HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2005.12.19 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BURCity of Burlingame
Regular Meeting - Monday, December 19, 2005 CITY HALL- 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
Page 1 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
3. ROLL CALL
4. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of December 5, 2005 Approve
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS The mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS -At this time,persons in the audience may speak on
any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The
Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from
acting on any matter which is not on the agenda. It is the policy of council to refer such
matters to staff for investigation and/or action. Speakers are requested to fill out a
"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor
may limit speakers to three minutes each.
7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a. Consider Appointments to Beautification Commission Appoint
b. Study proposed amendment to the zoning map and revised Discuss/Direct
zoning regulations for the Rollins Road industrial area
C. Introduce an Ordinance prohibiting spectators to gather at Introduce
or be present within 200 feet of illegal speed contests,
exhibitions of speed, or sideshows
8. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve
a. Approval for tentative and final parcel map for lot
combination at 1441 and 1445 Bellevue Avenue
b. Approve contract to Economic Research Associates for
Downtown Economic Study and authorize appropriation of
funds
C. Approve rotation list for offices of Mayor and Vice Mayor
d. Approval of Transient Occupancy Tax refund for
Doubletree Hotel as related to the Chapter 11 filed by
United Airlines and Air Canada Airlines
e. Warrants and Payroll
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
BUR6INGAME BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame
Regular Meeting - Monday, December 19, 2005 CITY HALL 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
Page 2 of 2 BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010
(650) 558-7200
a. Commission Minutes: Parks & Recreation,November 17,
2005; Beautification, December 1, 2005; Planning,
December 12, 2005
b. Department Reports: Finance,November, 2005; Building,
November, 2005
C. Two letters from Comcast concerning programming
changes and a price adjustment
13. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION
CLOSED SESSION
Threatened Litigation(Government Code § 54956.9(b)(1), (3)(c))
a. Claim of Jonathan Sharp
b. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government
Code § 54957.6:
City Negotiators: Jim Nantell, Deirdre Dolan, Glenn Berkheimer
Labor Organizations: Police Officers Association; Police
Administrators
NOTICE:Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities,please contact the City Clerk at
(650)558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for
public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall,501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.
before the meeting and at the meeting.Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas
and minutes are available at this site.
NEXT MEETING—Tuesday,January 3, 2006
��CITY C
Q
BV.Wb!9AME
Oo-
BURLINGAME
'hFoA$.—� 6CITY COUNCIL
Unapproved Minutes
Regular Meeting of December 5, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER
A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall
Council Chambers. Mayor Cathy Baylock called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Led by Mary Thompson.
INVOCATION
Pastor Pete Garrison of the Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd led the invocation.
3. ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Nagel, O'Mahony
COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: Galligan
4. MINUTES
Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 21, 2005 Special and Regular
Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by voice vote, 3-0-1
(Galligan absent).
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments from the floor.
6. DECLARING ELECTION RESULTS
a. DECLARING RESULTS OF NOVEMBER 8, 2005 ELECTION
CC Mortensen reviewed the staff report and requested Council adopt Resolution No. 90-2005 declaring the
results of the November 8, 2005 election. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to adopt Resolution No.
90-2005 declaring the results of the November 8, 2005 election; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel, approved
unanimously by voice vote, 3-0-1 (Galligan absent).
1
Burlingame City Council December 5, 2005
Unapproved Minutes
b. DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF NEW COUNCIL MEMBERS
Mayor Baylock requested moving this item to Ceremonial, item 7.b., after seating of the new Council
Members; Council concurred.
7. CEREMONIAL
a. SEATING OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
New Councilwoman Ann Keighran was sworn in by Former San Francisco Mayor Frank Jordan; new
Councilman Russ Cohen, by his father, Alfred Cohen; City Clerk Doris Mortensen, by City Manager Jim
Nantell; re-elected Councilwoman Rosalie O'Mahony, by Assemblyman Gene Mullin; and re-elected Mayor
Cathy Baylock, by her mother, Mary Thompson. Mayor Baylock then asked new Council Members Ann
Keighran and Russ Cohen to join the rest of the Council on the dais.
b. DETERMINATION OF SENORITY OF NEW COUNCIL MEMBERS
CC Mortensen asked the two new council members to draw straws to determine their position relative to
each other at the bottom of the Council rotation list as required by Resolution No. 117-1999. Councilwoman
Keighran drew the longer straw winning the position next in line to follow Councilwoman O'Mahony.
Mayor Baylock opened comments from the floor. Lions Club members Paul Davis, Diane Condon Wirgler,
Eric Winkler and Ken Newman jointly toasted Councilman Cohen (Lion Russ). Kent Lauder commented on
the election.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1774 ADDING THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO TO THE SAN
MATEO COUNTY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt Ordinance No.
1774, adding the City of East Palo Alto to the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District.
Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 1774, amending the San Mateo County
Tourism Business Improvement District to add the City of East Palo Alto to the District; seconded by
Councilman Cohen, approved unanimously by voice vote 5-0.
Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the ordinance at least 15 days after
adoption.
b. ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR YEAR 2006 FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY
TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
CA Anderson requested Council hold a public hearing on the levy of assessments for 2006 and adopt
Resolution No. 91-2005 adopting assessments for 2006 for the San Mateo County Tourism Business
Improvement District.
2
Burlingame City Council December 5,2005
Unapproved Minutes
Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was
closed.
Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 91-2005 establishing and levying Year 2006
assessments for the San Mateo County Tourism Business Improvement District and approving district
programs and activities for Year 2006; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony, approved unanimously by
voice vote, 5-0.
9. STAFF REPORTS
a. APPOINT INTERVIEW SUBCOMMITTEES FOR COMMISSION VACANCIES
Mayor Baylock appointed herself and Councilwoman Keighran to interview Planning Commission
applicants and appointed Councilwoman O'Mahony and Councilman Cohen to interview Beautification
Commission applicants.
Note: Following Consent Calendar approval (item 10.), the application period for Planning Commissioner
was extended from December 9, 2005, to January 3, 2006.
b. APPROVAL OF TWO DAY SUSPENSION OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT IN THE
BROADWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT
CM Nantell reviewed the staff report and requested Council consider a request from the Broadway BID to
provide two hours of free parking in the Broadway Business District for two days, December 16 and 17,
2005.
Each Council Member spoke against this request due in part to the potential revenue loss and suggested
Broadway merchants consider other ways to stimulate more business on Broadway.
From the floor, Ross Bruce, President of the Broadway BID, stated that the Broadway merchants realized
that free parking could result in unintended consequences and withdrew the request.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2006
CC Mortensen requested Council approve Council Assignments for 2006.
b. RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT 2006 COUNCIL MEETING DATES
CC Mortensen requested Council approve the 2006 Council Meeting Dates.
Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel,
approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0.
At this time, Mayor Baylock extended the application period for Planning Commissioner from December 9,
2005, to January 3, 2006, as suggested by Vice Mayor Nagel. (See Note in item 9.a.)
3
Burlingame City Council December 5,2005
Unapproved Minutes
NEW BUSINESS
a. Mayor Baylock requested council members provide her with input before December 16, 2005, about
candidates for the vacant seat on the North County Transportation Authority. She advised of her support for
Councilwoman O'Mahony who is running for the Mid County seat left vacant by Former Mayor Galligan.
11. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
a. Commission Minutes: Library, September 20, 2005 and October 18, 2005; Planning, November 28,
2005
b. Department Reports: Finance, October 2005; Police, October 2005
12. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Baylock adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. in memory of Natalie Lanam and Stu Shafer.
Respectfully submitted,
Doris J. Mortensen
City Clerk
4
Burlingame City Council December 5,2005
Unapproved Minutes
CITY AGENDA
oc ITEM# ---7a -
BURLNGAME STAFF REPORT
MTG.
r ; DATE December 19,?005—
,oQo
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUB
MI
BY
DATE: December 13, 2005
AP ROVED
FROM: Netie Shinday (558-7204) BY
SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to Beautification Commission
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider appointment recommendations of interview committee and make appointments or take
other action.
BACKGROUND:
Two commission positions are due for appointment because of term expirations. The positions were
publicized and notification letters were sent to all past commission applicants on the City's 2-year
waiting list. Three applications were received as of the deadline of October 31, 2005. Those
applicants will be interviewed by the Council subcommittee of Russ Cohen and Rosalie O'Mahony on
December 14, 2005. The interview committee will make their recommendation at the Council
meeting on December 19, 2005.
The appointee terms will be for three years each, ending in October 2008.
, CITY o� STAFF REPORT
BURLJNCAME AGENDA
ITEM# 7b
,�oq 90
MTG.
°�A.TEDJVNE6 DATE 12.19.05
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED
BY
DATE: DECEMBER 12 2005
APPROVED, �
FROM: CITY PLANNER BY ? 4, ;ff
SUBJECT: STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONINq/MAP AND REVISED ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA.
Procedure:
The purpose of a study item is to familiarize the City Council members with the proposed zoning changes for
the Rollins Road industrial area. These changes are necessary because of the adoption of the North
Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan in September 2004.. At the end of the study discussion the Council
should determine if this item should be brought forward to the Council for Introduction (including a public
hearing). Introduction should be set for the Council meeting on January 3, 2006.
BACKGROUND:
California planning law requires that there be consistency between the land use policy and zoning
requirements throughout the city. This means that the plan cannot say that automotive sales and service uses
should be located in the Adrian Road area and the implementing zoning say that automobile service uses are
only allowed south of Easton Creek(which is outside of the proposed auto row area). This is only one
example of why it is important to adopt new zoning for the Rollins Road industrial area.
A second reason for adopting new regulations for the Rollins Road area is that the Specific Plan for the
Rollins Road area updates the city's policy objectives for the area and provides incentives to achieve the
City's policy objectives. Increasingly since the plans adoption in September 2004, property owners in the
Rollins Road area and people representing new businesses are becoming aware of new opportunities in
Burlingame and wish to take advantage of them. However, the current M-1 zoning is an obstacle, even a
discouragement,because it is not facilitating the new ideas included in the specific plan.
The Planning Commission felt that despite a few areas which need clarification, it was important to move
forward and recommend these new regulations for the Rollins Road area to Council action. So at their
meeting on October 24, 2005, the Commission inserted the regulation for veterinarian hospitals from the
current zoning and approved the Rollins Road regulations as proposed. Several items (see below) were
referred back the to Subcommittee for further review and recommendation. The Subcommittee has already
met once on these items (December 8, 2005) and will bring their recommendations to the Commission in
January or February.
The proposed zoning regulations and the revisions suggested by the Planning Commission are discussed
below.
STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP AND REVISED ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA. December 19,2005
Planning Commission Action:
The Planning Commission studied the Rollins Road zoning district at their meeting on September 26, 2005.
The Commission held a public hearing and recommended the RR zoning district regulations to the City
Council for approval on October 24, 2005, with a 7-0-0 voice vote. In their discussion at the time of
recommendation the Commissioners made three changes to the text of the proposed regulations:
• that as an incentive, in the automobile overlay zone, exceptions to the performance criteria for
automobile dealerships and automobile repair, major and minor, businesses be reviewed using
the conditional use permit process rather than requiring a variance.
• that the performance criteria for retail sales and display areas in warehouse structures be
modified to prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages, but not the service of such beverage
without charge; this change was to facilitate enforcement.
• that the current M-1 provisions regulating veterinarian hospitals replace the proposed
regulation, so that both boarding of animals and breeding of animals would continue to be
prohibited in the industrial area.
The commission then acted to recommend the remainder of the Rollins Road district with the three changes to
the City Council for action.
Although several issues were raised at the public hearing, the Commission felt that it was important to the
implementation of the plan and the fair treatment of those interested in located in the Rollins Road area, that
the city move forward with the new regulations for the area. In their action the Commission also sent several
items back to the subcommittee and staff for additional consideration and recommendation:
• Further consideration of the regulation to allow facilities for the boarding of animals in the
industrial area. This discussion should also include the location of veterinarian hospitals.
• Whether uses which are "free standing" requiring on-site parking and having on-peak trip
generation should be allowed to locate in the drainage area/holding basin (under the PGandE
power lines) between Adrian and Rollins Roads. The land use requested was self-storage in
shipping containers.
• In the Southern Gateway area(edge of the zone along Broadway between the CalTrain tracks
and US 10 1) a short distance into the industrial area, should: (1), pedestrian retail uses be
allowed as well as heavy commercial uses (service oriented); (2), the retail and office uses
identified in the plan be allowed, along with all the uses allowed in the industrial area; and (3),
the FAR incentive bonus be allowed if either consolidation of properties or including a gateway
feature was included in a project; OR require both consolidation and gateway feature for a
project to qualify for the FAR bonus.
Commission noted that the subcommittee would meet in the next several months and bring forward proposals
on these items to the Planning Commission in the form of an amendment to the adopted Rollins Road(RR)
regulations. the amendments would then be reviewed and acted on by the City Council. This was the same
procedure recently used for group residential care facilities and convalescent hospital requirements in the
Trousdale West zone.
Zoning Boundaries
The boundaries for the current M-1 zoning district and the proposed Rollins Road (RR) district are the same.
The adoption of the new zoning district requires an amendment to the Zoning Map because of the change in
the name of the zoning District. For this reason the City Council will be asked to adopt an ordinance to amend
the zoning map for the city. The new map for the Rollins Road area will outline the two special subareas: Auto
2
STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP AND REVISED ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA. December 19,2005
Row and Southern Gateway. The boundaries shown are consistent with the limits for these subareas in the
adopted plan.
Summary of the Proposed Zoning Regulations for the Rollins Road (RR) Zoning District
The new zoning regulations for the Rollins Road area include the land use directives and design guidelines for
the area as set out in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan and modify the current M-1 zoning for
the area. For example, if the design guidelines in the plan does not address side setbacks, then the standards
for the M-1 zone were used. This approach was used because the M-1 district standards have governed the
pattern of development in the Rollins Road area for many years. Too radical a departure would create many
non-conforming situations. Since the Specific Plan is a part the General Plan and the M-1 district
regulations were established to implement the General Plan, it is consistent to rely on the M-1 district in cases
the Specific Plan does not address. So the current standards were incorporated where the plan did not give
specific direction e.g. side and rear setbacks; and current uses incorporated where they were consistent with
the land use definitions of the plan which had not change, e.g. distribution facilities and veterinarian hospitals.
In the attachments to the staff report the Planning Commission recommended draft ordinance for the Rollins
Road (RR) district is followed by an annotated draft of the proposed RR district. The Annotation version
discusses the considerations used by the Planning Subcommittee and Planning Commission involved in the
recommendations for each provision in the ordinance. Council should review the entire ordinance as
recommended by the Planning Commission, particularly considering the following items which represent
changes or modifications to the current M-1 zoning to implement the Specific Plan for the Rollins Road area.
Some of these items were also issues brought up to the Planning Commission during their public hearing on
the proposed regulations:
1. Automobile and Truck Repair: The Specific Plan,by necessity, includes automotive repair shops as
part of the Auto Row subarea. However, many automobile repair shops are located in the southern
part of the industrial area between Broadway and Easton Creek. In order to allow those uses outside
of Auto Row to modernize and evolve in the future, the subcommittee recommended that automotive
and truck repair shops continue to be a permitted use in the specific area south of Easton Creek (p. 4
of Annotated Ordinance).
2. Office Use: The Specific Plan explicitly prohibits free-standing office buildings and the professional
uses found in those types of buildings (p. 5). In order to clearly establish that free-standing offices are
not allowed, the subcommittee recommended that an office use only be a permitted use if it does not
exceed 25 percent of the gross floor area of a building and the office use is only allowed to support a
permitted use occurring on the same site. (p. 6 of Annotated Ordinance). With a conditional use
permit, this industrial support office use could go up to 50 percent of the gross floor area. Office uses,
free standing and professional, are, however, allowed in the Southern Gateway area(p. 22 of
Annotated Ordinance). In the gateway area an FAR bonus is allowed for office development which
combine properties and include a gateway feature. (see below for the bonus issue) (p. 23 of
Annotated Ordinance)
3. Retail Sales and Display Areas. The draft regulations allow small retail sales and display areas
associated with warehouse or other permitted uses in the area, of up to 5,000 square feet and limited
to 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. hours, so long as no sale of alcohol occurs and there is no increase in noise or
generation of vibrations. (p. 7 of Annotated Ordinance) As a conditional use, the operating hours or
the sale of alcoholic beverages could be allowed. (p. 13 of Annotated Ordinance). The retail sales
and display area has to be accessory to a permitted or conditional use on the site and conducted inside
3
STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP AND REVISED ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA. December 19,2005
a building.
4. Building Materials and Garden Supply Stores: The zoning includes that building materials and
garden supply stores be allowed as a conditional use in the district. (p. 10 of Annotated Ordinance).
This would mean that paint stores, lumberyards, nurseries, and stores selling similar items, could
apply for a conditional use permit to locate in the district. To keep such use within the scale of the
Rollins Road area, performance conditions are identified, such as maximum square footage for sales
and display of 100,000 square feet. (p. 10-11 Annotated Ordinance) The Planning Commission felt
that the square footage limitation and required parking would off-set the need to establish a
maximum FAR for this use. A definition of this use is also included(p. 35 of Annotated Ordinance).
A copy of a staff report from the City of Santa Cruz is attached so that the Council can see what the
various sizes of these types of use might be. If the City Council decides to proceed with
recommending this provision, a specific plan amendment is probably required.
5. Automobile Sales and Service Overlay within the Rollins Road Area:
The Automobile Sales and Service overlay area would have a limited list of permitted uses—
Automobile dealerships and sales lots, automobile repair, and automobile rental. (p.18 of Annotated
Ordinance). Any uses that are permitted or conditional uses in the Rollins Road District would be
allowed with a conditional use permit (the Specific Plan notes that until an auto row is established, the
subarea would continue to be used for industrial uses). This permission allowing industrial uses as a
conditional use permit, also would include a building materials or garden supply store. It is not
recommended to allow any free-standing automobile parts retailers as either a permitted or conditional
use in the Auto Row overlay area or in the Rollins Road industrial area.
The Commission recommended leaving the area at the end of Edwards Court in the Auto Row
subarea as provided in the Specific Plan.
6. Southern Gateway
At the Planning Commission hearing on the Rollins Road zoning district three issues were raised
regarding development regulations in the Southern Gateway area. These had to do with:
• the kind of retail uses which should be allowed in this area(pedestrian as well as auto oriented,
or just auto oriented);
• whether the area should be an overlay with all the uses of the industrial area also allowed,
along with the retail and office uses which the plan advocates in order for both sides of
Broadway develop with consistency as well as announcing the "gateway" to Rollins Road;
• should eligibility for the development density bonus of up to an additional 1 FAR(maximum 2
FAR)be limited to a project which provides BOTH lot consolidation and a gateway feature; or
granting the bonus if the project included either consolidation of lots OR a gateway feature.
The Commission decided to recommend the Southern Gateway provisions of the ordinance to the City
Council as proposed by the Subcommittee e.g. without change. The reason for their action was that
projects currently are being proposed in the Rollins Road area which will implement the plan and they
need the guidance of zoning regulations. However, the Commission did recommend that the
Subcommittee study these three requests and make a future recommendation to the Commission on
how each should be treated.
4
STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP AND REVISED ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA. December 19,2005
7. Veterinary Hospitals and Animal Boarding
Another use in the Rollins Road area which was discussed at the Planning Commission study meeting
on September 26, 2005, and again at the October 24, 2005, action meeting was veterinarian hospitals
and animal boarding uses. The current M-1 zoning for the Rollins Road area allows veterinary
hospitals with performance criteria as follows:
"Veterinary hospitals with associated animal care facilities, excepting breeding and boarding facilities
where:
(a) all animal care activity is contained within a structure;
(b) the noise level is not increased at property line by more than 5 dBA L10; and
(c) no animal is kept overnight without an attendant being present."
Currently animal boarding only is not allowed in the M-1 district e.g. doggie day care, and there is no
place in which animal boarding can occur in Burlingame.
Veterinary hospitals were allowed in the M-1 zone because in the 1970s the City changed the zoning in
the retail commercial area(C-1) to exclude veterinary hospitals where animals were treated and kept
overnight. Because of the Euclidian structure of the zoning ordinance, this change effectively
precluded veterinary hospitals from locating in any commercial or industrial zone in the City. The
law discourages cities from "zoning out" a use if it is one which is reasonable to be located in the
community. In the case of veterinary hospitals the M-1 zone was chosen because it is a use which is
reasonable to have in Burlingame and residential uses were not allowed in that zone. The problem
with veterinary hospitals which emerged in the commercial zones in the 1970's was that almost all of
the retail and heavy commercial districts (C-1 and C-2) share boundaries with areas zoned for
residential uses.
The M-1 district regulations which currently regulate the Rollins Road area also include a provision
which allows the Planning Commission to make a determination about "uses similar to permitted or
conditional uses" allowed in the M-1 zone or other commercial zones. The purpose of this provision
is to provide flexibility as new land uses emerge. A good example of new uses not anticipated in the
1970's are doggie day care (dog boarding facilities) and the PHS/SPCA's proposed animal adoption
and care facility.
Recently the SPCA asked the Planning Commission for a determination regarding whether their
"animal adoption and care facility, including aviary for injured wild life and community education
facility" was similar to a veterinary hospital use. The commission determined that the PHS/SPCA use
was "similar to" and would require a conditional use permit which would include by the performance
criteria used for a veterinary hospital use. On this basis the zoning provisions for the new Rollins
Road district were modified to clarify the scope of veterinary hospital use as follows:
"Veterinary hospitals with associated animal care and boarding facilities, excepting breeding,but
including daycare for healthy dogs where:
(1) all animal care activity is contained within a structure; and
(2) the noise level is not increased at property line by more than 5 dBA L10; and
(3)no animal is kept overnight without an attendant being present." (CS 25.44.030 (p) annotated
ordinance page 13-14)
Following the public hearing on the proposed Rollins Road zoning district, the Planning Commission
directed staff to reinstate the M-1 zoning district provisions for veterinary hospitals and continue to
5
STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP AND REVISED ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA. December 19,2005
prohibit boarding of animals. The Commission then directed the Subcommittee which had prepared
the proposed Rollins Road regulations to review the requirements for veterinary hospitals and animal
boarding facilities and recommend to the Commission, at a later time, how these uses should be
allowed and regulated in the RR district. The conclusion was that the Rollins Road zoning district as
recommended for action to the City Council includes the current M-1 definition of veterinary hospital
provision which includes the performance criteria which allows sick animals to remain overnight on
the site with an attendant, but prohibits both boarding and breeding of animals. The Subcommittee of
the Planning Commission is reviewing these definitions and should report back to the Commission in
January or February, 2006.
8. Uses Similar To
It should be noted that the provision allowing the Planning Commission to determine that a new use is
"similar to" other uses permitted or conditional in the zone has been carried over from the M-1 zone to
the proposed RR zone. The only change is that in the RR zone the provision applies only to uses
permitted or conditional in the RR zone or in the Inner Bayshore zone. The current M-1 provision
would allow any use similar to any permitted or conditional use in the city's commercial and industrial
zones. The breadth of the current provision is misleading to property owners and developers since the
General Plan as amended by the Specific Plan would prohibit many uses allowed in the C-I or C-2
zone from being located in the M-1 zone. In the case of the Inner Bayshore and Rollins Road zones
the general plan and specific plan objectives are more consistent.
9. Development in the Drainage Right-of-Way
Between Adrian Road and Rollins Road there is a 120 foot wide drainage and Utility easement. This
area houses the electrical power towers which carry major service to San Francisco including an
upgrade to a 230 KV line and also functions as a drainage detention basin during periods of heavy
rainfall. On one side of the drainage area there is a protected wetland which provides habitat for at
least one rare and endangered species.
In the proposed Rollins Road zoning there are specific provisions addressing the use of the drainage
area(CS 25.44.045 Use of drainage rights-o-way). These provisions limit the land use of the drain to
the following:
• Supplemental parking for permitted or conditional uses in the district;
• Automobile storage for car rental businesses providing cars are not moved during the a.m. and
p.m. peak traffic periods, the lot size is at least .7 acres, no customers visit the site;
• RV storage so long as the vehicles are not moved during the a.m. and p.m. peak traffic periods;
• Outdoor storage related to immediately abutting uses which are permitted or conditional; and
• Uses similar to those allowed in this section.
At the public hearing before the Planning Commission, the representative of the owner of 4 acres in the
drain requested that the Commission broadened the permitted uses in the drainage right-of-way to
include public self storage facilities. His idea was to place shipping containers, elevated three feet off
the ground and stacked, in the drain. Members of the public could lease these for storage. The storage
area would be accessed by the driveway across the developed property which fronts on Rollins Road.
Several issues relating to the drain were discussed by the Planning Commission, including impacts
created by flooding of the area, frequency of flooding in the area, and impacts on the
Broadway/Rollins Road intersection caused by additional traffic generated by "free standing" uses in
the drain. The Planning Commission recommended that the regulations for uses in the drain not be
6
STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP AND REVISED ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA. December 19,2005
broadened at this time; and that the ordinance be forwarded to the City Council as it was proposed.
The Commission did recommend that the Subcommittee contact the Public Works Department be
contacted regarding the drain and asked about the function of this drainage area and what land uses, if
any, might be appropriate to allow to be built in it. Also what constraints (performance standards)
should be placed on any future development in the drainage areas. The Commission directed that,
once Public Works had provided their input the Subcommittee meet, review the zoning provisions and
make a recommendation to the Planning Commission on how the drainage area should be used.
Next Step
After the City Council has studied the proposed Rollins Road zoning regulations and given staff direction on
any changes or modifications you would like to see, this item will be set for introduction. The public notice
for the study session included the following schedule for review of the Rollins Road zoning regulations:
• City Council Study, December 19, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall
• Introduction and Public Hearing, January 3, 2006, 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers
• Second Reading and action, January 17, 2005, 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers
The public hearing will be held at introduction so that the people may comment on the proposed regulations
and Council can direct staff about any new language to be included in the ordinance brought forward for
action. Public notice and appropriate updates including this schedule were sent to the San Mateo Times and
to all property owners in the area to be designated as the Rollins Road zoning district.
Staff Comments
Attached to your packet are copies of all correspondence which the Planning Commission received regarding
the Rollins Road zoning issue. In addition there is a letter from Trask Leonard of Bayside Realty(date
stamped December 5, 2005) regarding the Southern Gateway subarea which was sent to the City Council after
the Planning Commission action.
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Map of the El Camino Corridor and Rollins Road Subareas in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific
Plan, Figure 3-2
Map of the Rollins Road (RR) Zoning District
Ordinance of the City of Burlingame Amending Title 25 to Adopt a Rollins Road (RR) District,
October 28, 2005
Annotated Version of the Rollins Road (RR) District Regulations, Draft 7, October 27, 2005
Planning Commission Minutes, October 24, 2005
Planning Commission Minutes, September 26, 2005
North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan Excerpts:
- 3 Illustrative Development Concepts
- 4 Land Use Designations
- 6 Design Guidelines and Development Standards, General and Rollins Road Design District
7
STUDY PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP AND REVISED ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ROLLINS ROAD INDUSTRIAL AREA. December 19,2005
City of Santa Cruz, City Council Staff Report, July 9, 2004. Special Use Permit for Building Material/Garden
Supply Uses in General Industrial
W. Trask Leonard, Bayside Realty Partners, December 1, 2005 (date stamped December 5, 2005) to Meg
Monroe.
Comments of the Proposed Rollins Road Zoning Received by the Planning Commission prior to the Public
Hearing, Submitted at the Public Hearing and Received Shortly Following the Public Hearing, October
24, 2005.
Public Notice of Council Review Process, published in the San Mateo Times November 23, 2005 and mailed
to all property owners within 500 feet,November 23, 2005
Revised Public Notice: Important Date and Time Change for Rollins Road Zoning Study Meeting, published
December 1, 2005; and mailed to all property owners December 1, 2005.
8
r
_�rtt (, 9AYSH.OREFREEW Y 1
s -
_ ............ _ } �
dyL
Emil
fl4r 11
1
'�i�r-p � �ai¢ / ,. � ... T :' .. `r,�•���`v. .. �� ,,,nu:rwa,+�o,v.\, .:r� �.I _ _ y�� V�,��,
I :.".r a'.I� ..t- -', ,.; � ��' } dAx, �,� t �..-: .I,,;.:.. �- TmgydmY. _ - - �+ •\ _ ._ 1� i�C���i t
Q � / ( � .• �� i M1 4 �.'A.lr rpMd�p\ti'..
WTddCtllm
r
j% •• ... -� 1- ( l ! t,-••-I --1i11 L�.i .... 1.1.1-1 1 T - .i. . a' '�
CIA! i I T7� —
E.J.CAMINO RF.AI.l82) a r
d,
� I 1JJ 1��� O J
.!�T (� f I i o
�„j. ' .�_I i r '.. I Q a ro N = .�...1.
)Atat 1 t i. a� . %. i.�, f1T1; f Tsai n — °J c o
t� } —
__ •" r j(� L �� 0 �r
- 'c F`
[� ! CL
;.., -. _
.._ / � ZV (A ¢ mqLRRw � Z
LL— I
7 IS
7-717-r..FF-.rr�`�,' v`
i�
� ==� ������f� �� `-: � �. 111■��
• is
■
/ ■ ���'■■
,/w �- • 1111111111
Vat
-ME-
Oman
I/�\111111111111110_r r_��p pp rrp �_ .C_pl IIU�/ �� '=
111111..1 ii r rr rf 11111111►• = '
ff ME
MEN•�'�� ���� ii ���i�i�� •- -i � •� 111/f11/�I 1 �� ■„■11���■
�� ���r •% •i-���-r r. r 11111/1N.
♦ �� ♦ . .- r_ -r -r _ 11111111►f, IIIIII
, ■
rr -r r � ■
In
MOM
•��, �����II\I�%I%1►r�11�/11111111 rr � s ���■- ,�
■■■■-
//111
�_ _— __ _,�� 11. � �stn► � °. � tit>•��■■'
WEE
,,,Hlilirlr,,11�1�1 ���� __ •1� �_ __ • CIIIIillllill �`�'.�.
iu 1111
Rollins R • . • (RR ��11111E r �I�I
11111111 ZoningI1i111111m ; - -
11111111 111 111111 VIII_ � .>
.0 IIII_
Ordinance •
—� �
Date:
1111111 � .0 11111= � �
From M-1 to • • Iti 1111111111_ °-
IIi1111111i1111� � -
CC ��IIIIIIG •
�-
•— -'— 1111111_ UK
� Southern Gateway Overlay
��� 1111111. ?��®�I® •
��i.�IiIIII�11�
Auto Row Overlay
5 Be No Owe PW
_a /11� �� ►��� �� `�
I ORDINANCE No.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AMENDING TITLE 25 TO ADOPT THE ROLLINS ROAD (RR) DISTRICT
3
4 Section 1. In 2004,the City Council adopted the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan
5 to guide development and use of the northern portion of the City. Among the subareas in the Plan is the
6 Rollins Road area, which includes a variety of uses and lot sizes. This ordinance implements the
7 Specific Plan for this subarea. This chapter replaces the M-1 District regulations,which had boundaries
8 that generally coincided with the new RR District.
9
10 Section 2. Chapter 25.44 is amended to read as follows:
11 Chapter 25.44
ROLLINS ROAD (RR)DISTRICT REGULATIONS
12
Sections:
13 25.44.010 Scope and purpose of regulations.
25.44.020 Permitted uses.
14 25.44.030 Conditional uses.
25.44.040 Prohibited uses.
15 25.44.050 Special requirements for the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area.
25.44.055 Special requirements for the entrance to the southern gateway area.
16 25.44.060 Use of drainage rights-of-ways.
25.44.065 Outdoor storage.
17 25.44.070 Design review.
25.44.075 Building Regulations.
18 25.44.080 Height limitations.
25.44.090 Minimum lot size and street frontage.
19 25.44.095 No variance for lot size and street frontage
25.44.100 Landscaping, creek access and fence requirements.
20 25.44.105 Parking space requirements and special parking requirements.
21
22 25.44.010 Scope and purpose of regulations.
23 The following regulations shall apply in all RR districts and shall be subject to all other
24 provisions of this title relating to RR districts. It is the purpose and policy of this chapter to implement
25 the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan by establishing in the Rollins Road area a vital
26 industrial center for the Burlingame community and the mid-peninsula. The Rollins Road area lies
27 between US 101 and the CalTrain railroad tracks,the City Boundary of Millbrae and Broadway. Future
28 development in the area should build on good access to mass transit for workers and employers,
10/28/2005 1 ROLLINS ROAD
1 incorporating daytime amenities for area workers and encouraging new development which enhances
2 Burlingame's industrial,heavy service and employment base. Fundamental to the planned character of
3 the Rollins Road area is the development of distinct gateway entrances which are supported by safe and
4 attractive pedestrian and bicycle access and roadway facilities throughout the area which balance the
5 needs of employee access,service vehicles,and business operations. The zoning regulations establish
6 and maintain all areas designated as RR district to provide space for warehouse, distribution, and
7 manufacturing uses;to provide opportunity for a centralized area for automobile sales and service with
8 reasonable access and optimum visibility from US 101; to provide areas for commercial and service
9 uses; to encourage other similar uses which are supported by access to San Francisco International
10 Airport; and to discourage uses, buildings and structures which are incompatible with the intended
11 character of the district.
12
13 25.44.020 Permitted uses.
14 The following uses are permitted in the RR district:
15 (a) Air courier,delivery,or other trans-shipment services,including freight forwarding,which:
16 (1) Provide on-site parking for all company vehicles dispatched from the site and for vehicles
17 of employees working on the premises; and
18 (2)Provide adequate on-site space for loading and unloading goods, equipment and materials.
19 (b) Ambulance services,including dispatch, day rooms, and parking for all company vehicles
20 dispatched or stored on the site and vehicles of employees working on the premises.
21 (c)Automobile and truck repair, service and body shops, wholesale or retail,which are:
22 (1) Located south of Easton Creek; and
23 (2) Provide on-site parking for all vehicles being serviced and for vehicles of all employees
24 working on the premises.
25 (d) Any light industrial or manufacturing use,including associated laboratories,such as but not
26 limited to electronic,biotechnology, furniture,pharmaceutical, and printing,which:
27 (1)Is conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building with a floor area ratio of no more
28 than 0.5; and
10/2812005 2 ROLLINS ROAD
1 (2)Does not increase noise at property line by more than 5 dBA L10; and
2 (3)Does not generate vibrations which can be felt off the site and which will have no increased
3 effect on permissible adjacent uses; and
4 (4) Is conducted in such a manner so as to preclude any nuisance, hazard, or commonly
5 recognized offensive and obnoxious conditions or characteristics from odors detectable at the property
6 line or off the site.
7 (e)Incidental food establishments within a multi-use building which meet all of the following
8 requirements:
9 (1)Are not the primary use of the building or structure; and
10 (2)Are open no earlier than five(5:00)a.m. and close no later than seven(7:00)p.m.,and open
11 Monday through Saturday only; and
12 (3)Have a maximum size of one thousand five hundred(1,500) square feet; and
13 (4)Are at least fifteen(15) feet in length and fifteen(15) feet in width; and
14 (5)Provide parking of at least one(1) space per three hundred (300) gross square feet.
15 (f) Laboratory and clean room facilities for research, testing, or creating products and goods.
16 (g)Office uses,but only in conjunction with and for the sole support of a permitted,non-office
17 use occurring on the same lot, where the office use does not exceed twenty-five(25)percent of gross
18 floor area of the buildings on the lot, and parking is provided on-site to code requirements.
19 (h) Outdoor storage of materials which is an accessory use to a permitted use and which meets
20 the requirements of section 25.44.065 below.
21 (i) Rental and leasing of goods and equipment conducted wholly within an enclosed building,
22 with no associated outdoor display or storage areas in the front yard where goods,equipment,or stored
23 supplies are visible from the street.
24 0) Service businesses,including but not limited to janitorial and contractors,and other support
25 services,but not including personal services,which:
26 (1) Provide on-site parking for all company vehicles dispatched from the site and vehicles of
27 employees working on the premises; and
28 (2)Provide adequate on-site space for loading and unloading goods, equipment and materials.
10/28/2005 3 ROLLINS ROAD
1 (k)Warehousing,storage,and distribution of goods,materials,liquids,and equipment conducted
2 wholly within an enclosed building with a floor area ratio not to exceed 0.5.
3 (� Accessory uses which are necessary for the permitted uses under this section.
4 (m)Retail sales and display areas as an accessory use to a permitted use, interior to a building
5 only,with the following additional requirements:
6 (1)The hours of operation are between six (6:00) a.m. to nine(9:00)p.m. only; and
7 (2)Retail display area is limited to a maximum of 5,000 square feet; and
8 (3)No sale of alcoholic beverages; and
9 (4)Does not increase noise at property line by more than 5 dBA L,o ; and
10 (5)Does not generate vibrations which can be felt off the site and which will have no increased
11 effect on permissible adjacent uses.
12
13 25.44.030 Conditional uses.
14 The following are uses requiring a conditional use permit:
15 (a) Industrial uses with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0;
16 (b) Air courier,delivery,or other transshipment services,including trucking which do not meet
17 the requirements for permitted uses.
18 (c) Automobile rental businesses,including rental of recreation vehicles and trucks,which meet
19 the following minimum standards:
20 (1) The use is the sole tenant and only occupant of any building or area on the site;
21 (2) The site is a minimum size of seven-tenths (0.7)of an acre;
22 (3)Parking is provided on-site for storage of at least twenty-five(25)percent of the cars rented
23 monthly,based on a annual average for the site;
24 (4)Parking is provided on-site for all employees and customers; and
25 (5)The use meets all the other requirements of development in the district,including peak hour
26 trip generation at critical intersections as defined in the city's traffic analyzer.
27 (d) Automobile dealerships that are wholly enclosed within a warehouse structure with no
28 outdoor vehicle display areas;
10/28/2005 4 ROLLINS ROAD
I (e)Automobile storage for car rental businesses provided the following requirements are met:
2 (1)Vehicles shall not be moved during a.m. and p.m.peak hour traffic periods as defined by the
3 city engineer; and
4 (2)Minimum site size of seven-tenths (0.7)of an acre; and
5 (3)The storage area is enclosed with an opaque fence or wall eight(8)feet in height at a location
6 approved by the Public Works Department.
7 (f) Building materials and garden supply stores,which:
8 (1) Have no more than 100,000 square feet of indoor floor area, outdoor storage display, and
9 sales areas combined; and
10 (2) Have paved,on-site parking based on retail sales requirements of chapter 25.70 and for all
11 employees on-site at one time.
12 (g)Technical schools with training related to the permitted and conditional uses in the Rollins
13 Road district with parking as required by chapter 25.70.
14 (h) Commercial recreation, including health clubs and gymnasiums,with on-site parking.
15 (i) Health services and medical clinics whose primary function is to support businesses in the
16 RR district.
17 0) Food establishments in multiuse buildings which do not meet the requirements of section
18 25.44.020(e) above.
19 (k) Motor freight terminals whose site development meets the following requirements:
20 (1) Provide on-site parking for all company vehicles dispatched from the site and for vehicles
21 of employees working on the premises; and
22 (2)Provide adequate on-site space for loading and unloading goods, equipment and materials.
23 (0 Office uses limited to supporting only a permitted or conditional uses on the same site and
24 that exceed twenty-five(25)percent of the gross floor area of buildings on a lot,but only where parking
25 is available on-site to code requirements.
26 (m)Outdoor storage of rental or leased equipment which is a primary use of a lot located in the
27 RR district between Easton Creek and Broadway, and which meets the requirements of section
28 25.44.065 below.
10/28/2005 5 ROLLINS ROAD
I (n) Outdoor storage or treatment of materials which is not an accessory use to a permitted use,
2 but which meets the requirements of section 25.44.065 below.
3 (o) Retail sales and display areas as an accessory use to a permitted or conditional use,interior
4 to a building only,with the following additional requirements:
5 (1)Retail display area is limited to a maximum of 5,000 square feet; and
6 (2)Does not increase noise at property line by more than 5 dBA L,o ; and
7 (3)Does not generate vibrations which can be felt off the site and which will have no increased
8 effect on permissible adjacent uses.
9 (p)Veterinary hospitals with associated animal care facilities,excepting breeding and boarding
10 facilities,where:
11 (1)All animal care activity is contained within a structure; and
12 (2) The noise level is not increased at property line by more than 5 dBA L,o ; and
13 (3)No animal is kept overnight without an attendant being present.
14 (q) Living quarters in association with a permitted or conditional use,but only to be used by a
15 night watchman or to provide security for the site;
16 (r) Structures over thirty-five(35) feet in height.
17 (s)Any structure or structures that cover more than sixty(60)percent of the lot.
18 (t)Accessory uses which are necessary for the conditional uses under this section.
19 (u) Retail sales as an accessory use to a warehouse use wholly enclosed within a structure for
20 specialty providers with a single product line for the construction industry, such as but not limited to
21 plumbing fixtures, tile outlets,paint stores.
22 (v) Accessory uses related to a permitted use which requires outdoor treatment or processing of
23 materials shall meet the following additional requirements;
24 (1)Is adequately screened from view from the street with an opaque eight(8) foot fence; and
25 (2)Is not located in the front yard of the property.
26 (w)Any commercial or industrial use similar in nature to a permitted or conditional use in this
27 or the Inner Bayshore (IB)district.
28
10/28/2005 6 ROLLINS ROAD
1 25.44.040 Prohibited uses.
2 All uses not listed as permitted or conditional shall be prohibited, including:
3 (a)Adult oriented businesses;
4 (b)Massage,bathing, or similar establishments;
5 (c)Automobile sales lots;
6 (d)Automobile wrecking,junk yards, storage or baling of scraps,paper,rags, sacks or metals;
7 (e) Conference and exhibition facilities;
8 (f)Hotels and motels;
9 (g) Living quarters and residential structures, except as specifically provided in subsection
10 25.44.030(17);
11 (h) Outdoor storage or treatment of materials in required parking or in landscaping in the front
12 setback;
13 (i) Gasoline service stations;
14 0) Personal services.
15
16 25.44.050 Special requirements for the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area
17 Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,within the Automobile Sales and Service
18 Overlay Area designated in Ordinance No. _as amended, the following use regulations apply:
19 (a) Only the following uses are permitted in the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area:
20 (1)Automobile dealerships and automobile sales lots,which include the following:
21 (A)A minimum site size of five(5) acres; and
22 (B) A floor area ratio of not more than 0.15.
23 (2) Automobile repair,both minor and major,which:
24 (A) Provide on-site storage for all cars being repaired on-site; and
25 (B) Provide on-site parking for all vehicles being serviced and for vehicles of all
26 employees working on the premise; and
27 (C) Have a floor area ratio of not more than 0.5 .
28 (3) Automobile rental, including rental of recreational vehicles and trucks, which meet the
10/28/2005 7 ROLLINS ROAD
I following minimum standards:
2 (A) The use is the sole tenant and only occupant of any building or area on the site; and
3 (B) The site is a minimum size of seven-tenths(0.7) of an acre; and
4 (C) Parking is provided on site for storage of at least twenty-five(25)percent of the cars
5 rented monthly,based on an annual average for the site; and
6 (D) Parking is provided on site for all employees and customers; and
7 (E) The use meets all the other requirements of development in the district, including
8 peak hour trip generation at critical intersections as defined in the city's traffic analyzer.
9 (b) The following are uses requiring a conditional use permit:
10 (1) Any exception to a performance standard listed in subsection (a) above for an automobile
11 dealership, automobile sales lot,or automobile repair,both major and minor; and
12 (2) All other uses that are permitted or conditional in sections 25.44.020 and 25.44.030 shall be
13 conditional uses in the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area except as provided in subsection
14 (c)below.
15 (c) All uses not listed as permitted or conditional in this section shall be prohibited in the
16 Automobile Overlay Zone, including but not limited to:
17 (a) Adult oriented businesses;
18 (b)Massage,bathing, or similar establishments;
19 (c)Automobile wrecking,junk yards, storage or baling of scraps,paper,rags, sacks or metals;
20 (d) Conference and exhibition facilities;
21 (e) Hotels and motels;
22 (f) Living quarters and residential structures, except as specifically provided in subsection
23 25.44.030(17);
24 (g)Outdoor storage or treatment of materials in required parking or in landscaping in the front
25 setback;
26 (h) Gasoline service stations; and
27 (i)Personal services.
28
10/28/2005 8 ROLLINS ROAD
1 25.44.055 Special requirements for the entrance to the southern gateway subarea..
2 Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, within the Southern Gateway Subarea
3 designated in Ordinance No. _as amended, the following use regulations apply:
4 (a) Only the following uses are permitted in the Southern Gateway Subarea :
5 (1) Office uses with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0;
6 (2) Automobile dealerships and sales lots with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0;
7 (3) Commercial recreation uses with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0; and
8 (4) Service businesses, including personal services,with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0.
9 (b) Only the following uses are allowed with a conditional use permit in the Southern Gateway
10 Subarea if lots are appropriately combined and gateway amenities included:
11 (1) Office uses with a floor area ratio not to exceed 2.0;
12 (2) Service businesses,including personal services,with a floor area ratio not to exceed 2.0;and
13 (3)Automobile dealerships and sales lots with a floor area ratio not to exceed 2.0.
14 (c) All uses not listed as permitted or conditional in this section shall be prohibited in the
15 Southern Gateway Subarea, including but not limited to:
16 (1) Adult oriented businesses;
17 (2) Massage,bathing, or similar establishments;
18 (3)Automobile wrecking,junk yards, storage or baling of scraps,paper,rags, sacks or metals;
19 (4) Conference and exhibition facilities;
20 (5) Hotels and motels;
21 (6) Living quarters and residential structures, except as specifically provided in subsection
22 25.44.030(q);
23 (7) Outdoor storage or treatment of materials in required parking or in landscaping in the front
24 setback; and
25 (8) Gasoline service stations.
26
27 25.44.060 Use of drainage rights-of-ways.
28 Only the following uses,with a conditional use permit,environmental review,city encroachment
10128/2005 9 ROLLINS ROAD
I permit, and all required State and Federal permits, shall be allowed within the drainage rights-of-way
2 from the southern boundary of Millsdale Industrial Park Number 5 Subdivision north to the city
3 boundary:
4 (a) Supplemental parking for permitted or conditional uses in the district;
5 (b)Automobile storage for automobile rental businesses provided the following requirements
6 are met:
7 (1)Vehicles shall not be moved during a.m. and p.m.peak hour traffic periods as defined by the
8 city engineer; and
9 (2)A minimum site size of seven-tenths (.7) of an acre; and
10 (3)No customers shall visit the site.
11 (c)Recreation vehicle storage so long as vehicles are not moved during a.m.and p.m.peak hour
12 traffic periods as defined by the city engineer;
13 (d) Outdoor storage related to immediately abutting uses which are permitted or conditional in
14 the district;
15 (e)Fencing; and
16 (f)Uses similar in nature to those allowed in this section.
17
18 25.44.065 Outdoor storage.
19 Outdoor storage in the RR district shall be subject to the following requirements:
20 (a) The storage area shall be paved and shall not be located in required parking, aisles,
21 driveways, or landscaping.
22 (b) Lots located north of Mills Creek or with lot fronts on Rollins Road. No outdoor storage
23 shall be placed in the front yard of any lot located north of Mills Creek or with a lot front on Rollins
24 Road.
25 (c)Fencing. All outdoor storage shall be fully enclosed by either an opaque or solid fence or
26 wall eight(8)feet in height or by buildings,or a combination of fencing and buildings. However,if the
27 outdoor storage area is located at the sides or rear of a building on a lot that is located south of Mills
28 Creek, and the outdoor storage area is not visible from a public street, the eight (8) foot fence or wall
1012812005 10 ROLLINS ROAD
I may be of an open design.
2
3 25.44.070 Design review.
4 Construction and alterations including substantial construction or change to more than fifty(50)
5 percent of the front fagade or change to more than fifty(50)percent of any facade facing a public or
6 private street or parking lot shall be subject to design review based on the design guidelines for the
7 Rollins Road Design District in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan and shall be processed
8 as provided in chapter 25.57.
9 (a) A design review application in the RR district shall be reviewed by the planning commission
10 for the following considerations:
11 (1) Architectural design and siting of structures which supports the light industrial,
12 manufacturing and job creating land uses of the Rollins Road subarea as adopted in the North
13 Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan with the focus on creating positive streets for safe vehicular,
14 bicycle and pedestrian use interfacing with appropriately scaled development.
15 (2) Create an appropriate form, shape and scaled interface between the vehicular,bicycle and
16 pedestrian uses of the street and the buildings and their uses along the public realm,including attention
17 to the pattern of landscaping,physical identification of the site and building entrances;the design should
18 be architecturally compatible with the surrounding development and consistent with the design
19 guidelines and development of structures in the Rollins Road subarea.
20 (3) Throughout the Rollins Road subarea, except for the special considerations for the area
21 designated for Auto Row, design of all structures should incorporate articulation on the building fagade
22 including elements which emphasize appropriate scale and relate to human form, entrances should be
23 clearly announced and oriented toward the street, a variety of materials should be used,roof screening
24 elements should be incorporated into the architectural design, signage should be a part of the site and
25 consistent with the scale and design of the building;exterior lighting should be sufficient for safety but
26 not used as an architectural feature or to illuminate adjacent properties.
27 (4) At the north and south gateway areas into the Rollins Road area special attention should be
28 paid to incorporation of gateway oriented architectural features,entrymarkers,street furniture,specially
10128/2005 11 ROLLINS ROAD
1 scaled landscaping to announce the entrance to the Rollins Road subarea; these features should be in
2 character with the purpose, scale and function of the Rollins Road area and should facilitate access by
3 vehicles,bicycles and pedestrians from adjacent mass transit locations
4 (5) On lots with any frontage on creeks, integrate the creek feature into the site and building
5 design, incorporate the creek amenity including interconnected public access and views into site
6 landscaping and planning, design access features particularly pedestrian and bicycle trails to be
7 interconnected and consistent with those on adjacent properties in order to promote and protect natural
8 features of the area to benefit those who work in and use the area while providing a safe environment
9 for walking and bicycling;respect and protect natural habitat areas including seasonal wetland breeding
10 locations for special species under power lines and in natural drains.
11 (6) To achieve a unified and successful Auto Row in the Rollins Road subarea, develop a
12 unifying thematic design concept for the area built on a single approach to the transition space between
13 the public sidewalk and the private outdoor sales area using such concepts as using consistent fencing
14 material throughout the auto row area,unifying signage approaches which also reflect the architectural
15 style and materials of the development on each site and take into consideration the character of the entire
16 Auto Row area;focus on development at a scale which works at the pedestrian level as well as from US
17 101,develop a pattern of consistent landscaping,and encourage building facades which are articulated
18 structurally incorporate human scale elements and properly integrate large display window areas.
19 (b) When any part of a commercial structure is subject to design review, any awnings on the
20 commercial structures shall be included in the design review.
21 (c) The following are exempt from the provisions of this section:
22 (1) Applications for building permits or planning approvals for development in the RR district
23 filed before ;
24 (2) Any amendment to a project exempt from design review pursuant to subsection(1) above
25 shall be subject to design review if the project involved would have otherwise been subject to design
26 review under subsection (a) above, the project has not been completed, and the amendment would
27 extend any structure involved in the application outside the envelope of the structure for which the
28 approval was granted or sought in the underlying application would change a fagade. Changes to,
10/2812005 12 ROLLINS ROAD
I additions of,or deletions of awnings as an amendment to a project shall not trigger design review under
2 this subsection.
3
4 25.44.075 Building Regulations.
5 The following maximum lot coverage shall apply to all parcels located in the RR district:
6 (a) Lot coverage. All buildings and structures or portions thereof which are hereafter erected,
7 constructed, established or enlarged shall be limited to seventy(70) percent of the total area of each
8 property or parcel.
9 (b) Maximum front setback and build-to-line.
10 (1) David Road and Rollins Road. The front wall of the first story of any structure built on a
11 lot with a lot front on Rollins Road or David Road shall be set back at least twenty(20) feet from the
12 front property line; and at least sixty(60)percent of the structure shall be located at the front setback
13 line.
14 (2)Broderick Road, Edwards Court, Guittard Road, Ingold Road, Marsten Road, and North
15 Carolan Avenue. There shall be a minimum front setback of fifteen (15) feet from Broderick Road,
16 Edwards Court, Guittard Road, Ingold Road,Marsten Road, or North Carolan Avenue.
17 (3) Adrian Road and Adrian Court. The front wall of the first story of any structure built on a
18 lot with a lot front on Adrian Road or Adrian Court shall have a zero(0)foot setback;and at least twenty
19 (20)percent of the structure shall be located at the zero(0) setback line.
20 (c)Side setback.
21 (1) There shall be no side setback requirement for any structures constructed on lots in the
22 portion of the RR district between Easton Creek and Broadway, including properties with lot frontage
23 on Broadway.
24 (2) There shall be a minimum ten (10) foot side yard setback on all buildings and structures
25 constructed on all other lots in the RR district.
26 (d) Rear setback. There shall be no rear setback requirements.
27
28 25.44.080 Height limitations.
10128/2005 13 ROLLINS ROAD
I (a)The maximum height for structures in the RR district is sixty(60) feet.
2 (b) However, structures on lots in the RR district with lot fronts on either Nerli Lane or
3 Broadway have a maximum height of seventy-five(75) feet.
4 (c)Notwithstanding subsections(a)and(b)above,maximum heights are also subject to further
5 limitation by the Federal Aviation Administration.
6
7 25.44.090 Minimum lot size and street frontage.
8 There shall be a minimum lot size of ten thousand(10,000) square feet and a minimum street
9 frontage of fifty(50)feet. No property in this district shall be divided or subdivided into a lot with less
10 area or less street frontage.
11
12 25. 44.095 No variance for lot size and street frontage.
13 No variances for lot size and street frontage shall be granted to any property within this district.
14
15 25.44.100 Landscaping, creek access, and fencing requirements.
16 (a) Landscaping requirements. The following landscaping requirements shall apply to-all
17 parcels located in the RR district:
18 (1) A minimum of ten(10)percent of the total area of each lot shall be suitably landscaped,and
19 the landscaped portions shall be properly irrigated and maintained.
20 (2) A minimum of sixty(60)percent of the front setback shall be covered with soft landscaping,
21 provided:
22 (A) If the area equal to ten (10) percent of the site is less than sixty(60)percent of the front
23 setback area, then all the required landscaping shall be placed within the front setback; or
24 (B) If the area equal to ten(10)percent of the site is more than sixty(60)percent of the front
25 setback area, then the remaining area of required landscaping shall be placed so that it is visible from
26 the public right-of-way.
27 (3) When fences are placed to enclose outdoor storage areas on any site,the required landscaping
28 shall be outside of the fence and visible from the public right-of-way.
10/28/2005 14 ROLLINS ROAD
1 (4) A landscaping plan and specifications,including irrigation, shall be submitted for approval
2 by the city arborist when construction plans are submitted to the building department for a building
3 permit.
4 (b) Fences. Fences up to eight(8)feet in height, as measured from the highest adjacent grade,
5 shall be allowed in this district, subject to the other requirements and limitations of this code, in
6 particular, chapters 11.12 and 25.78.
7 (c) Creek access. Any lot in the RR district with any lot frontage on Easton,Mills,and El Portal
8 Creeks shall be required to provide,as a part of the on-site landscaping plan,a paved,public access trail
9 along the top of the bank for the portion of the creek bank on the site. The design of the trail shall be
10 compliant with the Rollins Road Design District design guidelines and designed to the specifications
11 of the public works department. Each such trail segment shall connect directly to the termination of the
12 public access trail segment along the creek bank on each adjacent property;
13
14 25.44.150 Parking space requirements.
15 All uses shall be subject to the provisions of this code and such additional parking conditions as
16 may be required for permitted or conditional uses pursuant to this chapter.
17
18 Section 3. A new Section 25.08.155 is added to read as follows:
19 25.08.155 Building materials and garden supply store.
20 "Building materials and garden supply store" means a retail or wholesale establishment that
21 predominantly sells building materials,paint,wallpaper,glass,fixtures,lumber,nursery stock, lawn and
22 garden supplies,electrical,plumbing,heating,and air conditioning equipment and supplies,and building
23 and construction tools.
24
25 Section 4. This ordinance is to be published according to law.
26
27
Mayor
28
1012812005 15 ROLLINS ROAD
1 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the
2 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_day of
, 2005, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the_
3 _day of , 2005, by the following vote:
4 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
5 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
6 City Clerk
CARLESTIanning\rollinsroad 102005-2.ord.wpd
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1012812005 16 ROLLINS ROAD
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 17,2005 changes
North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan Implementation
Rollins Road Subarea
Rollins Road(RR)Zoning District
(with annotations)
This draft of the Rollins Road Zoning district includes the
revisions to the text recommended by the Planning Commission at
their study meeting on September 26 and their action meeting on
October 24, 2005. Changes recommended to the City Council for
consideration by the Planning Commission are shown in bold face
below. The annotations have also been amended to document why
the revisions have been recommended.
Chapter 25.44
ROLLINS ROAD(RR)DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Sections:
25.44.010 Scope and purpose of regulations.
25.44.020 Permitted uses.
25.44.030 Conditional uses.
25.44.040 Prohibited uses.
25.44.050 Special requirements for Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area.
25.44.055 Special requirements for the entrance to the southern gateway area.
25.44.060 Use of drainage rights-of-ways,designated planter strips and public right-of-ways.
25.44.065 Outdoor storage.
25.44.070 Design review.
25.44.075 Building Regulations.
25.44.080 Height limitations.
1
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
25.44.090 Minimum lot size and street frontage.
25.44.095 No variance for lot size and street frontage
25.44.100 Landscaping, creek access and fence requirements.
25.44.105 Parking space requirements and special parking requirements.
25.44.010 Scope and purpose of regulations.
The following regulations shall apply in all M-1 districts and shall be subject to all other
provisions of this title relating to M-1 districts. It is the purpose and policy of this chapter to
implement the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan by establishing in the Rollins Road
area a vital industrial center for the Burlingame community and the Mid-peninsula. The Rollins
Road area lies between US 101 and the CalTrain railroad tracks,the City Boundary of Millbrae
and Broadway. Future development in the area should build on good access to mass transit for
workers and employers, incorporating daytime amenities for area workers and encouraging new
development which enhances Burlingame's industrial,heavy service and employment base.
Fundamental to the planned character of the Rollins Road area is the development of distinct
gateway entrances which are supported by safe pedestrian and bicycle access and appropriate
roadway facilities throughout the area which balance the needs of employee access, service
vehicles and businesses operations. The zoning regulations establish and maintain all areas
designated as RR district to provide space for warehouse,distribution, and manufacturing uses;
to provide opportunity for a centralized area for automobile sales and service with reasonable
access and optimum visibility from US 101; to provide areas for commercial and service uses;to
encourage other similar uses which are supported by access to San Francisco International
Airport; and to discourage uses,buildings and structures which are incompatible with the
intended character of the district.
Annotation:
Revisions proposed by the subcommittee clarify that pedestrian
and bicycle access to and through the industrial should be safe,
but not expected to be at the same recreational amenity as along
the Bayfront . However, it was noted that bicycle and pedestrian
access should be provided along the creeks which cross the
industrial area in order to provide an amenity for the workers
in the area.
Original Annotation: The purpose section has been expanded to
reflect the broad objectives of the North Burlingame/Rollins
Road Specific Plan as they relate to the Rollins Road area
2
Rollins Road (RR) District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27, 2005 changes
( composed of 4 subareas : Northern gateway; Central Rollins Road;
Southern Gateway; Adrian Road Auto Row District ) . The sections
in italics include the revised language . One item to note is
that the M- 1 zone is now limited to just the Rollins Road area .
In the past there were areas in the Bayfront area which were
zoned M- 1 . These areas have now been assigned different zoning
districts .
25.44.020 Permitted uses.
Annotation :
The land use designations for the Rollins Road area could be
interpreted to present a significant change from the currently
allowed use opportunities in the Rollins Road Area . In the
NB/RR plan it notes (page 27 ) that : " The land use designation
of this subarea is Industrial , which consists primarily of
warehouse and manufacturing uses , as described below...Industrial
uses in the area should be limited to airport -related
industries , food preparation, fabrication, recreation,
commercial for preparation/processing and similar light
industry . Free- standing office buildings and professional uses
typical of occupants of such buildings are not allowed and
should be located in the City ' s Bayfront Area to the east of US
101 . " The only exception to this land use direction is for the
Southern Gateway area (A3 ) where it states (page30 ) "Unlike the
rest of the Rollins Road area , this subarea , because it is a
transition area between the Rollins Road industrial area and the
Broadway Commercial area allows for retail and office uses
along the Broadway frontage . The industrial uses that area
allowed in the rest of the Rollins Road area allowed north of
the commercial frontage on Broadway and at the Gateway" . Each
of the permitted and conditional uses shown below are uses
currently allowed or conditioned in the M- 1 . Each should be
reviewed in light of the land use description in the plan .
(a) Air courier, delivery or other trans-shipment services, including trucking, which:
(1) provide on-site parking for all company vehicles dispatched from the site and for
vehicles of employees working on the premises; and
3
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(2) provide adequate on-site space for loading and unloading goods,equipment and
materials.
(b) Ambulance services including dispatch,day rooms and parking for all company
vehicles dispatched or stored on the site and vehicles of employees working on the premises.
(c) Automobile and truck repair,service and body shops,wholesale or retail which are:
(1)located south of Easton Creek;
(2) provide on-site parking for all cars being serviced and for vehicles of all employees
working on the premise.
Annotation:
Whether car repair shops should be prohibited in the RR district
except in the designated Auto Row area along Adrian Road or also
allowed in the area south of Easton Creek, where many are
presently located, was much debated by the subcommittee. The
final conclusion was that there are a lot of small,
nonconforming auto repair shops which serve local residents and
businesses in the area south of Easton Creek. They should not
be discouraged from expanding because they are nonconforming.
Moreover, expansion would require these small business sites to
become conforming in parking which would greatly benefit the
other businesses in their area. Without this allowance these
sites might continue indefinitely without change, and there
would be no improvement to the serious parking and access
problem which they presently create in areas like North Carolan
Road and on Nerli Lane. e
(d) Any light industrial or manufacturing use,including associated laboratories,such as
but not limited to electronic, biotechnology,furniture,pharmaceutical,and printing,which:
(1) is conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building with a floor area ratio no
greater than 0.5 which:
Annotation:
The land use plan for the Rollins Road area sets a review line
for industrial uses which an FAR greater than 0.5, e.g. a
conditional use permit will be required. The plan also sets a
maximum FAR of 1.0 for industrial uses. ( NB/RR plan page 27-32)
(2) does not increase noise at property line by more than 5 dBA L 10;
4
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 17,2005 changes
(3) does not generate vibrations which can be felt off the site and which will have no
increased effect on permissible adjacent uses;
(4) is conducted in such a manner so as to preclude any nuisance, hazard, or commonly
recognized offensive and obnoxious conditions or characteristics from odors detectable at the
property line or off the site.
(e) Food establishments within a multi-use building which meet the following
requirements:
(1) are not the primary use of the building or structure;
(2) are open no earlier than five(5:00) a.m. and close no later than seven (7:00 p.m.),
and are open Monday through Saturday only;
Annotation:
At study the Planning Commission felt that since these food
establishments were intended to serve people working in the
industrial area whose work days might include shift work, the
hours for these food establishments should be longer than the 6
a.m. to 5 p.m. allowed in the current M-1 zoning requirements.
(3) have a maximum size of fifteen hundred (1500) square feet;
(4) are at least fifteen(15) feet in length and fifteen(15) feet in width; and
Annotation:
The dimensions were adjusted to be 15 ' by 15 ' which is the same
for the same use as in the Inner Bayshore district .
Original Annotation: Currently in the M-1 zone food
establishments within a multi-use building such as a warehouse
have a minimum size of 20 feet in length and 15 feet in width.
However when creating the Inner Bayshore district it was
suggested by the subcommittee and adopted with the ordinance
that these employee serving food establishments in light
industrial areas have a minimum length of 15 feet and width of
15 feet . This provision has been changed for the RR district to
be consistent with the standards in the IB district .
(5) provide parking at one (1) space per three hundred (300) gross square feet.
5
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
Annotation:
Large office buildings are not allowed by the land use policy of
the NB/RR plan. Typically this is a use which happens in large
office buildings.
(f) Laboratory and clean room facilities for research,testing, or creating products and
goods.
(g) Office use only in conjunction with and for the sole support of a permitted use
occurring on the same site, where the office use does not exceed fifty(50) twenty-five(25)
percent of gross floor area of a building and parking is provided on site to code requirements.
Annotation:
The Subcommittee felt that it was important to make it clear
that the Rollins Road area was not intended to become an office
park. This provision was modified to clarify that offices uses
in a building must be associated with a permitted use on the
site and the amount of area that the office could occupy was
reduced from 50% to 25% to insure that the office activity did
not take over the light industrial or heavy commercial activity
on the site.
Original Annotation: This provision has been interpreted in the
past to allow a free standing office use in the Rollins Road
area so long as office use does not occupy more than 50% of the
building (one office or a collection of offices) . The plan
clearly states that, except along the Broadway frontage at the
southern gateway area, office uses are to be discouraged. An
overlay zone will be added to address the additional land
uses/preferred land uses for the gateway and auto row areas.
(h) Outdoor storage of materials which are an accessory use to a permitted use which
meet the following requirements of section 25.44.065 below.
Annotation:
To make the zoning code easier to use the performance criteria
for outdoor storage have been moved to a separate section. This
also underscores the universal application to each site of these
standards whenever any use includes outdoor storage of
materials.
(i) Rental and leasing of goods and equipment conducted wholly within an enclosed
6
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
building,with no associated outdoor display or storage areas in the front yard where goods,
equipment,or stored supplies are visible from the street.
6) Service businesses, including but not limited to janitorial and contractors, and other
support services and excepting personal services,which:
(1) provide on-site parking for all company vehicles dispatched from the site and
vehicles of employees working on the premises; and
(2) provide adequate on-site space for loading and unloading goods, equipment and
materials.
(k) Warehousing, storage, distribution of goods,materials, liquids and equipment
conducted wholly within an enclosed building with an floor area ratio not to exceed 0.5.
Annotation:
The plan clearly includes warehousing under the umbrella of
industrial use, and therefore as permitted such structures are
limited to 0 .5 FAR. On reason to keep this building size
control is to keep the area available to smaller support type
businesses and to discourage the "big box" pressure to take over
an existing, very large building which might have inadequate
parking and access for such a use. "Big Box" retail is
prohibited in the Rollins Road area but there are other large
scale operations which have had a significant impact on the area
in the past such as the Purity Grocery Store's warehouse area
(which became the Hiram Walker bottling plant and later, after
subdivision, Metro Furniture manufacturing and a postal service
sorting station for military mail) Outdoor storage is addressed
with criteria that apply to all properties, in a separate
section, see below.
(0 Accessory uses which are necessary for the permitted uses under this section.
(m) Retail sales and display areas as an accessory use to a permitted use,interior to a
building only,with the following additional requirements:
(1) The hours of operation are within six (6:00) a.m.to nine (9:00) p.m.; and
Annotation:
The subcommittee noted that retail sales which might promote the
success of an industrial or warehouse use should be allowed to
7
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
operate within "normal" retail hours . The suggestion was that
the previously proposed closing time of 6 : 00 p.m. be extended to
9 : 00 P.M.
(2) Retail display area is limited to a maximum of 5,000 square feet; and
(3) No serviee e sale of alcoholic beverages; and
Annotation:
In their recommending action on the RR regulations the Planning
Commission deleted the reference to "service" in item m(3)
because they felt that it would be unenforceable and would
discourage some businesses which would be appropriate to the
area. Businesses in the are might serve alcoholic beverages at
an opening or staff party for example; or a wine distributor may
provide samples to a customer in a small retail area.
(4) Does not increase noise at property line by more than 5 dBA L 10 ; and
(5) Does not generate vibrations which can be felt off the site and which will have no
increased effect on permissible adjacent uses.
Annotation:
The subcommittee suggested that based on the impact on the
industrial are only two of the five performance criteria listed
here for retail sales and display areas should be subject to a
conditional use permit : hours of operation and service and sale
of alcoholic beverages . The others must be complied with or the
applicant must get a variance e.g. show a hardship on the
property.
original Annotation: This provision was added in the 1990 ' s to
allow warehouses used by wholesalers to have showrooms for
retailers to come see their products. We have several such
operations in the Rollins Road area presently. Wolfe appliances
and a coffee bean processor are two. The direction of the plan
would support these uses with wholesalers but not for the type
of retail sales which sells to or serves individuals. We have
had some issues with entertainment equipment rental operations
which have turned their display areas into locations for private
parties. For this reason the changes in italics area suggested.
8
Rollins Road (RR) District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27, 2005 changes
25.44.030 Conditional uses.
The following are uses requiring a conditional use permit:
(a) Industrial uses with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0;
Annotation :
The Specific Plan provides for a permitted FAR of 0 . 5 and
maximum FAR of 1 . 0 for industrial uses . In a footnote it notes
that the maximum FAR should not be allowed if it causes an
impact on critical intersections identified in by the traffic
analyzer . Usually the environmental document for development
which comes before the Planning Commission identifies the
traffic impacts of the use . Certainly the impacts would be
considered as a part of the analysis for a conditional use
permit . The way this is written , 0 . 5 FAR is permitted; 0 . 51 FAR
or more up to 1 . 0 FAR would require a conditional use permit .
More than 1 . 0 FAR would require a variance . As written this
provision would require a variance to all the other performance
requirements for industrial uses , see 25 . 44 . 020 (c) above .
(b) Air courier, delivery, or other transshipment services, including trucking which do
not meet the requirements for permitted uses.
Annotation :
Permitted uses are repeated in the conditional uses section with
performance zoning when it has been decided that an applicant
may ask for exceptions to one or more of the performance
criteria . In cases where the City feels that some performance
criteria must be met , these criteria are not included in
description of the use in the conditional uses section . This is
intended to give the instruction to the staff that the criteria
not mentioned cannot be excepted . In the case of air courier it
is noted here that all of the performance criteria may be
exceeded with a conditional use permit .
(c) Automobile rental businesses, including truck and recreation vehicles, which meet
the following minimum standards:
(1) The use is the sole tenant and only occupant of any building or area on the site;
(2) The site is a minimum size of seven-tenths (0.7) of an acre;
9
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(3) Parking is provided on site for storage of at least 25 percent of the cars rented
monthly,based on a annual average for the site;
(4) Parking is provided on site for all employees and customers;and
(5) The use meets all the other requirements of development in the district,including
peak hour trip generation at critical intersections as defined in the Traffic Analyzer.
Annotation:
Presently auto rental, truck and RV rental uses are allowed only
a conditional use; therefore this does not represent a change.
This however would apply the same performance criteria to all
vehicle rental uses.
(d) Automobile dealerships that are wholly enclosed within a warehouse structure with
no outdoor display areas;
Annotation:
This provision applies to those areas outside of the designated
'Auto Row area. So would allow automobile dealerships any place
within the Rollins Road industrial area. In addition this
provision no long addresses auto repair.
(e) Automobile storage for car rental businesses provided the following requirements
are met:
(1)Vehicles shall not be moved during a.m.and p.m.peak hour traffic periods as defined
by the City Engineer;and
(2)Minimum site size of seven-tenths(0.7)of an acre;and
(3)Area enclosed with an opaque fence eight(8)feet in height at a location approved by
the Public Works Department.
Annotation:
In general this use is presently confined to the upland portion
of the drainage area under the PG and E power lines. However,
this provision would allow such storage use through out the
Rollins Road area.
(f) Building materials and garden supply stores which:
10
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(1) Have no more than 100,000 square feet of indoor floor area,outdoor storage display
and sales areas combined; and
(2) paved, on-site parking based on retail sales requirements in Chapter 25.70 and for all
employees on site at one time.
Annotation:
The subcommittee felt that if the indoor and outdoor retail
activity was confined to a stated gross square footage and
parking then a floor area ratio or other measures to control
mass would take care of themselves. The structure would still
need to meet the requirements of the design criteria and the
outdoor areas uses would have to be screened as required
elsewhere in the district regulations.
Original Annotation: The subcommittee directed that big box
retail that supported the permitted and conditional uses of the
Rollins Road area should be considered for the Rollins Road
area. The kinds of large scale retail discusses as appropriate
were lumber yards, building materials, and garden supplies and
nursery outlets. The kinds of outlets which need larger sites
than "typical" retail outlets currently in Burlingame and which
support the local community. The location near the freeway of
the Rollins Road area makes it suitable for the regionally
oriented traffic which is necessary to support a larger retailer
of this kind. Addition of this use in the Rollins Road area will
require an amendment to the Specific Plan for the North
Burlingame/Rollins Road area.
(g) Technical schools with training related to the permitted and conditional uses in the
Rollins Road area with parking as set out in chapter 25.70.
Annotation:
There is currently at least one technical training school in the
Rollins Road area. It has been there since the early 1970 ' s and
there has been no use conflicts between it and the industrial
uses in the area. It is located in a portion of the Rollins
Road Area that is more accessible to BART. Making this a
conditional use will allow the school to cease being
nonconforming and allow the city to require more on-site parking
if this becomes an issue in the future (presently it is not) .
Training facilities which support activities in the area were
11
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
allowed in the Inner Bayshore industrial area. The same wording
has been used for the Rollins Road provision.
(h) Commercial recreation, including health clubs and gymnasiums,with on-site
parking.
(i) Health services and medical clinics whose primary function is to support businesses
in the M-1 district.
(j) Food establishments in multiuse buildings which do not meet the requirements of
section 25.44.020-5.
(k) Motor freight terminals whose site development meets the following requirements:
(1) Provide on-site parking for all company vehicles dispatched from the site and for
vehicles of employees working on the premises; and
(2) Provide adequate on-site space for loading and unloading goods, equipment and
materials.
(1) Office uses limited to supporting only a permitted or conditional use on the same site
that exceed twenty-five(25)percent of the gross floor area of a building where parking is
available on site to code requirements.
Annotation:
The subcommittee felt that to protect the industrial area from
becoming an office park in the future, on site office uses
should be limited to those which support a permitted or
conditional use which is allowed in the zone. Free standing
office uses, unrelated to any other activity on the site, should
not be permitted. This provision would allow a
permitted/conditional industrial use to have more than 25%
office to support their activity with a conditional use permit .
It would not allow application for leasing part of the building
developed for office to an unrelated business which did not have
a permitted or conditional use activity on the site.
Original Annotation: This provision has been interpreted to
allow free standing office uses in warehouse buildings so long
as they employ less than 50% of the gross floor area. This
interpretation is inclined to encourage conversion of the
industrial area to office.
12
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(m) Outdoor storage of rental or leased equipment which is a primary use of the site,
located in the RR district between Easton Creek and Broadway, and which meets the
requirements of Section 25.44.065 below.
Annotation:
This provision allows exceptions to the performance criteria for
outdoor storage to be granted with a conditional use permit
rather than requiring a variance. In a sense this weakens the
design direction of the specific plan for the area by allowing
more flexibility for the location of outdoor storage which can
be unsightly. However, this approach provides more options for
industrial uses which may have unique outdoor storage needs.
Should car rental storage be included with outdoor storage of
rental or leased equipment . Another approach to confining this
use and keeping it from over running the industrial area.
(n) Outdoor storage or treatment of materials which is not an accessory use to a
permitted use which meets the requirements of Section 25.44.065 below.
Annotation:
These provisions allow exceptions to storage uses with a CUP. A
separate section has been added for the performance criteria for
outdoor storage. See section 25 .44 . 065 below.
(o) Retail sales and display areas as an accessory use to a permitted use, interior to a
building only, with the following additional requirements:
(1) The hours of operation are within six(6:00) a.m. to nine (9:00)p.m.; and
(2) No seMee or sale of alcoholic beverages.
Annotation:
Following the public hearing the Planning Commission determined
that it would be difficult to enforce a prohibition on the
service of alcoholic beverages in display areas. For example, a
business may give a grand opening at which they serve wine. For
this reason they recommend that the sale of alcoholic beverages
should be prohibited but not the service without sale.
Subcommittee extended the permitted hours for this use, so a
conditional use permit is only required if the hours exceed 6
a.m. to 9 p.m. Inclusion of this use was discussed by the
Subcommittee in July. This provision would allow an applicant
13
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
an accessory use for retail sales and display activities to
request a conditional use permit to exceed the performance
criteria for hours of operation and service .or sale of alcoholic
beverages . All the other performance criteria shown in the
permitted uses section must be met, or a variance granted to
allow them to be exceeded.
Weeding,but ineludiiig dayeare for healthy dogs wher-e--.t
(1) All animal eare eti.Aty is nt ed within a street..- anA
(2)The noise level is fiet inereased at pr-epefty line by more than 5 dBA In 10 ; and
(3)M animal is kept e ght. Atheu4 a a#endant beingpfesent.
(p) Veterinary hospitals with associated animal care facilities, excepting breeding
and boarding facilities,where;
(1) All animal care activity is contained within a structure;
(2) The noise level is not increased at property line by more than 5 dBA L10; and
(3) No animal is kept overnight without an attendant being present.
Annotation:
At their action hearing the Planning Commission directed that
the proposed regulation for veterinary hospitals which was
expanded to include private boarding facilities (still
prohibiting breeding facilities) be replaced with the current
M-1 regulation for veterinary hospitals which prohibits breeding
and boarding facilities. The M-1 regulation would allow the
keeping of animals (boarding) overnight for an unspecified term
for medical purposed as long as an attendant is present on the
site with the animals and it is for a medical purpose. Other
kinds of boarding, including the 'doggie daycare' concept are
prohibited. Commission directed the Subcommittee which worked
on the new RR provisions to review the boarding issue and make a
recommendation back to the Planning Commission. By inserting the
M-1 standards the Commission felt that they could move the RR
district regulations on to the city council so that developers
interested in the industrial area would have the timely and
14
Rollins Road(RR) District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27, 2005 changes
clear direction they require to facilitate implementation of the
specific plan .
Original Annotation : A new use for the industrial area which
has been raised frequently recently with staff is " doggie day
care " . This is a use where healthy dogs are left for the day or
a week or two to be cared for by others . This use is similar to
a veterinary hospital which is a conditional use in the current
M- 1 zoning district . Doggie Day Care and uses such as the SPCA
care and adoption center would currently be allowed as a "use
similar to " under the conditional use provisions . In the
current provisions a determination is required by the Planning
Commission to confirm that the proposed doggie day care or SPCA
use is similar to a veterinarian hospital . Given the
performance criteria required for a veterinarian hospital and
the recent planning commission determination on the SPCA care
and adoption center being appropriate in the zone because it was
similar to a veterinarian hospital , it seems consistent to
include day and over night care for healthy dogs e . g . doggie day
care along with the veterinary hospital regulation . The
impacts and trip generation of the two activities would be about
the same .
Original Annotation : In the 1990 ' s the uses in the Rollins Road
area were expanded to allow Veterinary hospitals because there
was no other place in the city where they were allowed . Since
then a new use has arisen, doggie daycare . There are no
specific provisions in the code for this use . Staff has
determined that doggie daycare is " similar to " the performance
criteria of veterinary hospitals and has encouraged them in the
M- 1 zone with a CUP . When a use emerges as common it is better
to address it specifically rather than require an
" interpretation" for each request . If doggie day care is
allowed in the M- 1 zone that would mean, for example , that it is
not allowed in the C- 1 or C- 2 zones . Doggie day care is not
compatible , in most cases , with residential uses .
(q) Living quarters in association with a permitted or conditional use, to be used by a
night watchman or to provide security for the site;
(r) Structures over thirty-five (35) feet in height.
(s) Any structure or structures that cover more than sixty (60) percent of the lot.
15
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(t) Accessory uses which are necessary for the conditional uses under this section.
(u) Retail sales as an accessory use to a warehouse use wholly enclosed within a
structure for specialty providers with a single product line for the construction industry such as
but not limited to plumbing fixtures,tile outlets,paint stores.
Annotation:
This provision allows an applicant to request a larger retail
area than is allowed in the permitted uses section.
(v) Accessory uses related to a permitted use which requires outdoor treatment or
processing of materials shall meet the following additional requirements;
(1)Is adequately screened from view from the street with an opaque eight(8)foot fence;
and
(2)Is not located in the front yard of the property.
(y) Any commercial or industrial use similar in nature to a permitted or conditional use
in this or the Inner Bayshore zoning district.
Annotation:
This provision was taken from the M-1 district and modified to
allow any use allowed or conditional in the Inner Bayshore
zone. As written in the M-1 zoning district this provision
would have allowed any permitted or conditional use in any
commercial or industrial zone in the RR district. The
subcommittee felt that this was too broad a permission, and
could result in the loss of the industrial area should it be
taken over by small retail establishments. It would also be
inconsistent with the city's General Plan; and therefore
misleading to property owners and developers. To be consistent
with the General and Specific plans the only other commercial
uses which should be allowed in the RR district are those
allowed in the other area of the city which is similar in
character and plays a similar role in the city's land use base,
the interior of the Inner Bayshore district.
25.44.040 Prohibited uses.
All uses not listed as permitted or conditional shall be prohibited,including:
16
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(a)Adult oriented businesses;
(b)Massage, bathing or similar establishments;
(c) Automobile sales lots;
Annotation:
This provision is added to make the policy clear that it is the
city' s intention to concentrate new auto sales and service uses
in the area designated for Auto Row, or if they are an extension
of the existing auto sales and service uses presently on
Broadway at the entrance to the Rollins Road industrial area.
(d) Automobile wrecking,junk yards, storage or baling of scraps,paper, rags, sacks or
metals;
(e) Conference and exhibition facilities;
(f)Hotels and motels;
(g) Living quarters and residential structures, except as provided in subsection 25.44.030
(17);
(h) Outdoor storage or treatment of materials in required parking or in landscaping in the
front setback;
(i) Gasoline service stations;
Annotation:
Are there additional uses which should be included in the
prohibited uses list to under score the City' s opposition to
such uses in this area. One that comes to mind is free standing
retail uses .
0) Personal Services.
25.44.050 Special requirements for the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area
Annotation:
The Specific Plan for the Rollins Road area establishes an Auto
Row. The provisions below create a zoning overlay to define the
17
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
priority uses in the new Auto Row and provide an incentive for
this area to convert to an Auto Row. These priority uses
include: automobile dealerships, sales lots and related service,
automobile repair, and automobile rental . Performance criteria
are established for each of these uses. Except for automobile
dealership criteria which are new, the performance criteria are
based on criteria used for these three uses elsewhere in the
zoning regulations . This provision establishes a priority for
these three uses by making all other uses conditional . In
addition the prohibited uses are also clearly set out and
include large scale retail which is auto related. The
Subcommittee felt that Auto Row should not include the property
at the east end of Edwards Court . They felt that this was one
of the few sites large enough to support a large retail
building supply use which would be more supportive of community
needs and compatible with the SPCA use proposed on Rollins Road
at Edwards Court than an Auto Sales and Service use might be.
Further the Auto Row was more clearly defined by having David
Road as its southern boundary. This change will require an
amendment to the Specific Plan for the Rollins Road subarea.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, within the Automobile Sales and
Service Overlay area designed in Ordinance No. as amended, the following use
regulations apply:
(a) Only the following uses are permitted in the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay
area as designated in the Rollins Road subarea of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific
Plan Land Use Map:
(1) Automobile sales lots,which include the following:
Annotation:
Automobile as used here and in this section is an inclusive term
and includes trucks, recreation vehicles and other motorized
vehicles. The performance criteria listed below apply to lots
for the sale of all vehicle types.
(A) A minimum site size of five (5) acres;
(B) A floor area ratio of not more than 0.15.
Annotation:
18
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
The criteria for the automobile dealerships with service
business are set out in the Auto Row subarea land use
description of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan
(see page 31) . In the current code RV and truck lease and sales
are allowed in the M-1 zone only without any outdoor display and
wholly enclosed in a warehouse.
(2) Automobile repair,both minor and major,which:
(A) Provide on-site storage for all cars being repair on-site; and
(B) Provide on-site parking or all cares being serviced and for vehicles of all
employees working on the premise; and
(C) Have a floor area ratio of not more than 0.5.
Annotation:
Vehicular repair is a major use in the M-1 zone. Most of the
present uses are located on substandard sites with no on site
parking or storage for cars being repaired. Generally these are
nonconforming uses (e .g. along North Carolan) . It is hoped that
in the future the vehicle repair businesses will relocate to the
Adrian Road area on sites which can accommodate their
activities . The performance criteria included in this provision
are intended to address the issues which have arisen from the
currently nonconforming auto repair locations .
(3) Automobile rental which meets the following minimum standards:
(A) The use is the sole tenant and only occupant of any building or area on the
site; and
(B) The site is a minimum size of seven-tenths (0.7) of an acre; and
(C) Parking is provided on site for storage of at least twenty-five(25)percent of
the cars rented monthly, based on an annual average for the site; and
(D) Parking is provided on site for all employees and customers; and
(E) The use meets all the other requirements of development in the district,
including peak hour trip generation at critical intersections as defined in the city's traffic
analyzer.
19
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
Annotation:
The land use section of the Specific Plan does not address car
rental uses in the Rollins Road subarea. The traffic impact for
car rental uses is different than auto sales and service
businesses. The performance criteria noted here are the same
criteria uses in the Inner Bayshore subarea (e.g. the O-M
district) . Car rental uses are included here because the
dealers in the city' s current auto row have requested car rental
uses be added as a support use to their sales and service
activities to improve their customer service.
(b) Conditional uses:
(1) Any exception to a performance standards listed in subsection (a) for a
automobile dealership and sales lot and automobile repair, major and minor, shall be
conditional uses in the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area;
Annotation:
As an incentive to encourage auto sales and service businesses
into the Adrian Road area and in recognition that many auto
repair shops are independently owned and smaller in size and
capital so assemblage of acreage may not be feasible, the
Commission felt that since specific design guidelines were now
in place, it was appropriate to allow exceptions to the
performance criteria as conditional uses rather than variances.
(2) All other uses that are permitted or conditional in sections 25.44.020 and 25.44.030
shall be conditional uses in the Automobile Sales and Service Overlay Area except as provided
in subsection (c)below.
Annotation:
The Specific Plan states that the Adrian Road Auto District "may
continue to be used for industrial uses and is also targeted to
establish a new center for automobile sales and services" . To
provide an incentive to implement the establishment of a new
auto row, a priority is given to auto/vehicle sales and service
uses and support uses (auto service and auto rental) by
limiting the permitted uses to only those related to automobile
sales and service . All other uses would require a CUP if they
area allowed at all in the overlay zone.
20
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(c) All uses not listed as permitted or conditional in this section shall be prohibited in the
Automobile Overlay Zoning, including but not limited to:
(1) Adult oriented businesses;
(2) Massage,bathing or similar businesses;
(3) Automobile wrecking,junk yards, storage or baling of scraps,paper rags, sacks or
metals;
(4) Conference and exhibition facilities;
(e) Hotels and motels;
(f) Living quarters and residential structures, except as specifically provided in
subsection 25.44.030 (17);
(g) Outdoor storage or treatment of materials in required parking or in landscaping in the
front setback;
(h) Gasoline service stations;
(i) Personal services.
Annotation:
The subcommittee determined that large Building Materials and
Garden Supply businesses should be allowed in the designated
Auto Row area with a conditional use permit, as they are allowed
in the rest of the Rollins Road area. Therefore, this use is
not included in the prohibited uses section. The specific plan
makes it very clear that "large format auto parts retailer are
not allowed" in the Adrian Road Auto District . (page 31) . As
first drafted the prohibited uses section did not allow free
standing auto part retail sales with a floor area greater than
one thousand (1, 000) gross square feet . This provision is not
included in the current prohibited uses . However, the RR
district only allows large scale retail which is related to
building materials, so large format auto part retail sales uses
would be prohibited in the Auto Row area as the provisions are
now written.
21
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
25.44.055 Special requirements for the entrance to the southern gateway.
Annotation:
In their recommendation of the RR regulations to the City
Council the Planning Commission directed that this section be
brought forward as it was suggested by the Subcommittee.
However, the commission directed that their subcommittee study
further three issues:
(1) whether to be eligible for the bonus FAR the applicant must
both combine properties and include a "gateway feature" in the
development. This consideration should include whether there
should be a minimum parcel size where lot combination would not
be required for eligibility for the bonus.
(2) if this section represents an overlay zone or "special
requirements" . As an overlay zone all of the heavy commercial
and industrial uses allowed in the body of the RR zone would be
allowed in the Southern Gateway area as well as the retail and
office uses indicated in the plan. Defined with " special
requirements" only the uses identified in the plan ( commercial
retail and office uses) would be allowed. The regulations below
treat the Southern Gateway with "special requirements" .
(3) in referring to "retail and service commercial and office
uses" in the Southern Gateway did the plan mean pedestrian
oriented retail uses (like in the Broadway Commercial Area) as
well as heavier commercial, basically auto access oriented; or
just auto access oriented retail.
Because the Commission did not want to hold up implementation of
the specific plan, they recommended the provisions proposed by
the subcommittee be adopted. Proposed changes will be brought
back as a separate ordinance when the subcommittee has reviewed
the requests for changes .
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, within the Southern Gateway
Subarea designated in Ordinance No. as amended, the following regulations apply:
(a) Only the following uses are permitted in the Southern Gateway Subarea:
(1) Office uses with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0;
(2) Automobile dealerships and sales lots with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0;
22
Rollins Road(RR) District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27, 2005 changes
(3) Commercial recreation uses with a floor area ratio not to exceed 1.0; and
(4) Service businesses, including personal services, with a floor area ratio not to exceed
1.0.
(b) Only the following uses are conditional in the Southern Gateway Subarea providing
lots are combined and gateway amenities area included:
(1) Office uses with a floor area ratio up to 2.0;
(2) Service businesses, including personal services, with a floor area ratio up to 2.0; and
(3) Automobile dealerships and sales lots with a floor area ratio up to 2.0.
Annotation :
The Specific Plan provides a density incentive for office uses
in the gateway area if they include architectural and other
design features which create a gateway entrance into the Rollins
Road area at Broadway . The plan provides for up to a 2 . 0 FAR
incentive to the developer to incorporate design features which
create a physical/visual gateway at the entrance to the Rollins
Road area . The plan however leaves the decision of the
appropriate design of this "gateway" feature up to the Planning
Commission . For this reason the incentive FAR is included as a
conditional use . If a developer wishes more than 2 . 0 FAR
inorder to justify the "gateway" features , then a variance would
be required . The plan directs that this incentive bonus should
be applied to all of the uses being encouraged at the southern
gateway with the proviso for eligibility that the project
include combination of lots and a gateway design feature .
(NB/RR Specific Plan pg . 31 )
(c) All uses not listed as permitted or conditional in this section shall be prohibited in the
Southern Gateway Subarea, including but not limited to:
(1) Adult oriented businesses;
(2) Massage, bathing or similar establishments;
(3) Automobile wrecking, junk yards, storage or baling of scraps, paper rags, sacks or
metals;
23
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(4) Conference and exhibition facilities;
(5) Hotels and motels;
(6) Living quarters and residential structures,except as specifically provided in
subsection 25.44.030(17);
(7) Outdoor storage or treatment of materials in required parking or in landscaping in the
front setback;
(8) Gasoline service stations.
Annotation:
The Specific Plan's direction is vague regarding uses in the
gateway area. The discussion during the public hearings was to
develop the properties along Broadway as higher density office
and retail uses to provide a continuum of the types of uses in
the area at present. However, the plan states only "Commercial
(service and special uses)". The plan also provides for a
higher density of development along the Broadway frontage (FAR
1.0 with a maximum of 2.0 FAR if gateway provisions are
included, see conditional uses below) .
25.44.045 Use of drainage rights-of-ways.
Annotation:
In their recommendation for action on the section of the
proposed RR regulations for use of the drainage rights-of-ways
the Planning Commission determined that they would move forward
the regulation as proposed by the Subcommittee. However, at the
public hearing a property owner raised the question about
amending the permitted uses to allow a self-storage use in the
drainage area. Uses are presently restricted in the 100+ foot
wide drain because of the PGandE towers and because the area
acts as a retention basin annually during periods of heavy rain
and high tides. Because of the periodic flooding of the drain
the drain was not included in the trip generation calculations
for peak hour trips impacting the Broadway/Rollins intersection.
However, much of the property within the drain is in private
ownership. Because of the complex issues involved with
24
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
"permanent" independent uses in the drain, assignment of
liability for flood damage, and lack of detailed information
from Public Works regarding the impacts on the flood
control/Rollins Road drainage function created by a permanent
use in the drain, the commission elected to bring the regulation
forward as it stands. They referred the issue of locating
permanent, trip generating uses including self-storage in the
drainage area back to the Subcommittee for further
consideration after input from the Public Works Department.
Only the following uses, with a conditional use permit, environmental review, encroachment
permits and all required State and Federal permits, shall be allowed within the drainage right-of-
ways from the southern boundary of Millsdale Industrial Park Number 5 Subdivision north to the
city boundary:
Annotation:
Development in the drainage areas in the Rollins Road Area has
been a problem for years. These drains were installed when the
area was filled. They are low points in to which the land on
either side, included the roadway, drains . Periodically when
heavy rains and high tides coincide these drains back up and
flood. Generally the drains are about 60 feet wide and in many
area are in private ownership. It has been city policy that
these areas cannot be used for parking to support more intense
development on the portions of properties outside of the drain,
because the required parking may be underwater periodically, and
not useable for on-site parking. When the traffic analyzer for
the Bayfront was first done in the 1980 ' s the Rollins Road area
was included since the Bayshore/Rollins intersection was
critical to the access and operation of the roadway system
serving the Bayshore area. At that time no trip generation was
assigned to the drain and it was assumed that the area would be
undeveloped. When the Bayfront plan was updated and the new
North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan was completed, the
traffic analyzer was revised and expanded. In the revised
traffic analyzer it was assumed that the environmentally
sensitive portions of the drainage area would remain undeveloped
and the uses which would go into the remainder of the drainage
area would be low impact, off-peak trip generators. This zoning
reflects a change in policy; one which allows supportive uses
(supplemental , no required, parking for permitted or conditional
uses in the district) or free standing uses, such as automobile
storage, with the limitation that vehicles be moved during off
25
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
peak hours .
(a) Supplemental parking for permitted or conditional uses in the district;
(b) Automobile storage for car rental businesses provided the following requirements are
met:
(1) Vehicles shall not be moved during a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic periods as defined
by the City Engineer;
(2) Minimum site size of.7 acres;
(3) No customers shall visit the site;
(c) Recreation vehicle storage so long as vehicles are not moved during a.m. and p.m.
peak hour traffic periods as defined by the City Traffic Engineer;
(d) Outdoor storage related to immediately abutting uses which are permitted or
conditional in the district;
(e) Fencing;
(f) Uses similar in nature to those allowed in this section.
Annotation:
This section on the drain has been changed from the original in
the M-1 . The references to public right of way and designated
planter strips have been removed. These provisions now apply
only to the designated drainage areas. There are two major such
areas, one parallel to the railroad tracks on the west side of
the are and one in the middle of the area flanked by now
abandoned Southern Pacific spur rail right-of-way. Some of the
ownership of these drains is private and some is public.
25.44.065 Outdoor storage.
Annotation:
This is a new section created out of the performance criteria
previously included in the permitted and conditional uses
section of the M-1 district . These criteria have not changed
26
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
from the previous zoning; however, they have been collected
together to make them easier to use. The permitted and
conditional uses section refer the user to this section for the
requirements for outdoor storage .
Outdoor storage in the RR district shall be subject to the following requirements:
(a) The storage area shall be paved, shall not be located in required parking, aisles,
driveways, or landscaping.
(b) Lots located north of Mills Creek or with lot fronts on Rollins Road. No outdoor
storage shall be placed in the front yard or any lot located north or Mills Creek or with a lot front
on Rollins Road.
(c) Fencing. All outdoor storage shall be fully enclosed by either an opaque or solid
fence or wall eight(8) feet in height or by buildings, or a combination of fencing and buildings.
However, if the outdoor storage area is located at the sides or rear of a building on a lot that is
located south of Mills Creek, and the out door storage area is not visible from a public street,the
eight(8) foot fence or wall may be of an open design.
25.44.070 Design review.
Annotation:
This is a new section for the light industrial area. It is
based on the design guidelines set out in the Specific Plan on
pages 54-57 and 76-86 .
Construction and alterations including substantial construction or change to more than
fifty(50)percent of the front fagade or change to more than fifty(50)percent of any fagade
facing a public or private street or parking lot shall be subject to design review based on the
design guidelines for the Rollins Road Design District in the North Burlingame/Rollins Road
Specific Plan and shall be processed as provided in chapter 25.57.
(a) A design review application in the RR district shall be reviewed by the planning
commission for the following considerations:
(1) Architectural design and siting of structures which supports the light industrial,
manufacturing and job creating land uses of the Rollins Road subarea as adopted in the
North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan with the focus on creating positive streets for
safe vehicular,bicycle and pedestrian use interfacing with appropriately scaled development.
27
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
(2) Create an appropriate form, shape and scaled interface between the vehicular,bicycle
and pedestrian uses of the street and the buildings and their uses along the public realm,
including attention to the pattern of landscaping,physical identification of the site and
building entrances; the design should be architecturally compatible with the surrounding
development and consistent with the design guidelines and development of structures in the
Rollins Road subarea.
(3) Through out the Rollins Road subarea, except for the special considerations for the area
designated for Auto Row, design of all structures should incorporate articulation on the
building fagade including elements which emphasize appropriate scale and relate to human
form, entrances should be clearly announced and oriented toward the street, a variety of
materials should be used, roof screening elements should be incorporated into the
architectural design, signage should be a part of the site and consistent with the scale and
design of the building; exterior lighting should be sufficient for safety but not used as an
architectural feature or to illuminate adjacent properties.
(4) At the north and south gateway areas into the Rollins Road area special attention should
be paid to incorporation of gateway oriented architectural features, entry markers, street
furniture, specially scaled landscaping to announce the entrance to the Rollins Road subarea;
these features should be in character with the purpose, scale and function of the Rollins Road
area and should facilitate access by vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians from adjacent mass
transit locations
(5) On lots with any frontage on creeks, integrate the creek feature into the site and
building design, incorporate the creek amenity including interconnected public access and
views into site landscaping and planning, design access features particularly pedestrian and
bicycle trails to be interconnected and consistent with those on adjacent properties in order to
promote and protect natural features of the area to benefit those who work in and use the area
while providing a safe environment for walking and bicycling; respect and protect natural
habitat areas including seasonal wetland breeding locations for special species under power
lines and in natural drains.
(6) To achieve a unified and successful Auto Row in the Rollins Road subarea, develop a
unifying thematic design concept for the area built on a single approach to the transition
space between the public sidewalk and the private outdoor sales area using such concepts as
using consistent fencing material throughout the auto row area, unifying signage approaches
which also reflect the architectural style and materials of the development on each site and
take into consideration the character of the entire Auto Row area; focus on development at a
scale which works at the pedestrian level as well as from US 101, develop a pattern of
consistent landscaping, and encourage building facades which are articulated structurally
incorporate human scale elements and properly integrate large display window areas.
28
Rollins Road(RR)DistrictRegulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
Annotation:
One of the main features of the Specific Plan for Rollins Road
was to add design criteria with specific objectives . The
criteria address the interface of the street with the buildings
through out the Rollins Road area, then focus on specific
locations : the Gateways (north and south) , the newly designated
Auto Road area along Adrian Road, the properties adjacent to
creeks or other natural areas (PGandE E right-of-way and
drains) . The design criteria have been written to address each
of these areas of design focus. However, these criteria are not
intended to be used individually, they are intended to be used
together, so creekside properties, for example, should also be
held accountable for the criteria which address street frontage
and structural architectural elements and integration of
signage .
(b) When any part of a commercial structure is subject to design review, any awnings on the
commercial structures shall be included in the design review.
(c) The following are exempt from the provisions of this section:
(1) Applications for building permits or planning approvals for development in the TW
district filed before ;
(2) Any amendment to a project exempt from design review pursuant to subsection(1)
above shall be subject to design review if the project involved would have otherwise been
subject to design review under subsection(a) above, the project has not been completed, and
the amendment would extend any structure involved in the application outside the envelope
of the structure for which the approval was granted or sought in the underlying application
would change a fagade. Changes to, additions of, or deletions of awnings as an amendment
to a project shall not trigger design review under this subsection.
Annotation:
Section (c) above is the standard language which is being
included in all of the new zoning district which have added
design criteria.
25.44.075 Building Regulations.
The following maximum lot coverage shall apply to all parcels located in the RR district:
29
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
a. Lot coverage. All buildings and structures or portions thereof which are hereafter
erected, constructed, established or enlarged shall be limited to seventy(70)percent of the total
area of each property or parcel.
Annotation:
There is no change proposed to this provision. As in other
subareas, the Specific Plan does not address lot coverage.
However, this provision has been applied to this area since the
1950 ' s and has been instrumental in the pattern of development;
there does not seem to be a reason to change it at this time.
b. Maximum front setback and build-to-line.
1. Rollins Road, North Carolan Road, Ingold Road, Guittard Road, and Broderick
Road. The front wall of any structure built on a lot with a lot front on Rollins Road,
North Carolan Road,David Road, higold Road, Guittard Road and Broderick Road
shall be setback twenty(20)feet from the front property line; and shall have a
minimum of sixty(60)percent of the structure built at the front setback line.
Annotation:
As written this provision would require that 60% of the front
wall (no matter how many stories) of any building shall be
setback 20 feet from the front property line. The remaining 40%
of the structure may be setback farther on the lot and may have
variation in the setback of the stories. It should be noted that
this is a departure from the current M-1 zoning. The current
zoning requires a 25 foot front setback on the west side of
Rollins Road from Mills Creek north and a 15 foot front setback
for all other buildings in the Rollins Road area. The Specific
Plan would reduce the front setback for properties on the west
side of Rollins Road north of Mills Creek by 5 feet and increase
the overall front setback in the industrial area by 5 feet .
2. David Road, Edwards Court, Marsten Road and North Carolan Road. There shall be
a minimum front setback of fifteen(15) feet from the front property line.
Annotation:
The plan does not designate build to lines or minimum front
setbacks for these streets . Because the pattern of development
is established on these secondary streets, the setback standard
is taken from the current M-1 zoning district regulations.
30
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
3. Adrian Road and Adrian Court. The front wall of any structure built on a lot with a
lot front on Adrian Road and Adrian Court shall have a zero (0) foot setback; and shall
have a minimum of twenty(20)percent of the structure built at the zero (0) setback line.
Annotation:
In the Adrian Road auto row overlay there is no required front
setback; where 15 feet is currently required. However the
design guidelines would require only 20 percent of a new
structure to be built at property line. The remainder of any
structure would have to be setback from the front property line .
The amount of this setback is up to the developer. The design
guidelines give no direction so in a worst case an entire
building could be built parallel to the street frontage with 20%
at property line and 80% set back six inches from the property
line.
(c) Side setback.
(1) There shall be no side setback requirement for any structures constructed on lots in
the portion of the RR districts between Easton Creek and Broadway, including properties with
lot frontage on Broadway.
Annotation:
In the current zoning the creeks are used to separate uses.
Since much of the existing development on south of Easton Creek
is already developed lot line to lot line, setback standards for
this area were minimal . To encourage reuse the no side setback
requirement has been extended to the Gateway area along Broadway
(see italics) .
(2) There shall be a minimum ten(10) foot side yard setback on all buildings and
structures constructed on all other lots in the RR district.
Annotation:
In the majority of the Rollins Road area (all of that north of
Easton Creek) a 10 foot side setback is required. This standard
has been in effect since the 1970 ' s and has helped to develop
the pattern of development in the area.
(d) Rear setbacks.
There shall be no rear setback requirements.
31
Rollins Road(RR) District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27, 2005 changes
Annotation :
In the current zoning there are no rear setback requirements in
the M- 1 district zoning . For some kinds of development the
California Building and Fire Codes have separation requirements
which must be met . In cases where these apply at the rear of
abutting structures , a new structure would be required to have a
rear setback . The minimum distance between buildings for the
fire department is usually 3 feet and, when any point of the
development on a lot is more than 150 feet from the street , a 10
foot fire lane around the building is required .
25.44.080 Height limitations.
(a) The maximum height for structures in the RR district is sixty (60) feet.
(b) However, structures on lots in the RR district with lot fronts on either Nerli Lane or
Broadway shall have a maximum height of seventy-five (75) feet.
(c) Notwithstanding subsection s (a) and (b) above, maximum heights are also subject to
further limitation by the Federal Aviation Administration.
Annotation :
The Specific Plan sets a base line for maximum height in the
Rollins Road area . In the plan more intense development is
allowed in the Southern Gateway area (higher FAR and taller
buildings ) . Finally, the Specific Plan recognizes the proximity
of the airport and its potential impact on the safe operation of
the airport and requires that the FAA review and approve any
height , even if it over rides the maximum height allowed by the
city . This provision reflects these adjustments . ( see Plan page
56 ) This section has been reformatted since the first draft of
the RR district which was reviewed by the Subcommittee .
25.44.090 Minimum lot size and street frontage.
There shall be a minimum lot size of ten thousand (10,000) square feet and a minimum
street frontage of fifty (50) feet. No property in this district shall be divided or subdivided into
a lot with less area or less street frontage.
32
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
Annotation:
The same minimum lot size provisions used in the Inner Bayshore
subarea zoning are suggested here. In the current M-1 zone the
minimum lot size is 5,000 SF and the minimum lot frontage is 50
feet. Such small lots are inefficient in the industrial area.
Adopting this larger lot size will protect the .larger lots which
are more efficient to develop as well as being more able to meet
on site parking and landscaping requirements.
25.44.095 No variance for lot size and street frontage.
No variances for lot size and street frontage shall be granted to any property within this
district.
Annotation:
This provision makes it clear that the city means the minimum
lot size; and will discourage developers from thinking, when the
purchase a lot that it cannot be divided into units less land
10,000 SF. This should reduce requests to the Planning
Commission and staff discussion at the counter.
25.44.100 Landscaping,creek access,and fencing requirements.
(a) Landscaping requirements. The following landscaping requirements shall apply to
all parcels located in the RR district:
(1) A minimum often(10)percent of the total area of each property or parcel shall be
suitably landscaped and the landscaped portions shall be properly irrigated and maintained.
(2) A minimum of sixty(60)percent of the front setback shall be covered with soft
landscaping,provided:
(A) If the area equal to ten(10)percent of the site is less than sixty(60)percent of the
front setback area,then all the required landscaping shall be placed within the front setback;or
(B) If the area equal to ten(10)percent of the site is more than sixty(60)percent of the
front setback area,then the remaining of the required landscaping shall be placed so that it is
visible from the public right-of-way.
33
Rollins Road(RR)District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27,2005 changes
Annotation:
These are the landscape provisions from the M-1 district
adjusted for the new design guidelines. They focus on
landscaping in the required front setback area. They do not
address requiring landscaping in the area at the front of a site
which is between the front setback and the face of the building
e.g. on a zero front setback lot, the 80% area in which the
developer decides to set the building back 10 feet. Based on
these provisions that area would not need to be landscaped.
Although, if it were, it would count in the 10% of the lot area
required to be landscaped.
(3) When fences are placed to enclose outdoor storage areas on any site,the required
landscaping shall be outside of the fence and visible from the public right-of-way.
(4) A landscaping plan and specifications, including irrigation, shall be submitted for
approval of the City Arborist when construction plans are submitted to the building department
for a building permit.
(b) Fences. Fences up to eight(8) feet in height, as measured from the highest adjacent
grade, shall be allowed in this district, subject to the other requirements and limitations of this
code, in particular Chapters 11.12 and 25.78.
(c) Creek access. Any parcel in the Rollins Road area with any frontage on Easton,Mills
and El Portal creeks shall be required to provide, as a part of the on-site landscaping plan, a
paved,public access trail along the top of the bank for the portion of the creek bank on the site.
The design of the trail shall be compliant with the Rollins Road Design District design guidelines
and designed to the specifications of the Public Works Department, and each such trail segment
shall connect directly to the termination of the public access trail segment along the creek bank
on each adjacent property;
Annotation:
The Specific Plan does not give too much direction regarding the
installation of the pedestrian trails required along the creek
banks in the industrial area. The provisions included here are
based in concept on the provisions used for the Bay Trail in the
Bayshore Planning Area.
25.44.150 Parking requirements.
All uses shall be subject to the provisions of this code and such additional parking
34
Rollins Road(RR) District Regulations with Annotations
Draft 7 including Planning Commission Study
October 27, 2005 changes
conditions as may be required for permitted or conditional uses pursuant to this chapter.
Annotation :
Unlike the O-M zone there are no special parking provisions for
any use in the M- l . The Specific Plan does not suggest a change
in this policy .
Add a new definition, Building Materials and Garden Supply.
25.08.155 Building materials and garden supply store.
"Building materials and garden supply store" means a retail or wholesale establishment
that predominantly sells buildings materials, paint, wallpaper, glass, fixtures, lumber, nursery
stock, lawn and garden supplies, electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning equipment
and supplies, and building and construction tools.
Annotation :
With the inclusion of building materials and garden supply store
as a conditional use in the RR district a definition for this
use needs to be added to the zoning code .
U:\ZoningIssues\NorthBurlingame Subarea Zoning\Rollins Road Subarea\Dft7Ro11insRdSubzng wPCAmend 10.27.05.doc
35
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 24,2005
the project site.Soil samples shall be sent to a California-certified laboratory for analysis of lead,total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), pesticides, California Code of Regulations Title 22 metals, and
polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs).Laboratory analytical reports shall be attached to the letter provided to
CHS and the City of Burlingame. Soil sampling results shall demonstrate that the tested constituents do not
exceed established Residential and Commercial Environmental Screening Levels(ESLs). In addition,the
project applicant shall provide a written affidavit that no asbestos-containing materials are present at the site
from which fill is being imported,or that asbestos-containing materials at the site have been appropriately
disposed and document that disposed.One letter containing soil sampling data and an asbestos affidavit shall
be provided for each site from which fill will be imported;5)All site discharge materials created during and
after construction must be in compliance with the City Municipal Code,Stormwater Water Management and
Discharge Control Chapter 15.14 and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)
requirements to control pollutants from entering the storm drain system.A Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan(SWPPP)shall be required for review and approval by the Public Works Department. Examples of
stormwater pollution prevention controls could include using hay bales at drains,covering and containing
construction site materials,dry sweeping paved surfaces,cleaning up leaks and spills immediately,and
filtering pumped runoff before it enters the storm drain system. Because of the proximity of this
construction site to existing and ongoing active pedestrian activity,best management practices for dust and
mud control will be required to reduce the impact on an ongoing recreation and businesses in the immediate
area;6)Survey markers shall be established by a licensed engineer and checked in the field regularly;7)To
reduce construction noise effects,the applicant shall require the construction contractor to limit noisy
construction activities to the least noise-sensitive times of the day and week(i.e.,Monday through Friday,
7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.;and Saturday,9:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.;none on Sunday and holidays);8)The applicant
shall require contractors to muffle all equipment used on the site and to maintain it in good operating
condition.All internal combustion engine-driven equipment shall be fitted with intake and exhaust mufflers
that are in good condition. This measure should result in all non-impact tools generating a maximum noise
level of no more than 85dBA when measured at a distance of 50 feet;9)Applicant shall require contractors
to turn offpowered construction equipment when not in use;10)To the extent possible,the contractor will
schedule truck trips outside of peak commute hours(i.e.,outside of 7:00 to 9:00 am.,and 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.);
11)Haul routes minimizing truck traffic on local roadways will be used to the extent possible;12)Prior to
construction activity,the project sponsor shall submit a construction management plan for review and
approval by the City's Department of Public Works. This plan shall include,but is not limited to,the
following items: a)Identification of routes for the movements of construction vehicles that would minimize
the effects on vehicular traffic,bicycle and pedestrian circulation in the area;and b)Provision of traffic
control personnel and/or signage near the proposed construction ingress/egress to direct construction
vehicles and alert the general public of construction traffic. The motion was seconded by C.Deal.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
filling of the site located at 301 Airport Boulevard. The motion passed on a 7-0-0. Appeal procedures were
advised. This item concluded at 8:25 p.m.
5. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN:
PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ROLLINS ROAD DISTRICT REGULATIONS(NEWSPAPER
NOTICE AND 124 NOTICED)CITY PLANNER,MARGARET MONROE
Reference staff report October 24,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report along with the
letters of comment which had been sent to the Planning Commission's attention regarding the regulations for
the Southern Gateway subarea,whether veterinarian hospitals and/or animal boarding should be allowed in
the Rollins Road planning area,and whether the storage containers to provide self-storage should be allowed
-7-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 24, 2005
in the drainage area under the PG and E lines in the Rollins Road area. Sixteen or so letters,most received
after the packet was delivered commenting on animal boarding,were placed at the commissioners'desks,the
majority were from property owners in the Rollins Road area.
Commissioners asked: is it correct that the city cannot zone a use out by prohibiting it in all zoning
districts? CA responded that is the tendency of the courts, but would extend to uses "reasonable" for this
community to have such as a veterinarian hospital not a nuclear waste plant. Can boarding in a hospital
sense be distinguished from a animal boarding facility?CA noted that it could be. On page 4 item in 3 there
is an error, it says "no sale or service of alcoholic beverages", but that would preclude a wholesaler from
giving tastings or a reception for clients,should it be revised to prohibit only the sale of alcoholic beverages?
CP noted Commission may make that change if they wish. There were no further questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. John Ward,representing two property owners, 1206-1220 Rollins
Road and 1616 Rollins Road, in the Rollins Road area; David Moutoux, 1400 Rollins Road; Pat Giorni,
1445 Balboa Avenue; Herman Christensen, 1429 Rollins Road; Henry Kuechler, 40-50 Edwards Court;
Albert Guibara, 1400 Rollins and Marsten Roads;Art Michael,Prime Time,Rollins Road,spoke. Represent
property owner in Southern Gateway area, 1206/1220 Rollins Road,three points in letter,understood in June
2004, when reviewed the draft plan and adjusted FAR to allow additional 1.0 FAR as an incentive in the
Southern Gateway area,that it would be hard to combine parcels and for the incentive to be effective should
either combine parcels or include a gateway feature;regarding land uses want industrial as well as retail and
office in the gateway area to provide more options for redevelopment not make it more difficult;concerned
about the kinds of retail allowed,want the full range pedestrian and auto oriented; should do this to fulfill
objectives and goals ofplan adopted in 2004. Concerned about section 25.44.030(p)which allows"doggie
day care" e.g. the boarding of animals in the RR zone,based on the assumption that this use is similar to a
veterinary hospital and on a determination made by the Planning Commission May 9, in fact there are no
veterinary hospitals in the M-1 zone,there are two in the R-3 and C-3 zones but neither allows animals to
stay overnight or board; feel commission's determination was not well considered before so should not be a
justification for the proposed zoning,should re-examine the proposal since a majority of the business owners
in the area are opposed. Commissioner asked if there is a distinction between veterinary hospital and
boarding of animals? Feel its OK to keep them over night if it is necessary for their health,all right for sick
for a night or two,not boarding. Boarding of animals is OK but opposed to breeding animals in the RR area;
SPCA has a relationship with the county to provide animal control,not good on Rollins Road should be on
Airport Blvd.on property nearer the existing facility,if they need more money for land could ask the County
to help them,SPCA has to go someplace,don't see Burlingame saying no even if it is temporary,spend a lot
of time at Coyote Point,cannot hear or smell the animals at the SPCA facility there,SPCA is not the same as
boarding animals in Burlingame. Oppose an animal boarding function in Burlingame, it is a use that is
incompatible with the area and its development potential and will not generate revenue for the City,Coyote
Point is a great place for this use not our potential auto row. Tonight is a different issue from the SPCA,
current language in zoning says no breed or boarding, determination cited as reason to broaden and allow
boarding but not breeding,not comfortable with the determination being use in that way;concerned with the
city's ability to enforce a conditional use permit, have business with one across the street and violates
conditions all the time;concerned about sewage generated by SPCA and boarding use,the volume will over
load the sewer system, if you allow SPCA to board animals how will you stop others, city is giving up
revenue on$5.2 million for the property taxes and bearing the burden of higher sewer costs; unclear with
boarding how long a dog would stay,this could become long term. Worked in a sewer treatment plant and
sewage is a spurious issue,rate paid would be based on volume generated,if collection system not sufficient
SPCA will have to pay to have it upgraded.
-8-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 24,2005
Public comment continued: Represent an owner of about 4 acres in the drainage easement under the PG&E
lines,got a permit to use site for long term airport parking for a local hotel,market went away,now paved
with all required permits,would like zoning to be modified to allow self storage in shipping containers
elevated above ground 3 feet so the water would circulate under them,would be willing to hold the city
harmless and assume all liability caused by flooding;currently RV storage is allowed in this area and storage
if it is related to immediately adjacent uses,are asking for conceptual acceptance for self storage by change
in zoning so can come forward with specific plan. Commissioners asked: was the auto storage approved
under the PG and E lines,is self storage allowed in the zone?CP noted that it was allowed in the zone,but
this request is for self storage in a drainage easement which needs to act seasonally as a holding basin. If
storage were on pallets would it be allowed? CP noted any storage in any easement requires an
encroachment permit from the Department of Public Works as well as zoning compliance. CA noted that
the uses permitted in the proposed zoning in the drainage area are those which can be moved quickly so that
they are not damaged and do not impede the flow of water in the drain.Maybe trailers could be there if on
wheels? CP noted when did the original Bayfront flan set aside capacity in the Broadway/Rollins
intersection for development in the Rollins Road industrial area but figured that there would be no use ofthe
drain;uses allowed in the drain were those which did not increase the intensity of land uses outside of the
drainage area;if the drain is now developed by uses which generate traffic themselves it will have a big
impact on the Rollins/Broadway intersection. Seems that a storage use could come under the proposed
zoning as a"similar to use",with a conditional use permit so access could be limited by timing on gate,etc.
Applicant noted that would have to design for water to flow in drain,don't know now what that would be.
CA noted that there is a$500,000 bill the cityjust settled regarding water in the drain,Commission could
refer this issue back to staff and the subcommittee. Am an artist and property owner in the area,and think
that the storage facility in South San Francisco where the container are stacked looks terrible,some property
owners in the area have put a lot of money into making their buildings attractive,such storage would be a
deterrent;remember in the past that drain being underwater when it rains and there are high tides. Own 4-5
acres in the drainage area,not now in the auto row overlay,only use is auto storage because ofthe PG and E
lines,maybe the auto row overlay should be extended to include the drain. There were no further comments
from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commission comment:the storage use in the drainage easement should be referred to Public Works and
come back to the commission;this ordinance includes commercial design review,this is an important
regulatory improvement and will affect how any storage would be done in the drainage easement so review
would include both Public Works and aesthetics;there has been a lot of testimony and discussion,should
send back to subcommittee to look at;would like to hear from commissioners what they think;no problem
with storage idea,have difficult design review standards they must meet,use may not be visible,need to
work on a definition of"boarding of animals"see different between SPCA keeping for adoption to benefit
public and private facility for boarding,opposed to private boarding facility,think FAR bonus at gateway
should be and/or,don't feel that the gateway is the place for pedestrian retail,retail OK if associated with
another type of use. Retail could be in multistory,mixed use building. One vision includes the change to
the 101 interchange,this more possible with the end ofthe Broadway train station,then the north side of
Broadway could become an extension ofthe Broadway Commercial Area.Agree with mixed use for retail;
not like to see a precedent set for animal boarding facilities in the Rollins Road area,this is not the right
location for kennels;storage facility OK as a conceptual idea,but problems could be hidden. Storage in the
drain should be sent back to Public Works,concerned about veterinary hospitals and SPCA which boards
animals until they are adopted,not want animals walked in area,with veterinary hospital animals are kept
inside and the noise is addressed;the number of animals boarded needs to be regulated;if animals in the
veterinary hospital need to be kept overnight it would fit,if SPCA with larger services and traffic associated
are incompatible,is this where we want it? Storage is possible depending on Department of Public Works
-9-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 24, 2005
and history of flooding;property may not be available for consolidation of lots so for FAR bonus should be
"or"gateway feature,mixed use would work well in this area,has the potential ofbeing pedestrian friendly if
the interchange includes pedestrian access, but we don't know how soon that will happen; definition of
boarding needs to be clear,has a different impact if it is day care of animals or the SPCA proposed use. To
determine the SPCA suitability need more information on noise and odor impacts from the environmental
study; density at the gateway should depend upon the amenities provided like the idea of a threshold site
size,so required to combine for FAR bonus if smaller than required site size; storage use in the drain is OK
if the environmental concerns can be addressed.
Discussion continue: would argue that commission make a decision tonight, consensus is good,the bright
line is on boarding of animals and veterinary hospitals,need information from Public Works regarding the
drain, at the southern gateway need to arrive at a minimum parcel size, like to see commission recommend
ordinance to City Council for action with those exceptions;concerned about the veterinary hospital use,size
should be limited; could replace the proposed veterinary hospital/ boarding provision with the current
requirements for veterinary hospital in the M-1 which preclude boarding and breeding on site. CA suggested
that Southern Gateway and drain regulations could be kept as proposed, and revisions brought back after
staff and subcommittee review, auto row revisions to allow conditional use permit exceptions to
performance criteria should be included in what is recommended. Commissioners noted SPCA project
problem is the other things going on there the community education programs and the adoption and care
facility;on page 3 talk about retail building/garden center,how does the 100,000 SF size regulation work?
CP noted that site size constraints would require specific designs/format for such uses in Burlingame. CA
noted that this use is being built at this size in other communities in the Bay Area. What about adding the
area in the drain to the auto row overlay? CA noted could be addressed in the response regarding the use of
the drain.
C. Brownrigg moved to approve the ordinance as submitted with:
• the change to make exceptions to the performance criteria for auto row subject to a conditional use
not a variance;
• the change to the requirements for retail sales and display areas (Page 4, item in (3))to allow the
service of alcoholic beverages but prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages;
• Leave in current proposal for the drainage area, have the city staff, including the Public Works
department review issues regarding allowing self storage uses in the drainage area under the PG and
E lines in Rollins Road;
• Leave in current proposed FAR wording in the Southern Gateway zoning provision but have the staff
and subcommittee study what an appropriate minimum lot size might be to exempt a developer from
having to both consolidate properties and provide a gateway feature in order to qualify for the 1.0
FAR density bonus;
• Leave in the current proposal and have staff and subcommittee review and make a recommendation
back to the Commission regarding what are appropriate retail uses,including mixed retail and other
uses,for the Southern Gateway area,and whether industrial uses should be allowed on the Southern
Gateway properties as well as retail and office uses.
The motion was seconded by C. Deal.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend the proposed Rollins Road zoning
regulations as amended and revised to the City Council for action. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
CP Monroe noted that this ordinance would probably go forward to the City Council at their first meeting in
December 2005. CA noted that the issues identified would go back to the subcommittee along with the other
-10-
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes October 24, 2005
zoning they are discussing for the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Planning area. This item concluded at
9:50 p.m.
Chair Auran called for a break so the council chambers could be cleared. The meeting reconvened at 10:05
p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
6. 2518 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING (TINA & KEVIN VILLEGIANTE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JD &
ASSOCIATES. DESIGNER) (56 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
C.Deal recused himself from this item because he has a business relationship with the applicant and left the
dais and chambers. SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Randy Whitney,JD&Associates presented the project and was
available for questions.
Commissioner comment: notice garage is one foot from rear and side property lines,leaving only one foot
for maintenance is tight, could that be increased to two feet,yes; in the back corner, a Mayten tree is called
out, this is an invasive species, should consider another type; the roof as proposed is too steep on Spanish
Colonial style with tile, usually see a much gentler slope, when driving down the hill, you will see a lot of
roof;the chimney is the only place where brick veneer is used,could it be carried through to another element
at the front such as at the entryway to provide some linkage; for a corner house it is well articulated,
softening the roof line will help;this is virtually a new house, am comfortable with extending the existing
setback along the side,but it is important that real true divided light windows not simulated are used since
this wall will be so close to the street,although the cost is high should build a house that will look good fifty
years from now,is an important feature for a Spanish Colonial house. There were no other comments from
the floor. The public comment was closed.
C.Osterling made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions
have been made and plan checked.
• Change the pitch on the roof from 6/12 to 4/12 or similar,roof is too steep for the Spanish Colonial
style;
• Add a brick veneer feature either along the base of the house or at the front entry to coordinate with
the brick veneer used on the chimney;
• Increase setback of garage from property line from F-0"to T-0" so there is enough room for future
maintenance;
• Use a different species of tree selected from the City tree list rather than a Mayten tree at rear comer;
• Encourage owners to consider a one-car garage rather than a two-car garage to preserve more yard
space; and
• Since this is virtually a new house, true divided light windows should be used throughout.
The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:20 p.m.
-11-
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
September 26, 2005
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the September 26, 2005,regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Cauchi,Deal, Keighran and Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: Brownrigg and Osterling
Staff Present: Senior Planner,Maureen Brooks;Planner,Ruben Hurin;City
Attorney,Larry Anderson
III. MINUTES The minutes of the September 12, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were approved with one correction on Page 14 regarding Item 7
as follows: Generally 2 to 3 story buildings have FAR of 0.4 0.6 with
parking at grade.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR Diane Mason, 1451 Balboa Avenue, wanted to speak to Commission and
neighbors about the tear down of existing houses and the impact on the
neighborhood during the construction process,during the hearing process for
the project at 1453 Balboa,had submitted letters of concerns about privacy,
livability, now under construction looks like it is shoved against our home;
Planning Commission should ask for story poles,when a project is sent to a
design review consultant,they work for the developer not for the neighbor,no
one came to see the impact, as a resident, you need to consider changes to
grade or drainage caused by the project, how it will affect your trees or
shrubs, it's a good idea to take "before" pictures; expressed concern with
windows looking into living spaces, told to put up shades.
VI. STUDY ITEMS
X1. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN:
DRAFT ROLLINS ROAD DISTRICT REGULATIONS CITY PLANNER: MARGARET
MONROEXITY ATTORNEY LARRY ANDERSON
Chair Auran noted that this is a study item and asked Commissioners if they had any comments on the
proposed ordinance. Commissioners asked for clarification for what is meant by"day rooms"for ambulance
services. CA Anderson clarified that this is a waiting area for use by ambulance personnel waiting to
respond to calls for service,similar to what is found at a fire station. Commissioners noted that the hours of
operations for incidental food establishments should be expanded to accommodate the different work
schedules of employees in the area; it was recommended that the hours of operation should be from 5:00
a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Commissioners noted that the proposed zoning regulations discuss unified signage
approaches in the Auto Row overlay,would that be a new process. SP Brooks clarified that the signs would
be reviewed under the sign code regulations as they are now. Commissioners asked if there would be
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Minutes September 26, 2005
standards for enclosures for outdoor storage areas. CA Anderson noted that the design guidelines and
conditional use permit process offer tools for review. Commissioners noted the proposed ordinance is in
good shape, should be brought back for action with the minor changes noted. This item concluded at 7:11
p.m.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissionerprior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
2. 1524 COLUMBUS AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO
CONVERT A PORTION OF AN EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE TO ACCESSORY LIVING SPACE
(HOME OFFICE) (MICHAEL BROWNRIGG, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; MAAK &
SULLIVAN, ARCHITECT) (70 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: CATHERINE BARBER /
MAUREEN BROOKS
Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent
calendar. There were no requests. C. Keighran noted that she lives within 500 feet of 1524 Columbus
Avenue so she would recuse herself from that vote.
C. Deal moved to approve the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioners
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in the staff report and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C.Cauchi. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion and
it passed 4-0-1-2(C.Keighran abstaining;Cers.Brownrigg and Osterling absent). Appeal procedures were
advised. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
3. 1021 CORTEZ AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO-
STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (FARSHID SAMSAMI,
APPLICANT;SAMUEL KWONG,ARCHITECT;KWANG PAK,PROPERTY OWNER)(46 NOTICED)
PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report September 26, 2005, with attachments. Plr Hurin presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Thirteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions
of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Samuel Kwong, architect, was available to answer questions,
thanked staff for assistance with processing this project, noted that the design review consultant was very
helpful, Commission's comments and concerns have been addressed on the revised plans, most notable
change is on the front fagade with the addition of a covered porch,which adds articulation along the front of
the house,second floor deck at the rear of the house was eliminated,an additional tree was added in the rear
yard for additional screening,window trim was reduced and landscaping was modified. Commission noted
that the front porch is a big improvement to the project but that there are several concerns which still need to
be addressed.
2
i
NORTH BURLINGAME / ROLLINS ROAD
SPECIFIC PLAN
4114
d ,
-tt
p i�flpY�[ mT T"jy.
ydv
1` t rf 7 Y
wows
,,.,�,,��•.w
i
cem
i
i
3 ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
This chapter describes the concepts shown in the Specific Plan Illustrative,which demonstrates
bow the northern part of Burlingame might look if currently vacant or underused parcels were
to be developed as proposed in the Specific Plan.
A. Specific Plan Illustrative includes that part of the Plan Area east of the
Many of the components of the Illustrative Caltrain tracks,between the City of Millbrae
drawing,shown in Figure 3-1,are a commu- border to the north and the Broadway inter-
nity response to existing conditions in change to the south. The El Camino Real
Burlingame. The existing design and devel- North area includes the streets and parcels
opment conditions are set out in Chapter 7, around Burlingame Plaza and Mills Peninsula
which includes a discussion of land use,devel- Hospital bordered by California Drive and
opment conditions and opportunities,urban the Caltrain tracks,south to the rear of prop-
design features and economic trends. erties fronting on Dufferin Avenue and Davis
Drive. Marco Polo Way and Ogden Drive
Based on the goals and issues identified mark the western border of the area, and
through the workshop process,the commu- Murchison Drive, the City boundary with
mty reviewed and selected from several alter- Millbrae,marks the northern boundary. El
native development scenarios for the Specific Camino Real (State Route 82) bisects this
Plan Area. The Specific Plan Illustrative rep- area.
resents a visual synthesis of the components
for inclusion in the preferred alternative
among the alternatives selected by the com-
munity during the planning process. C. The Rollins Road Area
The Rollins Road area will generally main-
tain the same types of land uses, although
future development in a subarea along the
B. Description of the Specific Plan U.S.101 frontage will be directed to empha-
Area size a concentration of auto sales and service.
The Caltrain main line railroad tracks divide
the Plan Area into two segments, each of The entrance into the City of Burlingame at
which is divided into several subareas for Rollins Road should be identified by a gate-
planning purposes. These are illustrated and way feature. Figure 3-5 illustrates an entry
labled in Figure 3-2. The Rollins Road area gateway which incorporates the parking
lanes on the bridge over El Portal Channel,
i
NORTH BURLINGANEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 13
CHAPTER 3: ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
where parking is now prohibited. Architec-
tural and landscaping elements, such as . i I
replacing the fence on the bridge over El
ING�pAO
Portal Channel and establishing a gateway
feature and entry signs, would improve and
define the entry to Burlingame at this end of
Y
Rollins Road.
X . I
1
1. Northern Gateway 8
El Portal Channel is tidal-influenced and sep-
arates this subarea from the City of Millbrae. tg
A pedestrian trail should be developed in `
conjunction with future development on
parcels on the south side of the channel `
p �
pro-
viding a pedestrian/bicycle connection
- I w.
n
-- DAVID 0.O
A
Eli
C17,
_ .
or
t _ /// _ L•--.--'.` �,.,.-_� � P�. EOWAAOS COURT
SAOOEXIC[ ROA -y-'-" _ V, Z
� _ O
- -
' z
_ ti
z
GUI RD ROAD ] Figure 3-4.
® Central Rollins Road subarea (A2)
x; D between Rollins Road and Adrian Road.
Additionally, this trail amenity would be a
- place for people working and living nearby
to take a short walk, eat lunch, relax out-
;
Figure 3-3. doors or gain access to commercial recreation
Northern Gateway subarea (Al) uses in the industrial area.
16 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 3: ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
2. Central Rollins Road which is expected within 10 years of the
New development in this subarea should con adoption of this Plan. Reconstruction of the
tinue to emphasize industrial,manufacturing interchange may also impact the phasing and
and job-generating uses. These uses can be design of a gateway element. The gateway
facilitated by the installation, maintenance could include an architectural statement,
and enhancement of landscaping in front set- such as one or more tall buildings or building
elements on the north side of the intersection
backs to improve the street environment.
Circulation improvements in the public of Rollins Road and Broadway. Some sugges-
right-of-way,including street lamps,sidewalk tions for achieving`a gateway element are
treatments and additional street trees are dis- included in the Design Guidelines contained
cussed and illustrated in Chapter 5. in Chapter 6. A strategy for working with
property owners who planto redevelop this
area and will need to construct a gateway ele-
Mills Creek,which is under tidal influence,is mens is discussed in Chapter-8.
located in this subarea. Mills Creek has;an
earthen bed and bank and supports vegeta-
tion, including red willow shrubs at the edge Easton Creek, at the northern end of this
has
of the Caltrain corridor. A trail along Mills subarea is also under tidal influence and.
Creek would be part of a pedestrian and bicy- an earthen bed and bank that supports vege-
cle network that would connect with anoth- tation. A pedestrian trail should be devel-
er trail that would run along Easton Creek to oped in conjunction with new development
the south. Conceptual plans for how such a
network can be implemented are provided in
Chapter 5. i Figure 3-6.
Southern
Gateway
z
subarea(A3)
3. Southern Gateway
The entrance to the Rollins Road area from o
the south should be signified by an architec-
tural or landscaped gateway element near the o
intersection of Rollins Road and Broadway. ._
On the east side of Rollins Road, this gate-
way area includes properties from the inter-
section north to the PG&E substation. Some =
of these parcels may be affected by recon-
struction of the U.S. 101 and Broadway inter-
change overpass into an urban interchange,
18 NORTH SURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 3: ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
as it occurs on parcels adjacent to the creek Figure 3-7.
'
on both sides of Rollins Road. The trail area � '' Adrian Road
Auto Row
is envisioned as an amenity to area business- D subarea (A4)
es, providing an interconnected pedestrian ;
and bicycle network with places to sit and eat `-
lunch or take a break.
4. Adrian Road Auto Row District i
This subarea should become primarily an _•._`
auto row, consisting of automobile dealer-
ships and auto-related service businesses
TD,".
along Adrian Road facing U.S. 101. The
Specific Plan Illustrative shows where with_ .%A
consolidation of properties, two automobiles 0
dealers could potentially locate.
These auto-related businesses will be able to
capitalize on the exposure and visual accessi-
bility to U.S. 101. The Adrian Road p
o
streetsca a treatment along U.S. 101 should
create a "front window" to Burlingame. A IS
staggered or intermittent pattern of tree
gg P
planting between Adrian Road and U.S. 101
would reinforce Burlingame's identification
with trees while allowing commercial devel-
- '-pwVID 110wD
-9 s !:
opment to maintain adequate visual exposure ;,
to the freeway. The species, location and
management of trees and other landscaping "
on both private and public property should - :'=i - - -
receive careful consideration. Guidelines for ' DD
signs and lighting in this area are included in
g
Chapter 6. The sign code will need to be FD Ww0.DF GOV0.
`rR1 s
amended to reflect these guidelines and to
determine appropriate size and height for i
signs in this area. The revised regulations
NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 19
1
CHAPTER 3: ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
I
will need to balance the need for visibility section will facilitate the transformation of
with the desire to maintain a consistent this area into a pedestrian-scaled neighbor-
theme for the area. hood that is safer and more conducive to
pedestrian activity generated by the new
A road should be constructed to connect Millbrae Intermodal Station, the Plaza I
Rollins and Adrian Roads in order to facili- Shopping Center and the reconstructed hos-
tate increased access to the new auto row area pital. Incorporation of the existing frontage
from Rollins Road. The exact location of roads into the overall urban design concept
this road will be determined as properties for this area will be important to implement
develop and opportunities arise. this transformation.
1. Burlingame Plaza f
D. EI Camino Real_North Area Burlingame Plaza is a heavily-used and vital e
The northern end of El Camino Real in neighborhood retail amenity for residents in
Burlingame should develop with a variety of the northern and northwestern end of
uses,which will become a destination for res- Burlingame. As shown in the Specific Plan
idents of Burlingame and neighboring cities Illustrative,it is envisioned that no significant I
as well as provide a neighborhood for new land use changes to existing Burlingame Plaza
residents. Components of this area will buildings will occur during the timeframe of
include medical offices, retail shops and serv- this Specific Plan.
ices, and residences. These uses may be free-
standing or mixed within a building. Multi- _ Figure 3-8. I
Burlingame Plaza
family housing in this subarea is appropriate
subarea(B1)
for singles, young families and seniors who
1
wish to live near medical services, retail
r�`1
opportunities and regional mass-transit i§Z" -
amenities. - � - �w
- z° o: I
A gateway feature, as envisioned in Figure -" --
3-9, could be incorporated into the architec- TROUSI)
ture or open space elements of new develop-
ment on El Camino Real south of Murchison
Drive. Additional residential uses and a
reconfiguration of the El Camino Real cross-
20 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
5
4 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Chapter 4 describes the land use designations and densities that will implement the development
vision for North Burlingame outlined in Chapter 3. Land use densities are described according
to subareas, as mapped in Figure 4-1. This figure also shows the land use designations for areas
covered by this Specific Plan.
This chapter includes maximum allowed A. The Rollins Road Area
development densities,expressed as floor area Industrial, manufacturing and other job-gen-
ratios (FARs) for each type of development erating uses will continue to be the emphasis
anticipated to occur in the area, except resi- of development in the Rollins Road area.
dential, which is defined by a maximum Additionally, future development in a sub-
number of dwelling units allowed per acre area along U.S. 101 frontage will emphasize
(du/ac). Allowed FARS have been set based auto sales and service.
on development industry standards in com-
mon use throughout the Bay Area. These
proposed FARs will generally result in one- At. Northern Gateway
to two-story commercial or industrial build- The land use designation of this subarea is
ings with surface parking and adequate land- Industrial, which consists primarily of ware-
scaping in the Rollins Road area and three-to house and manufacturing uses, as described
four-story residential, commercial or mixed- below. Allowed uses and their appropriate
use buildings in the North Burlingame area densities are as follows:
along El Camino Real.
Industrial 0.5 FAR Review Line
This chapter includes guidance, regarding i
1.0 FAR Maximum
land use on private property only.
Streetscape design concepts for public streets
throughout the area are included in Chapter Industrial uses in the area should-be limited
- to airport-related industries, food prepares
5. Design guidelines for privateproperties
tion, fabrication, recreation, commercial
are included in Chapter 6.
food preparation/processing and similar light
industry. Free-standing office buildings and
the professional uses typical of occupants of
i Determined by trip generation and intersection capacity and/or providing a gateway feature.
NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 27
i
CHAPTER 4: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
such buildings are not allowed and should be Figure 4-2.
located in the City's Bayfront Area to the Parcels adja-
-;mayr= cent to trail
east of U.S. 101. r network
A special gateway treatment is envisioned at o EDWARD S CT
the very northern end of this area along
Rollins Road at El Portal Creek. As an
Creek Area
incentive for the development of this gate-
way, property owners who redevelop their — Trail
I. 1429 Rollins Road
sites at or near the Millbrae city limit with
2. 1480 Rollins Road
approved gateway features may,at the discre-
3. 40 Edwards Court
tion of the City, be granted a density bonus
of up to an additional 0.5 FAR. Design fea-
tures that would qualify for such a bonus A2. Central Rollins Road
include structural features, such as towers, The land use designation in this subarea is Indus-
entry markers or street furniture and land- trial. Allowed uses and densities are as follows:
scaping along the sidewalk.
Industrial 0.5 FAR Review Line
1.0 FAR Maximum
In this area, the City desires to see a new
street linking Adrian Road and Rollins Road.
Parcels along the south side of Mills Creek,
As redevelopment in the area allows for the
identification of an appropriate alignment, on both sides of Rollins Road,are required to
b
owners of the properties designated forthis build a pedestrian.trail adjacent to the creek
new road, will be_required to dedicate land in conjunction with new development as it
for this road at the time they propose new occurs. The parcels that are subject to this
development on their sites. However, as an requirement are designated in Figure 4-2.
incentive, the allowed density for the entire
parcel, including the roadway alignment, Additionally, natural habitat areas have been
may be built on the remainder of the site. identified under the PG&E power lines on
both sides of David Road. In addition to sur-
face drainage, these drainage areas have been
2 Determined by trip generation and intersection gapacity and/or protecting native habitat or providing creekside amenity.
NORTH BURLINGAMElROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 29
I
CHAPTER 4: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
found to provide some potential seasonal retail and office uses along the Broadway
wetland areas and breeding locations-for spe- frontage. The industrial uses that are allowed
cial-status species. As required by federal in the rest of the Rollins Road area are
law, no development may occur in areas that allowed north of the commercial frontage on
have jurisdictional wetlands or special-status Broadway and at the Gateway. Allowed uses
species habitat. and densities are as follows:
Industrial 0.5 FAR Review Line
A3. Southern Gateway 1.0 FAR Maximum
Unlike the rest of the Rollins Road area, this OR
subarea, because it is a transition area Commercial (Service and Special Uses)
between the Rollins Road industrial area and Only on Designated Gateway Sites
the Broadway Commercial area, allows for 1.0 FAR Review Line
2.0 FAR Maximum4
Figure 4-.3. E D�^/A R D S C T =u� a��:,
Parcels adja- o
cent to trail
network 4 Parcels along Easton Creek are required to
X build a pedestrian trail adjacent to the creek
oZ in conjunction with new development as it
occurs. As shown in Chapter 3, it is envi-
e AO• sioned that the likelihood of development is
m
higher on the southwest and northeast sides
Z of Rollins Road and Easton Creek. The
m parcels that this requirement applies to are
• designated in Figure 43. A diagram of the
Creek Area trail network and suggestions for the design
Trail of the trails are shown in Chapter 5.
1. 1379 North Carolina Avenue
2. 1399 Rollins Road
3. 1400 Rollins Road
Additionally,natural areas have been identi-
4. 1400 Rollins Road ied under the PG&E power lines on both
S. 50 Edwards Court sides of David Road. These drainage areas
have been found to provide some potential
3 Based on trip generation and intersection capacity and/or providing a creek trail or habitat feature.
4 Based on trip generation and intersection capacity and consolidation of parcels,achievement of significant landscaping
g
and provsion of a gateway statement.
30 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
1
CHAPTER 4: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
seasonal wetland areas and breeding locations impact how some parcels near Broadway and
for special-status species. As required by fed- Rollins Road can be developed.
eral law, no development may occur in areas
that have jurisdictional wetlands or special-
status species habitat. A4. Adrian Road Auto District
This subarea may continue-to be used for
A special gateway treatment_should be devel- industrial uses, and is also targeted to estab-
�: oped at the very southern end of this area lish a new center for automobile sales and
along Rollins Road to physically announce service. Allowed uses are as follows:
the industrial area. As an incentive for the
development of this gateway, property own- Industrial 0.5 FAR Review Line
ers who redevelop their sites with gateway 1.0 FAR Maximums
` features and combine existing lots into larger, OR
more developable lots between the Automobile Service 0.5 FAR Review Line
Broadway/Rollins Road intersection and the 1.0 FAR Maximum
PG&E substation on the east side may be
granted a density bonus of up to 1.0 FAR if Large-format auto parts retailers are not
G lot combination or gateway features consis- Mowed in this designation.
tent with City objectives are included. When
density bonuses are included, the proposed
E development must not cause any intersection Additionally, this subarea is an Automobile
to exceed Service Level E. Design features Sales and Service Overlay District. In this
that would qualify for Stich a bonus include overlay district new large format automobile
dealers with service are allowed, but only on
significant tree plantings, towers or entry
markers, street furniture along the sidewalk parcels that will support substantially sized
and architectural features on the building. businesses. For this reason,the following use
The development of gateway features in this is allowed only where parcels combine to cre-
area needs to be planned relative to Caltrans' ate a single project totaling five acres or
future plans for reconfiguration of the more:
Broadway/U.S. 101 interchange, which may
f
5 Based on trip generation and intersection capacity and creek or habitat amenities.
6 Based on trip generation and intersection capacity and creek or habitat amenities.
INORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 31
1
CHAPTER 4: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Automobile Sales and B I. Burlingame Plaza
related service The Burlingame Plaza shopping center will
businesses 0.15 FAR Review Line retain its existing designation as a retail sales
and service commercial center. Medical and
Maximum height regulations for the Adrian other office uses would be allowed above the
Road Auto District, which should be kept first floor only. Allowed land uses and den-
similar to existing building heights, with an sities are as follows:
administrative review for buildings proposed
over 35 feet, are discussed in Chapter 6. Commercial(Shopping and
Service)and office above
the first floor 0.5 FAR
Development in the new auto row area will
be enhanced by a new cross street linking
Use of
Adrian Road and Rollins Road. As redevel- the frontage road right-of-waywill be
.
opment in the area allows.for the identifica Phased.first as a green space and.pedestrian
tion of an appropriate alignment, owners of area and later, additional mixed use develop-
ment will be allowed on the frontage road
the properties designated for this new road,
right-of-way. The designation for this Bevel-
as discussed above, will be required to dedi- opment is included in Section B2, below.
cate land for this road at the time of new
development on their sites. However, the
allowed density for the entire parcel, includ-
ing the roadway alignment, maybe built on B2. E► Camino Real Gateway Corridor
the remainder of the site. This subarea has a land.use designation of
Mixed-Use, allowing for a mix of uses,
including:xesidealtial, office and commercial,
as follows:
B. EI Camino Real North Area
This area, which is the northern gateway to Ground Floor Retail 0.5 FAR
Burlingame along El Camino Real, will con- or Office,
tinue to serve as a residential, retail, office combined with
and medical node. It is proposed that more Multi-Family Maximum
residential opportunities be provided either 30 du/ac
in free-standing structures or as part of OR
mixed-use development. The land use regula- Multi-Family Maximum
tions below will implement this vision. Residential 50 du/ac
32 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
6 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
This chapter contains design guidelines and development standards that define the character of new development in
the North Burlingamel Rollins Road Specific Plan area. The design guidelines mill he implemented to achieve the
vision and goals of the Specific Plan as presented in other chapters.
The design guidelines and standards contain A. Design Standards for All Areas
language that reflects the following principles: Streets that are successful for multiple users,
♦ "Shall" or "Must" means that the state- such as vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians, can
ment is a standard and conformance to the often be thought of as outdoor rooms. The
guideline is intended to be mandatory,once sides of these outdoor rooms are the buildings
implemented through ordinance. that enfront the streets. This section defines
the parameters of development that forms and
♦ "Should" or "Highly Encouraged" shapes the pedestrian and public realm of the
means that conformance will be strongly principal streets in the Specific Plan area. It
encouraged by the City through the review includes specifications for the following:
process and that the guideline is intended
to be a recommendation to a developer * Build-to Lines, or the specific distance
about how to implement the goals of the that new development should maintain
Specific Plan. between the sidewalk and the front faiiade_
♦ Minimum Building Heights,so that new
The guidelines and standards have been devel- development will create appropriately-
oped for the Specific Plan area based on three scaled building frontages specific to the
particular districts. The districts, the bound- scale and use of particular streets and fos-
aries for which are shown in Figure 6-1, were ter greater pedestrian activity.
drawn based on the character of the streets and
the nature of the development in each of the � Maximum Building Heights, which are
in conformance with zoning requirements
districts, as envisioned by this Specific Plan. and airport-related height constraints.
NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 51
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 6-1.
Design d
Districts
G7-0",
�
!! � '^H
1 1
. 4 i
H
i t t w
Al 7
r-Tn
rrrr,"-1~,I 1� _ — �j SAN
FRANCISCO
— BAY
4
EI Camino Real Design District 4
' Rollins Road Design District
1 ® BROADWAYCAL
( \
Auto Row Design District STTArIon 4 ! \\
j f •, ��,-`t_ 0 308 BDO 12001eet
52 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
♦ Minimum Percentage Frontage, which building height wrap around the corner onto
gives direction for the minimum amount of the street where the lower maximum building
a new building's facade that must be placed height is otherwise required for a distance of 30
at the Build-to Line. feet. Where no specific guidance is recom-
mended for maximum building heights, new
1. Build-to Lines construction should conform to zoning regula-
New buildings in the Specific Plan area shall
tions and airport-related height constraints.
conform to the Build-to Lines as mapped and
specified in Figure 6-2. The Build-to Line pre- 4. Minimum Percent Frontage
scribes a very specific setback that, together
with specifications contained in Section AA, New buildings in the Specific Plan area shall
Minimum Percentage Frontage, will define the have a minimum percentage of their frontages
space between the sidewalk and the front built to the Build-to Line as mapped and spec-
fa�ade of a building. Corner parcels fronting ified in Figure 6-5. The range of specifications
onto streets with differing build-to standards in this standard reflect the nature of develop-
shall be built so that each fa4ade conforms to ment that is expected and the character of the
the standard for the street that it faces. street on which the development will occur.
The Minimum Percentage Frontage standards,
together with those standards specified in
2. Minimum Building Heights Section A.1 of this chapter,Build-to Lines,will
New buildings in the Specific Plan area shall form the public realm and pedestrian experi-
conform to the minimum height standards ence on streets in the Specific Plan area.
mapped and specified in Figure 6-3. Corner
Corner parcels fronting onto streets with dif-
parcels fronting onto streets where two stan- fering standards shall be built so that each
dards meet may have the higher allowed build- facade conforms to the standard for the street
ing height wrap around the corner onto the
that it faces.
street where the lower building height is other-
wise required for a distance of 30 feet..
3. Maximum Building Heights
New buildings in the Specific Plan area shall
conform to the maximum height standards
mapped and specified in Figure 6-4. Corner
parcels fronting onto streets where two stan-
dards meet may have the higher maximum
NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 53
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 6-2. STATION
Build-to Lines
d
crTy
of Mrt� D
� 1ROUSDMF omit ■ "^MI
■
•
I _
z
0 0
0
r
D
LEGEND Property Line
I
0'Build-to Line
1
t
1
®�10'Build-to Line k
I ® SAN
FRABAY
BAY
BROADW` AY s
20' STA IT ON Q
I20'Build-to Line
54 NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STATION Figure 6-3.
Minimum
Q Building
Heights
C`ry OF M14 F ��
D
C
Z � x
F ' p
r a
LEGEND 1
4
• • • Two Storiese
Three Stories
SAN
FRANCISCO FRA
BAY
® BAY
BRA OADWAY
CALTRAIN
STATION oQ
■ Four Stories
NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 55
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 64. AW STATION
Maximum
Building g d
Heights Q
M,u
II f
t
� ROIRDNE ptlYE _
•
• -
3
Z • O
O 1 • m
A
r �f
• D
e i o
LEGEND
WOMEN 60 Feet Review Line
75 Feet Maximum
SAN
FRANCISCO
1 1 1 1 35 Feet Review Line , RAY
75 Feet Maximum
35 Feet Review Line Rhe ogowar
60 Feet Maximum CAI_TRaN a
STATION
56 NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 6-5.
Minimum
Q Parcel
Frontage
Ciry
°FM14 D j]
� E
all
111 .11. 1 L
i
mauou[r�
Z x
° 1 A
P
r
D
LEGEND S~Build-to Line '
0
0
ek
■Nun■ 100%
I
�—Build-to line
as
C)
0
1111111 60%
4
® SAN
FRANCISCO
—Build-to Line BAY
b
Q N BROADWAY °
CALTRAIN
STATION Q
• • • 20% �.._
NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 57
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
C. Rollins Road Design District
This section includes guidelines and standards
for specific design and development conditions
for buildings in the Rollins Road Design
District, the boundaries for which are mapped
in Figure 6-1.
1. Front Setback Areas
a. Landscaping
Except for driveways, all areas between the
sidewalk and the front fa4ade of buildings shall
be adequately designed and maintained,includ-
ing installation of an irrigation system for
planted areas.
b. Fencing
Fencing in the area between the sidewalk and
the building should be semi-transparent.
"Chain-link" fencing is highly discouraged.
76 NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER B: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Articulation
Building fapdes should avoid long, single
planes in excess of 100 feet. Building facades
should include elements that emphasize a scale
that relates to the human form.
i. Building Entries
Building entries facing public streets are
encouraged.
NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 77
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ii. Window Details
Window reveals of greater than 3 inches should
be employed to create shadow lines and greater
visual interest on building facades.
iii. Fa4ade Components
A variety of materials is encouraged to articu-
late building elements, such as the base, the
ground floor, and upper floors,if any.
Top of equipment
Top of parapet 3. Rooftop Equipment
n rt Mechanical equipment located on rooftops
shall be screened from ground plain view by
extended walls or parapets that are an integral
component of the building architecture.
Painting equipment or constructing enclosing
fences shall not be acceptable remedies.
4. Service Areas
Service areas and ground-mounted equipment
shall be screened from view by fences or walls
that conform to the style and materials of the
accompanying building_
78 NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
5. Landscaping
Landscaping shall be provided on a minimum
of ten percent of the developed site area of a
parcel. 0
6. Fences and Walls
a. Height
Fences and walls shall be no more than eight
feet high.
b. Articulation
Walls and fences 60 feet or longer shall be artic-
ulated by combining two or more of the fol-
lowing interventions for a minimum of ten
feet, at intervals of 60 feet or less:
♦ A minimum 2-foot change in vertical plane
♦ A minimum V/2-foot change in height
♦ A section of open fence
♦ A change in material or substantial change
in texture
c. Materials and Detailing
Walls and fences shall have a maximum of 16
feet between piers. Walls visible from public
streets shall be constructed of durable materi-
als and be detailed to include a base, body and
a distinctive cap. Along street frontages, semi-
transparent fences are encouraged.
NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 79
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
7. Signage
a. Building Signage
Signage that is incorporated into building
facades shall not extend higher than the parapet
of the building
b. Awning Signs
There shall be no interior-lit awning signs.
c. Monument Signs
Freestanding signs in the front setback should
not exceed 5 feet in height.
Q Yoke of Ho"d
8. Surface Lighting
On-site lighting shall be designed,installed and
maintained so as to direct light only onto the
property on which the light source is located.
All lighting fixtures and other means of illumi-
nating signs, structures, landscaping, parking,
loading and similar areas shall be focused,
directed and arranged to prevent glare or direct
illumination on adjoining properties or streets.
80 NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER B: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
9. Creekside Open Space
New buildings on parcels adjacent to Mills
Creek and Easton Creek should incorporate
outdoor open space and trail network compo-
nents into their site planning, particularly on
those parts of sites that face a creek.
s
L
r-
10. Gateway Features
Property owners at either end of Rollins Road
are encouraged to develop as part of their proj-
ect architectural or landscape elements that
contribute to a gateway feature for the area.
Building
Such a project would establish a gateway at A plaza at a
either the Broadway entrance to the Rollins significant building
ORoad area or the entry from Millbrae at El entry can help toannounce an entry
Portal Creek on the north side of the Specific El to an area
Plan Area.
A tower element
helps to
demarcate a
special entry to
an area
NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 81
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
D. Auto Row Design District
al F1This section includes guidelines and standards
for specific design and development conditions
for buildings in the Auto Row Design District,
the boundaries for which are mapped in Figure
6-1.
O 1. District Image
A unifying thematic concept should be devel-
oped for this district as automobile sales uses
are established on parcels along Adrian Road.
This could be achieved by the adoption of a
unified approach to the transition space
between the public sidewalk and the private
outdoor automobile sales areas. Approaches to
this could include:
♦ A special district-wide fence material or
style
♦ A series of bollards in a unified style or
design
J a ♦ A change in the ground plane level
t'
♦ Landscaping or raised planting beds
O
82 NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER B: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The district-wide concept should work at the
pedestrian scale of the business patron as well as
the scale of the adjacent US. 101. There-fore,
the concept could include a unified approach to:
♦ Showroom fa4ade design
♦ Design treatment of the street-facing exteri-
or sales areas,such as varying ground planes
♦ Design of freestanding signs
2. Build-to Lines for Adrian Road
Parcels
Build-to lines on Adrian Road are specified as
zero feet. However,only 20 percent of a parcel's
build-to line must be occupied by a building.
The intent is to have a minimum of 20 percent
of an automobile dealership's street frontage be
occupied by a building. This will help to define min 20%
the pedestrian realm on the sidewalk as well as
place the automobile showroom closer to U.S.
101 passers-by. Up to 80 percent of an automo- 100 %
bile dealership's frontage could be occupied by
the exterior sales area.
NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 83
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
3. Front Setback Areas
a. Landscaping
Except for driveways,all areas between the
sidewalk and the front fa4ade of buildings
shall be adequately designed and maintained,
including installation of an irrigation system
for planted areas.
b. Fencing
Fencing in the area between the sidewalk and
the building should be semi-transparent and
in keeping with an overall design concept for
the Auto Row Design District,as discussed
in Section D.1,above. As an alternative to
fenc-ing,differentiation of the sidewalk area
from exterior automobile sales areas could
be established by use of paving materials,
building components or changes in eleva-
tion.
4. Building Fagades
Building fag2des should avoid long, single-
planes in excess of 100 feet Building fagades
should include elements that emphasize a scale
that relates to the human form. Large window
areas on the facades of auto sales buildings
should be carefully integrated into the overall
design of the building facade.
84 NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
CHAPTER 6: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
5. Building Materials
A variety of materials is encouraged to artic-
ulate building elements, such as the base, the
ground floor, and upper floors, if any.
These basic components of a building y
should be articulated by means other than 1j IL
0
the exterior finish. Such means can include
delineation of rooflines or pediments, pier Buildings should incorporate a variety of
and column bases and building entries as materials that work well with glass
fagades typical to auto showrooms
well as smaller details, such as windows and
awnings. Where large areas of glass are used
on the facades of auto sales buildings, the
glass should be one component of a careful-
ly considered palette of materials. Colored
glass should be coordinated with the other
colors used on the building.
6. Signs
The Adrian Road Auto District benefits from -
I �a��o
good exposure to the Bayshore Freeway.
Signage for businesses on Adrian Road should
demonstrate to passing motorists that the
Adrian Road businesses offer higher quality =.
automobile products and services.
a. Scale
Signs, particularly those that are freestanding,
should relate to the massing and height of the
building that it serves.
e
Signs can be incorporated into the build-
ing or freestanding, but should reflect the
architecture of the building
NORTH BURLINGAMEIROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN 85
CHAPTER B: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Materials 7. Surface Lighting
Signs,particularly those that are freestanding, On-site lighting shall be designed,installed and
should employ materials and colors that are in maintained so as to direct light only onto the
keeping with a palette developed for the property on which the light source is located.
buildings which the sign serves. All lighting fixtures and other means of illumi-
nating signs, structures, landscaping, parking,
c. Illumination loading and similar areas shall be focused,
Illuminated signs should be designed and directed and arranged to prevent glare or direct
constructed so as to avoid glare and excessive illumination on adjoining properties or streets.
light falling onto adjoining properties or U.S.
101.
No mercury vapor utility yard lights or other
light fixtures with high intensity discharge
lamps or bulbs,which are not designed to limit
or control light direction or do not shield the
light source from neighboring properties and
streets, shall be permitted.
86 NORTH BURLINGAME/ROLLINS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
Zoning Ordinance/Local Coastal Implementation Plan Amendment Application 04-127 City-wide. A... Page I of 4
S
CITY COUNCIL
SAl�1� F AGENDA REPORT
DATE: July 9, 2004
AGENDA OF: July 13,2004
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Community Development
SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance/Local Coastal Implementation Plan Amendment
Application 04-127 City-wide
Amendment to Title 24 of the Santa Cruz Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) and
the Local Coastal Implementation Plan modifying Chapter 24.10 Part 16 to require a
Special Use Permit for Building Material/Garden Supply Uses in the General
Industrial (IG) Zoning District in certain circumstances. (Environmental
Determination: Categorical Exemption) (City of Santa Cruz, applicant / filed:
5/26/04). KT/LS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce for publication the proposed amendment to Chapter 24.10
Part 16 of the Zoning Ordinance/Local Coastal Implementation Plan and adopt the attached resolution authorizing
and directing the City Manager to submit the Local Coastal Implementation_Plan amendment to the California
Coastal Commission for final certification.
BACKGROUND:
In response to citizen concerns regarding development proposals on the Westside, the City Council directed staff to
prepare an ordinance regulating building material and garden supply uses in the General Industrial (IG) zoning
district. Currently, such uses are principally permitted in this zone. Although it is a retail use, it was allowed in the
IG zone given the industrial aspects of such businesses including outdoor storage areas. Council directed staff to
amend the IG district regulations to require a Special Use Permit for larger building material/garden supply uses to
enable public review and consideration.
DISCUSSION:
In its motion of April 27, 2004 the City Council directed staff to establish a threshold for a Special Use Permit that
would not preclude the retention and possible expansion of existing smaller uses. Staff is proposing a threshold of
40,000 square feet of floor area and outdoor storage, display, or sales areas, such as garden sales. This threshold was
arrived at based on a survey of existing uses and an examination of how other cities define large-scale retail
businesses, as described below. Based on City of Santa Cruz Trip Generation Rates established by the Department
of Public Works, a retail building materials use generates 30 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.
Therefore, a 40,000 square foot use would generate 1,200 trips.
Existing Uses. Staff analyzed existing building material/garden supply uses in the City (see Table 1). Most
businesses of this nature are not located within the IG zone. For example, the Garden Company on Mission Street is
in the CC (Community Commercial) zone while San Lorenzo Lumber on River Street is in the CT (Thoroughfare
Commercial) zone. The exceptions include Central Home and Garden Supply on River Street, in the Harvey West
industrial area. Other uses, such as Granite Rock, are considered wholesalers and would not be affected by this
ordinance.
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/cc/archives/04/7-13meeting/7-13rpt/pl227rpt.htm 08/08/2005
Zoning Ordinance/Local Coastal Implementation Plan Amendment Application 04-127 City-wide. A... Page 2 of 4
One concern expressed by the Council is the potential impact on existing businesses should they decide to expand in
the future. There are minimal foreseeable impacts to existing businesses with the exception of Central Home and
Garden Supply, which would become a nonconforming use given its size. Many similar uses located in the IG
district fall under other use categories such as furniture and fixtures(e.g., cabinet makers and installers) or wholesale
trade- durable goods and therefore would not be affected by this ordinance. Should an existing business choose to
relocate to a site in the IG zoning district, a Special Use Permit would be required if the use exceeded the 40,000
square foot threshold.
Table 1: Existing Building Material and Garden Supply Businesses
Business Estimated Square Foota et Zoning
Westside Ace Hardware 4,000 CC
855 Almar Avenue
Santa Cruz Hardware(Ace) 4,000 CBD
703 Front Street
San Lorenzo Lumber Indoor-20,000 CT
235 River Street Outdoor-66,500
Garden Company Indoor-3,850 CC
2218 Mission Street Outdoor-15,000
Central Home and Garden Supply Indoor-5,440 IG
808 River Street Outdoor-Approx 4 acres
(Note: Salz Arts District plan
includes a 1.7-acre site for
Central 74,000 sq.ft.
Home Depot 98,000 --
Watsonville-under construction
1 Square footages obtained from Business License database or estimated using aerial
photographs in GIS.
In addition to minimizing impacts to existing businesses, staff considered a threshold that would serve to protect the
City's limited supply of vacant industrial lands. The 40,000 square foot threshold for a Special Use Permit would
enable greater scrutiny of proposals for larger building supply uses that could preclude use of these few remaining .
vacant sites for industrial purposes.
Examples from Other Communities. Many other cities in California and throughout the country are also grappling
with this issue. For the most part, the focus is on "big box" stores such as Wal-Mart and Target, as well as Home
Depot. The public policy resource web site newrules.org notes that most of these businesses typically occupy
buildings between 80,000 and 120,000 square feet. The prototypical Home Depot is about 100,000 square feet with
a 35,000 square foot garden center. The new trend for retailers such as Wal-Mart are `supercenters', which can be
up to 250,000 square feet. In comparison, chain bookstores average 30,000 square feet while chain pharmacies
average 15,000 square feet. It should be noted that such retail uses are not allowed in the IG zoning district but are
cited for comparison.
Staff researched how other communities are approaching this issue. For example, San Francisco recently adopted an
ordinance banning large-scale retail stores over 120,000 square feet in any part of the city, with stores over 50,000
square feet banned in less intensive commercial zones. In 2001, San Luis Obispo voted to regulate large-scale
retailers over 45,000 square feet in certain commercial zones and over 60,000 square feet in other zones, with a
potential maximum of 140,000 square feet based on compliance with adopted guidelines. Table 2 lists retail size
thresholds adopted by several other communities.
Table 2: Retail Thresholds in Other Cities
Ashland, OR 45,000
Belfast, ME 75,000
Boxborou h, MA 25,000
Bozeman, MT 75,000
Easton, MD 65,000/CUP 25,000
Flagstaff, AZ 70,000/CUP @ 25,000
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/cc/archives/04/7-13meeting/7-13rpt/pl227rpt.htm 08/08/2005
Zoning Ordinance/Local Coastal Implementation Plan Amendment Application 04-127 City-wide. A... Page 3 of 4
Northham ton, MA 90,000
San Francisco 50,000/90,000/120,000
San Luis Obispo 45,000/60,000/140,000
Santa Fe,NM 150,000/CUP @ 30,000
Taos,NM 80,000/CUP 30,000
Source: newrules.org
It should be noted that the above restrictions are mostly based on gross floor area or gross sales floor area, and
typically do not address outdoor sales areas. Given that the subject ordinance deals with building material and
garden supply uses that generally have such sales areas, staff has proposed a threshold of 40,000 square feet of floor
area and outdoor storage, display, or sales areas.
Planning Commission Review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 17, 2004 to consider the
proposed amendment. The Commission recommended approval to the City Council by a vote of 4 to 2, with one
Commissioner absent. Discussion amongst the Commissioners focused on concerns that the threshold for a Special
Use Permit was too low and should be increased to 60,000 square feet. Minutes from the meeting are attached.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
The proposed amendment has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) per Section 15061 (b)(3). General Rule Exclusion State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3), which
states that CEQA applies only to projects with the potential to cause significant effect on the environment. The
proposed amendments would not result in increased densities or intensification of uses but greater public scrutiny of
certain applications.
FINDINGS, ZONING AMENDMENT, SECTION 24.06.040:
The Zoning Ordinance requires that prior to making a recommendation to the City Council, the City Planning
Commission must find that the public necessity, the general community welfare, and good zoning practices are
served and furthered by the proposed amendment. It must also find that the proposed action is in general
conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the General Plan and adopted area
plans. In recommending approval of the amendment to the City Council on June 17, the City Planning Commission
made the following findings:
• The proposed amendment is consistent with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the
General Plan and adopted area plans and promotes good zoning practices as it will enable public review of
larger building supply uses and facilitate the compatibility of land uses within the IG zoning district.
Furthermore, such projects will be subject to public review, conditions of approval, and environmental
review and mitigation as necessary.
• The proposed amendment is in the public interest and would contribute to the general welfare of the
community, as it will facilitate public participation in planning decisions that would have an impact on the
community.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None. Costs associated with additional staff time required to process Special Use Permits would be recovered
through the collection of permit fees.
Submitted by: Approved by:
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/cc/archives/04/7-13meeting/7-13 rpt/pl227rpt.htm 08/08/2005
Zoning Ordinance/Local Coastal Implementation Plan Amendment Application 04-127 City-wide. A... Page 4 of 4
Eugene O. Amer, Director of Richard C_ Wilson
Planning and Community Development City Manager
PL227
Attachments:
Draft Resolution
—Draft Ordinance
Excerpt from June 17,2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Comment letters from the public
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/cc/archives/04/7-13meeting/7-13rpt/pl227rpt.htm 08/08/2005
BAYSIDE IVED
REALTY PARTNERS
DEC - 5 2005
December 1,2005 CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPT.
Ms.Meg Monroe
CITY OF BURLINGAME
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame,CA 94010
Re: Proposed New Zoning Regulations for Rollins Road Area
Dear Ms.Monroe:
Per our conversation this week,I am writing to express our serious concerns with the new proposed zoning
regulations for Rollins Road. These changes,if enacted,could cause substantial economic hardship to our client,the
owner of the three industrial buildings at 1222-1250 Rollins Road.
These buildings are occupied by industrial tenants on leases that expire over the next 24 years. Should these
tenants not extend their occupancies,the landlord would need to try to find other industrial users within six months
in order to meet the proposed requirements for"grandfathered"uses.
If she cannot find such identical users within six months,then she would have no option but to attempt to find users
for the buildings that fit into the extremely narrow band of approved uses under the proposed new zoning
regulations. If no demand existed in the marketplace by these approved uses,then her income from the properties
would disappear.
In effect,the new zoning regulations would take away the landlord's right to generate income from properties that
are currently allowed uses. This amounts to a taking of her property.
We strongly urge the City to add the new targeted uses as an overlay to existing uses,instead of forcing industrial
landlords in the area to forgo industrial uses. This would allow property owners the opportunity to upgrade their
assets to the uses desired by the City when the marketplace justifies it,while at the same time allowing them to
receive income from their properties as they are currently configured.
Very truly yours,
BAYSIDE RE ARTNERS
W.Trask Leonard,Jr. rnYPARTNERSSIDE
President/CEO
President/CEOW.Trask Leonard,Jr.
2570 W.El Camino Real, Suite •
Mountain View,CA 94040-1315
650.949.0700
650.949.0701
650.533.2591 c
2570 West EI Camino Real, Suite 110 • Mountain View, CA 94040. 650.949.0700 v• 650.949.0701 f•www.baysiderp.com
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED ROLLINS ROAD ZONING
RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION PRIOR TO THE
PUBLIC HEARING,SUBMITTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING
PROCESS AND RECEIVED SHORTLY FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC
HEARING,OCTOBER 24,2005
JOHN M. WARD AND ASSOCIATES
A Consulting Group 792 Willborough Place
Burlingame, CA 94010
TEL (650) 342-0683
FAX (650) 342-0977
john@jmwassociates.com
October 24, 2005
Tim Auran, Chairman
Planning Commission
City Hall — 501 Primrose Rd.
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Chairman and Commissioners:
My firm represents Sanjaylyn Co., LLC, owner of a 4-acre parcel at 1616 Rollins
Road, a portion of which is currently leased to American Medical Response, the company
which provides county-wide paramedic ambulance services. Most of the site is a paved
parking lot and unoccupied.
As background, a conditional use permit was granted by the City in 2002 for long
term hotel parking and as conditions of approval the owner was required to secure
permits from the California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and Army Corps of Engineers. The agencies approved the applicant's plan to
grade and pave the drainage easement at 1616 Rollins Road as well as a plan for a
Streambed Alteration Agreement Amendment to move the California red-legged frog, an
endangered species. In summary, all of the environmental issues involving endangered
species were addressed and approved by all of the appropriate agencies. The project was
developed and constructed in strict accordance with all the required safeguards mandated
for protection of the endangered species identified. The construction activities were
monitored, as required, by a team of ecological consultants and at is conclusion the
construction project was approved and accepted by the City of Burlingame.
The property owner expended considerable time and sums of money in pursuit of the
above only to face a change in the market and with that the need for long term hotel
parking went away. Since that time the owner has been unable to achieve a viable
economic use of the property given its limited access and visibility from Rollins Road,
the requirement to restrict vehicular trips in and out of the site to the off-peak periods,
and fact it lies within a drainage right-of-way. With limited options and limited uses
under Section 25.44.045, the question being put before the Commission this evening is
whether to include within the RR district an additional use which would allow self-
storage containers subject to the following conditions:
-2 -
1) Shipping containers(proposal to be filed in future) for self-storage would not be
placed on a permanent foundation, but elevated on a platform to a height of at least
three feet and with a structure that would allow for flow of water under containers.
2) As a condition of an encroachment permit, owner would provide insurance and
an indemnity to the City as well as a waiver of liability or assumption of risk for
any damage that could occur due to flooding.
In considering this request, the Commission should note that recreational vehicle
storage is allowed as long as vehicles are not moved during a.m. and p.m. peak hour
traffic periods, and outdoor storage is also allowed if related to immediately abutting uses
permitted or conditional in the district.
We believe that the proposed use represents a low impact to the Rollins Road corridor
and that a specific project proposal for self-storage use can be mitigated to satisfy
concerns related to such development occurring within the drainage right of way. Thank
you for your consideration.
Best regards,
John M. Ward
Principal
v �'•e-�'E��`r '4 �- �°f �' a•,_; e •; \ls,�`j,�i�v'„+y. r •eC �Ft� • � � � '�`s 7 ��3'
•�!3'� ♦ �•,, "`aX t�• �t• y�s�j, <fie,yea 'n,Ii°, s ,�`�tiS,♦ =f✓c�, ±s� fi s 8 it qs Z.
s
'-r' a4 4' la; .\• E Y� `xtz ` two �'f, •I � *'
,� ,,v � �3'' i � .-r•♦. � `4 \`�. .a,�1 .. � t c♦` +..i 4'' �."t-L,�� A �''• �'- s si % z� s.. fe
4
Ali
4 1 o� n .rK �� �� •
y$y 1 �<'F<,:- s�♦i5Z - r��, b' ♦. � ���i Y..'� '`,\
Bs b L #
� '` ~ �• �3 r 3
_,44.
at`� z.. �'ti � f n � Cl. 'I./:♦\. -'o;� ^,. �-". _ �* `�/
^' s �^+.� ,mac i "a 's' *R. j t 't4• 'L."-� YA�V- 1 - ,z v Y rti
s•�`'^ff� r`'�"a7 r .; � ��,� r ai°�s�, €v(iY/�d"n ����'�.. � ��;�w��`1��.,ya •: �` :,;r )•'� �w '�<<a ',
�`. `Ct•.
"t � � "'r.,'3.� `"; M � O��r• �®�., _ s.r,4, n ;` •..� L E1 •a.:
'�� sy,1 y ".. A 4F,r • .[ �t0' S_y` O ,i.�•s �w..i 8 ,0,�„ �\
t� �,�s��'s~yy !, o�a •L!<�f tr xa,R[ �r C�4.'"„��+y .4 �. �i�' ..'Y.�`GA "T �k '�':�['.rP'2, ti•./e—" �a
C,a \ �• !.; s [,£'E Pa3 a°aa"•�! 00 � ... ^{=o9j qy a:''� '�l� �� �
a Z l ry ri�'t a♦ � �p $�4' c
V.,�y k,,•+•St'L. r ° � - �•i �' !'� 4 L '�, � � s^*k� `iQ• "t§, 6� k
w, ♦. •I e 3S t >~' W.�t•/'' ,�" su�4i�x�rys�t� d,�c7jS}. ^J'.",� $� �,.� -.
�*4'Rtz '"''' iA''; i'.,, '.._µd4 t�4:L7,4♦ a{ i�SS.y rg'" taf't �C �Rkr �_.: �'
'r: 4 .. < t •4'�''° �� \•t. � ��,�• -'!� 3.,Z.�;�`t 30,•F,4w '#•f �s f � �*, a � `♦ s r.-� y`I�=,9
•'Y rx ,:�.� e.�,, ."�'. .. ;v `.��r�/iq$y.y&" !. '.���zK��� w ..�'. .YaB' �4`�,��
�[� ,�` � s�Y�.i+" �.C,3' r `( '¢ ... ° J�•z ,`°Yfi��d Tp r 1t-w, Tt <.+ � h'1 y': >, a x -
rrt h ��', �'\'rib ah f 3 !•6 '�'t,./ .4 • +a ``� F O vri zr;'7,a
?°�"`� '�yr fy .� '"°'. £z.,.•, C .t �� •''�. �'� " a; '=�'�
��c°! r 'J ac,'s�'. r• \r �•. ''4� q°,��"`�i,+a a.
'Nor-
_41
�1`• � •zr .£ �?Y� ib r� Ys ��°3'• }O•.is ����3 "'•'ii/ • / • :'�•y �S ,•`•i �� ::r-i 4 +� `d [
v �fi, }a ! ," 'rim�.. s •�s s $ <5 O� � J`'�rs� r x � - s.° -i • �� "/ '" "`• '•� '7'c„� �• 4a v
E nt�y� u�'Ei rJ 4 f f a�i X�;�4.�•�'°.,, � r�fi�Gsi .. �5�� �i�r�! s-+F"d ♦ ' f �� .' yy o� �`, cam^}'
,kw °.t-.!� `��`R a yt :, c�a � r,�.'' /„ �»�f 6 y ,. ��� �"S'S� � �-1 !�f s x�.i� �••�
s. h "•�• �� t � �`-a t y6s �,� a r '�!4c o-,� ,� q t`'-� `'°`��"S.{ �°a .1 ' S� { �•' w�ti`� '-` ..
•�'� ! i ak f I s: �• y a. U
.`fi., ;� \.. �/,�' �>} ,ty er 'c :..••. .C C -r,,, �q^" :�^+L* .:;"" Lid-`il����.�. "fa 't�'`.
jt .-yrt tt�j,,�-°'..))� "� -aw. ?g)d �''. r�, ,� f. �L, °+'r.'" •..t �* -� � - s`Tr`u�p ar --r. s \,
�•\1 S• ,3 Y J , r4 � •(.• Sf• j sh Ar%, ,�tL ,.�. f"
�V'
•f' c' J�y, J "„H.+. rY j C S"'Yv.•� i "'�" ` rt
.� (.'{•� �" '"` 4 '�=a�. ; ,fit`• .t, s ♦ `S vs *' s�`-.�.. -y-
S ' .n .�"�..t'fis C'�# .i -d `�„ r� 3, r ,.t � •s.ar r
! yq � � -�! '�''i. � ,-® rr' `��t�g [ •`.�� p!�� h'pa�. � �'e*�,[��,�+�N �`'� a �i� t�`' `�?2 j�
� I g
J a . ., ct� r�,t� '.. � :s t j3✓y � .� .. I ;'�.d* �.�*A e � s+`"J i & Cr n! !.. �c k
� -: '� ". ,..l -ee ' r' l ,gt P n lr• w +.*. !. �••,y %ri5ge..3..� S�a^^'.^J a' � •.,”
,Y"
YI > �"/ .� 1-:.•'R "�Y v,/J 6r
'ctFM,& {:
•-�• F`£"h��
q 6 i��� ark I/'i'/� _��x't`t�`�.,, �tl. g y?�� I 'c. .�.� �[; 'r �'� ." •. ��y r sem,,.'?' '' -� 9-
� rj -., a � O(•'V1_/` '�'ti � ��'�,'� `�'f• � ° 3 •� � j'�',, 'E' �°,a' ��� `Z tv,'`'E.r "-�'{�" r - N
�.'\} �! '�. I .'`! x. y 2 '4 i rr £ 4f r t C>i"• ?.'� a .•i .a'v1.Note.k - 9�•-:.
Y
'� fes, b"�^�y� ."^�e�-��..x v�4 "�';.. i a 9 �'� `•/ ' t. [
c �;%.���•��',t� °�" ti.,,' t`'$ ^9'"£'3'•�fir,. ��T �� ..� t,�y�, Y .r"•' ti., t}�„''�L d v�'�' a ;�'f '�`� -
r
F i-�� .,Y.t �� �.. ,`Q}; n• • ♦ `• A hr' r°'e � wi �•,-� J•y f .. ''�.+ �t � � .(� .
"�.''♦ a3•`x'Y�`"�rs'N�+� � ` •, s. "�' �,:�` y.`k` � (MJ<dJ o�1.i 7 ���'�. '� � i � �,�,�nfi� �` 4� ��
Nr
r:� j'r�J}.y 6y s.4r`s Y"^. 8°kir v i I_fjr. J" -,a� $ ic. i Z ti. 2L ♦ z c� rA
tibs �} uo� ��•ti!f�4•,�C7VAY_-6Q t ,•as4•s ET A � �
# �f,jri r"�e J .: *`% .�. `*ay+ 3`X;``f. r ec• a
t 'I 4.r. ,L �'dd 5 3 �.p `• ':may t`
t 3 i �.,� �`' .. O r0 •a" yr '1'"y *„• a d' % �.aJa. F,-J� ` ~r�''° .,:” '� ,1.tq.'�t+,�3'
ri f/�c'h+} f J �1.��."'`?' h4.,�v :,;^��//p.�' '.. 6��� t'K 1�� _.. � r e .xz � k t L .L•LF�v�t
tt
.,°! :� z ¢9..} ,,` rbc •s4�f-Y4 tyh,�r r �rC rsAg$ ,.',' ,/(°1c.� d�a"p�c '-:�� .x+ ��vi'. �� .•Yx�'zr, .::� / '%
`v ewyr� " ' ��•.
n r 4'•. =K. L ./F�..fa o � f ",If A �,.
..a• et'x� -.� 1 < s _:.u�•✓sae,, • :a�♦ t• ��g "� ri� ~ate V` O o �ji
.. 'Fa l,�,L.'!s ie ., a. y ar,F35ve �•ke. �1:s�TfTT •a ,y r s $• s ` J �+1• 'r�r r' GGX -'
Kk
All
_ , ['s f•' �O• .is fr [ 'tc k �• f - !_♦/ ^�[<.cu +� `y. 9' s. h i,f
z u '�ti f t+-�,� � Y a .�- � � • `�I a �•w�:�, s� /F �� '¥ c'at 'x �',� ";` ,� ,.
Tj
..�� 3.i 5 -o 06 �,g5��¢,,.,st.4 • ' �=.� ..�` �.'2 ����� ���,-�r'S'y,'.'�Sh&;y �'},�/`����s'�•'� ` �yd,� ♦ �
Ot
�
` l. �� t � .r 4.' � A ¢�.,® �a"ice �14)`A1,�1•• hdy W�\•.� . ;,\�
:. -. . �'tyXp�.>yp' x�s ♦ r , � - .� .F 4�.,.gFz°�•+ �3,�syn,
�• "kykr"[,��.,� .-. � �'"' `�-'^•E•,-fir'��." i 'j �' ,,y. �� �♦I,:�\ .<S w,. 4 �� `r�i�. �,rr•�'
•4 � ��.r � A r t '` p r �
PC
All,
M Vy
"40?
411 vK�
/4e
14
I W.-S
Z
,x4l,C. V g
4
'YA t.
IT
VIM
$
43
fiS3Y' d;
luo
kN 4.
1'0 -Ml /b�:���S.5:ft'�S 4'41„#'\4,.vS'\+•,;;:f.!r=:jt•�,Viy i at 2�``:a.t.\•�':,V'y*("(..vp'�g•tr,f Y,'i'.cer:�P f�5.¢> ♦.:•y�,•W,.�t,+r,.itM7.s''1�•,d'ed">'a,�Gt9qel1jeX:u711.S�rry,",,�'!-•a i .`fY.!r(:•'a3Y,-',/�`!.1!,''/�1 p•rI!Y!/IP�'..,rF't�I''Iv�/!-P?
V I •
�� ",-�!j!,", — ,N ,t.— ;,4.
ve
p ZN—Q�& -Np
N.*
�f"t'tk�Elj�`
1w,
hvl,v
e. w
F'%'V-14
NI'y 4&
Art
i-O
3�y EOW,
Z
'Ilk
9A
®R
"Al
Nho,
g,4
41,
,N'N
T 4�.P Itw
i1MM"
Z
irS`J' "i'
q?f:
9)1,-
z P".
�Vz
k, )w
itp
Ar
wt—
.0
51A
0 tk
z
14
kli;%
,�.
41
4
,A"-• NF
•
5
ikl
ry�"41
V —V-7s. -�'?
$V7
-IiI5' o
qX"a.ffkll
V
Ar N wA,
,.;k qF,
T�q 1 Y.-
peg"
im
RL 79
p
g
U Y
n ,
71:
A9t
r
Vi
15
170AVSrAFFP"0jtr WCAT'IONRLCEIYEt}
MPREPARATION
LAW OFFICES AARONSON, DICKERSON, COHN & LANZONEA
ROBERT J.LANZONE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MICHAEL AARONSON
JEAN S.SAVAREE 939 LAUREL STREET, SUITE D (1910-1998)
MARC L.ZAFFERANO POST OFFICE BOX 1065 OF COUNSEL
GREGORY J.RUBENS SAN CARLOS. CALIFORNIA 94070
LINDA J.NOESKE PHONE:650-593-3117 MELVIN E.COHN
FAX:650-637-1401 (SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE I RETIRED)
www.adcl.com KENNETH M.DICKERSON
October 21, 2005
RECEIVED
VIA MAIL AND FAX 696-3790
Planning Commission OCT 2 4 2005
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Rd. C11y OF BURLINGAME
Burlingame, CA 94010 pLANNING DEPT.
Re: 1206-1220 Rollins Road
Rollins Road Rezoning
Dear Commissioners:
We represent Eileen and Simon Chow the owners of the above referenced property. We
appeared before you on their behalf at the time you were considering the North Burlingame/Rollins
Road Specific Plan. Also,John Ward has appeared on their behalf, and will be appearing before you
when you consider the rezoning changes,on Qct.,24,2005
Our clients property is,right at the'corner of Rollins Road and Broadway; and is in the area
designated in the Specific Plan as the"'Southern Gateway". The parcel is approximately 22,000 sq
ft. and is occupied currently by building(s)totaling about 22,000 sq ft. fo office and warehouse use.
We previously requested and obtained changes in the final version of the Specific Plan to
allow a density bonus of 1.0 FAR(over the allowed density of 1.0 FAR)on the occurrence of"a lot
combination or gateway features (p. 31 ofthe Specific Plan). The proposed rezoning changes under
Section 25.44.055 (b) speaks to allowing up to a 2.0 FAR only"providing lots are combined and
gateway amenities are included. This language is inconsistent with the Specific Plan in two instances:
(1)the and should be an or, and(2)it should state that an FAR density bonus of 1.0 is allowed,over
and above the normal 1.0 FAR density allowed. As worded there is no baseline guarantee of any
FAR with the use of the words>p to 2.0. In summary, Section 25.44.055(b)should be brought into
consistency with the wording in the Specific Plan.
The other point we would like to make deals with the restricted uses set forth in Section
25.44.055 for the Southern Gateway area. As stated this section would limit the uses to office,
service and auto dealer, and commercial recreation. At present the property has all ofthe uses of the
RR zoning on Rollins Rd. We assumed from the language in the Specific Plan that the gateway area
would provide for an overlay,zoning that would allow for additional uses to those allowed in the RR
`district= Instead we are confronted with far fewer choices for the use of the property than we had
Q:\Attys\jPChoy"ICom.wpd
before. For example warehouse,biotech lab and research,print shop...are all uses we currently have
and which are being taken away. It is almost as if the property is being downzoned, not upgraded.
We thought the gateway would provide an owner with encouragement to do something special at the
entrance to Broadway,if possible, not lock in only special uses. In summary we would propose that
Section 25.44.055 be modified to indicate it is an"overlay"of zoning uses for the southern Gateway
area, and that the zoning provisions for the RR zoning District would otherwise apply.
Lastly, the Specific Plan at p. 30 expressly indicates that the Broadway commercial area
allows for retail uses along the Broadway frontage. The staff annotations to the suggested zoning
changes seems to assert that the Specific Plan is "vague regarding uses in the gateway area".
Reference to retail use, at least in the gateway area and along Broadway is not vague and we would
request that retail use be added to either the permitted or conditional uses for the gateway"overlay'
area. It is quite possible to use a building on our clients property for certain retail uses such as a
jicwcler,mattress store _lightipg store...and we are sure there are many others that would benefit from
the Broadway frontage and be appropriate in the gateway area. Assuming the retail use was listed
as being a conditional use, the City would retain control over what retail use would be able to go in,
and place appropriate conditions on the use permit.
Thank you for your consideration.
ery ly yours,
ROBER J LANZO
cc: Meg Monroe
John Ward
Eileen Chow
QAAttysVjhChovAPlCom.wpd
CIT7 AGENDA
," REM# 7c
STAFF REPORT MAG -
DATE Ck+ramher F,2005
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council _ SUBMITTED v'
BY* Jack Van Etten Police Chip& -
DATE: November 25, 2005 _
APPROVED
FROM: Jack Van Ftten Police Chief _ BY& Jim Nantell, Gity M anpr lfl�ty
SUBJECT: Introduce a newly proposed City Ordinance (Chapter 10.72), Prohibiting Sp ctators to gather
at or be present within 200 feet of Illegal Speed Contests, Exhibitions of Speed, or Sideshows
RECOMMENDATION:
Introduce a newly proposed Burlingame City Ordinance that will specifically prohibit spectators to gather or
be present (within 200 feet) at illegal speed contests, exhibitions of speed, or sideshows
A. Request that the City Clerk read the title of the proposed ordinance
B. Waive further reading of the proposed ordinance
C. Introduce the proposed ordinance
D. Direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days prior to the
proposed adoption
BACKGROUND:
Under existing law (section 23109 of the California Vehicle Code), motor vehicle speed contests and
exhibitions of speed conducted on public streets and highways are illegal. Motor vehicle speed contests and
exhibitions of speed are more commonly known as drag races or street races. Streets within the City of
Burlingame have been the site of continuing and escalating illegal street racing over the past several years.
Such street racing threatens the health and safety of the public, interferes with pedestrian and vehicular traffic,
creates a public nuisance, and interferes with the rights of private business owners to enjoy the use of their
property within the City of Burlingame. The illegal street races occur on an irregular basis on various streets
within the City. Dozens of racers and spectators gather on these streets late at night and in the early morning
hours, blocking the streets and sidewalks to traffic, forming a racetrack area, and otherwise encouraging,
aiding and abetting the racing process.
Illegal street racers accelerate to high speeds without regard to oncoming traffic, pedestrians, or vehicles
parked or moving nearby. The racers drive quickly from street to street, race for a period of time, and then
move to other locations upon the arrival of the police. Those who participate in this illegal activity are very
sophisticated, using their cell phones, police scanners, and other electronic devices to communicate with each
other to avoid detection or arrest by the police. They also use the Internet to provide information on where to
race, and give advice on how to avoid detection and prosecution. As a result, the police have increased their
awareness of street racers and the locations where they occur in a proactive effort to protect the public,
prevent traffic accidents, property crimes, and eliminate (or reduce) additional calls for police service.
As a result of increased reports of street racing and exhibitions of speed (5 incidents in 2004 and to 14 to
date in 2005), the Burlingame Traffic, Safety and Parking Commission has addressed this issue. Following
their study, the TSP Commission has recommended that an ordinance be created to specifically address
making it illegal for spectators to be present at these illegal activities. The TSP Commission has sent their
recommendation back to staff to present it to council for consideration and approval.
DISCUSSION:
Existing California Vehicle Code laws prohibit speed contests and exhibitions of speed. In addition, existing
California Vehicle Code law also prohibits persons who aid, abet or actively participate in these types of illegal
street activities. However, there is no existing state law that prohibits being a spectator at these types of illegal
events. This new city ordinance will specifically prohibit the gathering of spectators (on public or private
property) to be present at, or to view illegal motor vehicle speed contests or motor vehicle exhibitions of speed
if the person is within 200 feet of the illegal event.
This new city ordinance will provide local law enforcement with additional means by which to protect the
public, and to discourage and prevent illegal and dangerous street racing and sideshows from occurring within
the City of Burlingame.
The City of San Diego has adopted a similar city ordinance that prohibits being a spectator at illegal street
racing events, exhibitions of speed or side shows. Our spectator ordinance is similar to that of the City of San
Diego.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Burlingame City Ordinance 10.72
Related Police Department Calls for Service involving recent Street Racing
1 ORDINANCE NO.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OFLB CODE TOAPKOHIBIT THE GATHERING OF
E ADDING CHAPTER 10.72 TO
THE BURLINGAME MUNICIPA
3 SPECTATORS AT ILLEGAL SPEED ONT STS,EXHIBITIONS OF SPEED, AND
4
5 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows:
6
7 Section 1. This ordinance is adopted in order to provide law enforcement with
8 additional means by which to discourage and prevent dangerous street racing and sideshows in
9 the community.
10
11 Section 2. A new Chapter 10.72 is added to read as follows:
12 Chapter 10.72
SPECTATORS PROHIBITEDT OR ILLEGAL SPEED
CONTESTS, EXHIBITIONS OF
13
14 Sections:
10.72.010 Purpose.
15 10.72.020 Definitions.
10.72.030 Spectator at illegal speed contest,exhibitions of speed,or sideshows-Violation.
16 10.72.040 Relevant circumstances to prove a violation.
10.72.050 Admissibility of prior acts.
17
18 10.72.010 Purpose.
19 (a) The city council finds and declares that motor vehicle speed contests and exhibitions
20 of speed conducted on public streets and highways are illegal under California Vehicle Code
21 section 23109. Motor vehicle speed contests and exhibitions of speed are commonly known as
22 street races or drag races. Streets within the city have been the site of illegal street racing over
23 the past several years. Such street racing threatens the health and safety of the public,interferes
24 with pedestrian and vehicular traffic,creates a public nuisance,violates the rights of persons to
25 peacefully use and enjoy the city and its facilities,parks,and walkways, and interferes with the
26 right of business owners to enjoy the use of their property within the city. Illegal street racers
27 accelerate to high speeds without regard to vehicular traffic,pedestrians, or vehicles parked or
28 moving nearby. The racers drive quickly from street to street,race for several hours,and then
813112005 1
I move to other locations upon the arrival of the police. In addition,the Bay Area has witnessed
2 a variation on speed contests called sideshows, where drivers of vehicles engage in reckless
3 stunts and maneuvers on streets,sidewalks,and other public places in the presence of spectators.
4 These sideshows constitute a public nuisance.
5 (b) Those who participate in this illegal activity can be very sophisticated, using their
6 cell phones,police scanners, and other electronic devices to communicate with each other to
7 avoid detection or arrest.They also use the Internet to provide information on where to race,and
8 give advice on how to avoid detection and prosecution. Traffic accidents,property crimes,and
9 calls for police service can increase dramatically. The mere presence of spectators at these
10 events fuels the illegal street racing and sideshows and creates an environment in which these
11 illegal activities can flourish.
12 (c) This chapter is adopted to prohibit spectators at illegal street races and sideshows
13 with the aim of significantly curbing and inhibiting this criminal activity. The chapter gives
14 proper notice to citizens as to what activities are lawful and what activities are unlawful. In
15 discouraging spectators, the act of organizing and participating in illegal street races and
16 sideshows will be discouraged.
17
18 10.72.020 Definitions.
19 For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
20 (a) "Illegal motor vehicle speed contest" or "illegal exhibition of speed" means any
21 speed contest or exhibition of speed referred to in California Vehicle C6de sections 23109(a)
22 and 23109(c).
23 (b) "Preparations for the illegal motor vehicle speed contest, exhibition of speed, or
24 sideshow" include,but are not limited to, situations in which:
25 (1)A group of motor vehicles or individuals has arrived at a location for the purpose of
26 participating in or being spectators at the event; or
27 (2) A group of individuals has lined one or both sides of a public street or highway for
28 the purpose of participating in or being a spectator at the event; or
813112005 2
1 (3)A group of individuals has gathered on private property open to the general public
2 without the consent of the owner, operator, or agent thereof for the purpose of participating in
3 or being a spectator at the event; or
4 (4) One or more individuals has impeded the free public use of a public street or
5 highway by actions, words, or physical barriers for the purpose of conducting the event; or
6 (5)Two or more vehicles have lined up with motors running for an illegal motor vehicle
7 speed contest, exhibition of speed, or sideshow; or
8 (6)One or more drivers is revving his engine or spinning his tires in preparation for the
9 event; or
10 (7) An individual is stationed at or near one or more motor vehicles serving as a race
11 starter.
12 (c) "Sideshow"means a gathering,procession, or assemblage of vehicles on highways
13 where vehicles in motion are used to exhibit stunts and maneuvers in the presence of spectators.
14 (d) "Spectator" means any individual who is present at an illegal motor vehicle speed
15 contest,exhibition of speed,or sideshow or at a location where preparations are being made for
16 such activities, for the purpose of viewing, observing,watching, or witnessing the event as it
17 progresses. "Spectator" includes any individual at the location of the event without regard to
18 whether the individual arrived at the event by driving a vehicle, riding as a passenger in a
19 vehicle,walking, or arriving by some other means.
20
21 10.72.030 Spectator at illegal speed contest,exhibitions of speed,or sideshow-Violation.
22 (a)It is unlawful for any individual to be knowingly present as a spectator, either on a
23 public street or highway, or on private property open to the general public without the consent
24 of the owner,operator, or agent thereof, at an illegal motor vehicle speed contest or exhibition
25 of speed.
26 (b)It is unlawful for any individual to be knowingly present as a spectator, either on a
27 public street or highway, or on private property open to the general public without the consent
28 of the owner,operator,or agent thereof,where preparations are being made for an illegal motor
813112005 3
1 vehicle speed contest or exhibition of speed.
(c) It is unlawful for any individual to be knowingly present as a spectator, either on
3 a public street or highway,or on private property open to the general public without the consent
4 of the owner, operator, or agent thereof, at a sideshow.
5 (d) It is unlawful for any individual to be knowingly present as a spectator, either on a
6 public street or highway, or on private property open to the general public without the consent
7 of the owner, operator, or agent thereof, where preparations are being made for a sideshow.
8 (e) An individual is present at the illegal motor vehicle speed contest or exhibition of
9 speed if that individual is within 200 feet of the location of the event, or within 200 feet of the
10 location where preparations are being made for the event.
11 (f) Exemption: Nothing in this section prohibits law enforcement officers, a medical
12 professional, or a firefighter from being present at illegal motor vehicle speed contests,
13 exhibitions of speed, or sideshows in the course of their official duties.
14
15 10.72.040 Relevant circumstances to prove a violation.
16 Notwithstanding any other provision of law,to prove a violation of section 10.72.030,
17 admissible evidence may include,but is not limited to, any of the following:
18 (a) The time of day;
19 (b) The nature and description of the scene;
20 (c) The number of people at the scene;
21 (d) The location of the individual charged in relation to any individual or group
22 present at the scene;
23 (e) The number and description of motor vehicles at the scene;
24 (f) The activities in which the motor vehicles are engaged;
25 (g)Whether the individual charged drove,walked, or was transported to the scene;
26 (h)How long the individual charged was present at the scene of the event;
27 (i)Whether the individual charged has previously participated in an illegal motor
28 vehicle speed contest, exhibition of speed, or sideshow;
813112005 4
I (j) Whether the individual charged has previously aided and abetted an illegal motor
2 vehicle speed contest, exhibition of speed, or sideshow;
3 (k)Whether the individual charged has previously attended an illegal motor vehicle
4 speed contest, exhibition of speed, or sideshow;
5 Whether the individual charged previously was present at a location where
6 preparations were being made for an illegal speed contest,exhibition of speed, or sideshow, or
7 where an exhibition of speed,illegal motor vehicle speed contest,or sideshow was in progress.
8
9 10.72.050 Admissibility of prior acts.
10 The list of circumstances set forth in section 10.72.040 is not exclusive. Evidence of
11 prior acts may be admissible to show the propensity of the defendant to be present at or attend
12 an illegal motor vehicle speed contest, exhibition of speed,or sideshow,if the prior act or acts
13 occurred within three (3) years of the presently charged offense. These prior acts may always
14 be admissible to show knowledge on the part of the defendant that a speed contest, exhibition
15 of speed, or sideshow was taking place at the time of the presently charged offense. Prior acts
16 are not limited to those that occurred within the city.
17
18 Section 3. The provisions of this ordinance are severable, and if any word, clause,
19 sentence,paragraph,provision,or part of this ordinance,or the application of this ordinance to
20 any person,is declared invalid,preempted, or unconstitutional by any court, that holding shall
21 not invalidate any other portion of this ordinance. The City Council finds and determines that
22 it would have adopted this ordinance without the word,clause, sentence,paragraph,provision,
23 or part that was declared invalid.
24
25 Section 4. This ordinance shall be published as required by law.
26
27 Mayor
28
813112005 5
1 1,DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that
2 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of
3 Burlingame on the day of ,2005,and the ordinance was duly adopted
4 at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2005, by the
5 following vote:
6
7 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
8 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
9
10 City Clerk
11
12
13 CADocuments and Settings\Shep1ey.PD\Loca1 Settings\Temp\sideshowspectators.ord.wpd
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
813112005 6
Call 511066 File Date 01/16/2004 Opr riley 1
CN Unit. Status
Buris BURL 1
Location S7 DISPCH
WATCH COMMANDER
Type 23103 Svc P Agcy BPD Area 3 Dist IP° YZPty B
1How - 1 125
Remarks (RECKLESS DRIVING) 15:27:00 1
01 2 MOTORCYCLES GOING UP AND DOWN DOING 15.27:13 1 PATROL
25 P
02 WHEELIES/ TSELF/ENDAGERING
03 THEMSELVES AND MOTORISTS COMING OUT OF DRWYS 15:36:54 1 L26 CLEARD
04 UTL GOA I L34 CLUARD
First ftp
Phone 408-687-7833 i L36 CLEARD
Last
AddressI
Cross Streets Rec POD 1 BOLO N HAZ N EL N PH 57 (AFTER O000, L12
01 O
I
I
I
RM DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
UNIT NAME
JNI NAME, CHARLES 1526 1528 1535 1536 77 ISu: D P2: 0
T22P3: 0 P1: -
CMD:
-Call 533485 File Date 07/10/2004 Opr eisenman 1CN Unit. Status
Juris BURL
Location WATCH CONIlSANDER
Type 4155 Svc gc3' BPD Y Pty
Bt C
ea 3 Dist 21 Zn
Remarks (PERSON CAUSING A DISTURBANEE) IP? 2 How? 1 57 CLEARD
01:15:12
01 SEVERAL DOZEN YOUNG PEOPLE DRAG RACING ON 01:15:13 I PATROL
02 STREET 01:18:29 125 L12 ARRIVD
03 CODE-4 01:18:35 127 L26 DISPCH
04 VERS LEAVING THE AREA 01:19:09 126 L34 DISPCH
05+ MLB PD ADVISED phone (
Last CITIZEN First 126 L36 DISPCH
Address 1
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 BOLO N HAZ N EL N PH 21 1AFTER 0000, L12
01
1
1
1
1
UNIT NAME RCM DISP ABVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L33 GRANUCCI, DAVID 0114 0115 D117 0119 18 L36 Isu: 0 P2: 0
1P3: 0 Pl: 1
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 533489 Page IOf 1Time. Operator POD
## Remarks....................... ..... 07/10 01:15 eisenman -2
1 SEVERAL DOZEN YOUNG PEOPLE DRAG RACING ON 07/10 01:15 eisenman 2
2 STREET 07/10 01:18 chrisg 17
3 CODE-4 07/10 01:18 chrisg 17
4 VERS LEAVING THE AREA 07/10 01:19 chrisg 17
5 MLB pD ADVISED 07/10 01:19 chrisg 17
6 AREA CLEAR
Call 541D45 File Date 09/05/2004 OPT winter 1CN Unit. Status
Juris BURL
Location _ WATCH COMMANDER
22350 Svc Y Agcy BPD Area 3 Dist =PZ? NPty 1BH w'S � 25 S7 DISPCH
Remarks (SPEEDING) 02:37:10 1
01 VERS ABOUT TO RACE/ SUBJS LEAVING NOW D2:39:33 1 PATROL
02LIC 02:39:39 125 L12 DISPCH
03 LIC 02:40:01 1 L26 CLEARD
04 LIC 02:40:07 1 L34 CLEARD
05+ LIC1
Last OFFICER First GRANUCCI, DAVID Phone 1 L36 CLEARD
AddressPOD 17 BOLO N HAZ N EL N PH 7 1
Rec
Crow
S=e 1AFTER 0000, L12
1
V—c St Year Make Model Color Additional
1
1
RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units 1
UNIT NAME1
L33_ GRANUCCI, DAVID 0236 EVNT 0236 0245 77 1Su: 0 P2: 0
IP9: D P1: 1
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 541045 page 1 of 1
Date. .Time. Operator POD
## Remarks.............
09/05 02:37 winter 17
1 VEHS ABOUT TO RACE/ SUBJS LEAVING NOW 09/05 02:39 winter 17
2 09/05 02:39 winter 17
09/05 02:40 winter 17
09/05 02:40 winter 17
09/05 02:40 winter 17
09/05 02:40 winter 17
09/05 02:40 winter 17
09/05 02:41 winter 17
09/05 02:41 winter I17
winter 17
09/05 02:41
i
�Cal1 546540 File Date 10/16/2004 OPr eisenman 1CN Unit. Status
Juris BURL
Location
Type 1136 Svc P Agcy BPD Area 3 Dist 21 NZnn PD1BH w� 5 125TCH SOMMANDVD
Remarks (TRAFFIC STOP) I How?02 1
01 2 VEHICLES RACING 23:3B:34 1 PATROL
02 LIC 23:45:01 125 L12 ARRIVD
03 NAM/ 23:44:54 127 L26 DISPCH
04 CODE 7 PER R16 126 L34 DISPCH
Last OFFICER First BOLL- ROBERT Phone 126 L36 DISPCH
Address
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 BOLO N HAZ N EL N PH 22 (AFTER DODD, L12
01
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional 1
0
1
I
. I
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units 1
L23 BOLL, ROBERT 2338 TSTP 2338 2351 86 1Su: 0 P2: 0
1P3: 0 P1: 1
CMD:
Call 546558 File 200403785 Date 10/17/2004 Opr eisenman ICN Unit. Status
Juris BURL 1
Location P WATCH COMMANDER
Type VC Svc P Agcy BPD Area 3 Dist TP' yZptyDIBnow? 5 125 S7 DISPCH
Remarks (VEH CODE VIOLATION) 00:49:54 1
01 WITH 3 RACERS 00:58:39 PATROL
02 3 CARS, 6 SUBJS. BEING CITED DO:56:19 125 . L12 DISPCH
03 00:58:19 1 L26 CLEARD
04 01:06:29 1 L34 CLEARD
05+
Last OFFICER _rst BOLL, ROBERT Phone I L36 CLEARD
AddressSOLO N HIu^ N EL h Ph 64
1
Cross Streets kec POD 2 1AFTER 0000, L12
I
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
I
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L23 BOLL, ROBERT 0045 EVITT DD49 0129 77 ISu: 0 P2: 0
IP3: 0 Pl: 1
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 546558 Page IOf1Date. Time. Operator POD
## R 10/17 00:49 eisenman 2
1 10/17 00:58 eisenman 2
2 SEX/M 10/17 00:56 eisenman 2
3 P 10/17 00:58 eisenman 2
10/17 01:06 eisenman 2
OUPE
SEX/M 10/17 01:04 eisenman 2
5
SEX/M 10/17 01:04 eiaeaman 2
10/17 01:15 sisenman 2
SEX/M 10/17 01:15 eisenmen 2
10/17 01:16 eisenman 2
10
Call 562575 File Date 03/01/2005 Opr lembke ICN Unit. Status
Juris HURL I
LocationWATCH COMMANDER
Type 231 0 vc Agcy BPD Area 3 Dist 22 Zn PD Ht C
TP? Y Pty 1 How, 1 I 57 CLEARD
Remarks (RECKLESS DRIVING) 21:10:56
01 VEE DOING DONUTS IN GRAVEL PARKING LOT/ 21:11:22 � PATROL
02 TO ADV/ 21:22:10 I L12 CLEARD
03 DISPO: GOA/ I L26 CLEARD
L34 CLEARD
Phone
Last E Firsc�
I L36 LUNCH
Address
Cross Streets Rec POD 1 BOLO N HAZ N EL Y PH 836 (AFTER 0000, L12
01 Now
RM DISP ARVD CLRD .CLS Backup Units
UNIT NAME
L11 HUTCHINGS, DAME 2109 2111 2119 2122 77 ISu: 0 P2: 0
IP3: 0 P1: 0
CND:
\Rall 562941 File Date 03/05/2005 Opr winter JCN Unit. Status
Location US GROUP CONSOLIDATOR duris BURL
Type 1186 Svc P Agcy BPD Area 3 Dist 21 2n PD Bt C WATCH COMMANDER
Remarks (TRAFFIC STOP) IP? N Pty 1 How? 5 126 S7 ARRIVD
001:45:44
1 LIC/
02 NAM/ SER/M 01:46:57 PATROL
01.57:13 125 L12 ARPIVD
03 15 SUBJS SHOWED UP AT THE SAME TIME / FLED WHEN 01:57:19 127 L26 ARRIVD
04 22 DID TRAFFIC STOP 126 L34 ARRIVD
Last OFFICER First WITT, CHARLES Phone i26 L36 ARRIVD
Address
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 BOLO N HAZ N EL Y PH 50AFTER 0000, L12
01
02
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
01
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L22 WITT, CHARLES 0145 TSTP 0145 0158 86 ISu: 0 P2: 0
JP3: 0 Pl: 1
CMD:
(Call 562942 File Date D3/05/2005 O r winter iCv Unit. Status
LocationWATCH COMMANDER
Type 1186 Svc P Agcy SPD Area 3 Dist IP? Bt C 5 125 S7 DISPCH
Remarks (TRAFFIC STOP) 02:02:44 1
01 LIC -- --,/M 02:05:16 1 PATROL
02 NAM 02:12:57 125 L12 DISPCH
SE
03 CHASED .5 MORE CARS AWAY 1 L26 CLEARD
1 L34 CLEARD
Last OFFICER First WITT, CHARLES Phone i L36 CLEARD
Address
Cross Streets Pec POD 2 BOLO N HAZ N EL N PH 65 1AFTER DODO, L72
1
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
D� 1
1
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS BackuP Units
L22 WITT, CHARLES 0202 TSTP 0202 0212 66 1Su: 0 P2: 0
JP3: 0 P1: 1
CMD:
i
Call 562945 File Date 03/05/2005 Opr winter JCN Unit. Status
Location Juris BURL
21 Zn PD Bt C (WATCH COM
Type 1186 Svc Agc�D Area 3 Dist MANDER
Remarks (TRAFFIC STOP) IP? N Pty 1 now, 5 125 57 ARRIVD
01 LIC 02:17:01
4 02:17:16 PATROL
02 LIC SEX/M 02:19:11 125 - L12 ARRIVD
03 NAM SEX/M 02:19:25 127 L26 DISPCH
04 NAM/ 02:31:10 126 L34 DISPCH
05+ 20 MORE LOCATED
Last OFFICER First WITT, CHARLES Phone 126 L36 DISPCH
Address
Cross'—Streets I=ec POD 2 BOLO N HN EL N YH 23 (AFTER 0000, L12
VLic St year Make Model Color Additional
I
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L22 WITT, CHARLES 0217 TS
0217 0231 86 L26 ISu: 0 P2: 0
IP3: 0 P1: 1
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 562945 page 1 of 1
.. Date. Time. Operator POD
03/05 62:17 winter 2
03/05 02:17 winter 2
03/05 02:19 winter 2
03/05 02:19 winter 2
03/05 02:31 winter 2
03/05 02:32 winter 2
/Call 563068 File Date 03/06/2005 Opuriaine iCN Unit. Status
Location �
Type 11B6 Svc y A4cY B Area 3 Diet 21 2n PD Bt C WATCH COMMANDER
Remarks (TRAFFIC STOP) IP? N Pty 1 How? 5 125 S7 ARRIVD
01:33:01 1
01 01:33:06 1 PATROL
02 01:33:12 125 L12 ARRIVD
03 0 ADV SEX/M 01:36:12 127 L26 DISPCH
04 NAM/ WWITT,
ER/M01:37:13 126 L34 DISPCH
05+ NAM/Last OFFICER FirCHARLES Phone
126 L36 DISPCH
Address
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 BOLO N HAZ N EL N PH 24
AFTER 0000, L12
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ABVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L22 WITT, CHARLES 0133 TSTP 0133 0149 86
Call 585727 has been updated by user 12 (hough) . ISU: 1
CMD: 0 P1:
Remarks Detail for Call 563068 page 1 of 1
## Remarks........................................... Date. Time. Operator POD
03/06 01:33 caine 2
03/06 01:33 caine 2
03/06 01:33 caine 2
-- 03/06 01:36 winter 17
03/06 01:37 winter 17
03/06 01:48 winter 17
ICa11 564117 File Date 03/14/2005 Opr eisenman ICN Unit. Status
Juris BURL
Location� WATCH COMMANDER
Type 4155 Svc P Agcy BPD Area. 3 Dist 22 Zn PD Bt C
Remarks (PERSON CAUSING A DISTURBANCE) IP? Y Pty 22How? I S7 CLEARD
01 SEVERAL CARS.DOING DONUTS IN THE GRAVEL 22:59:35 I PATROL
02 DISPO: UTL/ I L12 CLEARD
L26 CLEARD
L34 CLEARD
Last First Phone
L3 6 LUNCH
Address
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 BOLO N HAZ N EL Y PH 641 (AFTER 0000, L12
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L15 LAZZERINI, RICH 2253 2254 2257 2259 1S ISu: 0 P2: 0
IP3: 0 P1: 0
CMD:
.ICall 567090 File Date 04/10/2005 Opr Caine ICN Unit. Status
,7uris BURL I
Location
Type 23103 Svc P gCy PD Area 3 Dist IP° YZPtyD1BH w? 5 �25TCH S7I+IliAND`E�R
Remarks (RECILESS DRIVING) 02:22:16 I
D1 LIP/
/ /�
02 Lt /CA 02:22:24 PATROL
/CA 02:22:31 125 L12 ARRIVD
03 LIC
04 NAM/ SEX/M CTY/REDWOOD CITY 02:22:53 I L26 CLEARD
05+ NAM _ SE%/F CTY/PALO ALTO 02:23:46 i L34 CLEARD
Last OFFICER First BASURTO, NORMA Phone I L36 CLEARD
Address
Cross Streets Rao POD 2 BOLO N M N EL N PH 27 (AFTER OOOD, L12
VLiC st Year Make Model Color Additional.
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ABVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L36 BASURTO, NORMA 0221 EVNT 0221 0246 54 L22/L34/L12 ISu: D P2: 0
IP3: 1 P1: 1
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 567090 page 1 of 1
## Rema::'-s. ...... .. . .... .. . . .. .. ....... .............. Date. Time. Operator POD
04/10 02:22 Caine 2
04/10 02:22 Caine 2
04/10 02:22 Caine 2
ITY 04/10 02:22 Caine 2
'-C?'
F C PALO ALTO 04/10 02:23 Caine 2
��Y/REDWOOD CITY 04/10 02:24 Caine 2
M CTY/REDWOOD 04/10 02:25 Caine 2
04/10 02:25 Caine 2
' g ALL C=mED 04/10 02:46 Caine 2
r_-,E Date 04/29/2005 OPr chrisg 1CN Unit. Status
-Call 569330 Juris BURL I
Location
Type 22355 Svc t k7c"' Area 3 Dist IP' NZPtyDIBH w° 5 �25TCH COMMANDER
Remarks (SPEEDING. 23:19:04 1
01 LIC/ 23;19:09 I PATROL
02 LI=C__� 23:19:57 125 L12 DISPCH
03 L I L26 CLEARD
L34 CLEARD
Last OFFICER rirst BASURTO, NORMA Phone i L36 CLEARD _
Address1
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 80L0 N HAZ N EL N PH 68 1AFTER 0000, L12
i
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
01 I
02+
I
I
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L36 BASURTO, NORMA 2318 EVNT 2318 2321 77 1Su: 0 P2: 0
IP3: 0 P1: 1
CMD:
Call 56975" r- E Date 05/03/2005 Opr johnson JCN Unit. Status
Location Jurla HURL
Svc P Agcy BP
Dist 22 Zn PD Ht C (WATCH COMMANDER
Type 23103
Remarks (RECKLESS DRIVING) IP? Y Pty 1 How? 1 S7 CLEARD
01 VERS DOING DONUTS - YELLOW JEEP WITH BIG 16:43:06
02 TIRES - MALE DRIVER BLV - JUST LEFT TOWARDS 16:44:03 PATROL
03 AIRPORT BLVD 16:44:07 I L12 CLEARD
04 OTHER VER - HONDA CIVIC TAN/GOLD - OCCUPIED 16:43:47 ICLEAR
05+ PARKED IN GRAVEL AREA - AT THE END 145 L34 D
Last First Phone 650-342-9844
Address KINCAIDS �45 L36 ARRIVD
Cross Streets Rec POD 3 BOLO N HAZ N EL Y PH 552 iAFTER 0000, L12
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
T33 GRANUCCI, DAVID 1642 1644 1649 1702 77 L39 ISu: 0 P2: 0
CMD: JP3: 0 P1: 0
Remarks Detail for Call 569757 page 1 of 1
## Remarks.. .......... Date. Time. Operator POD
1. 05/03 16:43 Johnson 3
05/03 16:44 johnson 3
05/03 16:44 johnson 3
05/03 16:43 johnson 3
05/03 16:43 johnson 3
05/03 17:02 johnson 3
Call 57862: F e Date 07/15/2005 Opr bjworden JCN Unit. Status
Location . � Juris HURL
Type 415J Svc P Agcy BPD Are 3 Dist 22 Zn PD Bt C WATCH COMMANDER
Remarks (DISTURBANCE (JUVENILES)) IP? N Pty 2 How? 1 1 S7 CLEARD
01 RP STATES THERE ARE SEVERAL J'S DOING DONUTS 23:17:05
02 IN THE BACK PARKING PARKING LOT. SUBJECTS IN 23:17:19 I PATROL
03 AN UNK TYPE OF VER, POSS EXPLORER AND BMW 23:17:34 L12 LUNCH
04 LARGE GROUP OF J'S ON SCENE 23:23:38 L26 CLEARD
05+ ALL SUBJECTS LEFT THE AREA AND ARE NOW OUT OF 23:28:52 144 L34 DISPCH
Last First low L36
L36 CLEARD
AddreBANKROFT ROAD
s 27
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 BOLO N HAZ N EL Y PH 866
(AFTER 0000, L12
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L34 CAMINS, JOSEPH 2316 2318 2323 2328 19 S7
Call 585744 has been updated by user 264 (hough) . . jSu: 0 P2: 0
IP3: 0 P1: 0
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 578.624 page 1 of 1
## Remarks. .......................................... Date. Time. Operator POD
1 RP STATES THERE ARE SEVERAL J'S DOING DONUTS 07/15 23:17 bjworden 2
2 IN THE BACK PARKING PARKING LOT. SUBJECTS IN 07/15 23:17 bjworden 2
3 AN UNK TYPE OF VEH, POSS EXPLORER AND BMW 07/15 23:17 bjworden 2
4 LARGE GROUP OF J'S ON SCENE 07/15 23:23 bjworden 2
5 ALL SUBJECTS LEFT THE AREA AND ARE NOW OUT OF 07/15 23:28 bjworden 2
6 THE CITY - 07/15 23:28 bjworden 2
Date 07/16/2005 Opr chrisg �CN Unit. Status
\Call 578649 File auris BURL
Location
Type 415W vc P Agcy BPD Area Dist 22 Zn PD Bt C IWATCH COMMANDER
Remarks WATERFRONT DISTURBANCE) IP? Y Pty 2 How? 5 57 CLEARD
0 02:51:49
1 LIC
02 LIC/ 02:51:54 I PATROL
02:52:17 I L12 LUNCH
03 Call holding for unit L26. 02:52:34 I L26 CLEARD
04 Call holding for unit L26. 02:53:06 I L34 CLEARD
05+ OLDER MODEL VEH W/ 5 SUBJS
Last OFFICER First BASURTO, NORMA Phone I L36 CLEARD
Address
Cross et Rec POD 1 SOLO N HAZ N EL Y PH 867
OlJAFTER 0000, L12
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
01
02+
90
I •
I
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ABVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L36 BASURTO, NORMA 0251 MT 0251 0317 18 S7/L34/L26 ISu: 0 P2: 1
IP3: 0 P1: 0
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 578649 page 1 of 1
## Remarks. ...................................... Date. Time. Operator POD
1 LIC/ 07/16 02:51 chrisg 1
2 LIC/ 07/16 02:51 chrisg 1
3 Call holding for unit L26. 07/16 02:52 chrisg 1
4 Call holding for unit L26. 07/16 02:52 chrisg 1
-5 OLDER MODE VEH W/ 5 SUBJS 07/16 02:53 chrisg 1
6 LIC/ 07/16 02:55 chrisg 1
7 GRN EXPLORER NEWER MODEL 07/16 02:55 chrisg 1
8 5 VEHS HEADING TWOS KINCAIDS 07/16 02:57 chrisg 1
9 ESCORTING VEHS OUT OF THE LOT 07/16 03:01 chrisg 1
10 LIC/ 07/16 03:02 chrisg 1
11 VEHS HAVE LEFT 07/16 03:04 chrisg 1
12 BAYSIDE PARK IS CLEAR 07/16 03:07 chrisg 1
13 MLB PD ADV 3'VEHS OF IWOMING INTO BLGM 07/16 03:12 chrisg 1
14 S/B BAYSHORE 07/16 03:13 chrisg 1
15 3 SIL VEHS 2D AND 4D SEDANS 07/16 03:13 chrisg 1
16 UTL ON BAYSHORE FOR VEHS 07/16 03:14 chrisg 1
17 CHECKING THE WATERFRONT 07/16 03:14 chrisg 1
Date 08/07/2005 Opr bjworden JCN Unit. Status
Call 581,1 Juris BURL
Location
Type OW5 Svc P Agcy Area 3 Dist 22 2n PD Bt C WATCH COMMANDER
Remarks (OFCR OUT W/SUBJ) IP? N Pty 2 How? 5 57 CLEARD
D2:53:23
O1 LARGE GROUP
02 REQ FOP. SEVERAL MORE UNITS TO TO HELP CLEAR THE 02: 54 :30 PL120LVNCH
03 AREA- 02:57:02 L26 CLEARD
04- ALL UNITS ENROUTE 02:57:36 L34 CLEARD
05+ SUBJECTS DISPERSED
Last OFFICER First CISSNA, ROBERT Phone I L36 CLEARD
Address
Cross Streets � c POD 3 SOLO N HAZ N EL X PH 877 JAFTER 0000, L12
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
01 HI 05
02+
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ABVD CLRD CLS Backup units
L26 CISSNA, ROBERT 0252 EVNT 0252 0259 66 X16/L36/S7/L34/ iSu: D P2: 0
IP3: 0 P1: 0
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 581710 page1 of 1
## Remarks........................................... Date. Time. Operator POD
08/07 02:53 bjworden 3
1 LARGE GROUP IFO KINCAIDS
07 02:54 bjworden 3
2 REQ FOR SEVERAL MORE UNITS TO TO HELP CLEAR THE 08/07 02:54 bjworden 3
3 AREA. '08/07 02:57 bjworden 3
4 ALL UNITS ENROUTE 08/07 02:57 bjworden 3
5 SUBJECTS DISPERSED 08/07 02:58 bjworden 3
6 SUBJECTS HEADING N/B 08/07 02:59 bjworden 3
7 LIC/ LIS/HI LIY/OS
_ 06/07 03:00 bjworden 3
8 LIC 08/07 03:01 bjworden 3
9 LI 08/07 03:01 bjworden 3
10 LI 08/07 03:01 bjworden 3
11 LI
Call 581925 File Date 08/06/2005 Opr eisenman 1CN Unit. Status
Location Juris BURL
Type 1154 Svc P Agcy BPD Area 3 Diet 20 Zn PD Bt C WATCH COMMANDER
Remarks (SUSP. VER-) IP? N Pty 2 How? 1 �25 S7 DISPCH
O1 TWO VEHICLES CAME ONTO ADRIAN BURNING RUBBER 1B:16:20
02 ONE DROVE TO REAR OF R/P'S BLDG BEFORE 18:16:39 PATROL
03 PARKING IN FRONT OF SPEEDMARY. R/P BELIEVES _18:16:49 125 L12 DISPCH
04 DRIVERS HAVE GONE INTO THE GO CART PLACE. 18:17:09 L26 CLEARD
05+ ONE VEHICLE IS A BLU OR BLU PORSCHE, THE 18:17:22 L34 CLEARD
Last First Phone
Address WORLDPAC, 1511 ADRIAN RD i L36 CLEARD
Cross Streets Rec POD 2 SOLO N HAZ N EL N PH 70 ITER 0000, L12
01 O
VLic St `?ear Make Model Color Additional
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ABVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L4 CHAPPELL, MORGA 1815 1823 1830 1834 54 JSu: 0 P2: 0
CMD. JP3: 0 P1: 1
Remarks Detail for Call 581925 page 1 of 1
## Remarks............ .. . . .....................•••••. Date. Time. Operator POD
1 TWO VEHICLES CAME ONTO ADRIAN BURNING RUBBER OB/08 18:16 eisenman 2
2 ONE DROVE TO REAR OF R/P'S BLDG BEFORE OB/08 18:16 eisenman 2
3 PARKING IN FRONT OF SPEEDMARK. R/P BELIEVES 08/08 18:16 eisenman 2
4 DRIVERS HAVE GONE INTO THE GO CART PLACE. 08/08 18:17 eisenman 2
5 ONE VEHICLE IS A BLU OR BLU PORSCHE, THE 08/08 18:17 eisenman 2
6 OTHER IS A BLK NISSAN S/W. BOTH DRIVERS ARE 08/08 18:17 eisenman 2
7 4M MALES. 08/08 18:17 eisenman 2
8 R/P NOT SURE IF SUBJS ARE CHECKING HIS PLACE 08/08 18:19 eisenman 2
9 OUT OR JUST LOOKING FOR A PLACE TO DRIVE 08/08 18:19 eisenman 2
10 RECKLESSLY. 08/08 18:19 eisenman 2
11 VEHICLES G.O.A. 08/08 18:34 eisenman 2
. t ,
\Call 585630 File Date 09/04/2005 Opr winter JCN Unit. Status
auris BURL
Location
Type 23103 AlUrT
Agc Area 3 Dist 22 Zn PD Bt C WATCH COMMANDER
Remarks (RECKLESS DRIVING) IP? Y Pty 1 How? 1 I S7 CLE
ARD
01 VERS DOING DONUTS IN PARKING LOT NEAR 00:10:04 I PATROL
02 � 00:13:13 I L12 LUNCH
03 TO ADVISE 00:16:53 L26 CLEARD04 OUT WITH A LARGE GROUP/L34/1,12 ENROUTE 00:17:45 I L34 CLEARD
O5+ LIC Phone i
First� I L36 CLEARD
Last
Address
Cross Streets Rec POD 3 BOLO N M N EL Y PH 923 (AFTER 0000, L12
01 O
VLic St Year Make Model Color Additional
01
02+ I
I
I
UNIT NAME RCVD DISP ARVD CLRD CLS Backup Units
L26 CISSNA, ROBERT 0009 0013 0015 0025 77 L34/L12 ISu: 0 P2: 0
IP3: 0 P1: 0
CMD:
Remarks Detail for Call 585630 page 1 of 1
...... Date. Time. Operator POD
## Remarks.....................................
1 VERS DOING DONUTS IN PARKING LOT NEAR GOLF 09/04 00:10 winter 3
2 CENTER 09/04 00:10 winter 3
3 TO ADVISE 09/04 00:13 bjworden 2
4 OUT WITH A LARGE GROUP/L34/L12 ENROUTE 09/04 00:16 bjworden 2
5 LIC/ 09/04 00:17 winter 3
6 LIC/ 09/04 00:17 winter 3
09/04 00:17 winter 3
7 LIC 09/04 00:18 winter 3
B LIC/ 09/04 00:18 winter 3
9 LIC 09/04 00:18 winter 3
10 LIC 09/04 00:18 winter 3
11 LIC 09/04 00:21 bjworden 2
12 LI 09/04 00:25 bjworden 2
13 SUB7EC FT THE CITY
Agenda
Item # 8a
Meeting
BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: December 19, 2005
- 1
SUBMITTED BY
APPROVED BY
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DATE: DECEMBER 8, 2005
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR LOT COMBINATION OF
1441 AND 1445 BELLEVUE AVENUE (APN 029-121-040 AND 029-
121-050)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council concur with the Planning
Commission and approve the subject lot merger as a tentative and final parcel map
with the following conditions.
• A final parcel map for a lot merger shall be filed by the applicant within the
time period allowed by the Subdivision Map Act and the City's subdivision
ordinance. Action of this map should be considered as both the tentative
and final map to facilitate processing.
• All property corners shall be set and shown on the final parcel map.
• The final map shall show the width of the right-of-way for Bellevue Avenue
including the centerline of the right-of-way, bearings and distance of the
centerline and any existing monuments in the roadway.
• All existing easements shall be retained except as noted.
• All damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be replaced.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission met on November 28, 2005 to review
the attached parcel map and recommended Council approval with the conditions
listed above. The parcel map should be considered as the final parcel map to
facilitate processing of the tentative and final parcel map.
EXHIBITS: Lot Merger Exhibit, Tentative Map, Staff Memorandum, November 28,
2005 Planning Commission Minutes, Public Hearing Notice
Douglas Be P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
c: Sye Murtuza, Assistant Director of Public Works
Victor Voong, City Engineering Department
Maureen Brooks, City Planning Department
Dale Meyers Associates
Litke Properties
U:\Planningl441BellevueDecO5.doc
BURLINGAME
.;y MEMORANDUM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
November 22, 2005
To: Planning Department
From: Engineering Division
Subject: Planning Review for 1441-1445 Bellevue Avenue
Staff has completed the preliminary review for the project and comments are as follows;
I. GENERAL:
1. Show proposed drainage system and indicate that all roof and site drainage shall go to street
frontage and/or be designed to connect with the existing storm drain system. Hydraulic
calculations shall also be provided to identify any adverse impacts to existing creek as well as
the upstream and downstream of the creek. Show direction of drainage on adjacent property
to confirm that no drainage enters this site or else that drainage needs to be included in the on-
site system.
2. Since this whole site is to be developed below street or adjacent grade, approvals will be
conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump system; and
the sump pump system shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dual
pumps, controls, level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators must be so housed that they meet
the City's noise requirement - see attached plan check sheet. Proposed pumps and generators
are to be shown.
3. Sanitary sewer analysis is required for this project to identify the project's impacts to the
existing sanitary sewer system and the associated mitigation measures.
4. If large trees are to be removed, plans shall show new proposed plantings to help ameliorate
the tree removals.
5. Show required seven foot (7') minimum clearances at parking garage floor areas not just floor
to floor. Provide room for all pipings, ducts and fire sprinklers. Disabled parking shall have
access and parking area at eight feet two inches (82") clear.
6. All utilities to this site must be installed underground. Any transformers needed for this site
must be installed underground or behind the front setback on this site.
7. The project shall, at its own cost, design and construct frontage public improvements,
including curb, gutter, sidewalk and other necessary appurtenant work. Indicate that new
curb, gutter and sidewalk fronting this site shall be designed by a civil engineer, approved by
the City Engineer.
U:\VICT0R\Projects\Pdvate\1441 Bellevue1.wpd
8. Provide sewer capacity study to determine if garage water discharge (contaminated) can be
pumped into sewer system.
9. Water demand study for domestic and fire protection needs will require a pressure model
study to verify water needs are available.
10. The clean ground water discharge point at the creek needs to be protected as not to cause
erosion of the stream bank.
11. Approval needs to be obtained from Fish and Game, Army Corp. Of Engineers for any
stream bed alterations and work in the creek.
12. All de-watering procedures must meet Regional Water Quality Control Board standards.
13. If poured-in-place method for piers is used, water that comes in contact with uncured
concrete cannot be discharged directly into creek(R.W.Q.C.B. Standards).
14. The back of wall drainage system will require a pump and back-up pump power system.
15. Sand bags located in box culvert section of creek need to be checked as to why there
appears to be a settled spot in the middle of wall.
II SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS:
1. All transformers needed for this project shall be indicated on project plans and installed
underground on this site or behind the front setback.
2. All irrigation systems and planting shall follow City's water conservation guidelines.
3. Rear landscape area shall drain to street or to a storm drainage system without pumping.
4. Show route of piping from drainage inlets.
5. Show the location for the fire sprinkler connection that is proposed. All fire system work
shall conform to the City's current procedures for underground water systems.
6. All on site catch basins and drainage inlets shall be stenciled. All catch basins shall be
protected during construction so no debris will be dumped into them. The City will provide a
stencil.
7. Grading and drainage plans need to submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a Building
permit.
III PARKING:
1. Show underground and at-grade parking slab elevations. Maximum slope in any parking
space is 5%. Show drainage pattern.
U NICTORTrojectsTrivate\1441 Bellevue 1.wpd
2. Provide all on site drainage inlets or the sump pump basin for the underground garage with a
petroleum absorbent system for treating all drainage flows from the automobile parking areas.
3. Dimension the structural columns and dimensions with respect to parking stalls. Columns
that are on the side of parking spaces are to be clear of vehicle's side door access and should
be at least two feet(2') clear of the rear of the stalls to facilitate maneuvering.
4. The underground garage walls are near property lines with little clearances. Show how
excavation is to be made on property with room also for back of wall drainage or propose
alternate system. Also show the type of foundation proposed for this building.
5. A geotechnical report will be required to determine any adverse effects to the existing creek
as a result of this development and identify mitigation measures. This development proposes
two levels of parking below the street grade. Because the lower level may be below the
groundwater table, the report shall address how this development is to sustain the resulting
hydrostatic pressure.
6. Show callbox/intercom system to all units from driveway in front of security gate and at the
top of the driveway so guests may have access to guest parking spaces. If no gate is planned,
install conduit to all units so that if gate is installed in the future, the system may be easily
installed.
7. Provide driveway profile with 2% from top of curb (6" high minimum) to back of sidewalk
and transition to a high point, on site or at property line, at 12" above flow line of street.
Transitions at top of driveway and at bottom required to the approval of the City Engineer.
Project plans currently show a driveway slope of 18.24% which exceeds the maximum
driveway slope of 15%. The driveway shall be revised to meet the maximum allowed slope
of 15%.
8. Project plans show two new driveways on Bellevue Avenue which may adversely affect the
parking spaces available on Bellevue Avenue. The project shall indicate net effect to existing
parking spaces due to the two new driveways and as compared with the net effect of one 24'
wide driveway. Driveways for adjacent properties shall be shown on projects plans.
9. Underground garage area vents shall be shown on the project plans.
10. Show which parking spaces belong to which unit.
IV ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
1. Show design of trashroom and indicate size of receptacles, including receptacles for
recycling. Confirm sizes needed with BFI.
2. On the two parking level plans and first floor (site) plan, show adjacent site and street
elevations for reference.
3. Elevator sump drainage shall go to sanitary sewer and be shown on project plans. A
backwater valve shall be installed for elevator sump drainage below the sanitary sewer.
U:NICTORTrojectsTrivate\1441 Bellevue1.wpd
Elevator sump drainage shall also be separate from groundwater system which is to go to the
storm drainage system.
4. The sewer ejection system shall be shown in garage plans and indicate the pit, ventilation, etc.
Sewer ejection system must also be on the emergency generator.
5. Individual unit climate controls as well as separate shutoffs for gas, electric and water are
required.
V TRAFFIC STUDY:
1. The traffic circulation plan within the project plans does not appear to provide adequate
turning radius for turning movements.
Cc: Syed Murtuza, City Engineer
Doug Bell, Senior Civil Engineer
U:W1CTOR\Projects\Pdvate\1441 Bellevuel mpd
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road,Burlingame, CA
November 28 2005
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the November 28,2005,regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:03 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present:Commissioners Auran,Brownrigg,Cauchi,Deal,Keighran Osterling
and Vistica(arrived at 7:08 p.m.)
Absent: None
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Zoning Technician, Erica
Strohmeier; City Attorney,Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer; Doug Bell.
III. MINUTES The minutes of the November 14, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were amended:Item 4,hospital replacement review of specific
issues,page 6,paragraph 3,add following Commissioner comment"that the
public should be aware that the mitigation panel provides them with a way to
make comments about the project and construction impacts as the project
proceeds,"... C. Osterling made a motion to approve the minutes as
amended. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. The motion passed
on a 6-0-1 (C. Vistica abstaining since he arrived during the discussion). (C.
Vistica arrived at 7:08 p.m.)
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
VI. STUDY ITEMS There were no study items.
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
IA. ADOPTION OF THE 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION CALENDAR—CITY PLANNER: MEG
MONROE
1B. 1532 COLUMBUS AVENUE,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (TRG ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND DAVE AND DENISE MAURO, PROPERTY OWNERS) (72
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
I C. 1801 EL CAMINO REAL, ZONED C-1 — APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING FINANCIAL INSTITUTION(ROGER HAGMAN,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT AND PEDERSEN AND PEDERSEN, PROPERTY OWNER) (20
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
City.of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
1D. 1199 BROADWAY,SUITE 5,ZONED C-1,BROADWAY COMMERCIAL AREA—APPLICATION
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR REAL ESTATE AND TRAVEL
OFFICE (GARBIS BEZDJIAN, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER) (61 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent
calendar. There were no requests. Cers. Keighran and Brownrigg abstained from voting on 1532 Columbus
because they live within 500 feet of the project. C. Deal abstained on 1199 Broadway because he lives
within 500 feet of the project.
C. Cauchi moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners'
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and by
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion
and the Planning Commission 2006 Calendar and 1801 El Camino Real which passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
The project at 1532 Columbus Avenue passed on a 5-0-2(Cers. Keighran and Brownrigg abstaining)voice
vote; and the project at 1199 Broadway passed on a 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining) voice vote. Appeal
procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:10 p.m.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
2. 21 CLARENDON ROAD,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND
SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (SCOTT KUEHNE, SUAREZ-
KUEHNE ARCHITECTURE,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;AND TODD FRIEDMAN&MICHELE
DOYLE FREEDMAN,PROPERTY OWNERS) 60 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report November 28,2005,with attachments. ZT Strohmeier presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions
from the Commission.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Todd Freidman,property owner,represented the project,stating that
the entire roof and all of the existing windows will be replaced; it was hard to come up with one window
style, so the front of the house was treated as a separate design element; documents were submitted to
Commission to provide further explanation and illustration;does Commission want the existing Mayten tree
to be taken out? Commission responded that they are not going to require an existing tree to be removed,
however, applicant should be aware that it has the possibility to become invasive. There were no further
comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling moved to approve the application for design review, by resolution, with the following
conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date
stamped November 16, 2005, sheets Al-A7, and that any changes to building materials,exterior finishes,
footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;2)that any changes to the
size or envelope of the basement,first or second floors,or garage,which would include adding or enlarging
a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,
shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 3) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the
project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the
architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is
no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005
certification under penalty of per ury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department;4)that
prior to final inspection,Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural
details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved
Planning and Building plans;5)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall
shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;6)that
all air ducts,plumbing vents,and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and
installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be
included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;7)that the conditions of
the Chief Building Official's September 16,2005 memo,the City Engineer's September 21,2005 memo,the
Fire Marshal's September 13, 2005 memo, and the Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's
September 19,2005 memos shall be met;8)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California
Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;9)that the project
shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected
demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling
requirements;any partial or full demolition of a structure,interior or exterior,shall require a demolition
permit;and 10)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water
Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the design review. The motion passed on a 7-
0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:15 p.m.
3. 1213 MILLS AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMITS FOR GARAGE LENGTH AND FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE
REAR 40% OF THE LOT FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH
DETACHED GARAGE(GRANT MOHR,APPLICANT&DESIGNER;AND GRANT&KELLY MOHR,
PROPERTY OWNERS)(75NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:ERIKA LEWIT
C. Keighran recused herself from this item because she has a business relationship with the applicant she
left the dais and chambers. Reference staff report November 28,2005,with attachments. ZT Strohmeier
presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fourteen conditions were suggested for
consideration. Commission asked staff if a man door could be placed on the east side of the garage?Staff
responded that yes,a door could be placed on the east side of the garage,however,if there is any glazing in
the door,it must be more than 10'away from an adjacent property line.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Grant Mohr,applicant,property owner and designer,was available
to answer any questions. Commission commented:
• Side of garage is a long wall,a man door should be installed on the side of the garage facing
the rear yard for extra access;should locate door more than 10'from adjacent property line,
then could do French doors;
• Would be nice if left elevation was broken up on garage with French doors,a gable end and a
half-column;
• Show slight eave on right side,needs to be 3'from property line;gutter has to go up against
the building;
• For on-site illumination it states in the Design Review Guidelines that light must shine down
onto property and not onto neighboring properties;do not want a bright area at the end of the
driveway;
• What lighting is proposed for the front porch?This needs to be addressed on the plans;
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
• Large treelike shrubs, Victorian Box or Bay Laurel of a medium scale, should be planted at
the front to help frame the house; should be added to the conditions; one should be located at
the front and one should be located at the driveway; and
• Ordinances and the Design Guidelines will regulate lighting on the site.
There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed.
C. Deal moved to approve the application, by resolution, with added conditions concerning landscaping,
lighting and a double door area with a gable end and a half column off of the detached garage to break up the
long wall of the accessory structure, and with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as
shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 15, 2005, sheets 1
through 8, including wood windows with built-in simulated true divided lights on inside and outside of
windows throughout; that a double door area with a gabled end and a half column similar to the front of the
house shall be added to the left elevation of the detached garage; that all on-site lighting shall be consistent
in style and designed so that the cone of light is contained on site; and that any changes to building materials,
exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment; 2) that two large tree-
like shrubs, Victorian Box or Bay Laurel, shall be added to the front of the property, one in front of the house
towards the left and one at the driveway; 3) that any increase to the habitable basement floor area and any
changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include expanding the footprint or
floor area of the structure, replacing or relocating a window (s), adding a dormer (s) or changing the roof
height or pitch, shall be subject to design review; 4) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's
September 16, 2005 memo and the Recycling Specialist, Fire Marshal, NPDES Coordinator memos dated
September 19, 2005 and the City Engineer's memo dated September 22, 2005 shall be met; 5) that prior to
scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide
architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown
on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project, the property owner or
contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the
Building Department; 6) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note
compliance of the architectural details (trim materials, window type, etc.) to verify that the project has been
built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 7) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues
shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not
visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans
before a Building permit is issued; 8) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor
shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9)
that during construction the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in
Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff,
and 10) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property
corners and set the building footprint; l l) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify
the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City
Engineer; 12) that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new
residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's
Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 13) that the
project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water
Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 14)
that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not
occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; and 15) that the project shall meet all the
4
City ofBurlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005
requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of
Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
Comment on motion:great project;will help the street;what are the proposed changes to the landscaping?
Will the rose bushes be affected due to lack of light?That two new large scale shrubs be planted in the front
yard to help frame the house,one on the right hand side in the lawn area relatively close to the house and one
next to the driveway;the rose bushes will barely get up to the level of the porch,there should not be too
much shade for them;current proposed landscaping is not in keeping with the bulk of the house;could plant
shrub more towards the left to avoid shade on the roses. Comments concerning the garage will really
enhance the project.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with the added conditions. The motion passed
on a 670-1(C. Keighran abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7:30 p.m.
4. 1441&1445 BELLEVUE AVENUE,ZONED R4—APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION,TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP,TENTATIVE AND FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR
LOT COMBINATION,CONDOMINIUM PERMrT AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FRONT SETBACK
LANDSCAPING FOR A NEW FOUR-STORY 17-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM(DALE
MEYER, AIA, DALE MEYER ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; BELLEVUE
ASSOCIATES,LLC C/O LrFKE PROPERTIES,PROPERTY OWNERS)(140 NOTICED)PROJECT
PLANNER:MAUREEN BROOKS
Reference staff report November 28,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Ninety-four conditions which include the mitigations from the Mitigated
Negative Declaration were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Dale Meyer,architect,represented the project;Michael Callan,
landscape architect for the project, 1400 Rollins Road;Abraham Landis, 1547 Bellevue Avenue;Mark
Engleman,1435 Bellevue,#105,Redwood Crest Homeowners Association,spoke.Applicant summarized
the revisions made to the plans in response to the Commission's comments at study;Commissioners noted
regarding revised plans that there is no closet in the bedroom in unit 5;that because of the orientation of the
sun and the project,the depth of the fourth floor deck on the rear of the building will have a big impact on
the light access to the building next door;clarified that what looks like balconies on the front of the building
are actually decorative wrought iron grills;concern about the survival of the redwood tree at the rear,
commissioner noted that with removal of the Cypress growing next to the redwood,the redwood will fill
out;for safety,outdoor fire place should not be wood burning nor should a shed for storing wood be located
in the public open space,gas with timed tum-off valves for grill and fireplace would be safer and more
practical;feel that the structure is not placed correctly on the site,too close to the building on the right,
driveway should be reversed and building moved to the left,this is so serious cannot support the project;
common open space has a real sense of space but needs a sink with running water,a toilet,and the bridge
needs to remain central to the open space and building but also should not be built against the redwood tree,
be sure foundation ofbridge protects redwood roots;two story below grade parking garage located next to a
creek raises serious questions about sump pumps running 24 hours a day,where the water is pumping to so
creek will not be contaminated,not want to see fossil pillows used to clean water; CP noted that the
mitigations from the Mitigated Negative Declaration address these drainage and water quality issues,
including various sump pumps, back up generators and drainage receptors, and the mitigations are
implemented as conditions of approval;important that the sump pumps and emergency generators are sound
baffled so that they cannot be heard by the neighbors or by the residents of the project;on the balconies on
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005
the southwest elevation the balconies are cantilevered from the cornice and look awkward,they should be
moved to align with the balconies below and corbels added below the upper most balconies to visually attach
them to the structure;the window pattern still seems monotonous,could be more interesting;the plans show
the roof to be real slate,would not like to have a revision from this material later; SE Bell noted that it is
important that the excavation for the garage and the parking is built in one season because of the creek,
otherwise the hole should be properly shored to insure that it will not fail because of the proximity of the
creek and adjacent development,the project should be bonded to insure this;there is limited opportunity to
install big trees,would be nice to replace the Liquid Ambers on the street with a bigger,evergreen species,
but that is up to the City; on the right side elevation should install "forest scale" tree to establish proper
screening,Podocarpus on the left side should also be replaced with two"forest scale"evergreen trees,these
would hide the limited space between buildings;Pittosporum along the right side property line should not be
trimmed in order to provide the highest screen possible for residents in the adjacent building; check with
Department of Fish and Game about what should be planted along the creek bank to stabilize it,at least filter
fabric should be put on the bank and material planted through it,concerned about erosion during and after
construction.
Continued public comment:part of this building faces his condominium,will be all that is visible from all
windows,now sees greenery;will reduce the value of his condominium; studies show this kind of change
can have an effect on the mental health of older people; bought condominium 10 years ago, three story
building,not expect visual impact of four story building next door. Redwood Crest Condominium would
like to work with the developer on selecting the fence between the two properties, would like to leave
existing vegetation at the front and start fence back some;concerned about the crooked telephone pole in the
right-of-way at the front,would like it installed so it is up right now and in the future would like the service
placed underground. Applicant noted they would work with the homeowners association on the selection of
the fence between the two properties. Also noted that there is considerable existing vegetation on the
property to the right side of the lot, plan to plant single trunk tree form Pittosporum along the shared
property line on the right, it can grow up to 20 to 25 feet if it is not trimmed. There were no further
comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner's discussion: In their discussion the commissioner identified the following items to be
included as conditions of approval on the project:
• excavation of the garage, construction of the parking structure or proper stabilization of the
excavated hole and all drainage facilities shall be completed in one season and a bond shall be
required to insure that all this work is accomplished;
• balconies on the southwest side shall be lined up,causing the fourth floor balcony to be shifted and
corbels shall be placed below the upper most balcony to tie it to the structure, this modification
should be reviewed by the Planning Commission to insure that the proportions work and the
balconies are properly integrated into the design prior to issuance of the building permit;
• the property owner or his representative shall meet with the home owners association at 1435
Bellevue and agree on a commonly beneficial fence design separating the two properties,it shall be
the responsibility of the project to install and maintain this fence;
• a sink with running water,a toilet,a gas grill and gas fire place shall be installed in the common open
space for the convenience and enjoyment of the residents on site,for safety the gas fixtures shall be
placed on timers,the use common open space shall be managed and maintained by the homeowners
association;
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
• the landscape plan shall include the addition of two forest scale evergreen trees on the right side and
one forest scale evergreen tree on the left side at the rear of the site beyond the edge of the below
grade parking garage;
• there shall be a closet added to the bedroom in unit 5;
• that the applicant and the City Attorney shall work to determine if a program can be developed to
reserve the two affordable dwelling units in the project for economically qualified teachers in the
Burlingame schools,including a ten percent reduction in the established rent because the tenants are
teachers in the Burlingame schools,should a program be possible the applicant shall be required to
implement the program;
• that landscaping along the right property line shall be predominantly single trunk tree form
Pittosporum and that these plants shall be allowed to grow to their natural form at a height of 20 to
25 feet;
• that the entry from the building to the common open space shall be maintained at its central location
as it is designed and shall be built around the existing redwood tree and in a manner approved by a
licensed arborist to protect and maintain the roots of the redwood tree;
• that no permits including demolition shall be issued for this project until the developer and
contractor have prepared a traffic plan for trucks and parking for construction workers for all phases
of the project from demolition to interior finish and landscape installation.
C. Osterling moved approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that it was an adequate
disclosure of the potential impacts of the project and that the mitigations identified and included as
conditions of approval would reduce to levels acceptable to the community any potentially adverse impacts
identified by the report. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration as
adequate. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C. Brownrigg dissenting)voice vote.
C. Osterling moved to approve the condominium permit and special permit for font setback landscaping for
the proposed project at 1441 and 1445 Bellevue Avenue with the 94 conditions of approval in the staff report,
which include the mitigations from the Negative Declaration and the 10 conditions identified and added by
the Planning Commission as noted in the minutes of the November 28,2005 meeting and incorporated into
the conditions of approval on the project, by resolution, with the following conditions: 1)that the project
shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped November 2,2005,
sheets P 1 through P 15,L1.0,Ll.I and L2.0,including the roofing material which shall be true slate;2)that
the maximum elevation at the top of the roof ridge shall not exceed elevation 77.32' as measured from the
average elevation at the top of the curb along Floribunda Avenue(31.32')for a maximum height of 46-0",
and that the top of each floor and final roof ridge shall be surveyed and approved by the City Engineer as the
framing proceeds and prior to final framing and roofing inspections. The second level garage floor finished
floor elevation shall be elevation 11.32';garage level one finished floor elevation shall be elevation 21.32%
first floor finished floor shall be elevation 32.82%second floor finished floor shall be elevation 43.82';third
floor finished floor shall be elevation 53.82%fourth floor finished floor shall be elevation 63.82;and the top
of ridge elevation shall be no more than 77.32'. Should any framing exceed the stated elevation at any point
it shall be removed or adjusted so that the final height of the structure with roof shall not exceed the
maximum height shown on the approved plans; 3)that any changes to the size or envelope of the building,
which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure,replacing or relocating windows
or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review;4)that the conditions
of the City Engineer's November 22,2005,memo,the Chief Building Official's November 9,2005,memo,
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
the Fire Marshal's November 18, 2005, memo, and the Recycling Specialist's November 14, 2005, memo
shall be met; 5) that prior to issuance of a demolition and/or building permit, the propertyowner shall obtain
all permits required or present notification from the agencies to the City that the permits are not required by
State and Regional agencies including but not limited to the California Department of Fish and Game, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the Regional Water
Quality Control Board; 6) that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public
right-of-way shall be prohibited; 7) that `guest parking stall' shall be marked on the five guest parking spaces
and designated on the final map and plans, these stalls shall not be assigned to any unit, but shall be owned
and maintained by the condominium association, and the guest stalls shall always be accessible for parking
and not be separately enclosed or used for resident storage; and that in addition to the five guest parking
stalls, 37 parking spaces shall be available on site for owners, and none of the on-site parking shall be rented,
leased or sold to anyone who does not own a unit on the site; 8) that the Covenants Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the condominium project shall require that the five guest parking stalls shall be
reserved for guests only and shall not be used by condominium residents; 9) that the final inspection shall be
completed and a certificate of occupancy issued before the close of escrow on the sale of each unit; 10) that
the developer shall provide to the initial purchaser of each unit and to the board of directors of the
condominium association, an owner purchaser manual which shall contain the name and address of all
contractors who performed work on the project, copies of all warranties or guarantees of appliances and
fixtures and the estimated life expectancy of all depreciable component parts of the property, including but
not limited to the roof, painting, common area carpets, drapes and furniture; 11) that the trash receptacles,
furnaces, and water heaters shall be shown in a legal compartment outside the required parking and
landscaping and in conformance with zoning and California Building and Fire Code requirements before a
building permit is issued; 12) that if a security gate system across the driveway is installed in the future, the
gate shall be installed a minimum 20'-0' back from the front property line; the security gate system shall
include an intercom system connected to each dwelling which allows residents to communicate with guests
and to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside their units; 13) that prior to
scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners, set the building
envelope; 14) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of
the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 15) that prior to
scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall establish the height of the roof ridge and
provide certification of that height; 16) that trash enclosures and dumpster areas shall be covered and
protected from roof and surface drainage and that if water cannot be diverted from these areas, a self-
contained drainage system shall be provided that discharges to an interceptor; 17) that this project shall
comply with the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management
and Conservation Plan together with complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided at the time of
building permit application; 18) that all site catch basins and drainage inlets flowing to the bay shall be
stenciled. All catch basins shall be protected during construction to prevent debris from entering; 19) that
project approvals shall be conditioned upon installation of an emergency generator to power the sump pump
system; and the sump pump shall be redundant in all mechanical and electrical aspects (i.e., dual pumps,
controls, level sensors, etc.). Emergency generators shall be housed so that they meet the City's noise
requirement; 20) that the excavation of the garage, construction of the parking structure or proper
stabilization of the excavated hole and all drainage facilities shall be completed in one construction season
and a bond shall be required to insure that all this work is accomplished within that time frame the money
shall be spent to secure the site; 21) that the balconies on the southwest side shall be lined up, causing the
fourth floor balcony to be shifted and that corbels shall be placed below the upper most balcony to tie it to
the structure, this modification shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission to insure that the proportions
work and the balconies are properly integrated into the design prior to issuance of the building permit ; 22)
that the property owner or his representative shall meet with the home owners association at 1435 Bellevue
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
and agree on a commonly beneficial fence design separating the two properties and that it shall be the
responsibility of the project to install and maintain this fence;23)that a sink with running water,a toilet with
sewer connection, a gas grill and gas fire place shall be installed in the common open space for the
enjoyment of the residents on site and that for safety the gas fixtures shall be placed on timer; and that the
use common open space shall be managed and maintained by the homeowners association; 24) that the
landscape plan shall include the addition of two forest scale evergreen trees on the right side and one forest
scale evergreen tree on the left side at the rear of the site beyond the edge of the below grade parking garage;
25)that there shall be a closet added to the bedroom in unit 5; 26)that the applicant and the City Attorney
shall work to determine if a program can be developed to reserve the two affordable dwelling units in the
project for economically qualified teachers in the Burlingame schools,including a ten percent reduction in
the established rent because the tenants are teachers in the Burlingame schools,should a program be possible
the applicant shall be required to implement the program;27)that landscaping along the right property line
shall be predominantly single trunk tree form Pittosporum and that these plants shall be allowed to grow to
their natural form at a height of 20 to 25 feet;28)that the entry from the building to the common open space
shall be maintained at its central location as it is designed and shall be built around the existing redwood tree
and in a manner approved by a licensed arborist to protect and maintain the roots of the redwood tree; 29)
that no permits including demolition shall be issued for this project until the developer and contractor have
prepared a traffic plan for construction trucks and parking for construction workers for all phases of the
project from demolition to interior finish and landscape installation;30)that prior to issuance of a building
permit the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and approval;
31)that all structural design shall conform to the City of Burlingame building codes and,at a minimum,to
the most recent revision of the California Building Code(which incorporates the Uniform Building Code),
the California Building Code specifically details design and construction practices for structures subject to
significant earthquake hazards; 32) that utilities shall be designed to provide sufficient flexibility to
withstand the expected ground shaking induced during an earthquake; 33) that structural designs and
construction procedures for foundation construction shall be completed in conformance to City of
Burlingame seismic regulations and project specific professional design recommendations for seismic
hazards made by the project Structural Engineer; 34)that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the
applicant shall submit GeoForensics' Geotechnical Investigation to the Chief Building Official and City
Engineer for review and approval. The investigation has been undertaken to determine the presence and
extent of expansive soil and provides foundation design,construction and grading recommendations. The
recommendations in the report and any requirements imposed by the Chief Building Official and City
Engineer shall be followed during construction; 35)that prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant
shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and approval that illustrate the mat
foundation for deep basement parking,alternate foundation designs for near surface grade such as pier and
grade beam systems with piers extending into underlying competent soils. Concrete slab-on-grade and
walkways shall all be founded on properly compacted non-expansive fill; 36) that prior to issuance of
building permits,the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Chief Building Official for review and
approval that illustrate that pavement sections shall be properly designed to resist the effect of underlying
expansive soils; 37) that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the applicant shall submit
GeoForensics'Geotechnical Investigation to the Chief Building Official and/or City Engineer for review and
approval. The Investigation shall include boreholes completed in the area of the proposed excavations. The
Investigation shall be used to develop recommendations for retaining walls and shoring of soils during
construction;38)that prior to issuance of the first grading permit the applicant shall submit a shoring plan to
the Chief Building Official and/or City Engineer for review and approval based on the recommendations in
the Geotechnical Investigation required by the mitigation listed directly above; 39) that all surface
stormwater run-off around the building shall be required to drain to the street into the storm drainage system;
40)that clean subsurface ground water encountered during excavation and pier drilling shall be discharged
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 18,2005
into Ralston Creek,provided that discharge into the creek is approved by the Department of Fish and Game
and the Regional Water Quality Control Board;41)that a subsurface drainage system shall be installed in the
walls and/or foundation ofthe two-story below grade garage for the collection ofground water intrusion;this
water shall be discharged into the creek,provided that it is approved by the Department of Fish and Game
and the Regional Water Quality Control Board;42)that the finished parking area(garage)surface drainage
and run-off shall be required to drain to the local sanitary sewer system because of the possibility of
contamination from vehicles;this drainage system shall be connected to gas powered pumps connected to a
self activating emergency generator;short floodwalls may also be required to prevent water from the creek
spilling over into the below grade area;43)that biodegradable fertilizer shall be used on-site due to the close
proximity to Ralston Creek;44)that minor stream flows shall be controlled by constructing a temporary dam
in the creek bed and forcing the water to flow into a closed pipe,which shall extend past the dewatering zone
of influence,also to be placed within the creek bed;dewatering ofthe basement and/or basement foundation
excavations may be accomplished by installing pump(s)in shallow sump(s)in the excavation;water shall be
directed to the streambed to flow into the diversion pipe;water discharge location will depend on the quality
of the water;clean water obtained from the gravel drains located behind the garage retaining walls can be
discharged into the creek where the creek channel is concrete lined;45)that to minimize flooding and/or
spillover of the creek during peak runoff,the existing concrete retaining walls beneath the apartment
building at the southwest corner of the site,which will be exposed with the demolition of the apartment
building spanning over the creek,shall be raised,as the western wall redirects the flow to a more northerly
direction,and short floodwalls or earthen berms at the top of the open channel shall also be installed,as
required,and the necessary permits shall be obtained for this work from the California Department of Fish
and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers;46)that water that comes into contact with concrete
during pier drilling or pouring shall not be discharged into the creek,and shall be treated on-site with
treatment approved by the City Engineer,and shall be discharged as approved by the City Engineer,47)that
in order to minimize flooding in the excavation from shallow groundwater and spilling from the creek
excavation for the below grade parking area shall be accomplished during the dry season,April 15th to
October 150%48)that prior to issuance of a demolition,grading or construction permit,the applicant shall
submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs(Best Management practices)to be used
to prevent soil,dirt and debris from entering the creek and storm drain system;the plan shall include a site
plan showing the property lines,existing and proposed topography and slope;areas to be disturbed,locations
of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas;areas with existing vegetation to be protected;existing and
proposed drainage patterns and structures;watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downstream
of a project;and designated construction access routes,staging areas and washout areas;49)that methods
and procedures such as sediment basins or traps,silt fences,straw bale dikes,storm drain inlet protection
such as soil blanket or mats,and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to
maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls
have been established;50)that construction access routes shall be limited in order to prevent the tracking of
dirt onto the public right-of-way,clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods;51)
that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run-oft,promote surface filtration
and minimize the use of fertilizers,herbicides and pesticides;52)that any site work including grading and
landscaping shall be limited to the dry months,from April 15 to October 15;53)That prior to issuance of a
demolition,grading or construction permit protective silt fences shall be installed along the open channel of
the creek;the protective fence shall be installed between the top ofthe creek bank and at least two feet below
the top of the areas to be graded,and also no lower than the ordinary high water line;54)that prior to
issuance of a demolition,grading and building permit the applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and
approvals from the Department ofFish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board,and shall
provide a copy of these approval to the City ofBurlingame;55)that demolition ofthe existing structures and
any grading or earth moving on the site shall be required to receive a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality
10
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit from the Burlingame Building Division; and
all requirements of the permit shall be complied with during construction; 56) that all active construction
areas shall be watered at least twice daily, especially during the demolition and excavation phase of the
project; 57) that water that may run off the site due to the dust control measures required shall not be allowed
to run-off into Ralston Creek or into the storm drain system; 58) that sandbags shall be installed around the
perimeter of the site to prevent water run off from the dust control activity from spilling onto the public
right-of-way or on to adjacent properties; 59) that trucks to and from the site hauling soil, sand or other loose
material shall be covered or that a minimum of two feet of freeboard shall be maintained; 60) that during
construction soil stabilizers shall be applied to unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at the
construction site; 61) that at a frequency required by the Engineer, the paved access road, parking areas and
staging areas at the construction site shall be sprayed with water to keep these areas from creating dust; 62)
that the public street shall be swept as required by the City Engineer with a water sweeper if visible soil
materials are carried beyond the construction site; 63) that excavation and grading activities shall be
suspended.immediately if winds exceed 25 mph; 64) that sandbags or other erosion control measures shall be
installed to prevent silt runoff from the site to public roadways and into the creek; 65) that any demolition on
this site shall comply with BAAQ MD Regulation 11, Rule #2, which governs the handling of asbestos-
containing materials; this rule requires that a survey be done of all the building materials to be removed prior
to commencement of any demolition; the property owner shall be responsible for having a professional on-
site that is familiar with the implementation of Regulation 11, Rule 2 of the BAAQMD to supervision the
removal or demolition of an asbestos containing materials; 66) that during demolition and construction all
hazardous materials shall be stored, handled and disposed of properly; and that any coating or sealant to be
used shall comply with the BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rules3 and 51 for volatile organic compound (VOC)
content, which governs the application of architectural coatings and adhesive and sealant products; 67) That
in order to reduce the occurrence of visitors in the below grade garage from entering a dead-end aisle with no
maneuvering space to exit, a sign shall be posted near the guest parking spaces which directs visitors to the
area designated for guest/visitor parking; all parking spaces in the below grade garage in the area of the dead
end aisle shall be assigned directly to residential units on the site and shall be closely managed by the
homeowners association; 68) that signs shall be posted at both ends of the ramp accessing the below grade
parking warning pedestrians against the use of ramps for pedestrian travel; 69) that the proposed 30 foot
driveway shall be reduced to 24 feet, or a size approved by the City Traffic Engineer, and shall be shifted
east, as shown on revised plans date stamped November 2, 2005; 70) that the circular driveway at the front
shall have proper signage indicating that it is a one-way driveway with the entrance on the western driveway;
71) that the circular driveway at the front shall have yield signage at the end where it merges with the
driveway that provides entrance and exit to the underground garage; 72) that the driveway elevation at the
garage entrance shall be 12 inches above the gutter flow line on Bellevue Avenue or at an elevation approved
by the City Engineer and the maximum driveway slope on the driveway shall not exceed 15 percent; 73) that
all dumpsters located on the public street shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits from the City of
Burlingame Public Works Department prior to locating the dumpsters on the street; 74) that all personnel
involved with the demolition and/or construction of the proposed project at this site shall be required to park
in the public parking lots and garage in the immediate vicinity; 75) that since all guest parking is provided in
the below grade garage there shall be an intercom with a buzzer to each unit, and a keypad access shall be
provided so each tenant can operate the security gate to the garage on demand (Transportation/Circulation);
76) that prior to issuance of a grading, demolition, or construction the project shall comply with the City's
tree protection and urban reforestation requirements as approved by the City Arborist; 77) that the property
shall apply for protected tree removal permits as per the City Arborist's August 26, 2002 memo; 78) that tree
protection measures shall be installed under the supervision of a licensed arborist prior demolition or
construction and shall be inspected by the City Arborist; 79) That prior to demolition or construction any
trees that will likely suffer root loss or soil compaction as a result of this project shall be deeply irrigated and
11
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
fertilized; and a long term maintenance plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City Arborist for
approval; 80)that protected trees that will have soil fill or the construction of hardscape within their root
zone as part of this project shall have a root aeration system installed prior to said fill or hardscape;and all
hardscape shall be of pervious material; 81) that all trees which border any area where grading or soil
compaction is likely to occur shall be mulched to depth of 8-16 inches or as required and approved by the
City Arborist or as required and approved by the City Arborist; 82) that any trees located in areas where
construction traffic is likely to occur shall be mulched to help reduced soil compaction as required by the
City Arborist; 83) that soil siltation fences shall be installed and maintained to keep soil from disturbing
areas out of the root zones of protected trees as required and inspected by the City Arborist; 84) that the
applicant shall install fire sprinklers and a fire alarm system monitored by an approved central station as
required by the Fire Marshal prior to the final inspection for building permit; 85)that any demolition on this
site shall comply with BAAQMD Regulation 11,Rule 2,which governs the handling of asbestos-containing
materials; this rule requires that a survey be done of all the building materials to be removed prior to
commencement of any demolition;the property owner shall be responsible for having a professional on-site
that is familiar with the implementation of Regulation 11, Rule 2 of the BAAQMD to supervision the
removal or demolition of any asbestos containing materials;86)that during demolition and construction all
hazardous materials shall be stored,handled and disposed of properly; and that any coating or sealant to be
used shall comply with the BAAQMD Regulation 8,Rules3 and 51 for volatile organic compound(VOC)
content,which governs the application of architectural coatings and adhesive and sealant products;87)that
all construction shall be done during the hours of construction imposed by the City of Burlingame Municipal
Code; these hours are between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on
Saturdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays. There shall be no construction on holidays;
construction activity that will result in Llv noise levels of 85 dBA or higher shall be limited to the hours of
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; 88) that noise emission levels from construction and
demolition on the site shall not exceed the values listed in table 4-6 of the City of Burlingame's General Plan
Noise Element; 89) that at no time shall the noise levels due to construction exceed levels greater than
90dBA; 90) that ground vibration levels 3 feet from the nearest occupied residential structures shall not
exceed 0.1 in./sec. and vibrations shall be monitored during the demolition of the existing structures when
concrete is removed, during the pre-drilling of holes for piles and when excavation is done closer than 30
feet from neighboring properties;91)that a Construction Coordinator shall be appointed prior to issuance of
demolition and building permits for this project; the name and phone number of this coordinator shall be
provided to the neighbors and to the Planning and Public Works Departments;the Construction Coordinator
shall be responsible to the most practicable extent possible to mitigate construction impacts; 92) that all
internal combustion engines operating on this subject property shall be fitted with noise suppression
mufflers;93)that the method of construction and materials used in construction shall insure that the interior
noise level within the building and inside each unit does not exceed 45 dBA in any sleeping area;94)that the
proposed 0 floor shall include noise attenuation measures to achieve an interior CNEL of 45 dBA,these
features would include some or all of the following: stucco exterior, acoustical lining in exterior walls, a
minimum of STC-31 windows or greater(STC-33 or STC-34),and proper mechanical ventilation;95)that
the contractor shall submit the "Recycling and Waste Reduction" form plan to the Burlingame Building
Division that demonstrates how 60 percent of construction demolition material will be diverted from the
waste stream to be approved by the Chief Building Official and the applicant shall be required to document
implementation of the recycling before a final inspection can be scheduled;96)that all surface storm water
runoff created during construction and future discharge from the site shall be required to meet National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)standards as adopted by the City of Burlingame and shall
be directed as required by the Department of Public Works;97)that sewer laterals from the site to the public
sewer main shall be checked and shall be replaced to city standards as required by the Public Works
Department;98)that all abandoned utilities and hookups shall be removed as directed by the City Engineer;
12
Ci�v of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
99)that storm water run-off shall drain from the site to the street into the storm drain system; 100)that clean
subsurface ground water into the depressed parking area shall be pumped to discharge into Ralston Creek,
provided that this is approved by the Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control
Board; 101)that drainage and run-off into the two-story below grade garage shall drain to the local sanitary
sewer system due to the lower elevation of the parking areas and the possibility of contamination from
vehicle drainage; 102)that the applicant shall prepare a water demand study for the proposed building prior
to obtaining a building permit to determine the adequacy of the existing domestic water line to supply the
proposed condominium building as well as the required fire sprinkler system for the building; if it is
determined that the domestic water line needs to be increased the applicant shall replace the water line in the
street to city standards as required by the City Engineer; 103)that this project shall comply with Ordinance
No. 1477, Exterior Illumination Ordinance; 104)that should any cultural resources be discovered during
construction,all work shall be halted until they are fully investigated by a professional accepted as qualified
by the City Planner and the recommendations of the expert have been executed to the satisfaction of the City.
The motion was seconded by C. Deal.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the condominium permit and special permit for
front setback landscaping for the project including the 94 conditions in the staff report and the 10 conditions
added by the Planning Commission following the public hearing. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C.
Brownrigg dissenting)voice vote.
C. Osterling made a motion to recommend the tentative condominium map and the tentative and final parcel
map to the City Council for action. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the
tentative condominium map and the tentative and final parcel map. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m.
5. 1504,1508,1512,1600,1604,1608&1612 DAVIS DRIVE,1701 &1704-1706 ALBEMARLE WAY—
FENCE EXCEPTION FOR AN EIGHT-FOOT HIGH FENCE ALONG PROPERTY LINES SHARED
WITH THE PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT AT 1783 EL CAMINO REAL(CHRIS
FOLEY,ANTHONY BRUNO,WILFRED&NANCY HUANG,ADAM PATTERSON,NADER ALMASI
AND SIMOUN GHASEMIAN, STEVEN & LEONIE WOHL, ABDULDEYYAN & RUKIYE SAFA,
LATTA TRUST,AND GEORGIA DELROSSO TRUST,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS)(9
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
Reference staff report November 28,2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staff comments. She noted that seven of the nine property owners in this area adjacent to the
hospital site have joined with the hospital project applicant in this request. If approved the fence exception
will be recorded with their properties;also included in this fence exception are the city right-of-way at the
end of Albemarle Way and at the rear of the San Francisco Water Line Parcel where the water main enters
the hospital property. Four conditions to be recorded with each property were suggested for consideration.
Commissioner asked if it was possible to grant in"advance" fence exceptions to two properties which did
not participate so that they do not need to come back to the Commission at a later date. City Attorney
Anderson noted that fence exceptions are legal actions which are recorded with the properties;a recordation
cannot occur without the owner's permission and cannot be granted in advance. If the two property owners
change their minds and work something out with the hospital for fence replacement, they could make a
request of the city and come back to the Commission on the consent calendar. Commissioner asked if this
proposed 8 feet was a minimum or a maximum. Staff noted that this would allow these property owners to
13
Ci�v of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005
build a fence up to 8 feet in height as measured from highest adjacent grade along their rear(or in the case of
1704-1706 Albemarle Way side)property line;and the fence would follow the change in slope along the 640
foot long area. What is the height of the existing new fence at 1701 Albemarle Way?Six feet. There were
no further questions from the Commission.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Oren Reinbolt, project manager for the hospital reconstruction
project represented the application; Simoun Almasi, 1604 Davis Drive; Steven Dambrosie, 1504 Davis
Drive. Applicant noted that this fence design has been agreed to among the neighbors with the fence
company,the project manager of the hospital project has stayed neutral,it will be a well designed fence of 7
feet of solid board with one foot of lattice, designed and built to last 40-50 years; if individual property
owners do not want a fence the hospital replacement project will pay them$5000,the cost of each piece,in
lieu of building them a rear property line fence;weather permitted they will build the first segment of fence
the first week of January and if done in sequence the fence will be completed in 3-4 weeks,the last piece on
the lot opposite Balboa where the water line is will not be completed until the water main in completed in
February or March 2006. The piece across Albemarle may be delayed because of utility work nearby;
currently they are installing a 36 inch storm drain which will be below the SF water line which they will
begin installing next month. Would like to have the fence in place before they install the landscaping so
that the fence does not have to be built from the neighbor's side. How will the gate at Albemarle work?
Neighbors do not want it locked since they use this access as a short cut, someone has already used bolt
cutters on the lock placed on the existing gate;before the gate is built,will need to clarify with the neighbors
if this gate will be "open" or not; a number of the property owner have gates from their properties directly
onto hospital property, they will continue to allow this. The fence posts should be 6 x 6 and pressure
treated; believe that is the case.
Comment continued:will not decide on whether to apply for a fence exception until the hospital responds to
the letter I sent them last year;concerned that the immediate neighbors were not notified before most recent
work began,particularly the removal of adjacent trees;daughter home studying on November 22 and there
was dust everywhere,big machinery was working behind her house,Carole Groom said would send truck to
water down grading but could do nothing about large machinery. Mitigation panel should meet once a week.
Commissioner noted that by refusing to sign the letter for the fence exception property owner gave up the
right to build an 8 foot fence which would increase the privacy of your property; do not need to build the
fence at this time,if you want to build a fence without the exception the tallest fence you can build is 7 feet,
you could agree now. Do not know if I will need the money for the fence to spend on window replacement,
so did not sign. Helped coordinate neighbors,and owner at 1600 Davis has a gate in his fence directly on to
hospital property which he wishes to keep; Commission noted that he would have work that out with the
hospital project manager;be happy to have a gate for public use at Albemarle because it provides a short cut
to BART; the fence posts will be 6 x6's and will be pressure treated;would like to have a uniform fence
including 1701 Albemarle,it would look better over all,and the lack of consistency will be visible from his
hour,currently that fence is six feet tall. Commissioner asked about the letter sent by a neighbor a year ago.
Hospital project representative noted that it was a request for the hospital to purchase the property at 1604
Davis,was based on the project purchasing a property for them someplace else in Burlingame,keeping the
existing tax basis and including moving costs. Cannot do that,but have had appraisal done and should know
in the next several days the fair market assessment,then there is a process for resolving differences;it is hard
to live next to a construction zone,willing to purchase but they are a not for profit corporation and cannot
pay above the fair market value; feel they are close to being able to write a letter to the property owner at
1604 Davis. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
14
Chty of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
C. Brownrigg moved to approve a 8'-6"fence exception for 1504, 1508, 1512, 1608 and 1612 Davis Drive
and 1704-1706 Albemarle Way,allowing T-6"of solid board fence and 1 foot of lattice on the basis that the
construction of the hospital is a hardship which speaks for itself,and if the remaining two properties in this
area wish to apply for the same fence exception they should be placed on the consent calendar for action;this
action should be by resolution with the following conditions to be recorded on each property: 1)that the
proj ect shall be built at this property based on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped
October 20,2005,site plan and fence elevation,with a maximum fence height along the shared property line
with the hospital of 8'-6"feet(7'-6"foot solid board and 1 foot of lattice); 2)that the applicant shall obtain a
building permit for each segment of fence included in the fence exception from the Burlingame Building
Department; 3) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes,
2001 edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;and 4)that this fence exception shall be recorded with
each property affected. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi.
Commissioner comment: would like to allow the remaining two property owners to come back to the
consent calendar if they wish to request fence exceptions;concerned about the maximum/minimum 8 feet,
because of the existing slope would like the fence exception to be 8'6"which would provide some tolerance
for sloping conditions,it should be T-6"solid board and 1 foot of lattice would like the motion amended to
include these two provisions. C. Brownrigg the maker of the motion and C. Cauchi the second agreed to
the amendment to the motion.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to grant the fence exception for an 8'-6"fence,T-6"solid
board, 1 foot lattice at the rear of the properties at 1504, 1508, 1512, 1600, 1608 , 1612 Davis Drive and
1704-1706 Albemarle Way and including the city right of way at the end of Albemarle and along the San
Francisco Water property at Balboa,with the conditions on each property as noted in the staff report;noting
that if the remaining two properties wish to apply for a fence exception they may do it as a consent item.
The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:20 p.m.
6. 1783 EL CAMINO REAL,PENINSULA HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT,ZONED C-1,C-
3 & UNCLASSIFIED — REVIEW OF REFINED LANDSCAPE PLANS WITH RESPECT TO: 1)
STREET LIGHT STANDARD DESIGN;2)SIDEWALK/PATHWAY ALONG EL CAMINO REAL;AND
3) FIRE ACCESS LANE/PATHWAY ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE (MILLS PENINSULA
HEALTH SERVICES,APPLICANT,ANSHEN&ALLEN,ARCHITECT;AND PENINSULA HEALTH
CARE DISTRICT AND MILLS PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES, PROPERTY OWNERS) (201
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS
Reference staff report November 28, 2005,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed
criteria and staff comments. She noted that there were three items which at the last meeting the Planning
Commission had asked the applicant to return to the Commission for further discussion: street light
standards;pavement on the 20 wide fire access lane on the south side ofthe proposed hospital,and location
of the sidewalk along El Camino Real. As noted in the staff report none of these issues need to be resolved
before the building permit can be issued for the parking garage, they are all tied to other phases of the
project; and some of the items, like the street lights,will need to be used through out the North El Camino
corridor so should be carefully reviewed. The Chair suggested that some of these items might be referred to
the Commission's Subcommittee for the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan implementation.
Commissioner asked what latitude there was in the width of the fire lane;CP noted that the Fire Department
would need to be involved in both the selection of the material and the width,there were also maintenance
issues associated with the options chosen. There were no more questions of staff.
15
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,1005
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Oren Reinbolt,project manager for the hospital replacement
project;Jim Romer,architect for the hospital replacement project;Chris Foley, 1504 Davis Drive;Pat
Giomi,1445 Balboa Avenue. As staff report table notes,all three of these decisions are tied to phases other
than the building permit of the parking garage,they need to be decided so that they can be incorporated into
the plans for those phases,need to come back with the Fire Department for the fire lane,resin may or may
not be affordable and may or may not meet the Fire Department's needs,there are other permeable,light
colored asphalts for example;these street lights are a design independent of the lights on the hospital site,
they will set a theme for the city, so hospital has no preference and would be happy to work with a
committee of the Planning Commission. The project architect presented three options for the sidewalk
location along El Camino Real,he noted that the surface grade was pretty well fixed by the requirements to
cover the SF-PUD water line,also there is a meandering pathway up closer to the building,at a higher grade
than the sidewalk which they intend to install,gave commissioners three schematic options for the sidewalk,
which they discussed.
Public Comment continued:do not want you to put off decision about the path(fire lane)behind our house,
we are here tonight and if you put off you will decide without the neighbors participating;things we have
wanted you have not done,would like to see you improve this pathway,want to look at a nice appealing path
not a street;currently it is dusty,there is awful vibration from construction,you should not hold over or
compromise on the pathway. Commissioner noted that there are other surfaces which would be aesthetically
acceptable which is more reason to refer this to the subcommittee so everyone involved can understand.
Feel that a 20 foot wide path is excessive;a traffic lane is only 12 feet,why does it need to be 20 feet wide?
Should be a surface which percolates since there is a drainage problem from this site on El Camino Real
where the present sidewalk ends. Have observed people walking in this area for years,observation is that a
linear sidewalk will get more use;Caltrans has made a concerted effort to remove trees along El Camino so
it is good to have them planted on the hospital property where they cannot remove them in the future.There
were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commission discussion:Regarding the Fire Lane the commission needs to have more information,for the
street lights need to see the best examples in the field,sidewalks are generally lineal and since there is an
inner pathway which meanders there are choices for walkers in this area.
C. Brownrigg made a motion to continue this item for additional information and have a subcommittee
meeting devoted to these hospital issues so that the neighbors may attend. There was no second;and the
motion died.
Commission discussion:Subcommittee should have a representative from the Fire Department there so that
their issues are understood,it can be an open meeting;in the evening.
Chair Auran made a motion to refer the fire lane and street light standard issues to the North
Burlingame/Rollins Road Implementation Subcommittee for further consideration. The motion was
seconded by C. Deal.
Comment on the motion:CA noted that the sidewalk issue needs to be resolved sooner because the city must
back up the hospital's application to CalTrans for a permit; the city must workout maintenance
responsibilities which do not involve CalTrans before CalTrans will act.
Chair Auran moved to have the subcommittee address the light standard and fire lane issues at a public
meeting,including all responsible agencies. The second,C. Deal,agreed.
16
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to refer the fire lane and street light standard issues to the
North Burlingame/Rollins Road subcommittee,to hold a public meeting including the Fire Department and
other city agencies and to include the neighbors. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote.
Discussion continued on the sidewalk: like options 1 or 2 which depict a more linear sidewalk,not see a lot
of difference between these two alternatives,sidewalk is over so that trees can be planted between the street
and the sidewalk for most of the way,curves at the ends are different. Is one allowed to ride a bicycle on the
sidewalk? CA noted not in a business district,do not know how the area by the hospital is classified. How
wide is the proposed sidewalk? Six feet. CP noted that the sidewalks in the Bayfront area are 8 feet. Hear
the consensus that the primary sidewalk should be as straight as possible with the trees between the street
and sidewalk and 8 feet wide to provide more room for mixed uses.
C. Vistica moved to approve option 2 as the preferred location for the sidewalk with a width of 8 feet
because it is a safer dimension for users. The motion was seconded by Chair Auran.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve option 2 for the sidewalk alignment along El
Camino Real with a paved width of 8 feet and landscaped as shown on option 2. The motion passed on a 7-0
voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:05 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
7. 2010 BROADWAY,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(JAMES AND MARA
FERRARO, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (54
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
C. Deal recused himself from this item because he has a business relationship with the applicant. He left the
dais and chambers. ZT Strohmeier briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of
staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. James Ferraro, applicant and property owner, represented the
project, stating that the design of the addition is sympathetic to the design of the existing house and to the
neighborhood. Commission asked: the proposed slate roofing is an asset to the project,will it actually be
used or will synthetic slate material be installed?If budget allows,slate material will be used. Will second
story balcony on bedroom number 2 take away from neighbor's privacy? No; there is a wide separation
between the two homes because of the backyards and because of a 15' City easement that runs between the
two properties. The mock-balcony at the front of the house off the master bedroom looks odd because it has
no access,no door. Applicant stated this balcony is designed to be sympathetic to the lower balustrade and
for design purposes only. Do the double doors on the rear elevation provide access to the utilities?Yes. Is
the trim around the windows simulated stone trim or a Styrofoam trim? It will be a cement based product
that will be as narrow as possible so there is not too much bulk around the windows and doors. There were
no other comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions
have been made and plan checked:
• The option to put in a door to access the balcony at the front of the house, or consider removing the
balustrade and doing something different here to make the area look like a porch roof; and
17
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 18, 1005
• Needs a final decision on the proposed roofing material, real slate or some other material.
This motion was seconded by C. Keighran.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Deal abstaining). The Planning
Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:20 p.m.
8. 469 BLOOMFIELD ROAD, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST
AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (GARY AND STACY
O'GRADY, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND KATRINA KUHL, ARCHITECT) (72
NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Katrina Kuhl,architect,represented the project. Commissioners
made the following comments:
• Basically a good project,just minor changes to the plans to bring it to next step;
• Indicate the actual size of each window on the plans, indicate egress windows in bedrooms;
• Change elevations to the '/4 inch scale size;
• Revise the trellis over the garage,needs support or redesign so it looks as if it is supported,could be
narrow;
• All eaves should be stepped back and should be the same size; correct this in a number of places
throughout the plans;
• Clarify the location of the uppermost window shown at the rear;
• The gutter needs to stick out on the west elevation roof line; the roof is engulfing the gutter; all
gutters should be shown on the plans at this stage of the process;
• On elevation number 2,the pocket in the soffit windows will look like a mistake,revise,may mean
increasing the plate height and thus the height of the house;
• Roof height of 30' is ok; what is the second story plate height?Show the plate heights on the plans
(7'-9"); could go over 30' in height with a special permit application for architectural purposes and
to flame the windows better;
• The chimney shown on elevations 1 and 2 is different,make consistent;
• Rear elevation 9"continuous overhang should show on side elevations;
• Gutters not consistent on plans; gutter should show that it wraps around;
• A lot of detail work is needed on the plans;the relationship between the eaves,roof and gutters needs
to be shown;
• Front elevation entry door seems cramped,do something so that it does not look like a back door;
• Site plan showing existing neighboring houses is great and helpful;
• Take one of the three proposed new 24"box size landscape trees in the rear and plant it in the front
of the property on the right hand side of the driveway to reduce the visual scale of the house; and
• There should be vines planted along the trellis area, identify what you will plant.
There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
18
City of Bu7lingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28, 2005
C. Deal made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the directed revisions
have been made to the plans and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:40 p.m.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
Review of City Council regular meeting of November 21, 2005.
CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of November 21, 2005, noting that the application
period for the Commission seat vacated because C. Keighran was elected to the City Council will close
Friday, December 9, 2005, applications are available in the City Manager's office. The Council will appoint
the interview committee at their meeting on December 5, 2005. CP Monroe also noted that DPW has just
completed an Urban Water Management Plan for the city which evaluates the current water availability for
the City and discusses how water shortages can be handled. She noted that the City Council would hold
their regular meeting on December 19, 2005. There was a letter from a neighbor regarding 1453 Cypress.
Commissioners expressed concern that inclusionary zoning was being misused, the purpose of relaxing
requirements was so that applicants for multiple family developments could increase their densities, instead
they are building bigger units, replacing fewer than they are removing, including affordable units. CA noted
that the city's has hired an expert to give us some advice on local inclusionary regulations, because
Burlingame is not big enough to have the vehicles for retention of these units that other communities have.
A report will be made in the Spring
- FYI — review of requested changes to an approved design review project at 1149 Drake Avenue.
The Planning Commission approved the proposed changes to the project at 1149 Drake Avenue.
FYI — review of requested changes to an approved design review project at 1506 Alturas Drive.
Commissioner noted that the proposal to change the side of this.building will make it look odd and would be
visible from the street. Suggested that the width of the chimney be changed from 2'-2" to 2'-6", that the right
side of the chimney be extended straight to the ground (the angled projection removed) and that the lower
roof on the right side be doubled in length to meet the flattened right side of the chimney. If appropriate the
revised plans should be returned on the FYI calendar.
In recognition that this was C. Keighran's last meeting as a Planning Commissioner, the Planning
Commission thanked her for her service and teamwork and wished Commissioner Keighran well in her new
endeavor as a member of the City Council.
X.I. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 11 :00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
19
Cit; of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes November 28,2005
Michael Brownrigg, Secretary
SA IINUTES\unapproved.11.28.05.doc
20
carr oN CITY OF BURLINGAME
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BURLJlIGAME 501 PRIMROSE ROAD
BURLINGAME,CA 94010
o. TEL:(650)558-7250 • FAX:(650)696-3790
4jv,,,m ,�.•' www.burlingame.org
Site: 1441& 1445 BELLEVUE AVE
Application for mitigated negative declaration,
tentative condominium map,tentative and final PUBLIC HEARING
parcel map for lot combination, condominium
permit and variance for front setback landscaping NOTICE
for a new four-story 17-unit residential
condominium at : 1441& 1445 BELLEVUE AVE,
zoned R-4. (APN: 029-121-040,-050).
The City of Burlingame Planning Commission
announces the following public hearing on
Monday, November 28,2005 at 7:00 P.M.
in the City Hall Council Chambers located at
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, California.
Mailed: November 18,2005
(Please refer to other side)
CITY OF BURLINGAME
A copy of the applic an�� `projec y be reviewed prior
to the meeting t ��,Primrose Road,
Burlingame, C
x
If you challe_ge u u ma�be limited to
raising only �e �t blic hearing,
described in he
e ri e� ive=ed to the city
at or prior to a pu c aon&. F _
Property ow rs a respon ble or informing
their tenants Lbou io al infor ati i, please call
(650) 558-7 0 i
Margaret Mo }
City Planner
P Id CE
(Please refer to other side)
CITY o� STAFF REPORT
BVWMG.AME AGENDA 8b
ITEM#
/ . MTG.
l`0 90
DATE 12.19.05
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED �
BY qawp�_&Ot_
DATE: NOVEMBER 28 2005
APPROVE
FROM: CITY PLANNER BY
, r
SUBJECT: APPROVE CONTRACT FOR DOWNTOWN ECONOM C STUDY AND AUTHORIZE
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.
Recommendation:
City Council should adopt a resolution approving the proposed contract with Economic Research Associates
to prepare an economic study for the downtown area at a cost of$59,000.00; and authorizing the use of funds
from the Parking Enterprise Fund and transferring the money to the appropriate account.
BACKGROUND:
In May the City Council appointed a committee to work with the City Planner to develop a scope of work for
an economic study for the downtown area of Burlingame. The study area would extend from Peninsula
Avenue to Oak Grove Avenue, between El Camino Real and the CalTrain tracks. The RFP was distributed
and the city received four responses. All of the responses exceeded the expected budget amount of$35,000 to
$45,000. All four firms were interviewed in October 2005. For the interview each firm was asked to suggest
how to narrow the scope of the study to fit a smaller budget. The contract which is the basis of the proposed
program is the "trimmed" program suggested by Economic Research Associates (ERA) and was the subject of
the interview. William Lee will be the project manager. He has done a number of similar studies, both
economic base evaluations and site specific development studies, in the Bay Area over the past ten or more
years.
It was noted in checking the references on the individuals and the firm, that Economic Research Associates
had done work directly for the Safeway Corporation. I contacted Mr. Lee and asked him to investigate when
this work was done, who did it, and was it on going. Mr. Lee responded by e-mail (attached) that the last
work done by ERA for the Safeway Corporation was in 1985. The work was done by J. Richard McElyea
who retired from the ERA a number of years ago. Mr. Lee did note that ERA does a "fair amount of grocery
store analysis but typically for municipalities" including a current one for Snoqualmie, Washington. These
kinds of studies are typically done by redevelopment agencies to determine what they would need to do to
attract a grocery store to an area which is "struggling" economically. Most of the firms interviewed have
done attraction evaluation work similar to this for redevelopment agencies.
If the contract is approved, Mr. Lee would be available to begin the work on the Downtown Economic Study
in January 2006. He anticipates that he would be ready for the public presentations in April and May 2006.
Prior to the start of the study, City Council would be involved in assisting staff to identify people, particularly
knowledgeable about the various facets of Burlingame's economy, to interview for the initial step of the study.
These interviews would commence in January.
APPROVE CONTRACT FOR DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC STUDY AND AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.
December 19,2005
At the inception of the idea of preparing an economic study for Burlingame's downtown, City Council had
expressed the notion that the economic study was directly related to the future viability of the downtown and
the role of the physical improvements and parking facilities to be built in the downtown area. For that reason
the Council directed that the economic study be funded from the Parking Enterprise Fund. The money in the
Parking Enterprise Fund is raised from parking meters and parking enforcement in the downtown area. In
addition to expenditures for parking enforcement personnel and equipment, money in this fund is used to
repay the city for past investments in the downtown public parking, and for investing in future sidewalk and
parking related infrastructure improvements in the downtown area which would be managed as capital
improvement projects.
Fiscal Impact:
Appropriate $59,000.00 to fund the Downtown Economic Study from the Parking Enterprise Fund; and
determine if the City Council would like to "borrow" the money from the fund now, and repay it from the
General Fund to the Parking Enterprise Fund in the future. If Council would like to pay the money back to the
Parking Enterprise Fund so that it will be available for physical and/or parking improvements in the downtown
area in the future, that direction should be given to staff in the motion to approve the resolution on the transfer
of funds.
Margaret Monroe
City Planner
Attachments:
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Burlingame Approving an Agreement with Economic Research
Associates for Performance of a Downtown Economic Study, Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute Agreement, and Transferring Funds for the Study.
Agreement for Economic Study of Downtown Burlingame between the City of Burlingame and Economic
Research Associates with scope of work attached.
William W. Lee, e-mail to M Monroe, November 7, 2005.
2
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH ECONOMIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATES FOR
PERFORMANCE OF A DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC STUDY, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT,AND TRANSFERRING FUNDS FOR THE
STUDY
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame:
WHEREAS,the City is beginning the process of evaluating the Burlingame Avenue Area of
the City and developing a plan to sustain and improve the area; and
WHEREAS, an experienced consultant can provide the City with an economic analysis of
the area to provide baseline information in the planning process; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted a request for proposal process involving citizens and staff
in evaluation and selection process for such a consultant; and
WHEREAS, Economic Research Associates is an experienced consultant that appears to be
the best qualified to provide these services,
NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED:
1. The Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A between the City and Economic Research
Associates is approved.
2. The City Manager is directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City and the City
Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager.
3. The City Manager is further authorized to transfer$59,000 to fund the study from the
Parking Enterprise Fund to the Account No. 530-65400-220.
MAYOR
I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of
2005,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
�- CITY CLERK
AGREEMENT FOR ECONOMIC STUDY OF DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME
BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
AND ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of
, 2005 , by and between the City of Burlingame, State of
California, herein called the "City", and Economic Research Associates, a
California corporation, herein called the "Consultant" .
RECITALS
A. The City is considering undertaking activities to develop a Downtown
Burlingame Specific Plan.
B. The City desires to engage a Economic Study Consultant to provide
consulting services in conjunction with the development of basic economic
information for the planning process.
C. The Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to
perform the desired work pursuant to this Agreement.
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS :
1 . Scope of Services. The Consultant shall provide the services described in
the Scope of Work, which is attached to and made a part of this Agreement
as Exhibit A. Attached as Exhibit B is a Cost Detail that is an estimate of
the time and services to be devoted to the tasks within the Scope of Work.
Exhibit B also shows the hourly rate of the Consultant' s employees for use
in the event that the City requests additional services of Consultant; any
agreement for additional services shall be in writing and executed by both
parties.
2. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence
upon the execution of this Agreement with completion of the program by
April 30, 2005 .
3 . Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable
laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations of governing federal, state and
local laws. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all
licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which
Revised: November 7, 2005 Pagel of 8
C:\FILES\AGREENIEN\economicstudy.agr.wpd
are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant
represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and
expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this
Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required
for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City
of Burlingame business license.
4. Sole Responsibility. Consultant shall be responsible for employing or
engaging all persons necessary to perform the services under this
Agreement.
5. Information/Report Handling. All documents furnished to Consultant by
the City and all reports and supportive data prepared by the Consultant
under this Agreement are the City's property and shall be delivered to the
City upon the completion of Consultant's services or at the City's written
request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled
by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant
to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public,
and the Consultant shall not make any of the these documents or
information available to any individual or organization not employed by
the Consultant or the City without the written consent of the City before
such release. The City acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by the
Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are for the purpose of evaluating a
defined project, and City's use of the information contained in the reports
prepared by the Consultant in connection with other projects shall be
solely at City's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in
writing. City further agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology
or technique of Consultant which is and has been confirmed in writing by
Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant.
6. Compensation. Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall
not exceed $59,000; and payment shall be based upon City approval of
each task.
Billing shall be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the work
performed by whom, at what rate, and on what date. The submittal shall
include the following:
A. A narrative progress report of specific accomplishments during the
billing period, problems encountered or anticipated, plans for
resolving problems, accomplishments scheduled during the next
billing period, and results of any significant activities.
Revised: November 7, 2005 Page 2 of 8
C:\FILESWGREEMEN\economiestudy.agr.wpd
B. A cost report for each task showing:
(i) Current period and cumulative expenditures to date;
(ii) Estimated cost at completion;
(iii) Estimate date of completion;
(iv) Approved contract amount and task budgeting; and
(v) Comparison of task budgeting with the estimated costs to show
any variations.
Also, documents or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for City
review, even if only in partial or draft form.
7. Availability of Records. Consultant shall maintain the records supporting
this billing for not less than three (3) years following completion of the
work under this Agreement. Consultant shall make these records available
to authorized personnel of the City at the Consultant's offices during
business hours upon written request of the City.
8. Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Consultant for the work
under this Agreement shall be William F. Lee.
9. Assignability and Subcontracting. The services to be performed under this
Agreement are unique and personal to the Consultant. No portion of these
services shall be assigned or subcontracted without the written consent of
the City.
10. Notices. Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and
properly given if mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to:
To City: City Planner
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
To Consultant: Bill Lee
Economics Research Associates
388 Market Street, Suite 1580
San Francisco, CA 94111
or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address
as Consultant designates in writing to City.
Revised: November 7, 2005 Page 3 of 8
C:\FILES\AGREEMENIeconomicstudy.agr.wpd
1,1. Independent Contractor. It is understood that the Consultant, in the
performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as
and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the
City. As an independent contractor he/she shall not obtain any rights to
retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City employee(s).
With prior written consent, the Consultant may perform some obligations
under this Agreement by subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate
responsibility for performance or assign or transfer interests under this
Agreement.
Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject
of the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be
compensated for its costs and expenses in preparing for, traveling to, and
testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of compensation,
unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of
Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing.
12. Conflict of Interest. Consultant understands that its professional
responsibilities is solely to the City. The Consultant has and shall not
obtain any holding or interest within the City of Burlingame. Consultant
has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of the
Staff or management of the City or its representatives nor shall it enter into
any such holdings or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it
does not presently and shall not acquire any direct or indirect interest
adverse to those of the City in the subject of this Agreement, and it shall
immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it discover it
has done so and shall, at the City's sole discretion, divest itself of such
interest. Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to
ensure that it does not employ a person having such an interest in this
performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person,
Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or indirect
interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement,
Consultant shall promptly notify City of this employment relationship, and
shall, at the City's sole discretion, sever any such employment
relationship.
13. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant warrants that it is an equal
opportunity employer and shall comply with applicable regulations
governing equal employment opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its
subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate against persons employed
or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color, race,
marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability,
national origin, religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona
Revised: November 7, 2005 Page 4 of 8
C:\FILES\AGREEMEN\economicstudy.agr.wpd
fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment
& Housing Act.
14. Insurance.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance:
i. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the
contract, General Liability insurance policies insuring him/her
and his/her firm to an amount not less than: one million
dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage in a form
at least as broad as ISO "Occurrence" Form CG 0001.
ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the
contract, an Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring
him/her and his/her staff to an amount not less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
iii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the
contract, professional liability insurance in amounts not less
than one million dollars ($1,000,000) sufficient to insure
Consultant for professional errors or omissions in the
performance of the particular scope of work under this
agreement.
iv. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to
and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either:
the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-
insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a
bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.
B. General and Automobile Liability Policies:
i. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are
to be covered as insured as respects: liability arising out of
activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant;
products and completed operations of Consultant, premises
owned or used by the Consultant. The endorsement
providing this additional insured coverage shall be equal to or
Revised: November 7, 2005 Page 5 of 8
�• C:\FILESWGREEMEN\economicstudy.agr.wpd
broader than ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 and must cover joint �
negligence, completed operations, and the acts of
subcontractors. This requirement does not apply to the
professional liability insurance required for professional
errors and omissions.
ii. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be endorsed to be
primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurances
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and
shall not contribute with it.
iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the
policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
iv. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
C. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall have and maintain
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by California law.
Further, Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by
Consultant provide the required Workers' Compensation insurance
for their respective employees.
D. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City. Current certification of such insurance
shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement
with the City Clerk.
E. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers
with a Best's rating of no less than A-:VII and authorized to do
business in the State of California.
F. Verification of Coverage. Upon execution of this Agreement,
Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and
with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this
clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy
Revised: November 7, 2005 Page 6 of 8
C:\FILESWGREEk EN\economicstudy.agr.wpd
are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind
coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be
on forms approved by the City. All certificates and endorsements
are to be received and approved by the City before any work
commences. The City reserves the right to require complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
15. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Consultant
shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend the City, its
officers, agent, employees and volunteers from all damages, liabilities,
penalties, costs, or expenses in law or equity, including but not limited to
attorneys' fees, that may at any time arise, result from, relate to, or be set
up because of damages to property or personal injury received by reason
of, or in the course of performing work which may be occasioned by a
negligent or willfully wrongful act or omission of the Consultant, or any of
the Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any subconsultant.
16. Waiver. No failure on the part of either parry to exercise any right or
remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy
that party may have hereunder, nor does waiver of a breach or default
under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent
breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
17. Governing. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be
governed by and construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue
for any action regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of
the County of San Mateo or Santa Clara.
18. Termination of Agreement. The City and the Consultant shall have the
right to terminate this agreement with or without cause by giving not less
than fifteen (15) days written notice of termination. In the event of
termination, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all plans, files,
documents, reports, performed to date by the Consultant. In the event of
such termination, City shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same
ratio to the maximum contract price as the work delivered to the City bears
to completed services contemplated under this Agreement, unless such
termination is made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall
be adjusted in light of the particular facts and circumstances involved in
such termination.
19. Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment
of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the
City and the Consultant.
Revised: November 7, 2005 Page 7 of 8
C:\FILES\AGREENIEN\economicstudy.agr.wpd
20. Disputes. In any dispute over any aspect of this Agreement, the prevailing
parry shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, as well as costs not to
exceed $7,500 in total.
21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive
statement of the Agreement between the City and Consultant. No terms,
conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary
this Agreement, unless hereafter made in writing and signed by the parry
to be bound, shall be binding on either parry.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this
Agreement as of the date indicated on page one (1).
City of Burlingame Economics Research Associates
By
Print Name
Title
ATTEST: Approved as to form:
City Clerk City Attorney
1
Revised: November 7, 2005 Page 8 of 8
C:\FILES\AGREENIEN\economicstudy.agr.wpd
Economics Research Associates
Revised Proposal for
ECONOMICS STUDY OF DOWNTOWN
BURLINGAME
Prepared for
City of Burlingame Planning Department
Submitted by
Economics Research Associates
October 12, 2005
ERA Proposal No. 45305R
388 Market Street Suite 1580
San Francisco, CA 94111 ERA is affiliated with Drivers Jonas
415 . 956 . 8152 FAX 415 . 956 . 5274 www. erasf. com/erasf
EXHIBIT
A H Los Angeles San Francisco San Diego
Chicago Dallas Washington DC London
Economics Research Associates
October 12, 2005
Ms. Maureen Brooks
City Planner
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010-3997 Proposal No. 45305R
Re: Revised Proposal for Economics Study of Downtown Burlingame
Dear Ms. Brooks:
Economics Research Associates (ERA) is pleased to have the opportunity to
submit this revised proposal to provide an economics study of Downtown
Burlingame. Our new proposal responds to the objectives of the assignment, as
reflected in the RFP, and incorporates the cost-effectiveness considerations
conveyed in your letter of September 22"d. If you have any questions, please give
me a call at (415) 956-8152.
Sincerely,
Gjv
William W. Lee
Executive Vice President
388 Market Street Suite 1580 San Francisco, CA 94111
415-956,8152 FAX 41 5.956.5274 www.econres.com ERA is affiliated ,Kith D11-1 J-1
Los Angeles San Francisco San Diego Chicago Washington DC London
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Market Outlook
ERA will prepare a regional market analysis to determine downtown Burlingame's role and
function in the broader retail, hotel and service markets. This market analysis will look at the
mid- eninsula region for the next 20 years and will forecast retail MEMMEMSM
cinema, office and hotel demand for the next 20 years by five-year increments. The
market study will include a study of housing demand by types of housing and price structure for
downtown Burlingame. This analysis will assess the attractiveness of the downtown for mixed-
use The market analysis findings will cover the
amount of each type of development supportable by five-year timeframe and the preferred
locations for each type of land use. As part of this initial task, ERA will interview key
community and regional stakeholders and representatives of the development community for an
"on the ground" view of the downtown. The interviews will include developers, including
affordable housing providers, who have worked in cities on downtown projects. The proposal
includes, interviews of stakeholders, developers an
2. Discussion of Development Economics Issues
Once we complete Task 1, ERA will be able to provide an insightful discussion of the issues of
concern to the community based upon a combination of local research and broad based
experience in downtown planning.
2.A. Auto Row Contribution and Possible Relocation
ERA will assess the importance of"Auto Row" to the viability of downtown and to the city's
economy and revenue base. Based on the City's subarea sales tax data, we will quantify the
impact of the loss of Auto Row to Burlingame or its relocation within Burlingame. We will
identify uses that would be economically viable in the existing Auto Row area should the auto
sales/service businesses relocate.
2.B. Downtown Expansion
ERA will provide a discussion of the economic reality of expanding the downtown
retail/service center from "the Avenue" to the "the Avenues" including Howard and Donnelly-
Chapin Avenues. The market analysis will inform this discussion.
2.C. Reuse of Older Buildings versus Redevelopment
ERA will provide a framing discussion of "reuse" of current structures as opposed to
redevelopment. The discussion will on one hand present the property owner/developer
perspective and on the other hand cover the community development/place making perspective.
ERA Scope—October 27,2005
1
We recommend that any policy level recommendations concerning a historic preservation and
adaptive reuse strategy be deferred into the Downtown Specific Plan, within which the adaptive
reuse approach can be fully discussed as an alternative for selected portions of the downtown.
2.1). Amount of Mixed-Use Supportable
Not all areas of Downtown Burlingame will be able to support mixed-use development. Based
upon the market analysis and a block-by-block examination of the downtown, ERA will
identify the blocks that have the best chance of successful mixed-use development over the
next 20 years.
2.E. Share Parking—Cost and Benefits
ERA understands downtown parking intimately. We have addressed shared parking, parking
districts, diagonal parking and parking strategies in cities like Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo,
Los Gatos, Pleasanton, Pasadena, San Carlos, Seattle and Portland. We will discuss the benefit
and constraints of shared parking including the integration of public and private ownership.
2.F. Value of Direct Rail Access
ERA will assess the value of direct rail.access to the economy of the downtown area and
discuss the costs and benefits of having rail service to the downtown. We will base this
assessment on a combination of our project manager's experience with development
analysis at over 300 rail stations through the country and the local insights gained from
`. Task 1.
2.G. Fiscal Return of Different Land Uses
In this first phase, ERA will provide a general discussion of the fiscal return of different land
uses to the City of Burlingame. This discussion will cover hotels, automobile dealers,retail uses,
office development, condominiums and apartments. Because the specific fiscal return will vary
widel by location and quality of development, we recommend
be one of the key economic tasks in the Downtown Specific
Plan, which would be in the next phase of work..
3. Focused Analysis of Key Site
The redevelopment of the Safeway site has generated much discussion within Burlingame
during the past three or four years, including development proposals by Safeway and concepts
proposed by some local architects. ERA will use a mixed-use development pro forma to
examine three or four alternatives for redevelopment of the Safeway site integrated with other
nearby properties. The pro forma is designed in part to measure the impact of different parking
alternatives, including underground parking, above ground parking and shared parking.
ERA Scope—October 27,2005
2
ERA uses a dynamic pro forma that examines cash flow over the next 12 years to compute what
a developer is able to pay for land. For example, ERA's office development pro forma would
consider: 1) the expected rents at the time of development, 2) the gross floor area of the
building, 3) the rentable floor area, 4) the estimated operating cost, 5) the estimated direct
building and parking construction costs, 6) the indirect construction cost, 7) the construction
loan interest rate, 8) the long term take-out financing rate, 9) the debt coverage ratio in year
four, 10) the capitalization rate, 11) the project's value net of debt in the last year of the
analysis, 12) the build-up and steady state occupancy rates, 13) the projected rate of lease rate
increase, and 14) the developer's required rate of return. The resulting residual land value is
then compared to recent land transactions in the downtown to determine feasibility of alternative
development scenarios. In a market economy, if a major landowner chooses not to sell or
participate in a redevelopment project, the project is not likely to move to completion regardless
of feasibility. Informed by both the market and financial analyses, ERA will suggest one or two
development approaches that best balance the interests of the property owner with the economic
interests of the downtown community for this key site.
4. Final Report and Presentation
ERA will provide the following:
• One hard copy and a PDF copy of the draft and final reports.
• Two community workshops including presentation of results and discussion of topics of
concern to attendees. (This assumes that City staff will organize these sessions including
sending out notices,providing a venue and offering refreshments.)
• One hard copy and an electronic copy of PowerPoint slide show used to support the
presentation.
• We will be available to make additional presentations on a time and expenses basis.
ERA MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL
ERA's project team identified below is based out of San Francisco. Detailed resumes of each are
enclosed.
• William `Bill"Lee—Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager
• Linda Cheu—Market Analysis
• Ian Van Reepinghen—Research and Analysis
ERA Scope—October 27,2005 3
SCHEDULE
ERA proposes a four-month schedule from receipt of executed contract to submission of draft
final report. The final report will be submitted within two weeks of ERA receiving comments on
the draft.
COST PROPOSAL
1. Market Outlook(Includes Stakeholder Interviews) $25,000
2. Response to Issues (Requires Task 1) 10,000
3. Financial Analysis of Target Site(Requires Task 1) 10,000
ERA Scope—October 27,2005 4
BURLINGAME DOWNTOWN ECONOMICS ANALYSIS: COST DETAIL
Economics Research Associates
ERA
Task LeeCheu Van Reepinghen Expenses Total
1. Market Analysis 4,000 10,000 10,600 400 25,000
2. Response to Issues 8,000 1,800 0 200 10,000
3. Financial Analysis of Safeway Site 9,200 400 400 10,000
4. One Presentation& Two Workshops 8,000 4,000 1,550 450 14,000
Total Assignment $29,200 1 $16,200 1 $12,550 $1,050 1 $59,000
Hourly Rate $250 $200 $110
Hours 117 81 114 231
' Mr. Lee's commercial rate is $304 per hour
Note: Additional community workshops attended by all three ERA staff would cost in the $2,500 to $3,000 range depending upon
level of preparation required.
t
CITY C AGENDA 8c
ITEM#
BURLINGA' MTG.
ME STAFF REPORT
""""
DATE 12/19/2005
�RaTm ewe 6`�O
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITT
BY
DATE: December 6, 2005 APPROVED
BY
FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
APPROVE ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve rotation list for Mayor and Vice Mayor for coming year.
DISCUSSION:
Resolution No. 117 (1999) sets forth the process for rotating the offices of Mayor and Vice Mayor. Pursuant to
that resolution, the rotation list is to be updated each year so that the rotation list is kept current. On December
5, the newly elected councilmembers drew straws to establish their relative seniority on the list.
Attached are the rotation lists for November 15, 2004 (before the current rotation) and December 5, 2005 (the
current rotation list).
Attachment
Rotation List(November 15, 2004, and December 5, 2005)
Resolution No. 117 (1999)
ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR
(November 15,2004)
1. Mayor Joe Galligan
2. Vice Mayor Cathy Baylock
3. Councilmember Mike Coffey
4. Councilmember Terry Nagel
5. Councilmember Rosalie O'Mahony
ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR
(December 5, 2005)
1. Mayor Cathy Baylock
2. Vice Mayor Terry Nagel
3. Councilmember Rosalie O'Mahony
4. Councilmember Ann Keighran
5. Councilmember Russ Cohen
RESOLUTION NO. 117-1999
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME
ADOPTING CITY COUNCIL POLICY ON ROTATION OF COUNCIL OFFICERS
WHEREAS, Section 36802 of the Government Code requires the City of Burlingame have a Mayor
and Vice Mayor; and
WHEREAS, by Council tradition the Council has rotated the office of Mayor and Vice Mayor
annually at the second meeting in November of each year; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to insure an equitable rotation of officers amongst all persons
elected to the City Council,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED and DETERMINED by the CITY COUNCIL of THE
CITY OF BURLINGAME that the following procedure shall govern the appointment of Council officers:
1. Rotation of the office of Mayor and Vice Mayor shall occur annually at the second City Council
meeting in November of each year.
2. The Vice Mayor shall become Mayor if eligible and a new Vice Mayor shall be appointed from
the remainder of the councilmembers next in order of position on the rotation list described below. If the
Vice Mayor is ineligible, unable, or declines to serve as Mayor, then councilmembers next in order of
position on the rotation list described below shall fill both the offices of Mayor and Vice Mayor.
3. A rotation list based on seniority of consecutive years in the office of councilmember and this
resolution is established pursuant to Exhibit A.
4. As changes in Council membership occur, the rotation list shall be updated as follows:
A. The outgoing mayor shall be placed ahead of any councilmembers newly elected in the
November general election, if any, but below all continuing and re-elected council-members
B. A newly elected or appointed councilmember shall be placed at the bottom of the rotation list
upon taking office. If more than one councilmember is elected or appointed at the same time, the newly
elected or appointed councilmembers shall draw straws to determine their position relative to each other at
the bottom of the rotation list.
1
C. If a councilmember declines to serve as either mayor or vice mayor when it is that
councilmember's turn to serve, the declining councilmember shall be placed on the rotation list ahead of
any councilmembers newly elected in the November general election, if any, and below all continuing and
re-elected councilmembers. If however, more than one councilmember at the same time declines to serve
as either mayor or vice mayor when it is their turn to serve, the declining councilmembers shall be placed
in the same relative order to each other as before but below all other councilmembers on the rotation list.
5. The same process for rotation of officers contained in this resolution shall be used if the office of
mayor or vice mayor becomes vacant at a time other than the second Council meeting in November of
each year. However, if the vacancy occurs because the mayor or vice mayor is no longer able or willing to
serve in that office, the outgoing officer shall be placed below all other councilmembers on the rotation
list.
6. For purposes of this resolution, "the November general election"refers to the City general
election that has occurred on the first Tuesday of November immediately preceding the second Council
meeting for that November.
Mayor
I, Judith A. Malfatti, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1 st day of November, 1999,
and was adopted thereafter by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: GALLIGAN, KNIGHT, JANNEY, O'MAHONY, SPINELLI
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
City Clerk
[C:\FILES\COUNREPS\mayorlist2005.ca.wpd]
2
EXHIBIT A
ROTATION LIST FOR OFFICES OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR
(November 1, 1999)
1. Mayor Mary Janney
2. Vice Mayor Marti Knight
3. Councilmember Rosalie O'Mahony
4. Councilmember Joe Galligan
5. Councilmember Mike Spinelli (Immediate Past Mayor)
3
��� CITY 0 STAFF REPORT
BURUNGAME AGENDA 8d
ITEM#
MTG.
ticDq DAATED JYNE 6'9D0 DATE December 19,2005
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMI
BY
DATE: December 19,2005 (�
AP OVED B l
FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director
558-7222
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF TOT REFUND FOR DOUBLE TREE HOTEL AS RELATED TO THE
CHAPTER 11 FILED BY UNITED AIRLINES AND AIR CANADA IN 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve a refund of Transient Occupancy Taxes in the amount of$7,215.50 to the
Double Tree Hotel, San Francisco Airport and authorize staff to make payment.
BACKGROUND:
United Airlines and Air Canada filed for bankruptcy protection in 2003, under Chapter 11 of the Federal
Bankruptcy Code. The Double Tree Hotel submitted its claims against the airlines along with other
creditors. The attorneys for the hotel indicated that the TOT refund could not be collected and asked that
the hotel write off the claim. The hotel contacted the city directly and requested the refund. The hotel
submitted documentation that a refund was due. The documents were inspected by the Finance Department
and the City Attorney's Office and the refund claim was accepted.
The refund is due because TOT taxes were paid prior to the use of the hotel rooms by United and Air
Canada. After the bankruptcy filing, the rooms were not occupied; therefore, the tax was not due to the
City of Burlingame.
A tax refund requires City Council approval.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The impact of the refund on the General Fund budget is not significant. The FY05-06 budget estimate for
TOT is $8.2 million. Growth in the current year is 16%when compared with the same period last year
(July thru Oct). Growth in TOT collections for FY04-05 was 10.5%.
ATTACHMENTS:
0 Refund letter from the Double Tree Hotel, dated November 8, 2005
DOUBLETREE°
HOTEL
SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT
November 8, 2005
Ms. Linda Freitas
Deputy Treasurer
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Re: TOT Refund
Dear Linda,
This letter is to request a Transient Occupancy Tax refund at the total amount $7,215.50.
This TOT refund request is related to the Chapter 11 filed by United Airlines and Air
Canada in 2003. Our Corporate Office legal department had been handling the whole
process of these 2 claims and recently we are instructed to write-off these debts in
November. Enclosed please find copy of our claim forms to United States Bankruptcy
Court, invoices, financial statements and TOT returns which proof we had paid the said
tax amount in 2002 & 2003.
We apologize for the delay of the refund request. If you have any questions, please call
me at(650)373-2201 or Michael Froelich, Controller at(650)373-2238.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Raymond Wai
Assistant Controller
835 Airport Boulevard,Burlingame,CA 94010
Tel:650 344 5500 Fax:650 340 8851
TheHiltonFamily Reservations:wwwdoubletree.com or 1-800-222-TREE
$3,425,973.28
Ck. No. 15148- 15773
Excludes Library Cks.15256-15283
RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
I
Payroll for November 2005
$2,495,458.67
Ck. No. 163984- 164202
INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
PERS HEALTH
PERS RETIREMENT
FEDERAL 941 TAX
STATE DISABILITY TAX
STATE INCOME TAX
PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP
SECTION 125 DEDUCTION
CCD o0
m m
as Q
q �
oCD
d 3
is
S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS
w
�l
CITY OF BURLINGAME
12-08-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11
FUND RECAP - 05.06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 142,125.70
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 2,960.60
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 7,932.23
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 213,336.63
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 39,080.87
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 123,725.26
WATER FUND 526 10,069.89
SEWER FUND 527 14,994.95
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,993.00
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,477.61
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 134.97
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 5,773.06
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 17,476.70
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 343.03
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,183.01
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 550.00
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,906.25
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 8,980.97
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $596,044.73
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
I
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 15642 THROUGH 15773 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $596,044.73, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
................... . ........... .... . .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
..... .............. . . . ........ . .... . .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15770 JOHN O'BRIEN 26109 64.00
MISCELLANEOUS 64.00 101 36330 000 1782
15771 JOHN SCHULZ 26110 46.00
MISCELLANEOUS 46.00 101 36330 000 1645
15772 MRS ERGIN 26111 55.00
MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1781
15773 TRI STAR BUILDERS 26112 210.00
MISCELLANEOUS 210.00 526 36730
TOTAL $596,044.73
��0�
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15754 M.H.A. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 26017 11,716.99
DEPOSIT REFUND 11,716.99 101 22590
15755 EILEEN NASH 26058 110.00
MISCELLANEOUS 110.00 101 36330 000 1781
15756 TRI FORCE SOLUTIONS INC 26067 44.58
OFFICE EXPENSE 44.58 621 64450 110
15757 GRAPHICS ON THE EDGE 26096 1,830.19
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,830.19 625 65213 203
15758 GTG MARKETING 26097 820.38
GAS, OIL & GREASE 820.38 201 65200 201
15759 U.S. DIARY 26098 20.35
OFFICE EXPENSE 20.35 101 64420 110
15760 IMPACT SCIENCES 26099 26,855.45
DEPOSIT REFUND 26,855.45 101 22590
15761 DFS COMMERCIAL 26100 1,130.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,130.00 619 64460 210
15762 NU TEK SUPPLY 26101 1,640.00
SMALL TOOLS 1,640.00 527 66520 130
15763 EL REPORTERO 26102 420.00
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 420.00 101 64540 150
15764 CECIL CHAN 26103 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 731 22520
15765 S&C TREE SERVICE 26104 298.44
MISCELLANEOUS 298.44 526 22502
15766 SUMITA FLEMING 26105 351.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 351.75 101 68010 220 1349
15767 JULIE BUTEL 26106 96.00
MISCELLANEOUS 96.00 101 36330 000 1644
15768 MARISSA JOHNSTON 26107 96.00
MISCELLANEOUS 96.00 101 36330 000 1644
15769 WILLIAM SCHMID 26108 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
15739 CINGULAR WIRELESS 24607 1,071.86
UTILITY EXPENSE 1,071.86 896 20281
15740 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 24714 582.80
MISCELLANEOUS 582.80 101 64420 030
15741 THE POWER SOURCE 24718 1,477.61
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,477.61 530 65400 200
15742 A2Z BUSINESS SYSTEMS 25020 1,199.70
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 299.92 101 65150 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 899.78 101 65100 220
15743 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 609.37
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220
15744 KNOX COMPANY 25083 220.83
MISC. SUPPLIES 220.83 619 64460 120
15745 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 2,101.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1646
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,585.00 101 68010 220 1349
15746 ADVANCED MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 25198 1,783.70
RADIO MAINT. 1,783.70 201 65200 205
15747 KRAMER-WIESE 25250 2,922.50
PROFESSIONAL B SPECIALIZED S 2,922.50 101 64420 210
15748 TES 25256 600.86
SUPPLIES 600.86 620 15000
15749 MERCY MARTIN 25270 656.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 656.25 101 68010 220 1661
15750 CARRIE FRANCIS 25286 989.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 989.00 101 68010 220 1349
15751 NICHOLAS BELLAFATTO 25625 1,510.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,510.00 101 68010 220 1331
15752 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25775 264.75
COMMUNICATIONS 264.75 101 65100 160
15753 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTIN 25885 25,002.49
DEPOSIT REFUND 25,002.49 101 22590
( f
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15726 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 1 , 197.26
MISC. SUPPLIES 80.16 101 68010 120 1112
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12.59 619 64460 220 5121
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 224.57 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 861 .00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9.47 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9.47 619 64460 220 5130
15727 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 508.54
COMMUNICATIONS 508.54 101 68020 160 2300
15728 MUSIC SYSTEMS 23956 550.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 550.00 730 69533 220
15729 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521
15730 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 644.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 644.00 101 68010 220 1521
15731 JESUS NAVA 24204 200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 64250 031
15732 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 2,400.00
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 2,400.00 526 69020 290
15733 DPR CONSTRUCTION 24429 2,250.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 2,250.00 101 22520
15734 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 24466 786.09
MISC. SUPPLIES 435.30 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 66.08 619 64460 120
SMALL TOOLS 284.71 619 64460 130
15735 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8.28 130 21015
MISCELLANEOUS 312.32 130 21092
15736 WATER SOLUTIONS 24532 750.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 750.00 526 69020 260
15737 WESTERN STATES SURFACING 24557 22,042.62
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,042.62 320 81130 220
15738 SWRCB FEES 24588 6,406.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 6,406.00 527 66520 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15715 CORE COMMUNICATIONS 23199 1,000.00
.DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,000.00 101 22520
15716 OFFICE MAX 23306 396.67
OFFICE EXPENSE 3.89 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 30.39 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 18.89 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 256.14 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 87.36 621 64450 110
15717 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 196.16
MISC. SUPPLIES 196.16 619 64460 120 5180
15718 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 5,320.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 4,500.00 101 64420 262
TRAINING EXPENSE 820.00 526 69020 260
15719 DATASAFE 23410 923.74
OFFICE EXPENSE 110.72 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 136.29 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 244.09 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 40.04 101 64400 120
BANKING SERVICE FEES 273.35 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 119.25 101 64350 120
15720 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 39,080.87
PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 38,767.32 326 81480 210
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 313.55 326 80931 210
15721 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 27,999.92
PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 27,999.92 327 81150 210
15722 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 11,340.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,340.00 101 68010 220 1331
15723 SBC/MCI 23728 7,959.66
COMMUNICATIONS 35.98 101 67500 160
COMMUNICATIONS 14.57 526 69020 160
UTILITY EXPENSE 7,909.11 896 20281
15724 KEITH MARTIN 23788 91.91
MISC. SUPPLIES 4.21 527 66520 120
TRAVEL&MEETINGS 49.70 619 64460 250
SMALL TOOLS 3.00 620 66700 130
TRAINING EXPENSE 35.00 620 66700 260
15725 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 125.00
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 125.00 619 64460 210 5240
., CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15700 MONICA EHLERS 21627 175.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 175.50 101 68010 220 1661
15701 AUTO DIESEL ELECTRIC INC. 21648 205.19
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 205.19 201 65200 203
15702 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 108.03
SUPPLIES 108.03 620 15000
15703 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 21741 1,641.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,641.50 101 68010 220 1349
15704 CINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 103.26
COMMUNICATIONS 103.26 101 65300 160
15705 SEWER RAT 21821 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
15706 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 606.48
MISCELLANEOUS 134.97 618 64520 604
SUPPLIES 471.51 620 15000
15707 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 1,121.14
MISC. SUPPLIES 525.16 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 595.98 527 66520 120
15708 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT 22358 359.68
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 359.68 201 65200 203
15709 VERI20N WIRELESS 22593 47.31
COMMUNICATIONS 47.31 101 68010 160 1101
15710 MARTIN AND CHAPMAN 22731 15.83
OFFICE EXPENSE 15.83 101 64200 110
15711 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 69020 233
15712 THE DAILY NEWS 22964 113.20
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 113.20 320 80470 220
15713 D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC 23092 95,392.34
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95,392.34 327 81010 220
15714 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 195.07
MISC. SUPPLIES 195.07 101 68010 120 1349
CITY OFBURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15684 PRIORITY 1 19239 45.59
SUPPLIES 45.59 620 15000
15685 JAMES CACCIA PLUMBING 19320 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15686 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 58.77
OFFICE EXPENSE 36.50 101 64250 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 22.27 620 66700 120
15687 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 28.62
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 28.62 201 65200 203
15688 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 - 228.36
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220
15689 CASEY CONSTRUCTION 19820 190,643.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 190,643.00 320 80570 220
15690 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00
RENTS & LEASES 3,914.00 526 69020 180
15691 SIMPLEX GRINNELL 20315 198.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 198.50 619 64460 210 5120
15692 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 333.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 333.00 327 81360 210
15693 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 239.87
SUPPLIES 239.87 620 15000
15694 FERMA CORP. 20568 85.00
MISCELLANEOUS 85.00 526 22502
15695 JEFF DOWD 20779 171.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.00 101 68010 220 1785
15696 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 645.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 645.00 101 68010 220 1331
15697 ESA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 2,606.25
DEPOSIT REFUND 2,606.25 731 22590
15698 CIR 21211 3,497.33
MISC. SUPPLIES 3,497.33 527 66520.120
15699 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 77.12
OFFICE EXPENSE 77.12 101 64250 110
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15669 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 176.00
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 176.00 101 64420 121
15670 TRESSER'S TOW SERVICE 15543 80.00
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 80.00 101 65100 292
15671 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 163.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 163.50 101 68010 220 1787
15672 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 15,386.09
GAS, OIL & GREASE 1,048.45 201 65200 201
SUPPLIES 14,337.64 620 15000
15673 JOE MCCLAIN 16066 280.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 280.00 101 68010. 220 1787
15674 LINDA HOECK 16390 3,870.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,870.00 101 68010 220 1349
15675 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING 17534 34.86
OFFICE EXPENSE 34.86 527 66520 110
15676 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 18.48
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 18.48 625 65213 203
15677 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 2,570.17
SMALL TOOLS 296.63 201 65200 130
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,273.54 201 65200 203
15678 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 211.09
OFFICE EXPENSE 211.09 621 64450 110
15679 CECIL H. WELLS JR & 18403 537.81
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 537.81 320 76010 210
15680 TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH 18419 2,640.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,640.00 130 20018
15681 BAY ALARM 18854 102.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.00 619 64460 220 5230
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 87.50 619 64460 220 5140
15682 COYOTE POINT MUSEUM 18889 1.,440.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,440.00 101 68010 220 1349
15683 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 12.99
MISC. SUPPLIES 12.99 101 68010 120 1785
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15655 SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL LABS 03536 1,993.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,993.00 528 66600 210
15656 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 5,834.12
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,834.12 101 68020 220 2300
15657 U S POSTAL SERVICE 03821 3,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 64250 114
15658 FASTSIGNS 09136 127.74
MISC. SUPPLIES 51.10 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 76.64 619 64460 120 5110
15659 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 119.08
MISC. SUPPLIES 119.08 101 66100 120
15660 ANA FITZGERALD 09975 249.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 249.75 101 68010 220 1646
15661 CAL-STEAM 10557 1,369.78
MISCELLANEOUS 47.79 101 68020 192 2200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 184.04 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 302.72 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 564.88 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 11.15 619 64460 120 5170
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 259.20 619 64460 210 5110
15662 PIP PRINTING 10620 184.03
OFFICE EXPENSE 184.03 101 64100 110
15663 LEE STAMBOLIS 11361 28.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 28.00 101 68010 220 1788
15664 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 1,331.56
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,331.56 527 66520 120
15665 NORTH VALLEY OIL 13815 92.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 92.00 620 66700 120
15666 RECHARGE-EM 14523 75.78
OFFICE EXPENSE 75.78 201 65200 110
15667 HDL COREN&CONE 14750 2,444.73
MISCELLANEOUS 2,444.73 101 30400
15668 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 85.79
MISC. SUPPLIES 85.79 619 64460 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
12/08/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15642 EDWARD R. BACON CO. , INC. 01182 920. 13
SMALL TOOLS 920. 13 527 66520 130
15643 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 384.90
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 384.90 201 65200 203
15644 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 2,035.59
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 199.31 201 65200 203
SUPPLIES 1 ,501 .94 620 15000
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 334.34 625 65213 203
15645 GENE EVANS 02149 161 .25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 161 .25 101 68010 220 1644
15646 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 1 ,811 .29
MISC. SUPPLIES 290.30 101 68020 120 2200
MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,520.99 101 68020 192 2200
15647 FEDEX 02160 63.41
OFFICE EXPENSE 44.42 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 18.99 620 66700 110
15648 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 79.86
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 56.34 201 65200 203
SMALL TOOLS 23.52 619 64460 130
15649 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 3,005.61
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 3,005.61 101 66210 226
15650 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 1 ,339.78
MISC. SUPPLIES 1 ,038.31 619 64460 120 5250
MISC. SUPPLIES 171 .14 619 64460 120 5121
MISC. SUPPLIES 130.33 619 64460 120
15651 P. G. & E. 03054 17,055. 19
GAS & ELECTRIC 17,055.19 101 66100 170
15652 SBC 03080 52.37
COMMUNICATIONS 52.37 101 65100 160
15653 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 428.67
MISC. SUPPLIES 82.27 101 68010 120 1787
MISC. SUPPLIES 346.40 101 68010 120 1780
15654 MARGARET PRENDERGAST 03179 255.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 255.00 101 68010 220 1641
CITY OF BURLINGAME
12.02-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10
FUND RECAP 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 184,612.56
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 16,476.42
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 .4,666.77
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 57,729.73
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 105,375.62
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 278,652.74
WATER FUND 526 13,329.01
SEWER FUND 527 7,478.49
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 4,665.00
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 772.,88
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 6,580.81
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 500.00
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 165.62
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,242.74
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 765.74
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 174,378.47
BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 24,749.94
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 2,582.99
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8884,725.53
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 15517 THROUGH 15641 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF 8884,725.53, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
...........I........................ .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15632 CICELY LEARY 26086 250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22593
15633 JANE QUINN 26087 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
15634 GORDAN MURRAY 26088 1 ,020.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,020.00 101 22525
15635 LUANNE KOCH 26089 61 .00
MISCELLANEOUS 61 .00 101 36330 000 1521
15636 STELLA DAIRE 26090 91 .00
MISCELLANEOUS 91 .00 101 36330 000 1661
15637 ELLIE BYRD 26091 387.00
MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593
MISCELLANEOUS 237.00 101 36330 000 1213
15638 CHERI MCGILVERY 26092 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
15639 PAULA RIEGO DE DIOS 26093 3,375.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,375.00 101 22546
15640 GERALD HAMILTON 26094 1 ,200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,200.00 101 22546
15641 TITUS INDUSTRIAL GROUP INC 26095 793.47
MISC. SUPPLIES 793.47 527 66520 120
TOTAL $884,725.53 , - `
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R RA N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15617 DIANNA HERRMANN 26071 1,800.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,800.00 101 22546
15618 SQUAD FITTERS 26072 140.00
MISCELLANEOUS -5.36 101 23611
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 80.36 101 65100 200
MISCELLANEOUS -5.36 530 23611
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 70.36 530 65400 200
15619 ELEGANT GARDENS 26073 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15620 GOLDEN GREEN LANDSCAPING 26074 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15621 RETAIL CONS. SERVICES 26075 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15622 DAN Ol"BRIEN 26076 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15623 JOHN BRITTA 26077 800.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 800.00 101 22520
15624 CHARLES DART 26078 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15625 MICHAEL LEONG 26079 480.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 480.00 101 22520
15626 MEDITERRANEO DESIGN 26080 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15627 STEPHANIE LUCAS 26081 1,079.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,079.00 101 22546
15628 DAVID LUZURIAGA 26082 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15629 TIM KELSO 26083 275.00
MISCELLANEOUS 275.00 101 22593
15630 MARISSA BORDON 26084 110.00
MISCELLANEOUS 110.00 101 36330 000 1781
15631 PILARCITOS CYCLE SPORTS 26085 125.00
MISCELLANEOUS 125.00 101 22593
1 /
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15602 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,111.96
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,133.71 130 20021
MISCELLANEOUS 978.25 130 20025
15603 RICHARD CALAHAN 24916 2,250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546
15604 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 113.98
UTILITY EXPENSE 113.98 896 20281
15605 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25088 516.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 516.00 101 68010 220 1644
15606 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ELE 25146 90.00
DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 90.00 101 65300 240
15607 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 99.46
OFFICE EXPENSE 72.13 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 27.33 201 65200.111
15608 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 547.43
OFFICE EXPENSE 547.43 101 65100 110
15609 CARRIE FRANCIS 25286 150.00
MISCELLANEOUS 150.00 101 22593
15610 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25731 271.69
UTILITY EXPENSE 271.69 896 20281
15611 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25776 89.58
COMMUNICATIONS 89.58 201 65200 160
15612 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25777 697.92
COMMUNICATIONS 697.92 201 65200 160
15613 J HOWARD ENGINEERING 25811 269,473.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 269,473.50 327 81150 220
15614 MAYA TOGASHI 25940 40.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.50 101 68010 220 1644
15615 KEVIN REYES 25970 180.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 180.00 101 68010 220 1789
15616 DANIEL STROUD 26070 102.00
MISCELLANEOUS 102.00 101 36330 000 1644 .
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15587 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 3,700.00
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 3,700.00 526 69020 290
15588 LCC PENINSULA DIVISION 24407 100.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 101 64150 240
15589 EASYLINK SERVICES CORP 24430 5.00
COMMUNICATIONS 5.00 101 65100 160
15590 COMPUCOM 24467 209.77
SMALL TOOLS 209.77 101 68020 130 2100
15591 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,095.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,095.00 130 20016
15592 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 64.00
UNION DUES 64.00 130 21080
15593 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 180.00
MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024
15594 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 600.00
MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024
15595 C.L.E.A. 24523 663.00
MISCELLANEOUS 663.00 130 20026
15596 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 490.00
UNION DUES 490.00 130 21091
15597 O'NEIL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INC. 24675 707.88
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 707.88 530 65400 200
15598 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 119.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 119.25 101 68010 220 1660
15599 CA ADVANCED IMAGING MED ASSOC 24715 51.00
MISCELLANEOUS 51.00 618 64520 234
15600 AETNA 24760 2,924.37
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,653.07 130 20022
MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028
15601 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 2,348.09
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,348.09 130 20014
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15573 CUTTING EDGE DRAPERY 22880 2,748.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,748.50 320 80790 210
15574 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 8,953.75
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,507.05 320 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,491.96 326 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,954.74 327 79400 210
15575 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 237.28
OFFICE EXPENSE 237.28 101 65300 110
15576 OFFICE MAX 23306 98.19
OFFICE EXPENSE 98.19 101 68010 110 1101
15577 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 208.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.00 101 68010 220 1762
15578 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 542.96
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 542.96 326 73171 210
15579 MILLS PENINSULA EMERGENCY MED,IN 23548 255.00
MISCELLANEOUS 255.00 618 64520 234
15580 GBA MASTER SERIES INC. 23693 10,565.20
TRAINING EXPENSE 1,065.20 101 66210 260
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,000.00 526 69020 220
COMMUNICATIONS 4,000.00 527 66520 160
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,000.00 528 66600 120
TRAINING EXPENSE 500.00 619 64460 260
15581 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 3,665.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,665.00 528 66600 210
15582 KAREN LIU 23823 83.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 83.25 101 68010 220 1646
15583 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,302.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,238.00 101 23620
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210
15584 T&B SPORTS 24035 279.85
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 279.85 101 68010 190 1106
15585 C.F. ARCHIBALD .,24094 52,474.18
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 52,474.18 320 81350 220
15586 D.C. TAPPING SERVICE 24195 375.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 375.00 526 69020 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W AR R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15558 K-119 OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 20924 26.66
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 26.66 101 68020 200 2200
15559 THE BANK OF NEW YORK 21439 1,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 32100
15560 JACKIE COOPER 21469 430.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 430.00 101 68010 220 1646
15561 AUTO DIESEL ELECTRIC INC. 21648 205.19
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 205.19 625 65213 203
15562 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 1,093.85
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,093.85 101 66210 222
15563 SEWER RAT 21821 150.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520
15564 VB GOLF LLC 21948 1,188.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,188.00 101 68010 220 1784
15565 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 - 5,019.75
PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 5,019.75 326 80770 210
15566 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 2,186.16
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,186.16 526 69020 120
15567 OTTO MILLER 22399 70,738.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70,738.00 326 80770 210
15568 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 23,057.81
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,063.93 736 64571 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,31.1.41 736 64572 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,966.60 736 64571 220
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,715.87 736 64572 220
15569 DUNCAN PRINTING 22581 165.62
OFFICE EXPENSE 165.62 621 64450 110
15570 JONES AND MAYER 22818 255.21
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 255.21 101 64350 210
15571 ROBERTA RESTANI 22828 860.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 860.00 101 68010 220 1660
15572 ALLIED IRON CO. 22855 131.63
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 131.63 201 65200 203
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15543 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 115.30
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. -33.43 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 148.73 625 65213 203
15544 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 168.87
SMALL TOOLS 168.87 201 65200 130
15545 ESPOSTO'S RED CARPET CATERING 18385 167.40
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 167.40 101 64420 121
15546 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 239.08
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 239.08 101 64200 150
15547 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 272.27
MISC. SUPPLIES 272.27 201 65200 111
15548 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 254.68
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 173.23 201 65200 203
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 81.45 625 65213 203
15549 DON DORNELL 19617 608.78
MISC. SUPPLIES 608.78 730 69585 120
15550 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 19679 156.96
MISC. SUPPLIES 156.96 730 69560 120
15551 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,692.13
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,692.13 736 64570 220
15552 PENINSULA HOSPITAL 20346 268.00
MISCELLANEOUS 268.00 618 64520 234
15553 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 6,224.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,224.50 327 81360 210
15554 CLAUDE ARRIOLA 20435 400.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.00 101 68010 220 1789
15555 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 3,061.85
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,061.85 326 80910 210
15556 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 283.03
MISCELLANEOUS 283.03 101 64350 031
15557 SPRINT PCS 20724 71.64
COMMUNICATIONS 33.28 101 64150 160
COMMUNICATIONS 38.36 101 64420 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T, E R PAGE 2
12/02/05 ..
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15531 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 1,670.69
MISCELLANEOUS 32.46 201 22585
OFFICE EXPENSE 59.71 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 73.44 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 161.94 201 65200 120
SMALL TOOLS 130.21 201 65200 130
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 632.85 201 65200 140
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 97.00 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 303.09 201 65200 260
MISCELLANEOUS 179.99 731 22554
15532 BURLINGAME SCHOOL DISTRICT 11695 1,615.52
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,615.52 101 68010 120 1646
15533 3m COMPANY 13848 105.80
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 105.80 101 66210 222
15534 DOCUMENT PROCESSING SYSTEMS 13890 428.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 428.00 101 64250 200
15535 SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS 14144 22,521.10
MISC. SUPPLIES 22,521.10 326 80770 120
15536 TRESSER.'S TOW SERVICE 15543 80.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 80.00 101 65100 200
15537 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,109.86
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,109.86 101 65100 220
15538 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 148.75
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 148.75 101 68010 200 1787
15539 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 16247 5,046.15
MISC. SUPPLIES 4,776.15 101 64100 120
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 270.00 101 64100 250
15540 HILTON, FARNKOPF & HOBSON 16656 5,370.05
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,685.03 526 69020 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,685.02 527 66520 210
15541 STANDARD REGISTER 17495 534.01
OFFICE EXPENSE 534.01 101 64250 110
15542 COLORPRINT 17497 155.88
MISC. SUPPLIES 155.88 526 69020 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 1
12/02/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15517 BAUER COMPRESSORS 01309 866.03
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 866.03 201 65200 203
15518 MATTHEW BENDER & CO., INC. 01312 352.36
MISC. SUPPLIES 352.36 101 64350 120
15519 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 219.51
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 219.51 201 65200 203
15520 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 2,197.32
MISCELLANEOUS 2,197.32 896 20282
15521 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 226.94
SMALL TOOLS 226.94 526 69020 130
15522 KAVANAGH ENGINEERING 02665 2,300.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,300.00 101 66100 210 3007
15523 SANDRA POBE 03175 1,760.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,760.00 101 68010 220 1644
15524 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 174,198.48
MISCELLANEOUS 174,198.48 731 22587
15525 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 7,466.72
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,466.72 101 68020 220 2300
15526 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 349.80
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 349.80 101 64350 210
15527 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 6,006.81
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 673.30 618 64520 210
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 5,333.51 618 64520 601
15528 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220
15529 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO-ANIMAL CONTR 11305 133,739.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 133,739.00 101 64560 220
15530 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 807.37
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 807.37 625 65213 203
CITY OF BURLINGAME
11.23-2005 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 150,052.52
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 10,734.21
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 5,846.78
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 916.60
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 6,992.60
WATER FUND 526 5,619.19
SEWER FUND 527 203,777.38
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,111.28
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,057.64
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 196.90
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 6,831.78
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 85,080.74
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 16,636.86
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 744.98
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,907.91
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1,777.53
UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 50,887.65
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $552,172.55
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 15413 THROUGH 15516 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $552,172.55, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
J
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15515 KINKOS 26021 58.46
OFFICE EXPENSE 58.46 101 65300 110
15516 COMET MICRO SYSTEMS 26069 648.60
SMALL TOOLS 648.60 326 80770 130
TOTAL 8552,172.55
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15500 THE COBBLER 25176 4,278.76
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 4,278.76 201 65200 140
15501 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 62.30
OFFICE EXPENSE 62.30 201 65200 110
15502 OFFICE DEPOT 25488 40.81
OFFICE EXPENSE 40.81 101 64200 110
15503 ED PHILLIPS 25603 1,500.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546
MISCELLANEOUS -1,500.00 101 31510
15504 SC FUELS 25627 17,340.17
GAS, OIL & GREASE 17,340.17 101 65100 201
15505 FAST AGGREGATE PRODUCTS CO 25695 553.31
MISC. SUPPLIES 553.31 101 66210 120
15506 F.A. POLI TRUCKING 25696 807.18
MISC. SUPPLIES 807.18 101 66210 120
15507 VALERIE ASHE 25716 435.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 435.75 101 68010 220 1660
15508 CINGULAR WIRELESS-ATLYS 25730 61.46
COMMUNICATIONS 61.46 101 65100 160
15509 LARSON CONSULTING 25732 1,472.60
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,472.60 327 80730 210
15510 DIANE LABRADOR 25781 1,800.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,800.00 101 22546
15511 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 251.48
RENTS & LEASES 251.48 526 69020 180
15512 SAN JOSE BLUE 25886 268.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 43.27 326 80950 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 89.15 326 80770 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 135.58 326 80950 120
15513 YA LIN KAO 25909 52.00
MISCELLANEOUS 52.00 101 36330 000 1349
15514 RONG LI 25911 52.00
MISCELLANEOUS 52.00 101 36330 000 1349
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15486 KEITH MARTIN 23788 72.75
TRAINING EXPENSE 50.00 526 69020 260
MISC. SUPPLIES 7.50 527 66520 120
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 9.25 527 66520 250
MISC. SUPPLIES 6.00 620 66700 120
15487 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,621.51
BANKING SERVICE FEES 548.70 101 64250 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,072.81 530 65400 120
15488 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 1,567.23
MISC. SUPPLIES 477.39 101 68010 120 1114
MISC. SUPPLIES 955.87 101 68010 120 1111
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 133.97 619 64460 220 5121
15489 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 77.80
MISC. SUPPLIES 77.80 101 65300 120
15490 BRET BOTTARINI 24049 1,600.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,600.00 101 22520
15491 C.F. ARCHIBALD 24094 750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502
15492 SAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 8,024.86
OFFICE EXPENSE 8,024.86 101 64250 110 _
15493 SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER 24408 2,100.00 -
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 2,100.00 101 65100 292
15494 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 196.90
MISCELLANEOUS 196.90 618 64520 234
15495 DATA 911 24689 3,978.19
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 3,978.19 620 66700 800
15496 GREG TERRY 24814 3,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546
15497 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 186.33
MISC. SUPPLIES 186.33 527 66520 120
15498 DANIEL HAAS 25049 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
15499 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 520.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 520.00 730 69583 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
°* 1 Denotes Hand Written Checks
15475 FIRE SERVICE SPECIFICATION & SUP 22705 198.25
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 198.25 201 65200 203
15476 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 435.00
UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281
15477 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 4,479.05
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 4,479.05 201 65200 140
15478 PITNEY BOWES 23128 2, 192.00
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 2, 192.00 621 64450 200
15479 OFFICE MAX 23306 368.51
OFFICE EXPENSE 9.69 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 22.34 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 78.28 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE -151 .21 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE -53.29 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 7.41 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 78.26 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 15.58 101 64400 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 59.22 101 68010 110 1330
OFFICE EXPENSE 170.05 101 66100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 132. 18 101 68010 110 1101
15480 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 157.58
MISC. SUPPLIES 157.58 619 64460 120 5240
15481 GREG MILANO 23346 4,220.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 300.00 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 540.00 101 68010 120 1423
MISC. SUPPLIES 375.00 101 68010 120 1422
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,005.00 101 68010 220 1212
15482 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105.00
MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518
15483 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. 23462 984.83
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 984.83 530 65400 200
15484 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 470.32
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 87.69 101 66210 226
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 382.63 320 80790 210
15485 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 41 .05
MISC. SUPPLIES 41 .05 619 64460 120 5130
f
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15461 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 734.56
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 154.24 101 66100 200
OFFICE EXPENSE 156.50 201 65500 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 92.31 620 66700 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 331.51 621 64450 110
15462 BASIM AZAR 21552 300.00
DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520
15463 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 72.57
BLDG. &GROUNDS MAINT. 72.57 621 64450 190
15464 HILLYARD 21658 958.12
MISC. SUPPLIES 958.12 101 68020 120 2200
15465 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 195.79
SUPPLIES 195.79 620 15000
15466 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 206.12
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 206.12 101 66210 222
15467 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 17,893.45
MISCELLANEOUS 17,893.45 101 37010
15468 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES 21769 1,968.47
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,968.47 320 79160 220
15469 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLERS OFF 21897 14,304.00 ..
MISCELLANEOUS 14,304.00 101 37010
15470 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 95.05
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 95.05 320 81350 210
15471 ALL PETROLEUM RECOVERY SERVICE, 22008 95.00
GAS, OIL&GREASE 95.00 201 65200 201
15472 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 2,412.63
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,849.77 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 562.86 527 66520 120
15473 ARMOR HOLDINGS TRAINING DIVISION 22412 315.00
MISCELLANEOUS •24.54 101 23611
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 339.54 101 65100 292
15474 ALTEC INDUSTRIES 22466 79,996.75
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 79,996.75 620 66700 800
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
15445 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 102.38
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 102.38 320 80470 220
15446 SIX FLAGS MARINE WORLD 19119 7,182.62
MISC. SUPPLIES 271.83 101 68010 120 1422
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,910.79 101 68010 220 1212
15447 BURTON-S FIRE, INC. 19366 339.63
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 339.63 625 65213 203
15448 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210
15449 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 19679 114.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 114.75 201 65200 120
15450 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 1,765.74
COMMUNICATIONS _ 1,765.74 621 64450 160
15451 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 158.20
SUPPLIES 158.20 620 15000
15452 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 5,520.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,520.00 327 75170 210
15453 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 495.00
DEPOSIT REFUND 495.00 731 22590
15454 FERMA CORP. 20568 580.00
MISCELLANEOUS 580.00 526 22502
15455 BRIDGE WIRELESS 20633 263.50
SUPPLIES 263.50 620 15000
15456 CATHERINE J.M. NILMEYER 20801 350.00
MISCELLANEOUS 350.00 731 22525
15457 PACIFIC COAST TRANE SERVICE 20818 78%00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 781.00 619 64460 210 5110
15458 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 12,275.04
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 12,275.04 621 64450 800
15459 ESA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 21160 932.53
DEPOSIT REFUND 932.53 731 22590
15460 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 725.44
MISC. SUPPLIES 725.44 527 66520 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hard Written Checks
15430 OCE 09493 857.34
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 857.34 101 66100 210
15431 NOEL L. MILLER, INC, 09499 1,235.97
VEHICLE MAINT. .845.97 201 65200 202
SUPPLIES 390.00 620 15000
15432 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 2,200.85
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 2,137.94 526 69020 230
MISC. SUPPLIES 27.06 619 64460 120 5240
MISC. SUPPLIES 35.85 619 64460 120 5250
15433 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 133.00
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 133.00 101 64420 121
15434 AIR EXCHANGE, INC 15625 1,287.11
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,287.11 619 64460 210 5160
15435 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 4.33
OFFICE EXPENSE 4.33 101 65100 110
15436 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 119.08
TRAINING EXPENSE 119.08 101 66210 260
15437 COMMUNITY GATEPATH 16575 3,015.00
MISCELLANEOUS 3,015.00 101 22546
15438 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 13,863.46
MISCELLANEOUS 13,863.46 101 22515
15439 COLORPRINT 17497 937.34
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 937.34 101 64560 210
15440 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 449.64
OFFICE EXPENSE 353.64 101 65100 110
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 96.00 101 65100 200
15441 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 25,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 25,000.00 101 22546
15442 PENINSULA CONFLICT 18633 7,480.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,480.50 101 64560 220
15443 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 211.20
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 211.20 101 64420 121
15444 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 195.52
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.52 201 65200 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A RR A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15423 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY .CASH 03910 5,898.87
MISCELLANEOUS 6.00 101 36330 000 1283
MISCELLANEOUS 14.00 101 36330 000 1780
MISCELLANEOUS 18.00 101 36330 000 1331
OFFICE EXPENSE 668.34 101 68010 110 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 116.34 101 68010 120 1101
MISC. SUPPLIES 22.23 101 68010 120 1520
MISC. SUPPLIES 13.80 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 269.61 101 68010 120 1521
MISC. SUPPLIES 74.73 101 68020 120 2300
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 37.87 101 68020 140 2200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 16.00 101 68020 200 2300
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 101 68010 220 1646
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 750.00 101 68010 220 1331
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 380.00 101 68010 220 1422
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 132.53 101 68010 220 1349
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 419.00 101 68010 220 1644
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 134.00 101 68010 220 1645
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 120.00 101 68010 240 1101
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 60.00 101 68020 240 2100
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 165.00 101 68010 240 1100
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 270.00 101 68020 240 2300
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 145.00 101 68020 240 2100
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 170.00 101 68020 250 2300
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 140.00 101 69537 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 243.51 101 68020 250 2100
MISC. SUPPLIES 787.91 730 69533 120
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 730 69533 220
15424 JEAN BUCKS 09019 367.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 367.50 101 68010 220 1644
15425 MUFFIE CALBREATH 09125 821.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 821.25 101 68010 220 1891
15426 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 2,258.10
MISC. SUPPLIES 2,258.10 101 66100 120
15427 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 1,456.00
PRISONER EXPENSE 1,456.00 101 65100 291
15428 STERICYCLE, INC. 09439 34.24
SUPPLIES 34.24 201 65200 112
15429 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES 09461 3,298.25
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,298.25 320 81Q90 210
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
11/23/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*' Denotes Hand Written Checks
15413 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 405.35
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 405.35 625 65213 203
15414 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 273.87
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT - 273.87 201 65200 140
15415 VEOLIA WATER 02110 202,286.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 202,286.00 527 66530 220
15416 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157. 544.92
MISCELLANEOUS 544.92 101 68020 192 2200
15417 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,392.39
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,392.39 101 66210 226
15418 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 3,151.90
MISC. SUPPLIES 280.17 619 64460 120 5150
MISC. SUPPLIES - 179.27 619 64460 120 5260
MISC. SUPPLIES 106.84 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 553.50 619 64460 120 5260
MISC. SUPPLIES 678.73 619 64460 120 5120
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,353.39 619 64460 120 5250
15419 P. G. & E. 03054 50,115.55
UTILITY EXPENSE 50,115.55 896 20280
15420 SBC 03080 337.10
UTILITY EXPENSE 337.10 896 20281
15421 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 1,216.26
MISC. SUPPLIES 36.26 619 64460 120 5240
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 590.00 619 64460 210 5170
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 590.00 619 64460 210 5150
15422 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 350.00 101 65100 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
11-18-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 13
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 94,511.67
PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 3,722.50
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 2,206.06
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 56,487.00
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 651,170.55
WATER FUND 526 18,175.85
SEWER FUND 527 3,751.20
SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,123.34
PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,500.51
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 24,275.76
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 17,222.49
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 4,093.39
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 33,121.85
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,754.10
OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 918.06
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 799.57
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $917,833.90
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 13
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 15284 THROUGH 15412 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF $917,833.90, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.....................I...I.......... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 12
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15410 KENNETH NEUMANN 26065 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 36330 000 1644
15411 YOLANDA VALLE 26066 80.00
MISCELLANEOUS 80.00 101 36330 000 1422
15412 EDDIE MOORE 26068 626.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 626.00 130 20015
TOTAL $917,833.90
iH�, 1��
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15394 JENNI HEATH 26049 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
15395 AMY MING CHOU 26050 40.00
MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1422
15396 LORRAINE CHARAS 26051 40.00
MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1422
15397 JENNIFER PFAFF 26052 139.00
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 139.00 618 64520 601
15398 D CLEARY 26053 4,860.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,860.00 101 22546
15399 MAFOA KUPU 26054 800.00
MISCELLANEOUS 800.00 101 22593
15400 SUZANNA SENNETT 26055 336.00
MISCELLANEOUS 336.00 101 36330 000 1330
15401 HEIDI LEUPP 26056 40.00
MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1422
15402 LUZMILLA MERTENS 26057 25.00
MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 101 36330 000 1660
15403 GLEN NASH 26058 110.00
MISCELLANEOUS 110.00 101 36330 000 1781
15404 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC. 26059 1,374.31
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,374.31 625 65213 203
15405 ROBERT SMITH 26060 47.00
MISCELLANEOUS 47.00 101 36330 000 1645
15406 MARSHA KUNZ 26061 252.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00 101 68010 220 1660
15407 CHRISTIANNE BARROGA 26062 250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22593
15408 DEBORAH SULLIVAN 26063 93.00
MISCELLANEOUS 93.00 101 36330 000 1644
15409 RONALD SIDDONS 26064 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 36330 000 1644
CITY OF BURLINGAME
WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15379 S AND S SUPPLIES $ SOLUTIONS 24963 823.33
MISC. SUPPLIES 133.48 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 689.85 527 66520 120
15380 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 1,394.53
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,394.53 530 65400 220
15381 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 25084 - 185.00
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 185.00 201 65200 140
15382 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 304.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 223.57 101 65100 110
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 81.18 530 65400 200
15383 MOTION PICTURE LICENSING CORP 25253 427.00
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 427.00 101 68010 240 1101
15384 JILL JOHNSON 25373 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
15385 JANE DONAHUE 26000 53.00
MISCELLANEOUS 53.00 101 36330 000 1645
15386 EDMOND'S PLAZA FLORIST 26041 63.87
MISC. SUPPLIES 63.87 101 65100 120
15387 MARIA PERAZA 26042 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
15388 DENISE MARTIN 26043 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
15389 SHERI BASS 26044 110.00
MISCELLANEOUS 110.00 101 36330 000 1781
15390 JIM BREEN 26045 625.00
MISCELLANEOUS 625.00 101 22546
15391 PRISTINE AUTO DETAIL 26046 50.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 50.00 101 65100 200
15392 MADELEINE FIORE 26047 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 36330 000 1644
15393 ISIDOR COLON 26048 93.00
MISCELLANEOUS 93.00 101 36330 000 1644
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Nand Written Checks
15374 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 5,546.74
OFFICE EXPENSE 60.02 101 68010 110 1100
OFFICE EXPENSE 35.59 101 67500 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 161.24 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 109.67 101 67500 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 5.40 101 65300 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.65 101 68010 120 1890
MISC. SUPPLIES 266.66 101 68010 120 1780
MISC. SUPPLIES 316.64 101 67500 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 40.00 101 68020 120 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 3.78 101 68010 120 1100
MISC. SUPPLIES 83.92 101 68010 120 1330
MISC. SUPPLIES 119.08 101 68010 120 1781
MISC. SUPPLIES 429.28 101 68010 120 1521
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 24.75 101 64420 121
LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 70.41 101 67500 129
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 75.00 101 64420 150
COMMUNICATIONS 191.02 101 65100 160
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 108.86 101 67500 190
MISCELLANEOUS 438.40 101 68020 192 2200
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 287.40 101 64420 250
TRAVEL &MEETINGS 758.00 101 66100 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 110.00 101 64100 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 62.29 101 69537 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 38.94 101 64420 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS - 26.00 101 64150 250
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 602.36 526 69020 250
MISC. SUPPLIES 116.88 527 66520 120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 169.00 620 66700 210
MISC. SUPPLIES 417.81 730 69583 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 198.38 730 69533 120
LIBRARY EXPENSES 188.69 731 22531
MISCELLANEOUS 5.62 731 22553
15375 BRIAN MCKAGUE 24778 417.50
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 417.50 130 20060
15376 SHIRLEY LADDY 24826 895.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 895.00 130 20015
15377 MARK BURAN 24904 4,200.00
MISCELLANEOUS 4,200.00 101 22546
15378 SHAWNELL HARRISON 24938 261.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 261.00 130 20060
J / '
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Nand Written Checks
15369 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 585.63
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 179.69 619 64460 210 5240
SUPPLIES 405.94 620 15000
15370 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 816.80
PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 547.50 101 64420 121
MISCELLANEOUS 269.30 618 64520 234
15371 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 100.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 101 65300 240
15372 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 75.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 75.00 619 64460 210 5121
15373 SPRINGERWEST LLC 24704 810.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 810.00 101 68010 220 1660
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15359 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160
15360 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 13,967.45
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,176.00 619 64460 220 5130
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 465.00 619 64460 220 5121
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,974.00 619 64460 220 5180
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 958.00 619 64460 220 5210
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,802.00 619 64460 220 5240
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,807.00 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 358.00 619 64460 220 5170
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 145.00 619 64460 220 5230
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 408.45 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 874.00 619 64460 220 5190
15361 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 656.10
SUPPLIES 656.10 620 15000
15362 HUGO CURLIONIS 24077 1,330.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,330.00 101 22546
15363 QUILL 24090 193.98
OFFICE EXPENSE 193.98 621 64450 110
15364 GEMPLERS, INC. 24196 186.90
SMALL TOOLS 186.90 527 66520 130
15365 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 576.00
MISCELLANEOUS 576.00 526 69020 233
15366 THE BERKELEY CHESS SCHOOL 24287 3,610.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,610.00 101 68010 220 1349
15367 A&G SERVICES 24400 8,000.00
DITCH & CREEK CLEANING EXPEN 5,500.00 101 66210 223
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,500.00 320 79400 220
15368 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 647,809.55
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 647,809.55 327 79480 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15347 CUTTERS EDGE 22407 462.98
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 462.98 201 65200 203
15348 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 375.00
MISCELLANEOUS 375.00 731 22554
15349 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 9,733.00
CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 9,733.00 618 64520 225
15350 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 497.74
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 302.94 101 65100 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 194.80 530 65400 140
15351 ALLIANCE GAS PRODUCTS 23245 30.53
GAS, OIL & GREASE 30.53 201 65200 201
15352 SIERRA OFFICE SUPPLIES 23301 1,540.25
OFFICE EXPENSE 16.32 101 64150 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 398.89 101 66210 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 25.41 101 64350 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 60.54 101 65100 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 9.10 101 64200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,029.99 10166210 120
15353 OFFICE MAX 23306 - 310.01
OFFICE EXPENSE 107.79 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 10.93 101 64200 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 161.73 101 64250 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 29.56 201 65200 110
15354 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200
15355 KAREN SCHEIKOWITZ 23507 138.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 138.40 101 68010 220 1660
15356 COLAINE ROEPKE 23574 47.00
MISCELLANEOUS 47.00 101 36330 000 1645
15357 SBC/MCI 23728 176.60
COMMUNICATIONS 176.60 621 64450 160
15358 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 1,540.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,540.00 526 69020 233
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
*` Denotes Hand Written Checks
15333 CENTRAL GARDEN CENTER 20300 373.05
MISC. SUPPLIES 373.05 101 68020 120 2200
15334 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 20394 125.00
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 125.00 101 66100 240
15335 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 1,394.13
SUPPLIES 1,394.13 620 15000
15336 SPRINT PCS 20724 230.26
MISCELLANEOUS 230.26 731 22554
15337 JEFF DOWD 20779 171.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.00 101 68010 220 1785
15338 PHYLLIS E. EVERSON 20833 301.87
MISC. SUPPLIES 301.87 730 69585 120
15339 BRIAN BLANTON 20950 600.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 101 68010 220 1781
15340 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 885.70
MISC. SUPPLIES 535.12 101 66210 120
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 350.58 101 66210 219
15341 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 889.57
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 667.93 619 64460 220 5110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221.64 619 64460 220 5130
15342 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 3,080.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,750.00 101 64420 210
TRAINING EXPENSE 399.00 101 66210 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 399.00 526 69020 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 399.00 527 66520 260
TRAINING EXPENSE 133.00 619 64460 260
15343 STAR COFFEE INC. 21623 173.00
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 173.00 621 64450 190
15344 ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. 21749 1,830.00
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,830.00 530 65400 200
15345 REED EQUIPMENT CO 21980 107.43
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 107.43 101 68020 200 2200
15346 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT 22382 1,200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,200.00 101 68010 220 1785
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15319 TEAM CLEAN 15827 330.71
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 330.71 201 65200 220
15320 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 204.73
SUPPLIES 204.73 620 15000
15321 SYDNEY MNLK00 16347 134.23
SMALL TOOLS 134.23 620 66700 130
15322 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 821.70
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 821.70 101 68020 140 2200
15323 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 17248 426.96
COMMUNICATIONS 426.96 526 69020 160
15324 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 245.82
COMMUNICATIONS 122.91 101 65100 160
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 122.91 101 65100 200
15325 COLORPRINT 17497 99.05
OFFICE EXPENSE 99.05 101 64200 110
15326 SOUTH BAY CONSTRUCTION 18093 1,470.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,470.00 101 22546
15327 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 25,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS 25,000.00 101 22546
15328 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY - 18990 161.21
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 161.21 201 65200 140
15329 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,406.55
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 425.74 101 66210 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 302.06 526 69020 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 425.73 527 66520 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 12.06 528 66600 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 87.04 619 64460 140
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 153.92 620 66700 140
15330 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 103.16
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 103.16 625 65213 203
15331 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210
15332 CASEY CONSTRUCTION 19820 53,987.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 53,987.00 320 80570 220
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15307 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,493.75
MISC. SUPPLIES 112.43 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 151.51 101 68020 120 2200
SMALL TOOLS 109.97 101 68020 130 2200
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 40.58 101 68020 190 2200
MISCELLANEOUS 92.87 101 68020 192 2200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 29.20 101 65150 200
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 12.98 101 66210 222
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 68.45 101 65100 292
SMALL TOOLS 142.71 201 65200 130
MISC. SUPPLIES 459.05 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 93.94 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 11.89 619 64460 120 5130
MISC. SUPPLIES 168.17 619 64460 120 5150
15308 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 580.22
MISC. SUPPLIES 580.22 201 65200 111
15309 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 813.06
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 813.06 625 65213 203
15310 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY 11532 748.01
POLICE--SUPPLIES 748.01 101 65100 126
15311 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 21.43
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 21.43 201 65200 203
15312 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 1,823.35
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,823.35 527 66520 120
15313 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 275.32
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 275.32 625 65213 203
15314 RECHARGE-EM 14523 70.36
OFFICE EXPENSE 70.36 201 65200 110
15315 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 14692 16.28
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 16.28 101 68020 190 2200
15316 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 687.39
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 687.39 619 64460 210
15317 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,455.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,455.40 .101 65100 220
15318 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 362.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 362.75 101 68010 220 1787
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R - PAGE 2
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15295 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 561.82
MISC. SUPPLIES 561.82 101 68010 120 1780
15296 DOROTHY RADYK 03235 495.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 495.00 101 68010 220 1644
15297 BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY 03361 13,588.75
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 13,588.75 526 69020 240
15298 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 12,447.96
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,447.96 101 68020 220 2300
15299 ROBERT GOODMAN 09048 86.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86.00 101 68010 220 1660
15300 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 24.33
MISC. SUPPLIES 24.33 526 69020 120
15301 FRANK ERBACHER 09195 1,322.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,322.00 130 20015
15302 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210
15303 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 3,361.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,361.00 327 81150 210
15304 ABAG . LIABILITY 09518 14,134.46
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,681.00 618 64520 210
CLAIMS PAYMENTS 12,453.46 618 64520 601
15305 BERNARD EDWARDS 09548 1,935.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,935.00 101 68010 220 1762
15306 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 2,799.16
MISC. SUPPLIES 5.55 101 68020 120 2200
SMALL TOOLS 301.97 101 68020 130 2200
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 168.78 101 68020 200 2200
MISCELLANEOUS 2,235.89 101 68020 400 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 86.97 526 69020 120
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
11/18/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15284 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 357.49
TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 25.92 101 66210 222
MISC. SUPPLIES 187.12 619 64460 120 5180
MISC. SUPPLIES 78.44 619 64460 120 5230
MISC. SUPPLIES 40.05 619 64460 120 5150
MISC. SUPPLIES 25.96 619 64460 120 5130
15285 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 188.25
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 188.25 625 65213 203
15286 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 31,005.12
COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160
CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 30,705.12 621 64450 220
15287 GENE EVANS 02149 215.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 215.00 101 68010 220 1644
15288 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,351.18
STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,351.18 101 66210 226
15289 PENINSULA BATTERIES 02625 1,075.25
MISCELLANEOUS 120.18 101 68020 192 2200
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.23 619 64460 120 5130
SUPPLIES 938.84 620 15000
15290 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 1,076.34
MISC. SUPPLIES 56.20 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 8.47 101 68020 120 2200
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 345.74 101 68020 190 2200
SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 244.75 101 66210 219
MISC. SUPPLIES 170.37 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 5.32 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 143.54 619 64460 120 5180
MISC. SUPPLIES 101.95 619 64460 120 5120
15291 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 473.06
MISC. SUPPLIES 473.06 101 68020 120 2200
15292 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23
GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170
15293 ALFRED J. PALMER 03085 201.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 201.00 130 20015
15294 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 227.85
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 191.35 201 65200 203
SUPPLIES 36.50 620 15000
CITY OF BURLINGAME
11-10-2005 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 9
FUND RECAP - 05-06
NAME FUND AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND 101 29,264.01
CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 2,939.44
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 211,880.05
WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 41,000.77
SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 63,671.26
WATER FUND 526 10,110.27
SEWER FUND 527 53,486.94
SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 11,266.50
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 2,372.74
EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 51,209.94
INFORMATIONSERVICES FUND 621 132.06
FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 254.33
TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1,286.03
STATE GRANTS FUND 734 4,552.49
DEBT SERVICE FUND 930 750.00
TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $4z
4 176.83
�g,.sv>
979a.70yV"1D Aff
8dd
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9
INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 15148 THROUGH 15255 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN
THE AMOUNT OF 5484,176.83, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER
OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
.................................... .../.../...
FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.................................... .../.../...
COUNCIL DATE
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15243 JUDITH KEEL 26028 1,925.00
MISCELLANEOUS 1,925.00 101 22546
15244 IDVILLE 26029 70.20
OFFICE EXPENSE 70.20 101 64420 110
15245 LORI BAINTON 26030 50.00
MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593
15246 MARVIN WIEDEMER 26031 75.00
MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593
15247 JOHN WATTERSON 26032 900.00
MISCELLANEOUS 900.00 101 22546
15248 SAN MATEO COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH S 26033 250.00
MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 22593
15249 BECKY SAN DIEGO 26034 60.00
MISCELLANEOUS 60.00 101 36330 000 1660
15250 SUETT WONG 26035 30.00
MISCELLANEOUS 30.00 101 36330 000 1660
15251 LINDA SAN FELIPE 26036 94.00
MISCELLANEOUS 94.00 101 36330 000 1645
15252 FLORENCE CHEN 26037 48.00
MISCELLANEOUS 48.00 101 36330 000 1644
15253 KRISTEN DUMONT BRENT 26038 63.00
MISCELLANEOUS 63.00 101 36330 000 1782
15254 CHRISTINE CHAN 26039 132.00
MISCELLANEOUS 132.00 101 36330 000 1330
15255 MARGARET MCDONNELL 26040 27.00
MISCELLANEOUS 27.00 101 36330 000 1644
TOTAL $484,176.83
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15227 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 224.37
OFFICE EXPENSE 169.70 201 65200 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 54.67 201 65200 111
15228 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 86.59
POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 86.59 101 65100 292
15229 PAUL CLAY 25282 112.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.00 101 68010 220 1788
15230 ROCHE GEORGE 25323 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788
15231 CRW SYSTEMS INC 25337 40,000.00
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 40,000.00 320 81300 210 -
15232 LORAL LANDSCAPING 25394 160.00
BLDG. 8 GROUNDS MAINT. 160.00 527 66520 190
15233 BAY AREA EDUCATIONAL THEATER 25611 895.37
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 895.37 101 68010 220 1646
15234 TOSETTI ELECTRIC CO 25668 1,807.43
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 1,807.43 326 73171 210
15235 JEFF GALVIZ SR 25721 28.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 28.00 -101 68010 220 1788
15236 TOM MONTROSS 25723 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788
15237 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25727 63.34
COMMUNICATIONS 63.34 101 64250 160
15238 DAN PAULUS 25917 470.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 470.00 201 65200 260
15239 ADCOM/BHS 26024 4,552.49
MISCELLANEOUS 4,552.49 734 65198 400
15240 AMERICAN BLINDS AND DRAPERIES 26025 1,346.42
PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 1,346.42 320 80790 210
15241 TOUT ABOUT TOYS 26026 330.28
MISC. SUPPLIES 330.28 101 68010 120 1330
15242 MRS. E.R. BURROWS 26027 436.34
MISCELLANEOUS 436.34 526 22502
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15216 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 3,794.82
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,794.82 320 80520 220
15217 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521
15218 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 221 .60
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 221 .60 101 68010 220 1521
15219 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 24466 156.63
MISC. SUPPLIES 156.63 619 64460 120
15220 BEACON FIRE & SAFETY 24535 956.79
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 334.40 619 64460 210 5140
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 54.47 619 64460 210 5170
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 36.00 619 64460 210 5160
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 99.00 619 64460 210 5120
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 108.59 619 64460 210 5180
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 145.40 619 64460 210 5150
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 178.93 619 64460 210 5110
15221 SWRCB FEES 24588 3,274.00
OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 3,274.00 527 66530 270
15222 DATA 911 24689 49,278.54
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 49,278.54 620 66700 800
15223 HEADSETS.COM 24746 382.01
MISC. SUPPLIES 382.01 101 68010 120 1101
15224 I .M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 2,602.33
MISC. SUPPLIES 42.19 201 65200 111
MISC. SUPPLIES 139.86 201 65200 120
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 133.11 201 65200 190
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 109.51 201 65200 203
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 834.63 201 65200 250
TRAINING EXPENSE 57.00 201 65200 260
MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,286.03 731 22554
15225 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 1 ,347.08
MISC. SUPPLIES 785.40 527 66520 120
SMALL TOOLS 162.52 527 66520 130
TRAINING EXPENSE 399. 16 527 66520 260
15226 JESSE MOORE 25104 200.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 101 68010 220 1780
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A NT R E G I S T E R PAGE 5
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
�•� Denotes Hand Written Checks
15203 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 203.51
MISC. SUPPLIES 203.51 101 65100 120
15204 BONDLOGISTIX 23088 1,500.00
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 375.00 526 69020 764
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES - 375.00 527 66520 764
OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 750.00 930 66840 764
15205 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00
MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031
15206 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 8,373.75
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 2,344.65 320 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 3,265.76 326 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 2,763.34 327 79400 210
15207 OFFICE MAX 23306 306.23
OFFICE EXPENSE 214.07 101 68010 170 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 92.16 101 66100 110
15208 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 614.00
TRAINING EXPENSE 614.00 526 69020 260
15209 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 47.80
MISC. SUPPLIES 47.80 619 64460 120
15210 AT&T 23661 24.56
COMMUNICATIONS 24.56 621 64450 160
15211 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 896.51
MISC. SUPPLIES 298.83 101 66210 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 298.84 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 298.84 527 66520 120
15212 SBC/MCI 23728 50.38
COMMUNICATIONS 36.08 101 67500 160
COMMUNICATIONS 14.30 526 69020 160
15213 DAVE CREAMER 23876 912.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 912.00 101 68010 220 1644
15214 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 4,869.00
RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 4,869.00 101 66210 218
15215 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 186.98
COMMUNICATIONS 186.98 619 64460 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15188 RACQUET SMITH 20339 1,003.20
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,003.20 101 68010 220 1782
15189 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 5,270.96
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,270.96 327 81360 210
15190 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 20394 187.50
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 187.50 101 66100 240
15191 CONTROL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. 20421 92,122.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 25,794.16 320 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 35,927.58 326 79400 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 30,400.26 327 79400 210
15192 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 5,520.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,520.00 327 75170 210
15193 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 155.90
MISCELLANEOUS 155.90 101 64350 031
15194 LAWRENCE S. MOY 20954 765.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.00 101 68010 220 1762
15195 CDN GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 161.33
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 84.30 101 64350 200
MISC. SUPPLIES 77.03 526 69020 120
15196 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 55.76
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 55.76 625 65213 203
15197 LINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 104.82
COMMUNICATIONS 104.82 101 65300 160
15198 GREG BARNES 21885 700.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700.00 101 68010 220 1781
15199 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 61.55
MISC. SUPPLIES 61.55 526 69020 120
15200 UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 22305 19,935.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 19,935.00 320 80520 210
15201 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 110,817.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110,817.00 320 80520 220
15202 DAVID DJANIKIAN 22447 112.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 112.00 101 68010 220 1788
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
'•' Denotes Hand Written Checks
15173 STANDARD REGISTER 17495 772.59
OFFICE EXPENSE 772.59 101 64250 110
15174 COLORPRINT 17497 6.50
OFFICE EXPENSE 6.50 101 66210 110 '
15175 DUKE'S SALES & SERVICE, INC 18082 750.00
MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502
15176 MICHAEL ADAM 18275 268.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 101 68010 220 1785
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788
15177 PENINSULA PUMP & 18450 10,102.04
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 10,102.04 527 66520 230
15178 SAMCEDA 18568 65.00
TRAVEL & MEETINGS 65.00 101 64100 250
15179 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 63.64
COMMUNICATIONS 31.82 526 69020 160
COMMUNICATIONS 31.82 527 66520 160
15180 BULBMAN 18811 51.05
MISCELLANEOUS -3.73 101 23611
OFFICE EXPENSE 54.78 101 68010 110 1101
15181 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 4,635.60
UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 4,635.60 526 69020 140
15182 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 268.00
PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 268.00 101 64200 150
15183 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 98.43
MISC. SUPPLIES 98.43 201 65200 120
15184 BURTON-S FIRE, INC. 19366 331.35
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 331.35 201 65200 203
15185 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220
15186 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75
OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101
15187 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 107.50
COMMUNICATIONS 107.50 621 64450 160
CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15159 SNAP ON TOOLS 03587 116.85
SMALL TOOLS 116.85 620 66700 130
15160 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 60.29
MISC. SUPPLIES 60.29 101 64350 120
15161 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 126.99
MISC. SUPPLIES 79.88 619 64460 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 47.11 619 64460 120 5240
15162 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 09402 45.00
MISC. SUPPLIES 45.00 101 64400 120
15163 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 11,266.50
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,266.50 618 64520 210
15164 CAL-STEAM 10557 1,670.57
MISCELLANEOUS 331.58 101 68020 192 2200
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 5.74 20165200 203
MISC. SUPPLIES 1,295.64 527 66520 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 37.61 619 64460 120
15165 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER 11101 567.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 567.00 101 64350 210
15166 LEE STAMBOLIS 11361 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788
15167 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 613.02
PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 79.89 526 69020 230
MISC. SUPPLIES 533.13 619 64460 120
15168 DON E. GIOVANNETTI 15229 224.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 224.00 101 68010 220 1788
15169 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC 15395 2,000.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,000.00 327 81010 220
15170 TIM OLENO 15629 168.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1788
15171 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 16460 178.69
MISC. SUPPLIES 178.69 101 68010 120 1330
15172 HILTON, FARNKOPF & HOBSON 16656 4,786.48
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,393.24 526 69020 210
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,393.24 527 66520 210
� CITY OF BURLINGAME
W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1
11/10/05
NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT
Denotes Hand Written Checks
15148 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 2,178.42
EQUIPMENT MAINT. 180.49 101 68020 200 2200
GAS, OIL & GREASE 102.35 201 65200 201 -
VEHICLE MAINT. 25.63 201 65200 202
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 136.91 201 65200 203
SUPPLIES 1,534.47 620 15000
FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 198.57 625 65213 203
15149 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220
15150 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 87.91
OFFICE EXPENSE 10.83 101 68010 110 1101
OFFICE EXPENSE 77.08 101 66100 110
15151 VEOLIA WATER 02110 51,925.98
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 17,716.70 327 79480 210
BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 7,313.85 527 66530 190
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 26,895.43 527 66530 800
15152 FEDEX 02160 86.67
OFFICE EXPENSE 16.94 101 64420 110
OFFICE EXPENSE 33.70 101 66100 110
MISC. SUPPLIES 19.09 101 64400 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 16.94 101 68010 120 1212
15153 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 283.73
MISC. SUPPLIES 202.04 526 69020 120
MISC. SUPPLIES 81.69 619 64460 120 5150
15154 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 665.82
SMALL TOOLS 140.62 526 69020 130
MISC. SUPPLIES 245.12 619 64460 120
SUPPLIES 280.08 620 15000
15155 MAYNE TREE EXPERT CO., INC. 02872 200.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 200.00 101 68020 210 2300
15156 DON PLAGMANN 03172 140.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 140.00 101 68010 220 1788
15157 R & S ERECTION OF 03234 7,848.00
PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,848.00 320 80790 210
15158 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 6,371.10
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,371.10 101 66100 220
MEETING MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission
Thursday, November 17, 2005
The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by
Chairman Heathcote at 7:00 pm at Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Heathcote, Hesselgren, Larios, Muller, Schreurs, Shanus
Commissioners Absent: Dittman
Staff Present: Randy Schwartz, Parks & Recreation Director;
Joleen Butler, Account Clerk II
Others Present: None
MINUTES
The minutes of the October 20, 2005 Regular Commission meetings were approved as
submitted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
OLD BUSINESS
A. Community Recognition Program — Director Schwartz presented for review the sub-
committee's drafts for the Selection Committee's Guidelines and the Walk of Fame
application and process. It was discussed that the applications be ready by the end of
June for pick up by the local non-profit organizations. The program will be
advertised in the Recreation Brochure, City website, and the local media. The actual
location of the Walk of Fame is yet to be determined. A ceremony for presentation
will be developed and conducted by the City Manager's office. The application
forms will be finalized and presented for review at the January meeting.
B. No Smoking in Sections of City Parks - Schwartz presented several use rules of other
local agencies regarding the establishment of a City ordinance that would prohibit
smoking in City parks during organized activities. After much commission
discussion, Schwartz and City Attorney Larry Anderson will draft an ordinance and
bring it back to commission for review in January.
November 17, 2005 minutes
Coniiinfed-page 2
NEW BUSINESS
A. December Meeting status — Motion by Larios (seconded by Muller): No meeting
will take place in December due to holiday schedules. Motion accepted 6-0.
Commission will reconvene January 19, 2006.
REPORTS/HAND-OUTS
A. Parks &Recreation Department Reports
1. Monthly Report (see attached)
2. 2004-5 FY Revenue Report (see attached)
3. Key Indicators (see attached)
B. Commissioners
1. Commissioner Larios asked if the City is actively enforcing the Dogs off
Leash in the Park Ordinance. Commissioner Muller said the 1St offense is a
fine of$187.50 and the second offense is double the amount. It was discussed
that the police department can be called to enforce the ordinance at any time.
2. Commissioner Heathcote asked that the Rotation of Commission Chair Policy
be reviewed. For the 2005-06 year, Heathcote will serve as Chair and
Dittman as Vice-Chair. The rotation thereafter will be on a seniority basis. If
more than one Commissioner has the same seniority, then the rotation will be
based on alphabetical order by last name of the Commissioners involved.
This will make the rotation Heathcote (Chair), Dittman (Vice-Chair), Muller,
Schreurs, Hesselgren, Shanus, Larios.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday,
January 19, 2006 at 7:00 p.m, at Burlingame City Hall.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at
8:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Joleen Butler
Parks &Recreation Account Clerk 11
City ®f Burlingame - Parks & Recreati®n Dept.
f 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010
�'R`�N�".+►� phone: (650) 558-7300 • fax: (650) 696-7216
recreation caburlingame.org
herA�10 LM1t'
Date: November 13, 2005
To: Parks &Recreation Commissioners
City Council
From: Randy Schwartz
Re: Monthly Report
Parks Division
1. Tree Crew began grid pruning(south east section glus sycamores)
2. Annual field closure is scheduled for December 4 through February
3. Renovation of Murray Field and Lower Bayside will begin the 1St week of December
4. Purchasing updated version of TreeKeeper software to track maintenance & status of each City
street tree
Recreation Division
1. New afternoon preschool class, "Kinderclub",began with 15 residents enrolled on Mondays &
Wednesdays
2. Flu shots were given to 350 senior citizens
3. Upcoming senior trips include White Christmas(20 registered) and Beach Blanket Babylon(46)
4. Adult softball ends on November 18th
5. 4'& 5'grade basketball is underway
6. 7th& 8th grade basketball evaluations have been completed and teams have been formed
7. 7'& 8`h grade all-City dance will take place on November 18`h
8. Annual pool closure scheduled for November 28th—December 1St
9. Completed hiring process for new Recreation Coordinator (replacement for Greg Milano)—
Christy Neal scheduled to begin work on November 21St
Facility_finprovements
1. New curtains have been installed in the Auditorium; paint job scheduled for January
2. Lights on Bayside 91 have been repainted and rewired; relighting project to be completed by the
end of the month
UDcomine Events
1. Spring Field Users Meeting—December 1St
2. Holiday Tree Lighting Ceremony—December 2nd
City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreati®n Dept.
850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010
phone: (650) 558-7300 - fax: (650) 696-7216
Bj RLINGAME
recreation a,burli game.org
KEY INDICATORS
Kev Indicator Statistics
Service Population: 27,950 (per City's website - California, Dept of Finance January 2004)
Recreation Division
2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1. 5 year comparison of facility rental revenues $62,984 $51.363 $56,7981 $51,9461 $40,402
2. Number of days swimming pool is closed for maintenance 7 9 13' n/al n/a
3. Percentages of revenue compared to expenses 66.80 64.17 60.751 55.87
4. Total Revenue per Capita 63.17 59.19 57.26 52.72.
5. Cost per Capita 94.57 92.241 94.261 94.37
6. Net per Capita 31.40 33.051 37.001 41.65
7. *of residents enrolled in registration required activities 11,9431 12,0731 12,2451 11,8631 11,910
Expenditures Revenues GF Subsidv
04-05 2,643,122 1,765,611 877,511
03-04 2,577,969 1,654,275 923,694
02-03 2,634,555 1,600,524 1,034,031
01-02 2,637,512 1,473,498 1,164,014
Accrued savings to General Fund from 02-03, 03-04, 04-05 compared to 01-02: $656,806
10/12/05 —RS
SDCITY' F U INGAME
BURLINGAME C011 MUNIT Y COGNITION GMC
"I" W
WAJii K OF FAME APPLICATION
(November 6, 2005 DRAFT)
The City of Burlingame will establish a Walk of Fame in order to honor those who have made
significant contributions to our Community. The Walk of Fame will be a permanent honor, consisting
of a marker describing the honoree's accomplishments, placed along a selected pathway.
Criteria-For a Walk of Fame marker to be dedicated, the individual must have demonstrated or
performed the following:
a. Ten(10) or more years of volunteer service to the community
b. Had a positive impact on the lives of Burlingame individuals
C. Been considered an appropriate role model
d. Made a significant contribution to the Burlingame community by
(1) Creating opportunities for the community through new facilities or programs;
and/or
(2) Making a significant impact on the continuation and/or enhancement of
established community programs
Nomination
a. Nominations must be submitted by at least one (1) established Burlingame non-profit
organization
b. Each community organization is limited to one (1)nomination per year
C. Nomination submissions should include the completed application and a list of
contributions
d. Nominations should be submitted to the City Manager's Office at Burlingame City Hall,
501 Primrose Road,Burlingame,before Wednesday, August 30, 2006
Selection
a. The Selection Committee will consist of two (2)representatives from each City
Commission, appointed by each Commission's Chairperson.
b. The Selection Committee will consider the nominations and supporting documentation,
and will conduct a public hearing before making a recommendation to the City Council.
C. The City Council will take the Selection Committee's recommendations into account and
will conduct a public hearing before making a final decision.
d. No more than four(4) individuals will be selected to the Walk of Fame in any one year.
e. Nominees not selected will be added for consideration to those nominated during the one
following year.
Annual Timeline
a. Wednesday, August 30, 2006 —Nomination deadline
C. September— Selection Committee makes recommendations and Council vote
d. October—Recognition Ceremony
CITY OF BURLINGAME
B�,RLINGAME
COMMUNITY UNIT COGNITION POLICY
SELECTION CO 'FEE'S GUIDELINES
(November 13, 2005 DRAFT)
The City of Burlingame will establish a Walk of Fame in order to honor those who have made
significant contributions to our Community. These contributions must include (1) at least ten or more
years of volunteer service to the community; (2) had a positive impact on the lives of Burlingame
individuals; (3) been considered an appropriate role model; and (4) created opportunities for the
community through new facilities or programs or the continuation or enhancement of established
community programs.
Nominations must be submitted by at least one established Burlingame non-profit organization and each
community organization is limited to one nomination per year. The Selection Committee will consist of
two representatives from each City Commission, appointed by each Commission's Chairperson, who do
not volunteer for, nor serve on the board of, anv organization submitting a nomination form. The
nomination application will be distributed to the community groups in the summer with an August
deadline for submittal. The Selection Committee will receive the nominations and make
recommendations for a Council vote in the month of September each year.
The Selection Committee needs to follow the items below:
A. No more than four (4) individuals will be selected to the Walk of Fame in any one year.
Nominees not selected will be added for consideration to those nominated during the one
following year.
B. Consider the nomination applications, any supporting documentation and conduct a
public hearing before making a recommendation to the City Council. (Note: Staff will
delete the names from the nomination applications and any supporting documentation, so
the Selection Committee will not take into account the name of the nominee.)
Committee members will be free to develop the process used to select the recommendations, such as
categorization of nominations, weight of applications, etc.
BURLINGAME PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Collection Report
October 2005
Recreation Division 2005-06 2004-05 2003-04
COLL.YTD COLL.YTD COLL.YTD
Acc IProgram Gross Refunds Current Net Notes
25 01 1 Misc.Admin. 923.68 923.68 2,453.37 2,098.26 1.429.42
1 10 Advertising - - 822.00 365.50
26 12 Tix/Bks/ArtSls 1,051.90 - 1,051.90 33,030.65 27.661.40 22,827.60
2 13 Bldg. Rental 4.815.00 - 4.815.00 22,027.50 19,138.00 18.349.50
27 Rental Deposits 1.475.00 2,875.00 (1.400.00) 3,800.00 975.00 (187.50)
3 16 Park Permit 525.00 - 525.00 2.550.00 1,900.00 2,425.00
28 1294 Pool Rental 11,480.00 11.480.00 21,013.00 7,637.164,205.25
4 20 Sr. Lunch - - - - 478.00
29 21 Sr.Activities 992.00 992.00 10,044.00 9.680.00 8,301.00
5 22 Teens 1,820.50 1,820.50 8,137.00 6.485.00 3,531.00
30 23 Jr.Teen Camps - - 7,116.75 4,572.25 5,670.00
8 24 PFRN - - - - 150.00 60.00
6 30 Pre-school 4,727.97 723.00 4,004.97 50,369.97 34,344.50 35,010.00
31 31 Pre-Sch. Class 3.855.50 104.00 3,751.50 43,708.50 33.875.20 27,854.77
32 41 Lang.Arts 1,653.00 37.50 1,615.50 3,953.50 3,364.00 5,676.00
9 44 Adult Art 2.762.00 1,046.00 1,716.00 33,182.00 34,262.50 34,196.10
34 45 Culinary 202.00 - 202.00 2,561.50 1,912.00 3,672.00
10 46 Youth Art 885.00 885.00 9,580.75 12.287.50 7,273.75
35 47 Misc.Art - - 42.00 25.00 253.00
12 48 Computers 65.00 - 65.00 169.00 1,347.00 399.00
7 49 Enrichment 1,865.00 2,106.00 (241.00) 29,332.75 20,854.50 15,965.20
11 50 Art in Park - - - 20.00 460.00 100.00
37 60 Special Classes 272.00 243.00 29.00 8,435.00 5.347.00 5,384.70
13 61 Fitness 589.00 209.00 380.00 20,534.00 25.775.00 30,321.86
38 62 Sport Classes 118.00 - 118.00 7,271.00 6,611.50 9.173.00
14 70 Youth Camps/Trips 214.50 214.50 12,642.60 20,593.25 29,901.00
15 72 lContractSprts 1,450.00 - 1,450.00 48,506.20 36.811.00 24,861.00
40 80 1 Elem.Sports 3,535.00 70.00 3,465.00 20,986.00 22,173.50 22.650.00
16 81 BIS Sports 5,083.00 - 5,083.00 49,155.00 42,884.00 42.464.00
41 82 Tennis Lessons 364.50 740.00 (375.50) 15,847.50 13,832.00 16,129.00
17 83 Tennis Courts 188.00 - 188.00 5.768.00 3,740.25 3,899.00
42 84 Golf Classes 719.00 - 719.00 6,538.00 3.432.00 3,879.00
18 85 Misc.Sports 254.00 - 254.00 5,816.00 6,882.00 6,633.00
43 86 Field Lats/Rent 840.00 - 840.00 13.849.50 13,660.00 11,377.00
19 87 Softball 1.790.00 - 1.790.00 9.359.64 21.353.35 14,572.50
44 88 Basketball 740.00 - 740.00 2,590.00 2,920.00 4.995.00
20 89 Volleyball 2,410.00 - 2,410.00 5,804.00 1.280.00 2.397.00
21 90 Yth Aqu.Class (35.00) 176.00 (211.00) 19,601.00 12,835.19 3,636.25
45 91 Adit Aqu.Class 910.00 110.00 800.00 6,273.00 6,978.50 3.969.00
46 92 Lap Swim @Rec 3,055.50 - 3.055.50 7,290.00 1.948.00 1 1.540.00
22 93 Rec Swim 2.800.00 2,800.00 6,163.65 14.471.40 18,646.00
24 Yth Schlor. Fund - - 258.00 295.00
Lap Swim @Pool 2.498.50 2,498.50 11.829.05 14,901.00 11.149.50
Totals $ 66.894.55 66.894.55 $ 568,431.38 $ 502.596.71 $ 464.588.90
Less Refunds $ 8,439.50 $ 8,439.50
Net $ 66,894.55 58,455.05 $ 5687431.38 $ 502,596.71 $ 464,588.90
47 jParks Revenue $ $ $ 825.00 $ 2,195.00
48 JField Prep Fees $ $ - - $ 5.305.00
23 95 Golf Cards $ 3,000.00 MIS-- Aad
Totals $ 66,894.55 $ 8,439.50 1 58.455.05 $ 568,431.38 $ 503.421.71 $ 475,088.90
Aquatics Summary $17,367.50 $ 64,879.70 $ 56,823.25 $ 41;606.00
incl. (Pool Rentals,Yth,Adlt Classes,Lap and Rec swim)
BURLINGAME BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
December 1, 2005
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Beautification Commission was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by
Chairperson McQuaide.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson McQuaide, Carney, Grandcolas,Hesselgren, Lauder, and Webb
Absent: Commissioner O'Connor
Staff: Parks &Recreation Director Schwartz,Parks Superintendent Richmond, and Secretary Harvey
Guests: Bobbi Benson
MINUTES
The minutes of the November 3, 2005 Beautification Commission meeting were approved as submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE
Copy of a letter from Robert and Cindy Gilson, appealing the denial of the removal of a private Deodar Cedar
tree in the back yard of their property at 1480 Vancouver Avenue.
Letter(s) to the appellant of 1480 Vancouver and adjacent property owners notifying that the appeal of the
denial to remove a protected Deodar Cedar tree will be held at the January 5h meeting of the Beautification
Commission.
Draft copy of an invitation inviting Easton Drive homeowners to attend a preliminary meeting to discuss any
possible reforestation projects or plans for Easton Drive from El Camino to Vancouver Avenue.
FROM THE FLOOR-
Bobbi Benson thanked the Commission for recommending recognition for her volunteer work in the City to
the City Council. She reported that she has seeded poppy seeds in the little pots on Broadway and in some
spaces in the Burlingame Avenue planters and has nearly completed the weeding/planting of the large pots off
Broadway. Ms. Benson stated that future plans include: 1) planting flowering (or perhaps artificial)plants in
the Washington Park Carriage House planter boxes and 2)conducting a rose pruning clinic in the Washington
Park Rose Garden for the public; Citizens for a Better Burlingame have agreed to sponsor and publicize the
clinic. The clinic is planned for a Saturday in January (date yet to be determined), will be held from 8-12
noon, and will be free of charge. Ms. Benson concluded that she will head up the Friends of the Mills Canyon
group for the next year, helping to maintain the area by picking up litter, removing non-native plans, and
general upkeep.
OLD BUSINESS—
Proposed Tree View Policy Review/Recommendation—
Superintendent Richmond stated that staff reviewed and made revisions, some of which were consistent with
language used in the protected tree ordinance. The Commission reviewed the changes and discussed the
additional comments, questions, and edits.
Following the discussion, Superintendent Richmond stated the Commission's recommendation for a Tree
View Policy will be forwarded (via Director Schwartz) to the City Council for further consideration and if
approved,the document will be forward to the City Attorney for any further revisions.
Long Range Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive—
Commissioner Lauder stated that the Committee suggests that a preliminary forum be conducted with the
Easton Drive property owners to discuss long range reforestation plans for the area. She then submitted the
Committee's suggestion of an invitation for the Commission to review.
Long Range Reforestation Plan for Easton Drive(Contd.)—
Chairperson McQuaide stated that she is also very interested in a preliminary forum with the area's residents
to listen to their ideas and vision for their neighborhood, but feels the Commission needs to do more research
and needs further guidance from a consultant as to appropriate specie selections for the area. Commissioner
Webb stated he would like to see a Master Plan design developed for 20 years down the road. Commissioner
Grandcolas stated he is very interested in hearing from the residents in the area; some like the Eucalyptus and
others may not, neighborhood input will be very helpful. He stated it is critical that the public understand that
removal and replacement (reforestation) of the existing Eucalyptus will only be conducted on an as needed
basis. Superintendent Richmond noted that currently there are approximately 20-28 available planting spaces
that could be planted out when a reforestation plan is put into place and that he could confer with Larry
Costello (UC Extension) with regard to consulting services.
Following further discussion, the Commission made revisions to the invitation and asked Superintendent
Richmond to confer with Larry Costello regarding consultant services, the Committee's reforestation
recommendations, and any other suggestions Mr. Costello may have for appropriate specie selections for the
area.
NEW BUSINESS-
Beautification Commission Meeting Time—
Superintendent Richmond stated this item was placed on the agenda because there was some thought that the
5:30 pm meeting time could interfere with some people wishing to serve on the Commission. Commissioner
Hesselgren stated that the 5:30 time was an ongoing issue for her to arrive on time due to her work schedule;
and "the meeting time" was one of her considerations in deciding to apply for the Parks and Recreation
Commission which begins at 7:00 pm. Commissioner Grandcolas thought beginning a half hour later, at 6:00
pm, may not be quite enough of a change to make a real difference but that perhaps 6:30 or 7:00 pm might be
more effective. Chairperson McQuaide commented that the 5:30 pm meeting time was a particularly good
time for her because a later hour would conflict with commitments she has at a later hour on some Thursday
evenings.
Following further discussion, the Commission agreed with Commissioner Grandcolas that any decision made
to change the time of the Beautification Commission meetings be postponed until after the vacant seats on the
Commission are filled so the new Commissioners would also have input into this decision.
REPORTS—
Parks & Recreation Director — Director Schwartz reminded the Commission that the Tree Lighting
Ceremony at City Hall will be on Friday, December 2nd and begins at 4:15 pm followed by activities on
Burlingame Avenue.
Superintendent — Superintendent Richmond thanked Commissioner Hesselgren for her service on the
Commission as well as serving as Chairperson and that much had been accomplished particularly over the last
year; and he also thanked Commissioner Webb for his service and the passion that he brought to certain
items.
a. Tree Crew began Sycamore pruning this week. They began work on Newlands and will also
be working along Occidental. Crew has also been working in the currently scheduled City
grid area.
b. Parks Division is upgrading its tree inventory and work record software. New software has
GPS compatibility.
c. Parks Landscape Crew will perform turf renovation at Murray Field and Lower Bayside
Soccer field starting this month now that soccer season has ended.
d. No objections were received to the removal of the Cypress trees on Forestview. Work will be
scheduled in next two weeks, if possible; otherwise, it will be scheduled after Christmas/New
Years.
REPORTS—(Contd.)
e. A fruiting Gingko was removed on Bayswater at the request of the property owner.
Commission gave blanket approval to such removals at Department discretion some time ago.
f Silver Maple on Chapin that was the subject of the November appeal, has been removed.
g. There will be an appeal of a denial by Arborist Porter to permit removal of a Cedar tree at
1480 Vancouver Drive. The packet will include the denial document and two separate
arborist reports supporting removal.
McQuaide — Chairperson McQuaide would like the Beautification Commission to consider making
recommendations for landscape improvements at the City's entrances, particularly at the North and South
ends of El Camino Real and thinks a program by which the area businesses could donate to fund a landscape
improvement project. Commissioner Grandcolas suggested the Commission could first come up with a
concept that the businesses could own and then funding possibilities can be discussed at a later date.
Superintendent Richmond commented that the North Burlingame Area Improvements that the Planning
Department/Commission have been working on may include improvements to the northern entrance and
stated he would check with City Planner and report back to the Commission at their next meeting so the item
could be agendized.
Carney — Commissioner Carney asked if there was any information on when the sound wall project on
Rollins Road was to begin. Commissioner Hesselgren stated that it is scheduled to begin in the Spring of
2006. Commissioner Carney then asked Superintendent Richmond if the litter and debris along Rollins Road
will be cleaned up by City crews. Superintendent Richmond responded that frequency of clean up in that area
has been greatly decreased due to the employee cutbacks in the Parks Division and the traffic hazards while
working on the planting strip.
Lauder — Commissioner Lauder commended and thanked the Parks Division for all their good work
throughout the City.
Webb — Commissioner Webb said that serving on the Commission had been an interesting couple of years
and said good-bye.
Hesseleren— Commissioner Hesselgren stated she enjoyed working on the Commission, she has learned a lot
about trees and much has been accomplished, and that now she is pleased to have been appointed to serve on
the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Grandeolas — Commissioner Grandcolas recalled that at the last Commission meeting Arborist Porter stated
that "flat topping" the trees accelerates internal decay, impacting the health of trees. Grandcolas continued
that P.G.&E. "flat tops"trees under utilities in the City of Burlingame and he would like the Commission to
meet with P.G.&E. representatives to discuss this practice and perhaps persuade P.G.&E. to "tunnel trim"
instead. Superintendent Richmond stated he had reported to the Commission at the August meeting that
Director Schwartz had been in communication with a P.G.&E. representative that would be willing to
participate in a commission sponsored information session; that the Commission would just need to be
schedule a time and have it placed on the agenda.
After further discussion, the Commission agreed that this item should be placed on an agenda for a future
meeting. Director Schwartz suggested that Chairperson McQuaide meet with Superintendent Richmond to set
agenda items for future meetings.
There being no further business, Chairperson McQuaide adjourned the meeting at 7:10 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Kalane Harvey
Recording Secretary
CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES
501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA
December 12, 2005
Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Auran called the December 12, 2005,regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to order at 7:03 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling and
Vistica
Absent: Commissioners: None
Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner, Maureen
Brooks; City Attorney, Larry Anderson
III. MINUTES The minutes of the November 28, 2005 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission were approved as mailed.
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CP Monroe noted that item 2, 2412 Hale Drive has been continued until
complete plans have been submitted and plan checked.
V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments.
VI. STUDY ITEMS There are no study items on the agenda
VII. ACTION ITEMS
Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless
separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the
commission votes on the motion to adopt.
1B. 2010 BROADWAY,ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING (JAMES AND MARA FERRARO, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; JD &
ASSOCIATES DESIGNER)(54 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
1C. 1418 CASTILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 -APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AMENDMENT
FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (RANDY GRANGE, TRG ARCHITECTS,
APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;DUTCH HOSMAN,PROPERTY OWNER)(64 NOTICED)PROJECT
PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
Chair Auran asked if anyone in the audience wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no
requests. Chair Auran called Item 1A, 1021 Cortez Avenue, off the consent calendar because he was not
satisfied with the response regarding the front porch. C.Deal noted concern about the bay window. C.Deal
also noted that he would have to abstain on Item 1B,2010 Broadway,because he has a business relationship
with the applicant.
C. Osterling moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff reports, commissioners'
comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and by
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Auran noted that C. Deal would abstain from
2010 Broadway, and called for a voice vote on the motion and 2010 Broadway passed on a 5-0-1 (C. Deal
abstaining) voice vote; and 1418 Castillo Avenue passed on a 6-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were
advised. This item concluded at 7:10 p.m.
VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM
IA. 1021 CORTEZ AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,
TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (FARSHID SAMSAMI,
APPLICANT; SAMUEL KWONG, ARCHITECT; KWANG PAK, PROPERTY OWNER) (49
NOTICED) (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 26. 2005 MEETING) PROJECT PLANNER:
RUBEN HURIN
Reference staff report December 12, 2005, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Thirteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions
of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Sam Kwong, architect, represented the project. Believe they
addressed all the issues raised,provided a porch on the front elevation part of which is 5 feet deep,think this
project has been through enough design review. Commissioner noted that he called the item up because part
of the porch as designed is too narrow(2')and not functional,this is new construction so should be designed
properly; fatal flaw,has no purpose since it has no function;the mix of wide and narrow porch is awkward,
can see the part not useable from the street, narrow portion needs to be treated differently than the deeper
part or move the wall out in that area and get the relief to the front facade in a different way; if we had seen
this arrangement on the original plans Commission would have flagged it as an error. Architect noted did
not want to move the front wall back, made the porch continuous across the front; other buildings on the
street have a narrow front setback,feel that the proposed design addresses the concerns. Commission asked
for a number of items to be added or clarified on the drawings and in the conditions:
• are windows casement or double hung, important for Commission to know, should be noted;
• the greenhouse window should be wood construction and should be noted on the plans;
• there should be a note that the fire places are gas appliances so Commission can properly look at
design of chimneys;
• it should be noted on the plans that the windows will be true divided light, wood windows as
requested by the design reviewer;
• the knee braces have been made larger but their number should have been reduced to make it work
visually and be proportional to the mass of the roof(ones on the west elevation should be reduced by
2; number on the east elevation should have a total of five).
• size of the posts/columns on the porch should be more decorative, their style should be changed to
solidify the craftsman style of the house;
• there needs to be room for the beam in gable at the front door to accent the entry; and
• the chimney needs to be made to be proportional with the rest of the house.
There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner comment: there are a number of choices for redesign of the front porch,should be left to the
applicant.
2
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
C. Osterling moved to continue this item until the applicant has addressed the issues raised by the
commission in the design and the staff has had an opportunity to check them. The motion was seconded by
C. Cauchi.
Comment on the motion: the redesign should address the number of knee braces,the columns at the front,
the porch,the notes on the plans for windows and fire place apparatus,the green house window material;and
the proportion of the chimney to the house; when all the issues raised have been addressed and the plans
checked this could be returned on the consent calendar.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item for additional work on the plans as
noted by the commissioners in the public hearing and in their discussion. The plans should be placed on a
consent calendar after the corrections have been made and the plans checked by the staff. The motion passed
on a 6-0 voice vote. There is no appeal. This item concluded at 7:25 p.m.
2. 2412 HALE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND A SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING(JAMES WONG,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT,ALVIN YANG,PROPERTY OWNER)
(71 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
This item was continued until a complete set of plans for the proposal have been submitted and checked by
staff. The item will be renoticed when it is placed on a future agenda.
3. 1529 MEADOW LANE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SIDE SETBACK
VARIANCE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
(ARKADY ZLOBINSKY, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; AND MARK BRAND,
ARCHITECT (67 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER
Reference staff report November 12, 2005, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of
staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Mark Brand, architect, 425 Second Street, San Francisco,
represented the project. He noted that after the last meeting his client scaled back the project, and is now
adding only one bedroom and the majority of the addition is now one story, the existing second floor wall
will be extended only 5 feet.
Public comment: Jean Ann Carroll, 1525 Meadow Lane, Steve Alms, 1534 Meadow Lane; Chris Palmer,
1533 Meadow Lane; Katie McCormick, 1530 Meadow Lane;Lisa Alms, 1534 Meadow Lane;spoke. After
the November meeting and the items identified by the Planning Commission thought that the project would
be better,disappointed that it was not,submitted a letter dated December 12,2005,outlining the flaws in the
project and points made by the commission before that were not addressed. Reduced the scale of the project
for quick approval but did not address the Commission's comments, did not improve, all the addition is at
the edge with a dark hole in the center, will impact all the surrounding property owners which is
unnecessary,when done it will not look as if it was original, it will look like a trailer was added to the site.
Commissioner asked if prefer massing on the second floor at the middle. Support adding a second story at
the center,would be a nice addition,his view would be most impacted and mostly from the street. Neighbor
to the west,concerns have been addressed,unfortunate that something of value is being removed,the sun in
his neighbor's garden, wrong for speculating builders come into the neighborhood and build at Jean's
3
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
expense. Commissioner noted that if second story was in the middle it would have the greatest impact on
this neighbor. Concerned about privacy in my back yard,OK if there were only a few windows on his side
of the house. Commissioner noted that this redesign is a substantially different project than the Commission
reviewed earlier; some of the comments made then no longer apply. Was impressed by the Commission's
comments at the last meeting,heard serious concerns,these concerns still remain,hope listen and consider
neighbors'concerns. Recognize that this is a significant change from the first,but they just flipped the plan,
they should do a smaller project at the center and go up, not want to see another big box from her lot as
happened behind her because she did not realize what would happen. Architect noted disappointed
neighbors did not like the change,did try to add at the center,not much square footage,second story would
be big and bulky, unattractive; did not do the shadow study requested because this is now a one story
addition,the side setback variance is requested is based on the width of the lot,which at the front would not
be required because it is narrower; feel that the neighbors' are over estimating the impact. Commissioner
asked the plate height of the single story addition, it was established to be 8 feet. There were no further
comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner discussion: applicant did respond to the commission concerns about bulk,went a different
direction to a single story addition with one small addition on the second story, added 5 feet to the upper
bedroom; commission is allowed to grant a variance when the property owner shows all the findings are
met,feel they have been met for a 5 foot side setback instead of 7 feet for a portion of this addition,this lot is
not a rectangle,so setback is measured from the midpoint of the side property lines,property owner is being
penalized because this is an unusual lot which is a valid reason for a variance; would ask the architect to
prepare a solar study for the proposed project,would go a long way to resolving the neighbors concerns;it is
irrelevant that the project is being done by a developer,he has the right to purchase and improve a property.
Impact of this proposal is much less than a two story addition,even one at the center of the house; shadows
would be much deeper with a two story addition,can't do much less than proposing;could the roof at the end
of the second floor be hipped, would preserve all the sun to the neighbor's yard, may not be the best
architecture but would reduce the impact on light next door;support since this addition minimizes the mass
and bulk impact,second story addition at the center would have a greater impact;big improvement. This is a
better solution than what was discussed at study,reduces mass more. Personally privacy and light impacted
in rear yard by neighbor's addition,neighbors and owners have a right to ask for modification within reason,
this change appears to be a win-win, a balance for both. Not convinced that the side setback is warranted;
more work should be done,roof should be hipped,reorient part of downstairs with a lower pitch;less impact
on the neighbor to the west because the ridge slopes away; still not think there is a justification for the
variance;bedroom opens on to a common area,is this the best the project could be? Lot of structure on the
side could be pushed other way,need to do work to mitigate the impact along with the gable end;with 7 foot
side setback would add 18'-8",with the peak of the roof 16 feet from the property line given a 4:12 pitch,
will not block much sun. Regarding the variance,lot is almost 6,000 SF,if it were a rectangle would require
4 foot side setback,will lose 540 SF of available lot because it is not a rectangle, shape forces addition to
one side,will not vote against a variance,impact is to reduce 30 SF,being overly restrictive. Small addition,
easy to comply,right side is already out of compliance,but there is no compelling reason for a variance and
there is a solution. There should be a condition requiring that the tool shed be removed. Not convinced a
trellis is sufficient to break up the large blank wall, needs windows or articulation, it was noted that the
neighbor did not want windows.
C.Brownrigg moved to continue this item based on the discussion which the Commission has had,feel that
the architect is competent and the direction clear,there is no consensus to approve the project as its stands,
when it returns this project should be set on the action calendar. The motion was seconded by C. Deal.
4
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
Comment on the motion: want to be clear what the concerns are and that they include addressing an
alternative to the trellis for breaking up the expanse of the wall and that more detail on the landscaping for
that area is provided;a solar study is also essential and should be prepared to address the light issue/impacts
of the different proposals and the impact of the variance on the light availability.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item. The motion passed on a 6-0 voice
vote. This action is not appealable. The item will be renoticed when it is returned to the Commission. This
item concluded at 8:15 p.m.
4. 1440 CHAPIN AVENUE,SUITES 100 AND 200,ZONED C-1,SUBAREA B-1—APPLICATION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO EXPAND A REAL ESTATE USE (APR REAL
ESTATE SERVICES, INC., APPLICANT, CORTINA INVESTMENTS, LTD., PROPERTY OWNER,
AND S.J. SUNG AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT) (92 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN
HURIN
C. Cauchi recused himself from this action because he works for the applicant, and stepped down from the
dais and left the Council Chambers.
Reference staff report December 12, 2005, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed
criteria and staff comments. Ten conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked for
clarification of the group meeting day and noted that the conditions needed to be made consistent with the
recent request for Monday. Staff noted that the request was for Monday and the condition should be
corrected. Commissioner asked if there is any revenue for the city from real estate businesses. CA noted
that the city benefits from the increase in property tax which results from sales and from a portion of the
property transfer fees. There were no further questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, attorney, 216 Park Road, represented the project.
This is a nice building,whenever he is there it seems to have plenty of parking on-site,in addition on-street
parking and public lots appear to have spaces; Chapin Avenue is the place professional offices have
congregated downtown,this is the third application for space in this building by Alain Pinel Realty,they are
successful and this building is working well for them;use has a unique parking demand,successful realtor is
not in the office, s/he's out working as a sales person; clients only come to the office to pick things up or
sign papers; would like to keep agent group meeting on Monday as it is now; there have not been any
complaints about parking impacts. Commissioner asked if APR anticipates more expansion in this building.
Currently no more space, expand only if someone else moves out; agents in other offices have transferred
here because they like Burlingame.There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was
closed.
C.Brownrigg moved to approve the application,by resolution,with condition 6 amended to have the group
meetings on Monday from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and the following conditions as included in the staff
report: 1) that the real estate business shall be limited to 10,862 SF in Suites 100 and 200 at 1440 Chapin
Avenue(8,465 SF in Suite 200 and 2,397 SF in Suite 100),as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning
Department and date stamped November 1, 2005 (Suite 100) (8%2" x 11" sheet); 2) that the real estate
business shall not expand into the remainder of the tenant space in Suite 200 (5,530 SF) or into any other
tenant space in the building without an amendment to this permit; and that the subleased area shall not be
occupied by any other business which has an employee to office density exceeding one person to 300 SF; 3)
that the real estate business may not be open for business except during the hours of 9:00 a.m.to 9:00 p.m.,
seven days a week;weekly agent meetings shall be on Monday mornings between 9:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.,
5
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
with a maximum of 68 persons on site during the meeting which includes agents, full-time employees, and
managers; 4)that the real estate business shall have a maximum employees/managers of 93 part-time agents
and 5 full-time employees/managers (with a maximum of 14 persons on-site at any one time except on
Monday from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. for group meetings); the number of full-time or part-time real estate
agents,employees and managers for a real estate use in 10,862 of Suite 100 and 200 and the maximum of 14
persons on site except for one and one-half hours on Tuesday, shall not be increased(from 98)without an
amendment to this permit; 5)that the owner of the property shall file a report with the City Planner by July 1
of each year declaring how many managers, employees, agents, and independent contractors have been
working at the site over the previous calendar year,and the date and maximum number of employees,agents
and independent contractors who have been on-site at any one time and the report shall include the usage
(business and employee count) of the 5,530 SF sublet space; 6) that due to the impact of weekly agent
meetings on parking in this area, the owner agrees to schedule the weekly group meetings or client
conferences so that the parking impact is minimized and will consult with the City Planner on an annual
basis regarding any difficult times or days of the week and shall make adjustments that may be applicable;
7)that any changes in operation, floor area,use, or number of employees,which exceeds the maximums as
stated in these conditions shall require an amendment to this use permit; 8) that the conditions of the
Recycling Specialist's November 28,2005,memo shall be met; 9)that the use and any improvements for the
use shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code,2001 edition,
as amended by the City of Burlingame; and 10) that this conditional use permit shall be reviewed in two
years from the date of approval(December,2007)or upon complaint. The motion was seconded by C.Deal.
Chair Auran called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with conditions as noted. The motion passed
on a 6-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:35 p.m.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS
5. 1404 VANCOUVER AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR ATTACHED GARAGE FOR FIRST AND SECOND STORY DECK ADDITIONS TO A
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(CONSTANTIA PETROU AND STEFANOS ZENIOS, APPLICANTS
AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND PATRICK PEREZ, ARCHITECT) (62 NOTICED) PROJECT
PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Patrick Perez, architect, 4211 Shafter Avenue, Oakland, was
available to answer questions,noted that this is a small addition to make better use of the lower level,garage
is shifted forward to gain usable area at the lower level;the roof of the new garage is next to the dining room
and office, propose to use the roof as an exterior deck.
Commissioner comments: This is a nice Spanish style house,the wood and steel guard rail proposed for the
deck is not in keeping with the style of the house; should check on whether the existing stairs will be
required to meet current code because of the extent of work being proposed. There were no other comments
from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Osterling made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following
revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg.
• Design of deck is inappropriate,the components are completely incompatible with the architecture of
the house; want to see something that matches the style of the house; could use stucco wall with
6
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
ornamental guard rail; this is a critical design element prominent to the neighbor and the street,it is
critical to get it right,now it looks like a solid wood fence;need to see the details on the deck screen,
it is not in keeping with the style of the house;
• Check with Chief Building Official that the existing stairwell to second floor which does not meet
current code will be acceptable; if it will have to meet current code,might affect footprint,show the
revisions on the plans;
• Having a hard time understanding the rationale for the east elevation,windows are kept high in the
wall(clerestory),assume for privacy with neighbors,yet a second story deck is proposed which will
have a major impact on neighbors;would like to see more windows placed lower in the wall to break
up the long wall and add more light to this space;
• Want to see input from neighbors at 2020 Hillside that they are okay with the deck above the garage;
• On the site plan, show the orientation of the adjacent house to the right;
• Provide a landscape plan, there is a lot of blank space, need to show small shrubs and trees to
enhance, show the types of vines proposed;
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 8:55 p.m.
6. 2533 HAYWARD DRIVE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE
AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING (DAVID & KELLY TILLMAN, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS; AND
GEORGE SKINNER, ARCHITECT) (27 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERIKA LEWIT
CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. George Skinner,project architect, and David Tillman,applicant,
were available for questions. Noted that the project takes the existing building and improves the roofs,
opened up the house to the back, addition is a classical craftsman style in keeping with the neighborhood,
have spoken to neighbors and no concerns were raised.
Commissioners noted that this is a charming proposal,but it does require a hillside area construction permit,
so story poles are needed to be installed to show the addition and the new roof line;done a nice job matching
the style,even though it does not match the neighborhood,it matches the existing house,and glass wall will
give nice view. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C.Brownrigg made a motion place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the following revisions
have been made and plan checked. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
• Need to install story poles that accurately reflect the perimeter of the proposed addition and the
changes to the roof line; story poles shall be surveyed to determine accuracy;
• On the plans, provide existing elevations along with the proposed elevations;
• There is a lot of information on these plans that we don't need for design review, should be
simplified;
• Would like to see a landscape plan,there is a huge yard,landscaping in the front should be enhanced
to augment the style of the house.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been
7
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory
and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:05 p.m.
7. 1255 BERNAL AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH DETACHED GARAGE(CHRISTOPHER&ANITA KENNON,
APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;AND JAMES CHU,CHU DESIGN AND ENGINEERING,
INC., DESIGNER) (54 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN
SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked about the tree removal permit,
how many trees are proposed to be removed? SP Brooks noted that there were two trees at the front of the
house, a Fir tree and a Pepper tree,which are to be removed with a permit because they are diseased. There
were no questions of staff.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. James Chu,Chu Design and Engineering,39 W.43`d Avenue,San
Mateo, project designer, and Chris Kennon, 1255 Bernal Avenue, were available for questions. The
applicant noted that the plans have been reviewed with the neighbors, and there is no opposition, it is a
straightforward application with no exceptions requested.
Commissioners commented on the proposed design, noting that it is very massive and there are some
inconsistencies in the style, needs a little work before it comes back for review. There were no other
comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed.
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the following
revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Osterling.
• Look at a different type of street trees than Crepe Myrtle, look at the street tree list, there are other
species that are larger in scale and will do better in this location;
• Consider a different species than Maple adjacent to the patio along the right side in the rear yard,
something taller and evergreen, and consider some small trees or larger shrubs to provide greater
privacy;
• The massing of the gable end on the right front elevation does not look right, similar element on the
right side rear elevation looks better;
• Left hand portion of front elevation needs a little more work;
• Style is not consistent throughout,the heavy timbers at the entry portico with open truss does not go
with the solid stucco around it, it is too big and massive;
• Double knee braces seem out of proportion with the weight of the gutters that are being supported,
should be supporting the roof structure;
• Concern with the impact of the mass and bulk on the neighborhood, 4000 SF house is bigger than
what we usually see, the execution of this particular design does not do much to reduce the mass;
• Not necessarily too big, but if it is to remain this large, the mass and bulk will have to be handled
sensitively, now has a second story plate line that is the same all around, some portions could be
lowered; and
• Having double pillars on the porch element increases the sense of mass.
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans had
been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0. The Planning Commission's action is
advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:25 p.m.
8
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
8. 270 LORTON AVENUE,ZONED C-1,SUBAREA A—APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN
REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR A FULL SERVICE FOOD
ESTABLISHMENT(NECTAR WINE LOUNGE,LLC,APPLICANT,TRI TERRA REALTY,PROPERTY
OWNER,AND WINGES ARCHITECTS,ARCHITECT)(34 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:ERICA
STROHMEIER
SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked about the history of the food
establishment regulations,why the limit on number in Subarea A,what are the concerns with intensification?
CP Monroe noted that the food establishment regulations were originally put into place to limit the number
in order to preserve the pedestrian retail activity. At one time, the regulations allowed the food
establishments to change location,but the fixed locations were established in the 1990's so that the rights for
a food establishment did not become a commodity. The current regulations allow a food establishment to
relocate within a parcel, this application is proposing to do that. Another issue that the regulations were
trying to resolve was the proliferation of fast food restaurants in the area; it was felt that full service
restaurants would have less of an impact on pedestrian activity and the commercial area. Commissioners
noted that the concern is not with the type of restaurant,but that the restaurants are getting larger and as in
this case taking over retail spaces.
Chair Auran opened the public comment. Jerry Winges, 1290 Howard Avenue,project architect,noted that
this is an upscale, full service, sophisticated operation, the applicants now have a similar establishment in
San Francisco in the Marina District which has been open for two years,would like to expand the concept to
the Peninsula, it is different than what we now have in the area, it is a wine lounge concept,with food and
wine pairings; the size of the existing mezzanine is being reduced and there is no parking required for this
application, there will be a small meeting room in back for luncheons; the brick fagade is being preserved,
are replacing the old leaking windows,but preserving the proportions, and the look and feel;this site is part
of a larger parcel, the entire block is undergoing renovation,there were two retail spaces before,now there
will be three, feel this project is a great fit for Burlingame.
Commissioners asked: noticed in the application form that they are considering valet parking, how is that
proposed to operate? CP Monroe noted that the Traffic Safety and Parking Commission reviews proposals
for valet parking, the applicant would have to submit a proposal for review if that is proposed. Will the
kitchen be operating until closing? No, food service would be until 10:30 or 11:00 p.m. The plans note a
Number 17 Pilkington window system,but don't provide details, could you describe? The architect noted
that the structure is made up of a series of curved vertical glass panels that are connected with silicone,
would be used at the corner and would be semi-transparent. There were no other comments from the floor
and the public hearing was closed.
C. Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent action calendar at a time when the following
information is provided and revised plans have been plan checked. The motion was seconded by C.
Osterling.
• Provide more detail on the plans regarding the window system proposed;provide colors and samples
of the materials; and
• Determine the need for valet parking;contact the City Traffic Engineer if valet parking is proposed.
Comment on motion: Commissioners noted that the bigger issue of intensification and size of food
establishments needs to be addressed in the context of the downtown study. CA Anderson noted that if the
applicant proposes to provide valet service,that it needs to be discussed with the Traffic Safety and Parking
Commission soon because it is a long and difficult process.
9
City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes December 12, 2005
Chair Auran called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been
revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory
and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m.
X. PLANNER REPORTS
- Review of City Council regular meeting of December 5, 2005.
CP Monroe presented a review of the Council meeting of December 5, 2005.
- FYI—review of requested changes to an approved design review project at 1229 Paloma Avenue.
C.Deal recused himself since he lives across the street. Commission reviewed the changes to the project
at 1229 Paloma Avenue and acknowledged that they would have no affect on the design.
- FYI—review of requested changes to an approved design review project at 1506 Alturas Drive.
Commission reviewed the revisions made to this project following their earlier comments, they noted
that the addition looks odd, particularly the window in the lower part of the chimney, would be better to
have no windows in the chimney area; it was noted that this change was done to enlarge the master
bedroom, so C. Deal moved this to return on the regular action calendar for a public hearing and design
review amendment. Commission consensus was that this item be put over to the action calendar.
- Discussion of subcommittee openings.
CP Monroe noted that since C. Keighran was elected to the City Council there were some openings on
some of the Planning Commission Subcommittees. The following committee assignments were confirmed
by the Chair: Bayfront Zoning Implementation, Cers. Cauchi, Deal, Vistica; North Burlingame/Rollins
Road,Cers. Auran,Brownrigg,Vistica; Sign Code Revision,Cauchi,Brownrigg,Osterling;Neighborhood
Consistency, Auran, Deal, Osterling. A new subcommittee was formed to work with the historic architect
and applicant for the proposed project at 1427 Chapin Avenue for implementation of the Historic Registry
guidelines as this project develops. Cers. Auran and Vistica were assigned to this Subcommittee.
- Discussion of design review application processing including use of consent calendar and FYI.
Two procedural questions were raised with the Commissioners. The best way in the staff report to notify
the Commissioners if plans are submitted for the consent calendar which are not responsive to any of the
direction given by the Commission. Group felt current format, item by item analysis,works fine. Second
question addressed how to process FAR increases which do not affect the exterior of an approved design and
are within the allocated FAR for the site. Commissioners felt that any FAR change that affected the exterior
of a previously approved building should be brought forward for a public hearing and an amendment to the
design review and recorded with the property. If the change inside an approved design was less than 100 SF
and within the FAR allowed on the property,it would be appropriate to bring the change forward as an FYI.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Auran adjourned the meeting at 10:17 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Brownrigg, Secretary
10
CITY OF BURLINGAME '
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 2005
Par Market Book %,of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
LAIF&County Pool 17,614,225.47 17,614,225.47 17,614,225.47 66.18 1 1 3.472 3.521
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 9,000,000.00 8,861,650.00 9,000,000.00 33.82 1,015 607 3.505 3.554
26,614,225.47 26,475,875.47 26,614,225.47 100.00% 344 206 3.484 3.532
Investments
Total Earnings November 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 72,623.20 371,423.80
Average Daily Balance 25,928,738.57 27,878,651.70
Effective Rate of Return 3.41% 3.18%
Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and
availability of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds).
�2 � 2.00s
J US NAV FINANCE DIR./TREASURER
Reporting period 11/01/2005-11/30/2005 Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:12/12/2005-09:42 PM(PRF_PM1)SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
November 30, 2005
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date
LAIF&County Pool
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 7,246,719.51 7,246,719.51 7,246,719.51 3.636 3.636 1
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 10,367,505.96 10,367,505.96 10,367,505.96 3.440 Aaa 3.440 1
Subtotal and Average 16,395,405.24 17,614,225.47 17,614,225.47 17,614,225.47 3.521 1
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 982,190.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 Aaa 3.500 568 06/22/2007
3133XARN9 518 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/08/2005 1,000,000.00 990,630.00 1,000,000.00 3.390 Aaa 3.390 281 09/08/2006
3133XDGM7 519 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2005 1,000,000.00 994,380.00 1,000,000.00 4.450 Aaa 4.450 1,058 10/24/2008
3133XDNL1 520 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/17/2005 1,000,000.00 995,940.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 1,082 11/17/2008
3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP, 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,935,380.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 Aaa 3.000 425 01/30/2007
3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 978,750.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 Aaa 3.100 512 04/27/2007
3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 984,380.00 1,000,000.00 3.820 Aaa 3.547 686 10/18/2007
Subtotal and Average 9,533,333.33 9,000,000.00 8,861,650.00 9,000,000.00 3.554 607
Total and Average 25,928,738.57 26,614,225.47 26,475,875.47 26,614,225.47 3.532 206
Portfolio CITY
Run Date:12/12/2005-09:42
CP
PM(PRF_PM2)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
rt Ver.5.00
h
� ) 1
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 3
Activity By Type
November 1, 2005 through November 30, 2005
Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance
LAW&County Pool (Monthly Summary)
SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 3.636 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00
SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 3.440 392,968.74 0.00
Subtotal 16,721,256.73 1,892,968.74 1,000,000.00 17,614,225.47
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon
3133XDNL1 520 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 5.000 11/17/2005 1,000,000.00 0.00
3128X16Q5 513 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 2.300 11/17/2005 0.00 2,000,000.00
Subtotal 10,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 9,000,000.00
Total 26,721,256.73 2,892,968.74 3,000,000.00 26,614,225.47
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:12/12/2005-09:42 PM(PRF_PM3)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver,5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 4
Activity Summary
November 2004 through November 2005
Yield to Maturity
Managed Number Number
Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average
End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity
November 2004 6 25,300,063.99 2.661 2.698 2.653 0 0 275 198
December 2004 7 30,433,082.99 2.695 2.732 2.673 1 0 259 188
January 2005 7 30,025,165.46 2.659 2.696 2.622 0 0 262 182
February 2005 7 30,076,952.25 2.728 2.766 2.717 0 0 262 174
March 2005 8 27,632,224.41 2.824 2.863 2.819 1 0 305 199
April 2005 8 28,872,808.56 2.864 2.903 2.880 0 0 292 181
May 2005 8 31,478,082.19 2.976 3.018 3.043 0 0 268 158
June 2005 8 31,826,904.29 3.006 3.048 3.085 0 0 265 147
July 2005 8 30,880,702.93 3.045 3.087 3.141 0 0 273 143
August 2005 8 29,380,702.93 3.048 3.091 3.151 0 0 287 141
September 2005 8 25,480,702.93 3.125 3.168 3.285 0 0 330 151
October 2005 9 26,721,256.73 3.268 3.313 3.406 1 0 356 175
November 2005 9 26,614,225.47 3.484 3.532 3.521 1 1 344 206
Average 8 28,824,836.55 2.952% 2.993% 3.000 0 0 291 173
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:12/12!2005/-09:42 PM(PRF PM4)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
1 ` / Report Ver,5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 5
Distribution of Investments By Type
November 2004 through November 2005
November December January February March April May June July August September October November Average
Security Type 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 by Period
LAW&County Pool 72.3 73.7 73.4 73.4 67.4 68.8 71.4 71.7 70.9 69.4 64.7 62.6 66.2 69.7%
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
Certificates of Deposit-S&L _
Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln
Negotiable CD's-Bank
CORP NOTES
Bankers Acceptances
Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing
Commercial Paper-Discount
Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 27.7 26.3 26.6 26.6 32.6 31.2 28.6 28.3 29.1 30.6 35.3 37.4 33.8 30.3%
Federal Agency Issues-Discount _
Treasury Securities-Coupon
Treasury Securities-Discount
Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon
Miscellaneous Securities-Discount
Non Interest Bearing Investments
Mortgage Backed Securities
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 2
Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:12/12/2005-09:42 PM(PRF_PM5)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
CITY OF BURLINGAME
Portfolio Management Page 6
Interest Earnings Summary
November 30, 2005
November 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
CD/Coupon/Discount Investments:
Interest Collected 23,000.00 115,450.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 67,532.77 67,532.77
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 63,827.22) ( 66,482.49)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 26,705.55 116,500.28
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 26,705.55 116,500.28
Pass Through Securities:
Interest Collected 0.00 0.00
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00)
Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00
Cash/Checking Accounts:
Interest Collected 0.00 324,975.96
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 354,590.80 354,590.80
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 308,673.15) ( 424,643.24)
Interest Earned during Period 45,917.65 254,923.52
Total Interest Earned during Period 72,623.20 371,423.80
Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00
Total Earnings during Period 72,623.20 371,423.80
Portfolio CITY
CP
Run Date:12/12/2005-09:42 PM(PRF_PM6)SyrnRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver.5.00
PROGRAM
Investment Portfolio Information For
CAMP - CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00)
Portfolio#
12510150
Section/ Report Title
A. Account Summary
B. Detail of,Securities Held
C. Fair Market Values&Analytics
D, Security Transactions&Interest
E. Cash Transactions Report
F. Realized Gains&Losses
G. Cash Balance Report
For The Month Ending
November 30, 2005
CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME
CA
PFM Asset Management LLC *One Keystone Plaza*North Front&Market Streets,Suite 300*Harrisburg,PA 17101-2044*(717)232-2723
For more information,please contact your client manager: NSESA KAZADI (415)982-5544 KAZADIN@pfm.com
i PFMAsset Management LLC- CAMP PROGRAM —1
Account Summary: 12510150 CAMP-CITYOFBURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: November 30,2005
MARKET%OF YTM AT YTM AT DURATION
SECURITY TYPE PAR VALUE AMORTIZED COST MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO COST MARKET TO WORST
COMMERCIAL PAPER 1,000,000.00 992,083.33 990,754.71 8.141 3.834 4.363 0.206
FED AGY BOND/NOTE 3,800,000.00 3,787,603.76 3,773,000.00 31.001 3.987 4.597 0.619
FED AGY DN 7,560,000.00 7,423,197.43 7,406,881.69 60.859 3.927 4.419 0.438
TOTAL SECUFXnES 12,360,000.00 12,202,884.52 12,170,636.40 100.000 3,938% 4.470% 0.475
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 12,360,000.00 12,202,884.52 12,170,636.40 100.000%
ACCRUED INTEREST 51,251.39 51,251.39
TOTAL PORTFOLIO $12,360,000.00 $12,254,135.91 $12,221,887.79
Disclosure Statement; PFM's monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes(i.e.settles)all investment transactions.The custodian
statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.Only the client has the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian and to direct the movement of securities.Clients
retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies,implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.PFM recognizes that our clients may use these
reports to facili cord keeping,therefore the custodian bank statement and the PFM statement should lonciled and differences resolved.PFM's market prices are derived from closing bid p s of the last
business day of )nth as supplied by F.T.Interactive Data,Bloomberg or Telerate.Prices that fall betwk a points are interpolated. Non-negotiable FDIC insured bank certificates of deposit r ed at par.
A-1
PFMAssetI PROGRAM I / I
Detail of Securities Held: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash)
MONTH ENDED: November 30,2005
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY S&P TRADE SETTLE ORIGINAL YTM ACCRUED AMORTIZED MARKET
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE RATING DATE DATE COST AT COST INTEREST COST VALUE
COMMERCIAL PAPER
36959JBF9 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 1,000,000 02/15/06 A-I+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 978,020.83 3.834 0,00 992,083.33 990,754,71
1,000,000 978,020.83 3.834 0.00 992,083.33 T9U,7T4_7
FED AGY BOND✓NOTE
31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5.250 06/15/06 .AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,011,340.00 3.958 24,208.33 1,006,813.10 1,003,437,50
31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 991,682.00 3.991 11,805,56 994,737.01 990,937,50
3133X85ZI FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 AAA 07/18/05 07/19/05 1,778,891.40 4.002 15,237.50 1,786,053.65 1,778,625.00
FED AGY DN 3,800,000 3,781,913.40 3.987 51,251.39 3,787,603.76 3,773,000.00
313589QM8 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/14/05 A-1+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 985,405.56 3,603 0,00 998,718.06 998,401.66
313385RT5 FHLB DISC NOTE 1,000,000 01/13/06 A-l+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 982,200.00 3.665 0.00 995,700.00 994,921,03
313397UG4 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 03/15/06 A-1+ 07/19/05 07/19/05 975,270.14 3.819 0.00 989,238.89 987,475.35
313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 A-1+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 972,276.89 3.830 0.00 986,241.89 983,853.66
313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 A-I+ 07/18/05 07/19/05 969,260.50 3.844 0.00 983,233,00 980,164,97
313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 A-1+ 09/22/05 09/22/05 1,498,508.27 4,081 0.00 1,510,398.92 1,503,311,46
313589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 A-1+, 11/17/05 11/18/05 958,077,78 4,593 0.00 959,666.67 958,753.56
, , ,
TOTAL SECURITIES $12,360,000 $12,100,933.37 3.938% $51,251.39 $12,202,884.52 $12,170,636.40
Issuers by Market Value Ratings by Market Value
FHLB $2.773,548 22.8%
FHLMC $4,454,805 38.8% ❑A-1+ $8,397,838 89.0%
RIM $3,951,530 32.5% AAA $3,773,000 31.0%
.TRI toa0 755 B 1% ■Total: $12.170,836 100.0%
Total: $12,170.838 100.0%
B-1
PFM
.I / PR
, /
Fair Market Values & Analytics: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: November 30,2005
SECURITY TYPE MATURITY FIRST CALL MARKET MARKET UNREAL G/(L) UNREAL G/(L) DURATION YTM
CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE DATE PRICE VALUE ON AMORT COST ON COST TO WORST AT MKT
COMMERCIAL PAPER
36959JBF9 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL COR 1,000,000 02/15/06 99.075 990,754.71 (1,328.62) 12,733.88 0.206 4.363
FED AGY BOND/NOTE
31359MJX2 FNMA BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 5.250 06/15/06 100.344 1,003,437,50 (3,375.60) (7,902.50) 0.517 4,596
31359MVP5 FNMA GLOBAL BENCHMARK NOTES 1,000,000 3.125 07/15/06 99.094 990,937.50 (3,799.51) (744.50) 0.603 4,607
3133X85Z1 FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 98.813 1,778,625.00 (7,428.65) (266.40) 0.685 4.592
FED AGY DN
313589QM8 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/14/05 99.840 998,401.66 (316.40) 12,996.10 0.038 4,117
313385RT5 FHLB DISC NOTE 1,000,000 01/13/06 99.492 994,921.03 (778,97) 12,721.03 0.118 4.177
313397UG4 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 03/15/06 98.748 987,475.35 (1,763.54) 12,205.21 0.281 4.349
313397VMO FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 04/13/06 98.385 983,853.66 (2,388.23) 11,576.77 0.359 4.409
313397WS6 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 05/12/06 98.016 980,164.97 (3,068.03) 10,904.47 0.437 4.469
313397047 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 96.366 1,503,311.46 (7,087.46) 4,803.19 0.784 4,633
313589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 95.875 958,753.56 (913.11) 675.78 0.886 4.679
SUBTOTALS $12,170,636.40 ($32,248.12) $69,703.03 0.475 4.470 %
ACCRUED INTEREST ON INVESTMENT 51,251.39
TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF INVESTMENTS $12,221,887.79
C-I
CAMP PROGRAM
Security Transactions & Interest: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash)
MONTH ENDED: November 30,2005
S&P MATURITY PRINCIPAL ACCRUED
TRADE SETTLE TRAN TYPE SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP RATING PAR COUPON DATE AMOUNT INTEREST TOTAL
11/17/05 11/18/05 BUY FNMA DISC NOTE 313589M26 A-1+ 1,000,000 0.000 10/27/06 (958,077.78) 0.00 (958,077.78)
11 1,000,000 (958,077.78) 0,00 (958,077.78)
11/15/05 11/15/05 MATURITY FHLMC DISC NOTE
313397PG0 A-1+ 1,000,000 0.000 11/15/05 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
TOTAL SECURITY TRANSACTIONS
41,922.22
D-1
PFM
I PROGRAM/ 1
Cash Transactions Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) '
MONTH ENDED; November 30,2005
CASH DATE TRANSACTION CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
11/18/05 CC CASH CONTRIB 958,077,78
958.077.78
11/15/05 CW CASH WITHDRAW (1,000,000.00)
(1,000.000.00)
NET CASH CONTRIBUTIONS/(WITHDRAWS) ($41,922.22)
E-1
was iFF.,
, ,
Realized Gains and Losses: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00)
(Excluding Cash)
MONTH ENDED: November 30,2005
TRADE SETTLE
PRINCIPAL REALIZED REALIZED
DATE DATE IRAN TYPE SALE METHOD SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP PAR VALUE COUPON PROCEEDS G/(L)COST G/(L)AMORT CST
II/IS/OS 11/13/05 MATURITY FHLMC DISC NOTE 313397PGO 1,000,000 0.000 1,000,000.00 11,569.44 0.00
TOTAL GAINS AND LOSSES
$11,569.44 $0.00
0
F-1
PROGRAM PFMAsset • I
Cash Balance Report: 12510150 CAMP- CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00)
MONTH ENDED: November 30, 2005
CASH BALANCE: $0.00
Earnines Calculation Tem Ig ates
Current Month-End Book Value + Add Coupon Interest Received +
Current Month-End Accrued Interest + Less Purchased Interest Related to Coupons
Less Purchases Add/Subtract Gains or Losses on Cost For The Mth +/-
Less Purchased Interest
Total Cost Basis Earnings For The Month
Add Disposals (Sales, Maturities, Paydowns, Sinks, etc,) +
Add Coupon Interest Received +
Less Previous Month-End Book Value
Less Previous Month-End Accrued Interest
Total Accrual Basis Earnings For The Month
Economic Calendar
12/01/05 Initial Jobless Claims 12/20/05 Producer Price Index
12/02/05 Change in Nonfarm Payrolls 12/22/05 Initial Jobless Claims
12/02/05 Unemployment Rate 12/23/05 Durable Goods Orders
12/08/05 Initial Jobless Claims 12/29/05 Initial Jobless Claims
12/13/05 FOMC Meeting 12/29/05 Existing Home Sales
12/15/05 Consumer Price Index 12/30/05 Chicago Purchasing Manager
Market Commentary
The revised 3rd quarter GDP showed higher than expected growth but lower than expected inflation. The economy was estimated to have grown at a rate of 4.3% in the 3rd quarter, the highest rate of growth since the
3rd quarter of 2004. The GDP price index was estimated to have changed by 3.0%, lower than the expected change of 3.1%. The market reacted to the release of the Fed minutes in November with yields dropping as
the minutes showed the Fed has started to consider when they should stop raising rates. Housing numbers were mixed. New home sales reached a record level, existing home sales were disappointing and there was a rise in
the supply of unsold homes. The mix of data seems to indicate that the housing market may be showing signs of weakness. The market is concerned that a slow down in housing could have a negative impact on
economic growth. The FOMC meets on 12/13 for the final time this year with the market expecting another 25 basis point increase taking the overnight rate to 4.25%.
G-1
City of Burlingame
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY
November 2005
SAME MONTH F. Y. 2005 TO F. V. 2004 TO
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF DATE DATE DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
WATER HEATER 8 13,200 9 0 0 112 22,608 18 0 0
SWIMMING POOL 4 273,650 2 4,000 6,741.3
SIGN 3 7,500 3 12,300 39- 47 155,816 13 39,450 295.0
ROOFING 23 295,958 18 246,859 20 379 4,653,972 123 1,503,695 209.5
RETAINING WALL 1 8,300 1 0 0 8 259,017
PLUMBING 16 76,935 60 12,000 541 553 397,464 68 75,110 429.2
NEW SFD 1 321,000 2 606,000 47- 22 81490,639 3 1,371,079 519.3
NEW COMMERCIAL
NEW 5 UNIT APT OR CO 2 2,550,540
MECHANICAL 4 39,000 10 64,300 39- 79 261,635 13 12,400 2,010.0
KITCHEN UPGRADE 1 35,000 36 876,275
FURNACE 6 31,980 6 0 0 49 71,265 10 0 0
ELECTRICAL SERVICE 2 53,000 5 61,200
ELECTRICAL 2 2,200 12 14,000 84- 213 112,817 39 0 0
City of Burlingame
MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY
November 2005
SAME MONTH F. Y. 2005 TO F. Y. 2004 TO
THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF DATE DATE DIFF
Permit Type # # % # # %
BUILDING 6 421,300 11 72,900 478 322 8,101,829 135 13,981,400 42.1-
BATHROOM UPGRADE 5 111,300 41 701,800
ALTERATION RESIDENTI 33 570,662 33 607,311 6- 588 20,697,913 165 3,691,699 460.7
ALTERATION NON RES 12 380,289 9 966,500 61- 122 11,974,351 27 955,254 1,153.5
Totals: 123 2,367,624 174 2,602,170 -9.0 2,582 59,662,791 616 21,634,087 175.8
CO 1 1 1 ca st. Comcast Cable
J l 12647 Alcosta Boulevard
Suite 200
San Ramon,CA 94583
November 30, 2005 Office:925.973.7000
Fax:925.973.7015
mw.comcast.com
Mr. Jesus Nava
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Jesus Nava:
The purpose of this letter is to ensure that your office remains informed of the
programming services that Comcast offers to our customers who reside in your
community. It has always been our goal to ensure that you are informed of these
options. In keeping with that goal, we are sending you this letter to inform you of a
programming adjustment.
Effective December 14, 2005 we will re-tier the FUSE channel from its current level of
service on the Digital Premier—the FUSE channel will be a part of the Digital Classic
level of service and will remain on channel 476.
If you should have any questions or concerns regarding the adjustment please feel free
to contact Kathi Noe at (650) 289-6794.
Sincerely,
Mitzi Givens-Russell on behalf of
Kathi Noe
Director of Government Affairs and Franchising
West Bay Peninsula
i,
(q'omcast)
Comcast Cable
12647 Alcosta Boulevard
Suite 200
San Ramon,CA 94583
November 22, 2005 office:925.973.7000
Fax:925.973.7015
www.comcast.com
Mr. Jesus Nava
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Road
Burlingame, CA 94010
Dear Mr. Jesus Nava:
When Comcast became the Bay Area's cable company, we promised that we would work hard
to upgrade the cable service, offer useful new products and deliver improved customer service.
We believe that we have kept with our promised by offering more new channels, as well as
introducing new products like High Definition Television, Video-on-Demand and Digital Video
Recorders. Our customers have more choices and more control over their television viewing!
Comcast is committed to providing our customers with the finest variety of programming
choices, excellent picture quality and improved customer service. We realize that our customers
have other alternatives for entertainment and we're working hard to offer the best choice and
value in the industry. We have invested in significant technical improvements that advance the
reliability and quality of our multi-channel video services, added new channels, and substantially
invested in the improvement of the customer service we provide.
To reflect the current value of the products and services we deliver, we will be adjusting the
prices for our analog and digital service levels. Prices for equipment and installation are not
being adjusted at this time. These price adjustments will be effective for billing periods on or
after January 1, 2006.
Customer will be notified of these adjustments by legal notice and a bill insert. The specific
adjustments and their respective service levels are set forth in the attached legal notice.
Comcast has also just completed an internal audit to insure all West Bay area customers are in
the proper billing agents for tracking purposes. Moving these customers to the proper agent
may generate a new account number and could affect rates, fees and taxes. We are
communicating this information by a separate direct mail letter to customers.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Kathi Noe at (650) 289-6794.
Sincerely,
U u
Mitzi Givens-Russell on behalf of
Kathi Noe
Director of Government Affairs and Franchising
West Bay Peninsula Area
Enclosure: Price Adjustment Legal Notice
Notice of Price Change
Comcast
Burlingame, Burlingame Hills, Northpark Apartments, San Mateo County
Effective for billing periods beginning on or after January 1 2006, Comcast will make the following changes in the area(s)
listed above with respect to its cable television pricing.
TYPE OF SERVICE CURRENT PRICE NEW PRICE
Limited Basic Service $11.83 $12.79
Expanded Basic Service $30.16 $32.46
Standard Cable $41.99 $45.25
DIGITAL VALUE PACKAGES CURRENT PRICE NEW PRICE
The Comcast packages below do not include Standard Cable:
Digital Classic $9.95 NO CHANGE
Digital Plus $14.95 NO CHANGE
Digital Silver Package $28.95 $29.95
Digital Gold Package $41.95 $43.95
Digital Platinum Package $53.95 $56.95
The following digital packages include Standard Cable:
Digital Starter Package $55.99 $60.99
Digital Bronze Package $58.99 $63.99
Digital Standard Package $66.99 $71.99
Digital Silver Package $76.99 $81.99
Digital Gold Package $86.99 $92.99
Digital Platinum Package $96.99 $103.99
Spanish Language Packages:
Cable Latino $24.99 $27.99
Cable Latino Con HBO $34.99 $37.99
Completo $46.99 $49.99
Completo Con HBO $56.99 $59.99
Important Information:For customers receiving service through commercial accounts or bulk arrangements,some of the product,pricing,and other information contained
herein may not apply.Please refer to the terms and conditions of the separate agreement covering these arrangements.Where such terms are inconsistent with the
information in this notice,the terms and conditions of the separate agreement will apply.Prices for products or services not listed above are not changing on January 1,2006.
All prices are exclusive of franchise fees,regulatory fees and taxes.Pricing,programming,channel location and packaging may change.After notice of a retiering of our
services or rate increase,you may change your level of service at no additional charge for a period of 30 days.Otherwise,changes in the services you receive,which are
requested or caused by you,will be subject to upgrade and downgrade charges.If you have questions,please contact us at 1-888-824-8066.
FCC#CA0967,#CA0925,Headend#H2534A,Sys/Priv#8770-2100,Agent#0390,#0400,#0410 12/05