;shows how project can be improved with the design review process. The maker of the motion and the second on the motion agreed to add a condition that two noble laurels be added in the front yard to screen the anew addition, location to b e approved by the City Arborist. Chair Osterling called for a roll call on the amended motion to approve. The motion passed on a 4-0-3 (Cers. Bojues, Brownrigg, and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m. 4. 716 HOWARD AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A NEW ATTACHED GARAGE (KENDRICK LI, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; BEN BEHRAVESH, ARCHITECT) (51 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER Reference staff report November 13, 2004,with attachments. Plnr. Barber presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Kendrick Lee,property owner,716 Howard Avenue,noted that he is back after two months with revised plans. Made lots of changes, also got an arborist report for the fir tree on the adjacent property,met with Randy Grange,design reviewer,and followed his recommendations, changed driveway to a no soil cut with pervious pavers; met with neighbor Sheila Janakos, she liked the revised plans. The proximity of the chimney to the roof is o.k.because it is a gas fireplace, also sloped the firebox,the posts in the front have been removed and more landscaping has been added to the site plan,the front entry is now emphasized. Architecturally this design will fit in the neighborhood,the property owner presented a slide with the addition superimposed on the subject property. The property owner noted that the design reviewer agrees that the project will fit in with the neighborhood. In his analysis he also commented that the floor area ratio is consistent with other houses in this areas and if the floor area ratio were calculations for a project with a detached garage then the project would be 230 SF below the maximum allowable floor area ratio. The proposed garage is set far back in the driveway and appears as detached garage. The property owner showed other homes in the area that have attached garages. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C.Keele moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped December 1,2004 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13,2004 sheets T 1,A-1.0 through A-4.0,site plan,floor plans and building elevations;2)that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3)that the conditions of the Recycling Specialist,City Engineer, Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal's memos dated June 17, 2004 shall be met; 4)that the proposed driveway shall be designed and constructed without soil cut, above soil grade,with basalite pavers over a sand sub-base to reduce impact on the tree roots of the fir tree on the adjacent property at 720 Howard Avenue; and that the project arborist shall oversee the installation of the driveway and it shall be inspected by the City Arborist before scheduling a final inspection; 5)that the 94 inch Fir tree located on the adjacent property at 720 Howard Avenue and all tree protection measures shall be inspected by a certified arborist prior to demolition or construction activity; 6) that the protective tree fencing shall be 4 feet tall orange plastic attached to metal stakes no less than 12 inches into the ground and at 6 foot centers and shall be placed along the 30 feet of the property line in between 716 and 720 Howard Avenue adjacent to the 94 inch Fir tree in prior to demolition or construction activity on the site; 7)that no equipment,storage,dumping, grading, or excavation shall be permitted within the designated tree protection zones without the prior written approval of the consulting arborist; and confirmed by the City Arborist; 8)that if excavation must occur within the tree protection zone that the consulting arborist shall determine where tunneling, hand work,and root pruning is required; and shall be on site observing the work as these activities occur; 9)that the 94 inch Fir tree located on the adjacent property at 720 Howard Avenue shall be inspected one year following the construction at 716 Howard Avenue and every three years for 6 years thereafter by a certified arborist;and a report shall be sent to the City Arborist; 10)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide to the Building Department certification of that height documenting that it is the same or less than the maximum height shown on the plans; 11)that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect, engineer or other licensed --. professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 12) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type, etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; l 3)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 14) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible,to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; and 15)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Commission discussion: compliment the applicant on the revised project,nice presentation with the slide show; design has been improved, support the application. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 4-0-3 (Cern. Boju6s,Brownrigg and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m. 5. 1512-1516 FLORIBUNDA AVENUE,ZONED R-3—APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FRONT SETBACK -� LANDSCAPING FOR A NEW, FOUR-STORY, 9-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;THORENFELDT CONSTRUCTION,INC., PROPERTY OWNER) (142 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HUR1N 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13, 2004 A. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT B. TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT MERGER AND TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP Reference staff report November 13, 2004, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. CP noted that this is the first project to be reviewed under the inclusionary zoning requirements;the application preceded the requirements but the applicant chose to follow them as a trade-off for the taller building. CP noted that the action should betaken on the project before the action on the map. Forty conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission noted that on page 6 question#1 asks if the Planning Commission can set parameters for the affordable units,can the Commission direct the location of the affordable unit. CA Anderson noted that the intent is to have the affordable unit fit in with the project; Planning Commission has a lot of discretion in this area. Commission noted that they did not see the Hexagon Traffic Report,has this report looked at the number of on-street parking spaces that would be lost on Floribunda because of the new curb cut and the red zone on each side. CP Monroe noted that with the worst case scenario one on-street parking space would be lost because there are currently three curb cuts and now there will be two curb cuts of different size,red zones will reduce on-street parking. Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. He noted that C.Vistica is absent from this meeting but that he emailed his comments to the Chair to be read at the public hearing. These comments are as follows: proposed building is too large for size of the lot,units are too large,reduce 500 SF per unit to reduce the size of the building, no large common open space for people to gather; exterior articulation needs to be more consistent with other buildings in this area,reduce the fourth floor to half of the size of the third floor and incorporate the fourth roof into within the plate of the floor below;trees are not in scale with the size of the building because most are in planter boxes over garage, should be where they can grow full size to screen such a large building. Dale Meyer,project architect, 851 Burlway Road Suite 408,Burlingame,noted that setbacks on each side are greater than the required except on the fourth floor where that are at the required setback. The common open space and private open spaces are also larger than the required amount. This project does include an affordable one-bedroom unit,the code requires this unit to be at least 650 SF,however the proposed unit is 800 plus square feet. The landscaping in the front is allowed to be reduced to 45%with a circular driveway, but this project has 47%. The incentives for having an affordable unit allow the height of the building to increase to 46 feet, and the building is not at that limit. Only used one of the incentives, could have also reduced the size of the parking spaces or the landscaping. There will be no decrease in the amount of street parking because there are currently three driveway and only two driveways are proposed with this project. Dale Meyer noted that last meeting the Planning Commission requested the applicant to give them a summary of the vision he has for this area of Burlingame because he is doing several multi-family developments in the area. Mr.Meyer stated that this is a city,and is dense,people live in close proximity,it is not farmland. This is a growing,desirable place to live with a limited amount of land,this creates a drive for increased density to happen. Developments here tend to have higher cost because of the land cost,also affordable units will be increased due to the new ordinance,which will help to solve housing pressures in the City. In this neighborhood notice homes of different styles and architecture,think that the area will continue to develop this way. Ten years ago there was a burst of condominium developments,they go in cycles,and sometimes the envelope gets pushed. Need to consider if projects are good designs and use good quality materials. Mr. Meyer passed forward two color renderings of the proposed condominium building. He noted that this will help give the Planning Commission an idea about the concept of the project, there are 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13,2004 varied windows on the elevations,some square,some with opening above;and the sides of the building move in and out to break up the look. Commissioner asked why the affordable unit is placed right next to the driveway ramp on the first floor.Mr. Meyer responded that usually the price of units increase as you go up,this is the smallest unit and least expensive so it is located on the first floor,and that the smallest yard and patio area were in this location so it was proportional to the size of the unit. Commissioner noted that on sheet L1.0 of the revised plans that there is a raised planter box over the garage slab. Mr.Meyer stated that at the last Planning Commissions meeting one of the Commissioners asked him to create more dense landscaping so he added an additional foot to the planter to make it deeper. Commission asked why they didn't do a three and a half story building rather than a full four-story,fourth floor adds mass,need to consider pushing it back. Mr.Meyer explained they looked at a series of sketches,looked at a three-story building,looked a three-story building with a penthouse. From the point of view of standard overall development cost,thought that the building could take a full fourth floor.The model shows how the building steps up and down from the street. CA Anderson asked if the lower floor affordable unit was ADA accessible.Commission clarified questions by asking the unit was wheel chair accessible throughout. Mr.Meyer stated that yes it is ADA accessible, the bathroom will need to made a little larger or have a pedestal sink. CA Anderson noted that this may be a reason to accept the unit at this location or not. Commissioner stated that there is a lot of mass and bulk with the fourth floor,without a setback on the top floor it looks like a big box with the same windows geometry,appears as if architect doesn't want to address this issue. Mr.Meyer stated that they looked at this issue,site plan does show a large setback,left front has an 18'setback and the right side has a 20'setback because of the lot geometry,project is not totally pushing the envelope,have more landscaping,more open space and larger setbacks than code requires. Why have a code if this is not o.k.,not good practice. Commissioner stated that on sheet P8 and P9 that the elevations look like a big box,the fourth floor looms over the building. Commission asked the architect to consider reducing the size of the units. These units are 2,853 SF to 2,700 SF,downscale the units to get more articulation in design,concerned with this project,it is a big box,need to downscale the overall size. Mr. Meyer stated that they had a real estate agent look at a market study,and they design for a certain buyer, have to talk with the owner about changes. There are not too many building in this area with the fourth floor setback. There is a four story building on Oak Grove next to the church and also one across the street. Can attempt to articulate the fourth floor,but need to discuss it with the owner. Commission asked if there were any other four-story buildings in the area. Mr. Meyer stated that immediately adjacent they are only 2,there are more three or three and half story buildings. Commissioner commented,can live with overall height and shadow study says it is a reasonable height,but should consider setting fourth floor back,this will be an opportunity to reduce the size of the units,can setback and add balconies,will reduce the bulk and mass,and reduce the apparent height of the building;rendering is nice but would like to see more work done on this project. C.Brownrigg arrived at 8:00 p.m. Commission noted that this project has very large rooms,14'8"x 17'bedrooms, 18'6"x 9'foyer,add articulation to top unit,may result in a better floor plan for the units. Commission asked the plate height for this project. Mr.Meyer noted that that he first floor has a 10'floor to ceiling and the rest of the floor have a 9'floor to ceiling. Commission asked the architect what design criteria is used starting these projects. Mr. Meyer explained that he first looks at the size of the property,then does a code analysis,determines the 6 City ojBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13, 2004 setback parameters,looks at the number of parking spaces that can be accommodated on the site,then does an analysis on the number of bedrooms, this gives the envelope of the structure and then the look of the building is determined by the envelope(mass). Public Comments: Lena Zhang, Z Studio Architects, 1390 Monterey Boulevard, San Francisco, Mark Buran,property owner, 1508 Floribunda Avenue:At meeting for another project,but had some suggestions; understands what architect is trying to achieve, land is valuable so there is a trend in cities to increase the density,nice rendering,share feeling of Commission that project is kind ofmassive,might consider breaking building up into sections, can articulate with various color schemes,use different color for 25' length,can read like three buildings,see this a lot in European towns,can keep the volume and solve housing pressures.; Concerned with four story project,will cast a shadow on 30%of their units,they are getting the most value out of their property at our expense. There were no further comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. CA Anderson noted that C.Brownrigg came after the start of this item and can participate in the discussion of this project, but can not vote on it. Summary of Commission comments: • Need to work on articulation and design,not enough articulation; • Fourth floor is heavy, needs to be setback from street under roof; • Looks like institution with all the balconies on the front, front windows are too symmetrical; • Reduce the size of the units, 2,700 to 2,900 SF is too big; • No problem with design, it is close to downtown; • Concerned with the size of the affordable unit, so small compared to the other units in this project, need to increase the size of that unit; and • We do need greater density in downtown areas but an entire extra floor only adds two units, eliminate floor or push back. Architect and owner should redesign based on the given comments. Commission asked CA Anderson what option they have for this project.CA Anderson explained that the Commission can deny the project without prejudice with the direction given,or deny the project outright,or continue the item. Commission asked CA Anderson and CP Monroe to clarify the authority of the Planning Commission on this project in regards to design comments made;CA Anderson and CP Monroe explained that on page 8 of the staff report there are condominium regulations that discuss the aesthetic qualities of the project, so the Commission has the discretion under these regulations to review design concerns. Commission noted that criteria A of the condominium permit criteria does look at sound community planning and aesthetic qualities of a project. Commission stated that they have trust in this architect, if he is given the chance to respond to these comments. C. Keighran made a motion to continue this item with the direction given to the project architect. The motion was seconded by C. Keele. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to continue. The motion passed on a 4-0-1-2 (C. Browmigg abstaining, Cers. Bojues and Vistica absent,). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:20 p.m. 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13,2004 2. 2108 EASTON DRIVE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT, FLOOR AREA RATIO AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A NEW ATTACHED GARAGE (ERNIE AND PHYLLIS BODEN, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; 2 STUDIO ARCHITECTS,ARCHITECT) (54 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER C.Auran stated that he would be abstaining from participating on this item because he lives within 500 feet of the subject property and left Council Chambers. Reference staff report December 13,2004,with attachments. Plnr.Barber presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirteen conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Osterling opened the public hearing. Lena Zhang,Z Studio Architects, 1390 Monterey Boulevard,San Francisco,thanked the Commission for giving her clients another chance on making this project work. The floor area has been reduced and a floor area ratio variance is not required. Plnr.Barber clarified that a floor area ratio variance is still required for this project although the floor area has been reduced;noted that the project architect is referring to the fact that if the floor area for the lot were calculated for a detached garage rather than an attached garage(as proposed)then the project would be within allowable floor area for the site. Ms. Zhang noted the arborist was against option 2,which proposed a new detached garage with pier and beam construction at the rear of the lot,because a major portion of the garage and driveway would be within the drip line of the Redwood tree. Impressed that the property owners took on this project and have gone so far to work with the arborist, construction estimator and architect to examine the options on this property. The applicant has limited means for this project but has tried to preserve the tree. Jean Alder,2111 Easton Drive,lives across the street from the subject property. Appreciates that the Bodens "1 will have shed, since all of the neighbors borrow their tools, applaud the efforts of the Bodens to keep the tree, other neighbors are also in favor of this proposal. Commission asked if she minds looking at the new attached garage across from her house. Ms.Adler stated that the attached garage did not bother her because it is set far enough back from the front property line and there is a long driveway. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Brownrigg moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 18, 2004 Sheets A0.0 through A1.2, site plan, floor plan, landscape plan and elevations; 2) that the conditions of the City Engineer,Recycling Specialist, Chief Building Official and Fire Marshal's memos dated March 29,2004 shall be met and the City Arborist's memo dated April 8,2004 shall be meet; 3)that a tree protection zone shall be established and maintained throughout the entire construction of the project, and during construction the Redwood tree shall be properly irrigated and maintained as determined by the proj ect arborist and approved by the City Arborist,and following the construction the Redwood tree shall be fed and maintained as proposed by the project arborist in the June 1,2004 report and approved by the City Arborist; 4) that a 4 foot tall orange plastic fencing supported by metal poles or stakes pounded into the ground shall be installed as the protective fencing at a location approved by the arborist as close to the drip line of the tree as possible; 5)that the redwood trunk shall have 2' x 4' lumber placed vertically on the trunk and then wrapped with orange fencing for additional protection;6)that no materials or tools shall be stored within the protection zone established around the Redwood tree,nor shall any equipment be cleaned within the protection zone during demolition and reconstruction of the shed; 7)that any roots to be cut shall be observed and shall be documented by the project arborist prior to cutting and that large roots greater than 3"or root masses shall be inspected and documented by the project arborist to determine that cutting will not negatively impact the tree prior to removal,any root cutting shall be done cleanly using a saw or topper, 8) 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13, 2004 that hand excavation shall be required for the removal of the garage foundation, floor and a portion of the existing driveway that is within root zone of the Redwood tree; 9) that hand digging observed by a licensed arborist shall be required for digging the foundation for the rear wall and exterior corner (5') of the new garage; 10) that the area where the 8'6"by 14'8" portion of the garage is to be removed shall be mulched to help maintain a health root zone; 11) that these measures shall be monitored by the project arborist who prepared the protection plan, and a three year maintenance plan following construction, including regular inspections by the arborist, as approved by the City Arborist, shall be added to this report; any corrective measures required during the maintenance period shall be implemented by the property owner; 12) that any increase to the size or envelope of the approved garage or garden shed, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; and 13) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Commission discussion on the motion: the hardship on this property for the variances is the Redwood tree, option 2 with a pier and beam seems like a lot of contriving to shoe horn a new detached garage at the rear of the lot, an attached garage is a good solution, also the added exterior improvements that are proposed are a good solution; arborist repot agrees that a new detached garage at the rear of the lot is not good for the tree; applaud the applicant for efforts to preserve the tree and look at all options. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 4-0-2-1 (C. Auran abstaining, Cers. Bojues and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:35 p.m. Commission asked the applicant and staff to notify the property owners to the left of this property that the project was approved so that they may adjust their proposed new single family dwelling accordingly. C. Auran returned to the dais. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 6. 2122 ROOSEVELT AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; DAN AND ANGELA DOBSON, PROPERTY OWNERS) (41 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Dan Dobson, property owner, John Stewart, architect, 1351 Laurel Street, San Carlos represented the project. Applicant thanked staff for their high level of customer service, family is built out, four boys, now need to build out house, presently not a great house to raise four boys; with remodel the bedrooms will be upstairs and the common spaces downstairs; lot slopes to the rear so the deck is higher than 30 inches and is included in lot coverage; no neighbors to rear(Roosevelt school), neighbors on east and west reviewed and said OK, 12 other neighbors as well. Resident in Hillsborough contacted, agreed to add trees to resolve their problem. Architect noted that the overhang of the second story added to achieve articulation along the driveway also affected lot coverage. 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13, 2004 John Widman , 407 Midway spoke in support, noting good plan, unfortunate that slope toward school, without would not have lot coverage issue. There were no further comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. Commissioners asked: • Could the roof pitch be lowered to reduce the height because you sit on a bluff? C.Keighran noted that overall did a nice design job,blends in with the existing structure,lot coverage is OK given slope on the lot, floor area ratio is met, so move to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion was seconded by Chair Osterling. Comment on the motion: beautiful design on an existing structure,hard to do,the hardship for the variance is the small size of this lot on the block. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote to place this item on the consent calendar. The motion passed on a 5- 0-2 (Cers. Bojues, Vistica absent) voice vote. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:45 p.m. 7. 900 CAROLAN AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(JOHN MARCH,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MR.AND MRS.KRIS REDDY,PROPERTY OWNERS)(45 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:ERICA STROHMEIER CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. John Marsh, I 1 Airport Blvd.South San Francisco,represented the project. Noted that they had revised this application several times for staff. There were no further comments from the floor. The public comment was closed. Commissioners comments: • This is a perfect example of a project not working, the addition does not blend into the existing structure, could use help of design reviewer; • Concerned that the addition looks too boxy; • South elevation is not articulated well,too much stucco,2 oval windows do not reflect anything else on the building. Chair Osterling moved to direct this project to a design reviewer. The motion was seconded by C.Keighran. Comment on the motion: less concerned about the variance in this case,this is an oddly shaped corner lot. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to direct this project to a design reviewer. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers.Bojues,Vistica absent)voice vote. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:55 p.m. 8. 1552 LOS MONTES DRIVE,ZONED R-1-APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A LOWER FLOOR ADDITION AND SECOND FLOOR DECK (DEREK WEE, AIA, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; GREG AND SERENE LIM, PROPERTY 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13,2004 OWNERS) (50 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER (CONTINUED TO JANUARY 10,2005 MEETING) 9. 1418 CASTILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; DUTCH HOSMAN, PROPERTY OWNER) (64 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Randy Grange,architect,205 Park Road,and Dutch Hosman, property owner,represented the project.He noted that this was a difficult house to work with;and he would answer questions. Commissioners noted: • Would like to see a landscape plan with evergreen trees added; • Need to talk with neighbor and address the neighbor's carport,which may be affected by fire code requirements, resolve issue; and • See roof moved up, but in keeping with houses on both sides, plans work well with existing and proposed side by side. There were no further comments on the project from the floor or Commission. The public comment was closed. C.Keele complemented the design, first time he has seen someone design to a decrease in lot coverage and FAR, move that this project be placed on the consent calendar. The motion was seconded by Chair Osterling. Comment on the motion: want to be sure that the plans when resubmitted include adding some landscaping and discussion with the neighbor about the carport, including a letter discussing the carport issue. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the motion to refer the item to the consent calendar when all the revisions have been submitted, checked and there is space. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Bojues, Vistica absent). This item concluded at 9:00 p.m. 10. 1031 MORRELL AVENUE,ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(POKO KLEIN,TRG ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;PAUL AND ELLEN DONATI,PROPERTY OWNERS)(35 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Randy Grange, architect, 205 Park Avenue, presented the project. He noted that the goal of the remodel was to add a bedroom and bath,however since the house is split level and they already had 6.5 feet of head room under the addition they were also adding a bonus room which counts as a fourth bedroom. Because of the split level design of the house can not get a car in the �— driveway without demolishing the rear of the house or paving the back yard. Commissioner noted that he 11 City ojBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13,2004 was troubled by the increase from 2 to 4 bedrooms without additional parking, which could cause a significant parking pressure on this corner lot.Applicant noted that there were two street frontages,serving this house,one of which was more than 100 feet long without curb cut. There were no further comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. C.Auran noted he could find for a variance because of the two street frontages,narrow curb cut on one and no curb cut on the long side,like the design so would move to put this item on the consent calendar for action. C.Keighran seconded the motion. Comment on the motion: the mitigation here is the street parking,what is the hardship?It is an existing condition,today typically have only 20 feet in front of a house;to get the additional on site parking would need to remove the back of the house;so hardship is created by the orientation of the house. CA noted that commission could add a condition that the variance is based on the location of the house and that there is any significant change to the property beyond this application or to the house,the variance would be void. The maker of the motion and the second agreed to the amendment to the motion to add a condition to have the variance for parking granted with this project voided should the house ever be demolished or changed significantly in the future. Chair Osterling called for a voice vote on the amended motion to refer this project to the consent calendar when the plans had been revised as directed and with the condition that the parking variance would be voided if the house were demolished or further changed in the future. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers. Boju6s,Vistica absent)voice vote.The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:05 p.m. 11. 821 COWAN ROAD, ZONED O-M — ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING FOR A FIRST FLOOR REMODEL AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING (GREG WARD,ONESTOP DESIGN,INC.,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;KONSTANTINOS DOKOS, PROPERTY OWNER)06 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN CP Monroe presented the project description. Commissioners asked staff: table on parking does not indicate number or location of disabled accessible parking spaces,are the bath rooms in the office spaces disabled accessible,would like to see a landscape plan which enriches the landscaped areas provided;why is CEQA applicable?CEQA requires initial study and environmental document when 10,000 SF ormore been added to this type of use;why concerned with design guidelines,for CEQA project must comply with General Plan. There were no further questions of staff. Chair Osterling opened the public comment. Greg Ward,One Stop Design,Inc.,Fremont.Understand that this is the first project under the newly adopted design guidelines and this is a time of transition. Chair Osterling called for a five minute break at 9:20 p.m.to allow the applicant to fix his power point presentation. The Commission reconvened at 9:25 p.m. Applicant continued: have added a landscape plan sheet L.1;added articulation to the building,tried to make the building look smaller and screen the flat roof;there are five warehouses each with an office area above,each has its own fire exiting. Commissioner noted that the rendering does not include windows which are shown on the elevation in the plans,in the future they should match. Learned of the setback problem late,after a detailed survey was completed. 12 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 13, 2004 Commissioners asked : • What is the role of the barrier areas at the rear of the building, how are they designed?; • Should call out the materials, what will the columns at the front be made of?; • There is an arch at the front which looks blank, what is going on there?; • Is the location of the disabled parking correct? Is the number of disabled accessible spaces appropriate?; • Is the elevator access at the front or the rear of the building; • How closely will the project be required to comply with the Inner Bayshore design guidelines, don't think will get perfection, this looks like a good place to start? Check list is good; and • More landscaping integrated into parking is positive given the design guidelines. Not looking for flowers but more massive screening plants, vines on building effective, automatic irrigation on all. There were no further comments from the floor or commission and the public comment was closed. Chair Osterling noted that this completed the scoping for this project. When the initial study is completed and the type of environmental document determined, this item will be back to the Commission for study. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. X. PLANNER REPORTS - Review of City Council regular meeting of December 6, 2004. CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of December 6, 2004. Commission asked for a `.. copy of the staff report on the update of the recent changes to the Fire regulations. - Planning Commission Assignments 2005. CP noted that she would e-mail each subcommittee group this week and begin the process of selecting a single day each month for them to meet. By January the schedule should be complete. - Chair Memo to City Council Regarding 2005 Planning Commission Working Groups and Coordinating Meeting with the City Council. Mayor Galligan noted at the council meeting that the Planning Commission had requested to meet with the Council and that they would set a date later. Planner will e-mail a copy of the memo to each Planning Commissioner. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chair Osterling adjourned the meeting at 9:56 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Michael Brownrigg, Secretary S:\MINUTES\unapproved12.13.04.doc 13 MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission Thursday, December 16, 2004 The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by Vice-Chairman Heathcote at 7:02 pm at Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Dittman, Erickson, Heathcote, Kahn, Lawson Commissioners Absent: Larios, Muller Staff Present: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz, Others Present: Youth Advisory Committee Members: Grant Gilliam, Jake Rouse Friends of Mills Canyon Members: Viola Larson, Marjorie Taylor MINUTES The minutes of the November 18, 2004 Commission meeting were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENTS -None OLD BUSINESS A. Field Use Policy — Following up on the Field Use Policy from the last Commission meeting, staff presented a matrix displaying current athletic field use by the various community organizations. Commissioner Lawson moved to "Adopt the matrix for the purpose of establishing a baseline of use under the Field Use Policy". The motion was seconded by Commissioner Kahn and passed unanimously. This matrix will serve as the baseline to determine the level of use and typical seasons for each of the field users. B. Pershing Park Playground Rehabilitation — The equipment is being ordered and the project is still on schedule for spring construction. Vice-Chair Heathcote noted the progress of San Mateo's Bayside Park construction at their former dump site. NEW BUSINESS A. Friends of Mills Canyon Use of Recreation Center — Marjorie Taylor asked the commissioners for free use of the Recreation Center for meetings of the Friends of Mills Canyon (FMC). The five members of the FMC Steering Committee meet monthly in the Recreation Center and pay approximately $18 each month. FMC resents being charged anything at all and would eventually hope to have the Recreation Division staff take over the Canyon tours. Marjorie's husband, Ed Taylor, started the trail in Mills Canyon, working with then-Director John Hoffman. After Mr. Taylor's death, the City named the trail after him. FMC was formed in the mid-80's and now has approximately 80 members. They used to meet in Marjorie's home, but now find it easier to meet in the Recreation Center. Parks&Recreation Commission Minutes December 16,2004—page 2 Staff stated that the FMC is a non-profit organization that does a tremendous amount of work for the Mills Canyon area. FMC is charged a nominal fee for use of the Recreation Center classrooms; the same fee as is charged to other community non-profit groups — 50% of the private rental rate. Like many other non-profit groups, FMC makes improvements to the City facility as well as providing community programs. The Commissioners discussed the similarities and differences between FMC and other non-profits and could not find substantial differences. Commissioners Lawson and Kahn stated that they would seek to find an alternate location for the meeting, at a site that would not charge the group. Mrs. Taylor stated that was fine if they looked, but the group would prefer to pay the money than meet in a different location. YAC representatives Gilliam and Rouse said that they would bring this item back to the YAC for discussion, in hopes of having the YAC underwrite the cost of the meeting rooms for the FMC. The YAC representatives will report back to the Commission at their next meeting. B. Commissioner's Trainings — Schwartz mentioned several Commission training opportunities available to Parks & Recreation Commissioners and asked for feedback from the Commissioners. The four training opportunities are: California Association of Parks & Recreation Commissioners and Board Members California Parks & Recreation Society's annual conference City of Burlingame Commissioner's training Local Parks &Recreation Commissioner training The Commissioners stated a preference to meet with other Burlingame commissioners in a training session. Staff will pass this information on to the City Manager's office. Commissioner Kahn also suggested that this training session may take the place of the annual Commissioner's Dinner. REPORTS A. YAC Representatives Gilliam and Rouse reported they spoke with Burlingame High School Principal Matt Biggar about the drug prevention program discussed at last month's meeting. The High School will include a drug prevention component in their upcoming Student Impact Team seminar. The seminar will include guest speakers and will focus on ways to relieve stress and the effects of drugs on the body. Staff will work with representatives from Burlingame Intermediate School to determine if a similar program can be conducted at the middle school. Gilliam suggested the program be comprised of small group discussions to allow interaction with the speaker and to ensure students paying attention. Commissioner Erickson complimented YAC on working on important social projects and not just focusing on providing recreational activities. Parks&Recreation Commission Minutes December 16,2004—page 3 Rouse also reported on several YAC activities: a canned food drive in conjunction with their next 7t'/8a' grade dance, a recent paint ball trip was very successful, an upcoming ski trip, visit to a retirement home, Parent's Night Out, and service at a homeless shelter. B. Vice-Chair Heathcote stated he is unhappy with the level of quality of the sycamore pruning and asked if there is any progress on plans to build a new Community Center. C. Commissioner Lawson asked about the stop light at El Camino Real and Adeline. Staff said that intersection is controlled by Caltrans. D. Commissioner Kahn stated that she is moving to Sonoma in January and will be leaving the Commission. She said that being on City commissions was one of her favorite parts of living in Burlingame. E. Commissioner Dittman asked about the progress of the effort to form a Parks Joint Powers Authority in San Mateo County and suggested downsizing next year's annual Commissioner's Dinner due to budget reductions. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission will be held on Thursday, January 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. at Burlingame City Hall. There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 pm. Respectfully submitted, Randy Schwartz Director of Parks &Recreation CITY OF BURLINGAME BUILDING INSPECTION MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY NOVEMBER, 2004 F.Y. 2004 F.Y. 2003 SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF TO DATE TO DATE DIFF Permit type # Valuation # Valuation % # Valuation # Valuation % Vew Single Family 2 $606,000 1 $394,000 53.8 11 $3,920,767 6 $2,452,000 59.9 dew Multi-Family 0 $0 0 $0 .0 0 $0 0 $0 .0 Vew Commercial 0 $0 0 $0 .0 1 $1,200,000 2 $2,500,000 52.0- llterations-Res 22 $594,835 19 $451,430 31.8 139 $7,137,808 139 $5,195,617 37.4 %Iterations-NonRes 10 $1,060,500 6 $294,750 259.8 40 $4,596,332 38 $4,354,050 5.6 demolition 2 $0 10 $93,000 100.0- 24 $35,500 32 $117,000 69.7- 3wimming Pool 0 $0 0 $0 .0 0 $0 2 $50,000 100.0- 3ign Permits 3 $12,300 2 $10,900 12.8 20 $59,882 13 $61,550 2.7- ?ences 0 $0 1 $8,000 100.0- 0 $0 2 $9,500 100.0- teroofing 19 $258,859 26 $322,246 19.7- 140 $1,816,364 175 $1,919,746 5.4- 2epairs 2 $16,000 2 $55,500 71.2- 14 $238,194 21 $186,900 27.4 gindow Repl 7 $62,276 7 $44,661 39.4 34 $312,901 47 $508,100 38.4- 4iscellaneous 3 $89,000 0 $0 .0 13 $208,805 11 $151,101 38.2 TOTALS...... 70 $2,699,770 74 $1,674,487 61.2 436 $19,526,553 488 $17,505,564 11.5 12/01/04 A-27v07 I I � CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2004 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. LAIF & County Pool 18,300,063.99 18,300,063.99 18,300,063.99 72.33 1 1 2.617 2.653 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 7,000,000.00 6,957,190.00 7,000,000.00 27.67 991 714 2.776 2.814 Investments 25,300,063.99 25,257,253.99 25,300,063.99 100.00% 275 198 2.661 2.698 Total Earnings November 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 62,370.22 326,944.91 Average Daily Balance 28,076,226.83 29,628,835.04 Effective Rate of Return 2.70% 2.63% Pursuant to State law, there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types, and availa of some of these fu s is restricted by law (e.g. Gas Tax, Trust & Agency funds, Capital Projects, and Enterprise funds). I /d ixtc zoodl JEO FINANCE DIR./TREASURER Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/10/2004 - 11:59 PM (PRF_PM1) SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver. 5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments November 30, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date LAIF&County Pool SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 2,786,537.88 2,786,537.88 2,786,537.88 2.003 2.003 1 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 15,513,526.11 15,513,526.11 15,513,526.11 2.770 2.770 1 Subtotal and Average 21,076,226.83 18,300,063.99 18,300,063.99 18,300,063.99 2.653 1 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 312§X1605 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,989,380.00 2,000,000.00 2.300 2.300 351 11/17/2005 3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,974,680.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 790 01/30/2007 3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 994,380.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 3.100 877 04/27/2007 3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 998,750.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 3.000 1,051 10/18/2007 Subtotal and Average 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 6,957,190.00 7,000,000.00 2.814 714 Total and Average 28,076,226.83 25,300,063.99 25,257,253.99 25,300,063.99 2.698 198 Portfolio CITY Run Date:12/10/2004-11:59 CP PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept V6.21 �rt Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 3 Activity By Type November 1, 2004 through November 30, 2004 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 2.003 0.00 1,000,000.00 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 2.770 335,471.27 3,000,000.00 Subtotal 21,964,592.72 335,471.27 4,000,000.00 18,300,063.99 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon Subtotal 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 Total 28,964,592.72 335,471.27 4,000,000.00 25,300,063.99 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:12/10/2004-11:59 PM(PRF_PM3)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 4 Activity Summary November 2003 through November 2004 Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity November 2003 3 26,087,655.91 2.614 2.651 2.680 1 1 57 56 December 2003 3 28,680,215.64 2.617 2.654 2.680 0 0 52 49 January 2004 4 27,400,432.25 2.663 2.700 2.696 1 0 174 168 February 2004 4 27,499,689.16 2.557 2.592 2.564 0 0 174 163 March 2004 4 29,579,440.12 2.512 2.547 2.512 0 0 161 146 April 2004 5 31,824,022.87 2.373 2.405 2.318 1 0 184 165 May 2004 5 32,351,524.97 2.412 2.445 2.368 0 0 181 157 June 2004 5 32,705,947.05 2.452 2.486 2.420 0 0 180 150 July 2004 5 31,221,968.21 2.561 2.597 2.553 0 0 188 151 August 2004 5 31,242,288.45 2.603 2.639 2.605 0 0 188 145 September 2004 5 25,250,564.07 2.625 2.662 2.624 0 0 232 172 October 2004 6 28,964,592.72 2.629 2.666 2.618 1 0 240 181 November 2004 6 25,300,063.99 2.661 2.698 2.653 0 0 275 198 Average 5 29,085,261.95 2.560% 2.596% 2.561 0 0 176 146 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:12/10/2004-11:59 PM(PRF PM4)SymRept V6.21 { Report Ver.5.00 I page S I CITY OF BURLINGAME portfolio Management _ ents By Type �erag v Distribution of Investm ber 2004 PPer`� h Novem November November 2003 through ust September October 2004 bq April May June 004 2004 July Au2004 2004 2004 _ _ a1. March p 2004 2 80.8 76.2 75 8 72 3 February November December January 2004 2004 2004 81 7 80 8 ........ 2004 ......_ Security Type 2003 2003 812 81.5 - _ 81.8 81.8 83.1 _ - LAIF&County Pool 92.3 93.0 Certificates of Deposit-Bank ......................._... . l........ — _ Certificates of Deposit-S&L _ - Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln - Negotiable CD's Bank __. .... CORP NOTES - _ Bankers Acceptances 7 Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing —-- 19 2 19 2 _........ ..__.... - 18.6 184 . .. Commercial Paper Discount _ 18.3 18 2 ... ..16 9 ........ 18 9 .. .. Federal Agency Issues'-Coupon 7.7 - . ...._..... Federal Agency Issues-Discount ............. -... I Treasury Securities-Coupon —. Treasury Securities-Discount - _......-..................._.._...,_.-. . Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon -••-- -T _. . ..... .. . Miscellaneous Securities-Discount __ ..... ....... ... .............................. ............._. .......... ....... — Non Interest Bearing Investments .. .-'----- ' ....... . .. ... ..............._._........... Mortgage Backed Securities ................ ....... ..... .......... ...... ...__ ....................................... ..... Miscellaneous Discounts At Cost 2 ....... Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3 Run Date:12/10/2004-11:59 CITY OF BURLINGAME P°rtfO"O Management Interest Earnings Summa November 30 2004rY November 30 Month Ending CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest CollectedFiscal Year To Date Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 23,000.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period 38,550.00 Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 45,133.33 83,500.00 ( ) 38,550.00 Interest Earned during Period 0.00) 48,883.33) Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 16,416.67 ( 0.001 Earnings during Periods 0.00 73,166.67 Pass Through Securities: 16,416.67 0 00 Interest Collected 73,166.67 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) 0.00 ( 0.00 0.00) ( Interest Earned during Period 0.00) Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 ( 0.00) Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: 0.00 0.00 Interest Collected 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period 322,567.61 ( 276,614.06) 313,670.78 Interest Earned during Period 382'460.1 322,567.61 45,953.55 ( 6) Total Interest Earned during Period Total Capital Gains or Losses 62,370,22 253,778.24 Total Earnings during Period 0.00 326,944 91 62,370.22 0.00 326,944,91 Run Date:12/10/2004•11:59 POrffolio Crr, PM(PRF-PM,)SYmRep/VB�p IReport Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 5 Distribution of Investments By Type November 2003 through November 2004 November December January February March April May June July August September October November Average Security Type 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 by Period LAIF&County Pool 92.3 93.0 81.8 81.8 83.1 81,2 81.5 81.7 80.8 80.8 76.2 75.8 72.3 81.7% . .... ...........-......................... ................ .............. Certificates of Deposit-Bank .............................................................................................. ................._..................-.....__.....I.......... ................................_­.................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............. .............................................. ................. ....... Certificates of Deposit-S&L ........................ ..........- ........................-..................... ................. .......... Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln ........... .......... ..................................... ............I.............I..................I............. .................................. ............................................... ...............- Negotiable CD's-Bank I—-............... ......................................................-........................... ................. ...................... ..................... .................I.............................. ..............................­­....................................................... ......................................................................................... ................................................I........................................................ ...................... ........................ CORP NOTES . ......... ............. ............ ............................................ ........ .....r-I.I..,........... ................ ............................. ......................- ..................... .......... Bankers Acceptances ............................................ .........................I.......................................1........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ............................. Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing .............................. .. . .............................*................................... ................................................................................. Commercial Paper-Discount ... ... ..... Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 7.7 7.0 18.3 18.2 16.9 18.9 18.6 18.4 19.2 19.2 23.8 24.2 27.7 18.3% ............. ....... ..........................................I........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........... .............. ............. ................................... Federal Agency Issues-Discount I.............."I'll I I I........................................................... ................. ............... ...................................................... ...............I..........I................................. ....................I.....................................................................I................. ............................................... ................. ............. ................ ......... Treasury Securities-Coupon T....r...e....a.....s....uI Securities-Discount ..... ........ .. ....... ......................... ..................................-1-1............... ...... .............. ....................................... Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon ................................................ ........... .........................................................I.."............ ....................................................................................................................................................... ................ .................. ......... ............................... .......................... Miscellaneous Securities-Discount ......................................... ...................... ......................... .............................................................................. ........... ................................ ................... ........... Non Interest Bearing Investments ...............111.1 ................... ............................................................... ............. ............. ................................................................................................................... ................................................_............................................................................... Mortgage Backed Securities ...................1.1.1.1.11 1 ... I........................................................... ................ .......................I...................... ............................................................................................................ ..............- ............................... ................................ ................ ............................. ................................................................................ Miscellaneous Discounts-M Cost 2 ................ .............................. ...................... .........................I............... ................................ Miscellaneous Discounts At Cost 3 .................................... ................................ .............. ........... ............................................................................................ ....................................... ................................ ............................................... .......... .............................. Portfolio CITY CID Run Date:12/10/2004-11:59 PM(PRF_PM5)SynnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 6 Interest Earnings Summary November 30, 2004 November 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest Collected 23,000.00 83,500.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 38,550.00 38,550.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 45,133.33) ( 48,883.33) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 16,416.67 73,166.67 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 16,416.67 73,166.67 Pass Through Securities: Interest Collected 0.00 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: Interest Collected 0.00 313,670.79 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 322,567.61 322,567.61 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 276,614.06) ( 382,460.16) Interest Earned during Period 45,953.55 253,778.24 Total Interest Earned during Period 62,370.22 326,944.91 Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Total Earnings during Period 62,370.22 326,944.91 Portfolio CITY CP Run Dale:12/10/2004-11:59 PM(PRF_PM6)SyrnRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2004 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 198,559.26 198,559.26 198,559.26 100.00 1 1 1.976 2.003 Investments 198,559.26 198,559.26 198,559.26 100.00% 1 1 1.976 2.003 Total Earnings November 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 311.91 2,517.98 Average Daily Balance 200,392.59 350,975.87 Effective Rate of Return 1.89% 1.71% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months.Total funds invested represent consolidation of some of these funds is restricts law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). 4W �O C::, )a nce DirectorlTreasurer Portfolio 03BD CP Run Date:12/10/2004-12:00 PM(PRF PM1)SymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 03BD Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments November 30, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS82 82 Local Agency Investment Fund 198,559.26 198,559.26 198,559.26 2.003 1.976 2.003 1 Subtotal and Average 200,392.59 198,559.26 198,559.26 198,559.26 1.976 2.003 1 Total and Average 200,392.59 198,559.26 198,559.26 198,559.26 1.976 2.003 1 Portfolio 03BD CP Run Date:12/10/2004-12:00 PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept V6.21 ' I ( In Ver.5.00 ! I 04BD Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2004 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 100.00 1 1 1.976 2.003 Investments 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 100.00% 1 1 1.976 2.003 Total Earnings November 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 26,115.92 123,461.66 Average Daily Balance 16,778,396.15 16,976,208.38 Effective Rate of Return 1.89% 1.73% � IO iG' til>0� Je Nave Finance Dir./Treasurer Portfolio 04BD CP Run Date:12/10/2004-12:01 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept V6.21 Report Ver.5.00 04BD Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments November 30, 2004 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts SYS85 85 Local Agency Investment Fund 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 2.003 2.003 1 Subtotal and Average 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 2.003 1 Total and Average 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 16,778,396.15 2.003 1 Portfolio 04BD CP Run Date:12/10/2004-12:01 PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept V6.21 .1 Ver.5.00 '-17-04 SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES PAGE: 1 FOR: NOVEMBER, 2004 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD -ime Classification............... ... .. Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change t Change irder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 inslaughter by Negligence 0 0 0 0 0 ipe By Force 0 2 4 8 -4 -50.00 :tempt to Commit Forcible Rape 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 )bbery Firearm 1 0 8 5 3 60.00 )bbery Knife 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 )bbery Other Dangerous Weapon 1 0 8 4 4 100.00 )bbery Strong-Arm 0 0 2 5 -3 -60.00 ;sault - Firearm 0 0 0 0 0 3sault - Knife 0 0 6 3 3 100.00 3sault - Other Dangerous Weapon 0 0 18 15 3 20.00 3sault - Hands,Fists,Feet 2 1 13 8 5 62.50 3sault - Other (Simple) 7 22 184 187 -3 -1.60 zrglary - Forcible Entry 8 6 78 75 3 4.00 irglary - Unlawful Entry 2 2 80 55 25 45.45 irglary - Attempted Forcible Entry 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 irceny Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 3,rceny Purse-Snatching 1 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 arceny Shoplifting 1 2 27 23 4 17.39 irceny From Motor Vehicle 11 43 248 273 -25 -9.16 irceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories 3 5 49 47 2 4.26 irceny Bicycles 4 5 30 34 -4 -11.76 irceny From Building 1 1 15 21 -6 -28.57 irceny From Any Coin-Op Machine 0 6 11 31 -20 -64.52 irceny All Other 19 25 259 218 41 18.81 �-tor Vehicle Theft Auto 6 13 104 78 26 33.33 )tor Vehicle Theft Bus 2 0 3 3 0 0.00 Dtor Vehicle Theft Other 2 0 8 5 3 60.00 ------- ------ ------- ------- 71 133 1,157 1,104 ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- 71 133 1,157 1,104 i-17-04 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 1 CITY REPORT FOR: NOVEMBER, 2004 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD =ime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change % Change L1 Other Offenses 37 42 403 406 -3 -0.74 iimal Abuse 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 iimal Nuisance 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 =son 2 0 6 10 -4 -40.00 3sists to Outside Agencies 0 0 0 0 0 Lcycle Violations 0 0 0 0 0 !gamy 0 0 0 0 0 3mb Offense 0 0 0 3 -3 -100.00 3mb Threat 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 ribery 0 0 0 0 0 Zeck Offenses 0 0 3 15 -12 -80.00 zild Neglect/prot custody 0 4 16 26 -10 -38.46 Dmputer Crime 1 0 1 0 1 Dnspiracy 1 0 1 0 1 redit Card Offenses 0 1 0 1 -1 -100.00 ruelty to Dependent Adult 0 0 3 2 1 50.00 arfew and Loitering Laws 0 0 2 1 1 100.00 eath Investigation 4 4 29 27 2 7.41 isorderly Conduct 2 3 22 36 -14 -38.89 river's License Violations 0 1 4 4 0 0.00 riving Under the Influence 3 4 68 61 7 11.48 rug Abuse violations 2 2 40 22 18 81.82 rug/Sex Registrants 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00 runkeness 2 5 51 57 -6 -10.53 mbezzlement 0 2 15 9 6 66.67 scape 0 0 0 0 0 xtortion 0 0 0 0 0 alse Police Reports 0 0 0 0 0 alse Reports of Emergency 0 0 0 0 0 ish and Game Violations 0 0 0 0 0 orgery and Counterfeiting 2 3 38 38 0 0.00 ound Property 7 14 95 88 7 7.95 raud 2 1 31 34 -3 -8.82 ambling 0 0 0 0 0 arrassing Phone Calls 5 1 44 44 0 0.00 ?-17-04 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 2 CITY REPORT FOR: NOVEMBER, 2004 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD rime Classification.................. .. Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change it and Run Accidents 5 7 51 35 16 45.71 npersonation 0 0 3 1 2 200.00 acest 0 0 0 0 0 adecent Exposure 0 0 3 8 -5 -62.50 atimidating a Witness 0 0 1 0 1 idnapping 0 0 0 0 0 =wd Conduct 0 0 2 0 2 iquor Laws 1 0 8 8 0 0.00 ittering/Dumping 0 0 0 0 0 , arijuana Violations 0 0 23 17 6 35.29 ental Health Cases 9 8 101 105 -4 -3.81 issing Person 4 7 52 40 12 30.00 issing Property 10 5 95 91 4 4.40 snicipal Code Violations 4 4 71 41 30 73.17 arcotics Sales/Manufacture 0 0 1 0 1 ffenses Against Children 0 0 2 6 -4 -66.67 ther Assaults 7 22 184 187 -3 -1.60 ther Juvenile Offenses 0 0 2 5 -3 -60.00 Cher Police Service 2 4 65 58 7 12.07 andering for immoral purposes 0 0 0 Y 0 0 arole Violations 0 0 2 1 1 100.00 erjury 0 0 0 0 0 ossession of Burglary Tools 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 ossession of drug paraphernalia 0 0 0 0 0 ossession of obscene literature;picture 0 0 0 0 0 robation Violations 0 0 3 7 -4 -57.14 rostitution and Commercial Vice 0 0 2 3 -1 -33.33 rowling 0 0 0 0 0 esisting Arrest 0 0 4 0 4 unaways (Under 18) 0 0 0 0 0 ex Offenses 2 0 3 3 0 0.00 ex Offenses against Children 0 0 1 3 -2 -66.67 odomy 0 0 0 0 0 talking 0 0 1 3 -2 -66.67 tatutory Rape 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 6 ( s r 2-17-04 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 3 CITY REPORT FOR: NOVEMBER, 2004 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change tolen Property;Buying;Receiving;Possess 1 1 5 5 0 0.00 uspended License 3 1 40 26 14 53.85 ax Evasion 0 0 0 0 0 emp Restraining Orders 1 3 52 31 21 67.74 errorist Threats 0 4 24 24 0 0.00 Dwed Vehicle 38 42 427 379 48 12.66 respassing 2 2 14 16 -2 -12.50 ruants/Incorrigible Juvs 1 1 5 3 2 66.67 s 3 Mail Crimes 0 0 0 0 0 agrancy 0 0 0 0 0 andalism 14 19 177 246 -69 -28.05 -hicle Code Violations 8 2 35 40 -5 -12.50 iolation of Court Order 2 0 22 25 -3 -12.00 arrants - Felony 1 0 14 11 3 27.27 arrants - Misd 1 5 53 33 20 60.61 aapons;Carrying,Possessing 1 0 16 8 8 100.00 elfare Fraud 0 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ ------- ------- 187 225 2,438 2,363 ------- ------ ------- ------- 187 225 2,438 2,363 12-13-04 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS PAGE : 1 CITY REPORT FOR: NOVEMBER, 2004 Current Prev Last Actual Actual Crime Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current Year. . YTD. . YTD. . Parking Citations 3738 3 , 132 46, 288 35 , 679 Moving Citations 165 283 2 , 882 2 , 863 ------- - -- -- - - -- ---- --- ---- 3903 3 , 415 49, 170 38 , 542 ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------- 3903 3 , 415 49, 170 38 , 542 t BURLINGAME Officer Productivity. . . . generated on 12/13/2004 at 05 : 24 : 20 PM Reported On: All Officers Report Range: 11/01/1904 to 11/30/2004 Data Type Reported on: PARKING Valid % All Voids All Officer: ID: Cnt Valid Cnt Voids Valid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DAVIS 190 6968 22.42 77 12.50 98.91 DAZA-QUIROZ 634 3675 11.82 48 7.79 98.71 GARRETT 501 7253 23.33 220 35.71 97.06 HARRISON 506 7508 24.15 99 16.07 98.70 KIRKPATRICK 502 5667 18.23 172 27.92 97.05 MORAN 201 13 0.04 0 0.00 100.00 Total 31084 616 f Page 1 of 1 1 a Oe David A. Hankin -Ai Vice President Regulatory&Government 1400 Fashion Island Blvd.,Suite 100 San Mateo CA 94404 (650)212-8010 Fax(650)212-8009 December 7, 2005 Jesus Nava, Finance Director City of Burlingame, City Hall 501 Primrose Road Burlingame CA 94010-3997 Dear Mr.Nava: This letter serves to notify you of RCN's new rate structure that will take effect January 15,2005 and to summarize our 2004 service activities. RCN's full basic cable service will increase by$3.00 to$42.95 from$39.95, which will still be less than the incumbent's charge for the same service. There will be no rate increase for RCN's limited basic cable service tier. As of January 15, 2005, there will be no additional charge for the HD Tier and the monthly Home Lan charge will be reduced by$10.00 from$14.95 to$4.95. Also,the PEG support payments will be itemized on customer bills. For those customers who take advantage of our multiple services offerings, there will be rate increases for most of RCN's Power, Resilink and Essentials Packages. In addition,the Power PI(Phone and Internet)package will decrease by$4.00 from$84.00 to$80.00. The new prices for the Packages and other services are as follows. Summary of Changes Eelecuvc,wmmry 15.2005 Bundled Packages Power Current New Change CPI Plus $162.00 $165.00 +$3.00 CPI $133.00 $138.00 +$5.00 C1 $101.00 $104.00 +$3.00 CP $ 82.00 $ 85.00 +$3.00 PI $ 84.00 $ 80.00 -$4.00 ResiLink Current New Change Platinum $169.00 $172.00 +$3.00 Gold $133.00 $133.00 +$5.00 Mercury $99.00 $104.00 +$5.00 Sliver $ 85.00 $ 88.00 +$3.00 Bronze $75.00 No Change Essentials Current New Change CPI $90.00 $96.00 +$6.00 Cl $ 80.00 $ 83.00 +$3.00 CP $51.00 $54.00 +$ 3.00 PI $52.00 No Change Essential Prices do not include converter box. i Video Current New Change Full Basic Cable $39.95 $42.95 +$3.00 Digital Set-Top Additional Outlets $ 7.95 No Change Digital Vision $ 11.95 No Change HD Tier $ 9.95 $ 0.00 -$9.95 HD Digital Set Top Box $ 9.95 No Change High Sneed Internet Current New Change HomeLand $ 14.95 $ 4.95 -$10.00 A La Carte HSD Services $ 49.95 No Change Key C = Cable P = Phone 1 = Internet RCN's 2004 Activities In 2004, RCN continued our commitment to enhanced services with the launch of: -Megamodem Mach and Megamodem Mach 7- RCN increased our basic and premium cable modem download speeds at no additional cost to our customers. -Power Bundles- These bundles provide our customers with greater flexibility for selecting premium programs and the ability to receive free Video on Demand Programming. -Home Networking (HomeLan)- This service allows our customers to share RCN's high-speed Internet connection across multiple computers. -McAfee Software- This service allows our customers to protect their computer and Internet connection against viruses, hackers and spam. -RCN InterACTION Music, Games and Kids- This online service provides our customers access to numerous downloadable songs, games and educational titles. Should you have any questions regarding our rate structure or the service offerings launched in 2004, please do not hesitate to contact me. qvSierey,i Hankin