HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.12.05 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
City of Burlingame
BURLINC%AME
Regular Meeting - Monday, December 5, 2005 CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
Page 1 of 2 REVISED BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Chambers
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
INVOCATION
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES - Regular and Special Meeting of November 21, 2005 Approve
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any
item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown
Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter which is
not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such matters to staff for investigation and/or
action. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door
and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
6. DECLARING ELECTION RESULTS
a. Declaring results of November 8, 2005 election Approve
b. Determination of seniority of new Council Members
7. CEREMONIAL
a. Seating of Council Members
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
a. Adopt Ordinance adding the City of East Palo Alto to the Hearing/Action
San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement
District
b. Adoption of Assessments for year 2006 for the San Mateo Hearing/Action
County Tourism Business Improvement District
9. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Appoint Interview Subcommittees for Commission Appoint
Vacancies
b. Approval of two day suspension of parking enforcement in Approve
the Broadway Business District
10. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve
a. Recommendation to accept Council Assignments for 2006
b. Recommendation to adopt 2006 City Council calendar
11. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library, September 20, 2005 and
October 18, 2005; Planning,November 28, 2005
�� BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame
BURLINU'AME
.. Regular Meeting - Monday, December 5, 2005 CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
Page 2 of 2 REVISED BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
b. Department Reports: Finance, October, 2005; Police,
October, 2005
12. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at
(650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.
before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas
and minutes are available at this site.
NEXT MEETING—Monday, December 19, 2005
r'
CITY G
BURLJNGAME
YW
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Special Meeting of November 21, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed special meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
in Conference Room A. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 6:10 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Mayor Galligan.
CLOSED SESSION:
CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following:
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8:
Property: South Lane Crossing
Agency Negotiators: Jim Nantell, Larry Anderson, George Bagdon
Negotiating Parties: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board
Under Negotiation: Vacation of Crossing
b. Claim of Catherine Jones (Government Code § 54956.9(b)(1),(3)(c))
3. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Galligan, Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None
4. MINUTES
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 7, 2005 Regular Council
meeting; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mayor Galligan requested Item 5.b. be discussed first; Council concurred.
b. HOLD FIRST PUBLIC MEETING ON ADDITION OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO
IN SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
1
Burlingame City Council November 21,2005
Unapproved Minutes
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing on the addition of the
City of East Palo Alto to the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District.
Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
CA Anderson advised that the second public hearing is scheduled for the December 5, 2005 Council
meeting.
a. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF THE 2005 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT
PLAN FOR THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
DPW Bagdon reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and approve Resolution
No. 87-2005 adopting the 2005 Urban Water Management Plan. Mr. Bagdon introduced Matt Zucca of Erler
&Kalinowski, Inc. who made the presentation.
Mayor Galligan opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 87-2005 adopting the City of
Burlingame 2005 Urban Water Management Plan; seconded by Vice Mayor Baylock, approved unanimously
by voice vote, 4-0.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments from the floor.
7. STAFF REPORTS
a. CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC SAFETY AND PARKING
COMMISSION
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the re-appointment of Stephen Warden and
appointment of Mike Bohnert to the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission; seconded by Mayor Galligan,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
b. PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT TO REPLACE ANN KEIGHRAN
EA Shinday requested Council open the application period for the appointment of a new commissioner with
a deadline of December 9, 2005.
Vice Mayor Baylock made a motion to open the application period and set a deadline of December 9, 2005;
seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, unanimously approved by voice vote, 4-0. Vice Mayor Baylock
stated that the interview committee would be appointed at the December 5, 2005 Council meeting.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Burlingame City Council November 21,2005
Unapproved Minutes
a. RESOLUTION NO. 88-2005 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
WITH BKF ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF THE BURLINGHOME SUBDIVISION SEWER
REHABILITATION PHASES I AND II
DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 88-2005 authorizing a professional services
agreement with BKF Engineers for the Burlinghome Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation, Phase I and Il.
b. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1773 AFFIRMING FLOOR AREA RATIO COMPUTATIONS
FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
CA Anderson requested Council adopt Ordinance No. 1773 amending section 25.08.265 to affirm floor area
ratio (FAR) calculation standards for commercial development.
Mayor Galligan requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after
adoption.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 89-2005 ACCEPTING THE 2005 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
BY C.F. ARCHIBALD PAVING, INC.
DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 89-2005 accepting improvements for the Street
Resurfacing Program 2005 by C.F. Archibald Paving, Inc.
d. WARRANTS AND PAYROLL
FinDir Nava requested approval for payment of Warrants #14552-15147 duly audited, in the amount of
$2,820,178.07 (excluding library checks 14701-14734), Payroll checks #163756-163983 in the amount of
$2,500,729.44 for the month of October 2005.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor
Baylock, approved unanimously by voice vote, 4-0.
9. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, November 3, 2005; Planning,November 14, 2005
b. Department Reports: Building, October 2005
10. ADJOURNMENT TO REGULAR MEETING
Mayor Galligan adjourned to the regular Council meeting at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Doris J. Mortensen
City Clerk
3
Burlingame City Council November 21,2005
Unapproved Minutes
CITY C
Byj L Mq j ME
W-
Qn-
®o-gun[6•
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of November 21, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Joe Galligan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Helen Galligan.
3. INVOCATION
Reverend Paul Watermulder of the United Presbyterian Church gave the invocation.
4. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Galligan, Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Galligan acknowledged some of the dignitaries and thanked them for coming. Mark Church,
President of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, honored Mayor Galligan with a resolution from the
Board of Supervisors for his work in the community. Geraldine O'Connor, representing Assemblyman Gene
Mullin, announced that a resolution from the State Legislature would be presented by Senator Jackie Speier
later in the evening. Former Mayor and Councilman Bud Harrison thanked Mayor Galligan for his
dedication to the City of Burlingame. Senator Jackie Speier arrived and honored Mayor Galligan with a joint
resolution from the California State Legislature authored by Senator Speier and Assemblyman Mullin
recognizing Mayor Galligan's many attributes and dedication. There were no further comments from the
floor.
6. CEREMONIAL
a. ROTATION OF COUNCIL OFFICERS
Mayor Galligan noted some of the many accomplishments of each of the City's council members,
commissioners and department heads during the eight years that he served on the Council.
Mayor Galligan turned the meeting over to incoming Mayor Cathy Baylock, who presented former Mayor
Galligan with a proclamation, an outgoing mayor plaque and a plaque commemorating his many community
4
Burlingame City Council November 21,2005
Unapproved Minutes
commitments. Both Former Mayor Galligan and Mayor Baylock introduced family members and friends in
attendance. Mayor Baylock spoke regarding the upcoming year. She then introduced the new Vice Mayor,
Terry Nagel.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Baylock adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m. in memory of Jerry Hill's father, Herbert, and Will
McGowan's father, Bill, and Joan Hare.
Respectfully submitted,
Doris J. Mortensen
City Clerk
5
Burlingame City Council November 21,2005
Unapproved Minutes
64�� CITY o� STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAME AGENDA
ITEM# 6a
MTG.
DATE 12/5/05
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY A��A .1 /��—Z��
DATE: November 29, 2005
APPROVED
FROM: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk By
650-558-7203
SUBJECT: Declaring Results of November 8, 2005 Election
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution declaring the results of the November 8, 2005 election.
BACKGROUND
The City of Burlingame held its November 8, 2005 election and Council should declare the final results of the
election by resolution. The County Clerk's certificate is Exhibit A of the resolution.
The final vote count for City Council—Full Term is: The final vote count for City Council—Short Term is:
Ann Keighran (elected) 4,415 Russ Cohen 4,167
Rosalie O'Mahony(elected) 4,073 Don Lembi 3,030
Cathy Baylock (elected) 3,667
John Root 3,640
Gene Condon 2,494
Dan Andersen 2,024
Paul Prendiville 739
The final vote count for City Clerk is:
Doris Mortensen 5,733
Therefore, Ann Keighran, Rosalie O'Mahony, Cathy Baylock and Russ Cohen are elected to City Council and
Doris Mortensen is elected to the office of City Clerk.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON
NOVEMBER 8,2005
RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY of BURLINGAME that:
WHEREAS,a General Municipal Election was held in the City of Burlingame,on Tuesday,
the 8th day of November, 2005, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of San Mateo County was duly requested and did
consent to a consolidated election pursuant to the Elections Code; and
WHEREAS,the County Clerk was duly requested to hold the election,notice of the election
was duly and regularly given as required by law; voting precincts were duly established; election
officers were appointed and voting supplies furnished,and in every respect and manner the election
was held and conducted,and the votes cast were received within the time and manner prescribed by
the law of the State of California controlling elections in general law cities; and
WHEREAS,pursuant to Elections Code §§ 10262, 10263,and 10264, the City Council of
the City of Burlingame duly convened in the Council Chambers at City Hall on the 5th day of
December 2005, following receipt of the County Clerk's Certificate of Election, to accept the
Certificate of the canvass of the returns of the election,to declare the results of the election, and to
install the newly elected officers, and as provided by the canvass, the City Council finds that the
number of votes cast,the persons for whom such votes were cast,and all other matters required by
law are hereinafter stated;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The election held in the City of Burlingame on the 8" day of November, 2005, was
1
conducted in the time, manner and form required by the laws of the State of California governing
elections in general law cities.
2. The number of ballots cast in the election,the names of the persons and offices voted for,
the measures voted upon, and the number of votes given at each precinct and in the City to each
candidate are as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto.
3. At this General Municipal Election, the following persons received the highest number
of votes cast for and were elected to the office of City Councilmember for a term of four(4)years:
ANN KEIGHRAN
ROSALIE O'MAHONY
CATHY BAYLOCK
4. At this General Municipal Election, the following persons received the highest number
of votes cast for and were elected to the office of City Councilmember for an unexpired term of
two (2)years:
RUSS COHEN
5. At this General Municipal Election, the following person received the highest number
of votes cast for and was elected to the office of City Clerk for a term of four(4)years:
DORIS MORTENSEN
6. The City Clerk is requested to deliver the certificates of election as provided in the
Elections Code.
Mayor
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was introduced at a special meeting of the City Council held
on the day of , 2005, and adopted thereafter by the following vote:
2
AYES: COUNCILMEMBER:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER:
City Clerk
C:\FILES\Elections\ELECTION2005.res.wpd
3
CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF ELECTIONS OFFICER
In the Matter of the CANVASS OF VOTE CAST )
at the CITY OF BURLINGAME MUNICIPAL )
ELECTION held on November 8,2005 )
I,WARREN SLOCUM, Chief Elections Officer of the County of San
Mateo,State of California hereby certify;
THAT an election was held within the boundaries of the CITY OF
BURLINGAME on Tuesday, November 8,2005 for the purpose of electing three
(3)members to the City Council for four(4)year terms and one(1)member to
the City Council for a two(2)year term and one(1)City Clerk for a four(4)year
term;and I caused to have processed and recorded the votes from the canvass
of all ballots cast at said election within the boundaries of the CITY OF
BURLINGAME.
HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY that the record of votes cast at said
election are set forth in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference as though fully set forth at length.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my hand and seal this 29th day
of November,2005,and file this date with the City Clerk of the CITY OF
BURLINGAME.
1ARRE SLOCUM
Chief Elections Officer&
Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder
:FINAL OFFICIAL CANVASS CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL STATEWIDE
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
NOVEMBER 8. 2005
PAGE 018.019.001
CITY OF BURLINGAME - MEMBERS. CITY COUNCIL FULL TERM CITY OF
3 TO BE ELECTED BURLINGAME -
MEMBER. CITY
P P COUNCIL SHORT
R V T P A R TERM
E 0 U E U E
GT RR AK LN DA R M 0
IE BC NC NE D CB AN 0 . �
SR AA OE ( NI GC I AA ND S MDPL
TS LS UN G EO V TY E A ARC O . E
E L T T T H N N I J S R H L R L H U 0 N M
R 0 A R E D L 0 . 0 Y 0 S I 0 S H A B
E T G A 0 L H 0 C E E N S E L I
15 PRECINCTS D S E N N E N T K N Y N D
COUNTY TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
VOTING PRECINCTS 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
12TH CONGRESSIONAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
CONGRESSIONAL TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
8TH SENATORIAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
SENATORIAL TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
19TH ASSEMBLY 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
ASSEMBLY TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 11 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
BOARD TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
1ST SUPERVISORIAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
SUPERVISORIAL TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
BURLINGAME 15789 9095 57.60 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 1 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 4167 3030
FINAL OFFICIAL CANVASS CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL STATEWIDE
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
NOVEMBER 8. 2005
PAGE 018.019.002
CITY OF BURLINGAME - MEMBERS. CITY COUNCIL FULL TERM j CITY OF j
3 TO BE ELECTED j BURLINGAME - j
MEMBER, CITY j
P P j COUNCIL SHORT j
j R V T P j A R j TERM j
j E0 UE j UE
j GT Rj AK LN DA R M 0 j
j IE BC NC j NE D CB AN 0 . j j
j SR AA OE j NI GC I AA ND S Mj DPLj
j TS LS UN j G EO V TY E A A j RC 0 . E j
j E L T T T j H N N I J S R H L R L H j U 0 N M j
j R 0 A j R ED L 0 . 0 YO S I 0 j SH A B j
j E T G j A 0 L H 0 C E E N j S E L I j
15 PRECINCTS j D S E j N N E N T K N Y j N D j
1001 Burlingame 01 j 771 375 48.64 j 178 101 21 140 160 66 152 j 189 98 j
1002 Burlingame 02 j 878 559 63.67 j 277 215 43 231 195 117 259 j 244 201 j
1003 Burlingame 03 j 1116 598 53.58 j 284 165 89 210 245 128 231 j 260 219 j
1005 Burlingame 05 j 1842 1041 56.51 j 499 270 80 361 502 292 421 j 478 379 j
1008 Burlingame 08 j 1411 653 46.28 j 277 161 57 164 238 141 309 j 252 217 j
1009 Burlingame 09 0 j 1440 816 56.67 j 400 222 54 323 355 181 356 j 397 250 j
1012 Burlingame 12 j 666 380 57.06 j 189 115 33 168 164 66 144 j 174 125 j
1013 Burlingame 13 0 j 663 375 56.56 j 188 107 27 154 155 64 163 j 188 100 j
1014 Burl irgame 14 j 5".^ 362 56.21 j 167 1C2 39 116 150 70 iouu j 170 Ili j
1015 Burlingame 15 j 681 427 62.70 j 235 121 28 166 183 93 211 j 191 148 j
1016 Burlingame 16 j 1553 956 61.56 j 487 273 66 456 386 168 451 j 452 307 j
1018 Burlingame 18 j 791 537 67.89 j 302 134 33 329 220 116 208 j 302 147 j
1019 Burlingame 19 j 838 552 65.87 j 246 167 45 252 199 131 260 j 247 200 j
1020 Burlingame 20 j 1181 660 55.86 j 312 139 46 193 226 174 333 j 261 234 j
1021 Burlingame 21 j 1314 804 61.19 j 374 202 78 377 287 217 395 j 354 292 j
GRAND TOTALS j 15789 9095 57.60 j 4415 2494 739 3640 3667 2024 4073 j 4167 3030 j
:FINAL OFFICIAL CANVASS CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL STATEWIDE
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
NOVEMBER 8. 2005
PAGE 033.033.001
CITY OF BURLINGAME • CITY CLERK
RV TP
EO UE D J M
G T R R 0 . 0
IE BC NC R R
SR AA OE I T
TS LS UN S E
E LT TT N
R 0 A S
E T G E
15 PRECINCTS D S E N
COUNTY TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
VOTING PRECINCTS 15789 9095 57.60 5733
12TH CONGRESSIONAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
CONGRESSIONAL TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
8TH SENATORIAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
SENATORIAL TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
19TH ASSEMBLY 15789 9095 57.60 5733
ASSEMBLY TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
I
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 1i 15789 9095 57.60 5733
BOARD TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
IST SUPERVISORIAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
SUPERVISORIAL TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
BURLINGAME 15789 9095 57.60 5733
TOTAL 15789 9095 57.60 5733
FINAL OFFICIAL CANVASS CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL STATEWIDE
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
NOVEMBER 8, 2005
PAGE 033.033.002
CITY OF BURLINGAME - CITY CLERK
RV TP
EO UE D J M
GT RR 0 . 0
I E B C N C R R
S R A A 0 E I T
T S L S U N S E
E LT TT N
R 0 A S
E T G E
15 PRECINCTS D S E N
1001 Burlingame 01 771 375 48.64 241
1002 Burlingame 02 878 559 63.67 340
1003 Burlingame 03 1116 598 53.58 380
1005 Burlingame 05 1842 1041 56.51 646
1008 Burlingame 08 1411 653 46.28 418
1009 Burlingame 09 0 1440 816 56.67 493
1012 Burlingame 12 666 380 57.06 247
1013 Burlingame 13 0 663 375 56.56 227
1014 Burlingame 14 644 362 56.21 234
1015 Burlingame 15 681 427 62.70 268
1016 Burlingame 16 1553 956 61.56 611
1.018 Burlingame 18 1 791. 537 F7,R9 1 332
1019 Burlingame 19 838 552 65.87 362
1020 Burlingame 20 1181 660 55.88 397
1021 Burlingame 21 1314 804 61.19 537
GRAND TOTALS 15789 9095 57.60 5733
CITY c AGENDA 8a
ITEM#
BIJRL,NGAME STAFF REPORT
MTG.
DATE 12/5/2005
$Nsico J Vwe bmo
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTEa---
BY—
DATE:
Y DATE: November 22, 2005 APPROVED
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
ADOPT ORDINANCE ADDING THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO TO THE SAN MATEO
COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt ordinance to add the City of East Palo Alto to the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement
District and direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation.
DISCUSSION:
The City of East Palo Alto and the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors Bureau have worked together
over the past year to welcome the upcoming opening of the Four Seasons Hotel at University Circle in East Palo
Alto. The new hotel will have 200 rooms, including 27 suites. In October, the City Council of East Palo Alto
adopted a resolution consenting to the inclusion of the City in the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District. East Palo Alto would be in Zone A of the District, and the Four Seasons Hotel is
classified as a full-service hotel with more than 20 rooms.
The ordinance was introduced on November 7, 2005, and further reading was waived at that time. Pursuant to
the Brown Act, the Council held a public meeting on the inclusion on November 21, 2005. At that time, no one
testified against the inclusion. At this meeting,the Council holds the second public hearing. Notice of both
public hearings was published in newspapers of general circulation in Burlingame and East Palo Alto, and
notice was mailed to the Four Seasons Hotel, which is the only hotel in the city.
Attachment
Proposed Ordinance
Resolution of Consent from the City Council of the City of East Palo Alto (Res. No. 2522)
Distribution
Anne LeClair, SMCCVB
I ORDINANCE No.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO
3 ADD THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO TO THE DISTRICT
4
5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
6 Section 1.
7 (a) Ordinance No. 1648 was adopted in February 2001 to form the San Mateo County
8 Tourism Business Improvement District pursuant to the provisions of the Parking and Business
9 Improvement Area Law of 1989, as codified in California Streets and Highways Code sections
10 36500 and following.
11 (b) The City Council of the City of East Palo Alto has consented to the inclusion of its
12 territory within the District.
13 (c) Pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36523, copies of the Resolution of
14 Intention were duly mailed to all hotels within the City of East Palo Alto, and the Resolution of
15 Intention was duly published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of East Palo
16 Alto.
17 (d) Pursuant to the Resolution of Intention adopted by the City Council of the City of
18 Burlingame, the City Council held a public meeting and then a public hearing on the addition.
19 Following the hearing,all protests,both written and oral,were considered and were duly overruled
20 and denied,and the City Council determined that there was no majority protest within the meaning
21 of Streets & Highways Code sections 36523, 36524, 36525, and 36542.
22
23 Section 2. Section 4(o of Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by adding "City of East Palo
24 Alto".
25
26 Section 3. Section 14(a)(6)of Ordinance No. 1648 is amended by adding"East Palo Alto".
27
28 Section 4. Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 1648, as amended by Ordinance No. 1678, is
11/7/2005 1
I amended by deleting the City of East Palo Alto from the exceptions to the Description of the
2 District.
3
4 Section 5. Except as expressly provided in this Ordinance and as amended by Ordinance
5 Nos. 1678 and 1725, all other provisions of Ordinance No. 1648 and implementing resolutions
6 shall remain in full force and effect.
7
8 Section 6. The assessments for the y-ear 2006 for the San Mateo County Tourism Business
9 Improvement District shall apply to hotels in the City of East Palo Alto beginning upon the
10 effective date of this ordinance.
11
12 Section 7. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
13
14
Mayor
15
16 I,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
17 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 7`h day of
18 November,2005,and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
19 day of , 2005, by the following vote:
20 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
21 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
22 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
23
24
City Clerk
25
26 C:\FILESWotelBid\EPAaddtion.ord.wpd
27
28
11/7/2005 2
NOV. 22. 2005 4:03PM CITY OF E PALO ALTO N0. 0567 P. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2522
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO
CONSENTING TO THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO BISING INCLUDED WIT IIIN
THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of East Palo Alto that;
WHEREAS,Section 36521.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code authorizes this City
to consent to its inclusion within the boundaries of a Business Improvement District;and
WHEREAS,it is proposed that the City of East Palo Alto be included in the boundaries of the
San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District for the purpose of collecting
assessments from commercial lodging facilities(hotels,motels,etc.);and
WHEREAS,pursuant to the Street and Highways Code sections.356500 and following,the City
of Burlingame will hold necessary hearings,provide required notices,and receive testimony and
protests;and
WHEREAS,this City has reviewed the ordinances establishing the San Mateo County Tourism
Business Improvement District,including but not limited to the proposed district boundaries,,
assessments,and purposes for the District,
NOW THEREFORE,IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED THAT:
The City of East Palo Alto hereby consents to being included in the boundaries of the San Mateo
County Tourism Business Improvement District for hotels and authorizes the City of Burlingame
to take necessary steps and actions to formalize its inclusion in the boundaries of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18a'day of October,2005 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Evans,Rutherford,Foster,Abrica,Woods
NOES: 0
.ABSENT: 0
.ABSTAIN: 0
MAYOR,CIV OF EAST PALO ALTO
ATTEST:
e,
Y MANAGER Approved as to f rm,CITY ATTORNEY
CITY a AGENDA
,�`�' '" ITEM # 8b
W.N..O,
STAFF REPORT
MTG.
DATE 12/5/2005
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTE
BY
DATE: November 21, 2005 APPROVED
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR YEAR 2006 FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY
TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION:
1 . Hold public hearing on the levy of assessments for the year 2006 in the San Mateo County Tourism
Business Improvement District.
2. Close public hearing on the levy of assessments for the year 2005 in the San Mateo County Tourism
Business Improvement District.
3. Adopt resolution overruling protests received as to assessments for the year 2006, approving programs
and activities for the year 2006, and levying assessments for the year 2006.
DISCUSSION
In February 2001 , the City Council formed the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District
with the consent of the County of San Mateo and the Cities of Belmont, Daly City, Foster City, Half Moon
Bay, Millbrae, Redwood City, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, and South San Francisco. Burlingame is
the lead agency for the District. Daly City withdrew in 2002 because its absence of a tourism industry. East
Palo Alto has been included in the District by adoption of an ordinance earlier in the meeting.
The City has entered into an agreement with the San Mateo County Convention and Visitors' Bureau to
provide the activities and services for the District. To date, the assessments have been timely paid by almost
every hotel in the District.
The key elements of the District are a stable, focused source of revenue for promotion of tourism and
conventions in the County, which has been so difficult in the past, and management and direction of the
district and the convention and visitors bureau by hotel and tourist professionals, who establish the priorities
for programs on a County-wide basis.
Mayor and Council
Re: Adoption of Assessments for Year 2006 for the San Mateo County Tourism BID
November 21, 2005
Page 2
2006 Assessment Process
On November 7, 2005, the City Council received and approved the annual report of the BID Advisory
Board, which is composed of representatives of hotel properties and tourist-related businesses from
throughout the County. The Board recommended that assessments be levied for the year 2006 at the same
rate as in 2005. The small hotels in Half Moon Bay will continue to be exempt as that city is struggling to
establish a viable chamber of commerce. The Ritz-Carlton in Half Moon Bay is also exempted again for the
coming year.
The City of East Palo Alto will be included for the first time.
The annual report detailed the immense efforts made by the Bureau in the past 12 months to boost the
hospitality and tourism industry in the County.
The Council adopted Resolution No. 76-2005, declaring its intention to levy assessments for the coming
year and to approve the proposed programs and activities, and giving notice of the public hearing on the
2005 assessments on December 5, 2005.
A copy of that resolution and the proposed assessments were then mailed to each and every hotel in the
District. A copy of the resolution was also mailed to the County and each and every city that is within the
boundaries of the District.
A copy of the resolution was also published in the County-wide newspaper.
Adjustments were made to the following hotels after mailing: The Higgins Canyon Getaway is no longer
letting rooms; the Doubletree Hotel in Burlingame has reduced its room count by two rooms that have been
converted to other uses; and the Country Inn& Suites in San Carlos is no longer offering meeting room
space, so the assessment category has been changed.
Protests
The City has not received any protests from any hotels as of the date of this report.
Next Steps
At the conclusion of the public hearing,the Council should formally close the public hearing and consider
all protests received and changes requested. It does not appear that there is a majority protest as to the
services and programs to be offered or provided, or to the assessments for 2006.
It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution, which:
Mayor and Council
Re: Adoption of Assessments for Year 2006 for the San Mateo County Tourism BID
November 21, 2005
Page 3
— Overrules protests submitted;
— Approves the District programs and activities for the coming year; and
— Adopts and levies the assessments on hotels in the District for the coming year.
Attachments:
Proposed Assessments by Agency Location
Proposed Resolution
Distribution
Anne LeClair, SMCCVB
SUMMARY OF AGENCY ASSESSMENTS--YEAR 2006
TOTAL OF AGENCIES Rooms 2006 ASSESSMENT Per Room
Belmont 671 24,127 $35.96
Burlingame 3,769 722,869 $191.79
County of San Mateo 467 13,096 $28.04
East Palo Alto 200 46,800 $234.00
Foster City 503 99,180 $197.18
Half Moon Bay 575 9,720 $16.90
Millbrae 1,218 170,215 $139.75
Redwood City 1,218 123,464 $101.37
San Bruno 622 38,448 $61.81
San Carlos 368 14,429 $39.21
San Mateo 1,978 252,983 $127.90
South San Francisco 2,876 305,478 $106.22
TOTAL 14,465 $1,820,808.90 $125.88
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BURLINGAME ESTABLISHING AND LEVYING YEAR 2006 ASSESSMENTS FOR
THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND
APPROVING DISTRICT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2006
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq.,
the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District has been established for the
purpose of promoting tourism in the District; and
WHEREAS, the District Advisory Board has requested the Burlingame City Council to
establish Year 2006 assessments for the District; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2005, the City Council adopted a resolution of intention
(Resolution No. 76-2005) declaring its intention to impose assessments for the Year 2006 within
the assessment District, and setting a public hearings on the proposed assessments; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Streets & Highways Code, a public hearing on the proposed
assessments was duly noticed for December 5, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. before the City Council of the
City of Burlingame, at the Council's Chambers at 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing held at that place and time, the City Council received
and considered all oral and written testimony from all interested persons; and
WHEREAS, the City did not receive a majority protest pursuant to the Streets &
Highways Code as to the assessments or to any program or activity proposed for the District; and
WHEREAS, the proposed assessments appear reasonable and consistent with the
ordinance establishing the District and the underlying State law, and the assessment basis is
within the basis established in Ordinance No. 1648; and
WHEREAS, the proposed services, programs, and activities of the District are consistent
with the ordinance establishing the District,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Burlingame does hereby resolve, determine, and find
as follows:
1
1. Written protests to assessments, improvements or activities were not received at those
public hearings that constituted a majority as defined in Government Code sections 36500 and
following.
2. The City Council does hereby levy an assessment for the Year 2006 on hotels in the
District as described in City of Burlingame Ordinance Nos. 1648, 1678, and and to pay
for services, programs, and activities of the District.
3. The types of services, programs, and activities to be funded by the levy of assessments
on businesses in the District are set forth in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference.
4. The basis for assessments for the Year 2006 on all hotels within the District are set
forth in Exhibit"B", incorporated herein by reference.
5. The assessments for the Year 2006 on hotels within the District are set forth in Exhibit
"C", incorporated by reference.
6. New businesses shall not be exempt from assessment as provided in Exhibit"A."
MAYOR
I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
, 2005, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
C:\FILES\HotelBid\2006assessment.res.wpd
2 2004 Assessment Resolution
EXHIBIT A
SERVICES AND PROGRAMS TO BE PROVIDED IN 2006
San Mateo Tourism Business Improvement District
1. Generate Additional Group Leads through:
a. Participating in over 50 trade shows, putting word out about San Mateo County
b. Hosting receptions in Washington, DC, Chicago and Sacramento;
C. Conducting group "fam" (familiarization)tours for meeting planners from the
Midwest and Washington, DC area;
d. Targeting medical and incentive markets and conducting mail and sales blitzes in
those areas;
e. Conducting multiple individual "fam" tours for planners as well as "site" visits for
planners with possible interest in the area;
f. Further penetrating the military market buy conducting "fam" tour for military
planner group;
g. Hosting a "fam" tour for religious meeting planners;
h. Parlaying existing accounts, (e.g. California Farm Bureau annual meeting
contract) into related-industry accounts;
i. Increasing our marketing to planners in the sports industry, continuing our work
with Stanford University's athletic directors and other area universities, schools
and specialty sports groups;
j. Using a San Francisco State intern to assist with advance prospecting and
research;
k. Conducting numerous targeted mail and sales blitzes, including two in Chicago,
two in Washington, DC and two in Chicago;
1. Using testimonials to recruit additional planners;
M. Enhancing/updating trade show booth decor and marketing materials;
n. Increasing memberships in organizations/attendance at meetings with key,
potential target visitors;
o. Enhancing advertising in publications/web programs aimed at meeting planners;
P. Creating additional specialty guides/promotional pieces aimed at target market
segments (e.g. golf);
q. Continuing to make contacts/build business in Washington, D.C., Sacramento,
and Midwestern markets;
r. Continuing efforts to focus on new feeder markets for discounted airlines into
SFO, including Boston,New York and Calgary;
S. Continuing in-house sales managers' focus on corporate, SMERF markets;
t. Hosting "fam" trip for Sacramento planners;
U. Broadening outreach to fraternal groups from Midwest;
V. Targeting agricultural meetings;
W. Continuing in-house sales managers' focus on corporate, SMERF markets;
X. Creation of strong presence with tour and travel operators through conference
attendance and ads in targeted T&T publications;
A-1
Y_ Working with SFCVB and "Team Japan" to secure time on San Francisco Bay
Area "fam" trips for Japanese meeting planners to tour our area;
Z. Enhancing advertising in publications/web programs aimed at meeting planners;
aa. Continuing investment in Travel planner publications and distribution of editorial
to same publications.
2. Generate additional individual room nights-leisure and corporate-by:
a. Contracting for PR/professional ads targeting potential customers as outlined by
research;
b. Continue to place visitor guides in California Welcome Centers throughout the
State to generate drive traffic;
C. Participating in multiple travel writer shows, e.g. Society of American Travel
Writers and National Assn. of Travel Journalists in America;
d. Continuing to generate multiple editorial pieces every month for distribution to
several hundred publications per month;
e. Continuing to respond to all California Travel and Tourism Commission leads for
editorial requests;
£ Hosting annual group travel writer "fam" tour and numerous individual "fam"
tours for writers, editors and photographers;
g. Updating on-line individual reservation service to go directly to properties for
reservations;
h. Creating additional collateral and marketing materials;
i. Continuing ads in travel publications which generate the greatest return, e.g.
Sunset;
j. Continuing to subscribe to multiple travel writer "lead" services and editorial
calendar release programs, responding immediately to leads and calendaring all
scheduled publications for follow-up;
k. Continuing to publish specialty guides/promotional pieces aimed at target market
segments;
1. Continuing to work with SFO, CalTrain, and BART on coordinated marketing of
the area;
in. Continuing operation of Visitor Center Kiosk at Hiller Aviation Museum.
3. Use Film Commission to Enhance Area's Image and to Generate Room Nights by:
a. Continuing monthly "teaser" thumbnail photo emails to location scouts/producers
on various sites in San Mateo County;
b. Continuing immediate responses to California Film Commission leads re: specific
areas sought, finding matches within our County;
C. Continuing to attend several film industry trade shows to give producers an idea
of what we have to offer;
d. Continuing to build photo database for outreach by Film Commission;
e. Proactively contacting key location scouts and producers to offer assistance.
A-2
EXHIBIT B
ASSESSMENT BASIS FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR 2006 YEAR
CATEGORY ZONE A—ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2006 ZONE B—ASSESSMENT FOR YEAR 2006
Hotel with full service $360 per sleeping room X 65% $360 per sleeping room X 55%
and more than 20 sleeping (no assessment in Half Moon Bay)
rooms
Hotel with limited service $180 per sleeping room X 60% $180 per sleeping room X 40%
and more than 1000 square
feet of meeting space
and more than 20 sleeping
rooms
Hotel with limited service $90 per sleeping room X 60% $90 per sleeping room X 40%
and some meeting space but (no assessment in Half Moon Bay)
less than1000 square feet
and more than 20 sleeping
rooms
Hotel with standard service $54 per sleeping room X 60% $54 per sleeping room X 40%
and more than 20 sleeping (no assessment in Half Moon Bay)
rooms
Hotel with full service, $54 per sleeping room X 30% $54 per sleeping room X 25%
limited service, or standard (no assessment in Half Moon Bay)
service, and
20 sleeping rooms or less
I
ZONE A—Includes all cities participating in the District except Half Moon Bay
ZONE B—Includes Half Moon Bay, and most of the unincorporated areas of San Mateo County
Assessment of new hotels opening during fiscal year:
A new hotel shall be assessed for an amount equal to the ratio of the number of full quarters remaining in the fiscal year multiplied by the full annual
assessment that would have been due. A partial quarter is not counted for the ratio. For example, if a hotel opens in May, there are two full quarters
and 2 months of one partial quarter remaining in the fiscal year. The full annual assessment would be multiplied by 2/4 for that year's assessment for
the new hotel.
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2006 EXHIBIT C
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
Burlingame
Em-bass-Suites A $ 360.00 340 $ 79,560.00 $ 6,630.00
Doubletree Hotel A $ 360.00 388 $ 90,792.00 1 $ 7,566.00
SFO Marriott A $ 360.00 685 $ 160,290.00 $ 13,357.50
Hyatt Regency SFO A $ 360.00 789 $ 184,626.00 $ 15,385.50
Sheraton Gateway A $ 360.00 404 $ 94,536.00 $ 7,878.00
Hilton Garden Inn A $ 180.00 132 $ 14,256.00 $ 1,188.00
Crowne Plaza SFO A $ 360.00 309 $ 72,306.00 $ 6,025.50
Holiday Inn Express A $ 90.00 144 $ 7,776.00 $ 648.00
Red Roof Inn A $ 54.00 212 $ 6,868.80 $ 572.40
Va abond Inn A $ 54.00 91 $ 2,948.40 $ 245.70
Burlingame Hotel A $ 54.00 41 $ 1,328.40 $ 110.70
Country House* A $ 54.00 27 $ 874.80 $ 72.90
Hampton Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 77 $ 2,494.80 $ 207.90
Bay Landing A $ 54.00 130 $ 4,212.00 $ 351.00
Room Total 3769
Total: $ 722,869.20
*Closed July 2005 due to fire,reopen unknown
San Mateo
San Mateo Marriott A $ 360.00 476 $ 111,384.00 $ 9,282.00
Radisson Villa Hotel* A $ 360.00 286 $ 66,924.00 $ 5,577.00
Residence Inn by Marriott A $ 54.00 160 $ 5,184.00 $ 432.00
Hilton Garden Inn A $ 180.00 156 $ 16,848.00 $ 1,404.00
Homestead Studio Suites A $ 54.00 136 $ 4,406.40 $ 367.20
Holida Inn A $ 360.00 110 $ 25,740.00 $ 2,145.00
Best Western Los Prados Inn A $ 90.00 113 $ 6,102.00 $ 508.50
Comfort Inn A $ 54.00 111 $ 3,596.40 $ 299.70
Hillsdale Inn A $ 54.00 90 $ 2,916.00 $ 243.00
Howard Johnson A $ 54.00 57 $ 1,846.80 $ 153.90
Su er 8 A $ 54.00 53 $ 1,717.20 $ 143.10
Avalon Motel _ _ A $ 54.00 48 $ 1,555.20 $ 129.60
_ Firestone Lode A $ 54.00 46 $ 1,490.40 $ 124.20
San Mateo Motel** _ A _33 $ - $ _ - �
Coxhead House B&B A $ 54.00 4 $ 64.80 $ 5.40
Wingate Inn SFO South A $ 54.00 99 $ 3,207.60 $ 267.30
_ Room Total 1978 _
*Possible closure 2006 Total: $ 252,982.80
**Closed March 1,2005,future unknown
1 of 6 11/21/2005
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2006 EXHIBIT C
(Name of Property (Zone ;Category/Assessment i #Rooms (ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
South San Francisco
Embassy Suites A $ 360.00 312 $ 73,008.00 $ 6,084.00
Comfort Suites A $ 54.00 166 $ 5,378.40 $ 448.20
Best Western Grosvenor Hotel A $ 360.00 206 $ 48,204.00 $ 4,017.00
Hilton Garden Inn A $ 180.00 169 $ 18,252.00 $ 1,521.00
Holiday Inn SFO North A $ 360.00 224 $ 52,416.00 $ 4,368.00
La Quinta Inn A $ 180.00 174 $ 18,792.00 $ 1,566.00
Larkspur Landing A $ 90.00 111 $ 5,994.00 $ 499.50
Good Nite Inn A $ 180.00 175 $ 20,475.00 $ 1,706.25
Residence Inn A $ 90.00 152 $ 8,208.00 $ 684.00
Travelodge SFO North(Airport A $ 54.00 199 $ 6,447.60 $ 537.30
Ai ort Inn A $ 54.00 34 $ 1,101.60 $ 91.80
Americana Inn Motel A $ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ 22.95
Courtyard by Marriott A $ 180.00 197 $ 21,276.00 $ 1,773.00
Travelodge(EI Camino Real) A $ 54.00 49 $ 1,587.60 $ 132.30
Das Inn A $ 54.00 25 $ 810.00 $ 67.50
Deluxe Inn A $ 54.00 20 $ 324.00 $ 27.00
Economy Inn A $ 54.00 21 $ 680.40 $ 56.70
Hallmark House Hotel A $ 54.00 13 $ 210.60 $ 17.55
Hampton Inn A $ 54.00 100 $ 3,240.00 $ 270.00
Howard Johnson A $ 54.00 51 $ 1,652.40 $ 137.70
Inn at O ster Point A $ 90.00 30 $ 1,620.00 $ 135.00
Quality Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 45 $ 1,458.00 $ 121.50
Royal Inn A $ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ 22.95
Motel A $ 54.00 117 $ 3,790.80 $ 315.90
Travelers Inn A $ 54.00 20 $ 324.00 $ 27.00
Holiday Inn Express Hotel&Suit A $ 54.00 87 $ 2,818.80 $ 234.90
Four Points by Sheraton Hotel& A $ 90.00 100 $ 5,400.00 $ 450.00
Ramada Limited Suites A $ 54.00 45 $ 1,458.00 $ 121.50
Room Total 2876
Total: $ 305,478.00
&¢... ;, ✓>„ ,'3 ,v".,�� ,,,,�«,w�'w 3„<,.,..,.A� � �$ ` t... .. �T�.,s}.ar.
Millbrae
Westin Hotel A $ 360.00 390 $ _ 91,260.00 $ 7,605.00
Clarion Hotel A $ 360.00 250 $ 58,500.00 $ 4,875.00
Best Western EI Rancho Inn A $ 54.00 306 $ 9,914.40 $ 826.20
Millwood Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 34 $ 1,101.60 $ 91.80
SFO South Travelodge A $ 54.00 58 $ 1,879.20 $ 156.60
Comfort Inn SFO A $ 54.00 100 $ 3,240.00 $ 270.00
Quality Suites Millbrae A_ $ 90.00 80 $ 4,320.00 $ 360.00
Room Total 1218
Total: $ 170,215.20
2 of 6 11/21/2005
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2006 EXHIBIT C
Name of Property 'Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment 'Monthly assessment
Foster Ci' _
Crowne Plaza Mid-Peninsula A $ 360.00 356 $ 83,304-10-0 -$— —6,-9-42.00-
Courtyard
,942.00Cou and by Marriott A $ 180.00 _ 147 $ 15,876.00 $ 1,323.00
__ -- Room Total 503 -
Total: $ 99,180.00
Half Moon Bay - - - -- - -
Beach House Hotel B $ 180.00 54 $ 3,888.00 $ 324.00
Ritz Carlton B $ 360.00 261 $ - $ -
__ - Best Western Haff Moon Bay Lo B $ 180.00 81 $ 5,832.00 $ 486.00
Ramada Limited B $ 54.00 29 $ - $ -
Holiday Inn Express B $ 54.00 52 $ - $ -
Cameron's Inn B $ 54.00 3 $ - $ -
Mill Rose Inn&Garden B $ 54.00 6 $ - $ -
Miramar Lodge&Conf.Center B $ 90.00 40 $ - $ -
Moon Dream Cottage B $ 54.00 0 $ - $ -
Old Thyme Inn B $ 54.00 7 $ _ $ _
Plum Tree Court B $ 54.00 6 $ - $ -
San Benito House B $ 54.00 12 $ - $ -
The Gilchrest House B $ 54.00 1 $ - $ -
Zaballa House B $ 54.00 23 $ - $ -
Room Total 575
Total: $ 9,720.00
i
3 of 6 11/21/2005
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2006 EXHIBIT C
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
Unincorporated Coun
Best Western Exec.Suites IA $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Costanoa Resort B $ 90.00 172 $ 6,192.00 $ 516.00
Cypress In on Miramar Beach B $ 54.00 18 $ 243.00 $ 20.25
Farallone Inn B&B B $ 54.00 9 $ 121.50 $ 10.13
Goose&Turrets B&B B $ 54.00 5 $ 67.50 $ 5.63
Harbor View Inn B $ 54.00 18 $ 243.00 $ 20.25
Harbor House B $ 54.00 6 $ 81.00 $ 6.75
Landis Shores Oceanfront Inn B $ 54.00 8 $ 108.00 $ 9.00
Motorville Motel B $ 54.00 30 $ 648.00 $ 54.00
Pacific Victorian B&B B $ 54.00 3 $ 40.50 $ 3.38
Pillar Point Inn B $ 54.00 11 $ 148.50 $ 12.38
Princess Port B&B B $ 54.00 4 $ 54.00 $ 4.50
Seal Cove Inn B $ 54.00 10 $ 135.00 $ 11.25
Estancia del Mar B $ 54.00 5 $ 67.50 $ 5.63
Pescadero Creek Inn B $ 54.00 4 $ 54.00 $ 4.50
Pescadero Creekside Barn B $ 54.00 1 $ 13.50 $ 1.13
Stillheart B $ 54.00 16 $ 216.00 $ 18.00
Atherton Inn A $ 54.00 5 $ 81.00 $ 6.75
Rose Cottage by the Beach B $ 54.00 1 $ 13.50 $ 1.13
SLAC Guest House A $ 54.00 112 $ 3,628.80 $ 302.40
Room Total 467
Total: $ 13,095.90
4 of 6 11/21/2005
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2006 EXHIBIT C
Name of Property Zone Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
Redwood City
Sofitel San Francisco Bay A $ 360.00 419 $ 98,046.00 $ 8,170.50
Best Western Inn A $ 54.00 26 $ 842.40 $ 70.20
Deluxe Inn A $ 54.00 27 $ 874.80 $ 72.90
Capri Motel A $ 54.00 50 $ 1,620.00 $ 135.00
Pacific Euro Hotel A $ 54.00 55 $ 1,782.00 $ 148.50
Comfort Inn A $ 54.00 52 $ 1,684.80 $ 140.40
Das Inn A $ 54.00 68 $ 2,203.20 $ 183.60
Garden Motel A $ 54.00 17 $ 275.40 $ 22.95
Good Nite Inn A $ 54.00 123 $ 3,985.20 $ 332.10
Holida Inn Express A $ 54.00 38 $ 1,231.20 $ 102.60
Pacific Inn A $ 54.00 75 $ 2,430.00 $ 202.50
Redwood Motor Court A $ 54.00 12 $ 194.40 $ 16.20
Best Inn A $ 54.00 38 $ 1,231.20 $ 102.60
Sequoia Inn A $ 54.00 22 $ 712.80 $ 59.40
Super 8 Motel A $ 54.00 40 $ 1,296.00 $ 108.00
Towne Place Suites by Marriott A $ 54.00 95 $ 3,078.00 $ 256.50
Hampton Inn A $ 54.00 61 $ 1,976.40 $ 164.70
Room Total 1218
ME a5
m m
San Bruno .- �� � w
Total: 123,463.80
--
FS- -
Budget Motel A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Bayside Inn A $ 54.00 24 $ 777.60 $ 64.80
Super 8 W----$ 54.00 54 $ 1,749.60 $ 145.80
StayBrid a Suites SFO A $ 180.00 95 $ 10,260.00 $ 855.00
Courtyard by Marriott A $ 180.00 147 $ 15,876.00 $ 1,323.00
Re en Inn A $ 54.00 32 $ 1,036.80 $ 86.40
Ramada Limited A $ 54.00 61 $ 1,976.40 $ 164.70
Ritz Inn A $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10
Comfort Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Gateway Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 31 $ 1,004.40 $ 83.70
Howard Johnson A $ 54.00 49 $ 1,587.60 $ 132.30
Da s Inn A $ 54.00 48 $ 1,555.20 $ 129.60
Room Total 622
Total: $ 38,448.00
5 of 6 11/21/2005
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS ---YEAR 2006 EXHIBIT C
Name of Property Zone (Category/Assessment #Rooms ANNUAL Assessment Monthly assessment
�.
NEIs
Belmont
Be[Mateo Motel A $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10
Econolod a Belmont A $ 54.00 23 $ 745.20 $ 62.10
Holiday Inn Express&Suites A $ 90.00 82 $ 4,428.00 $ 369.00
Motel A $ 54.00 273 $ 8,845.20 $ 737.10
Summerfield Suites A $ 90.00 132 $ 7,128.00 $ 594.00
Belmont Palms A $ 54.00 14 $ 226.80 $ 18.90
ExtendedStay America A $ 54.00 108 $ 1,749.60 $ 145.80
Kingsway Motel A $ 54.00 16 $ 259.20 $ 21.60
Room Total 671
Total: $ 24,127.20
z- W1, 11,11"111,1111 .
_
I'M 'E
San Carlos
Country Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 50 $ 1,620.00 $ 135.00
Das Inn A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Homestead Studio Suites A $ 90.00 116 $ 6,264.00 $ 522.00
Fairfield Inn&Suites A $ 54.00 112 $ 3,628.80 $ 302.40
Best Value Inn A $ 54.00 32 $ 1,036.80 $ 86.40
Travel Inn A $ 54.00 29 $ 939.60 $ 78.30
Room Total 368
Total: $ 14,428.80
1111 �•;.
1111 .: 1111 „ „_1111 .> 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111..1111... 1111✓11_11 :,: .i„ 1111,,1111..... 1111. - ....i,1111 .nsG.u...i 1111,._ 1111. 1111... .k4% 1111 1111
East Palo Alto
Four Seasons Silicon Valle A $ 360.00 200 $ 46,800.00 $ 3,900.00
Room Total 200
Total: $ 46,800.00
6 of 6 11/21/2005
CITY AGENDA 9a
- _-
� ITEM#
BURLINGAME MTG.
STAFF REPORT
DATE Darnmher 5, 0�__
4e
I
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY__
DATE: November 29, 2005
APPROVE
FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY
SUBJECT: Appoint Interview Subcommittees for Commission Vacancies
RECOMMENDATION
Select Council subcommittees to interview applicants for the Beautification and Planning
Commissions.
BACKGROUND
Three applications were received for two vacancies on the Beautification Commission by the deadline
of October 31, 2005. It was decided by the previous Council to wait until the new Council was seated
to select the Council subcommittee who will perform the interviews.
Once Ann Keighran is seated as a new Council member, she will no longer be able to serve on the
Planning Commission. Thus, Council opened the application period and set the deadline for Planning
Commission applications for December 9, 2005. It is anticipated that the interviews will be scheduled
for the week of December 12, 2005 once the subcommittee is selected. It is expected that the new
commissioner will be appointed at the Council meeting of December 19, 2005.
If Council feels that the interview timeline is inadequate, please direct staff accordingly.
CITY o� STAFF REPORT
BURLINGAME AGENDA
�,,, ITEM# 9b
SCO MTG.Q'ii�. 9�0
�FnTco JUNE 6•
DATE 12-5-05
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY James Nantell
DATE: December 3,2005
APPROVED
FROM: Jim Nantell 558-7205 BY James Nantell
SUBJECT: Approval of two-day suspension of parking enforcement in the Broadway Business District
RECOMMENDATION: Consider request from Broadway Business Improvement District to provide two
hours of free parking in the Broadway Business District for the two days of Friday December 16th and
Saturday December 171h
BACKGROUND: On Wednesday November 301h Council Women Terry Nagel sent an e-mail to Mayor
Baylock and the City Manager about the possibility of allowing some free parking for a couple of days in our
two retail districts in Burlingame. The City Manager responded by explaining that the public loves free
parking but the merchants usually understand that free parking often results in employees parking all day in
front of the stores thus denying the customers the free parking. He also explained that staff had already talked
with the Burlingame Avenue Business Improvement District representatives about free parking and it was
agreed not to do so this year as it seems to encourage all day parking by employees which ends up driving
away customers.
The Manager also shared that last year San Mateo Downtown Association agreed to split the loss of revenue
associated with two hour free parking for a portion of the month of December. This year they decide to go
back to keeping it at the regular rate.
Council Women Nagel contacted Ross Bruce, President of the Broadway Business Improvement District and,
after checking with some of the Board Members for the Broadway BID, he indicated that they were interested
in trying out a couple of free parking days in the Broadway District. He felt that the Broadway District is
different than the Burlingame District and a couple of free parking days may encourage some new shoppers to
visit the Broadway retail district.
On Thursday afternoon, after talking with Mayor Baylock, it was agreed to place the request on the Council
Agenda for it's December 5th meeting, since waiting until the December 19t meeting would be to late to
accommodate the December 16th and 17th dates requested for free parking.
On Friday night, in a conversation with the City Manager, Ross Bruce indicated that after further discussion
with other Board Members for the Broadway BID they would be requesting that the Council authorize two
hours of free parking and that the parking enforcement staff continue to chalk the cars and enforce the two
hour limits so as to discourage abuse of the two free hours of parking.
BUDGET IMPACT: Last year the Broadway District parking meters generated $15,000 in revenue for the
month of December or about $555 per day. Therefore the loss in parking meter revenue would be about
$1100 for the two days of free parking. It is much harder to estimate the loss of citation revenue associated
with the two hours of free parking. Broadway area represents about 10% of the total meter revenue so we
would estimate worse case scenario in lost citation revenue would another $500 for the two days of free
parking. Prior to Monday night's meeting we will try to estimate the cost of printing and placing plastic bags
over the meters to indicate the two days of free parking.
CITY o� STAFF REPORT
BURLINGAME AGENDA
ITEM# 10a
"c0 0,a MTG. C
q�AYTEC JVNE6 DATE I2/G/OC
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: November 29, 2005
APPROVED
FROM: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk By
650-558-7203
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Adopt the Council Assignments for 2006
RECOMMENDATION:
To review, make changes if necessary and approve the City Council assignments for 2006.
EXHIBITS:
Council Assignments - 2006
BUDGET IMPACT:
None
CITY OF BURLINGAME
COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS
2006
1. ABAG—City Delegate (1 to 4 meetings per year) Cohen (alternate O'Mahony)
2. Airport Land Use Commission Keighran (alternate Cohen)
3. Airport Round Table(1St Wednesday) Nagel (alternate Keighran)
4. Audit Committee Baylock and O'Mahony
5. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Baylock
6. BAWSCA(Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency) O'Mahony
(4 year term from 2003-2007)
7. Budget Chair Baylock and O'Mahony
CA, CM, CC, FIN, HR O'Mahony
Parks &Recreation Cohen
Library Baylock
Fire and Police Keighran
Planning/Public Works Nagel
8. Chamber of Commerce Liaison (monthly) Baylock and Cohen
(alternate Keighran)
9. City/County Association of Governments (COAG) O'Mahony(alternate Nagel)
10. City/Schools Liaison Committee Keighran and Baylock
11. Commission interview teams Determined at recruitment time
12 Congestion Management Committee (CMAC) To be determined
13. Council of Cities (4 th Friday of month) All
14. Economic Development Committee Baylock and Nagel
15. Emergency Services Council (quarterly) Nagel (alternate Keighran)
16. Central County Fire Board Baylock and Nagel
17. Fire ALS Joint Powers Authority Nagel
18. Housing Trust &Endowment Cohen
CITY OF BURLINGAME COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS
2006—Page 2
19. Juvenile Justice Keighran
20. Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance Cohen(alternate Gomery)
21. Peninsula Division of League of California Cities All
(4 meetings year)
22. Regional Financing Authority(RFA) (4 year term from 2003- O'Mahony
2007)
23. San Mateo County Sesquicentennial Committee Liaison Baylock
24. Transportation Authority O'Mahony
25. Warrants review O'Mahony
11/30/2005 8:49 AM
CITY 0 STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAME AGENDA
ITEM# 10b
ti�oq Dom MTG.
�FATEOJUNEb DATE 12/5/05
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED _ 22r��
BY
DATE: November 29, 2005
APPROVED
FROM: Doris Mortensen, City Clerk By
650-558-7203
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Adopt 2006 City Council Calendar
RECOMMENDATION: To review, make changes if necessary and approve the Burlingame City Council
Calendar for 2006.
EXHIBITS:
2006 Burlingame City Council Calendar
BUDGET IMPACT:
None
Bj1R41tr��ME
2006 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR
City Council meetings are held on the first and third Monday of each month. When Monday is a holiday,the meeting is usually held
on Tuesday or Wednesday. Study meetings are held as scheduled. Meetings begin at 7:00 at City Hall, 501 Primrose Road,and are
open to the public. Regular Council meetings are televised live via Burlingame's Cable Channel 26 for RCN subscribers and Channel
27 for Comcast subscribers. For more information,please view the City's website at www.burlin ag me.org or call the City Clerk at
650-558-7203.
REGULAR MEETINGS
Tuesday, January 3 Monday, July 3 (tentative)
Tuesday, January 17 Monday, July 17
Monday, February 6 Monday, August 7 (tentative)
Wednesday, February 22 Monday, August 21
Monday, March 6 Tuesday, September 5
Monday, March 20 Monday, September 18
Monday, April 3 Monday, October 2
Monday, April 17 Monday, October 16
Monday, May 1 Monday, November 6
Monday, May 15 Monday, November 20
Monday, June 5 Monday, December 4
Monday, June 19 Monday, December 18 (tentative)
STUDY MEETINGS AND OTHER DATES
Saturday, January 28 2006/07 Goals Session, 9 a.m., Recreation Center
Wednesday, March 1 2006/07 Budget Session, 6 p.m., Lane Room, Main Library
Friday, March 3 Commissioner's Dinner
Saturday, March 18 Joint Council and Planning Commission Meeting, 9 a.m.
Wednesday, June 14 City Manager's mid-year review, 5:30 p.m.
Wednesday, December 6 City Manager's year end review, 5:30 p.m.
12/1/2005 10:10 AM
BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY
Burlingame Public Library
Board of Trustees
Minutes
September 20, 2005
I. Call to Order
President McCormack called the meeting to order at 5:30pm
II. Roll Call
Trustees Present: Nancy Brock, Bruce Carlton, Deborah
Griffith, Katie McCormack and Pat Toft
Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian
Sidney Poland, Recorder
III. Warrants and Special Funds
The Trustees unanimously approved the warrants. M/S/C
(Toft/Brock)
IV. Minutes
The Trustees unanimously approved the minutes of the August 16,
2005 meeting. M/S/C (Griffith/Carlton)
V. Correspondence and Attachments
Correspondence and Attachments were noted.
VI. From the Floor
Alex Veech, a Library patron and volunteer, asked the Trustees for
suggestions in helping him to make a donation to a Library in
Louisiana that was damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Katrina.
The City Librarian will contact the American Library Association
for information on adopting a Library. Trustee McCormack
suggested finding one in a community similar to the size of
Burlingame. This matter will be placed on the agenda for the
October meeting.
VII. Reports
A. City Librarian's Report - Highlights of Report
1. New Online System - The new system is up and
running. The staff is still sorting out how to work around
features that were part of the Dynix program but are not
available in Millennium. The hold issue has not been resolved
but a software solution should be on the way. Some senior
patrons are having difficulties with the increased use of
the mouse required by the system.
48o Primrose Road,Burlingame,CA 94010-4083
Phone (650) 558-7474'Fax (65o) 342-6295Email:www.burlingame.org/library
2. CLS Outsourcing Testing - Book additions in new
fiction are two months behind due to a software functions that
is not operating properly. Our outsourcing vendor Baker 8s
Taylor is working with our technical staff and PLS to resolve
the issue.
3. OCLC World Catalogue - OCLC will be available to our
patrons in the near future due to a grant made to our Library
from the California State Library.
B. Foundation Report
1. Birthday Bash - The hours for the event are 6:00pm until
8:30pm. Hot Dogs, popcorn, cake, and ice cream will be provided.
Guests will be entertained by the Walden Marionettes and folk
singer Jim Stevens.
2. Book Sale - The fall book sale will be held in the Lane
Community Room and will run from Friday, October 21 st 5:00-
8:00pm, Saturday, October 22nd 10:00-5:00pm, and Sunday,
October 23rd 1:00pm-4:00pm. There will be a $5.00 admission
fee on Friday night only. No admission is charged on Saturday or
Sunday.
VIII. Unfinished Business
Statue Status - David Biggs is still working on the base for the
statue and will have it finished before the Foundation event on
October 7th.
IX. New Business
A. Proposed Library Closure Dates - The Trustees unanimously
passed Trustee McCormack's motion to adopt the Library Closure
Dates for the year 2006 and January 1st and 2nd of the year 2007.
M/S/C (McCormack/Carlton).
B. Early Closure of Library October 7th - The Trustees
unanimously approved the request of the City Librarian to close the
Library at 3:00pm on Friday, October 7th to prepare for the
Foundation's 10th Anniversary fund raising event. M/S/C
(Griffith/Toft)
C. Literacy Adult Learner's DVD - The trustees viewed a film on
the literacy program which related stories of participants who have
benefited from it. The City Librarian advised the Trustees that
Burlingame does not have its own literacy program but the City
provides $8,000 to serve adult learners in the San Mateo City
Library program.
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2
September 20,2005
X. Announcements
A. Employment Achievement Awards-Staff will receive the
letter and form for the award by October 6th and will be asked to
return their nomination no later than November 4th to Deborah
Griffith or Pat Toft.
B. CALTAC-The CALTAC Special Fall Workshop will be held
Saturday,October 29th,2005 9:00- 1:00pm at the Santa Clara City
Library. Trustees are members of CALTAC. Nancy Brock will attend
the event.
XI. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:35pm.The next meeting will be held
October 18,2005 at 5:30pm in the Conference Room.
Respectfully Submitted,
��
Alfred H. Escoffier
City Librarian
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3
September 20,2005
BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY
Burlingame Public Library
Board of Trustees
Minutes
October 18, 2005
I. Call to Order
President McCormack called the meeting to order at 5:30pm
II. Roll Call
Trustees Present: Nancy Brock, Bruce Carlton, Katie
McCormack and Pat Toft
Trustee Absent: Deborah Griffith
Staff Present: Al Escoffier, City Librarian
Sidney Poland, Recorder
III. Warrants and Special Funds
The warrants will be considered for approval at the November 18th
meeting.
IV. Minutes
The Trustees unanimously approved the minutes of the September
20, 2005 meeting. M/S/C (Toft/Carlton)
V. Correspondence and Attachments
Correspondence and Attachments were noted.
A. Overview of Library Annual Statistics '04-'05 - The Trustees
reviewed the final numbers for the categories required for the
California State Survey. Trustee Carlton requested a comparison of
the figures for prior years as well as how Burlingame compared to
other libraries in the area.
B. Program List for Birthday Bash
1 . Children's Program Do
_. g nations -
Trustee McCormack
suggested putting the list of Children's programs on the
Website with a notation that a patron did not have to fund the
entire program but could make a donation of any amount
toward his or her program of choice.
2. Merchant Donations - The Trustees will be given a copy
of the merchant donation list for the Birthday Bash. Rachel
Rothe of the Foundation will send the appropriate
acknowledgements.
VI. From the. Floor
48o Primrose Road • Burlingame • CA 940zo-4o83
Phone (650) 558-7474 - Fax (650) 342-6295
VII. Reports
A. City Librarian's Report - Highlights of Report
1 . Popular Materials Area - The library Foundation has
given this area a new bookstore look by donating the funds to
purchase rolling shelving with slanted shelves that make it
more user friendly for patrons to select their reading materials.
2. Paperbacks - Quick Picks is the name selected for the
new catalogued paperback collection. Quick picks check out
for 3 weeks and accrue fines.
3. Public Art - The first piece of public art given to the City
under the new public art policy was dedicated in the
memory of Gloria Barton at the Library on October 18th. The
statue entitled "Boy Reading" was given by Gloria Barton's
friends and resides in the library lobby just outside the
children's room. The library staff hosted a reception in honor
of the family and friends who attended the dedication.
4. Personnel Issues - The Library staff remain at a deficit
of 3FTE. Tim Wallace, cataloger at the San Bruno Library, has
been hired to help the Technical Service staff clear up the back
log of non-fiction and children's materials.
B. Foundation 10th Anniversary Fundraising Report
The Birthday Bash was a huge success with both children and adults
enjoying themselves immensely. Entertainment included the Walden
Marionettes, strolling folk singer Jim Stevens, as well as crafts and face
painting. Adults amused themselves by purchasing balloons for $20.00
with secret prizes inside. Stephen Scheifele and Rochelle Yonezawa
held the lucky key to the treasure chest. The treasure was a fully paid
trip to Disneyland for four.
VIII. Unfinished Business
ALA Response to Aiding Libraries Damaged by Katrina
In answer to the City Librarian's inquiry on behalf of Alex Veech,
ALA has paired us with a library in St. Tammany Parrish for their
Adopt a Library program. We are awaiting further information.
IX. New Business
A. PR Awards from American Library Association - These
awards will be formally presented at the City Council meeting
November 7th.
B. Holiday Program - The library will host its own holiday
program on December 6th at 6:00pm featuring the Peninsula Girls
Chorus.
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2
October 18, 2005
C. Employee Awards Status - Nomination forms have been given
to all employees and the requested return date is November 4th.
D. Employee Recognition Dinner - Katie McCormack and Heidi
Kenney are planning the dinner and will send out the invitations in
the near future.
X. Announcements
A. Loss of Public Service Hours
Trustee McCormack suggested that the loss of public service hours
be a future agenda item and inquired as to when is the best time for
the Trustees to begin reviewing this subject with regard to current
budget planning. The City Librarian will provide the Trustees with
financial information on the loss of service hours.
B. System Advisory Board- Trustee McCormack noted that
either Saturday morning February 11th or 25th, there will be a
workshop with PLS, BALIS, SVLS and San Francisco Library.
C. Legislative Breakfast - The date has not been determined at
this time but it will be a Saturday morning and the topic will be the
Library Bond Issue for the June ballot. Trustee McCormack
suggested that City Council members should be invited to the
breakfast.
XI. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30pm. The next meeting will be held
November 15, 2005 at 5:30pm in the Conference Room.
M/S/C (Brock/Carlton)
Respectfully Submitted,
Alfred H. Escoffie�
City Librarian
Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3
October 18,2005
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
November 28 2005
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the November 28,2005,regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:03 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present:Commissioners Auran,Brownrigg,Cauchi,Deal,Keighran Osterling
and Vistica(arrived at 7:08 p.m.)
Absent: None
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Zoning Technician, Erica
Strohmeier; City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer; Doug Bell.
III. MINUTES The minutes of the November 14, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were amended: Item 4,hospital replacement review of specific
issues,page 6,paragraph 3,add following Commissioner comment"that the
public should be aware that the mitigation panel provides them with a way to
make comments about the project and construction impacts as the project
proceeds,"... C. Osterling made a motion to approve the minutes as
amended. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. The motion passed
on a 6-0-1 (C. Vistica abstaining since he arrived during the discussion). (C.
Vistica arrived at 7:08 p.m.)
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
VI. STUDY ITEMS There were no study items.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
1A. ADOPTION OF THE 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION CALENDAR—CITY PLANNER: MEG
MONROE
1B. 1532 COLUMBUS AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (TRG ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DAVE AND DENISE MAURO, PROPERTY OWNERS) (72
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
C. 1801 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED C-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING FINANCIAL INSTITUTION(ROGER HAGMAN,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT AND PEDERSEN AND PEDERSEN, PROPERTY OWNER) (20
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
1D. 1199 BROADWAY,SUITE 5,ZONED C-1,BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA—APPLICATION
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR REAL ESTATE AND TRAVEL
OFFICE (GARBIS BEZDJIAN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) (61 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent
calendar. There were no requests. Cers. Keighran and Brownrigg abstained from voting on 1532 Columbus
because they live within 500 feet of the project. C. Deal abstained on 1199 Broadway because he lives
within 500 feet of the project.
C. Cauchi moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners'
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion
and the Planning Commission 2006 Calendar and 1801 El Camino Real which passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
The project at 1532 Columbus Avenue passed on a 5-0-2(Cers. Keighran and Brownrigg abstaining)voice
vote; and the project at 1199 Broadway passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining) voice vote. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:10 p.m.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
2. 21 CLARENDON ROAD,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (SCOTT KUEHNE, SUAREZ-
KUEHNE ARCHITECTURE,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;AND TODD FREEDMAN&MICHELE --�
DOYLE FREEDMAN,PROPERTY OWNERS)(60 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report November 28,2005,with attachments. ZT Strohmeier presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions
from the Commission.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Todd Freidman,property owner,represented the project,stating that
the entire roof and all of the existing windows will be replaced; it was hard to come up with one window
style, so the front of the house was treated as a separate design element; documents were submitted to
Commission to provide further explanation and illustration;does Commission want the existing Mayten tree
to be taken out? Commission responded that they are not going to require an existing tree to be removed,
however, applicant should be aware that it has the possibility to become invasive. There were no further
comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling moved to approve the application for design review, by resolution, with the following
conditions: 1)that the proj ect shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped November 16, 2005, sheets Al-A7, and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes,
footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; 2)that any changes to the
size or envelope of the basement,first or second floors,or garage,which would include adding or enlarging
a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,
shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the
project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the
architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department;4)that
prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved
Planning and Building plans; 5)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall
shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;6)that
all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and
installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;7)that the conditions of
the Chief Building Official's September 16,2005 memo,the City Engineer's September 21,2005 memo,the
Fire Marshal's September 13, 2005 memo, and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's
September 19,2005 memos shall be met;8)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California
Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;9)that the project
shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected
demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling
requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition
permit; and 10)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the design review. The motion passed on a 7-
0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m.
3. 1213 MILLS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMITS FOR GARAGE LENGTH AND FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE
REAR 40% OF THE LOT FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH
DETACHED GARAGE(GRANT MOHR,APPLICANT&DESIGNER;AND GRANT&KELLY MOHR,
PROPERTY OWNERS) (75NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
C. Keighran recused herself from this item because she has a business relationship with the applicant she
left the dais and chambers. Reference staff report November 28, 2005,with attachments. ZT Strohmeier
presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fourteen conditions were suggested for
consideration. Commission asked staff if a man door could be placed on the east side of the garage? Staff
responded that yes,a door could be placed on the east side of the garage,however,if there is any glazing in
the door, it must be more than 10' away from an adjacent property line.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Grant Mohr,applicant,property owner and designer,was available
to answer any questions. Commission commented:
• Side of garage is a long wall,a man door should be installed on the side of the garage facing
the rear yard for extra access;should locate door more than 10' from adjacent property line,
then could do French doors;
• Would be nice if left elevation was broken up on garage with French doors,a gable end and a
half-column;
• Show slight eave on right side,needs to be 3' from property line;gutter has to go up against
the building;
• For on-site illumination it states in the Design Review Guidelines that light must shine down
onto property and not onto neighboring properties;do not want a bright area at the end of the
`- driveway;
• What lighting is proposed for the front porch? This needs to be addressed on the plans;
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005
• Large tree like shrubs,Victorian Box or Bay Laurel of a medium scale,should be planted at
the front to help frame the house;should be added to the conditions;one should be located at
the front and one should be located at the driveway; and
• Ordinances and the Design Guidelines will regulate lighting on the site.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Deal moved to approve the application, by resolution, with added conditions concerning landscaping,
lighting and a double door area with a gable end and a half column off of the detached garage to break up the
long wall of the accessory structure, and with the following conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as
shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 15, 2005, sheets 1
through 8, including wood windows with built-in simulated true divided lights on inside and outside of
windows throughout;that a double door area with a gabled end and a half column similar to the front of the
house shall be added to the left elevation of the detached garage;that all on-site lighting shall be consistent
in style and designed so that the cone of light is contained on site;and that any changes to building materials,
exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment;2)that two large tree-
like shrubs,Victorian Box or Bay Laurel,shall be added to the front of the property,one in front of the house
towards the left and one at the driveway; 3)that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any
changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors,which would include expanding the footprint or
floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer(s) or changing the roof
height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's
September 16, 2005 memo and the Recycling Specialist,Fire Marshal,NPDES Coordinator memos dated
September 19,2005 and the City Engineer's memo dated September 22,2005 shall be met; 5)that prior to
scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide
architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown
on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or
contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the
Building Department; 6) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note
compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;7)that all air ducts,plumbing vents,and flues
shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not
visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued; 8)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor
shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;9)
that during construction the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff,
and 10) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners and set the building footprint; 11)that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify
the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City
Engineer; 12)that during demolition of the existing residence,site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's
Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff, 13)that the
project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water
Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 14)
that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; and 15) that the project shall meet all the
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of
Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on motion: great project;will help the street;what are the proposed changes to the landscaping?
Will the rose bushes be affected due to lack of light?That two new large scale shrubs be planted in the front
yard to help frame the house,one on the right hand side in the lawn area relatively close to the house and one
next to the driveway; the rose bushes will barely get up to the level of the porch, there should not be too
much shade for them;current proposed landscaping is not in keeping with the bulk of the house;could plant
shrub more towards the left to avoid shade on the roses. Comments concerning the garage will really
enhance the project.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the added conditions. The motion passed
on a 6-0-1 (C. Keighran abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m.
4. 1441 & 1445 BELLEVUE AVENUE, ZONED R-4—APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION,TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP,TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR
LOT COMBINATION, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FRONT SETBACK
LANDSCAPING FOR A NEW FOUR-STORY 17-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (DALE
MEYER, AIA, DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; BELLEVUE
ASSOCIATES, LLC C/O LITKE PROPERTIES, PROPERTY OWNERS) (140 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
Reference staff report November 28, 2005, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Ninety-four conditions which include the mitigations from the Mitigated
Negative Declaration were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Dale Meyer, architect, represented the project; Michael Callan,
landscape architect for the project, 1400 Rollins Road; Abraham Landis, 1547 Bellevue Avenue; Mark
Engleman, 1435 Bellevue,# 105,Redwood Crest Homeowners Association,spoke. Applicant summarized
the revisions made to the plans in response to the Commission's comments at study; Commissioners noted
regarding revised plans that there is no closet in the bedroom in unit 5;that because of the orientation of the
sun and the project, the depth of the fourth floor deck on the rear of the building will have a big impact on
the light access to the building next door;clarified that what looks like balconies on the front of the building
are actually decorative wrought iron grills; concern about the survival of the redwood tree at the rear,
commissioner noted that with removal of the Cypress growing next to the redwood, the redwood will fill
out; for safety,outdoor fire place should not be wood burning nor should a shed for storing wood be located
in the public open space, gas with timed turn-off valves for grill and fireplace would be safer and more
practical; feel that the structure is not placed correctly on the site, too close to the building on the right,
driveway should be reversed and building moved to the left, this is so serious cannot support the project;
common open space has a real sense of space but needs a sink with running water, a toilet, and the bridge
needs to remain central to the open space and building but also should not be built against the redwood tree,
be sure foundation of bridge protects redwood roots;two story below grade parking garage located next to a
creek raises serious questions about sump pumps running 24 hours a day,where the water is pumping to so
creek will not be contaminated, not want to see fossil pillows used to clean water; CP noted that the
mitigations from the Mitigated Negative Declaration address these drainage and water quality issues,
including various sump pumps, back up generators and drainage receptors, and the mitigations are
�-- implemented as conditions of approval;important that the sump pumps and emergency generators are sound
baffled so that they cannot be heard by the neighbors or by the residents of the project;on the balconies on
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
the southwest elevation the balconies are cantilevered from the cornice and look awkward,they should be
moved to align with the balconies below and corbels added below the upper most balconies to visually attach
them to the structure;the window pattern still seems monotonous,could be more interesting;the plans show
the roof to be real slate, would not like to have a revision from this material later; SE Bell noted that it is
important that the excavation for the garage and the parking is built in one season because of the creek,
otherwise the hole should be properly shored to insure that it will not fail because of the proximity of the
creek and adjacent development,the project should be bonded to insure this;there is limited opportunity to
install big trees,would be nice to replace the Liquid Ambers on the street with a bigger, evergreen species,
but that is up to the City; on the right side elevation should install "forest scale" tree to establish proper
screening,Podocarpus on the left side should also be replaced with two"forest scale"evergreen trees,these
would hide the limited space between buildings;Pittosporum along the right side property line should not be
trimmed in order to provide the highest screen possible for residents in the adjacent building; check with
Department of Fish and Game about what should be planted along the creek bank to stabilize it,at least filter
fabric should be put on the bank and material planted through it,concerned about erosion during and after
construction.
Continued public comment:part of this building faces his condominium,will be all that is visible from all
windows, now sees greenery; will reduce the value of his condominium; studies show this kind of change
can have an effect on the mental health of older people; bought condominium 10 years ago, three story
building,not expect visual impact of four story building next door. Redwood Crest Condominium would
like to work with the developer on selecting the fence between the two properties, would like to leave
existing vegetation at the front and start fence back some;concerned about the crooked telephone pole in the
right-of-way at the front,would like it installed so it is up right now and in the future would like the service
placed underground. Applicant noted they would work with the homeowners association on the selection of
the fence between the two properties. Also noted that there is considerable existing vegetation on the
property to the right side of the lot, plan to plant single trunk tree form Pittosporum along the shared
property line on the right, it can grow up to 20 to 25 feet if it is not trimmed. There were no further
comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner's discussion: In their discussion the commissioner identified the following items to be
included as conditions of approval on the project:
• excavation of the garage, construction of the parking structure or proper stabilization of the
excavated hole and all drainage facilities shall be completed in one season and a bond shall be
required to insure that all this work is accomplished;
• balconies on the southwest side shall be lined up,causing the fourth floor balcony to be shifted and
corbels shall be placed below the upper most balcony to tie it to the structure, this modification
should be reviewed by the Planning Commission to insure that the proportions work and the
balconies are properly integrated into the design prior to issuance of the building permit;
• the property owner or his representative shall meet with the home owners association at 1435
Bellevue and agree on a commonly beneficial fence design separating the two properties,it shall be
the responsibility of the project to install and maintain this fence;
• a sink with running water,a toilet,a gas grill and gas fire place shall be installed in the common open
space for the convenience and enjoyment of the residents on site, for safety the gas fixtures shall be
placed on timers,the use common open space shall be managed and maintained by the homeowners
association;
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
• the landscape plan shall include the addition of two forest scale evergreen trees on the right side and
one forest scale evergreen tree on the left side at the rear of the site beyond the edge of the below
grade parking garage;
• there shall be a closet added to the bedroom in unit 5;
• that the applicant and the City Attorney shall work to determine if a program can be developed to
reserve the two affordable dwelling units in the project for economically qualified teachers in the
Burlingame schools,including a ten percent reduction in the established rent because the tenants are
teachers in the Burlingame schools, should a program be possible the applicant shall be required to
implement the program;
• that landscaping along the right property line shall be predominantly single trunk tree form
Pittosporum and that these plants shall be allowed to grow to their natural form at a height of 20 to
25 feet;
• that the entry from the building to the common open space shall be maintained at its central location
as it is designed and shall be built around the existing redwood tree and in a manner approved by a
licensed arborist to protect and maintain the roots of the redwood tree;
• that no permits including demolition shall be issued for this project until the developer and
contractor have prepared a traffic plan for trucks and parking for construction workers for all phases
of the project from demolition to interior finish and landscape installation.
C. Osterling moved approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that it was an adequate
disclosure of the potential impacts of the project and that the mitigations identified and included as
conditions of approval would reduce to levels acceptable to the community any potentially adverse impacts
identified by the report. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration as
adequate. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C. Brownrigg dissenting) voice vote.
C. Osterling moved to approve the condominium permit and special permit for font setback landscaping for
the proposed project at 1441 and 1445 Bellevue Avenue with the 94 conditions of approval in the staff report,
which include the mitigations from the Negative Declaration and the 10 conditions identified and added by
the Planning Commission as noted in the minutes of the November 28,2005 meeting and incorporated into
the conditions of approval on the project,by resolution,with the following conditions: 1)that the project
shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 2,2005,
sheets P1 through P15,L1.0,L1.1 and L2.0,including the roofing material which shall be true slate;2)that
the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 77.32'as measured from the
average elevation at the top of the curb along Floribunda Avenue(31.32)for a maximum height of 46-0%
and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the
framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The second level garage floor finished
floor elevation shall be elevation 11.32%garage level one finished floor elevation shall be elevation 21.32';
first floor finished floor shall be elevation 32.82';second floor finished floor shall be elevation 43.82';third
floor finished floor shall be elevation 53.82';fourth floor finished floor shall be elevation 63.82';and the top
of ridge elevation shall be no more than 77.32'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point
it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the
maximum height shown on the approved plans; 3)that any changes to the size or envelope of the building,
which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure,replacing or relocating windows
or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review;4)that the conditions
of the City Engineer's November 22,2005,memo,the Chief Building Official's November 9,2005,memo,
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
the Fire Marshal's November 18, 2005,memo, and the Recycling Specialist's November 14, 2005,memo
shall be met; 5)that prior to issuance of a demolition and/or building permit,the property owner shall obtain
all permits required or present notification from the agencies to the City that the permits are not required by
State and Regional agencies including but not limited to the California Department of Fish and Game,the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the Regional Water
Quality Control Board;6)that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public
right-of-way shall be prohibited;7)that`guest parking stall'shall be marked on the five guest parking spaces
and designated on the final map and plans,these stalls shall not be assigned to any unit,but shall be owned
and maintained by the condominium association,and the guest stalls shall always be accessible for parking
and not be separately enclosed or used for resident storage; and that in addition to the five guest parking
stalls,37 parking spaces shall be available on site for owners,and none of the on-site parking shall be rented,
leased or sold to anyone who does not own a unit on the site; 8) that the Covenants Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the condominium project shall require that the five guest parking stalls shall be
reserved for guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents;9)that the final inspection shall be
completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 10)that
the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the
condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all
contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and
fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property,including but
not limited to the roof,painting, common area carpets,drapes and furniture; 11)that the trash receptacles,
furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and
landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a
building permit is issued; 12)that if a security gate system across the driveway is installed in the future,the
gate shall be installed a minimum 20'-0' back from the front property line; the security gate system shall
include an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows residents to communicate with guests
and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; 13) that prior to
scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building
envelope; 14)that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of
the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15) that prior to
scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the roof ridge and
provide certification of that height; 16) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and
protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-
contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 17) that this project shall
comply with the state-mandated water conservation program,and a complete Irrigation Water Management
and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of
building permit application; 18) that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be
stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 19)that
project approvals shall be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump
system; and the sump pump shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dual pumps,
controls, level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators shall be housed so that they meet the City's noise
requirement; 20) that the excavation of the garage, construction of the parking structure or proper
stabilization of the excavated hole and all drainage facilities shall be completed in one construction season
and a bond shall be required to insure that all this work is accomplished within that time frame the money
shall be spent to secure the site; 21)that the balconies on the southwest side shall be lined up, causing the
fourth floor balcony to be shifted and that corbels shall be placed below the upper most balcony to tie it to
the structure,this modification shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission to insure that the proportions
work and the balconies are properly integrated into the design prior to issuance of the building permit ;22)
that the property owner or his representative shall meet with the home owners association at 1435 Bellevue
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
and agree on a commonly beneficial fence design separating the two properties and that it shall be the
responsibility of the project to install and maintain this fence;23)that a sink with running water,a toilet with
sewer connection, a gas grill and gas fire place shall be installed in the common open space for the
�-- enjoyment of the residents on site and that for safety the gas fixtures shall be placed on timer; and that the
use common open space shall be managed and maintained by the homeowners association; 24) that the
landscape plan shall include the addition of two forest scale evergreen trees on the right side and one forest
scale evergreen tree on the left side at the rear of the site beyond the edge of the below grade parking garage;
25)that there shall be a closet added to the bedroom in unit 5; 26)that the applicant and the City Attorney
shall work to determine if a program can be developed to reserve the two affordable dwelling units in the
project for economically qualified teachers in the Burlingame schools, including a ten percent reduction in
the established rent because the tenants are teachers in the Burlingame schools,should a program be possible
the applicant shall be required to implement the program;27)that landscaping along the right property line
shall be predominantly single trunk tree form Pittosporum and that these plants shall be allowed to grow to
their natural form at a height of 20 to 25 feet;28)that the entry from the building to the common open space
shall be maintained at its central location as it is designed and shall be built around the existing redwood tree
and in a manner approved by a licensed arborist to protect and maintain the roots of the redwood tree; 29)
that no permits including demolition shall be issued for this project until the developer and contractor have
prepared a traffic plan for construction trucks and parking for construction workers for all phases of the
project from demolition to interior finish and landscape installation; 30)that prior to issuance of a building
permit the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and approval;
31)that all structural design shall conform to the City of Burlingame building codes and,at a minimum,to
the most recent revision of the California Building Code(which incorporates the Uniform Building Code),
the California Building Code specifically details design and construction practices for structures subject to
significant earthquake hazards; 32) that utilities shall be designed to provide sufficient flexibility to
withstand the expected ground shaking induced during an earthquake; 33) that structural designs and
construction procedures for foundation construction shall be completed in conformance to City of
Burlingame seismic regulations and project specific professional design recommendations for seismic
hazards made by the project Structural Engineer; 34)that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the
applicant shall submit GeoForensics' Geotechnical Investigation to the Chief Building Official and City
Engineer for review and approval. The investigation has been undertaken to determine the presence and
extent of expansive soil and provides foundation design, construction and grading recommendations. The
recommendations in the report and any requirements imposed by the Chief Building Official and City
Engineer shall be followed during construction; 35)that prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant
shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and approval that illustrate the mat
foundation for deep basement parking, alternate foundation designs for near surface grade such as pier and
grade beam systems with piers extending into underlying competent soils. Concrete slab-on-grade and
walkways shall all be founded on properly compacted non-expansive fill; 36) that prior to issuance of
building permits,the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and
approval that illustrate that pavement sections shall be properly designed to resist the effect of underlying
expansive soils; 37) that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the applicant shall submit
GeoForensics' Geotechnical Investigation to the Chief Building Official and/or City Engineer for review and
approval. The Investigation shall include boreholes completed in the area of the proposed excavations. The
Investigation shall be used to develop recommendations for retaining walls and shoring of soils during
construction;38)that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the applicant shall submit a shoring plan to
the Chief Building Official and/or City Engineer for review and approval based on the recommendations in
the Geotechnical Investigation required by the mitigation listed directly above; 39) that all surface
stormwater run-off around the building shall be required to drain to the street into the storm drainage system;
40)that clean subsurface ground water encountered during excavation and pier drilling shall be discharged
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
into Ralston Creek,provided that discharge into the creek is approved by the Department of Fish and Game
and the Regional Water Quality Control Board;41)that a subsurface drainage system shall be installed in the
walls and/or foundation of the two-story below grade garage for the collection of ground water intrusion;this
water shall be discharged into the creek,provided that it is approved by the Department of Fish and Game
and the Regional Water Quality Control Board;42)that the finished parking area(garage)surface drainage
and run-off shall be required to drain to the local sanitary sewer system because of the possibility of
contamination from vehicles;this drainage system shall be connected to gas powered pumps connected to a
self activating emergency generator; short floodwalls may also be required to prevent water from the creek
spilling over into the below grade area;43)that biodegradable fertilizer shall be used on-site due to the close
proximity to Ralston Creek;44)that minor stream flows shall be controlled by constructing a temporary dam
in the creek bed and forcing the water to flow into a closed pipe,which shall extend past the dewatering zone
of influence,also to be placed within the creek bed;dewatering of the basement and/or basement foundation
excavations maybe accomplished by installing pump(s)in shallow sump(s)in the excavation;water shall be
directed to the streambed to flow into the diversion pipe;water discharge location will depend on the quality
of the water; clean water obtained from the gravel drains located behind the garage retaining walls can be
discharged into the creek where the creek channel is concrete lined; 45) that to minimize flooding and/or
spillover of the creek during peak runoff, the existing concrete retaining walls beneath the apartment
building at the southwest corner of the site, which will be exposed with the demolition of the apartment
building spanning over the creek, shall be raised, as the western wall redirects the flow to a more northerly
direction, and short floodwalls or earthen berms at the top of the open channel shall also be installed, as
required, and the necessary permits shall be obtained for this work from the California Department of Fish
and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 46) that water that comes into contact with concrete
during pier drilling or pouring shall not be discharged into the creek, and shall be treated on-site with
treatment approved by the City Engineer,and shall be discharged as approved by the City Engineer;47)that -�
in order to minimize flooding in the excavation from shallow groundwater and spilling from the creek
excavation for the below grade parking area shall be accomplished during the dry season, April 15th to
October 15`";48)that prior to issuance of a demolition, grading or construction permit,the applicant shall
submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs(Best Management Practices)to be used
to prevent soil,dirt and debris from entering the creek and storm drain system; the plan shall include a site
plan showing the property lines,existing and proposed topography and slope;areas to be disturbed,locations
of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and
proposed drainage patterns and structures;watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downstream
of a project; and designated construction access routes, staging areas and washout areas;49)that methods
and procedures such as sediment basins or traps, silt fences, straw bale dikes, storm drain inlet protection
such as soil blanket or mats, and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to
maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls
have been established;50)that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of
dirt onto the public right-of-way,clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 51)
that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-off,promote surface filtration
and minimize the use of fertilizers,herbicides and pesticides; 52)that any site work including grading and
landscaping shall be limited to the dry months,from April 15 to October 15; 53)That prior to issuance of a
demolition,grading or construction permit protective silt fences shall be installed along the open channel of
the creek;the protective fence shall be installed between the top of the creek bank and at least two feet below
the top of the areas to be graded, and also no lower than the ordinary high water line; 54) that prior to
issuance of a demolition, grading and building permit the applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and
approvals from the Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board,and shall
provide a copy of these approval to the City of Burlingame;55)that demolition of the existing structures and
any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to receive a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit from the Burlingame Building Division; and
all requirements of the permit shall be complied with during construction; 56) that all active construction
areas shall be watered at least twice daily, especially during the demolition and excavation phase of the
project; 57)that water that may run off the site due to the dust control measures required shall not be allowed
to run-off into Ralston Creek or into the storm drain system; 58)that sandbags shall be installed around the
perimeter of the site to prevent water run off from the dust control activity from spilling onto the public
right-of-way or on to adjacent properties; 59)that trucks to and from the site hauling soil,sand or other loose
material shall be covered or that a minimum of two feet of freeboard shall be maintained; 60)that during
construction soil stabilizers shall be applied to unpaved access roads,parking areas and staging areas at the
construction site; 61)that at a frequency required by the Engineer,the paved access road,parking areas and
staging areas at the construction site shall be sprayed with water to keep these areas from creating dust; 62)
that the public street shall be swept as required by the City Engineer with a water sweeper if visible soil
materials are carried beyond the construction site; 63) that excavation and grading activities shall be
suspended immediately if winds exceed 25 mph;64)that sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be
installed to prevent silt runoff from the site to public roadways and into the creek;65)that any demolition on
this site shall comply with BAAQ MD Regulation 11, Rule #2, which governs the handling of asbestos-
containing materials;this rule requires that a survey be done of all the building materials to be removed prior
to commencement of any demolition;the property owner shall be responsible for having a professional on-
site that is familiar with the implementation of Regulation 11, Rule 2 of the BAAQMD to supervision the
removal or demolition of an asbestos containing materials; 66)that during demolition and construction all
hazardous materials shall be stored,handled and disposed of properly;and that any coating or sealant to be
used shall comply with the BAAQMD Regulation 8,Rules3 and 51 for volatile organic compound(VOC)
content,which governs the application of architectural coatings and adhesive and sealant products;67)That
in order to reduce the occurrence of visitors in the below grade garage from entering a dead-end aisle with no
maneuvering space to exit, a sign shall be posted near the guest parking spaces which directs visitors to the
area designated for guest/visitor parking; all parking spaces in the below grade garage in the area of the dead
end aisle shall be assigned directly to residential units on the site and shall be closely managed by the
homeowners association; 68)that signs shall be posted at both ends of the ramp accessing the below grade
parking warning pedestrians against the use of ramps for pedestrian travel; 69) that the proposed 30 foot
driveway shall be reduced to 24 feet, or a size approved by the City Traffic Engineer, and shall be shifted
east, as shown on revised plans date stamped November 2,2005; 70)that the circular driveway at the front
shall have proper signage indicating that it is a one-way driveway with the entrance on the western driveway;
71) that the circular driveway at the front shall have yield signage at the end where it merges with the
driveway that provides entrance and exit to the underground garage; 72)that the driveway elevation at the
garage entrance shall be 12 inches above the gutter flow line on Bellevue Avenue or at an elevation approved
by the City Engineer and the maximum driveway slope on the driveway shall not exceed 15 percent;73)that
all dumpsters located on the public street shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits from the City of
Burlingame Public Works Department prior to locating the dumpsters on the street; 74) that all personnel
involved with the demolition and/or construction of the proposed project at this site shall be required to park
in the public parking lots and garage in the immediate vicinity;75)that since all guest parking is provided in
the below grade garage there shall be an intercom with a buzzer to each unit, and a keypad access shall be
provided so each tenant can operate the security gate to the garage on demand(Transportation/Circulation);
76)that prior to issuance of a grading, demolition, or construction the project shall comply with the City's
tree protection and urban reforestation requirements as approved by the City Arborist; 77)that the property
shall apply for protected tree removal permits as per the City Arborist's August 26,2002 memo;78)that tree
protection measures shall be installed under the supervision of a licensed arborist prior demolition or
construction and shall be inspected by the City Arborist; 79) That prior to demolition or construction any
trees that will likely suffer root loss or soil compaction as a result of this project shall be deeply irrigated and
11
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
fertilized; and a long term maintenance plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City Arborist for
approval; 80) that protected trees that will have soil fill or the construction of hardscape within their root
zone as part of this project shall have a root aeration system installed prior to said fill or hardscape; and all
hardscape shall be of pervious material; 81) that all trees which border any area where grading or soil
compaction is likely to occur shall be mulched to depth of 8-16 inches or as required and approved by the
City Arborist or as required and approved by the City Arborist; 82) that any trees located in areas where
construction traffic is likely to occur shall be mulched to help reduced soil compaction as required by the
City Arborist; 83) that soil siltation fences shall be installed and maintained to keep soil from disturbing
areas out of the root zones of protected trees as required and inspected by the City Arborist; 84) that the
applicant shall install fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station as
required by the Fire Marshal prior to the final inspection for building permit; 85)that any demolition on this
site shall comply with BAAQMD Regulation 11,Rule 2,which governs the handling of asbestos-containing
materials; this rule requires that a survey be done of all the building materials to be removed prior to
commencement of any demolition;the property owner shall be responsible for having a professional on-site
that is familiar with the implementation of Regulation 11, Rule 2 of the BAAQMD to supervision the
removal or demolition of any asbestos containing materials; 86)that during demolition and construction all
hazardous materials shall be stored,handled and disposed of properly; and that any coating or sealant to be
used shall comply with the BAAQMD Regulation 8,Rules3 and 51 for volatile organic compound(VOC)
content,which governs the application of architectural coatings and adhesive and sealant products; 87)that
all construction shall be done during the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal
Code; these hours are between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on
Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. There shall be no construction on holidays;
construction activity that will result in Lio noise levels of 85 dBA or higher shall be limited to the hours of
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; 88) that noise emission levels from construction and
demolition on the site shall not exceed the values listed in table 4-6 of the City of Burlingame's General Plan
Noise Element; 89) that at no time shall the noise levels due to construction exceed levels greater than
90dBA; 90) that ground vibration levels 3 feet from the nearest occupied residential structures shall not
exceed 0.1 in./sec. and vibrations shall be monitored during the demolition of the existing structures when
concrete is removed, during the pre-drilling of holes for piles and when excavation is done closer than 30
feet from neighboring properties; 91)that a Construction Coordinator shall be appointed prior to issuance of
demolition and building permits for this project; the name and phone number of this coordinator shall be
provided to the neighbors and to the Planning and Public Works Departments;the Construction Coordinator
shall be responsible to the most practicable extent possible to mitigate construction impacts; 92) that all
internal combustion engines operating on this subject property shall be fitted with noise suppression
mufflers; 93)that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the interior
noise level within the building and inside each unit does not exceed 45 dBA in any sleeping area;94)that the
proposed 4th floor shall include noise attenuation measures to achieve an interior CNEL of 45 dBA, these
features would include some or all of the following: stucco exterior, acoustical lining in exterior walls, a
minimum of STC-31 windows or greater(STC-33 or STC-34),and proper mechanical ventilation;95)that
the contractor shall submit the "Recycling and Waste Reduction" form plan to the Burlingame Building
Division that demonstrates how 60 percent of construction demolition material will be diverted from the
waste stream to be approved by the Chief Building Official and the applicant shall be required to document
implementation of the recycling before a final inspection can be scheduled;96)that all surface storm water
runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)standards as adopted by the City of Burlingame and shall
be directed as required by the Department of Public Works;97)that sewer laterals from the site to the public
sewer main shall be checked and shall be replaced to city standards as required by the Public Works
Department;98)that all abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed as directed by the City Engineer;
12
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
99)that storm water run-off shall drain from the site to the street into the storm drain system; 100)that clean
subsurface ground water into the depressed parking area shall be pumped to discharge into Ralston Creek,
provided that this is approved by the Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control
`- Board; 101)that drainage and run-off into the two-story below grade garage shall drain to the local sanitary
sewer system due to the lower elevation of the parking areas and the possibility of contamination from
vehicle drainage; 102)that the applicant shall prepare a water demand study for the proposed building prior
to obtaining a building permit to determine the adequacy of the existing domestic water line to supply the
proposed condominium building as well as the required fire sprinkler system for the building; if it is
determined that the domestic water line needs to be increased the applicant shall replace the water line in the
street to city standards as required by the City Engineer; 103)that this project shall comply with Ordinance
No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; 104)that should any cultural resources be discovered during
construction,all work shall be halted until they are fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified
by the City Planner and the recommendations of the expert have been executed to the satisfaction of the City.
The motion was seconded by C. Deal.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the condominium permit and special permit for
front setback landscaping for the project including the 94 conditions in the staff report and the 10 conditions
added by the Planning Commission following the public hearing. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C.
Brownrigg dissenting)voice vote.
C. Osterling made a motion to recommend the tentative condominium map and the tentative and final parcel
map to the City Council for action. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the
tentative condominium map and the tentative and final parcel map. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m.
5. 1504,1508,1512,1600,1604,1608&1612 DAVIS DRIVE,1701 &1704-1706 ALBEMARLE WAY—
FENCE EXCEPTION FOR AN EIGHT-FOOT HIGH FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINES SHARED
WITH THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT AT 1783 EL CAMINO REAL(CHRIS
FOLEY,ANTHONY BRUNO,WILFRED&NANCY HUANG,ADAM PATTERSON,NADER ALMASI
AND SIMOUN GHASEMIAN, STEVEN & LEONIE WOHL, ABDULDEYYAN & RUKIYE SAFA,
LATTA TRUST,AND GEORGIA DELROSSO TRUST,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS)(9
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
Reference staff report November 28,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staff comments. She noted that seven of the nine property owners in this area adjacent to the
hospital site have joined with the hospital project applicant in this request. If approved the fence exception
will be recorded with their properties; also included in this fence exception are the city right-of-way at the
end of Albemarle Way and at the rear of the San Francisco Water Line Parcel where the water main enters
the hospital property. Four conditions to be recorded with each property were suggested for consideration.
Commissioner asked if it was possible to grant in"advance" fence exceptions to two properties which did
not participate so that they do not need to come back to the Commission at a later date. City Attorney
Anderson noted that fence exceptions are legal actions which are recorded with the properties;a recordation
cannot occur without the owner's permission and cannot be granted in advance. If the two property owners
change their minds and work something out with the hospital for fence replacement, they could make a
request of the city and come back to the Commission on the consent calendar. Commissioner asked if this
proposed 8 feet was a minimum or a maximum. Staff noted that this would allow these property owners to
13
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
build a fence up to 8 feet in height as measured from highest adjacent grade along their rear(or in the case of
1704-1706 Albemarle Way side)property line;and the fence would follow the change in slope along the 640
foot long area. What is the height of the existing new fence at 1701 Albemarle Way? Six feet. There were
no further questions from the Commission.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Oren Reinbolt, project manager for the hospital reconstruction
project represented the application; Simoun Almasi, 1604 Davis Drive; Steven Dambrosie, 1504 Davis
Drive. Applicant noted that this fence design has been agreed to among the neighbors with the fence
company,the project manager of the hospital project has stayed neutral,it will be a well designed fence of 7
feet of solid board with one foot of lattice, designed and built to last 40-50 years; if individual property
owners do not want a fence the hospital replacement project will pay them$5000,the cost of each piece,in
lieu of building them a rear property line fence;weather permitted they will build the first segment of fence
the first week of January and if done in sequence the fence will be completed in 3-4 weeks,the last piece on
the lot opposite Balboa where the water line is will not be completed until the water main in completed in
February or March 2006. The piece across Albemarle may be delayed because of utility work nearby;
currently they are installing a 36 inch storm drain which will be below the SF water line which they will
begin installing next month. Would like to have the fence in place before they install the landscaping so
that the fence does not have to be built from the neighbor's side. How will the gate at Albemarle work?
Neighbors do not want it locked since they use this access as a short cut, someone has already used bolt
cutters on the lock placed on the existing gate;before the gate is built,will need to clarify with the neighbors
if this gate will be "open" or not; a number of the property owner have gates from their properties directly
onto hospital property, they will continue to allow this. The fence posts should be 6 x 6 and pressure
treated; believe that is the case.
Comment continued:will not decide on whether to apply for a fence exception until the hospital responds to
the letter I sent them last year•,concerned that the immediate neighbors were not notified before most recent
work began,particularly the removal of adjacent trees; daughter home studying on November 22 and there
was dust everywhere,big machinery was working behind her house,Carole Groom said would send truck to
water down grading but could do nothing about large machinery. Mitigation panel should meet once a week.
Commissioner noted that by refusing to sign the letter for the fence exception property owner gave up the
right to build an 8 foot fence which would increase the privacy of your property; do not need to build the
fence at this time,if you want to build a fence without the exception the tallest fence you can build is 7 feet,
you could agree now. Do not know if I will need the money for the fence to spend on window replacement,
so did not sign. Helped coordinate neighbors,and owner at 1600 Davis has a gate in his fence directly on to
hospital property which he wishes to keep; Commission noted that he would have work that out with the
hospital project manager;be happy to have a gate for public use at Albemarle because it provides a short cut
to BART; the fence posts will be 6 x6's and will be pressure treated; would like to have a uniform fence
including 1701 Albemarle,it would look better over all,and the lack of consistency will be visible from his
hour,currently that fence is six feet tall. Commissioner asked about the letter sent by a neighbor a year ago.
Hospital project representative noted that it was a request for the hospital to purchase the property at 1604
Davis,was based on the project purchasing a property for them someplace else in Burlingame,keeping the
existing tax basis and including moving costs. Cannot do that,but have had appraisal done and should know
in the next several days the fair market assessment,then there is a process for resolving differences;it is hard
to live next to a construction zone,willing to purchase but they are a not for profit corporation and cannot
pay above the fair market value; feel they are close to being able to write a letter to the property owner at
1604 Davis. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
14
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
C. Brownrigg moved to approve a 8'-6" fence exception for 1504, 1508, 1512, 1608 and 1612 Davis Drive
and 1704-1706 Albemarle Way,allowing T-6"of solid board fence and 1 foot of lattice on the basis that the
construction of the hospital is a hardship which speaks for itself,and if the remaining two properties in this
area wish to apply for the same fence exception they should be placed on the consent calendar for action;this
action should be by resolution with the following conditions to be recorded on each property: 1) that the
project shall be built at this property based on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
October 20,2005,site plan and fence elevation,with a maximum fence height along the shared property line
with the hospital of 8'-6"feet(7'-6"foot solid board and 1 foot of lattice); 2)that the applicant shall obtain a
building permit for each segment of fence included in the fence exception from the Burlingame Building
Department; 3) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
2001 edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;and 4)that this fence exception shall be recorded with
each property affected. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi.
Commissioner comment: would like to allow the remaining two property owners to come back to the
consent calendar if they wish to request fence exceptions;concerned about the maximum/minimum 8 feet,
because of the existing slope would like the fence exception to be 8'6"which would provide some tolerance
for sloping conditions,it should be T-6" solid board and 1 foot of lattice would like the motion amended to
include these two provisions. C. Brownrigg the maker of the motion and C. Cauchi the second agreed to
the amendment to the motion.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to grant the fence exception for an 8'-6"fence,T-6"solid
board, 1 foot lattice at the rear of the properties at 1504, 1508, 1512, 1600, 1608 , 1612 Davis Drive and
1704-1706 Albemarle Way and including the city right of way at the end of Albemarle and along the San
Francisco Water property at Balboa,with the conditions on each property as noted in the staff report;noting
that if the remaining two properties wish to apply for a fence exception they may do it as a consent item.
The motion passed on a 7-0 voice.vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:20 p.m.
6. 1783 EL CAMINO REAL,PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT,ZONED C-1,C-
3 & UNCLASSIFIED — REVIEW OF REFINED LANDSCAPE PLANS WITH RESPECT TO: 1)
STREET LIGHT STANDARD DESIGN;2)SIDEWALK/PATHWAY ALONG EL CAMINO REAL;AND
3) FIRE ACCESS LANE/PATHWAY ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE (MILLS PENINSULA
HEALTH SERVICES,APPLICANT,ANSHEN&ALLEN,ARCHITECT;AND PENINSULA HEALTH
CARE DISTRICT AND MILLS PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES, PROPERTY OWNERS) (201
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
Reference staff report November 28, 2005, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staff comments. She noted that there were three items which at the last meeting the Planning
Commission had asked the applicant to return to the Commission for further discussion: street light
standards;pavement on the 20 wide fire access lane on the south side of the proposed hospital,and location
of the sidewalk along El Camino Real. As noted in the staff report none of these issues need to be resolved
before the building permit can be issued for the parking garage, they are all tied to other phases of the
project; and some of the items, like the street lights,will need to be used through out the North El Camino
corridor so should be carefully reviewed. The Chair suggested that some of these items might be referred to
the Commission's Subcommittee for the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan implementation.
Commissioner asked what latitude there was in the width of the fire lane;CP noted that the Fire Department
would need to be involved in both the selection of the material and the width,there were also maintenance
�-- issues associated with the options chosen. There were no more questions of staff.
15
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Oren Reinbolt, project manager for the hospital replacement
project; Jim Romer, architect for the hospital replacement project; Chris Foley, 1504 Davis Drive; Pat
Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue. As staff report table notes,all three of these decisions are tied to phases other
than the building permit of the parking garage,they need to be decided so that they can be incorporated into
the plans for those phases, need to come back with the Fire Department for the fire lane, resin may or may
not be affordable and may or may not meet the Fire Department's needs, there are other permeable, light
colored asphalts for example; these street lights are a design independent of the lights on the hospital site,
they will set a theme for the city, so hospital has no preference and would be happy to work with a
committee of the Planning Commission. The project architect presented three options for the sidewalk
location along El Camino Real,he noted that the surface grade was pretty well fixed by the requirements to
cover the SF-PUD water line,also there is a meandering pathway up closer to the building,at a higher grade
than the sidewalk which they intend to install,gave commissioners three schematic options for the sidewalk,
which they discussed.
Public Comment continued: do not want you to put off decision about the path(fire lane)behind our house,
we are here tonight and if you put off you will decide without the neighbors participating; things we have
wanted you have not done,would like to see you improve this pathway,want to look at a nice appealing path
not a street; currently it is dusty, there is awful vibration from construction, you should not hold over or
compromise on the pathway. Commissioner noted that there are other surfaces which would be aesthetically
acceptable which is more reason to refer this to the subcommittee so everyone involved can understand.
Feel that a 20 foot wide path is excessive; a traffic lane is only 12 feet,why does it need to be 20 feet wide?
Should be a surface which percolates since there is a drainage problem from this site on El Camino Real
where the present sidewalk ends. Have observed people walking in this area for years,observation is that a
linear sidewalk will get more use; Caltrans has made a concerted effort to remove trees along El Camino so
it is good to have them planted on the hospital property where they cannot remove them in the future. There
were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion: Regarding the Fire Lane the commission needs to have more information, for the
street lights need to see the best examples in the field, sidewalks are generally lineal and since there is an
inner pathway which meanders there are choices for walkers in this area.
C. Brownrigg made a motion to continue this item for additional information and have a subcommittee
meeting devoted to these hospital issues so that the neighbors may attend. There was no second; and the
motion died.
Commission discussion: Subcommittee should have a representative from the Fire Department there so that
their issues are understood, it can be an open meeting; in the evening.
Chair Auran made a motion to refer the fire lane and street light standard issues to the North
Burlingame/Rollins Road Implementation Subcommittee for further consideration. The motion was
seconded by C. Deal.
Comment on the motion: CA noted that the sidewalk issue needs to be resolved sooner because the city must
back up the hospital's application to CalTrans for a permit; the city must workout maintenance
responsibilities which do not involve CalTrans before CalTrans will act.
Chair Auran moved to have the subcommittee address the light standard and fire lane issues at a public
meeting, including all responsible agencies. The second, C. Deal, agreed.
16
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to refer the fire lane and street light standard issues to the
North Burlingame/Rollins Road subcommittee,to hold a public meeting including the Fire Department and
�-' other city agencies and to include the neighbors. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
Discussion continued on the sidewalk: like options 1 or 2 which depict a more linear sidewalk,not see a lot
of difference between these two alternatives,sidewalk is over so that trees can be planted between the street
and the sidewalk for most of the way,curves at the ends are different. Is one allowed to ride a bicycle on the
sidewalk? CA noted not in a business district, do not know how the area by the hospital is classified. How
wide is the proposed sidewalk? Six feet. CP noted that the sidewalks in the Bayfront area are 8 feet. Hear
the consensus that the primary sidewalk should be as straight as possible with the trees between the street
and sidewalk and 8 feet wide to provide more room for mixed uses.
C. Vistica moved to approve option 2 as the preferred location for the sidewalk with a width of 8 feet
because it is a safer dimension for users. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve option 2 for the sidewalk alignment along El
Camino Real with a paved width of 8 feet and landscaped as shown on option 2. The motion passed on a 7-0
voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:05 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
7. 2010 BROADWAY,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(JAMES AND MARA
FERRARO, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (54
NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
C. Deal recused himself from this item because he has a business relationship with the applicant. He left the
dais and chambers. ZT Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of
staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. James Ferraro, applicant and property owner, represented the
project, stating that the design of the addition is sympathetic to the design of the existing house and to the
neighborhood. Commission asked: the proposed slate roofing is an asset to the project,will it actually be
used or will synthetic slate material be installed?If budget allows,slate material will be used. Will second
story balcony on bedroom number 2 take away from neighbor's privacy? No; there is a wide separation
between the two homes because of the backyards and because of a 15' City easement that runs between the
two properties. The mock-balcony at the front of the house off the master bedroom looks odd because it has
no access,no door. Applicant stated this balcony is designed to be sympathetic to the lower balustrade and
for design purposes only. Do the double doors on the rear elevation provide access to the utilities?Yes. Is
the trim around the windows simulated stone trim or a Styrofoam trim? It will be a cement based product
that will be as narrow as possible so there is not too much bulk around the windows and doors. There were
no other comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions
have been made and plan checked:
• The option to put in a door to access the balcony at the front of the house, or consider removing the
balustrade and doing something different here to make the area look like a porch roof; and
17
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
• Needs a final decision on the proposed roofing material, real slate or some other material.
This motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:20 p.m.
8. 469 BLOOMFIELD ROAD, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (GARY AND STACY
O'GRADY, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND KATRINA KUHL, ARCHITECT) (72
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Katrina Kuhl,architect,represented the project. Commissioners
made the following comments:
• Basically a good project,just minor changes to the plans to bring it to next step;
• Indicate the actual size of each window on the plans, indicate egress windows in bedrooms;
• Change elevations to the %a inch scale size;
• Revise the trellis over the garage,needs support or redesign so it looks as if it is supported,could be
narrow;
• All eaves should be stepped back and should be the same size; correct this in a number of places
throughout the plans;
• Clarify the location of the uppermost window shown at the rear;
• The gutter needs to stick out on the west elevation roof line; the roof is engulfing the gutter; all
gutters should be shown on the plans at this stage of the process;
• On elevation number 2,the pocket in the soffit windows will look like a mistake,revise,may mean
increasing the plate height and thus the height of the house;
• Roof height of 30' is ok;what is the second story plate height? Show the plate heights on the plans
(7'-9"); could go over 30' in height with a special permit application for architectural purposes and
to frame the windows better;
• The chimney shown on elevations 1 and 2 is different, make consistent;
• Rear elevation 9"continuous overhang should show on side elevations;
• Gutters not consistent on plans; gutter should show that it wraps around;
• A lot of detail work is needed on the plans;the relationship between the eaves,roof and gutters needs
to be shown;
• Front elevation entry door seems cramped, do something so that it does not look like a back door;
• Site plan showing existing neighboring houses is great and helpful;
• Take one of the three proposed new 24"box size landscape trees in the rear and plant it in the front
of the property on the right hand side of the driveway to reduce the visual scale of the house; and
• There should be vines planted along the trellis area, identify what you will plant.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
18
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
C. Deal made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the directed revisions
have been made to the plans and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:40 p.m.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of November 21, 2005.
CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of November 21,2005,noting that the application
period for the Commission seat vacated because C. Keighran was elected to the City Council will close
Friday,December 9,2005,applications are available in the City Manager's office. The Council will appoint
the interview committee at their meeting on December 5,2005. CP Monroe also noted that DPW has just
completed an Urban Water Management Plan for the city which evaluates the current water availability for
the City and discusses how water shortages can be handled. She noted that the City Council would hold
their regular meeting on December 19,2005. There was a letter from a neighbor regarding 1453 Cypress.
Commissioners expressed concern that inclusionary zoning was being misused, the purpose of relaxing
requirements was so that applicants for multiple family developments could increase their densities,instead
they are building bigger units,replacing fewer than they are removing,including affordable units. CA noted
that the city's has hired an expert to give us some advice on local inclusionary regulations, because
Burlingame is not big enough to have the vehicles for retention of these units that other communities have.
A report will be made in the Spring
FYI—review of requested changes to an approved design review project at 1149 Drake Avenue.
The Planning Commission approved the proposed changes to the project at 1149 Drake Avenue.
FYI—review of requested changes to an approved design review project at 1506 Alturas Drive.
Commissioner noted that the proposal to change the side of this building will make it look odd and would be
visible from the street. Suggested that the width of the chimney be changed from 2'-2"to 2'-6",that the right
side of the chimney be extended straight to the ground(the angled projection removed) and that the lower
roof on the right side be doubled in length to meet the flattened right side of the chimney. If appropriate the
revised plans should be returned on the FYI calendar.
In recognition that this was C. Keighran's last meeting as a Planning Commissioner, the Planning
Commission thanked her for her service and teamwork and wished Commissioner Keighran well in her new
endeavor as a member of the City Council.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 11:00 p.m.
�. Respectfully submitted,
19
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
Michael Brownrigg, Secretary
S AM INUTES\unapproved.11.28.05.doc
20
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
October 31, 2005
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv, 365 Equiv.
LAIF&County Pool 16,721,256.73 16,721,256.73 16,721,256.73 62.58 1 1 3.359 3.406
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 10,000,000.00 9,863,430.00 10,000,000.00 37.42 950 465 3.115 3.159
26,721,256.73 26,584,686.73 26,721,256.73 100.00% 356 175 3.268 3.313
Investments
Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 68,905.53 298,800.60
Average Daily Balance 25,570,969.81 28,354,240.27
Effective Rate of Return 3.17% 3.13%
Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and
availamy of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g. Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds).
J US NA FINANCE DIR./TREASURER
Reporting period 10/01/2005-10/31/2005
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:11/17/2005-13:02 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
October 31, 2005
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
LAIF&County Pool
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 6,746,719.51 6,746,719.51 6,746,719.51 3.458 3.458 1
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 9,974,537.22 9,974,537.22 9,974,537.22 3.370 Aaa 3.370 1
Subtotal and Average 16,312,905.29 16,721,256.73 16,721,256.73 16,721,256.73 3.406 1
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 982,190.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 Aaa 3.500 598 06/22/2007
3133XARN9 518 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/08/2005 1,000,000.00 990,630.00 1,000,000.00 3.390 Aaa 3.390 311 09/08/2006
3133XDGM7 519 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2005 1,000,000.00 995,310.00 1,000,000.00 4.450 Aaa 4.450 1,088 10/24/2008
3128X16Q5 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/17/2003 2,000,000.00 1,998,120.00 2,000,000.00 2.300 Aaa 2.300 16 11/17/2005
3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,934,360.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 Aaa 3.000 455 01/30/2007
3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 978,440.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 Aaa 3.100 542 04/27/2007
3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 984,380.00 1,000,000.00 3.820 Aaa 3.547 716 10/18/2007
Subtotal and Average 9,258,064.52 10,000,000.00 9,863,430.00 10,000,000.00 3.159 465
Total and Average 25,570,969.81 26,721,256.73 26,584,686.73 26,721,256.73 3.313 175
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:11/17/2005-13:02 PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management
Page 3
Activity By Type
October 1 , 2005 through October 31 , 2005
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
LAIF & County Pool (Monthly Summary)
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV,FD. 3.458 2,049,087.32 0.00
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 3.370 591,466.48 2,400,000.00
Subtotal 16,480,702.93 2,640,553.80 2,400,000.00 16,721,256.73
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon
3133XDGM7 519 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.450 10/24/2005 1,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 9,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 10,000,000.00
Total 25,480,702.93 3,640,553.80 2,400,000.00 26,721,256.73
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 11/17/2005 - 13:02 PM (PRF_PM3) SyrnRept 6.41 .202a
Report Ver, 5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 4
Activity Summary
October 2004 through October 2005
Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number
Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average
End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity
October 2004 6 28,964,592.72 2.629 2.666 2.618 1 0 240 181
November 2004 6 25,300,063.99 2.661 2.698 2.653 0 0 275 198
December 2004 7 30,433,082.99 2.695 2.732 2.673 1 0 259 188
January 2005 7 30,025,165.46 2.659 2.696 2.622 0 0 262 182
February 2005 7 30,076,952.25 2.728 2.766 2.717 0 0 262 174
March 2005 8 27,632,224.41 2.824 2.863 2.819 1 0 305 199
April 2005 8 28,872,808.56 2.864 2.903 2.880 0 0 292 181
May 2005 8 31 ,478,082.19 2.976 3.018 3.043 0 0 268 158
June 2005 8 31 ,826,904.29 3.006 3.048 3.085 0 0 265 147
July 2005 8 30,880,702.93 3.045 3.087 3.141 0 0 273 143
August 2005 8 29,380,702.93 3.048 3.091 3.151 0 0 287 141
September 2005 8 25,480,702.93 3.125 3.168 3.285 0 0 330 151
October 2005 9 26,721 ,256.73 3.268 3.313 3.406 1 0 356 175
Average 8 29,005,634.03 2.887% 2.927% 2.930 0 0 283 171
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 11/17/2005 • 13:02 PM (PRF_PM4) SymRept 6.41 .202a
Report Ver. 5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 5
Distribution of Investments By Type
October 2004 through October 2005
October November December January February March April May June July August September October Average
Security Type 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 by Period
LAW & County Pool 75.8 72.3 73.7 73.4 73.4 67.4 68.8 71 .4 71 .7 70.9 69.4 64,7 62.6 70.4%
Certificates of Deposit - Bank
Certificates of Deposit - S & L
Certificates of Deposit-Thrift & Ln
Negotiable CD's - Bank
CORP NOTES
Bankers Acceptances
Commercial Paper - Interest Bearing
Commercial Paper - Discount _
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 24.2 27.7 26.3 26.6 26.6 32.6 31 .2 28.6 28.3 29.1 30.6 35.3 37.4 29.6%
Federal Agency Issues - Discount
Treasury Securities - Coupon _ _
Treasury Securities - Discount
Miscellaneous Securities - Coupon
Miscellaneous Securities - Discount
Non Interest Bearing Investments
Mortgage Backed Securities
Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 2 _
Miscellaneous Discounts -At Cost 3
Portfolio CITY
CID
Run Date: 11/17/2005 - 13:02 PM (PRF_PM5) SyrnRept 6.41 .202a
Report Ver. 5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 6
Interest Earnings Summary
October 31 , 2005
October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
CD/Coupon/Discount Investments:
Interest Collected 30,500.00 92,450.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 63,827.22 63,827.22
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 71 ,007.49) ( 66,482.49)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 23,319.73 89,794.73
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 23,319.73 89,794.73
Pass Through Securities:
Interest Collected 0.00 0.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00
Cash/Checking Accounts:
Interest Collected 163,420.07 324,975.96
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 308,673.15 308,673.15
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 426,507.42) ( 424,643.24)
Interest Earned during Period 45,585.80 209,005.87
Total Interest Earned during Period 68,905.53 298,800.60
Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Total Earnings during Period 68,905.53 298,800.60
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date: 11/17/2005 - 13:02 PM (PRF_PM6) SyrnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver. 5.00
04BD
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
October 31 , 2005
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
No Active Investments 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.000 0.000
0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 0 0 0.000 0.000
Investments
Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 140.74 16,405.58
Average Daily Balance 49,851.79 1 ,409,714.16
Effective Rate of Return 3.32% 3.45%
.00
/BGG�rS"
esus NarinanceDir,/Treasurer
Reporting period 10/01/2005-10/31/2005
Portfolio 04BD
CP
Run Date: 11/17/2005 - 13:04 PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver. 5.00
04BD
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
October 31, 2005
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
SYS85 85 Local Agency Investment Fund 0.00 0,00 0.00 3.324 3.324 1
Subtotal and Average 49,851.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
Total and Average 49,851.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0
Portfolio 04BD
CP
Run Date:11/17/2005-13:04
PM(PRF_PM2)SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
in
CALIFORNIA ASSET STATEMENT
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
J 0 t N ! PO u . P. RS A UT H OR t r y
90 CA:LR'0RN1.A S`CREE'D 23RD FI-00R.
S A'NFR:lNLiSC 0 C7ALIFOoRNIA v.+ t t > FOR ACCOUNT
INFORMATION: 800-729-7665
STATEMENT DATE: 10/31/2005
CITY OF BURLINGAME ACCOUNT NUMBER: 116-00
ATTN: TREASURER'S OFFICE
WATER AND WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2004 FUND NAME: Cash Reserve Portfolio
501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Page 1 of 1
Account SuMMt ail asiaf 1' 112Ap5 '� r
.fv .v^�4Ya.dF oc... ..
a.m.4m..;-!`.'. _
Statement Income Dividends Capital Gains Total Shares Account
Date Paid This Year Paid This Year Owned Value
10/31/2005 $15,975.28 $0.00 1 ,346,676.540 $1 ,346,676.54
Vis. ,� �„�. ..x� �, :- �s� a"_ �:+sa'* '� zr 3`,'i � - a�`"� 2�`�'.G� a ,.-..,vs a : is,•_a- �^ '��s se� +'2+. '' �.sic *'"t-? s
M 'tt
j� r
Beginning Balance Purchases Reinvestments Redemptions Ending Balance
$463,597.50 $1 ,000,000.00 $3,079.04 $120,000.00 $1 ,346,676.54
) `
x� � r r
10/01/05 Beginning Balance 463,597.500
10/14/05 10/14/2005 Purchase - IndPortfol $1 ,000,000.00 $1 .00 1 ,000,000.000 1 ,463,597.500
10/21/05 10/21/2005 Redemption - Wire Red. $120,000.00- $1 .00 120,000.000 - 1 ,343,597.500
10/31/05 11/1/2005 Accrual Income Div Reinvestment - DIV $3,079.04 $1 .00 3,079.040 1 ,346,676.540
Message Line: The Monthly Distribution Yield is 3.60°/x.
The MonthlV Effective Annual Yield is 3.66'/x.
PFM Asset ManagenteAFLLC
- CAMP PROGRAM
Investment Portfolio Information For
CAMP - CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00)
Portfolio #
12510150
Section / Report Title
A. Account Summary
B. Detail of Securities Held
C. Fair Market Values & Analytics
D. Security Transactions & Interest
E. Cash Transactions Report
F. Realized Gains & Losses
G. Cash Balance Report
For The Month Ending
October 31, 2005
CAMP - CITY OF BURLINGAME
CA
PFM Asset Management LLC * One Keystone Plaza * North Front & Market Streets, Suite 300 * Harrisburg, PA 17101-2044 * (717)232-2723
For more information, please contact your client manager: NSESA KAZADI (415)982-5544 KAZADIN@pfin.com
PFM Asset I PROGRAM I , I
Account Summary: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: October 31 2005
MARKT%OF YTM AT YTM AT DURATION
SECURITY TYPE PAR VALUE AMORTIZED COST MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO COST MARKET TO WORST
COMMERCIAL PAPER 1,000,000.00 988,958.33 987,608.47 8.104 3.834 4.221 0.287
FED AGY BOND/NOTE 3,800,000.00 3,786,314.10 3,772,812.50 30.957 3.987 4.470 0.701
FED AGY DN 7,560,000.00 7,441,802.82 7,426,772.29 60.939 3.790 4.229 0.397
TOTAL SECURITIES 12,360,000.00 12,217,075.25 12,187,193.26 100.000 3.855% 4.303% 0.482
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 12,360,000.00 12,217,075.25 12,187,193.26 100.000%
ACCRUED INTEREST 39,959.72 39,959.72
TOTAL PORTFOLIO $12,360,000.00 $12,257,034.97 $12,227,152.98
Disclosure Statement: PFM's monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes(i.e.settles)all investment transactions.The custodian
statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.Only the client has the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian and to direct the movement of securities.Clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies,implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.PFM recognizes that our clients may use these
reports to facilitate record keeping,therefore the custodian bank statement and the PFM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.PFM's market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last
business day of the month as supplied by F.T.Interactive Data,Bloomberg or Telerate.Prices that fall bn data points are interpolated. Non-negotiable FDIC insured bank certificates of depot/ oriced at par.
PFM Asset Mtmaf)'e111dhLLC- CAMP PROGRAM
Detail ur Securities Held: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: October 31,2005
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY S&P TRADE SETTLE ORIGINAL YTM ACCRUED AMORTIZED MARKET
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE RATING DATE DATE COST AT COST INTEREST COST VALUE
COMMERCIAL PAPER
36959JBF9 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 1,000,000 02/15/06 A-I+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 978,020.83 3.834 0.00 988,958.33 987,608.47
, 0 8
FED AGY BOND/NOTE
7,608.47
31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5,250 06/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,011,340.00 3.958 19,833.33 1,007,841.94 1,004,687.50
31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 991,682.00 3.991 9,201.39 994,042.69 990,625.00
3133X85Z1 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,778,891.40 4.002 10,925.00 1,784,429.47 1,777,500.00
FED AGY DN 3,800,000 3,781,913.40 3.987 39,959.72 3,786,314,10 3,772,812.50
313397PGO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/15/05 A-l+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 988,430,56 3.541 0.00 998,638.89 998,339.46
313589QM8 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/14/05 A-1+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 985,405.56 3.603 0.00 995,759.72 995,115.36
313385RTS FHLB DISC NOTE 1,000,000 01/13/06 A-l+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 982,200.00 3.665 0.00 992,700.00 991,722.29
313397UG4 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 03/15/06 A-1+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 975,270.14 3.819 0.00 986,134.72 984,439.46
313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 A-I+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 972,276.89 3.830 0.00 983,138.56 980,825.43
313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 A-l+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 969,260.50 3.844 0.00 980,128.00 977,191.16
313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 A-l+ 09/22/05 09/22/05 1,498,508,27 4.081 0.00 1,505,302.93 1,499,139.13
7,560,000 7,371,35 1.92 3.790 0.00 7,441,802.82 7,426,772.29
TOTAL SECURITIES $12,360,000 $12,131,286.15 3.855% $39,959.72 $12,217,075.25 $12,187,193.26
Issuers by Market Value Ratings by Market Value
17 FHLB $2,789,222 22.7%
■FHLMC $5,439,935 44.6% $8,414,381 69.0%
Q FWA $2,990,428 24.5% ❑A•1-
■[:FN n TRI. $487 808 8 1% AAA $3,772,813 31.0%
Total: $72,187,193 100.0% Total: $12,187,193100.0%
B-I
PFM Asseti PROGRAM
Fair Market Values & Analytics: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: October 31,2005
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY FIRST CALL MARKET MARKET UNREAL G/(L) UNREAL G/(L) DURATION YTM
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE DATE PRICE VALUE ON AMORT COST ON COST TO WORST AT MKT
COMMERCIAL PAPER
36959JBF9 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 1,000,000 02/15/06 98.761 987,608.47 (1,349.86) 9,587.64 0.287 4.221
FED AGY BOND/NOTE
31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5.250 06/15/06 100.469 1,004,687.50 (3,154.44) (6,652.50) 0.599 4.448
31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 99.063 990,625.00 (3,417.69) (1,057.00) 0.685 4,466
3133X85Z1 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 98.750 1,777,500.00 (6,929.47) (1,391.40) 0.767 4.484
FED AGY DN
313397PGO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/15/05 99.834 998,339.46 (299.43) 9,908.90 0.040 3.992
313589QM8 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/14/05 99.5.12 995,115.36 (644.36) 9,709.80 0.118 4.016
313385RT5 FHLB DISC NOTE 1,000,000 01/13/06 99.172 991,722.29 (977.71) 9,522.29 0.199 4.061
3133971UG4 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 03/15/06 98.444 984,439.46 (1,695.26) 9,169.32 0.362 4.215
313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 98.083 980,825.43 (2,313.13) 8,548.54 0.440 4.291
313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 97.719 977,191.16 (2,936.84) 7,930.66 0.517 4.354
313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 96.099 1,499,139.13 (6,163.80) 630.86 0.865 4.525
SUBTOTALS $12,187,193.26 ($29,881.99) $55,907.11 0.482 4.303 %
ACCRUED INTEREST ON INVESTMENT 39,959.72
TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF INVESTMENTS $12,227,152.98
PFM
Asset CAMP
PROGRAM
Security Transactions & Interest: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash)
MONTH ENDED: October 31,2005
S&P MATURITY PRINCIPAL ACCRUED
TRADE SETTLE TRAN TYPE SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP RATING PAR COUPON DATE AMOUNT INTEREST TOTAL
10/14/05 10/14/05 MATURITY UBS FINANCE DELAWARE LLC COMM P 90262CXE2 A-1+ 1,000,000 0.000 10/14/05 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000 1,000,000.00 0.00 19000,000.00
TOTAL SECURITY TRANSACTIONS 1,000,000.00
D-1
PFM Asset Management LLC-CAMP PROGRAM
Cash Transactions Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
MONTH ENDED: October 31,2005
CASH DATE TRANSACTION CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
10/14/05 CW CASH WITHDRAW (1,000,000.00)
(1,000,000.00)
NET CASH CONTRIBUTIONS/(WITHDRAWS) ($1,000,000.00)
E-I
PFM Asset Manqgem�A ILC - CAMP PROGRAM
Realizeu Gains and Losses: 12510150 CAMP- CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00)
(Excluding Cash)
MONTH ENDED: October 31, 2005
TRADE SETTLE PRINCIPAL REALIZED REALIZED
DATE DATE TRAN TYPE SALE METHOD SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP PAR VALUE COUPON PROCEEDS G/(L) COST G/(L)AMORT CST
10/14/05 10/14/05 MATURITY UBS FINANCE DELAWARE LLC COMM PAPE 90262CXE2 1,000,000 0.000 1,000,000.00 8,434.17 0.00
TOTAL GAINS AND LOSSES $8,434.17 $0.00
F-1
PFM Asset Management LLC- CAMP PROGRAM
Cash Balance Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
MONTH ENDED: October 31,2005
CASH BALANCE: $0,00
Earnin¢s Calculation Templates
Current Month-End Book Value + Add Coupon Interest Received +
Current Month-End Accrued Interest + Less Purchased Interest Related to Coupons
Less Purchases Add/Subtract Gains or Losses on Cost For The Mth +/_
Less Purchased Interest
Total Cost Basis Earnings For The Month
Add Disposals(Sales,Maturities,Paydowns,Sinks,etc.) +
Add Coupon Interest Received +
Less Previous Month-End Book Value
Less Previous Month-End Accrued Interest
Total Accrual Basis Earnings For The Month
Economic Calendar
11/01/05 FOMC Meeting 11/17/05 Initial Jobless Claims
11/03/05 Initial Jobless Claims 11/22/05 Fed Minutes
11/04/05 Change in Nonfarm Payrolls 11/25/05 Initial Jobless Claims
11/10/05 Initial Jobless Claims 11/29/05 Durable Goods Orders
I 1/15/05 Producer Price Index 11/30/05 GDP Annualized
11/16/05 Consumer Price Index 11/30/05 Chicago Purchasing Manager
Market Commentary
the market's focus has turned to inflation and what the Fed is willing to do to keep it under control. Some key economic releases in the month of October have indicated that inflation pressures may be building.At the
same time several Fed Governors have indicated the need to keep inflation under control. President Bush nominated Ben Bernanke to replace Alan Greenspan as the Fed chairman.The market seems pleased with the
nomination and Mr.Bernanke's qualifications. If he is confirmed by the Senate Mr.Bernanke will chair his first FOMC meeting on March 28,2006.There are two FOMC meetings scheduled for the remainder of 2005
and the market expects that the Fed will increase the overnight lending rate an additional 25 basis points at each meeting,If the Fed does as the market expects the fed funds rate will finish the,ybar at 4,25%.
( ( G-I
a
11-15-05 SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES PAGE: 1
FOR: OCTOBER, 2005
Current Prev
Last Actual Actual YTD YTD
Crime Classification....... ........ ..... Current Year. . YTD.. YTD.. Change t Change
Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0
Manslaughter by Negligence 0 0 0 0 0
Rape By Force 1 0 2 4 -2 -50.00
Attempt to Commit Forcible Rape 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00
Robbery Firearm 1 1 8 7 1 14.29
Robbery Knife 1 0 1 0 1
Robbery Other Dangerous Weapon 0 2 3 7 -4 -57.14
Robbery Strong-Arm 1 0 10 2 8 400.00
Assault - Firearm 0 0 2 0 2
Assault - Knife 2 0 8 6 2 33.33
Assault - Other Dangerous Weapon 4 2 17 18 -1 -5.56
Assault - Hands,Fists,Feet 0 0 4 11 -7 -63.64
Assault - Other (Simple) 30 24 158 177 -19 -10.73
Burglary - Forcible Entry 5 3 69 70 -1 -1.43
Burglary Unlawful Entry 4 2 52 78 -26 -33.33
Burglary - Attempted Forcible Entry 0 0 2 0 2
Larceny Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0
Larceny Purse-Snatching 0 0 0 0 0
Larceny Shoplifting 5 1 37 26 11 42.31
Larceny From Motor Vehicle 33 16 205 237 -32 -13.50
Larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories 23 1 128 46 82 178.26
Larceny Bicycles 2 4 28 26 2 7.69
Larceny From Building 12 2 99 14 85 607.14
Larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine 1 0 18 11 7 63.64
Larceny All Other 6 24 93 240 -147 -61.25
Motor Vehicle Theft Auto 9 10 69 98 -29 -29.59
Motor Vehicle Theft Bus 1 0 8 1 7 700.00
Motor Vehicle Theft Other 1 1 2 6 -4 -66.67 _
------- ------ ------- -------
142 93 1,023 1,086
142 93 1,023 1,086
11-15-05 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 1
CITY REPORT FOR: OCTOBER, 2005
Current Prev
Last Actual Actual YTD YTD
Crime Classification... ..... ............ Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change
All Other Offenses 42 26 417 366 51 13.93
Animal Abuse 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00
Animal Nuisance 0 0 4 0 4
Arson 4 0 12 4 8 200.00
Assists to Outside Agencies 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycle Violations 0 0 0 0 0
Bigamy 0 0 0 0 0
Bomb Offense 0 0 0 0 0
Bomb Threat 0 0 2 0 2
Bribery 0 0 0 0 0
Check Offenses 0 0 4 3 1 33.33
Child Neglect/prot custody 3 0 28 16 12 75.00
Computer Crime 0 0 0 0 0
Conspiracy 0 0 0 0 0
Credit Card Offenses 0 0 0 0 0
Cruelty to Dependent Adult 0 0 2 3 -1 -33.33
Curfew and Loitering Laws 0 2 2 2 0 0.00
Death Investigation 1 2 37 25 12 48.00
Disorderly Conduct 2 1 27 20 7 35.00
Driver's License Violations 2 0 7 4 3 75.00
Driving Under the Influence 5 6 60 65 -5 -7.69
Drug Abuse Violations 4 4 28 38 -10 -26.32
Drug/Sex Registrants/Violations 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00
Drunkeness 6 6 47 49 -2 -4.08
Embezzlement 0 0 7 15 -8 -53.33
Escape 0 0 0 0 0
Extortion 0 0 0 0 0
False Police Reports 0 0 0 0 0
False Reports of Emergency 0 0 0 0 0
Fish and Game Violations 0 0 0 0 0
Forgery and Counterfeiting 4 3 38 36 2 5.56
Found Property 11 2 93 88 5 5.68
Fraud 1 4 22 29 -7 -24.14
Gambling 0 0 0 0 0
Harrassing Phone Calls 3 0 29 39 -10 -25.64
ti
11-15-05 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 2
CITY REPORT FOR: OCTOBER, 2005
Current Prev
Last Actual Actual YTD YTD
Crime Classification...... . .... ......... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change
Hit and Run Accidents 3 4 31 46 -15 -32.61
Impersonation 0 0 4 3 1 33.33
Incest 0 0 0 0 0
Indecent Exposure 7 0 13 3 10 333.33
Intimidating a Witness 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00
Kidnapping 0 0 0 0 0
Lewd Conduct 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00
Liquor Laws 1 2 7 7 0 0.00
Littering/Dumping 0 0 0 0 0
Marijuana Violations 3 2 21 23 -2 -8.70
Mental Health Cases 9 6 66 92 -26 -28.26
Missing Person 5 7 42 48 -6 -12.50
Missing Property 11 8 83 85 -2 -2.35
Municipal Code Violations 2 11 58 67 -9 -13.43
Narcotics Sales/Manufacture 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00
Offenses Against Children 0 0 3 2 1 50.00
Other Assaults 30 24 158 177 -19 -10.73
Other Juvenile Offenses 0 0 3 2 1 50.00
Other Police Service 7 2 62 63 -1 -1.59
Pandering for immoral purposes 0 0 0 0 0
Parole Violations 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00
Perjury 0 0 0 0 0
Possession of Burglary Tools 0 0 1 0 1
Possession of drug paraphernalia 0 0 0 0 0
Possession of obscene literature;picture 0 0 0 0 0
Probation violations 0 0 3 3 0 0.00
Prostitution and Commercial Vice 0 0 1 2 -1 -50.00
Prowling 0 0 2 0 2
Resisting Arrest 0 1 4 4 0 0.00
Restraining Orders 1 9 13 51 -38 -74.51
Runaways (Under 18) _ 0 0 0 0 0
Sex Offenses 0 0 2 1 1 100.00
Sex Offenses against Children 0 0 1 1 0 0.00
Sodomy 0 0 0 0 0
Stalking 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00
"v
11-15-05 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 3
CITY REPORT FOR: OCTOBER, 2005
Current Prev
Last Actual Actual YTD YTD
Crime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD. . YTD.. Change W Change
Statutory Rape 0 0 2 0 2
Stolen Property;Buying;Receiving;Possess 0 0 4 4 0 0.00
Suspended License 0 4 22 37 -15 -40.54.
Tax Evasion 0 0 0 0 0
Terrorist Threats 3 2 8 24 -16 -66.67
Towed Vehicle 25 54 322 389 -67 -17.22
Trespassing 0 1 7 12 -5 -41.67
Truants/Incorrigible Juvs 0 1 1 4 -3 -75.00
US Mail Crimes 0 0 0 0 0
Vagrancy 0 0 0 0 0
Vandalism 8 14 194 163 31 19.02
Vehicle Code Violations 3 4 27 27 0 0.00
Violation of Court Order 2 3 14 20 -6 -30.00
Warrants - Felony 2 1 13 13 0 0.00
Warrants - Misd 12 6 71 52 19 36.54
Weapons;Carrying,Possessing 0 0 9 15 -6 -40.00
Welfare Fraud 0 0 _ 0 0 0
------- ------ ------- -------
222 222 2,139 2,251
222 222 2,139 2,251
11-15-05 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS PAGE: 1
CITY REPORT
FOR: OCTOBER, 2005
Current Prev
Last Actual Actual
Crime Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current Year. . YTD. . YTD. .
Parking Citations 2048 4, 263 27, 933 42 , 550
Moving Citations 104 225 1, 192 2 , 717
------- ------ ------- -------
2152 4 , 488 29, 125 45 , 267
------- ------ ------- -------
------- ------ ------- -------
2152 4 , 488 29, 125 45 , 267
,F
BURLINGAME
Officer Productivity. . . . generated on 11/15/2005 at 09: 45 : 10 AM
Reported On: A11 Officers Report Range: 10/01/2005 to 10/31/2005
Data Type Reported on: PARKING
Valid All Voids All %
Officer: ID: Cnt Valid Cnt Voids Valid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4LVISO 355 193 9.95 1 4.76 99.48
DAZA-QUIROZ 634 245 12.63 3 14.29 98.79
EEITELBERG 508 784 40.41 7 33.33 99.12
HARRISON 506 173 8.92 3 14.29 98.30
KIRKPATRICK 502 445 22.94 5 23.81 98.89
MORAN 201 100 5.15 2 9.52 98.04
Total 1940 21 ,
Page 1 of 1