HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.11.21 BURLINGAMEBURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame
Special & Regular Meetings - Monday, November 21, 2005 CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
Page 1 of 2
BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
SPECIAL MEETING
CLOSED SESSION: 5:45p.m. Conference Room A
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to
Government Code § 54956.8:
Property: South Lane Crossing
Agency Negotiators: Jim Nantell, Larry Anderson, George Bagdon
Negotiating Parties: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board
Under Negotiation: Vacation of Crossing
b. Claim of Catherine Jones (Government Code §
54956.9(b)(1),(3)(C))
1. CALL TO ORDER 6:00 p.m. Conference Room A
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 7, 2005 Approve
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
a. Public Hearing and adoption of the 2005 Urban Water Hearing/Action
Management Plan for the City of Burlingame
b. Hold first Public Meeting on addition of the City of East Hearing
Palo Alto in San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any
item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown
Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is
not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or
action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door
and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Consider appointments to the Traffic Safety and Parking Appoint
Commission
b. Planning Commission appointment to replace Ann Discuss
Keighran
8. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame
9BYRY..GAME
Special & Regular Meetings - Monday, November 21, 2005 CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
Page 2 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
L (650) 558-7200
a. Resolution approving a professional services contract with
BKF Engineers for design of the Burlinghome Subdivision
Sewer Rehabilitation Phases I and II
b. Adopt an Ordinance affirming floor area ratio
computations for commercial development
C. Resolution accepting the 2005 Street Resurfacing Program
by C. F. Archibald Paving, Inc.
d. Warrants and Payroll
9. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Beautification,November 3, 2005;
Planning,November 14, 2005
b. Department Reports: Building, October, 2005
10. ADJOURNMENT TO REGULAR MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. INVOCATION
4. ROLL CALL
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any
item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown
Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is
not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or
action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door
and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
6. CEREMONIAL
a. Rotation of Council Officers
7. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at
(650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.
before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas
and minutes are available at this site.
NEXT MEETING—Monday, December 5,2005
AGEN
ACITY DA
0� TEM# Closed Session
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT MAG.
oFnt w[6�90
DATE 11/21/2005
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: November 17, 2005 APPROVED
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
REPORT ON POSSIBLE TRANSFER OR VACATION OF SOUTH LANE AT BURLINGAME
AVENUE TRAIN DEPOT
RECOMMENDATION:
Discuss options regarding real property arrangements at South Lane and new platform construction at
Burlingame Avenue Train Depot in closed session.
DISCUSSION:
The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain) is moving forward with the completion of the design of
the platform improvements at the Burlingame Avenue Train Depot. As part of the improvements, the crossing
at South Lane must be closed. However, the City has a number of options to consider in closing the crossing,
and any option involves arrangements with Caltrain regarding future commitments.
In closed session, the Council can discuss the options and instruct the City Manager and the Director of Public
Works on how to proceed.
Distribution
City Manager
Director of Public Works
CITY G
BURL(NOME
q+q 9
"FwT[o sur[6
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of November 7, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Bruce Carlton.
CLOSED SESSION:
CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following:
a. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code § 54957.6:
City Negotiators: Jim Nantell, Bob Bell
Labor Organizations: Department Heads and Unrepresented Employees
3. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Galligan, Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. MINUTES
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the October 17, 2005 Council meeting;
seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
5. PRESENTATIONS
a. COUNCIL RECOGNITION OF BOBBI BENSON FOR HER EFFORTS TO BEAUTIFY
BURLINGAME'S LANDSCAPED AREAS
P&RD Schwartz introduced Bobbi Benson thanking her for her efforts in beautifying Burlingame's
landscaped areas. Mayor Galligan presented Ms. Benson with a proclamation.
1
Burlingame City Council November 7, 2005
Unapproved Minutes
b. LIBRARY AWARD PRESENTATION
Lib Escoffier advised that the Library received four national awards from the American Library Association
for the following items: Library Brochure, a Children's program, and two Library Foundation items:
"Library Lines," the annual newsletter, and"Support Your Library"brochure.
C. CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT POSTER CONTEST AWARDS
FC Reilly introduced Acting Fire Marshal Christine Reed who announced the second annual Central County
Fire Department Poster Contest Award winners from Burlingame Elementary Schools.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1771 TO CHANGE PARKING TIME LIMITS ON HOWARD
AVENUE
DPW Bagdon reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on Ordinance No. 1771
to change the parking time limits on Howard Avenue.
Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 1771 fixing parking meter times and
rates on Howard Avenue between El Camino Real and Highland Avenue; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock;
approved by voice vote, 4-0.
Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after adoption.
b. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1772 MAKING AN EDITORIAL CORRECTION TO
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 23.01.050 REGARDING POOL BARRIERS
DPW Bagdon reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on Ordinance No. 1772
to make an editorial correction to Municipal Code Section 23.01.050 regarding swimming pool barriers.
Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 1772 amending Municipal code section to
correct possible safety issue on swimming pool barriers; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony; approved
by voice vote, 4-0.
Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after adoption.
C. INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AFFIRMING FLOOR AREA RATIO COMPUTATIONS
FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance restoring computation
language for commercial floor area ratio (FAR) in Section 25.08.265 and to hold a public hearing.
2
Burlingame City Council November 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance amending Section
25.08.265 to affirm Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation standards for commercial development.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by
Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman
O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days
before proposed adoption.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, suggested changes in remodel/replacement procedures for owners/
developers. Dorene Campanile, 1620 Howard Avenue, provided an update on the Relay for Life fundraiser.
Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater Avenue, spoke on Item 8.c. and her concerns about nightclub problems
involving the police. There were no further comments from the floor.
8. STAFF REPORTS
a. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 76-2005 APPROVING ANNUAL REPORT OF THE
ADVISORY BOARD OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND DECLARING INTENTION TO ESTABLISH
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2006 YEAR FOR THE DISTRICT
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council adopt Resolution No. 76-2005 approving the
Annual Report of the Advisory Board of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District and
declaring City of Burlingame's intention to establish and levy assessments for the 2006 year in the San
Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District.
Councilwoman Nagel made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 76-2005 declaring City of Burlingame`s
intention to establish and levy assessments for the 2006 year in the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
b. (i) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 77-2005—RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO CONSIDER
ADDITION OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO TO THE SAN MATEO COUNTY
TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND (ii) INTRODUCE ORDINANCE
AMENDING DISTRICT TO ADD THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council (i) adopt Resolution No. 77-2005 —Resolution
of Intention to consider the addition of the City of East Palo Alto to the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District(BID) and(ii) introduce an ordinance amending the San Mateo County Tourism BID
to add the City of East Palo Alto within the boundaries of the BID.
3
Burlingame City Council November 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 77-2005 declaring City of Burlingame's
intention to amend the boundaries of the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District to
encompass the City of East Palo Alto; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by
voice vote, 4-0.
Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen to read the title of the proposed ordinance amending the San Mateo
County Tourism Business Improvement District to add the City of East Palo Alto to the District.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by
Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman
Nagel, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days
before proposed adoption.
C. CONSIDER INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF
MEMBERS ON THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
CM Nantell reviewed the staff report and requested Council consider introduction of an ordinance to reduce
the number of positions on the Beautification Commission from seven to five.
After Council discussion, Councilwoman O'Mahony requested an attendance matrix of the commission
before considering this ordinance. Councilwoman Nagel requested interviews for this commission be
postponed until after November 21.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilwoman Nagel requested pulling Item k. for discussion.
a. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS OF ADVISORY BOARD FOR THE SAN MATEO
COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID)
CA Anderson requested Council approve appointment of eight Advisory Board members to the San Mateo
County Tourism BID.
b. RESOLUTION NO. 78-2005 APPROVING FIRE SURPLUS EQUIPMENT DONATION TO
SAN MATEO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
FinDir Nava requested Council approve Resolution No. 78-2005 approving the transfer of 1985 Van Pelt
Rescue Rig and Chassis to the San Mateo County Community College District.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 79-2005 ACCEPTING THE 2005 SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE
PROGRAM TO SPENCON CONSTRUCTION
DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 79-2005 accepting the 2005 Sidewalk Maintenance
Program, Spencon Construction, Inc.
4
Burlingame City Council November 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
d. RESOLUTION NO 80-2005 AWARDING CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA POWER
PARTNERS FOR CO-GENERATION POWER SYSTEM AT THE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT FACILITY
DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 80-2005 awarding contract for the Co-Generation
Power System Project at the Wastewater Treatment Facility to California Power Partners, Inc.
e. REQUEST TO CANCEL DECEMBER 19 COUNCIL MEETING
CC Mortensen requested Council approve cancellation of the December 19, 2005 Regular City Council
Meeting.
L ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 81-2005 CORRECTING THE EMPLOYER'S
CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL
CARE ACT FOR AFSCME, LOCALS 2190 AND 829, BAMM, DEPARTMENT HEAD/
UNREPRESENTED, POLICE ADMINISTRATORS, IAFF, TEAMSTERS AND FIRE
ADMINISTRATORS
CM Nantell requested Council approve Resolution No. 81-2005 updating the employer's contribution under
the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act.
g. RESOLUTION NO. 82-2005 APPROVING MINOR REVISIONS IN THE SECOND
AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE SAN
MATEO COUNTY NARCOTICS TASK FORCE
COP Van Etten requested Council approve Resolution No. 82-2005 approving the second amendment to the
Joint Powers Agreement establishing the San Mateo County Narcotics Task Force and authorizing the Mayor
to execute the amendment by and on behalf of the City of Burlingame.
h. RESOLUTION NO. 83-2005 APPROVING A SALARY INCREASE FOR THE CITY
MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY AND PARTICIPATION IN CENTRAL FIRE
DEPARTMENT MERIT PAY PLAN
HR Specialist Zarubin requested Council approve Resolution No. 83-2005 approving adjustment to salary of
City Manager and City Attorney and participation in Central Fire Department Merit Pay Plan.
i. APPOINTMENT OF RICK LYONS TO THE BURLINGAME AVENUE AREA BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) ADVISORY BOARD
CA Anderson requested Council approve the appointment of Rick Lyons to the Burlingame Avenue Area
BID Advisory Board.
j. RESOLUTION NO. 84-2005 ACCEPTING THE PLAYGROUND REHABILITATION AT
PERSHING PARK—PROJECT #81070
P&RD Schwartz requested Council approve Resolution No. 84-2005 accepting completion of Pershing Park
Playground Renovation, City Project No. 81070.
5
Burlingame City Council November 7,2005
Unapproved Minutes
1. TERMINATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL
COP Van Etten requested Council approve Resolution No. 85-2005 approving and authorizing the execution
of an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement establishing the Criminal Justice Council of San Mateo
County to terminate the Joint Powers Agreement.
M. REQUEST TO ATTEND OUT-OF-STATE CONFERENCE BY THREE LIBRARY
EMPLOYEES
Lib Escoffier requested Council approve out of state attendance at the Public Library Association
Conference in Boston, Massachusetts in March 2006.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Items a. through j., 1. and in. of the Consent Calendar;
seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
k. SPECIFY OFFICIAL FUNCTIONS FOR WHICH REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF
ATTENDANCE IS AUTHORIZED
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council approve the resolution specifying official
functions for which reimbursement of costs of attendance is authorized.
Councilwoman Nagel requested clarification of the organizations covered and whether fundraisers should be
included.
CA Anderson advised that he would modify the resolution to include Brown Act organizations as specified
by the Legislature. Reimbursement of costs for attendance at organizations not included in the resolution
requires Council approval prior to attendance.
For fundraiser events, CA Anderson advised that community groups would be contacted to request that they
charge elected officials an attendance fee rather than the full event fee.
Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to approve Resolution No. 86-2005, modified to include functions and
activities of organizations specified by the Brown Act; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved
unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City.
11. OLD BUSINESS
Councilwoman O'Mahony spoke on the violence which occurred recently at the successor to Fanny &
Alexander location. CA Anderson advised that the police chief is scheduled to meet with the owners on
November 81h
12. NEW BUSINESS
Mayor Galligan reminded every eligible citizen to vote on November Stn
6
Burlingame City Council November 7, 2005
Unapproved Minutes
13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Planning, October 24, 2005
b. Department Reports: Finance, September 2005
14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Galligan adjourned the meeting at 8:36 p.m. in memory of Nancy McGovern, wife of Russell
McGovern, and Mike Stucker's mother.
Respectfully submitted,
Doris J. Mortensen
City Clerk
7
Burlingame City Council November 7, 2005
Unapproved Minutes
Agenda
Item # 5a
Meeting
Date: November 21, 2005
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT
SUBMITTED BY n
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: November 10, 2005
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF THE 2005 URBAN WATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council take the following actions:
1 . Hold a public hearing on the City of Burlingame's draft 2005 Urban Water
Management Plan
2. Approve a resolution adopting the 2005 Urban Water Management Plan
BACKGROUND: The Urban Water Management Planning Act requires water
suppliers to prepare or update their Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) and
submit a complete UWMP to the State of California Department of Water Resources
every five years. Burlingame's last UWMP was prepared in 2000 and the updated
UWMP is due to the Department of Water Resources by December 31 , 2005.
UWMPs are planning documents prepared to help evaluate whether adequate water
supplies will be available to meet anticipated future water demands. In addition,
preparation of an UWMP is intended to assist water suppliers in managing the
efficient use of water within their service area.
DISCUSSION: The City retained Erler & Kalinowski, Inc. to prepare the 2005
UWMP. Findings from the development of the attached draft 2005 UWMP indicate
that, during normal water years, Burlingame is expected to have adequate water
supply to meet anticipated water demands for the next 25 years, the planning
horizon considered in the UWMP. The UWMP also addresses methods in which
Burlingame can achieve water use cutbacks during droughts and other water supply
disruptions. Additionally, the UWMP has found that Burlingame is efficiently using
water through appropriate conservation efforts and use of non-potable water. As the
UWMP document is voluminous, a separate copy of the Executive Summary is
attached and a presentation of the material will be made at the Council meeting.
Burlingame's draft UWMP has been prepared in accordance with the Act and in
cooperation with the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA),
the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, and the BAWSCA member agencies.
Additionally, the City has appropriately notified the public of the preparation of the
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Urban Water Mgnt Plan.doc
draft UWMP and made the document available for public review. To date,
Burlingame has not received any public or agency comments on the draft UWMP.
Staff has reviewed the draft 2005 UWMP and found it acceptable and reflective of
the City's water demands and supplies. Assuming there are no significant
comments from the Council or the public at the public hearing, staff recommends
that Council approve a resolution adopting the 2005 UWMP.
EXHIBITS: Draft 2005 UWMP(Council only), Executive Summary,Resolution
BUDGET IMPACT: There is no direct budget impact from the adoption of the
UWMP. The document refers to conservation measures which are founded in the
water operations budget.
c: City Clerk,City Attorney, Erler&Kalinowski, Inc.
S:�A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Urban Water Mgnt Plan.doc
Erler&
r-
Kalinowski,
Inc.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 1983, the California Legislature
enacted the Urban Water
Management Planning Act (UWMP 1 . NOTIFICATION OF UWMP
Act) which states that every urban PREPARATION
water supplier providing water to
3,000 or more customers annually On July 13, 2005, the City sent a
should meet the needs of its letter to BAWSCA and its member
customers during normal, dry, and agencies informing them of
multiple dry years. The UWMP Act Burlingame's plan update and
also requires suppliers to update their soliciting their input. In addition, a
Urban Water Management Plan and notification letter was sent to SFPUC,
submit it to Department of Water the San Francisco Planning
Resources every five years. Department, and the County of San
Mateo.
This updated plan has been
prepared to reflect the recent Consistent with State requirements,
changes to the UWMP Act and the Burlingame issued notifications
regional coordination efforts soliciting public input including a
between the Bay Area Water Supply notice in the City's e-News
and Conservation Agency electronic newsletter as well as an
(BAWSCA)and its members as well as advertisement in the San Mateo
the San Francisco Public Utilities County Times on July 21 and July 30,
Commission (SFPUC) . 2005. To date, the City has not
received any requests for
This Executive Summary is intended participation in the UWMP
to provide a brief synopsis of the development process.
content and information contained
in the body of the UWMP itself. But,
as with all summaries, important 2. WATER SOURCES
information that is contained in the
body of the report is omitted from As described below, Burlingame's
the Executive Summary for the sake water supply sources include surface
of brevity. Therefore, decisions water purchased wholesale from
developed based upon information SFPUC, recycled water, and
contained in this UWMP should only groundwater.
be made after careful review of the
body of the report itself and not the
Executive Summary.
DRAFT
Erler&
Kalinowski,
Inc.
SFPUC Water Supply Assurance is 5.23 MGD.
Although the contracts expire in
Burlingame receives water from the 2009, the Supply Assurance survives
City and County of San Francisco's their expiration and continues
regional system, operated by the indefinitely.
SFPUC. This supply is predominantly
from the Sierra Nevada, delivered The SFPUC can meet the demands
through the Hetch Hetchy of its wholesale customers in years of
aqueducts, but also includes treated average and above average
water produced by the SFPUC from precipitation. However, the Master
its local facilities in Alameda and San Contract allows the SFPUC to reduce
Mateo Counties. water deliveries during droughts,
Figure 1 - Total Historical Water Demand
5.00
b Q 4.00 - -
3.00 - - ---
w �
o Q 2.00
E
3 1.00
0.00
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Fiscal Year
❑Potable Water Demand ■Non-potable Water Demand
emergencies and for scheduled
In 1984 Burlingame, along with 27 maintenance activities.
other Bay Area water suppliers
signed a Master Contract with the Recycled Wat.e,
City and County of San Francisco,
supplemented by an individual The City currently uses approximately
Water Supply Contract. These 300,000 gallons per day (GPD) of
contracts, which expire in June 2009, recycled water for internal use within
provide for a 184 million gallon a day the wastewater treatment plant.
(MGD) Supply Assurance to the The City has not historically used
SFPUC's wholesale customers recycled water outside of the plant
collectively. Burlingame's individual and does not currently have the
DRAFT
,ps r:... [��j� I Kalinowski,
Ine.
treatment capabilities to meet the 3.WATER DEMANDS
State criteria for non-potable uses
such as irrigation. The following sections describe
Burlingame's historic,current,and
Groundwater projected future water demands for
both potable and non-potable water.
Historically,the City has not utilized
groundwater as a drinking water
source. However,the City has Current and Historic Total
maintained and intermittently Water Demand
operated one groundwater supply
well located in Washington Park for Figure 1 shows Burlingame's total
irrigating landscaping mainly in the historical water demand between
park. 2000 and 2005,including metered
Figure 2 - Distribution of Total Water Demand
2% 6% 0.1% ■Residential Single-Family
13% ■Residential Multi-Family
43% ■Commercial
❑Industrial
12% ❑Institutional
17% ■Irrigation
❑Temporary,Firelines
water consumption,unmetered
In the future,it is expected that water used by the Water and Fire
approximately 0.025 MGD of Departments,and water lost or
groundwater will be used on a more unaccounted for within the system.
regular basis to supply irrigation Currently,approximately 95%of the
water to portions of the park. The total water demand is for potable
well was not constructed for drinking water,which is purchased wholesale
water purposes and Burlingame is from SFPUC.
not currently pursuing development
of groundwater as a supplemental
potable water supply.
DRAFT
Eyler&
z —el'*%,l Kallnowski,
Inc.
Current and Historic Potable Water and Irrigation sectors accounted for
Demand 2% and 6% of the total potable
water demand, respectively. The
As indicated in Figure 2, total relative percentage of the total
potable water demand is grouped water demand by each sector has
into the following seven water-use not varied significantly over the past
sectors: five years and this pattern is not
projected to change in the future.
• Residential Single Family
• Residential Multi-Family
• Commercial
Figure 3 - Total Projected Water Demand
6.00
Q 5.00
b �
4.00
w 3.00
a�
Cd q
F 2.00
1.00
0.00
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Fiscal Year
®Potable Water Demand 0 Non-potable Water Demand
• Industrial
• Institutional Current and Historic Non-Potable
• Water Demand
Irrigation
• Other Approximately 5% of Burlingame's
Between 2000 and 2005, the total water demand is for non
residential sectors accounted for the potable water (see Figure 3) . This
majority of potable water demand in primarily consists of recycled water
the City. The Commercial and demand at the wastewater
Industrial sectors accounted for treatment plant. Groundwater from
approximately 12% and 13% of the the well has also been used in the
total potable water demand, past to offset potable water use for
respectively, while the Institutional
If
' DRAFT
Erler&
—e1'*%,1 Kalinoweki,
Inc.
irrigation purposes, mainly at SFPUC estimates that Burlingame will
Washington Park. purchase an annual average of
approximately 4.68 MGD of water
Projected Total Water from SFPUC in 2030 while Burlingame
Demand estimates it will purchase an annual
average of approximately
Burlingame's projected total water 5.03 MGD. Both of these estimates
demand is the sum of its projected are below Burlingame's Supply
potable and non-potable water Assurance of 5.23 MGD during
demands as indicated in Figure 3. normal years. It should be pointed
Burlingame's projected potable out that as a prudent planning
Figure 4 - Burlingame Normal, Single Dry, and
Multiple Dry Year Water Supplies
,1 5.0
4.0
a
3.0
3
2.0 -
0
.0 0 1.0
a
0.0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Fiscal Years
■Supply Assurance 0 Single Dry Year ■Multiple Dry Year
water demands have been strategy, the higher demand
independently estimated by projection by the Burlingame
Burlingame and separately by SFPUC methodology is being used to design
using two different methodologies. future city infrastructure
Both estimates assume improvements.
implementation of an aggressive
conservation program over the next
25 years as discussed later.
Executive Summary- DRAFT
—eINJElver&
Kalinowski,
Inc.
4. RELIABILITY OF WATER Burlingame's Single Dry
SUPPLY Year and Multiple Drys Year
Water Supply
The following sections describe
Burlingame's normal, as well as single During single dry and multiple dry
years, SFPUC is no longer obligated
and multiple dry year water supply.
to provide Burlingame with 100% of
its Supply Assurance. Figure 4 shows
Burlingame's Supply Assurance
relative to SFPUC's estimate of single
Figure 5 - Burlingame's Hetch Hetchy Supply
Assurance versus Projected Demand
5.0
A 4.0
3.0
3
2.0
Cd
0
a
1.0
0.0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Fiscal Years
Supply Assurance A SFPUC's Estimate of the Demand
—45—Burlingame's Estimate of the Demand
and multiple dry year water supplies.
Burlingame's Normal Year SFPUC has estimated that
Water Supply Burlingame's future dry year potable
water supplies will be 2.77% of the
SFPUC is contractually obligated to total BAWSCA wholesale water
provide Burlingame with up to 100% allocation during dry years until 2010,
of the City's Supply Assurance of and 2.70% thereafter. These
5.23 MGD during years of normal estimates are contingent on SFPUC
precipitation. developing additional water supplies
in the future.
DRAFT
Eder•&
Kalinowski,
OWN, Inc.
5. SUPPLY VERSUS DEMAND Assurance by 2030. Because SFPUC
is obligated to supply Burlingame
This section contains a comparison with up to 100% of its Supply
of Burlingame's and SFPUC's Assurance in a normal year, the
projections of Burlingame's potable City's potable water supplies should
water demands relative to the be sufficient to meet projected
projected water supplies. potable water demands in normal
years through 2030 as indicated in
Figure 5.
Figure 6 - Projected Demands versus Single-Dry
and Multiple-Dry Year Supplies
6.4
5.0
4.0 - - ----- -
i
----
2.0
0
a
0.0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Fiscal Years
D Single Dry Year Supply �Multiple Dry Year Supply
—�SFPUC's Estimate of the Demand —0--Burlingame's Estimate of the Demand
Projected Normal later Projected Single Dry and
Year Supply and Demand Multiple Dry Year Supply
Based on SFPUC and City projections and Demand Comparison
of Burlingame's future potable water During single dry and multiple dry
demands, Burlingame is not years, SFPUC is no longer obligated
expected to exceed its Supply
DRAFT
Erler&
—e,.... Kalinowski,
RMS
Inc.
to provide Burlingame with its Supply achieve the projected total water
Assurance. For dry year scenarios, demand.
both the SFPUC's and the City's
projections of Burlingame's potable Regional Water
water demand exceed SFPUC's Conservation
projected potable water supply as
indicated in Figure 6. BAWSCA and its member agencies
look for opportunities to leverage
Using SFPUC's projection of available resources and capitalize
Burlingame's future potable water on economics of scale in
demands, Burlingame's estimated implementing water use efficiency
cutbacks range from 21% in 2005 to projects. For example, in 2005, the
7% in 2030. Using Burlingame's SFPUC and BAWSCA administered a
projection of future potable water Spray Valve Installation Program
demands, estimated cutbacks where water conserving spray valves
range from a high of 18% in 2010 to were offered to food service
13% in 2030. It is anticipated that providers in BAWSCA member
these shortfalls in supply can be service areas.
made up through aggressive
implementation of the City's Water burlingarne Water'
Shortage Contingency Plan, as Conservation
discussed later.
Burlingame is committed to water
6. POTENTIAL WATER conservation and efficient use of
water and has commenced
SUPPLY PROJECTS AND implementing the following
management practices that have
PROGRAMS been developed by the California
Urban Water Conservation Council.
The City is not actively pursuing
additional potable water supplies to . Residential Water Surveys
supplement its SFPUC potable water . Residential Retrofits
supply as its future demands are not . System Water Audits
expected to exceed its Supply . Metering
Assurance. . Large Landscape Provisions
High-Efficiency Clothes
Washers
7. DEMAND MANAGEMENT . Public Information
MEASURES School Education
• Commercial, Industrial,
Following is a description of water Institutional Accounting
conservation measures being Conservation Pricing
pursued by Burlingame in order to Conservation Coordinator
LXeCUtiVC' _o&nary- DRAFT
Eder&
Kalinowski,
MW
Inc.
• Waste Prohibitions 10% short of its normal year supply. It
• Ultra Low Flow Toilets should be achievable through a 5%
reduction in indoor water use and a
30% reduction in outdoor water use.
8. WATER SHORTAGE
CONTINGENCY PLAN Stage III is to be implemented when
the City's potable water supply is
Burlingame's current Water Shortage 20% less than its normal year supply.
Contingency Plan was developed in It should be achievable by
response to severe droughts that decreasing indoor water use by 15%
occurred between 1975 and 1977, and outdoor water use by 50%.
and again between 1987 and 1992. Stage IV is to be implemented in the
During these drought periods, the event of a 30% reduction in potable
City was forced to reduce water water supply, as was necessary
consumption by a maximum of 34%, during previous droughts. It should
exemplifying the vulnerability of be achievable through the actions
SFPUC's Regional Water System to outlined in Stages 1 through III and
climatic conditions. In response to modification or replacement of all
these droughts, the City Council high-flow plumbing fixtures as well as
adopted a Water Rationing
Ordinance and a Water Rationing severe cutbacks in outdoor water
Plan.
use.
flag@S of Action Stage V responds to a 50% reduction
in potable water supply, and
Five Stages of Action have been includes a prohibition of all water use
established and mechanisms have except as required for public health
been identified to achieve water and safety (50 gallons per capita per
savings ranging from 5% to 50%. day) as well as a 100% cutback in
outdoor water use.
Stage I refers to a 5% cutback from
Suppiv
the City's normal year potable water
� ��
supply which SFPUC estimates is Interruption Pian
necessary during single dry years. It
should be achievable through In the event of a catastrophic supply
development of a public awareness interruption plan, Burlingame, San
campaign informing customers of Mateo County, and the SFPUC are
the drought conditions and asking prepared to take action to secure
them to change water use the reliability of the water supply.
behaviors. Planned responses to a catastrophic
supply interruption are described in
Stage II is to be implemented when (1 ) SFPUC's Suburban Customer
the City's potable water supply falls Water Supply Emergency Operations
: ufive Summary DRAFT '
Eder&
Kalinowski,
inc.
and Notification Plan,(2)the City of Major Emergency)and seven
Burlingame and San Mateo County's emergency planning scenarios.
Emergency Operation Plans,and Response actions could include a
(3)the City of Burlingame Water reduction or change in the supply
System Emergency Response Plan. available to customers in one or
more areas of the system,a change
Actions described in the above Plans to an auxiliary supply,or both.
primarily focus on maintaining flow in
the regional water system. In the Burlingame's Potable Water
event that this water is unsafe for Emergencies Plan
consumption,Burlingame has plans
in place to distribute potable water Emergencies
Potable Water
to residents at emergency Emergencies Plan was written in
coordination with the County of San
distribution centers within the City.
Mateo's Operational Area
SFPUC Emergency Operations Plan Emergency Operations Plan.
Together,these Plans provide the
SFPUC has established a Suburban framework for responding to major
Customer Water Supply Emergency emergencies such as natural
Operations and Notification Plan to disasters,technological incidents,
accommodate suburban purchasers and national security/terrorism
in the event of an emergency. The events. They outline a strategy to
SFPUC Plan is updated periodically, prepare for,mitigate,respond to,
with the next update scheduled for and recover from an emergency or
completion late 2005. disaster that affects the water utilities
serving San Mateo County and the
The purpose of the SFPUC Plan is to City.
provide procedures and guidelines
to be implemented by SFPUC and Specifically,Burlingame's Plan
suburban customers in an outlines procedures that the City can
emergency. SFPUC has committed follow to respond to water treatment
to make every attempt to ensure and distribution emergencies that
that the Regional Water System does affect the City. The goals of
not run out of water(even if an Burlingame's Plan are to(1) maintain
emergency water use reduction service of the City's water system
alert,boil water notice,or unsafe pumps,storage facilities,and
water alert is needed) to maintain infrastructure;and (2)acquire and
system pressure and fire protection distribute drinking water to City
capabilities. residents in the event that SFPUC is
not able to supply potable or
The SFPUC Plan identifies four treatable water through the
emergency response categories Regional Water System.
(Advisory,Alert,Emergency,and
Executive Su inory-- DRAFT M
Brier&
Kalinowski,
In the event that SFPUC is unable to emergency distribution centers
supply Burlingame with water within the City.
through the Regional System, the
City can reroute water held in Besides containing information
storage tanks through the system if related to emergency drinking water
such actions are necessary to distribution, Burlingame's Plan
maintain flow. Additionally, includes detailed information
emergency power generators are regarding personnel roles,
available to power the City's pump responsibilities, emergency services,
stations. communication recovery, and
reporting procedures. Burlingame
In the event that water provided by conducts training exercises with San
SFPUC is not potable, the City can Mateo County twice a year in order
rely on water stored in its reservoirs to to practice the implementation of
provide drinking water for a limited this plan.
amount of time. The quantity of
water available during an Emergency Response Plan
emergency will depend on the
nature of the actual emergency The City's Emergency Response Plan
(ERP) includes procedures that can
(e.g., time of day, season, damage
be implemented in the event of a
to infrastructure, etc.). Because
reservoirs cannot kept full all the terrorist or other intentional attack on
time, Burlingame has on average the City's water system to lessen the
impact on the safety and supply of
approximately 1 .6 million gallons of
drinking water. It is intended that the
water in storage. Assuming the
City's ERP would be used in
reservoirs survived a natural disaster
th
and contained the entire 1 .6 million conjunction with the City's Potable
gWater Emergencies Plan described
gallons, this quantity would be
sufficient to provide the City's above.
residents with a minimal water supply
for drinking purposes only for up to a
month.
Additionally, in coordination with San
Mateo County, Burlingame has also
devised plans to purchase and
distribute drinking water, most likely
in one-gallon plastic containers, in
the event that water within the
system is unfit for consumption after
an emergency. Distribution of
bottled water will occur at
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
ADOPTING CITY OF BURLINGAME 2005 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS, by Resolution 105-2000, the City Council of the City of Burlingame duly
adopted the City of Burlingame 2000 Urban Water Management Plan on October 16, 2000; and
WHEREAS, Water Code section 10261 requires the City, as a water supplier, to update this
Plan on a regular basis but at least once every five (5) years in years ending in five and zero; and
WHEREAS, the existing Plan has been reviewed and updated to address current conditions
in the City, the San Francisco Bay Area, and the State, and the City has consulted with the Bay Area
Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA), the San Francisco Public Utilities
Commission, and BAWSCA member agencies on the contents and goals of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the updated Plan will provide the outline for future improvements to the water
supply system, additional water conservation measures, and a ready reference resource; and
WHEREAS, the draft 2005 Urban Water Management Plan was made available for public
�. inspection pursuant to Water Code section 10642; and
WHEREAS, on November 21 , 2005, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on
the 2005 Urban Water Management Plan and received and considered all public testimony, both
written and oral, from all interested citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the updated Plan, the staff report, and the
responses to comments; and
WHEREAS, preparation and amendment of urban water management plans is exempt from
the requirements fo the California Environmental Quality Act under Water Code section 10652; and
WHEREAS, the 2005 Urban Water Management Plan, as amended, complies with the
requirements of the State Urban Water Management Planning Act,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED:
1 . The City of Burlingame 2005 Urban Water Management Plan, as amended, is approved.
2. The Director of Public Works is directed to file a copy of the Plan with the State
Department of Water Resources and to make a copy of the Plan available for review by the public
during normal business hours.
MAYOR
1
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
, 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
2
CITY G AGENDA 5b
ITEM #
BURY NGAME STAFF REPORT
" ' MTG.
DATE 11 /21 /2005
6rc• sun[6.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTE r
BY
DATE: November 8, 2005 APPROVED
BY—
FROM:
Y FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
HOLD FIRST PUBLIC MEETING ON ADDITION OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO TO
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION:
Hold public meeting on addition of the City of East Palo Alto to the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District and take public testimony. The public hearing on the addition will be held on December
5, 2005 .
DISCUSSION:
The City of East Palo Alto and the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau have worked together
over the past year to welcome the upcoming opening of the Four Seasons Hotel at University Circle in East Palo
Alto. The new hotel will have 200 rooms, including 27 suites. In October, the City Council of East Palo Alto
adopted a resolution consenting to the inclusion of the City in the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District. East Palo Alto would be in Zone A of the District, and the Four Seasons Hotel is
classified as a full-service hotel with more than 20 rooms.
The Brown Act requires the Council to hold two public hearings on the inclusion before reaching decision. This
is the first of those public hearings, which under the Brown Act is termed as a public meeting. Notice of both
public hearings was published in newspapers of general circulation in Burlingame and East Palo Alto, and
notice was mailed to the Four Seasons Hotel, which is the only hotel in the city.
Distribution
Anne LeClair, SMCCVB
CITY AGENDA
o� ITEM# 7a
BllR!lNGAME
_... � STAFF REPORT MTG
DATE Novem6ec2i.21245_
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITT,f
BYE -
DATE: November 14, 2005
APPROVED
FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY
r
i
SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to Traffic Safety Parking Com ssion
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider appointment recommendations of interview committee and make appointments or take
other action.
BACKGROUND:
Two commission positions are due for appointment because of term expirations. The positions were
n� b11 ini-s n tifi Cat1;nn In o ern c+nt to pa St n mi � I'r..�I ILa n th � nr
Nuuii�.i�2u a.�d 1-1 ou�i�,auvi i icttera vJci c acIn i w all poor Cvm��uSSion appii�,ai n� vn ��.e City s 2-yeas
waiting list. Six applications were received as of the deadline of October 28, 2005. Those applicants
were interviewed by the Council subcommittee of Joe Gailigan and Rosalie O'Mahony on November
9, 2005. The interview committee has recommended that Stephen Warden be re-appointed and
Mike Bohnert be appointed to the commission.
The appointee terms will be for three years each, ending in November 2008.
Page 1 of 1
MGR-Shinday, Netie
From: rosalieomahony1@netzero.net
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 6:01 PM
To: Nshinday@burlingame.org
Cc: joegallign@aol.com;jnantetl@burlingame.org
Subject: Re: Traffic Safety Parking commission appointments
Mayor Galligan and I interviewed six candidates for the two appointments to be made. Every
candidate interviewed was remarkably ready, willing, and conversant with TSP duties and
responsibilities.
We concur in(1) nominating Steve Warden for re-appointment and
(2)we nominate Michael Bohnert to fill the vacant seat.
Rosalie M. O'Mahony
11/14,/2005
4=.-T-7--.1-1AGENDA
"'t ITEM# 7b
@t)"q!ME MTG. 11/21/05
STAFF REPORT DATE
�o
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SyBMITT 1
c�
DATE: November 10, 2005 (,
APPROV
FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY__._ ✓` -_
SUBJECT: Planning Commission appointment to replace Ann K' ighran
RECOMMENDATION
Announce opening of application period with a deadline of December 9, 2005; schedule interviews
for the week of December 12, 2005; appoint new commissioner at the Council meeting of December
19, 2005.
BACKGROUND
Once Ann Keiqhran is seated as a new Council member she will no longer be able to serve on the
Planning Commission. v
Council may wish to open the application period for three weeks (instead of the customary four
weeks) for the following reasons:
• Avoid interviewing during the holidays
• Minimize the number of meetings when the Planning Commission will have only six
commissioners
• Historically, there have been an abundant number of applicants to this commission so the
recruitment period need not be as lengthy
Agenda
Item # 8a
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: November 21, 2005
SUBMITTED BY
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: OCTOBER 25, 2005
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH BKF ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF THE
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION
PROJECT, PHASES I AND II, CIP 81500
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached
resolution for a professional services contract with BKF Engineers in the amount of
$221 ,689 for design of the Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Project,
Phases I and ll. (Staff will seek approval of construction management services with
BKF at a later date.)
BACKGROUND: The sewer system in the Burlinghome Subdivision is 70 years old,
and is experiencing capacity and backup problems due to tree roots. As a result,
this area was identified as the next project in the City's Sewer Master Plan. Staff
received three proposals on October 14, 2005 for design, public outreach and
construction management services. Staff interviewed all three firms and BKF
Engineers received the highest rating based on their 20 years of design and
construction management experience with similar projects. BKF has successfully
worked on other City projects including the Easton Creek Sewer Project.
DISCUSSION: Burlinghome Subdivision borders Vancouver Avenue, Hillside Drive,
Alvarado Avenue and Adeline Drive as indicated on the attached map. The total
area has about four miles of sewer main including 60% located in the rear
easements and 40% in the streets. Due to the amount of work, the project may
require two phases of construction.
The project work plan is included in Exhibit A. The total fee includes $211,013 in
design services and $10,676 in public outreach services. The cost of design as a
percentage of the estimated $4,000,000 construction cost is below the industry
standards range of 8% to 10%. The design phase will begin November 2005 with an
estimated construction start in June 2006.
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80500 Burlinghome Subdiv Swr Rehab I&ll.doc
BUDGET IMPACT:
Expenditures:
Design Services (5.3% of construction estimate) $211,013
Public Relations (0.3%) 10,676
Total (5.6%) $221,689
There are sufficient funds available in the 2005/06 Sewer Capital Improvement
Budget.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Map, Agreement, Fee Schedule, Exhibit A
i
`ce"
Lt_;��i
Donald Chang, P.E. , ✓
Senior Civil Engineer
c: City Clerk
SA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\80500 Burlinghome Subdiv Swr Rehab I&II.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
BKF ENGINEERS FOR THE BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER
REHABILITATION - PHASE I AND II
CITY PROJECT NO. 81500
RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California and this
Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The public interest and convenience require execution of the agreement cited in
the title above.
2. The City Manager be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign said agreement for and
on behalf of the City of Burlingame.
3. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and instructed to attest such signature.
Mayor
1, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on
the day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\10.2005_Resolution.wpd
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION
SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT
d
3� •`` �P � wear xw
a
� � ti r / ,. J�' vt ti r',\'•Y� .. .r^r i1 �� e Ac:;
PROJECT AREA
CITY OF BURLINGAME
1%v SAN MATED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NITYVICI MAP
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR DESIGN, PUBLIC
RELATIONS, AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION - PHASE I AND II
CITY PROJECT NO. 81500
BKF ENGINEERS
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of
20 by and between the City of Burlingame,
State of California, herein called the "City" , and BKF
Engineers, engaged in providing design and consulting services
herein called the "Consultant" .
RECITALS
A. The City is considering undertaking activities for the
program management of water system capital improvements
services .
B . The City desires to engage a professional consultant to
provide design services . Consultant to provide consulting
services in conjunction with, because of Consultant ' s
experience and qualifications to perform the desired work
in Exhibit A.
C . The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified
and willing to perform the desired work pursuant to this
Agreement .
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS :
1 . Scope of Services . The Consultant shall provide the
following services listed below.
A. During design period, perform the public outreach
program in a manner similar to the Burlingame Park
Subdivision Sewer Project
B. Provide pre-design, investigation, design, and
construction management for Phase I and II .
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 1 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
2 . Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to
commence upon the execution of this Agreement with
completion of the program by June 2006 .
3 . Compliance with Laws . The Consultant shall comply with all
applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of
governing federal, state and local laws . Consultant
represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses,
permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature
which are legally required for Consultant to practice its
profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City
that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep
in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this
Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are
legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.
Consultant shall maintain a City of Burlingame business
license .
4 . Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for
employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the
services under this Agreement.
5 . Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to
Consultant by the City and all reports and supportive data
prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement are the
City' s property and shall be delivered to the City upon the
completion of Consultant ' s services or at the City' s
written request . All reports, information, data, and
exhibits prepared or assembled by Consultant in connection
with the performance of its services pursuant to this
Agreement are confidential until released by the City to
the public, and the Consultant shall not make any of the
these documents or information available to any individual
or organization not employed by the Consultant or the City
without the written consent of the City before such
release . The City acknowledges that the reports to be
prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are
for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and City' s
use of the information contained in the reports prepared by
the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be
solely at City' s risk, unless Consultant expressly consents
to such use in writing. City further agrees that it will
not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant
which is and has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to
be a trade secret of Consultant .
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 2 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
6 . Compensation. Compensation for Consultant ' s professional
services shall not exceed $221, 689; and payment shall be
based upon City approval of each task.
Billing shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of
the work performed by whom, at what rate, and on what date .
The submittal shall include the following:
A. A narrative progress report of specific
accomplishments during the billing period, problems
encountered or anticipated, plans for resolving
problems, accomplishments scheduled during the next
billing period, and results of any significant
activities .
B . A cost report for each task showing :
(i) Current period and cumulative expenditures to
date;
(ii) Estimated cost at completion;
(iii) Estimate date of completion;
(iv) Approved contract amount and task budgeting; and
(v) Comparison of task budgeting with the estimated
costs to show any variations .
Also, plans, specifications, documents or other pertinent
materials shall be submitted for City review, even if only
in partial or draft form.
7 . Availability of Records . Consultant shall maintain the
records supporting this billing for not less than three (3)
years following completion of the work under this
Agreement . Consultant shall make these records available
to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant ' s
offices during business hours upon written request of the
City.
8 . Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant
for the work under this Agreement shall be Michael Lin.
9 . Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be
performed under this Agreement are unique and personal to
the Consultant. No portion of these services shall be
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 3 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of
the City.
10 . Notices . Any notice required to be given shall be deemed
to be duly and properly given if mailed postage prepaid,
and addressed to:
To City: Donald Chang, P.E . , Sr. Civil Engineer
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
To Consultant : BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 200
Redwood City, CA 94065
or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or
such other address as Consultant designates in writing to
City.
11 . Independent Contractor . It is understood that the
Consultant, in the performance of the work and services
agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent
contractor and not an agent or employee of the City. As an
independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights
to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to
City employee (s) . With prior written consent, the
Consultant may perform some obligations under this
Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate
responsibility for performance or assign or transfer
interests under this Agreement .
Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought
regarding the subject of the work to be performed under
this Agreement . Consultant shall be compensated for its
costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and
testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates
of compensation, unless such litigation is brought by
Consultant or is based on allegations of Consultant ' s
negligent performance or wrongdoing.
12 . Conflict of Interest . Consultant understands that its
professional responsibilities is solely to the City. The
Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest
within the City of Burlingame . Consultant has no business
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 4 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
holdings or agreements with any individual member of the
Staff or management of the City or its representatives nor
shall it enter into any such holdings or agreements . In
addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently
and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest
adverse to those of the City in the subject of this
Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself
from such an interest should it discover it has done so and
shall, at the City' s sole discretion, divest itself of such
interest . Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take
reasonable steps to ensure that it does not employ a person
having such an interest in this performance of this
Agreement . If after employment of a person, Consultant
discovers it has employed a person with a direct or
indirect interest that would conflict with its performance
of this Agreement, Consultant shall promptly notify City of
this employment relationship, and shall, at the City' s sole
discretion, sever any such employment relationship.
13 . Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it
is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with
applicable regulations governing equal employment
opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do
and neither shall discriminate against persons employed or
seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex,
color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry,
physical or mental disability, national origin, religion,
or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide
occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair
Employment & Housing Act .
14 . Insurance .
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance :
i . Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the
duration of the contract, General Liability
insurance policies insuring him/her and his/her
firm to an amount not less than: one million
dollars ($2, 000, 000) combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and
property damage in a form at least as broad as
ISO `Occurrence" Form CG 0001 .
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 5 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
ii . Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the
duration of the contract, an Automobile Liability
insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her
staff to an amount not less than one million
dollars ($1, 000, 000) combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage .
iii . Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the
duration of the contract, professional liability
insurance in amounts not less than one million
dollars ($2, 000, 000) sufficient to insure
Consultant for professional errors or omissions
in the performance of the particular scope of
work under this agreement .
iv. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must
be declared to and approved by the City. At the
option of the City, either: the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-
insured retentions as respects the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or
the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration, and defense expenses .
B . General and Automobile Liability Policies :
i . The City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers are to be covered as insured as
respects : liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant;
products and completed operations of Consultant,
premises owned or used by the Consultant . The
endorsement providing this additional insured
coverage shall be equal to or broader than ISO
Form CG 20 10 11 85 and must cover joint
negligence, completed operations, and the acts of
subcontractors . This requirement does not apply
to the professional liability insurance required
for professional errors and omissions .
ii . The Consultant ' s insurance coverage shall be
endorsed to be primary insurance as respects the
City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers . Any insurance or self-insurances
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 6 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
maintained by the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the
Consultant ' s insurance and shall not contribute
with it .
iii . Any failure to comply with reporting provisions
of the policies shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers .
iv. The Consultant ' s insurance shall apply separately
to each insured against whom a claim is made or
suit is brought, except with respect to the
limits of the insurer ' s liability.
C. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have
and maintain Workers ' Compensation insurance as
required by California law. Further, Consultant shall
ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant
provide the required Workers ' Compensation insurance
for their respective employees .
D. All Coverages : Each insurance policy required in this
item shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall
not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days '
prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the City. Current
certification of such insurance shall be kept on file
at all times during the term of this agreement with
the City Clerk.
E . Acceptability of Insurers . Insurance is to be placed
with insurers with a Best ' s rating of no less than A-
:VII and authorized to do business in the State of
California .
F. Verification of Coverage . Upon execution of this
Agreement, Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance and with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this
clause . The certificates and endorsements for each
insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 7 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
on forms approved by the City. All certificates and
endorsements are to be received and approved by the
City before any work commences . The City reserves the
right to require complete, certified copies of all
required insurance policies, at any time .
15 . Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law,
he Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify
and defend the City, its officers, agent, employees and
volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs,
or expenses in law or equity, including but not limited to
attorneys' fees, that may at any time arise, result from,
relate to, or be set up because of damages to property or
personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of
performing work which may be occasioned by a willful or
negligent act or omissions of the Consultant, or any of the
Consultant ' s officers, employees, or agents or any
subconsultant . This provision shall not apply if the
damage or injury is caused by the sole negligence or
willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents,
employees, or volunteers .
16 . Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise
any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of
any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder,
nor does waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement
constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of
the same or any other provision of this Agreement .
17 . Governing Law. This Agreement, regardless of where
executed, shall be governed by and construed to the laws of
the State of California . Venue for any action regarding
this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County
of San Mateo or Santa Clara .
18 . Termination of Agreement . The City and the Consultant
shall have the right to terminate this agreement with or
without cause by giving not less than fifteen (15) days
written notice of termination. In the event of
termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all
plans, files, documents, reports, performed to date by the
Consultant . In the event of such termination, City shall
pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the
maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City
bears to completed services contemplated under this
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 8 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
Agreement, unless such termination is made for cause, in
which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in
light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in
such termination.
19 . Amendment . No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or
amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in
writing and signed by the City and the Consultant .
20 . Disputes . In any dispute over any aspect of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney' s fees, as well as costs not to exceed
$7, 500 in total .
21 . Entire Agreement . This Agreement constitutes the complete
and exclusive statement of the Agreement between the City
and Consultant . No terms, conditions, understandings or
agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement,
unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the party to
be bound, shall be binding on either party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed
this Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1) .
City of Burlingame
By
Jim Nantell, City Manager BKF Engineers
Print Name
Title
ATTEST : Approved as to form:
Doris J. Mortensen Larry Anderson
City Clerk City Attorney
Revised: Mach 31, 2005 Page 9 of 9
S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81500\Consultant Selection\Agreement_Consultant_Rev2005.doc
Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase I and II
City Proiect No. 81500
Estimated Work Effort by Task for Desiqn Phase Services (Study & Construction Documents)
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive,Suite 200
Redwood City Ca 94065
Senior Proj Project Engineer Engineer Engineer Surveyor Survey
TASKSMORK SCOPE TOTAL Principal Manager Manager III II 1II Crew Outside Phase
HOURS Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Services Totals
$163.00 $140.00 $137.00 $116.00 $99.00 $87.00 $99.00 $198.00
PART I.DATA GATHERING&PROJECT STUDY
Task 1. Study and Project Understanding
1.01 Meeting with City staffs of Burlingame to define projec 12 4 4 4 $1,760
scope and schedule
1.02 Site visit to inspect sewer line in easement and street 20 4 8 8 $2,584
1.03 Gather data on existing sewer system and 24 2 6 16 $2,686
underground utilities
tTfa.0101 ike dG "Ihtd e; x �, s 'r -n s :r �r u. `."€s ,61t V=
"r
'^�35
ry e
�f; '� �
" 472.
VO4 Am,
SAM
OWN
^ >r A9,165_WTIM'goil",
1^ "'�. t� ` .� F.kk
4�r
It A .r r 4 i*§'' " ty
e
, h
/t
k
ro e
Subtotal 218 10 38 42 68 40 20 0 0 $0 $26,292
Reimbursable Budget $789
Study and Preliminary Understanding Subtotal $27,081
Task 2. Alternative Design Investigation
� �;�°��,6'afu�k�if�Ifrrafiive r ttstn��iuctian to easettlenfi a�?d '' � � `s�f� ,„� ti�mp
r .t�,
�.N { al
r a�" f e ' U�-`O� Nil" On for",
K 4jr .., P x 0 k 1
4 P rer' �
3
.�a 'n `v
�' 1 Y`:u.l 2�x :� jt b+ f'fi,-
Mi`' i tl' #g Sf" "ur,leJfriastreet? N r 43 1=, 12 t 4 , 8. 1-2
*,. °^"�. , a IRF a°�; �r 4 Y.=s. ,t;.t, ... •�u,+t:»,.:.k arta, an
�, =rf�f3. tEClal f�tefal Gtlnn�GtlOn and:alterh t<e �.,• ,r r �r ?,"�, ,��� t d i ,��� r;,� „r� -�'' � � 1 7"'y....�.�`w� ,.ya.. ,�� ,c;.
,
cte�xI ,<r!°
rc '112"W
w �naryopi > n,�eR4
0
D�GURfE '1 afilVe in!`a'b{1w writtel1`I a N�Itfl CdBt' D a. t a t,� ,G i s P
X103#' • ,y
.ra.;, >.- ''8rilfr'eC6rtlfn �dtlbn�3 Air ,- .:,,. i a
°2.04 Mefiilg`WlthdY to�e'vicw r®cortm`mendatfOrt9 5 12 4 4
2:05 ftdmini5tiattoR and:repoitin9 regirieiYienfs 10 2 , $11434
Subtotal 220 12 68 42 44 18 36 0 0 $0 $27,248
Reimbursable Budget $817
Alternatives Design investigation Subtotal $28,065
Part I Total 438 22 106 84 112 58 56 0 0 $0 $55,146
Line items shaded in blue are tasks outside of typical Basic Services for design.
Burlinghome Sewer-Fees ver2.xls/Study&Design 1 of 4 11/2/05
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive,Suite 200
Redwood City Ca 94065
Senior Proj Project Engineer Engineer Engineer Surveyor Survey
TASKSIWORK SCOPE TOTAL Principal Manager Manager III 11 1 II Crew Outside Phase
HOURS Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Services Totals
$163.00 $140.00 1 $137.00 $116.00 $99.00 $87.00 $99.00 1 $198.00
PART II,CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PREPARATION
The following scope of work will need to be reevaluated based upon the design alternative selected in Task 2. The following hourly breakdown is an estimate
Note: based on the assumption that pipe burst,short reach open cut or combination at easement area,pipe burst or new sewer line at street. There are 400 laterals at
Burlinghome subdivision,43 laterals at 1400 Block Balboa,and 30 laterals at 1300 Block Capuchino.
Task 3 30%Design Phase
3.01 Prepare base maps for the project-we have assumed 116 4 40 40 32 $11,944
the City GIS ma s can be used
�,.P .� , c, - `r ;$ ''acv ti
MR
- .., le ta, i7 ,t0.:rate Ine.... ( C•et@ „tlQn9,: *',iipr r.x. rx;.�,. ti=..i',','-.„+'�crg"5 tr',. e'S� " �"� $� `
K- '+. �, ;�... , a 6,^rt,� d','.. 4 „, �...., ., ��o-i'j`•t. '-rr��$6'`a32
R , .q. M, �'°^.. � -. ., .�-2
,�v + 1lPie S SF.
.•e
3.03 Utility investigation
a.gather utility maps and show on plans 52 4 4 12 16 16 $5,476
� y.5
-r.-
1 ".721 60
m
a.„ "+n �N lGu s a r, '& t.3 '� 'a iw h
a § Ij § 47s1G� Q, ry a � &� r° 1r' $ ' �u + `; $J 600 2)a
. ,;rl�k»�.` ,
3.06 Prepare preliminary Plan&Profile alignments 34 2 4 8 20 $3,722
3.07 Plan submittal to the City for review 102 2 48 48 4 $10,942
3.08 Prepare preliminary opinion of probable construction 28 8 4 8 8 $3,388
cost
3.09 Meeting with City to discuss and receive direction 12 4 4 4 $1,760
3.10 Administration and reporting requirements 12 2 6 4 $1,714
Subtotal 603 8 54 44 136 112 72 24 40 $11,300 $69,616
Task 4 70%Design Phase
4.01 Incorporate City comments 34 2 1 12 12 8 1 $3,550
4.02 Develop plan&profile drawings 112 4 8 40 40 20 $11,996
4.03 Prepare outline technical specifications for project 46 2 12 8 24 $5,886
4.04 Coordinate&permitting with affected agencies 36 4 8 8 8 8 $4,492
4.05 Update opinion of probable construction cost 28 8 4 8 8 $3,292
4.06 Submit plans and specification to City for review 14 2 4 8 $1,524
4.07 Meet with City staff to review plans and receive 12 4 4 4 $1,760
comments
4.08 Administration and reporting requirements 10 2 4 4 $1,434
Subtotal 292 12 42 42 92 52 52 0 0 $0 $33,934
Task 5 100%Design Phase for 2006 construction package
5.01 Incorporate City comments 68 8 32 20 8 $7,508
5.02 Complete plan&profile drawings 106 2 4 8 40 32 20 $11,530
5.03 Complete project specifications 26 2 4 4 16 $3,290
5.04 Coordinate with affected agencies 24 2 8 6 8 1 $3,196
5.05 Update opinion of probable construction cost 13 1 2 2 4 4 $1,529
5.06 Submit plans and outline specs to City for review 26 2 4 12 8 $2,916
Burlinghome Sewer-Fees ver2.xls/Study&Design 2 of 4 11/2/05
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive,Suite 200
Redwood City Ca 94065
Senior Proj Project Engineer Engineer Engineer Surveyor Survey
TASKSMORK SCOPE TOTAL Principal Manager Manager III II 1 II Crew Outside Phase
HOURS Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Hrs Services Totals
$163.00 $140.00 $137.00 $116.00 $99.00 $87.00 $99.00 $198.00
5.07 Meet with City staff to review plans and receive 12 4 4 4 $1,760
comments
5.08 Prepare final Phase I bid document package and 24 16 8 $2,648
submit to City for issuing to bidders
5.09 Package design files submittal to City 18 4 8 6 $2,082
5.10 Administration and reporting requirements&QC check 20 12 4 4 $3,064
Subtotal 337 23 40 32 136 66 40 0 0 $0 $39,523
Task 6 100%Design Phase for 2007 construction package
6.01 Update opinion of probable construction cost 13 1 2 2 4 4 $1,529
6.02 Prepare final Phase II bid document package and 30 2 16 12 $3,324
submit to City for issuing to bidders
6.03 Package design files submittal to City 16 2 8 6 $1,802
6.04 Administration and reporting requirements&QC check 8 4 2 2 $1,206
Subtotal 67 5 8 4 28 18 4 0 0 $0 $7,861
Escalation to 2006-07 $393
Part II Subtotal $11,300 $151,327
Reimbursable Budget $4,540
Part II Total 1,299 48 144 122 392 248 168 24 40 $11,300 $155,867
Total for Design Phase Engineering 1,737 70 250 206 504 306 224 24 40 $11,300 $211,013
Line items shaded in blue are tasks outside of typical Basic Services for design.
Notes:
1 We propose using BAAG to do 2-3 borings to determine soils in the area for the alternative of open cut alternative at street.
2 Miller pipeline will pothole utility crossings to determine elevations. We have assumed 6-10 potholes will be needed,which will take about 2-days at$2500 per day.
Budinghome Sewer-Fees ve2.xis/Study&Design 3 of 4 11/2/05
Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase I and II
City Proiect No. 81500
Estimated Work Effort by Task for Additional Services
BKF Engineers
255 Shoreline Drive,Suite 200
Redwood City Ca 94065
TOTAL Senior Prol
PUBLIC OUTREACH-TASKSIWORK SCOPE work performed by Circle P HOURS Principal Manager Associate Coordinator Graphics Phase
Hrs Hrs Hm Hm Totals
$225.00 $150.00 $90.00 $65.00 $60.00
Task 1.Design Phase
1.01 Coordination Meetings 4 2 2 $480
1.02 Mailing List 14 2 12 $1,380
1.03 Information Line(Set up,monitoring,tracking) 0 $0
1.04 Web Site Initial Posting 10 2 8 $1,020
1.05 Informational Materials 30 5 20 5 $2,875
1.06 ROE Coordination Support As Needed 29 4 25 $2,850
Subtotal 87 0 15 67 5 0 $8,605
EXPENSES
Postage $300
Copying and Reproduction $500
Web Site Posting $300
Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 $1,100
Subtotal $9,705
10%Service Charge $971
Total for Design Phase Public Outreach $10,676
Total for Design Phase $221,689
Burlinghome Sewer-Fees ver2.xls/Public Outreach 4 of 4 11/2/05
,I PROJECT WORK PLAN
�■ PROJECT WORK PLAN
BRF
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER PROJECT
A. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING sewer main, the existing easements also serve PG&E
'1 overhead power and gas lines, water, and cable TV
J The Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer lines. Quite a few PG&E electrical overhead lines
Rehabilitation Phase I and II project consists of serving individual houses have been converted to
three major areas, namely (1) the Burlinghome underground power service line and this make sewer
Subdivision sewer main from Vancouver Drive to line replacement more difficult, especially if the
Alvarado Avenue and between Hillside Drive and open cut option is used. The PG&E power poles,
Adeline Avenue, (2) the 1400 Block Balboa, and existing underground utilities, and the 900 turns of
J (3) the 1300 Block Capuchino easements. We many of the easements are factors which make
have reviewed the RFP and the drawings provided maneuvering major equipment within the easements
by the City and have walked the entire length of difficult.
the sewer main proposed to be replaced to
familiarize with the scope of the project. We also B. PROJECT APPROACH
discussed the RFP with City of Burlingame staff to
understand the City's need. BKF's project approach will be to develop sewer
main replacement alternatives and cost estimates to
The sanitary sewer systems to be rehabilitated are replace the existing 6" and 8" sewer main in the
as follows: easements and at the street. To accomplish this, we
propose the following:'
Burlinghome Balboa& ➢ BKF will review the City-provided TV and
Subdivision Capuchino video investigation logs for the sewer lines to
Street Easement Easement identify the problem areas, including any dips,
Sewer Main pipe failures and root infiltration, and location of
(LF) 7,660 11,830 1,770 the sewer laterals.
The City has the desire to replace the existing 6"
Manhole 46 40 5 sewer mains with 8" lines. We will perform a
7 Lamphole 12 23 4 sewer capacity study to verify that the 8" pipes
Lateral 400 73 will meet the maximum anticipate sewer flow.
We will visit the site to locate problematic areas
Unfortunately, most of the sewer mains in the based on visible surface evidence and identify
d public right of way were constructed about 80 possible utility conflicts.
years or more ago and are covered by well > BKF will gather all available information from
established landscaping, retaining walls, and the City, utility companies and other sources
sidewalks. The sanitary sewer rehabilitation will regarding street boundaries, right-of-way, and
be designed to minimize the impact to the PG&E overhead and underground electrical and
neighbors. gas lines.
> We will superimpose the existing underground
We understand that by the time the City issues the utilities, particularly the PG&E overhead and
engineering design contract, TV and video underground electrical and gas lines, onto our
inspection reports for all the sewer lines will be design drawings in the early stages of design for
available. It is our understanding that Nnost of the use in the sewer main replacement alternative
sewer mains are 6" or 8" VCP material and the study.
depth ranges from two feet (2') to nine feet (9'). ➢ Identify the possible alternatives for sewer line
The pipes are located within the public right of replacement for both easement construction and
way in the street and rear lot easements. The street construction. Construction cost, schedule,
existing easements are well defined with wood project constructability-�traffic control, and
fences on both sides. In addition to the sanitary
RFP: Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase I and Il,City Project No.815000 _ 650.482.6300
Date: October 14,2005 www.bkf.com
I
, L
PROJECT WORK PIAN
J
PROJECT WORK PLAN
BkF
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER PROJECT
neighborhood impact will be considered for
each alternative. This task will consist of developing a thorough
Based on our preliminary study, it appears that understanding of the City of Burlingame's sewer
pipe bursting, open cut, or a combination of system. The purpose of this work is to gather all
1 both methods will be used for this project. relevant data, including a new TV survey of the
a existing sewer line provided by the City at the time
One of the challenges of this project is that neither of design, so that appropriate modeling studies can
1 the City nor BKF can clearly define a construction be done. Our work scope will include:
�+I method at this time. We cannot draw a conclusion ➢ Meeting with City of Burlingame staff and
that one method is better than the other until affected agencies and departments to define the
further studies are made. We expect that a project, design parameters,work scope, schedule
combination of construction methods will be used and other project concerns.
on this rehabilitation project. > Site visit to observe all sewer lines in the
1 easements and in the public right of way and
J Since selection of a construction method perform site inspection.
alternative is not known at this time, we have Gather data on existing sewer system and
made the assumption that during the study phase utilities from the City, utility companies, and to
Jof the project all the practical options will be identify the possible conflicts and
considered Pipe bursting method is likely to be encumbrances, particularly with the PG&E
used in most of the easement areas except in lines.
J locations where space is too limited to ➢ Review City-provided TV survey of all existing
accommodate the pipe bursting equipment and in sewer lines to identify the location of the sewer
locations where pipes turn. In such cases, open laterals, the existing line condition, and locate
cut method will be used. We have also tentatively possible storm line connection.
assumed that we will rule out the open cut option ➢ Based on TV survey and inspection of
in the public right of way and use the pipe bursting manholes, we will prepare a summary outlining
method. The existing sewer main alignments are the problems.
all behind existing sidewalks and under well ➢ Conduct a sewer study to analyze the flow
maintained landscape area, many with retaining capacity for each main sewer line. The City has
walls. It is difficult for the contractor to restore the desire to replace all existing sewer main
the landscaping in front of each individual within the study area to an eight (8") sewer
residential unit to their original mature condition. main. Based on the study, we will verify that
In addition to using the pipe bursting method to the proposed 8" sewer main will meet the design
replace sewer main at the same alignment in the criteria.
public right of way, new sewer main construction
in the street should be considered to minimize Deliverables: Logs documenting problems found,
damages to well developed landscape areas. The composite map showing the combined systems of
following sections outline specific tasks that would Burlinghome Subdivision, 1400 Block Balboa, 1300
be required. Block Capuchino, and sewer capacity report.
C. ENGINEERING DESIGN SCOPE Task 2—Alternative Design Investigation
OF WORK (services provided by
BKF Engineers) Based on the work performed in Task 1, this task
will involve the development of the alternative
PHASE I-Data Gathering and Project Study designs. At this stage, alternative methods of
-� construction for the sewer ruains are identified and
-
Task 1 Data gathering and project evaluated. Alternative solutions are evaluated based
understanding on cost, impact to the residents, and constructability.
RFP: Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase i and II,City Project No.815000
Date: October 14,2005 650.482.8300
www.bkf.com
PROJECT WORK PLAN
PROJECT WORK PLAN
BkF
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER PROJECT
Work to be performed includes the following: method will also be used in areas where the use of
pipe bursting machines is not feasible. For the
At least two alternatives to replace the existing public street area, pipe bursting or new sewer line
sewer main will be evaluated. Summary of construction will be decided in the preliminary
l findings in a brief report form will be engineering phase.
J submitted to the City for review and
discussion. Task 3 -30% Design
Evaluate alternative construction methods - At the plan development stage we will prepare a
We have assumed existing mapping from the skeleton set of project plan documents. We have
City will be used. assumed that the City's GIS maps will be used as
a. Replacement of sewer mains in the base maps for this work. The information shown on
easement the GIS maps will be supplemented with field
• Open cut replacing existing pipes in surveys to provide the information required to
the same alignment develop plan and profile sheets for the new
d Pipe bursting along existing alignment improvements. Utility crossings will be researched
d Combination of both methods and critical crossing locations identified. Potholing
b. Replacement of sewer mains in the street will be done to locate major utilities. The
■ Pipe bursting along existing alignment information will be shown on the plan sheets and the
• Open cut to install new pipes in the new sewer pipeline adjusted to miss the existing
street utilities to the maximum extent possible. If conflicts
■ Combination of both of these exist that would require the relocation of any
construction methods existing utilities they will be identified along with
v Prepare preliminary cost estimates for each the estimated cost of relocation. The work will
alternative include:
Document the alternatives in a written report
with cost and recommendations > Use City GIS maps to prepare project base
Meeting with City to review recommendations maps.
Supplemental survey to determine specific
Deliverables. Three copies of report outlining our elevations along alignment, verify the size of
investigation and findings. The report will include some of the existing main
cost estimates, schedule, impact to the residents ➢ Perform geotechnical investigation to determine
and constructability for each alternative proposed. if open cut construction is practical at some of
A recommendation will be presented. the public street areas
Utility investigation
PHASE II. Construction Document 1. gather utility maps, particularly PG&E
Preparation electrical and gas lines at easements and
incorporate information onto the project
Design base plans
After the final selection of the alternatives by the 2. field locate existing utilities at critical
crossing locations -assume two days
City, the actual design effort will begin. The ➢ Prepare preliminary Plan and Profile alignments
selected alternative may require refinements in the > Plan submittal to the City for review
scope of work. For purposes of this proposal, we > Meeting with City to discuss and receive
have assumed that pipe bursting method will be direction
used on the majority of the sanitary sewer main
replacement in the easements with a portion of Deliverables: three sets of 30% plan and profile
open cut method between backyards to minimize sheets,cost estimate.
disturbance to the local residents. Open cut
RFP: Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase I and 11,City Project No.815000 650.482.8300
Date: October 14,2405
www.bkf.com
PROJECT WORK PLAN
PROJECT WORK PLAN
BkF
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER PROJECT
J
Task 4-70% Design v Package design files for City submittal
At this stage of design we will be filling in details
of the design, preparing technical specifications, Deliverables: The final submittal includes
and more refined cost estimates. Plans will be sent construction plans, technical specifications which
to utility companies being affected by the project compliment City standard specification sections, bid
to inform them of the pending work and ask for documents and final Engineer's estimate. A set of
their verification of the utility information shown signed reproducible twenty-four(24") inch by thirty-
on the plans. six (36") inch drawings and electronic files of
v Incorporate City comments from 30%review drawings in Autocad 2004 format will be included
v Develop plan and profile drawings with the submittal. Specifications will also be
v Prepare outline technical specifications for submitted in the Word or WordPerfect. Permits will
project be submitted from all agencies identified as having
v Coordinate with affected agencies and apply permit requirements for this project.
for permits as needed
v Prepare cost estimate D. PUBLIC RELATIONS SCOPE OF WORK
v Submit plans and outline specifications to City (services provided by Circle Point)
for review
v Meet with City staff to review plans and The following is a partial list of potential public
receive comments issues to consider and our proposal for resolving
Deliverables: three sets of plans and technical them:
specifications v Potential construction impacts to private
property (landscaping, noise, dust, vibration,
Task 5- 100% Design impact of construction workers and equipments)
At this stage of the design we will be essentially 1. Use Website, mailers, door hangers,
preparing 100% drawings. Plans will be information phone line, and other
completed with all details and utility conflicts informational material to clearly
resolved, the specification package will be communicate scope and duration of work
completed and married with the City's standard prior to and during work, upon completion
boiler plate documents. A final engineer's of work and to communicate special
a estimate will be provided. Letters indicating their circumstances throughout the course of the
acknowledgement of the project and time frame project.
required to relocate their facilities from any utility 2. Provide information line and
companies affected by the project will be communication/contact log to maintain up
completed. Work items would include: to date record of resident's concerns and
v City comments from the 70% review will be project team responses.
incorporated v Length of effective dates of ROE (Right of
v Complete plan and profile drawings Entry)agreements
v Complete project specifications 1. Distribute ROE packets clearly noting
v Coordinate with affected agencies relevant information such as map of the
v Prepare cost estimate project area and construction schedule.
v Submit plans and final specifications with bid Maintain record of ROE packets to
schedule to City for review anticipate time sensitive issues.
v Intermediate meeting with City staff to review v Concern about potential vegetation removal and
plans and receive comments visual impacts
v Incorporate any City comments 1. Distribute informational materials and
J v Prepare final plan sets and bid documents for establish community contact to provide
bidding information on the project, options being
RFP: Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 1 and 11,City Project No.815000
Date: October 14,2005 650.482.6300
www.6kf.rnm
1 _
PROJECT WORK PLAN
PROJECT WORK PLAN
BftF
BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER PROJECT
considered, what to expect during the coordinate with the team to respond to inquiries.
design and construction phases, and how Circle Point will maintain a log of calls received.
to reach the project team.
Correct definition of property involved Informational Materials. Circle Point will prepare
1. Coordinate with the Assessor's Office to and distribute letter/fact sheets that provide the
ensure proper information is being utilized project overview, what to expect during the design
at all times. and construction phases, and who to contact for
Concerns about potential health impacts of more information.
sewer work
1. Address health concerns in informational ROE Coordination. As necessary, Circle Point
outreach materials and provide contact can assist the team in distributing agreements,
information for relevant agencies tracking returns, and following up with non-
including Water Department. responsive properties. This would include input on
Pet safety during contractor access/presence in the letter and a summary of past interaction with
yards property owners regarding ROE agreements.
1. Utilize ROE packets and door hangers to
notice construction, and schedule Community Coordination. Depending on the
appointments with property owners. response to the mailings and information line, Circle
Concern about continued disruption if work Point will be available to meet directly with
occurs in same area as recent water main residents to help solicit input and address questions
replacements (in conjunction with design team members) or
1. Identify/address any specific issues; potentially organize and conduct a neighborhood
clearly explain purpose/need for these meeting.
improvements and what to expect during
construction. \distrnibu
ruction/Construction
- Scope of Services Updates. Circle Point will prepare, post,
rly update information about the project
Design isting www.cityofburlin ameci"org web
l linked to the City's main web site.
J Coordination Meetings. Circle Point will attend
a project kick-off meeting to discuss the project al Materials. Circle Point will prepare
approach and attend other planning and u update letters to inform the public
s coordination meetings as requested. with the status,of the construction, overall schedule
and upcoming activities. If necessary, Circle Point
Mailing List. Circle Point will prepare a mailing could produce do hangers for use by the contractor
list of all the property owners and occupants to notify residents\\of construction, and schedule
within the Burlinghome Subdivision, 1400 Block appointments with prdperty owners.
Balboa, and 1300 Block Capuchin area, drawing
on mailing lists we have already compiled for Information Line/Communication Log. Circle
other projects in the area. The mailing list will Point will regularly check ,respond to, and log all
include relevant neighborhood organizations and telephone calls and e-mail's,. Circle Point will
other stakeholders. coordinate with the City and Elie construction team
- for responses, as necessary.
Information Line. Circle Point will set up an
information line coordinating with other CommunityCoordinati
on�eetiitg. As needed,
information lines in place for related city of Circle Point will organize and hemi conduct a
t7, Burlingamero' cts and will monitor p Je � for and meeting with property owners and residents in
RFP: Surtinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phase I and 11,City Project No.815000 650.482.6300
Date: October 14,2005
www.bkf.rnm
i
E
PROJECT WORK PLAN
�o PROJECT WORK PLAN
BkF
BU LINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER PROJECT
project area o discuss upcoming construction and ➢ \Revipew
nate required testing and submit test
help address q stions. to City
ate construction staking
Construction Me 'ngs/Planning. Circle Point ➢ daily and weekly reports
will participate in co truction meetings as needed ➢ ent the project with photos and video
and will coordinate with the City and the ➢ to construction with City and utility
construction team for th review and approval of i s
all outreach materials and a ivities. ➢ nd manage submittals and shop
sPost-Construction Surveys a Final Report. > ate -site contractor meetings
—� Circle Point will assist in develop g, distributing, )> Coordinate p 0ect final walk through, prepare
and summarizing post-construction surveys and punch list and pay estimates
will prepare a report summarizingey public ➢ Monitor and coordinate project schedule
concerns/issues. ➢ Prepare and pr cess Requests for Information
1 from contractor
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT > Prepare progress�ayment and change order
SERVICES (services provided by BKF > Manage project fibs
Engineers) > Recommend acceptance of project for Council
approval
Pre-C struction ➢ Administration including weekly project log
Constru tion management services during pre-
- j construct n will be performed by Yousef Post Construction
Moradzad our Project Engineer. The BKF will be responsible `for preparing a Post
responsibili 'es will include: Construction report for the,,, project. The work
product will be a combined",,effort of our project
3�1 Coordinat with utility agencies manager and the individual who performed
> Review co tractors plans for dealing with Construction Management servibe.
public safety
v Set up 24-ho information and emergency ➢ Prepare project report containigg:
phone line a. A narrative description of the entire project
v Coordinate and c air pre-construction meeting b. Discussion of laboratory test,and results
Prepare and stribute pre-construction c. Discussion of any regulatory interface
minutes d. Discussion of permitting agency interface
e. An Appendix will containjob-related
Construction Inspection correspondence.
Construction services will a o be in led by Yousef f. An Appendix will contain lab `tests and
Moradzadeh. Yousef will h dle the construction results with Certificate of Complian ze
management issues and dail inspection will be % Coordinate preparation of record drawings,based
performed by Francis Moriguch Yousef will also on mark-ups from the contractor
be able to draw in house staf or assistance if
necessary. The work scope will in lude:
Identify construction staging are and parking
and coordinate with Contractor for traffic
control
> Coordinate inspections and submittal eviews _.
Full-time construction inspection, submit
weekly report-to City
RFP: Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phas 1 and ii,City Project No.815000 650A82.6300
Date: October 14,2005 www.bkf.com
CITY c AGENDA 8b
ITEM#
BURL,NGAME MTG.
STAFF REPORT
a DATE 11/21/2005
�< wc60o
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMIT D
BY
DATE: November 8, 2005 APPROVED
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
ADOPT ORDINANCE AFFIRMING FLOOR AREA RATIO COMPUTATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt ordinance restoring computation language for commercial floor area ratio (FAR) in Section 25.08.265
and direct City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance within fifteen (15) days of adoption.
DISCUSSION:
In the comprehensive update to the Zoning Code in Ordinance No. 1586, Section 25.08.265 was amended to set
out the computations used in arriving at the floor area ratio for commercial development as well as residential
development. However, when Ordinance No. 1649 was adopted to amplify the calculations for residential
development FAR, subsection (c) regarding commercial development was inadvertently omitted.
The proposed ordinance would restore subsection (c) largely as it read in Ordinance No. 1586 and as FAR has
been calculated since that time. The two changes are 1) to amend the format and language regarding the
calculation of the FAR for commercial buildings that have clear space between floors, such as parking structures
and large lobbies, but without a change in substance; and 2)point out that in commercial districts, there are
often two FAR issues—a maximum FAR for a use and a maximum FAR for a lot.
The ordinance was introduced at the November 7 Council meeting and further reading was waived at that time.
Attachment
Proposed Ordinance
Distribution
City Planner
I ORDINANCE No.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING SECTION 25.08.265 TO AFFIRM FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR)
3 CALCULATION STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
4
5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
6
7 Section 1. Ordinance No. 1586 adopted calculation standards for determining the floor
8 area ratio for commercial development. However, when the section was revised for residential
9 development in Ordinance No. 1649,the commercial development subsection was omitted. This
10 ordinance affirms the previous standards and does not constitute a change in existing procedures
11 and standards as applied by the Planning Department.
12
13 Section 2. Subsection 25.08.265(c) is returned as follows:
14 (c) Commercial development.
15 (1) In calculating FAR for commercial development the measurement shall apply to the
16 gross floor area of the building above the average elevation of the curb opposite the front wall and
17 does not include basements or cellars.
18 (A)For parking structures and buildings having enclosed space without floors,each twelve
19 feet in height shall be considered as a story. In addition,each fraction of twelve feet in height shall
20 be calculated as a fraction of a story. The calculated gross floor area of parking structures,
21 auditoriums and other buildings with large enclosed spaces shall be determined by multiplying the
22 covered lot area by the equivalent number of stories plus any fraction thereof.
23 (B) The floor area for the parking structure or building having enclosed space without
24 floors will then be added to the floor area of the other building space on-site and dividing by the
25 total lot area of the project.
26 (2) Exempted from floor area ratio computation for commercial development are:
27 (A) Chimneys, cupolas, flag poles;
28 (B) Water tanks, elevator penthouses or other mechanical appurtenances; and
1
I (C) Fire or hose towers.
2 (3) In some of the commercial districts in the city, a separate maximum floor area ratio is
3 established for a particular use on a lot as well as a maximum overall floor area ratio for a lot.
4
5 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
6
7
Mayor
8
9 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the
10 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7`h day of
11 November,2005,and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
12 day of , 200_, by the following vote:
13 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
14 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
15
16 City Clerk
C:\FILES\ORDINANC\commercialfar.pin.wpd
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Agenda
Item # 8c
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: November 21, 2005
�e
SUBMITTED BY
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2005
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 2005 STREET RESURFACING
PROGRAM 2005 — CP 81350
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council accept the 2005 Street
Resurfacing Program by resolution in the amount of $1,049,483.66
DISCUSSION: On May 16, 2005, the project was awarded to C.F. Archibald Paving
Inc. in the amount of $645,588 and approved a $400,000 contingency authorization.
$280,000 was expended for paving additional streets to take advantage of the low
bid prices and $123,900 was expended for asphalt quantity adjustments. Because
the final cost of $1,049,484 is $3,896 above the authorized amount of $1,045,588,
staff also requests that Council approve this additional expenditure which was
necessary to modify the elevation of several manhole covers.
Attached is a map indicating the location of the resurfaced streets.
EXHIBITS: Resolution, Map, Final progress payment
BUDGET IMPACT: The following is a financial summary of the Project.
Expenditures:
Construction 1,049,484
Consultant Inspection 40,000
Engineering Admin. 50,000
Total $1,139,484
Funds Availability:
Street CIP Budget $1,305,845
Total $1,305,845
Staff will transfer the remaining funds to other resurfacing projects at a later time.
Donald T. Chang, P.E. y�
b
Senior Civil Engineer
(650) 558-7230
c: City Clerk, Finance, C.F. Archibald Paving
SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81350acceptance.doc
RESOLUTION NO. -
ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM 2005
BY C.F. ARCHIBALD PAVING INC.
CITY PROJECT NO. 81350
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council
does hereby find, order and determine as follows:
1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by C.F.
ARCHIBALD, INC. under the terms of its contract with the City dated MAY 16, 2005 has been com-
pleted in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 81350.
3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted.
Mayor
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
day of , 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
S:\A Public Works Directory\Author,By Name\Peggy Adam Letters\RESOLIJTN.ACC.wpd
13 A y
AN FRN
5,4
013
84rS"q E r"[WAY >S
P a o
4
20
CITY OF BURLINGAME
y \ 2005 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAMS
SAN MATEO COUNTY\ CALIFORNIA
Y , CITY PROJECT NO. 81350
CCO NO-1 A4GA8T B, 2005 V +
C.F. Archibald Paving, Inc. CITY OF BURLINGAME DATE: November-07-05
3624 Haven Avenue PROGRESS PAYMENT 4 (FINAL) FOR THE MONTH OF:
Redwood City, CA 94044 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM 2005 PURCHASE ORDER M
TELEPHONE: (650)364-3045 CITY PROJECT NO. 81350
+ITEM + « UNIT BID UNIT BID QUANTITY 9 AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT
p ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE QUANTITY SIZE AMOUNT TO DATE PAID TO DATE PAID THIS PMT.
A). STREET RESURFACING
1 AC "Dig Out" Base Repair $ 92.00 503 : TON $ 46,276.00 704.17 139.999 $ 64,783.64 $ 64,783.64 $ -
2 Concrete Base Removal $ 80.00 128 C.Y. $ 10,240.00 152.00 118.759 $ 12,160.00 $ 12,160.00 $ -
3 Aggregate Base $ 10.00 50 TON $ 500.00 0.00 0.009 $ - $ - $ -
4 AC Leveling Course $ 58.00 1,381 TON $ 80,098.00 1634.93 118.399 : $ 94,825.94 $ 94,825.94 $ -
5 AC Overlay $ 58.00 5,428 TON $ 314,824.00 9017.32 166.139 $ 523,004.56 $ 523,004.56 $ -
6 Cold Plane A. C. $ 22.00 3,244 C. Y. $ 71,368.00 7104.00 218.999 $ 156,288.00 $ 156,288.00 $ -
7 Wedge Grind $ 3.00 814 S. Y. $ 2,442.00 4544.34 558.279 $ 13,633.02 $ 13,633.02 $ -
8 Engineered Paving Mat $ 2.50 27,970 : S. Y. $ 69,925.00 33995.00 121.549 $ 84,987.50 $ 84,987.50 $ -
9 Concret Curb and Gutter with Saw Cut $ 60.00 300 : L. F. $ 18,000.00 309.00 103.009 $ 18,540.00 $ 18,540.00 $ -
10 Adjust Manholes $ 350.00 17 EACH $ 5,950.00 48.00 282.359 $ 16,800.00 $ 16,800.00 $ -
11 Adjust Valves, Monuments Lamp-holes 6 Etc. $ 300.00 20 EACH $ 6,000.00 107.00 535.009 : $ 32,100.00 $ 32,100.00 $ -
12 Traffic Loop $ 1,000.00 4 EACH $ 4,000.00 8.00 200.009 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ -
13 Type "A" 6 "AY" (Pavement Markers) $ 2.50 1,407 EACH $ 3,517.50 1704.00 121.119 $ 4,260.00 $ 4,260.00 $ -
14 Type "D", "G" 6 Blue (Pavement Markers) $ 4.00 316 : EACH $ 1,264.00 416.00 131.659 $ 1,664.00 $ 1,664.00 $ -
15 4" Solid Line -- Paint $ 2.00 100 : L.F. $ 200.00 418.00 418.009 : $ 836.00 $ 836.00 $ -
16 6" Solid Line -- Paint $ 3.00 100 : L. F. $ 300.00 0.00 0.009 : $ - $ - $ -
17 8" Solid Line -- Paint $ 5.00 100 : L. F. $ 500.00 19.00 19.009 $ 95.00 $ 95.00 $ -
18 12" Solid Line -- Paint $ 4.00 744 L. F. $ 2,976.00 2373.00 318.959 $ 9,492.00 $ 9,492.00 $ -
19 Parking Tees -- Paint $ 40.00 117 : EACH $ 4,680.00 117.00 100.009 $ 4,680.00 $ 4,680.00 $ -
20 Legends 6 Arrows -- Paint $ 3.00 809 : S. F. $ 2,427.00 1078.00 133.259 $ 3,234.00 $ 3,234.00 $ -
21 Handicap Legends -- Paint $ 100.00 1 EACH $ 100.00 1.00 100.009 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ -
STREET RESURFACING TOTAL $ 645,587.50
ORIGINAL BID $ 645,587.50 $ 1,049,483.66 $1,049,483.66 $ -
CHANGE ORDERS: '
CO 1 Add Additional Streets Payment Distributed Among $ 279,893.00
Various Bid Items
CO 2
CHANGE ORDERS $. 279,893.00 0.009 -
+++*a
DATE
PREPARED BY: LISHA LIN November-07-05 SUBTOTAL * ***"` * $ 925,480.50 *****"**** **`***"" $1,049,483.66 $1,049,483.66 $ -
RELEASE TEN PERCENT RETENTION **«+++++«++a ; +++x***+a+ $ _ $ (104,948.37) $ 104,948.37
CHECKED BY: ++««+++aa+aa* ****** + ++aaa+++++a++**x++ a+a*+++++++++ a++xx+r+++++ : ---------------
APPROVED BY SUBTOTAL WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS *********" +`******** $1,049,483.66 $ 944,535.29 $ 104,948.37
CITY ENGINEER: AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTRACTOR
APPROVED BY a+*aaa++++a+ + *+a***a *«**a**+aaa+++++*a *xx++****a++a **a.*««**a«+ _______________
CONSULTANT: TOTAL THIS PERIOD **********` ********" $ 1,049,483.66 $ 944,535.29 $ 104,948.37
s�*we�cwa«ox+Ec,am,r"os.,-rs,aa.,ewoac v+rnw"r,Aarm.c.m.meixw m,is.eer.r�.iv�.".Y,�.m�
$2,820,178.07
Ck. No. 14552- 15147
Excludes Library Cks. 14701 -14734
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
I
Payroll for October 2005
$2,500,729.44
Ck. No. 163756- 163983
INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
PERS HEALTH
PERS RETIREMENT
FEDERAL 941 TAX
STATE DISABILITY TAX
STATE INCOME TAX
PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP
SECTION 125 DEDUCTION
CD a
UQ
ID
r. C
aQ-
o
o Co
rn 3
S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS �^
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
11.04-2005 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 12
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 118,078.13
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 7,248.21
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 6,721 .04
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 89,472.78
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 33,910.81
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 29,072.85
WATER FUND 526 250,732.79
SEWER FUND 527 3,951.71
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 2,490.00
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 266.91
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 14,743.62
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,634.48
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 3,698.21
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 585.83
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 . 1,561.74
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 797.25
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 16,033.81
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 9,186.95
DEBT SERVICE FUND 930 1,500.00
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $592,687.12
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 12
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14998 THROUGH 15147 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $592,687.12, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
....... . ............................ .../. ./.
.. . ................. . ..
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
........ .......... .... . . ... . .... . ... . . ./. . ./. . .
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15142 M.H.A. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 26017 5,610.90
DEPOSIT REFUND 5,610.90 101 22590
15143 MARK OUILICI 26018 1,020.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525
15144 CESAR LOZADA 26019 1,885.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,015.00 101 22525
MISCELLANEOUS 870.00 101 36630
15145 SATISH DUTT 26020 52.50
MISCELLANEOUS 52.50 101 36630
15146 WHITESTONE RESEARCH 26022 259.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 259.00 619 64460 240
15147 MICHAEL LIBERTY 26023 1,875.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,875.00 101 22546
TOTAL 8592,687.12
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG IS T ER PAGE 10
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15126 CHRISTINA LIU 26001 44.00
MISCELLANEOUS 44.00 101 36330 000 1646
15127 ERIKA PIANIM 26002 44.00
MISCELLANEOUS 44.00 101 36330 000 1646
15128 VERA CRESSON 26003 51.00
MISCELLANEOUS 51.00 101 36330 000 1646
15129 LISA CHAI 26004 44.00
MISCELLANEOUS 44.00 101 36330 000 1646
15130 BETH JOHNSON 26005 51.00
MISCELLANEOUS 51.00 101 36330 000 1646
15131 JODY EMANUEL 26006 51.00
MISCELLANEOUS 51.00 101 36330 000 1646
15132 JULIE MOORHEAD 26007 44.00
MISCELLANEOUS 44.00 101 36330 000 1646
15133 KARIM ROLLA 26008 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1646
15134 CAROLYN HORRIGAN-WAY 26009 63.00
MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1372
15135 MR MENDELL 26010 74.00
MISCELLANEOUS 74.00 101 36330 000 1372
15136 MARK BURAN GENERAL CONTRACTOR 26011 2,358.76
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,358.76 326 80770 220
15137 GARRETT GOTTHARDT 26012 405.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 405.00 101 68010 220 1781
15138 ROCCO SAUCEDO 26013 125.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 101 68010 220 1780
15139 BRIAN STUBBS 26014 216.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216.00 101 68010 220 1660
15140 EDUARDO ATKINS 26015 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
15141 MARY JANE RAGGIO 26016 1,125.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,125.00 101 22546
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand written Checks
15110 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25792 139.78
COMMUNICATIONS 139.78 201 65200 160
15111 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTIN 25885 11,213.27
DEPOSIT REFUND .11,213.27 101 22590
15112 MAYA TOGASHI 25940 40.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.50 101 68010 220 1644
15113 MIKE BROWN 25988 411.45
TRAVEL 8 MEETINGS 411.45 526 69020 250
15114 MARK HOSKING 25989 1,020.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525
15115 STEPHANIE NAVARRO 25990 48.00
MISCELLANEOUS 48.00 101 36330
15116 RYAN HICKS 25991 351.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 351.00 101 68010 220 1781
15117 BARBARA WHITE 25992 54.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 54.00 101 68010 220 1644
15118 MELISSA THOMPSON 25993 200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1780
15119 NORM ROUSEEY 25994 56.00
MISCELLANEOUS 56.00 101 36330 000 1521
15120 REGINA BOSSHARD 25995 47.00
MISCELLANEOUS 47.00 101 36330 000 1645
15121 TED ANSTEDT 25996 168.00
MISCELLANEOUS 168.00 101 36330 000 1660
15122 CONNIE GRAVAGNO 25997 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
15123 JONATHAN HARRIS 25998 400.00
MISCELLANEOUS 400.00 101 22593
15124 PAIGE FARSAD 25999 225.00
MISCELLANEOUS 225.00 101 22593
15125 JANE DONAHUE 26000 53.00
MISCELLANEOUS 53.00 101 36330 000 1645
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15095 T MOBILE 24846 30.88
COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160
15096 S AND S SUPPLIES 8 SOLUTIONS 24963 754.44
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 525.33 101 68020 140 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 229.11 $26 69020 120
15097 LAURA MARSH 24964 1,032.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,032.00 101 68010 220 1646
15098 A22 BUSINESS SYSTEMS 25020 249.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 249.00 201 65200 220
15099 DE LADE LANDEN 25057 609.37
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220
15100 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 640.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 640.00 730 69583 220
15101 YANA MALONEY 25102 147.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147.00 101 68010 220 1645
15102 BAY CITIES DRIVING SCHOOL 25220 1,453.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,453.50 101 68010 220 1422
15103 JOYCE QUINN 25379 108.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.00 101 68010 220 1644
15104 OFFICE DEPOT 25488 24.13
OFFICE EXPENSE 24.13 101 64200 110
15105 SPENCON CONSTRUCTION INC. 25490 10,337.88
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,337.88 320 80960 220
15106 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25731 781.29
UTILITY EXPENSE 781.29 896 20281
15107 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25776 90.86
COMMUNICATIONS 90.86 201 65200 160
15108 LINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25777 700.19
COMMUNICATIONS 0.40 101 65100 160
COMMUNICATIONS 699.79 201 65200 160
15109 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25778 350.78
COMMUNICATIONS 350.78 101 66100 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E GI S T E R - PAGE 7
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15080 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 420.00
UNION DUES 420.00 130 21091
15081 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60
MISCELLANEOUS 312.32 130 21092
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8.28 130 21015
15082 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 391.71
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 391.71 619 64460 210 5130
15083 PRESERVATION PAINTING 24552 6,000.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,000.00 320 80790 210
15084 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 31,233.09
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 30,305.69 326 80950 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 927.40 326 81180 210
15085 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24607 217,99
UTILITY EXPENSE 217.99 896 20281
15086 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER, INC. 24637 1,489.60
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,489.60 101 68010 220 1372
15087 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 75.28
MISC. SUPPLIES 75.28 619 64460 120
15088 DAN FLERES 24703 200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1780
15089 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 64.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 64.50 101 68010 220 1660
15090 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 580.45
MISCELLANEOUS 580.45 101 64420 030
15091 AETNA 24760 2,877.65
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,633.48 130 20022
MISCELLANEOUS 244.17 130 20028
15092 ALMA GROSSMAN 24785 44.00
MISCELLANEOUS 44.00 101 36330 000 1646
15093 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 - 3,629.96
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,629.96 130 20014
15094 MARY PIAZZA 24807 709.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 709.50 101 68010 220 1661
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hard Written Cheeks
15066 SBC/MCI 23728 8,187.67
UTILITY EXPENSE 8,187.67 896 20281
15067 KEITH MARTIN 23788 154.04
MISC. SUPPLIES 8.64 526 69020 120
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 23.55 526 69020 250
MISC. SUPPLIES 24.25 527 66520 120
TRAINING EXPENSE 17.20 527 66520 260
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 80.40 619 64460 250
15068 KAREN LIU 23823 110.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 101 68010 220 1646
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 101 68010 220 1645
15069 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 1,540.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,540.00 526 69020 233
15070 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 135.95
MISC. SUPPLIES 135.95 619 64460 120 5120
15071 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,767.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,639.00 101 23620
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 128.00 101 64420 210
15072 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 162.44
COMMUNICATIONS 162.44 101 68020 160 2200
15073 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 318.96
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 318.96 326 80770 220
15074 GARY GONZALES 24052 540.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 540.00 101 68010 220 1781
15075 C.F. ARCHIBALD 24094 73,134.90
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 73,134.90 320 81350 220
15076 VOICE PRINT INTERNATIONAL 24095 2,891.36
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,891.36 101 65150 220
15077 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,376.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,376.00 101 68010 220 1644
15078 BRIAN WACHHORST 24372 3,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546
15079 ALERT•ALL 24392 241.31
MISCELLANEOUS 241.31 201 35220 000 7150
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15052 VINCENT FALZON 21893 1,268.38
MISC. SUPPLIES 451.14 526 69020 120
SMALL TOOLS 451.14 527 66520 130
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 366.10 527 66520 240
15053 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 15,808.50
MISCELLANEOUS 15,808.50 101 37010
15054 VB GOLF LLC 21948 1,122.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,122.00 101 68010 220 1784
15055 EXPRESS PLUMBING 22092 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15056 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 350.00
GAS, OIL & GREASE 350.00 101 65100 201
15057 BONDLOGISTIX 23088 1,500.00
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 1,500.00 930 66850 764
15058 PAUL WEBB 23292 800.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1780
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
15059 OFFICE MAX 23306 336.09
OFFICE EXPENSE 46.60 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 13.44 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 276.05 101 68010 110 1101
15060 MARCO CAVALIERI 23340 960.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 960.00 101 65300 260
15061 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 3,299.14
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 3,299.14 101 68010 200 1286
15062 DATASAFE 23410 232.78
OFFICE EXPENSE 142.08 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 90.70 101 64420 110
15063 COLAINE ROEPKE 23574 47.00
MISCELLANEOUS 47.00 101 36330 000 1645
15064 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 29,072.85
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 29,072.85 327 81150 210
15065 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,490.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,490.00 528 66600 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15037 JODI YOUNG 20589 200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1780
15038 JEFF DOWD 20779 2,171.38
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,171.38 101 68010 220 1785
15039 GAMETIME, INC. 20991 391.40
BLDG. 8 GROUNDS MAINT. 391.40 101 68020 190 2100
15040 MELANIE MARANI 21132 516.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1331
15041 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 1,044.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,044.00 101 68010 220 1331
15042 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 354.91
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 354.91 101 66210 219
15043 ESA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 2,450.00
DEPOSIT REFUND 2,450.00 731 22590
15044 CEB 21210 74.15
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.15 101 64350 120
15045 ADI 21362 7.74
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 7.74 619 64460 210
15046 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 77.12
MISC. SUPPLIES 77.12 526 69020 120
15047 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 700.88
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 700.88 201 65200 203
15048 RICOH CORPORATION 21630 137.12
OFFICE EXPENSE 137.12 101 68010 110 1101
15049 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 4,634.51
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 4,634.51 101 66210 222
15050 SEWER RAT 21821 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15051 EILEEN P. GOLDENBERG 21846 660.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 660.00 101 68010 220 1646
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15023 MIKE SMITH 16637 208.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.00 101 68010 220 1789
15024 BROADWAY BUSINESS 16849 13,462.50
MISCELLANEOUS 13,462.50 731 22555
15025 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 72.00
COMMUNICATIONS 72.00 101 65100 160
15026 GEORGE MASTALIR 18088 208.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.00 101 68010 220 1789
15027 KELLEHER 8 ASSOCIATES 18239 13,261.48
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 13,261.48 618 64520 210
15028 DEAN'S AUTO BODY 8 18795 1,482.14
MISCELLANEOUS 1,482.14 618 64520 604
15029 BAY ALARM 18854 1,240.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198.00 619 64460 220 5190
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 366.00 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 498.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 178.50 619 64460 220 5210
15030 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 147.37
MISC. SUPPLIES 84.55 101 64400 120
PUBLICATIONS 8 ADVERTISING 62.82 101 64200 150
15031 PRIORITY 1 19239 1,561.74
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,561.74 625 65213 203
15032 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 38,67
MISC. SUPPLIES 38.67 620 66700 120
15033 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 475.09
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 475.09 201 65200 203
15034 KATHY KARAS 19812 344.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 344.00 101 68010 220 1644
15035 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00
RENTS 8 LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180
RENTS 8 LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180
15036 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 585.83
COMMUNICATIONS 585.83 621 64450 160
�.
• CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 2
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15013 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 1,143.76
MISCELLANEOUS 105.70 201 35220 000 7150
OFFICE EXPENSE 40.92 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 3.29 201 65200 111
SUPPLIES 51.86 201 65200 112
MISC. SUPPLIES 22.50 201 65200 120
FIRE--SUPPLIES 316.55 201 65200 127
SMALL TOOLS 17.95 261 65200 130
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 81.17 201 65200 190
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 39.15 201 65200 203
TRAINING EXPENSE 343.36 201 65200 260
MISCELLANEOUS 121.31 731 22554
15014 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 1,136.02
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,136.02 527 66520 120
15015 BISHOP COMPANY 13641 327.73
SMALL TOOLS 327.73 101 68020 130 2300
15016 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 2,790.51
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.00 101 65150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 300.00 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 204.69 101 65100 120
COMMUNICATIONS 318.16 101 65100 160
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 400.00 101 65100 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 117.00 101 65100 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 996.50 101 65100 260'
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 266.91 530 65400 200
MISC. SUPPLIES 157.25 730 69574 120
15017 UNITED TRANSMISSION INC. 14760 2,186.46
SUPPLIES 2,186.46 620 15000
15018 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 443.90
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 443.90 619 64460 210
15019 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 90.00
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 90.00 101 64420 121
15020 TRESSER'S TOW SERVICE 15543 25.00
SUPPLIES 25.00 620 15000
15021 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,412.21
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,412.21 101 65100 220
15022 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 826.19
SUPPLIES 826.19 620 15000
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
11/04/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
14998 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 410.53
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 410.53 201 65200 203
14999 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01745 2,520.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 2,520.00 201 65200 250
15000 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 48.19
SUPPLIES 48.19 620 15000
15001 ANASTASIA COLE 01945 2,031.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,031.00 101 68010 220 1644
15002 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTS, INC., 01992 156.97
OFFICE EXPENSE 156.97 101 64400 110
15003 FEDEX 02160 26.02
OFFICE EXPENSE 26.02 101 65100 110
15004 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 631.12
MISC. SUPPLIES 631.12 101 68020 120 2200
15005 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,046.66
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,046.66 101 66210 226
15006 P. G. & E. 03054 17,033.88
GAS & ELECTRIC 17,033.88 101 66100 170
15007 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 246,034.78
WATER PURCHASES 246,034.78 526 69020 171
15008 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 7,554.08
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,554.08 101 68020 220 2300
15009 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 1,897.20
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,897.20 101 65100 220
15010 OLE'S 09626 181.89
SUPPLIES 181.89 620 15000
15011 CRAIG W. REED 09881 2,271.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,271.50 101 68010 220 1787
15012 3 T EQUIPMENT CO. 10077 391.81
SUPPLIES 391.81 620 15000
CITY OF BURLINGAME
10-27-2005 WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 11
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 120,980.36
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 10,680.58
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 22,963.65
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 4,025.24
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 356.50
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 107,739.20
WATER FUND 526 2,406.97
SEWER FUND 527 243,465.11
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 2,452.28
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 893.31
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 1,267.06
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 5,294.13
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 20,313.70
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1,371.92
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,191.67
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 137,571.57
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 22,393.16
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 55,089.09
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8761,455.50
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14863 THROUGH 14997 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $761,455.50, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED,THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT -
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14994 YAWEN LI 25984 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
14995 GINGER ROEHRIG 25985 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
14996 MICHELLE TAM 25986 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
14997 NICK HACKLEMAN 25987 453.96
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 453.96 526 69020 250
TOTAL $761 ,455.50
A
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
14978 TOSETTI ELECTRIC CO 25668 356.50
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 356.50 326 73171 210
14979 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25775 268.33
COMMUNICATIONS 268.33 101 65100 160
14980 KEVIN REYES 25970 140.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 140.00 101 68010 220 1789
14981 MARGARET HUSTEDT 25971 176.00
MISCELLANEOUS 176.00 101 36330 000 1521
14982 GERALDINE GALARZA 25972 723.00
MISCELLANEOUS 723.00 101 36330 000 1330
14983 GAIL PAPE 25973 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
14984 J&L TEAMWORKS 25974 287.00
MISCELLANEOUS 287.00 618 64520 234
14985 KEVIN SULLIVAN 25975 1,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 22546
14986 HC BECK LTD 25976 7,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 7,500.00 101 22546
14987 BAYMARK BUSINESS PARTNERS 25977 567.79
OFFICE EXPENSE 567.79 101 64250 110
14988 DAVID JURICIC 25978 400.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 400.00 101 22520
14989 CHUCK SENICI 25979 1,200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,200.00 101 22546
14990 BENJAMIN MEDIA, INC. 25980 900.00
TRAVEL&MEETINGS 900.00 527 66520 250
14991 GOODPARENTS, INC. 25981 900.00
MISCELLANEOUS 900.00 731 22553
14992 LYNN SEELY DITZLER 25982 150.00
MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593
14993 DEBORA BLUCHER 25983 200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 22593
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S E R PAGE 8
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14963 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 225.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 619 64460 220 5120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 619 64460 220 5121
14964 INSITE DESIGN 24711 1,650.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,650.00 101 22546
14965 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,078.58
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,100.33 130 20021
MISCELLANEOUS 978.25 130 20025
14966 AD CLUB 24809 90.00
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 90.00 101 64420 150
14967 CAPORICCI & LARSON 24920 32,332.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 32,332.50 101 64560 210
14968 WILSON TRUJILLO 24961 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
14969 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 645.93
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 645.93 526 69020 140
14970 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 99.44
UTILITY EXPENSE 99.44 896 20281
14971 MELISSA MIZEL 25048 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
14972 CAROL EEJIMA 25056 500.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 101 68010 220 1781
14973 JAMES MURPHY 25080 1,138.88
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,138.88 101 68010 220 1661
14974 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 645.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1646
14975 JEFF TATEOSIAN 25320 450.00
MISCELLANEOUS 450.00 101 22593
14976 SIR SPEEDY 25441 474.87
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 474.87 320 81300 210
14977 SPENCON CONSTRUCTION INC. 25490 750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14948 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 4,856.65
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 449.65 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,407.00 619 64460 220 5120
14949 RONALD AUGUST FAATZ 24004 808.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 808.00 101 68010 220 1781
14950 MICHELLE SALLING 24006 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
14951 ROBIN MAY 24285 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
14952 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 545.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 545.63 101 68010 220 1661
14953 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 483.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 483.75 101 68010 220 1661
14954 COMPUCOM 24467 324.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 324.75 101 64250 110
14955 C.N. ROEN CO. 24474 107,575.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 107,575.40 327 79480 220
14956 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,095.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,095.00 130 20016
14957 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00
UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080
14958 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00
MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024
14959 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 600.00
MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024
14960 C.L.E.A. 24523 663.00
MISCELLANEOUS 663.00 130 20026
14961 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 458.61
SUPPLIES 458.61 620 15000
14962 BURLINGAME ROTARY 24566 360.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 360.00 101 64150 240
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
14933 MORI CONSULTANTS 22209 2,250.00
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 2,250.00 320 79160 210
14934 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 2,210.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,530.00 201 35220 000 7100
MISCELLANEOUS 680.00 201 35221 000 7100
14935 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 20,753.10
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,206.66 736 64572 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,546.44 736 64571 220
14936 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22620 19,710.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,710.75 201 65200 220
14937 APWA 22681 870.00 -
TRAVEL 8 MEETINGS 870.00 527 66520 250
14938 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 300.00
MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22554
14939 CARL DEOUANT 22842 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
14940 VALLOMBROSA CENTER 22877 693.00
TRAVEL 8 MEETINGS 693.00 101 64420 250
14941 THE DAILY NEWS 22964 163.80
MISC. SUPPLIES 163.80 327 81510 120
14942 PITNEY BOWES 23128 548.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 548.00 621 64450 120
14943 OFFICE MAX 23306 289.13
OFFICE EXPENSE 80.42 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 62.37 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 146.34 101 68010 110 1101
14944 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 81.56
MISC. SUPPLIES 81.56 619 64460 120
14945 CLARE EVANS 23645 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
14946 CHEMSEARCH 23864 339.78
MISC. SUPPLIES 339.78 101 66210 120
14947 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 4,771.50
RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 4,771.50 101 66210 218
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14920 SPRINT PCS 20724 71.64
COMMUNICATIONS 33.28 101 64420 160
COMMUNICATIONS 38.36 101 64150 160
14921 D.B. METAL WORKS 20903 866.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 866.00 730 69560 120 2300
14922 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 919.15
MISC. SUPPLIES 465.64 101 66210 120
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 453.51 101 66210 219
14923 GEORGE SAGDON 21174 281.67
MISCELLANEOUS 281.67 101 66210 031
14924 AARDVARK TACTICAL, INC. 21176 243.82
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 243.82 101 65100 200
14925 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 389.89
OFFICE EXPENSE 228.47 101 64400 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 77.12 .527 66520 120
OFFICE EXPENSE 84.30 621 64450 110
14926 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 83.19
BLDG. 8 GROUNDS MAINT. 83.19 621 64450 190
14927 MONICA EHLERS 21627 117.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 117.00 101 68010 220 1661
14928 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 374.38
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 374.38 101 66210 222
14929 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 989.30
MISC. SUPPLIES 161.02 101 68010 120 1787
MISC. SUPPLIES 230.03 101 68010 120 1768
MISC. SUPPLIES 384.24 101 68010 120 1789
MISC. SUPPLIES 214.01 101 68010 120 1785
14930 VINCENT FAL20N 21893 560.86
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 560.86 527 66520 240
14931 CRANE CERTIFICATION CO 22007 1,475.00
SUPPLIES 1,475.00 620 15000
14932 MARK MEYERS 22051 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14905 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 - 211.20
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 211.20 101 64420 121
14906 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 362.76
MISC. SUPPLIES 41.51 101 64400 120
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 321.25 101 64200 150
14907 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 422.79
OFFICE EXPENSE 54.50 101 64250 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 368.29 201 65200 111
14908 TOM AMES 19502 674.61
TRAINING EXPENSE 674.61 201 65200 260
14909 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,472.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,472.00 528 66600 210
14910 GRAPHIC PRODUCTS 19691 279.60
OFFICE EXPENSE 279.60 101 68010 110 1101
14911 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES INC 19779 1,200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,200.00 320 81070 220
14912 MONICA OLSEN 19832 216.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216.00 101 68010 220 1661
14913 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,640.06
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,640.06 736 64570 220
14914 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 656.43
COMMUNICATIONS 656.43 621 64450 160
14915 LORI TALO 20350 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
14916 CLAUDE ARRIOLA 20435 450.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 101 68010 220 1789
14917 KAWANN SUMMERVILLE 20502 708.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 708.00 101 68010 220 1781
14918 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 93.70
OFFICE EXPENSE 93.70 101 64420 110
14919 BURLINGAME LIB. FOUNDATION 20561 836.29
MISCELLANEOUS 1.00 101 36320
MISCELLANEOUS 835.29 731 22551
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14892 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 11707 1,136.00
OFFICE EXPENSE 8.00 101 67500 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 227.56 101 67500 120
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 530.30 101 67500 125
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 250.22 101 67500 129
MISCELLANEOUS 86.36 101 67500 235
MISCELLANEOUS 23.66 101 67500 400
LIBRARY EXPENSES 9.90 731 22531
14893 BOETHING TREELAND FARMS, INC. 13743 1,325.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,325.67 730 69560 120 2300
14894 BURLINGAME LIBRARY 14228 10.00
MISCELLANEOUS 10.00 731 22552
14895 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY 14358 327.00
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 327.00 527 66520 230
14896 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,823.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,823.50 101 68010 220 1787
14897 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 8,947.34
SUPPLIES 8,947-34 620 15000
14898 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 25,746.12
MISCELLANEOUS 25,746.12 101 22515
14899 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 17224 14.49
MISC. SUPPLIES 14.49 619 64460 120 5150
14900 COLORPRINT 17497 53.58
MISC. SUPPLIES 53.58 526 69020 120
14901 BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY 17760 45.81
OFFICE EXPENSE 45.81 101 64400 110
14902 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 980.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 980.28 528 66600 210
14903 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE CO 18755 372.20
TRAINING EXPENSE 189.90 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 182.30 526 69020 260
14904 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 186.09
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 126.71 526 69020 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 59.38 619 64460 140
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
14877 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 135,516.38
MISCELLANEOUS 135,516.38 731 22587
14878 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 03483 37,857.75
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 37,857.75 527 66530 270
14879 TAP PLASTICS 03739 64.95
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 64.95 101 68020 190 2200
14880 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 8,792.76
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,792.76 101 68020 220 2300
14881 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 349.80
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 349.80 101 64350 210
14882 JEAN BUCKS 09019 367.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 367.50 101 68010 220 1644
14883 POM INC. 09248 893.31
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 893.31 530 65400 200
14884 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 09402 174.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 174.00 101 64400 120
14885 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 722.00
PRISONER EXPENSE 722.00 101 65100 291
14886 OCE 09493 857.34
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210
14887 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 980.06
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 980.06 618 64520 210
14888 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 2,083.27
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 97.43 101 68020 190 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,937.13 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 48.71 527 66520 120
14889 LEONA MORIARTY 09979 3,612.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,612.00 101 68010 220 1644
14890 ROMEO PACKING CO 11348 584.55
MISC. SUPPLIES 584.55 101 68020 120 2200
14891 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 9,704.90
MISC. SUPPLIES 462.02 527 66520 120
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 9,242.88 620 66700 800
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
10/27/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14863 * VALLOMBROSA CENTER 22877 231.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 231.00 101 64420 250
14864 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 01745 415.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 415.00 101 64200 250
14865 EDWARD COMERFORD 01756 107.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 107.50 101 68010 220 1660
14866 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 189.87
SUPPLIES 189.87 620 15000
14867 VEOLIA WATER 02110 202,286.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 202,286.00 527 66530 220
14868 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 125.15
MISCELLANEOUS 125.15 101 68020 192 2200
14869 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 1,987.97
MISCELLANEOUS 1,987.97 896 20282
14870 U.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 71.04
MISC. SUPPLIES 71.04 101 66210 120
14871 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 679.74
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 679.74 101 66210 226
14872 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 573.48
MISC. SUPPLIES 145.92 101 66210 120
SMALL TOOLS 100.37 320 79160 130
MISC. SUPPLIES 194.49 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 75.65 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 44.90 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.15 619 64460 120 5180
14873 P. G. & E. 03054 53,001.68
UTILITY EXPENSE 53,001.68 896 20280
14874 SBC 03080 52.37
COMMUNICATIONS 52.37 101 65100 160
14875 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT 03271 824.10
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 824.10 101 68020 190 2200
14876 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,913.42
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,913.42 101 65150 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
10-21-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 13
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 63,794.14
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 2,017.00
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 9,753.84
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 524,359.48
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 84,361.53
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 109,033.31
WATER FUND 526 7,048.34
SEWER FUND 527 5,319.58
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 20.10
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,406.71
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 11,907.00
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 19,467.79
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,569.50
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 32,852.20
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,453.91
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 3,751.50
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 67,376.81
FEDERAL GRANTS FUND 737 3,889.35
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 598.87
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $952,980.96
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 13
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14735 THROUGH 14862 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $952,980.96, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 12
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR -DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14848 ALMETEK INC. 25955 4,494.13
MISCELLANEOUS -352.69 101 23611
MISC. SUPPLIES 4,846.82 101 66210 120
14849 BAYSIDE EQUIPMENT 25956 75.00
SUPPLIES 75.00 620 15000
14850 ZHENG YU 25957 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782
14851 CAMELLIA COURT HOA 25958 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
14852 STEPHEN DUFFIN 25959 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
14853 A ACE SIGN CO. 25960 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
14854 COLIN FISHER 25961 199.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 199.00 618 64520 601
14855 JOEL SWARTZ 25962 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
14856 SAN FRANCISCO PARAMEDIC ASSN 25963 120.00
MISCELLANEOUS 120.00 731 22554
14857 ANGELA NORTON TYLER 25964 86.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.00 101 68010 220 1660
14858 FELICIA KARBO 25965 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
14859 ESTHER DICKS 25966 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
14860 BARBARA HEWITT 25967 500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 101 22593
14861 JOE BECKER 25968 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
1
14862 JOHN MARTIN 25969 108.00 d�
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.00 101 68010 220 1660
TOTAL $952,980.96
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14835 GLENN GROSSMAN 24785 1,501.50
MISCELLANEOUS 1,950.00 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS -448.50 101 31510
14836 ELIZABETH WHITTEMORE 24860 1,254.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 650.00 130 20015
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 604.00 130 20060
14837 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 25084 111.84
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 111.84 201 65200 140
14838 ADVANCED MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 25198 1,268.69
RADIO MAINT. 1,268.69 201 65200 205
14839 JOE CYR 25213 1,559.57
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 1,559.57 101 65300 250
14840 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 69.14
OFFICE EXPENSE 69.14 101 65100 110
14841 MERCY MARTIN 25270 656.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 656.25 101 68010 220 1661
14842 NETVERSANT SILICON VALLEY 25422 9,900.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,900.00 320 80430 220
14843 CONTINENTAL BUILDING SPECIALTY C 25572 436.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 436.00 619 64460 210 5120
14844 NICHOLAS BELLAFATTO 25625 1,240.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,240.00 101 68010 220 1331
14845 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25727 142.82
COMMUNICATIONS 142.82 101 64250 160
14846 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 153.19
RENTS & LEASES 153.19 526 69020 180
14847 SAN JOSE BLUE 25886 2,591.99
MISC. SUPPLIES 490.00 326 80950 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 997.94 326 80770 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 440.58 326 80950 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 69.50 326 80770 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 593.97 326 80950 120
V
- )ISCELLANECUS 328.68 731 2255E ) )
LIBRARY EXPENSES 120.00 731 22531
MISC. SUPPLIES 3,889.35 737 65180 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
N ARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 10
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
14834 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 16,337.46
MISCELLANEOUS 378.00 101 64150 031
OFFICE EXPENSE 19.44 101 68010 110 1100
OFFICE EXPENSE 9.74 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 238.76 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 142.97 101 67500 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 61.42 101 68010 120 1893
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.00 101 68010 120 1422
MISC. SUPPLIES 134.50 101 68020 120 2300
MISC. SUPPLIES •24.32 101 68010 120 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 50.85 101 64100 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,049.82 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 46.49 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 13.96 101 68010 120 1520
MISC. SUPPLIES 96.88 101 68010 120 1891
MISC. SUPPLIES 629.95 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 118.56 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 100.00 101 69537 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 55.13 101 68010 120 1780
MISC. SUPPLIES 65.93 101 68010 120 1370
MISC. SUPPLIES 70.00 101 69537 120
LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 32.44 101 67500 125
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 378.39 101 67500 129
COMMUNICATIONS 28.89 101 65150 160
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 78.81 101 68010 220 1349
MISCELLANEOUS 107.38 101 67500 235
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 70.00 101 67500 240
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 113.67 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 37.80 101 64100 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 315.00 101 64250 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 340.00 101 66100 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 40.07 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 600.00 101 64400 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 1,125.00 101 66100 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 440.00 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 95.00 101 64420 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 26.71 101 69537 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 140.00 101 64200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 716.00 101 64250 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 103.25 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 39.00 101 67500 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 159.67 101 64420 262
MISCELLANEOUS 286.84 101 67500 400
MISC. SUPPLIES 85.49 526 69020 120
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 453.09 526 69020 250
MISC. SUPPLIES 27.01 527 66520 120
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 831.96 527 66520 250
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 58.10 530 65400 200
MISCELLANEOUS 1,200.00 530 65400 400 li
OFFICE EXPENSE 17.73 621 64450 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 593.72 730 69583 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 126.33 730 69533 120
C ( �
CITY OF BURLINGAME /
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
14825 BELL PLUMBING 24116 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
14826 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 576.00
MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233
14827 CINGULAR WIRELESS TITAN 24299 559.33 _
COMMUNICATIONS 559.33 201 65200 160
14828 A&G SERVICES 24400 2,500.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,500.00 527 66520 220
14829 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 330.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 330.00 101 68010 220 1644
14830 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 248.01
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 248.01 326 80910 210
14831 COMPUCOM 24467 328.09
MISC. SUPPLIES 328.09 320 81300 120
14832 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 39,442.73
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 18,237.08 326 80950 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,197.81 326 81180 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,007.84 326 80950 210
14833 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 118.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 118.00 101 65300 260
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
14816 SBC/MCI 23728 83.20
COMMUNICATIONS 83.20 621 64450 160
14817 JANNETTE GREER 23769 108.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.00 101 68010 220 1648
14818 KAREN LIU 23823 166.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27.75 101 68010 220 1646
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 138.75 101 68010 220 1645
14819 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 108.43
MISC. SUPPLIES 108.43 619 64460 120 5150
14820 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150 -
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130
14821 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,697.31
BANKING SERVICE FEES 548.70 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,148.61 530 65400 120
14822 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 120.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 120.00 101 65100 292
14823 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 15,492.57
MISC. SUPPLIES 600.22 101 68010 120 1111
MISC. SUPPLIES 384.96 101 68010 120 1114
MISC. SUPPLIES 199.72 101 68010 120 1111
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 329.09 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 367.00 619 64460 220 5170
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 959.59 619 64460 220 5210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.34 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,941.80 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,895.18 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,144.18 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,772.23 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 145.00 619 64460 220 5230
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 483.69 619 64460 220 5121
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 869.57 619 64460 220 5190
14824 TOM RUSSELL 23966 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
�•� Denotes Hand Written Checks
14805 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 9,733.00
CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,733.00 618 64520 225
14806 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING 22931 46,547.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46,547.50 320 81060 220
14807 THE DAILY NEWS 22964 28.62
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 28.62 320 79080 220
14808 BOB MALLAMO 23173 135.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 135.00 130 20015
14809 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 1,208.20
OFFICE EXPENSE 341.57 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 159.73 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 448.78 101 65300 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 38.92 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 49.07 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE -2.49 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 24.22 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 148.40 619 64460 110
14810 OFFICE MAX 23306 304.48
OFFICE EXPENSE 258.12 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 19.05 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 27.31 101 66100 110
14811 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES, INC. 23311 64.99
MISC. SUPPLIES -38.65 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 103.64 619 64460 120 5240
14812 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 210.00
MISCELLANEOUS 210.00 101 22518
14813 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200
14814 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 2,449.66
MISC. SUPPLIES 59.00 101 66210 120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,390.66 320 80790 210
14815 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 37,986.71
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 548.76 326 73171 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 30,449.34 326 81480 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,696.41 326 73171 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,292.20 326 80931 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14791 JEFF DOWD 20779 171.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.00 101 68010 220 1785
14792 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 771.64
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 619 64460 220 5120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221.64 619 64460 220 5130
14793 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 266.68
MISC. SUPPLIES 266.68 201 65200 120
14794 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 2,248.75
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,750.00 101 64420 210
TRAINING EXPENSE 149.62 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 149.63 526 69020 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 149.62 527 66520 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 49.88 619 64460 260
14795 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 173.00
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 173.00 621 64450 190
14796 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 877.89
MISC. SUPPLIES 877.89 101 68010 120 1781
14797 YAT-CHEONG AU 21906 2,845.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,845.00 101 22546
14798 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 3,802.90
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,044.00 320 81350 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,758.90 326 80770 210
14799 BETTS TRUCK PARTS 22111 1,112.07
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,112.07 625 65213 203
14800 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 74.88
VEHICLE MAINT. 114.30 201 65200 202
SUPPLIES -39.42 620 15000
14801 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 456,559.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 456,559.00 320 80520 220
14802 CUTTERS EDGE 22407 171.84
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 171.84 201 65200 203
14803 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 435.00
UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281
14804 GLASER AND ASSOCIATES 22821 3,317.75
TRAINING EXPENSE 3,317.75 101 64420 262
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14778 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 3,009.58
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,122.95 101 68010 120 1780
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 886.63 527 66520 140
14779 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,440.10
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 288.61 101 66210 140
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 244.40 201 65200 220
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 296.45 526 69020 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 288.61 527 66520 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 20.10 528 66600 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 109.53 619 64460 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 192.40 620 66700 140
14780 PEGGY GUARALDI 19044 230.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 230.40 101 68010 220 1660
14781 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 549.37
MISC. SUPPLIES 549.37 101 68010 120 1780
14782 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 341.84
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 341.84 625 65213 203
14783 TOM AMES 19502 628.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 628.00 130 20060
14784 RICH POLONSKY 19761 51.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 51.75 101 68010 220 1660
14785 CIUCCI CONSULTING GROUP INC 19791 450.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 450.00 320 81300 210
14786 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 12,570.91
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 12,318.41 327 81360 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 252.50 327 77040 210
14787 CONTROL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. 20421 100,845.40
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,383.00 320 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 96,462.40 327 79400 210
14788 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 1,333.19
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,333.19 326 80910 210
14789 PHIL SCOTT 20550 290.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 290.00 526 69020 250
14790 PAUL ROSS WALLACH 20752 74.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74.25 101 68010 220 1660
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*� Denotes Hand Written Checks
14765 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 1,007.25
MISC. SUPPLIES 479.72 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 105.54 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 57.25 619 64460 120 5150
MISC, SUPPLIES 228.08 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 85.25 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 51.41 619 64460 120 5150
14766 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,412.21
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,412.21 101 65100 220
14767 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 - 1,162.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,162.50 101 68010 220 1787
14768 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 4,161.75
GAS, OIL & GREASE 3,776.19 201 65200 201
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 385.56 527 66520 230
14769 ACTION SPORTS 16167 1,748.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,748.00 101 68010 220 1781
14770 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 131.72
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 32.55 101 68020 200 2300
SUPPLIES 99.17 620 15000
14771 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 16460 584.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 584.67 730 69583 120
14772 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 840.80
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 840.80 101 68020 140 2200
14773 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16919 1,142.46
SUPPLIES 1,142.46 620 15000
14774 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 82.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 82.00 101 65100 200
14775 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 18635 5,044.49
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5,044.49 526 69020 240
14776 VALLEY CREST TREE COMPANY 18713 1,227.56
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,227.56 730 69560 120 2300
14777 UNITROL 18939 65.00
SUPPLIES 65.00 620 15000
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
14755 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210
14756 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 334.52
PRISONER EXPENSE 192.24 101 65100 291
SUPPLIES 34.24 201 65200 112
FIRE--SUPPLIES 108.04 201 65200 127
14757 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES 09461 2,728.61
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,728.61 320 81090 210
14758 NOEL L. MILLER, INC, 09499 1,901.86
VEHICLE MAINT. 1,050.42 201 65200 202
SUPPLIES 851.44 620 15000
14759 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 1,975.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,000.00 618 64520 210
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 975.00 618 64520 601
14760 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 809.26
MISC. SUPPLIES 469.39 101 68020 120 2200
SMALL TOOLS 125.83 201 65200 130
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 12.86 201 65200 190
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 65.87 201 65200 203
MISC. SUPPLIES 1.50 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 13.69 619 64460 120 5180
MISC. SUPPLIES 48.85 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 34.94 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 36.33 619 64460 120 5240
14761 GOVT. FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN. 09884 145.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 145.00 101 64250 250
14762 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220
14763 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 803.22
MISC. SUPPLIES 803.22 201 65200 111
14764 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 238.46
COMMUNICATIONS 238.46 527 66520 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14748 SANDRA POBE 03175 2,104.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,760.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 344.00 101 68010 220 1646
14749 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,913.42
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,913.42 101 65150 220
14750 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 31,206.87
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,246.00 101 68010 120 1423
MISC. SUPPLIES 3,786.31 101 68010 120 1422
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 26,174.56 731 22562
14751 SNAP ON TOOLS 03587 29.49
SMALL TOOLS 29.49 201 65200 130
14752 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 4,929.13
MISCELLANEOUS 110.00 101 36330 000 1349
OFFICE EXPENSE 11.67 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 54.65 101 68010 110 1100
MISC. SUPPLIES 86.74 101 68010 120 1781
MISC. SUPPLIES 110.19 101 68010 120 1520
MISC. SUPPLIES 815.60 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 136.82 101 68010 120 1521
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 151.81 101 68020 140 2200
COMMUNICATIONS 95.00 101 68020 160 2200
COMMUNICATIONS 79.98 101 68010 160 1101
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 210.00 101 68010 220 1331
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00 101 68010 220 1521
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.00 101 68010 220 1648
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 173.00 101 68010 220 1645
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 523.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 191.50 101 68010 220 1349
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.00 101 68010 220 1646
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 145.00 101 68020 240 2100
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 169.95 101 68010 240 1101
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 105.00 101 68020 240 2200
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 101 68010 240 1100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 80.00 101 68020 250 2100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 200.00 101 68010 250 1100
MISC. SUPPLIES 819.22 730 69533 120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.00 730 69533 220
14753 ROTO ROOTER 09063 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
14754 STATE OF CA/CONSERVATION DEPT 09073 1,435.01
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,435.01 731 22520
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
10/21/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*. Denotes Hand Written Checks
14735 ALPINE AWARDS, INC. 01052 23.27
MISC. SUPPLIES 23.27 101 66210 120
14736 BURLINGAME ELEM. SCHOOL DIST. 01500 39,198.56
SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT FEE 39,198.56 731 22563
14737 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 31,005.12
COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 30,705.12 621 64450 220
14738 L. N. CURTIS 8 SONS 02027 519.60
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 519.60 201 65200 140
14739 GENE EVANS 02149 322.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 322.50 101 68010 220 1644
14740 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 85.03
MISCELLANEOUS 85.03 101 68020 192 2200
14741 W.N. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 433.92
MISC. SUPPLIES 38.86 619 64460 120 5150
SMALL TOOLS 395.06 619 64460 130
14742 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,397.14
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,397.14 101 66210 226
14743 K 8 W DISCOUNT LIGHTING 8 SUPP 02645 1,466.27
MISC. SUPPLIES 578.38 619 64460 120 5120
MISC. SUPPLIES 379.09 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 876.68 619 64460 120 5120
MISC. SUPPLIES 135.59 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES -503.47 619 64460 120
14744 . P. G. 8 E. 03054 10.23
GAS 8 ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170
14745 SBC 03080 163.87
UTILITY EXPENSE 163.87 896 20281
14746 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 231.92
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 48.47 101 65200 203
SUPPLIES 73.00 620 15000
SMALL TOOLS 110.45 620 66700 130
14747 STEPHEN J. PICCHI 03168 355.20
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 355.20 101 68010 220 1372
CITY OF BURLINGAME
10-13-2005 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 12
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 141,998.68
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 4,661.29
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 17,260.21
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 3,660.00
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 16,787.67
WATER FUND 526 278,986.65
SEWER FUND 527 1,314.64
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 7,522.28
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 430.48
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 13,333.97
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,204.31
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 4,957.54
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 14,714.89
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,300.55
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,510.12
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1,411.21
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8513,054.49
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 12
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 14552 THROUGH 14700 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $513,054.49, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../. ./.
COUNCIL DATE
C
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 11
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14694 MIGUEL PEREZ 25948 132.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 132.00 101 68010 220 1645
14695 JOHN KEIRNAN 25949 67.00
MISCELLANEOUS 67.00 101 36330 000 1349
14696 MR/MRS BAUER 25950 67.00
MISCELLANEOUS 67.00 101 36330 000 1349
14697 KIMBERLY ROSALES 25951 45.00
MISCELLANEOUS 45.00 101 36330 000 1331
14698 SUE WORRALL 25952 45.00
MISCELLANEOUS 45.00 101 36330 000 1331
14699 FIXATION BUILERS INC. 25953 36.80
MISCELLANEOUS 36.80 101 31510
14700 STEPHEN DEZEREGA 25954 885.00.
MISCELLANEOUS 885.00 101 22546
TOTAL $513,054.49 f O�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14678 JENNIFER BESWICK 25932 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1782
14679 LISA CASAllA 25933 55.00
MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1891
14680 STEPHANIE JOE 25934 35.00
MISCELLANEOUS 35.00 101 36330 000 1660
14681 LATRICE WARD 25935 55.00
MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1891
14682 ANDREW MCGUGAN 25936 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1349
14683 DIANE WILLIAMS 25937 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1349
14684 ROBIN POPIN 25938 87.00
MISCELLANEOUS 87.00 101 36330 000 1661
14685 LIAM DANAGHER 25939 138.00
MISCELLANEOUS 138.00 101 36330 000 1349
14686 MAYA TOGASHI 25940 81.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 81.00 101 68010 220 1644
14687 BOBBI BENSON 25941 45.00
MISCELLANEOUS 45.00 101 36330 000 1660
14688 YOLANDA MOGANNAM 25942 400.00
MISCELLANEOUS 400.00 101 22593
14689 STAN CHUDNOVSKY 25943 71.00
MISCELLANEOUS 71.00 101 36330 ODO 1349
14690 DEBBIE DOLLOSSO 25944 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
14691 TONY BASQUES 25945 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
14692 VICKI FRIEDBERG 25946 97.00
MISCELLANEOUS 97.00 101 36330 000 1349
14693 VECTOR LABRATORIES 25947 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14662 MARY LYCETT 25834 98.00
MISCELLANEOUS 98.00 101 36330 000 1660
14663 DAN PAULUS 25917 470.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 470.00 201 65200 260
14664 STEWART THOMPSON 25918 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1782
14665 NIRMALA BANDRAPALLI 25919 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782
14666 BARRIE MENGARELLI 25920 76.00
MISCELLANEOUS 76.00 101 36330 000 1782
14667 KOZUKO MORINAGA 25921 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782
14668 JENNIFER AGEE 25922 122.00
MISCELLANEOUS 122.00 101 36330 000 1661
14669 SHARI STEED 25923 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1349
14670 CHRISTINA ZEPEDA-GUERRA 25924 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1349
14671 -LAURA ESCOBAR 25925 345.00
MISCELLANEOUS 345.00 101 36330 000 1349
14672 JANE CREAGER 25926 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1349
14673 JASMINE SCHWARTZ 25927 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1349
14674 KIMATHI MARANGU 25928 115.00
MISCELLANEOUS 115.00 101 36330 000 1349
14675 SAC COMPONENTS 25929 191.02
COMMUNICATIONS 191.02 101 65100 160
14676 JENNIFER SERRAN 25930 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1782
14677 JUSTIN COHEN 25931 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1782
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14646 T MOBILE 24846 30.88
COMMUNICATIONS 30.88 101 65150 160
14647 RENE ARIAS 24950 3,000.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 3,000.00 101 22520
14648 S AND S SUPPLIES 8 SOLUTIONS 24963 138.60
MISC. SUPPLIES 138.60 101 66210 120
14649 SEAN CONNOLLY 24978 1,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000.00 101 22546
14650 RUTH REIMCHE 25143 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
14651 KICKERS PLUS 25147 508.78
BLDG. 8 GROUNDS MAINT. 508.78 101 68010 190 1106
14652 HEART OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 25152 4,625.00
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 4,625.00 101 64560 240
14653 DANIEL DOBSON 25205 505.00
MISCELLANEOUS 505.00 101 36630
14654 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 93.25
OFFICE EXPENSE 93.25 101 65100 110
14655 JILL JOHNSON 25373 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
14656 LORAL LANDSCAPING 25394 160.00
BLDG. 8 GROUNDS MAINT. 160.00 526 69020 190
14657 NETVERSANT SILICON VALLEY 25422 40.63
MISC. SUPPLIES 40.63 619 64460 120 5130
14658 MONIQUE SCHLOETTER 25512 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782
14659 CINGULAR WIRELESS-ATLYS 25730 54.95
COMMUNICATIONS 54.95 101 65100 160
14660 LARSON CONSULTING 25732 12,539.47
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 12,539.47 327 80730 210
14661 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25792 59.49
COMMUNICATIONS 59.49 201 65200 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
14634 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 -
14635 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 186.98
COMMUNICATIONS 186.98 619 64460 160
14636 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 550.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 730 69533 220
14637 BAVCO 24002 88.44
MISC. SUPPLIES 88.44 526 69020 120
14638 T&B SPORTS 24035 1,255.81
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 1,255.81 101 68010 190 1106
14639 QUILL 24090 323.34
OFFICE EXPENSE 323.34 621 64450 110
14640 CINGULAR WIRELESS TITAN 24299 399.99
COMMUNICATIONS 399.99 527 66520 160
14641 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 24466 328.96
MISC. SUPPLIES 251.51 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 77.45 619 64460 120 5130
14642 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 135.83
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 135.83 619 64460 210 5180
14643 PRESERVATION PAINTING 24552 12,600.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 12,600.00 320 80790 210 5150
14644 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 3,797.45
OFFICE EXPENSE 100.74 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 128.17 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 27.04 201 65200 120
COMMUNICATIONS 29.21 201 65200 160
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 294.48 201 65200 190
VEHICLE MAINT. 17.14 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 601.25 201 65200 203
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 245.80 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 390.00 201 65200 260
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 625.31 625 65213 203
MISCELLANEOUS 1,338.31 731 22554
14645 THE LIGHTHOUSE 24840 - 93.09
MISCELLANEOUS -7.68 201 23611
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 100.77 201 65200 203
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14621 DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION 22252 12,776.05
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 12,776.05 621 64450 800
14622 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT 22382 1,200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,200.00 101 68010 220 1785
14623 TECHNOLOGY,ENGINEERING & CONSTRU 22435 629.13
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 400.00 101 65100 200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 229.13 530 65400 200
14624 COMMUTER CHECK CORP-SF BAY AREA 22485 2,422.20
MISCELLANEOUS 2,422.20 101 15400
14625 JIM KELLY 22703 58.20
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 58.20 327 75170 210
14626 CUTTING EDGE DRAPERY 22880 2,748.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,748.50 320 80790 210
14627 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00
MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031
14628 OFFICE MAX 23306 672.85
OFFICE EXPENSE 529.31 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 26.33 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 21.13 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 71.29 101 68010 110 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 24.79 101 66100 120
14629 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 761.84
MISC. SUPPLIES 191.51 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 91.97 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 88.84 619 64460 120 5110
MISC. SUPPLIES 176.83 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 212.69 619 64460 120 5130
14630 AT&T 23661 25.89
COMMUNICATIONS 25.89 621 64450 160
14631 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 2,375.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,375.00 528 66600 210
14632 CITY OF HALF MOON BAY 23862 72.90
MISCELLANEOUS 72.90 731 22587
14633 BRIAN ROCHE 23865 4,200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,200.00 101 22546
' CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14606 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 726.08
SUPPLIES 726.08 620 15000
14607 LINDA GRAHAM 20483 1,010.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,010.00 101 68010 120 1521
14608 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 7,500.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,660.00 326 75170 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,840.00 327 75170 210
14609 FRANKLIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 20523 154.54
OFFICE EXPENSE 154.54 101 65100 110
14610 AN-WIL BAG CO. 20559 1,039.20
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,039.20 101 66210 120
14611 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 555.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 555.00 101 68010 220 1331
14612 CES 21210 229.05
MISC. SUPPLIES 229.05 101 64350 120
14613 JACKIE COOPER 21469 430.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 430.00 101 68010 220 1646
14614 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 331.51
OFFICE EXPENSE 331.51 621 64450 110
14615 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 89.05
SUPPLIES 89.05 620 15000
14616 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 103.26
COMMUNICATIONS 103.26 101 65300 160
14617 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 1,473.76
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,473.76 101 68010 120 1787
14618 BETTS TRUCK PARTS 22111 52.37
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 52.37 201 65200 203
14619 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 971.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 971.67 526 69020 120
14620 HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES 22235 350.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 350.00 327 81010 240
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14591 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 1,177.76
MISC. SUPPLIES 876.82 101 68010 120 1789
MISC. SUPPLIES 300.94 101 66010 120 1781
14592 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 472.75
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 472.75 101 64200 150
14593 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 721.29
VEHICLE MAINT. 48.40 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 295.95 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 376.94 625 65213 203
14594 JOHN CAHALAN, ASLA 19561 1,610.77
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,610.77 320 81070 210
14595 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 5,147.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,147.28 528 66600 210
14596 FISHER DEVELOPMENT INC. 19576 2,250.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,250.00 101 22520
14597 CLARKS AUTO & MARINE 19586 60.00
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 60.00 101 65200 203
14598 ALL FENCE COMPANY, INC. 19710 610.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 610.00 527 66520 120
14599 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220
14600 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINE 19821 480.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 480.00 101 66100 240
14601 WESTERN STAR NURSERIES 19865 1,104.39
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,104.39 730 69560 120 2300
14602 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101
14603 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 170.00
COMMUNICATIONS 170.00 621 64450 160
14604 RACQUET SMITH 20339 1,778.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,778.40 101 68010 220 1782
14605 LONGS DRUGS 20453 - 7.63
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 7.63 101 65100 292
CITY OF BURLINGAME J J
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14577 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 450.33
OFFICE EXPENSE 248.98 101 65100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 201.35 530 65400 120
14578 SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS 14144 10,401.92
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 10,401.92 526 69020 803
14579 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,995.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,995.75 101 68010 220 1787
14580 TEAM CLEAN 15827 347.83
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 347.83 201 65200 220
14581 ACTION SPORTS 16167 594.29
MISC. SUPPLIES 594.29 101 68010 120 1781
14582 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 41.12
SMALL TOOLS 41.12 620 66700 130
14583 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 104.31
MISC. SUPPLIES 104.31 526 69020 120
14584 PRIDE PAINT 17414 80.48
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 80.48 101 68020 190 2200
14585 ROMIC ENVIRONMENTAL 17453 222.00
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 222.00 101 66210 226
14586 COLORPRINT 17497 300.94
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.94 320 80470 220
14587 GORDON E. MC CLINTOCK 17702 1,392.25
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,392.25 618 64520 210
14588 C/CAG 17725 88,148.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 88,148.00 101 64560 220
14589 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 63.64
COMMUNICATIONS 31.82 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 31.82 527 66520 160
14590 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 1,289.76
MISC. SUPPLIES 174.86 101 64420 120
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 259.17 527 66520 140
MISC. SUPPLIES 855.73 730 69533 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denates Hand Written Checks
14564 RANDY SCHWARTZ 03518 - 968.00
MISCELLANEOUS 968.00 101 68010 031
14565 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 4,132.38
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,132.38 101 68020 220 2300
14566 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 350.00 101 65100 220
14567 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 190.19
MISC. SUPPLIES 190.19 101 64350 120
14568 JEAN BUCKS 09019 99.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.00 101 68010 220 1644
14569 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 559.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 559.00 101 68010 220 1891
14570 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 240.34
MISC. SUPPLIES 136.40 101 68020 120 2200
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 103.94 101 66210 219
14571 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 267.66
RENTS & LEASES 267.66 101 68020 180 2300
14572 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 11,941.72
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,590.12 618 64520 210
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 10,351.60 618 64520 601
14573 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 2,100.86
SMALL TOOLS 109.12 101 68020 130 2200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,305.14 101 68020 200 2200
SMALL TOOLS 642.25 526 69020 130
SUPPLIES 44.35 620 15000
14574 CAL-STEAM 10557 277.39
MISCELLANEOUS 43.69 101 68020 192 2200
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 12.91 201 65200 203
MISC. SUPPLIES 98.42 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 78.64 619 64460 120 5130
SMALL TOOLS 43.73 619 64460 130
14575 MCGRAW-HILL COMPANY 11245 164.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 164.00 101 66100 240
14576 ROMEO PACKING CO 11348 584.55
MISC. SUPPLIES 584.55 101 68020 120 2200
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
10/13/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
14552 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 172.81
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 52.87 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 58.92 619 64460 120 5170
MISC. SUPPLIES 61.02 619 64460 120 5180
14553 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 300.00
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 225.00 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 75.00 625 65213 203
14554 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 5,578.67
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 208.44 101 68020 200 2200
GAS, OIL & GREASE 152.36 201 65200 201
VEHICLE MAINT. 117.65 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 724.05 201 65200 203
MISC. SUPPLIES 13.66 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 82.27 619 64460 120
SUPPLIES 4,056.94 620 15000
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 223.30 625 65213 203
14555 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220
14556 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 19.31
OFFICE EXPENSE 10.83 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 8.48 101 66100 110
14557 COMPUTER TECHNICIANS, INC., 01987 1,088.10
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,088.10 621 64450 200
14558 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 351.42
MISC. SUPPLIES 351.42 101 68020 120 2200
14559 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 425.49
MISC. SUPPLIES 81.37 619 64460 120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 344.12 619 64460 210 5110
14560 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 151.55
MISC. SUPPLIES 151.55 101 68020 120 2200
14561 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 928.79
MISC. SUPPLIES 928.79 101 68010 120 1787
14562 DOROTHY RADYK 03235 495.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 495.00 101 68010 220 1644
14563 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 266,487.82
WATER PURCHASES 266,487.82 526 69020 171
BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
November 3,2005
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by
Chairperson McQuaide.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson McQuaide, Carney, Grandcolas,and Lauder
Absent: Commissioners Hesselgren, O'Connor,and Webb
Staff: Parks & Recreation Director Schwartz, Parks Superintendent Richmond, Arborist Porter,
Supervisor Disco, Secretary Harvey
Guests: Russ Cohen, Susie Lahey, Jennifer Pfaff, Bob Hocker, Philip Wilkinson, and Randi Murray
MINUTES
The minutes of the September 1, 2005 Beautification Commission meeting were approved as submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE
Letter from Robert Hocker, Jr., 1610 Chapin Avenue, appealing the approval of the removal of a private
Silver Maple tree in the front yard of his neighbor's property at 1604 Chapin Avenue.
Letter(s)to the appellant and the applicant regarding the appeal approving the removal of a private Silver
Maple tree at 1604 Chapin Avenue.
Copy of letter to Code Enforcement, Sue Harris, (copied to the Beautification Commission) regarding on
street parking regulations, home occupations, and limitations on signage in residential areas.
FROM THE FLOOR-
There were no comments from the floor.
With the Commission's permission, Chairperson McQuaide changed the order of the agenda.
NEW BUSINESS-
Appeal of the Approval to Remove a Protected Silver Maple Tree nu, 1604 Chapin Avenue- Arborist
Porter commented that the property owners at 1604 Chapin Avenue applied for a permit for the removal
of the Silver Maple tree because the tree was unhealthy. Submitted with the permit application was a
Certified Arborist Report from Ned Patchett of Treescape, citing recommendation for removal due to
dead limbs, tip die back [probably caused by internal decay], and a weakened main branch attachment
which is susceptible to failure. Arborist Porter stated that, upon his site inspection, he agreed with the
Arborist's Report and approved the removal because the tree's structure was poor, having multiple co-
dominant stems, and the tree's roots are causing extensive damage to hardscape.
Commissioner Lauder asked Arborist Porter the average age of the tree and the life span of a Silver
Maple. Arborist Porter responded that the Silver Maple tree is a short lived specie and could live another
10-15 years; the Silver Maple's wood is soft and is susceptible to heart rot in the trunk. Arborist Porter
stated that he notices sloughing off of the bark and markings on the trunk that would indicate heart rot in
the trunk.
Commissioner Grandcolas asked if P.G.&E.'s practice of "topping"under the utility lines has shortened
the life of this tree. Arborist Porter replied that any"topping"of trees hastens decline of a tree; "topping"
trees is not an acceptable pruning standard according to the International Society of Arboriculture.
Commissioner Lauder asked if the major limbs were in danger of failing in the wind. Arborist Porter
stated that the heavy,hazardous limbs could be eliminated by severe pruning but the crown would need to
be trimmed by more than one third. He added that this type of pruning is not only unsightly but the
"grow back"of the sucker growth is weakly attached and would need to be pruned more frequently.
1
NEW BUSINESS-
Appeal of the Approval to Remove a Protected Silver Maple Tree(i, 1604 Chapin Avenue- Contd-
Commissioner Carney asked if cutting the roots for driveway and sidewalk replacement would cause a
further problem. Arborist Porter responded yes, that he would be concerned about whole tree failure if
this tree's roots were cut.
There being no further questions of Arborist Porter from the Commission, Chairperson McQuaide opened
the meeting to the audience for comment.
Mrs. Murray(1604 Chapin Avenue) stated that, at the start of the remodel project of their home they had
met with their surrounding neighbors to inform them of the plan and scope of the project. However,
removal of the tree was only considered after receiving an Arborist Report that evaluated the condition of
trees on their property as well as preparation of a tree protection and preservation plan for the proposed
construction. The Arborist Report specifically recommended removal and replacement of the Silver
Maple tree due to its poor health. Mrs. Murray stated that they are aware of their neighbor's concern with
regard to shade and privacy and now have a landscape plan in place that will address some of those
concerns. Mrs. Murray concluded that they are concerned about liabilities if something were to occur with
the tree.
Mrs. Murray's contractor, Philip Wilkinson, stated that the Murray's will be installing permanent fencing
prior to the construction, and with the tree down, replanting could occur on both properties right away.
Commissioner Carney asked if the type of replacement tree had been decided. Mrs. Murray stated that
planting trees and shrubs are part of the relandscaping plan. Commissioner Lauder stated that fasting
growing shrubs and a large shade tree would be most preferable.
Mr. Hocker stated that he has not had access to the Arborist Report to date, but have had an agreement
with the Murray's regarding privacy protection during construction. Mr. Hocker reported that discussions
with the previous property owner [since deceased] included placing steel rods (cabling) the heavy limbs
to save the tree and to eliminate any possible hazards; if the work had been done, perhaps some of the
conditions would not have become so egregious. He stated he has received mixed signals as to whether
the tree should be removed or not but if it does need to come down, he requests removal be at a later date
to give something else a chance to grow. He stated that his neighbor, Frank Pagliaro, who lives across the
street from the tree, has stated that the tree is very beautiful and provides a screen for him as well.
Mr. Hocker stated he had recently hired Ron Eicher of Davey Tree Company to submit an Arborist
Report on the tree. He then submitted copies of the report to the Commission and stated that Mr. Eicher's
report states that the tree has "very good structure", and that maintenance pruning and cabling should be
performed. The Arborist Report also indicated that the driveway damage was caused by heavy equipment
when an Oak tree was removed on his property. Mr.Hocker concluded that he has only been an opponent
of when the tree comes out because the tree will help to mitigate the sight and dust that will come from
the project. He stated that he is fully in favor of property improvements. He is only requesting that for
now, the tree and other landscaping remain during the construction, if only for a year, to maintain
protection as long as long as possible.
Commissioner Grandcolas asked how long would the construction last and how long might the tree need
to stay. Mr. Hocker stated the construction is expected to last for approximately one year and he would
like the tree to stay as long as possible during the construction phase. Arborist Porter asked Mr. Hocker if
the Arborist had done any drill testing on the trunk. Mr. Hocker responded that he had not conducted drill
testing but the Arborist had indicated that he was familiar with the tree because he had worked on the tree
in the past.
2
NEW BUSINESS - Appeal of the Approval to Remove a Protected Silver Maple Tree (a), 1604
Chapin Avenue - Conte - Arborist Porter commented that during his visual inspection of the tree he
noticed numerous indications on the trunk that would indicate the tree has heart rot and stated he would
not trust this tree with just "maintenance" pruning; that it has been his experience when removed, trees
with similar visual indicators,have significant heart rot decay.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that liabilities this tree can cause is an issue and asked the question: "If a limb falls
from this tree and damages something, whose liability is it?" Mr. Hocker responded that insurance
companies say that it is an "Act of God" and is not attributable to property owners as long as property
owners have taken reasonable actions.
Mrs. Murray commented that they are concerned about personal injuries and damage should this tree
remain and that any efforts to save the tree would cause the tree to be unsightly and would not meet the
objectives or reasons to save the tree.
Mr. Hocker responded that he just wants privacy from the construction and dust; that he would just like
the tree to be trimmed and pruned to see if the hazards can be mitigated.
Chairperson McQuaide closed the hearing. She stated that it sounds like the appellant is asking to buy
some time with regard to the tree's removal.
Commissioner Lauder stated it would be nice if removal of the tree could be postponed but that ultimately
the tree should be removed. She stated that she can identify with Mr. Hocker's concerns that the
construction may cause and wondered if there would be some way that the Commission could help.
Commissioner Grandcolas stated that three certified arborist's reports have been submitted; that the
Commission has what they need to make a decision. He added that 2 out of 3 Arborist reports say the tree
is in bad shape and the condition of the tree will only be worsened with sidewalk/driveway repairs and
severe pruning.
Following a brief discussion Commissioner Grandcolas moved that the appeal of the approval be denied
and the permit be issued to remove the Silver Maple tree, but that the tree be replaced with a 36" box
size tree Commissioner Grandcolas further stated that the Commission recommends and encourages
the property owner at 1604 Chapin Avenue to maintain the existing tree as long as possible during the
construction phase, and Commissioner Quaide stated that the Commission also recommends and
encourages that both property owners agree on a species that would someday provide a comparable
screen to the existing Silver Maple tree. The motion and the recommendations were seconded by
Commissioner Lauder. Motion carried 4-0-3(Absent/Hesselgren, O'Connor, Webb).
Chairperson McQuaide thanked the applicant and appellant for their presentations and Superintendent
Richmond advised them of appeal procedures.
NEW BUSINESS
Commission Organization - Director Schwartz stated that the Commission has 7 seats and 2 seats have
expired. Initially there were no applicants but before the application process closed 3 people have
applied. The 3 applicants will be interviewed by Council but if none of the applicants qualify the Council
may consider reducing the Commission seats to 5.
3
NEW BUSINESS - Contd - Commission Organization - Chairperson McQuaide wondered how well
the process was publicized and indicated that when someone she knew applied today they were told that
the deadline had passed. Chairperson McQuaide stated that because of the decisions made by the
Commission and the Committee work that is often required, she believes 7 voices representing the
community on this Commission are needed. She concluded that she hopes the application process would
be re-opened so that other people can apply.
Commissioner Lauder stated that over the past few years the Beautification Commission has had
problems with absenteeism; absenteeism was not so prevalent in the past and Commissioners would
resign if they couldn't attend the meetings. She concluded that applicants should be informed that serving
on City Commissions requires a serious commitment and if their families or jobs interfere with them
keeping their commitment,they should not apply. Commissioner Grandcolas stated that the 5:30 pm start
time might be an issue for some people and thought perhaps the Commission could consider a different
meeting time.
Director Schwartz stated that he would express to the Council the Commission's desire to remain with 7
seats. He stated that if the current applicants don't qualify, the Council might consider reopening the
application process.
Chairperson McQuaide then asked that the issue of the Commission meetings start time be placed on the
next agenda.
OLD BUSINESS -
Long Range Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive - Superintendent Richmond stated that the Council
had suggested consideration of a Master Plan for the Easton area to determine replacement varieties when
Eucalyptus removals occur. The Committee (Commissioners Lauder, O'Connor, and McQuaide) have
been meeting and researching different specie options and discussing a process by which area residents
can have input.
Commissioner Lauder stated that the Committee used the Official Street Tree list as their guide in
choosing replacement varieties and recommends the following species: Camphor, Sycamore, Red Maple,
Scarlet Oak, and Citriodora (Eucalyptus Sp). Commissioner Lauder stated that the Committee also
discussed the possibility of some Elm varieties, Accolade and Patriot, on which Jennifer Pfaff did
extensive research for replacement trees on El Camino. Chairperson McQuaide stated that the
Committee's selections were considerate to property owners and were trees that were wind hearty,
provided privacy, evergreen as well as deciduous, but also were species that would acclimate with the
existing Eucalyptus trees.
Commissioner Lauder stated the Committee discussed conducting a forum for the area residents at the
Easton Branch Library, giving the residents plenty of notice. Forum would include photos of trees, a
slide presentation,with a full description of the trees being recommended, and opportunities for feed back
from the residents. Chairperson McQuaide commented that after the holiday season might be a good
time to conduct such a forum, perhaps in January or February 2006. Commissioner Grandcolas
responded that this project is a long term project, and that the Commission can take the time needed to
properly inform and receive input from the community.
Superintendent Richmond suggested that staff retain a professional consultant that could assist and advise
in the specie selection. The Commission agreed and asked that Superintendent Richmond secure a
consultant to assist in the process.
4
OLD BUSINESS -
Lone Ranae Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive- Contd
Russ Cohen, Traffic & Safety Commissioner, reported on the Eucalyptus tree fronting the Easton Branch
Library and all the varying aspects considered by the Traffic& Safety Commission. To date,the removal
of the Eucalyptus tree is postponed for further study.
Commissioner Grandcolas excused himselffrom the meeting at 7:05 pm.
Susie Lahey, 1719 Easton Drive stated that she appreciates all the work that the Commission is doing the
Easton Drive reforestation project. She commented that the residents on Easton are involved in a
love/hate relationship with the Eucalyptus tree, but most seem to enjoy the grandeur of the trees. She
encourages the planting of selected species in empty planting areas, but asked that the trees be planted in
such a way that the residents can still park in the strips. She concluded that she is pleased that the existing
Eucalyptus will only be removed when they become a hazard or unhealthy. She stated she is happy that
the replacement selections that are being considered are a mix of evergreen and deciduous, and that this is
a long term plan.
Following further discussion and audience input on the long range reforestation plan, the meeting
adjourned at 7:20 pm due to lack of a quorum.
Respectfully subin" d,
Karlen Harvey
Recording Secretary
5
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road,Burlingame, CA
November 14, 2005
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the November 14,2005,regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Keighran,
Osterling and Vistica(arrived at 7:05 p.m.)
Absent: Commissioners: None
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Ruben Hurin; City
Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer, Doug Bell.
III. MINUTES CP Monroe noted that Commissioners had a desk item from David Moutoux
related to the minutes for the October 240' meeting, and noted that he
requested two changes. The minutes of the October 24,2005 regular meeting
of the Planning Commission were approved with the following two
amendments: 1) page 8, paragraph 1: Sixteen or so letters, most received
after the packet was delivered eenmnenfing in opposition to the proposed
zoning change allowing for "doggie day care"in the Rollins Road corridor,
were placed at the commissioner's desks, ...2) Page 10, paragraph 3, add a
bullet point which states: leave in current M-1 provision for veterinary
hospitals and refer this issue to the subcommittee for further study and to
make a recommendation back to the Commission.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
1. 1801 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED C-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING FINANCIAL INSTITUTION(ROGER HAGMAN,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT AND PEDERSEN AND PEDERSEN,PROPERTY OWNER)PROJECT
PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Plr Hurin presented a summary of the staff report. Commission asked staff to clarify ownership of the slip
road in front of this property along El Camino Real;CP Monroe noted that the frontage road is in the City's
right-of-way and will be landscaped in the future as noted in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific
Plan. Commissioners asked:
■ Application notes number of customers will increase from 40 to 50-55 per day;please clarify number
of existing customers.
This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the
Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:14 p.m.
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
2. 1199 BROADWAY,SUITE 5,ZONED C-1,BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA—APPLICATION
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR REAL ESTATE AND TRAVEL
OFFICE (GARBIS BEZDJIAN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER:
RUBEN HURIN
C. Deal recused himself from this item because he lives within 500 feet of the subject property and left the
dais and chambers. CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commission asked staff how much
floor area of the tenant space would have to be reduced to eliminate the need for the additional parking
space? Staff noted that given the parking ratio for office (1:300 SF) compared to retail (1:400 SF) any
increment of intensification would require an additional parking space. Commissioners asked:
■ Applicant to explain how the real estate and travel office will work together at this site; and
■ Provide information on occupancy(percentage of available spaces)of public parking Lot Y behind
this site, if available from Public Works.
This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the
Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:20 p.m.
C. Deal returned to the dais and took his seat.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
3A. 1718 ESCALANTE WAY,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,HILLSIDE AREA
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A
FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION(DAVID LUNG,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;
PAUL NII, PAUL NII ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT) (37NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA
STROHMEIER(CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 11 & 24, 2005)
3B. 2518 HILLSIDE DRIVE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,SPECIAL PERMITS
FOR HEIGHT AND DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A
FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION(JD ASSOCIATES,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;AND
TINA & KEVIN VILLEGIANTE, PROPERTY OWNERS) (56 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:
ERIKA LEWIT
3C. 1511 ROLLINS ROAD, ZONED M-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
PARKING VARIANCE FOR A DRIVING SCHOOL IN AN EXISTING TRADE UNION BUILDING
(VICTORIA & MOHAMMAD AZARSHOLAY, APPLICANT AND LOCAL 1781 BUILDING
CORPORATION PROPERTY OWNER)15 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent
calendar. C. Deal noted he has a business relationship with the applicant of the project at 2518 Hillside
Drive so he would recuse himself from that vote. Commission asked if staff received any comments from
neighbors regarding the story poles at 1718 Escalante Way; CP Monroe noted that no comments were
received. C.Brownrigg noted that he did not want to call anything off the calendar but wanted to make the
following comments: 1718 Escalante Way, feel that the story poles now represent the proposed addition;
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
1511 Rollins Road, application for driving school is appropriate at this location,however property owner
failed to respond to question if other parts of the office space will be leased out to other businesses;and 2518
Hillside Drive, appreciate that the applicant carefully noted simulated true divided light windows for the
proj ect.
C. Keighran moved approval of the consent calendar. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the consent calendar,noting that each project is approved based on
the facts in the staff reports, commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports with
recommended conditions in the staff reports and by resolution. The projects at 1718 Escalante Way and
1511 Rollins Road passed on a voice vote 7-0. The project at 2518 Hillside Drive passed on a voice vote
6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
4. 1783 EL CAMINO REAL,PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT,ZONED C-1,C-
3 & UNCLASSIFIED — 1) ACTION ON PROPOSED MITIGATION MONITORING PANEL
(CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 118);2)REVIEW FOR CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONS NO.
5,35,90& 103 WITH RESPECT TO REFINED LANDSCAPE PLANS,BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND
STREET LIGHT DESIGN; AND 3) REVIEW OF GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND
SPECIFIC SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW WATER LINE, INSTALLATION OF
LANDSCAPING AND CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING GARAGE (MILLS PENINSULA HEALTH
SERVICES, APPLICANT, ANSHEN & ALLEN, ARCHITECT; AND PENINSULA HEALTH CARE
DISTRICT AND MILLS PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES,PROPERTY OWNERS)(201 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
Reference staff report November 14,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed the
items to be considered by the Commission in response to the conditions of approval for the project. There
were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Oren Reinbolt,Mills Peninsula Health Services Project Manager,
gave an overview of the proposed mitigation monitoring panel, noting that a lot of effort had gone in to
broadening the membership of the group, as it is now composed there is one Davis Drive resident on the
panel, hope to have one more, there is a representative from the Burlingame Plaza Shopping Center, the
Hospital District and a City staff member;residents have expressed concern with the long commitment,the
intent is to let the panel determine its evolution, and determine meeting times and frequency. Neighbors
proximate to the hospital that share a property line were invited to represent the neighborhood,wanted to
have two or three members from the neighborhood, so far one has volunteered;think that the panel as it is
now composed has a reasonable core,hope it can grow.
Commissioners asked: has the panel met yet? No,want to get the concept approved by the Commission as
required,then will set up schedule. Concerned that there is only one resident,would like to see opportunity
for another. The major function of the group is to monitor that the hospital meets its obligations, at first
would expect a need to meet more frequently than monthly, then could adjust schedule as issues are
resolved; would like to see a meeting schedule set up so residents know that issues will be addressed in a
reasonable time frame.
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes. November 14, 2005
Oren Reinbolt introduced Todd Tierney,project architect and Antonia Bava,project landscape architect,to
present the changes to the garage design,the landscaping at the corner of El Camino Real and Trousdale,and -�
the landscaping along the property line adjacent to Davis Drive residences;it was noted that the only change
to the garage structure is the location and orientation of the security building at the garage's south side facing
the hospital entrance and changes to the surrounding landscaped areas to accommodate that change;noted
that the parking on the top deck was reconfigured and a row of trees in planters was added.
It was noted that the initial phase of landscaping would be to complete the 15-foot wide swath of
landscaping adjacent to the south property line,abutting the Davis Drive residences;this area will be planted
with a combination of 24"and 36"box trees,with both deciduous and evergreen varieties. The trees will be
planted as far from the existing power lines as possible,which will allow the use of taller species;neighbors
have been meeting with the fencing contractor, looks like agreement is being reached on a common fence
design on the property line,which would continue across the end of Albemarle;the trees to be planted at the
end of Albemarle on hospital property will be a mix of evergreen and deciduous,proposing a high/low mix,
using Birch,Chinese Maple,and some Redwoods;two trees are proposed within the Albemarle public right-
of-way placed so they will not interfere with residence's driveways, in this location have to use a species
from the list of City trees which can be planted under power lines,a flowering pear tree is proposed,open to
other choices the City would approve.
Commissioners asked: The visual representation for the Trousdale/El Camino Real frontage provides a nice
progression on the landscaping,what growth projection was assumed for the trees in this picture? The trees
represented depict a 10-year growth. How do you accomplish planting trees on top of the garage structure?
The trees will be in large planter boxes placed over a structural grid to bear the weight,will use multi-trunk
trees so that the view through the garage from the hospital will be of foliage, will use 3-foot by 3-foot
planters, and will plant 24"box trees, expect that they will attain a height of about 15 feet.
The applicant continued discussion of the landscape and sidewalk concept on El Camino Real.
Commissioners noted that street trees were originally proposed along El Camino Real between the street and
the sidewalk,that is the planting pattern shown in the street cross section for the North Burlingame Rollins
Road Specific Plan,why are the trees now shown on the inner side of the sidewalk? The applicant noted that
it was discovered that there is a 54"diameter water main within the public right-of-way in the location where
the street trees were to be planted. The water main is too close to the surface for trees to be planted in that
area. In addition,Caltrans has required a deceleration lane at the bus stop,which widens the roadway at the
intersection of El Camino Real and Trousdale;it is now proposed that waist high shrubs be planted between
the sidewalk and the roadway for pedestrian separation from the street,but there are no shrubs proposed next
to the deceleration lane for the bus stop;trees would be planted on the inboard side of the sidewalk,there is a
7-foot wide area between the Caltrans right-of-way and the new water easement where trees can be planted.
If the sidewalk were moved inboard to the property on the SF water easement,the trees could not be closer
to the street because of the location of the utilities within the Caltrans right-of-way;Cypress tree is proposed,
it is in the same family as the Elm,will replicate the historically planted Elms along the rest of El Camino
Real, this is one of the two species called out in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan for El
Camino Real.
Commissioner comment: There appears to be plenty of room between the hospital and the street along El
Camino Real to provide a nice,meandering walkway,similar to what is proposed on Trousdale,would like a -�
meandering walkway added to get the pedestrians away from the street, would like to see a sketch optior
with a meandering path.
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
Commissioners asked: What is the timing for the planting proposed adjacent to the Davis Drive properties?
Work will start on the neighborhood buffer zone by January 2006, and it should be completed by the
beginning of March 2006. Will the proposed public artwork be accommodated in the planting at the corner
of El Camino Real and Trousdale? Yes.
Terry Huebner,Davis Drive,Steve D'Ambrosio, 1504 Davis Drive,Kevin Nelson,Albemarle Resident,Pat
Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, and Chris Foley, 1504 Davis Drive,spoke regarding the hospital project and
the conditions of approval;concerned with Condition No. 118,the mitigation monitoring panel,would like
to see a resident from the western section of Davis Drive on the panel,concerned with meetings only being
held once a month, would like more immediate response to concerns, how will the City hear about the
concerns,neighbors on west end of Davis Drive have valid reasons why they cannot serve, should have an
outside representative similar to what was used during BART construction,would like to know how often
the panel will meet,there are problems which need to be addressed; also need representation from adjacent
apartments and the Plaza Shopping Center;think it is important that the landscaping is completed as soon as
possible, and that the landscaping installed be as mature as possible,need to decide what that means,what
size trees will be planted;would like to see the proposed wood fence continue across the end of Albemarle
along the property line;concerned with the path/fire access proposed behind Davis Drive homes,shown as a
20-foot wide asphalt path,will not be visually pleasing,would like to see an alternative; sent photographs
showing the view from Albemarle with trees removed,now there is construction noise,dust,visual impacts,
wind,trucks backing up,dirt being hauled and trucks not covered,would like to see the personal mitigation
items go forward; with Condition No. 119, there wasn't enough money to go around, but impacts are still
there;understand things have to go on,but hoping that through the panel neighbors will get protection from
impacts; appreciate the landscaping proposed at the end of Albemarle.
Public Comment continued: Would like to remind Commission that if deciduous trees are considered,will
only provide view protection during parts of the year,wind will go through the deciduous trees, should be
more evergreen along fence line; will berm be built north of the access path so that the trees will appear
taller,suggest a mix of evergreen and deciduous,suggest bay trees,they make a nice canopy and leave very
little debris; want to reiterate concern with asphalt pathway,would be directly behind my house, and back
yard will look directly onto the path,earlier renditions showed something that looked like a trail,now is a 20'
wide asphalt path.
The applicant responded to the public comments,noting that the path along the south property line is asphalt
primarily for fire access,needs to serve that purpose,may be able to come up with another surface option,
will need to work with the City to come up with an acceptable solution;will also be working with the City
on what is allowable within the Albemarle right-of-way for landscaping.
Commissioners asked: what is the timeline for planting on the north(hospital) side of the water pipeline?
The schedule for this planting is constrained because there will be a lot of work occurring in that area, the
foundation for the hospital structure will be under construction, so will have to wait until that is complete,
the construction fence and landscaping within the 15-foot wide buffer zone is expected to be completed by
March 2006. Will the planting behind the residences be on a berm? No, there will be a drainage swale
adjacent to the property line, and the tree planting will be a slight rise on the other side of the swale.
Neighbors commented that the trucks hauling dirt are not covered properly,please respond. The applicant
noted that the Highway Patrol requirement is that they either are covered or that dirt be kept 6 inches below
the top; contractor has chosen that option rather than covering the dirt. There were no further comments
from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
Commissioner comment: Regarding the mitigation panel,right now membership on the panel is light,would
like to see option of adding more residents if someone is willing to serve, note that Carole Groom is the.-,
designated point of contact from the hospital, also note that there is a representative from the BurlingamL
Plaza Shopping Center,this is an opportunity for neighbors to get involved,need to take accountability,note
that there is an email address available where residents can send their concerns;recommend that the panel
meet more frequently than monthly to address concerns now,may taper off as issues are resolved;CP noted
when concerns are brought up, City staff has contacted the applicant, they then follow up and notify City,
then get back to the concerned party;would like to see an open board seat for one more resident,is there a
way that other residents can be notified of panel meetings so that they can attend if they want to? CA
Anderson noted that it will be up to the panel to decide how the public will be notified; CP Monroe noted
that it was the intention that the neighbors will know who the panel members are and can talk to them
directly about any concerns; hospital has been sending notices/bulletins to a list which is larger than our
standard noticing radius; the panel will need to discuss its noticing policy.
C.Brownrigg made a motion to approve the monitoring panel and find that it meets the requirements spelled
out in Condition No. 118,with the provision made that there be an open panel seat for an additional resident
member. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to
approve the monitoring panel. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised.
Commissioner comment on landscaping and garage structure design: would like to note that on the
landscape plan,Sheet L1.3 notes 24"and 36"box trees to be planted,could put in larger,but the larger ones
sit for a year or two and don't show growth, in about a year the 24"and 36"box will show growth and will
attain the same size as a larger planting and grow with more vigor,the trees chosen are fast growing and will
do well; would like to see different ideas for the materials used for the emergency access pathway; woule
like to see different options for street light standards,provide several options and show examples of where
they can be seen in other cities,not sure the selection of light poles works with the vocabulary of the hospital
project, great opportunity to discuss a consistent theme to use throughout the area; would also like to see
different options for pedestrian walkway along El Camino Real, there appears to be a consensus that the
buffer landscaping adjacent to Davis Drive properties is as good as it can be given the site constraints;note
that the end of Albemarle is something which is not solely in the hospital's control, hospital will need to
work with City to determine what can be done.
Commission directed the applicant to bring back the following three items for further clarification:
■ That different options for streetlights be brought back,bring several selections from which to choose;
■ Would like to see different ideas for the material used for the emergency access pathway that would
satisfy the fire lane requirements; and
■ Bring back options for a meandering sidewalk pathway along El Camino Real frontage,with an eye
towards keeping pedestrians away from the street.
This item concluded at 9:05 p.m.
5. 904 AZALEA AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION (KEVIN AND DEBRA SULLIVAN,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS; AND RICHARD CAMPONUEVO, DESIGNER) (62 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER:,.1
ERIKA LEWIT
Reference staff report November 14, 2005, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions
from the Commission.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Kevin Sullivan,property owner,was available to answer questions.
There were no comments or questions and the public hearing was closed.
C. Brownrigg moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1)that the
project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 1,
2005,sheets 1 to 8 and 9A,with vinyl frame double-glass insulated windows without grids throughout,and
with a 3'-0" arched landing made of stamped concrete and decorative 2-inch Spanish tiles; and that any
changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an
amendment to this permit; 2)that at no time shall this residence be used as anything other than a single-
family home and at no time shall there be a second kitchen or a second unit on site; 3) that the Building
Department shall inspect and confirm that plywood has been glued and nailed to the living space side of
habitable attic areas to prevent future attempts to expand the second floor habitable areas; 4) that any
changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors, or garage, which would include
adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the
roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5) that prior to final inspection,
Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials,
window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building
plans; 6) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single
termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details
shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7) that the
conditions of the Chief Building Official's August 10, 2005 memo, the Fire Marshal's, NPDES
Coordinator's, and the Recycling Specialist's August 15,2005 memos, and the City Engineer's August 17,
2005,memo,shall be met; 8)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and
Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame; 9)that the project shall comply
with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new
construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any
partial or full demolition of a structure,interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 10)that
the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and
Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Comment on the motion: appreciate the applicant's revisions to the plans to eliminate the floor area ratio
variance and clarify the details of this project.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:12 p.m.
6. 1388 HILLSIDE CIRCLE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND MAY
INCLUDE AT LEAST POSSIBLE VARIANCES FOR FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS AND A
POSSIBLE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND
STORY ADDITION (DAN MCCARTHY, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JERRY
CHAPMAN,DESIGNER) (51 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
Reference staff report November 14, 2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed
.. criteria and staff comments. Because of the incomplete nature of the plans submitted for the project which
made it difficult to determine whether the project complied or not with the zoning code, there were no
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
conditions of approval suggested for consideration. Commission noted that the plans contain a lot of
handwritten notes and asked what they refer to; CP Monroe noted that the notes and their references are
unclear, could ask applicant to explain. There were no further questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. The applicant was not present to answer questions. There were no
further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C.Deal noted that the plans are difficult to read,have no idea what is being proposed,Commission and staff
cannot make plans,there are numerous errors,design is terrible,and therefore moved to deny the application.
The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to deny. The motion passed on a 7-0. Appeal procedures
were advised. This item concluded at 9:16 p.m.
7. 1160 CAPUCHINO AVENUE,ZONED C-1,BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA—APPLICATION
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A NEW FOOD
ESTABLISHMENT IN AN EXISTING TENANT SPACE (ALICIA PARNELL, APPLICANT;
CATHERINE NILMEYER,ARCHITECT;AND ANNE&DAVID HINCKLE,PROPERTY OWNERS)
(55 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
C. Deal noted that he clarified with the City Attorney that he lives more than 500 feet from the subject
property and therefore does not have to recuse himself from this item. Reference staff report November 14,
2005, with attachments. Plr Hurin presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fourteen
conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Michael Nihneyer, architect, and Alicia Parnell, applicant, were
available to answer questions,noted that there is little architecture involved with this application,front door
will be changed to comply with ADA requirements,mostly interior improvements will be made to comply
with the Health Department, exterior appearance of the building will not be changed,this will be the only
vegetarian food establishment with take-out on the peninsula,there is no cooking involved,this is a perfect
location,space is small enough,food will be picked up,may have seating on the sidewalk if the City allows,
will talk to Public Works about obtaining an encroachment permit, originally thought that adding seating
would require the restrooms to comply with ADA requirements,since found that based on the valuation the
upgrade is not needed; would like to offer a healthy food alternative especially for people without time or
inclination to prepare healthy food,healthy food enhances your diet,have several hundred customers within
the community,there are seven similar restaurants in San Francisco,would like to offer this type of food on
the Peninsula so people don't have to drive to San Francisco,location is perfect between Earthbeam and Caf6
Capuchino — two healthy choices, have supporters in the audience tonight. Commission noted that the
applicant's response letter indicates that classes will be offered at this site and asked how often classes would
occur; applicant noted that classes would be offered once a month with a maximum of 5-10 people.
Commission noted that there was a misconception at the study meeting that this business would operate
mainly as a wholesale and catering business,applicant has done a good job to clarify how this business will
operate,now comfortable that it is a specialty shop food establishment,however think the space may not be
big enough for the applicant's needs. Commission asked if classes can be included as part of this
application; CA Anderson noted that a condition of approval can be added regarding the classes.
Commission asked the applicant to clarify the frequency of the classes. Applicant noted that she wil! -�
probably have her hands full with the retail end of the business so feel classes will occur once a month,will
most likely be two hour classes in the afternoons on weekends and in the evening on weekdays.
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
Kerry Bitner, 2517 Poppy Drive; Maureen Kilo, San Mateo; Kourami Davenport; Beverly Yates; and
Symantha Vietz,256 San Luis Avenue,San Bruno,spoke in support of the application;CP Monroe read into
the record written comments in support from Maggie Smith, 1199 Howard Avenue#1103;Gregg Jackson,
`- 414 Ulloa Street, San Francisco; Leslie Anderson, 22333 Big Oak Drive; am a Burlingame resident,have
been a customer for three years,business provides a valuable service,food is healthy and delicious,operator
is ethical,many devoted customers come,go to the San Mateo store two to three times a week,this market is
growing, demand exceeds supply,this is an attractive alternative for lunch offering salads and soups to go
and take back to work, support local businesses and those with a lower impact on the environment, food
used is organic,no cooking involved,operator is dedicated to sharing her knowledge with the community;
am a customer and the administrator for The San Francisco Professional Food Society, there are many
wonderful examples of this type of growing food establishments in the Bay Area,this will be the only raw
food establishment in the south bay, food scene is cutting edge; am a six-year cancer survivor, one of two
people alive with this type of bone cancer,did not fully recover until began eating raw food,now am a 175
pound martial arts teacher,now help people to turn to this type of food,have to drive to San Francisco to eat
at a raw food establishment, excited to be spending time in Burlingame; made a commitment to eat raw
food, come to shop in Burlingame once a week;have been a vegetarian for 16 years, love raw food offered
by applicant,difficult to find this type of food at restaurants,Burlingame is a unique and quaint city,has an
upscale feel and is on the cutting edge,this would be a perfect addition to Broadway. There were no further
comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
C. Vistica moved to approve the application, by resolution, with the following amended conditions to
include classes offered at the site: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the
Planning Department date stamped September 26,2005,sheets A-1 and A-2; 2)that this business location
shall be occupied by a specialty shop food establishment(396 SF)with no on-site seating area,which may
change its food establishment classification to a different type of food establishment upon approval of a
conditional use permit amendment for the establishment;the criteria for the new classification shall be met
in order for a change to be approved;3)that classes shall occur at a maximum frequency of once a week,in
the afternoon hours on weekends and on weekdays from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., with a maximum number of
students not to exceed the occupancy allowed by the Fire Department; any changes to the number or
frequency of classes offered,duration or class times shall require an amendment to this use permit;4)that
this specialty shop food establishment may be replaced by another specialty shop food establishment at the
same location within the same or less square footage; if this specialty shop is changed to any other
classification the site shall not return to specialty shop use; 5) that on-site seating shall be added to the
specialty shop food establishment only by an amendment to this conditional use permit; 6)that the parking
variance shall only apply to this 396 SF tenant space and the food establishment use with no on-site seating
area and the parking variance shall become void if the tenant space or food establishment use is ever
expanded, demolished or destroyed by catastrophe or natural disaster or if the building is replaced or
remodeled to qualify as new construction; 7) that the specialty shop food establishment may be open for
business Monday through Friday, from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. and on Saturday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., with a
maximum of 6 employees on site at any one time, including the business owner and manager; 8)that this
food establishment shall provide a trash receptacle located on the sidewalk at the front as approved by the
city; the trash container shall be consistent with the streetscape improvements and that this business shall
maintain all trash receptacle(s) on the sidewalk at the front and at the entrances to the building and at any
additional locations as approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department; 9) that the business shall
provide litter control along all frontages of the business and within fifty(50) feet of all frontages of the
business, including the parking lot to the rear of the site; all trash/garbage shall be removed on a schedule
established with the Health Department; 10) that an amendment to this conditional use permit shall be
required for delivery of prepared food from this premise which requires more than one trip a day or a
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14,2005
designated delivery vehicle other than the owners personal car; 11)that there shall be no food sales allowed
at this location from a window or from any opening within 10'of the property line; 12)that if this site is
changed from any food establishment use to any retail or other use,a food establishment shall not be
replaced on this site and this conditional use permit shall become void; 13)that seating on the sidewalk
outside shall conform to the requirements of any encroachment permit issued by the city; 14)that the
conditions of the Chief Building Official's,Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's October 3,
2005,memos,and the City Engineer's October 11,2005,memo,shall be met including any special waste
treatment requirements resulting from food preparation on this site;and 15)that the project shall meet all the
requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code,2001 edition,as amended by the
City of Burlingame,and that failure to comply with these conditions or any change to the business or use on
the site which would affect any of these conditions shall require an amendment to this use permit. The
motion was seconded by C.Keighran.
Comment on the motion:with regard to the parking variance it should be noted that the City Council
approved ordinance to allow for five additional food establishments in the Broadway Commercial Area,
knowing many properties in the area do not have on-site parking,this site has an advantage because it
contains eight on-site parking spaces behind the building;this is clearly a retail food establishment and not a
catering business,parking should not be a problem.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the application with amended conditions. The
motion passed on a 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
8. 1532 COLUMBUS AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (TRG ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;AND DAVE AND DENISE MAURO,PROPERTY OWNERS) (72
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
Cers.Brownrigg and Keighran recused themselves from this item because they live within 500 feet of the
subject property and left the dais and chambers. Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. There
were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Randy Grange,TRG Architects,noted that this is a typical
Spanish style house and Spanish details will be carried to the addition at the rear of the house. Commission
complimented the architect for providing the existing and proposed building elevations on the same sheet,it
makes it very easy to review the proposed changes. There were no other comments from the floor and the
public comment was closed.
C.Deal noted that the addition is consistent with existing Spanish design,the project has all of the attributes
to comply with the design guidelines and made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar with no
recommended changes to the project. This motion was seconded by C.Vistica.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar with no recommended
changes to the project. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2(Cern.Brownrigg and Keighran abstaining).
The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:50 p.m.
Cers.Brownrigg and Keighran returned to the dais and took their seats.
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
9. 1125 CLOVELLY LANE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SIDE
SETBACK AND PARKING VARIANCES FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (SATISH AND MEENU DUTT, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY
OWNERS; AND MARK SANG, DESIGNER) (78 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Satish Dutt, applicant and property owner, was available to
answer questions. Commission noted that the massing and proportions are handled well, but that the details
need to be worked out to make the project better. Commission asked the applicant to clarify the existing and
proposed plate heights; the applicant noted that 8'-1" is existing on the first floor; and 8'-6" is proposed on
the second floor. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
C. Deal made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the following comments:
■ Provide first and second floor plate height dimensions on building elevations; as proposed second
floor plate height (8'-6") is taller than first floor plate height (8'-1"), consider reducing the second
floor plate height to 8'-1" to make it more proportional, would also help to reduce the overall height
of the building;
■ provide dimension from the top of the first floor plate to the second floor finished floor;
■ provide proposed tree species on landscape plan, trees to be retained and new trees;
■ clarify on plans if fireplace in living room is gas or wood burning; if gas burning, how is it going to
vent; if wood burning does it need a chimney;
■ verify if furnace will fit into the enclosure shown on the plans, actual furnace maybe larger than area
shown;
■ change vinyl windows to wooden simulated true-divided light windows;
■ clarify on plans the type of window trim proposed, should use a traditional stucco mold;
■ porch seems diminished in stature and should continue for the width of the recess, the porch area
should encompass the living room windows;
■ the pitch of the roof on the porch could be less than the other roof pitches so it will not ride too high
up on the upper windows;
■ consider placing the crawl space vents closer to the ground on all building elevations so they are not
so dominant and can be covered by vegetation;
■ show gutters and downspouts on all building elevations;
■ consider using wider shutters on the front elevation, 18 inch width may look better for this design;
■ windows may be shown too close to the roof line and may not allow for flashing, should verify and
revise now so that changes won't have to be made later;
■ new rear sliding doors are not compatible with the design, grids should be omitted or have the
windows consistent with the grid pattern in the doors;
■ the corbels on the rear elevation are spaced approximately 7 feet on center, suggest adding corbels
between each 7 foot spacing on 3'-6" spacing, will look better;
■ label all egress windows on plans, verify that the size and opening comply with egress requirements;
■ horizontal band on the rear elevation should be wood not stucco, will work better with this design;
■ mixture of sliding and double hung windows does not work well, use one consistent window style
throughout;
■ all skylights should be tinted, add note on plans;
This motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
11
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
Comment on motion: this is a big improvement to the existing house,not sure if sending this project to a
design review consultant is appropriate,a detailed list has been provided to the designer,feel the requested
changes can be made since there is no concern with the massing;concerned with the side setback variance
request and the impact on the neighbor; feel side setback variance is appropriate, most houses in this
neighborhood were built with nonconforming side setbacks,if no second floor and design review were not
required the request to extend building with a 3'-0" side setback would be eligible to be a minor
modification;parking variance is also appropriate,does not make sense to demolish the house to gain four
inches in the garage;sending the project to a design review consultant may speed the project up byproviding
appropriate guidance and reducing chance that Commission might refer revised plans to design reviewer
because all issues were not addressed.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant with direction
given. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Cauchi dissenting). The Planning Commission's action
is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:10 p.m.
10. 1529 MEADOW LANE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (ARKADY ZLOBINSKY,
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;AND MARK BRAND ARCHITECTURE,ARCHITECT) (67
NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Mark Brand,architect,noted that he discussed the project with the
adjacent neighbor at 1533 Meadow Lane, sent a letter to the adjacent neighbor at 1525 Meadow Lane but
that neighbor did not respond. Commission noted that this is a difficult-shaped lot and this project has been
designed without variances. Commission asked the architect to clarify construction of the sunshades;
architect noted that they would be a wooden lattice design.
Jean Ann Carroll, 1525 Meadow Lane; Chris Palmer, 1533 Meadow Lane; Steve and Lisa Alms, 1534
Meadow Lane;Martha and Katie Mccormack, 1530 Meadow Lane;and Samuel Bandrapalli, 1524 Meadow
Lane,expressed concerns with the project. They live adjacent to side where addition is proposed,spoke with
the architect when they were on the site and they took notes on concerns,did not respond to letter since had
already talked to them; reviewed the plans submitted and noted that her concerns were not taken into
account,decided it would be best to bring concerns to the Commission,proposed addition adds 27 feet to the
existing 38 foot long wall; wall of the new addition is massive and will take away the existing view,
submitted a photograph of the existing view and what the addition would look like from backyard,greenery
and sunlight, spend a lot of time in the back yard,will feel invaded, feel that an addition can be designed
without impacting neighboring properties,there are a lot of existing trees,now have a shade garden but don't
want the entire garden to be shaded,this is an odd-shaped lot,now have almost total privacy along addition
side,new addition will take away privacy,neighborhood children come to play in her garden;present owner
currently does not live in the house and does not intend to live there,heard that he want to finish the project
and put it on the market by April of next year, continually picking up trash and mailings to keep the
neighborhood looking clean,house is used to store lumber,person comes to house to drop off and pick up
construction materials;have parking problems on this cul-de-sac,there is no space for parking at this house,
no one on cul-de-sac uses their garage for parking,cul-de-sac shape makes it difficult for street parking and -�
for cars to turn around, cars park at an angle and frequently extend into driveway aprons; larger four-
bedroom house is too big and will only make the parking problem worse,this is a cohesive neighborhood,
owners park in front of their own houses;service vehicles,street cleaner and garbage trucks constantly have
12
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
problems maneuvering on this street,proposed project will add to the congestion;Burlingame Village feels
like a village, this project is out of scope with the neighborhood, will have a problem if this is the first of
many projects to come on this street.
Further comment: reviewed the proposed plans, feel terrible for the impact to the house at 1525 Meadow
Lane, will block out the sun to her property, concerned with the massive wall; live next door at 1533
Meadow Lane, bought the house 11 years ago mainly for its backyard privacy, concerned with loss of
privacy from the new dining room window,could be mitigated by adding vegetative screening,the existing
large Redwood tree will likely block the view into backyard form their second story windows;disconcerting
to see the limited concern regarding the massive wall facing 1529 Meadow,massing along the left side needs
to be reduced, project is doubling the length of the fagade, this is a serious concern and it needs to be
addressed,project could be redesigned to be a split level house, it would be attractive and in keeping with
what the improvements to other houses in the neighborhood in the next 20-30 years. There were no other
comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
C. Deal made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the following comments:
■ Concerned with the east elevation, this side is already massive and is getting longer with no
windows,east elevation needs more articulation,it is hard on the adjacent property,this side is very
visible from the street;
■ stucco portion at the rear of the house is too vertical, need to visually reduce the height;
■ like the use of wood siding;
■ concerned with the flu for the gas fireplace,would look better if a chimney stack were used instead;
■ like the shutters on the front elevation,style of the house is defined on the front elevation,concerned
that the design is not being carried on the side and rear elevations;
■ there should be a consistent style throughout the house, now looks like an addition to the house,
should look like one house;
■ should have some sense that the design on the front of the building evolves around the corner to the
side and rear elevations;
■ concerned with the wide stairs at the rear elevation, handrails on the walls don't look like they
belong,would look better if the size of the stairs and railing was reduced;
■ there are too many different types of windows,need to choose a consistent style;
■ concerned with the location of the deck, feel that it will not be used and will be very dark; and
■ trees should be added to help screen the addition from the adjacent neighbor.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed.
Commission comment: knew wall along east side was massive, but was not aware of the impact to the
neighbor's space until now, there are many options to the reduce the impacts, feel a radical redesign is
required here,confident that the architect can redesign the project to minimize the impact on the neighbor;as
proposed the deck will be really shady,would rather like to see this area incorporated as part of the interior
space of the house;the existing house can accommodate a second floor addition over the center of the house
away from the side property lines, family room can be added in place of the deck, this project needs a
complete rework.
CA Anderson noted that the project can either reapply as a redesigned project or it can be referred to a design
review consultant after the project has been redesigned based on the comments given.
13
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
C. Deal made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. Commission
noted that the project must be redesigned prior to being reviewed by the design reviewer. This motion was
seconded by C Keighran.
Comment on the motion:would like to point out that other issues may arise with the redesign of the project,
house may appear larger from the front and may impact other neighbors,cannot solve the parking problem
with this project, project complies with the on-site parking requirement; existing house is 22'-0" tall,
proposed addition is similar in height at 20'-1" tall, new house design could be taller, would like to see a
shadow study provided to see impacts on the neighboring properties;proposed design does not fit in with
this charming neighborhood, would like to see a charming design compatible with the neighborhood; it's
clear that the problems are with the design since the house is within all other zoning code requirements.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant with direction
that the project be completely redesigned to reduce the impacts on the neighbors before seen by the design
reviewer. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not
appealable. This item concluded at 10:45 p.m.
11. 2620 HALE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (KEVIN WEINMANN,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND LORNA BECCARIA, PROPERTY OWNER) (56 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Kevin Weinmann,architect,and Lorna Beccaria,property owner,
were available to answer questions,noted that this is a small addition at the rear of the house,clarified that
the house has four bedrooms now,with this project the number of bedrooms will be reduced to three,tried to
design the addition to be compatible with the house, this is a wonderful house,would like to increase the
function of the house, architect has dedicated a lot of time and effort to the proposed design,would like to
have both decks proposed at the rear of the house off the bedrooms. Commission asked what is the existing
and proposed ceiling height; architect noted 8'-1" for existing and new.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
■ Plans are difficult to read, it may be because of the CAD program used,materials proposed do not
show up correctly on the plans,plans do not show gutters,would like to see plans cleared up to better
show details;
■ on the rear elevation, second floor on left side,roof should be carried up to a ridge as done over the
garage,would add character; and
■ concerned with how the two decks on the rear elevation are integrated,upper deck overlaps the lower
deck,does not work well and it looks awkward; area at overlap on lower deck is not useable,could
incorporate a sloped tile roof and deck instead; the two decks need to be better integrated.
C. Osterling made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when plans have
been revised and all information is shown clearly and correctly based on the direction given and have
been plan checked by staff. This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
14
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 14, 2005
Comment on the motion: not opposed to having two decks at the rear of the house, they just need to be
integrated better.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 11:00 p.m.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
- Review of City Council regular meeting of November 7, 2005.
CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council study and regular meetings of November 7, 2005.
- FYI: Review of requested changes to an approved design review project at 1808 Davis Drive.
Commission reviewed and accepted changes proposed in the FYI report.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Brownrigg, Secretary
S AMINUTMunapproved.11.14.05.doc
15
City of Burlingame
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY
October 2005
THIS MONTH F. Y. 2005 TO F. Y.2004 TO
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF DATE DATE DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
WATER HEATER 4 3,358 N/A 21 9,408 N/A
SWIMMING POOL 0 0 0 0 4 63,800 0 0 100
SIGN 2 15,000 4 21,850 31- 13 44,437 17 47,582 6.61-
ROOFING 36 459,390 27 289,699 59 114 1,413,686 121 1,557,505 9.23-
RETAINING WALL 2 28,717 N/A N/A N/A
PLUMBING 22 77,282 N/A N/A N/A
NEW SFD 2 742,000 2 721,079 3 8 3,169,000 9 3,314,767 4.40-
NEW MULTIFAMILY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MECHANICAL 5 28,985 N/A 20 53,085 N/A
KITCHEN UPGRADE 3 108,000 N/A 12 370,000 N/A
FURNACE 5 15,045 N/A 11 19,285 N/A
ELECTRICAL SERVICE 2 5,600 N/A 3 8,200 N/A
ELECTRICAL 5 16,200 N/A 33 96,617 N/A
City of Burlingame
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY
October 2005
THIS MONTH F. Y. 2005 TO F. Y.2004 TO
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF DATE DATE DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
BATHROOM UPGRADE 5 59,000 N/A 13 263,600 N/A
ALTERATION- RES 23 1,434,578 32 1,734,823 43- 140 6,916,422 118 6,552,973 5.5
ALTERATION -NON RES 1 180,000 11 589,800 21 3,041,200 30 3,535,832 13.9-
Totals: 117 3,173,155 76 3,357,251 5- 413 15,468,740 295 15,008,659 3