The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.10.17 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame 6CIRLINGAME Regular Meeting - Monday, October 17, 2005 CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 1 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 3, 2005 Approve 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. a. Hearing on and confirmation of report of repairs and costs Hearing/Action for the 2005 sidewalk maintenance program b. Public Hearing and action on an Ordinance to amend the Hearing/Action Trousdale West zoning regulations for Convalescent Facilities and Group Residential Facilities for the elderly and to revise the boundary of the residential overlay along Marco Polo Way C. Public Hearing and Action to amend and revise the current Hearing/Action animal control regulations in City of Burlingame Ordinance, Chapter 9.04 to coincide with the newly amended changes in the San Mateo County Animal Ordinance 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Approval of parking study related actions including(i) Presentation/Approve/Introduce introducing an Ordinance to change parking time limits on Howard Avenue and(ii) a Resolution to change parking time limits and rates in Lots B1, F, G,N and V b. Consider appointments to the Parks &Recreation Appoint Commission C. Introduce an Ordinance making an editorial correction to Introduce Municipal Code, Section 23.01.050 regarding pool barriers 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Resolution awarding Mills Tank Seismic Retrofit Construction Contract to Anderson Pacific Engineering b. Resolution approving a professional services agreement with Kennedy Jenks Consultants for construction management of the Mills Tank Seismic Retrofit Project �642BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame BURLINGAME Regular Meeting - Monday, October 17, 2005 CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD Page 2 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 (650) 558-7200 C. Resolution awarding construction contract to JMB Construction, Inc. for Burlinghome Easton water main replacement , Phase III d. Resolution approving a professional services agreement with Yev Philipovitch, P.E. for construction management of the Burlinghome Easton water main replacement, Phase III e. Resolution accepting Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase Two by D'arcy and Harty Construction f. Resolution accepting Street Scrub Seal and Microsurfacing Program 2004 by Western States Surfacing g. Appointment of Elizabeth Moore to the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District(BID) Advisory Board h. Approve out-of-state travel for Finance Director i. Warrants and Payroll 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Parks & Recreation, September 15, 2005; Planning, October 11, 2005 b. Department Reports: Building, September, 2005 C. Letter from Burlingame Historical Society acknowledging the City's contribution d. Chinese Ministry of Finance and his delegation to visit Burlingame City Hall and meet with City's Finance Director on October 20, 2005 13. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at (650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m. before the meeting and at the meeting.visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Monday, October 24,2005 CITY G BURUNGAME e W.... BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of October 3, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Dorene Campanile. CLOSED SESSION: CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following: Threatened Litigation(Government Code §54956.9(b)(1), (3)(c)) a. Claim of State Farm Insurance 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Galligan, Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. MINUTES Councilwoman Nagel made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 6, 2005 Joint City Council/ Beautification Commission meeting; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 19, 2005 Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. 5. PRESENTATION a. CALIFORNIA ART PRESENTATION Charles Bettencourt, Exhibit Chairman of the Burlingame Art Society,presented members' artworks for display at City Hall. Mayor Galligan read proposed Resolution No. 67-2005 declaring October 7, 2005, as California Arts Day(see Item 9.a.). 1 Burlingame City Council October 3,2005 Unapproved Minutes b. PROCLAMATION FOR RELAY FOR LIFE DAY, OCTOBER 8, 2005 Mayor Galligan presented a proclamation to Relay for Life Chair Danny Keoa and Co-Chair Dorene Campanile declaring October 8, 2005, as Relay for Life Day. C. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FC Reilly made a presentation on Burlingame's Emergency Preparedness Program. He advised that the next disaster exercise would occur on October 13 at the Hyatt Regency. An area-wide information fair is scheduled to be held at the County fairgrounds on November 12. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1767 AMENDING CHAPTER 6.16 TO CLARIFY REGULATIONS REGARDING ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESSES CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on Ordinance No. 1767 amending Chapter 6.16 to clarify regulations regarding entertainment businesses. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 1767 amending Chapter 6.16 to update the entertainment business permit provisions of the Municipal Code; seconded by Councilwoman Nagel; approved by voice vote, 4-0. Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after adoption. b. PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON ORDINANCE NO. 1768 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR AREAS CURRENTLY ZONED C-3 IN THE TROUSDALE/ MURCHISON NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE PROPERTIES WITH LOT FRONTS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF MARCO POLO WAY BETWEEN CLARICE LANE AND TROUSDALE DRIVE FROM R-3 TO TW CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on Ordinance No. 1768 to change the zoning designation for areas currently zoned C-3 in the Trousdale/Murchison neighborhood and the properties with lot fronts on the east and west sides of Marco Polo Way between Clarice Lane and Trousdale Drive from R-3 to TW. Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 1768 amending the zoning maps incorporated in the Burlingame Zoning Code by reclassifying the C-3 areas in the Trousdale/Murchison neighborhood to Trousdale West (TW) and the properties with lot fronts on the southwest side of Marco Polo Way between Clarice Lane and Trousdale Drive from R-3 to TW; seconded by Councilwoman Nagel; approved by voice vote, 4-0. 2 Burlingame City Council October 3,2005 Unapproved Minutes Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after adoption. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Valerie Teele, 1235 Broadway, representing Broadway merchants, presented Councilwoman Nagel with topiary for her contributions in helping to organize Broadway's Pet Parade. Marjorie Taylor, 701 Burlingame Avenue, spoke about Friends of Mills Canyon. There were no further comments from the floor. 8. STAFF REPORTS a. INTRODUCE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS IN BURLINGAME CITY ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 9.04 TO COINCIDE WITH THE NEWLY AMENDED CHANGES IN THE SAN MATEO COUNTY ANIMAL ORDINANCE COP Van Etten reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance to amend Chapter 9.04 to revise animal control regulations to coincide with changes in the San Mateo County Ordinance Code. Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 9.04 to revise Animal Control Regulations to provide a more complete review, assessment and hearing process for dangerous and vicious dogs. Councilwoman O'Mahony waived further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. b. DISCUSS AND REVIEW AB 438; COUNCIL TO CONSIDER TAKING A POSITION ON THIS LEGISLATION COP Van Etten reviewed the staff report and requested Council discuss taking a position on AB 438 and to direct staff. After Council discussion, Councilwoman O'Mahony stated she would like to obtain more information on this legislation from the League of California Cities and the City/County Association of Governments before Council takes a position on this legislation. C. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE TW ZONING REGULATIONS FOR CONVALESCENT FACILITIES AND GROUP RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES FOR THE ELDERLY AND TO CORRECT AN ERROR IN THE BOUNDARY OF THE RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ALONG MARCO POLO WAY CP Monroe reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance to amend the TW zoning regulations for convalescent facilities and group residential facilities for the elderly and to correct an error in the boundary of the residential overlay along Marco Polo Way. 3 Burlingame City Council October 3,2005 Unapproved Minutes Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 25.40 to make group residential facilities for the elderly a conditional use in the Trousdale West (TW) District and modifying the Marco Polo Way overlay restrictions to delete the parcel on the southeast corner of Trousdale Drive. Vice Mayor Baylock waived further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR a. RESOLUTION NO. 67-2005 DECLARING OCTOBER 7, 2005, CALIFORNIA ARTS DAY CC Mortensen requested Council approve Resolution No. 67-2005 declaring October 7, 2005 as California Arts Day. b. RESOLUTION NO. 68-2005 AWARDING BAYSIDE BALLFIELD LIGHTING PROJECT TO REPUBLIC ELECTRIC P&RD Schwartz requested Council approve Resolution No. 68-2005 awarding Bayside Ballfield Lighting Project to Republic Electric. C. FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR AN 8-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 512-516 PRIMROSE ROAD, PARCEL 1, BLOCK 5, BURINGAME LAND COMPANY DPW Bagdon requested Council approve the Final Condominium Map for 512-516 Primrose Road. Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 11. OLD BUSINESS a. POTENTIAL SHARED RECREATION SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE CITY OF MILLBRAE P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report and requested Council receive public comment and provide direction to staff on whether to pursue a shared recreation services agreement between the Cities of Burlingame and Millbrae. Mayor Galligan opened the floor for comments. The following citizens requested clarification of the benefits to Burlingame: John Root, 728 Crossway Road; Charles Voltz, 725 Vernon Way; and Kimberly Rosales, Cortez Avenue,who also requested more public outreach. Marge Colapietro, 367 El Paseo, Millbrae, was 4 Burlingame City Council October 3,2005 Unapproved Minutes concerned about the cost recovery for classes. Barbara Dorenside, Anita Road, was concerned about availability of facilities to Burlingame residents. Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater, suggested a mail survey for more public outreach. P&RD Schwartz responded to questions from the floor and advised that the City of Millbrae will have a public hearing on this item at their meeting on October 11, 2005. There were no further comments from the floor. After Council discussion, Vice Mayor Baylock requested more financial data be provided before Council considers the merger any further. b. CONSIDER EXTENSION OF APPLICATION PERIOD FOR BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION VACANCIES CM Nantell requested Council extend the application period for the Beautification Commission. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve extending the application period for the Beautification Commission to October 31, 2005; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0. 12. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman O'Mahony stated that funding for the Broadway train station would come from the Transportation Authority, not from the City of Burlingame as recently misstated in a local newspaper. DPW Bagdon advised that the Joint Powers Board will make a presentation to Council in the near future on the closing of South Lane and on the status of both train stations. 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library, August 16, 2005; Planning, September 26, 2005 b. Department Reports: Police, August 2005 c. Two letters from Comcast concerning programming changes 14. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 10:10 p.m. in memory of Bill Merchant. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 5 Burlingame City Council October 3,2005 Unapproved Minutes Agenda 5a Item Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: October 17, 2005 C' SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY I � TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: HEARING ON AND CONFIRMATION OF REPORT OF REPAIRS AND COSTS FOR 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM, PROJECT NO. 80960 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council confirm the attached report of sidewalk repairs and costs, as is, revised, corrected or modified after property owners have an opportunity to present any objections or protests. BACKGROUND: As a result of the economic downturn, Council adopted the attached ordinance in March 2004 which obligates the maintenance and repair of sidewalks to the adjacent property owners. This was done under the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code and was consistent with the practice in other Peninsula cities. A second ordinance was adopted which made the original ordinance effective up to March 31, 2009, unless earlier repealed by the Council. Staff implemented the ordinance in the 2004-05 sidewalk program which covered the area west of EI Camino Real and south of Carmelita Avenue as well as the area south of Howard Avenue between EI Camino Real and California Drive per the attached map. Staff examined the sidewalk conditions in these areas and marked the concrete that needed to be removed and replaced. A letter was then sent to property owners with defective sidewalks which gave the option of the City performing the work or the owner hiring a licensed contractor to make the repairs. The letter included a sketch showing the location and approximate area of repair along with the City's cost per square foot. Two additional letters were sent informing the property owners of their repair options and advising them of the date by which the City would perform the work. 40% of the repairs were completed by contractors hired by the property owners. The remaining 60% were included in the City project. Council approved a contract with SpenCon Construction, Inc. on February 7, 2005 and the sidewalk repairs were undertaken over the last six months. DISCUSSION: Notices were sent to all property owners regarding their assessment and the timing of the hearing. Attached is a summary report of repairs and costs totaling $42,186.16. In accordance with the Streets and Highways Code, property owners have an opportunity to present any objections or protests at this hearing. Council may revise, correct or modify the report as deemed just. Decisions by Council on all objections and protests are final and conclusive. Council should confirm the report with any revisions,corrections,and modifications as applicable. After confirmation of the report,property owners have 30 days to pay for the repairs. If payment is not received, the cost of repairs will be forwarded to the County Assessor's Office for collection with property taxes due in December 2006. EXHIBITS: Report of sidewalk repairs and costs Ordinances Map c: City Clerk Victor Aoona As ' an Engineer SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80960Hearing.doc 2005 Sidewalk Program, Project No. 80960 Report of Repairs and Costs Address Property Owner Notice Assessor's Sidewalk Driveway Grinding Total Costs Carmelita No. Parcel Number (Square Foot) (Square Foot Each 1801 Ho an Flake and Sall Downing 5 026-184-010 114.2 4.0 $974.24 1815 James and Kathleen Yawn 4 026-184-140 25.0 1.0 $218.00 1915 JAnthony and Gail Mosse 2 122.6-185-100179.51 $1,292.40 2000 Bradley83 and Julie Wilson 1 026-1 -140 111.01 1 2.0 $875.20 Bernal 1030 Mar aret McMillan 13 026-185-090 117.01 1 1.0 $880.40 Drake 1001 Anthonyand Michelle Johnson 136 026-185-120 22.0 $158.40 1008 Gilbert and Rita Deiz 135 026-184-100 1.0 $38.00 1009 Andrea Ca ozzoli 137 026-185-040 62.5 1.0 $488.00 1011 Jeanne Patterson 138 026-185-030 35.0 39.5 $568.00 1012 Fred Bertetta III 134 026-184-110 12.5 1.0 $128.00 1017 Kari Lopez 139 026-185-020 2.0 $76.00 Cabrillo 1001 Ste hen Fona and Christine Noma 6 026-184-050 1.0 $38.00 1008 Marina Plissak 11 026-166-140 49.5 $356.40 1010 Thomas Mario Giorgi and Virginia Maire We 12 026-166-150 15.0 60.0 2.0 $664.00 1011 Larry Guthrie and Grace Fong 7 026-184-040 8.0 31.5 1.0 $347.60 1015 Daniel Griffin 8 026-184-030 83.9 1.0 $641.72 1025 Leonid and Larisa Gesin 9 026-184-020 62.5 $500.00 Balboa 1000 Anthonyand Estela Madulara 115 026-164-140 36.5 3.0 $376.80 1001 Russ and Yelena Maslenko 126 026-165-090 126.7 3.0 $1 026.24 1008 Gregory Hughes 116 026-164-150 37.0 $266.40 1011 Marina Plissak 125 026-165-080 11.5 48.0 $466.80 1032 James Chu 117 026-164-210 4.0 $152.00 1040 Lana Appenrodt 119 026-164-230 25.0 1.0 $218.00 1045 Daniel Griffin 123 026-165-020 1.0 $38.00 1047 Paul Roeder and Adelaide Roberts 1122 026-165-010 1 162.01 1 1 $1,166.40, SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80960\ListofCosts.xls 2 Sanchez 1513 IRaul Besteiro 151 028-131-240 23.0 $184.00 1517 William and Nancy Koenig 150 028-131-230 12.5 16.5 1.0 $260.00 1601 David Burlingame 149 028-131-210 2.0 $76.00 1604 Maria Corradino 145 026-165-100 42.5 2.0 $382.00 1608 Archie and Audrey Fabbri 144 026-165-110 31.5 2.0 $302.80 1609 Peter and Kim Utrata 148 028-131-190 37.5 $270.00 1616 David and Anne Hinkle 143 026-165-130 100.0 1.0 $758.00 1704 Julia and Vitas Viskanta 142 026-166-100 1.0 $38.00 1716 Maril nn Lehmann 141 026-166-130 138.0 $993.60 Forest View 1514 Jean Judson 15 028-131-060 62.5 12.0 $546.00 1516 Burt and Christina Toma 155 028-131-080 26.0 $187.20 1600 Mathew and Ellen Nq 16 028-131-100 47.0 $338.40 1602 Edward and Julie Collantes 17 028-131-110 62.0 14.5 $562.40 1610 Dean and Tami Rally 18 028-131-120 25.5 $183.60 1614 Lori Anne and David Paul Zimmerman 19 028-131-130 31.5 20.5 $390.80 1622 Alannah McKeever Hurley 20 028-131-150 13.5 $97.20 1624 Jerold and Paula Ruggiero 121 028-131-160 1 24.0 $172.80 Walnut 717 Peter and Roseann Mirosnkoff 46 028-142-060 45.5 $327.60 721 Michael and Christine Read 45 028-142-050 14.5 $104.40 742 Bruce and Jane Dobbs 47 028-141-340 2.0 $76.00 748 Marc J. and M.L. Friedman 24 028-141-350 2.0 $76.00 766 Michael and Leona Mullery 27 028-141-180 15.0 11.0 $196.00 816 Victor Anderson 37 028-132-130 95.9 $767.04 819 Elizabeth Weber 43 028-133-130 26.5 38.8 $501.02 822 Thomas and Joan Starkovich 36 028-132-120 1 32.11 1 257.04 838 lJohn and Eva Nowa Kowska Blan ied 33 028-132-190 37.51 1 1 270.00 847Renato and Luz Santia o 40 028-133-060 12.8 1.0 $129.80 848 John and Barbara Glennon 32 028-132-210 44.0 $316.80 863 Emilio and Lolita Rossi 38 028-133-020 91.3 $657.29 Willow 1612 1 Dale McCown 150 028-133-160 1 -i-231 $88.20 SAA Public Works DireotoWROJECTS\80960tListotCosts.xls 3 Peninsula 1102 Warren and Julia Gibeson 1152 029-241-150 1 1 2.0 $76.00 Bayswater 1110 ITara Hi hlands Condominium Association 80 108.490-010-020-030-0 90.1 7.0 $914.43 1113 Winfred and Aurora Ru erto 73 029-241-030 16.6 $119.38 1155 Alan and Jeanne Alexander 75 029-241-010 11.6 7.0 $349.59 1305 Richard and Ronald Wachter 156 029-233-080 12.5 $90.00 1311 Richard and Ronald Wachter 77 029-223-060 43.5 6.5 1.0 $403.20 1207/1205/ Bayswater Association 76 105-500-010/020/030/040 1.0 $38.00 1208 Jose and Linda Franco 79 029-224-160 1.0 $38.00 Park 2 Crosb -N-Gra &Co. 129 029-225-170 78.0 11.2 2.0 $727.58 12 John and Ellen Kruger 154 029-225-190 171.5 $1,234.80 16 Joseph and Carolyn Steil 130 029-225-200 27.0 $194.40 19 Edward J. and M. L. Haslam 82 029-223-140 1.0 $38.00 33 Parkwood Townhouse 84 029-360-010-020-030- 89.3 $643.10 48 Investek Properties Company 161 029-225-010 94.4 4.0 $711.68 49 Richard and Ronald Wachter 85 029-223-090 11.4 388.8 6.0 $3,421.13 145 Burlin ame Masonic Hall Association 97 029-222-050 1.0 $38.00 180 Ral hand Marclaret Ho 162 029-224-290 39.01 i $280.80 Lorton 1 Joan Ragghianti 66 029-225-150 16.0 4.0 $280.00 15/15A/15 Alois and Irene Stock 67 029-225-120 24.5 $176.40 20 1 Steven and Ann Mary Stluka 71 029-241-230 80.0 $576.00 21 1 Jerry and Susanna Fong 68 029-225-100 27.5 1.0 $236.00 37 lWinifred Wilson 69 029-225-070 1.0 $38.00 Highland 11 IAnna Dascoulias 60 029-241-130 12.5 $100.00 14 Mary Gerlach 86 029-242-160 62.5 $450.00 16 Allen and Linda Secrest 87 029-242-170 1.0 $38.00 20 Luke Wang 88 029-242-180 21.0 $168.00 22 ALESCO I LLC 89 029-242-190 63.0 24.5 $649.60 25 Clarke and Sarah Carrawa 61 029-241-090 25.0 1.0 $218.00 27 Steven Desantis 158 029-241-080 34.0 41.5 $576.80 32 Herbert and E. B.Williamson 190 029-242-200 1 25.0 $180.00 SA Public Works DirectoWROJECTSt8096OUstofCosts.xls 119 Richard and April Sofos 164 029-231-090 1 1.0 $38.00 California 200 Michael and Krystyna Harvey 104 029-213-040 134.0 $964.80 Cortez 1008 Florenda and Adora Ancheta 108 026-165-140 12.5 11.5 1.0 $220.00 1011 Marina Plissak 113 029-166-080 51.0 49.5 1.0 $801.20 1015 Marina Plissak 114 029-166-070 102.0 50.0 $1,134.40 1020 W. C.and Gail G. Roberts III 109 026-165-160 76.0 2.0 $623.20 1032 Paul and Elfriede Jordan 110 026-165-190 36.0 $259.20 1033 Leonard J. and P. T. Saldanha 106 026-166-040 21.5 $154.80 1036 Ove and Mary Ann Anderson 111 026-165-200 11.5 2.0 $168.00 1037 Anna Traverso 105026-166-030 39.5 19.5 2.0 $516.40 1040 Ma orie Chahal 112 026-165-210 146.0 $1,051.20 1041 Belin Soloman 1107 026-166-020 1 2.0 $76.00 Primrose 117 Emile A. and T. M. De Antoni 59 029-221-080 76.0 $608.00 119 Primrose Gardens Home Owners Associati 58 108-160-010/020/030/ 27.51 1 3.0 $312.00 123/125 jAlbert and Theresa Wong 157 029-221-050 71.41 34.0 $786.08 S:W Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\80960\LislofCosts.xls ORDINANCE NO. 1732 (2) 1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME ESTABLISHING AN EXPIRATION 2 DATE FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1732, WHICH RESTORED THE OBLIGATION TO PROPERTY OWNERS FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF SIDEWALKS PURSUANT TO STATE LAW 4 The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows: 5 6 Section 1 . On March 15, 2004, the City Council adopted an ordinance amending the Municipal 7 Code to require property owners to maintain the sidewalks adjacent to their properties in a safe g condition. For single-family residential properties, this was a change in a policy that had been adopted 9 in 1990. The Council would like to ensure that this change is reviewed in the hope that economic 10 conditions will allow the policy to be reconsidered if the City is in a more advantageous position in 11 financial terms. 12 13 Section 2. Ordinance No. 1732 shall be effective until March 31, 2009, unless earlier repealed, 14 and shall have no further force and effect beyond that date. If Ordinance No. 1732 ceases to be effective, 15 the provisions of Sections 12.12.005, 12.12.010, 12.12.015, and 12.12.020 in effect when Ordinance No. 16 1732 was adopted shall be reinstated unless otherwise provided by an ordinance subsequent to this one. 17 18 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 19 20 Mayor 21 ?? I; DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 51h day of April, 24 2004, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19`h day of April, 2004, 25 by the following vote: 26 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK, COFFEY, GALLIGAN, NAGEL, O'MAHONY 7 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE 8 City Clerk I ORDINANCE NO. 1732 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTERS 11.04 AND 12.12 TO RESTORE OBLIGATION TO PROPERTY OWNERS FOR MAINTENANCE 3 AND REPAIR OF SIDEWALKS PURSUANT TO STATE LAW 4 5 The City Council of the City of Burlingame ordains as follows: 6 7 Section 1. For the past ten to fifteen years, the City of Burlingame has been in the fortunate 8 position of being able to provide for the routine maintenance and repair of public sidewalks in residential 9 neighborhoods without asking for contribution from the residential property owners in most cases. 10 However,the continued inability of the State government to develop a balanced and responsible budget 11 and the State's insistence on seizing local monies to pay its own debts mean that the City cannot 12 continue the sidewalk funding for the time being. This ordinance returns the obligation to maintain and 13 repair sidewalks in residential neighborhoods to the adjacent property owners as provided in the Streets 14 & Highways Code and is consistent with the practice in other Peninsula communities. Commercial 15 property owners will continue to be responsible for maintenance and repair as in the past. 16 17 Section 2. Section 12.12.005 is amended to read as follows: 18 12.12.005 Responsibility for damaged sidewalks. 19 The property owner shall be responsible for all sidewalk repairs. As used in this chapter, 20 "sidewalk" shall refer to curb, gutter, sidewalk or other such improvements within city right-of-way. 21 22 Section L Section 12.12.010 is amended to read as follows: 23 12.12.010 Notice to repair defective sidewalks. 24 When the city engineer determines that any portion of any sidewalk is in such a condition that 25 it may interfere with the convenient or safe use of the sidewalk by the public, the city engineer is 26 authorized to notify the owner or owners of any lot fronting on that portion of sidewalk, by notice 27 pursuant to the Streets & Highways Code to maintain and repair the sidewalk If the sidewalk is not 28 properly maintained or repaired, the city engineer may proceed under the procedures contained in the 3/15/2004 I Streets & Highways Code to bring the maintenance or repair to completion. 2 3 Section 4. Section 12.12.015 is repealed. 4 5 Section 5. Section 12.12.020 is amended to read as follows: 6 12.12.020 Cost of repair as lien on property and collection. 7 If any owner refuses or neglects to make such repair, or reconstruction, or improvement, as 8 hereinabove provided,when required and directed in conformity with the provisions of this chapter,the 9 city engineer may cause such repair, or reconstruction, or improvement to be made. Pursuant to the 10 procedures contained in the Streets&Highways Code,the cost and any sum of money expended by the 11 city in making such repair, or reconstruction, or improvement, may be assessed as a lien upon the 12 property fronting on the sidewalk on which the maintenance or repair was made,and may be recovered 13 in an action brought therefor in the name of the city. The cost and expenditure may be reported to the 14 tax collector and placed upon the tax bill and collected in the same manner and at the same time as taxes 15 on the property are collected. 16 17 Section 6. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 18 19 Mayor 20 21 1, ANN T. MUSSO, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing 22 ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1't day of March, 2004, 23 and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 15`h day of March, 2004, by 24 the following vote: 25 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COFFEY, GALLIGAN, NAGEL, O'MAHONY 26 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BAYLOCK 27 28 City Clerk 311512004 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM VICINITY MAP v 1 -5 Go ,4 - 1 ff> o Aw .. .b aNa _ : �- •-tee- CITY OF BU.RLING-AME \ SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA 1t �ecvsco: • 11-8-199 _ �X CITY STAFF REPORT BURLJNGAME AGENDA ITEM# 5b om MTG. pOA MTED DATE 10.17.05 oAWNE 6`0 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE BYIN�Wjk DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2005 APPROVED / FROM: CITY PLANNER BY ' l SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANC TO AMEND THE TW ZONING REGULATIONS FOR CONVALESCENT FACILITIES AND GROUP RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES FOR THE ELDERLY AND TO REVISE THE BOUNDARY OF THE RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ALONG MARCO POLO WAY RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should hold a public hearing and take action on the proposed ordinance which would amend the provisions of the TW zoning regulations for convalescent facilities and group residential facilities for the elderly and revise the boundary of the residential overlay along Marco Polo Way. Affirmative action should be to adopt the proposed ordinance. In its action the Council should: A. Adopt the proposed ordinance; and B. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. The public hearing for action was noticed by mail on October 7, 2005 to all property owners within the area affected by the change in zoning designation and to property owners within 500 feet of the area. A notice was also published in a newspaper of general circulation on October 7, 2005. General Plan Compliance: The Trousdale West (TW) zoning district is part of the implementation phase of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan adopted by the City Council and amended to the General Plan in September 2004. The proposed amendments to the zoning district regulations are consistent with the plan because they are taken from the subarea designations of the land use element of the specific plan: the North of Trousdale area(B-4), and parcels fronting on Marco Polo Way within the Mills Peninsula Hospital Block (B-3). CEQA Status: On September 20, 2004, the City Council adopted Negative Declaration ND-533-P as a part of the approval of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. The proposed amendments to the zoning regulations is an implementation action of the adopted plan, and is therefore covered by the Negative Declaration ND-533-P. Planning Commission Action: At their meeting on September 12, 2005, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Keighran absent) to recommend to the Council approval of the amendment regarding group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent facilities in the Trousdale West (TW) zoning regulations. In their action, the Commission noted that using the parking requirements to determine density for group residential facilities is logical since it is the same way residential densities have been established in the R-3 and R-4 zoning districts; it is a standard that the City has used for many years with success and with no complaints and, in this area, the proximity to BART insures that some employees will use mass transit to Public Hearing and Action on an Ordinance to Amend the TW Zoning Regulations for Convalescent Facilities and Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly and to Revise the Boundary of the Residential Overlay along Marco Polo Way October 17,2005 work rather than bring their cars. They further noted that this action will facilitate the development of group residential care facilities for the elderly within this zoning district as support uses to the hospital, consistent with the adopted North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: On September 19, 2005, the City Council approved new zoning regulations for the Trousdale West area of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. The new regulations outline the uses and development standards for an area of North Burlingame as shown on the attached map, Trousdale West (TW) Zoning District Map. When the Planning Commission reviewed the TW district regulations on August 22, 2005, it was noted that there is a difference between convalescent facilities and group residential facilities for the elderly. As originally drafted, the TW district regulations established group residential facilities for the elderly, including convalescent facilities, as a permitted use. The Specific Plan establishes a density for convalescent homes of 60 beds per acre. At Planning Commission's direction, the proposed amendment to the TW zoning regulations would address the differences between convalescent facilities and group residential care facilities for the elderly. Both group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent facilities would require a conditional use permit. The zoning regulations would establish a density standard of 60 beds per acre for convalescent homes, in keeping with the density established by the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. The density for group residential facilities would be determined by the parking provided on-site and by the other development standards, such as setbacks and building height. Revision to the Residential Overlay boundary: On September 19, 2005, the City Council also directed staff to revise the boundary of the Marco Polo Way residential overlay as denoted in the Trousdale West (TW) zoning regulations. The owner of the property at the southeast corner of Trousdale Drive and Marco Polo Way spoke from the floor at the September 19th meeting and noted that the land use map for the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan designates that particular property for mixed use, office and residential. He noted that it was his understanding that office uses were allowed on this property. As originally drafted, the Marco Polo Way residential overlay, which limits uses to residential only, applies to properties with any lot frontage on Marco Polo Way. The attached ordinance revises the language so that the parcel on the southeast corner of Trousdale Drive and Marco Polo Way is not included in the residential overlay and is redesignated to the mixed use area, consistent with the land use map of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Figure 4.1 —Land Use Map for the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan Planning Commission Minutes, September 12, 2005 Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments Ordinance Amending Chapter 25.40 to make Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly a Conditional Use in the Trousdale West (TW) District and to Revise the Residential Overlay along Marco Polo Way. -2- ■ B1 ■ ,.;.;. 64 B2 �•�' ■ �� •.: - til• ♦��` - . �� ,,.,.,. Al F. `A4 S B3 iii �— 'iii.'��•• �,. . /� iuntinm q�glllllt 111111111,1■■■■11n�1-m1-1m= = Illilitil� ■'�."■ il_ __ C 11lIIIU�I Il. ZZ �� i i •O 111{111/ € :' � 111111111U A2F -, -- _ Sub Areas: Al Northern Gateway A4 Adrian Road Auto District CaminoA2 Central Rollins Road A3 Southern Gateway B1 Burlingame Plaza B2 El Real B4 North of Trousdale Drive 1111111// B3 Mills Peninsula Block 1111111{I ...-■. w Rim Land Use Designations: :�:'■` •Mixed-Use- :C Residential Office/Residential m uun uu■■ �� uu 'A3Commercial-Shopping/Service j ZZ Commercial-Service and Special Uses �. III IIIII tiiii It It Auto Row IIII IIIII 111111 ® _Overlay District !p.0 1111111= ' F 1111111. *� ��FLA Residential-Medium- I ., High • i 1 du/ac) Is nN x;11►�1�� :•.,. Industrial-Industrial and Office Spac Institutional-Institutional/Other ►r r rr r► City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2005 ask developer because he will ways want a bigger bui ing,more FAR. Sho refer back to subconiXittee /iltoros., review;need to ap int third member of sub mmittee. Subcommi a might also consider and need to refer to bcommittee. _ C. Vistica move o continue this item to refer it back to th subcommittee for fu er review of the items raised a is hearing. The motio was seconded by C. ran. The motion pas d on a 5-0-2(Cers. Cauchi and eighran absent). voice ote. Chair Auran app nted C.Vistica to the ayfront Subcommittee. This act' n is not appealable. T ' item concluded at 1 :30 p.m. 8. NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: PROPOSED ZONING FOR THE TROUSDALE WEST DISTRICT—DENSITY FOR GROUP RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES CITY PLANNER:MARGARET MONROE(NEWSPAPER NOTICE AND 212 NOTICED) r Reference staff report September 12, 2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report noting that the Commission at their last meeting forwarded the Trousdale West regulation to the City Council without the provisions for convalescent hospitals and group residential facilities for the elderly. Tonight the hearing is on separating the regulation of convalescent hospitals from group residential facilities and establishing different standards for determining density for each,based on the nature of the services offered,the needs of the clients, and the differing number of employees required for each type of service. Commission asked if parking numbers shown in letter from Sunrise are similar to city's experience.CP indicated that the proposed Sunrise project meets city on site parking requirements and we have had no problems with other similar facilities built in the city based on these on-site parking requirements. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, noted that with current demographics more people are going to need the service of these facilities and they will not be driving,using parking to establish density for group residential facilities for the elderly is the right direction to go; don't think family members visiting will affect the neighbors a lot. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Osterling made a motion to recommend the amendment as proposed in the staff report to the Trousdale West zoning district regulations for convalescent hospitals and group residential facilities for the elderly to city council for action. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Comment on the motion: using the current on site parking requirements to determine the density of the group residential facility for the elderly is logical since it is based on the way multiple family residential densities are established in the R-3 and R-4 zoning districts,it is a standard the city has used overtime with success and no complaints, and, in this area, the proximity to BART insures that some employees will use mass transit to work rather than bring their cars. This action will facilitate the development of convalescent hospitals and group residential care facilities for the elderly within this zoning district as support uses to the hospital, consistent with the specific plan. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to the Council for approval the amendment for group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent hospitals to the Trousdale West zoning district regulations. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi and Keighran absent). This item will go forward to City Council for action. This item concluded at 10:40 p.m. 15 City of Burlingame item# North Burlingame/Rollins Road Special Plan Implementation: Action Calendar Trousdale West District-Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly Meeting Date: 09.12.05 Planning Commission Action: Commissioners should review the proposed amendment to the recently approved Trousdale West(TW) zoning regulations to add requirements for convalescent and group residential facilities for the elderly and hold a public hearing. The reasons for the Commission's recommendation should be clearly stated for the record. Action in the case of zoning changes is recommendation to City Council. l r This item was noticed as required by law in the San Mateo Times on September 2, 2005. A public notice card was also sent on September 2, 2005,to all property owners within the TW district boundaries and because of the change in zoning regulation to all property owners within 500 feet of the district's new boundary. Planning Commission Study: At the Commission meeting on August 22, 2005, the Commissioners discussed the proposed regulations for the Trousdale West(TW)zoning district. Commission discussed the difference between convalescent facilities and group residential facilities for the elderly. In the end, inorder to move the Trousdale West ordinance forward to the City Council because of a number of projects pending, the Commission recommended the TW district to the City Council for adoption without including the zoning provision addressing convalescent facilities and group residential facilities for the elderly(senior independent living and assisted living facilities). Commission directed staff to bring the issues of regulation for Convalescent and Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly back to the Commission for further consideration and action at September 12, 2005, meeting. Commission directed staff to: address the differences between convalescent and assisted living(group residential care for the elderly) as a land use and discuss the particular needs of the clients in each type of facility, which would result in different densities and intensity of development necessary for these two types of uses. Background: History: The term "Group residential facilities for the elderly" was added to the Burlingame zoning code in 1975. At that time the on-site parking requirement was the same as used for hospitals and convalescent facilities, one space for each 3 % beds. Group residential facilities for the elderly were defined in 1975, and continue to be defined as: "A residence for elderly persons sixty(60)years of age or over, in good health and not bed-fast, which residence provides centralized dining facilities and related living services." In 1997 there was an update to the zoning ordinance. As a part of that update, in the parking requirement section(Chapter 70) hospitals and convalescent facilities were separated from group residential facilities for the elderly. Ordinance 1586 adopted January 20, 1998, created a differentiation North Burlingame/Rollins Road Special Plan Implementation: Trousdale West District-Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly(Continued from August 22,2005) September 12,2005 between parking requirements for each of these three uses,regrouping group residential facility uses with rooming houses and hotels, and establishing a separate parking requirements for critical care hospitals, convalescent facilities and group residential facilities for the elderly. The parking requirement for a"critical care" hospital is one car space for each one and one-half beds. The parking requirement for convalescent and extended care hospitals is one car space for each three and one-half beds. (CS 25.70.036 Requirements for hospitals, including critical care, convalescent and extended care) Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly were moved to a separate section CS 25.70.034 Requirements for rooming houses, motels, hotels, group residential facilities for the elderly. The parking requirement for Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly is either one parking space for each three dwelling units, when the units are separate; or one space for each Thur lodgers plus one space for each two people employed on the premises. The 1997 revisions to the group residential facility on site parking requirements were based on the traffic studies prepared for proposed projects and the city's experience with three group residential for the elderly projects: 1221 Bayswater Avenue (1984)not built; 1117 Rhinette Avenue(1990) 24 beds and 24 client rooms; and 1733 California Drive(1994)48 beds and 40 client rooms. Both of the projects which were built provided parking on site to the city's requirement of one space for each 4 lodgers. This turned out to be a ratio of 0.40 for the 1733 California project and a ratio of 0.33 for the 1117 Rhinette project. Data collected in 1990 for three projects similar to the project at 1117 Rhinette showed on site parking ratios similar to or less than what was proposed at 1117 Rhinette. (See excerpt Parking Study, 1117-1125 Rhinette, Richard Hopper,November 1990) ITE(International Traffic Engineers Parking Generation study, second edition)establishes a ratio of 0.27 for week days, 0.32 for Saturday and 1.0 for Sundays for retirement centers which provide a broader range of housing from independent living units through convalescent care. There would probably be more residents still driving in a retirement center than in a group residential facility for the elderly. For these reasons, the Burlingame requirement based on the number of residents and number of employees, as computed to a per room parking ratio, seems consistent with the ITE findings. In 1998 Planning staff reviewed the two projects as 1117 Rhinette Avenue and 1733 California Drive for complaints which would indicate that the parking on site was inadequate. No complaints were found. (See Monroe letter August 3, 1998 to John Cimino). Since August 1998 the on-site parking requirement has driven the density of group residential facilities for the elderly. Since 1990 there have been no parking problems related to these existing projects reported to the city traffic engineer or planning department. The ITE and other studies, including the city's current parking requirements, indicate that the parking and trip generation for critical care hospitals and convalescent care facilities is greater than for group residential facilities for the elderly. Certainly it is true that from a social point of view, group residential facilities benefit from more residents to provide opportunity for healthy interactions. In addition, fewer employees are required because there is less direct support to individual residents. Proposal: The North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan specifically establishes a development density for 2 North Burlingame/Rollins Road Special Plan Implementation: Trousdale West District-Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly(Continued from August 22,2005) September 12,2005 convalescent homes in the North of Trousdale subarea,which is the area included in the proposed Trousdale West zoning district. The density established for convalescent homes when the plan was adopted in September 2004,was 60 beds to the acre. The specific plan did not address a density for the group residential facilities for the elderly use. However, the plan does encourage high density residential uses in the North of Trousdale subarea. Moreover the current zoning code includes group residential facilities in the as permitted uses in the R-3 and R-4 zones; the city's two high density residential districts. Burlingame's experience has also demonstrated that letting the parking requirement drive the size of group residential projects as it does other multiple family developments irythe city, seems to have worked well. Based on the data and the city's experience,staff would suggest that Group Residential Facilities for the Elderly be allowed as a conditional use in the TW zoning district, subject to the same on-site parking requirements as group residential facilities for the elderly in the R-3 and R-4 districts e.g. additional floor area ratio requirements are not necessary. Convalescent homes should also be included as a conditional use because they are considered more like a hospital and have a maximum density set out in the specific plan which needs to be applied, e.g. 60 beds to the acre. Proposed changes to the TW zoning district are as follow: Amendment to the TW district: Amend CS 25.40.020 Permitted uses delete(c): (c) group residential facilities for the elderly, including convalescent facilities; Amend CS 25.40.025 Conditional uses to add(d) and renumber(e) and(f): (f) Group residential facilities for the elderly, including convalescent facilities; Add new subsection CS 25.40.050 (c)(4) (4) Group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent homes: Group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent homes shall have no maximum floor area ratio. Convalescent homes shall have a maximum density of sixty(60)beds to the acre based on the number of persons the rooms are designed to accommodate. The density for other group residential facilities for the elderly shall relate to the parking provided. Margaret Monroe Attachments: Map of the Trousdale West(TW)zoning district boundaries Map of Subareas of Specific Area Plan,North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan, September 2004 Parking Study,Residential Care Facility, 1117-1123 Rhinette Avenue,Richard Hopper,November 1990, excerpt. Monroe letter, August 3, 1998, to John Cimino, regarding adequacy of on-site parking at two group residential facilities for the elderly: 1117-1123 Rhinette Avenue and 1733 California Drive. 3 11 1 ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 25.40 TO MAKE GROUP RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES FOR 3 THE ELDERLY A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE TROUSDALE WEST (TW)DISTRICT 4 5 Section 1. In developing the standards for the Trousdale West District, the City is 6 establishing density standards for various uses. However,because of the various types of group 7 residential facilities for the elderly that can be developed, it does not appear reasonable to 8 establish a density standard for such faciltiies,except for convalescent"care facilities. Therefore, 9 this ordinance provides a conditional use process that will evaluate applications on an individual 10 basis to ensure that parking and density is consistent with the specific location and type of 11 operation proposed. 12 13 Section 2. Section 25.40.020 is amended to read as follows: 14 25.40.020 Permitted uses. 15 The following uses are permitted in the TW district: 16 (a) Multifamily dwellings in one or more buildings; 17 (b) Office uses, including health services,but not including financial institutions; 18 (c) Group residential facilities for the elder1r, includiiig convalescent facilities; 19 ----(d)-Multifamily dwellings and office uses as permitted under subsection(b) above in 20 mixed use buildings, if the office uses are located on the first and second floors only; 21 (d) Accessory structures or uses supportive of residential uses, including greenhouses, 22 lath houses, trellises, sheds, swimming pools, an accessory buildings to serve such swimming 23 pools, but not including group pools of swimming pool clubs; these accessory structures or uses 24 shall be located on the same lot as the residential use being supported; 25 (e) Convents and parish houses. 26 27 Section 3. Section 25.40.025 is amended to read as follows: 28 25.40.025 Conditional uses. 8/30/2005 1 I The following are conditional uses requiring a conditional use permit: 2 (a) Financial institutions with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5; - 3 (b) Public utility and public service structures or installations when found by the 4 commission to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience and welfare including 5 transformer boxes; 6 (c) Extended stay hotels; 7 (d) 8 (e) Any structure that is more than thirty-five(35) feet in height; 9 Ifi Lot coverage over fifty(50)percent, but only if additional,usable common open space 10 generally equivalent to the square footage of excess lot coverage is provided on-site in such areas 11 as roof gardens and courtyards. 12 13 Section 4. A new subsection 25.40.050(c)(4) is added as follows: 14 (4) Group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent homes: Group 15 residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent homes shall have no maximum floor area 16 ratio. Convalescent homes shall have a maximum density of sixty(60)beds to the acre based on 17 the number of persons the rooms are designed to accommodate. The density for other group 18 residential facilities for the elderly shall relate to the parking provided. 19 20 Section 5. This ordinance shall be published according to law. 21 22 Mayor 23 24 25 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 26 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of , 2005, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council 27 held on the day of , 2005, by the following vote: 28 8/30/2005 2 I AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 2 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 3 City Clerk 4 C:WH-ES\ORDINANC\trousdalewestelderly.ord.wpd 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8/30/2005 3 Trousdale Zoning District Map V 'own no 1■■■■■■■ i u■■■■■■ A■AMR, ao:aa[►ue. . won -:%■■I-.e■IA.tlrA.Iae//'ItArIlA.it/■nnnA�■//■■II■tal■■rt■.■st■/s■ ■■Aa•■\ ta. ate ■► s ■m t/■■/.ao■aa■ ■\t a■oe■ a■sa■■eu ■■ l■ al.,1. t■■elsot■nso/\ t.■ ■.\ / tamm[mel lntt ■lnmssrisat.■ /. - • '■■roam■man emmte[e■■sasam■//►ta■. ' I■■%■■t■■Ata■■son I t[A■s/so■noaaa►IN t. I■DI[lampoon■mtl000estamt ago■►.o►t■l. All's/Ransoms■mo■a■■o/aims■►.o■/.las. a[r.l■atae[s■■t■monsoot0 noses tttEMPA ELVEN or/so usso.'t■\. �te!eolsommoss■Wasson setlltr/oSam eaon►at 1. ■�t.Y■■oososettan■le/e a►/■■a■aaa■■.'o■s. C■■1/s.`e■amesumonsoottoo oar/loot■tsommmtm:�■l. ■r[e■a.`/soul[ust[m■[■sr/ae■Ro■tlletasoa.sal. • iA■'Io/ae.`soole[aaoalamso■►taso[tsosoms■■t■.'baa. ' st/tea■n.`t■■aa■■ssommest\tamstn soao■■m1.►mat. !` •A/'Ial■■uos.`a■amanna soan\t■mmtst■etaaar/■/:•■l. =ar Damon t■ o"mmmoomemommestmo►asseeoo[eem/lolla.•s■ imr.\%mataoamaa.`!a eoe so mmm utmt■\t soonaAr.e//ae.•�Zm ■arsolAlla■[/ao lone■oa■eottssmam►tet[■/sr/tr/o■tot.te:. ualn■u ua.vat■antan atlsoup/[/ ■[Inmos\t■ woo ae■■t■.`am■sat■aesotn lq II rn■a tl■A.al. ' ittr.mmu■■►vuuuu.`oauuuusoa►lr/aranannuvu. ' ■sroensoO►V nm■ao■�n■Usansoo■soCI■►Ul■■■a a t■■te2■aa IIVJslaont►tenso■e■o.Ieleaaa amu H■LUAU stt■a■u■■/:a: ■sou n■n■uupaaa■t.•uauuan at or/ am or assort n.•aa ♦iso Olstn swoons, is Bot■6`aeesan on lura■usn■nunu■A:n\ alruussnnvAt\auu u■u..unmuo■u■:sosmtsounaon m".`on r ,It■'Ammo■at►/ns\a■■t■ulola■sotemm DID an aomsgotda\ • • .a■Laurin•s■►/tsotm►t■telmmsngnaso/■•.aCaa■Olat/t/■■eUtmaJtU ' •�aAn man O/a■oat■\ta■nm■a.0■tla•aa■hl■a ataea■V;oena:a\ �.•p..... nnucauntnt-vaso, man •mtaatnuso anu a 011 �.uuur.t■n nuuacnnan,tT vr.A u■luaauunu•,aauun.•nl ' altrAOO■as■tt\Yaattna]t%, so! us B.`sm\ \tlr/[a uoommoar.anns;tNl-ota Iamsom■60 a Us Uma asm mems atl\ Vic•=masounnur.a:ato nnnvuunlsoynrua■uunnmrum no • .�•��c■vp\v�uv�u►usovenuta t■aaltnun..tuV/t aso�acturu.■n.■a■,aao■riuso•.lriarr.aaarso■.•nmura■ntasoso^u.nn.uunnanuusoauum ■ vma•,.•anancArsoa:.r,.ut,mnsoaa■t■ntesounvmouamnuvO¢euma■ttGsoumso■o stuuun7u ■/meso■■■Rome me anVU, aOtA6•mat-aman Oman egaasoSasososo■Os9Oa ■ eamt■ nUnamore■ewnone4n ■peasonutsoatrnmsar.m■alv.n■a .m■■ as .uaa s ►OI sol [.tra■toemis Poo U11■C[men. on t■■•.Aoa Ytuln O;I,mmssrOOe an .✓Immo■\■■111.84/4 as mr,:em"m 0■n:naa■■P.I■sol V a■a■aa' t�n�tona■moo■ala■■■r/t.`:!■■■■■moo.• sola►/■et■■►/■aurae■■t' \� waa■aI moor 40 111osonu�■un/■unr/uuun• ., rnano■•.unrutnr.•u■ntat.•tanuua.nnu■r '�s:nu■u n.t llv does noun rnlualvnnsotr 'al east■aRas a mea na2ssolutn,nu u•atlamler ' p:•uwatr/son ntaomun.tua�•.annnv au•r„�rtaanualolu ne.•u ur.t a•.�■ nnoour � , moloma►7ur/a■■r.■aaana:artr •ria■n 1 anpN so'aa tm■tt..& a�amr • �acnlua/n 'aallmeom//lr Un' • titt��iiiiiiiiiir m• . V\In nmmmn mr •uvununu •I\V ttlaso on Umrl ■. .nglemou r.neu. v[voar.a11a” ttIn HoO/ F Hi . tas.�so/Ile■t[►/tAo\ tstlt[ntr/lmalam■: a ■1m a/ittm5 'Anal am■■r v :aa t■■/ , /ol•aa■■■nA:lr . . . mi.a. rt►eana.Au►utsov/ MCI te ►•■tet■r iinI nnu\var i■aUsoHso • .r■ usoat . Mason rrs / . I/■r ■ ■e■■ s. , .:■..�.................■■■■mA■■e. .:... .............•..■■...least■..mosom on he. t:a■astU ■►tataastBrain, ' a.-ri:uuausonr• soucuannuu f aunn■a[ursout1 Selo auunuuu► , aatuuuu..uean\`um■ uanuuur.\ , moa emuLn■t■■■■l V■■tJBatn=m■■!Il\ ' •tuurusou eves 6l peau■ ■rmn t► on 0 \�nan/9n■'ia.V 61VI" en let•.e• , 1 ■■■■puri■■r.vv_a=u-I/ IN! sour. , soO■so■:s■■r so.ta lAl queen MEMO, , a�nn:en►/u/.a.:o vnurauuu. .at ar•.inmpr:.to:aaamam► , I �I va•.irrr�r■ u.vtrr..uunmuu `unsonurt.tor/,tuuuunuu •ntuuoncr.►vesonunur. . ouau•aua.•m.vinumtuun•.0 , noun . Iso 0 Mr, FAFtuavuu�`t../icooioaaon. . • .a�mounueven\•.Eauoumot. , , ►munna��nn.v�unnnn. � � ' � /. I ananua.asun:_aauua•. �uuun►:vnnm:::::a• r �mueuma.'.■�aur , , vatr�uaWO r , mor' �n■u■� , e.et4 r ♦,, ,ice BI law 5 th t ►w �•� ' ON� B3 j7 iii m• �� - � ��. 'r gyp...... NILl{Ettt�l�n1Cm J �Itn sI gRnrnfit - to ISO INS ►�I...- a.r -IS- fill _v US =� == _uutmnmi{�:.• �p -c ilia _iI==-r llll lull Illi{ .It :_•err -- - _ � _ �� 1111 VIII IIIA 1♦� �,,. ��Intl t{t= 1•, 'mon -• - - - - .. - ... n- - r so AL Northern Gateway 3 A2. Central Rollins Road tA3. Southern Gateway Kill Adrian Road Auto Row District iPlaza : - 11i1n1_ B2. El Camino Real Gateway Corridor 63. Mills Penninsula Hospital Block B4. North of Trousdale Drive i sea I .��•• 1!! ss rad �`.a- ��- I y r r s�s �s■HUt{- � - �- -U � � r `� r r CA not indicate the duration of parking by individual vehicles nor is it a measure of parking turnover. The study excluded loading zones. ' The results of the two day study are contained in the Appendix. The maximum parking occupancy on Wednesday, October 31 , was found to be 63% of the total area surveyed and that occurred at 12 : 30 p.m. The maximum occupancy on Friday, November 2, was 66%, also - at 12 : 30 p.m. On Rhinette Ave. itself , the maximum parking occupancy was 7.8% at 12: 30 p.m. on Wednesday and 89% at 1 : 30 p.m. on Friday. The check of parking on Thursday evening found no vehicles parked on the south side of Rhinette and the number of vehicles parked on the north side was 12 . On Friday evening there were 10 vehicles parked on the north side of Rhinette and four parked on the south side. Parking on the other surrounding streets was found to be about the same as that of mid-afternoon. xPROJECT PARKING DEMAND There is virtually no parking study data for- the type of facility proposed. The facility will be caring for up to 24 non-am- bulatory persons . Such a facility closely approximates a nursing home. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication, "Parking Generation," Second Edition, 1987, a nursing home of this size would have a peak parking demand of 0.29 spaces per bed (the range being from 00 .7 to 0. 35 spaces per bed) . A retirement community, according to the ITE publication, would have a peak parking demand of 0. 27 parking spaces per unit in a range of 0.11 to 0. 48 spaces per unit. A check of similar facilities for other recent studies [RKH, "Traffic Study for the Multiple Family Residential District, " San Carlos, 12/12/88, and "Traffic Study for The Stratford," San Mateo, 5/8/891 found the following: Retirement Inns of America, Burlingame 68 units, 28 parking spaces, 18 occupied. Parking demand = 0.26 spaces per unit. Green Hills, Millbrae 160 units, 54 parking spaces, 46 occupied. Parking demand = 0. 29 spaces per unit. Chenate of Santa Rosa 120 units, 40 parking spaces. Parking supply = 0. 33 spaces per unit. F 4 :.,z It would appear that the proposed care facility will have a parking demand equal to or less than the facilities described above. The residents of the facility will not have vehicles to drive as they will be non-ambulatory. The parking demand will come from visitors and staff persons . Assuming a conservative parking demand of 0.3 spaces per bed and assuming that the peak demand would not be more than 85% of supply, the supply of parking should be on the order of eight or nine parking spaces. [0. 3*24/0.85=8. 47 ] The developer is providing eight on-site parking spaces. Because the peak parking demand on the surrounding streets. is less than 70% of supply during the peak parking time of the day, it appears that any probable overflow of parking from this facility can easily be accommodated. City Lot "S" at the corner of Rhinette and California is grossly underutilized and could easily accom- modate -overflow parking from this facility. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The estimated peak parking demand of the facility is on the order of the eight spaces proposed to be provided. ..However, any overflow of parking from the facility can be easily accommodated in Lot "S" or on the surrounding streets without causing a parking problem. Because the facility can accommodate. virtually all of its ex- pected peak parking demand on site and any overflow can be easily accommodated in the adjacent public Lot "S" or other public street parking facilities, there are no recommendations to mitig- ate the expected parking demands of the residential care facil- ity. 4 R K. RICHARD K. HP R, P.E. ��ZP� y�iO,oyc Czar cc No. 1425 q OF CLn I A�� 5 CITY BURL* E CITY OF BURLINGAME City Hall-501 Prittuose Road Planumb E"arhreat Barragmr. Cafifaeia 94010-3997 TeL(6N))6%-7200 August 3, 1998 Mr. John Cimino Cimino Holdings, Inc. ' 1268 Balboa Avenue Burlingame CA 94010 Dear Mr. Cimino, In response to your letter of July 28, 1998, 1 have checked the city files and find: That the city approved construction of a 24 bed residential care facility with eight on site parking spaces at 1117-1123 Rhinette Avenue on January 8, 1991. The property is zoned R-3 Multiple Family Residential and your project, which required a conditional use permit, was an infill in this established neighborhood of apartment buildings near the Broadway Commercial Area. I note in reviewing my file that there were no complaints by neighbors during construction; nor have there been any complaints about the operation since it has been open. As I recall at the time of approval there was some concern about how the parking demand would work out. The parking seems to have worked well, since we have received no complaints from the neighbors, nor have we received in the Planning Department any other kind of complaint regarding this operation. That the city approved construction on November 21, 1994, of a 48-bed group residential care facility for the elderly at 1733 California Drive, zoned C-1 (commercial) with an R-4 (multiple family residential) over lay. The project included 16 parking spaces. This project is immediately adjacent to a new multiple family residential condominium project any several existing mid-rise office buildings. The Planning Department received no complaints about the project during construction, nor do have we any complaints of any kind on record since occupancy. I hope that this addresses your concerns. Sjncerelfyy , MIV/arltggar�t onro NZZ— City Planner ON— CITY OF BURLINGAME BMUXRL*4 ME PLANNING DEPARTMENT 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME,CA 94010 TEL:(650)558-7250 • FAX:(650)696-3790www.burfngarne.org NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CLARIFY ZONING REGULATIONS The City of Burlingame Planning Commission PUBLIC HEARING will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 12, 2005 at 7:00 P.M. in the City NOTICE Hall Council Chambers located at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame to consider zoning regulations for convalescent and group residential facilities for the elderly in the Trousdale West zoning district to implement the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan i adopted in September 2004. Mailed:September 2,2005 (Please refer to other side) CITY OF B URLINGAME A copy of the applic an �projec y be reviewed prior to the.meeting �6 Primrose Road Burlingame, C ffou challe e u y m beli. mited to raising only blic hearing, described in h e rit e e ed to the city at or prior to he pu ceaLl g Property ow 'Irsrespon ble r informing their tenants ibou io pal infor i , please call (650) 558-7 0� Margaret Mo �► City Planner , 'h PU CE (Please refer to other side) errr c� CITY OF BURLINGAME 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BURLDR.A.W 1 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME,CA 94010 TEL:(650)558-7250 • FAX:(650)696-3790 www.burlingame.org NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CLARIFY TW DISTRICT REGULATIONS The CITY OF BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to amend the recently adopted PUBLIC HEARING TW(Trousdale West)zoning regulations to clarify NOTICE regulations for convalescent facilities and group residential facilities and to revise the boundary of the residential overlay along Marco Polo Way,to implement the North Burlingame/ Rollins RoadAN $ " > Specific Plan. The hearing will be held on Monday, October 17, + 2005 at 7:00 P.M.. in the City Hall Council Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA .` ; Mailed:October 7,2005 (Please refer to other side) ------------ CITY OF BURLINGAME A copy of the applict and� n GV tht projec ay be reviewed prior to the meeting ate , ; � attro Primrose Road, f Burlingame, Carlo Ak If you challe pe t , 'u mabe limited to ' raising only th-ag- S our Xfreo- ublic hearing, described in (heet*�e� °� n heso livei ed to the city at or prior tothe pub�;iciearin g• � ? Property ow 4ers "l ° r _ f .o615 e respon 1 ble r informing their tenants bou hi >_ io al or at ` lea 1 inf , please call (650) 558-70 II } - � t s Margaret Monfoe,� g City Planner 'Y, ' PUSL CE r 1 . (Please refer to other side) I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 25.40 TO MAKE GROUP RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES FOR 3 THE ELDERLY A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE TROUSDALE WEST(TW) DISTRICT AND MODIFYING THE MARCO POLO WAY OVERLAY RESTRICTIONS TO 4 DELETE THE PARCEL ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TROUSDALE DRIVE 5 6 Section 1. In developing the standards for the Trousdale West District, the City is 7 establishing density standards for various uses. However, because of the various types of group 8 residential facilities for the elderly that can be developed, it does not appear reasonable to 9 establish a density standard for such faciltiies, except for convalescent care facilities. Therefore, 10 this ordinance provides a conditional use process that will evaluate applications on an individual 11 basis to ensure that parking and density is consistent with the specific location and type of 12 operation proposed. 13 In addition, the description of the residentially restricted area along Marco Polo Way 14 inadvertently included the parcel on the southeast corner of Marco Polo Way and Trousdale 15 Drive. This parcel is included in the mixed office-residential area of the North 16 Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan and is removed by this ordinance from being limited to 17 residential only. 18 19 Section 2. Section 25.40.020 is amended to read as follows: 20 25.40.020 Permitted uses. 21 The following uses are permitted in the TW district: 22 (a) Multifamily dwellings in one or more buildings; 23 (b) Office uses, including health services, but not including financial institutions; 24 (c) Multifamily dwellings and office uses as permitted under subsection(b) above in 25 mixed use buildings, if the office uses are located on the first and second floors only; 26 (d) Accessory structures or uses supportive of residential uses, including greenhouses, 27 lath houses, trellises, sheds, swimming pools, an accessory buildings to serve such swimming 28 pools, but not including group pools of swimming pool clubs; these accessory structures or uses 10/5/2005 1 J I shall be located on the same lot as the residential use being supported; 2 (e) Convents and parish houses. 3 4 Section 3. Section 25.40.025 is amended to read as follows: 5 25.40.025 Conditional uses. 6 The following are conditional uses requiring a conditional use permit: 7 (a) Financial institutions with a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5; 8 (b) Public utility and public service structures or installations when found by the 9 commission to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience and welfare including 10 transformer boxes; 11 (c) Extended stay hotels; 12 (d) Group residential facilities for the elderly, including convalescent facilities; 13 (e) Any structure that is more than thirty-five(35) feet in height; 14 (f) Lot coverage over fifty(50) percent, but only if additional, usable common open 15 space generally equivalent to the square footage of excess lot coverage is provided on-site in such 16 areas as roof gardens and courtyards. 17 18 Section 4. A new subsection 25.40.050(c)(4) is added as follows: 19 (4) Group residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent homes: Group 20 residential facilities for the elderly and convalescent homes shall have no maximum floor area 21 ratio. Convalescent homes shall have a maximum density of sixty(60) beds to the acre based on 22 the number of persons the rooms are designed to accommodate. The density for other group 23 residential facilities for the elderly shall relate to the parking provided. 24 25 Section 5. Section 25.40.035 is amended to read as follows: 26 25.40.035 Uses on properties with frontage on Marco Polo Way. 27 Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the following specific provisions 28 shall apply to lots with any frontage on Marco Polo Way north of Clarice Lane: 10/512005 2 I (a) Permitted uses. Only multifamily residential uses, including group residential 2 facilities for the elderly and convalescent facilities, shall be a permitted use. 3 (b) Conditional uses. 4 (1) All uses allowed in section 25.40.025 above except extended stay hotels and financial 5 institutions shall be allowed with a conditional use permit; and 6 (2) In addition, day care facilities to support employees and residents in the area shall be 7 allowed with a conditional use permit; and 8 (3) In addition, schools that serve the needs of health-challenged or disabled persons shall 9 be allowed with a conditional use permit. 10 (c) Prohibited uses. Uses not listed as permitted or conditional in this section shall be 11 prohibited, including but not limited to the uses listed in section 25.40.030 above. 12 (d) Exception. The provisions of this section do not apply to any parcel that is located on 13 the southeast corner of Marco Polo Way and Trousdale Drive with continuous frontage on both 14 Marco Polo Way and Trousdale Drive. Instead, such a parcel is governed by the general use 15 provisions of the Trousdale West district. 16 17 Section 6. This ordinance shall be published according to law. 18 19 Mayor 20 21 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 22 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 3`d day of October, 2005, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 23 day of , 2005, by the following vote: 24 25 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 26 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 27 City Clerk 28 C:\FILES\ORDINANC\trousdalewestelderly.ord.wpd 101512005 3 4 CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA 5C ITEM# ti10 4-,: _ 900 MTG. qo ATED JUNE"' DATE October 17, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY: Jack Van Etten, Ch olice DATE: October 6, 2005 APPROVED FROM: Jack Van Etten, Chief of Police BY: Jim Nantell, City Manager er SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Action to amend and revise the current animal control regulations in Burlingame City Ordinance, Chapter 9.04 to coincide with the newly amended changes in the San Mateo County Animal Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: This evening, the City Council should hold a public hearing and take action to amend and revise the existing animal control regulations contained in Chapter 9.04 of the Burlingame City Ordinance Code. These revisions will provide a more complete review, assessment, and hearing process for dangerous and vicious dogs. These revisions will also coincide with changes in Section 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code regarding animal control and dangerous animal proceedings. The introduction of the proposed amendments and revisions to this ordinance was made at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on October 3, 2005, following which the City Clerk published a summary of the proposed amended ordinance. BACKGROUND: Over the past 45 years, the County of San Mateo has contracted with the Peninsula Humane Society (PHS) to provide Animal Control Services to all twenty cities and the unincorporated areas of the County. The contract between the County and cities states each city is responsible to adopt and maintain an animal control ordinance and fee schedule that is substantially the same as the County. Enforcement of city ordinances which differ substantially from the County ordinance and which result in an increase to PHS' costs shall be reimbursed directly from the city requiring special services to PHS, as negotiated between the city and PHS. Under the existing County ordinance, all cities maintain a substantially similar animal control ordinance that does not require additional services from PHS. After approval from the County Board of Supervisors, each city will be required to adopt the revised ordinance within 60 days. The ordinance will become effective Countywide thirty days from the date of adoption by the last of the twenty cities. While the existing dangerous animal ordinance provides vigorous controls over animals posing a threat to public safety, County, city and PHS staff sought to tighten existing regulations. Through a series of meetings with the Animal Control Task Force, which included representatives from all cities and PHS, a revised ordinance was developed. Under both the existing and revised ordinances, animal control staff has the latitude to declare an animal"dangerous,"which means the animal owner may maintain the animal under a set of strict conditions under the jurisdiction of a dangerous animal permit.The dangerous animal designation generally follows an incident involving an attack to another animal or a relatively minor bite to a human.Animal control staff also has the authority to impound and euthanize an animal that has committed an attack of an egregious nature.Should an animal owner disagree with the dangerous animal declaration or intent to impound and euthanize an animal,they may request a hearing to dispute the charge.The revised county ordinance follows this existing system,yet allows for more stringent regulations on dangerous animals,clarifies the hearing procedure,and cleans up various provisions of the county ordinance. Current state laws prohibit cities and counties from passing breed specific ordinances. There is currently a bill pending at the state level which would allow local jurisdictions to adopt an ordinance mandating spay/neuter and breeding permits for certain breeds of dogs. Should this state legislation be enacted,the County and cities may opt to pass additional revisions regarding spay/neuter and breeding permits on a breed specific basis. As of the writing of this memo,the bill had passed the Assembly and will now move on to the Senate. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of changes contained in the revised county ordinance that have been brought into our city ordinance: *Clarifies definitions of"dangerous"animal(allowing an animal to be maintained with a permit)vs.a"vicious"animal(an animal that must be euthanized) *Expands the definition of"vicious animal'to include an animal which kills another animal *Simplifies and unifies hearing procedures *Clarifies procedures for the transfer of dangerous animals into the County,between cities and out of County agencies *Gives PHS and hearing officers more options,e.g.order obedience training,etc. *Requires dangerous animals to be spay/neutered *Disallows animals declared dangerous because of aggression to humans from being maintained in a residence with juveniles under the age of 18 *Clarifies procedures allowing PHS or the hearing officer(s)to modify dangerous animal permits,i.e.place additional restrictions on repeat offenders *Clarifies impoundment procedures *Increases hearing fees to recover costs *Clarifies that in cases in which no hearing is held that the PHS decision is final "Allows interested persons to request a hearing should the Animal Control Officer determine an animal is not dangerous or vicious *Gives PHS the ability to process violations as infractions without going through the prosecuting attorney *Various "clean-up" revisions The County ordinance revision also contains numerous clerical "clean-ups" throughout. It is our understanding that San Mateo County Counsel has reviewed the County ordinance and finds it in order. Additionally, the Burlingame City Attorney has also been involved in the revisions and changes in our Municipal Code Ordinances and finds them to be appropriate and in order. BUDGET IMPACT: This revision in the San Mateo County Ordinance raises the limit on hearing fees from $250 to $350. Since the number and cost of hearings varies, this change may result in approximately $1,500 in additional revenue that will be used to offset the County and cities' Animal Control costs. ATTACHMENTS: Revised Burlingame Ordinance and Amendments to Chapter 9.04 of the City of Burlingame Municipal Code Title 6, Chapter 6.04 of San Mateo County Animal Control Ordinance 1 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 9.04 TO REVISE ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE A MORE COMPLETE REVIEW, ASSESSMENT, AND HEARING PROCESS FOR DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS DOGS 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Scction 1 . The City works in concert with the County of San Mateo and other cities in the 8 County to use a common animal control ordinance regarding dogs. After months of review anci 9 negotiation, the County has adopted revised provisions regarding assessment, review, and regulation 10 of dangerous and vicious dogs. The revised provisions are intended to clarify the overall process, 11 and provide both the public and dog owners with a fair and effective system. 12 13 Section 2. Section 9.04.001 is amended to read as follows: 14 Section 9.04.010 Definitions. 15 (a) "Animal control officer" means that person designated as the animal control program 16 manager of the division of animal control services for the county and his or her duly authorized 17 officers or deputies, as well as the president of the county's contract agent and his or her duly 18 authorized officers or deputies. 19 (b) "Animal control program" means that program within the division of animal control 20 services of the environmental services agency of the county, or the county's designated contract agent 21 or both, which is specifically charged with regulating and enforcing laws dealing with animal control 22 within its jurisdiction. 23 (c) "Animal control shelter" means the facilities provided by the county or the county's 24 designated contract agent for the impounding of animals. 25 (d) "County" means the County of San Mateo. 26 (e) "Director of environmental services agency" means that person so designated by the 27 governing body of the county. 2(S (f) "Licensing program" means that program within the division of revenue services of the 10/5/2005 I employee and public services agency of the county which is specifically charged with regulating and 2 selling animal licenses and registrations in the county. 3 (g) "Impoundment"means the picking up and confining of an animal by the animal control 4 1)rogram. 5 (h) "Owner" means that person eighteen(18)years of age or over who holds the license to 6 the animal, or if the animal is not licensed, that person eighteen (18) years of age or over legally 7 entitled to possession of the animal concerned and who has primary responsibility for the care of the 8 animal. 9 (i) "Dangerous animal" means any animal, except a trained dog assisting a peace officer 10 engaged in law enforcement duties, which because of its disposition, behavior, training, or other 11 characteristic constitutes a danger to persons or property, or which demonstrates any or all of the 12 following behavior: 13 (1) Any attack or other behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent 14 bodily injury or property damage or that results in an injury to a person or property; or 15 (2) Any aggressive attack or other behavior that constitutes a substantial threat of bodily 16 harm to a person or animal, where such attack, injury or behavior occurs in a place where such 17 person or animal is conducting himself or herself peaceably and lawfully; or 18 (3) An attack on another animal or livestock which occurs off the property of the owner of 19 the attacking animal; or 20 (4) Any animal that has been deemed by another governmental jurisdiction as"potentially 21 dangerous," "dangerous," "vicious," or any other similar designation. 22 0)"Wolf hybrid"means any offspring of domestic dogs bred to wild canids(e.g.,wolves or 2 3 coyotes) and their subsequent generations. 24 (k) "Vicious animal" means any animal, except a trained dog assisting a peace officer 2 5 engaged in law enforcement duties, which meets any or all of the following criteria: 26 (1) Any animal previously designated as "dangerous," that after investigation by an animal 27 control officer or a peace officer is found under conditions which constitute a violation of this IS chapter or applicable dangerous animal permit and which demonstrates a significant danger to the 10/5/2005 - 2 - I public health or safety; or (2) Any animal seized under section 599aa of the Penal Code or upon the sustaining of a conviction of the owner or caretaker under subdivision (a) of the section 597.5 of the Penal Code; 4 or 5 (3) Any animal which inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being or another animal; or 6 (4) Any animal which has engaged in any aggressive behavior which demonstrates that the 7 animal represents a clear and present substantial danger to the public health or safety and that due 8 to substantial risk to the public health or safety it is unlikely that the animal could be safely 9 maintained under a dangerous animal permit. 10 (l) "Severe injury" means any physical injury directly caused by an animal attack that 11 consists of muscle tears, multiple punctures, broken bones or disfiguring lacerations, or which 12 requires multiple sutures or corrective or cosmetic surgery. 13 14 Section 3. Subsection 9.04.011(b) is amended to read as follows: 15 (b)Scope ofAuthority ofHumane Officers and Animal Control Officers. Humane officers 16 qualified and appointed pursuant to California Corporations Code section 14502,who are employees 17 of any public pound, society for prevention of cruelty to animals, or humane society which has 18 contracted with the county to provide animal control services, shall have the authority to issue 19 notices to appear in court pursuant to chapter 5c(commencing with section 853.5 of title 3 of part 20 2 of the Penal Code) for violations of state and local animal control laws. This authority is based 21 on section 14503 of the Corporations Code. Animal control officers shall have the authority 22 provided by state law including but not limited to that described by Penal Code section 830.9. 23 24 Section 4. Section 9.04.015 is amended to read as follows: 25 Section 9.04.015 Dangerous animal permit required. 26 (a) No person shall knowingly keep, have, maintain, sell, trade or let for hire an animal 27 designated under the provisions of this chapter as dangerous without obtaining a dangerous animal 28 permit from the animal control officer. The animal owner shall comply with all conditions of the 10/5/2005 - 3 - I dangerous animal permit, including but not limited to, all requirements of section 9.40.019 of this 2 chapter. Any animal which is determined to be dangerous under this chapter and for which a permit has not been obtained shall be surrendered to an animal control officer for appropriate disposition 4 including humane destruction. (b) If an animal control officer or a peace officer has investigated and determined that an 6 I animal is dangerous, the animal control officer or peace officer shall deliver written notice of such 7 determination to the owner of the animal. Should the animal pose a threat to the public health and 8 safety, an animal control officer may immediately impound the animal. 9 (c) If, after investigation by an animal control officer or a peace officer, that officer 10 , determines that probable cause does not exist to believe the animal is dangerous, any interested 1 1 person may appeal that determination by submitting within five(5)calendar days of the decision a 12 written request to the animal control officer or a peace officer for a hearing and paying the required 13 fee. The hearing shall be conducted according to the procedures set forth in section 9.04.016-1 of 14 this chapter. 15 (d) In determining whether or not an animal shall be declared dangerous,the animal control 16 officer,peace officer,or hearing officer appointed pursuant to section 9.04.016-1,may consider,as 17 a mitigating factor or factors,whether, at the time of the injury,attack or molestation,the person or 18 animal suffering the injury, attack or molestation: 19 (1) Provoked, tormented, teased, abused or assaulted the animal thereby causing or 20 contributing to the alleged behavior; or 21 (2) Committed a willful trespass or other tort upon the private property of the owner or 22 caretaker of the animal; or 2> (3)Threatened or committed an unjustified attack or assault against the owner,caretaker,or 24 person in control of the animal; or 5 (4)Any other mitigating factors deemed appropriate for consideration by the animal control 26 officer,peace officer, or hearing officer. 27 (e) Upon receipt of written or oral notification by the animal control officer or a peace officer 8 that an animal is dangerous as defined in this chapter, the owner shall submit an application for a 10/5/2005 - 4 - i I dangerous animal permit to the animal control officer within five(5)calendar days.The application 2 for a permit shall contain the name of the applicant, applicant's address, the applicant's home and 3 business phone numbers,the address and description of the proposed location of where the animal 4 will be kept, if different from applicant's, a complete description, and a photograph of the aminal. 5 The permit shall contain all of the requirements of section 9.04.017 and any additional conditions 6 or requirements deemed necessary by the animal control officer or peace officer to protect the public 7 health or safety. 8 (f) Should the owner of the animal wish to contest the dangerous animal designation, the 9 owner may request a hearing to be conducted according to the procedures set forth in section 10 9.04.016-1 of this chapter. The owner shall submit a written request for a dangerous animal hearing 1 I to the animal control officer or peace officer within five(5)calendar days of written notification by 12 the animal control officer or peace officer that the animal has been declared dangerous. Should the 13 owner not submit a request for a hearing within five (5) calendar days of notification, the hearing 14 process shall be deemed waived by the owner, and the dangerous animal declaration will be 15 considered final by the city. In that event, the city may allow the dangerous animal permit to be 16 issued without a hearing. Unless a dangerous animal permit is immediately obtained, the animal 17 shall be impounded at the owner's expense pending appropriate disposition as determined by the 18 animal control officer or peace officer. 19 20 Section 5. A new section 9.04.015-1 is added to read as follows: 21 Section 9.04.015-1 Declaration of vicious animals. 22 (a)No person shall keep,have,maintain,sell,trade,or let for hire an animal which has been 2 designated as vicious pursuant to this chapter. 24 (b) If an animal control officer or a peace officer has investigated and determined that an 25 animal is vicious,the animal control officer or peace officer shall deliver to the owner of the animal 26 written notice of that determination. The animal control officer or peace officer shall immediately 27 impound or cause to be impounded the animal and shall cause the animal to be humanely destroyed 28 unless the owner requests a hearing under subsection (c) of this section. 10/5/2005 - 5 - i I (c) If the owner of the animal disputes the designation of an animal as a vicious animal by 2 the animal control officer or peace officer,the owner may submit a written request for a hearing to 3 the animal control officer or peace officer within five(5)calendar days of notification. Such hearing 4 shall be conducted according to the procedures set forth in section 9.04.016-1 ofthis chapter. Failure 5 of the owner to request a hearing shall result in the animal being declared vicious and humanely 6 destroyed. The vicious animal declaration will be considered final by the city. 7 (d) If after investigation by an animal control officer or a peace officer, that officer 8 determines that probable cause does not exist to believe that the animal is vicious, any interested 9 person may appeal that determination by submitting within five(5) calendar days of the decision a 10 written request to the animal control officer or peace officer for a hearing and paying the required 11 fee. 12 (e) In determining whether or not an animal shall be declared vicious, the animal control 13 officer,peace officer, or hearing officer may consider, as a mitigating factor or factors, whether at 14 the time of the injury,attack or behavior,the person or animal suffering the injury,attack or behavior 15 for which the animal is being determined vicious: 16 (1) Provoked, tormented, teased, abused or assaulted the animal thereby causing or 17 contributing to the alleged behavior; or 18 (2) Committed a willful trespass or other tort upon the private property of the owner or 19 caretaker of the animal; or 20 (3)Threatened or committed an unjustified attack or assault against the owner, caretaker or 21 person in control of the animal; or 22 (4)Any other mitigating factors deemed appropriate for consideration by the animal control 2 officer, peace officer, or hearing officer. 24 25 Section 6. Section 9.04.016 is amended to read as follows: 26 Section 9.04.016 Issuance of permit for dangerous animal. 27 (a) No permit obtained under this section is transferable. If the owner's address or the 28 location where the animal is kept changes or the owner transfers ownership of the animal,the permit /0/5/2005 - 6 - 1 6 - z I shall become null and void and an application for a new permit must be submitted to the animal 2 control officer. 3 (b) A permit issued under this chapter is subject to renewal and approval each year and is 4 subject to conditions and requirements existing as of the date of renewal.The permittee shall pay an 5 annual fee for this permit pursuant to the procedures established by the division of animal control 6 services. If permittee fails to file an application for renewal or pay the permit fee prior to the permit 7 anniversary date, the permit shall automatically become void. The fee for such permit shall be as 8 set forth in section 9.04.031. This fee shall not be refundable. 9 (c) If the owner or permittee has a history of multiple violations of this chapter or of the 10 conditions of any previously issued dangerous animal permit,the animal control officer or hearing 11 officer may deny the permit and impound the animal for appropriate disposition as determined by 12 the animal control officer or hearing officer. 13 14 Section 7. A new Section 9.04.016-1 is added to read as follows(replacing existing Section 15 9.04.022): 16 Section 9.04.016-1 Hearing procedures. 17 (a) A hearing pursuant to this chapter shall be conducted by a hearing officer or designated 18 representative appointed by the director of the environmental services agency. The hearings shall 19 be scheduled no less than five (5) working days and no more than fifteen (15) working days from 20 the receipt of the request for the hearing unless agreed upon by the involved animal control officer 21 or peace officer and the animal owner. A hearing may be continued if the hearing officer deems it 22 necessary and proper or if the owner, or animal control officer or peace officer shows good cause. 23 (b) The hearing shall be conducted in an informal manner consistent with due process of law. 24 Both the owner of the animal and the animal control officer or peace officer may be represented by 25 counsel. The parties may present relevant evidence and call and cross-examine witnesses. The strict 26 rules of evidence shall not be applicable. Any relevant evidence may be admitted if it is the sort of 27 evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs. The 28 hearing shall be tape-recorded and all documentary evidence submitted at the hearing shall be 10/5/2005 - 7 - I preserved. Any party may arrange for a court reporter to be present. Any party desiring the presence 2 of a court reporter shall make all necessary arrangements and shall be responsible for payment of all 3 costs. 4 (c) The hearing officer may exclude disorderly or disruptive persons from the hearing or 5 make other orders as necessary to ensure the fair and orderly conduct of the hearing. 6 (d) The hearing officer may decide all issues for or against the owner of the animal should 7 the owner fail to appear at the hearing. 8 (e) Within five (5) working days of the hearing, the hearing officer or designated 9 representative shall render a brief written decision,which decision shall be final at the administrative 10 level. The written decision shall be mailed to the parties by certified mail and include a declaration 1 1 or proof of mailing which includes the date on which the decision was mailed to the parties. 1? (f)Unless the hearing officer for good cause otherwise determines,the owner of the animal 1 is liable for all costs related to such hearing not to exceed three-hundred and fifty dollars ($350). 14 (g) The failure to conduct a hearing required by this section shall have no bearing on any 15 criminal prosecution for violation of any provisions of this chapter. 16 (h) In the case of animals determined by an animal control officer or a peace officer to be 17 dangerous or vicious, the hearing officer may decide any or all of the following: 18 (1) That the animal be designated "vicious," and the owner of the animal lose all rights of 19 ownership and control of the animal, and the animal shall be humanely destroyed. An animal 20 designated as "vicious" will be held at the animal shelter for a minimum of five (5) calendar days 21 from the date of the hearing officer's decision, after which time it may be humanely destroyed 22 without further notice to its owner; 23 (2) That the animal be designated "dangerous" and the owner must apply for and obtain a 24 dangerous animal permit as provided by this chapter within five(5) calendar days of receipt of the 25 decision letter in order to maintain the animal, and the owner must comply with all mandatory 26 dangerous animal permit rules and regulations as defined in section 9.04.017; 27 (3) That the dangerous animal permit shall contain additional permit conditions to 28 supplement the mandatory dangerous animal permit rules and regulations as defined in section 10/5/2005 - 8 - f 1 9.04.017 below, including but not limited to, the following: (A)That the owner keep the animal muzzled at all times when the animal is off the owner's property; 4 (B)That the ownerprove financial responsibilityby posting a bond or certificate of insurance 5 for an amount of$1,000,000 per animal as determined by the hearing officer; 6 (C) That the owner provide private behavioral and obedience training to the animal, at the 7 owner's expense and within the time set forth by the hearing officer following the issuance of a 8 dangerous animal permit. Proof of participation, a report of behavioral assessment, and/or a 9 certificate of satisfactory completion from an animal behaviorist or organization approved by the l0 I hearing officer shall be provided to the animal control officer within seven (7) calendar days 1 l following any required training; 12 (D) That the owner comply with any other permit requirement the hearing officer deems 13 necessary to protect the public health or safety; 14 (E) That the owner reimburse the victim for the victim's medical expenses or the victim 15 animal's veterinary expenses; 16 (F)Pursuant to section 9.04.019 of this chapter,that the dangerous animal permit be modified 17 as ordered by the hearing officer, or revoked and the animal humanely destroyed. 18 19 Section 8. Existing section 9.04.019 is renumbered as Section 9.04.017 and amended to read 20 as follows: 21 Section 9.04.017 Mandatory dangerous animal permit requirements. 22 Any owner of a dangerous animal shall insure compliance with the following rules and 23 regulations which shall be mandatory requirements for any dangerous animal permit 24 (a)When the animal is off the property of its owner, the owner shall ensure that the animal 25 is restrained with a leash not to exceed four(4)feet in length and having a tensile strength of at least 26 three hundred (300)pounds and shall be under the direct control and supervision of the owner or a 27 person of such age, size, and strength as can easily control such animal. Extraordinary care shall be 28 taken by the owner to ensure that such restraint is sufficient to control the animal in a manner which 10/5/2005 - 9 - I it will not endanger other persons or animals. (b)The owner shall maintain the animal so that it is not a threat to any mail carrier,sanitation worker, meter person, or other person who has the lawful right to enter the property. 4 (c)The owner shall ensure that the animal is not allowed to be upon any unenclosed premises 5 unless it is leashed and controlled by a person capable of controlling such animal. The owner shall 6 ensure that the animal is not tethered,tied,or staked on any unenclosed premises. The owner shall 7 ensure that the animal is not kept in a house or structure when the windows or doors are open or 8 screen doors are the only obstacle preventing the animal from exiting the structure. 9 (d)The owner shall ensure that the animal is kept in a fenced yard,kennel,run,or enclosure 10 approved by the animal control officer or peace officer. The owner shall ensure that all structures 11 used to confine the animals are locked with a key or combination lock when the animals are within 12 the enclosure. The owner shall regularly inspect the fenced yard,kennel,run,or enclosure to ensure 13 that it is secure to maintain the animal. 14 (e) The owner shall open premises upon which an animal is maintained at any reasonable 15 hour for inspection by the animal control officer or peace officer and said premises shall be 16 surrendered for inspection by the owner upon the request of the animal control officer or peace 17 officer.The owner shall pay a fee for the costs incurred by County for the inspection or reinspection 18 of property. Such fee shall be set forth in section 9.04.031. 19 (f) The owner of the dangerous animal shall post the entrances to the property where the 20 animal is kept with a legible sign conspicuous to the public warning persons of the presence of a 21 dangerous animal. The owner of the dangerous animal shall obtain an approved sign from the 22 animal control program for a non-refundable fee and shall surrender such sign in the event of the 23 revocation of the permit,death of the animal,or approved relocation of the animal,or upon any other 24 reasonable demand by an animal control officer. 25 (g) The owner of any dangerous animal shall advise all members who reside in the same 26 household and on the same premises of the conditions established by the permit for keeping or 27 maintaining said dangerous animal. 28 (h) The owner shall strictly comply with all local and state laws regarding the care, use, 10/5/2005 _ 10 - I control, and maintenance of animals. 2 (i) In addition to a license, the owner shall ensure that the animal shall at all times wear a 3 separate tag issued by the division of animal control services which designates it as a dangerous 4 animal. The owner shall ensure that the dangerous animal be microchipped and registered with the 5 animal control program for a fee specified by section 9.04.031 within thirty(30)calendar days from 6 the date the permit was issued.The animal owner shall be responsible for payment of said fee which 7 shall be utilized by the animal control program to offset the cost of the chip and to maintain the 8 registration program. 9 0) The owner shall have the animal spayed or neutered by a licensed veterinarian, at the 10 owner's expense,within fifteen(15)calendar days from the date the permit was issued. The owner 11 shall present written proof to the animal control officer that the surgery was performed. In the event 12 an animal cannot be safely spayed or neutered due to medical reasons, the owner shall present 13 written proof from a licensed practicing veterinarian to the animal control officer that said animal 14 cannot be spayed or neutered. 15 (k) The owner may not sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of such animal to another county 16 or city without notifying animal control at least twenty-four(24)hours before such sale,transfer,or 17 disposal. Animal control will notify the proper authorities of the jurisdiction to which the dangerous 18 animal is transferred. Should the owner of a dangerous animal wish to transfer ownership of the 19 animal to another individual within the county,the new owner shall submit to a property inspection, 20 apply for and obtain a new dangerous animal permit, pay all requisite fees, and comply with all 21 provisions of this chapter and the requirements of the permit. 22 (� No more than two dangerous animals may be kept at any one household. 23 (m)The owner shall not allow any animal designated"dangerous"as the result of aggression 24 against human(s)to be kept on property or within a household in which a juvenile person under the 25 age of eighteen(18) years of age resides. 26 (n) The owner of a dangerous animal shall notify the animal control officer of the animal's 27 death within twenty-four (24) hours and shall produce the animal's body for verification upon 8 request. The owner of a dangerous animal must notify the animal control officer immediately in the 10/5/2005 - 11 - I event the animal becomes lost or stolen. 2 (o) The owner shall pay all permit and property inspection fees as described in section 3 9.04.031 of this chapter. 4 (p) The owner shall comply with all other pen-nit conditions or requirements imposed 5 pursuant to section 9.04.016-1 or 9.04.015(a). 6 7 Section 9. Existing Section 9.04.018 is replaced with the following: 8 Section 9.04.018 Possession of animals after revocation of dangerous animal erinit or vicious g p 9 declaration. 10 No person who has been determined to be in possession or ownership of a vicious animal or 11 a dangerous animal for which a permit has been revoked under this chapter shall be granted any 12 dangerous animal permit for a period of three(3)years following such determination or revocation. 13 14 Section 10. Existing Section 9.04.017 is renumbered as Section 9.04.019 and amended to 15 read as follows: 16 Section 9.04.019 Revocation or modification of permit. 17 (a) Subject to the provisions of subsections (b) and (c), any permit issued pursuant to this 18 chapter may be revoked if the animal control officer has reasonable cause to believe any of the 19 following to be true: 20 (1) The dangerous animal owner or any person the owner has allowed to have possession 21 of the animal has violated any local animal ordinances, or is in violation of any zoning, health and 22 safety or building ordinance or Penal Code section relating to keeping, care, or use of any animals; 23 or 24 (2) The dangerous animal owner or any person the owner has allowed to have possession 25 of the animal has violated any rules, regulations, or conditions of this chapter, including but not 26 limited to,dangerous animal conditions, or any requirement imposed by the animal control officer, 27 peace officer,or hearing officer as necessary to insure the animal will not endanger the peace,health 28 or safety of any person or property; or 10/5/2005 - 12 - 1 (3) The dangerous animal owner has changed the location of his or her residence or his or 2 her place of business or sells,assigns,transfers,donates,leases,or otherwise disposes of the animal 3 for which the permit was issued. 4 (b) In the event that it is reasonably necessary to protect against a threat to the health or 5 safety of the public, or of any animal, the animal control officer or peace officer may impound or 6 cause to be impounded the animal while an investigation is taking place. 7 (c) If, after investigation, the animal control officer or peace officer concludes that it is 8 probable that one or more of the above grounds for revocation has occurred, the officer shall cause 9 written notice thereof to be transmitted to the owner. Said notice shall specify the grounds of 10 possible revocation or modification of the permit. Should the owner of the animal wish to contest 11 the revocation or modification of the permit,(s)he may request a hearing to be held before a hearing 12 officer not previously involved with the permit issuance or investigation, as designated by the 13 director of the environmental services agency within five (5) calendar days of receiving the notice 14 of intent to modify or revoke permit. Said hearing date shall be not less than five(5)working days 15 or more than fifteen (15) working days subsequent to the date the request for hearing is received. 16 The hearing shall be conducted as set forth in section 9.04.016-1 of this chapter. After the hearing, 17 the officer conducting the hearing may modify the terms of the permit or revoke the permit 18 depending upon the permittee's ability to comply with the requirements of this chapter and to control 19 the animal so that the health, safety, and property of the public are protected. 20 (d) Upon written or oral notification by the animal control officer, or hearing officer if a 21 hearing was held, of any modifications to a dangerous animal permit,the owner shall immediately 22 comply with such modified permit requirements. 23 (e) Upon written or oral notification by the animal control officer, or hearing officer, if a 24 hearing was held, of the revocation of a permit for a dangerous animal, the owner of such animal 25 shall within two (2) calendar days of such notification surrender said animal to the animal control 26 officer to be humanely destroyed or provide written proof to an animal control officer in the form 27 of declaration(s)under penalty of perjury that such animal has been permanently removed from the 28 county and declaring the new location or new address where the animal is to be kept. 101512005 - 13 - I Section 11. Section 9.04.020 is amended to read as follows: 2 Section 9.04.020 Animals to be impounded. 3 (a) Every animal kept or found by an animal control officer or a peace officer under 4 conditions which constitute a violation of this chapter or other local or state law may be impounded 5 by an animal control officer or a peace officer. The animal's owner shall be charged all costs 6 incurred or fees applicable with respect to such impoundment. 7 (b)When the animal control officer or peace officer has reasonable cause to believe that any 8 animal is dangerous or vicious,the animal control officer or peace officer may also impound or cause 9 to be impounded the animal and keep it for such period not to exceed fifteen (15) days in order to 10 observe, examine, and determine whether or not such animal is dangerous or vicious. 11 (c)Any animal subject to dangerous or vicious animal proceedings maybe impounded at the 12 discretion of the animal control officer or peace officer pending notice,hearings and determinations 13 hereunder and until any required permit is obtained. 14 (d) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or state law, an impounded animal may be 15 redeemed by the owner, after payment of the required fees and charges and compliance with 16 licensing requirements . In the event the animal is not so redeemed within the time set forth by state 17 law, it may be disposed of in the manner determined by an animal control officer. 18 19 Section 12. Section 9.04.021 is amended to read as follows: 20 Section 9.04.021 Notice to owner of animals impounded. 21 Within twenty-four(24)hours of the impoundment of any animal,the animal control officer 22 shall mail a written notice thereof to the place of business or residence of the owner of the animal 23 if known. If the animal may not be redeemed as provided by subsection 9.04.020(d),the owner may 24 request a hearing under section 9.04.017, subsections (a) - (g),or applicable state law. The animal 25 control officer shall maintain records of the impoundment pursuant to section 9.04.026. 26 27 Section 13. Existing section 9.04.022 is repealed and a new section 9.04.022 is added to read 28 as follows: 10/5/2005 - 14 - I Section 9.04.022 Misdemeanor violations. 2 (a)A person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of an infraction except as otherwise specifically provided. 4 (b) A person violating any provision of subsection (a) of section 9.04.015 or subsection (a) 5 of section 9.04.015-1 of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 6 7 Section 14. Section 9.04.023 is amended to read as follows: 8 Section 9.04.023 Redemption. 9 (a) Except as otherwise required by this chapter or by any other law, the owner or person 10 , entitled to the control or custody of an_y animal impounded may, at any time before the sale or other 11 disposition thereof,redeem the same by paying all proper fees assessed by animal control services. 12 Animal control services shall issue to the owner duplicate receipts for the amount of the fee paid. 13 (b) Upon redemption of any impounded unaltered animal,the owner will be required to pay 14 a spay/neuter fee in the amount of$35.00 in addition to the impound fees imposed under section 15 9.04.031. Such fee shall be refundable upon proof of spay/neuter of the animal within thirty(30) 16 days of the redemption date. Any unaltered animal impounded twice or more within a three-year 17 period shall be altered at the owner's expense prior to redemption. At the option of the owner, 18 required spaying or neutering may be performed by a private veterinarian. 19 (c)Any owner of an impounded animal subject to mandatory spay/neuter under subsection 20 (b)may petition, in writing, for a hearing conducted by the animal control program manager or his 21 or her designee within three(3)days following notice of the second impoundment.The hearing shall 22 be held within four(4)working days of such petition and shall be subject to the provisions of section 23 9.04.016-1, subsections(a)—(g). After the hearing,the hearing officer may require that the animal 24 be spayed or neutered at the owner's expense,unless the hearing officer determines that good cause 25 exists for not requiring that the animal be spayed or neutered. 26 27 Section 15. Section 9.04.026 is amended to read as follows: 28 10/5/2005 - 15 - I Section 9.04.026 Record of impounded animals. 2 The animal control program shall keep a record of all animals impounded,which record shall 3 include a description of the animal,the date of its receipt,the date and manner of disposal,the name 4 of the person redeeming or purchasing, and the fees and charges and proceeds of sales received on 5 account thereof,and such additional matters as maybe necessary and incidental to implementing this 6 chapter. The records shall be kept for four(4) years. 7 8 Section 16. Subsection 9.04.013(a) is amended to read as follows: 9 (a) Requirements. An annual license fee shall be paid for every dog over the age of four 10 months owned and harbored in this city. The annual license fee shall be first due when the animal 11 reaches four months of age or within sixty days after the dog is acquired and due on the anniversary 12 date of the original purchase date each year thereafter.New residents shall have sixty days in which 13 to acquire such license.Persons renewing their license shall have thirty days following their due date 14 before being delinquent and having to pay a late penalty.The fee for the license shall be as set forth 15 in Section 9.04.031. The fee paid for the licensing of spayed or neutered dogs shall be no more than 16 one-half of the license fee for unaltered dogs upon presentation of the proper certification. The fee 17 paid by persons over the age of sixty shall be one-half of the license fee.Any person who fails to pay 18 the license fee after the fee is due, or the dog is required to be licensed, shall, in addition to paying 19 any past due license fee or fees, also pay a penalty in accordance with section 9.04.031. A license 20 shall be obtained but no license fee shall be payable for the licensing of any dog which is being 21 trained for guide or hearing purposes by a resident of the city or used for guide or hearing purposes 22 by a handicapped resident of the city and which has come from a guide or hearing dog training 23 facility, or for dogs which have served as a member of the armed forces of the United States of 24 America, or any dog currently being used by a local law enforcement agency for the purposes of 25 crime prevention or control. Dog licenses are not transferable between owners;however,if the dog 26 dies and the owner acquires a new dog,the license is transferable to the new dog. The license does 27 not have to be renewed until the original purchase anniversary date. The fee paid for a dog license 28 is not refundable. Licenses provided for in this section shall be signed by the director of community 101512005 - 16 - I services. The licenses shall be numbered consecutively. 2 3 Section 17. This ordinance shall be published in accordance with law and shall take effect 4 thiryt (30) days after adoption by the last of the twenty(20) cities in the County of San Mateo that 5 are parties to the Agreement for Animal Control Services dated June 17, 2003, as amended. 6 7 Mayor 8 9 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 10 foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Burlingame on 11 October 3, 2005, and the Ordinance was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on 12 , 2005,by the following vote: 13 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 14 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 15 16 City Clerk 17 18 19 CADocuments and Settings\vanetten\Local SettingsUemporary Internet Files\OLK5\animalcontro12005-clean.BPD.wpd 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10/5/2005 - 17 - ORDINANCE NO. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 6.04 OF TITLE 6 OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo, State of California, ORDAINS as follows SECTION 1: Section 6.04.010 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6.04.010 Definitions. (a) "Animal Control Officer" means that person designated as the Animal Control Program Manager of the Division of Animal Control Services for the County and his or her duly authorized officers or deputies, as well as the President of the County's contract agent and his or her duly authorized officers or deputies. (b) "Animal Control Program" means that program within the Division of Animal Control Services of the Environmental Services Agency of the County, or the County's designated contract agent or both, which is specifically charged with regulating and enforcing laws dealing with animal control within its jurisdiction. (c) "Animal Control Shelter" means the facilities provided by the County or the County's designated contract agent for the impounding of animals. (d) "Director of Environmental Services Agency" means that person so designated by the governing body of the County of San Mateo. (e) "Licensing Program" means that program within the Division of Revenue Services of the Employee and Public Services Agency which is specifically charged with regulating and selling animal licenses and registrations in the County of San Mateo. (f) "Impoundment" means the picking up and confining of an animal by the Animal Control Program. (g) "Owner" of an animal means that person 18 years of age or over who holds the license to the animal, or if the animal is not licensed, that person 18 years of age or over legally entitled to possession of the animal concerned and who has primary responsibility for the care of the animal. (h) "Dangerous Animal" means any animal, except a trained dog assisting a peace officer engaged in law enforcement duties, which because of its disposition, behavior, training or other characteristic constitutes a danger to persons or property, or which demonstrates any or all of the following behavior: (1) Any attack or other behavior which requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury or property damage or that results in an injury to a person or property. (2) Any aggressive attack or other behavior that constitutes a substantial threat of bodily harm to a person or animal, where such attack, injury or behaviors occurs in a place where such person or animal is conducting himself or herself peaceably and lawfully. (3) An attack on another animal or livestock which occurs off the 2 property of the Owner of the attacking animal. (4) Any animal that has been deemed by another governmental jurisdiction as "potentially dangerous," "dangerous," "vicious," or any other similar designation. (i) "Wolf Hybrid" means any offspring of domestic dogs bred to wild canids (e.g., wolves or coyotes) and their subsequent generations. (j) "Vicious Animal" means any animal, except a trained dog assisting a peace officer engaged in law enforcement duties, which meets any or all of the following criteria: (1) Any animal previously designated as "dangerous," that after investigation by an Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer is found under conditions which constitute a violation of this chapter or applicable dangerous animal permit and which demonstrates a significant danger to the public health or safety; (2) Any animal seized under section 599aa of the Penal Code and/or upon the sustaining of a conviction of the Owner or caretaker under subdivision (a) of the Section 597.5 of the Penal Code; (3) Any animal which inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being or another animal; (4) Any animal which has engaged in any aggressive behavior which demonstrates that the animal represents a clear and present 3 substantial danger to the public health or safety and that due to substantial risk to the public health or safety it is unlikely that the animal could be safely maintained under a dangerous animal permit. (k) "Severe injury" means any physical injury directly caused by an animal attack that consists of muscle tears, multiple punctures, broken bones or disfiguring lacerations, or which requires multiple sutures or corrective or cosmetic surgery. SECTION 2: Subsection (b) of Section 6.04.020 is hereby amended to read as follows: (b) Scope of Authority of Humane Officers and Animal Control Officers. Humane Officers qualified and appointed pursuant to California Corporations Code 14502, who are employees of any public pound, society for prevention of cruelty to animals or humane society which has contracted with the County to provide animal control services, shall have the authority to issue notices to appear in court pursuant to chapter 5c (commencing with section 853.5 of title 3 of part 2 of the Penal Code of the State of California) for violations of state and local animal control laws. This authority is based on section 14503 of the Corporations Code. Animal Control Officers shall have the authority provided by state law including but not limited to that described by Penal Code Section 830.9. SECTION 3: Section 6.04.100 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to be entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.100 Dangerous animal permit required. (a) No person shall knowingly keep, have, maintain, sell, trade or let for hire an 4 animal designated under the provisions of this chapter as dangerous without obtaining a Dangerous Animal Permit from the Animal Control Officer. The animal Owner shall comply with all conditions of the Dangerous Animal Permit including but not limited to all requirements of Section 6.04.120 of this Chapter. Any animal which is determined to be dangerous under this Chapter and for which a permit has not been obtained shall be surrendered to an Animal Control Officer for appropriate disposition including humane destruction. (b) If an Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer has investigated and determined that an animal is dangerous, the Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer shall deliver written notice of such determination to the Owner of the animal. Should the animal pose a threat to the public health and safety, an Animal Control Officer may immediately impound the animal. (c) If, after investigation by an Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer, that officer determines that probable cause does not exist to believe the animal is dangerous, any interested person may appeal that determination by submitting within five (5) calendar days of the decision a written request to the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer for a hearing and paying the required fee. The hearing shall be conducted according to the procedures set forth in Section 6.04.115 of this Chapter. (d) In determining whether or not an animal shall be declared dangerous, the Animal Control Officer, Peace Officer or Hearing Officer appointed pursuant to section 6.04.115, may consider, as a mitigating factor or factors, whether, at the time of the injury, attack or molestation, the person or animal suffering the injury, attack or molestation: 5 (1) Provoked, tormented, teased, abused or assaulted the animal thereby causing or contributing to the alleged behavior; (2) Committed a willful trespass or other tort upon the private property of the Owner or caretaker of the animal; (3) Threatened or committed an unjustified attack or assault against the Owner, caretaker or person in control of the animal. (4) Or any other mitigating factors deemed appropriate for consideration by the Animal Control Officer, Peace Officer or Hearing Officer. (e) Upon receipt of written or oral notification by the Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer that an animal is dangerous as defined in this Chapter, the Owner shall submit an application for a Dangerous Animal Permit to the Animal Control Officer within five (5) calendar days. The application for a permit shall contain the name of the applicant, applicant's address, the applicant's home and business phone numbers, the address and description of the proposed location of where the animal will be kept, if different from applicant's, a complete description and a photograph of the animal. The permit shall contain all of the requirements of Section 6.04.120 and any additional conditions or requirements deemed . necessary by the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer to protect the public health or safety. (f) Should the Owner of the animal wish to contest the dangerous animal designation, the Owner may request a hearing, to be conducted according to the procedures set forth in Section 6.04.115 of this Chapter. The Owner shall submit a written request for a Dangerous Animal Hearing to the Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer within five (5) calendar days of written notification by the 6 Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer that the animal has been declared dangerous. Should the Owner not submit a request for a hearing within five (5) calendar days of notification, the hearing process shall be deemed waived by the Owner, and the dangerous animal declaration will be considered final by the County Director of the Environmental Services Agency, or the City having jurisdiction. In that event, the County Director of the Environmental Services Agency or the City having jurisdiction may allow the dangerous animal permit to be issued without a hearing. Unless a dangerous animal permit is immediately obtained, the animal shall be impounded at the Owner's expense pending appropriate disposition as determined by the Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer. SECTION 4: A new Section 6.04.105 is hereby added to Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code to be numbered and entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.105 Declaration of vicious animals. (a) No person shall keep, have, maintain, sell, trade or let for hire an animal which has been designated as vicious pursuant to this Chapter. (b) If an Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer has investigated and determined that an animal is vicious, the Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer shall deliver to the Owner of the animal written notice of that determination. The Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer shall immediately impound or cause to be impounded the animal and shall cause the animal to be humanely destroyed unless the Owner requests a hearing under subsection (c) of this section. 7 (c) If the Owner of the animal disputes the designation of an animal as a vicious animal by the Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer (s)he may submit a written request for a hearing to the Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer within five (5) calendar days of notification. Such hearing shall be conducted according to the procedures set forth in Section 6.04.115 of this Chapter. Failure of the Owner to request a hearing shall result in the animal being declared vicious and humanely destroyed. The vicious animal declaration will be considered final by the County Director of the Environmental Services Agency, or the City having jurisdiction. (d) If, after investigation by an Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer, that officer determines that probable cause does not exist to believe that the animal is vicious, any interested person may appeal that determination by submitting within five (5) calendar days of the decision a written request to the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer for a hearing and paying the required fee. (e) In determining whether or not an animal shall be declared vicious, the Animal Control Officer, Peace Officer or Hearing Officer may consider, as a mitigating factor or factors, whether at the time of the injury, attack or behavior, the person or animal suffering the injury, attack or behavior for which the animal is being determined vicious: (1) Provoked, tormented, teased, abused or assaulted the animal thereby causing or contributing to the alleged behavior; (2) Committed a willful trespass or other tort upon the private property of the Owner or caretaker of the animal; (3) Threatened or committed an unjustified attack or assault against 8 the Owner,caretaker or person in control of the animal. (4)Or any other mitigating factors deemed appropriate for consideration by the Animal Control Officer,Peace Officer or Hearing Officer. SECTION 5: Section 6.04.110 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to be entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.110 Issuance of permit for dangerous animal. (a)No permit obtained under this section is transferable. If the Owner's address or the location where the animal is kept changes or the Owner transfers ownership of the animal,the permit shall become null and void and an application for a new permit must be submitted to the Animal Control Officer. (b)A permit issued under this chapter is subject to renewal and approval each year and is subject to conditions and requirements existing as of the date of renewal.The permittee shall pay an annual fee for this permit pursuant to the procedures established by the Division of Animal Control Services. If permittee fails to file an application for renewal or pay the permit fee prior to the permit anniversary date the permit shall automatically become void.The fee for such permit shall be as set forth in section 6.04.290.This fee shall not be refundable. (c)If the Owner or permittee has a history of multiple violations of this Chapter 6.04 or of the conditions of any previously issued dangerous animal permit,the Animal Control Officer or Hearing Officer may deny the permit and impound the animal for appropriate disposition as determined by the Animal Control Officer or Hearing Officer. 9 SECTION 6: A new section 6.04.115 is hereby added to Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code to be numbered and entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.115 Hearing procedures. (a) Hearings held under this Chapter shall be conducted by a hearing officer or designated representative appointed by the Director of the Environmental Services Agency. Any city contracting with the County for animal control services may elect to utilize the services of any San Mateo County designated hearing officer to hold hearings under that City's animal control ordinances. The hearings shall be scheduled no less than five (5) working days and no more than fifteen (15) working days from the receipt of the request for the hearing unless agreed upon by the involved Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer and the animal Owner. A hearing may be continued if the Hearing Officer deems it necessary and proper or if the Owner, or Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer shows good cause. (b) The hearing shall be conducted in an informal manner consistent with due process of law. Both the Owner of the animal and Animal Control Officer and/or Peace Officer may be represented by counsel. The parties may present relevant evidence and call and cross-examine witnesses. The strict rules of evidence shall not be applicable. Any relevant evidence may be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs. The hearing shall be tape-recorded and all documentary evidence submitted at the hearing shall be preserved. Any party may arrange for a court reporter to be present. Any party desiring the presence of a court reporter shall make all necessary arrangements and shall be responsible for 10 payment of all costs. (c) The Hearing Officer may exclude disorderly or disruptive persons from the hearing or make other orders as necessary to ensure the fair and orderly conduct of the hearing. (d) The Hearing Officer may decide all issues for or against the Owner of the animal should the Owner fail to appear at the hearing. (e) Within five (5) working days of the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall render a brief written decision, which decision shall be final at the administrative level. The written decision shall be mailed to the parties by certified mail and include a declaration or proof of mailing which includes the date on which the decision was mailed to the parties. (f) Unless the hearing officer for good cause otherwise determines, the Owner of the animal is liable for all costs related to such hearing not to exceed three- hundred and fifty dollars ($350). (g) The failure to conduct a hearing required by this section shall have no bearing on any criminal prosecution for violation of any provisions of this chapter. (h) In the case of animals determined by an Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer to be dangerous or vicious, the hearing officer may decide any or all of the following: 1 ) That the animal be designated "vicious" and the Owner of the animal lose all rights of ownership and control of the animal and the animal shall be humanely destroyed. An animal designated as 11 vicious will be held at the animal shelter for a minimum of five (5) calendar days from the date of the hearing officer's decision, after which time it may be humanely destroyed without further notice to the Owner; 2) That the animal be designated "dangerous' and the Owner must apply for and obtain a dangerous animal permit as provided by this chapter within five calendar days of receipt of the decision letter in order to maintain the animal and the Owner must comply with all mandatory dangerous animal permit rules and regulations as defined in Section 6.04.1201- 3) .04.120;3) That the dangerous animal permit shall contain additional permit conditions to supplement the mandatory dangerous animal permit rules and regulations as defined in Section 6.04.120, including, but not limited to, the following: i) That the Owner keep the animal muzzled at all times when the animal is off the Owner's property, ii) That the Owner prove financial responsibility by posting a bond or certificate of insurance for an amount of $1,000,000 per animal as determined by the Hearing Officer; iii) That the Owner provide private behavioral and obedience training to the animal, at the Owner's expense and within the time set forth by the Hearing Officer following the issuance of a dangerous animal permit. Proof of participation, a report of behavioral assessment, and/or a certificate of satisfactory 12 completion from an animal behaviorist or organization approved by the Hearing Officer shall be provided to the Animal Control Officer within seven calendar days following any required training; iv)That the Owner comply with any other permit requirement the Hearing Officer deems necessary to protect the public health or safety; v)That the Owner reimburse the victim for the victim's medical expenses or the victim animal's veterinary expenses; vi)Pursuant to section 6.04.160 of this Chapter,that the dangerous animal permit be modified as ordered by the Hearing Officer,or revoked and the animal humanely destroyed. SECTION 7: Section 6.04.120 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to be entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.120 Mandatory dangerous animal permit requirements. Any Owner of a dangerous animal shall insure compliance with the following rules and regulations which shall be mandatory requirements for any dangerous animal permit: (a)When the animal is off the property of its Owner,the Owner must ensure that the animal is restrained with a leash not to exceed four(4)feet in length and 13 having a minimum tensile strength of 300 pounds and shall be under the direct control and supervision of the Owner or a person of such age, size and strength as can easily control such animal. Extraordinary care shall be taken by the Owner to ensure that such restraint is sufficient to control the animal in a manner which it will not endanger other persons or animals. (b) The Owner shall maintain the animal so that it is not a threat to any mail carrier, sanitation worker, meter person, or other person who has the lawful right to enter the property. (c) The Owner shall ensure that tho animal is not kept upon any unenclosed premise unless it is leashed and controlled by a person capable of controlling such animal. The Owner shall ensure that the animal is not tethered, tied or staked at any unenclosed premise. The Owner shall ensure that the animal is not kept in a house or structure when the windows or doors are open or screen doors are the only obstacle preventing the animal from exiting the structure. (d) The Owner shall ensure that the animal is kept in a fenced yard, kennel, run or enclosure approved by the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer. The Owner shall ensure that all structures used to confine the animals are locked with a key or combination lock when such animals are within the structure. The Owner shall regularly inspect the fenced yard, kennel, run or enclosure to ensure that it is secure to maintain the animal. (e) The Owner shall open premises upon which an animal is maintained at any reasonable hour for inspection by the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer and said premises shall be surrendered for inspection by the Owner upon the request of the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer. The Owner shall pay a fee for the 14 costs incurred by County for the inspection or reinspection of property. Such fee shall be set forth in section 6.04.290. (f) The Owner of the dangerous animal shall post the entrances to the property where the animal is kept with a legible sign conspicuous to the public warning persons of the presence of a dangerous animal. The Owner of the dangerous animal shall obtain an approved sign from the Animal Control Program for a non- refundable fee and shall surrender such sign in the event of the revocation of the permit, death of animal, or approved relocation of the animal, or upon any other reasonable demand by an Animal Control Officer. (g) The Owner of any dangerous animal must advise all members who reside in the same household and on the same premises of the conditions established by the permit for keeping or maintaining said dangerous animal. (h) The Owner shall strictly comply with all local and state laws regarding the care, use, control and maintenance of animals. (i) In addition to a license, the Owner shall ensure that the animal shall at all times wear a separate tag issued by the Division of Animal Control Services which designates it as a dangerous animal. The Owner shall ensure that the dangerous animal be microchipped and registered with the Animal Control Program for a fee specified by Section 6.04.290 within thirty (30) calendar days from the date the permit was issued. The animal Owner shall be responsible for payment of said fee which shall be utilized by the Animal Control Program to offset the cost of the chip and to maintain the registration program. (j) The Owner shall have the animal spayed or neutered by a licensed veterinarian, at the Owner's expense, within fifteen (15) calendar days from the 15 date the permit was issued. The Owner shall present written proof to the Animal Control Officer that the surgery was performed. In the event an animal cannot be safely spayed or neutered due to medical reasons, the Owner shall present written proof from a licensed practicing veterinarian to the Animal Control Officer that said animal cannot be spayed or neutered. (k) The Owner may not sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of such animal to another County or City without notifying Animal Control at least twenty-four (24) hours before such sale, transfer or disposal. Animal Control will notify the proper authorities of the jurisdiction to which the dangerous animal is transferred. Should the Owner of a dangerous animal wish to transfer ownership of the animal to another individual within San Mateo County, the new Owner must submit to a property inspection, apply for and obtain a new dangerous animal permit, pay all requisite fees, and comply with all provisions of this chapter and the requirements of the permit. (1) No more than two dangerous animals may be kept at any one household. (m) The Owner shall not allow any animal designated "dangerous" as the result of aggression against human(s) to be kept on property or within a household in which a juvenile person under the age of eighteen resides. (n) The Owner of a dangerous animal must notify the Animal Control Officer of the animal's death within twenty-four (24) hours and shall produce the animal's body for verification upon request. The Owner of a dangerous animal must notify the Animal Control Officer immediately in the event the animal becomes lost or stolen. (o) The Owner must pay all permit and property inspection fees as described in 16 section 6.04.290 of this chapter. (p)The Owner shall comply with all other permit conditions or requirements imposed pursuant to section 6.04.115 or 6.04.100(a). SECTION 8: Section 6.04.130 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to be entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.130 Misdemeanor violations. (a)A person violating any provision of this Chapter shall be guilty of an infraction except as otherwise specifically provided. (b)A person violating any provision of subsection(a)of section 6.04.100 or subsection(a)of section 6.04.105 of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. SECTION 9: Existing Section 6.04.140 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby repealed and a new Section 6.04.140 is hereby added to be numbered and entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.140 Possession of Animals after Revocation of Dangerous Animal Permit or Vicious Declaration. No person who has been determined to be in possession or ownership of a vicious animal or a dangerous animal for which a permit has been revoked under this Chapter shall be granted any dangerous animal permit for a period of three years following such determination or revocation. SECTION 10: Section 6.04.150 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo 17 County Ordinance Code is hereby repealed and a new Section 6.04.150 is hereby added to be numbered and entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.150 Inspection fee. A fee shall be charged for the costs incurred by County for the inspection or reinspection of property. The fee charged shall be paid by the Owner or person who has custody of the animal. Such fee shall be set forth in section 6.04.290. SECTION 11: Section 6.04.160 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6.04.160 Revocation or modification of permit. (a) Subject to the provision of subsection (b), any permit issued pursuant to this section may be revoked or modified by the inclusion of additional requirements or otherwise, if the Animal Control Officer has reasonable cause to believe any of the following to be true: (1) The dangerous animal Owner or any person the Owner has allowed to have possession of the animal has violated any local animal ordinances, or is in violation of any zoning, health and safety or building ordinance or Penal Code section relating to the keeping, care or use of any animals; (2) The Owner or any person the Owner has allowed to have possession of the animal has violated any rules, regulations or conditions of this Chapter including but not limited to dangerous animal permit conditions, or any requirement imposed by the i8 Animal Control Officer, Peace Officer or Hearing Officer as necessary to insure the animal will not endanger the peace, health or safety of any person or property; or (3) The Owner has changed the location of his residence or his place of business or sells, assigns, transfers, donates, leases, or otherwise disposes of the animal for which the permit was issued. (b) In the event that it is reasonably necessary to protect against a threat to the health or safety of the public, or of any animal, the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer may impound or cause to be impounded the animal while an investigation is taking place. (c) If, after investigation, the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer concludes that it is probable that one or more of the above grounds for revocation or modification of the permit has occurred, the Officer shall cause written notice thereof to be transmitted to the Owner. Said notice shall specify the grounds of revocation or modification of the permit. Should the Owner of the animal wish to contest the revocation or modification of the permit, (s)he may request a hearing to be held before a hearing officer not previously involved with the permit issuance or investigation, as designated by the Director of the Environmental Services Agency within five (5) calendar days of receiving the notice of intent to modify or revoke permit. Said hearing date shall be not less than five (5) working days or more than 15 working days subsequent to the date the request for hearing is received. The hearing shall be conducted as set forth in section 6.04.115 of this Chapter. After the hearing, the Officer conducting the hearing may modify the terms of the permit or revoke the permit depending upon the Owner's ability to comply with the requirements of this Chapter and to control the 19 animal so that the health, safety and property of the public are protected. (d) Upon written or oral notification by the Animal Control Officer, or Hearing Officer if a hearing was held, of any modifications to a dangerous animal permit, the Owner shall immediately comply with such modified permit requirements. (e) Upon written or oral notification by the Animal Control Officer, or Hearing Officer if a hearing was held, of the revocation of a permit for a dangerous animal, the Owner of such animal shall within two (2) calendar days of such notification surrender said animal to an Animal Control Officer to be humanely destroyed or provide written proof to an Animal Control Officer in the form of declaration(s) under penalty of perjury that such animal has been permanently removed from the County of San Mateo and declaring the new location or new address where the animal is to be kept. SECTION 12: Section 6.04.170 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6.04.170 Animals to be impounded. (a) Every animal kept or found by an Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer under conditions which constitute a violation of this Chapter or other state or local law may be impounded or caused to be impounded by an Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer. The animal's Owner shall be charged with all costs incurred or fees applicable with respect to such impoundment. (b) When the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer has reasonable cause to believe that any animal is dangerous or vicious the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer may also impound or cause to be impounded the animal and keep 20 it for such period not to exceed fifteen (15) days in order to observe, examine and determine whether or not such animal is dangerous or vicious. (c) Any animal subject to dangerous or vicious animal proceedings may be impounded at the discretion of the Animal Control Officer or Peace Officer pending notice, hearings and determinations hereunder and until any required permit is obtained. (d) Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter or state law, an impounded animal may be redeemed by the Owner, after payment of the required fees and charges and compliance with licensing requirements. In the event such animal is not so redeemed within the time set forth by state law, it may be disposed of in the manner determined by an Animal Control Officer. SECTION 13: Section 6.04.180 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to be entitled and to read as follows: 6.04.180 Notice of impounded animals. Within twenty-four (24) hours of the impoundment of any animal, the Animal Control Officer shall mail a written notice thereof to the place of business or residence of the Owner of the animal if known. In the event the animal may not be redeemed as provided by subsection (d) of section 6.04. 170, the Owner may request a hearing under section 6.04.115, subsections (a) — (g) of this Chapter or applicable state law. The Animal Control Officer shall maintain records of said impoundment pursuant to section 6.04.200. SECTION 14: Section 6.04.190 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby repealed. 21 SECTION 15: Section 6.04.200 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6.04.200 Record of impounded animals. The Animal Control Program shall keep a record of all animals impounded, which record shall include a description of the animal, the date of its receipt, the date and manner of disposal, the name of the person redeeming or purchasing, and the fees and charges and proceeds of sales received on account thereof, and such additional matters as may be necessary and incidental to implementing this ordinance. Said records shall be kept for four years. SECTION 16. Section 6.04.220 of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6.04.220 Redemption. Except as otherwise provided by this ordinance or by any other law, the Owner or person entitled to the control or custody of any animal impounded may, at any time before the sale or other disposition thereof, redeem the same by paying all proper fees assessed by Animal Control Services. Animal Control Services shall issue to the Owner duplicate receipts for the amount of the fee paid. SECTION 17: Unless specifically amended herein, the remaining sections of Chapter 6.04 of Title 6 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 18: This Ordinance shall be effective thirty days (30) from the date of adoption by the last of the twenty cities which are parties to the Agreement for 22 Animal Control Services, dated June 17, 2003, as amended. L:\CLIENT\A DEPTS\ANIMAL\2005\City ORD Amending Chapter 6.04 of Title 62 FINAL.doc Revised AugUSt 10,2005 23 Agenda Item # 7a Meeting Date: October 17, 2005 BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT aw SUBMITTED BY /4)!! APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARKING STUDY RELATED ACTIONS INCLUDING AN ORDINANCE TO CHANGE PARKING TIME LIMITS ON HOWARD AVENUE AND A RESOLUTION TO CHANGE PARKING TIME-LIMITS AND RATES IN LOTS B1, F, G, N, AND V RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that Council: 1. Approve the attached Burlingame Downtown Parking Study short-term and long-term actions regarding public education and enforcement/meters issues. 2. Take the following Burlingame Downtown Parking Study specific short-term actions regarding parking issues. a) Introduce the attached ordinance authorizing a change in the parking time limit on Howard Avenue, between Primrose Road and Highland Avenue to 4-hour metered parking, from the current 2-hour metered parking at $0.75 per hour by: o Requesting City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. o Waiving further reading of the ordinance. o Introducing the proposed ordinance. o Directing the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. b) Adopt the attached resolution to change the parking time limit and parking rates in the following City parking lots: o Increase the time limit on Lot B1 to 10-hour pay-by-space parking at $2.00 per 10-hours, from the current 2-hour metered parking at $0.75 per hour. o Increase the time limit on Lot V to 4-hour metered parking at $0.75 per hour, from the current 2-hour metered parking at $0.75 per hour. o Reduce the rate for Lots G and N to $1.00 per 10-hours, from $2.00 per 10- hours. o Increase the rate for Lot F to $1.00 per 10-hours, from free. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Downtown Parking Study-Recommended Actions.doc BACKGROUND: A final draft of the Burlingame Downtown Parking Study was completed on June 9, 2005. The recommendations were based on study results and input from public meetings held on April 28, 2005 and May 26, 2005 by the Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission (TSPC). On June 20, 2005, City Council held a Study Session to review the general recommendations compiled from the parking studies, TSPC meetings, and public feedback sessions. General changes to the parking time limits, method and type of enforcement, and public education were identified as potential actions. These changes could improve the parking situation and address the deficiencies which prevent the optimum use of parking for the Burlingame Avenue Downtown District. Council agreed with the general recommendations presented at the Study Session and directed staff to follow up with specific actions. Public Works staff coordinated with the Police Department, Burlingame Downtown Business District (DBID), and the Burlingame Chamber of Commerce to finalize actions which were accepted by the TSPC at their August 11, 2005 regular meeting. Staff evaluated possible actions to improve parking in the business district. Short-term actions were established as items that could be done fairly quickly at a relatively reasonable cost. Long-term actions require more investigation and have a potentially greater cost or resource impact. As a result, staff believes that it is prudent to evaluate the effect of short term actions prior to proceeding with long term options. DISCUSSION: Due to the interest from the public on this matter, the Traffic Engineer will make a presentation at the Council meeting. Recommendation 1: • Short-term Public Education Actions - Information banners indicating public parking lot locations will be installed in a coordinated program between the City, Chamber of Commerce, and DBID. The banners will be posted both within and at the entrances to city parking lots. The City's current parking logo will be incorporated into the new banner design in an effort to provide drivers with additional on-street information and icon recognition of public parking facilities. A similar program will be implemented using signs incorporating the City's adopted parking logo. These signs will also be conspicuously placed at the entrances to parking lots. New, updated parking brochures with fold-out cardboard holders will be provided to the Chamber and DBID for their use and distribution to downtown merchants. Parking lot and time-limit information will be placed on citation envelopes. This will help parkers to avoid future tickets by providing alternate parking locations which may better serve their needs. • Short-term Enforcement and Meter Actions - The Police Department is working with the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center who is facilitating separate meetings with some merchants and with the Parking Enforcement Officers in order to make parking enforcement more friendly and responsive to the needs of shoppers and the community. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Downtown Parking Study-Recommended Actions.doc Enforcement of parking will be strengthened to reduce residential and Caltrain parking abuses on such lots as F, G, N, and H. • Long-term Public Education Actions - Staff will investigate the use of large signs which show parking lot locations and time-limits within the downtown district. These signs would be installed along the sidewalk areas of the district and would be modified versions of the parking brochure. • Long-term Enforcementand Meter Actions - A comprehensive investigation of flexible meter payment methods will be made, including payment for parking by credit/debit cards, paper bills, or special parking cards. The investigation will also include the possible use of "smart meters" and "pay-by-space" meters, which have the capability for parkers to input specific times with appropriate fees. Staff will evaluate the performance of similar devices in other jurisdictions and determine their cost-effectiveness. • Long-term Parking' Actions — Staff has met with the Chamber and DBID to discuss their involvement with several long term parking actions. The DBID appears open to the possibility of administering a valet parking program at Lot O and an employee permit parking program at lots F, G, H or O. Staff will need to perform more research with cities that currently have these services. Shuttle service between City lots is also being examined but is subject to further study by the Chamber and DBID. Staff investigated augmenting the existing trolley routes to service the lots. However, staff believes that the increased headways would negatively impact hotel patronage use. An independent shuttle service for lots could cost as much as $150,000 to operate. Staff will examine possible future rates, time-limits, and parking facilities in conjunction with the SAP. Recommendation 2: • This recommendation deals directly with the short-term parking actions as identified by the TSPC; and, as outlined in Exhibit B. The actions include changes in rates and/or time limits to lots B1, F, G, N, V, and Howard Avenue. The purpose is to create a more uniform usage of parking spaces throughout the district by changing parking behavior where long-term parkers are shifted from the Burlingame Avenue core area to the more remote lots and along Howard Avenue. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Downtown Parking Study-Recommended Actions.doc BUDGET IMPACT: Funding for short term actions is available in the Parking Enterprise CIP project. Long term actions may involve substantial expenditures and/or additional staff resources. Therefore, staff would return to Council for direction after determining the financial impact. EXHIBITS: Short term actions Long term actions Ordinance Resolution Parking lot time limits and rates Area map/ Au tine Chou Traffic Engineer c: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Downtown Parking Study-Recommended Actions.doc BURLINGAME AVENUE BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING STUDY SHORT TERM ACTIONS Public Education • Install parking information banners on street light poles in and near public parking lots. • Install 'Public Parking" hard-signs at each parking lot entrance which will be visible when looking down a side street from Burlingame Avenue. • Include parking lot locations and time-limit information on all citation envelopes. • Distribute new parking brochures, with fold-out cardboard holders. • Ensure that projects funded through meter revenues are made known to the public through such means as signage at the project site or literature. Parkin • Change the 10 hour parking lot rates at lots F, G, and N to $1/day. (Currently lot F is free, and lots G and N are $2/day ). Due to the under-utilization of lots G and N, and the overuse of lot F, the change to $1 for all these lots would more evenly distribute parking usage south of Burlingame Avenue. • Increase the parking time limit for under-utilized lot B-1 to 10-hours @ $2/day, from the current 2-hour limit. • Increase the parking time-limit for under-utilized lot V to 4-hours @ $0.75/hr, from the current 2-hour limit. • Increase the on-street parking time-limit for under-utilized Howard Avenue to 4- hours, from the current 2-hour limit. Enforcement/Meters • Provide more friendly Police Department interaction with the public and be responsive to the needs of shoppers and the community. • Increase Police patrols and chalking of outer lots (F, G, N, and H) to mitigate any overnight and 12-hour parking limit abuses by residents and Caltrain users. BURLINGAME AVENUE BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING STUDY LONG TERM ACTIONS Actions pursued by the City of Burlingame staff • Install large signs along the sidewalks showing a version of the parking brochure. • Investigate flexible meter payment methods such as credit/debit cards or paper bills. • Investigate smart meters and pay-by-space meters that have the capability for the public to input a desired time and calculate a fee. • Determine the amount, timing, and location of any new parking in conjunction with the Specific Area Plan. • Determine the need for any further parking rate and time changes in conjunction with the Specific Area Plan. Actions pursued by the DBID with support from the City of Burlingame staff • Investigate the feasibility of an employee parking permit system for such lots as F, G, H or O. . • Investigate the feasibility of a business valet service using Lot O. • Investigate the feasibility of a shuttle service between lots. I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME FIXING PARKING METER TIMES AND RATES ON 3 HOWARD AVENUE BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND HIGHLAND AVENUE 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 Section 1. The City Council has established parking zones with parking meters in certain 7 areas of the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway Business Districts in order to encourage turnover 8 of parking spaces while ensuring convenient access to visitors and customers of the Districts. This 9 ordinance is intended to revise the metering program to encourage employees to park in City 10 parking lots, to place a higher value on more convenient parking, and to better meet the parking 11 needs within the District. It is also intended to clarify and affirm parking meter and time zones. 12 13 Section 2. Subsection 13.36.040(a)(15) is amended to read as follows: 14 (15) Howard Avenue, south side, from Crescent Avenue to El Camino Real and from 15 Prinnose-R-oazf�Na o the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; .. v 16 , 17 18 Section 3. Section 13.36.042 is amended to read as follows: 19 13.36.042 Four-hour parking. 20 It is unlawful for the driver of any vehicle to stop, stand or park such vehicle for a period 21 of more than four hours between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. of any day, Sundays and 22 holidays excepted, upon any part of the following streets or portions of streets: 23 (i) O Adrian Court, both sides; 24 O Adrian Road, on the west side of the 1600 and 1700 blocks; 25 (3-) ( California Drive, west side, between Trousdale Drive and Murchison Drive; and 26 (4) (d) Gilbreth Road, both sides, between Cowan Road and Mahler Road; and 27Howard fAvenue,, rom Fri,naxos Roapiliand Avenue. 28 8/4/2003 1 I Section 4. The following parking meter rate is hereby established in the City: 2 4-hour Parkin Limit imit 3 On the following street: Howard Avenue from El Camino Real to Highland Avenue 4 75 cents for each hour 5 6 Section 5. All other parking meter rates established in Ordinance No. 1719 shall remain 7 the same. 8 9 Section 5. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 10 11 Mayor 12 13 I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the 14 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of ,2005, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on 15 the day of , 2005, by the following vote: 16 17 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 18 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 19 20 City Clerk 21 22 C:\FILES\ORDINANC\parkingmeters-2005.pwd.wpd 23 24 25 26 27 28 8/4/2003 2 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME REVISING THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING CITY PARKING LOT TIME LIMITS AND CHARGES FOR PARKING LOTS B1,F, G, N,AND V RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME, California,that: WHEREAS, Municipal Code title 13 provides the framework for regulating the City's parking lots; and WHEREAS,this Council has from time to time established regulations for time limitations and charges for various City parking lots; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted extensive parking studies of the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway areas to determine what might be the best balance of parking availability in public off-street parking lots that will provide the greatest benefit to motorists,pedestrians,merchants,and property owners; and WHEREAS, it is important to provide an incentive to persons to use Lot B-1 and the proposed time limits and parking rate should increase usage; and WHEREAS, Lot V provides ready access to Burlingame Avenue and usage should be increased by allowing longer parking; and WHEREAS, the arrangement of Lots F, G, and N as employee parking at a minimal daily rate will assist in shifting employee parking out of the retail core; and WHEREAS,the other time limits and parking rate charges established in Resolution No.71- 2004 shall remain unchanged, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED and DETERMINED as follows: 9/28/2005 1 1. No person shall park any vehicle on any City parking lot for longer than the designated period and,in those lots having parking meters or coin boxes,after the meter has expired or without placing required amounts in the coin box. 2. The time limitations,meter or coin box rates,and hours of enforcement set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto are hereby adopted and shall supersede any and all such limitations and hours adopted by prior resolutions of this Council. 3. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized and directed to procure and install parking meters or coin boxes and appropriate signs giving notice of the provisions of this resolution. 4. The Director of Public Works is specifically authorized to adjust the balance of differently timed spaces within the lots as set authorized and set forth in Exhibit A as the Director determines will best achieve the goals of providing parking to customers,employees,and residents. 5. Limitations and charges set forth in this resolution shall be operative upon the installation of such signs, meters and coin boxes;existing limitations and charges shall continue in effect until changed. 6. Resolution No. 71-2004 is repealed. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 9/28/2005 2 EXHIBIT A CITY OF BURLINGAME PUBLIC PARKING LOTS TIME LIMITS AND RATES PARKING LOCATION TIME LIMITS METER OR COIN BOX RATE LOT A Donnelly Avenue to Bellevue 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours Avenue adjacent to Main Library 9 hours $2.25 for 9 hours B Chapin Avenue,West 10 hours Flat rate of$2.00 for up to 10 hours B-1 Chapin Avenue,East 10 hours $2.00 for 10 hours C Donnelly Avenue,South 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours 10 hours $2.50 for 10 hours D Donnelly Avenue at Lorton Avenue 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours 4 hours $3.00 for 4 hours E Lorton Avenue to Park Road, 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours South of Burlingame Avenue 4 hours $3.00 for 4 hours F Lorton Avenue to Park Road,South of 12 hours' Flat rate of$1.00 for up to 10 hours Howard Avenue G Park Road to Primrose Road,South of 10 hours Flat rate of$1.00 for up to 10 hours Howard Avenue West Side of EI Camino Real at H Ralston Avenue 12 hours Free up to 12-hour limit Primrose Road to Park Road, 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours South of Burlingame Avenue 4 hours $3.00 for 4 hours K EI Camino Real,between Howard 10 hours $2.00 for 10 hours Avenue and Burlingame Avenue K-1 Burlingame Avenue at EI Camino Real 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours L Off Fox Plaza Lane 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours M California Drive,South of Burlingame 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours Avenue N Lorton Avenue to Highland Avenue, 10 hours Flat rate of$1.00 for up to 10 hours South of Howard Avenue O North Lane to Oak Grove 2 hours $1.50 for 2 hours 10 hours Flat rate of$2.00 for up to 10 hours P Paloma Avenue,North of Broadway 2 hours $1.00 for 2 hours 10 hours $2.00 for 10 hours O Capuchino Avenue to Paloma Avenue, 2 hours $1.00 for 2 hours North of Broadway 10 hours $2.00 for 10 hours 'To allow but control overnight parking. 9/28/2005 Exhibit A-I PARKING LOCATION TIME LIMITS METER OR COIN BOX RATE LOT R Capuchino Avenue, South of 2 hours $1 .00 for 2 hours Broadway S Rhinette Avenue at California Drive 2 hours $0.20 for 2 hours 9 hours $1 .00 for 9 hours T California Drive, North of Broadway 10 hours $1 .00 for 10 hours U California Drive, South of Broadway 10 hours $1 .00 for 10 hours V California Drive, adjacent to 4 hours $0.75 per hour Burlingame Avenue Train Station W Howard Avenue, between Park and 10 hours $2.00 for 10 hours Primrose Roads X Tennis Court lot, Burlingame Avenue 4 hours Free up to 4-hour limit Y Chula Vista Avenue to Laguna 2 hours $1 .00 for 2 hours Avenue South of Broadway 10 hours $2.00 for 10 hours NOTES: (1) For complete description of Lots A through N, see Map entitled PARKING LOTS BURLINGAME AVENUE OFF-STREET PARKING DISTRICT, as revised, which map is numbered C-1988, is dated February 1965, and is on file in the office of the City Engineer of the City of Burlingame. (2) All parking limitations established by this resolution shall be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Sundays and holidays excepted. Specific parking lots may be subject to other City ordinance, resolution, or regulation provisions. 9/28/2005 Exhibit A - 2 BUU�RLINGAME PARKING IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW O nvE � V Fy • • a � • • A • ..• 89% 92% • •• • • CHAMN AVE NORTH 1Di LOf • NOT TO SCALE • " AJ ' • 54% ' • 2 7%u • • tbF lei • 93°� • 52°� � 95% � . •'� 100% 90% .• ORTH L1 O • • 32% ' BURuNGAME AVE • • Lot Time Limit A 2&9Hr. • • A+3 2&9 Hr. TH• ar o B-1 2 Hr. 2 96% C 2&10 Hr. •� 59% 91% D 2&4Hr. 100% ••• 35% 93% A �• E 2&4Hr. F" Free Parking G* to • . � H" Free Parkln ON A� • • J 2&4Hr. •..••••••••...• HOWARD AVE 6000000 ••••••• K* 10 Hr.— K-1 2 Hr. 82% Peak Hour Occupancy o L 2 Hr. M 2 Hr. •••• Commercial Core a g \ N* 10 Hr.** _ I;r O" 10 Hr."* Number of Peak Porkers Increased o' V 2 Hr. No Significant Change in Parking 4% W* 10 Hr." — Number of Peak Porkers Decreased 98% *Long-Term Parking 39% ""`Pay-and Display Machines %aeaa PIANNab BAYSWATER AVE aaaa/e ao`' �—. � r � r—� r= Figure 1 Wilbur Smith Associates SHIFT IN WEEKDAY PEAK PARKING OCCUPANCY,2002-2004 511730\FIGURE 1.1/11/05 •t i 1 !pa Y > b 1 t n � � s �• . --zoai fid . 'I '`��.. �. y :v 11 O � 3'i C°•��: \..t' _..� taw. 6•�I � Y+ �� x ,,�.�` IS ite , 1., M kkk 00,i n-.y.._.+.e.�.�-�.w_�\Via\ NI+•. t � �r �� 1 s �.. a i � 3 � c i �� i •� �: 6 CITY AGENDA 7b om ITEM # —.—----- — BURLINGAME I MTG. STAFF REPORT DATE Octnher 17, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE BY DATE: October 11 , 2005 APPROVED FROM : Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to Parks and Recreation Commission RECOMMENDATION : Consider appointment recommendations of interview committee and make appointments or take other action . BACKGROUND : Two commission positions are due for appointment because of term expirations. The positions were publicized and notification letters were sent to all past commission applicants on the City's 2-year waiting list. Six applications were received as of the deadline of September 30, 2005. Those applicants were interviewed by the Council subcommittee of Cathy Baylock and Terry Nagel on October 4, 2005. The interview committee will make their recommendation at the Council meeting on October 17 , 2005. The appointee terms will be for three years each , ending in October 2008. Agenda Item # 7c Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: October 17, 2005 . o SUBMITTED BY A�91w� APPROVED BY � �(� " TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 11, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE MAKING AN EDITORIAL CORRECTION TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 23.01.050 REGARDING POOL BARRIERS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council introduce a change to the Burlingame Municipal Code, Section 23.01.050 regarding pool barriers as follows: A. Request the City Clerk to read the title of the proposed ordinance. B. Waive further reading of the ordinance. C. Introduce the proposed ordinance. D. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance at lease five days before proposed adoption. BACKGROUND: Municipal Code Section 23.01.050 regarding pool barriers conflicts with the 2001 California Building Code. The Municipal Code requires builders to limit openings in pool barriers to sixteen square inches which means that horizontal members have to be installed at 4" on center. This creates a ladder that children could use to climb over the protective fencing at swimming pools and in effect creates an attractive nuisance. As a result, staff recommends the attached ordinance which incorporates the Building Code language allowing pool barriers to be comprised of vertical members spaced "such that the passage of a 4" diameter sphere is not allowed." BUDGET IMPACT: None EXHIBITS: Proposed ordinance v Joe tyr Chief Building Official c: City Clerk, Public Works Superintendent SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Municipal Code 23.01.050.doc I ORDINANCE No. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION TO CORRECT POSSIBLE SAFETY 3 ISSUE ON SWIMMING POOL BARRIERS 4 5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 6 7 Section 1. The City has adopted strict standards for barriers around swimming pools 8 to enhance public safety. One of the requirements regarding maximum opening size,however,may 9 lead to creation of a possible safety issue. Therefore,this ordinance places the barrier requirement 10 spacing under the California Building Code and eliminates the maximum square size of opening. 11 12 Section 2. Subsection 23.01.050 is amended to read as follows: 13 (a)A fence entirely enclosing the pool,hot tub or spa or yard containing it shall be erected 14 and maintained. Such fence shall not be less than four feet six inches, nor more than six feet in 15 height. All gates must be self-closing and 16 self-latching, and the latch or lock shall be located at least four feet six inches above the surface 17 of the underlying ground or floor. A space at least four feet in width shall be provided between the 18 line of the fence and the edge of the unit.Fencing is to be constructed and approved before filling 19 the unit. 20 21 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 22 23 Mayor 24 25 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 26 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_ day 27 of , 2005, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 28 _day of , 2005, by the following vote: 1 I AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 2 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 3 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 City Clerk 5 C:\FILES\ORDINANC\pool correction.bld.wpd 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Agenda Item # 8a Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: October 17, 2005 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY l?a TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FOR MILLS TANK SEISMIC RETROFIT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 80950 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding a contract with Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction for the construction of the Mills Tank Seismic Retrofit project in the amount of $981,000. BACKGROUND: A seismic analysis of all storage tanks in the City's water system was completed by G&E Engineering in January 2003, and it was determined that Mills Tank required seismic retrofitting. On June 24, 2004, Council approved a resolution awarding the design of the Mills Tank Seismic Retrofit project to Kennedy Jenks Consultants. The project includes demolishing the existing concrete dome, extending the existing footing, wrapping the existing tank walls with pre-stressing wire, covering the walls with shotcrete, and constructing a new aluminum dome. Mills Tank will need to be drained and remain out of service until the work is completed in April 2006. During this time, the City of Millbrae will supply water to the hillside area served by the tank under a purchase agreement. DISCUSSION: The project was advertised on September 1, 2005, and bids were opened on October 6, 2005. A total of five bids were received ranging from $1,184,000 to $981,000. Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction is the lowest responsive bidder with a bid of $981,000, which is $64,000 lower than the engineer's estimate of $1 ,045,000. Staff checked references for Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction and believes that they are qualified for performing work of this size and nature. Construction is estimated to begin in December 2005. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80950 Staff Report-Construction Contract.doc BUDGET IMPACT: Construction contract $981,000 Construction management 132,400 Staff administration and oversight 50,000 Contingency(10%) 98,100 Total $1,261,500 A total of $1,348,000 is available in the 2005/2006 Water System CIP for this project. A related Construction Management contract is discussed in a companion staff report. EXHIBISS: Resolution, Bid Summary r Philip Ndonagha Senior Engineer c: City Clerk,City Attorney, Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80950 Staff Report-Construction Contract.doc RESOLUTION NO. - AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FOR MILLS TANK SEISMIC RETROFIT CITY PROJECT NO. 80950 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITY PROJECT 80950-CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FOR MILLS TANK SEISMIC RETROFIT PROJECT NO. 80950 WHEREAS, on OCTOBER 6, 2005, all proposals were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of$981,000. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION for said project in the amount of$981,000, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor I, DORIS J. MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk s:\apublicworksdir\projects\resolutionaward CITY OF BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA Mills Tank Seismic Retrofit CITY PROJECT NO.80950 Bid Opening Date:October 6,2005 1 jAnderson Pacific Power Eng.Const. D.W.Nicholson corp Valentine Corp Pacific Infrastructure ENGINEER'S ES Santa Clara Alameda,CA Hayward San Rafael,CA Pleasanton,CA BID DESCRIPTION OF ITEM BID Unit Unit Unftl Unit Unit I Unit I Unit ITEM Q Price Price I Price Price Price Price 1 Remove Ex.Dome&Appurt. 1 LS $0 $150,000 $160,000 $205,000 $140,000 $200,000 2 Construct new dome 1 LS $0 $176,000 $260,000 $233,000 $250,000 $200,000 3 Construct Siesmic Improvements 1 LS $0 $425,000 $570,000 $531,000 $550,000 $564,000 4 Relocate/Construct SCADA 1 LS $0 $30,000 $35,000 $26,000 $55,000 $20,000 5 Construct yard piping 1 LS $0 $100,000 $120,000 $138,000 $115,000 $150,000 6 Mobilization 1 LS $0 $100,000 $25,000 $46,000 $69,369 $50,000 BID TOTAL $1,048,000 $881,000 $1,170,000 $1,179,000 $1,179,369 $1,184,000 Agenda Item # 8b Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: October 17, 2005 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY J" re,4t� TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KENNEDY JENKS CONSULTANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE MILLS TANK SEISMIC RETROFIT PROJECT; CITY PROJECT NO. 80950 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with Kennedy Jenks Consultants for construction management of the Mills Tank Seismic Retrofit Project in the amount of $132,400. BACKGROUND: A seismic analysis of the storage tanks in the City's water system was completed by G&E Engineering in January 2003, and it was determined that the Mills Tank required seismic retrofitting. On June 24, 2004, Council approved a resolution awarding the design of the Mills Tank Seismic Retrofit project to Kennedy Jenks Consultants. The project includes demolishing the existing concrete dome, extending the existing footing, wrapping the existing tank walls with pre-stressing wire, covering the walls with shotcrete, and constructing a new aluminum dome. DISCUSSION: Kennedy Jenks is familiar with the proposed work and is qualified to serve as the construction manager. Additionally, Kennedy Jenks as the design engineer will be responsible for reviewing submittals and responding to requests for information. The City has negotiated the scope of work for a fee of $132,400. This represents approximately 13% of the $981,000 total construction cost which is within the normal industry range of 10% to 15%, and is reasonable given the scope and complexity of the project. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80950-Construction manager Mills.doc The tasks to be performed by the consultant include: • providing construction support services,such as reviewing contractor submittals • construction inspection • providing construction quality assurance • preparing record drawings BUDGET IMPACT: Construction contract $981,000 Construction management 132,400 Staff administration and oversight 50,000 Contingency 98,100 Total $1,261,500 A total of $1,348,000 is available in the 2005/2006 Water System CIP for this project. A related construction contract is discussed in a companion staff report. EXHIBITS: Resolution YJ�/ Z/ Philip M naghan Senior Civil Engine4r c: City Clerk,City Attorney, Kennedy Jenks Consultants S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80950-Construction manager Mills.doc RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR KENNEDY JENKS CONSULTANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE MILLS TANK SEISMIC RETROFIT CITY PROJECT NO. 80950 RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\PROJECTS\RESAGRMT.GEN Agenda Item # 8c Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: October 17 2005 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY /� � TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR BURLINGHOME EASTON WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT, PHASE III; CITY PROJECT NO. 80770 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding a contract with JMB Construction for the construction of water mains and service lines in the amount of $936,684.00. BACKGROUND: This CIP project is the third phase of a three-phase project involving the replacement of undersized, inaccessible water mains at the end of their service life located within the Burlinghome and Easton Subdivision No. 5 and 7. Water mains and meters will be relocated from rear easements to the fronts of the homes to improve access and maintainability. DISCUSSION: The Phase III Project was advertised on August 29, 2005 and bids were opened on September 29, 2005. A total of five bids were received ranging from $936,684.00 to $1,731,790.60. JMB Construction is the lowest responsive bidder with a bid price of $936,684.00, which is $46,752.00 lower than the engineer's estimate of $983,436.00. JMB Construction was the contractor that successfully constructed the Phase II Project and staff believes that they remain qualified to perform work on the Phase III Project. Construction will begin in November 2005. BUDGET IMPACT: The following are the estimated construction costs: Construction contract $936,684 Construction management 115,470 Staff administration and oversight 50,000 Contingency (15%) 165,323 Total $1,267,477 S:\P,Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80770 PH.III Staff Report-Construction Contract.doc A total of $1,590,000 is available in the 2005/2006 Water System CIP for this project. A related Construction Management contract is included in a companion staff report. EXHIBITS:Resolution Philip naghan Senior Civil Engin er c: City Clerk,City Attorney,JMB Construction, Inc. SAA Public Works Directory\Stat(Reporls\80770 PH.III Staff Report-Construction Contract.doc RESOLUTION NO. - AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR BURLINGHOME EASTON WATER MAIN REPOLACEMENT, PHASE III CITY PROJECT NO. 80770 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for bids for the - CITY PROJECT 80770 - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO JMB CONSTRUCTION FOR BURLINGHOME EASTON WATER MAIN REPOLACEMENT, PHASE III. WHEREAS, on SEPTEMBER 29, 2005, all proposals were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, JMB CONSTRUCTION submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of$936,684.00. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of JMB CONSTRUCTION for said project in the amount of$936,684.00, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor 19 DORIS J. MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk Agenda Item # 8d Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: October 17, 2005 rj 1 ��. JJ SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL , DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH YEV PHILIPOVITCH, P.E. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE BURLINGHOME EASTON WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT, PHASE III; CITY PROJECT NO. 80770 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing a Professional Services Agreement with Yev Philipovitch, P.E. for construction management in the amount of $115,470. BACKGROUND: This CIP project is the third phase of a three-phase project involving the replacement of undersized, inaccessible water mains at the end of their service life located within the Burlinghome and Easton Subdivision No. 5 and 7. Water mains and meters will be relocated from the rear easements to the front of the homes to improve access and maintainability. DISCUSSION: Similar to the first two phases of work, this project involves installing water services on the private property of approximately 170 homes. Having performed the construction management on the previous two phases, Yev Philipovich, P.E. (formerly of The Culver Group) is extremely familiar with the work and community relations issues. Therefore, staff believes that Mr. Philipovich is the firm with the best qualifications to perform the management tasks. The City has negotiated the scope of work for a fee of $115,470. This represents approximately 12% of the $936,684 total construction cost which is within the normal industry range of 10% to 15% and is reasonable given the scope and complexity of the project. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80770-Construction Management Contract.vCity Review.doc The tasks to be performed by the consultant include: • providing construction support services, such as reviewing contractor submittals • construction inspection • coordinating construction issues with the residents • providing construction quality assurance • preparing record drawings BUDGET IMPACT: Construction contract $936,684 Construction management 115,470 Staff administration and oversight 50,000 Contingency 165,323 Total $1,267,477 A total of $1,590,000 is available in the 2005/2006 Water System CIP for the Agreement. A related construction contract is included in a companion staff report. EXHIBITS:Resolution /"4, �'�4— Philip Monagh Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk,City Attorney, Yev Philipovitch, P.E. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80770-Construction Management Contract.vCity Review.doc RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH YEV PHILIPOVITCH, P.E. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE BURLINGHOME EASTON WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - PHASE III CITY PROJECT NO. 80770 RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in the title above. 2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame. 3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SADA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\PROJECTS\RESAGRMT.GEN Agenda Item # 8e BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: October 17, 2005 .o r SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY �vQ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: October 3, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION PHASE TWO, CITY PROJECT NO. 81010 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting the Burlingame Park Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation project Phase II in the amount of $1 ,907,846.71. DISCUSSION: On July 19, 2004, D'arcy and Harty Construction was awarded the contract for replacing the sewer main in the remaining portion of Burlingame Park Subdivision in the amount of $1,290,000. On January 3, 2005, Council authorized Change Order I to replace sewer main in the City Hall area in the amount of $600,000. The project was completed successfully within budget. Change Orders 2 and 3 included additional sewer pipe replacement and minor extra work due to unforeseen field conditions. Staff is satisfied that this project is completed and recommends approval by Council. BUDGET IMPACT: Construction Including Change Orders $1,907,847 Construction Management 220,153 Engineering Administration 132,000 Total $2,260,000 There are sufficient funds in the existing sewer capital improvement budget. Remaining funds will be used for the design of the next phase of the sewer rehabilitation program. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment Donald Chang, PE % Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Finance, City Attorney SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81010acceptance.doc RESOLUTION NO. - ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - BURLINGAME PARK SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILTATION PHASE II BY D'ARCY AND HARTY CONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 81010 - PHASE II RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by D'ARCY AND HART CONSTRUCTION under the terms of its contract with the City dated JULY 19, 2005 has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 81010- PHASE II. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SAA Public Works DirectoryWuthor,By Name\Peggy Adam Letters\RESOLUTN.ACC.wpd £ j 88888,88 8,8.88888.8,88, 8,8,8.8888.8.8.8.8 888.888888 88,8,88. 8.8888,88,8, 8.88,888.8.8.8, 88888,8. 88 8.8 £ 89 �8 � 929saa«««« 992assassaa S&2223222 3«»«« ««»S«S»» ««»S&»««« »SRS«« »« i i £ K S <ft i £ i £ • f 88.$8$98 888888.8.888 888$8888888 898888.898 ssp8ss $$$88.8$8 8888.98988. 889888. p9 a R»�»»�� »V; ail ;Pi k RX»�x £:»»�s »x» w w a . o=o fF 88$8888 Ras ,S ,asas 988 ,8.8.8.$ ,$ , 8.8.8 ,888,8.8. 898 ,8 8888,9888 888„8.$88 , 88.8888 fib§MM BU rq rk x� rww wwwwwwww ww arc e i »www»ww »www»www»» w«w»«ww»»ww w »» w..~.. .... ........... .................. ............ .......... .............. o i .. ............ ...... .......... ...... .. .. F sxu."xs." spa" M �rrrrr M kr a" kxxxr rr r r " �3� 88 s ❑3 8.8m?B8a R$8 gg �1 � a8s6,8!; $5�3��-8. 8 8.8.889 .- . o8Re88 88 ° 89a a6� nas pa as�sre�s� _�!. ` �em.qsq. �Ngo.0o_ ...... � $ c 8.88.888 s?88,8 81 88:88888.8.8 88891 9 $$8$884:: $88.88888.8.8 8.888.889 fl 9! R«wwmw$ z£ zo£ w wrcw � S m^w off¢ EE ww w w w ww ww w w w w w w ww w w w w w w w w w.,w'.. --..--........ .......... ................ ...............� wwww www wwwwwwww ww wwwww w ai.,u! i w• oS �rz�£ =d Ste$ '59'8 t9:�� 999�wa�a65a tn,�66666 ww99� �5!b6 111 �� t6 66111 . Z51 £ °o: 'mws$i 0m 5 £ ❑„ io. ..... ............ ...... .......... .......................... ...... .... ..... .......... ................ .................. .......... .... ...... $ LL: 4 ono o £ w E Hi o °£ wmn z i f 88888,88, 88888.88888 8.8888888888 88888,8888 88888, 8888,8888 888.888888 88,8,8.88 m zY ji www ww i t t i a 2 z �2 0 r0 '� °w ° W ° z2 S 2 rz m m r r r £^ £ N 5' m55 i000.0 a:00.0 `s U 2 z u r >a< o? �sr ooi ia�� ° - my iiw im wzz - > o ^ mz3z A = zji 4 z az < I bum. S� zw»� W �a» 4 i siz iv<,i ii°u r�i.0o 3 S3�s.0=� � `o �.z i ui mz U.-Z oz m zga<5 zzercw =zag €�o sb- w� _ ��_� ? <o=�,= os� 'cam ��w <rm Hew ;�w g u>�u� F�U oi6mS55s z sm3e u z ?u Yr�a uu�m iww555 o= pw55�r0 i =�55r 5� : <o e £ o uuW�z m ¢ ' to.e^ r4 s zz�n; r4 w Sn�¢ wi .eapwi z z< Z Ww0❑ o u e�W< assF Jw,z�r .>;m xwwm?www 0.r':uo as3w ❑zSwuwm 'wF� aw "'4 c < < � s m z<r Www�iwir 8' a� ❑ r�ai 0e�wm� w sw� a�u5<iw�ww< mi s 35a�aF rwzozo i1 o,33 iwo �❑. who o � Ma£ =ymmz_ xar0 w �zu 3 0 k'xw izWF wwbiw.wn^z0r ° 0 �. i $� mzrca a o uF b :tob5<� ppy.1od 2 i mSn Ki '6� zW wi�a:a5 i g�F Sm=u oz SSSo o u 3 F:b <oWWk4w S =wwb �aarmr�aszw _ <3r w3 w3 baa .. uwCww �N_ ¢tea byaFnF '• �£ m❑ ¢ eCFOxw Swa x W�� ¢tr�uwa �K�woW�.. o'-'Q wtww« ac�iw t� yy!! (>zurc bbw wb a.am �Sbwwuwi vwi: '�w> ii Gbm « o Gebw«a:aao o pw o ❑ b•' . 1 d ��<z�� d3 °��w c�bwzwwzo3 z0wwc�'v bwzw z "<zw zwww��wzwz z 23,-wz 3<:¢ 00w --u�oo wuu5 u-000xi pwu�c .u�om W <W<g� Quuu--u�om QWuu uoo giWwJ-O�Q uzi33 < u _ w--'w mr< �SSSommS<xx SSS❑<S<ZSZar m:5<❑s S<x w <r mSSSm<S<i mga5imi5iig m0geS2 Fa,m ❑ m mmWm� o .. z z �Tz< �wwwz Sid zz maan2x a•'22a«F rzx�ayz 2aam 'w. 4x xar ¢ ^ £ z "' �oorc Dow wwwN www<www< wow^ aw' oze S 8. £"a••w w wwwi<k' k'6 wi aw win.<a�' �'s �" o�� : W o of uy �£ iefum❑un¢ m¢arc�rc .eS iS escxrcrcb7i<5❑ �arcS�x acrc?�� um❑uaa <.c.crc¢rcrc_�� < a22 <j rcrce 3< .. .. .� W. m. ..... .............. ........................m a................ u............ ..............a m_................. ........... o........ ? ... o u rc W H H." Agenda Item # jq f _ Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: Octobe 17 2005 C; SUBMITTED BY I OF APPROVED BY L 41, TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2005 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING STREET SCRUB SEAL AND MICRO- SURFACING PROGRAM 2004, CP 81130 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve the attached resolution accepting the Street Scrub Seal and Micro-surfacing Program for 2004 in the amount of $220,426.18 DISCUSSION: On September 7, 2004, Western States Surfacing, Inc. was awarded the contract for sealing and micro-surfacing various streets. Unfortunately, due to early rains, the micro-surfacing portion of work was postponed until Summer 2005. The contract was completed within the budget and one change order was issued in the amount of $12,000 for extra work associated with the delay and additional clean up. The staff also added one more street in the scope to take advantage of the low bid. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final Progress Payment BUDGET IMPACT: Construction $220,426 Construction testing & inspection 10,000 Engineering administration 22,000 Material cost 27,574 Total $280,000 There are sufficient funds available in the capital improvement budget. The remaining funds will be transferred to the next phase of the resurfacing program. I Donald T. Chang, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk, Finance, City Attorney SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81130acceptance.doc RESOLUTION NO. - ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM 2005 BY WESTERN STATES SURFACING, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 81350 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by WESTERN STATES SURFACING,INC.under the terms of its contract with the City dated SEPTEMBER 7,2004 has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 81350. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk S:W Public Works DirectoryWuthor,By Name\Peggy Adam Letters\RESOLUTN.ACC.wpd CONTRACTOR: WESTERN STATES SURFACING INC. CITY OF BURLINGAME DATE: 10/3/2005 ,? ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4770 FINAL PROGRESS PAYMENT FOR THE MONTH OF: July MODESTO, CA 95352 STREET CAPE SEAL PROGRAM 2004 PURCHASE ORDER # 13664 TELEPHONE: (209) 525-9065 FAX (209) 236-1864 CITY PROJECT NO. 8113 a*fi« f rf arx rxrxrf rff rfff:ff+*f rxrfff:ffa«rrxx*rxrx«rr:rxrxxrxrxf rffffxrxxxrx: x f x + +a++aa+++++ ++*+fff«xrf x + * « * a *a.fi....fi..a..xxxrf rxx«x * x f f f + + + a a fi + + fi a a a + ITEM: UNIT BID UNIT BID QUANTITY % AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT # ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE QUANTITY SIZE AMOUNT TO DATE PAID TO DATE PAID THIS PMT. x«x+ «•«xrxxx+x*«xf xf««f«f««x*xx««x««x««x*«x**«xxx««x««x«*«xx«x«rffxr«rx++«x« + « « * +x«x«f«r+++ +++«x«x«x«fi a * x « * « x«r««x«x««x r«rx«x««x«« x * + x r r + + * * + * * a + + + x A GENERAL ITEMS 1 Scrub Seal and Microsurfacing ; $ 2.78 66,000 S.Y. $ 183,480.00 : 72,123.36 109.288 : $ 200,502.95 $ 200,502.95 $ - 2 Type "A" a "AY" (Pavement Markers) $ 5.00 370 EACH $ 1,850.00 516.00 139.46% $ 2,580.00 $ 2,580.00 $ - 3 Type "D", "G" i Blue (Pavement Markers) $ 7.00 80 EACH $ 560.00 139.00 : 173.75% $ 973.00 $ 973.00 $ - 4 4" Solid Line -- Paint $ 2.50 100 EACH $ 250.00 0.00% $ - $ - $ - 5 : 6" Solid Line -- Paint $ 2.00 100 L.F. $ 200.00 0.008 : $ - $ - $ - 6 8" Solid Line -- Paint $ 3.00 100 L.F. $ 300.00 0.008 : $ - $ - $ - 7 12" Solid Line -- Paint $ 5.60 200 L.F. $ 1,120.00 380.00 190.00% $ 2,128.00 $ 2,128.00 $ - 8 Parking Tees -- Paint $ 30.00 2 EACH $ 60.00 0.00% $ - $ - $ - 9 Legends s Arrows -- Paint $ 6.00 400 S.F. $ 2,400.00 408.00 102.00% $ 2,448.00 $ 2,448.00 $ - 10 Handicap Legends -- Paint $ 103.00 1 EACH $ 103.00 0.00% $ - $ - $ - $ 190,323.00 CHANGE ORDERS: CO 1 :Extra work ######### $ 11,794.23 1.0 0.00% $ 11,794.23 $ 11,794.23 $ - CO 2 $ - 0.0 0.00% $ - $ - $ - CO 3 $ - 0.0 0.00% $ - $ - $ - CHANGE ORDERS $ 11,794.23 DEDUCTIONS AND DAMAGES DDI DD2 DEDUCTIONS AND DAMAGES $ DATE xrxrxxxx x«x«xx«x+ . SUBTOTAL ••••••••+•••" $ 202,117.23 "'""*'*" ******""" $ 220,426.18 $ 220,426.18 $ - PREPARED BY: 10/3/2005 LESS TEN (10%) PERCENT RETENTION '*""*' ****'"*'" $ - $ (22,042.62) $ 22,042.62 CHECKED BY: SUBTOTAL WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS '**'*'** ***'*'**' $ 220,426.18 $ 198,383.56 $ 22,042.62 APPROVED BY AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTRACTOR *'*'*"** *"*"*"*' $ - $ - $ - CITY ENGINEER: ff:faa+«++ ++*f xfxax+++ * * x « + r«f xffxf +xf xff«f _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ I APPROVED BY TOTAL THIS PERIOD * * " * " **'***** ******"* $ 220,426.18 $ 198,383.56 $ 22,042.62 CONSULTANT: ---------------------- =yes------ s e a APPROVED BY AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTRACTOR *'**'*"* **'**"' $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY ENGINEER: xffffffa+* ++raafffff+f *+*+raf of ra:rf++ ffa:af rfff x+xfffrrfr __________________ ________________ ______________ APPROVED BY TOTAL THIS PERIOD **'*'*'***'**"* *'*"**'* ***'**'* $ 220,426.18 $198,383.56 $ 22,042.62 CONSULTANT: -------- -------- -----a S:A PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORY1PROJECTS%08321Pro0ress PaymentAs,(SHEET-PROGRESS PAYMENT 4) 1013!1005,3:08 PM PAGE 1 OF 1 CITY AGENDA ITEM# Sg BURL,NGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. 6.90 DATE 10/17/2005 ue TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITT r BY DATE: October 11, 2005 APPROVED BY FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF ELIZABETH MOORE TO THE BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Accept nomination of Elizabeth Moore by the Burlingame Avenue (BID) and appoint Ms. Moore to the Advisory Board to serve an unexpired term to January 2007. DISCUSSION: Last month, the Council approved Ordinance No. 1761 providing that vacancies on the Burlingame Avenue Area BID Advisory Board would be filled by Council appointment on nomination by the Advisory Board. The Advisory Board has nominated Elizabeth Moore of Solo Bambini, 1150 Howard Avenue, to fill one of the vacancies on the Board. Ms. Moore's appointment would be for an unexpired term to January 2007. As the Council knows, the Board has been short-handed, and this appointment would help the Board extend its representation and capability. Attachment October 11, 2005, Letter from Advisory Board Distribution Laurelle Gutierrez-Lundquist Cheryl Enright CARR McCLELLAN INGERSOLL THOMPSON & HORN Professional Law Corporation LaurelleGutierrez-Lundquist Iglundquist@carr-mcclellan.com CELEBRATING 60 YEARS October 11,2005 Larry Anderson,Esq. City Attorney City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,California 94010 Re: Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District Dear Larry: As you know,I am a board member of the Advisory Board to the Burlingame Avenue Area Business Improvement District(the"BID"). As you know,Ordinance No. 1735 of the City of Burlingame was recently amended to provide a nomination procedure for replacing members of the board who resign mid-term. The members of the Advisory Board have unanimously voted to nominate Elizabeth Moore to the Advisory Board,to serve the remainder of a 2-year term(ending in January 2007). We request that our nomination be presented to the Burlingame City Council at its next regularly scheduled meeting for consideration and approval. Please let me know if you require any additional information in order to present our nomination to the Council. Ve ly y9w , 4rell G tierrez uist LGL:Igl P 650.342.9600 216 Park Road Burlingame • California 94010 F 650.342.7685 www.carr-mccle)Ian.com CITY 0 STAFF REPORT BURLINGAME AGENDA 8h ITEM# MTG. D�DNATED JUNE b9O DATE October 17,2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMIT _ BY DATE: October 11,2005 AP VED IX,:t FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR FINANCE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Finance Director's travel to East Elmhurst, New York to attend the Fall Meeting of the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council (GASAC), November 2 -4, 2005. There is no impact on the City's budget. GASAC will cover the costs associated with the travel. BACKGROUND: The International City/County Management Association(ICMA) appointed Jesus to the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council. GASAC members serve four-year terms subject to annual reappointment by the ICMA Board of Directors. The GASAC holds three meetings per year(Spring, Summer and Fall). $2,276,801.18 Ck. No. 14022- 14551 Excludes Library checks 14022-14056 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT l ^.0 Payroll for September 2005 $2,626,746.18 Ck. No. 163515- 163755 INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION CD C am CD m =3 CL ov o m m S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS V CITY OF BURLINGAME 10-06-2005 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 10 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 106,887.11 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 2,137.96 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,966.52 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 33,908.99 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 136,470.46 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 443,987.09 WATER FUND 526 1,586.13 SEWER FUND 527 255,802.41 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 713.00 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,226.38 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 87.40 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 141.23 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 90.00 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 10,999.30 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,796.26 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 7,225.55 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $1,0 8,025.79 ,Vol D 4VK 114 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14433 THROUGH 14551 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,008,025.79, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ....... . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .... .. ........ .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .. . .. . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./.. . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 14550 IRINA SMITH 25915 6.00 MISCELLANEOUS 6.00 101 36330 000 1349 14551 THE VILLAGE GARDENER 25916 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 731 22520 TOTAL $1 ,008,025.79 � o . n`�l CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT f`l Denotes Hand Written Checks 14534 MARCELLA MURRAY 25899 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 14535 EILEEN CONWAY 25900 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 14536 SISTERS OF MERCY OF THE AMERICAS 25901 10,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 10,000.00 731 22520 14537 DANIELE CONSTRUCTION 25902 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 14538 SUZANNE VARGAS 25903 37.50 MISCELLANEOUS 37.50 101 36330 000 1641 14539 CASINO CRUISELINE 25904 860.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 860.00 101 68010 120 1521 14540 HYOSOOK SONG 25905 67.00 MISCELLANEOUS 67.00 101 36330 000 1349 14541 JAN BALDWIN 25906 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 14542 MICHAEL ZYGAREWICZ 25907 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 14543 CHRISTOPHER MAFFEI 25908 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 14544 YA LIN KAO 25909 67.00 MISCELLANEOUS 67.00 101 36330 000 1349 14545 MAY KEE FONG 25910 6.00 MISCELLANEOUS 6.00 101 36330 000 1349 14546 RONG LI 25911 15.00 MISCELLANEOUS 15.00 101 36330 000 1349 14547 MR SCHOUSTRA 25912 6.00 MISCELLANEOUS 6.00 101 36330 000 1349 14548 AVIVA LEVINE 25913 12.00 MISCELLANEOUS 12.00 101 36330 000 1349 14549 MARIBETH VALERIO 25914 70.00 MISCELLANEOUS 70.00 101 36330 000 1780 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14519 LISA LEMBI 25873 14.00 MISCELLANEOUS 14.00 101 36330 000 1331 14520 JONATHAN HUANG 25881 30.00 MISCELLANEOUS 30.00 101 36330 000 1660 14521 SAN JOSE BLUE 25886 2,884.47 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,217.87 326 80950 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,274.68 326 80770 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 167.99 326 80950 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 223.93 326 80770 120 14522 DORIS HARVEY 25887 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 14523 SUSAN MCGARR 25888 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1349 14524 KATHLEEN KANE 25889 96.00 MISCELLANEOUS 96.00 101 36330 000 1644 14525 COURTNEY AVERY 25890 144.00 MISCELLANEOUS 144.00 101 36330 000 1644 14526 MARIA BULLER 25891 81.00 MISCELLANEOUS 81.00 101 36330 000 1644 14527 DEBBIE HARRISON 25892 35.00 MISCELLANEOUS 35.00 101 36330 000 1660 14528 PAM MARSH 25893 144.00 MISCELLANEOUS 144.00 101 36330 000 1644 14529 YVONNE LEE 25894 144.00 MISCELLANEOUS 144.00 101 36330 000 1644 14530 YUEN MA 25895 91.00 MISCELLANEOUS 91.00 101 36330 000 1644 14531 RITA NEVARE2 25896 58.00 MISCELLANEOUS 58.00 101 36330 000 1644 14532 GOLDEN YEARS FINANCIAL 25897 150.00 MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593 14533 DOLLY SAUER 25898 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14503 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 210.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 101 68010 220 1330 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00 730 69583 220 14504 REMY SIJBRANT 25202 390.00 MISCELLANEOUS 390.00 101 22525 14505 DR. NICOLE CHEROK 25264 54.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 54.00 101 68010 220 1660 14506 ANDREA SWENSRUD 25361 144.00 MISCELLANEOUS 144.00 101 36330 000 1644 14507 NANCY STONE 25363 144.00 MISCELLANEOUS 144.00 101 36330 000 1644 14508 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 25398 795.52 MISCELLANEOUS 795.52 101 64420 031 14509 SPENCON CONSTRUCTION INC. 25490 29,231.37 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29,231.37 320 80960 220 14510 AA GALAXY INTERNATIONAL INC. 25492 100.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 100.00 101 64540 150 14511 LINDA MURPHY 25530 67.00 MISCELLANEOUS 67.00 101 36330 000 1349 14512 BERNARD CORRY 25686 14,400.00 MISCELLANEOUS 14,400.00 101 22505 14513 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25731 940.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 940.00 896 20281 14514 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25776 93.33 COMMUNICATIONS 93.33 201 65200 160 14515 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25777 839.25 COMMUNICATIONS 839.25 201 65200 160 14516 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25778 376.61 COMMUNICATIONS 376.61 101 66100 160 14517 J HOWARD ENGINEERING 25811 283,968.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 283,968.00 327 81.150 220 14518 KATHLEEN SREMAC 25817 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14489 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 128,119.56 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 112,019.58 326 81480 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,099.98 326 80931 210 14490 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 24,971.33 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 24,971.33 327 81150 210 14491 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 5,440.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,440.00 101 68010 220 1331 14492 SBC/MCI 23728 6,336.30 COMMUNICATIONS 36.45 101 67500 160 COMMUNICATIONS 14.30 526 69020 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 6,285.55 896 20281 14493 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 159.48 COMMUNICATIONS 159.48 101 68020 160 2300 14494 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 14495 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 444.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 444.80 101 68010 220 1521 14496 JESUS NAVA 24204 1,001.48 MISCELLANEOUS 1,001.48 101 64250 031 14497 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY PROJECT 24527 90.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 90.00 101 64420 250 14498 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 MISCELLANEOUS 312.32 130 21092 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8.28 130 21015 14499 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 582.80 MISCELLANEOUS 582.80 101 64420 030 14500 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 1,817.36 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,817.36 130 20014 14501 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 626.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17.55 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220 14502 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 272.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 272.00 101 68010 220 1349 V CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14475 EILEEN P. GOLDENBERG 21646 330.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 330.00 101 68010 220 1646 14476 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 1,086.42 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,086.42 101 68010 120 1781 14477 VINCENT FALZON 21893 675.64 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 675.64 527 66520 240 14478 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 16,602.00 MISCELLANEOUS 16,602.00 101 37010 14479 GCI NUTRIENTS 21917 1,571.83 UTILITY BILL REFUND 1,571.83 526 36710 14480 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT 22529 90.54 MISC. SUPPLIES 90.54 101 68010 120 1114 14481 VERIZON WIRELESS 22593 45.50 COMMUNICATIONS 45.50 101 68010 160 1101 14482 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. 22632 552.53 MISC. SUPPLIES 552.53 201 65200 111 14483 TARA PRATT 23040 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 731 22520 14484 D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC 23092 95,392.34 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95,392.34 327 81010 220 14485 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 13,195.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,694.60 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,146.05 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,354.35 327 79400 210 14486 OFFICE MAX 23306 308.81 OFFICE EXPENSE 80.40 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 62.44 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 78.57 201 65200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 87.40 621 64450 110 14487 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 276.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 276.80 101 68010 220 1661 14488 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 374.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 374.40 101 68010 220 1762 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14461 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 1,359.97 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.99 101 64400 120 PUBLICATIONS 8 ADVERTISING 530.55 101 64200 150 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 469.05 320 81060 220 MISC. SUPPLIES 157.14 326 80770 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 163.24 326 80950 120 14462 PRIORITY 1 19239 2,110.88 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 2,110.88 620 66700 800 14463 GARY PARTEE 19249 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 14464 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 33.49 MISC. SUPPLIES 33.49 620 66700 120 14465 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 629.64 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 488.41 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 141.23 625 65213 203 14466 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 19679 156.96 MISCELLANEOUS 156.96 731 22548 14467 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,796.26 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,796.26 736 64570 220 14468 CWEA - CALIFORNIA WATER 20631 1,215.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,215.00 527 66520 260 14469 JEFF DOWD 20779 399.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 399.00 101 68010 220 1785 14470 SPORTS CHOICE 20845 578.60 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 578.60 101 68010 140 1892 14471 K-119 OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 20924 43.24 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.24 101 68020 120 2200 14472 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 1,075.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,075.00 101 68010 220 1331 14473 REGINA MC ADAM 21744 67.00 MISCELLANEOUS 67.00 101 36330 000 1349 14474 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 9,834.54 MISCELLANEOUS 9,834.54 101 37010 1 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14448 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 688.28 MISCELLANEOUS 165.12 201 35220 000 7150 MISC. SUPPLIES 5.40 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 15.43 201 65200 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 27.41 201 65200 140 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 91.36 201 65200 190 VEHICLE MAINT. 1.18 201 65200 202 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 201 65200 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 245.00 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 37.38 201 65200 260 14449 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHINES 14252 1,150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,150.00 101 68010 220 1101 14450 HDL COREN&CONE 14750 2,025.65 MISCELLANEOUS 2,025.65 101 30400 14451 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,109.86 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,867.52 101 65100 220 MISCELLANEOUS 242.34 731 22594 14452 AIR EXCHANGE, INC 15625 60.71 MISC. SUPPLIES 60.71 619 64460 120 5150 14453 JOE MCCLAIN 16066 280.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 280.00 101 68010 220 1787 14454 LINDA HOECK 16390 920.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 920.00 101 68010 220 1349 14455 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING 17534 513.97 MISC. SUPPLIES 151.96 320 80570 120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 362.01 320 81060 220 14456 TOOLS EXPRESS 18027 275.73 TRAINING EXPENSE 275.73 101 68020 260 2200 14457 RAGING WATERS 18665 9,225.57 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,225.57 101 68010 220 1212 14458 ROXANN LOOSE 18776 18.00 MISCELLANEOUS 18.00 101 36330 000 1349 14459 BAY ALARM 18854 168.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 619 64460 220 5180 14460 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 519.60 MISC. SUPPLIES 519.60 101 68010 120 1283 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 10/06/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT �•� Denotes Hand Written Checks 14433 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 82.01 SUPPLIES 82.01 620 15000 14434 VEOLIA WATER 02110 289,212.84 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 35,301.07 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 20,639.96 527 66530 190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 202,286.00 527 66530 220 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 30,985.81 527 66530 800 14435 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 318.90 MISCELLANEOUS 318.90 101 68020 192 2200 14436 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 123.35 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 123.35 201 65200 203 14437 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 988.64 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 988.64 101 66210 226 14438 P. G. & E. 03054 16,991.40 GAS & ELECTRIC 16,991.40 101 66100 170 14439 SBC 03080 52.37 COMMUNICATIONS 52.37 101 65100 160 14440 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 450.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 450.00 619 64460 210 5170 14441 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 5,848.32 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,848.32 101 68020 220 2300 14442 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 412.80 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 412.80 101 64350 210 14443 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 34.29 MISC. SUPPLIES 34.29 619 64460 120 5170 14444 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 1,126.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,126.75 101 68010 220 1891 14445 LIFE ASSIST 09392 150.58 SUPPLIES 150.58 201 65200 112 14446 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 357.23 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 357.23 101 68020 190 2200 14447 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 780.87 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 780.87 201 65200 203 I CITY OF BURLINGAME 09-29-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11 FUND RECAP 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 75,363.39 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 14, 130.88 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 6,631 .06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 23,423.81 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 29,978.47 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 61256.00 WATER FUND 526 91487.79 SEWER FUND 527 25,265.84 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 6,775.50 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 863.22 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 5,065.59 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 3,542.83 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 24,498.06 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 848.00 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1 ,341 .69 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 100.83 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 136,707.51 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 21 ,713.02 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 51 ,910.01 DEBT SERVICE FUND 930 3,946.80 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $447,850.30 Vol 5u � CIc.. jD HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14296 THROUGH 14432 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $447,850.30, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, TH AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST E CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14422 ANDREA SPILLANE 25875 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 14423 MEGAN CONNERY 25876 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1646 14424 CAROL MURPHY 25877 83.00 MISCELLANEOUS 83.00 101 36330 000 1646 14425 RITU KHANNA 25878 73.00 MISCELLANEOUS 73.00 101 36330 000 1349 14426 SARAH WONG 25879 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1660 14427 DIANA FERRIS 25880 71.00 MISCELLANEOUS 71.00 101 36330 000 1660 14428 JONATHAN HUANG 25881 71.00 MISCELLANEOUS 71.00 101 36330 000 1660 14429 CMA 25882 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 65150 220 14430 L.E.A.D.S. ONLINE 25883 1,897.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 948.50 101 65100 220 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 948.50 101 65100 292 14431 SMFD LEARNING PROGRAM 25884 665.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 665.00 201 65200 260 14432 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTIN 25885 1,437.50 DEPOSIT REFUND 1,437.50 101 22590 TOTAL $447,850.30 � l � 1 ) ) CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 14407 LINA ZANZERKIA 25860 70.00 MISCELLANEOUS 70.00 101 36330 000 1641 14408 MARIPET MACABANTAD 25861 70.00 MISCELLANEOUS 70.00 101 36330 000 1641 14409 PAT NICHOLSON 25862 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1644 14410 NATHAN O'GORMAN 25863 19.21 MISCELLANEOUS 19.21 526 22502 14411 H.I.R. ENTERPRISES 25864 41.00 MISCELLANEOUS -2.72 101 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.72 101 68020 120 2200 14412 DIANE MCGILL 25865 71.00 MISCELLANEOUS 71.00 101 36330 000 1660 14413 SARA JONE MURPHY 25866 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1646 14414 PAULA BIANCHI 25867 58.00 MISCELLANEOUS 58.00 101 36330 000 1646 14415 KRISTINE YEE 25868 121.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1646 MISCELLANEOUS 66.00 101 36330 000 1331 14416 PETER GARRISON 25869 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 14417 ALEXANDRA GEDMAN 25870 70.00 MISCELLANEOUS 70.00 101 36330 000 1780 14418 SAYAKA ETD 25871 126.00 MISCELLANEOUS 126.00 101 36330 000 1660 14419 KIRA SASAKI 25872 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1330 14420 LISA LEMBI 25873 7.00 MISCELLANEOUS 7.00 101 36330 000 1331 14421 JENNY COLEMAN 25874 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14391 ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS SY 25378 1,338.00 MISCELLANEOUS -102.14 101 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,440.14 101 65300 120 14392 NETVERSANT SILICON VALLEY 25422 467.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 467.50 619 64460 210 5270 14393 LELANA CRAYNE 25470 70.00 MISCELLANEOUS 70.00 101 36330 000 1660 14394 LARISA YAGLONITSER 25517 47.00 MISCELLANEOUS 47.00 101 36330 000 1646 14395 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS INC 25527 16,638.23 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,638.23 527 66520 210 14396 TRACIE KRIEGER 25598 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 14397 MICHELLE KLEID 25660 77.00 MISCELLANEOUS 77.00 101 36330 000 1891 14398 LEONA WILCOX 25670 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1782 14399 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25775 290.74 COMMUNICATIONS 290.74 101 65100 160 14400 DENNIS MAYER 25853 1,280.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,280.00 101 22520 14401 SHANNON CONSTRUCTION 25854 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 14402 GAIL FOLAN 25855 85.00 MISCELLANEOUS 85.00 101 36330 000 1644 14403 YOUMON TSANG 25856 63.00 MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1372 14404 SHAHLA HAIDER 25857 110.00 MISCELLANEOUS 110.00 101 36330 000 1644 14405 MEENA VELLIS 25858 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1644 14406 KATHY PARIANI 25859 41.00 MISCELLANEOUS 41.00 101 36330 000 1660 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14376 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00 UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080 14377 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00 MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024 14378 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024 14379 C.L.E.A. 24523 663.00 MISCELLANEOUS 663.00 130 20026 14380 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 408.00 UNION DUES 408.00 130 21091 14381 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 146.65 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 146.65 619 64460 210 5130 14382 WESTERN STATES SURFACING 24557 10,614.81 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,614.81 320 81130 220 14383 LINGULAR WIRELESS 24607 241.17 UTILITY EXPENSE 241.17 896 20281 14384 AETNA 24760 2,909.03 MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,637.73 130 20022 14385 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,106.85 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,128.60 130 20021 MISCELLANEOUS 978.25 130 20025 14386 JAMES DAVINO 25028 105.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 105.00 527 66520 250 14387 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 110.47 UTILITY EXPENSE 110.47 896 20281 14388 NORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL 25045 696.00 SUPPLIES 696.00 620 15000 14389 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 39.53 OFFICE EXPENSE 39.53 201 65200 110 14390 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 39.64 OFFICE EXPENSE 39.64 101 65100 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 14364 CULVER GROUP 23448 7,460.24 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,460.24 326 80770 210 14365 KORALEEN ENTERPRISES 23510 1,206.03 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,206.03 526 69020 120 14366 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 179.05 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 179.05 326 81200 210 14367 BANK OF NEW YORK 23553 4,946.80 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 500.00 526 69020 763 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 500.00 527 66520 763 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 1,000.00 930 66840 763 BANK TRUSTEE SERVICES 2,946.80 930 66850 763 14368 JIM KLEEBAUER 23722 500.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 500.00 101 22520 � 14369 KEITH MARTIN 23788 213.11 OFFICE EXPENSE 21.83 526 69020 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 11.98 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 66.17 527 66520 120 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 50.00 527 66520 250 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.94 619 64460 120 5150 MISC. SUPPLIES 4.29 619 64460 120 5130 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 14.90 619 64460 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3.00 620 66700 250 14370 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 7,451.00 RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 4,785.00 101 66210 218 ` RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 2,666.00 527 66520 218 14371 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 64.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210 14372 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 934.23 MISC. SUPPLIES 57.23 101 68010 120 1111 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 837.00 619 64460 220 5120 14373 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 495.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 495.00 326 80770 220 14374 NELSON NUGENT 24295 464.48 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 464.48 527 66520 250 14375 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,200.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,200.00 130 20016 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14351 UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 22305 7,017.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,017.50 320 80520 210 14352 ARMOR HOLDINGS TRAINING DIVISION 22412 505.75 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 505.75 101 65100 292 14353 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 3,671.62 MISCELLANEOUS 3,671.62 620 66700 400 14354 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,700.00 MISCELLANEOUS 595.00 201 35221 000 7100 MISCELLANEOUS 1,105.00 201 35220 000 7100 14355 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 21,713.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,820.01 736 64571 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,893.01 736 64572 220 14356 TURF STAR 22682 285.97 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 285.97 101 68020 200 2200 14357 HOLDEN DANIELS 22687 689.84 TRAINING EXPENSE 689.84 201 65200 260 14358 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 1,759.38 MISCELLANEOUS 1,134.38 526 69020 233 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 625.00 526 69020 240 14359 D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC 23092 6,156.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,156.00 327 81010 220 14360 PITNEY BOWES 23128 548.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 548.00 621 64450 200 14361 OFFICE TEAM 23256 954.80 OFFICE EXPENSE 954.80 526 69020 110 14362 OFFICE MAX 23306 315.94 OFFICE EXPENSE 79.73 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 31.95 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 110.28 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 45.15 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 48.83 101 68010 110 1101 14363 DATASAFE 23410 416.47 OFFICE EXPENSE 69.35 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 61.98 101 66100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 7.65 101 64350 120 BANKING SERVICE FEES 277.49 101 64250 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14337 ALL FENCE COMPANY, INC. 19710 3,010.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,505.00 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,505.00 527 66520 120 14338 PENINSULA GLASS 19771 6.50 MISC, SUPPLIES 6.50 619 64460 120 5180 14339 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 14340 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 628.56 SUPPLIES 628.56 620 15000 14341 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 21,844.18 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 21,844.18 326 80910 210 14342 PHIL SCOTT 20550 151.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 151.00 527 66520 250 14343 SPRINT PCS 20724 77.31 COMMUNICATIONS 38.49 101 65150 160 COMMUNICATIONS 38.82 101 64420 160 14344 COMPUMASTER 20923 199.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 199.00 101 66210 260 14345 FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA, INC. 20967 103.92 ` CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.92 101 65100 220 14346 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 533.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 533.21 527 66520 120 14347 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 2,024.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 506.00 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 759.00 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 506.00 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 253.00 619 64460 260 14348 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 21741 18,820.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,820.00 101 68010 220 1372 14349 RON RICKMAN 21880 123.75 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 123.75 527 66520 250 14350 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 1,281.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,281.00 320 81350 210 l CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14321 SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS 14144 643.56 MISC. SUPPLIES 643.56 526 69020 120 14322 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 327.00 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 327.00 101 66210 230 14323 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 1,554.93 MISCELLANEOUS 1,554.93 731 22594 14324 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,906.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,906.50 101 68010 220 1787 14325 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 19,193.79 SUPPLIES 19,193.79 620 15000 14326 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 64.94 SMALL TOOLS 64.94 620 66700 130 14327 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 98.10 COMMUNICATIONS 98.10 101 65100 160 14328 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 6,775.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,775.50 528 66600 210 14329 DEAN'S AUTO BODY & 18795 1,323.96 MISCELLANEOUS 1,323.96 618 64520 604 14330 BAY ALARM 18854 111.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 111.00 619 64460 220 5230 14331 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 99.34 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 99.34 619 64460 140 14332 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 229.96 MISC. SUPPLIES 229.96 101 64400 120 14333 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 258.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 258.34 201 65200 111 14334 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 75.94 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 75.94 625 65213 203 14335 WINGES ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 19471 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 731 22525 14336 STEVE SILVER PRODUCTIONS INC 19675 1,863.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,863.00 101 68010 120 1521 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14309 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 327 75170 220 14310 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 134,552.58 MISCELLANEOUS 134,552.58 731 22587 14311 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 8,106.44 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,106.44 101 68020 220 2300 14312 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 150.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 150.00 526 69020 110 14313 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 4,510.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,510.50 320 81350 210 14314 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CO. 09319 19.38 SUPPLIES 19.38 620 15000 14315 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 21,834.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,962.60 101 65100 220 PRISONER EXPENSE 1,872.00 101 65100 291 14316 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 3,741.63 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 3,741.63 618 64520 601 14317 OLE'S 09626 202.12 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 202.12 625 65213 203 14318 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 540.00 RADIO MAINT. 540.00 201 65200 205 14319 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,063.63 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,063.63 625 65213 203 14320 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 3,889.12 MISC. SUPPLIES 462.11 101 65100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 45.00 101 65150 120 COMMUNICATIONS 443.50 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 455.89 101 65100 200 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 43.30 101 65100 210 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 45.00 101 65100 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,235.00 101 65100 260 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 126.70 101 65100 292 MISCELLANEOUS 87.00 101 65100 703 MISC. SUPPLIES 395.11 530 65400 120 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 449.68 530 65400 200 MISC. SUPPLIES 100.83 730 69530 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 09/29/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14296 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 157.22 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 157.22 201 65200 203 14297 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 300.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 300.00 621 64450 200 14298 COMPUTER TECHNICIANS, INC., 01987 35.72 MISC. SUPPLIES 35.72 101 66100 120 14299 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 2,442.72 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 2,442.72 201 65200 140 14300 D & M TOWING, INC. 02029 95.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 50.00 101 65100 200 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 45.00 101 65100 292 14301 FEDEX 02160 54.66 OFFICE EXPENSE 13.64 101 66100 110 3007 OFFICE EXPENSE 22.59 101 64420 110 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 18.43 530 65400 200 14302 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 2,451.94 MISCELLANEOUS 2,451.94 896 20282 14303 N.N. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 852.03 MISC. SUPPLIES 508.99 101 68020 120 2200 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 138.41 201 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 18.51 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 125.44 619 64460 120 5180 SMALL TOOLS 60.68 619 64460 130 14304 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,206.97 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,206.97 101 66210 226 14305 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 1,252.99 MISC. SUPPLIES 780.91 101 68010 120 1283 MISC. SUPPLIES 264.14 619 64460 120 5120 MISC. SUPPLIES 207.94 619 64460 120 5150 14306 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 220.77 SUPPLIES 220.77 620 15000 14307 P. G. & E. 03054 49,106.43 UTILITY EXPENSE 49,106.43 896 20280 14308 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 845.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 845.00 619 64460 210 5170 CITY OF BURLINGAME 09-23-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11 FUND RECAP 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 941572.69 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 3,538.50 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,961 .61 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 61 ,380.21 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 3,201 .75 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 216, 169. 15 WATER FUND 526 28,861 .40 SEWER FUND 527 51628. 12 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 16.08 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,041 .58 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 12,550.00 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 6,683.62 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 168.92 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 32,903.65 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 195.85 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 390.34 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1 ,905.00 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1 ,557. 17 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 598.87 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $477, 24.51 7e.00> vv Cts 13 3 co ce CL2S .0c7> VOL c:) HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14158 THROUGH 14295 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $477,324.51 , HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes He.Written Checks 14288 JOHN ROOT 25844 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 14289 INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT SERVICES, 25845 150.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520 14290 COPWARE INC. 25846 735.00 MISCELLANEOUS 735.00 101 65100 400 14291 JOSHUA GRATCH 25847 565.00 MISCELLANEOUS 565.00 101 22525 14292 LILY WONG 25848 348.48 MISCELLANEOUS 348.48 101 31510 14293 GARY NOLAN 25849 1,295.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,295.00 130 20015 14294 ED BARTON 25850 356.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 356.00 130 20060 14295 MARTIN DILLON 25851 44.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 44.00 130 20060 TOTAL $477,324.51 �O CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14272 MICHELLE BARBARY 25828 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1641 14273 JANE DELZELL 25829 84.00 MISCELLANEOUS 84.00 101 36330 000 1891 14274 SEONGHEE KIM 25830 67.00 MISCELLANEOUS 67.00 101 36330 000 1331 14275 MR/MRS KANAGAIAH 25831 49.00 MISCELLANEOUS 49.00 101 36330 000 1891 14276 CHARLOTTE SCOTT 25832 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1641 14277 CECILE COAR 25833 76.00 li MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1641 14278 MARY LYCETT 25834 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1641 14279 ANN LEVIN 25835 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1641 14280 PAULA-JO HUSACK 25836 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1641 14281 HELEN KUAN 25837 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 36330 000 1372 14282 SELEN DUYGU 25838 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 14283 LORI GATMAITAN 25839 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 14284 MARIA FAKHOURI 25840 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 14285 COLLEEN DOWNER 25841 91.00 MISCELLANEOUS 91.00 .101 36330 000 1661 14286 MARIA SANCHEZ 25842 84.00 MISCELLANEOUS 84.00 101 36330 000 1661 14287 BOB DAILY 25843 14,500.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 14,500.00 101 22520 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14256 CRW SYSTEMS INC 25337 43,000.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 43,000.00 320 81300 210 14257 NETVERSANT SILICON VALLEY 25422 1,061.30 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,061.30 619 64460 210 5130 14258 HOUSTON & HARRIS PCS INC 25527 13,875.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,875.00 327 81330 220 14259 DORI LOW 25570 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 14260 ED PHILLIPS 25603 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 14261 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 25729 41.35 TRAINING EXPENSE 41.35 101 68020 260 2200 14262 KATHLEEN VON MAYRHAUSER 25771 141.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 141.00 130 20060 14263 LYNDA POULTON 25772 1,002.50 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,002.50 130 20015 14264 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 381.44 RENTS & LEASES 381.44 526 69020 180 14265 TONY LEUNG 25821 4,025.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,025.00 101 22546 14266 DAVID SPEASE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 25822 500.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 500.00 101 68020 260 2100 14267 GREEN AGAIN LANDSCAPING 25823 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 14268 GILL YEE 25824 1,015.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525 14269 DANIELLE HOROWITZ 25825 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1641 14270 ANGELA BEUCUS 25826 42.00 MISCELLANEOUS 42.00 101 36330 000 1641 14271 HEATHER BENJAMIN 25827 76.00 MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1641 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14241 WESTERN EMULSIONS INC 24556 7,608.03 MISC. SUPPLIES 7,608.03 320 81130 120 14242 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 3,201.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,201.75 326 80950 210 14243 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 375.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 375.00 101 65300 250 14244 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 120.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 619 64460 220 5120 14245 FEDEX FREIGHT WEST,INC. 24748 50.88 OFFICE EXPENSE 50.88 619 64460 110 14246 CASEY PERA 24829 345.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 345.00 201 65200 260 14247 TOM DONNELLY 24830 674.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 674.00 201 65200 260 14248 DORIS MORTENSEN 24871 589.96 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 589.96 101 64200 250 14249 A2Z BUSINESS SYSTEMS 25020 1,199.70 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 899.78 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 299.92 101 65150 220 14250 POLLARDWATER.COM-EAST 25115 89.43 MISCELLANEOUS -5.75 526 23611 MISCELLANEOUS 95.18 526 69020 233 14251 EDWARD SUPPLEE 25149 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1641 14252 ADVANCED MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 25198 145.06 RADIO MAINT. 145.06 201 65200 205 14253 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 88.18 OFFICE EXPENSE 59.89 201 65200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.89 201 65500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.40 201 65200 111 14254 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 30.84 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 30.84 530 65400 200 14255 MITCHELL MATTEA 25302 123.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 123.00 130 20060 - CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14227 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120 14228 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 2,070.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,070.00 101 23620 14229 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,741.39 BANKING SERVICE FEES 528.10 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,213.29 530 65400 120 14230 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 78.61 MISC. SUPPLIES 78.61 101 68010 120 1114 14231 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 38.14 COMMUNICATIONS 38.14 101 65300 160 14232 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 3,387.81 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,387.81 320 80520 220 14233 QUILL 24090 263.04 OFFICE EXPENSE 263.04 621 64450 110 14234 CHRISTINE REED 24153 623.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 623.00 201 65200 260 14235 AEP WORKSHOPS 24166 150.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 150.00 101 64420 250 14236 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 720.00 MISCELLANEOUS 720.00 526 69020 233 14237 A&G SERVICES 24400 2,300.00 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 2,300.00 526 69020 230 14238 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 202,070.35 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 202,070.35 327 79480 220 14239 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY PROJECT 24527 90.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 90.00 101 65300 250 14240 HONEYWELL 24546 1,676.37 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,676.37 619 64460 210 5180 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14214 PITNEY BOWES INC 22878 716.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 716.00 621 64450 200 14215 THE DAILY NEWS 22964 970.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 806.40 320 79080 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 163.80 327 81510 220 14216 MIKE COFFEY 23009 152.50 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 152.50 130 20060 14217 T. RANDOLPH GRANGE 23112 500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 731 22525 14218 OFFICE TEAM 23256 954.80 OFFICE EXPENSE 954.80 526 69020 110 14219 JIM BROWN 23260 169.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 169.00 527 66520 250 14220 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 463.71 OFFICE EXPENSE 463.71 101 65300 110 14221 OFFICE MAX 23306 530.67 OFFICE EXPENSE 54.32 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 67.12 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 86.75 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 28.91 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 52.70 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 13.03 101 64250 110 MISCELLANEOUS 227.84 730 39583 14222 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105.00 MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518 14223 FREEMAN-DESIGNS 23653 162.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 162.50 730 69533 220 14224 DEVINCENZI ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT 23679 2,135.77 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,135.77 526 69020 120 14225 FORDERER CORNICE WORKS 23775 1,255.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,255.00 619 64460 210 5130 14226 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 3,225.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,225.00 526 69020 233 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14199 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,557.17 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,557.17 736 64570 220 14200 UNITED STATES POST OFFICE 20144 5,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000.00 101 15500 14201 LONGS DRUGS 20453 6.28 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 6.28 101 65100 292 14202 PACIFIC COAST TRANE SERVICE 20818 1,510.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,510.00 619 64460 210 5120 14203 MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP. 20925 1,455.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,455.00 101 64200 110 14204 LORI BENINTENDI 21003 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 22593 14205 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 516.74 MISC. SUPPLIES 516.74 527 66520 120 14206 ESA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 1,105.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 1,105.00 731 22590 14207 SPITERI'S HARDWOOD 21360 1,845.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 1,845.00 101 68010 190 1111 14208 HILLYARD 21658 238.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 238.34 101 68020 120 2200 14209 SEWER RAT 21821 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 14210 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 5,247.72 MISC. SUPPLIES 4,444.40 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 803.32 527 66520 120 14211 CHRIS KUJAT 22492 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 22525 14212 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 735.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22554 UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281 14213 JONES AND MAYER 22818 2,240.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,240.00 101 64350 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14187 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL 17938 400.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 400.00 101 64560 210 14188 CALBO TRAINING INSTITUTE 18697 405.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 405.00 101 65300 260 14189 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 63.74 COMMUNICATIONS 21.24 101 66210 160 COMMUNICATIONS 21.25 526 69020 160 COMMUNICATIONS 21.25 527 66520 160 14190 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 467.32 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 467.32 526 69020 140 14191 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 211.20 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 211.20 101 64420 121 14192 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,201.48 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 255.64 101 66210 140 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.52 201 65200 220 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 221.16 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 255.64 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 16.08 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 88.52 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 168.92 620 66700 140 - 14193 MARY JANNEY 19042 214.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 214.00 130 20015 14194 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 158.02 MISC. SUPPLIES 158.02 101 64400 120 14195 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 96.98 OFFICE EXPENSE 60.50 101 64250 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 36.48 201 65200 111 14196 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 65.37 FIRE APPARATUS MA1NT. 65.37 201 65200 203 14197 D J DOWLING 19368 2,580.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,580.00 101 22546 MISCELLANEOUS •420.00 101 31510 MISCELLANEOUS 420.00 101 22546 14198 CHI HUA HUNG 19912 6,025.00 MISCELLANEOUS 6,025.00 101 22546 C CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14173 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 7,697.33 MISC. SUPPLIES 5,997.06 101 66210 120 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,542.84 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 97.43 320 80960 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 60.00 327 81150 120 14174 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220 14175 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 884.12 MISC. SUPPLIES 884.12 201 65200 111 14176 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN 10567 5,070.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,150.00 526 69020 010 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 1,994.00 527 66520 011 MISCELLANEOUS -74.00 530 65400 010 14177 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY 11532 350.74 MISCELLANEOUS 350.74 101 65100 400 14178 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 145.44 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 115.15 101 65100 200 MISC. SUPPLIES 30.29 527 66520 120 14179 SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS 14144 8,308.74 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 8,308.74 526 69020 803 14180 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 343.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 343.00 101 64420 121 14181 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 1571.1 2,278.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,278.50 101 68010 220 1787 14182 TEAM CLEAN 15827 413.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 413.88 201 65200 220 14183 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 20,069.91 MISCELLANEOUS 20,069.91 101 22515 14184 HILTON, FARNKOPF & HOBSON 16656 3,675.76 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,837.88 526 69020 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,837.88 527 66520 210 14185 ITRON 16913 919.49 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 919.49 621 64450 200 14186 COLORPRINT 17497 604.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 604.21 526 69020 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 09/23/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 14158 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 31,005.12 COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 30,705.12 621 64450 200 14159 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 251.32 MISC. SUPPLIES 251.32 619 64460 120 5150 14160 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 310.49 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 310.49 101 66210 226 14161 HASELBACH SURVEYING INSTRUMENT 02410 32.42 SMALL TOOLS 32.42 101 66100 130 14162 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 240.23 MISC. SUPPLIES 240.23 619 64460 120 14163 SBC 03080 163.87 UTILITY EXPENSE 163.87 896 20281 i 14164 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 195.85 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 195.85 625 65213 203 14165 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 4,644.14 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,644.14 101 68020 220 2300 14166 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 64250 114 14167 FRANK ERBACHER 09195 210.50 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 210.50 130 20060 14168 POM INC. 09248 871.45 ' EQUIPMENT MAINT. 871.45 530 65400 200 14169 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 3,220.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,220.00 101 65100 220 14170 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES 09461 6,480.54 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 6,480.54 320 81090 210 14171 OCE 09493 857.34 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210 14172 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 12,550.00 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 12,550.00 618 64520 601 CITY OF BURLINGAME 09-15-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 51,570.83 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 8,604.45 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 166,165.31 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 40,308.11 WATER FUND 526 3,934.67 SEWER FUND 527 24,689.98 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 6,607.25 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 681.56 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 10,735.35 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 19,422.10 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 7,290.54 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1,898.04 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,066.17 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 394.44 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 56.83 STATE GRANTS FUND 734 4,010.45 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8347,436.08 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM i THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14057 THROUGH 14157 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8347,436.08, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ............................I....... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14155 KATHLEEN SREMAC 25817 285.00 MISCELLANEOUS 285.00 101 36330 000 1330 14156 BARBARA CASEY 25818 38.00 MISCELLANEOUS 38.00 101 36330 000 1644 14157 SUSAN PETERSON 25819 94.00 MISCELLANEOUS 94.00 101 36330 000 1782 TOTAL $347,44336.0088 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14139 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 410.47 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 410.47 201 65200 200 14140 MARK BURAN 24904 1,750.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,750.00 101 22520 14141 RENE ARIAS 24950 3,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,000.00 101 22520 14142 SHIU TSUN TSAI 25039 1,600.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,600.00 101 22520 14143 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 265.72 OFFICE EXPENSE 265.72 101 65100 110 14144 LORAL LANDSCAPING 25394 160.00 BLDG- & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.00 526 69020 190 14145 NETVERSANT SILICON .VALLEY 25422 170.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 170.00 619 64460 210 5270 14146 LISA GUEVARA 25473 640.00 MISCELLANEOUS 640.00 101 36330 000 1330 14147 SPENCON CONSTRUCTION INC. 25490 63,580.73 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 63,580.73 320 80960 220 14148 MR FINAU 25640 64.00 - MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782 14149 CINGULAR WIRELESS-ATLYS 25730 14.17 COMMUNICATIONS 14.17 101 65100 160 14150 MELISSA MATOSIAN 25812 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 14151 GIL FRIAS 25813 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 14152 GUTH LABORATORIES INC. 25814 600.28 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.28 101 65100 220 , 14153 TSA SILICON VALLEY CHAPTER. 25815 700.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 700.00 619 64460 260 14154 BORIS FRANOV 25816 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT 0.0 Denotes Hand Written Checks 14135 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 12,259.03 MISCELLANEOUS 237.06 101 64420 031 OFFICE EXPENSE 136.44 101 67500 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 69.00 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 37.87 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 505.50 101 68010 120 1422 MISC. SUPPLIES 799.64 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,429.30 101 68010 120 1422 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,011.50 101 68010 120 1893 MISC. SUPPLIES 8.96 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 82.97 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 127.16 101 68010 120 1890 MISC. SUPPLIES 4,329.08 101 68010 120 1423 MISC. SUPPLIES 892.61 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 220.61 101 68010 120 1330 - MISC. SUPPLIES 38.37 101 68010 120 1104 MISC. SUPPLIES 92.76 101 68010 120 1891 MISC. SUPPLIES 24.87 101 68010 120 1114 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 86.91 101 64420 121 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 242.18 101 67500 129 COMMUNICATIONS 19.50 101 67500 160 COMMUNICATIONS 1,605.54 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 135.00 101 67500 200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19.95 101 65100 220 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 52.08 101 69537 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 7.93 101 64250 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 46.24 101 64150 250 14136 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 5,142.23 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 36.82 101 65100 292 MISCELLANEOUS -707.21 101 68010 400 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES -155.06 526 69020 120 COMMUNICATIONS 75.00 526 69020 160 MISC. SUPPLIES -155.06 527 66520 120 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 935.53 527 66520 250 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 681.56 530 65400 200 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 368.00 620 66700 210 OFFICE EXPENSE 52.20 621 64450 110 MISCELLANEOUS 4,010.45 734 65195 400 14137 CALIFORNIA BMW TRIUMPH 24782 1,190.13 SUPPLIES 1,190.13 620 15000 14138 T MOBILE 24846 30.88 COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME - W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14123 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 87.57 MISC. SUPPLIES 87.57 619 64460 120 5130 14124 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 95.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 70.00 619 64460 240 TRAINING EXPENSE 25.00 619 64460 260 14125 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 18,100.27 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 18,100.27 327 81150 210 14126 SBC/MCI 23728 23.30 COMMUNICATIONS 23.30 621 64450 160 14127 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 13,688.06 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 456.06 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,036.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,671.00 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES- 2,195.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 855.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 619 64460 220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 964.00 619 64460 220 5210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,836.00 619 64460 220 5180 14128 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 43.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43.20 101 68010 220 1521 14129 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 207.32 OFFICE EXPENSE 207.32 101 64250 110 14130 GEMPLERS, INC. 24196 134.50 MISCELLANEOUS -10.03 101 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 144.53 101 68020 120 2300 14131 DENCO SALES 24393 310.12 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 310.12 101 66210 222 14132 HONEYWELL 24546 1,293.84 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,293.84 619 64460 210 5240 14133 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 19.50 TRAINING EXPENSE 19.50 101 65300 260 14134 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS INC 24659 375.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. .125.00 101 66210 190 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 125.00 526 69020 190 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 125.00 527 66520 190 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14110 HILLYARD 21658 529.11 MISC. SUPPLIES 529.11 101 68020 120 2200 14111 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 78.68 SUPPLIES 78.68 620 15000 14112 TENNANT 22621 192.90 MISC. SUPPLIES 192.90 101 66210 120 14113 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 9,733.00 CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,733.00 618 64520 225 14114 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 59.68 OFFICE EXPENSE 59.68 101 68010 110 1101 14115 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 14116 EUGENE SUPANICH 23291 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 14117 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 1,049.32 OFFICE EXPENSE -51.96 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 150.02 101 66210 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 81.53 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 102.29 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 199.30 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 385.16 526 69020 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 176.07 619 64460 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 6.91 620 66700 110 14118 OFFICE MAX 23306 134.66 OFFICE EXPENSE 38.06 101 64250 110 MISC, SUPPLIES 87.71 101 66100 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 8.89 621 64450 110 14119 SCAPES, INC. 23326 88,310.55 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 88,310.55 320 81070 220 14120 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200 14121 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 51.42 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.42 101 66210 120 14122 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 1,807.43 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,807.43 526 69020 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14098 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 6,067.87 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 2,979.03 101 66210 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 2,979.02 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 109.82 619 64460 140 14099 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 963.21 MISC. SUPPLIES 882.21 101 68010 120 1787 MISC. SUPPLIES 81.00 101 68010 120 1788 14100 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 1,330.35 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 539.50 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 790.85 625 65213 203 14101 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 4,036.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,036.00 528 66600 210 14102 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 67.50 COMMUNICATIONS 67.50 621 64450 160 14103 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 2.36 OFFICE EXPENSE 2.36 101 64420 110 14104 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 795.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 795.00 101 68010 220 1331 14105 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 2,215.96 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221.64 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 667.93 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,326.39 619 64460 220 5120 14106 ADI 21362 350.29 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 350.29 619 64460 210 5270 14107 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 280.84 OFFICE EXPENSE 280.84 101 64250 110 14108 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 2,818.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,750.00 101 64420 210 TRAINING EXPENSE 320.63 101 66210 260 TRAINING.EXPENSE 320.63 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 320.63 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 106.86 619 64460 260 14109 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 173.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 173.00 621 64450 190 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 14085 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 41.33 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 41.33 201 65200 203 14086 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 610.01 MISC. SUPPLIES 610.01 527 66520 120 14087 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 275.32 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 275.32 625 65213 203 14088 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 42.06 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 42.06 527 66520 230 14089 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 3,394.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,394.50 101 68010 220 1787 14090 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 6.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 6.50 619 64460 120 5120 14091 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 898.26 GAS, OIL 8 GREASE 898.26 201 65200 201 14092 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 731.31 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 731.31 101 68020 140 2200 14093 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 116.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 51.79 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 45.22 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 19.29 527 66520 120 14094 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 17224 111.19 MISC. SUPPLIES 111.19 619 64460 120 5130 14095 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE CO 18755 224.12 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 224.12 101 68020 140 2200 14096 REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM 18900 10,874.00 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 10,874.00 527 66530 270 14097 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 64.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 64.00 526 69020 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT �•� Denotes Hand Written Checks 14076 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 12,574.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 12,574.50 320 81350 210 14077 LIFE ASSIST 09392 503.96 SUPPLIES 503.96 201 65200 112 14078 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 425.79 FIRE--SUPPLIES 425.79 201 65200 127 14079 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 477.23 MISC. SUPPLIES 477.23 101 68020 120 2200 14080 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 1,002.35 CLAIMS PAYMENTS. 1,002.35 618 64520 601 14081 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 2,699.76 SMALL TOOLS 1,943.20 101 68020 130 2200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 679.93 101 68020 200 2200 SUPPLIES 76.63 620 15000 14082 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,789.33 MISC. SUPPLIES 413.00 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 89.98 101 66210 120 SMALL TOOLS 323.92 101 68020 130 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 87.61 101 68020 192 2200 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 94.43 101 65100 292 SMALL TOOLS 38.46 201 65200 130 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 141.69 201 65200 190 VEHICLE MAINT. 16.23 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 16.73 201 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 349.36 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 2.57 527 66520 120 SMALL"TOOLS 62.61 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.49 619 64460 120 5140 MISC. SUPPLIES 31.00 619 64460 120 5160 MISC. SUPPLIES 36.79 619 64460 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 32.46 619 64460 140 14083 CAL-STEAM 10557 812.96 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 50.62 101 68020 190 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 621.10 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 89.00 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.24 619 64460 120 5240 14084 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,063.63 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,063.63 201 65200 203 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 14068 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23 GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170 14069 SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS 03536 1,840.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,840.00 528 66600 210 14070 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 03764 250.99 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 250.99 101 68010 190 1787 14071 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 350.00 101 65100 220 14072 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 5,218.84 OFFICE EXPENSE 17.99 101 68010 110 1100 MISC. SUPPLIES 504.04 101 68010 120 1891 MISC. SUPPLIES 7.03 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 401.81 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 45.50 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.24 101 68010 120 1520 MISC. SUPPLIES 348.65 101 68010 120 1893 MISC. SUPPLIES 17.30 101 68010 120 1781 MISC. SUPPLIES 423.23 101 68010 120 1423 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 101 68010 220. 1101 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 210.00 101 68010 220 1645 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 805.61 101 68010 220 1646 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 430.00 101 68010 220 1644 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.00 101 68010 220 1660 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.00 101 68010 220 1648 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30.00 101 68010 220 1331 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 460.00 101 68010 220 1422 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 140.00 101 68020 240 2100 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 200.00 101 68020 240 2300 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 55.00 101 68020 250 2100 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 525.00 101 68010 250 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 394.44 730 69533 120 14073 BARTLETT'S AUTO BODY 09079 3,940.56 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 3,940.56 201 65200 203 14074 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 649.91 MISC. SUPPLIES 103.92 101 68020 120 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 290.47 101 66210 219 MISC. SUPPLIES 60.67 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 194.85 527 66520 120 14075 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210 LL CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 09/15/05 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 14057 HARBOR SAND & GRAVEL 01313 245.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 210.98 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 34.82 527 66520 120 14058 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 5,823.69 GAS, OIL & GREASE 17.49 201 65200 201 VEHICLE MAINT. 35.35 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 200.66 201 65200 203 SUPPLIES 1,566.02 620 15000 MISCELLANEOUS 4,004.17 620 66700 400 14059 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 119.49 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 119.49 201 65200 203 14060 VEOLIA WATER 02110 30,687.77, PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 22,185.08 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 8,502.69 527 66530 190 14061 FEDEX 02160 172.50 OFFICE EXPENSE 35.16 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.75 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.65 101 68020 110 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 81.18 101 64400 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 22.76 327 81490 120 14062 N.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 223.70 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 194.85 201 65200 190 MISC. SUPPLIES 28.85 619 64460 120 5230 14063 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 2,990.80 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 2,990.80 101 66210 226 14064 MACTEC ENGINEERING 02365 731.25 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 731.25 528 66600 210 14065 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 1,776.64 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,699.53 320 80790 210 MISC. SUPPLIES 77.11 619 64460 120 5250 14066 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 587.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 433.84 101 66210 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 26.72 101 68020 190 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 8.05 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 76.16 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 42.73 527 66520 120 14067 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 56.83 MISCELLANEOUS 56.83 731 22560 MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission Thursday, September 15, 2005 The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by Chairman Larios at 7:05 pm at Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Dittman, Erickson, Heathcote, Larios, Lawson, Muller, Schreurs Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz; Joleen Butler, Account Clerk II; Lindsy Caldwell, Recreation Coordinator Others Present: Bobbi Benson (550 El Camino Real, # 103) MINUTES The minutes of the April 21 , May 17 and June 16, 2005 Regular Commission meetings were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENTS Bobbi Benson spoke to the Commission about her volunteer work in Burlingame. Ms. Benson is a Master Gardener and wishes to preserve the ambiance of area. She prunes, picks up litter and has assisted with the Adopt a Planter program on Burlingame Avenue. Ms. Benson has made repeated requests to Caltrans to prune the growth along El Camino Real but has yet to receive acknowledgement from their offices. She invited the Commission and public to gather on Burlingame Ave. at Primrose on October 2d at 8:00am to plant annuals in the planters. OLD BUSINESS A. Pershing Park Playground Rehabilitation — Director Schwartz presented the Commission with a Certificate of Completion for Pershing Park. The Playground is now open and being used by the local children. B. Update on Shared Recreation Services with Millbrae — There are study sessions scheduled with City Councils regarding the concept of merging recreation services on Oct. 3rd (Burlingame) and Oct. 11th (Millbrae). Burlingame recreational services may be offered to Hillsborough also. Motion by Lawson (seconded by Schreurs): It is the consensus of the Park & Recreation Commission that merging Burlingame & Millbrae Recreation Departments would be beneficial to Burlingame Motion accepted 7-0. September 15,2005 minutes Continued—page 2 NEW BUSINESS A. Burlingame Golf Center Presentation—This item was tabled until the next meeting. B. Commission Elections—Lawson, Erickson terms are up in October. Discussion regarding annual rotation of Chairperson position. Motion by Schreurs (seconded by Erickson): Commission shall annually rotate the position of chairman based on seniority. Aye: 5, Nay: 1 (Dittman),Abstained: Muller, stating the process is not needed, we have always worked well together. Staff will present a plan outlining a rotation procedure to the Commission at the next meeting. C. Change in Recreation Registration Process - Director Schwartz reported that,because of the high volume of initial registrations overloaded the telephone and internet capacities of the City's system,there is no longer a starting registration date. When the brochures are delivered to residents, registration can be taken. D. New Commissioner Handbook and Brown Act—Director Schwartz distributed copies of the City of Burlingame's New Commissioners Handbooks to the Commissioners. E. Community Recognition Program—Commission discussed the criteria for the development of an application process for the program. Schwartz will mail a copy of the approved policy to the Commissioners to be further discussed at the next meeting. Discussion of a subcommittee being formed to develop the application process. F. The Parks &Recreation Directors of San Mateo County are coordinating a training seminar for Parks &Recreation Commissioners on October 29th in San Mateo. REPORTS/HAND-OUTS A. Parks &Recreation Department Reports 1. Monthly Report (see attached) 2. 2004-5 FY Revenue Report (see attached) 3. Aquatics Programs—Presentation from Lindsy Caldwell, Aquatics Coordinator. Caldwell said that summer programs went well and revenues were high. She also explained about Family Nights during the summer and the new option of Quarterly Lap Swim fees that are catching on. Commissioner Muller asked about the quality of the maintenance of the pool. Caldwell explained that Carlos Sandoval,Pool Manager, also works for the Burlingame School District and has been maintaining the pool and thus far quality of maintenance has been excellent. Caldwell also explained the Users Group Agreement with the Aquatic Club,the Burlingame School District and a representative from the lap swimmers. The group meets once month to discuss maintenance, scheduling and any other pertinent issues. Commissioner Dittman asked if the website was kept up to date. Caldwell explained that updates to the website are given to her supervisor and are completed within a day or two at the most. Commissioner Schruers mentioned that she knows many swimmers who are very happy with the pool. 4. Teen Programs—This item was tabled until next month's meeting. September 15,2005 minutes Continued—page 3 B. Commissioners 1. Chairman Larios asked staff about the status of the Drug Education Program to be developed from the Shinnyo-En donation. Director Schwartz reported that programs for parents and teens have been developed and will be held in both the Fall and Spring. 2. Commissioner Dittman asked if the building rentals for the Friends of Mills Canyon were being paid by the Youth Advisory Committee. Schwartz confirmed that this was being done. 3. Commissioner Muller asked if speed bumps could be put in at Bayside Park. Schwartz said he would talk to Public Works and the Fire Department regarding regulations and report back at the next meeting. 4. Muller asked if the new soccer field was posted with non-smoking area signs. Schwartz stated that there is no smoking permitted in the area. Muller then asked if the City can prohibit smoking in the ballfields and grandstands. Schwartz said that staff will agendize this item for the next meeting. 5. Commissioner Heathcote asked about having special use permits to use the Aquatic Center's aquatic centers bathroom facilites when they rent the BHS tennis courts. Coordinator Caldwell mentioned that the restrooms are able to be used by the tennis players,but the Aquatic Center is not always open when the courts are being used. 6. Commissioner Lawson asked where the AYSO kids are playing as the fields in Burlingame are filled to capacity. Schwartz mentioned that the back field at the High School should be available next year with discussion that the City may be asked to contribute to surfacing the area with synthetic turf. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Parks &Recreation Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday, October 20t', 2005 at 7:00 p.m. at Burlingame City Hall. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joleen Butler Parks &Recreation Account Clerk II City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreation Dept. 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 BtJRLINGAME phone: (650) 558-7300 - fax: (650) 696-7216 y� recreationnburlin ame.org TYars ro LM1^ Date: September 15, 2005 To: Parks &Recreation Commissioners City Council From: Randy Schwartz Re: Monthly Report Parks Division 1. Pershing Park playground has been completed and been certified by a playground safety inspector. The fences are down and the playground is in use. 2. Bayside Park restroom project is on schedule to begin construction in the winter. 3. Tree Crew completed its current grid area and is now completing active service requests. 4. Tree contractor has fulfilled insurance requirements and has begun work on Skyline Blvd. Contractor will also be grinding stumps in the near future. 5. Landscape Crew completed hedging of vegetation on the east side of California Drive,north of Broadway. 6. Lions Club held a successful Car Show in the front area of Washington Park in July and has asked to use the area again in the summer of 2006. The show was very well organized and was carried out without damage to turf, trees, or irrigation systems. Follow up cleanup of the area was outstanding. Recreation Division 1. Fall sr. citizens trips are sold out(River Rock—46 people; Steinbeck museum and lunch at Steinbeck house —20; White Christmas—20;Beach Blanket—46)are sold out. 2. Discussions are beginning to provide recreational classes at Hillsborough facilities 3. Burlingame&Hillsborough will combine their 4h&5t`grade volleyball program this season. 4. Five Music concerts were held in August, supported by$6000 sponsorship from Veolia Water 5. Teen finance class, sponsored by the Wells Fargo Bank on Broadway, had 80 participants 6. Preschool's Camp Treehouse had a total of 105 students in three sessions. 7. Movie in the Park series featured Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Shrek 2, and The Incredibles. Each movie had approximately 200-300 in attendance. 8. Drama class performed School House Rocks on July 29/30 at BIS. 18 children involved in the production and approximately 400 attended the three shows. 9. Income from golf classes for summer 2005 was up approx 60%over summer 2004. 10. Working with Burlingame School District and Community Gatepath to conduct a transitional kindergarten program at Washington School beginning in October. 11. Bayside Park diamond#1 lighting project is scheduled for October and November. 12. Burlingame High School stadium lights are being renovated this week. 13. New classes for Fall include Chinese Zither, Authentic Salsas, Appetizer Party Cooking and Planning, Storytelling for Mature Adults, Stroller Strides, Cardio Strength Combo, Cardio Express Challenge, 30/30 Cardio Core, Give me 5: Intervention Program for Overweight Kids(Parent/child class), Creating a Home for the Rest of our Lives: The Missing Link in Retirement Planning, Design Elements for Power and Pleasure-Feng Shui,Take Great Holiday Photos, Avoiding Identity Theft/Credit Score, Computer Comfort for Seniors, Propel Your Child to Reading Success, Take Back the Night! Slaying the Homework Dragon, and Tuesday Night Coffee Break Series Upcoming Events 1. YAC Dance—Sept 30`h 2. Flu shots—Nov 4'h CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA October 11, 2005 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the October 11, 2005, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Keighran, Osterling and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: None Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Zoning Technician, Erica Strohmeier; City Attorney, Larry Anderson III. MINUTES The minutes of the September 26, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. VI. STUDY ITEMS There are no study items. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. 1A. 110 STANLEY ROAD,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE(CESAR LOZADA,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; RUDOLFO PADA, DESIGNER) (75 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT 1B. 1461 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMITS FOR HEIGHT AND FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A NEW,TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(JERRY WINGES,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT,MARK&ILKA HOSKING, PROPERTY OWNERS)65 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS 1C. 1604 CHAPIN AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GARAGE WIDTH AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SIZE OF GARAGE FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH DETACHED THREE-CAR GARAGE (RANDY GRANGE,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT,GORDON&RANDI MURRAY,PROPERTY OWNERS) (36 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 1D. 1123 EASTMOOR ROAD,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SIDE SETBACK AND PARKING VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(RANDY GRANGE, -� APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT, MARK & CAROLYN QUILICI, PROPERTY OWNERS) (66 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT 1E. 1718 ESCALANTE WAY, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(DAVID LUNG, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;PAUL NII, PAUL NII ARCHITECTS,ARCHITECT) (37NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. CP Monroe noted that she did not want to call anything off the calendar but wished to make some corrections. She noted that there were corrections to the conditions of 110 Stanley, condition 1 should reference landscape plans date stamped October 3,2005; 1604 Chapin Avenue condition 1 should reference plans date stamped September 2,2005,not August 19,2005;and the story poles installed at 1718 Escalante Way were installed two feet lower than the roof line proposed in the plans. C.Deal noted some comments for the record on 1461 Bernal and the approval of a new house at this location,noting that the architect has done a skillful job of design:he commented that he voted no because of the attached garage on a new house where the garage and the automobile dominate the front fagade in an area where the majority of the houses have detached garages;the few and only houses with attached two car garages at the front,which were used as examples to justify the proj ect,belong to the group of houses which were built just prior to design review and were the type of the projects that were changing the character of the neighborhood and design review ..� came about to stop that dramatic change; the reasons for continuing the detached garage in this neighborhood was to provide the following : increased setbacks (caused by the driveway along the side); reduction of the mass at the front fagade; to decrease the effects of the automobile which was overly dominating the front fagade and drastically changing the character of these neighborhoods; the proposed design at 1461 Bernal satisfies none of these objectives;additionally the concept of having staggered doors on a two car attached garaged located at the front of the property as used here was never intended to be a "check the box" alternative, it was intended as a means to address garages in neighborhoods where the attached garage was the character of the neighborhood. C. Vistica noted that 110 Stanley should have a condition added to require stucco mold window trim. C.Vistica moved to continue action on the item at 1718 Escalante two weeks to October 24,2005,and story poles shall be installed which show the outline of the entire roof and addition and shall be surveyed to document that they are accurately installed. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item to the meeting of October 24,2005, and the story poles outlining the entire addition shall be installed accurately and can be seen by the Commission. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. C. Osterling moved approval of 1461 Bernal Avenue, 1604 Chapin Avenue, and 1123 Eastmoor Road as amended. C. Vistica seconded the motion. Chair Auran noted that there would be a separate vote on 110 Stanley Road and called for a voice vote on the -� motion to approve 1461 Bernal Avenue, 1604 Chapin Avenue, and 1123 Eastmoor Road. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 C. Brownrigg made a motion to approve 110 Stanley Road. C. Keighran seconded the motion. Comment on the motion: will vote no on the project because the porch is not integrated into the front of the �.- house and correction is a simple thing to fix. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve 110 Stanley Road with an added condition requiring stucco mold window trim to be installed. The motion passed on a 6-1 vote(C. Deal dissenting). Appeal procedures were advised for all of the consent calendar items. This item concluded at 7:10 p.m. VIIL REGULAR ACTION ITEM 2. 900 CAROLAN AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(JOHN MARCH,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; MR.AND MRS.KRIS REDDY,PROPERTY OWNERS)(45 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report dated October 11, 2005, with attachments. ZT Strohmeier presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments.Commission asked about the uncovered paved area next to the garage. Staff stated that an uncovered driveway parking space is defined as that space between the sidewalk and the entrance into the garage area,this additional paved area does not count. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Auran opened the public hearing. John Marsh, 11 Airport Blvd.#209,South San Francisco,designer, represented the project. Commission comment: • no problem with parking variance; • chimney is too close to second story projection per CBC, if it were a gas fireplace this requirement would go away; • very difficult house to put addition on; • windows in some bedrooms do not meet egress requirements; • front elevation bump out looks odd with no windows in it, needs fenestration to address blank projected fagade; • big improvement from original design; • could use a little more work on the windows,particularly on the bump out at the front; • more info needed about landscaping and how it will be screened from the street; and • proposed 24"-box size Golden Rain tree should be replaced with three 15-gallon size trees from the city street tree list, ones that will grow between 20 and 25 feet tall. Peter Fairclough, 905 Azalea Ave,thought project had been postponed and would not happen; concerned with the shade factor on rear yard and the moisture issue brought on by the shade;proposed second story will block the sun path to their backyard;concerned with proposed trees also creating additional shade. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission comment:second story addition meets the rear yard setback requirements,so there is no need to change the placement of the addition;to address shade in neighbors rear yard,suggest the proposed 24"-box size Golden Rain tree should be replaced by three 15-gallon sized trees from the City approved street tree list that will grow between 20'-25' in height maximum. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 C.Keighran moved to continue the application until the applicant has had the opportunity to address all of the Commissions concerns and make all necessary changes. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Comment on the motion: after discussion it was suggested that the motion be amended to place the application on the consent calendar after the changes had been made and staff checked. The maker of the motion and the second agreed. It was further noted that the changes are substantial and should all be addressed before the consent hearing. It was noted that if there is a problem,the item can be called off the consent calendar. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when all requested changes have been made and plan checked by staff. The motion passed on a 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m. 3. 1512-1516 FLORIBUNDA AVENUE,ZONED R-3—APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,CONDOMINIUM PERMIT,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT,SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FRONT SETBACK LANDSCAPING, TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP AND TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR A NEW, FOUR-STORY, 9-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM(DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;THORENFELDT CONSTRUCTION, INC., PROPERTY OWNER) (145 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN(CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 12, 2005) Reference staff report October 11, 2005, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Forty conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. --� Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Dayle Meyer,851 Burlway Rd.,architect,and Michael Callan,63, Bovet Rd.#314, San Mateo,landscape architect,represented the project. He stated changes were made to the project in response to the Planning Commissions concerns;the color board was revised and included in the packet;main concern at last meeting was the common open space area,a hallway was added directly off the lobby for access to the space from inside the building,planters were placed along each side of exit to provide privacy screening, screening walls were added off of private open spaces,and the largest chunk of the open space was placed in the area that will get the most sunlight,which caused a stairwell change and a revision in the parking plan. Commission asked: why did not put in security gates?Never came up before,never discussed with client. There are still trees in planters, landscaping plays a major part in this development, are the planters large enough for the trees to grow? Bottom of planters will be sawed off which will encourage roots to grow down into dirt below,will require a lot of maintenance. Seems unnecessary to walk all the way around the building to get to the open space at the back corner; how does revised common open space work? Any tenant could take the elevator to the lobby to the hallway and walk back to the common open space; no greater distance then if you were at a park and to travel from the street;this is a shorter straighter direction than the other option;the redesign has several areas for people to sit in. Right route to common open space should be a direct connection from the lobby, should be a stronger connection from lobby to open space; what is the relationship between the master bedrooms at the rear of the building and the open space? Privacy walls have been installed to help with screening these areas. Tried to create more intimate spaces in the common open space for people with separate seating areas, outdoor fire pits, low seat walls, a centrally -� located BBQ area and a putting green. Because of the grade change towards the rear of the property, it would be hard to look up into lower level units. Is rear landscaping in ground or in pots? Mostly in ground. 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 Design is a lot better,big improvement,but connection to common open space is no where near as nice as it could be. Common open space has been increased by approximately 405 SF because of moving the stairwell area. Like change to common open space and proposed color board. Who is responsible for maintaining the wooden balconies at the front? The condo association. Who is responsible for the planting over the pergola? Has yet to be discussed. Like the vines,is a softening feature;like tile element on front fagade at door and would like it continued on the tower element? Main reason tile is around entrance is to help distinguish the entrance,if tile work were on the tower it might detract from the entrance. Would help to add the to the windows that have balconies on the east elevation on the tower. Public comments continued:This is a good project and a good compromise for the site;the project has come a long way. Change in elevation from common open space to 15t floor units will be a sloping ramp? Yes. Is the seat wall between the circular seating areas three feet tall? Yes. Landscape architect should be complimented on this revision,there is a lot of varied interest;appreciates what was done. Will windows be true divided light windows? Yes. Like changes; color is very nice; some concern over interior access to common open space; could walk-in closet towards the back of unit number 2 be used as a restroom for people using the patio area? Would work to locate a bathroom in the closet area, do not feel route to common open space is out of the ordinary,like visiting a park;could add bathroom if Commission desires. Understands applicants idea,however,this space should be looked at as a backyard,not a park;there should be a sink by the BBQ area with running water and the installation of a bathroom. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commission commented:Much better project then what was seen in the past;concerned with connection to common open space; nicer building; a bathroom will add convenience to the outdoor space; would be in favor of the project with the proposed changes, including a waste line and a sink with running water in the BBQ area;how much use does a place like this get used realistically?;cold water in the sink would suffice; is it a necessity to have the bathroom?; restroom should be put in,bottom units are large and do not see a problem with reducing one of the bottom units for a restroom; likes adding a sink facility; access down middle of building would be better, but this will suffice; bathroom is a nice amenity; these added conveniences will help to create better use of the space;wants the tile incorporated around balconies on the east elevation; wood areas in front should be properly maintained; nice to see increased density in the downtown area; done a nice job. The commission requested the following changes to the project,added to the conditions of approval: • A sink with hot and cold running water and a waste line shall be added next to the BBQ area; • The master bedroom walk-in closet in unit#2 shall be replaced by a bathroom with direct access from the common open space area; • Title work shall be added to the window areas with the balconies along the east elevation; and • All windows shall be true divided light windows. Chair Auranmoved to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote to approve the mitigated Negative Declaration. The motion passed on a 7-0 vote. C. Keighran moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped September 26,2005, sheets T1,P1 through P10,SS4,L1.0,Ll.1,and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map;with 1,997 SF of common open space; and that the project shall include an affordable unit as shown on the plans date stamped September 26, 2005, and shall comply with the inclusionary housing requirements in Municipal 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 Code Chapter 25.63; 2)that a sink with hot and cold running water and a waste line shall be added next to the BBQ area; 3) that the master bedroom walk-in closet in unit#2 shall be replaced by a bathroom with direct access from the common open space area; 4) that the tile work shall be added to the window areas with the balconies along the east elevation; 5)that all windows shall be true divided light windows; 6)that the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 85.69'as measured from the average elevation at the top of the curb along Floribunda Avenue(32.61) for a maximum height of 53'-1", and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The garage floor finished floor elevation shall be elevation 22.73'; first floor finished floor shall be elevation 33.36; second floor finished floor shall be elevation 44.36';third floor finished floor shall be elevation 54.36';fourth floor finished floor shall be elevation 64.36';and the top of ridge elevation shall be 82.95'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the maximum height shown on the approved plans; 7)that any changes to the size or envelope of the building, which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 8) that the conditions of the City Arborist's July 15, 2003 memo, the City Engineer's August 6, 2003, and December 6,2004 memos,the City's Traffic Engineer's April 13,2004,memo,the Chief Building Official's June 9,2003,memo,the Fire Marshal's June 9,2003,memo,the Recycling Specialist's June 6,2003,memo, and the City Attorney's June 7, 2003, memo shall be met; 9) that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited; 10)that the applicant shall receive a Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Department before removing the two existing 22-inch diameter liquidambar trees at the front of the property in the city right-of-way,and that a building permit shall not be issued before such permits are issued; 11) that `guest parking stall' shall be marked on the three guest parking spaces and designated on the final map and plans,these stalls shall not be assigned to any unit,but shall be owned and maintained by the condominium association, and the guest stalls shall always be accessible for parking and not be separately enclosed or used for resident storage; 12)that the Covenants Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)for the condominium project shall require that the two guest parking stalls shall be reserved for guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents; 13)that the final inspection shall be completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 14) that the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but not limited to the roof,painting,common area carpets,drapes and furniture; 15)that the trash receptacles,furnaces,and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a building permit is issued; 16)that if a security gate system across the driveway is installed in the future, the gate shall be installed a minimum 20'-0'back from the front property line;the security gate system shall include an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows residents to communicate with guests and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; 17) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building envelope; 18)that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 19) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 20) that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs(Best Management Practices)to be used to prevent soil,dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed,locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11,2005 existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures;watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas; 21) that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, silt ._ fences, straw bale dikes, storm drain inlet protection such as soil blanket or mats,and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established; 22)that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way, clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 23) that if construction is done during the wet season(October 15 through April 15),that prior to October 15 the developer shall implement a winterization program to minimize the potential for erosion and polluted runoffby inspecting,maintaining and cleaning all soil erosion and sediment control prior to, during, and immediately after each storm even; stabilizing disturbed soils throughout temporary or permanent seeding,mulching matting,or tarping;rocking unpaved vehicle access to limit dispersion of mud onto public right-of-way; covering/tarping stored construction materials,fuels and other chemicals; 24)that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-off,promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers,herbicides and pesticides; 25)that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas,a self-contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 26) that this proj ect shall comply with the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of building permit application; 27)that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 28) that this proposal shall comply with all the requirements of the Tree Protection and Reforestation Ordinance adopted by the City of Burlingame in 1993 and enforced by the Parks Department; complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted at the time of building permit application and the street trees will be protected during construction as required by the City Arborist; 29) that project approvals shall be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump system; and the sump pump shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects(i.e.,dual pumps,controls,level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators shall be housed so that they meet the City's noise requirement; 30) that the project shall be required to meet all the construction requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame, including seismic standards, for structural stability and other related items; 31) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,City of Burlingame Storm Water management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 32)that demolition of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to receive a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit from the Building Department; and all requirements of the permit shall be complied with during construction; 33)that in order to reduce the occurrence of visitors entering a dead-end aisle in the below grade garage with no maneuvering space to exit, a sign shall be posted near the guest parking spaces which advises visitors of the limited area for guest/visitor parking;parking spaces in this area shall be assigned directly to residential units on the site and shall be closely managed by the homeowners association; 34)that the applicant shall plant two 36-inch box replacement Flowering Pear trees in the city right-of-way in front of the property and shall comply with the City's on-site reforestation requirements as approved by the City Arborist; 35) that the applicant shall install fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station as required by the Fire Marshal prior to the final inspection for building pen-nit; 36) that prior to demolition of the existing structures on the site, a survey shall be performed to determine if there is any presence of asbestos. The person who performs the survey must be Cal-OSHA certified. If asbestos is found,the BAAQMD(Bay Area Air Quality Management District)shall be immediately notified �.. and the applicant shall comply with asbestos removal requirements; 37)that all construction shall be done during the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal Code; these hours are 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 between 7:00 a.m.and 7:00 p.m.on weekdays,9:00 a.m.and 6:00 p.m.on Saturdays and 10:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. There shall be no construction on holidays; 38) that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the interior noise level within the building and inside each unit does not exceed 45 dBA in any sleeping area; 39)that the contractor shall submit the"Recycling and Waste Reduction" form to the building department to be approved by the Chief Building Official that demonstrates how 60 percent of construction demolition material will be diverted from the waste stream and the applicant shall be required to implement this plan;40)that all surface storm water runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)standards as adopted by the City of Burlingame;41)that sewer laterals from the site to the public sewer main shall be checked and shall be replaced to city standards as required by the development; 42) that all abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed as directed by the City Engineer; 43)that this proj ect shall comply with Ordinance No. 1477,Exterior Illumination Ordinance;and 44)that should any cultural resources be discovered during construction,all work shall be halted until they are fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified by the City Planner and the recommendations of the expert have been executed to the satisfaction of the City. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on motion:because an exemption was taken,the standard condition for affordable housing should be included;the corridor stays as is unless the applicant makes a change;who will maintain the vines on the pergolas above the balconies? Those are generally handled by the CC&R's. People will most likely take a lot of pride in their building and will do their own maintenance or the neighbors will get involved. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the project with the suggested changes and added condition. The motion passed on a 7-0 vote. C. Brownrigg moved to recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map for the project by the City Council. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map for the project by the City Council. The motion passed on a 7-0 vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:15 p.m. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 4. 904 AZALEA AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR FLOOR AREA RATIO AND PARKING SPACE DIMENSION FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(KEVIN SULLIVAN,APPLICANT&PROPERTY OWNER;RICHARD CAMPONUEVO, DESIGNER) (62 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT Reference staff report October 11, 2005, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. She noted that there were seven areas in which the plans were deficient and these would have to be addressed before action could be taken on this item. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. Commissioners asked: when the staff saw this project the first time there was no second floor?CP Monroe responded that when the original project was submitted in 2004 there was an attic with a 30"x 30"access door in a bathroom ceiling,so the attic was not considered habitable space,at that time the addition of the dormers was presented as architectural amenity for appearances,the attic was to be used for light storage with limited access. The present plan proposes a to-code fixed stair way to the attic area and enables the attic to be used for habitable area including being partitioned into two rooms. The covered parking area appears to be 19' by 22' on the plans. CP Monroe noted that a parking space must be unobstructed for its entire area,perhaps the applicant should address this. There were no further questions from the Commissioners. 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Kevin Sullivan, 904 Azalea Avenue, Allen Ash, and Richard Camponuevo, designer,represented the project. Submitted pictures of the progress of work on the house. Commissioner noted that the staff comments of corrections required to the plans covered about 80%of his concerns;in addition the dryer in the garage could be relocated to enlarge the parking area;the issue of two kitchens should be resolved, a house can only have one; the location of the family room is not typical, usually adjoins the kitchen, this is set off and looks like a bedroom with a door opening into the garage which the California Building Code does not allow; the way the bathroom with shower adjoin the family room it looks as if it is setup for a second unit,need to note specifically if it is not and add a condition that it will never be used as a second unit;there is a problem with the front porch,it requires a landing,show 12"it requires 3 feet,want to know how the landing will be integrated into the front of the house; dormers and clipped gables are out of scale with the rest of the house; plans show grids in the windows,do you intend to add them. Applicant noted that there were no grids in the windows now and he did not intend to add divided lights. The arches are different than shown on the plans and there are no arches on the dormers,did you not build them? The skylight is too big, 6 feet, it should be reduced and tinted. Are the trusses in? The Applicant responded yes. Generally the aesthetics are OK but there are a lot of code issues to work on. Commissioner asked about the floor plan of the attic area. Applicant said that he would remove the partition wall built in the attic area,then would he avoid the parking variance? Why is there no window on the back of the master bedroom into the rear yard? Applicant noted that the closet was located on that wall,did not want a window on the back yard to reduce noise in the bedroom. Public hearing and comments continued: Since asking for a variance for floor area ratio, what are the exceptional hardships on the property? Applicant noted the house has been built to previously approved plans,the roof is in,the windows are in,etc.,seek to put in a stair to provide safe access to the second floor which will be used like a library or study,the way the trusses are built preclude anything to make the second story bigger or reorganized. Commissioners noted: from outside looks fine,kitchen is setup for a second unit;where is the hardship,as you explained it you created your own hardship,if commission agrees it will be to benefit you. Applicant asked about the kitchen, why was it a problem now and not before. Commissioner noted it may not have been caught since you can have a bar area in a family room, but no cooking;this begins to look like a"duck";way the code reads cannot expand into an existing attic if it causes the FAR to be exceeded,not much change to the house, only raised the roof ridge one foot, all area over 5 feet is counted in FAR. Applicant's representative noted that a problem with the trusses meant that they had to shorten the porch but did keep the same pitch as the existing on the roof, only add dormers. Designer noted that they used the same roof pitch, better condition inside as able to use the attic area, the dormers make the house look better,changed the arches to improve the appearance,used the attic before,opened in a closet with a pull down stair, when the saw the room sheet rocked not see why they couldn't use it, stair improves safety, kitchen would be extended into the family room so that it would not be a second unit. There were not further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner comments: so many changes needed to the plans and deviations between existing and plans do not know what am voting on, need clean set of accurate plans reviewed by staff with planning issues identified, without good base plans should not act; should bring to action when drawings are complete, commission needs to address concept of FAR variance in order to give applicant direction. Because count all area 5 feet and over in FAR, not fair. Correct to focus on FAR issue, if approve people will build extreme one story houses with big attics to convert to living space later;applicant raised roof before the attic area was 6 feet now able to use the space,if he had been straight forward would not add master bedroom and keep square footage under FAR maximum with attic, this is not an attic existing 50 years, it is a recently built condition which created livable space and exceeds FAR by 10%. Problem is they can't use existing attic if add 200 SF over FAR. On properties where attic areas existing expanding into living area is not 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11,2005 adding impact and square footage existing,should not ask to reduce area in attic in order to use if that is the case. In this case the code is the problem for this kind of property,the 5 foot rule comes from contractors moving walls later. Need to stand by code,intention is not to make it hard to use attic space,is there a way to take some area out of use? CP Monroe noted that it had been tried unsuccessfully in the past,poses a big enforcement problem over time with multiple property owners. Commission needs an accurate set of plans, encourage applicant to look at ways to reduce FAR, do not see hardship. Variance is a concern, do not want this to apply to all attics, do not want to set a precedent, lower the roof so it is not habitable and increase storage or decrease the first floor area.When look at plans hard to follow,need accurate plans,need to look toward future owners,to grant FAR variance would do serious damage and create a bad precedent. Have same situation at home with fold down stair and live with it,works OK, if fold down stair would be considered inaccessible attic storage, if allow stair then changes use and sets precedent. Commissioner comments continued: maybe send this to design review with direction to make the FAR conform, maybe the reviewer can identify other ways to reduce FAR; if put on regular action could the applicant ask for design review? Yes. This is an older house (1940s) with an attached garage, if garage detached would gain 400 SF of floor area would this be a factor? CP noted no because many houses of the period have attached garages and the "hardship"would then be true for all of them. C.Vistica moved to refer this project to a design reviewer when an accurate set of plans have been prepared to explore opportunities to reduce the FAR,this is one way to get a complete and accurate set of plans. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: Can't support design review,it will not solve the problem;not see a good reason for the FAR variance,not support want to look at other solutions;motion give best opportunity to resolve, --� applicant has boxed himself in,give applicant an opportunity to fix without a variance,design reviewer will set the documents and give the best look; design reviewer may have a new idea. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to refer the project to a design reviewer. The motion passed on a 5-2-0(Cers.Brownrigg and Deal dissenting)voice vote. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:00 p.m. 5. 1840 OGDEN DRIVE,ZONED C-3/R-4 OVERLAY—ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING AND DESIGN REVIEW STUDY FOR AN APPLICATION FOR CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, SIDE SETBACK AND LOT COVERAGE VARIANCES FOR A NEW,4-STORY,45-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM WITH TWO LEVELS OF UNDERGOUND PARKING (ALEX NOVELL, BURLINGAME HILLS MANOR, LLC, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER AND TOBY LEVY, LEVY DESIGN PARTNERS,ARCHITECT(36 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. Commissioners noted: that he was at the propertyon Sunday and crews were cleaning up the grounds; staff should check the environmental check list the headings regarding level of impact are missing. There were no further questions of staff. Chair Auran opened the public comment. Alex Novell, developer, Toby Levy, architect, John Hickey, attorney,represented 1840 Ogden. Developer noted that this was his second project in the area and he lives and has an office in the city; this is one of the first proposed residential projects developed with the new zoning,close to BART,it is within the city's vision,targeting more affordable market segment with 5 below -� market rate units.Architect noted that the proposed project reflects the design of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s in the area, four stories with the forth story setback,two levels of underground parking,no unit looks into 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 neighboring buildings or into any other unit, lot coverage is an issue because of the central court yard, the setback variance is for one corner which is enclosed so the neighbor does not have to look into the garage; dwelling units about 1,400 SF,two bedrooms, average sales price$600,000. Commission comments for design review: new design guidelines establish build-to lines, envision area increasing density and creating a street wall,not included in this design; agree that area to south will change and area to north more slowly, but not a hardship to shift this building to meet build-to line and increase pedestrian traffic with a series of stoops and a strong connection to the street;concerned about the eastern fagade facing 1820 Ogden; met open space with lot coverage, not problem with the grade; in Block F if change two units you could have an interesting roof line and break up the long eastern fagade; not have a problem with 50.3 dwelling units to the acre rounding down; need to submit plans with the exact areas counted as common open space delineated,need to be able to determine that these are useable open spaces;3 guest parking spaces for 45 units seems insufficient;unusual not to have a security gate on a project of this type and size,if you do,need to wire to each unit so have access to guest parking;guest parking needs to be located so easily accessible and well signed; would like to see elevations of all four sides ofbuilding with a materials board,not sure elevation shown reflects what is shown on the plans should match on all four sides; landscape plan does not show exterior lighting, should add, also need key plant list; what kind of brick is being used, color and size,is there any charcoal brick? Where is the cedar wood trim located? Attorney noted that application includes a vesting tentative map; if been by site noted that it has been cleaned up,will have some one maintain regularly now;responses to the variances required included in the packet. There were no further comments from the floor. The public comment was closed. Commissioner's comments on design review: • Need to create a street wall,positive result will be to increase the court yard area; • Need to see a good color sample for the project including materials; • Need to break up the eastern fagade next to 1820 Ogden; • Site design is good with the interior court yard,but the vocabulary of the entire design does not work well, feels like an institution from the early 1970s, flat roof lines brick and stucco exterior, feels dated; • Bring up to the street to increase pedestrian orientation, include items like person sized railings; • Try to change neighborhood with Specific Plan,not look like medical building,this looks like South of Market or Mission Bay want Burlingame to feel different, like below grade parking; • Want to know more about what is on the roof and how it will be screened, will be seen from the hillside above as well; • Provide location information and pictures of similar buildings built elsewhere so Commissioners can see. • Add guest parking and decide about security gate, if include gate, show location; • Provide rendered elevations of all sides of the building; and • Provide exterior lighting plan. Commissioners noted: like modern architecture but troubled about impact on neighbors; can lookup and down the block and embellish,step forward and still blend can be a combination if it is rich enough; don't have a problem with lot coverage given the courtyard and the setback is caused by slope on lot and limited to a small area caused by parking and can be landscaped; this can be referred to a design reviewer in the `-- future if necessary; this building is important to bring forward because it is first and will set a precedent; 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 11, 2005 need colored renderings of all four sides particularly if architect and applicant choose to stay with this vocabulary, need right away identification of other similar projects elsewhere including photographs. .� Comments on the environmental document included: • Will traffic and circulation items 6a and 6b look at the office building as if it were fully occupied and operational or vacant? • How will the visual impact be assessed? Will it address what residents will see from above, looking down on the roof? • Will the project have an impact on the city's water supply? • Provide the existing lot coverage including impervious surface and the proposed project's lot coverage calculated in the same way. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m. X. PLANNER REPORTS Review of City Council regular meeting of October 3, 2005. CP Monroe reviewed the Council's actions on the Trousdale West zoning district and correction to the limits of the residential overlay area. FYI— 1309 Balboa Avenue, changes to approved Design Review project. Commission reviewed the proposed changes and acknowledged them. Correspondence and desk items related to the Peninsula Hospital project. CP Monroe noted that the commission had received several letters in their packet and one at their desks this evening regarding the Peninsula Hospital project. In addition she was waiting for a letter from the Hospital applicant addressing the Mitigation Panel. Condition requires that the project applicant submit for review to the Planning Commission a proposal for the Mitigation Panel. Commission directed that this issue be agenized and the representatives of the Hospital come and present a proposal for the Mitigation Panel. Commissioners also requested that the applicant provide a general long term time line for the project with some specifics for the short term time frame e.g. next 6 months. Problems seem to develop when people don't know when planting and other things are intended to occur. Also would like to know if the development team for the hospital has ever had any experience with replacing windows on adjacent properties caused by impacts during construction. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Michael Brownrigg, Secretary SAMINUTES\unapproved.10.11.05.doc ..� 12 CITY OF BURLINGAME BUILDING INSPECTION MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY Sep-05 F.Y.2005 F.Y.2004 SAME MONTH THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF TO DATE TO DATE DIFF Permit type # Valuation # Valuation % # Valuation # Valuation % New Single Family 0 $0 3 $1,130,000 -100 6 $2,427,000 8 $2,928,688 -17.1 New Multi-Family 0 $0 0 $0 0 0 $0 0 $0 0 New Commercial 0 $0 0 $0 0 0 $0 0 $0 0 Alterations-Res 44 $2,459,150 26 $1,140,050 115.7 120 $6,226,645 83 $4,333,150 43.7 Alterations-NonRes 7 $1,965,000 3 $25,300 666.8 21 $3,072,200 19 $2,946,032 4.3 Demolition 0 $0 8 $12,000 -100 4 $20,000 14 $13,500 48.1 Swimming Pool 0 $0 0 $0 0 1 $33,000 0 $0 0 Sign Permits 4 $5,900 4 $12,300 -52 12 $30,937 13 $25,732 20.2 Fences 0 $0 0 $0 0 0 $0 0 $0 0 Reroofing 31 $356,225 20 $238,403 49.4 77 $965,483 94 $1,267,806 -23.8 Repairs 1 $750 2 $26,000 -97.1 8 $42,300 8 $105,800 -60 Window Repl 6 $58,257 5 $35,051 66.2 12 $140,428 24 $215,742 -34.9 Miscellaneous 0 $0 2 $35,675 -100 7 $201,317 7 $67,105 200 TOTALS...... 93 $4,845,282 73 $2,654,779 82.5 268 $13,159,310 270 $11,903,555 10.5 s THE EUMINGANZ HISTORICAL SOCIETY P.O. BOX 1" BUBIMIMM CA 90U RECEIVED 2005 September 21, 2005 CITY CLERKS OFFICE CITY OF BURLINGAMF Mayor Joseph Galligan Members of City Council City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Dear Mayor Galligan and Council Members: The Burlingame Historical Society very greatly appreciates your grant of $3,000. The support of the City Council continues to be critically important to Burlingame Historical Society. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, RUSS COHEN President RC/rm