The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - CC - 2006.09.18 BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting–Monday, September 18, 2006 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 Page 1 of 2 650 558-7200 STUDY SESSION 6:15 p.m. Council Chambers a. Joint City Council and Chamber of Commerce 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p. m. Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES —Regular Council Meeting of September 5, 2006 Approve 5. PUBLIC HEARING The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. a. Public Hearing and adoption of Ordinance to amend and Hearing/Action clarify parking meter and metered lot enforcement on designated City holidays that fall on certain weekends 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS — At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 7. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Provide direction for the Planning Commission work Direction program FY 2006-2007, single family residential development b. Civic Engagement Resource Grant Discuss/Direct 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Resolution approving a traffic study scope of work for the Peninsula Avenue interchange at U. S. Hwy. 101 and a cost sharing agreement with the City of San Mateo b. Resolution awarding Mills Canyon sewer and access road repairs to Hillside Drilling Company c. Resolutions accepting Airport Blvd. resurfacing project to G. Bortolotto & Company and approving an increase in funding BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting—Monday, September 18, 2006 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 Page 2 of 2 650 558-7200 d. Progress update on the Mills Canyon slide repairs e. Warrants & Payroll 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 10. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Traffic, Safety & Parking Commission, July 13, 2006; Planning, September 11, 2006 b. Department Reports: Finance, August, 2006 14. ADJOURNMENT Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall 501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burl inag ne.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Tuesday, October 3,2006 CITY o BURUNGAME Y-11.1"Wu- BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of September 5, 2006 STUDY SESSION a. PENINSULA AVENUE/HIGHWAY 101 INTERCHANGE TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE OF WORK Asst. DPW Murtuza introduced Larry Patterson, Public Works Director for the City of San Mateo, who made a presentation for a proposed traffic study of southbound access to Highway 101 in the vicinities of Peninsula Avenue and Poplar Avenue. Mayor Baylock opened the floor for comments. The following San Mateo citizens spoke: Linda Lara, 228 N. San Mateo Drive; Gary Parma, 4312 Edison Street; and Joanne Bennett, 837 N. Idaho. The following Burlingame citizens spoke: Patrick O'Flaherty, 409 Bayswater Avenue; Laura Hesselgren, 416 Bayswater Avenue; Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater Avenue; Lynn Lenardon, 143 Dwight Road; Cheryl Bower, 8 Peninsula Avenue; Caroline Serrato, 8 Peninsula Avenue; Curt Bererton, 712 Bayswater Avenue; Len Lubrano, 109 Humboldt Road; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; and Toni Moore, 16 Channing Road. Council discussion followed: highway auxiliary lanes project has been well advertised and would benefit entire community with easier access for everyone using the highway; requested the study include statistics on the impact of future developments planned for this area; more opportunities for mass transit are needed; determine if impacts outweigh the benefits of proposed changes. See Item 9.a. for Council action. 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Cathy Baylock called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Kris Cannon. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Cohen, Keighran, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: Nagel 4. MINUTES 1 Burlingame City Council September 5,2006 Unapproved Minutes Two corrections were made to the minutes of the August 21, 2006 regular Council meeting: Change to Item 4.: The motion was approved by voice vote, 3-0-2...; and Change to Item 12.b.: Mayor Baylock and Councilwoman Keighran met with Safeway consultants... Councilman Cohen made a motion to approve the amended minutes of the August 21, 2006 regular Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 4- 0-1 (Nagel absent). 5. PRESENTATIONS a. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION—ONE BOOK/ONE COMMUNITY Mayor Baylock presented a proclamation to Library Trustee Deborah Griffith honoring One Book, One Community: Burlingame Reads "The Kite Runner."Ms. Griffith advised that the author of The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini, will appear at the San Mateo Performing Arts Center on October 19 and that Kris Cannon's brother, Stephen Olsson, who is the Emmy award-winning filmmaker of"Last Images of War,"will present his film at the Library on October 11 at 7:00 p.m. Kris Cannon talked about the film being a compelling and tragic story of four photojournalists covering the Afghan-Soviet War. b. PRESENT LIFESAVING AWARD TO LOCAL CITIZEN Police Chief Van Etten presented a Lifesaving Award to Dr. Andrew Soss, a local business owner, for his quick action on June 20`h in rescuing 4-year-old Lilli Hirth from being hit by a van after entering a crosswalk on Broadway. Dr. Soss accepted the award and thanked the City for their quick action in installing safety enhancements to the crosswalk on Broadway. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. APPEAL OF BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION DENIAL OF STREET TREE REMOVAL AT 1812 EASTON DRIVE P&RD Schwartz reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and determine whether or not to uphold the recommendation of the Beautification Commission to deny the removal of a City street tree at 1812 Easton Drive. Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. Judy Schneider, applicant for 1812 Easton Drive, spoke on problems encountered on her property due to the location of a City street tree near her driveway and the damage caused by its roots. There were no further comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. After Council discussion, Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to withhold Council decision until the Beautification Commission report of the Easton Reforestation Plan is adopted; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). b. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1793 CLARIFYING, UPDATING, AND MAKING CONSISTENT VARIOUS PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and to adopt Ordinance No. 1793 to update and clarify various provisions and to make provisions consistent with recent changes in the Zoning Code. 2 Burlingame City Council September 5,2006 Unapproved Minutes Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments from the floor, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve adoption of Ordinance No. 1793 making clarifying and consistency amendments to various code sections of the Municipal Code and uncodified ordinances; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). Mayor Baylock directed CC Mortensen to publish a summary of the ordinance within 15 days of adoption. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Jay Kershner, 160 Occidental, spoke about his automobiles being vandalized and lack of police enforcement in his neighborhood. Bobbi Benson, 550 El Camino Real, spoke on the Friends of Mills Canyon organization. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke on the recent mail-in ballot and the upcoming November election. Jennifer Pfaff, 615 Bayswater, spoke on placing new police officers on the bicycle beat. There were no further comments from the floor. COP Van Etten advised that to increase enforcement, the Police Department has recently hired four new officers and Council had authorized a new position for the department for this fiscal year. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. SHERIFF'S WORK PROGRAM Asst. DPW Murtuza reviewed the staff report and requested Council provide direction on utilizing the Sheriff's Work Program for a three month pilot program to increase maintenance of the business districts on Saturday mornings and public works facilities on Saturday afternoons. Council discussion followed: requested public comment on program; concerned about introducing an element of crime in the downtown areas; these workers are neighbors who made a mistake; requested cost benefit analysis, including types of work to be assigned and locations; safety issues to be addressed; requested contacting merchants if downtown areas are included in the program; and requested information on how other cities utilize this program. Council requested that more details be included in the pilot program as discussed. Asst. DPW Murtuza stated he would present the pilot program for Council approval at a future meeting and would include the information Council requested. b. RESOLUTION NO. 70-2006 APPROVING THE BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH PENSION OF OBLIGATION BONDS AND AUTHORIZING OTHER RELATED MATTERS FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council adopt Resolution No. 70-2006 approving the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Official Statement on the Pension Obligation Bonds. John Kim, Vice President of E.J. De La Rosa Investment Bankers, provided an update of Burlingame's pension system financing. Bond sales would be offered to both institutional buyers and retail investors. 3 Burlingame City Council September 5,2006 Unapproved Minutes FinDir Nava advised that the City is financially self-sufficient reaffirming our AA+rating. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 70-2006 approving the Bond Purchase Agreement and Official Statement in Connection with Pension Obligation Bonds and Authorizing other matters relating thereto; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). C. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION VACANCY AND BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION VACANCY CM Nantell reviewed the staff report and recommended that Council call for applications for the three upcoming vacancies in the Beautification Commission and for the two upcoming vacancies in the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mayor Baylock appointed Councilwoman Keighran and Councilwoman O'Mahony to conduct interviews for the Beautification Commission. The application deadline was set for September 22, 2006. Mayor Baylock appointed Councilman Cohen and Vice Mayor Nagel to conduct interviews for the Parks and Recreation Commission. The application deadline was set for September 22, 2006. d. INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF HOLIDAYS FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT COP Van Etten reviewed the staff report and requested Council introduce an ordinance amending the definition of holidays for parking enforcement. Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance amending chapter 13.04 to amend the definition of holidays for parking enforcement. Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Cohen requested removal of Items c. and d. from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. Mayor Baylock requested removal of Item a. from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. b. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 71-2006 URGING SUPPORT FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE PARKS FOR THE FUTURE (MEASURE A) AT THE NOVEMBER 7, 2006 ELECTION P&RD Schwartz requested Council approve Resolution No. 71-2006 urging support for the adoption of Parks for the future (Measure A) at the November 7, 2006 election. 4 Burlingame City Council September 5,2006 Unapproved Minutes e. RESOLUTION NO. 72-2006 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PARKING CITATION PROCESSING FinDir Nava requested Council approve Resolution No. 72-2006 approving the agreement between the City and Turbo Data Systems, Inc. for parking citation processing and adjudication. L RESOLUTION NO. 73-2006 AWARDING AN EMERGENCY CONTRACT TO HILLSIDE DRILLING CO., INC. FOR REPAIRS AT MILLS CANYON SLIDE Asst. DPW Murtuza requested Council approve Resolution No. 73-2006 determining that an emergency exists requiring the award of a repair contract for Mills Canyon without formal bids and awarding the contract for emergency repairs to Hillside Drilling Company. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Items b., e. and f. of the Consent Calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). d. APPROVE RESPONSES TO 2005-06 GRAND JURY REPORT AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THEM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL CA Anderson requested Council approve proposed responses and authorize the Mayor to sign the responses on behalf of the City Council. Councilman Cohen requested that the on-going communications plan with our citizens be included in the response. Councilman Cohen made a motion to approve Item d.; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). C. TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR A 45-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1840 OGDEN DRIVE—0.89 ACRE PORTION OF BLOCK 7, MAP OF MILLS ESTATE, NO. 3 SUBDIVISION Asst. DPW Murtuza requested Council approve the Tentative Condominium Map for a 45-unit condominium at 1840 Ogden Drive. Councilman Cohen asked if the suggested changes to the on-site vehicle turnaround had been approved. Asst. DPW Murtuza stated that it had been reviewed and found to meet City requirements. Councilwoman Keighran made a motion to approve Item c.; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved by voice vote, 4-0-1 (Nagel absent). a. RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE OF WORK FOR PENINSULA AVENUE INTERCHANGE AT U.S. HIGHWAY 101 AND A COST SHARING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN MATEO Asst. DPW Murtuza requested Council approve a resolution approving the agreement between the City of Burlingame and the City of San Mateo for traffic impact analysis of the Peninsula Avenue Interchange. 5 Burlingame City Council September 5,2006 Unapproved Minutes Mayor Baylock requested adding to the scope of work a subset to the scenarios indicating the effects on Burlingame streets of whatever changes are proposed for Poplar. Asst. DPW Murtuza stated that he would present the resolution for Council approval at a future meeting with an amended scope of work to include suggestions received this evening. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke on the Sheriff's Work Program. There were no further comments from the floor. 12. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. 13. NEW BUSINESS a. SET HEARING DATE FOR APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION AT 1520 ARC WAY. Council set October 3, 2006, as the hearing date for the Planning Commission appeal of 1520 Arc Way. b. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT CM Nantell requested Council submit suggestions on potential civic engagement efforts that the City might want to submit for consideration for a resource grant from the Institute for Local Government. CM Nantell will submit the suggested items to Council for approval at a future meeting. 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Beautification, August 3, 2006; Parks &Recreation, August 17, 2006; Planning, August 28, 2006 b. Letter from Comcast concerning programming adjustment: c. Memorandum to Council from City Manager concerning potential civic engagement efforts to be considered for resource grant 15. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION Mayor Baylock adjourned to Closed Session at 10:10 p.m. in memory of Veronica Gray, a long-time resident of Burlingame. CLOSED SESSION CA Anderson advised that Council met in closed session and directed staff regarding the following: 6 Burlingame City Council September 5,2006 Unapproved Minutes a. Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code § 54957.6: City Negotiators: Deirdre Dolan and Jim Nantell Labor Organizations: AFSCME, Locals 2190 and 829; BAMM, Teamsters, Local 856; and Department Heads 16. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Baylock adjourned the meeting at 10:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 7 Burlingame City Council September 5,2006 Unapproved Minutes CITYAGENDA 5a �41 0 ITEM# _ eurGAME STAFF REPORT MAG. �4 DATE September 18,2006 � [n nuc b`•o TO: Honorable Mayor and CityCom unci) ______ ___ _______ SUBMITTED BY:__Jack Van Ffttzn, Chief of Police DATE: _septemher 7, 2006 APPROVED 17 FROM: -lack Van ft .n, .hi .f o _ BY' '� SUBJECT: Public Hearing to amend and clarify parking meter and metered lot enforcement on designated city holidays that fall on certain weekends RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should hold a public hearing and take action to amend existing Burlingame City Ordinance (section 13.04.100), clarifying parking meter and metered lot parking enforcement on city holidays falling on the certain weekends. BACKGROUND: For the purpose of parking meter and parking lot enforcement, existing city ordinance regulations (section 13.04.100) identifies a total of ten (10) holidays when both the meters and city lots are not enforced. The "holidays" included in this ordinance are: 1) January 1; 2) The third Monday in January; 3) The third Monday in February; 4) The last Monday in May; 5) July 4- 6) The first Monday in September; 7) The second Monday in October; 8) November 11; 9) The fourth Thursday in November; and 10) December 25. Under the existing code, a city designated holiday falling on a Saturday, but observed on a Friday, could create some confusion (on both days) for citizens patronizing the Burlingame Avenue and Broadway business districts, as well as for enforcement staff. To eliminate confusion, staff is recommending a minor change to the existing city ordinance (section 13.04.100) to cover Friday, Saturday, Sunday and Monday holidays. For enforcement purposes, "whenever a city defined holiday falls on a Sunday, the Monday following is also a holiday; whenever a city defined holiday falls on a Saturday, the Friday preceding is also a holiday." This action will eliminate parking enforcement on certain holiday weekends (namely Fridays and Saturdays) as defined above. Projecting out 10 years, there appears to be only five times when this would become an issue on Friday and Saturdays: November 11, 2006; July 4, 2009; December 25, 2010; January 1, 2011; and July 4, 2016. The fiscal impact to the city negligible and this action would be a gesture of goodwill to both our business community and the citizens patronizing local businesses, consistent with recent council direction. ATTACHMENTS: Refer to attached updated City Ordinance, section 13.04.100 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AMENDING CHAPTER 13.04 TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF HOLIDAYS FOR PARKING ENFORCEMENT 3 4 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as follows: 5 6 Section 1 . The State and Federal governments have established a variety of holidays 7 for a variety of purposes. Section 13 .04. 100 is amended in order to make parking enforcement 8 applicable to Fridays and Mondays when holidays fall during the weekend. By reference, this 9 amendment would also change the limitations on hours of leaf blowers and power equipment 10 in residential districts under Section 10.40.037, meaning that regular weekday hours would 11 apply on those Fridays and Mondays. 12 13 Section 2. Section 13 .04. 100 is amended to read as follows: 14 13 .04. 100 Holidays. 15 For purposes of this title, "holidays" are: 16 (a) January 1 ; 17 (b) The third Monday in January; 18 (c) The third Monday in February; 19 (d) The last Monday in May; 20 (e) July 4; 21 (f) The first Monday in September; 22 (g) The second Monday in October; 23 (h) November 11 ; 24 (i) The fourth Thursday in November; and 25 0) December 25. 26 Whenever a holiday defined above falls on a Sunday, the Monday following is also a holiday. 27 Whenever a holiday defined above falls on a Saturday, the Friday preceding is also a holiday. 28 1 Section 3. This ordinance shall be published as required by law. 3 Mayor 4 5 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that 6 the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5T'-'day of September,2006,and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held 7 on the day of , 2006, by the following vote: 8 9 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 10 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 11 City Clerk 12 U:\FILES\ORDINANC\holidaydef2006.pol.wpd 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4�Ty STAFF REPORT 04 BURL INGAME AGENDA ITEM# 7a o MTG. 'pA* �Nff DATE 9.18.06 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED V) By /Y2�-- DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 2006 /� APPROVED 6 FROM: CITY PLANNER By SUBJECT: PROVIDE DIRECTION FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM FY 206-2007, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Direction: City Council should review the various single family residential issues and process changes suggested by the members of the Council and Planning Commission and identify three for study by the Commission during FY 2006-2007. Background: At the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting on March 18, 2006, there was recognition that FY 2006-2007 was going to be a very busy year in Burlingame for community planning. There was general consensus that the single family residential design review process was working effectively. Having said that, the group noted that there were issues which could be addressed to improve the process. Given the over all workload for the Planning Department, there was a consensus that the Planning Commission should narrow their activity regarding single family residential regulation to the most essential issues. The process suggested was that the City Planner would ask each Council member and Planning Commissioner to submit their top three issues. She would tabulate them and prepare a list for the City Council to review. The City Council would select from the list the three residential design review issues for the Planning Commission to focus on this fiscal year. Once the three issues have been identified by the Council, the City Planner will work with the Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee of the Planning Commission to develop recommendations on the best way to address them. Any proposed changes to the zoning code which come from the Subcommittee would be reviewed by the Planning Commission and would be subject to public comment,before making their way to the City Council for action. Issues Identified by City Council and Planning Commissioners Over the summer the City Council and Planning Commissioners identified their three priority issues associated with single family residential design review or development. Nineteen issues were identified (see attached list). They were grouped by topic: single family residential mass and bulk, 7 comments; garages, 3 comments; Landscaping, 3 comments; public noticing, 2 comments; revision to existing regulations, 2 comments; and design guidelines, 2 comments. PROVIDE DIRECTION FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM FY 206-2007, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT September 18,2006 Three specific issues suggested received more than one vote: encourage basements to reduce mass and bulk (4 votes); study FAR and lot coverage to see if the current allowances represent a continuum of the past(2 votes); and review second story setbacks/declining height envelope(2 votes). Attachments: Survey of City Council and Planning Commission: Identification of Most Important Single Family Residential Development Issues Minutes Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting, March 18, 2006 2 Revised: September 14, 2006 FY 2006-2007 Planning Work Program Survey of City Council and Planning Commission Identification of Most Important Single Family Residential Development Issues City Council and Planning Commissioners identified their priority three issues associated with single family development. The purpose of the survey and subsequent list was to provide City Council with input for defining the Commission's FY 2006-2007 work program relating to the R-1 zone and development/modification of regulations addressing the city's single family residential sector. The suggested items have been grouped for ease of review. The number of votes each item received is noted in parenthesis next to the item. Maximum number of votes was 11. Single Family Residential Mass and Bulk ■ Study FAR and lot coverage- are the current standards a continuum of the past. (2) ■ Review including attic space over 5 feet in the FAR calculation. (1) ■ Encourage basements to reduce mass and bulk. (4) ■ Review second story setbacks -declining height envelope on two sides. (2) ■ Require a special permit for nonconforming front and side setbacks for remodeled houses. (1) ■ Crawl space heights should conform to the average on the side of the street.(1) ■ Investigate 'face print'methodology to evaluate mass and bulk-make sure new development does not 'overpower' existing. (1) Garages ■ Encourage rear yards by encouraging detached garages as close as possible to side and rear property lines. (1) ■ Attached garages should be allowed FAR bonuses if setback is two times required front setback. (1) ■ Encourage attached garages by allowing full FAR to reduce driveway pavement. (1) FY 2006-2007 Planning Work Program Survey of City Council and Planning Commission Identification of Most Important Single Family Residential Development Issues September 11,2006 Landscaping ■ Where the driveway and house are adjacent, require a landscaped area between the house and the driveway. (1) ■ Limit landscaping review to size of trees and shrubs, exclude flat work. (1) ■ Require concrete paved driveways. (1) Noticing ■ No expansion of neighborhood notification. (1) ■ Require no-site posting of plans at initiation of project. (1) Revision of Existing Regulations ■ Revise Hillside Area Construction Permit to focus on the extent of view obstruction. (1) ■ Allow new second units in the R-1 zone.(l) Design Guidelines ■ All houses should be required to have a definable style.(1) ■ Evaluate integrating form based zoning into the design guidelines.(1) UAPC SubcommitteesTY 2006 07 Workprogram\RevsdCC PC Survey R-1 priorities 9.14.06.doc CITY OF BURLINGAME UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Fire Station No. 34 799 California Drive,Burlingame, CA March 18, 2006 I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Baylock called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Present: Councilmembers: Mayor Baylock, Cohen,Keighran,O'Mahony,Nagel Commissioners: Chair Auran,Brownrigg, Cauchi,Deal, Terrones, Vistica Absent: Planning Commissioner Osterling Staff Present: City Manager,Jim Nantell; City Planner,Margaret Monroe; City Attorney,Larry Anderson; Senior Planner,Maureen Brooks H. DISCUSS THE COUNCIL'S FY 2006-2007 GOALS FOR PLANNING AND SET FY 2006-2007 WORK PROGRAM CP Monroe reviewed the current Planning Department work program and the status of current projects,and timing for their consideration; and reviewed the proposed items identified for consideration by the City Council at their recent goal sessions. Council members and Planning Commissioners participated in discussions on each of the identified goals and issues. The following priorities were determined for the FY 2006-2007 Planning work program. Specific Plan for the Downtown Area Preparation of a Specific Plan for the Downtown area which would include developing goals and policies for development in the area,a land use plan and urban design elements, along with establishing community environmental standards for the area. Additional direction included: • Public participation program should focus on a Citizens Advisory committee made up of stakeholders; Safeway should be invited to be a member. • Scope should include an historic inventory which reviews all buildings in the planning area. • Consider Form Based Zoning, if appropriate for zoning implementation. • Funding from parking enterprise fund. Charrette A design charrette to proved an opportunity for the community to come together with teams of design professionals to focus on developing design concepts for up to four areas within the downtown area. Everyone is welcome; all ideas are heard and considered. A charrette is an educational opportunity for members of the community to hear from expert designers. Additional direction included: • Should plan for October 7,2006, date. • Should focus on Howard Avenue and its cross streets—linkages to Burlingame Avenue. • Should set a second study meeting of City Council and Planning Commission to discuss the "design parameters"for the event(June,2006). • Staff should budget$25,000 ($15,000 for AIA and$10,000 for event) in FY 2006-2007 budget. • Funding from Parking Enterprise Fund. CITY OF BURLINGAME MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 18,2006 Encourage Safeway to Submit Plans for a New Store in the Burlingame Avenue Area At the conclusion of the Economic Study,the City should have some idea of what is a viable Safeway project on the site at El Camino/Howard/Primrose. The City should be receptive to a submittal of plans for a new store in the Burlingame Avenue area,whenever it is submitted. Direction included: • Continue dialogue,invite them in economic study presentations, and invite to participate in Citizens Advisory Committee for Specific Plan. • Accept an application if choose to make one before or during Specific Plan process. • Give them the option of providing funding for a contract planner to expedite their project processing. Investigate Development Impact Fees With the increase in construction particularly in the single family residential areas,the conditions of the local roads,curbs, gutters and sidewalks has been impacted alarmingly. The purpose of a development fee would be to address off-site damage. Discussion expanded this item to an evaluation of all fees: • Evaluate advantages of increasing three types of fees(1)application and processing fees; (2) construction impact fees(building department,public works) effects at time of construction; and (3) on going impact fees(park development fees, civic improvement fees). • Hire a consultant to prepare information and document local fee schedules($40,000) • Work to be overseen by Finance and Public Works Departments,Planning will also participate. Investigate Effectiveness of Design Review(impact on single family neighborhoods) During discussion this goal was clarified,to include focusing on an overview of the design review process/issues,working with Council to identify three which would improve the process and implementing those. Discussion included: • Have Neighborhood consistency subcommittee work with Planning Commission to identify three issues to work on. • Each Council member and Planning Commissioner should E-mail to City Planner their list. (Face Print and incentives for basements to reduce lot coverage and mass and bulk were identified to start the list at the meeting). • Planning Commission will review; select three to recommend to City Council. Council will review and approve list. • Neighborhood Consistency Subcommittee will work on with staff and make recommendation to Planning Commission;will go to City Council for public hearing. Demolition Policy • Do nothing now. A group of residents is studying the city's demolition policy and that of the surrounding cities. They will provide a report to the City Planner. Can decide at that time what to do. Other Goals • Council will let Commission know when they need Commission representation to assist them in implementation of the goal to attract and retain desired business. • C. Cauchi volunteered to participate on a Bicycle Committee to identify projects and get them ready for grant funding should one be reconstituted. -2- CITY OF BURLINGAME MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 18,2006 III. PUBLIC COMMENT Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; John Root, 728 Crossway;and Dennis O'Brien,2204 Poppy Drive, spoke. It is gratifying hearing the Council and Planning Commission discuss the issues brought to this forum,; complimented the new Commissioner,Richard Terrones, in bringing balance to the Commission; encouraged the Council to pursue funding for bicycle projects and to stay on top of the issues with the Caltrain transportation corridor and the trend toward more bullet trains and less local service. Hope that someone talks to Safeway on a regular, informal basis; the idea of a citizens advisory committee for the Specific Plan is really important,can act as buffer if the committee membership is representative of the Community; if focus of the charrette is Howard,make sure the train station is included; concerned with changes to the floor area ratio regulations,will destroy what is working well now,will drive away builders, shouldn't change things based on a couple of bad experiences,most builders are reputable. Mayor Baylock adjourned the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting at 12:00 noon. -3- ��CITY STAFF REPORT ByRIJNGAME AGENDA 7b ITEM# '�, •o• MTG. 9/18/06 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY DATE: Sept. 14,2005 _ G'v APPROVED FROM: Jim Nantell 5587205 BY SUBJECr: Civic Engagement Resource Grant RECOMMENDATION: That the Council discuss civic engagement opportunities and select one for submittal of a resource grant from the Institute for Local Government. BACKGROUND: At the Council's meeting on September 5t", in response to acknowledgement item on the agenda relative to the civic engagement resource grant,Mayor Baylock requested that we agendize the item for your next meeting to allow time for all council members to suggest any other ideas that they might like to have considered for the resource grant. ATTACHMENTS: A. 8/31/06 Memo from City Manager to the City Council re: Civic Engagement Resource Grant To: Mayor Baylock and City Council From: Jim Nantell Subject: Civic Engagement Resource Grant Date: 8/31/06 Terry Nagel and I attended the League Peninsula Division meeting in July where they featured a panel presentation on"Strategies for Public Involvement: Choosing the Forum to Fit the Fuss". One of the panelists was Terry Amsler, from the Institute for Local Government who unveil their new publication, "Public Involvement Strategies: A Practical Guide for Local Officials". Mr. Amsler also indicated that they would be offering grants to three public agencies for assistance in significant civic engagement projects. Vice Mayor Nagel spoke with Mr. Amsler about the City of Burlingame been one of those three cities to receive the in-kind civic engagement assistance. Mr. Amsler has earmarked one of the three resource grants to us. Vice Mayor Nagel and I brainstormed some potential civic engagement efforts that we might want to submit for consideration for the resource grants. Those are listed below: 1. Involving the public in the downtown specific area planning process; 2. Developing the civic engagement master plan (part of this year's council goals); 3. Working with the community to develop an inventory of neighborhood skills available to assist in emergencies; 4. Work with the city to resolve the issue of where to locate a new/reconstructed community center. In discussing the alternatives we would recommend pursuing the resource grant to assist us with the community center issue after the conclusion of the November election. We felt that the downtown specific area planning process was to larger a project and we felt that items two and three above did not have the element of"fuss" and would probably be less appropriate for the resource available through the Institute for Local Government. Before Vice Mayor Nagel proceeded on writing up the description of the project we agreed that I would pass it by the Council in case any of you wanted to discuss at the Council meeting. Agenda 8a Item Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: September 18 2006 1 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE PENINSULA AVENUE INTERCHANGE AT U.S. HWY 101 AND A COST SHARING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN MATEO RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution for a scope of work for the Peninsula Avenue Interchange Traffic Study and a cost sharing agreement with the City of San Mateo in the amount of $25,000. DISCUSSION: Based on Council and public input received at the September 5, 2006 meeting, staff met with City of San Mateo and prepared a revised scope of work for the traffic study. It includes an additional scenario to study improvements to the U.S. 101/Poplar Avenue interchange with no changes to the existing Peninsula Avenue interchange. Further, the intersection of Bloomfield Avenue and Bayswater Avenue is included in the traffic volume projections. Following is the total scope of work with these revisions: ScenarioPoplar Ave. Interchange Peninsula Ave. ' interchange __ _ _.._ _� Existing (no_change__)___ (no change) 2Closure both ramps Existing (no change) 3Closure both ramps New on/off ramps 4Closure SB off-ramp Existing (no change) 5 Closure of SB off-ramp New SB off-ramp 6 Closure of SB off-ramp New SB on/offramps �7 I Improvement options ' Existing (no change) based on earlier study The traffic volumes in each scenario will be projected to year 2020 based on the San Mateo County traffic congestion model as well as City of Burlingame traffic analyzer. The study will include the future projected traffic from new development in the Burlingame bay front area as well as several key intersections and roadway segments in Burlingame as follows: • Humboldt street and Peninsula Avenue • Humboldt Street and Howard Avenue • Dwight Road/Delaware Avenue and Peninsula Avenue • Dwight Road and Burlingame Avenue • Bloomfield Avenue and Bayswater Avenue • Rollins Road and Howard Avenue • EI Camino Real and Peninsula Avenue • California Drive and Peninsula Avenue EI Camino Real and Burlingame Avenue • California Drive and Burlingame Avenue • Rollins Road and Hwy 101 on-off ramps/Cadillac Way • Rollins Road and Broadway • California Drive and Broadway • EI Camino Real and Broadway • Airport Boulevard and Hwy 101 interchange ramps In addition, the study will provide information on traffic conditions in the residential areas along Rollins Road, Howard Avenue and Bayswater Avenue. It should be pointed out that is a preliminary study designed to obtain information on traffic conditions for each scenario and to identify areas requiring more detailed analysis which would be done as part of the EIR. The City of San Mateo has hired Hexagon Transportation Consultants of San Jose to perform the study. Hexagon has performed similar work successfully and is a well qualified to perform the traffic study (see attachment). The study will take approximately six to eight weeks to complete. The total cost of the traffic study is $36,940 of which Burlingame's share is$25,000. PUBLIC OUTREACH: Staff has mailed notifications of the study session to residents of both communities who attended previous meetings on this subject. Newspaper advertisements have been published in the local newspapers that cover both cities. In addition, notices have been sent to citizens on the Burlingame list serve. BUDGET IMPACT: Burlingame's share of the traffic study is $25,000 which will be funded by Proposition 42 payments received from the State. EXHIBITS:Agreement with scope of services, resolution, map of the study area and fl chart of p ocess. ed Mur a, P.E. ssistant ublic Works Director S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\Peninsula Interchange traRcstudy-sr-9-18-06.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AND THE CITY OF SAN MATEO FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE PENINSULA AVENUE INTERCHANGE RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the Peninsula Avenue interchange is scheduled for reconstruction as part of improvementS to U.S. 101 ; and WHEREAS, the City of San Mateo is beginning a traffic study of the Peninsula Avenue/Poplar Avenue interchange system; and WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame should participate in that study in order to ensure that Burlingame's needs are met and to assist San Mateo in bearing the costs of a full study, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1 . The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the Agreement between the City of San Mateo and the City of Burlingame as contained in Exhibit A hereto. 2. The Clerk is directed to attest to the signature of the Manager. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SAN MATEO AND CITY OF BURLINGAME FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE PENINSULA AVENUE INTERCHANGE This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 2006, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California, hereafter "SAN MATEO", and the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California, hereafter "BURLINGAME". RECITALS: A. The U.S. 101 Auxiliary Lane project has been approved. This project will consist of adding an auxiliary lane to U.S. 101, provide soundwalls in the area, and reconfiguration of the eastern structure ramps. B. In an effort to examine the potential of relocating the U.S. 101/Poplar ramps to the Peninsula interchange, SAN MATEO has developed a number of ramp scenarios that would allow this interchange to serve both the east and west approach directions. C. SAN MATEO has contracted with Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., hereinafter "Hexagon," to perform a traffic study of potential Peninsula/U.S. 101 interchange ramp scenarios to determine their impact to the adjacent local street network. As the traffic impacts of the reconfiguration of this interchange falls to streets also within BURLINGAME, it has been requested by BURLINGAME that additional traffic analysis be performed in their City. D. In light of their common interests in conducting a traffic impact analysis, it is agreed that BURLINGAME will contribute $25,000 towards the overall $63,940 cost of the analysis. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED as follows: SECTION 1 - SCOPE OF AGREEMENT This agreement is for the purpose of BURLINGAME's cooperating with SAN MATEO in the conduct of the traffic impact analysis, receiving the results of that analysis in a usable, model form, and providing funds to SAN MATEO for the Hexagon traffic impact analysis. CADocuments and Settings\smurtuza\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLUTunding Agreeement-Burlingame-SanMateo2.DOC -1- SECTION 2 - DUTIES/REPRESENTATIONS OF SAN MATEO a. SAN MATEO shall be responsible for paying the full contract amount for the project. b. SAN MATEO shall require Hexagon to perform the traffic impact analysis in accordance with the Scope of Work contained in Exhibit A to this Agreement. SAN MATEO shall provide BURLINGAME with a copy of the existing agreement between SAN MATEO and Hexagon, and any changes to the agreement that occur in the future. C. SAN MATEO shall require Hexagon to name BURLINGAME, its officers and employees as additional insureds on the general liability and automobile liability insurance policies provided to SAN MATEO in connection with the work to be done by Hexagon on the traffic impact analysis and further require provision of endorsements demonstrating that Hexagon has done so. d. Upon completion of the traffic impact analysis, SAN MATEO shall provide a copy of the traffic impact analysis as well as a usable model of the traffic impact analysis to BURLINGAME as provided in Exhibit A. SECTION 3 - DUTIES/REPRESENTATIONS OF BURLINGAME a. BURLINGAME agrees that funding under this agreement satisfies BURLINGAME's obligations regarding, and is representative of BURLINGAME's fair share of the traffic impact analysis for the interchange ramp options. b. Within thirty (30) days of delivery by SAN MATEO to BURLINGAME of the traffic impact analysis completed pursuant to Section 2 above, BURLINGAME shall pay SAN MATEO the sum of$25,000. SECTION 4 - CHANGES TO SCOPE OF WORK OR COSTS a. If the contract cost billed to SAN MATEO by Hexagon is less than $63,940, then BURLINGAME shall only pay to SAN MATEO an amount equal to the actual contract cost multiplied by a factor of 0.3910 (25,000/63,940). b. No reduction or change in the Scope of Work contained in Exhibit A shall be made without the written consent of BURLINGAME. c. SAN MATEO agrees and understands that BURLINGAME shall not be responsible for any payment greater than $25,000 to SAN MATEO unless BURLINGAME has consented in writing to such a larger payment before any related costs or expenses are incurred. CADocuments and Settings\smurtuzaTocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK8\Funding Agreeement-Burlingame-SanMateo2.DOC -2- SECTION 5 - TERM The term for performance of this agreement shall extend until such time as SAN MATEO and BURLINGAME have completed their obligations under this Agreement. SECTION 6 - TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated by either party for cause only and otherwise shall be in full force and effect for the term. Cause to terminate this agreement shall be only for a material breach of its terms or obligations and may only take place after providing 30 days written notice of the material breach and a reasonable opportunity to cure. SECTION 7 - RELEASE AND INDEMNITY SAN MATEO agrees to hold harmless and indemnify BURLINGAME, its officers and employees from and against any and all claims, loss, liability, damage, and expense arising from the negligent, or claimed negligent, performance of this agreement by SAN MATEO or its contractor relating to the performance of this agreement. SAN MATEO agrees to defend BURLINGAME, its officers or employees against any such claims. This provision does not apply to claims, loss, liability or damage or expense arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct, or active negligence of BURLINGAME. BURLINGAME agrees to hold harmless and indemnify SAN MATEO, its officers and employees from and against any and all claims, loss, liability, damage, and expense arising from the negligent, or claimed negligent, performance of this agreement by BURLINGAME. BURLINGAME agrees to defend SAN MATEO, its officers, elected officials or employees against any such claims. This provision does not apply to claims, loss, liability or damage or expense arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct, or active negligence of SAN MATEO. SECTION 8 - NONASSIGNABILITY Both parties hereto recognize that this agreement cannot be transferred, assigned, or subcontracted by either party without the other party's written consent. SECTION 9 - WAIVERS The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any term, covenant, or condition of this agreement or of any provisions of any ordinance or law shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant, condition, CADocuments and Settings\smurtuza\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK8\Funding Agreeement-Burlingame-SanMateolDOC -3- ordinance or law or of any subsequent breach or violation of the same or of any other term, covenant, condition, ordinance or law or of any subsequent breach or violation of the same or of any other term, condition, ordinance, or law. SECTION 10 - COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES Attorney fees in an amount not exceeding $85 per hour per attorney, and in total amount not exceeding $5000, shall be recoverable as costs (by the filing of a cost bill) by the prevailing party in any action or actions to enforce the provisions of this agreement. The above $5000 limit is the total of attorneys' fees recoverable whether in the trial court, appellate court, or otherwise, and regardless of the number of attorneys, trials, appeals, or actions. It is the intent of this agreement that neither party shall have to pay the other more than $5000 for attorney's fees arising out of an action, or actions to enforce the provisions of this agreement. SECTION 11 - NON-DISCRIMINATION Each party warrants that it is an Equal Opportunity Employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither party nor any of its contractors shall discriminate in the employment of any person because of race, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, or age, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act or provisions of the ADA. In addition, SAN MATEO warrants that Hexagon has warranted to SAN MATEO that Hexagon is an Equal Opportunity Employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. SAN MATEO has further required Hexagon to contractually affirm that neither Hexagon nor any of its subcontractors shall discriminate in the employment of any person because of race, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, or age, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act or provisions of the ADA SECTION 12 - MEDIATION Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, any party may request that it be submitted to mediation. The parties shall meet in mediation within 30 days of a request. The mediator shall be agreed to by the mediating parties; in the absence of an agreement, the parties shall each submit one name from mediators listed by either the American Arbitration Association, the California State Board of Mediation and Conciliation, or other agreed-upon service. The mediator shall be selected by a "blindfolded" process. The cost of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties. Neither party shall be deemed the prevailing party. No party shall be permitted to file a legal CA\Documents and Settings\smurtuza\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLUTunding Agreeement-Burlingame-SanMateo2.DOC -4- action without first meeting in mediation and making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated settlement. The mediation process, once commenced by a meeting with the mediator, shall last until agreement is reached by the parties but not more than 60 days, unless the maximum time is extended by the parties. SECTION 13 - ARBITRATION After mediation above, and upon agreement of the parties, any dispute or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement may be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Rules of the American Arbitration Association, or any other rules agreed to by the parties and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The costs of arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties. SECTION 14 - NOTICES All notices hereunder shall be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To SAN MATEO: Larry Patterson Director or Public Works CITY OF SAN MATEO 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, California 94403 To BURLINGAME: Director of Public Works City of Burlingame 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, CA 94010 SECTION 15 - AGREEMENT CONTAINS ALL UNDERSTANDINGS: AMENDMENT This document represents the entire and integrated agreement between SAN MATEO and BURLINGAME and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and agreements, either written or oral. This document may be amended only by written instrument, signed by both parties. CADocuments and Settings\smurtuza\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK8\Funding Agreeement-Burlingame-SanMateol DOC -5- SECTION 16 - GOVERNING LAW This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAN MATEO and BURLINGAME have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF SAN MATEO CITY OF BURLINGAME Larry Patterson George Bagdon Director of Public Works Director of Public Works APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant City Attorney City Attorney Michael J. Ogaz CA\Documents and Settings\smurtuza\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK8\Funding Agreeement-Burlingame-SanMateolDOC -6- Exhibit "A" Scope of Work (5/5/06) Travel Demand Modeling/Forecasting Support for the Peninsula Avenue/US 101 Interchange Improvement Study Task 1: Develop Future Year Transportation Networks Hexagon will use the San Mateo Citywide travel demand model networks and C/CAG traffic congestion model the City of Burlingame to create future year transportation networks for the Peninsula Avenue Interchange Improvement Study. The networks need to reflect the preliminary alternatives that have been defined by city staff. The transportation networks and basic model data being used for this work consists of a San Mateo citywide travel demand model system that was validated against year 2000 ground counts and utilizes ABAG Projections 2000. The future networks will reflect up to five individual alternatives defined by City of San Mateo staff, plus a"No Build"Alternative. The future alternatives will all include the RTP Track 1 project list for the entire nine-county Bay Area. For the future year,both financially constrained and fiscally projected projects will be included in the background transportation networks. The defined alternatives for study are as follows: Scenario Number Poplar Interchange Peninsula Avenue Interchange 1 Existing Existing 2 Closure of both ramps No access to/from SB 101 (existing) 3 Closure of both ramps New SB off-and on-ramp(full i/c) 4 Closure of off-ramp No access to/from SB 101 (existing) 5 Closure of off-ramp New SB off-ramp 6 Closure of off-ramp New SB off-and on-ramp (full i/c) 7* Safety Improvements Existing *Review of safety improvements at Amphlett/Poplar completed under separate contract. All scenarios will be modeled for year 2020, using the land use data assumpations associated with the 2020 Corridor Plan with Bay Meadows Phase II project. The forecast for Scenario 1 has already been developed. Task 2: Develop Year 2020/2030 Travel Demand Forecasts Hexagon will use the San Mateo Citywide travel demand forecast model system to create travel forecast scenarios for the transportation alternatives shown in Task 1. This model will be used as the basis for developing travel forecasts and future intersection link volumes for five future alternatives, plus a No Build option(see Task 1). For each scenario, volumes for the AM and PM peak 3-hour periods will be produced. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Scope of Work to Conduct Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis for the Peninsula Interchange Improvement Study 1 Task 3: Evaluate Travel Demand for Alternatives Hexagon will provide a series of model outputs for the six individual alternatives. Hexagon will analyze the AM and PM peak(3-hour)period results of these model runs and provide the following information: • Volume plots, • Difference plots, and • Level of Service(volume-to-capacity)plots. The change in forecast volumes(for each alternative)wil be analyzed for 17 individual intersections as follows: I. Humboldt Street& Third Avenue 2. Humboldt Street&Fourth Avenue 3. Humboldt Street&Peninsula Avenue 4. Humboldt Street& Poplar Avenue 5. Delaware Street& Third Avenue 6. Delaware Street& Fourth Avenue 7. Delaware Street& Peninsula Avenue 8. Delaware Street& Poplar Avenue 9. El Camino Real &Third Avenue 10. El Camino Real & Fourth Avenue 11. El Camino Real &Peninsula Avenue/Park Road 12. El Camino Real &Poplar Avenue 13. El Camino Real &Burlingame Avenue 14. El Camino Real&Broadway Avenue 15. Burlingame Avenue and Dwight Road 16. Broadway Avenue and California Avenue 17. Airport Boulevard and US 101 Interchange ramps 18. Bloomfield/Bayswater* *This intersection may require additional modeling if not currently in model. Task 4: Perform Select Link Analysis for Alternatives Hexagon will provide select link analysis for the six individual alternatives shown in Task 1. Hexagon will analyze up to two select link analyses for both the AM and PM peak(3-hour)periods,for a total of 24 possible select link runs. Task 5: Develop Travel Demand for 2020 Alternative without 25th Av Extension Hexagon will use the San Mateo Citywide travel demand forecast model system to create travel forecast for the scenario that includes extension of 28`h Avenue and 31"Avenue and does not include the extension of 25`h Avenue. This model will be used as the basis for developing travel forecasts and future link volumes. For this scenario,volumes for the AM and PM peak 3-hour periods will be produced. Products will include volume plots, difference plots(comparing to the alternative that includes the extension of 25`h Avenue),and level of service (volume-to-capacity) plots. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Scope of Work to Conduct Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis for the Peninsula Interchange Improvement Study 2 Task 6: Document Analysis and Prepare Traffic Demand Forecasting Model Memorandum Hexagon will prepare draft technical documentation presenting the results of the travel demand forecasts. The evaluation data developed in Task 3, and the change in intersection link volumes resulting from each of the alternatives(compared to the No Build)will be incorporated into the travel demand forecasting technical memorandum. Task 7: Attend Meetings Hexagon will attend up to three meetings with City staff in conjunction with this study. Any results, analyses, model outputs or services not described in the above tasks are considered extra services and would be subject to a supplemental add-on to the initial scope of work. Schedule The analysis and the draft memorandum of the forecast results will take approximately 6 weeks to complete. It is anticipated that another two to three weeks will be needed to respond to any remaining questions and concerns by city staff. The analysis will be completed by June 30, 2006 Cost The cost of producing and documenting the travel demand model runs and analysis is estimated at $55,972($55,572 in labor costs and$400 in other direct costs). The break down of costs by task is included in the following table. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Scope of Work to Conduct Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis for the Peninsula Interchange Improvement Study 3 Cost Estimate(5/5/06) Travel Demand Forecasting Support for Peninsula Interchange Improvement Feasibility Study Jill Ling Jennifer Jordan Hough Jin Hunter Chan Total Labor Total Labor Other Total Task \Rate 162 94 85 66 Hours Cost Direct Cost Cost 1.Develop Future Year Transportation Networks(5) 8 32 8 48 4,818 4,818 2.Develop 2020/2030 Forecasts for 6 Alternatives 16 40 56 6,336 6,336 3.Evaluate Travel Demand for Alternatives 32 80 24 136 14,256 14,256 4.Perform Select Link Analysis 24 80 104 11,374 11,374 5.Develop and Analyze 2020 without 25th Av connection 8 28 36 3,916 3,916 6.Prepare Model Forecast Documentation 28 20 40 88 9,823 100 9,923 7.Attend Meetings(3) 20 12 8 40 5,049 300 5,349 Total 136 292 48 32 508 55,572 400 $55,972 Hexagon Transportation Consultants,Inc. Scope of Work to Conduct Travel Demand Forecasting Analysis for the Peninsula Interchange Improvement Study 4 ♦P ,y . ..• ,r 6x.. J 4� }, .aX ` _ .. � V ogyeS - r be + 4�,. b . M a. 4.+, r .. ay 'rt 1`y 9 tiJ• s` ° s��f V. ;♦ .J ',4 . „ . M rr ,# •..,Y r{r'3°.'n', *" �' ti 'R*f -,• _. 7 .^ }4,° - - 4 ' t ,�.~.n39' ,"zd.,;"�trN'"�Pb]x, cy Gt7y'�► ' '� a ''♦ `tr"� $g��w1 r,1y,.'r�e4.yk kd.� ',��-Bri,a- s,+w. r, a��.y' @ . ]y4'tf}f5f ,!e. ' +fq4"St'uTo'. tt .. e ' a y ^,pi • E 11qYaS4qYo4tµ e6ow,� 9016610Uj`OWWA1Y FF..�fYr� i !4'�'.t.,,.,k-gyp"P',yi�►. s f l r a �. ,ti�.ef-trf f , � ��, .,� }�, k�a � y "ts" r, � ...+3x °"4 ° R>.tr+ 4 " •a .�.r y.. P e9' a x �` y.•`^' , f-'-" '_s' ' r� "i. �.. •�`y F,>Y}x�''�* v.F 1 �� a. k � � #� � ,.ara°4,,.aryr{M-1"►+.� a a �.y ' • R�ft M"'�ta�..+ t w +�.} •�4 iS4 .F''7}SR:,+.°,x �aFYT" ♦.y yF...'#{,ay�atoo,a '. *'. f�..� .'v:y r.r'tr a ! h ,r a. 1F,io ' raV' J'�to.- 4 �' \ } . .y'�n 1L ' /�' #FY ,p9��Y#e M '"�; e # . ;' J'°, - ...ry '#, ,� $' a..� a �e]6r�d,� �+�4 'Ws jV �_. +: �- 4��, ;• ,.' ��a�, T '".J*�. tl° �Y !�''.J X e �j < ��It* �+ V �'°rk ro7] R y � R.yt:y " ,;z � +.�:.,, y ;tr.fr{�P,t�„ .} �w �� K � ��.y�are.' rs... "R':�tit, or •,' y . :rr. ,.{ F^ �' il' A •tq. �f''Jk "h-t ,"yy` 'St +>.t"a a .rr..�r'Ir riy, '"# '+]t, ',yc ahM � ^" [.. , ti � Aw, �yy, 2G. p "# a 4 �'] #. XX i°• T °k,,�♦ }t J.♦ �a P`A s. "� "d ^�.. b , u �'�atR( ��^+;Y •�& � m°i., .r` ,{'�. g,'. ,�^�„'°i +A up.. X rA J"+{"t � �. *v .� ,�:xP 4 J!#,•`'"i F°rx� • `5°,t/..y��5 a M 7'k',gt k :,w`:`r' i µ�$+^ d ;a a w t' P '�k° "'�` *°' 14�A+.s' :;a 4Mr ✓o YJ'+c., yF' 1` 'y► ..MC +' ''k '' YC41-0� y +5 ;p °" i s N. 5 v r .L•,. �4,,7 t p.i* � 'j", ti,s� n. 'i y�":•s�. ',ptc �" a,'�.'i. "4, pia .` " _: S.rr: - '�; Y�`,ih'., . sq,.";•^t r 'I$'. ^y"��Y',.^' r�,< ># _ 4' ror J ➢. . i- i `ivv +` .:� ) � ;,� fifi.,•�;,` tc,(e y,. "Afi.. kiN*k' v+�"" .i,� ..• 4 r,� , t `k' z w. a# .,. +*k ,:;r�� ' '-+.�' �' .4 ,x ! +., wr`'r_ J:ra ,..4.+Mx »,:.�� '� t e• y�yi' < 'a f+ Ms. .,y^ '#. .§§� p •+,P y' +.'rot' i ti= .. k ] ryi� �s, L� + • ,fie�44s't °..w fJ�r. 1(_„ �' .e4 •tr...a .Iry«a''♦w .+9' g .> o ^ '♦ _ "� • R Ay 'd'"a }.; ♦ ` �r 4 Via,+ :,� A .+ ,f'A4 meg.- ' x 4 r. ai. ,., V r R*' } "'�R. 5..' #.ut •a `" ® r^ # °tr .3.'.�'� �`*. �"a�p'T�ro4Y 'B'� ''FS'' � x4�.'t' k h '�¢'d • yj M� i n . . a , ! . x, e w *ti` w -# » • yy-' 'r HB < i, wo., �# •' x y R fl4 ,� 'Yi @. '.,. p ' ..4 u,, !a -,'¢� R yew�.,I �v� ,e• s.y." :n„�” .;¢�^ �.. �'�''�i#'� � t,.,`" RwSir ,,y ! 4� °.� r � ]¢A� 'i°A�{ 'dx t` �tt+' ��'• „1"M'rIIrM.AAAIII . s,W ri 'k�� „ 1 ♦.� .: a �. .P 4 + \� ,h t Vr'°a ,y`s xx ^'S ,>tt� __ w°roy, i 7 W a / yl;, 4 ice„ a. .,� ]�`� °2 as `#X" . '�' af�°ti��.!}�v :I ��" �� ` � ± r '�.'� .,. ' 3 'Ik , `h. y J p. r kM, fro` .. � � \ Y „ a,.M $�� t x •'� V� . y��p J`K ''4• "'\4w�i J +'_7. � 'f '�'v«,., ,... .t } w 1� 44.*ere,4�, �i �'. 'a r�_ 3' 1a.'°';M � etuantlWin 4 ' y y, ,•, a � ' �"�- "� y� r ,�_,, •V+ �` A � .' w q�,�a6( .� .';� x * . .. per, '#'tB `''iq°�ri. "t« $ ntta', '.t` �k „ A � ♦ � .tt 4 a 4 ek ffi yR x,� j + �23 ih.� T f, r 4 �� 9 • t �� J ��y"eT 'T i'�� 4 '. '�klf�y'� r� roe .. SPS ava. {i''1KI�1 x ... � �aa0t , kfYe � . . jj� ' �""'� �# aA;t -�- �• � � �d`n :r ,a w��II�� " • . � y,n � ''. p. a�-.-,,iY4,�a d M! �" Ti-f�`"y"e _ 4L rp, , v p r I al u �. s Agenda Item # 8b Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: September 18 2006 1 SUBMITTED BY AW I APPROVED BY /!r TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL v DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AWARDING MILLS CANYON SEWER AND ACCESS ROAD REPAIRS, CITY PROJECT NO. 81700 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution awarding Mills Canyon Access and Road Repairs to Hillside Drilling Company, Inc. in the amount of $297,369. BACKGROUND: Due to heavy rains and an unusually long winter earlier this year, a mud slide occurred on a sewer easement in the Mills Canyon area which damaged an access road to the sewer main. Over the last few months staff has worked with geologists and FEMA representatives to develop a project that would stabilize the slide area and prevent further earth movement before next winter. The scope of the project includes constructing two soldier pile retaining walls, repairing roadway sections, repairing drainage structures, and slurry sealing of the access road. DISCUSSION OF BIDS: Bids were opened on September 6, 2006 and two bids were received. Bids ranged from $297,369 to $353,895. The low bid was 9.4% below the Engineer's estimate of $328,078. The low bidder, Hillside Drilling Company, Inc. has successfully completed a similar retaining wall project in Mills Canyon for the City in 2003 and is also working on another slide repair project in Mills Canyon. The company is experienced in performing work of this size and nature. Construction will begin immediately and will be completed by the end of October. BUDGET IMPACT: Construction contract $297,369 Contingency (15%) 44,631 Construction Management 27,000 Staff Administration 31 ,000 Total $400,000 S:W Public Works Directory\Staff Repo rts\81700MiIlsCynSlideStaffRprt Rev 1Aug 06.doc Funds are available in the 2006/2007 Sewer CIP. Staff will pursue possible reimbursement from FEMA for the project costs. EXHIBITS: Resolution,Agreement and Bid Summary Donald T.Chang P.E. Senior Civil Engineer c: City Clerk,City Attorney, Hillside Drilling Company, Inc. S:\A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\8170OMilIsCynSlideStaffRprtRevlAugO6.doc RESOLUTION NO. - AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MILLS CANYON SEWER AND ACCESS ROAD REPAIRS TO HILLSIDE DRILLING COMPANY, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 81700 WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized an invitation for proposals for the - CITY PROJECT 81700 --CONTRACT FOR MILLS CANYON SEWER AND ACCESS ROAD REPAIRS WHEREAS, on SEPTEMBER 6, 2006, all proposals were received and opened before the City Clerk and representatives of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, HILLSIDE DRILLING COMPANY, INC submitted the lowest responsible bid for the job in the amount of $297,369. NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, and it is hereby ORDERED, that the Plans and Specifications, including all addenda, are approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the bid of HILLSIDE DRILLING COMPANY, INC, for said project in the amount of $297,369, and the same hereby is accepted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THERETO that a contract be entered into between the successful bidder hereinabove referred to and the City of Burlingame for the performance of said work, and that the City Manager be, and he hereby is authorized for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame to execute said contract and to approve the faithful performance bond and the labor materials bond required to be furnished by the contractor. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk SAA Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81700\ResolutnAward.awd.doc AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT MILLS CANYON SEWER AND ACCESS ROAD REPAIRS CITY PROJECT NO. 81700 THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate and entered into in the City of Burlingame, County of San Mateo, State of California on , , 2006, by and between the CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and Hillside Drilling, hereinafter called "Contractor," WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, City has taken appropriate proceedings to authorize construction of the public work and improvements herein provided for and to authorize execution of this Contract; and WHEREAS,pursuant to State law and City requirements, a notice was duly published for bids for the contract for the improvement hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2006, after notice duly given, the City Council of Burlingame awarded the contract for the construction of the improvements hereinafter described to Contractor, which the Council found to be the lowest responsible bidder for these improvements; and WHEREAS, City and Contractor desire to enter into this agreement for the construction of said improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work Contractor shall perform the work described in those Specifications entitled: MILLS CANYON SEWER AND ACCESS ROAD REPAIRS, CITY PROJECT NO. 81700 2. The Contract Documents The complete contract consists of the following documents: this Agreement,Notice Inviting Sealed Bids,the prevailing wage rates of the State of California applicable to this project by State law,the accepted Bid Proposal,the complete plans,profiles, detailed drawings and Standard Specifications, Special Provisions and all bonds, and are hereinafter referred to as the Contract Documents. All rights and obligations of City and Contractor are fully set forth and described in the Contract Documents. All of the above described documents are intended to cooperate so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in the other, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all said documents. AGREEMENT- 1 3. Contract Price The City shall pay, and the Contractor shall accept, in full, payment of the work above agreed to be done, the sum of two hundred ninety-seven thousand three hundred sixty-nine dollars ($297,369). This price is determined by the unit prices contained in Contractor's Bid. In the event authorized work is performed or materials furnished in addition to those set forth in Contractor's Bid and the Specifications, such work and materials will be paid for at the unit prices therein contained. Said amount shall be paid in progress payments as provided in the Contract Documents. 4. Provisions Cumulative. The provisions of this Agreement are cumulative and in addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or remedies available to the City. 5. Notices. All notices shall be in writing and delivered in person or transmitted by certified mail, postage prepaid. Notices required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows: CITY ENGINEER CITY OF BURLINGAME 501 Primrose Road Burlingame, California 94010 Notices required to be given to Contractor shall be addressed as follows: Hillside Drilling Attn: Bob Ramos P.O. Box 70130 Point Richmond, CA 94807 6. Interpretation. As used herein, any gender includes the other gender and the singular includes the plural and vice versa. 7. Waiver or Amendment. No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the City and the Contractor. AGREEMENT- 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two identical counterparts of this Agreement, consisting of three (3) pages, including this page, each of which counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original of this Agreement, have been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named on the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF BURLINGAME, "CONTRACTOR" a Municipal Corporation By By City Manager—James Nantell Hillside Drilling Co. Inc. Approved as to form: City Attorney—Larry Anderson ATTEST: City Clerk—Doris Mortensen AGREEMENT- 3 CITY OF BURLINGAME BID SUMMARY MILLS CANYON SEWER AND ACCESS ROAD REPAIRS City Project No.81700 Engineer's Estimate Hillside Drilling,Inc. Malcolm Drilling Co.Inc. ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICETOTAL COST QUANTITY SCHEDULE STREET RESURFACING FEMA Category B Work 1 Mobilization&Demobilization 1.00 LS $24,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 17,469.00 $ 17,469.00 $ 44,475.00 $ 44,475.00 2 Construction Survey and Site Preparation 1.00 LS $3,500.00 $ 31500.00 $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 4,800.00 3 Clearing and Grubbing 1.00 LS $26,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 4a Concrete Piers 660 VLF $150.00 $ 99,000.00 $ 125.00 $ 82,500.00 $ 201.00 $ 132,660.00 4b Lagged Sections 390 SF $20.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 50.00 $ 19,500.00 $ 3200. $ 12,480.00 4c Disposal of Soil 140 CY $140.00 $ 19,600.00 $ 65.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 62.00 $ 8,680.00 5 Class 1 Permeable Material,in place 12 TONS $250.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 400.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 711.00 $ 8,532.00 6 Asphalt Concrete Restoration Along New Wall 1,400.00 SF $20.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 23.00 $ 32,200.00 $ 11.00 $ 15,400.00 7 Core barrel drilling hours 15 SF $20.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 950.00 $ 14,250.00 8 Restoration,Finish Grading and Revegetation 1.00 LS $15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 6,100.00 $ 6,100.00 9 Concrete Sack Transitions on End of Walls 30.00 SF $10.00 $ 300.00 $ 90.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 48.00 $ 1,440.00 10 Clean,Reconstruct and Line Ditch 72.00 LF $20.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 22.00 $ 1,584.00 $ 57.00 $ 4,104.00 SUBTOTAL BID(FEMA Category B Work): $ 227,940.00 $ 216,863.00 $ 268,421.00 FEMA Category C Work 1(i) Mobilization&Demobilization 1.00 LS $6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 15,760.00 $ 15,760.00 2(i) Construction Survey and Site Preparation 1.00 LS $1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 3(i) Clearing and Grubbing 1.00 LS $6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 4a(i) Concrete Piers 110 VLF $150.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 140.00 $ 15,400.00 $ 175.00 $ 19,250.00 4b(i) Lagged Sections 80 SF $20.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 40.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 49.00 $ 31920.00 4c(i) Disposal of Soil 20 CY $140.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 65.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 146.00 $ 2,920.00 5(i) Class 1 Permeable Material,in place 3 TONS $250.00 $ 750.00 $ 300.00 $ 900.00 $ 881.00 $ 2,643.00 6(i) Asphalt Concrete Restoration Along New Wall 400.00 SF $20.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 27.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 14.00 $ 5,600.00 7(i) Core barrel drilling hours 5 SF $20.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 600.00 $ 3,000.00 8(i) Restoration,Finish Grading and Revegetation 1.00 LS $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 9(i) Concrete Sack Transitions on End of Walls 20.00 SF $10.001 $ 200.00 $ 90.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 55.00 $ 1,100.00 SUBTOTAL BID(FEMA Category C Work): $ 48,460.00 $ 43,900.00 $ 62,093.00 Alternate Work Items ALT 1 Asphalt Concrete-Dig-out repairs at Various Locations 1,700.00 SF $20.00 $34,000.00 $ 1200. $ 20,400.00 $ 10.00 $ 17,000.00 ALT 2 Crack Sealing 1.00 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,325.00 $ 5,325.00 ALT 3 Slurry Seal 12,640.00 SF $0.45 $5,688.00 $ 0.65 $ 8,216.00 $ 0.40 $ 5,056.00 ALT 4 Rip Rap Placed Below Culvert Discharge 2000. TONS $100.00 $2,000.00 $ 150.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 6,000.00 SUBTOTAL BID(Alternate Work Items): $51,688.00 $36,616.00 $33,381.00 a egory B Work,category or erna e $ Work Items): 328,078.00 $ 297,369.00 $ 353,895.00 By LL 9/6/2006 1 of 1 Agenda Item # 8c Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2006 SUBMITTED BY I APPROVED BY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROJECT AND APPROVING AN INCREASE IN FUNDING — CP 81120 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council accept the Airport Boulevard Resurfacing Project in the amount of $392,770.01. It is also recommended that the Council approve the transfer of $60,000 to the project from Proposition 42 Gas Tax funds. BACKGROUND: On April 17, 2006, the Council awarded the project to G. Bortolotto & Company in the amount of $339,388 and approved a $60,000 contingency. $53,400 of the contingency was expended for additional paving along Airport Boulevard to take advantage of the low bid prices. The project has been completed successfully. DISCUSSION OF FUNDING: The approved 2005-06 capital improvement budget for the project is $380,000. However, staff requested a $60,000 contingency authorization knowing that additional gas tax funds from Proposition 42 would become available prior to the completion of the work. The City has recently received $210,000 of Proposition 42 funds. As a result, staff is requesting authorization to transfer $60,000 gas tax funds from Proposition 42 to the project at this time. As this is a federal grant project, staff will be requesting reimbursement of $160,000 from the State. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Final progress payment BUDGET IMPACT: The following is a financial summary of the Project. Expenditures: Construction 391,764 Consultant Inspection 22,395 Engineering Admin. 20,841 Total $435,000 With the approval of $60,000 of additional gas tax funds, there is sufficient revenue available for the project. Any remaining funds will be transferred to other resurfacing projects at a later time. SAA Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\81120acceptance.doc RESOLUTION NO. - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF $60,000 IN PROPOSITION 42 FUNDS TO PROJECT NO. 81120 CITY PROJECT NO. 81120 RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the City is completing the Airport Boulevard Resurfacing Project; and WHEREAS,the Project was expanded to included additional footage on Airport Boulevard under the terms of the project agreement; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 funds are now available to fund this additional work, NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: 1. An appropriation of$60,000 from the Proposition 42 funds received by the City to the Airport Boulevard Resurfacing Project is approved. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk sAapubl i cworksdir\proj ects\re sol uti onaward 1 RESOLUTION NO. - ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS - AIRPORT BOULEVARD RESURFACING PROJECT BY G. BORTOLOTTO & COMPANY CITY PROJECT NO. 81120 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame,California,and this Council does hereby find, order and determine as follows: 1. The Director of Public Works of said City has certified the work done by G. BORTOLOTTO & COMPANY under the terms of its contract with the City dated APRIL 17, 2006 has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. Said work is particularly described as City Project No. 81120. 3. Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. Mayor I,DORIS MORTENSEN,City Clerk of the City of Burlingame,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81120\RESOLUTN.ACC.wpd G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. CITY OF BURLINGAME DATE: August-29-06 580 Bragato Road PROGRESS PAYMENT 4 (Final) FOR THE MONTH OF: JULY San Carlos, CA 94070 AIRPORT BLVD. RESURFACING PROGRAM PURCHASE ORDER R 10095 TELEPHONE: (650) 595-2591 CITY PROJECT NO. 81120 ITEM UNIT BID UNIT BID QUANTITY 5 AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT A ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE QUANTITY SIZE AMOUNT TO DATE PAID TO DATE PAID THIS PMT. A). STREET RESURFACING 1.00 : A.C. DIGOUT REPAIR $70.00 100.00 : TON 7,000.00 121.99 121.99% $ 8,539.30 $ 8,539.30 $ - 2.00 AGGREGATE BASE $20.00 20.00 : TON 400.00 0.008 : $ - $ - $ 3.00 LEVELING COURSE $83.00 870.00 : TON 72,210.00 806.96 92.758 $ 66,977.68 $ 66,977.68 $ 4.00 A.C. OVERLAY $82.28 1945.00 : TON 160,034.60 2546.00 130.905 : $ 209,484.88 $ 209,484.88 $ - 5.00 COLD PLANE $43.74 1476.00 : C.Y. 64,560.24 1566.00 106.105 : $ 68,496.84 $ 68,496.84 $ - 6.00 : ENGINEERED PAVING MAT $3.11 6187.00 S.Y. 19,241.57 4920.00 79.525 $ 15,301.20 $ 15,301.20 $ - 7.00 ADJUST MANHOLES $301.00 2.00 EACH 602.00 1.00 50.005 : $ 301.00 $ 301.00 $ - 8.00 ADJUST VLVES, LAMPHOLES, ETC. $301.00 2.00 EACH 602.00 12.00 600.005 $ 3,612.00 $ 3,612.00 $ - 9.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOP $436.00 14.00 EACH 6,104.00 15.00 107.145 $ 6,540.00 $ 6,540.00 $ - 10.00 TYPE "A" & "AY" (PAVEMENT MARKERS) $3.27 57.00 : EACH 186.39 210.00 368.425 $ 686.70 $ 686.70 $ 11.00 TYPE "D" & BLUE (PAVEMENT MARKERS) $6.54 260.00 EACH 1,700.40 300.00 115.385 $ 1,962.00 $ 1,962.00 $ - 12.00 6" SOLID LINE -- PAINT $1.00 1.00 : L.F. 1.00 0.005 $ - $ - $ - 13.00 8" SOLID LINE -- PAINT $2.18 140.00 : L.F. 305.20 476.00 340.005 : $ 1,037.68 $ 1,037.68 $ - 14.00 4" SOLID LINE -- PAINT $0.81 6005.00 : L.F. 4,864.05 9129.00 152.025 : $ 7,394.49 $ 7,394.49 $ - 15.00 12" SOLID LINE -- PAINT $3.27 190.00 : L.F. 621.30 312.00 164.215 $ 1,020.24 $ 1,020.24 $ - 16.00 LEGENDS & ARROWS -- PAINT $3.54 270.00 : S.F. 955.80 400.00 148.155 $ 1,416.00 $ 1,416.00 $ - - ORIGINAL BID $ 339,387.55 STREET RESURFACING TOTAL $ 339,388.55 $ 392,770.01 $ 392,770.01 $ CHANGE ORDERS: - �_-. '---'--'-'--- -' '---"-- CO 2 ....._._.........-........-'--- .............---'--'-....-._...........----...-- CHANGE ORDERS $ _ _ 0.005 $ $ $ DATE PREPARED BY: LISHA LIN SUBTOTAL * ****** * $ 339,388.55 *********** *********** $ 392,770.01 $ 392,770.01 $ LESS FIVE PERCENT RETENTION ************ ************ $ - $ (19,638.50) $ 19,638.50 CHECKED BY: +*k*******#k * ****** * iak*i***+kkkirfff* +++++aiii+iii *+**+kkkrf*f ---------------- ______________ ---------------- APPROVED BY SUBTOTAL WITHOUT DEDUCTIONS ************* ********** $ 392,770.01 $ 373,131.51 $ 19,638.50 CITY ENGINEER: AMOUNT DUE FROM CONTRACTOR APPROVED BY iakki*r*iii* * ********+i+a+a+i++++*i+iai #*#***#**+#++ aia+a+*+aa+* ________________ --------------- CONSULTANT: TOTAL THIS PERIOD ****************** ************ ************ $ 392,770.01 $ 373,131.51 $ 19,638.50 one�a,x Agenda 8d Item Meeting BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT Date: SeptemAr 18 2006 1 SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY o TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE MILLS CANYON SLIDE REPAIRS PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 81720 BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Public Contract Code 22035, Council awarded an emergency construction contract to Hillside Drilling Company, Inc., for performing repairs to the Mills Canyon mudslide at its meeting on September 5, 2006. This is a progress update report provided in accordance with the requirements of Pubic Contract Code 22035. PROGRESS UPDATE: The following progress has been made on the project: ■ Hillside Drilling Company, Inc. has executed the contract and has satisfied the insurance and bonding requirements. ■ The contractor has initiated purchasing materials and equipment to perform the work. It is anticipated that the materials will be delivered to the site by September 18. ■ Staff is in the final stages of negotiating with the adjacent property owners for site access. ■ Preliminary topographic and property surveys for the mudslide area are completed. Doug Bell Senior Engineer C: City Clerk, City Attorney, Director of Public Works, Hillside Drilling Company, Inc. S:\A Public Works Directory\PROJECTS\81720\Staff ReportProgressUpdate091806.doc ) $2,033,275.34 Ck. No. 20637-21117 Excludes Library cks. 21080-21117 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT �TPsus/Uu�� Payroll for August 2006 $2,659,549.32 Ck. No. 166317- 166582 INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION m oa C 5' n. oa � CDo d 3 00 S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS O 61 CITY OF BURLINGAME 09-08-2006 W A R R A NT R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 FUND RECAP - 06-07 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 36,384.78 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 7,341.25 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 59,248.16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 4,381.38 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 9,054.87 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 171.50 WATER FUND 526 305,716.14 SEWER FUND 527 387.39 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 4,036.00 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 91.68 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 644.80 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 6,534.89 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 25,454.04 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 17,454.35 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 458.20 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 259.20 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1,460.55 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 5479,079.18 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 8 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 20997 THROUGH 21079 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8479,079.18, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . . . ........ ......... ........... ...... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ..... ...................I........... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 09/08/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 21073 BAY AREA MOTORSPORTS WEST 26852 4,905.50 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 4,905.50 620 66700 800 21074 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26896 105.66 COMMUNICATIONS 105.66 201 65200 160 21075 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26897 917.51 COMMUNICATIONS 917.51 201 65200 160 21076 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26898 36.25 OFFICE EXPENSE 36.25 101 64150 110 21077 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26899 67.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 67.98 101 64150 120 21078 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26900 51.97 COMMUNICATIONS 51.97 101 64250 160 21079 LINGULAR WIRELESS 26901 138.81 COMMUNICATIONS 138.81 101 65300 160 TOTAL $479,079.18 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 09/08/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 21061 TES 25256 62.54 SUPPLIES 62.54 620 15000 21062 SSFFD CTC 25376 240.00 MISCELLANEOUS 240.00 731 22554 21063 NETVERSANT SILICON VALLEY 25422 1,151.70 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,151.70 619 64460 210 5270 21064 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 111.70 OFFICE EXPENSE 30.63 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 3.01 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 22.57 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 33.27 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 2.65 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 19.57 101 64350 110 21065 SYSKA HENNESSEY 26142 682.50 MISCELLANEOUS 682.50 619 64460 804 21066 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26161 43.04 COMMUNICATIONS 43.04 530 65400 160 21067 AUTOMOTIVE RESOURCES INC 26419 2,001.55 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 2,001.55 201 65200 203 21068 LAKE TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS 26590 1,637.82 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,637.82 101 66210 222 21069 UNITED COMFORT SOLUTIONS INC 26639 2,000.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,000.00 619 64460 210 5240 21070 WEF MEMBERSHIP 26809 144.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 144.00 527 66520 240 21071 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 771.97 MISC. SUPPLIES 347.65 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 180.93 526 69020 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 243.39 527 66520 110 21072 RIZALINE PEJI 26847 420.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 120.00. 101 36330 000 1213 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 09/08/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 21051 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 3,637.19 MISCELLANEOUS 348.54 201 35200 OFFICE EXPENSE 74.53 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 234.23 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 152.63 201 65200 120 SMALL TOOLS 37.04 201 65200 130 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 132.50 201 65200 140 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 213.24 201 65200 190 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 499.13 201 65200 200 GAS, OIL & GREASE 5.00 201 65200 201 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 100.02 201 65200 203 RADIO MAINT. 1,319.78 201 65200 205 MISCELLANEOUS 443.87 731 22557 MISCELLANEOUS 76.68 731 22554 21052 AETNA 24760 - 3,036.01 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,764.71 130 20022 MISCELLANEOUS 271.30 130 20028 21053 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 4,305.24 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,305.24 130 20014 21054 EXCEL FITNESS SOLUTIONS 24854 387.48 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 387.48 201 65200 200 21055 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 249631,151.27 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 575.63 101 65100 200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 575.64 530 65400 200 21056 ARBORWEAR LLC 24999 611.04 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 611.04 101 68020 140 2300 21057 A2Z BUSINESS SYSTEMS 25020 1,494.19 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,120.64 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 373.55 101 65150 220 21058 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 609.37 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171.35 201 65200 220 21059 HEART OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 25152 10,621.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 10,621.00 101 64560 240 21060 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 115.42 OFFICE EXPENSE 10.16 201 65500 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 105.26 201 65200 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R - PAGE 4 09/08/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 21038 JOHN KAMMEYER 22612 400.00 MISCELLANEOUS 400.00 731 22554 21039 TURF STAR 22682 39.77 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 39.77 101 68020 200 2200 21040 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 300.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 731 22554 21041 OFFICE MAX 23306 523.19 OFFICE EXPENSE 30.62 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 30.62 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 166.42 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 295.53 621 64450 110 C 21042 AIRGAS 23307 168.72 SMALL TOOLS 168.72 201 65200 130 21043 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 600.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 300.00 101 66100 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 300.00 526 69020 260 21044 AT&T 23661 23.79 COMMUNICATIONS 23.79 621 64450 160 21045 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 450.83 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 118.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 332.83 619 64460 220 5110 21046 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 472.63 COMMUNICATIONS 285.39 101 68020 160 2300 COMMUNICATIONS 187.24 619 64460 160 21047 CHRISTINE GRANUCCI 24197 1,535.25 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,535.25 101 64420 210 21048 SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER 24408 3,500.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 3,500.00 101 65100 292 21049 IMEDD INCORPORATED 24550 970.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 970.00 201 65200 260 21050 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 - 9,054.87 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,054.87 326 80950 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 09/08/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 21022 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 171.50 OFFICE EXPENSE 171.50 327 81700 110 21023 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 520.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 520.00 101 64420 210 21024 HUSBANDS & ASSOCIATES 19253 2,062.25 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,062.25 101 68020 260 2200 21025 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 353.65 MISC. SUPPLIES 353.65 201 65200 111 21026 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 41.60 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 41.60 201 65200 203 21027 AMERICA PRINTING 19430 54.13 OFFICE EXPENSE 54.13 101 64250 110 21028 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 4,036.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,036.00 528 66600 210 21029 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 745.41 COMMUNICATIONS 745.41 621 64450 160 21030 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 20335 3,426.00 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 3,426.00 320 81710 800 21031 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S AREA 20366 40,429.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40,429.00 201 65500 220 21032 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 185.00 MISCELLANEOUS 185.00 101 64350 031 21033 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 16,389.62 MISCELLANEOUS 16,389.62 621 64450 400 21034 SEWER RAT 21821 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 21035 ATLAS TOWING SERVICES, INC. 21937 330.00 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 330.00 625 65213 203 21036 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 1,113.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,113.78 526 69020 120 21037 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 1,900.00 MISCELLANEOUS 570.00 201 35221 000 7100 MISCELLANEOUS 1,330.00 201 35220 000 7100 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 09/08/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 21010 LIFE ASSIST 09392 25.63 SUPPLIES 25.63 201 65200 112 21011 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220 21012 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN 10567 5,433.00 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 103.00 101 67500 011 MISCELLANEOUS 158.00 526 69020 010 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SVC. 5,699.00 526 69020 011 MISCELLANEOUS -527.00 530 65400 010 21013 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 2,680.44 MISC. SUPPLIES 34.60 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 128.54 201 65200 120 SMALL TOOLS 91.60 201 65200 130 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 879.73 201 65200 140 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 50.00 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,236.77 201 65200 260 MISC. SUPPLIES 259.20 730 69585 120 21014 THE ADAM-HILL COMPANY 11571 271.98 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 271.98 201 65200 203 21015 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 20,045.22 SUPPLIES 20,045.22 620 15000 21016 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 193.22 SUPPLIES 193.22 620 15000 21017 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING 17534 2,393.80 SMALL TOOLS 2,393.80 101 66210 130 21018 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 128.20 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 128.20 625 65213 203 21019 LEE & ASSOCIATES 17568 2,304.57 SMALL TOOLS 674.76 201 65200 130 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 984.48 201 65200 203 TRAINING EXPENSE 645.33 201 65200 260 21020 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 644.80 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 644.80 618 64520 210 21021 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY 19066 3,075.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 3,075.00 201 65200 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 09/08/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20997 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 124.97 MISC. SUPPLIES 69.26 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.97 619 64460 120 5110 MISC. SUPPLIES 42.74 619 64460 120 5120 20998 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 907.40 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 907.40 101 68020 190 2200 20999 G. BORTOLOTTO & CO., INC. 01358 955.38 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 955.38 320 81120 220 21000 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,441.66 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,441.66 101 64560 220 21001 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 242.80 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 242.80 201 65200 140 21002 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 938.42 MISCELLANEOUS 319.73 526 69020 233 MISC. SUPPLIES 166.43 619 64460 120 5240 SMALL TOOLS 452.26 619 64460 130 21003 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 2,628.98 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 979.54 101 66210 219 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 1,649.44 101 66210 226 21004 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 941.65 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 941.65 619 64460 210 5250 21005 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 694.13 MISC. SUPPLIES 446.57 619 64460 120 SUPPLIES 198.34 620 15000 SMALL TOOLS 49.22 620 66700 130 21006 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 297,875.44 WATER PURCHASES 297,875.44 526 69020 171 21007 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,962.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,962.75 101 65150 220 21008 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 113.87 OFFICE EXPENSE 47.63 101 64350 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 66.24 101 64350 120 21009 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 271.81 RENTS & LEASES 271.81 101 68020 180 2300 CITY OF BURLINGAME 08-31-2006 WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 8 FUND RECAP - 06-07 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 62,448.55 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 11,900.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 365.93 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 68,798.69 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND - 327 21,260.00 WATER FUND 526 15,855.52 SEWER FUND 527 224,837.19 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 1,111.28 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 665.69 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 456.15 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 7,400.61 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 205.36 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 1,573.92 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 64.04 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 1,623.30 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 11,108.39 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $429,674.77 V%7 LD <3qhj.->V0 30 dd$.31o> VOID slur l HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: vo I o THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH d INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 20904 THROUGH 20996 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $429,674.77, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .........................I.......... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 08/31/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20985 SUMITA FLEMING 26105 646.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 646.88 101 68010 220 1646 20986 STEVEN LEWAN 26117 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 20987 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 582.61 OFFICE EXPENSE 8.09 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 19.77 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 436.13 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 15.03 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 83.81 101 64400 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 19.78 101 64350 120 20988 COIN TECH 26173 371.69 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 371.69 530 65400 200 20989 LINGULAR WIRELESS 26418 448.76 UTILITY EXPENSE 448.76 896 20281 20990 JOSEPH VELA 26787 2,335.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,335.00 101 65100 400 20991 GARRATT CALLAHAN 26888 7,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 7,500.00 101 22546 20992 ANTHONY FABBI 26889 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 20993 JOHN-STEVEN RAMACCIOTTI 26890 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 20994 R 8 W CONCRETE 26891 - 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 20995 ANDREA GAILUNAS 26892 40.00 MISCELLANEOUS 40.00 101 36330 000 1331 20996 LYSETTE ANAYA 26893 300.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593 TOTAL $429,674.77 ` COO � r CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R - PAGE 6 08/31/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20969 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 4,485.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,485.00 130 20016 20970 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 48.00 UNION DUES 48.00 130 21080 20971 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 160.00 MISCELLANEOUS 160.00 130 20024 20972 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 - 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024 20973 C.L.E.A. 24523 624.00 MISCELLANEOUS 624.00 130 20026 20974 TEAMSTERS #856 24526 420.00 - UNION DUES 420.00 130 21091 20975 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 320.60 MISCELLANEOUS 320.60 130 21092 20976 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 5,242.55 MISCELLANEOUS 988.65 130 20025 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,253.90 130 20021 20977 S AND S SUPPLIES 8 SOLUTIONS 24963 98.42 TRAINING EXPENSE 98.42 527 66520 260 20978 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 - 150.31 UTILITY EXPENSE 150.31 896 20281 20979 JAMES MURPHY 25080 - - - - 1,122.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,122.00 101 68010 220 1661 20980 CATHY FOXHOVEN 25068 646.88 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 646.88 101 68010 220 1646 20981 LINGULAR WIRELESS 25775 73.83 COMMUNICATIONS 73.83 101 65100 160 20982 HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLL 25852 520.77 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 520.77 621 64450 200 20983 SAN MATEO COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH S 26033 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593 20984 EDMOND'S PLAZA FLORIST 26041 64.41 MISC. SUPPLIES 64.41 101 65100 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 08/31/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20958 DATASAFE 23410 1,030.89 OFFICE EXPENSE 91.63 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 312.00 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 2.00 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 122.53 101 64420 110 BANKING SERVICE FEES 326.75 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 46.00 101 64400 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 129.98 101 64350 120 20959 ICE CENTER OF SAN MATEO 23512 582.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 582.40 101 68010 220 1762 20960 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 9,690.87 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,690.87 326 80931 210 20961 MILLS PENINSULA EMERGENCY MED,IN 23548 165.00 MISCELLANEOUS 165.00 618 64520 234 20962 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 2,614.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 49.37 619 64460 120 5240 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,565.08 619 64460 210 5240 20963 AT&T/MCI 23728 8,620.56 COMMUNICATIONS 16.68 101 67500 160 UTILITY EXPENSE 8,603.88 896 20281 20964 KEITH MARTIN 23788 197.72 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 23.79 526 69020 250 OFFICE EXPENSE 38.95 - 527 66520 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 54.77 527 66520 120 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 40.00 527 66520 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 32.45 527 66520 260 SUPPLIES 7.76 620 15000 20965 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 1,210.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 447.21 101 68010 120 1114 MISC. SUPPLIES 763.13 101 68010 120 1111 20966 ART OF CONSTRUCTION 24413 596.25 MISCELLANEOUS 1,125.00 101 22546 MISCELLANEOUS -528.75 101 31510 20967 GRETCHEN LOTT 24452 765.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.00 101 68010 220 1661 20968 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 21,260.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,260.00 327 79480 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 08/31/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20945 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 1,687.08 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,687.08 526 69020 120 20946 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 56,440.42 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 56,440.42 326 80950 220 20947 LEADERSHIP 22496 1,370.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 1,370.00 101 64420 250 20948 TURF STAR 22682 129.48 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 129.48 101 68020 200 2200 20949 CAWC WATERPROOFING AND RESTORATI 22708 3,919.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,919.00 619 64460 210 5150 20950 BURLINGAME FAMILY PET HOSPITAL 22773 103.04 MISC. SUPPLIES 103.04 101 65100 120 20951 MONEY 22983 39.95 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 39.95 101 66100 240 20952 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 130.89 OFFICE EXPENSE 130.89 101 68010 110 1101 20953 OFFICE MAX 23306 383.60 OFFICE EXPENSE 157.51 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 82.94 101 66010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 143.15 101 66160 110 20954 AIRGAS 23307 176.42 MISC. SUPPLIES 176.42 526 69020 120 20955 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 152.04 MISC. SUPPLIES 152.04 619 64460 120 5120 20956 LIBERTY FLAG AND SPECIALTY CO 23402 206.95 MISCELLANEOUS -16.01 101 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 222.96 101 65100 120 20957 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE 23409 12,999.00 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 12,999.00 527 66530 270 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 08/31/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20931 RICH SCIUTTO 18572 689.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 689.00 101 68010 220 1762 20932 BAY ALARM 18854 171.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 126.00 619 64460 210 5140 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 45.00 619 64460 210 5230 20933 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 940.70 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 940.70 101 64350 210 20934 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 56.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 56.87 620 66700 120 20935 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 1,111.28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,111.28 528 66600 210 20936 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 5,537.30 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,623.30 736 64570 220 20937 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75 OFFICE EXPENSE 94.95 101 68020 110 2100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 264.80 101 68010 220 1101 20938 AFFINITEL COMMUNICATIONS 20246 152.50 COMMUNICATIONS 152.50 621 64450 160 20939 CWEA - CALIFORNIA WATER 20631 110.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 110.00 527 66520 240 20940 COW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 478.47 OFFICE EXPENSE 478.47 621 64450 110 20941 IMSA CERTIFICATION 21579 229.00 MISCELLANEOUS -18.89 619 23611 TRAINING EXPENSE 247.89 619 64460 260 20942 HILLYARD/SAN FRANCISCO 21658 333.91 MISC. SUPPLIES 333.91 101 68020 120 2200 20943 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 21741 9,094.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,094.40 101 68010 220 1372 20944 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 2,667.40 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,667.40 326 80770 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 08/31/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20918 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 101 65100 220 20919 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES 09461 365.93 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 365.93 320 81090 210 20920 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 291.15 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 291.15 618 64520 601 20921 MARGARET KRAMER 09612 1,935.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,935.00 101 68010 220 1661 20922 WECO INDUSTRIES, INC. 11640 764.02 MISC. SUPPLIES 764.02 527 66520 120 20923 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 4,286.76 MISC. SUPPLIES 250.00 101 65100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 197.98 101 65150 120 COMMUNICATIONS 329.64 101 65100 160 TRAINING EXPENSE 3,259.14 101 65100 260 MISC. SUPPLIES 250.00 530 65400 120 20924 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 604.94 MISC. SUPPLIES 604.94 526 69020 120 20925 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 117.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 117.00 101 64420 121 20926 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 22.10 MISC. SUPPLIES 22.10 527 66520 120 20927 SUPERIOR ALUMINUM BODY CORP. 16229 140.73 SUPPLIES 140.73 620 15000 20928 GOLDEN NURSERY 17128 342.74 MISC. SUPPLIES 207.97 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 70.73 526 69020 120 MISCELLANEOUS 64.04 730 39531 20929 COLORPRINT 17497 1,240.10 OFFICE EXPENSE 183.81 101 64100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 163.80 101 69537 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 646.79 101 68020 120 2300 MISCELLANEOUS 225.70 526 69020 233 20930 CENTRAL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 18011 422.18 OFFICE EXPENSE 422.18 621 64450 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 08/31/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20904 ALPINE AWARDS, INC. 01052 23,27 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.27 527 66520 120 20905 VEOLIA WATER 02110 207,343.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 207,343.00 527 66530 220 20906 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 538.70 MISCELLANEOUS 538.70 101 68020 192 2200 20907 FEDEX 02160 246.42 MISC. SUPPLIES 99.20 101 64400 120 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 108.23 101 65100 200 TRAINING EXPENSE 22.05 101 65100 260 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 16.94 530 65400 200 20908 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 1,905.44 MISCELLANEOUS 1,905.44 896 20282 20909 N.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 1,394.08 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 39.87 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,354.21 527 66520 120 20910 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 821.66 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 410.83 101 66210 219 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 410.83 101 66210 226 20911 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 234.53 MISC. SUPPLIES 234.53 619 64460 120 20912 P. G. & E. 03054 19,534.40 GAS & ELECTRIC 19,534.40 101 66100 170 20913 CITY OF SAN BRUNO 03340 316.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 316.00. 101 64420 121 20914 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 11,109.86 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,109.86 526 69020 210 20915 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 1,892.47 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,892.47 101 68010 220 1423 20916 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 80.59 MISC. SUPPLIES 80.59 619 64460 120 5260 20917 POM INC. 09248 27.06 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 27.06 530 65400 200 CITY OF BURLINGAME 08-25-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 13 FUND RECAP - 06-07 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 150,990.91 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 1,992.17 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 9,734.66 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 60,239.65 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 73,307.51 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 174,060.27 WATER FUND 526 74,008.11 SEWER FUND 527 1,460.73 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 18.08 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,834.81 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 19,232.62 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 8,888.13 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 5,360.29 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 4,206.57 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 306.53 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 161,263.96 STATE GRANTS FUND 734 2,930.00 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 46,304.37 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 8796,139.37 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 13 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 20749 THROUGH 20903 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8796,139.37, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../-.. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../. ./. COUNCIL• DATE• CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 12 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20893 MR/MRS. ARON 26877 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20894 SUSAN CHORTKOFF 26878 48.00 MISCELLANEOUS 48.00 101 36330 000 1372 20895 JESSICA HEREDIA 26879 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20896 DEBBIE E. GIN-WONG 26880 52.00 MISCELLANEOUS 52.00 101 36330 000 1890 20897 KATHLEEN SMITH 26881 107.00 MISCELLANEOUS 107.00 101 36330 000 1890 20898 KATHY ABRAMS 26882 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20899 MIKE GHIOZZI 26883 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 20900 FAIR PLAY 26884 13,500.00 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 13,500.00 101 68010 800 1101 20901 AMY GRENIER 26885 292.00 MISCELLANEOUS 292.00- 101 36330 000 1330 20902 SUE MILWEE 26886 780.00 MISCELLANEOUS 780.00 101 36330 000 1330 20903 DIANE ERLANGER 26887 87.00 MISCELLANEOUS 87.00 101 36330 000 1212 TOTAL 8796,139.37 ,,, \ CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20877 MELINDA SHAUGHNESSY 26861 292.38 MISCELLANEOUS 292.38 526 22502 20878 ALEX CHAN 26862 4,325.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,325.00 101 22546 20879 SCHEINER CONSTRUCTION 26863 1,350.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,350.00 101 22546 20880 SAM'S SANDWICHES 26864 1,125.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,125.00 101 22546 20881 TOM GERAGHTY 26865 1,033.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,033.00 101 22546 20882 MSA 06 26866 875.00 TRAINING EXPENSE . 450.00 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 425.00 527 66520 260 20883 MIYE JEE 26867 36.00 MISCELLANEOUS 36.00 101 36330 000 1890 20884 MR/MRS. GUARDADO 26868 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20885 MR/MRS HOFLER 26869 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20886 VALERIE T. TONER 26870 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20887 ROISIN CASSIDY 26871 - 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20888 EMILY R. BOGDANOFF 26872 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20889 MR/MRS. DORMAN 26873 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20890 DANIELLA KRINER 26874 131.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20891 WENHE YU 26875 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 20892 MR/MRS. SIBLEY 26876 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 10 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20862 PAULA RIEGO DE DIOS 26093 50.00 .MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 20863 IMPACT SCIENCES 26099 23,837.75 DEPOSIT REFUND 23,837.75 101 22590 20864 INFOMOTION 26174 65.65 MISCELLANEOUS -4.70 101 23611 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 70.35 101 65100 292 20865 GSWAW 26520 62.17 MISC. SUPPLIES 62.17 526 69020 120 20866 THOMAS REX HARDY AIA 26740 6,924.07 DEPOSIT REFUND 6,750.00 101 22590 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 174.07 101 64400 210 20867 JOSEPH VELA 26787 23,634.46 MISCELLANEOUS 426.69 101 65150 400 MISCELLANEOUS 23,207.77 101 65100 400 20868 SKYLINE BUSINESS PRODUCTS 26825 62.80 MISC. SUPPLIES 62.80 101 66210 120 20869 YEH-KATAOKA 26851 25.00 MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 101 36330 000 1216 20870 BUREAU VERITAS 26854 14,282.12 MISCELLANEOUS 14,282.12 101 22515 20871 TASER INTERNATIONAL 26855 350.00 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 350.00 101 65100 200 20872 WANT CONSTRUCTION 26856 1,050.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 1,050.00 101 22520 20873 BATTERY ZONE 26857 200.57 MISC. SUPPLIES 200.57 201 65200 111 20874 MARK-IT 26858 134.20 MISCELLANEOUS -10.37 530 23611 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 144.57 530 65400 200 20875 DEBBIE AROSIO 26859 150.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00 101 68010 220 1781 20.876 RUEDI MUGGLI 26860 193.88 MISCELLANEOUS 193.88 526 22502 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20846 SHIRLEY LADDY 24826 416.90 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 416.90 130 20015 20847 TOM DONNELLY 24830 660.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 660.00 201 65200 260 20848 SETON IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS 24855 181.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 181.45 619 64460 120 5110 20849 CHETCUTI & ASSOCIATES 25015 5,000.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 5,000.00 101 22520 20850 14ADDAUS WATER MANAGEMENT 25098 5,500.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,500.00 526 69020 210 20851 RAMONA BOADA 25116 494.27 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 494.27 130 20060 20852 THE COBBLER 25176 3,603.16 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 3,603.16 201 65200 140 20853 MICHAEL VONADA 25235 100.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060 20854 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 - 245.74 OFFICE EXPENSE 245.74 101 65100 110 20855 MERCY MARTIN 25270 623.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 623.50 101 68010 220 1661 20856 TOSETTI ELECTRIC CO 25668 558.00 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 558.00 101 66210 230 20857 NINA ORLANDO 25784 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 20858 RIVA RUFINO 25785 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 20859 J HOWARD ENGINEERING 25811 76,701.43 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76,701.43 327 81150 220 20860 TSA SILICON VALLEY CHAPTER 25815 790.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 790.00 619 64460 260 20861 ED BARTON 25850 100.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20843 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 24,339.15 OFFICE EXPENSE 85.07 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 61.35 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES- 1,347.49 101 68010 120 1893 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,341.59 101 64420 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 20.85 101 68010 120 1114 MISC. SUPPLIES 300.93 101 64420 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 241.77 101 68010 120 1423 MISC. SUPPLIES 635.51 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 112.04 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 84.12 101 68010 120 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 3,669.94 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 518.62 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 309.44 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 130.26 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 21.25 101 68010 120 1890 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.80 101 68010 120 1787 MISC. SUPPLIES 31.38 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 17.95 101 68010 120 1423 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,250.00 101 68010 120 1424 MISC. SUPPLIES 142.50 101 68010 120 1423 MISC. SUPPLIES 661.57 101 68010 120 1370 MISC. SUPPLIES 4,662.17 101 6801U 120 1423 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 46.35 101 64420 121 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 74.17 101 67500 129 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 647.20 101 67500 190 MISCELLANEOUS 296.95 101 67500 235 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 171.29 101 69537 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 177.10 101 64250 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 45.73 101 64150 250 MISC. SUPPLIES 924.24 320 80760 120 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 574.52 320 80430 270 MISC. SUPPLIES 167.76 527 66520 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 100.00 527 66520 260 OFFICE EXPENSE 285.03 530 65400 110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 169.00 620 66700 210 OFFICE EXPENSE 424.34. 621 64450 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 306.53 730 69533 120 LIBRARY EXPENSES 1,329.34 731 22531 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,930.00 734 65195 120 20844 CWEA SFBS 24794 100.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 100.00 527 66520 260 20845 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 24815 90.00 COMMUNICATIONS 90.00 201 65200 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT. AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20828 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 - 250.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 20829 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 21182.57 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 147.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 677.57 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.00 619 64460.220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,238.00 619 64460 220 5130 20830 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 36.48 COMMUNICATIONS 36.48 101 65300 160 20831 IBM CORPORATION 23990 2,149.50 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 2,149.50 621 64450 200 20832 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 6,502.26 MISCELLANEOUS 6,502.26 320 20000 20833 JESUS NAVA 24204 953.70 MISCELLANEOUS 953.70 101 64250 031 20834 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 - 486.00 MISCELLANEOUS 486.00 526 69020 233 20835 ART OF CONSTRUCTION 24413 2,700.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,700.00 101 22546 20836 SUSAN MCKEE 24442 738.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 738.00 101 68010 220 1661 20837 OLIVIA CHEN CONSULTANTS 24445 49,908.75 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 49,908.75 326 80910 210 20838 JACK'S AUTO TOP AND UPHOLSTERY 24505 162.14 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 162.14 201 65200 203 20839 WATER SOLUTIONS 24532 375.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 375.00 526 69020 260 20840 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS 24570 11,988.37 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 11,988.37 326 80950 210 20841 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 75.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 75.00 619 64460 210 5121 20842 GOLDEN STATE FLOW MEASUREMENT 1N 24696 58,455.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 58,455.00 526 69020 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20816 OFFICE MAX 23306 392.47 OFFICE EXPENSE 336.94 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 55.53 101 66100 110 20817 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 1,563.07 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,563.07 619 64460 210 5120 20818 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 14,210.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,210.50 320 81060 220 20819 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200 20820 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. 23462 109,92 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 109.92 530 65400 200 20821 CHEN QUIP 23481 83.52 MISCELLANEOUS 83.52 526 69020 233 20822 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 11,432.19 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,190.39 326 81690 210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,241.80 526 69020 220 20823 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 356.12 MISC. SUPPLIES 111.35 619 64460 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 244.77 619 64460 120 5120 20824 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 242.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 14.62 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 158.47 619 64460 120 5110 MISC. SUPPLIES 69.21 619 64460 120 5240 20825 BKF ENGINEERS 23641 16,087.71 MISCELLANEOUS 12,712.46 327 20000 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,375.25 327 81500 210 20826 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 430.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 619 64460 220 5180 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5150 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5160 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.00 619 64460 220 5170 20827 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,247.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,183.00 101 23620 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 64.00 101 64420 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME ' W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT _ Denotes Hand Written Checks 20800 HILLYARD/SAN FRANCISCO 21658 139.14 MISC. SUPPLIES 139.14 101 68020 120 2200 20801 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 640.41 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 640.41 101 66210 222 20802 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 5,802.84 MISCELLANEOUS 5,802.84 101 37010 20803 SEWER RAT 21821 150.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 150.00 101 22520 20804 CAREER TRACK 22177 99.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 99.00 101 65300 260 20805 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 5,429.65 MISC. SUPPLIES 5,429.65 526 69020 120 20806 YEV PHILOPOVITCH 22217 2,220.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,220.00 326 81230 210 20807 OUENVOLDS SAFETY SHOEMOBILES 22479 327.46 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 327.46 619 64460 140 20808 ANZA ENGINEERING 22634 35,768.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 35,768.00 320 80520 210 20809 TURF STAR 22682 502.83 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 502.83 101 68020 200 2300 20810 HOLDEN DANIELS 22687 329.40 TRAINING EXPENSE 329.40 201 65200 260 20811 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 435.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 435.00 896 20281 20812 NFPA 22780 95.81 TRAINING EXPENSE 95.81 619 64460 260 20813 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 11.68 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.68 101 68010 110 1101 20814 BOB MALLAMO 23173 245.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 245.00 130 20015 20815 CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 975.00 MISCELLANEOUS 975.00 320 20000 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20786 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 198.65 OFFICE EXPENSE 5.14 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 55.08 101 64250 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 5.14 101 64350 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 5.15 101 64420 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 5.15 101 64150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 63.41 201 65200 111 OFFICE EXPENSE 59.58 621 64450 110 20787 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 144.05 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 144.05 201 65200 203 20788 AMERICA PRINTING 19430 1,097.66 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,097.66 101 64560 210 20789 MONICA OLSEN 19832 336.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 336.00 101 68010 220 1661 20790 SIMPLEX GRINNELL 20315 969.00 PROFESSIONAL &SPECIALIZED S 969.00 619 64460 210 5120 20791 RACQUET SMITH 20339 2,246.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,246.40 101 68010 220 1782 20792 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 6,650.23 MISCELLANEOUS 6,650.23 327 20000 20793 CONTROL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. 20421 74,620.90 MISCELLANEOUS 74,620.90 327 20000 20794 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 743.77 SUPPLIES 743.77 620 15000 20795 CWEA - CALIFORNIAN WATER 20631 220.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 220.00 527 66520 240 20796 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 3,358.93 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 3,358.93 201 65500 800 20797 LAWRENCE S. NOY 20954 731.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 731.25 101 68010 220 1762 20798 GAMETIME, INC. 20991 624.56 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 624.56 101 68020 190 2200 20799 MONICA EHLERS 21627 546.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 546.00 101 68010 220 1661 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hard Written Checks 20774 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 562.90 MISC. SUPPLIES 562.90 619 64460 120 5130 20775 .MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 42.54 SUPPLIES 42.54 620 15000 20776 STANDARD REGISTER 17495 813.94 OFFICE EXPENSE 813.94 101 64250 110 20777 COLORPRINT 17497 186.08 OFFICE EXPENSE 99.05 101 64100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 87.03 101 64350 110 20778 PENINSULA DIGITAL. IMAGING 17534 560.12 MISC. SUPPLIES 560.12 320 81550 120 20779 C/CAG 17725 728.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 728.00 101 64560 210 20780 RALF SINGER 18476 860.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 860.00 101 68010 220 1660 20781 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 202.40 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 202.40 101 64420 121 20782 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,087.69 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 234.84 101 66210 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 318.80 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 234.84 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 18.08 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 80.04 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 201.09 620 66700 140 20783 MARY JANNEY 19042 435.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 435.00 130 20060 20784 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 3,128.58 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 3,128.58 101 64200 150 20785 HUSBANDS & ASSOCIATES 19253 165.88 MISCELLANEOUS 165.88 101 68020 192 2200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks - 20761 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 159,934.62 MISCELLANEOUS 159,934.62 731 22587 20762 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CTR. 03964 447.79 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 447.79 101 64350 210 20763 POM INC. 09248 1,305.66 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 1,305.66 530 65400 200 20764 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 3,045.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,975.00 101 65100 220 PRISONER EXPENSE 1,070.00 101 65100 291 20765 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518 19,232.62 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 19,232.62 618 64520 601 20766 OLE'S 09626 335.39 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 335.39 201 65200 203 20767 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 857.27 MISC. SUPPLIES 176.54 101 68020 120 2200 SMALL TOOLS 45.38 101 68020 130 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 69.22 101 68020 190 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 42.56 101 68020 192 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 25.27 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 331.58 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 166.72 527 66520 120 20768 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 491.00 201 65200 220 20769 PIP PRINTING 10620 525.01 MISC. SUPPLIES 525.01 320 80760 120 20770 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER 11101 793.80 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 793.80 101 64350 210 20771 CAMINO REAL PET CLINIC 11577 17.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 17.50 101 65100 120 20772 HDL COREN&CONE 14750 1,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 30400 20773 UNITED TRANSMISSION INC. 14760 2,018.75 MISCELLANEOUS -113.44 620 23611 SUPPLIES 2,132.19 620 15000 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 08/25/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20749 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 253.03 MISC. SUPPLIES 101.15 619 64460 120 5180 MISC. SUPPLIES 151.88 619 64460 120 5120 20750 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 2,342.28 SMALL TOOLS 39.80 201 65200 130 GAS, OIL & GREASE 55.86 201 65200 201 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 200.95 201 65200 203 SUPPLIES 2,045.67 620 15000 20751 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 200.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 200.00 320 80760 120 20752 POLETTI ASSOCIATES INC. 01992 159.33 MISC. SUPPLIES 159.33 101 65300 120 20753 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 836.13 MISCELLANEOUS 836.13 101 68020 192 2200 20754 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 551.64 MISC. SUPPLIES 551.64 619 64460 120 5120 20755 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 188.36 MISC. SUPPLIES 188.36 619 64460 120 20756 _ MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 526.43 MISC. SUPPLIES 175.03 101 66210 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 34.09 101 68020 190 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 3.42 101 68020 192 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 238.33 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 36.18 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.38 619 64460 120 20757 P. G. & E. 03054 45,879.60 GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170 UTILITY EXPENSE 45,869.37 896 20280 20758 AT&T 03080 234.57 COMMUNICATIONS 78.36 101 67500 160 COMMUNICATIONS 77.85 101 65100 160 COMMUNICATIONS 78.36 101 67500 160 20759 ALFRED J. PALMER 03085 201.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 201.00 130 20015 20760 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 139.47 SUPPLIES 139.47 620 15000 - CITY OF BURLINGAME 08-17-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9. , FUND RECAP - 06-07 NAME FUND AMOUNT 0.00 GENERAL FUND 101 1121010.24 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 10,649.81 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 48,852.65 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 9,712.59 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 7,800.00 WATER FUND 526 26,569.15 SEWER FUND 527 21509.85 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 4,262.61 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 25,262.09 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 3,509.62 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 49,790.21 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 8,936.05 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 705.80 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 22,307.24 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 203.80 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $333,081 .71 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 20637 THROUGH 20748 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $333,081 .71 , HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME 08-17-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 11 FUND RECAP - 06 07 NAME FUND AMOUNT 0.00 GENERAL FUND 101 90,628.06 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 10,649.81 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 48,852.65 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 216.30 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 7,800.00 WATER FUND 526 26,569.15 SEWER FUND 527 2,509.85 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 4,262.61 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 25,262.09 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 3,509.62 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 49,790.21 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 8,936.05 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 705.80 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 22,307.24 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 203.80 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $392,203.24 .�a.33> CV'xv.' i�� o HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 20637 THROUGH 20748 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $302,203.24, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME 08-17-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 21,382.18 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 9,496.29 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $30,878.47 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 20637 THROUGH 20748 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,878.47, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ...................I................ .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Herd Written Checks 20734 LB HAYHURST&ASSOCIATES INC 26463 5,080.38 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 5,080.38 101 64420 210 20735 GSWAW 26520 22,593.13 MISC. SUPPLIES 22,593.13 526 69020 120 20736 NICHOLAS BUSTOS 26611 56.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 56.00 101 68010 220 1787 20737 NEAL MARTIN&ASSOCIATES 26660 4,740.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 4,740.00 101 64400 210 20738 ANDY CARLISLE 26782 39.99 MISCELLANEOUS 39.99 526 22502 20739 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN (MIG) 26811 35,692.65 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 35,692.65 320 80760 210 20740 ILANA C. TANDOWSKY 26844 250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 36330 000 1422 20741 DENISE PAYNE 26845 250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 36330 000 1372 20742 ELAINE SMITH 26846 250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 36330 000 1422 20743 RIZALINE PEJI 26847 420.00 MISCELLANEOUS 300.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 120.00 101 36330 000 1213 20744 KRISTINE-ANN D. BELTRAN 26848 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 20745 MEI LAN SU 26849 75,00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 20746 GISELLE BEUCUS 26850 112.50 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 37.50 101 36330 000 1216 20747 YEH-KATAOKA 26851 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 20748 PDSI 26853 100.96 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 100.96 625 65213 203 TOTAL $333,081.71 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20720 BAY CITIES DRIVING SCHOOL 25220 2,509.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,509.00 101 68010 220 1422 20721 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 106.11 OFFICE EXPENSE 89.71 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 16.40 201 65200 111 20722 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 39.93 OFFICE EXPENSE 39.93 101 65100 110 20723 IRENE GONZALEZ 25453 1,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,500.00 101 22546 20724 AA GALAXY INTERNATIONAL INC. 25492 100.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 100.00 101 64540 150 20725 ACCURACY INTERNATIONAL 25528 90.00 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 90.00 101 64540 150 20726 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 25729 76.91 TRAINING EXPENSE 76.91 101 68020 260 2200 20727 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 153.22 RENTS & LEASES 153.22 526 69020 180 20728 EDMOND'S PLAZA FLORIST 26041 84.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 84.98 101 65100 120 20729 COMET MICRO SYSTEMS 26069 328.36 SMALL TOOLS 328.36 101 66100 130 20730 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 473.45 OFFICE EXPENSE 115.13 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 42.05 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 219.37 101 65300 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 5.06 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 62.62 530 65400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 29.22 621 64450 110 20731 LANCE BAYER 26156 1,287.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,287.50 101 64350 210 20732 TERESA SILVESTRI 26266 450.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 101 68010 220 1646 20733 CATHERINE BLAIR 26383 215.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 215.00 101 68010 220 1646 / CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A NT R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Cheeks 20705 AT&T/MCI 23728 26.29 COMMUNICATIONS 26.29 621 64450 160 20706 MATT VAUGHN 23787 659.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 659.75 101 68010 220 1372 20707 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES, INC. 23889 50.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 50.00 101 64420 120 20708 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,974.74 BANKING SERVICE FEES 548.70 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,426.04 530 65400 120 20709 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 162.22 MISC. SUPPLIES 162.22 101 68010 120 1112 20710 .UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOG 24050 176.66 MISC. SUPPLIES 176.66 101 66210 120 20711 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 218.56 OFFICE EXPENSE 218.56 101 64250 110 20712 SANDRA J. SULLIVAN 24268 - 125.00 MISCELLANEOUS 125.00 101 36330 000 1372 20713 COMPUCOM 24467 - 161.52 OFFICE EXPENSE 161.52 201 65200 110 20714 CSAC EXCESS INSURANCE AGENCY 24561 3,000.00 INSURANCE PREMIUMS 3,000.00 618 64520 602 20715 CALIFORNIA BMW TRIUMPH 24782 725.94 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 725.94 620 66700 200 20716 INTERNATIONAL HISPANIC NETWORK 24906 250.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 250.00 101 64250 240 20717 PLAY WELL TEKNOLOGIES 25013 5,600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,600.00 101 68010 220 1349 20718 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 25084 257.10 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 257.10 201 65200 140 20719 ADVANCED MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 25198 2,130.66 RADIO MAINT. 2,130.66 201 65200 205 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hard Written Checks 20691 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT 22382 1,200.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,200.00 101 68010 220 1785 20692 QUENVOLDS SAFETY SHOEMOBILES 22479 2,970.80 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 692.61 101 68020 140 2300 TRAINING EXPENSE 837.88 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 326.11 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,000.00 527 66520 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 114.20 620 66700 260 20693 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 22,307.24 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,343.99 736 64571 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,963.25 736 64572 220 20694 ANZA ENGINEERING 22634 AP 15,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,000.00 101 66210 220 20695 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 299.07 MISCELLANEOUS 299.07 526 69020 233 20696 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS 22851 10,476.00 .CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES 10,476.00 618 64520 225 20697 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 20698 MIMI SIEN 23349 1,020.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,020.00 101 22525 20699 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 1,300.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,300.00 526 69020 260 20700 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 - 13,160.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,160.00 320 81660 220 20701 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105.00 MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518 20702 TAMMY MAX 23445 962.41 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 962.41 101 64420 210 20703 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 57.38 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 45.47 101 66210 226 SMALL TOOLS 11.91 526 69020 130 20704 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 AP 9,712.59 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 9,496.29 326 81480 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 216.30 326 73171 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 20678 SYSTEMS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY 19066 2,050.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,050.00 201 65200 260 20679 GARY PARTEE 19249. 1,020.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 101 22525 MISCELLANEOUS 270.00 101 36630 20680 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 816.04 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,377.63 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. -561.59 625 65213 203 20681 RACQUET SMITH 20339 10,905.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,905.60 101 68010 220 1782 20682 JEFF DOWD 20779 3,390.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,390.40 101 68010 220 1372 20683 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 15,732.70 MISCELLANEOUS 15,732.70 621 64450 400 20684 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 1,075.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,075.00 101 68010 220 1331 20685 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 120.30 MISC. SUPPLIES 120.30 527 66520 120 20686 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 2,586.25 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 900.00 101 64420 210 TRAINING EXPENSE 562.08 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 562.09 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 562.08 527 66520 260 20687 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 21741 1,486.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,486.80 101 68010 220 1372 20688 MANDEGO, INC. 21855 676.96 MISC. SUPPLIES 445.03 101 68010 120 1789 MISC. SUPPLIES 231.93 101 68010 120 1785 20689 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 480.97 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 176.10 101 65100 200 SUPPLIES 304.87 620 15000 20690 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 2,128.52 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 405.75 101 68020 190 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,035.21 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 687.56 527 66520 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT �•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 20663 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 3,104.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,104.00 101 68010 220 1787 20664 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 112.66 MISC. SUPPLIES 112.66 101 65300 120 20665 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE 16629 47.58 SUPPLIES 47.58 620 15000 20666 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 680.80 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 680.80 101 68020 140 2200 20667 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 17402 413.47 RADIO MAINT. 413.47 201 65200 205 20668 COLORPRINT 17497 346.40 OFFICE EXPENSE 162.92 101 65300 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 183.48 526 69020 110 20669. PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING 17534 AP - 632.18 SMALL TOOLS 632.18 101 66210 130 20670 JEFF HIPPS 17803 3,082.95 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,082.95 101 68010 220 1372 20671 PARAMOUNT'S GREAT AMERICA 18078 7,670.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,670.00 101 68010 220 1212 20672 KELLEHER & ASSOCIATES 18239 10,095.11 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 10,095.11 618 64520 210 20673 PENINSULA PUMP & 18450 9,574.39 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,031.31 101 66210 220 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 543.08 101 66210 230 20674 RICH SCIUTTO 18572 559.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 559.00 101 68010 220 1372 20675 LINDA LENORE 18729 51.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 51.75 101 68010 220 1660 20676 UNITROL 18939 174.74 SUPPLIES 174.74 620 15000 20677 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 444.62 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 444.62 201 65200 220 CITY OF BURLINGAME " W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20653 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210 20654 ABAG - LIABILITY 09518- 1,690.98 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,690.98 618 64520 210 20655 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 09560 704.55 SMALL TOOLS - 438.37 101 68020 130 2300 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 92.94 101 68020 190 2300 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 66.25 101 68020 200 2300 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 106.99 201 65200 203 20656 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 371.95 OFFICE EXPENSE 86.13 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 64.94 201 65200 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 116.57 201 65200 190 MISC. SUPPLIES 104.31 530 65400 120 20657 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 2,020.68 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 954.42 101 66210 222 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,066.26 101 68020 260 2300 20658 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,497.88 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,497.88 201 65200 203 20659 CAMINO REAL PET CLINIC 11577 170.55 MISC. SUPPLIES 170.55 101 65100 120 20660 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 129.88 MISC. SUPPLIES 64.94 526 69020 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 64.94 527 66520 110 20661 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 995,75 OFFICE EXPENSE 78.46 101 65150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 500.00 101 65100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 143.78 101 65100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 78.47 101 65150 120 COMMUNICATIONS 220.49 101 65100 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 119.97 101 65100 200 TRAINING EXPENSE -359.11 101 65100 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 202.44 101 65150 260 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 11.25 530 65400 200 20662 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 2,669.45 OFFICE EXPENSE 951.52 101 65100 110 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 59.54 101 65100 292 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,658.39 530 65400 110 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 08/17/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 20637 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 9,396.68 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 9,396.68 625 65213 203 20638 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 34,002.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 34,002.00 621 64450 220 20639 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 1,922.32 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 1,922.32 201 65200 140 20640 GENE EVANS 02149 76.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.50 101 68010 220 1644 20641 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 74.97 MISC. SUPPLIES 74.97 527 66520 120 20642 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 1,865.90 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 1,865.90 10166210.219 20643 PENINSULA BATTERIES 02625 98.29 SUPPLIES 98.29 620 15000 20644 KAVANAGH ENGINEERING 02665 7,800.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,800.00 327 81500 210 20645 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 745.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.05 101 68020 120 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 705.80 730 69561 120 20646 P. G. & E. 03054 1,041.54 GAS & ELECTRIC 1,041.54 101 68010 170 1286 20647 AT&T 03080 203.80 UTILITY EXPENSE 203.80 896 20281 . 20648 STEPHEN J. PICCHI 03168 2,229.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,229.50 101 68010 220 1372 20649 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT 03271 152.68 MISCELLANEOUS 152.68 101 68020 192 2200 20650 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 AP 5,750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,750.00 101 66100 173 20651 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 - 2,044.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,044.00 620 66700 120 20652 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 350.00 101 65100 260 r l3�1R�MiVGAME The City of Burlingame CITY HALL - 501 PRIMROSE ROAD CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 www.burlingame.org TRAFFIC, SAFETY AND PARKING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - Approved Thursday — July 13, 2006 Commissioners Present: Eugene Condon, Chair Victor James, Vice-Chair Michael Bohnert Stephen Warden Dan Conway Staff Present: Augustine Chou, Traffic Engineer, Public Works Police Chief Jack Van Etten Commander Mike Matteucci, Police Department Traffic Officer Robert Boll Visitors: Councilman Russ Cohen Wade Bettesworth, Director Sales and Marketing Red Flex Traffic Systems Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue Linda Abbey, 1415 Adeline Drive Olen Creech, 1833 Castenada Drive John Kevranian, 1241 Broadway Avenue Nora Kevranian, 1241 Broadway Avenue Barbara Zukowski, 1108 Capuchino Avenue Tom Koros, 2225 Summit Drive Farris Horak, 1332 Edgehill Drive Rudy Horak, 1332 Edgehill Drive AnnaMarie Daniels, 515 Howard Avenue Norm Utigard, 1252 Paloma Avenue Basim Azar, 245 California Drive Jack Casey, 2525 Poppy Drive Dr. Andrew Soss, 1159 Broadway Gary Doss, 214 California Drive Reiner Nissen, 721 Laurel Carl and Debbie deQuant, 1232 Paloma Avenue Scheherezade Bharabianleu, 220 California Drive TRAFFIC, SAFETY & PARKING COMMISSION July 13, 2006 Minutes Page 1 of 12 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 5 of 5 Commissioners present 4. CURRENT BUSINESS 4.1 ACTION ITEMS 4.1.1 Approval of minutes June 8 meeting Motion to approve June 8 Meeting minutes M/S/C: Warden,James;5/0/0. Chair Condon asked his fellow Commissioners if there were any objections to moving item 7.3.2.1 (Red Light Camera Enforcement Program Presentation) up as the first item of business. 7.3.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report 7.3.2.1 Red Light Enforcement Program Presentation Police Chief Jack Van Etten explained the Red Light Enforcement Program priorities are accident avoidance, increasing public, safety and traffic calming. Any monies generated will be used to offset administrative costs for this program.Chief Van Etten requested that if the Traffic Commission thought this was a good program for the community, that a staff report be submitted to the City Council for their consideration. Chief Van Etten then introduced Wade Bettesworth, Director of Sales and Marketing for Red Flex Traffic Systems, who gave a presentation for their Red Light Enforcement product. Mr. Bettesworth went through the company profile, nationwide installations, public education program, nation-wide installations, how the process of photographing and timing at each intersection installation worked, the impact of the program through traffic statistics,and city renewals. TRAFFIC,SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 2 of 12 Mr. Bettesworth demonstrated the online tracking by police officers for citations using the web-based program and the process for citation issuance through Red Flex. Chair Condon stated that since this was just a staff presentation, that comments and discussions from the floor could be done at the City Council meeting, where the matter would be presented in a staff report to Council. Chair Condon asked who would be viewing the videos. Police Chief Van Etten explained that if this matter went to City Council and was approved by Council and implemented, that one of the Traffic staff would work on the videos part-time and attending Traffic hearings. Depending on how the Program was running, a part-time person might need to be hired. Commissioner James asked if warrant studies would be helpful in determining the location of installations. Mr. Bettesworth explained this had been done and they had determined and studied the top tier (four) intersections using number of collisions and injuries. Commissioner Conway asked how the Program would be funded by the City. Mr. Bettesworth went through the fee structure stressing that the City would not pay out in any one month more than they generated in violation revenue. Commissioner Bohnert asked what the top tier intersections were. Police Commander Mike Matteucci explained the four (top tier) intersections studied for installation were: Chapin/EI Camino, Broadway/EI Camino (northbound), Trousdale/EI Camino, and Broadway/Rollins Road. Commissioner Warden asked about the time involved for video tape review in the City of San Mateo where this Program is in use. Mr. Bettesworth explained it took about 10-15 seconds to view the tape of each incident which would equate to approximately five hours per week depending on the number of violations. Commissioner Warden commented with four systems this would take staff about 1-1.5 hours per day with Monday being the busiest. Commissioner Warden commented that three of the four intersections studied for installations are Caltrans intersections and where did the revenue have to be sent since these are not City owned. Chief Van Etten explained that the revenue goes only to the City and not to Caltrans. Commissioner Warden asked if the TRAFFIC,SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 3 of 12 brightness of the flash units used at night in the program would be a distraction to drivers. Mr. Bettesworth assured him that it would not. Commissioner Warden stated that currently Burlingame out-sources the citation process to a company in Redwood City, and that Burlingame did not see a great deal of revenue as a result. Mr. Bettesworth explained the monthly flat fee program charge for services provided by Red Flex and any revenue generated over and above this amount would go to the City. Commissioner Conway asked about the privacy issue. Mr. Bettesworth stated they only kept images of violators for the City to view, no other images are kept only for six months for adjudication purposes. Chief Van Etten then made a few closing comments. He stated that other companies were considered and requested that staff bring this matter to City Council. Commissioner Condon supports the project and would recommend this be brought to City Council. 4.2 Discussion Items 4.2.1 California Drive/Highland Avenue Crosswalk enhancement or removal Traffic Engineer Chou presented an aerial overhead and referred to two options for considerations in the staff report. • The crosswalk to be removed if there was little or no traffic; or ■ The crosswalk to remain but with additional safety enhancements. Gary Doss, 214 California Drive, spoke in support of keeping this crosswalk. He stated that the new train station would bring additional people to this area. He suggested a minimal enhancement would be well placed Yield signs. Basim Azar, 245 California Drive, spoke in support of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. He spoke about the pedestrian traffic to and from the train station and that people will not use the controlled crosswalks at either end of the street. He also offered pages of signatures of residents in favor of keeping and the crosswalk. Scheherazade Bharabianleu, 220 California Drive, spoke in favor of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. She stated she doesn't see Traffic Officers on California Drive to monitor the quick moving traffic. She would TRAFFIC,SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 4 of 12 like to see enhancements to the crosswalk as well as signs posted to reduce the driving speed. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, spoke in favor of keeping the crosswalk. She spoke about the hazard to bike-riders around the island by Highland and that the crosswalk was a reminder to drivers to slow down for pedestrians, which helped the safety issue for bike-riders. Jack Casey, 241-243 California Drive, spoke in favor of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. He commented on the high speeds along California Drive and suggested a stop sign. AnnaMarie Daniels, 515 Howard, spoke in favor of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. She stated the distance between the two signals at either end of the street was very long. The crosswalk in the middle was necessary. Enhancements like the ones in San Bruno seemed very effective. She also asked to add some knockdown delineators. Olen Creech, 1833 Castenada Way spoke in favor of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. He stated that he was a senior citizen and using the other crosswalks at the end of each street was too far for him to go. Commissioner Bohnert spoke in strong support of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. He stated drivers were looking through this crosswalk to the signals on either side, and were paying more attention to those. He felt attention needed to be brought back to this crosswalk with strong enhancements. Commissioner Warden spoke in favor of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. He also supported knockdown delineators. Commissioner James agreed with him. Commissioner Conway said he was also in favor of keeping and enhancing the crosswalk. He spoke to the thoroughness of Mr. Chou's traffic study and his unbiased information showing liabilities and benefits of either option. Commissioner James added that Traffic Engineer's Chou's report was balanced. Motion: To move to an Action item M/S/C: James, Conway; 5/0/0. Motion: To keep the mid-block crosswalk across California Drive, near Highland; and enhance with knockdown delineators, paint and reflector buttons. M/S/C: Warden, Conway; 5/0/0. TRAFFIC, SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 5 of 12 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NEW ITEMS 5.1 Burlingame Avenue/Clarendon Avenue — Request for stop signs. Traffic Engineer Chou stated the City received a request to consider making this intersection 4-way stop. He said that staff would hold off doing any stop sign warrant studies in the summer because of differences in traffic patterns due to summer vacations. He added that when the City receives similar requests in the future, that they be acknowledged, and that the studies be done in the fall when the data studies would be more accurate. 5.2 Occidental Avenue/Howard Avenue — Request for an additional stop sign at the existing 3-way intersection. Traffic Engineer Chou stated this was a confusing non-standard 3-way intersection. Commissioner Conway asked if there was a conflict of interest and if he could participate in the discussion. Traffic Engineer Chou stated that, according the City attorney, Commissioner Conway could participate as long as there was no financial gain involved. 6. FROM THE FLOOR Before opening the floor for public comment, Chair Condon clarified that a sub- committee for the Broadway traffic/stop sign issue would be making a report back to the Commission later on the agenda. However, he encouraged speakers to step forward and each take three minutes to comment on the issue at this time if they wanted. Farris Horak, 1332 Edgehill, stated that Broadway was not safe and a stop sign at Broadway and Paloma to stop the traffic for pedestrians was needed. She asked that the Commission make a motion for temporary stop signs. Rudy Horak, 1332 Edgehill, stated that Broadway was a "killing machine". He asked the Commission to make a motion for a temporary stop sign for 90 days to begin August 1. Tom Koros, 2225 Summit Drive, talked about the new businesses on Broadway bringing an influx in pedestrian traffic and encouraged looking at the problem. Dr. Andrew Soss, 1159 Broadway, commented on an incident where he prevented a three year old girl from being hit on Broadway. He asked for stop signs on Broadway at the Walgreen's and Paloma crosswalk. Norman Utigard, 1252 Paloma Avenue, agreed that crossing at Broadway and Paloma could be hazardous, but felt that putting two stop signs would cause massive traffic jams especially getting on and off Highway 101 at Broadway. TRAFFIC,SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 6 of 12 Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa, wanted to know if there was going to be public involvement with the Bicycle Committee and the Planning Commission, as monies are available to municipalities for bicycle and pedestrian projects. She said that she wouldn't want to see Burlingame lose out because it did not have a strong Public and City-oriented BPAC (Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Board). John Kevranian, 1241 Broadway, spoke in support of stops signs on Broadway. He asked that a motion be made for temporary stop signs. He stated that he spoke to the City Attorney and a motion could be made tonight by the Commission to have a temporary stop sign. He asked the audience by a show of hands who was in favor of temporary stop signs. Barbara Sukowsky, 1108 Broadway, spoke in support of 90-day temporary stop signs on Broadway. She spoke of her experience crossing Broadway and asked for the Commission to vote for one. Chair Condon explained that it is his understanding that no motion would be made at this time regarding temporary stop signs on Broadway since this item was not on the agenda as a discussion item, but as an update from the sub-committee. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS 7.1 Bicycle Safety Issues in Burlingame — Future sub-committee meetings and project considerations. Traffic Engineer Chou stated that the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee would be open to the public to discuss issues. He added that the sub-committee had met first to outline their responsibilities, especially with respect to possibly having another subcommittee established by Council later. This committee wanted to make sure that there would be no duplication of work or responsibilities. He said the September TSPC meeting would have agenda items that would be open to the public for discussion about pedestrian and bicycle issues. Chair Condon stated the sub-committee was working to identify projects that would qualify for funding. Mr. Chou added that there were six potential designs to present at the public meetings. He also said that these public meetings were a good place to see if there were other projects that might the public might want added. 7.2 From Council to Commission/Staff None. 7.3 From Staff to Commission TRAFFIC, SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 7 of 12 7.3.1 Traffic Engineer's Report 7.3.1.1 Peninsula Ave/101 Overpass Status Report Traffic Engineer Chou said that the City of Burlingame and the City of San Mateo were working on a contract agreement to hire a traffic consultant to do some studies. He said these studies would include Burlingame's interests. 7.3.1.2 Broadway/US 101 Overpass Status Report Traffic Engineer Chou stated that this project was with the San Mateo County Transportation Authority - Strategic Planning and Finances. Plans and specifications were ready to go and they were in the process of planning how the money would be allocated. 7.3.1.2 Radar Speed Zones —Analysis Traffic Engineer Chou explained that after an in-depth review of all the accident reports, staff determined that the speed limits on California Drive, Rollins Road, and Airport Boulevard should remain at 35 mph. He also reported that a portion of California Drive was re-surveyed in order to create a new survey segment. He explained that past surveys showed two segments for California Drive — Murchison to Burlingame, and Burlingame to Peninsula. Mr. Chou said that there were significant differences within the segment from Murchison to Burlingame that it should be broken into two segments — Murchison to Broadway, and Broadway to Burlingame. The remaining segment to Peninsula was still valid. Mr. Chou said that since there would be no changes to the speed limit, no action other than a report to Council was necessary. 7.3.2 Traffic Sergeant's Report 7.3.2.1 This presentation was done as the first item of business. (Refer to page 2.) 7.3.3 Other City Staff Reports None. TRAFFIC, SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 8 of 12 7.4 From Commission to Staff 7.4.1 Commission Chairperson's Report Chair Condon re-iterated the important issues before the Commission and sub-committees: • Railway Safety Study/Fencing with Cal/train • Broadway Pedestrian Traffic Safety Project 7.4.1.1 Caltrain Railroad Corridor Safety Commissioner Conway reported that a sub-committee met to discuss this on-going issue. He stated that the sub-committee was not quite ready to discuss their findings yet, but that they were looking at what might be involved with fencing; and, making sure to communicate internally with the City Council on options and next steps with Caltrains. Chair Condon added that this sub-committee was also looking into available outside funding. Mr. Chou stated that one of the things that Sam Trans/Caltrain did discuss at the May 11 public meeting was the evaluation of bus stops and bus routes. Caltrain has contacted staff to coordinate re- location of bus stops along Carolan. Three new stops were planned along Carolan. • Carolan south of Oak Grove • Carolan at Morrell • Carolan south of Cadillac Way Mr. Chou said that if these proposed stops are agreed upon, then pedestrian pads would be poured for the stops. Mr. Chou said that Samtrans was also asking if the City would consider a mid-block crosswalk at the location on Carolan, south of Cadillac Way. Chair Condon was concerned that the problem might be moved from California Drive to Carolan Avenue. Commissioner Warden agreed that the same problem existed for those people getting off buses, because they would have to cross Carolan. He stated he had been very specific in the special May 11 meeting that if they took the bus route down Oak Grove, make the stop at Washington school and then make the entire route run back northbound on Carolan, every TRAFFIC,SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 9 of 12 stop would be on the east side of Carolan and no one would have to cross Carolan Avenue at the time the high schools were letting out. He asked that the City push Caltrain/Samtrans to look at this alternative by next month. Chair Condon asked Traffic Engineer Chou if Caltrain/Samtrans responded back regarding any of their steps besides the bus stop. Mr. Chou stated that they had not as of yet and that he was waiting on the fencing issue. 7.4.2.1 Broadway/Paloma Avenue Traffic Safety Measures Commissioner Warden reported that he and Commissioner Bohnert met several weeks ago with four of the Broadway merchants (John Kevranian, Ross Bruce, Dave Armanino and Gerald Weisl). They agreed that the problem was pedestrian safety, not speed. He said they also discussed the options for measures that needed to be addressed. A recommendation would be made to the Commission, via a staff report, next month. He added that staff should take a look at temporary stop signs at Paloma and Broadway and come back to the Commission with several added points: • The situation would be heavily monitored until the Commission received Traffic Engineer Chou's report on possible traffic back-ups on Broadway to EI Camino or on Broadway to California Drive. • What impact temporary stops might have on surrounding neighborhoods. • The sub-committee will be re-assembled to monitor what the effects might be with traffic and pedestrians trying to cross. The merchants will monitor this as part of the sub-committee. • The sub-committee should continue to meet over the next 60- 90 days and look into a signal light. • Investigate the possibility of using red-light camera enforcement program monies from fines to partially fund a signal light at this location. Commissioner Bohnert stated that he was in agreement with the sub-committee's recommendation of a 60-90 day temporary stop sign and getting feedback from the merchants and residents. TRAFFIC,SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 10 of 12 Chair Condon asked the sub-committee to look into knockdown delineators before considering stop signs. He also said that traffic counts might be needed for Lincoln and Carmelita. He also expressed concern that many surrounding residents might be impacted and it would be best to begin with a study and staff report rather than just installing temporary stop signs. Commissioner Warden asked Mr. Chou if there was a way to tell what would happen to traffic if the stop sign were put in without actually installing them. Mr. Chou said there was not. He added that if temporary stop signs were installed now, traffic studies could not be done until the fall season. Commissioner James asked if something could be done immediately to control the traffic. He asked the sub-committee members what the feeling was of the merchants regarding crosswalk enhancements. Commissioner Bohnert explained that the sub-committee met as laymen, and thought a temporary stop sign would be a good idea. Commissioner James stated that the problem was not about an uncontrolled intersection; and, that enhancements would better address the issue, rather than stop signs. Chair Condon stated that knockdown delineators and enhancements could be done immediately. Commissioner James concurred, and said that the knockdown delineators would not have the negative impact that the stop sign would have. Commissioner Conway said that he would like to see delineators put in immediately, while the sub-committee continued to review other measures. Commissioner Warden wanted to clarify that tonight was not the night to vote for putting in temporary stop signs, but it was the appropriate time for voting to put in delineators. He wanted to come back next month, with a staff report on all the pros and cons of the options discussed. Chair Condon summarized that the stop sign issue was still open, that there have been no ayes or nays towards the original question of a stop sign within the Commission. Motion To make this an Action Item. M/S/C: Warden, Conway; 5/0/0. TRAFFIC,SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page t I of 12 Motion: To install knockdown delineators and bots dots at Paloma and Broadway; and for Traffic Engineer Chou to bring other options before the Commission (including stop signs/stop lights) and for the sub-committee to continue monitoring the situation. M/S/C: Warden, James; 5/0/0. 7.4.3 Reports of Citizen Complaints or Requests Commissioner Warden asked about the status of the No Overnight Parking signs on the 700 block of California. Mr. Chou stated that he would check on the work order status. 7.5 Comments and Communications None. 7.6 Next Regular Meeting - August 10 No expected absences were reported. 8. Inactive or Pending Items None. 9. Agendum for Next Meeting —August 10 Item 5.2 Occidental Avenue/Howard Avenue 3-way stops Item 7.4.2.1 Broadway/Paloma Pedestrian Safety Measures 10. ADJOURNMENT 9:57 PM. TRAFFIC, SAFETY&PARKING COMMISSION July 13,2006 Minutes Page 12 of 12 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA September 11 , 2006 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Brownrigg called the September 11, 2006, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling, Terrones and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: None Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Maureen Brooks; City Attorney, Larry Anderson III. MINUTES The minutes of the August 28, 2006 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved as mailed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There were no changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, city should revise its wording when referring to 'affordable housing' and call it 'below market rate housing' as other jurisdictions do. There is a new window available which has a three dimensional mullion between the double panes of glass, want to be sure that the city's condition regarding windows does not allow this type of window. Chair noted that 'affordable housing' is defined by law and Burlingame follows that law which is addressed in our ordinance. VI. STUDY ITEMS There were no study items for review. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Brownrigg asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests from the Commission or audience. CP Monroe noted that the latest plans for the project at 127 Loma Vista are at the Commissioner's desks this evening for the Commission to look over, should act only if feel comfortable that you have had sufficient review. Commissioner noted he had looked over the plans for 127 Loma Vista in detail and the corrections were consistent with those noted in the staff report and it appears that the applicant has responded to the questions raised by the Commission. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 1 a. 743 ACACIA DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GARAGF—� LOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DETACHED GARAGE (DAVID MELLOR, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; REMY'S QUALITY CONSTRUCTION, DESIGNER) (64 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN lb. 1420 MONTERO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (GEURSE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, INC., APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; SARAH GOLDBERG, PROPERTY OWNER) (67 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER lc. 127 LOMA VISTA DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(LUIS ROBLES,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; JAIME GOMEZ, PROPERTY OWNER) (35 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER C. Auran moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, Commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff reports with recommended conditions in each staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Comment on the motion: Do not want to call off, but would like more detailed landscape plans to be submitted for 1420 Montero and 127 Loma Vista for FYI review before issuance of a building permit for these projects. These landscape plans need to be tightened up as was requested in the previous Commission reviews of these projects. It is important to the Commission to know what landscaping they are approving --� particularly trees and large shrubs. For 1420 Montero Avenue in particular, large scale landscaping in the front yard was requested which should be included in the FYI review. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the consent calendar with the two items to be referred to FYI for compliance and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM 2. 1505 BALBOA AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE (MICHAEL AND AMY GONG,APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;AND JOHN STEWART,AIA,ARCHITECT) (51 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report September 11, 2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Michael Gong and Amy Lui, property owners; and John Stewart, architect, represented the project. Applicants noted that they met with the neighbors and the changes on the plans reflect their input; on the right side increased privacy by making the window in the —� master bedroom smaller,on the left side added a foot of lattice to the fence.Architect noted some revisions to the plans not noted: mission tile or barrel tile,simulated divided lite wood clad windows,the post at the rear is 12/12,the dentils are 12/12,on the rear elevation the roof of the bay will be tile;the rafter tails will be 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 3 x6, 32 inches on center. Commissioners asked about the massing on the right side elevation, concerned about the changes looking 'stuck on', instead of addressing integrated structural articulation,just added flower boxes and a water table,raising the house one foot increases the mass and bulk of the right side,issue `- here is that the house is at the maximum FAR and it is hard on the neighbor on the right side,need to reduce the roof line, could do by cutting back the wall on the first or/second floor to change roof line and add variation. Other comments from the floor: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; Christine Habelt, 1509 Balboa Avenue; James Cacciato, 1600 Adeline Drive;would be better if the house were moved back on the site 2 to 3 feet,so its front lined up with the neighbors; increasing the green at the front would help the mass and would be equal to neighbor's setback; to reduce the mass should remove the curve,remove the chimney on the right side,put on the eaves as shown on the picture submitted by the applicant, in fact the front of that house is better than this one. There are other 2 story houses on the block but they are all split level, with the front submerged 2 feet or more; the change to smaller windows is good, particularly if they all match; remain concerned about the right side elevation, the two driveways are side by side so the right side of this house will be very visible from the street. There is an error in the setback from his house to property line as shown on the plans, the plan shows 20 feet from the rear property line which is distance from furthest wall not closest; this two story house would have a significant impact on his living space, are building within the building code so have a right within current law,but this is a city wide problem, need to take the time and effort to change the ordinance to prevent this kind of development in the future. Applicant response, can remove the chimney on the right side, feel it breaks up that wall, could cut master bedroom back 2 feet on the second floor and install a lower roof, do not see the advantage in reducing the lower floor as well; if commission wishes will submerge the house 2 feet, if feel it would better fit Burlingame; need clear direction on the right side. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioners'comments: Right side elevation is a large wall,solution of cutting back the master bedroom 2 feet on the second story would help,should note that the design reviewer is focused on architecture,but not always sensitive to the fact that the project is pushing the maximum FAR,this project is within 3 SF of the maximum, that's a lot of bulk on this lot; would like to see a good solution for a 'sawed off chimney, chimneys do add a vertical line,but not needed if appear short or cut off, should provide a positive vertical line at the rear. There are a couple of corrections need to be made to the plans: ■ elevation of the garage and the garage section do not match; ■ reduce the mass of the right elevation,set the wall of the second story at the master bedroom back at least 2 feet and change roof; ■ the bay window on the second floor should be designed with a shed roof and a lower roof line in order to be less massive; C. Osterling noted that Commission has provided specific direction as requested so would move to place this item on the consent calendar with the direction that all the items on the specific list created by the Commission this evening be addressed before it is brought back to the Commission agenda. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar only after all the items listed by the Planning Commission had been addressed and included on the plans. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. There is no appeal for this action. The item concluded at 7:45 p.m. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 3. 1213 CABRILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE FOR CHANGES TO A.-, PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHEL GARAGE(66 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report September 11, 2006, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration. Staff noted a letter from Steve Pade requesting a continuance for this action because the neighbor next door is out of town and cannot comment. Commission had no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. James Chu, designer, and Janelle Baldwin, property owner, represented the project. The redesign has been caused by the contractor becoming aware,when he went to order the roof trusses, that there would not be enough head clearance in the stairwell. It was a design problem, and unintentional. The applicant voluntarily stopped work on the project while he is requesting Commission approval. Regarding the neighbor's letter, there is only one window on this project which affects the neighbor and it overlooks his single-story living room roof. Have agreed to plant more vegetation on the left hand side,not installed yet so it looks bare. The staircase is 4'-6" from the property line but the remainder of the house is setback 12 feet. Commissioner asked if the leaded glass window could be relocated into the small gable over the front entrance? Other comments: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; change requested is not so big, but where was the designer and plan checker when project was reviewed; want to believe that this was unintentional not an attempt to avoid a declining height exception, this change costs some articulation in the structure, Commission should consider impact on the neighborhood, loss of the leaded glass window is major Commissioner noted think that this is an improvement, like the taller bay, need to work with the smah dormer,front elevation shows a water table over wainscot,this trim piece should be extended from the front around the left side of the tall element. Property owner agreed. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Auran noted not concerned about the bigger window,not in occupied space,support the need to provide head room, move approval with the added conditions that the leaded glass window shown on the initially approved plans be relocated above the entry and that the water table and wainscoting shown on the front elevation be extended around to the left side of the taller element proposed and with the following conditions: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped August 23, 2005, sheets A.1 through A.6, and sheet L1.0, site plan, floor plans, building elevations, landscape plan and site survey and date stamped August 25, 2006, sheets A.1,A.4R and A.5R with the wainscoting on the front elevation extended to the left side around the taller element approved and the relocation of the leaded glass window shown on the originally approved plans to a location over the entry; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; and that the City Arborist shall review the existing street tree in front of the property and have the property owner install proper tree protection measures as needed; 2) that protection measures shall be incorporated to protect the existing rhododendron along the left side property line,and shall be inspected by the City Arborist, prior to commencing demolition or construction on the subject property; 3) that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to design review; 4) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architec engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 professional involved in the project, the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 5) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim �-- materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;all new windows shall be true divided light wood windows and shall contain a wood stucco- mould trim to match the existing trim as close as possible; 6) that all air ducts,plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 7) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 8) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 9) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 10) that during demolition of the existing residence,site preparation and construction of the new residence,the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 11) that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 12) that the conditions of the City Arborist's July 13,2005,memo, the City Engineer's August 28, 2006 and July 11, 2006, memos, the Chief Building Official's August 25, 2006 and July 8,2005,memos,the Fire Marshal's August 28,2006 and July 11,2005,memos,the NPDES Coordinator's August 28, 2006 and July 18, 2005, memos, and the Recycling Specialist's July 13, 2005, memo shall be met; 13) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 14) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance;and 15) that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Commissioners noted: if the changes proposed were more substantial would have continued item for neighbor input;thank developer for stopping work until changes were approved,realize that it is a hardship to shut down a working job. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m. 4. 1459 OAK GROVE AVENUE, ZONED R-3 — APPLICATION FOR CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HEIGHT AND TENTATIVE CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR A NEW THREE-STORY, THREE-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM (MIKE PRESCOTT, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;AND HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS,ARCHITECT)(88 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN• PROJECT ENGINEER: VICTOR VOONG Reference staff report September 11, 2006, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report, reviewed criteria and staff comments. Thirty-four conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. ti.. 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Michael Palza,Hunt Hale Jones Architects,444 Spear Street, San Francisco,and Mike Prescott, 1459 Oak Grove,applicant,presented the project noting that at the study—, meeting the Commission had voiced concerns, most of these concerns have been addressed in the plar, submitted,would like to elaborate on two major points,the mass and bulk of the project and the architectural style;Commissioners had noted that the street elevation does not match the scale of the neighborhood,look at other buildings on the street, some are three and four stories,other are large two story buildings with no articulation; building as proposed is appropriate to neighborhood; addressed several items related to mass and bulk, the building has been set back,reduced the floor area,height was reduced,the building footprint staggers back on the left side; asking for conditional use permit for height in order to allow for a pitched/hipped roof to match the style of the building, didn't want to have a mansard roof; on the right elevation, stairway area was recessed to create a shadow line, added bay window, created an entry at the front; Commission was concerned with the color,now proposing a golden/tan palette with pastel trim and columns and a dark roof, wrought iron railings are also proposed. Commissioners asked: Are the units air conditioned, if so,where will the units be placed? The applicant noted that there will be a central system which will be placed in the mechanical room in the basement. Don Doolittle, 1520 Floribunda, lives in condominium building across the back fence, think this is an attractive building,concern with privacy and landscaping,our project has trees and bushes planted along the back fence that are twenty feet tall, there is a three-foot wide space to the rear of the underground garage where there is soil for planting large scale landscaping,this project proposes that the underground garage be placed right at the rear property line,this may damage the plants on our side, and there is no opportunity in their project for large-scale planting along the rear fence; the underground garage has storage areas in the rear,there are six storage areas shown for the three units,could reduce the size and number of storage area, --� and decrease the size of the garage by three feet which would leave a 3-foot area of dirt at the rear fo, planting and minimize the chance that our trees will be damaged. Commissioner comments: • Have a concern with the common open space at the rear,do not see it as usable by the residents,it is hard to get there,must pass bedrooms and bathroom of ground floor unit, cannot get there easily from units above, do not think it is the quality of open space we like to see; could add a series of sitting areas; • Building is big, it is built out to the setbacks all the way around, it impacts the open space, could cut some corners on the building to add more useable open space area; • The stairway at the back is only an exit for the third floor unit,should provide access from the other units to the back open space area as well; could add a usable deck with stairway going from one level to the next to provide more accessibility to the open space area; • Might consider eliminating the windows from the master suites that overlook the open space to give users increased sense of privacy; • Revised plans addressed the front entry way,but it looks like a back entry, it is not inviting,there is no protection from the elements for guests ringing the buzzer for entry; • Should add amenities both to the front entry and to the rear common open space to make it more inviting, a bench at the front entry to identify it as an arrival point, entry could also be enlarged and articulated; • The design of the front entry should echo the elements of the entry along the side; • At courtyard need to add amenities to attract people to use the space, could add a bench element or a- gazebo that invites people to sit and read; • Could dedicate a portion of the planter space in the courtyard to a"victory garden"for residents to share; 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 • The room dimensions on sheets A.4 through A.6 need to be checked; • The stair-stepping window pattern on the right elevation at the stair well looks awkward,it appears that the sills are ramming into each other, could use oval windows so the sills do not butt up against each other; • Concerned with the amount of stucco,use different materials on some elements such as on the chimney; • Should reduce the size of the underground garage by at least 3 feet at the rear to provide an area for large scale planting in soil along the rear property line; • Applicant should show the current proposal for the rear open space on the same sheet as the revised proposal to see how it all fits together; it there is articulation that allows access from the units, could work within the existing 15-foot wide area of open space; fifteen feet can be a great outdoor space as long as it is designed well and there is access to it. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C. Cauchi made a motion to continue the item and bring the project back on consent after the changes have been made. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Comment on the motion: there are a lot of comments,am a little concerned that the changes are significant, not sure about putting it on consent,it is a sizable project and there has been a lot of discussion,do not think consent is appropriate. C. Cauchi amended the motion to bring the project back on the action calendar. C. Auran agreed to the amendment to the motion. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to bring the item back on the action calendar when the revisions directed have been made and checked by the Planning Department and there is room on an agenda. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. This item is not appealable. This item concluded at 8:47 p.m. 5. DETERMINATION ON THE DESIGNATION OF FRONT YARD ON CORNER LOTS WHICH CAN AFFECT SETBACKS IN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS (33 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE Reference staff report September 11, 2006, with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report. Commissioner asked if after the determination the applicant would still need to apply to the Commission for his prof ect. CP Monroe noted yes that other permits were required. There were no further questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Dennis Zell, 1800 Ashton,noted that he built a play structure for his kids, he lives on a corner and a person complained about the height, and depending upon how you read the zoning code the play structure was 6 feet to a few feet too high, staff told him he would need a conditional use permit which costs$1,800;he likes the play structure and wanted to bring it into conformity so took off part of it. In his case, on the corner lot, his house faces the long side of the lot, and the staff called the short side,which he considers the side of the house,the front. The accessory structures ordinance does not use the term'lot front'(the short side of the street)but uses the term'in front of the main building'to determine if a conditional use permit is required. The front of his house,the front door and address, are on Ashton,would think that the city would be opposed to him building a play structure in his front lawn facing Ashton. Staff noted that they had previously read'lot front'to be'in front of the main structure'so had to be consistent. Therefore,recourse is to the Planning Commission to change interpretation. His argument is that 'in front of the main building' does not relate to 'lot front'. 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September]], 2006 Further comment from the applicant: He also noted that he would like to address the issue of a variance being required if the structure is within the required setback. Feel that the accessory structure ordinance, .� since its language is more specific, trumps the more broadly applicable setback requirements as far at accessory structures are considered. Because the clear limitations on accessory structures located'in front of the main building'are so specific,e.g. square footage,height,etc.,a variance should not be required for the structure being located within the front, side, or rear setback. One code provision cannot cancel another. Commission asked: What is the height of the play structure now? At the highest point, it is about 11'-6". There were no other comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commission comments: Number of years ago had a tree house come before the commission, since it was not over 100 SF was not considered to be a structure and did not require building permits; 'in front of the main building' is a separate issue, a lot of swings are 8'or 9'tall, need building permit because attached to the ground. Large play structures were not specifically considered when the code was written;issue here is 'lot front'vs. 'in front of the main structure'. Location of the front door on a corner lot is up to the developer, the zoning front should stay the same, if the developer creates a hardship by placement of the front door facing the exterior side, it was his choice; 'in front of the main building' should refer to the lot front for consistency. CA noted that the applicant needs to get this resolved before he can move forward on his application. Commission comments continued: in design career have looked at a lot of corner lots, restricts design options if the front of the house is forced to the 50 foot side,but it is equally absurd for the zoning code to wait for someone with a corner lot to pick which side will be the front. Intent of accessory structure requirements is to control access in front of the main building on the exterior side. CP noted that if the exterior side were selected as the lot front on a 50 x 100 foot lot,the house would need to be setback at least 15 feet and the opposite,rear,yard would have to be 15 feet,so the house could only be 20 feet wide,which also presents a design issue. Agree that current language is ambiguous, need to change language of accessory structure regulations. Agree need to better address corner lots. Setbacks appear to be clear whether in front or side yard. Question is does the city want to regulate access in front of the building. Should be able to have accessory structure on the side of the main building,should not be tied to front of lot. Chair Brownrigg moved to continue this item and ask staff to return with some definitions and choices and discussion of consequences regarding each; and how setbacks affect accessory structures on corner lots. Motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on motion: should also consider if there should be special conditions in the code for corner lots, not only accessory structures. CA noted that any enforcement action on the project at 1800 Ashton would be held open until this item is resolved. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item until the study and suggestions from staff have been prepared. The motion passed on a 7-0 voice vote. This item is not appealable. This item concluded at 9:30 p.m. Chair Brownrigg passed the gavel to Vice-Chair Deal,noting that it was necessary for him to leave and Vice Chair Deal would complete the meeting. C. Brownrigg left the chamber. 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 6. 3 RIO COURT, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA `- CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (MONICA LIANG, STEWART ASSOCIATES,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER;JEFFREY MARK,PROPERTY OWNER) (39 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Vice Chair Deal opened the public comment. John Stewart, 1351 Laurel Street, San Carlos, project architect, and Jeffrey Mark,3 Rio Court,applicant represented the project. Commissioners asked: Has the applicant been in touch with the neighbors? No. Bob DeVincenzi, 1809 Castenada;Lawrence Barulich, 1821 Loyola;Alonzo Richardson, 1809 Loyola;Mary Anne Rowe-Beccio,2 Rio Court;Pat Giomi, 1445 Balboa;Bahman Zohuri,on behalf of Amir Tabrizi,5 Rio Court; spoke regarding the project. Not opposed to properties being improved, this project is below my property, am concerned with safety,there is a drainage problem,property now drains onto other properties, this will be the first of many additions in the area, concerned with the engineering and slope stability, as other properties develop will it create an unsafe condition;have planted trees to prevent mudslides,want to be proactive to prevent future problems;the proposed addition will affect our view,every room in our house has a view, had an appraisal of the house, indicated that more value is added for my view than is typical, addition will block a large row of trees from our view,this addition will change the architectural balance of the neighborhood, now all the roofs are the same height, parking is an issue, when add rooms, need to accommodate additional parking,with five bedrooms there is the potential for six cars,and owner now has a Winnebago in the driveway; should require story poles to assess the impact on views; was attracted to this area because of the uniform appearance, all houses are single-story ranch style houses,have had neighbors build first floor additions on either side of my property,now it is boxed in;own home on Rio Court,all four houses have views of San Francisco Bay, there are now no two story houses on the court, will change the character of the neighborhood and impair views and privacy of adjacent neighbors; concerned with who owns this property, deed says property transferred to Li Wen Bu, tax statements are mailed to business address in San Francisco; question if this is ultimately a spec house; neighbors have asked for story poles, only fair so can see what the change will be;bought the home for the view and sense of privacy,there is no parking available on the cul de sac, concern with safety, not much land left, when it rains hard will cause stress and there will be erosion. Applicant response: Drainage is not the purview of the Planning Commission,do not think this project will substantially block views,will work on design consistency all the way around the building;need to know if we should pursue this, it is clear the neighbors do not want a second story addition. There were no other comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioners clarified: with the addition,the Public Works Department will require that all drainage will go to the street; drainage issues will be better if the addition is done because it will need to meet current seismic and drainage requirements, the house will be engineered for the hillside. Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project: • Concerned with the consistency of the detailing,front elevation is nice,but it stops at the front and does not carry throughout; needs to follow through on the sides and rear; • Massing is well done, nice design, it's hard to add on to this style of house; 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 • Replace the proposed vinyl windows with wood clad simulated true divided-lite window; • Need to install story poles to assess potential view blockage;story poles shall be installed and surveyed -� for accuracy at least the Friday before the public hearing so the Commission can see over the weekend, story poles shall show the outline of the entire structure with mesh; • Ask staff to provide contact information for neighbors so that Commissioners can visit the neighboring sites once the story poles are installed; • Even though there are no second stories in the vicinity, owner has a right to develop the property,but will have to be concerned about potential for view blockage; and C.Vistica made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the above revisions have been made and plan checked and the story poles have been installed as instructed. This motion was seconded by C. Cauchi. Vice-Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when plans have been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Brownrigg absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:55 p.m. 7. 525 OAK GROVE AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ATTACHED GARAGE FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION AND NEW ATTACHED GARAGE (SCOTT ADAMS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; NARESH DHADHAL, PROPERTY OWNER) (68 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Vice Chair Deal opened the public comment. Scott Adams,949 Via Casitas,Greenbrae,project architect; and Naresh Dhadhal, 525 Oak Grove, applicant, presented the project, noting that originally wanted to convert garage to a family room and build another garage,ran into problems with ceiling heights of existing garage,now propose to take off the existing second floor,raise the building,add second story and add a one car garage. Commissioners noted that there is an existing accessory structure on the side, appears to be in the way of the proposed uncovered parking space. The applicant noted that the accessory structure will be removed and not replaced as part of the project. There were no other comments from the floor and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project. • Massing is an improvement, location of the addition is good,but concerned with the detail; • There are existing, simple but specific details on the existing house, it is not clear from the plans that these details will remain,existing plans need to accurately reflect what is there;and proposed plans need to show details which are to remain; • Do not have a problem with contemporary design,but it is a problem when it is coupled with the existing style, should go with one style or the other; • Would prefer if the new would match the existing style; • Modify the fireplace to have a more traditional shape,the style of the chimney is not consistent on all the elevations; • The wrought iron proposed at porch and second floor does not work with the existing style of the house —� it is too ornate; 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 • Front door is a prominent feature, should add divided lite windows in the garage door to mimic other windows at front; • Concerned with five foot high fence along the driveway,will impede visibility when backing out of the garage; • The new wood gate at the driveway swings over the property line onto the sidewalk, will have to redesign so it does not block the sidewalk; • Existing drawings do not show the details of what is existing,such as the stucco mold,shutters,trim not shown, eaves not shown properly,not accurate representation of what is there; • Show details on proposed plans as well, on eaves where there are gutters, they should be shown; • Rethink the windows at the second floor that follow the rake of the roof, they do not work with this design; • Stairs are shown differently on first and second floor plans,the building code does not allow the use of a winder staircase as shown; staircases are shown to be three feet wide,it is very difficult to get furniture upstairs around a bend,might want to make the staircase wider; • Provide a landscape plan and identify species and location of new landscaping,larger scale planting should be added to break up the massing of the wall on both street frontages; C. Auran made a motion to send this project to a design reviewer with the comments made. This motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Discussion on the motion: In this case, main concern is with window trim and other details, have given enough direction to bring this back to action,not a design review issue,think architect can follow direction; not confident, this is a low-roof charming structure with true divided lites, now have a modern structure, drawings are poor enough in quality and detail,think design review consultant could help with the detailing �. and result in a more efficient, speedy review process. Vice-Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to refer this item to a design review consultant. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-1-1 (C. Osterling dissenting and C. Brownrigg absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:17 p.m. 8. 214-216 LORTON AVENUE, ZONED C-1, SUBAREA A — APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR RENOVATIONS TO CONVERT AN EXISTING TWO-STORY HOTEL TO RETAIL ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND OFFICE ON THE SECOND FLOOR(JERRY WINGES, WINGES ARCHITECTS, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; MENDELL PARTNERS, PROPERTY OWNER (37 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked how the parking requirement was determined for the change of use,why weren't all 27 hotel rooms counted to offset the change to office use on the second floor. CP Monroe noted that because this property is within Subarea A of the Burlingame Avenue Commercial District,the change from hotel use to retail resulted in an exemption for the first floor from the parking requirements for the retail use;the second floor previously contained 18 hotel rooms,the parking requirement for hotels is one space per room,requiring 18 parking spaces. The requirement for the proposed second store office use is one space for every 300 SF of gross floor area, which results in a requirement for 21 parking spaces,therefore,a parking variance is required for the intensification of the use on the second floor. 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 Vice-Chair Deal opened the public comment. Jerry Winges, 1290 Howard Avenue,project architect,Mark Hudak, 216 Park Road, and Pat Giomi, 1445 Balboa spoke regarding the project; the applicant is a long-—� term,high quality Burlingame business owner, this will bring more retail down Lorton, and strengthen the retail character of the street; is a marvelous opportunity to bring more life to Lorton, front of the building will be opened up to see activity and merchandise displayed,this project will include seismic and fire code upgrade,will appear as a new building with the same mass,rendering shows the understated white on white theme combined with dark wood panels,will be a white limestone entry with pre-cast elements in a lighter color,thought the dark composition shingle roof would be appropriate to the design;going through process to encourage creative reuse on Howard, this is a perfect opportunity to see what can be done to improve retail connection,should look at what is existing demand for parking and compare it with the demand for the proposed use, should look at holistically, current demand under code is for 27 parking spaces, some of the rooms had kitchens so should be a 1-%z space requirement per room,demand is between 27 and 33 parking spaces,proposed use requires 21 spaces,should not be need for parking variance;exciting that this project is coming forward right before the design charrette, this is a forward looking step. Commissioners asked: Do you know if the upstairs units had kitchens,if so,how many;how will the HVAC units on the roof be screened;how will the security screens look;why was the the roof not incorporated into the design. The applicant noted that they will look into the number of units on the first and second floor with kitchens and provide at the next meet; a parapet is proposed on all sides to provide screening for the HVAC units;haven't made a final selection on the roll down security screens,concern is that the store when closed not be visible clear to the back,do not want to create a police problem,whatever is proposed will be high quality;considered retaining the Spanish tile roof and although it is beautiful,the image we are trying to project is different, the tile roof will not fit in. There were no other comments from the floor. The public comment was closed. Commissioner comment: Concern with the fagade design,the existing building has a clean,well organized Spanish style with timeless qualities, have no problem with a modern design, but would like to see more timeless qualities so it does not become dated,would like to see a more pedestrian feel;this will be a very classy addition to Lorton, it does have a timeless elegance that you might expect on Fifth Avenue in New York, would like to see it move ahead, will be a great bridge between Burlingame Avenue and Howard. Originally had similar concerns about the timeless quality of the design,but after seeing the rendering and color scheme and materials, feel that the design will fit in, it matches the proposed use. Commissioners had the following comments regarding the project: • Display windows are large, might want to make them smaller; • Security screens roll down in the front of the building, how are they detailed and what will they look like,will come down when store closes at 5:30 p.m. and will see them for a good part of the day;would like to see the security screens held back from the street frontage by a couple of feet: and • There are now operable windows on the second floor and proposed at the rear of the building,would like to see operable windows used on the rest of the second floor office space. C.Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the above revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: Regarding the parking variance,the demand for parking from the previous hotel -� use exceeds the demand for the current proposal to convert the second floor to office use,there is no space on the lot to provide on-site parking and the proposed use will play a significant role in bridging the retail 12 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 uses on Burlingame Avenue with those on Howard Avenue where there is considerable off-street public parking; therefore, the parking variance is justified. Vice-Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Brownrigg absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 10:50 p.m. X. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS - Continued discussion of sidewalk widths in the El Camino Real North Planning Area of the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan. Planning Commissioners reviewed the information provided on sidewalks in New York City and Chevy Chase Maryland. They discussed the size of the available city right-of-way along El Camino, 50 -60 feet, and the space needed to support street trees and planters. The Commission directed staff to bring back to the next meeting some sketches showing the variety of approaches which may be used. XI. PLANNER REPORTS Review of City Council regular meeting of September 5, 2006. CP Monroe reviewed the actions of the Council meeting of September 5, 2006, noting that the appeal hearing for 1520 Arc Way was set for Tuesday, October 3, 2006. - FYI: Status Report on Peninsula Hospital Construction Hours Commission acknowledged receipt of the August 2006 Complaint Log from Sutter Health's construction supervisor. Staff noted that they would begin to move the stockpiled dirt to backfill around the parking garage and create the new entrance to the Medical Office Building, replacement hospital and parking garage in mid-September. The garage itself will not be available for occupancy until mid-November. The applicant is continuing on their phased construction program with commencement of the excavation for the replacement hospital at the end of September. They do not anticipate that the hospital excavation will affect any of the existing parking until after the new parking garage is in operation. Oren Reinbolt,the replacement hospital project manager,has requested that the Planning Commission give him some direction for selecting the public art to be placed at the front of the new parking garage (condition 18). CP Monroe noted that according to the city's public art policy the commission with the responsibility for the area would be the one to review the public art. In this case, the Planning Commission is the commission which was responsible for project review. CP suggested that the Commission form a subcommittee of two members to work with the applicant and staff in order to develop a process for identifying and selecting a piece of public art work to be placed along either the Trousdale or El Camino street frontage at the parking garage. Cers.Osterling and Vistica volunteered to work with staff and the applicant to develop a process. CP noted that the conditions of approval require that this public art be installed with the landscaping of the parking garage, and mid-November was a short time if a piece of art needed to be created. The commission consensus was that it was more important to select the right piece of public art, that the applicant has shown good faith in wanting to �. provide the piece of art and fund it, so it is appropriate to provide sufficient time to execute the proper selection process. 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes September 11, 2006 XII. ADJOURNMENT Chair Brownrigg adjourned the meeting at 11:22 p.m. Respectfully submitted, David Cauchi, Secretary SAMINUTESIunapproved 09.11.06.doc 14 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary August 31, 2006 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. LAIF&County Pool 17,273,960.22 17,273,960.22 17,273,960.22 53.58 1 1 4.496 4.558 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 13,500,000.00 13,406,080.00 13,500,000.00 41.88 805 298 4.009 4.064 Federal Agency Issues-Discount 1,500,000.00 1,485,750.00 1,464,362.23 4.54 173 66 5.057 5.127 Investments 32,273,960.22 32,165,790.22 32,238,322.45 100.00% 345 128 4.317 4.377 Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 118,860.47 237,950.16 Average Daily Balance 32,227,695.45 32,530,354.09 Effective Rate of Return 4.34% 4.31% Pursuant to State law,there are sufficient available funds to meet Burlingame's expenditure requirements for the coming 6 months. Total funds invested represent consolidation of all fund types,and availability of some of these funds is restricted by law(e.g.Gas Tax,Trust&Agency funds,Capital Projects,and Enterprise funds). zv-ndL�/ ✓ -l-/Z-Olo JESUS NAVE, FINANCE DIR./TREASURE �T�ScCS /('IL.UIC Reporting period 08/01/2006-08/31/2006 Portfolio CITY Run Date:09/12/2006-11:32 CP PM(PRF_PM1)SymRepl 6.41.202a Report Ver.5,00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2006 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment tt Issuer Balance Date" Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date LAIF&County Pool SYS77 77 LOCAL AGENCY INV.FD. 10,383,547.61 10,383,547.61 10,383,547.61 4.849 4.849 1 SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 6,890,412.61 6,890,412.61 6,890,412.61 4.120 Aaa 4.120 1 Subtotal and Average 17,263,333.22 17,273,960.22 17,273,960.22 17,273,960.22 4.558 1 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133X9QV5 517 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/22/2004 1,000,000.00 985,630.00 1,000,000.00 3.500 Aaa 3.500 294 06/22/2007 3133XARN9 518 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/08/2005 1,000,000.00 999,690.00 1,000,000.00 3.390 Aaa 3.390 7 09/08/2006 3133XDGM7 519 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/24/2005 1,000,000.00 994,380.00 1,000,000.00 4.450 Aaa 4.450 784 10/24/2008 3133XDNL1 520 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/17/2005 1,000,000.00 993,130.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 808 11/17/2008 3133XE2W8 521 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/28/2005 1,000,000.00 996,250.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 483 12/28/2007 3133XEUE 522 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/22/2006 2,000,000.00 1,996,880.00 2,000,000.00 5.000 Aaa 5.000 112 12/22/2006 3133XFNM4 525 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/25/2006 1,000,000.00 999,060.00 1,000,000.00 5.280 Aaa 5.280 266 05/25/2007 3133XFRL2 527 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/22/2006 500,000.00 499,690.00 500,000.00 5.200 Aaa 5.200 112 12/22/2006 3128X2NA9 514 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 01/30/2004 3,000,000.00 2,971,050.00 3,000,000.00 3.000 Aaa 3.000 151 01/30/2007 3136F5TJ0 515 FANNIE MAE 04/27/2004 1,000,000.00 985,630.00 1,000,000.00 3.100 Aaa 3.100 238 04/27/2007 3136F6FZ7 516 FANNIE MAE 10/18/2004 1,000,000.00 984,690.00 1,000,000.00 3.820 Aaa 3.547 412 10/18/2007 Subtotal and Average 13,500,000,00 13,500,000.00 . 13,406,080.00 13,500,000.00 4.064 298 Federal Agency Issues-Discount 313397E23 524 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 05/17/2006 500,000.00 500,000.00 492,718.06 4.900 Aaa 5.041 0 09/01/2006 313589H48 523 FANNIE MAE 05/17/2006 500,000.00 498,150.00 490,948.61 4.900 Aaa 5.060 26 09/27/2006 313588CFO 526 FANNIE MAE 05/19/2006 500,000.00 487,600.00 480,695.56 4.964 Aaa 5.285 175 02/23/2007 Subtotal and Average 1,464,362.23 1,500,000.00 1,485,750.00 1,464,362.23 5.127 66 Total and Average 32,227,695.45 32,273,960.22 32,165,790.22 32,238,322.45 4.377 128 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:09/12/2006-11:32 PM(PRF PM2)SyrnRept 6.41.202a / ( 't Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 3 Activity By Type August 1, 2006 through August 31, 2006 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance LAIF&County Pool (Monthly Summary) SYS79 79 S M COUNTY POOL 4.120 19,378.65 0.00 Subtotal 17,254,581.57 19,378.65 0.00 17,273,960.22 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon Subtotal 13,500,000.00 13,500,000.00 Federal Agency Issues-Discount Subtotal 1,464,362.23 1,464,362.23 Total 32,218,943.80 19,378.65 0.00 32,238,322.45 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:09/12/2006-11:32 PM(PRF_PM3)SyrnRepl 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 4 Activity Summary August 2005 through August 2006 Yield to Maturity Managed Number Number Month Number of Total 360 365 Pool of Investments of Investments Average Average End Year Securities Invested Equivalent Equivalent Rate Purchased Redeemed Term Days to Maturity August 2005 8 29,380,702.93 3.048 3.091 3.151 0 0 287 141 September 2005 8 25,480,702.93 3.125 3.168 3.285 0 0 330 151 October 2005 9 26,721,256.73 3.268 3.313 3.406 1 0 356 175 November 2005 9 26,614,225.47 3.484 3.532 3.521 1 1 344 206 December 2005 10 27,741,871.03 3.594 3.644 3.613 1 0 356 214 January 2006 10 29,203,493.47 3.692 3.743 3.767 0 0 338 192 February 2006 10 27,236,535.77 3.734 3.786 3.836 0 0 363 196 March 2006 11 28,865,253.49 3.750 3.802 3.721 1 0 361 192 April 2006 11 31,600,492.83 3.997 4.052 4.136 0 0 330 165 May 2006 15 34,904,265.49 4.169 4.227 4.293 4 0 317 155 June 2006 16 33,717,988.31 4.224 4.283 4.375 1 0 330 150 July 2006 16 32,218,943.80 4.307 4.367 4.539 0 0 346 143 August 2006 16 32,238,322.45 4.317 4.377 4.558 0 0 345 128 Average 11 29,686,465.75 3.747% 3.799% 3.862 1 0 339 170 Portfolio CITY CP Run Dale:09/12/2006-11:32 PM(PRF PM4)SyrnRept 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 5 Distribution of Investments By Type August 2005 through August 2006 August September October November December January February March April May June July August Average Security Type 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 by Period LAIF&County Pool 69.4 64.7 62.6 66.2 64.0 65.8 63.3 58.4 62.0 58.6 55.6 53.6 53.6 61.4% Certificates of Deposit-Bank . .......... ......._ . .............................................................. .. Certificates of Deposit-S&L Certificates of Deposit-Thrift&Ln Negotiable CD's-Bank ......... CORP NOTES Bankers Acceptances Commercial Paper-Interest Bearing .._....._........_... Commercial Paper-Discount -- Federal Agency Issues Coupon 30.6 35.3 37.4 33.8 36.1 34.2 36.7 41.6 38.0 37.2 40.0 41.9 41.9 37.3% Federal Agency Issues Discount - __. _..... .. 4.2 43 4.6 4.5 1.4% Treasury Securities-Coupon Treasury Securities-Discount Miscellaneous Securities-Coupon ....... .. _ . _...... .. .........................._............................................................._.... ............................. ... ....... .................................... .................. .... ........ .. Miscellaneous Securities-Discount Non Interest Bearing Investments Mortgage Backed Securities ...... ..... ... .... ........... . ........... ..........._. Miscellaneous Discounts-At.Cost 2 - - Miscellaneous Discounts-At Cost 3 Portfolio CITY Run Date:09/12/2006-17:32 CP PM(PRF_PM5)SymRepl 6.41.202a Report Ver.5.00 CITY OF BURLINGAME Portfolio Management Page 6 Interest Earnings Summary August 31, 2006 August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date CD/Coupon/Discount Investments: Interest Collected 0.00 45,000.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 179,465.82 179,465.82 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 127,159.10) ( 119,852.38) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 52,306.72 104,613.44 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 52,306.72 104,613.44 Pass Through Securities: Interest Collected 0.00 0.00 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 0.00 0.00 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period ( 0.00) ( 0.00) Interest Earned during Period 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts 0.00 0.00 Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Earnings during Periods 0.00 0.00 Cash/Checking Accounts: Interest Collected 0.00 200,955.49 Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period 386,227.01 386,227.01 Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period ( 319,673.26) ( 453,845.78) Interest Earned during Period 66,553.75 133,336.72 Total Interest Earned during Period 118,860.47 237,950.16 Total Capital Gains or Losses 0.00 0.00 Total Earnings during Period 118,860.47 237,950.16 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date:09/12/2006-11:32 PM(PRF_PM6)SynnRept 6.41.202a / Report Ver.5.00 PFM Asset 1 PROGRAM Investment Portfolio Information For CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME (116-00) Portfolio # 12510150 Section/Report Title A. Account Summary B. Detail of Securities Held C. Fair Market Values&Analytics D. Security Transactions&Interest E. Cash Transactions Report F. Realized Gains&Losses G. Cash Balance Report For The Month Ending August 31, 2006 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME CA PFM Asset Management LLC*One Keystone Plaza*North Front&Market Streets,Suite 300*Harrisburg,PA 17101-2044*(717)232-2723 For more information,please contact your client manager: NSESA KAZADI (41'5)982-5544 KAZADIN@pfm:com PFMAssetManagement I PROGRAM I , Ii Account Summary: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: August 31 2006 MARKET%OF YTM AT YTM AT DURATION ECURTTY TYPE PAR VALUE AMORTIZED COST MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO COST MARKET TO WORST FED AGY BOND/NOTE 1,000,000.00 989,649.01 989,687.50 17.959 5.346 5.316 0.376 FED AGY DN 4,560,000.00 4,526,533.46 4,521,141.39 82.041 4.514 5.218 0.158 TOTAL SECURITIES 5,560,000.00 5,516,182.47 5,510,828.89 100.000 4.663% 5.235% 0.197 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 5,560,000.00 5,516,182.47 5,510,828.89 100.000% ACCRUED INTEREST 3,062.50 3,062.50 TOTAL PORTFOLIO $5,560,000.00 $5,519,244.97 $5,513,891.39 Disclosure Statement: PFM's monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity.The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes(i.e.settles)all investment transactions.The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions.Only the client has the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian and to direct the movement of securities.Clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies,implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.PFM recognizes that our clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping,therefore the custodian bank statement and the PFM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.PFM's market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of t}u month as supplied by F.T.Interactive Data,Bloomberg or Telerate.Prices that fall betw� rata points are interpolated. Non-negotiable FDIC insured bank certificates of deposit `ced at par. 1( A-1 PFM Asset I ,meWL C- I PROGRAM Detail of Securities Held: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: August 31,2006 SECURITY TYPE MATURITY S&P TRADE SETTLE ORIGINAL YTM ACCRUED AMORTIZED MARKET CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE RATING DATE DATE COST AT COST INTEREST COST VALUE FED AGY BOND/NOTE 31359MTXI FNMA NOTES(CALLABLE) 1,000,000 2.625 01/19/07 AAA 08/30/06 08/31/06 989,574.00 5.346 3,062.50 989,649.01 989,687.50 1,000,000 989,574.00 5.346 3,062.50 989,649.01989,687.50 FED AGY DN 313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 A-1+ 09/22/05 09/22/05 1,498,508.27 4.081 0.00 1,556,942.40 1,555,732.32 313589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 A-I+ 11/17/05 11/18/05 958,077.78 4,593 0.00 993,155.56 991,812.87 313397P47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/14/06 A-l+ 12/21/05 12/21/05 959,246.00 4.663 0.00 990,805.50 989,228.24 313589T60 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/18/06 A-I+ 03/22/06 03/22/06 963,941.94 4.969 0.00 985,630.00 984,367.96 4,560,000 4,379,773.99 4,514 0.00 4,526,533.46 4,521,141.39 TOTAL SECURITIES $5,560,000 $5,369,347.99 4.663% $3,062.50 $5,516,182.47 $5,510,828.89 Issuers by Market Value Ratings by Market Value FMJviC $2,544,981 48.2% []A•ta $4,521,141 82.0% FNMA $2.985,888 53.8% AAA $989,688 180%. Total: $5,510,829100.0% Total: $5,510.829100,0% B-I i PROGRAM Fair Market Values & Analytics: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: August 31,2006 SECURITY TYPE MATURITY FIRST CALL MARKET MARKET UNREAL G/(L) UNREAL G/(L) DURATION YTM CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR COUPON DATE DATE PRICE VALUE ON AMORT COST ON COST TO WORST AT MKT FED AGY BOND/NOTE 31359MTXI FNMA NOTES(CALLABLE) 1,000,000 2,625 01/19/07 01/19/05 98.969 989,687.50 38.49 113.50 0.376 5.316 FED AGY DN 313397G47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,560,000 09/19/06 99.726 1,555,732.32 (1,210.08) 57.,224.05 0.051 5.198 13589M26 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 10/27/06 99.181 991,812.87 (1,342.69) 33,735.09 0.152 5.214 313397P47 FHLMC DISC NOTE 1,000,000 11/14/06 98.923 989,228.24 (1,577.26) 29,982.24 0.200 5.227 313589T60 FNMA DISC NOTE 1,000,000 12/18/06 98.437 984,367.96 (1,262.04) 20,426.02 0.291 5.245 SUBTOTALS $5,510,828.89 ($5,353,58) $141,480.90 0.197 5.235 % ACCRUED INTEREST ON INVESTMENT 3,062.50 TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF INVESTMENTS $5,513,891.39 I PROGRAM Security Transactions & Interest: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OF BURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: August 31,2006 S&P MATURITY PRINCIPAL ACCRUED TRADE SETTLE TRAN TYPE SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP RATING PAR COUPON DATE AMOUNT INTEREST TOTAL 08/15/06 08/15/06 INTEREST FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 3133X85Z1 AAA 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 0.00 25,875.00 25,875.00 1,800,000 0.00 25,875.00 25,875.00 08/30/06 08/31/06 BUY FNMA NOTES(CALLABLE) 31359MTX1 AAA 1,000,000 2.625 01/19/07 (989,574,00) (3,062.50) (992,636.50) 1,000,000 (989,574.00) (3,062.50) (992,636.50) 08/15/06 08/15/06 MATURITY FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 3133X85Z1 AAA 1,800,000 2.875 08/15/06 1,800,000.00 0.00 1,800,000.00 1,800,000 1,800,000.00 0,00 1,800,000.00 TOTAL SECURITY TRANSACTIONS 833,238.50 a D-1 PFMAsset I PROGRAM I , I Cash Transactions Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) MONTH ENDED: August 31 2006 CASH DATE TRANSACTION CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT 08/31/06 CC CONTRIB 992,636.50 992.636.50 08/15/06 CW WITHDRAW (1,825,875.00) i (1.825,875.00) NET CASH CONTRIBUTIONS/(WITHDRAWS) ($833138.50) PFMAssetMrtnqgemJWLLC- CAMP PROGRAM 1 , i Realized Gains and Losses: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) (Excluding Cash) MONTH ENDED: August 31 2006 TRADE SETTLE PRINCIPAL REALIZED REALIZED DATE DATE TRAN TYPE SALE METHOD SECURITY DESCRIPTION CUSIP PAR VALUE COUPON PROCEEDS G/(L)COST G/(L)AMORT CST 08/15/06 08/15/06 MATURITY FHLB GLOBAL NOTES 3133X85Z1 1,800,000 2.875 1,800,000.00 21,108.60 0.00 TOTAL GAINS AND LOSSES $21,108.60 $0.00 F-1 PFM A sset Man agem eni PR / GRA M Cash Balance Report: 12510150 CAMP-CITY OFBURLINGAME(116-00) MONTH ENDED: August 31,2006 CASH BALANCE: $0.00 Earnines Calculation Templates I Current Month-End Book Value + Add Coupon Interest Received + Current Month-End Accrued Interest + Less Purchased Interest Related to Coupons Less Purchases Add/Subtract Gains or Losses on Cost For The Mth +/. Less Purchased Interest Total Cost Basis Earnings For The Month Add Disposals(Sales,Maturities,Paydowns,Sinks,etc.) + Add Coupon Interest Received + Less Previous Month-End Book Value Less Previous Month-End Accrued Interest Total Accrual Basis Earnings For The Month Economic Calendar 09/01/06 Change in Nonfarm Payrolls 09/20/06 FOMC Rate Decision 09/01/06 Fed's Beige Book 09/25/06 Existing Home Sales 09/06/06 FOMC Meeting 09/27/06 New Home Sales 09/15/06 Consumer Price Index 09/27/06 Durable Goods Orders 09/19/06 Producer Price Index 09/28/06 GDP 2nd Quarter 09/19/06 Housing Starts 09/29/06 Chicago Purchasing Manager Market Commentary ..- The FOMC decided to keep rates unchanged at their August 8th leaving the overnight lending rate at 5.25%. Prior to this meeting's decision the Fed had increased rates 25 basis points 17 consecutive times,taking the Fed Funds level from 1%to 5.25%over the course of three years. The decision was characterized as a"close call"in the Fed minutes,with concerns about inflation still being expressed by some Governors. Both the equity and bond markets viewed the decision as positive with both markets finishing the month in positive territory. Yields on the two-year note declined 16 basis points from 4.94%to 4,78%and yields on the ten-year note declined 25 basis points dropping from 4.97%to 4.72%during July. Lower than expected inflation reports and moderating economic data have reduced the chances of future Fed hikes in the market's view. Although the market believes the Fed may be done hiking rates the Fed has left their options open. The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for September 20th, G-1