Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet - CC - 2006.07.17
BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting—Monday, July 17, 2006 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 650 558-7200 Page 1 of 3 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL 4. MINUTES —Regular Council Meeting of June 19, 2006 Approve 5. PRESENTATION a. San Mateo County Operational Area Plan to deal with a potential pandemic 6. PUBLIC HEARING The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. a. Consideration of a ballot measure for November, 2006 to Hearing/Action finance municipal improvements b. NPDES Stormwater Management Plan—2006/2007 Hearing/Action General Program Budget 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS — At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits Council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a "request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. Consider appointment to the Library Board Appoint 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Approve a. Resolution authorizing coordination with the American Institute of Architects San Mateo County on the destination: SOBA (South of Burlingame Avenue) Design Charrette b. Resolution accepting the light rehabilitation at Bayside Park Field#1 c. Approval for a Police Department employee to attend out of state training for the purpose of accepting specialized police equipment obtained through a Department of Homeland Security grant BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame Regular Meeting—Monday,July 17, 2006 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 650 558-7200 Page 2 of 3 d. Authorization of signatories for city checks and drafts e. Action on a Resolution authorizing C/CAG to act as a subregion for allocating the housing needs numbers for the mandated 2009 update of the Burlingame Housing Element f. Warrants & Payroll 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS—At this time,persons in the audience may speak on any item on the agenda or any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Council. The Ralph M.Brown Act(the State local agency open meeting law)prohibits council from acting on any matter that is not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to fill out a"request to speak"card located on the table by the door and hand it to staff. The Mayor may limit speakers to three minutes each. 12. OLD BUSINESS 13. NEW BUSINESS 14. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Library, May 16, 2006; Parks & Recreation, June 15, 2006; Planning, June 26 & July 10, 2006 b. Department Reports: Police, May, 2006; Building, June, 2006 c. Copy of letter being sent to artists and architects in the community requesting suggestions for a centennial monument d. Continuation of parking permit program 15. ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION a. Claim of Douglas Winnett b. Claim of Denis Champagne (GEICO) BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Burlingame irur> Regular Meeting—Monday, July 17, 2006 501 Primrose Road Burlingame,CA 94010 Page 3 of 3 650 558-7200 16. ADJOURNMENT TO 8:00 A.M.,JULY 19,2006 Notice: Any attendees wishing accommodations for disabilities please contact the City Clerk at 650 558-7203 at least 24 hours before the meeting. A copy of the Agenda Packet is available for public review at the City Clerk's office,City Hall 501 Primrose Road,from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.before the meeting and at the meeting. Visit the City's website at www.burlingame.org. Agendas and minutes are available at this site. NEXT MEETING—Wednesday,July 19, 2006 CITY OA BURUNGAME y-1W1-6.------11-P- BURLINGAME CITY COUNCIL Unapproved Minutes Regular Meeting of June 19, 2006 JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/COUNCIL MEETING a. DISCUSSION OF DOWNTOWN DESIGN CHARRETTE Neomi Avram and Ellis Schoicut, of the AIA San Mateo County Chapter, gave a brief presentation; and members of the Steering Committee asked for input from the Planning Commission and City Council on the study area and scope of work as the group proceeds with plans for the design charrette destination: SOBA (South of Burlingame Avenue). The charrette will be held on September 301, 2006, in the Recreation Center. 1. CALL TO ORDER A duly noticed regular meeting of the Burlingame City Council was held on the above date in the City Hall Council Chambers. Mayor Cathy Baylock called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Led by Matthew Stevens. 3. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Baylock, Cohen, Keighran, Nagel, O'Mahony COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None 4. MINUTES Two corrections were made to the minutes of the June 5, 2006 regular Council meeting: Item 5.a. to read, "...the Chamber would meet with the City Council in September ..." Item 5.b. addition needed to complete the comments Council made relative to the purpose and nature of the ballot measure. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve the minutes of the May 31, 2006 adjourned regular Council Meeting/Budget Study Session and the amended minutes of the June 5, 2006 regular Council meeting; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. 5. PRESENTATIONS a. COMMUNITY GRANTS AWARD BY ROTARY CLUB Dick Gregory, President of the Burlingame Rotary Club, announced the various community groups receiving grants through the Rotary Club's annual award program and the club's support of local youth services. 1 Burlingame City Council June 19,2006 Unapproved Minutes b. ECONOMIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (ERA) PRESENTATION ON DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC STUDY CP Monroe introduced William Lee of Economic Research Associates. Mr. Lee presented the conclusions of the economic study of the downtown area. Council members asked about retail sales trends, the market for a cinema downtown, noted that a number of options including mixed use would be possible on the Safeway site, and remarked on the value of the train station downtown. There was a discussion about the best fiscal land use meaning a reasonable tax base or the City cannot provide services; this influences the price of housing within the mixed use alternative. He noted that in the next phase, as a part of the preparation of the Specific Plan for the Downtown, the conclusions would be more finely tuned to the downtown area. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. ISSUANCE OF PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS AND RELATED LEGAL MATTERS FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and approve a resolution authorizing the issuance of Pension Obligation Bonds. He then introduced John Kim, Vice President of E.J. De La Rosa Investment Bankers, who provided an overview of Burlingame's pension system financing. Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments, and the hearing was closed. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Resolution No. 43-2006 authorizing the issuance of one or more series of pension obligation bonds, approving the Trust Agreement, a validation action and other matters relating thereto; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. TAX EQUITY AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT (TEGRA) PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ISSUANCE OF $3,000,000 IN TAX EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO FUND THE RENOVATION OF A FACILITY BY COMMUNITY GATEPATH AGENCY FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt obligations to fund renovation of a Community Gatepath facility. Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. There were no comments, and the hearing was closed. Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 42-2006 approving the issuance of tax-exempt obligations by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority for renovation of a facility by Community Gatepath; seconded by Councilwoman Keighran. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. C. CONSIDER PLACEMENT OF A MEASURE ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006 ELECTION BALLOT FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO FINANCE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS; AND (i) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND NECESSITY FOR CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND (ii) INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE OR ORDINANCES CALLING SPECIAL 2 Burlingame City Council June 19,2006 Unapproved Minutes ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006, AND PLACING A MEASURE OR MEASURES FOR FINANCING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON THE BALLOT Acting CM Schwartz reviewed the staff report and requested Council consider the options for placing a ballot measure on the November ballot to finance public improvement, to adopt a resolution of intention and necessity regarding the ballot measure, and to introduce an ordinance to place the measure on the November 7, 2006 ballot. DPW Bagdon provided an overview of a reformatted Facilities Master Plan that highlighted the projects needed and their costs for flood control ($39 million), buildings health and safety improvements ($6 million) and new or expanded buildings ($57 million). Financial Consultant Sean Powers of Government Financial Strategies, Inc. gave a general overview of what a$53 million bond measure would look like for Burlingame, what facilities could be included in it, and what it would cost the taxpayer. Burlingame's tax base for 2005-06 contains a total of 8,562 parcels. For a$53 million bond, the average yearly tax levy would be $38.30 per$100,000 of assessed value. Therefore, a median assessed parcel would cost an average of $150 per year for 30 years. A flat parcel tax would cost $420 per year for each owner(a flat tax of$150 would provide only$17 million). A tax exemption for senior citizens, 36% of the tax base, would have to be subsidized. Acting CM Schwartz explained the two bond options that staff provided: Option 1 provides $52.7 million for both flood control and capital improvements to buildings. This option allows flexibility in funding expenditures, e.g., unforeseen emergency funding. Option 2 provides $43 million for flood control and $10 million for capital improvements to buildings. This option is less flexible due to specific designation of the funding. Staff recommended Option 1. At Council's request, FinDir Nava explained that the citizens' oversight committee's responsibility is to perform duties as established by the Council to ensure that appropriate fund expenditures are made according to the pledge made to the voters. Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. The following citizens spoke: Kirk Heathcote, 2305 Hillside Drive; Charles Voltz, 725 Vernon Way; Daniel Glatt, 10 Belvedere Court; Dan Andersen, 728 Vernon Way; Hank Sauer, 840 Fairfield; Ed Larios, 1536 Barroilhet; Jeremy Verba, 1548 Ralston Avenue; Joe LaMariana, 1336 Balboa Avenue; Laura Hesselgren, 416 Bayswater Avenue; John Root, 728 Crossway Road; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue; Gene Condon, 1308 Mills Avenue; Stephen Fong, 1001 Cabrillo Avenue; and Michael Shanus, 1541 Albemarle Way. There were no further comments, and the hearing was closed. Council discussed Options 1 and 2, and funding for a new Recreation Center. Council agreed that there is a need for flood control and health and safety improvements to city buildings and that there is a need to know what the community wants for a new Recreation Center before designating funds in a bond measure. Council agreed on Option 2, designating $37 million for flood control and $7 million for health and safety improvements to specific existing city buildings for a total of$44 million for the bond measure. The median tax rate was set at an average of$125 per year, or an average of$31.97 per$100,000 of a property's assessed valuation. Staff members left the Chambers to rewrite the proposed ordinance and resolution to incorporate Council's changes. Mayor Baylock declared a five-minute intermission at 10:55 p.m.; then reconvened the meeting at 11:10 p.m. Mayor Baylock moved to Item 7. since staff had not yet returned to the Chambers. 3 Burlingame City Council June 19,2006 Unapproved Minutes 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke on the proposed bond measure. Charles Voltz, 725 Vernon Way, spoke on the Downtown Economic Study and invited the public to a parking forum sponsored by the Citizens for a Better Burlingame. Mark Hudak, 216 Park Road, requested to speak on Item 9.h. There were no further comments from the floor. 8. STAFF REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a. RESOLUTION NO. 47-2006 AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN (MIG) TO CONDUCT PHASE II COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOR THE CITYWIDE FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DPW Bagdon reviewed the staff report and requested Council approve a resolution for an agreement to conduct a community education program for citywide facilities improvements. Carie DeRuiter, MIG Principal, advised that MIG's goal is to inform and educate the public on the City's proposed bond measure by providing education, not advocacy, using neutral information. Project Manager, Joyce Vollmer, provided examples of their projects on other bond measures. Mayor Baylock continued with Item 6.c. since staff had returned to the Chambers with the revised resolution and ordinance. C. CONSIDER PLACEMENT OF A MEASURE ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006 ELECTION BALLOT FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO FINANCE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS; AND (i) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND NECESSITY FOR CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND (ii) INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE OR ORDINANCES CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006,AND PLACING A MEASURE OR MEASURES FOR FINANCING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON THE BALLOT (CONTINUED) CA Anderson reviewed the revised resolution and ordinance, which incorporated Council's changes. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve adoption of Resolution No. 51-2006 determining the public interest and necessity of construction and completion of municipal improvements for flood control, and for disaster preparedness, disabled access, safety and security capital improvements to existing city buildings; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen read the title of the proposed ordinance calling a special municipal bond election for approval of bonds to finance construction and completion of municipal improvements for flood control, and for disaster preparedness, disabled access, safety and security capital improvements to existing city buildings. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to waive further reading of the proposed ordinance; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to introduce the proposed ordinance; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Baylock requested CC Mortensen publish a summary of the proposed ordinance at least five days before proposed adoption. 4 Burlingame City Council June 19,2006 Unapproved Minutes Mayor Baylock continued with Item 8.a. a. RESOLUTION NO. 47-2006 AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN (MIG) TO CONDUCT PHASE II COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOR THE CITYWIDE FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CONTINUED) Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to approve Resolution No. 47-2006 authorizing an agreement with Moore Iacofano Goltsman to conduct Phase II community education for citywide facilities improvements; seconded by Councilman Cohen. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. b. STATUS OF TREES ADJACENT TO THE DEPOT Acting CM Schwartz provided an update on the status of the tree replacement on Highland Avenue adjacent to The Depot. Three trees had been removed due to heart rot. The original Elms ordered as replacements had a pathogen and were not delivered. The order for the tree replacements has been resubmitted for fall delivery. C. AMEND 2006 CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR TO ADD AN ADJOURNED REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JULY 19, 2006,AT 8:00 A.M. CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council amend the City Council Calendar for 2006 by adding an adjourned regular Council meeting on July 19, 2006, to ensure that at least four Councilmembers would be present to consider the ballot measure for the November election. Vice Mayor Nagel made a motion to amend the 2006 City Council Calendar adding July 19, 2006, as an adjourned regular City Council meeting to be held at 8 a.m. in the Council Chambers; seconded by Councilwoman O'Mahony. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. d. REVIEW FUNDING REQUESTS FOR COMMUNITY GROUPS FinDir Nava reviewed the staff report and requested Council review the funding for community groups. In response to funding arts programs, Councilman Cohen stated that his support is based on the difficulty the arts have in establishing funding and that schools are no longer funding the arts. Councilwoman Keighran stated that it's important to monitor performing arts groups that receive City support to ensure that they do perform and that the funding is a benefit to the community. Funding for community groups is included in the City's 2006-07 Budget scheduled for approval in Item 9.a. 9. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Baylock requested removal of Item h. from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. a. ADOPT FY 2006-07 BUDGET AND GANN LIMIT RESOLUTIONS FinDir Nava requested Council approve Resolution No. 49-2006 establishing 2006-07 Appropriation Limit for City of Burlingame pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution and to approve Resolution No. 50-2006 adopting Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of Burlingame FY ending June 30, 2007, including approval of Community Group Funding for 2006-07. 5 Burlingame City Council June 19,2006 Unapproved Minutes b. RESOLUTION NO. 48-2006 TO REJECT ALL BIDS AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO READVERTISE THE MITTEN ROAD PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 48-2006 rejecting all bids for Mitten Road Pump Station Improvements, City Project No. 81360. C. RESOLUTION NO. 46-2006 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BKF ENGINEERS FOR PUBLIC RELATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR BURLINGAME SUBDIVISION SEWER REHABILITATION, PHASES I AND II DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 46-2006 approving a contract with BKF Engineers for public relations and construction management services for Burlingame Subdivision Sewer Rehabilitation Phases I and II. d. RESOLUTION NO. 45-2006 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ERLER& KALINOWSKI, INC. FOR FY 2006-07 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OF WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DPW Bagdon requested Council approve Resolution No. 45-2006 approving agreement with Erler& Kalinowski, Inc. for FY 2006-07 program management of Water System Capital Improvements Program. e. EXTENSION OF AUDIT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAPORICCI & LARSON, CPA'S FOR 2007 AND 2008 FinDir Nava requested Council approve Resolution No. 44-2006 approving extension to agreement with Caporicci & Larson to provide independent audit services to the City for two additional audit years and authorizing the City Manager to sign the extension agreement. L APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR FINANCE DIRECTOR FinDir Nava requested Council approve the Finance Director's travel to New York to attend the Summer Meeting of the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council July 12-14, 2006. g. WARRANTS & PAYROLL FinDir Nava requested approval for payment of Warrants #18598-19278 duly audited, in the amount of $2,535,404.79 (excluding Library checks#18727-18754), Payroll checks #165476-165683 in the amount of $2,573,746.07 for the month of May 2006. Councilwoman O'Mahony made a motion to approve Items a. through g. of the Consent Calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Nagel. The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. h. APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 52-2006 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF REVOCABLE EASEMENT FOR 1427 CHAPIN AVENUE ACCESS ACROSS PARKING LOT B-1 (GARDEN CENTER) 6 Burlingame City Council June 19,2006 Unapproved Minutes CA Anderson reviewed the staff report and requested Council approve the resolution providing a revocable access easement in City Parking Lot B-1 to office development at 1427 Chapin Avenue with the conditions as written. Mayor Baylock opened the public hearing. Mark Hudak, 216 Park Road, represented the applicant and provided an overview of the applicant's intent to retain the historic elements of the building. He stated that the upstairs bathroom does not contain original fixtures. Also, the marble (red) floor tiles are not the original tiles and proposed to incorporate these tiles into the new bathrooms. Bonnie Bertetta, owner, and Mr. Hudak responded to Council's questions. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke. There were no further comments, and the hearing was closed. Mayor Baylock made a motion to approve Item h. of the Consent Calendar including the requirement that the marble floor tiles in the upstairs bathroom shall be incorporated into an aspect of the original building; seconded by Councilman Cohen. Approved unanimously by voice vote, 5-0. Mayor Baylock moved to Item 12. 12. OLD BUSINESS a. PARKS OF THE FUTURE BALLOT MEASURE Mayor Baylock asked Council if they would agree to discuss endorsement of the Parks of the Future bond measure scheduled for the November ballot. Julia Bott of the San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Foundation stated that the County Board of Supervisors has scheduled public hearings on this item for July 18 and August 1, 2006. Council agreed to consider endorsement of this item at their August 21St meeting. b. Mayor Baylock asked whether the Bicycle Subcommittee plans to apply for funding this year. DPW Bagdon will verify the membership and find out what they have planned for this year. c. Vice Mayor Nagel asked about cleaning up the weeds at the entryway to Broadway. Acting CM Schwartz advised that he will contact Caltrans since this is their property. Some citizens are voluntarily maintaining areas that they have adopted through Caltrans. Councilman Cohen suggested this would be a good project for the sheriff's Work Furlough Program. d. Councilman Cohen requested an update on the installation of a lighted crosswalk at Morrell Avenue. DPW Bagdon stated that construction is expected to begin in July. 10. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Council reported on various events and committee meetings each of them attended on behalf of the City. 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the floor. 13. NEW BUSINESS a. Councilwoman Keighran stated that Safeway representatives have contacted her and other Council- members about wanting to start an open process. She suggested the formation of a subcommittee consisting 7 Burlingame City Council June 19,2006 Unapproved Minutes of two councilmembers, the City Manager and the City Planner. Mayor Baylock appointed herself and Councilwoman Keighran to the subcommittee. 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS a. Commission Minutes: Traffic, Safety& Parking, April 13 & May 18, 2006; Planning, June 12, 2006 b. Department Reports: Building, May 2006; Finance, May 2006 c. Letters to the Burlingame Redevelopment Agency and to the Burlingame Financing Authority concerning Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Notice 15. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Baylock adjourned the meeting at 12:59 a.m. in memory of Vinnie Bridges. Respectfully submitted, Doris J. Mortensen City Clerk 8 Burlingame City Council June 19, 2006 Unapproved Minutes Pandemic Flu History Pandemic Flu •: 1918 Spanish Flu •500,000 US Deaths .40 Million Deaths World Wide Pandemic=Greek for"All of the People" •r 1957/58 Asian Flu --•_;�6 Mark Ladas •70,000 US Deaths Central County Fire Department Division Chief �V ,..' •2 Million Deaths World Wide Pandemic Flu History Con't. Current Concern •:1968 Hong Kong Flu *Unprecedented outbreak of avian :•34,000 US Deaths influenza in Asia and Europe (H5N1) :•1Million Deaths World Wide #►200 million dead birds •Present in long-range migratory birds Other viruses/Scares: :BARS s Able to infect birds and people " • -,West Nile virus •230 human cases, 132 deaths(57%) :African Killer Beesa ' ;I S y Indonesia Incident #8 People in one family *7 Die r Person to Person Transmission *Not 1st incident •1997—Hong Kong � MSNt n wiLl brvs� r e HSNi in powNena wta bms© p a 2004-Thailand -+ ' HSNl in humans ■ ,.,.I r ti 1 How would the Avian Flu get to Transmission the "Sustained" state? #Bird-to-bird #Bird-to-human(close contact) "Mutation" e Human-to-human ►Individual Infected with Normal Flu •Limited—Prolong Exposure s Efficient •Same Individual contracts Avian Flu s (Must contract both at the same time) Sustained a�9 *�Y f What are the Symptoms of _.i Avian Flu? Transmission Process Risk of transmission greatest during first Fever&Cough Eye Infections 2 days—Incubation period Sore Throat Pneumonia Stay infectious for two weeks Muscle aches Malaise *Outbreak will last 6-8 weeks with 3 Upper Respiratory Severe Respiratory Complications Complications pandemic waves likely rx Threat Assessment .£.m' "Normal" Disaster SM Residence of Employees of ) Localized County Burlingame Burlingame Resources:Local, State,and Federal Pop. 750,000 28,158 230—F/T +Volunteers Paid Self-Sufficient for 72-96 hours Become 262,500 9,855 81 (35%) ♦Loss of Physical Infrastructure ILL r Freeways/Overpasses Require 10,000 375 3 (3.8%) *water Main Breaks .Loss of Electricity Hospital ` s Communication Issues Deaths 5,000 187 1.5 (50%) 2 "Pandemic" Disaster r: _ County Board of Supervisors •Global Outbreak �►Bio-Surveillance *No Outside Resources *Containment Measures •No/Limited Volunteers ♦Vaccines *Self-Sufficient for 2 weeks to 2 months ; r Use of Anti-Viral Agents N *increased Call Volume ►Next Steps.............. *Depleted Work Force � �l Pre-Hospital Operations City of Burlingame — Important Pandemic Flu Committee areas to continue to address *Agencies involved: Fire Chiefs, Fire *Public Information Officer(PIO), needs/ ,/V,/ Ops, Fire Training, Fire Prevention, to work closely with the Joint Fire EMS, County EMS, Dispatch,AMR, Information Center(JIC) County Health, OES, a Hospital Rep, PPE for City Personnel and the Coroner's office. +►Essential Services—What should be cut ' .Stockpiling of PPE's and Supplies or reduced and when •Training ►Staffing—Use non-essential positioned �1 .Emergency Response and Transport ' employees in essential departments City of Burlingame — Areas to continue to address, con't. Stay Informed s Provisions for housing employees -t •www.smhealth.org *Use of retired employees *www.pandemicflu.gov *Determine who can telecommute •www.who.int/ ♦Lines of succession •www.cdc.gov *RECOVERY J Pandemic Flu Emergency Kit Questions? ;g r 2 weeks worth of food/water 02 weeks prescription medications, Tylenol, cough medicine s, z Mark Ladas :. Re-hydration solution—Pedialyte for children and Gatorade for teens/adults Division Chief *Supply of face masks and gloves 650.520.6280 •Disinfectant mladas@centralcountyfd.org ;5i Preventing and Treating Avian Flu in Humans +�VIGOROUS HANDWASHING s Warm Soap and water for at least 30 seconds s Stay home if ill a Eye protection :Simple surgical mask to be worn by caregiver and patient 4 AVIAN INFLUENZA (115NI) • Pandemic Overview: Scientists fear that the HSNI virus,the avian influenza strain currently circulating in Asia,could mutate to infect and easily spread from person-to-person, causing a worldwide health emergency(pandemic). • Estimated Number of Infections &Deaths: Using the statistics from the 1918 pandemic, the number of influenza infections and deaths in San Mateo County could be substantial: 245,000 infected; 700 deaths. • What's Being Done to Prepare: The Department, in cooperation with the San Mateo County Public Health, is working to develop a comprehensive plan to prepare for, and respond to, a pandemic influenza outbreak. This plan will include several aspects,with four major areas to include: o Bio-Surveillance o Stockpiling of PPE& supplies o Training&reinforcement of infection control policies o Emergency response&transport • AVIAN FLU—Frequently Asked Questions What is the avian influenza (bird flu)? It is an influenza type A virus normally found in wild birds. When the virus infects domestic poultry,the disease and death rates are very high. The H5N1 virus is being closely monitored by the World Health Organization(WHO)and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)for future pandemic spread. How is the avian influenza spread? Infected birds shed the H5N1 virus in their saliva,nasal secretions and feces. It is believed that infections in humans have resulted from contact with infected poultry (animal-to-human). So far,there have been no sustained human-to-human transmissions. If the avian influenza mutates into sustained human-to-human spread,most likely the virus would infect humans via airborne/droplet exposure. How many people have been infected by the avian influenza? As of July 17,2006,the H5NI virus has infected 230 human cases and resulted in 132 deaths(57%fatality rate); all human infections have occurred in Asia. Countries that have human infections: Indonesia,Viet Nam,Thailand, Cambodia, and China. What are the symptoms of avian influenza? Avian influenza begins with typical flu-like symptoms: • Fever& cough • Sore throat • Muscle aches/malaise • Upper respiratory infection Avian influenza also includes: • Eye infections • Pneumonia • Severe respiratory complications Is there a vaccine to protect humans? There are two manufacturers currently working on an experimental vaccine. The federal government has nearly 8 million doses,but this is enough to vaccine only 4 million people(it takes 2 doses one month apart). Techniques to dilute the vaccine while preserving a strong immune response are under way. How well the vaccine, diluted or not,would prevent influenza in a pandemic remains uncertain. Can Tamiflu®be used to vaccinate people? No, Tamiflu®is not a vaccine. Tamiflu® can be used prophylatically within 48 hours following exposure to boost the immune system,but it is not a replacement for a vaccine. The length of increased immunity following avian influenza exposure has not been studied. To date, on the limited number of people infected by the H5N1 virus, Tamiflu® treatment appears to reduce severe symptoms and prevent death. It is unknown how well Tamiflu®will perform prophylatically or as a treatment if the H5N1 virus mutates into sustained human-to-human transmission. What bio-surveillance is being done by County Health to detect the avian flu? Data is sent to the County Health Department and analyzed on a daily basis. The data is then compared with bio-surveillance information sent from every hospital in the County and, if there is an increase of flu-like activity, an Infection Control Alert is sent. Additionally, if a patient presents with avian flu-like symptoms,the County Health Medical Director would issue a countywide alert for all hospital and prehospital personnel. If an avian flu pandemic were to occur, how can I protect myself against infection? Department personnel who consistently use good infection control practices on all patient contacts (whether or not there is a pandemic flu)will be well-prepared for the challenge when the pandemic finally arrives. If conscientiously and consistently applied, current protective measures will significantly reduce or eliminate exposure and infection of the avian flu in rescue personnel. • Point of contact,ALL inquires regarding infectious diseases (including Avian Flu), personal protection,decon,and possible exposures must be FIRST directed to the Division Chief directing EMS.Mark Ladas—650.520.6280 May 2, 2006 Pandemic Flu Preparedness and Response Plan Executive Summary Background A pandemic is an epidemic which affects the entire world. Influenza pandemics have occurred regularly throughout human history. Is the threat of pandemic flu real? Yes, it is. Will a pandemic be caused by the current circulating strain (H51\11) of avian influenza? There is no way of knowing. Despite the rapid spread of avian influenza worldwide, all evidence to date indicates that the H5N1 virus does not spread easily from birds to infect humans. At this time, the risk remains highest in persons who reside in countries with widespread outbreaks in poultry, and who have had direct contact with infected poultry, or surfaces and objects contaminated by their droppings. As of the writing of this summary, there have yet been no cases of avian influenza, in either birds or humans, in our country. Estimates vary as to how many Americans will become ill in a pandemic flu scenario. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has developed estimates of the impact pandemic influenza can have on a population. The following table applies these estimates to the population of California and San Mateo County to quantify the impact pandemic influenza may have. CDC Estimates of Percent of Population Affected by the Next Pandemic (Avian Flu Rate California San Mateo Rates) Count Population 33,000,000 750,000 Influenza Infection Rate 35% 11,550,000 262,500 Patients Requiring Hospitalization 3.8% 440,000 10,000 Mortality Rate (additional deaths) 50% 220,000 5,000 Because of the possibility of severe adverse impacts to our community, the Health Department has made preparation for pandemic flu one of its highest priorities. In September, 2005, President Bush announced a federal initiative to attempt to deal with the possibility of an emerging pandemic flu epidemic in response to the continuing spread of avian influenza (1-151\11) in Asia. In October, 2005, Dr Scott Morrow, Health Officer, presented to John Maltbie, County Manager and elected and appointed Department Heads the potential dangers of pandemic flu. As a result of this potential pandemic, and with the support of the County Manager, the Health Department convened a group of representatives from various County Departments and the Hospital Consortium to begin developing phase 1 of a Pandemic Flu Preparedness and Response Plan. The members of this group e.g. County Manager's Office, Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services, County Coroner, local hospitals and Health Department staff have worked together before on other county-wide response issues like earthquakes. Teams of staff 1 May 2,2006 were formed covering the many important elements of a Pandemic Flu response and met weekly for several months.In November 2005,the Federal Department of Health and Human Services released its Pandemic Flu Plan. The plan serves as a blueprint for all federal pandemic influenza preparedness planning and response activities. The plan updated the August 2004 draft federal Pandemic Flu Preparedness and Response Plan and featured important additions and refinements. The Plan integrates changes made in the 2005 World Health Organization classification of pandemic phases and expansion of international guidance and is now consistent with the National Response Plan published in December 2004. The federal plan was instrumental in providing a framework as we drafted phase 1 of our county pandemic plan. Recently,the State Department of Health Services released a draft Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Plan dated January 18,2006. The Plan is an annex to the State Public Health Emergency Response Plan and Procedures. The draft of phase 1 of the county Pandemic Flu and Preparedness and Response Plan is consistent with the Federal and State Flu Plans. The Flu Plan identifies basic preparedness and response activities as follows: 1) Concept of Operations 2) Continuity of Government and Business 3) Surveillance 4) Laboratory Diagnostics 5) Health Care Planning 6) Infection Control Strategies 7) Infection Control in the Community Setting 8) Clinical Guidelines and the Role of Public Health Services 9) Vaccine and Antiviral Distribution and Use 10)Community Disease Control and Prevention-Legal Aspects 11)Travel-Related Risk of Disease Transmission 12)Public Health Communication 13)Psychosocial Workforce Support Services 14)Coroner's Office The health department has a key role to play in pandemics. Emergencies like the pandemics trigger four traditional public health lines of defense. These four lines of defense are: • Surveillance, • Containment measures, • Vaccines,and • Use of Anti-Virals 2 May 2, 2006 Section 1: Surveillance With respect to pandemic flu, surveillance is situational awareness. It is the collection, collation, analysis, and dissemination of data. It is the understanding of the current conditions present in a community. It is, simply put, the ability to see a threat coming. The earlier we can spot the emergence of a dangerous health threat, the sooner we can intervene. Adequate surveillance can enable the county to take proactive steps. For example, San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is likely to be the entrance point of pandemic flu into San Mateo County. Discussions are taking place at the Federal and State levels of government about implementing travel restrictions to prevent the entrance of people who are coming from nations where an outbreak of the avian virus has been detected. With SFO located within the county, measures to handle potential human cases with flu- like symptoms arriving into the county, are being discussed with SFO, the San Mateo County (SMC) Health Department and the Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services. Experience with SFO regarding ill travelers has been mixed in the past, but is steadily improving. Public Health laboratory services will be a cornerstone of surveillance during a pandemic. The public health lab technical capacity has recently been upgraded to identify different flu strains. During a pandemic, a variety of surveillance indicators, including outpatient surveillance data, will be needed on a frequent basis to monitor disease severity, determine the most severely affected population groups within SMC, and target interventions. The SMC Public Health Division receives outpatient surveillance data through several mechanisms including Confidential Morbidity Reports (CMR), the Automated Vital Statistics Systems (AVSS), the Nurses' Database, Sentinel Provider Network/Flu Surveillance, Syndromic Surveillance, and Emergency Department Surveillance such as Emergency Department Census, FirstWatch, etc. These systems act as potential early warning indicators of virus activity in the community. Section 4: Surveillance of the Pandemic Flu Plan outlines these and other data capacities more thoroughly. These surveillance data are collated daily by the epidemiology staff in the Public Health and Environmental Protection Division in the form of a daily situational awareness report (DSAT). Based on this report and other indicators, Dr. Morrow will identify the alert level. This will trigger the action plan. The alert levels are color coded starting with Green. The county is presently at the Green alert level. 3 May 2, 2006 Phase MA nc /Or anization Action 4t r g nom_ All Agencies and Preparation phase represented by: Organizations • Review and update existing plans and procedures (Local government, • Ensure essential services are identified Businesses, Schools, • Ensure essential supplies necessary to provide Hospitals) essential services are available (stockpile) • Identify how essential services will be delivered with when there are shortages of key personnel and essential supplies Yellow - limited to moderate human transmission All Agencies Cooperate with PHD instructions • Implement phase yellow actions as needed to continue essential operations • Prepare to perform essential services only • Increase use of telecommuting and social distancing strategies • Deploy PPE (masks) to assigned personnel • Ensure staff understand self- rotection strate ies All Agencies 0 Perform essential services only • Follow PHD guidance • Maximize telecommuting option • Deploy PPE to assigned personnel • Respond to NETVACs or RSS as requested • Ensure staff understand self-protection strategies governmentBlack- uncontrolled Essential and uncontrollable service only. People are human transmission self-sufficient. Austere medical All Agencies • Perform essential services, if possible • Follow PHD guidance • Maximize telecommuting option • Ensure staff understand self-protection strategies 4 May 2,2006 Section 2: Containment Measures Legal containment strategies such as quarantine,isolation,and other interventions represent an important line of defense in Public Health and have been used for over 500 years. In California,the legal basis for controlling the movement of people related to the control of communicable disease rests with the Local Health Officer. On the national level,the Centers for Disease Control(CDC)are actively updating and refining quarantine activities. The CDC are working to set up a clearer appeals process for people subjected to quarantines.The number of quarantine stations at airports,ship ports and border crossings has been increased from 8 to 18. The SFO has one of these stations staffed with medical officers. At the state and county level,the State Department of Health Services,California Conference of Local Health Officers and the County Health Executives Association of California have recently edited the Health Officers Practice Guide for Communicable Disease Control in California,detail can be found in Section 11:Community Disease Control and Practice-Legal Aspects-Pandemic Flu Plan. This document is a practice guide developed in collaboration with the Public Health Law Working Group drafted by several County Counsels and City Attorney Offices. In fact,the lead attorney for this effort was Brenda Carlson,Deputy County Counsel,County Counsel's Office,San Mateo County. An important section in the practice guide sums up the Health Officer's authority to provide:"Communicable disease control,including availability of adequate isolation facilities,and the control of acute communicable diseases...,based upon provision of.... appropriate preventive measures for the particular communicable disease hazards in the community."To fulfill this requirement,Health Officers are authorized to control contagious,infectious,or communicable disease and may"take measures as may be necessary"to prevent and control the spread of disease within the territory under their jurisdiction. This statutory provision alone can authorize all manner of measures taken by Health Officers,provided that the measures are necessary to prevent the spread of disease. Another legal strategy,not related to quarantine,and likely to be used here is business closures,school closures,and the limiting of public gatherings. Clearly the authority exists at the federal,state and local levels of government to contain disease. However,it is unlikely that we can contain H5N1 once it reaches the pandemic stage. Many experts believe that even in an advanced country like ours,a containment strategy of quarantine will be ineffective. Health officials are quick to point out that 5 May 2, 2006 quarantines will not work when you have symptomatic people and large, urban, mobile populations. While not a legal strategy, "social distancing", the act of separating oneself from others as much as possible during a pandemic, is likely to be effective in slowing the spread of disease. We will strongly encourage social distancing as a containment strategy. Social distancing is mostly a voluntary behavior. Social distancing strategies will be most effective if people have prepared and become self-sufficient prior to a pandemic. Section 3: Vaccines Typically vaccines are the major mechanism with which to control the spread of influenza. It is likely to be late in a pandemic before vaccine becomes generally available to the community. We do not know exactly how the H5N1 virus might mutate and what that transmissible virus will look like. Utilizing existing technologies, an effective vaccine for the pandemic virus cannot be developed until the virus itself actually comes into existence. Large lots of vaccine take six to seven months to produce. The first supplies of the vaccine will be of small quantity, and they will, of necessity, go only to the priority groups, thus leaving the majority of the population vulnerable for some time to come. The determination of priority groups will be based on federal guidance (the likely suppliers of the vaccine) and specific local needs. As much as we would all like to point to vaccination as a central strategy, it will not be. Some significant problems include • Today, vaccines are made in a fairly inefficient way. The virus of concern is identified, isolated, and modified into an inactive form. Enough of the virus's genetic makeup is preserved that the modified form still stimulates an immune system response even though the virus is no longer dangerous. This new seed virus is injected into fertilized chicken eggs. The pathogen then replicates inside the egg. Even under normal circumstances, concern has developed over how much vaccine the system can produce. It may take by some estimates three to five years to produce enough vaccine for all Americans to get a single dose. • Because the virus is so lethal, and because our human biology has no previous experience with it, protection may require two doses, not one. • There remain significant unresolved liability concerns that have plagued the vaccine manufacturers for years. • Reimbursement to the private sector for development and production costs has not been resolved. 6 May 2, 2006 Section 4: Use of Anti-viral Agents Anti-viral agents can have a role in both the prevention of the spread of disease and in the treatment of disease. In the case of pandemic flu, the medication we may turn to are antiviral agents called Tamiflu and Relenza. Many believe that these two new-generation antiviral medications may provide some protection against the bird flu. This is why some 40 nations around the world are stockpiling them. Assuming an infection rate of 25 percent, many countries are putting in orders for enough of these antivirals to cover 25 percent of their populations The United States has thus far stockpiled 2.3 million courses of the antiviral drugs with the goal of stockpiling 50 million courses. There are no stockpiles of Tamiflu in San Mateo County. Section 5: Next Steps Every individual, as well as all sectors of our community, has a role to play in preparing for pandemic flu. A severe pandemic is likely to cause massive social and economic upheaval. Critical shortages of both human capital and supplies are likely to occur. Individuals and organizations need to prepare themselves for the possibility of a severe pandemic. A key operating principle of the planning should be one of self-sufficiency. Because of the world-wide nature of pandemics, we will need to be as self-sufficient as possible. Phase II brings together key stakeholders in planning and preparedness activities. A team of first responders, planners and medical experts from the staff of the Health Department, County Manager's Office, and Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services have been meeting to develop goals and action plans for phase two of the pandemic flu plan. The purpose of Phase II is to provide detail to areas covered broadly by Phase I, to fill in the gaps left by Phase I, and to engage partners such as local governments, the business community, and schools, enabling San Mateo County to respond fully to an outbreak of pandemic influenza. A sample of the numerous goals, action steps and time lines are listed below: Goal 1 Develop a regional Public Health message for the community. 7 May 2,2006 Action Step:Work with Bay Area Health Officers and Directors to develop a consistent public health message to the public. Time Line: 3 months to a year Goal 2 Develop a Medical Care Rationing Plan in an environment where the public may not be able to access,or receive medical care in the way they are accustomed to under normal circumstances. Action Step: 1)Work with the San Mateo County Medical Association to develop a framework on rationing care and operation procedures. 2)Meet with local hospitals to review the medial care rationing and operation procedures. Time Line: 3 months to a year Goal 3 Develop the criteria for identifying the priority population for influenza vaccinations. Action Step: Work with the San Mateo County Medical Association to develop the framework on priorities for vaccination. Time Line: 3 months to a year Goal 4 Meet with all cities and the county to develop strategies to maintain continuity of governmental services e.g.drinking water,waste water disposal and treatment,solid waste collection,law enforcement and fire emergency services. Action Step: Meet with law enforcement,fire service,pubic works,water and sewer departments to develop education and outreach messages,policies and procedures for response to crowd control and civil disobedience around emergency rationing and vaccinations. Time Line: 3 months Goal 5 Meet with private industry to communicate and coordinate pandemic flu planning Action Step: Meet with local business associations e.g.PIBA,BRMA and Chambers of Commerce to develop strategies around flu planning,employee vaccinations and prophylaxis, work force reductions,business closures and work force health and safety education and training. Time Line: 3 months to a year Goal 6 Meet with public and private schools to communicate and coordinate pandemic flu planning Action Step: Meet with local public and private schools and school districts to develop plans for communication,coordination,work force reductions,school closures,class room alternatives and student/teacher health and safety education and training. Time Line: 3 months to 6 months 8 May 2, 2006 The list of goals, action steps and time lines above represents only a partial list of activities planned in Phase II of the Pandemic Flu Plan. An important Summit on the Pandemic Flu sponsored by the County Board of Supervisors, Hospital Consortium and Health Department for May 18 and 19, 2006 will launch the Pandemic Flu into the forefront of issues facing the citizens in San Mateo County. Day two of the summit, May 19, will be devoted internally to pandemic flu planning with private sector involvement. 9 CITYAGENDA 6a 0 ITEM# BWRIJNGAME STAFF REPORT MAG. �9 o DATE 7/17/2006 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council SUBMITTED �n BY- DATE: Y DATE: July 12, 2006 APPROVED BY— FROM: Y FROM: Larry E. Anderson, City Attorney SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF BALLOT MEASURE FOR NOVEMBER 2006 TO FINANCE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: Conduct public hearing and further consider the ballot measure for financing flood control and building safety improvements. BACKGROUND On June 19, 2006, the City Council adopted a resolution of intention and necessity and introduced an ordinance that would place a ballot measure on the November 7, 2006, election to finance flood control and building safety improvements. A copy of the proposed ordinance is contained in Attachment A. The proposed measure would provide up to $37 million in general obligation bonds for flood control improvements and up to $7 million in building safety improvements. A list of the projected improvements is contained in Attachment B. The bonds would be financed by a property tax based on assessed valuation. A graphic presentation of the projected taxes is contained in Attachment C, with an average tax levy over the life of the bonds of$31.97 per hundred thousand dollars valuation. On July 10, 2006, the Planning Commission concurred in the improvement plans. The Council should take public testimony this evening and further discuss the issues presented. Tonight's meeting will adjourn to July 19, 2006, at 8 a.m. to consider adoption of the proposed ordinance. Attachments Proposed Ordinance List of projected improvements Analysis of projected tax levies i 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME CALLING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL BOND ELECTION FOR APPROVAL OF BONDS 3 TO FINANCE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR FLOOD CONTROL, AND FOR DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, 4 DISABLED ACCESS, SAFETY, AND SECURITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING CITY BUILDINGS 5 6 The CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF BURLINGAME does hereby ordain as 7 follows: 8 WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Burlingame (the "City"), by 9 resolution duly passed and adopted by affirmative vote of more than two-thirds of all its 10 members at a meeting of the Council duly and regularly held on June 19, 2006, did determine 11 that the public interest and necessity demand the design, construction and completion of the 12 municipal improvements hereinafter mentioned; and did further determine that the cost of the 13 design, construction and completion of said City plan of municipal improvements will be too 14 great to be paid out of the ordinary annual income and revenue of the City and will require an 15 expenditure greater than the amount allowed therefor by the annual tax levy, and will require the 16 incurring of a bonded indebtedness therefor; and 17 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has heretofore approved a city plan of 18 improvements consisting of the aforementioned projects; and 19 WHEREAS, this Ordinance was introduced and first read at a meeting of the City 20 Council held and conducted on June 19, 2006; and 21 WHEREAS, a summary of this ordinance was published not less than 5 days prior to this 22 meeting, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933; 23 24 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Burlingame does ordain as 25 follows: 26 27 Section 1. Specifications of Election Order. 28 (a) A special municipal bond election is hereby ordered to be held throughout the City of 1 I Burlingame on November 7, 2006, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of the 2 City a proposition of incurring bonded indebtedness of the City, summarized for purposes of 3 Section 13247 of the Elections Code of the State of California(the "Elections Code"), as follows: 4 5 "BURLINGAME FLOOD PROTECTION AND SAFETY MEASURE. To safeguard 6 Burlingame residents, homes and businesses, shall the City of Burlingame be authorized 7 to issue $37,000,000 in bonds to improve aging and under-capacity flood control 8 infrastructure; and for seismic stability, disabled access, safety, security, fire protection, 9 ventilation and disaster preparedness improvements in existing City buildings, shall the 10 City be authorized to issue $7,000,000 in bonds; with all expenditures monitored by a 11 citizens' oversight committee with annual independent audits?" 12 13 (b) The Registrar of Voters (the "Registrar of Voters") of the County of San Mateo 14 (the "County") is hereby requested to reprint the summary of the measure contained in 15 subdivision (a) of this Section(the "Measure") as the ballot measure in all official materials 16 pertaining to the election, including notices of election, notices inviting arguments, and other 17 notices, voter information pamphlets, and the official ballots. 18 19 Section 2. Required Recitals. 20 (a) Purpose. The object and specific purpose of incurring the indebtedness is to 21 finance a portion of the cost of construction and completion of the municipal improvements 22 described in Section 1(a) hereof(including acquisition and/or construction of other facilities, 23 works, property, or structures necessary or convenient for the flood control improvements so 24 described), and proceeds of the bonds shall be spent only for such purposes, pursuant to 25 Government Code Section 53410. These municipal improvements constitute and are hereby 26 approved as the City's plan of improvements proposed to be funded from a bond issue at this 27 time. 28 (b) Cost of Improvements. The estimated cost of the municipal improvements 2 I described in subdivision (a)to be funded from the bonds is $44,000,000. The estimated cost of 2 the municipal improvements includes legal and other fees incidental to or connected with the 3 authorization, issuance and sale of the proposed bonds, the costs of printing the bonds and other 4 costs and expenses incidental to or connected with the authorization, issuance and sale of the 5 bonds. 6 (c) Amount of Bonds. The amount of principal of the indebtedness proposed to be 7 incurred for said municipal improvements is $37,000,000 for flood control improvements and 8 $7,000,000 for the other improvements described in Section 1(a). 9 (d) Maximum Interest Rate. Said bonds shall bear interest at the rate of not to exceed 10 12% per annum, the maximum currently allowed by law, such rate or rates to be determined at 11 the time of sale of the bonds or any series thereof. 12 (e) Date of Election. The election will be held on November 7, 2006. 13 (f) Election Procedures; Request for Consolidation. Pursuant to Section 10400 and 14 following of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County and the Registrar of 15 Voters are hereby authorized and requested to canvass the returns of the election. Except as 16 otherwise provided herein, the manner of holding the election, the forms of the ballots, the 17 procedures for soliciting ballot arguments and the dates on which such arguments are due, the 18 procedures for voting for or against the Measure, the procedures for canvassing the vote, and all 19 other procedures for conducting the election, shall be as directed by the Elections Code, or as 20 determined by the Registrar of Voters in accordance with the Elections Code. The City Clerk is 21 hereby authorized and directed to cooperate with the Registrar of Voters and to follow the 22 procedures and meet all deadlines established by the Registrar of Voters. Costs charged by the 23 County for conducting the election are hereby declared to be a cost of the municipal 24 improvements to be paid from the proceeds of bonds. The Measure shall be approved by the 25 affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the qualified electors voting on the Measure. 26 (g) Maximum Maturity of Bonds. The final maturity date of any of the bonds shall 27 not exceed 40 years from the time of incurring the indebtedness evidenced by such bonds or the 28 series of bonds of which such bonds are a part. 3 i I (h) Special Bond Proceeds Account; Annual Report to Council. Upon approval of the 2 Measure and the sale of any bonds approved, the Council shall establish an improvement fund or 3 account (which may be an existing fund or account, if appropriate) in which proceeds of the sale 4 of bonds will be deposited. As long as any proceeds of the bonds remain unexpended, the City 5 Manager shall cause a report to be filed with the Council no later than December 31 of each year, 6 commencing December 31, 2007, stating (1)the amount of bond proceeds received and 7 expended in that year, and (2) the status of any project funded or to be funded from bond 8 proceeds. The report may relate to the calendar year, fiscal year, or other appropriate annual 9 period as the City Manager shall determine, and may be incorporated into the annual budget, 10 audit, or other appropriate routine report to the Council. 11 12 Section 3. Request for Consolidation. Pursuant to its resolution declaring the public 13 interest and necessity of calling the election, adopted on June 19, 2006, the Council hereby 14 requests with respect to the special municipal bond election called hereby, that the Board of 15 Supervisors of the County consolidate said election with any other election being conducted on 16 the same date in the same territory or any territory which is in part the same. The precincts, 17 polling places and officers of election shall be the same as those set forth in any order of the 18 Registrar of Voters or the Board of Supervisors of the County providing for the precincts, polling 19 places and election officers for the general county and statewide election to be conducted on the 20 date of the special municipal bond election, as set forth in the notice to be published by the 21 Registrar of Voters pursuant to Sections 12105 and 10417 of the Elections Code. 22 23 Section 4. Tax Rate Statement. The Finance Director of the City is hereby authorized 24 and directed to cause to be prepared a tax rate statement as required by Elections Code Section 25 9401 in connection with the Measure. The Finance Director shall submit the Tax Rate Statement 26 to the City Attorney and the City Clerk, in such time to permit the City Clerk to cause the Tax 27 Rate Statement to be filed with the Registrar of Voters at the same time as this Ordinance is filed, 28 in any event no later than August 11, 2006. 4 I. I Section 5. Primary Arguments. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to 2 select an argument for and an argument against the measure to be printed and distributed to the 3 voters pursuant to Elections Code Section 9287. 4 5 Section 6. Rebuttal Arguments. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to 6 enable preparation and submittal of rebuttal arguments as set forth in Elections Code Section 7 9285. The City Council hereby adopts the provisions of Elections Code Section 9285(a) with 8 regard to rebuttal arguments. 9 10 Section 7. Impartial Analysis. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of 11 the Measure to the City Attorney of the City, who is hereby directed to prepare the impartial 12 analysis of the Measure pursuant to Elections Code Section 9280. The City Attorney shall cause 13 the Impartial Analysis to be filed with the City Clerk no later than August 28, 2006. 14 15 Section 8. Notice of Election. Notice of the election shall be given by publication of 16 this ordinance in a newspaper published at least six days per week in the City, once a day for at 17 least seven days prior to the holding of the election, and the City Clerk is hereby ordered and 18 directed to cause this ordinance to be so published. No other notice of the election need be 19 given. 20 21 Section 9. Filing with Registrar of Voters. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and 22 directed to file a certified true and correct copy of this Ordinance with the Registrar of Voters as 23 soon as practicable after the adoption hereof, and in any event no later than August 11, 2006. 24 25 Section 10. Effective Date. A two-thirds vote of all of the members of the Council is 26 required for approval of this ordinance. Being an ordinance calling and ordering an election, this 27 ordinance shall take effect from and after its final passage and approval. 28 5 1 Mayor 4 5 I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the 6 foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19'x`day 7 of June, 2006, and adopted thereafter at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 8 day of , 2006, by the following vote of at least four-fifths of its members: 9 10 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 11 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: 12 ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 13 14 City Clerk 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ,4 25 26 27 28 6 ATTACHMENT B PROJECTED IMPROVEMENTS Easton Watershed Recreation Center Upgrade Marsten Road pump station Upgrade building to seismic standards Install force main from pump station to Install fire sprinklers Bay Remedy electrical code deficiencies Improve catch basins and creek Make facility ADA accessible embankments Improve heating and ventilation system Burlingame/Ralston Watershed City Hall Install bypass from Burlingame Creek to Upgrade building to seismic standards Bay with floodgates Install fire sprinklers Install bypass from Ralston Creek to Remedy asbestos contamination channel Make facility ADA accessible Sanchez/Terrace Watershed Police Station Increase box culvert size Improve heating and ventilation system Install debris basis upstream from Improve security Carolan Avenue Install emergency power Install new pump station and force main Provide equal access pipeline in vicinity of Carolan Make facility ADA accessible Avenue Improve catch basins and storm drainage Fire Stations in Laguna Avenue neighborhood Make facilities ADA accessible Provide equal access Mills Watershed Widen channels and raise Parks Yard embankments/headwalls Make facilities ADA accessible Raise or remove footbridge Provide equal access Add box culvert across Rollins Road El Portal/Trousdale Watershed Repair liner in El Portal and Gilbreth Creeks and Trousdale channel Install corrosion protection system in drainage pipes Bayfront curb/gutter Rehabilitate storm drain systems and pump stations City of Burlingame Government Financial Tax Levies are Projected to Decline Over the Life of the Bonds and Average $31.97 per $100,000 of Assessed Value Strategies inc. $70.00 - - $60.00 -- - --- - - Maximum $50.00 Projected Tax Levy $50.19 14* $40.00 meq., $30.00 Average Projected Tax Levy $31.97 Minimum Projected Tax Levy $20.00 $4.66 $10.00 —--- - u � $0.00 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 Fiscal Year Beginning July 1 2006 GO$44M in 4ser-no res.xls(Tax Levy Chart 2) 6/26/06 SP Page 1 of 3 City of Burlingame (iovernment Financial The Average Projected Tax Levy is Different for Each Parcel Depending on Assessed Value Strategies inc. $800.00 ®Avg. Projected Tax Levy Per$1,200,000 of A.V. Avg. Projected Tax Levy Per$900,000 of A.V. $700.00 Avg. Projected Tax Levy Per$600,000 of A.V. Avg. Projected Tax Levy Per$300,000 of A.V. Avg. Projected Tax Levy Per$100,000 of A.V. $600.00 $500.00 - - - ----- $400.00 $383.63 $300.00 $287.72 $200.00 $191.82 $100.00 - - - $95.91 g — — —L�31.97 $0.00 _ 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 Fiscal Year Beginning July 1 2006 GO$44M in 4ser-no res.xis(Levy by AV Chart) 6/26/06 SP Page 2 of 3 City of Burlingame Governmentinancia! F Strategies $44,000,000 General Obligation Bond Measure inc. Projected Tax Levies by Assessed Value Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Avg.Projected Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Tax Levy Per Fiscal $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 S700,000 $800,000 $900,000 $1,000,000 $1,100,000 $1,200,000 Year of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. of A.V. 2005 - 06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2006 - 07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 2007 - 08 $14.98 $29.96 $44.94 $59.92 $74.91 $89.89 $104.87 $119.85 $134.83 $149.81 $164.79 $179.77 2008 - 09 $13.82 $27.64 $41.46 $55.28 $69.10 $82.92 $96.74 $110.56 $124.38 $138.20 $152.02 $165.84 2009 - 10 $29.21 $58.43 $87.64 $116.85 $146.06 $175.28 $204.49 $233.70 $262.92 $292.13 $321.34 $350.55 2010 - 11 $27.68 $55.35 $83.03 $110.70 $138.38 $166.05 $193.73 $221.40 $249.08 $276.75 $304.43 $332.11 2011 - 12 $43.56 $87.12 $130.67 $174.23 $217.79 $261.35 $304.91 $348.46 $392.02 $435.58 $479.14 $522.69 2012 - 13 $41.67 $83.34 $125.01 $166.68 $206.35 $250.02 $291.69 $333.35 $375.02 $416.69 $458.36 $500.03 2013 - 14 $50.19 $100.38 $150.56 $200.75 $250.94 $301.13 $351.32 $401.50 $451.69 $501.88 $552.07 $602.25 2014 - 15 $48.37 $96.74 $145.11 $193.47 $241.84 $290.21 $338.58 $386.95 $435.32 $483.69 $532.06 $580.42 2015 - 16 $46.95 $93.91 $140.66 $187.82 $234.77 $281.72 $328.68 $375.63 $422.59 $469.54 $516.49 $563.45 2016 - 17 $45.73 $91.46 $137.19 $182.92 $228.66 $274.39 $320.12 $365.85 $411.58 $457.31 $503.04 $548.77 2017 - 18 $44.41 $88.82 $133.23 $177.64 $222.05 $266.46 $310.87 $355.28 $399.69 $444.10 $488.51 $532.91 2018 - 19 $43.21 $86.42 $129.63 $172.64 $216.05 $259.27 $302.48 $345.69 $388.90 $432.11 $475.32 $518.53 2019 - 20 $41.98 $83.97 $125.95 $167.94 $209.92 $251.90 $293.89 $335.87 $377.86 $419.84 $461.82 $503.81 2020 - 21 $40.80 $81.60 $122.40 $163.20 $204.00 $244.81 $285.61 $326.41 $367.21 $408.01 $448.81 $489.61 2021 - 22 $39.71 $79.43 $119.14 $158.85 $198.57 $238.28 $278.00 $317.71 $357.42 $397.14 $436.85 $476.56 2022 - 23 $38.59 $77.18 $115.77 $154.36 $192.95 $231.54 $270.14 $308.73 $347.32 $385.91 $424.50 $463.09 2023 - 24 $37.44 $74.88 $112.32 $149.76 $187.20 $224.64 $262.09 $299.53 $336.97 $374.41 $411.85 $449.29 2024 - 25 $36.38 $72.76 $109.13 $145.51 $181.89 $218.27 $254.65 $291.03 $327.40 $363.78 $400.16 $436.54 2025 - 26 $35.39 $70.78 $106.16 $141.55 $176.94 $212.33 $247.71 $283.10 $318.49 $353.86 $389.26 $424.65 2026 27 $34.35 $68.71 $103.06 $137.42 $171.77 $206.13 $240.48 $274.84 $309.19 $343.55 $377.90 $412.26 2027 - 28 $33.39 $66.78 $100.17 $133.56 $166.95 $200.34 $233.73 $267.12 $300.50 $333.89 $367.28 $400.67 2028 - 29 $32.43 $64.86 $97.29 $129.72 $162.15 $194.58 $227.01 $259.44 $291.86 $324.29 $356.72 $389.15 2029 30 $31.47 $62.95 $94.42 $125.90 $157.37 $188.85 $220.32 $251.80 $283.27 $314.75 $346.22 $377.70 2030 - 31 $30.57 $61.14 $91.71 $122.28 $152.85 $183.42 $213.99 $244.56 $275.13 $305.71 $336.28 $366.85 2031 - 32 $29.75 $59.50 $69.26 $119.01 $148.76 $178.51 $208.26 $238.02 $267.77 $297.52 $327.27 $357.02 2032 - 33 $21.94 $43.87 $65.81 $87.74 $109.68 $131.61 $153.55 $175.48 $197.42 $219.35 $241.29 $263.22 2033 - 34 $21.31 $42.62 $63.93 $85.25 $106.56 $127.87 $149.18 $170.49 $191.80 $213.12 $234.43 $255.74 2034 - 35 $13.33 $26.66 $39.99 $53.32 $66.65 $79.9B $93.31 $106.64 $119.97 $133.30 $146.63 $159.96 2035 - 36 $12.97 $25.94 $38.90 $51.87 $64.84 $77.81 $90.78 $103.75 $116.71 $129.68 $142.65 $155.62 2036 37 $4.80 $9.59 $14.39 $19.18 $23.98 $28.77 $33.57 $38.37 $43.16 $47.96 $52.75 $57.55 2037 - 38 $4.66 $9.32 $13.98 $18.64 $23.30 $27.96 $32.62 $37.28 $41.93 $46.59 $51.25 $55.91 2038 - 39 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Average: $31.97 $63.94 $95.91 $127.88 $159.85 $191.82 $223.78 $255.75 $287.72 $319.69 $351.66 $383.63 Maximum: $50.19 $100.38 $150.56 $200.75 $250.94 $301.13 $351.32 $401.50 $451.69 $501.88 $552.07 $602.25 Minimum: $4.66 $9.32 $13.98 $18.64 $23.30 $27.96 $32.62 $37.28 $41.93 $46.59 $51.25 $55.91 Note: 95%of Single Family Residential Parcels have an Assessed Value of less than$1,200,000 2006 GO S44M in 4servno res.zls(Levy by A.V 2) 6/26/06 SP Page 3 of 3 City of Burlingame vermT►ent Financial Parcels All Parcel Distribution by Assessed ValueStrategies inc. 9,000 - __ .._—— _.._ 8,000 - 7,000 - U00 0007,000 v 6,000 Average A.V. $605,004 5,000 - 4,000 - ,0004,000 Median A.V. $391,038 3,000 - 2,000 - 1,000 - D ,000 2,000 1,000 8,562 Parcels 100% All Parcels 2006 GD$44M in 4ser-no res.xis(All Parcels Dist. &Pange) 6/26/06 SP Page 4 of 5 City of BurlingameGrovinc.ernment Financial Parcels Single Family Residential Parcel Distribution by Assessed Value `V:Strategies 7,000 �_ ____. t 6,000 - Ufa < 5,000 - 4,000 ,000 4,000 Average A.V. $462,429 Median A.V. $374,370 3,000 - 2,000 - 1,000 - 0 ,0002,0001,0000 6,745 Parcels 100% Single Family Residential Parcels 2006 GO$44M in 4ser-no res.xls(SFR Dist. &Range) 6/26/06 SP Page 5 of 5 BURLINGAME STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM# 6b MT 7/17/06 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED DATE: JULY 10, 2006 BY APPROVED FROM: PUBLIC WORKS BY SUBJECT: NPDES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - 2006-2007 GENERAL PROGRAM BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council endorse the 2006-2007 General Program Budget as adopted by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) and use the San Mateo County Flood Control District as the funding mechanism to support the General Program activities by adopting: • Resolution recommending that the District continue to impose and collect basic and additional charges for funding the expanded program scope of work until a Council Resolution rescinds or modifies this authorization. BACKGROUND: The Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandate local government to control and reduce the amount of storm water pollution runoff into receiving waters of the United States. Under the authority of the Porter- Cologne Water Quality Act, the State Water Resources Control Board has delegated authority to its regional boards to invoke permitting requirements. The permitting programs have been developed to deal with industrial, construction and municipal stormwater requirements. In July 1991, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board notified San Mateo County and all incorporated cities of the requirement to submit a Municipal NPDES Stormwater Permit application and to implement a Stormwater Management Plan. Failure to implement such a plan poses significant penalties that can be levied against a jurisdiction by the Regional Board. Under the Water Code, the Regional Board may impose an administrative fine of up to $10,000 for each day a violation occurs. In addition, the Regional Board may request that the Attorney General seek judgment in superior court to impose civil liability not to exceed $25,000 for each day a violation occurs. The District adopted a basic charge, $3.44/APN (Assessor's Parcel Number), to fund the County-wide General Program in 1995. In order to meet the expanded requirements of the General Program, the District adopted and imposed additional annual charges that, when added to the previously adopted Basic Charges, would be necessary to fund the Program. DISCUSSION: The General Program encompasses those efforts undertaken for the benefit of all 21 agency co-permittees involved with the implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan and adherence to the conditions set forth under the Countywide NPDES Waste Discharge Permit. The General Program includes work tasks to be undertaken and completed during 2006-2007 (see attached). The Program budget is $1,422,500. Unlike the City's ballot measure which emphasizes physical flood control improvements, the countywide program focuses on stormwater pollution prevention including source control regulations on business and land development. Page 2... The funding mechanism uses parcel information currently available and creates land use categories for purposes of financing General Program activities.The size of a parcel clearly impacts the amount of stormwater run-off which flows through the storm drainage system and into the waterways. The recommended financing mechanism utilizes single family residence as the base rate and establishes a common rate assessed uniformly among all land use classes. Utilizing the total area of the parcels within differing land uses divided by the average single family parcel size provides an equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The impact of this fee is a single base rate for all single family residences of $6.06/APN($3.44 basic fee and$2.62 additional annual charge). As a matter of equity, all other land uses are charged at the minimum of the base rate and their proportionate share of cost increases with the corresponding size of the parcel as calculated by its EDU. Condominiums, miscellaneous, vacant and agricultural land uses are charged at one-half the single family per parcel rate. BUDGET IMPACT: These fees will cover Burlingame's portion of the Countywide program. EXHIBITS: Resolution, Budget,Work Program Philip B.Mona han, P.E. Senior Civil E gineer c: City Clerk, Finance S:�A Public Works Directory\Staff Reports\NPDES2006.SR.wpd RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME RECOMMENDING THAT THE SAN MATEO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IMPOSE BASIC AND ADDITIONAL CHARGES FOR FUNDING THE EXPANDED SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE 2006-2007 COUNTY-WIDE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PROGRAM RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency, under amendments to the 1987 Federal Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandate local governments to control and reduce the amount of stormwater pollutant runoff into receiving waters; and WHEREAS, under the authority of California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act, the State Water Resources Control Board has delegated authority to its regional boards to invoke permitting requirements upon counties and cities; and WHEREAS, in July 1991, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board notified San Mateo County of the requirement to submit a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Application by November 30, 1992; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the NPDES Permit Process, San Mateo County in conjunction with all incorporated cities in San Mateo County has prepared a San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan which has a General Program as a fundamental component of the Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan has been submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Management Plan has been approved by the Board and made part of the NPDES Waste Discharge Permit CA 0029921, issued September 13, 1993, and remaining in effect through June 30, 1998; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan and NPDES Waste Discharge Permit CA 0029921 required that San Mateo County submit a renewal application by March 31, 1998 which shall include a Stormwater Management Plan for 1998 through 2003; and WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame has accepted, adopted and committed to implement the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Management Plan for 1998-2003 and the renewal application and Plan were submitted to the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board on March 18, 1998; and WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, after Public Hearing, approved the Renewed NPDES Permit effective July 21, 1999 and which expired July 20, 2004; and WHEREAS, THE San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board opened the NPDES Permit CAS0029921 for the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention 1 Program to Amend the Permit to add New and Redevelopment Language (Amendment of Order 99-059), and adopted the amendment on February 19, 2003; and WHEREAS, with the complete and timely application by the San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program for Permit renewal submitted on January 23, 2004, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board will administratively extend the expiration of that Permit until such time as a Public Hearing is held and the application is considered; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Flood Control District Act, as amended by the State Legislature in 1992 (Assembly Bill 2635), authorized the San Mateo County Flood Control District to impose charges to fund storm drainage programs such as the NPDES Program; and WHEREAS, Basic Annual Charges and Additional Annual Charges for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 to fund a$1,422,500 Budget are as follows: Basic Annual Charges: Single Family Resident: $3.44/APN Miscellaneous, Agriculture, Vacant and Condominium: $1.72/APN All other land uses: $3.44/APN for the first 11,000 square feet plus $0.32 per 1,000 additional square feet of parcel area Additional Annual Charge (Adjusted annually by CPI): Single Family Resident: $2.68/APN Miscellaneous, Agriculture, Vacant and Condominium: $1.34/APN All other land uses: $2.68/APN for the first 11,000 square feet plus $0.24 per 1,000 additional square feet of parcel area WHEREAS, the charges are in the nature of a sewer service charge in that they are intended to fund a federally mandated program, the purpose of which is to create waste treatment management planning processes to reduce the amount of pollutants in discharges from property into municipal storm water systems, which in turn,discharge into the waters of the United States; and WHEREAS, the City of Burlingame has held a public hearing on the proposal to fund the County-wide NPDES General Program through the San Mateo County Flood Control District and received and considered all information and testimony submitted, NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The City of Burlingame approves the amended Scope of Work imposed on the NPDES General Program and respectfully requests the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, acting as the governing board of the San Mateo County Flood Control District, to impose those basic and additional charges necessary to fund the County-wide NPDES General Program annually. 2. The City of Burlingame further respectfully requests the basic and annual charges be collected through the San Mateo County Flood Control District until a Council resolution rescinding or modifying this authorization is transmitted to the San Mateo County Flood Control District by May 1 prior to the budget year that the cancellation or modification is to take effect. 2 3. The City of Burlingame agrees that the additional charges to be imposed are to be adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index, and the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County(C/CAG) shall notify the City of these adjustments prior to May 31 of each year. 4. . The City of Burlingame further respectfully requests that all properties within the territorial limits of the City of Burlingame be charged the annual charges in accordance with the charges set forth above. 5. The City Clerk is hereby requested to forward a copy of this Resolution to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, the San Mateo County Flood Control District, and the NPDES Coordinator of C/CAG. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2006,and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk 3 FY 2006/07 General Budget Categories Program Budget Personnel Services Executive Director $25,000 Program Manager $60,000k wd "1 Program Secretary $0 Member Agency Support $10,000 Miscellaneous $ , w0 Subtotal $96,000 Fees and Dues BASMAA Dues $35,000 Regional Monitoring Program $77,500 Clean Estuary Partnership $79,000 Regional Ad Campaign $40,000 Subtotal $231,500 Supplies and Other Charges Copier and Service Agreement $0 Publications $10,000 Conferences and Meetings $1,500 Education and Training $0 Subtotal $11,500 Additional Expenses Database Management $12,500 EDS Consultant Work $13,000 Controller's Processing Fee @ $0.30/APN $66,000 Miscellaneous (litigation and permit renewal) " r $75,OQOi Subtotal $166,500 Tasks in the SWMP 2.0 Municipal Maintenance 3.0 Industrial and Illicit Discharge Controls 4.0 Public Information and Participation 5.0 New Development 6.0 Watershed Assessment and Monitoring Subtotal $917,000 TOTAL BUDGET $1,422,500 DRAFT Table 2-1 Municipal Maintenance General Program Work Plan and Budget- FY 2006/07 Task No.and Description. ' Rationale/Background(if necessary) Budget Schedule/ ;Due Date Task 2.1 Develop and Implement Performance Standards: Assist Improvements to the performance standards will be formally $4,000 ongoing municipalities to understand and implement the performance considered by the Maintenance Subcommittee every two standards. The performance standards will be reviewed and years. improvements will be made,as appropriate,for approval by STOPPP and for submittal to the Regional Board. Task 2.2 Conduct Outreach and Training: Coordinate the annual See SWMP $15,000 ongoing workshop.Prepare educational materials to increase the awareness of performance standards. Task 2.3 Coordinate with Maintenance Related Activities by Other Coordination among agencies and industries whose activities $5,000 ongoing Subcommittees of the STOPPP,Other Agencies and Private affect municipal maintenance will result in greater efficiency Industries:Participate in work groups with staff from other public and effectiveness in meeting this component's goal. agencies and private industries to identify issues of common concern and appropriate BMPs. Coordinate with the PI/P Subcommittee to design an outreach piece. Task 2.4 Assist with Regulatory Compliance and Planning: This See SWMP $30,000 NPDES task includes the following items:assist with NPDES permit required permit reporting;provide administrative support and guidance for the required Municipal Maintenance Subcommittee;revise two year work plan and reports will budget as needed;and provide other regulatory assistance. Subtasks be may include participation in the development of a new 5 year Municipal completed NPDES Stormwater Permit. by required dates. Other activities will be ongoing. Task 2.10 Integrated Pest Management; Continue to work with the See SWMP and Pesticide Management Plan. $15,000 ongoing Park and Recreation Work Group to implement the integrated pest management(IPM)performance standards. Conduct IPM training. Total Budget $69,000 1 Mid-Fiscal Year Report 2005/06 Agenda Item No. 6 Table 3-1. Industrial and Illicit Discharge Controls General Program Work Plan and Budget-FY 2006107 Task'No.:ancl:Descriptian RationalelBackground(If necessary} Budget Schedule/Due !_ Date 3.1 Assist implementation and improvement of the Possible improvements in the performance $0 N.A. performance standards: Assist the municipalities to standards will be formally considered by the understand and implement the performance standards. The Commercial, Industrial,and Illicit Discharge performance standards will be reviewed and improvements,if (CII)Subcommittee every two years and will any,may be prepared for approval by STOPPP for submittal to not occur in FY 2006/07. the Regional Board. 3.2 Provide Guidance on Developing and Implementing This task will include updating materials that $10,000 Ongoing Discharge and Business Inspection Plans: STOPPP will are used to help implement the anticipated assist with developing model materials. performance standards. 3.3 Assist Compliance with Requirements for Conditionally This will include providing assistance in $5,000 Ongoing Exempted Discharges: Continue to facilitate compliance with implementing the BMPs and Implementation the requirements for handling non-stormwater discharges that Procedures for Conditionally Exempted have been identified as conditionally exempted from the Discharges or whatever similar requirements permit's discharge prohibition. have been adopted as part of the regional general permit. 3.4 Conduct Outreach and Training: This task includes The CII Subcommittee will be responsible for $23,000 June 2007 conducting targeted educational outreach and training to identifying the target audience and methods municipal staff and to businesses. Educational outreach to used for conducting training and/or other types businesses will need to focus increasingly on particular of educational outreach. The decision on pollutants of concern,such as mercury and PCBs. which audience to target will consider previous trainings. 3.5 Assist with Regulatory Compliance and Planning:This See SWMP $61,000 NPDES permit task includes the following activities:assist STOPPP's required reports municipalities to comply with the reporting and other will be completed requirement of the NPDES permit; (including development of by required deliverable reporting forms and preparation of the industrial and dates. illicit discharge controls section of STOPPP's Annual Report); develop General Program work plans and budgets; assist with other activities will be ongoing .any additional planning needed to improve the industrial and illicit discharge controls section of the Plan;and continue to assist the CI1 Subcommittee to conduct its meetings and other activities. FASm5x\Sm53\Sm53.05\CII Subcommiflee\January\ciii0607&070&doc 1 version approved by TAC February 15, 2005 3.6 Implement Pollutants of Concern Tasks: This includes The Regional Water Board is developing $70,000 ongoing implementing pollutants of concern tasks contained in the TMDLs for specific pollutants of concern,and regional general permit and/or in a plan developed to comply STOPPP will need to respond to pollutant load with this permit. allocations that it is assigned. 3.7 Assist with NPDES Permit Reissuance: This task There may be areas where additional follow up $5,000 June 2007 includes providing assistance to STOPPP in working with the with the Regional Water Board staff or others Regional Water Board staff to resolve any issues raised by the is needed regarding the adopted regional adopted regional general permit. general permit. Total Budget $ 174,000 FASm5x1Sm531Sm53.051C11 Subcommittee\Januarylciii06078,0708.doc 2 version approved by TAC February 15, 2005 4.0 PUBLIC INFORMATION 06-07 Draft Task 2006- Task Description Responsible Stag and Plan Hours hours Total Cast Material.Coat Total 00 2007 2006 27 Hours 5110 4.1 Implement and Assist wkmn h the PertoranStandards $107 4.1.1 Performance Standards E 1.170.00 E E 2.170.00 Assist municipalities[o understand and implement standards.Provide Derma 1 t T 2,170.00 Iist of motions loon a standards 4 Assist MlA Reginal Com lance and Planning CLI Provide support to P/IP 94 E 91114.00 $ 500.00 f 9,614.00 AuerM 6 monthly meetings and assist chair with preparation,discussion topics and handouts. Meeting attendance Susan and Sarah 1 18 3d S 3.906.00 Meeting Preparation Sasso 24 14 4 $ 5,208.00 materials S 50000 6.22 Annual Report BO $ 6,680.00T E 8,680.00 Assist EOA In "ng the WIP section of the Annual Rpart Derma and Susan will prepon,PIP senion. $ 8,680.00 4.23 Mercury campaign-I'l—reot tamp Collect Strategy 200 f 21,700.00 $ S 21.700.00 4.3 Cnllabomte with San Memo County ErAmme ental Health on a Vendor Susan loc 1 S 21.700.00 Take Rack(VTB)or Legislative effort for Universal Waste including ,,.a---Lamps.This period will he a time of research and ,.lot..an of a nategy to implement a countywide ordinance m develop a sustainable system for the disposal and recycling of u-waste. Eli will co-fund this position to easeamb other u-waste and emerging contaminants so 1,as batteries and phammuceuticals.The countywide Rncou e P sh fanvolvlation ill be imalcattalcal i.074)R Education 43.1 Point ofPumhase-IPM Point of Purchase Campaign 33. f36,239.00 $ 6.00D.00 S 42,239.00 12 meetings-4 hours including navel time Sarah 4 S 5,208.00 Stam visits and setup-19 stores 3 het a teh.101 rs per season Sarah _ 14 14- 2 $ 31,031.00 —apondence,mining card Materials-si nu e,books,em S 6,000.00 433 Websim It: E 12,15200 S 20,000.00 E 34152.00 Provide ongoing design and updating suppon for website Contactor/Susan $ 6,SI0.00 f 10,000.00 quanedy meetings with subcommittee working SmuP. Susan 1 1 3 $ 3.172.00 Geographic Information System interface S 10.000.00 Contras Administration Susan I 1 S 2.170.00 4.3.3 Promotional hems,pamphlati.displays,and exhibit items Contractor f 9,780.00 S 16,500.00 E 26,280.00 Assist in purchasing promotiorel imine for Tair Susan 1 t S 1,100.00 f 6,500,00 fela'ntbroehures Dermot E 8.660.00 S 10,000.00 43A Outreach developmem PR Fum S 61510.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 11510.00 Continue work with PR or graphics firm to devebp publi<mecognition of Conuacror f 5,000.00 pmgmm.Retain services for ongoing outreach and gaphic develonment. Interface with other subeammioes on graphic/Gochurt development Susan S 4,340.00 needs Conran Administration Susan 10. iq T 2170.00 06-07 Draft 43.5 Produce Spanish ReNews newsletter and insert in Spanish language 15 $ 1,650.00 S 1,550.00 $ 3,200.00 Newspapers Work with translator to produce insert for ReNews Contractor/Susan 5 5 $ 550.00 $ 1.000.00 Insert in EI Observador newspaper. Susan U $ - $ 550.00 Contract Administration/Evaluation Susan U to 1 $ 1.100.00 4.3.6 Elementary Outreach 40 $ 4.340.00 $ 10,700.00 $ 15,040,00 Contract Administration Susan 2C 20 4 $ 4,340.00 Provide ZunZun "W atersongs" cd to schools who see performance $ 700.00 100@ $7 each Partner with the Used Oil Program to have Zun Zun perform at County PIP Funding $ 10,000.00 Elementary Schools. 4.3.7 Watershed Stewardship- with The Watershed Project 40 $ 4,340.00 $ 32,500.00 $ 36,840.00 Kids in Gardens workshop+teacher stipends Susan $ 15,000.00 Healthy Schools Inside and Out workshop for teachers and custodians $ 12,000.00 Garden Registration program(for 10 school or community gardens) $ 5,500.00 Contract Administration and Evaluation 20 20 4,340.00 4.3.8 Cable Television commercials 4 $ 4,400.00 $ 20,000.00 S 24,400.00 Run commercials on cable Contractor $ 20,000.00 Contract Susan 4 $ 4,400.00 4.3.9 Trash Campaign Research and implementation 8 $ 19,620.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 24,620.00 Coordinate coastal cleanup with CA. Coastal Commission and creek and Sarah $ 5,000.00 beach cleanup site leaders. Integrate social marketing theory into promotion of canvas bag usage in partnership with solid waste agencies to reduce use of plastic bags.Research and development for implementation of community outreach efforts for 07-08. Coastal Cleanup coordination Sarah 60 20 8 $ 8,620.00 Research and development for implementation of outreach efforts Sarah too 100 $ 11,000,00 4.4 Assist with Focused Staff Training 4.4.1 Focused Staff training 40 S 4,400.00 $ 5,000.00 S 9,400.00 Develop training videos based on live training provided to TAC and Contractor S 5,000.00 other subcommittees-contract with DeAnza College Work with contractor to develop and edit cds about Inspector Training. Dermot 0 40 40 $ 4.40).00 ed copies#per city 4.51 Collaborate with Other Groups 4.5.1 Community Outreach Grants-Collaborate with Volunteer Groups 33 S 3,531.00 $ 450.00 S 3,981.00 Provide STOPPP with an application to be distributed by the SC. Update application Susan 88 S 856.00 Update database and organinze mailing distribution Susan 20 2 S 2,140.00 mailing printing mail room $ 450.00 press release S 5 S 535.00 4.5.2 Assist other STOPPP committees 12 $ 13,020.00 S - $ 1.3.020.00 Work with EOA and other subcommittees to integrate P/1P activities Susan and Dermot 60 60 120 S 13,020.00 with the general program components,developing public, municipal and commercial pollution prevention outreach materials. programs and trainines. Total 1,.388 $ 161,646 S 123,200 $ 284,846 Agenda Item No.XII 6-2. New Development and Construction Controls General Program Work Plan and Budget-FY 2006/07 Task No...and Description R lona le/Background+iil Budget Schedule/Due necessary) Date 5.1 Implement and Improve Performance Standards:Continue to assist the See SWMP. Performance standards are $5,000 Ongoing municipalities to understand and implement the updated performance standards reviewed every two years. This task will including the pesticide requirements for new development projects. This will include participation in reviewing, include,through New Development Subcommittee meetings and semi annual commenting,and representing STOPPP reports from the municipalities,the tracking of the implementation and in the adoption of the regional general effectiveness of stormwater controls in municipal and private projects. permit anticipated to occur in the summer of 2006. 5.2 Assist with the Implementation of Provision C.3: Continue to assist See SWMP. $55,000 Ongoing municipalities to implement source controls,site design measures,post- construction stormwater treatment measures and provisions for the continued operation and maintenance of stormwater treatment controls as part of the municipalities'new development review approval processes. This may include, through the New Development Subcommittee and semi annual reports from the municipalities,the tracking of the implementation and effectiveness of stormwater controls in municipal and private projects. 5.3 Assist with Implementation of the Hydrograph Modification Management See SWMP. Required by NPDES permit $83,000 See permit Plan: Assist municipalities in the implementation of the HMA that is ultimately amendment, amendment approved by the Regional Board. This may include any revisions required by the Regional Board,as well as special outreach and training programs timed to coincide with the date on which the Regional Board ultimately requires the HMP to be implemented. 5.4 Assist with Improving Construction Site Controls: Assist municipalities in See SWMP. $2,000 Ongoing conducting appropriate inspections and enforcement for construction sites and project-specific stormwater management plans. F:\SmSx\Sm55\Sm55.05\NDS Mtgs\Fcb Mtg\nds Arkpin&budget 0607 0708.doc Agenda Item No. XII Task No and.:Description - R1.1 rouintl..if`:.::;:: '::..;;Bud et SchetlulelDue . . . 9 .... . ..... . ... :....:........ .. .. .:. .. necessa ':: ::. Date 5.5 Promote Outreach and Training: Reinforce and,as necessary,expand See SWMP. This task includes one $20,000 June 2006 educational outreach to agency planning and engineering staff, planning workshop for municipal staff,up to two commissions,city councils,builders,and builders'consultants and contractors, outreach events,and the development or revision of one outreach piece,as appropriate. 5.6 Assist with Regulatory Compliance and Planning: This task includes See SWMP. $21,000 See permit assistance with: NPDES permit required reporting(including new development section of annual reports);developing two year work plans and budgets for General Program;providing any improvements to the new development section of the SWMP;assisting the NDS in conducting meetings;and developing a detailed NDS work plan for each fiscal year. Total Budget $186,000 5-2. New Development and Construction Controls General Program Work Plan and Budget-FY 2007108 Task No.and Description RationaEeTBackgroirnd(if Budget Schedule)Due necessary} Date 5.1 Implement and Improve Performance Standards:Continue to assist the See SWMP. Performance standards are $5,000 Ongoing municipalities understand and implement the updated performance standards reviewed every two years. including the pesticide requirements for new development projects. This will include,through New Development Subcommittee meetings and semi annual reports from the municipalities,the tracking of the implementation and effectiveness of stormwater controls in municipal and private projects. 5.2 Assist with the Implementation of Provision C.3: Continue to assist See SWMP. $55,000 Ongoing municipalities to implement source controls,site design measures,post- F:\Sm5x1Sm55\Sm55.05\NDS Mtgs\Feb Mtg\nds wrkpin&budget 0607 0708.doc Agenda Item No.XII Task No::ani1 Detcri tion RatianateBack round if i3ud et Sclw+ ule%ue :: p necessary)` .:...: ... .... Date construction stormwater treatment measures and provisions for the continued operation and maintenance of stormwater treatment controls as part of the municipalities'new development review approval processes. This may include, through the New Development Subcommittee and semi annual reports from the municipalities,the tracking of the implementation and effectiveness of stormwater controls in municipal and private projects. 5.3 Assist with Implementation of the Hydrograph Modification Management See SWMP. Required by NPDES permit $83,000 See permit Plan: Assist municipalities in the implementation of the HMP, amendment. amendment 5.4 Assist with Improving Construction Site Controls: Assist municipalities in See SWMP. $2,000 Ongoing conducting appropriate inspections and enforcement for construction sites and project-specific stormwater management plans. 5.5 Promote Outreach and Training: Reinforce and,as necessary,expand See SWMP. This task includes one $20,000 June 2007 educational outreach to agency planning and engineering staff,planning workshop for municipal staff, up to two commissions,city councils,builders,and builders'consultants and contractors, outreach events,and the development or revision of one outreach piece,as appropriate. 5.6 Assist with Regulatory Compliance and Planning: This task includes See SWMP. $21,000 See permit assistance with: NPDES permit required reporting(including new development section of annual reports);developing two year work plans and budgets for General Program;providing any improvements to the new development section of the SWMP;assisting the NDS in conducting meetings;and developing a detailed NDS work plan for each fiscal year. Total Budget $186,000 F:l.Sm5x\Sm55\Sm55.05\NDS Mtgs\Feb Mtg\nds wrkpin&budget 0607 0708.doc DRAFT Table 6-2. Watershed Assessment and Monitoring General Program Work Pian and Budget-FY 2006/07 Task Number and Description Rationale/Background Planning Schedule/ Budget Due Date 6.1 Conduct Watershed Assessments: Perform chemical, Assess water quality conditions in representative $103,000 Work will be biological and/or physical monitoring in local tributaries. watersheds in San Mateo County and thereby help evaluate performed during Potential activities will include field probe measurements, the overall effectiveness of STOPPP's BMPs and inform FY 2006/07_ physical habitat assessment,bioassessment,toxicity screening, STOPPP's efforts to select new BMPs. See STOPPP's pollutant analysis(e.g.,pesticides),compiling existing data, SWMP for more details. designing monitoring programs and developing and (— implementing strategies to assess and manage trash.(,This task may also include participating in regional watershed assessment and monitoring efforts. 6.2 Develop Plans to Address Specific Pollutants of Assist STOPPP to select BMPs to address specific $70,000 Work will be Concern: Develop plans to address specific pollutants of pollutants of concern in accordance with Bay Area TMDLs. performed during concern and perform related special studies as appropriate. See STOPPP's SWMP for more details. FY 2006107, 6.3 Participate in Regional Monitoring and TMD -related Participate in regional efforts to monitor water quality and $18,000` Ongoing. Programs: Participate in selected regional coliaborative solve water quality impairment problems. See STOPPP's programs(e.g.,BASMAA,the San Francisco Estuary Regional SWMP for more details. Monitoring Program and the Bay Area Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment Information Network). Includes participating on selected committees and work groups and assisting with their development of study work plans and reports. 6.4 Perform Activities Related to Regulatory Compliance Meet specific requirements in STOPPP's NPDES permit and $12,000 NPDES permit and Planning: Prepare the WAM component section of facilitate oversight of WAM component activities by required reports STOPPP's annual report and work plans and coordinate the STOPPP's municipalities. See STOPPP's SWMP for more will be completed Watershed Assessment and Monitoring Subcommittee. details. by the required dates. Other activities will be ongoing. Total Budget $203,000 STOPPP's funding of regional collaborative programs is not included in the above table,but is shown under the General Program Budget Summary,Fees and Dues. F:1Sm5x1Sm561Sm56-041WAM 06-07 and 07-08 work plan tables.doc CITYAGENDA 8a O o� ITEM# ----._..LINGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. c_ DATE July 17,2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY (� DATE: July 11, 2006 APPROVED FROM: Crystal Duong (558-7204) BY SUBJECT: Consider Appointment to Library Board RECOMMENDATION: Consider appointment recommendation of interview committee and make appointment or take other action. BACKGROUND: One commission position is due for appointment (Nancy Brock's, who has served out the remainder of David Carr's term). The position was publicized and notification letters were sent to all past commission applicants on the City's 2-year waiting list. Three applications were received as of the deadline of June 23, 2006. Those applicants will be interviewed by the Council subcommittee of Cathy Baylock and Terry Nagel prior to the council meeting on July 17,2006. The interview committee will notify the council in writing of their recommendation at the on set of the meeting. The term will be for three years ending in June 2009. STAFF REPORT B U R L I N G A M E' AGENDA - ITEM# 9a MTG. DATE 07.17.06 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE BY IQM4 DATE: JULY 7, 2006 APPROVED FROM: CITY PLANNER BY SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COORDINATION WI THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS SAN MATEO COUNTY ON THE DESTINATION: SOBA (SOUTH OF BURLINGAME AVENUE) DESIGN CHARRETTE RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should take action on the request to adopt a resolution to authorize staff to coordinate with the American Institute of Architects (AIA) San Mateo County Chapter on the Downtown Burlingame Design Charrette and to endorse the Draft Program Outline for the event to be held on September 30, 2006. BACKGROUND: On March 18, 2006, at the Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting to discuss goals for the 2006-07 budget year, direction was given to proceed with the planning process for a design charrette to be led by the AIA San Mateo County. In June, the Council authorized the funding for the event and a contribution to the San Mateo County AIA scholarship fund for the organization's participation. Since that time, staff has been working with a design charrette steering committee to plan the event. The day-long event will be held on September 30, 2006, and will involve dozens of architects and other design professionals who will volunteer their time at the event. The architects and other design professionals will be organized into design teams with the goal of creating a series of visions for the area south of Burlingame Avenue (SOBA). The charrette will be an open forum where members of the community are invited to provide input throughout the day as concepts are developed by the design experts. On June 19, 2006, the AIA San Mateo County made a presentation to a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission and discussed the general concept of the charrette process. Council members and Planning Commissioners then provided input on the boundaries of the area of interest; particular features in the area which should be retained,program goals and the title of the charrette event. The ideas brought forth at this meeting, together with ideas collected at a walkabout held with selected representatives, as well as from representatives in the design area, have been incorporated into the attached "Destination: SOBA" Program Outline. The architects and design professionals will gather in the morning on the day of the event, and the teams will spend the day brainstorming, sketching and drafting ideas, which will be assembled at the end of the day into a final design proposal for each team. At the end of the day, each of the teams will present their design concept to the other teams, attendees and the public. Public input and dialogue are encouraged so that the visions developed for the study area are shared by the community. Resolution Authorizing Coordination With The American Institute Of Architects San Mateo County On The Destination:SOBA(South Of Burlingame Avenue)Design Charrette July 17,2006 In addition to the presentations made the day of the event, a formal report will be prepared which will summarize each team proposal. The formal report will be presented to the City Council at a future Council meeting. The results of the design charrette will serve as a springboard for the upcoming Specific Plan process proposed for Downtown Burlingame which is expected to commence in January 2007. At this time, the City Council is being asked to review the draft Program Outline for the Destination SOBA Design Charrette and to adopt a resolution authorizing coordination with the AIA San Mateo County. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Authorizing Coordination with AIA San Mateo County Program Outline for Destination: SOBA(south of Burlingame Avenue) Design Charrette -2- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME TO AUTHORIZE COORDINATION WITH AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS SAN MATEO COUNTY ON THE DESTINATION: SOBA, SOUTH OF BURLINGAME AVENUE DESIGN CHARRETTE AND APPROVING STAFF RESOURCES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 RESOLVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the American Institute of Architects San Mateo County Chapter (AIA) proposes to lead a design charrette for Downtown Burlingame to be held on September 30, 2006; WHEREAS, Council has given direction to staff to coordinate with the AIA, and has provided further direction on the design charrette program goals which have been incorporated into the attached Destination: SOBA (South of Burlingame Avenue)Design Charrette program outline. NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED: The Burlingame City Council does hereby authorize coordination with the AIA San Mateo County, a chapter of the American Institute of Architects on a downtown design charrette and approve staff resources to hold the event on September 30, 2006. Mayor I, Doris J. Mortensen, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk Nk BURLINGAME Destination: SOBA South of Burlingame Avenue Design Charrette PROGRAM OUTLINE The Destination: SOBA design charrette will focus on creating visions for a revitalized and vibrant Howard Avenue between El Camino Real and California Drive. Improvements to the edges of the area and its connections to Burlingame Avenue, the train station, and the surrounding residential and business neighborhoods will be key elements of this Urban Design event. Participants will consider new visions and propose fresh approaches to the future development of the area and its mix of land uses. Goals: • Improve the visual character of the entry to Burlingame's downtown area from both the Howard/El Camino Real and the Howard/California Drive approaches. • Improve the visual character of Howard Avenue itself, and improve the sense of connection with the streets that tie it to the surrounding areas. • Create an identity for Howard Avenue which will give it its own "sense of place". The new identity should not compete with Burlingame Avenue but should stand on its own. The revitalized Howard Avenue should both support and expand on the success of its upscale neighbor to the north. • Create a pedestrian friendly environment that encourages people to leave their cars and visit more than one business at a time rather than making a single stop. • Create, enhance, and improve mid-block pedestrian connections, such as Hatch Lane and the Fox Mall. Ideas to Consider: • Residential uses may be considered as a way of intensifying pedestrian activity in the area. • Consider the most effective use of public property, such as development over public parking lots. • The recently released Downtown Economic Study should be a resource for information and ideas,but should not be a considered a definitive roadmap that sets the boundaries for what can be proposed. Elements to Remain: • Bus Depot (currently Sam's Sandwiches) • Masonic Hall • Methodist Church • Women's Club • Small converted Victorian houses on the south side of Howard • Post Office Building • The amount of public parking in the area should not be reduced. V STAFF REPORT AGENDA BURLINGAME 9b ITEM# MTG. 7/17/06 DATE TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL suB BY DATE: June 20,2006 APPROVED FROM: Parks& Recreation Director (558-7307) BY4?nn=.5,Q SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LIGHT REHABILITATION AT BAYSIDE PARK FIELD#1- PROJECT#81060 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution accepting the light rehabilitation project at Bayside Park Field#1 performed by Republic Electric of Novato, CA in the amount of$149,805.00. BACKGROUND: On October 3, 2005 Republic Electric was awarded the contract for this re- lighting Bayside Park Field #1. The work included the removal of old and inadequate wiring and lighting to the existing poles. A new "green" lighting system with ballast, wiring and lights were installed. Two credits were given back to the city in the amounts of $6,160.00 and $1,540.00. With the two credits back to the City the amount owed to Republic Electric is $142,105.00. The punch list has now been completed and the lights are operational. Staff is satisfied with the work and is recommending approval by Council. The total project cost is $202,265.64. EXHIBITS: Resolution BUDGET IMPACT: Electrical Consultant-Zeiger Engineering $11,080.00 Musco Lights 46,547.50 Republic Electric (installation) 142,105.00 Advertising cost(bid book& ad) 831.06 Public Works-staff cost 1,702.08 Total $202,265.64 The project was funded from the 2004-05 CIP budget and residual amounts from previous Parks &Recreation projects. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING COMPLETION OF BAYSIDE PARK RE-LIGHTING PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 81060 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Burlingame, California, and this Council does hereby FIND, ORDER and DETERMINE as follows: 1 . The Parks & Recreation Director of said City has certified that the work done by Republic Electric under the terms of its contract with the City of Burlingame dated October 3, 2005, has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by this Council therefor and to the satisfaction of the Parks & Recreation Director. 2. Said work is particularly described as #81060 BAYSIDE PARK RE-LIGHTING PROJECT 3 . Said work be and the same hereby is accepted. 4. The city engineer is directed to execute and file for record with the County Recorder notice of the completion thereof as required by law. Mayor I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17'd day of July. 2006 and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk CITY a AGENDA 9C ITEM# BURI INGAME STAFF REPORT MTG. DATE 7/17/06 w TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED BY JqrkV2nEtten, ( hipfnfPolirp�V) DATE: June 16,2006 APPROVED FROM: Jark Van Etten, Chief of Pnfirp BY Jim Nantell, City Manager SUBJECT: Request to allow a police department employee attend out of state training for the purpose of obtaining equipment from a federal grant RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully request that the City Council allow the police department to send an assigned officer to attend out of state training for the purpose of accepting specialized police equipment obtained through a Department of Homeland Security Grant. BACKGROUND: The police department recently applied for and was awarded a grant for equipment (a portable video enhancing system) from the Department of Homeland Security through the Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program (CEDAP). To obtain the equipment, a sworn officer is required to attend a 16 hour training course on the operation and care of the equipment in Orlando, Florida, during the month of August, 2006. There is no cost associated with this training, as all transportation, lodging and meals will be paid through the federal government. ATTACHMENTS: Related Department of Homeland Security documents. U.S. Department Homeland Security Office of Grants and Training Washington, DC 20531 RTA Homeland h' °U Security June 15, 2006 Chief Jack Van Etten Burlingame Police Department 1111 Trousdale Drive Burlingame, California 94010-3209 Dear Chief Van Etten, On behalf of the Secretary of Homeland Security, I am please to confirm that your application to the Commercial Direct Assistance Program (CEDAP) has been approved. Your agency will receive a VideoDetective Image Processing System. The Office of Grants and Training (G&T) sponsors the CEDAP to provide agencies with equipment and technology to fulfill their homeland security mission . The Department of Homeland Security has partnered with the Department of Defense, which serves as the procurement agent for the equipment awarded under CEDAP. As such , you will be receiving a letter from the U.S. Army with instructions to complete the CEDAP award process. Again, congratulations on your award. We look forward to working with you to complete the award process and transfer this equipment to your agency. Sincerely, C 4- 4�A� Tracy A. Henke Assistant Secretary, Grants and Training DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S.ARMY ELECTRONIC PROVING GROUND POST OFFICE BOX 12718 FORT HUACHUCA.ARIZONA 85670-2718 June 15,2006 Special Programs Office Chief Jack Van Etten Burlingame Police Department 1111 Trousdale Drive Burlingame, California 94010-3209 Dear Chief Van Etten, My organization, the United States Army Electronic Proving Ground (EPG), administers the Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program (CEDAP) on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security, Office of Grants and Training (G&T). In response to your application, we have scheduled your agency to receive the VideoDetective TM. The VideoDetective is a portable, real-time, video enhancement system. It is used to eliminate camera jitter and motion effects, enhance dark or washed out scenes, improve low resolution, decrease noise and eliminate interlacing from video. The Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program recognizes the importance of new equipment education and training, not only for the user, but also to ensure proper operation and deployment of the equipment. With this in mind, attendance at a training session is required prior to receipt of the equipment. The program provides travel, lodging, and an allotment for one person per agency. Our VideoDetective TM training session is scheduled for Monday and Tuesday, August 14 and 15 in Orlando, Florida and includes 16 hours of hands-on instruction. The program will provide the following for your designated attendee: ♦ Airline tickets (Departure Sunday, August 13 with return on Wednesday, August 16) ♦ Shuttle transportation from Orlando International Airport to hotel with return Hotel lodging for 3 nights — Doubletree Hotel at the Entrance to Universal Studios (Sunday, August 13 Monday, August 14, & Tuesday, August 15) Breakfast and lunch on training days (Monday, August 14 & Tuesday, August 15) ♦ Allotment to cover partial expenses Please call our toll-free number 1-866-659-9170 to schedule attendance with our Training Coordinator, Ms. Yvonne Lepisto or with any available staff member. This will be our third training session and will include over 850 law enforcement officers, firefighters, and first responders from across the nation. Our office is operating under a compressed time schedule and requires scheduling to be completed by June 30. If your agency fails to respond prior to the June 30 deadline, your agency will be removed from consideration and will not receive the equipment. Our office hours are Monday through Friday —8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST Saturday —8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. EST The program pays for the airline ticket, hotel lodging, and meals prior to the session; thus, all airline transportation and hotel requirements are coordinated and scheduled through our office. Please have your designated attendee call at the earliest date and prior to June 30. All airline reservations will be non-refundable / non-changeable. After your designated attendee's flight is reserved, we will not be able to change the ticket, and any changes will be at the cost of the attendee . The following information is required when scheduling training attendance: ♦ Agency name, address, telephone, and fax ♦ Name ♦ Address for Federal Express delivery of airline itinerary (If different from agency address) ♦ Departing airport ♦ Room preference (Smoking / non-smoking & bed type) Once initial coordination has been completed, our staff representative will email a copy of the scheduled airline itinerary to the attendee. Our office will send training packets to each attendee on August 4. Each packet will include: ♦ Airline itinerary ♦ Hotel pamphlet ♦ Shuttle information ♦ Training agenda Upon completion of training, the VideoDetectiveTM will be shipped within 48 hours to your agency. I look forward to meeting your representative during the August training session in Orlando. L. I Shnider Director JUN=14-2006 14:35 From:CONGRESSMAN LANTOS 16503758270 To:650+697+8130 P.1'2_ DOJ-OJP 6/14/2006 7:28 PAGE 001/003 Fax Server US. ik-P utment or Justice 3 p Office of Justice Programs washinkrtui.D.C. 205N GRANT AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT IMPORTANT FAX TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (202) 226-4183 TO: Honorable Tom Lantos Jason P.osenstoak Attn Phone Number: (202) 225-3531 FROM: Chris Rizzuto Office of Congressional and Public Affairs Office of Justice Programs Phone Number: (202) 307-0703 Fax Number: (202) 514-5958 SUBJECT: Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program (CEDAP) Phase Z Total Number of Pages (including cover page): 03 JUN-f4-2006 14:35 From:CONGRESSMAN LANTOS 16583758270 To:650+697+8138 P.2r2 _ DOJ--OJP 6/14/2008 7: 28 PAGE 002/003 Fax Server Gi.rce::rra;.cfo(Prep>t:icrca US,Dcr}arrzt air.o{ Kczwiry Washington,Dc 20531 �cAtq <9 'cur GRANT GRANT NOTIFICATION To, Members of Congress From: Office of Grants and Training,Office of Legislative Affairs Subject: Commercial Equiptucnt Direct Assistance Program(CEDAP) Phase 11, Round 2 Award Notification Date: -Tune 14, 2006 Pages: 2 Comments: This facsimile serves as notification of an equipment award being made by the U.S. Deparrment of Homeland Security's Office of Grauts and Training- This allocation is being made under the Fiscal Year (FY)2005 Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program(CEDAP), Phase iI(Round 2), which included an expanded catalog of equipment. The attached spreadsheet includes the awards being made to jurisdictions or agencies within your. State;, as well as a description of the piece of equipment.awarded. Background: CEDAP provides smaller law enforcement and emergency responds agencies with equipment items that will enhance and support.regional response,mutual aid, and interoperability of responder equipmenr.- CFDAP recognizes the;importance of new equipment education and training to cnstirc. the proper operation and deployment of the equipment. Therefore, attcudance at a training session is required prior to receipt of the equipment. CEDAP provides travel,lodging,and a limited per diem for one representative from each agency or jurisdiction. Funding: Funding for CEDAP was included in the FY 2005 Depanment of Homelmid.Security Appropriations Act (P.L. 108-334). Overall fand.ing for CEDAP was$50,000,000, which is being broken down as follows: • $32,000.000 for direct equipment procurement. • $10,000,000 for testing and validation of commercially available teebnology for inclusion in the program. • $8,000,000 for training, workshops, administration,and evaluation, Contact Information: For additional information,please contact Chris Rizzwo aL 202-786-9450 or Andrew White at 202-786- 9452. CITY o� STAFF REPORT BURUNGAME AGENDA 9d ITEM# MTG. O� AAT=JUNPd DATE July 17,2006 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTE i BY � � DATE: July 17,2006 W 0 APPRO FROM: Jesus Nava, Finance Director 558-7222 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF SIGNATORIES FOR CITY CHECKS AND DRAFTS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Resolution authorizing certain city staff members as the official signatories on city checks and drafts. BACKGROUND: Bank of America is the City of Burlingame's official depository and banking services provider. The bank requires that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing individuals to sign city checks and drafts. One signature is required for checks and drafts under$5,000. Two signatures are required for check totaling $5,000 or more. The resolution removes the name of Ann Musso,who retired as the City Clerk and adds the name of Doris Mortensen in her stead. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of the City Council Of The City of Burlingame Authorizing Signatories To City of Burlingame Checks and Drafts RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING SIGNATORIES TO CITY OF BURLINGAME CHECKS AND DRAFTS RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS,the Bank of America requires the City to adopt a resolution in order to allow City finds to be deposited with the Bank of America, and this Resolution is intended to meet that requirement, NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Funds of the City of Burlingame may be deposited in the Bank of America subject to the terms of the signature card, rules of the Bank, including all amendments or additions thereto, all applicable laws and regulations and practices of the Bank in force from time to time, and all service charges now or hereafter established and allowed by law. 2. The following persons are hereby authorized to sign checks, drafts, or other orders for and on behalf of the City;the signature of one of these persons shall be required for checks, drafts, or other orders under five thousand and no/00 dollars($5,000.00); the signature of two of these persons shall be required for checks, drafts, or other orders of five thousand and no/00 dollars ($5,000.00) or more. #1 Chris H. Rogers #5 Linda Freitas #2 James M. Nantell #6 Mary Asturias #3 Jesus Nava #7 Sharon L. Jackson #4 Doris Mortensen 3. Each of these people is hereby authorized to endorse checks, drafts, and other orders for and on behalf of the City of Burlingame for deposit, encashment, or otherwise, and the Bank of America is hereby authorized to honor and pay on account any and all checks, drafts, or other orders signed and/or endorsed herewith, or if presented unendorsed for deposit to this account with the Bank of America, to supply the required endorsement. 4. The City agrees that any sum at any time in this account with the Bank of America shall be subject to right of offset for liabilities of the City of Burlingame to the Bank of America to the extent legally permissible, and agrees further to pay the Bank of America on demand the amount of overdrafts on this account and of Bank of America current schedule of account fees and rates. 1 5. The Bank of America is authorized to hold all statements and vouchers until called for, and if not called within thirty(30) days,the Bank of America is authorized to mail statements. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _day of 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 2 CITY o� STAFF REPORT BUIWNGAME AGENDA ITEM# 9e MTG. "T` —NE DATE 7.17.06 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBMITTED i DATE: JULY 10, 2006 BY APPROVED FROM: CITY PLANNER BY SUBJECT: ACTION ON A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING C/CA TO ACT AS A SUBREGION FOR ALLOCATING THE HOUSING NEEDS NUMBERS FOR THE MANDATED 2009 UPDATE OF THE BURLINGAME HOUSING ELEMENT Action: City Council should review the requested authorization to create a Sub-region for allocation of the 2009 Housing Element update needs numbers; and if it can be supported approve the attached resolution. BACKGROUND The next State mandated Housing Element update is due in 2009. A key number in planning for housing is the local housing needs allocation; it provides the basis for our plan. Usually the housing needs number is provided by a process administered by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). This time a unique opportunity has been presented to allow sub-regions within the ABAG counties to be created. Each sub-region would be given a collective number by ABAG and the members of the individual sub-regional would be able to decide how to divide the housing among the cities and county in that sub-region. One advantage of a sub-region allocation is that it would allow us to explore creating the opportunities to provide for joint agreements to fund housing with reasonable credit going to participating cities/county. Although it has been tried, it is unlikely that this flexibility can be achieved for cities and counties through State legislation because it is strongly opposed by some housing groups. The C/CAG Board has indicated that it is willing to facilitate and provide staff support for a sub-regional housing needs allocation process if the Cities and County in the C/CAG region are interested in forming a sub- region. The actual process/formula for the region will need to be developed by representatives of the cities and County in a joint effort. So participating cities will be expected in the next year to devote staff planning time to developing a process and allocation scheme. A draft copy of the San Mateo County RHNA Process suggested by C/CAG staff is attached for your review. The first step in forming a sub-region for housing allocation is to adopt a resolution indicating the desire to participate in a San Mateo County sub-region. The resolution needs to be delivered to C/CAG and ABAG no later than August 31, 2006. Attachments: San Mateo County RHNA Process Resolution C/CAG CITY/COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY Atherton•Belmont•Brisbane•Burlingame•Colma•Daly City•East Palo Alto•Foster City•HaljMoon Bay•Hillsborough•Menlo Park Millbrae•Pacifica•Portola Valley•Redwood City•San Bruno•San Carlos•San Mateo•San Mateo County•South San Francisco•Woodside San Mateo County RHNA Process 1) Resolutions from 20 cities and the County to accept the housing delegation by 8/31/06 2) ABAG scoping meeting/research 3) Work with Cities/County to define a City/County based process 4) City Managers/Housing Directors Scoping Meeting 5) Work scope to CMAQ 6) Work scope for C/CAG Board approval 7) Establish Housing Committee 8) Housing/Planning Directors Policy development 9) To CMAQ and C/CAG Board for policy approval 10) Process to determine City/County housing production commitments 11) Research local housing opportunities based on prior studies (Housing Needs Study, ECR, TOD, etc.) 12) Determine City/County swap opportunities 13) Determine countywide credits/incentives 14) Other housing opportunities based on credits and incentives 15) Have we met countywide target (ABAG numbers for San Mateo County)? 16) If shortfall then negotiate method for allocation of residual. 17) Is the plan reasonable? a) If yes, sub-regional delegation accepted b) If no, give back to ABAG 18) Submittal to the Cities and County for approval 555 County Center,5`h Floor,Redwood City,CA 94063 NONE:650.599.1460 FAx: 650.361.8227 RESOLUTION No. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BURLINGAME TO BECOME A MEMBER OF A COUNTYWIDE SUB-REGION, AN ENTITY THAT WOULD LOCALLY ADMINISTER THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION PROCESS (RHNA) OF THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS (ABAG) RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Burlingame: WHEREAS, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is required by State law to administer the Regional Housing Needs Allocation program in the Bay Area; and WHEREAS, ABAG has begun preliminary work on developing the program with the objective of completing the program in August of 2008; and WHEREAS, changes to the State laws governing development of housing elements for local general plans allow ABAG to transfer administration of the program to local jurisdictions who create sub-regions for the purposes of distributing housing need allocations among the members of the sub-region; and WHEREAS, a sub-region is defined as two or more cities in a county or any combination of geographically contiguous local governments; and WHEREAS,the City of Burlingame desires to become part of such a sub-region in San Mateo County; and WHEREAS,the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG)will facilitate and provide staff support to the sub-region; and WHEREAS, each member of a sub-region must adopt a resolution authorizing its inclusion in the sub-region; and WHEREAS, adopted resolutions must be sent to ABAG by August 31, 2006; and WHEREAS, ABAG must adopt a resolution approving the sub-region, NOW, THEREFORE,IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City of Burlingame agrees to participate in the process to establish realistic housing allocations among the sub-region(cities and the County) established within San Mateo 1 County for use in the next housing element that is due in 2009. 2. Adoption of this resolution indicates the Council's intention to participate in the sub-region process for San Mateo County and to designate the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County(C/CAG) as the official representative of the San Mateo County sub-region. 3. The City Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and C/CAG for inclusion in the Resolution designating the sub-region. MAYOR I, DORIS MORTENSEN, City Clerk of the City of Burlingame, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _day of 2006, and was adopted thereafter by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK 2 $1,927,569.03 Ck. No. 19279- 19842 Excludes Library Checks 19280-19308 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT i Payroll for June 2006 $3,668,471.64 Ck. No. 165684- 166040 *NOTE: June had 3 pay periods INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS&ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION S:IFINEXCELIMISCELLANEOUSICOUNCILCKS.XLS $1,927,569.03 Ck. No. 19279 - 19842 Excludes Library Checks 19280-18308 RECOMMENDED FOR PAYMENT APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Payroll for June 2006 $3,668,471.64 Ck. No. 165684 - 166040 ` NOTE: June had 3 pay periods INCLUDES ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS PERS HEALTH PERS RETIREMENT FEDERAL 941 TAX STATE DISABILITY TAX STATE INCOME TAX PERS & ICMA DEFERRED COMP SECTION 125 DEDUCTION CD OrQa CD =' n. 00 o m J-4 S:\FINEXCEL\MISCELLANEOUS\COUNCILCKS.XLS —1 O 6' CITY OF BURLINGAME 07-06-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 FUND RECAP - 06-07 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 122,967.64 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 21,606.79 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 10,694.52 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 5,272.70 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 3,024.00 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 82,989.57 WATER FUND 526 248,951.89 SEWER FUND 527 211,517.69 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 7,119.70 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 648.56 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1,864.09 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620. 1,961.48 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 738.92 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 3,673.58 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,919.50 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,264.39 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 627.77 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $728,842.79 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 19744 THROUGH 19842 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $728,842.79, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . ................... ............ . ... .../. ../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ............ ......... ...... ...... . . . .../.../. .. COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME 07-06-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 11 FUND RECAP - 06-07 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 22,680.85 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 7,640.06 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 171.35- WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 3,024.00 WATER FUND 526 1,957.00 SEWER FUND 527 210,172.00 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 512.46 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 2,150.00 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 600.00 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $249,107.72 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 19744 THROUGH 19842 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $249,107.72, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME 07-06-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 FUND RECAP 05.06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 100,286.79 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 13,766.73 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 10,523.17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 5,272.70 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 82,989.57 WATER FUND 526 246,994.89 SEWER FUND 527 1,345.69 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 7,119.70 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 648.56 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 1,864.09 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,961.48 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 226.46 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 3,673.58 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 769.50 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 1,664.39 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 627.77 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $479,735.07 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 19744 THROUGH 19842 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $479,735.07, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .....................I.............. .../.../... COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19842 JACKIE PRIESTLY 26715 1,800.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,800.00 101 22546 TOTAL $728,842.79 (SJ CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19826 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25731 AP 627.77 UTILITY EXPENSE 627.77 896 20281 19827 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25777 AP 636.93 COMMUNICATIONS 636.93 201 65200 160 19828 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25778 AP 446.35 COMMUNICATIONS 446.35 101 66100 160 19829 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25792 AP 104.98 COMMUNICATIONS 104.98 201 65200 160 19830 HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC 25852 512.46 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 512.46 621 64450 200 19831 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 AP 71.46 MISC. SUPPLIES 71.46 527 66520 120 19832 DATABANK IMX 26176 AP 15,505.67 MISCELLANEOUS 15,505.67 101 22518 19833 CALIFORNIA POWER PARTNERS 26205 AP 82,360.57 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82,360.57 327 81510 220 19834 U S POSTAL SERVICE (CMRS-FP) 26339 1,000.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,000.00 101 67500 110 19835 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 26420 AP 14,043.84 OFFICE EXPENSE 14,043.84 101 64200 110 19836 ELIFEGUARD 26709 AP 166.95 MISC. SUPPLIES 166.95 101 68010 120 1892 19837 LAWRENCE LANDESS 26710 655.00 MISCELLANEOUS 655.00 101 22546 19838 MUSIC THEATER INTERNATIONAL 26711 AP 10.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.00 101 68010 220 1349 19839 ROBERT INNES 26712 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 731 22520 19840 BRUCE BETTENCOURT PAINTING 26713 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 731 22520 19841 CHARLES BONA 26714 3,024.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 3,024.00 326 80770 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 19814 I .M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752 AP 2,725 .97 MISC. SUPPLIES - 128.50 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 198.85 201 65200 120 SMALL TOOLS 106.66 201 65200 130 COMMUNICATIONS 18.39 201 65200 160 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 173.88 201 65200 190 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 152.26 201 65200 203 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 143.84 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 396.20 201 65200 260 MISCELLANEOUS 1 ,664.39 731 22554 19815 AETNA 24760 2,869. 18 MISCELLANEOUS 271 .30 130 20028 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,597.88 130 20022 19816 SERENE LIM 24791 AP 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31000.00 101 22546 19817 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA 24793 AP 7,069.63 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,069.63 130 20014 19818 THE HARTFORD PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 24796 4,970.88 MISCELLANEOUS 995. 15 130 20025 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 31975.73 130 20021 19819 ART IN ACTION 24912 AP 5,725.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,725.50 101 68010 220 1646 19820 RON GARIFFO 24931 1 ,200.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,200.00 730 69544 220 19821 CMTA 24971 370.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 370.00 101 64250 260 19822 DE LAGE LANDEN 25057 609.37 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23.08 101 65150 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.94 101 65100 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171 .35 201 65200 220 19823 MADDAUS WATER MANAGEMENT 25098 AP 6,220.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,220.00 526 69020 210 19824 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 AP 151 . 14 OFFICE EXPENSE 112.08 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.06 201 65200 111 19825 CARRIE FRANCIS 25286 AP 688.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 688.00 101 68010 220 1349 I ( + CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19801 FLORA ROBELET 24167 AP 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 19802 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 AP 124.80 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 124.80 101 68010 220 1521 19803 MAYBELLE PINSON 24419 AP 362.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 362.25 101 68010 220 1644 19804 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24518 AP 4,485.00 MISCELLANEOUS 4,485.00 130 20016 19805 CENTRAL COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS FUND 24519 AP 48.00 UNION DUES 48.00 130 21080 19806 BURLINGAME POLICE ADMINISTRATION 24520 AP 180.00 MISCELLANEOUS 180.00 130 20024 19807 BURLINGAME POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 24521 AP 600.00 MISCELLANEOUS 600.00 130 20024 19808 C.L.E.A. 24523 AP 643.50 MISCELLANEOUS 643.50 130 20026 19809 TEAMSTERS#856 24526 AP 420.00 UNION DUES 420.00 130 21091 19810 TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 856 24528 AP 320.60 MISCELLANEOUS 320.60 130 21092 19811 SWRCB FEES 24588 872.00 OTHER AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 872.00 527 66520 270 19812 KID2 LOVE SOCCER, INC. 24637 AP 2,856.70 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,856.70 101 68010 220 1372 19813 W.L. BUTLER 24697 AP 5,175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 5,175.00 101 22546 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19786 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 AP 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220 19787 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 3,914.00 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 526 69020 180 RENTS & LEASES 1,957.00 527 66520 180 19788 CALIFORNIA COWBOYS 20079 950.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 950.00 730 69544 220 19789 ROBERT BARRY 20369 AP 2,815.38 MISCELLANEOUS 2,815.38 101 65100 010 19790 PHYLLIS E. EVERSON 20833 AP 769.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 769.50 730 69585 120 19791 FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA, INC. 20967 AP 103.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.92 101 65100 220 19792 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 AP 1,018.96 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,018.96 625 65213 203 19793 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 AP 1,325.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,325.00 201 65200 220 19794 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 AP 5,603.56 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 5,603.56 101 66210 222 19795 Z.A.P. MANUFACTURING 22249 AP 1,550.90 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,550.90 101 66210 222 19796 CARL DEQUANT 22842 AP 1,111.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,111.50 101 68010 220 1372 19797 OFFICE MAX 23306 AP 122.57 OFFICE EXPENSE 122.57 101 66100 110 19798 SCS FIELD SERVICES 23727 AP 1,972.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,972.50 528 66600 210 19799 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 AP 929.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 102.91 101 68010 120 1112 MISC. SUPPLIES 321.34 101 68010 120 1114 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 301.60 619 64460 220 5240 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 204.00 619 64460 220 5170 19800 QUILL 24090 AP 226.46 OFFICE EXPENSE 226.46 621 64450 110 - CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19770 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 AP 2,822.31 GAS, OIL & GREASE 2,822.31 201 65200 201 19771 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 AP 84.67 SMALL TOOLS 84.67 526 69020 130 19772 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 AP 731.08 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 731.08 625 65213 203 19773 ACCURATE MAILINGS, INC 17623 AP 1,301.77 MISCELLANEOUS 1,301.77 526 69020 233 19774 JEFF HIPPS 17803 5,569.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,569.20 101 68010 220 1372 19775 ICNA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 18050 1,283.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,283.00 101 64250 240 19776 TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH 18419 AP 500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 500.00 530 65400 400 19777 PENINSULA PUMP & 18450 AP 1,262.34 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 1,262.34 527 66520 230 19778 RICH SCIUTTO 18572 715.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 715.00 101 68010 220 1372 19779 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 AP 91..20 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 91.20 528 66600 210 19780 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOE CO 18755 AP 349.33 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 349.33 101 68020 140 2300 19781 JOHN KOCKOS 18942 AP 3,750.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,750.00 320 79400 220 19782 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 AP 3,254.74 MISC. SUPPLIES 3,254.74 101 68010 120 1781 19783 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 AP 73.90 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 73.90 320 80790 210 19784 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 3,900.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 3,900.00 101 64420 262 19785 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 AP 727.85 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 694.06 201 65200 203 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 33.79 625 65213 203 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19758 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 AP 862.88 MISC. SUPPLIES 862.88 101 68010 120 1423 19759 TIMBERLINE TREE SERVICE, INC. 03760 AP 3,811.52 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,362.72 101 68020 220 2300 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,448.80 320 76350 220 19760 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 03764 AP 1,477.16 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 1,477.16 101 68020 190 2200 19761 B.E.I. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 09072 AP 183.86 MISC. SUPPLIES 183.86 526 69020 120 19762 POM INC. 09248 AP 148.56 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 148.56 530 65400 200 19763 TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 09270 AP 629.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 629.00 327 81150 210 19764 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPPLY 09459 AP 824.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 824.87 101 68020 120 2200 19765 OLE'S 09626 AP 1,142.92 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,142.92 201 65200 203 19766 CHIEF BILL REILLY 11568 AP 1,360.25 OFFICE EXPENSE 219.20 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 286.50 201 65200 120 SMALL TOOLS 25.95 201 65200 130 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 297.14 201 65200 140 COMMUNICATIONS 21.64 201 65200 160 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 19.47 201 65200 190 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 66.46 201 65200 203 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS -55.00 201 65200 240 TRAVEL & MEETINGS- 63.12 201 65200 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 415.77 201 65200 260 19767 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 AP 11.89 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.89 527 66520 110 19768 RECHARGE'EM 14523 AP 75.78 OFFICE EXPENSE 75.78 201 65200 110 19769 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 AP 359.07 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 359.07 619 64460 210 5150 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 07/06/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19744 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNME 01131 4,649.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 4,649.00 101 64560 240 19745 WHITE CAP 01250 AP 357.21 SMALL TOOLS 357.21 526 69020 130 19746 BURLINGAME AUTO SUPPLY 01507 AP 4,244.99 GAS, OIL & GREASE 77.81 201 65200 201 VEHICLE MAINT. 227.47 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 88.48 201 65200 203 SUPPLIES 1,921.45 620 15000 TRAINING EXPENSE 40.03 620 66700 260 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,889.75 625 65213 203 19747 BURLINGAME CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01637 2,301.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,301.63 101 64560 220 19748 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 AP 526.10 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 526.10 201 65200 140 19749 VEOLIA WATER 02110 207,343.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 207,343.00 527 66530 220 19750 FEDEX 02160 AP 26.47 OFFICE EXPENSE 26.47 101 66100 110 19751 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 AP 639.83 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 639.83 101 66210 226 19752 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 AP 999.42 ` PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 999.42 619 64460 210 19753 P. G. & E. 03054 AP 19,533.61 GAS & ELECTRIC 19,533.61 101 66100 170 19754 SANDRA POBE 03175 AP 3,600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,600.00 101 68010 220 1644 19755 SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPT. 03353 AP 238,847.38 WATER PURCHASES 238,847.38 526 69020 171 19756 CITY OF SAN MATEO 03366 AP 7,468.04 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,468.04 101 66100 220 19757 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 AP 5,056.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 5,056.00 528 66600 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME 06-30-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 12 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 118,748.57 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,647.97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 17,533.40 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 26,502.17 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 18,757.10 WATER FUND 526 17,828.84 SEWER FUND 527 44,166.56 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 5,773.11 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 1,282.52 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 779.00 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 3,048.79 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,139.40 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 9,557.79 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 321.87 OTHER.LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,700.00 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 115,921.47 STATE GRANTS FUND 734 2,649.81 FEDERAL GRANTS FUND 737 649.45 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 64,281.08 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL 54551,288.90 N 7 IQ�• ' HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 19596 THROUGH 19743 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $455,288.90, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .......................I............ .../.../... FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../.../... COUNCIL DATE C \ CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 11 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19737 GINA O'NEAL 26701 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 19738 SUZANNE KASAD 26702 150.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1216 19739 FIONA HIGGINS 26703 125.00 MISCELLANEOUS 125.00 101 36330 000 1372 19740 COSTEN HICKMAN 26704 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 36330 000 1660 19741 PATRICK GREELY 26705 25.00 MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 101 36330 000 1660 19742 RENEE ROJAS 26706 25.00 MISCELLANEOUS 25.00 101 36330 000 1660 19743 MR/MRS BENTLEY 26707 124.00 MISCELLANEOUS 124.00 101 36330 000 1372 TOTAL 8455,288.90 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 10 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 19722 KANTOLA PRODUCTIONS 26686 766.46 TRAINING EXPENSE 383.23 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 383.23 527 66520 260 19723 CARMEN SIU 26687 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 19724 COLLEEN NOLAN 26688 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 19725 ELIA ZAPATA 26689 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 19726 KATHRYN BAXTER 26690 200.00 MISCELLANEOUS 200.00 101 36330 000 1370 19727 MR MRS SCHENSEMA 26691 126.00 MISCELLANEOUS 126.00 101 36330 000 1645 19728 RITU BHARGAVA 26692 143.00 MISCELLANEOUS 143.00 101 36330 000 1646 19729 SUZANNE DENNEY 26693 272.00 MISCELLANEOUS 107.00 101 36330 000 1890 MISCELLANEOUS 165.00 101 36330 000 1646 19730 SANDRA BRENNAND 26694 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1372 19731 DONNA KRONEWETTER 26695 52.00 MISCELLANEOUS 52.00 101 36330 000 1661 19732 KELLY KORENAK 26696 52.00 - MISCELLANEOUS 52.00 101 36330 000 1661 19733 MR/MRS. BRANSCUM 26697 250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 250.00 101 36330 000 1372 19734 HELEN O'ROURKE 26698 125.00 MISCELLANEOUS 125.00 101 36330 000 1372 19735 MR/MRS CREEKS 26699 162.00 MISCELLANEOUS 162.00 101 36330 000 1372 19736 KRISTINA M. THUMA 26700 579.00 MISCELLANEOUS 579.00 101 36330 000 1372 CITY OF BURLINGAME • W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 19708 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25775 110.29 COMMUNICATIONS 110.29 101 65100 160 19709 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 25778 251.60 COMMUNICATIONS 251.60 101 66100 160 19710 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 575.26 OFFICE EXPENSE -25.38 101 65300 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 32.49 101 64420 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 14.11 101 64350 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 337.55 101 65300 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 44.54 101 66210 120 OFFICE EXPENSE 14.46 526 69020 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 157.49 527 66520 110 _ 19711 CINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 26143 69.19 MISC. SUPPLIES 69.19 101 64150 120 19712 LINGULAR WIRELESS ATLYS 26144 34.62 COMMUNICATIONS 34.62 101 64100 160 19713 SOLEM AND ASSOCIATES 26196 8,649.34 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 8,649.34 320 80760 210 19714 BAKER AND TAYLOR BOOKS 26276 2,735.31 LIBRARY CATALOGING EXPENSE 687.84 101 67500 124 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 2,047.47 101 67500 129 19715 VISION INTERNET PROVIDERS INC 26294 9,000.00 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 9,000.00 621 64450 220 19716 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26418 215.48 UTILITY EXPENSE 215.48 896 20281 19717 SUE GARFIELD 26618 129.00 MISCELLANEOUS 129.00 101 36330 000 1422 19718 MARY CARRASCO 26681 140.00 MISCELLANEOUS 140.00 101 36330 000 1660 19719 DAU PRODUCTS 26683 2,300.55 MISCELLANEOUS 2,300.55 101 68010 400 1114 19720 UNITED SITE SERVICES INC 26684 1,278.89 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,278.89 101 68010 120 1950 19721 ERIK ROSEGARD 26685 600.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 600.00 730 69546 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19693 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 24647 59.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 59.00 101 65300 260 19694 RUTAN & TUCKER LLP 24678 779.00 - PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 779.00 618 64520 210 19695 ART IN ACTION 24912 640.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 640.00 101 68010 220 1646 19696 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 2,449.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,449.34 527 66520 120 19697 SBC LONG DISTANCE 25033 112.02 UTILITY EXPENSE 112.02 896 20281 19698 GINA BALDRIDGE 25092 300.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 300.00 101 68010 120 1330 19699 MADDAUS WATER MANAGEMENT 25098 5,164.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,164.00 526 69020 210 19700 JESSE MOORE 25104 220.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 220.00 101 68010 220 1785 19701 OFFICE DEPOT 25244 181.70 MISC. SUPPLIES 181.70 101 65100 120 19702 ROCHE GEORGE 25323 232.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 232.00 101 68010 220 1788 19703 KIM BULLOCK-UTRATA 25333 162.00 MISCELLANEOUS 162.00 101 36330 000 1372 - 19704 JOSEPH BOJUES 25335 36.00 MISCELLANEOUS 36.00 101 36330 000 1782 19705 ECS IMAGING INC. 25690 3,682.67 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,227.56 101 65150 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,227.56 101 65400 220 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,227.55 530 65400 120 19706 CINGULAR WIRELESS 25727 53.58 COMMUNICATIONS 53.58 101 64250 160 19707 MR. CANNIFFE 25758 48.00 MISCELLANEOUS 48.00 101 36330 000 1372 • 1 CITY OF BURLINGAME • W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19680 SBC/MCI 23728 8,264.93 MISCELLANEOUS 16.27 101 68020 192 2200 UTILITY EXPENSE 8,248.66 896 20281 19681 KEITH MARTIN 23788 86.88 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3.00 526 69020 250 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.75 527 66520 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 3.00 527 66520 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 26.50 527 66520 260 SMALL TOOLS 6.63 620 66700 130 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 31.00 620 66700 250 19682 AVR REALTY 23855 65.11 MISCELLANEOUS 65.11 526 22502 19683 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 126.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 126.00 619 64460 220 5110 19684 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 842.75 SUPPLIES 842.75 620 15000 19685 WINZLER & KELLY CONSULTING ENGIN 23992 1,064.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,064.50 326 80770 220 19686 GEMPLERS, INC. 24196 417.95 MISCELLANEOUS 32.79 527 23611 MISC. SUPPLIES 385.16 527 66520 120 .19687 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONERY 24275 3,614.43 MISC. SUPPLIES 3,614.43 526 69020 120 19688 FASTLANE TEK INC. 24304 4,800.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,200.00 101 66210 260 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1,200.00 526 69020 290 COMMUNICATIONS 1,200.00 527 66520 160 TRAINING EXPENSE 1,200.00 527 66520 260 19689 PENINSULA AQUATICS CENTER 24375 223.20 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 223.20 101 68010 220 1372 19690 C.N. ROEN CO. 24474 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502 19691 HONEYWELL 24546. 2,011.71 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,011.71 619 64460 210 5240 19692 BURLINGAME ROTARY 24566 200.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 200.00 101 64150 240 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19666 CSG CONSULTANTS 22465 3,325.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,470.00 201 35220 000 7100 MISCELLANEOUS 855.00 201 35221 000 7100 19667 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 22794 750.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 750.00 320 79410 220 19668 DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 22823 4,305.87 MISC. SUPPLIES 4,305.87 101 66100 120 19669 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGI 22824 45,00 MISC. SUPPLIES 45.00 101 66100 120 19670 ALLIED IRON CO. 22855 107.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 107.38 619 64460 120 5130 19671 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 863.87 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 214.42 101 65100 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 649.45 737 65120 140 19672 SAN MATEO COUNTY PROBATION DEPAR 22943 9,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,000.00 101 65100 220 19673 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 162.36 MISCELLANEOUS 162.36 101 68010 400 1111 19674 CYSERNET CONSULTING, INC. 23234 3,487.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 976.50 320 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,360.12 326 79400 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,150.88 327 79400 210 19675 OFFICE MAX 23306 107.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 107.00 101 68010 110 1101 19676 THE PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS GROUP 23367 1,000.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 500.00 101 66100 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 500.00 526 69020 260 19677 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 23382 5,420.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,420.00 320 81660 220 19678 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 17,820.49 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,180.13 326 80931 210 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,640.36 326 81480 210 19679 GWENDOLYN BOGER 23703 3,960.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,960.00 101 68010 220 1331 w CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19651 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20900 2,649.81 MISCELLANEOUS 2,649.81 734 65198 400 19652 RENEE RAMSEY 21136 930.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 930.00 101 68010 220 1331 19653 QUICK MIX CONCRETE 21140 1,301.17 MISC. SUPPLIES 640.62 101 66210 120 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 660.55 101 66210 219 19654 JOE ADDIEGO 21249 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 19655 ADI 21362 84.97 MISC. SUPPLIES 84.97 619 64460 120 5150 19656 CDU GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 613.15 OFFICE EXPENSE 55.36 526 69020 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 557.79 621 64450 110 19657 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 85.40 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 85.40 625 65213 203 19658 MISSION VALLEY FORD 21675 23.87 SUPPLIES 23.87 620 15000 19659 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, INC. 21680 1,811.71 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 1,811.71 101 66210 222 19660 WALT KOHNERT 21704 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 1.01 36330 000 1780 19661 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 21741 1,970.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,970.50 101 68010 220 1349 19662 CIRCLEPOINT 21986 1,726.15 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 1,726.15 326 80770 210 19663 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 24.67 SUPPLIES - 24.67 620 15000 19664 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 2,329.71 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,300.84 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 28.87 527 66520 120 19665 JOHN FUNGHI 22347 42.00 MISCELLANEOUS 42.00 101 36330 000 1890 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 19636 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 954.61 PUBLICATIONS & ADVERTISING 954.61 101 64200 150 19637 PRIORITY 1 19239 48.27 SUPPLIES 48.27 620 15000 19638 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 458.08 BANKING SERVICE FEES 96.25 101 64250 120 WATER PURCHASES 361.83 526 69020 171 19639 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 322.97 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 322.97 201 65200 203 19640 POWER WASHING SERVICE 19564 5,147.28 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 5,147.28 528 66600 210 19641 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 19679 108.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 108.79 101 68010 120 1781 19642 ALL FENCE COMPANY, INC. 19710 1,420.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 1,420.00 526 69020 190 19643 MICHAEL LUZZI 20090 1,100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,100.00 730 69544 220 19644 GE CAPITAL 20216 379.75 OFFICE EXPENSE 94.93 101 68020 110 2100 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.82 101 68010 220 1101 19645 NOLTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20376 2,945.12 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 2,945.12 327 81360 210 19646 DAPPER TIRE CO., INC. 20464 437.61 SUPPLIES 437.61 620 15000 19647 LINDA GRAHAM 20483 1,120.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,120.00 101 68010 120 1521 19648 EIP ASSOCIATES 20526 4,530.91 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,530.91 326 80910 210 19649 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 59.74 MISCELLANEOUS 59.74 101 64420 031 19650 SPRINT PCS 20724 52.52 COMMUNICATIONS 52.52 101 65100 160 A CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S TE R PAGE 3 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT '•' Denotes Hand Written Checks 19622 BURLINGAME POLICE DEPT 13720 1,148.85 MISC. SUPPLIES 100.83 101 65100 120 COMMUNICATIONS 165.95 101 65100 160 TRAINING EXPENSE 365.33 101 65150 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 461.77 101 65100 260 COMMUNICATIONS 37.68 530 65400 160 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 17.29 530 65400 200 19623 FORTE PRESS CORP. 13759 232.74 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 232.74 101 65100 292 19624 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 603.55 PUMP EQUIPMENT REPAIR 603.55 526 69020 230 19625 PARKIN SECURITY CONSULTANTS 15250 450.00 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 450.00 101 64420 121 19626 TRESSER'S TOW SERVICE 15543 25.00 SUPPLIES 25.00 620 15000 19627 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,023.48 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,023.48 101 65100 220' 19628 STOFFEL SEALS CORP. 15683 324.75 MISC. SUPPLIES 162.37 101 65150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 162.38 101 65100 120 19629 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,756.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,756.50 101 68010 220 1787 19630 SYDNEY MALKOO 16347 284.23 SMALL TOOLS 284.23 620 66700 130 19631 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 16460 532.95 MISC. SUPPLIES 532.95 101 68010 120 1330 19632 LINHART PETERSEN POWERS ASSOC. 16599 56,574.61 MISCELLANEOUS 56,574.61 101 22515 19633 STANDARD REGISTER 17495 811.20 OFFICE EXPENSE 811.20 101 64250 110 19634 HI-TECH EMERGENCY VEHICLE 17546 62.89 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 62.89 625 65213 203 19635 MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES 18546 629.20 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 629.20 101 64420 210 CITY OF-BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E.G I S T E R PAGE 2 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19611 RANDY SCHWARTZ 03518 1,706.49 MISCELLANEOUS 964.00 101 68010 031 MISC. SUPPLIES 742.49 101 68010 120 1101 19612 STATE CONTROLLER 03666 1,843.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,843.02 101 64560 220 19613 TAP PLASTICS 03739 65.76 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 65.76 101 68020 190 2200 19614 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 03764 290.87 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 290.87 101 68020 190 2200 19615 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES 09461 1,737.56 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,737.56 320 81090 210 19616 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 1,952.35 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.34 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 21.33 10168020 120 2200 SMALL TOOLS 22.99 101 66210 130 SMALL TOOLS 93.05 101 68020 130 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 64.80 101 68020 190 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 152.56 101 68020 192 2200 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 56.00 101 66210 222 TRAINING EXPENSE 32.45 101 68020 260 2200 MISC. SUPPLIES 426.59 526 69020 120 SMALL TOOLS 216.44 526 69020 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 569.00 527 66520 120 SMALL TOOLS - 47.69 527 66520 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 210.11 619 64460 120 19617 3 T EQUIPMENT CO. 10077 352.26 SUPPLIES 352.26 620 15000 19618 PIP PRINTING 10620 152.24 OFFICE EXPENSE 152.24 101 68020 110 2100 19619 MCGRAW-HILL COMPANY 11245 82.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 82.00 101 66100 240 19620 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY 11532 2,727.90 POLICE--SUPPLIES 2,727.90 101 65100 126 19621 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 54.09 MISC. SUPPLIES 54.09 527 66520 120 C C � CITY OF BURLINGAME / W.A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 06/30/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *� Denotes Hand Written Checks 19596 SAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 173.58 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 173.58 625 65213 203 19597 WHITE CAP 01250 2,939.47 SMALL TOOLS 947.63 101 66210 130 SMALL TOOLS 1,991.84 527 66520 130 19598 G. BORTOLOTTO & CO., INC. 01358 750.00 MISCELLANEOUS 750.00 526 22502 19599 VEOLIA WATER 02110 50,281.91 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 14,661.10 327 79480 210 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. -3,133.09 527 66530 190 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 38,753.90 527 66530 800 19600 GENE EVANS 02149 195.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.00 101 68010 220 1644 19601 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 106.79 MISCELLANEOUS 106.79 101 68020 192 2200 19602 WATER/FINANCE PETTY CASH 02184 2,857.93 MISCELLANEOUS 2,857.93 896 20282 19603 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 399.71 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 399.71 101 66210 226 19604 K & W DISCOUNT LIGHTING & SUPP 02645 508.62 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S - 508.62 619 64460 210 5250 19605 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 02755 63.11 - SUPPLIES 63.11 620 15000 19606 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 03002 625.83 MISC. SUPPLIES 625.83 528 66600 120 19607 P. G. & E. 03054 52,846.99 UTILITY EXPENSE 52,846.99 896 20280 19608 AT&T 03080 78.01 COMMUNICATIONS 78.01 101 65100 160 19609 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONVENTION & 03431 115,921.47 MISCELLANEOUS 115,921.47 731 22587 19610 SAN MATEO UNION HIGH 03471 700.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 700.00 101 68010 120 1286 CITY OF BURLINGAME 06-22-2006 WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 12 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 71,740.06 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 3,836.86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 20,529.44 WATER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 326 175,256.40 SEWER CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 327 195,704.60 WATER FUND 526 11,883.78 SEWER FUND 527 7,777.22 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 6,337.04 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 3,067.06 SELF,INSURANCE FUND 618 790.13 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 23,991.04 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 1,446.14 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 5,557.96 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 1,539.06 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 1,050.00 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 35.80 BURLINGAME TRAIN SHUTTLE PROGRAM 736 24,712.92 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 435.00 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $55 ,690.51 L3aJ-� yul p HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 19451 THROUGH 19595 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $555,690.51, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, .................................... .../. ./. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE -APPROVED FOR PAYMENT .................................... .../. ./. ••COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 11 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19587 FRANCIE PERKINS 26673 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1372 19588 MRS. LEE 26674 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1372 19589 JEANNIE CORY 26675 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1372 19590 JACKIE CHEUNG 26676 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 36330 000 1372 19591 WINNIE IP 26677 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1890 19592 KEVIN SCULLY 26678 107.00 MISCELLANEOUS 107.00 101 36330 000 1644 19593 ROBERT HUNTER AARONSON 26679 624.00 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 624.00 101 64350 210 19594 BARBARA AIGNER-NELSON 26680 30.00 MISCELLANEOUS 30.00 101 36330 000 1660 19595 MARY CARRASCO 26681 35.00 MISCELLANEOUS 35.00 101 36330 000 1660 TOTAL $555,690.51 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 10 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *. Denotes Hand Written Checks 19571 DEXTER ADEVA 26657 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 19572 BILL CORKERY 26658 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 19573 FAYE DAWDY 26659 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 19574 NEAL MARTIN & ASSOCIATES 26660 6,150.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,150.00 101 64400 210 19575 HELEN KAPRIELIAN 26661 71.00 MISCELLANEOUS 71.00 101 36330 000 1647 19576 GAYLE ANN BLAIR 26662 60.00 MISCELLANEOUS 60.00 101 36330 000 1647 19577 MR/MRS CAMPBELL 26663 81.00 MISCELLANEOUS 81.00 101 36330 000 1644 19578 MARY LOU CULLEN 26664 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1646 19579 SUZANNE MAHLSTEDT 26665 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1646 19580 DE ETTE JOHNSON 26666 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1644 19581 FRYE 26667 790.13 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 790.13 618 64520 210 19582 EDWARD SUPPLEE 26668 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 19583 NOB HILL PIZZA 26669 150.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 150.00 730 69533 120 19584 JEN SAMMUT 26670 42.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.00 101 68010 220 1787 19585 VALERIE MARCHANT 26671 900.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 900.00 730 69544 220 19586 JENNIFER COHN 26672 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1372 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19557 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 755.53 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.49 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 334.78 101 64400 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 11.50 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 20.54 101 65300 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 61.99 101 64420 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 200.64 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 114.59 526 69020 120 19558 CALIFORNIA POWER PARTNERS 26205 80,454.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80,454.60 327 81510 220 19559 GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL STRATEGIES 26417 8,031.48 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 8,031.48 320 80760 210 19560 PAUL J. STEFANI 26498 203.00 MISCELLANEOUS 203.00 101 36330 000 1372 19561 JENNIFER CALLAHAN 26565 45.00 MISCELLANEOUS 45.00 101 22593 19562 U.S.S.B. 26589 1,408.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,408.00 527 66520 400 19563 LAKE TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS 26590 674.40 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 674.40 101 66210 222 19564 NICHOLAS BUSTOS 26611 70.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70.00 101 68010 220 1787 19565 STERLING ENVIRONMENTAL CORP 26617 12,397.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,397.50 320 81600 220 19566 CAROL PICCOLOTTI 26652 170.00 MISCELLANEOUS 170.00 101 36330 000 1372 19567 MAURICIO MARTINEZ 26653 203.00 MISCELLANEOUS 203.00 101 36330 000 1372 19568 ANAS VELARDE 26654 140.00 MISCELLANEOUS 140.00 101 36330 000 1521 19569 ROXANNA NASRE 26655 129.00 MISCELLANEOUS 129.00 101 36330 000 1422 19570 MICHAEL MOLNAR 26656 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19541 MARK PEARCY 24833 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 36330 000 1646 19542 T MOBILE 24846 61 .84 COMMUNICATIONS 61 .84 101 65150 160 19543 ART IN ACTION 24912 1 ,040.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,040.00 101 68010 220 1646 19544 S AND S SUPPLIES & SOLUTIONS 24963 118.22 SMALL TOOLS 118.22 527 66520 130 19545 NORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL 25045 504.00 SUPPLIES 504.00 620 15000 19546 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 360.00 MISCELLANEOUS 360.00 530 31310 19547 OFFICE DEPOT 25224 374.96 OFFICE EXPENSE 364. 16 201 65200 110 MISCELLANEOUS 10.80 731 22557 19548 LORAL LANDSCAPING 25394 160.00 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 160.00 101 66210 190 19549 JENNIFER LABORDE 25419 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 19550 MILLIE CHAUSER 25543 65.00 MISCELLANEOUS 65.00 101 36330 000 1644 19551 CINGULAR WIRELESS-ATLYS 25730 87.94 COMMUNICATIONS 87.94 101 65100 160 19552 WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEASING 25820 153.22 RENTS & LEASES 153.22 526 69020 180 19553 TONY LEUNG 25821 4,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 41000.00 101 22546 19554 MARK HOSKING 25989 3,595 .00 MISCELLANEOUS 31595 .00 526 36730 19555 SUETT WONG 26035 16.00 MISCELLANEOUS 16.00 101 36330 000 1660 19556 IMPACT SCIENCES 26099 12,033.62 DEPOSIT REFUND 121033.62 101 22590 � � i CITY OF BURLINGAME • W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19528 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERN 23935 250.00 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 250.00 101 65100 292 . 19529 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 23941 13,559.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,176.00 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,807.00 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 874.00 619 64460 220 5190 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 958.00 619 64460 220 5210 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 145.00 619 64460 220 5230 CONTRACTUAL SERVCES 3,974.00 619 64460 220 5180 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 358.00 619 64460 220 5170 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 465.00 619 64460 220 5121 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,802.00 619 64460 220 5240 19530 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 23946 88.52 COMMUNICATIONS 88.52 101 65300 160 19531 SANCRA PENINSULA DIVISION 24190 200.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 200.00 101 68010 120 1787 19532 BAYSIDE PRINTED PRODUCTS 24192 1,017.70 OFFICE EXPENSE 1,017.70 101 64250 110 19533 JESUS NAVA 24204 655.82 MISCELLANEOUS 655.82 101 64250 031 19534 CINGULAR WIRELESS TITAN 24299 11.24 COMMUNICATIONS 11.24 101 64150 160 19535 C.W. ROEN CO. 24474 114,650.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114,650.00 327 79480 220 19536 BEACON FIRE&SAFETY 24535 495.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 495.00 619 64460 210 5120 19537 DIAMOND SECURITY SOLUTIONS 24659 495.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 120.00 619 64460 210 5120 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 375.00 619 64460 220 5130 19538 ARTON CHAU 24674 622.50 MISCELLANEOUS 1,245.00 101 22546 MISCELLANEOUS •622.50 101 31510 19539 JOSEPH BYRNE 24754 3,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000.00 101 22546 19540 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 24815 89.55 COMMUNICATIONS 89.55 201 65200 160 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R - PAGE 6 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19516 WILCO SUPPLY 23333 406.34 MISC. SUPPLIES 209.69 619 64460 120 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 196.65 619 64460 210 5180 19517 DATASAFE 23410 321.30 OFFICE EXPENSE 281.35 101 66100 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 39.95 101 64350 120 19518 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 23436 1,573.15 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 1,573.15 621 64450 200 19519 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS, INC. 23462 574.30 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 574.30 530 65400 200 19520 ERLER AND KALINOWSKI,INC. 23531 5,321.93 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,374.33 526 69020 220 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 947.60 526 69020 240 19521 LIEBERT GLOBAL SERVICES 23551 4,380.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 4,380.00 619 64460 210 5130 19522 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 23611 49.67 MISC. SUPPLIES 49.67 619 64460 120 5130 19523 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUT 23639 130.16 MISC. SUPPLIES 76.03 619 64460 120 5240 MISC. SUPPLIES 54.13 619 64460 120 5130 19524 INDUSTRIAL PLUMBING SUPPLY 23857 208.45 MISC. SUPPLIES 208.45 619 64460 120 5110 19525 DEWEY SERVICES, INC. 23902 5,930.00 RAT CONTROL PROGRAM 5,500.00 527 66520 218 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5170 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5160 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5110 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5150 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 55.00 619 64460 210 5130 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5180 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 70.00 619 64460 210 5120 19526 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 23905 1,311.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,279.00 101 23620 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 32.00 101 64420 210 19527 DUNBAR ARMORED 23925 2,634.29 BANKING SERVICE FEES 548.70 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,085.59 530 65400 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT *' Denotes Hand Written Checks 19502 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 21767 8,280.68 MISCELLANEOUS 81280.68 101 37010 19503 YAT-CHEONG AU 21906 4,709.00 MISCELLANEOUS 41709.00 101 22546 19504 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 17.20 SUPPLIES 17.20 620 15000 19505 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 911 .04 MISC. SUPPLIES 911 .04 526 69020 120 19506 YEV PHILOPOVITCH 22217 16,520.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 16,520.00 326 80770 210 19507 ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CON 22387 27,216.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,216.00 326 80950 220 19508 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERICA 22500 22,927.29 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,659.57 736 64572 220 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,267.72 736 64571 220 19509 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT 22529 170.83 MISC. SUPPLIES 170.83 101 68010 120 1891 19510 KRISTIN KELLY 22710 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1372 19511 SAN MATEO REGIONAL NETWORK, INC. 22759 435.00 UTILITY EXPENSE 435 .00 896 20281 19512 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 397.81 OFFICE EXPENSE 397.81 101 68010 110 1101 19513 TLC ADMINISTRATORS 23156 175.00 MISCELLANEOUS 175.00 101 64420 031 19514 EAST BAY TRUCK CENTER 23295 62.40 SUPPLIES 62.40 620 15000 19515 OFFICE MAX 23306 587. 12 OFFICE EXPENSE 84.57 101 68010 110 1101 OFFICE EXPENSE 26.41 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 234.55 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 241 .59 101 68010 120 1781 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Chetks 19490 ARROWHEAD MOUNTAIN SPRING WATER 19330 392.23 OFFICE EXPENSE 12.19 101 64200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.19 101 64350 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.19 101 64150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 12.18 101 64420 120- MISC. SUPPLIES 234.06 201 65200 111 - OFFICE EXPENSE 109.42 621 64450 110 19491 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. 19366 1,128.66 VEHICLE MAINT. 1,078.55 201 65200 202 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 50.11 201 65200 203 - 19492 PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 20060 1,785.63 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,785.63 736 64570 220 19493 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES 20501 600.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 600.00 327 75170 210 19494 BAYSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS INC. 20650 18.39 MISC. SUPPLIES 18.39 101 66210 120 19495 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR-042 21240 2,335.17 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 703.86 619 64460 220 5110 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 233.56 619 64460 220 5130 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,397.75 619 64460 220 5120 19496 FEHR AND PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC. 21289 620.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 310.00 101 22590 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 310.00 101 64400 210 19497 SPARTAN TOOL LLC 21329 489.98 MISC. SUPPLIES 489.98 527 66520 120 19498 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 179.89 OFFICE EXPENSE 179.89 201 65200 110 19499 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 2,250.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 2,100.00 101 64420 210 TRAINING EXPENSE 50.00 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 50.00 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 50.00 527 66520 260 19500 HILLYARD 21658 565.21 BLDG. &GROUNDS MAINT. 565.21 101 68020 190 2200 19501 MARIA FRANTZ 21759 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19478 CINTAS CORP. #464 16911 680.80 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 680.80 101 68020 140 2300 19479 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 17224 23.07 MISC. SUPPLIES 23.07 619 64460 120 5240 19480 JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. 17299 68,549.40 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 68,549.40 326 80770 220 19481 STANDARD REGISTER 17495 3,875.39 MISCELLANEOUS 3,875.39 621 64450 400 19482 COLORPRINT 17497 100.46 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 100.46 320 80790 210 19483 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGING 17534 1,106.75 SMALL TOOLS 1,106.75 101 66210 130 19484 TOOLS EXPRESS 18027 597.91 TRAINING EXPENSE 597.91 101 68020 260 2300 19485 ACCESS UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY 18990 2,331.35 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,947.70 101 64420 120 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 383.65 201 65200 140 19486 PREFERRED ALLIANCE 19025 211.20 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 211.20 101 64420 121 19487 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 19027 1,255.80 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 211.05 101 66210 140 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 227.59 201 65200 220 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 318.02 526 69020 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 211.02 527 66520 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 17.04 528 66600 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 75.88 619 64460 140 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 195.20 620 66700 140 19488 GOETZ BROTHERS 19045 162.37 MISC. SUPPLIES 162.37 101 68010 120 1781 19489 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 19095 82.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 82.00 101 64420 250 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19465 TAP PLASTICS 03739 63.71 MISC. SUPPLIES 63.71 619 64460 120 5141 19466 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC. 09112 631.44 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 294.61 101 68020 190 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 336.83 101 68010 190 1787 19467 SAFETY KLEEN CORP. 09168 271.81 RENTS & LEASES 271.81 101 68020 180 2200 19468 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 1,976.00 PRISONER EXPENSE 1,976.00 101 65100 291 19469 BURLINGAME PUBLIC LIBRARY 09490 962.18 MISCELLANEOUS 206.89 101 36320 OFFICE EXPENSE 278.61 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 17.26 101 67500 120 LIBRARY--RECORDS AND CASSETT 20.00 101 67500 125 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 97.97 101 67500 129 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 125.75 101 67500 190 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 123.98 101 67500 200 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 66.72 101 67500 250 LIBRARY EXPENSES 25.00 731 22531 19470 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING A 10101 491.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 491.00 201 65200 260 19471 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,502.16 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,502.16 625 65213 203 19472 RADIOSHACK CORPORATION 11749 25.95 POLICE INVESTIGATION EXPENSE 25.95 101 65100 292 19473 FOUNDATION FOR CROSS-CONNECTION 13961 357.48 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 357.48 526 69020 240 19474 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 14855 620.60 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 620.60 619 64460 210 5250 19475 TEAM CLEAN 15827 243.86 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 243.86 201 65200 220 19476 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 28.64 SUPPLIES 28.64 620 15000 19477 HILTON, FARNKOPF & HOBSON 16656 1,062.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,062.50 526 69020 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 06/22/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19451 GRAY'S PAINT, BURLINGAME 01025 253.17 MISC. SUPPLIES 180.14 619 64460 120 5170 MISC. SUPPLIES 40.58 619 64460 120 5250 MISC. SUPPLIES 32.45 619 64460 120 19452 ALAN STEEL & SUPPLY CO. 01059 65.27 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 21.65 201 65200 203 MISC. SUPPLIES 43.62 619 64460 120 5130 19453 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 36.90 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 36.90 625 65213 203 19454 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION 01726 183.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 183.00 101 68010 120 1101 19455 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 638.70 SUPPLIES 638.70 620 15000 19456 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 359.48 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 273.87 201 65200 140, FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 85.61 201 65200 203 19457 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 02174 62,971.00 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 62,971.00 326 80910 800- 19458 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 02248 535.51 SMALL TOOLS 113.31 201 65200 130 MISC. SUPPLIES 88.20 619 64460 120 5180 SMALL TOOLS 334.00 619 64460 130 19459 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 406.57 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 406.57 101 66210 226 19460 MEG MONROE 02936 365.05 MISCELLANEOUS 365.05 101 64250 031 19461 P. G. & E. 03054 47.17 GAS & ELECTRIC 47.17 530 65400 170 19462 AT&T 03080 145.55 COMMUNICATIONS 145.55 101 67500 160 19463 INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT. 03378 1,913.42 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,913.42 101 65150 220 19464 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03380 6,320.00 MISC. SUPPLIES 6,320.00 528 66600 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME 06-16-2006 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 13 FUND RECAP - 05-06 NAME FUND AMOUNT GENERAL FUND 101 71 ,268.65 PAYROLL REVOLVING FUND 130 2,834.35 CENTRAL COUNTY FIRE 201 8,833.88 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 320 6,225.00 WATER FUND 526 21 ,524.91 SEWER FUND 527 4,651 . 10 SOLID WASTE FUND 528 7,629.50 PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 530 20,200.63 SELF INSURANCE FUND 618 3,613.70 FACILITIES SERVICES FUND 619 481 .82 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND 620 2,200.80 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 621 35,746.27 FIRE MECHANIC SERVICES FUND 625 2,883.91 OTHER LOCAL GRANTS/DONATIONS 730 31305.73 TRUST AND AGENCY FUND 731 2,867.23 UTILITY REVOLVING FUND 896 254.55 TOTAL FOR APPROVAL $194, 22.03 �Z 3 Z Vv c1� I �gSJ HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE CLAIMS LISTED ON PAGES NUMBERED FROM 1 THROUGH 13 INCLUSIVE, AND/OR CLAIMS NUMBERED FROM 19279 THROUGH 19450 INCLUSIVE,TOTALING IN THE AMOUNT OF $194,522.03, HAVE BEEN CHECKED IN DETAIL AND APPROVED BY THE PROPER OFFICIALS, AND IN MY OPINION REPRESENT FAIR AND JUST CHARGES AGAINST THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNTS AS INDICATED THEREON. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE APPROVED FOR PAYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . ./. . . COUNCIL DATE CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REGI ST ER PAGE 12 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19435 CHEESE PLEASE 26635 458.00 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 458.00 101 64420 250 19436 COUNTRY WIDE SUPPLY 26636 135.98 SMALL TOOLS 135.98 201 65200 130 19437 KENNETH DAY 26637 300.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 300.00 101 22520 19438 WING SHUN YU 26638 210.00 MISCELLANEOUS 210.00 526 36730 19439 UNITED COMFORT SOLUTIONS INC 26639 405.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 405.00 619 64460 210 5240 19440 APPLIED MICROFILM SYSTEMS 26640 31.78 MISC. SUPPLIES 31.78 101 65300 120 19441 SAN MATEO COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEM 26641 12,436.25 MISCELLANEOUS 12,436.25 101 22546 19442 LITITIA LII 26642 166.00 MISCELLANEOUS 166.00 101 36330 000 1890 19443 MUSARRAD KAZI 26643 278.00 MISCELLANEOUS 278.00 101 36330 000 1330 19444 KARLYN SCHNEIDER 26644 37.00 MISCELLANEOUS 37.00 101 36330 000 1660 19445 JEAN DURKEE 26645 39.00 MISCELLANEOUS 39.00 101 36330 000 1660 19446 GLORIA DELAO 26647 31.00 MISCELLANEOUS 31.00 101 36330 000 1890 19447 NICOLE LIONETTI 26648 75.00 MISCELLANEOUS 75.00 101 22593 19448 ALANNAH CHASE 26649 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 19449 MARIETTE VANHOOIDONK 26650 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 19450 ROBERT BRAND 26651 141.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.00 101 22593 MISCELLANEOUS 41.00 101 36330 000 1213 'n TOTAL 8194,522.03 O" �1��� CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG 1 ST ER PAGE 11 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19420 RONALD SIDDONS 26064 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS 90.00 101 36330 000 1644 19421 GRAPHICS ON THE EDGE 26096 1,227.70 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,227.70 201 65200 203 19422 ALLIED OFFICE SUPPLIES 26138 177.72 OFFICE EXPENSE 4.61 101 64350 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 99.50 101 64250 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 37.04 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 36.57 621 64450 110 19423 LANCE BAYER 26156 712.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 712.50 101 64350 210 19424 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26161 44.50 COMMUNICATIONS 44.50 530 65400 160 19425 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26338 54.69 UTILITY EXPENSE 54.69 896 20281 19426 CINGULAR WIRELESS 26373 70.36 COMMUNICATIONS 70.36 101 65100 160 19427 ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 26380 - 18,507.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 18,507.00 530 65400 210 19428 R.A. METAL PRODUCTS, INC 26527 2,257.01 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,257.01 526 69020 120 19429 CALPICO INC 26556 62.79 MISC. SUPPLIES 62.79 526 69020 120 19430 MARY MINDER14AN 26559 108.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 108.00 130 20015 19431 CAROLINA GUEVARA 26631 204.00 MISCELLANEOUS 136.00 101 36330 000 1784 MISCELLANEOUS 68.00 101 36330 000 1370 19432 RONELA HUSKINS 26632 29.00 MISCELLANEOUS 29.00 101 36330 000 1891 19433 SFPUC WATER DEPARTMENT 26633 1,231.14 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1,231.14 526 69020 290 19434 MR,MRS SROAT 26634 2,250.00 MISCELLANEOUS 2,250.00 101 22546 CITY OF BURLINGAME WARRANT REG I ST ER PAGE 10 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19404 BRAYER CONSTRUCTION 24981 480.00 DEPOSIT REFUNDS 480.00 101 22520 19405 DOWNTOWN BURLINGAME IMPROVEMENT 25058 580.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 580.02 530 65400 220 19406 BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL INC. 25185 450.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 450.00 201 65200 260 19407 BAY CITIES DRIVING SCHOOL 25220 76.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.50 101 68010 220 1422 19408 MICHAEL VONADA 25235 100.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060 19409 RICK VELEZ 25265 212.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 212.00 130 20015 19410 THOMSON-WEST/BARCLAYS 25423 86.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 86.00 101 64400 240 19411 SIR SPEEDY 25441 350.28 MISC. SUPPLIES 350.28 101 65300 120 19412 OFFICE DEPOT 25488 63.18 MISC. SUPPLIES 63.18 201 65200 120 19413 ANNIE KISHIYAMA 25700 50.00 MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 101 22593 19414 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 25729 82.85 TRAINING EXPENSE 82.85 101 68020 260 2300 19415 LYNDA POULTON 25772 327.50 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 327.50 130 20060 19416 ED BARTON 25850 100.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 100.00 130 20060 19417 KATHLEEN KANE 25889 96.00 MISCELLANEOUS 96.00 101 36330 000 1644 19418 SUETT WONG 26035 55.00 MISCELLANEOUS 55.00 101 36330 000 1660 19419 EDMOND'S PLAZA FLORIST 26041 170.49 MISC. SUPPLIES 170.49 101 65100 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 9 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19399 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES 24752, 12,242.63 OFFICE EXPENSE 43.80 101 64100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 20.47 101 67500 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 27.00 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 157.63 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 189.03 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 307.78 101 65100 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 252.99 101 64420 120 MISC. SUPPLIES -8.50 101 64150 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 563.91 101 67500 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 136.36 101 68010 120 1891 MISC. SUPPLIES 7.96 101 68010 120 1520 MISC. SUPPLIES 217.55 101 68010 120 1890 PERSONNEL EXAMINATIONS 47.00 101 64420 121 LIBRARY--BOOKS AND MAPS 446.42 101 67500 129 SMALL TOOLS 211.95 101 65300 130. EQUIPMENT MAINT. 76.77 101 68020 200 2200 MISCELLANEOUS 740.42 101 67500 235 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 143.94 101 64150 250 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 209.59 101 64250 250 TRAINING EXPENSE 64.84 101 67500 260 MISCELLANEOUS 2,412.14 101 68010 400 1890 OFFICE EXPENSE 63.40 201 65200 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 428.09 201 65200 111 MISC. SUPPLIES 48.52 201 65200 120 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 564.67 201 65200 190 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 48.06 201 65200 203 - DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 229.90 201 65200 240 TRAINING EXPENSE 337.68 201 65200 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 462.00 201 65500 260 MISC. SUPPLIES 275.95 526 69020 120 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 465.91 620 66700 250 MISC. SUPPLIES 198.48 730 69533 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 241.44 730 69583 120 MISCELLANEOUS 460.45 731 22557 MISCELLANEOUS 2,149.03 731 22554 19400 GAIRD SCHLESINGER 24771 3,500.00 MISCELLANEOUS 3,500.00 101 22546 19401 SHIRLEY LADDY 24826 365.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 365.00 130 20060 19402 TOM DONNELLY 24830 685.29 TRAINING EXPENSE 685.29 201 65200 260 19403 LAURA MARSH 24964 1,032.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,032.00 101 68010 220 1646 CITY OF BURLINGAME • W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 8 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19389 SBC/MCI 23728 35.55 COMMUNICATIONS 35.55 621 64450 160 19390 SFPUC WATER QUALITY BUREAU 23846 1,540.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1,540.00 526 69020 233 19391 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 23950 168.30 SUPPLIES 168.30 620 15000 19392 FLORA ROBELET 24167 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00 101 68010 220 1521 19393 ERIC GATTMAN 24169 605.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 605.60 101 68010 220 1521 19394 KUMUDINI MURTHY 24210 1,026.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,026.00 101 68010 220 1644 19395 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 24249 810.00 MISCELLANEOUS 810.00 526 69020 233 19396 ALERT-ALL 24392 375.38 MISC. SUPPLIES 375.38 201 65200 120 19397 C&N TRACTORS 24468 44.29 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 44.29 101 68020 200 2200 19398 O'NEIL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT INC. 24675 733.86 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 733.86 530 65400 200 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 7 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19375 ROBERTS AND BRUNE 22178 991 .65 MISC. SUPPLIES 991 .65 526 69020 120 19376 BUSINESS 2000 INC 22326 6,225.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 6,225.00 320 81120 210 19377 NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT 22382 1 ,600.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 ,600.00 101 68010 220 1785 19378 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 22620 765.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 765 .00 101 64420 250 19379 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 22804 159.38 MISCELLANEOUS 159.38 526 69020 233 19380 PENINSULA UNIFORM & EQUIPMENT 22899 335.25 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 335.25 530 65400 140 19381 PALO ALTO DAILY NEWS 22964 200.00 OFFICE EXPENSE 200.00 101 66100 110 19382 BONDLOGISTIX 23088 2,250.00 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 1 , 125.00 526 69020 764 OTHER DEBT EXPENSES 1 , 125.00 527 66520 764 19383 OFFICE DEPOT 23153 86.59 MISCELLANEOUS 86.59 101 68010 400 1111 19384 BOB MALLAMO 23173 557.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 557.00 130 20015 19385 DATASAFE 23410 1 ,061 .39 OFFICE EXPENSE 2.00 101 64150 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 351 .50 101 66100 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 93.40 101 64200 110 OFFICE EXPENSE 65.00 101 64420 110 MISC. SUPPLIES 46.00 101 64400 120 BANKING SERVICE FEES 288.00 101 64250 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 215.49 101 64350 120 19386 RECALL- TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT 23411 105 .00 MISCELLANEOUS 105.00 101 22518 19387 CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS 23470 74.70 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 74.70 101 66210 226 19388 THE MARLIN COMPANY 23712 13.54 TRAINING EXPENSE 13.54 527 66520 260 I i CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 6 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19360 ANG NEWSPAPERS 19083 615.33 PUBLICATIONS&ADVERTISING 615.33 101 64200 150 19361 CLIFF WHITE 19208 1,000.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 730 69544 220 19362 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 19679 197.29 MISC. SUPPLIES 197.29 201 65200 120 19363 CREATIVE INTERCONNECT 19768 228.36 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.36 201 65200 220 19364 LARRY ANDERSON 20716 437.81 MISCELLANEOUS 437.81 101 64420 031 19365 SPRINT PCS 20724 257.75 MISCELLANEOUS 257.75 731 22554 19366 AARONSON, DICKERSON, COHN& 20798 1,150.00 PROFESSIONAL&SPECIALIZED S 750.00 101 64350 210 TRAVEL&MEETINGS 400.00 101 64420 250 19367 H.V. CARTER CO., INC. 20876 92.68 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 92.68 101 68020 200 2200 19368 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 21482 370.45 MISCELLANEOUS 370.45 101 64420 400 19369 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY INC. 21543 31.93 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 31.93 625 65213 203 19370 DU-ALL SAFETY 21613 7,305.50 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,435.17 101 66210 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,435.16 526 69020 260 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,435.17 527 66520 260 19371 LINGULAR WIRELESS 21747 102.07 COMMUNICATIONS 102.07 101 65300 160 19372 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 21765 100.90 MISC. SUPPLIES 100.90 526 69020 120 19373 IEDA 21981 2,426.32 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,426.32 101 64420 240 19374 TOWNE FORD SALES, INC. 22146 71.11 SUPPLIES 71.11 620 15000 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19347 VALLEY OIL CO. 15764 1,674.68 GAS, OIL & GREASE 1,674.68 201 65200 201 19348 LOS ALTOS TYPEWRITER 15853 16.23 OFFICE EXPENSE 16.23 101 65100 110 19349 ACTION SPORTS 16167 1,904.39 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,904.39 101 68010 120 1787 19350 MOSS RUBBER & EQUIPMENT CORP. 16225 2,781.74 MISC. SUPPLIES 2,766.39 526 69020 120 SUPPLIES 15.35 620 15000 19351 SYDNEY MALK00 16347 63.86 SMALL TOOLS 63.86 620 66700 130 19352 CALIFORNIA PNEUMATIC TOOL CO 17741 99.90 MISC. SUPPLIES 99.90 526 69020 120 19353 TOOLS EXPRESS 18027 432.10 TRAINING EXPENSE 432.10 101 68020 260 2200 19354 BAAMA 18269 25.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 25.00 101 66100 240 19355 KLEINFELDER, INC 18684 7,512.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 7,512.50 528 66600 210 19356 LYNNE FIRESTONE 18746 214.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 214.50 101 68010 220 1331 19357 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVI 18763 63.68 COMMUNICATIONS 21.22 101 66210 160 COMMUNICATIONS 21.23 526 69020 160 COMMUNICATIONS 21.23 527 66520 160 19358 DEAN'S AUTO BODY & 18795 1,833.70 MISCELLANEOUS 1,833.70 618 64520 604 19359 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN. 18951 1,665.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,550.00 526 69020 240 TRAINING EXPENSE 115.00 526 69020 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME ' • W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 4 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT 0.1 Denotes Hand Written Checks 19333 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFC. 09433 581.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 581.00 101 65100 220 19334 ABAG • LIABILITY 09518 1,780.00 CLAIMS PAYMENTS 1,780.00 618 64520 601 19335 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 09670 17.06 OFFICE EXPENSE 12.75 101 65100 110 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 4.31 201 65200 190 19336 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC 09790 7,400.35 TRAFFIC CONTROL MATERIALS 4,614.05 101 66210 222 MISC. SUPPLIES 140.29 526 69020 120 TRAINING EXPENSE 2,043.22 526 69020 260 MISC. SUPPLIES 602.79 527 66520 120 19337 AUGUST SUPPLY, INC 10256 1,025.50 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,025.50 201 65200 111 19338 CAL•STEAM 10557 - 462.96 MISC. SUPPLIES 308.48 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 77.66 527 66520 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 24.36 619 64460 120 5110 MISC. SUPPLIES 52.46 619 64460 120 5240 19339 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER 11101 472.50 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 472.50 101 64350 210 19340 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS 11316 1,655.85 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 1,655.85 625 65213 203 19341 MVP REPAIR SERVICE CO. 11739 1,442.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 1,442.00 526 69020 210 19342 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 13689 528.74 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 528.74 625 65200 203 19343 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHINES 14252 276.25 OFFICE EXPENSE 276.25 101 68010 110 1101 19344 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT 15595 3,435.47 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,435.47 101 65100 220 19345 PENINSULA SPORTS OFFICIALS 15711 1,942.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,942.00 101 68010 220 1787 19346 MILLBRAE LOCK SHOP 15739 4,28 MISC. SUPPLIES 4.28 526 69020 120 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19327 BURLINGAME REC. DEPT./PETTY CASH 03910 7,087.30 MISCELLANEOUS 65.00 101 36330 000 1521 MISCELLANEOUS 21.75 101 36330 000 1782 OFFICE EXPENSE 35.69 101 68010 110 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 180.24 101 68010 120 1330 MISC. SUPPLIES 60.40 101 68010 120 1101 MISC. SUPPLIES 41.17 101 68010 120 1520 MISC. SUPPLIES 494.31 101 68010 120 1521 MISC. SUPPLIES 27.92 101 68010 120 1891 MISC. SUPPLIES 318.05 101 68010 120 1646 MISC. SUPPLIES- 108.24 101 68010 120 1950 UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT 487.09 101 68020 140 2200 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 8.00 101 68020 200 2200 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.00 101 68010 220 1660 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 168.00 101 68010 220 1641 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00 101 68010 220 1648 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 410.00 101 68010 220 1349 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 341.00 101 68010 220 1331 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 802.00 101 68010 220 1644 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 210.00 101 68010 220 1645 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 540.00 101 68010 220 1422 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21.00 101 68010 220 1660 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.00 101 68010 220 1646 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 130.00 101 68010 240 1101 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS 430.00 101 68020 240 2300 TRAVEL 8 MEETINGS 155.00 101 68020 250 2100 TRAINING EXPENSE 37.87 101 68020 260 2200 TRAINING EXPENSE 135.00 101 68010 260 1100 MISCELLANEOUS 342.07 101 68010 400 1114 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,284.50 730 69583 120 19328 MUFFLE CALBREATH 09125 1,759.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,759.50 101 68010 220 1891 19329 LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS 09143 551.22 MISC. SUPPLIES 368.05 101 68020 120 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 183.17 101 66210 219 19330 FRANK ERBACHER 09195 297.00 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 297.00 130 20015 19331 RD OFFICE SOLUTIONS 09213 38.43 OFFICE EXPENSE 38.43 527 66520 110 19332 CITY OF MILLBRAE 09234 3,152.82 PROFESSIONAL 8 SPECIALIZED S 3,152.82 101 64350 210 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19321 AT&T 03080 199.86 UTILITY EXPENSE 199.86 896 20281 19322 PATTERSON PARTS, INC 03106 852.73 - SUPPLIES 421.29 620 15000 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 431.44 625 65213 203 19323 PERSONAL AWARDS, INC. 03145 948.27 MISC. SUPPLIES 948.27 101 68010 120 1787 19324 TESTAMERICA SEQUOIA ANALYTICAL 03536 117.00 PROFESSIONAL & SPECIALIZED S 117.00 528 66600 210 19325 FRANK TEALDI 03743 767.85 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 767.85 130 20060 19326 WITMER-TYSON IMPORTS, INC. 03788 350.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 350.00 101 65100 260 CITY OF BURLINGAME W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 06/16/06 NUMBER NAME VENDOR DETAIL ACCOUNT AMOUNT Denotes Hand Written Checks 19279 * ACCURATE MAILINGS, INC 17623 1,720.41 MISCELLANEOUS 1,720.41 526 69020 233 19309 BAYSHORE INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 01236 235.95 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 235.95 625 65213 203 19310 BURLINGAME STATIONERS 01676 47.09 OFFICE EXPENSE 47.09 101 68010 110 1101 19311 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 01857 685.92 SUPPLIES 685.92 620 15000 19312 CITY OF REDWOOD CITY 01862 34,797.32 COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 621 64450 160 CITY HALL MAINTENANCE 34,497.32 621 64450 220 19313 POLETTI ASSOCIATES INC. 01992 876.83 OFFICE EXPENSE 362.64 621 64450 110 MISCELLANEOUS 514.19 621 64450 400 19314 L. N. CURTIS & SONS 02027 33.71 FIRE APPARATUS MAINT. 33.71 201 65200 203 19315 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 02157 616.91 MISCELLANEOUS 616.91 101 68020 192 2200 19316 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 02261 693.49 STREET RESURFACING EXPENSE 693.49 101 66210 226 19317 PENINSULA BATTERIES - 02625 358.75 EQUIPMENT MAINT. 49.69 101 68020 200 2200 SUPPLIES 309.06 620 15000 19318 MILLBRAE LUMBER CO. 02898 704.57 MISC. SUPPLIES 28.98 101 66210 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 9.96 101 68020 120 2200 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 41.55 101 68020 190 2200 SIDEWALK REPAIR EXPENSE 182.30 101 66210 219 MISC. SUPPLIES 114.73 526 69020 120 MISC. SUPPLIES 327.05 527 66520 120 19319 PACIFIC NURSERIES 03041 1,131.49 BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT. 550.18 201 65200 190 MISC. SUPPLIES 581.31 730 69560 120 2300 19320 P. G. & E. 03054 10.23 GAS & ELECTRIC 10.23 527 66520 170 BURLiNOAME Board of Trustees Minutes May 16, 2006 i I. Call to Order President McCormack called the meeting to order at 5:30pm. IL Roll can Trustees Present: Nancy Brock,Bruce Carlton,Deborah Griffith,Katie McCormack, Pat Toft Staff Present: Al Escoffier,City Librarian Sidney Poland,Recorder III. Warrants and Special Funds The Trustees approved the warrants dated May 15,2006. M/S/C (McCormack/Toft) IV. Minutes The Trustees approved as written the minutes of the April 18,2006 meeting. M/S/C(Carlton/Griffith) V. Correspondence and Attachments A. Trustees and Revolving Quarterly Reports-The reports show balances of$13,633.08 for the Revolving Account and $91,651.80 for the Trustees. Many of the individual accounts in the Trustees Special Fund are private or memorial donations designated for specific needs of the Library such as children's books. B. Peninsula Community Foundation-The Peninsula Community Foundation and the Community Foundation Silicon Valley are exploring opportunities of merging their resources in order to provide an expanded level of service for their donors. Presently, daily operations and grant making practices will remain the same. VI. From the Floor No one from the public attended the meeting. VII. Reports A. City Librarian's Report-Highlights of Report 1. Library Budget-The total budget,increase will be 4.1%. Increases will be in the following areas: 3%for employee salaries and benefits,2 additional public service hours,$33K in funding for materials and 18%in costs for the Peninsula Library Automated Network. The final Council budget session is May 31st,6:00pm in the Lane Room. 48o Primrose Road•Burligarvie•California 94010-4083 Phone(650)558-7474'Fax(650)342-6295•www.burlingame.org/library 2. Personnel Issues - Recruitment for the vacant full time librarian position is scheduled for June with the final selection being made in July. With an increased page staff, the Circulation Department has been able to finish the backlog in book shelving,and is now in the process of shifting the collection. s 3. City Emergency Plan - The City is in the process of developing an emergency evacuation plan for each individual building. The Library's evacuation plan has been in existence since 1997 and will be updated and reviewed by the Safety Committee. B. Foundation. Report President Hamilton presented the strategic plan draft which was developed by those members who attended the meeting on April 29th. A key feature of the plan is to provide a steady flow of revenue for specific needs ,of the Library that are not funded through the City budget. The Board is in the process of preparing to host a soiree in September and invite the Library Trustees. C. Centennial Report Present plans for the Centennial celebration are to focus on 4 major events which will include a series of smaller events. The Trustees received a current schedule of events. Both the Library and the Foundation plan to tie their programs and fund raising events to the Centennial. VIII. Unfinished Business - Library Budget - Budget issues were previously discussed during the City Librarian's report. IX. New Business - Review of 2 Options for Scheduling 2 Additional Service Hours Allocated to the Library by the City Council A. Options - The Trustees reviewed the pros and cons for "Option I" which would extend Friday hours from 5PM to 7PM and "Option II" which would extend Friday and Saturday hours from 5PM to 6PM. B. Conclusion - The, Trustees unanimously approved the motion of Trustee Griffith to support "Option I". MIS/C (Griffith/McCormack) Library Board of Trustee Minutes 2 May 16, 2006 X. Announcements A. Trustee McCormack advised the Trustees of two events they may wish to attend and recommended that new Trustees attend the PLS Orientation Program. 1. Orientation Program- PLS will hold an orientation program for new staff on September 19, 2006 at the PLS building located at 2471 Flores Street, San Mateo. 2. BALIS, Silicon Valley Library System - A breakfast will be held by these entities on October 21, 2006 to inform attendees what bay area libraries are doing. B. Volunteer Tea- Trustees Griffith, Carlton and Brock will attend the volunteer tea on May 18th which the staff gives to acknowledge the important contributions of the Library volunteers. C. Summer Meeting Schedule - Nancy Brock will be on vacation for the June 20th meeting; Trustees Carlton, Griffith, McCormack and Toft will be in attendance. All Trustees will be in attendance for the July 18th and August 15th meetings. XI. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:00pm. The next meeting will be held June 20, 2006 in the Conference Room at 5:30pm. M/S/C (Toft/Carlton) Respectfully Submitted, I44 of Alfred H. Escoffier City Librarian Library Board of Trustee Minutes 3 May 16,2006 MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission Thursday, June 15, 2006 The regular meeting of the Burlingame Parks & Recreation Commission was called to order by Chairman Heathcote at 7:00 pm at Burlingame City Hall, 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Dittman, Heathcote, Hesselgren, Larios, Muller, Shanus Commissioners Absent: Schreurs Staff Present: Randy Schwartz, Parks & Recreation Director; Joleen Butler, Account Clerk III. Others Present: None MINUTES The minutes of the May 18, 2006 regular Commission meeting were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENTS None OLD BUSINESS Capital Improvement Projects Director Schwartz reported that a contract was awarded for the snack shack/restroom project at Bayside Park. A volunteer from the Boys Youth Baseball Association will run the food booth. The facility will be turned at an angle to better watch games while waiting in line. The Bayside lighting project has been completed. There are now path lights from diamond 1 to diamond 2. The scoreboard project will begin next week. The scoreboard from the Electrical Union will be installed at Washington Park and the Washington Park scoreboard will be moved to Bayside #1 . Improvements to the park pathways at Washington and Bayside Parks behind diamond 3 project will be open to bid on June 16, 2006. Commissioner Mueller asked where in Washington Park the pathways would be resurfaced. Schwartz reported that the paths to be resurfaced are near the rose garden at the rear of the park. The vendor is to repair playground surface area at Murray field in the next day or two. Parks&Recreation Commission June 15,2006 Minutes—page 2 Bond Measure - The City Council, at their next meeting, will decide whether to place a general obligation bond on the November 2006 ballot. The two items the council will need to decide are the average cost per parcel and the allocation of the funds. The City has identified $110 million in capital needs for the storm drain system and city buildings in the 2003 facility master plan. In a phone survey conducted last March, three items that polled well, were flood control, emergency preparedness and a new recreation center. Options for a new recreation center include, building at the existing site, at the tennis court site or across the street from the tennis courts outside of the park. The Council will need to introduce the measure at this meeting and will need to finalize the measure by July 19 in order to get this item on the November ballot. Several commissioners said that they would not support a storm drain bond measure as they felt that a new recreation center would benefit more people and asked what staff plan was to support a new recreation center. Schwartz explained how the City could fund a new recreation center using certificates of participation with the funds no longer needed to improve the storm drains on an annual basis. The commissioners (1) expressed concerns over the existing recreation center such as the un-reinforced auditorium, the lack of program space for athletic groups, teens and seniors, (2) the poll and the results produced, (3) the need to put the majority of the bond money into the storm drain system and(4)the need for a safe facility for our youth to go to after school. Chairman Heathcote read a letter from the Senior Citizens Organization of Burlingame supporting a new recreation center (see attached). Heathcote stated that the organization is willing to donate $250,000 for a center. Commissioner Larios asked when the council would be conducting its annual joint meeting with the commission and asked if the Mayor is still conducting quarterly meetings with the various commission chairpersons. Staff stated that these meetings are not on the current schedule. Larios made a motion that "The City Council consider funding an appropriate and significant amount of the upcoming bond measure for a new recreation center. " Commissioner Hesselgren seconded the motion which passed unanimously. Hesselgren stated the importance of Commission support at the upcoming Council meeting. BHS Field Schwartz drafted an agreement between the City and the SMUHSD. The agreement is being reviewed by the District and will be brought to the City Council for approval in July. Agreements with the non-profit groups that are pledging funds will be brought to Council at the same time. There will be no lights place on the new field and the maintenance responsibility will remain with the District. Parks for the Future Schwartz stated that the 1/8th cent sales tax proposal is going to the voters of San Mateo County in November. The items, which will bring $300,000 new tax dollars to Burlingame for Parks & Recreation use,will be reviewed by the City Council at a future meeting. Parks&Recreation Commission June 15,2006 Minutes—page 3 Senior Resource Handbook Commissioner Dittman reported that 9-10 high school students helped her update the Senior Resources Handbook. New suggested sections include identity theft and elder care. NEW BUSINESS July Vacation Schedule Due to vacation schedules, Commissioner Hesselgren made a motion to not hold a commission meeting in July. Commissioner Dittman seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. REPORTS/HAND-OUTS Staff In addition to the Parks & Recreation Department Monthly and Revenue Reports (see attached), Schwartz reported that (1) FEMA will be re-imbursing the City for some of the damage to Mills Canyon during the recent storms, (2) No parking signs were installed a Bayside Park where Commissioner Shanus had mentioned the illegal Barking on the tan bark areas and (3) and Movies in the Park will held on July 29t', August 12 and September 9t'. Commissioners 1. Commissioner Larios asked what had been done about the smoking near J Lot playground. Schwartz reported that the benches on which the smoking has been taking place are farther than 20 ft from the playground, which is the distance required by state law. 2. Commissioner Muller reported that someone had voiced a concern to her regarding there having been too many dogs at Art in the Park, despite the suggested signs posted to dissuade the public from bringing their dogs to the event. Muller also stated that she has noticed dogs running free on Bayside outfields after the women's softball leagues. Muller inquired as to how Art in the Park did financially this year. She noticed several commercial booths that did not contribute to small art event feel. Commissioner Larios asked for a financial report of Art in the Park. Schwartz stated that there will be several changes to Art in the Park in the next couple of years with the celebration of the City's centennial and suggested that this item be placed on the next commission agenda. 3. Commissioner Hesselgren said that a citizen had mentioned that the mid-day lap swim hours for the pool keep changing. She would like to see a consistent schedule that swimmers can count on for their own scheduling purposes. She also wanted to suggest trying a punch card type of system for swim passes instead of individual swim tickets as they get lost, wet, etc. Staff will investigate both items and report back to the commission. (Noon lap swim hours are changed due to BHS Physical Education classes during the spring and fall sessions) Parks&Recreation Commission June 15,2006 Minutes—page 4 NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday, August 17, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. at Burlingame City Hall. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:15pm. Respectfully submitted, '/ cu� Joleen Butler Parks &Recreation Account Clerk III City of Burlingame - Parks & Recreation De t. 850 Burlingame Ave., Burlingame, CA 94010 BURLINC aAME phone: (650) 558-7300 - fax: (650) 696-7216 recreationgburlingame.org �e Date: June 15, 2006 To: Parks &Recreation Commissioners City Council From: Randy Schwartz (� Re: Monthly Report Parks Division 1. Opening of Small Dog Area at Bayside Park 2. Landscaping work completed at the California Drive Fire Station 3. Two additional picnic tables were installed in Washington Park 4. Washington Park was prepared for Art in the Park 5. Spring tree planting(67 trees) was completed 6. Fields were prepared for upcoming BYBA and BGS tournaments Recreation Division Preschool 1. Playschool Villagers and After Lunch Bunch visited the Burlingame Public Library for a field trip 2. Playschool Villagers graduation was held on Friday,June 9, with 26 kids graduating. Youth Programs 3. Spring Vacation Camps in Aril had over 40 kids participate 4. Summer camp starts June 19 Adult Programs 5. Burlingame/Millbrae Golf Tournament was held at Green Hills Country Club in Millbrae 6. Summer Adult Basketball leagues start June 26th 7. Adult Volleyball classes and Women's soccer is underway Senior Citizens Programs 8. Bridge Tournament was full with 40 seniors playing 9. Thunder Valley Casino trip was full with 47 seniors 10. Carmel/17 mile drive trip was full with 20 seniors 11. Hosted CHP/San Mateo County special driving event as part of the Senior Mobility issue Upcoming Events 1. Art in the Park: June 10 & 11 2. Music in the Park Concerts: July 2, 9, 16, 23, 30 3. 1"time Co-ed 4's Volleyball tournament: August CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA June 26, 2006 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Brownrigg called the June 26, 2006, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Cauchi, Deal, Osterling, Terrones and Vistica Absent: Commissioners: None Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Planner, Ruben Hurin. III. MINUTES The minutes of the June 12, 2006 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were approved with the following corrections: Page 1 item 1 at the end of line 5 add(italics)Commissioners noted that a beauty shop or nail salon with five stations could generate more parking demand than the proposed retail space with 75SF of instructional area because of the short stay of retail customers and the small size and off hours emphasis of the instructional activity. Page 4 at end of last paragraph of Commissioners comments: "C. Deal noted that while he had voted for this item previously, he would oppose the present application because the conditions do not include a sunset clause;" C.Deal moved to approve the minutes as amended. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 with C.Osterling abstaining because he did not attend the June 12, 2006 meeting. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CP Monroe noted that Bill Lee of Economic Research Associates was present tonight to discuss the conclusions of the Downtown Economic Study with the Commission. She asked if the presentation could be added to the agenda before From the Floor so members of the audience could comment on the conclusions if they wished. The commission agreed to the amendment. V. PRESENTATION William Lee of Economic Research Associates presented a summary of the Downtown Economic Study which was prepared as a precursor to the preparation of a downtown specific plan and included an analysis of the potential for mixed use on the Safeway site at Howard and El Camino. As it turns out the economic study will also provide valuable background for the Downtown Design Charrette to be held at the end of September on Howard Avenue. After a Power Point presentation of the high points and conclusions of the study the Commissioners asked questions: noting the age of the respondents to the residential survey;that the schematic shown for the mixed use on the Safeway site was only one of a number of schematic designs which could work on the site; asked how the cost of relocation of the box culvert was determined, Mr. Lee noted that Public Works based it on the cost of a �.- recent project at another location and they inflated the price to be sure that the actual cost would be 'in the ball park'; explored the details of why the Auto City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 Row area was not appropriate for housing and how the new Auto Row on Adrian Road might develop, Mr. Lee noted that the environment of the current auto row is not supportive of residential development,there is a high --� potential for expensive hazardous clean up with the change in use, and the auto dealers are benefiting from low land and improvement costs and an established location which is regionally accessible and convenient to mass transit for service,and finally auto row is a major contributor to Burlingame's sales tax revenue advantage in the county. Wanted to know why promoting expensive condominiums in the mixed use, Mr. Lee noted that the service costs to the community are the same for housing at all values but the tax revenue for dwellings which sell for more are substantially greater, and the market is there for the higher cost units; the need and benefit for the downtown to be attractive to outsiders was discussed,and it was noted,is as important as bringing more residents into the downtown area to increase the market size, Mr. Lee noted that there was sufficient capacity to add residential uses on Howard to absorb the near term (10 year) housing demand. Mr. Lee noted that current retail challenge is that the large scale national tenants with broader attraction can force out the small scale tenants who give the downtown its character;mixed use is an advantage since these retail spaces are small, attractive to the smaller retailer, and the housing, at the proposed price, can support below grade parking allowing the retail to share the public parking so more than one retail visit can be made without moving the car. This item concluded at 7:45 p.m. VI. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. VII. STUDY ITEMS Chair Brownrigg confirmed with all the commissioners that they had visited all the sites with projects on tonight's agenda. 1. 1601 HOWARD AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (MARGARET JENSEN,APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;PETER SANG,DESIGNER)PROJECT PLANNER KRISTINA WOERNER Plr Hurin presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioners asked: ■ concerned that the proposed addition doesn't comply with front setback requirements, could reconfigure the kitchen or other space to make the addition comply; ■ the existing masonry wall along Crescent Avenue extends into the public right-of-way, can staff confirm if an encroachment permit was issued; ■ the existing fagade along Howard Avenue has character,why are the shutters and other details being removed? Suggestion retaining the existing shutters and other architectural details throughout; ■ have a large front yard with nice landscaping,apple tree may be negatively affected by the proposed addition,need to consider this more closely,show proximity of apple tree to proposed addition more accurately; 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 ■ clarify purpose of new stucco molding along the roof edge,not appropriate for aesthetic reasons,but may o.k. if it is for water proofing; ■ slope of the roof at the addition may be too flat for the tile roof, confirm that slope is adequate; �- ■ encourage use of wood or aluminum wood clad windows throughout the house,note on plans; ■ house clearly reads as if front is on Howard Avenue, can staff provide a setback analysis with Howard Avenue as the front of the lot; ■ concerned with 6'tall masonry wall along Crescent Avenue,can staff provide fence regulations for this lot; and ■ want to be clear that comments regarding stucco mold, affect on apple tree and suggestions for windows do not affect my review of variance request. This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 7:55 p.m. 2. 1315 SANCHEZ AVENUE,ZONED R-2—APPLICATION FOR LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A FIRST FLOOR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (JOHN SCHLENKE, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; ELISEY SOKOLIK, PROPERTY OWNER) PROJECT PLANNER: KRISTINA WOERNER Plr Hurin presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioner noted that he met with the property owner on site to review location of the addition at the rear of the house. Commissioners asked: ■ this is a small lot but more FAR is allowed on smaller lots, in addition an incentive is offered for detached garages, so lot size is not a hardship; ■ why can't the bedroom be added on the second floor,would eliminate the variance request; and ■ applicant needs to provide more justification for the lot coverage variance,what are the hardships on this property? This item was set for the regular action calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:00 p.m. 3. 1820 OGDEN DRIVE, ZONED TW—APPLICATION FOR PARKING VARIANCE AMENDMENT FOR CONVERSION OF OFFICE USE TO HEALTH SERVICE USE(JERRY WARREN,APPLICANT; GENE WARREN, DESIGNER; SUSAN FULLERMANN AND JERRY WARREN, PROPERTY OWNERS)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER CP Monroe presented a summary of the staff report. Commissioner noted that the comments from the Chief Building Official in his memo dated November 21,2005,regarding requirements for handrails at stairways is incorrect and should be fixed; staff will discuss this issue with the Chief Building Official to get the correct information in place. Commissioners asked: ■ condition needs to be added noting that the parking variance shall only apply to this building and shall become void if the building is ever expanded,replaced,demolished or destroyed by catastrophe or natural disaster; 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 ■ on site visit noticed a large storage shed in parking space#24 and other equipment in parking area, shed and all other equipment needs to be removed to make all parking spaces available at all times; "1 and ■ landscaping needs to be added around the garbage area. This item was set for the consent calendar when all the information has been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Department. This item concluded at 8:05 p.m. 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ZONING CONSISTENCY — BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN—PROJECT PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE Chair Brownrigg suggested that this item be moved to the end of the agenda,since it is not a public hearing and currently an item for Commission discussion. Commission concurred with the change. VIII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar-Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant,a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Brownrigg asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. A member of the audience asked that item 5a 1017 Balboa Avenue be placed on the action calendar for a public hearing. 5b. 1410-B BURLINGAME AVENUE,ZONED C-1,SUBAREA A—APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL CLASSES INCIDENTAL TO A RETAIL USE(35 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN C. Deal moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioner's comments and the findings in the staff report with recommended conditions in the staff report and by resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve and it passed 7-0. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:10 p.m. IX. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS 5a. 1017 BALBOA AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE (JERRY WINGES, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; ROBERT AND CINDY GILSON, PROPERTY OWNERS) (52 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER C. Auran noted that he would recuse himself from this item because of a business relationship with the applicant and left the dias and chambers. Reference staff report June 26,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria -� and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Jerry Winges, architect represented the project; Dave Steinberger, 1021 Balboa Avenue. Neighbor noted that during the rains this spring he saw a lot of water on his property from the property at 1017 Balboa, and wanted to know if this project would address this condition. Architect noted that all drainage will be directed to the street as required by the city of all new development. Commissioners noted that the new driveway would be pervious which should also help reduce surface drainage. Staff noted that there were conditions required of this project which address surface run- off and will be implemented through the Building permit. Commissioner noted that a condition should be added that this site should be maintained in a'neat and tidy'condition throughout construction and that all landscaping should be maintained during construction. There were no further comments from the floor.The public hearing was closed. C. Osterling moved to approve the application,by resolution,including an additional condition that the site shall be maintained in a neat and tidy condition throughout construction and that all existing landscaping shall be maintained through out construction and with the following conditions in the staff report: (1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 1, 2006,sheets T-1 through A-7,L1.0,and with the driveway paving material correction added to page A-0 on June 14, 2006; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit; and that the site shall be maintained in a neat and tidy condition throughout construction and that all existing landscaping shall be maintained through out construction; (2) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's April 28,2006 memo,the City Engineer's,Fire Marshal's, and NPDES Coordinator's May 1,2006 memos and the Recycling Specialist's May 5,2006 memo shall be met; 3)that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;4)that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s), moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to design review;5) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is no licensed professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury;certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department;6)that prior to final inspection,Planning Department staffwill inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; and all windows shall be simulated true divided light windows with three dimensional wood mullions;7)that all air ducts,plumbing vents,and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;9) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 10) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 11) that during demolition of the existing residence,site preparation and construction of the new residence,the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff, 12)that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program,and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 13) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26,2006 requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 14) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 15)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code,2001 edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Vistica. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the project with the added condition that the site and existing landscaping be maintained throughout construction. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-0-1 (C. Auran abstaining). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:15 p.m. C. Auran returned to the chambers and took his seat. 6. 1243 CABRILLO AVENUE, ZONED R-1 —APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCES AND PARKING DIMENSION VARIANCE FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (FARHAD ASHRAFI AND DEBBIE KAUFMAN, STEWART ASSOCIATES, APPLICANTS AND DESIGNERS, FRANK KNIFSEND,PROPERTY OWNER) (64 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS Reference staff report June 26,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Frank Knifsend, property owner, 1243 Cabrillo Avenue represented the project. Lived here 7 years,family growing,incorporated most of the good suggestions from --� the study review. Commissioner noted that there is a Dogwood in the rear yard near an Acacia at the rear, these two will not do well together,can the Acacia be removed and a more substantial tree from the Street Tree list be put in the place of the Dogwood? Acacia is in the easement, believe planted by the neighbor, will ask if can remove and will plant another tree in my yard. Why are you working within the existing foundation of the house,removing most of the walls and under pinning the foundation,might be better,more conforming to zoning code and cheaper to begin with a new house;will talk to a contractor,wife likes first floor layout reason did not begin from scratch. Only reason given for variances is cost,cost is not a hardship on the property, hardship must be a physical condition on the lot. Feel that the exceptions to the code are small,2 inches,4 inches and a substantial reduction in the amount of the existing house which encroaches into the front setback a foot. Previous comments made at study are not adequately addressed including the relationship of the first floor to the second floor at the front, lack of detailing on the front porch which will result in not being able to build the porch as shown and a return to the Commission with an FYI,poor detail on the gable ends,so may not turn out as shown,on the rear elevation the windows at the bay on the second floor are not resolved;right side elevation upper balcony with bay window does not work,it is not integrated into the fagade; wainscoting around the house is not an even height,not sure what is going on below, it is okay on the front but too small on the sides; lack of detailing will result in it being built differently so will have to be changed in the field and will result in an FYI. Commission noted not so concerned about the variances as I am about the detailing, the wainscoting on the left side is broken at the utility door, should continue around to the rear,and if it is on the side needs to be full height,will reduce the apparent height of the building if it is the same height all around. Have same concerns about design detail and bay window on right side,also need better gable end,on front elevation the gutter return on the left does not balance with the -� right side. Architect noted that this maybe because of the visual projection of the bay window on the side elevation. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 Commissioner comments: not able to support the number of variances requested because the design is not resolved,the work to address the comments at study was not well integrated into the design;agree a jumble of components, perhaps responded too fast;variances requested are understated,2 inches on the side,front is OK because encroachment is reduced substantially,concerned about the garage created from the shed in the rear, design of this building is not related to the house at all, feel a denial is appropriate. C. Vistica, noting that it would be cheaper to begin again on this design, moved for a denial without prejudice. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: Applicant has heard comments, should listen to tapes, denial without prejudice gives him the most options in terms of time and design; clarify not as concerned about the variances, generally minimal, and would support if had a design that would stand up to the objectives of the design guidelines;can this item be referred to design review? CP noted that it cannot be referred to design review now,but if denied without prejudice a resubmittal would be treated as a new project and can be referred to design review,a denial without prejudice leaves the amount of change for resubmittal up to the applicant,no additional fees are charged by the city although the applicant would be required to pay for the design review process if it is required. Need to give the applicant direction: ■ combination of lack of design and number of variances makes the project unapprovable; ■ cannot support motion because do not believe have given appropriate guidance; ■ difficult to develop dynamic design because confined by existing nonconforming conditions,with new building could loosen up and make a better design possible; and ■ plans lack detail, no definition of the window type, want sizing of corbels,outriggers, dimensions missing in many places, cannot tell room sizes etc. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to deny this application without prejudice with the direction to redesign as noted. The motion passed on a 6-1 (C.Brownrigg dissenting)voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m. 7. 110 CLARENDON ROAD, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (TINA CHENG, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER; JERRY DEAL, JD & ASSOCIATES, DESIGNER) (66 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER C. Deal recused himself because he has a business relationship with the applicant. He stepped down from the dial and left the chambers. Reference staff report June 26,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Tina Chen property owner represented the project. She summarized the change they had made to the plans since the study session. Commission asked what surface material was proposed for the driveway,stamped concrete would be OK since there is not much hard surface proposed for this site. It was noted that the project would benefit from a more artistic garage door conveying a more elegant appearance stylistically supporting the design of the house; also the second floor balcony at the rear is rather large,in this case it might work since it is at the center of the lot,but generally discourage �. such large balconies because of impacts on the neighbor's privacy. Applicant noted they were willing to reduce the size of the balcony. 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue. Like to note a typo on the data chart,FAR.49,does the trellis cantilever -� from the wall? Yes. Counted the Spanish houses in this area,there are a lot but most of them are one story; this design is OK but the rear is more pedestrian friendly than the front,will invite entertainment in the rear yard; good house, but too big. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C.Vistica noted that little bungalows predominate in this area,this project will standout,but they have kept the tree, reduced the garage from three to two cars, this is a much better project so move approval by resolution with the following conditions: 1)that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 13,2006,sheets 1 through 5,G-1,F-1 and Ll and dated April 25, 2006, Boundary and Topographic Survey; and that any changes to the footprint or floor area of the building shall require and amendment to this permit;2)that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 31, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's, Fire Marshal's and NPDES Coordinator's April 3, 2006 memos and the Recycling Specialist's April 5, 2006 memo shall be met; that the property owner should prepare a full landscape plan and submit it to the Planning Commission as an FYI prior to issuance of a building permit; (3) that the garage door shall be replaced with a new garage door which incorporates windows and conveys a more elegant design consistent with the design of the house to be reviewed as an FYI by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of the building permit; (4) that the site shall be maintained in a neat and tidy state before and during construction and that all current landscaping shall be maintained until it is replaced;(5)that the property owner shall prepare a full landscape plan and submit it to the Planning Commission FYI before issuance of a building permit; (6)that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air --� Quality Management District;(7)that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to design review;(8)that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is no licensed professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department;(9)that prior to final inspection,Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; all windows shall be simulated true divided light windows with three dimensional wood mullions and shall contain a stucco-mould trim; (10) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; (11) that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department;(12)that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; (13)that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 14) that during demolition of the existing residence, site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance, to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm -� water runoff; (15) that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program, and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; (16) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction Plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; (17)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance;and(18)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building Code and California Fire Code, 2001 edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. Comment on the motion: could leave the selection of a better garage door to the applicant; agree with the design reviewer that the landscape plan needs to be improved,currently does not define where the materials begin and end; should add a condition to keep the site neat and tidy during construction and to maintain the existing landscaping during the construction process;number of current conditions from public works and NPDES address maintenance of the site during construction, seems it will be difficult to enforce the site maintenance as a planning condition. Need to clarify amendments to the conditions of approval: ■ that the property owner should prepare a full landscape plan and submit it to the Planning Commission as an FYI prior to issuance of a building permit; ■ that the garage door shall be replaced with a new garage door which incorporates windows and conveys a more elegant design consistent with the design of the house to be reviewed as an FYI by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of the building permit; and ■ that the site shall be maintained in a neat and tidy state before and during construction and that all current landscaping shall be maintained until it is replaced. The maker and second of the motion to approve accepted the additional conditions to the motion. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with three additional conditions addressing submittal of a full landscape plan, maintaining the site and site landscaping during construction, and replacing the garage door with one that better matches the proposed design and supports the quality of the new construction. The motion passed on a 6-0-1 (C.Deal abstaining)voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:10 p.m. C. Deal returned to the chambers and took his seat. X. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 8. 1520 ARC WAY, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL PERMIT FOR LOCATION OF A NEW DETACHED GARAGE AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR PARKING IN THE FRONT SETBACK FOR A NEW, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; TOM AND LIZ O'CONNOR, PROPERTY OWNERS) (115 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: KRISTINA WOERNER Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. Commissioner asked staff to clarify the separation requirement between the house and detached garage. Plr noted that 4'-0"is the minimum required separation between structures,measured eave to eave. In this case,the distance was measured from the garage eave to the house wall since there is no eave at the first floor portion of the house. There were no further questions of staff. �•.- Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Mark Robertson,designer,represented the project,noted that there is a three-story apartment building across the street on Arc Way, to minimize the impact decided to 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 reorient the front of the house Walnut Avenue,also will give it a more single family residential feel;adjacent neighbor at 1524 Arc Way has its rear yard abutting the right side property line of the subject property, neighbor requested that the new house be set back as much as possible to reduce the impact on their real yard, accomplished that by designing a u-shaped house with a center courtyard; the new garage will be in approximately the same location as the existing garage;the amoeba-shaped parking area at the front of the lot will be good for guests and will help to take cars off the street on Walnut Avenue. Designer submitted several letters from neighbors in support of the project at 1524 Arc Way and 819 Walnut Avenue. Commission asked if the designer considered attaching the garage,would be functionally better and create a greater separation form the neighbor to the south,as proposed now it reads as though the house is attached. Designer noted that the owner wanted more square footage and an attached garage would require reducing the size of the house, don't want to do that. Jim Keighran, 1600 Willow Avenue;Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue,spoke. Noted that the designer has done a good job with the design,the neighbors are delighted with the proposed house,the owner designed the house to accommodate the neighbors' concerns, don't think it is appropriate to penalize the owner by reducing the square footage with an attached garage;this is a beautiful house,concerned about parking in the front setback but will take cars off the street, there is going to be a lot of paving on this lot, keeping the hedge along Walnut Avenue at its existing height will help to screen the cars parked in the front yard. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. The Commission noted that overall the design works well and had the following comments: ■ concerned with the stone veneer water table at the front of the house changing to a stucco water table along the side and rear of the building, need to choose one material for the entire house, a rustic stucco would work well in this case, could use stone veneer for the chimney; ■ concerned that the front porch posts and bases are too small,should use 6 x 6 posts with larger bases; ■ concerned with the landscaping at the front,Manzanita and Rhododendron planted next to each will not do well; ■ lavender proposed in the planter strip between the curb and sidewalk may get too tall,suggest pavers or a different ground cover; ■ street tree shown as a Walnut tree is actually a Locust tree,concerned that the street trees and on-site trees may not survive during construction,would like to add a condition requiring a tree protection plan,must be completed by a licensed professional and submitted and approved by the City Arborist prior to issuance of a building permit; ■ concerned with contemporary rake on some gable ends, gable ends should have a traditional craftsman style overhang; ■ concerned with interior spaces,spaces appear to be narrow and small,closet doors are very narrow, area between kitchen counter and island is narrow, designer should check all interior spaces to be sure dimensions will work; ■ double-check all windows sizes and locations to be sure they will work; ■ detached garage is appropriate, breezeway between house and garage is a nice feature, proposed fence between the house and garage provides a nice integration between the two structures; ■ concerned with the scale and impact of the detached garage on Arc Way,suggest lowering the plate height to 8 feet, adding decorative dormers,having two single-wide garage doors or a garage door that gives the appearance of two single doors, etc.; 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 ■ should consider stepping down the house at the rear (bedroom #5, bathroom #4 and mudroom), would add interest in the hallway and reduce the height of the stucco water table at the rear by a few steps; ■ parking variance for parking in the front setback and special permit for garage location are appropriate given the two different street frontages on this lot, will help to alleviate the parking problems on both streets; and ■ not in support of driveway and parking in front setback off Walnut Avenue, front yard should be landscaped. C.Vistica made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 6-1 (C. Deal dissenting). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:40 p.m. 9. 3066 HILLSIDE DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(MIKE MA,APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT;MIMI SIEN, PROPERTY OWNER) (42 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Plr Hurin briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Michael Ma,architect,represented the proj ect and noted that the remodel and addition is necessary because the interior connections are poor and overall the house is in poor condition. Leanne Legos, 3070 Hillside Drive; Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke. Would like to know when construction will begin,have been living with two houses under construction to rear for over a year•,would like to make sure oak tree on property is protected during construction;would like to know if retaining wall shown on plans is existing or new;this is an expensive area in Burlingame,high quality materials should be used. Commissioner noted that the existing oak tree is far enough away from the proposed addition so that it will not need tree protection during construction. Architect noted that the retaining wall is existing and that there are no changes proposed to it. Commission commented: ■ concerned with the proposed front entrance, it is out of character with the design of the house and does not look like it belongs,front porch needs to be better integrated into the front fagade,there are many good examples in the neighborhood to follow; ■ concerned with the window treatment at the rear of the house,it is not consistent with the rest of the house;arched head windows with gable above is not appropriate with this style,these windows and roof configuration above the windows need to be redesigned to be consistent with the rest of the house; ■ clearly indicate type of windows and window trim proposed, show and note on revised plans; ■ strongly suggest using wood or wood clad windows,adds character to the house,vinyl windows lack �- detail and thickness; ■ clarify which windows are to remain, windows to be replaced and all new windows; 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 ■ roof above the new stairway along the left side of the house (south elevation) needs to be better integrated into the existing roof; -� ■ attached garage at the front of the house is a prominent feature,should consider upgrading the garage doors to add curb appeal; and ■ story poles are not required for this project since the addition is not that tall at the rear of the house. There were no other comments from the floor. The public comment was closed. C.Osterling made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the revisions have been made and plan checked. This motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 7-0. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 9:55 p.m. VII. STUDY ITEMS (CONT.) 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ZONING CONSISTENCY-BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN -PROJECT PLANNER: MARGARET MONROE CP Monroe noted that state law requires that the General Plan and its Specific Plan components be consistent with any zoning created to implement the plan. Over the past two years the Planning Commission has prepared and the City Council has adopted, 5 new zoning districts to implement the Bayfront Specific Plan, adopted in 2004. During the course of preparing these zoning districts, a number of edits and corrections to the Specific Plan were noted. These were all identified with the adoption of each of the zoning districts,and found to be consistent with the mitigated negative declaration adopted as a part of the plan. Therefore,the last step in implementing the Bayfront Specific Plan is to adopt the amendments to the Bayfront Specific Plan in order to achieve consistency. Corrections and clarifications include that hotels in the Inner Bayshore area are limited to the Bayshore Overlay area; building design guidelines set the maximum development density based on FAR; that the height limit in the interior of the Inner Bayshore area is based on the 35 foot review line while in the Bayshore overlay area the height limits reflect the standards for the Shoreline area across the street. In the Shoreline area the clarifications are based on the fact that retail development including commercial recreation can locate in any of the identified retail nodes and that the design guidelines for view corridors, landscaping, gateway, and height are suggestive, not requirements. In the Anza Area there was wording added to address issues such as underused land,clarify subarea diagrams,and insuring that landscaping and building design guidelines are suggestive,not requirements. In the Anza Point subarea most of the changes are based on the fact that the subarea was divided into two zoning districts,and the text was written as if the area was a unit. The text and land uses were separated to distinguish between the land use potential for the already developed South Anza Point (Beach and Lang Roads) and the North Anza Point area which is currently vacant land. Design guidelines were amended to clarify the importance of compliance with the community wind standard and the fact that the guidelines are suggestive,not requirements. Commissioner asked if these changes incorporate flexibility in developing the commercial nodes in the Shoreline area and about the location and potential of the Morrell Avenue bicycle connection. Commissioners noted that they felt that these proposed amendments were complete and consistent with the adopted zoning and mitigated negative declarations and should come back to the commission without change 12 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes June 26, 2006 for action. Staff noted that action would include a public hearing and recommendation to City Council. YI. PLANNER REPORTS - Review of City Council regular meeting of June 19, 2006. CP Monroe noted that council adopted the FY 2006-2007 budget and discussed placing a bond measure for storm drainage and community facility improvements on the November ballot. She noted that there would be a presentation to the commission about the scope of the measure at the July 10,2006 meeting. FYI: 535 Almer Road—changes to previously approved residential condominium project. Commission noted that there were a number of changes to this project;however after reviewing changes in the field felt that they did not work against the originally approved design. Commission did note that the stand pipes look terrible, asked staff to see if there is a way to avoid this prominent location in the future; also asked if there was some way that the applicant could place landscaping or other screening around these. Commission comments regarding 3121 Margarita, 1464 Vancouver and 2301 Hillside Drive. Commission thanked staff for following up on these inquires. Understood the implementation of 3121 Margarita and 1464 Vancouver. However,the heavy balustrade on Hillside Drive is not necessary as a safety railing, looks over blown and should be removed. Staff noted that the balustrade is like a fence and since it was 42"tall would be allowed in the side yard;will work with the City Attorney to see how this can be addressed in the future. Commissioners also noted that the approved plans had the exposed concrete side of the stairs and landings covered in brick,these stairs and landings are clearly concrete and no brick was added to the sides. The brick veneer should be added to the side before the final inspection is completed. 2006/2007 Planning Commission Subcommittee Assignments. Chair Brownrigg reviewed the committee assignments for FY 2006-2007. He noted that the work of several of last year's subcommittee's has been completed, so is creating several new subcommittees for this year. Each committee has an appointed chair, who will be asked to report periodically to the Commission about the progress and deliberations of the subcommittee. The subcommittees for FY 2006-2007are: North End: Auran, Brownrigg, Vistica; Sign Code: Cauchi, Osterling, Terrones; Affordable Housing: Auran, Brownrigg, Vistica; Permit and Process Review: Auran, Cauchi, Deal; Downtown: Auran, Vistica, Deal; Neighborhood Consistency: Brownrigg, Osterling,Terrones. Discussion of Summer Schedules. CP asked for possible vacation schedules to be sure that there would be a quorum at all meetings during the summer months. It appeared that there will be no problem. XII. ADJOURNMENT Chair Brownrigg adjourned the meeting at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, David Cauchi, Secretary VA IINUTESWinutes Template.doc 13 CITY OF BURLINGAME PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES 501 Primrose Road, Burlingame, CA July 10, 2006 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Brownrigg called the July 10, 2006, regular meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:01 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Auran, Brownrigg, Deal, Osterling, Terrones Absent: Commissioners Cauchi, Vistica Staff Present: City Planner, Margaret Monroe; Senior Planner Brooks and Planner Hurin, City Attorney, Larry Anderson; Senior Engineer, Doug Bell. III. MINUTES The minutes of the June 26, 2006 regular meeting of the Planning Commission were reviewed; C. Brownrigg noted a clarification on Page 10, the end of the second paragraph to add: "Commissioner added that variance might be warranted inasmuch as there is a clear hardship, namely the house fronts on two streets at front and rear. Attaching the garage without penalizing the interior space(FAR) might result in a better design along the rear street frontage.. " Commission approved the minutes as amended. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CP noted that staff had received a copy of the complaint log from the project manager of the hospital replacement project and it would be added to the FYI items at the end of the agenda. There were no other changes to the agenda. V. FROM THE FLOOR There were no public comments. VI. STUDY ITEMS There were no study items for review. VII. ACTION ITEMS Consent Calendar - Items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. They are acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by the applicant, a member of the public or a commissioner prior to the time the commission votes on the motion to adopt. Chair Brownrigg asked if anyone in the audience or on the Commission wished to call any item off the consent calendar. There were no requests. 1. 1820 OGDEN DRIVE, ZONED TW — APPLICATION FOR PARKING VARIANCE AMENDMENT FOR CONVERSION OF OFFICE USE TO HEALTH SERVICE USE (JERRY WARREN, APPLICANT; GENE WARREN, DESIGNER; SUSAN FULLERMANN AND JERRY WARREN, PROPERTY OWNERS) (32 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER C. Deal moved approval of the consent calendar based on the facts in the staff report, commissioners' comments and the findings in the staff report with recommended conditions in the staff report and by �.. resolution. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion and it passed 5-0-2(Cers. Cauchi and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 7: 10 p.m. City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEM —� 2. PRESENTATION OF CITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN—PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Reference staff report July 10, 2006, with attachments including two reports: "Citywide Facilities Improvements: Building Improvements Summary,"and"Storm Drain Improvements Report." CP Monroe noted that City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Syed Murtuza would make the presentation regarding the improvement plan proposed for the obligation bond measure on which the Council will take final action on July 19,2006. CA Anderson noted that it is required that the Planning Commission review an improvement plan proposed for a bond measure when it combines a number of improvements,in this case storm water improvements and improvements to city building facilities, to determine that it is a coherent improvement plan. CE Murtuza made a power point presentation which reviewed the background studies done to establish the need and cost of the proposed improvements, the various financing alternatives and reasons for selecting general obligation bonds,and summarized the Council's conclusion that the obligation bond include $37 million for storm drain improvements and$7 million for improvements to city building facilities for safety and accessibility. Commissioners commented on the background studies for the storm drain system and public facilities,how the obligation bond would affect individual property owners as opposed to other means of financing; CA noted that the Commission's action is to determine whether this is a coherent improvement plan, the financing option is a Council decision;the poll undertaken to determine public support was discussed and the importance of providing some flexibility in how the funds would be spent because of the 30 year time line; it was noted that 60 bonds could be issued on an 'as needed'basis over the 30 years. Objective is to keep the cost per median valued property to an average of$125/year;the amount that people polled indicated was acceptable. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue spoke. Participated in a focus group to gather information for the campaign,urge Planning Commission to approve this improvement plan, need to fix storm drain and stop pass though at the Waste Water Treatment Plan during flooding; pass through could result in high penalty fees from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Staff did a good job preparing this one. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner comments: The Planning Commission action addresses only the improvements proposed,not financing or other issues; CA affirmed. C. Osterling noted that the proposed improvement plan is a coherent plan which will address community needs and will support the city's planning programs and community's physical needs. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to endorse that the improvement plan proposed by the City Council for the general obligation bonds as being coherent and consistent with the community's physical needs and plans. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cern.Cauchi,Vistica absent). This item concluded at 7:50 p.m. 2 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 3. 3105 MARGARITA AVENUE, ZONED R-1 - APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW, HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT,SPECIAL PERMITS FOR BUILDING HEIGHT AND DECLINING HEIGHT ENVELOPE, SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE AND PARKING VARIANCE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION (JERRY DEAL, JD & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECT; WAYNE SOSNICK, PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT) (45 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: KRISTINA WOERNER C. Deal recused himself because he has a business relationship with the applicant. He left his seat and the chambers. Reference staff report July 10, 2006, with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Fabian Bernardi, 1 St. Francis Place, San Francisco, represented the applicant. There were no questions. Comments from the floor: Gordon Miller, 3120 Margarita; Ann Nannini, 1555 Alturas Drive; Brian Murphy,3101 Margarita Drive;Linda Murphy,3101 Margarita Drive;Matt Murphy,3101 Margarita Drive; neighbors on west side of proposed project could not come tonight asked to request that this item be continued until they could come to the meeting;personally feel that the proposed house is too large and too tall, cuts the light off to the south,where we now see the sun and sky, will encroach on that view; need to evaluate proposed construction, too much for the lot size,key concern is drainage,want all water diverted from draining to rear onto her property; submit picture of story poles from bedroom window at 1560 Los Montes, will lose view of Mills Canyon, bay and Mt. Diablo; house up hill will lose a lot of distant view from balcony and front lawn; story poles are deceptive,show only roof ridge,not reflect mass,bulk to real scale, should require orange netting; concerned about pool shed at rear, it is noisy and has an illegal drain, built in 1976 and is nonconforming,this project does not address,was told does not have to,but should be fixed given the problems it causes, demonstrates unwillingness to cooperate, did not even let neighbors know was not going to fix this problem. Story poles do not document the width of this addition, do not include the large chimneys, would like to continue until neighbors return; feel that the mass, bulk and architectural style do not fit in this neighborhood which has been described as 'tract' homes, when they bought their homes they were told by this property owner that a second story addition was not possible,now he is asking for a second story. Saw story poles and realized that neighbor can look directly into my back yard and family room where like to camp in the summer,will lose privacy. Applicant noted tried to address all the issues raised by the Planning Commission at the last meeting; drainage and pool are not an issue at this time;with a second floor it is hard to comply with all rules,and sometimes views are affected;tried to reduce the size and scale of the house. Commission asked if the designer was familiar with the city's view ordinance,applicant noted that he was. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner discussion: when reviewed last time gave direction to eliminate some of the variances with adjusting the mass of the building, done some work on the right side, but the story poles are very telling, support the point that poles as presently installed do not tell the whole story,poles represent the peak at the center and gable, not the massing; this addition is massive from both uphill and downhill, can't support; agree, photos submitted show that this is too much; distant views of at least two neighbors are incontrovertibly blocked. C. Osterling moved to deny the application with prejudice. The motion was seconded by C. Brownrigg. 3 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 Comment on the motion: realize that it is difficult on this type of house to do an addition which requires a special permit for height, don't know how you do it without a special permit for height,but in any case the mass is still too broad. If deny without prejudice the City Planner will need to determine if the resubmittal is 'substantially different' and can be processed. If denied the same application cannot be resubmitted for a year. Needs a different solution,one which will not block someone's view,could have additional 700 SF of lot coverage and could add a lower level living area so there are options on this lot. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to deny this application. The motion passed on a 4-0- 2-1 (Cers.Cauchi,Vistica absent,C.Deal recused)voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:15 p.m. C. Deal returned to the chambers and took his seat on the dais. 4. 1207 CORTEZ AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (S.E.A. CONSTRUCTION, APPLICANT; ROGER AND ZENIAMAE GHIOTTI, PROPERTY OWNERS; MARC TETRAULT, ARCHITECT) (67 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: MAUREEN BROOKS (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 12, 2006 P.C. MEETING) Reference staff report July 10, 2006,with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Mark Tetrault, 501 Cortland Avenue, architect, and Roger Ghiotti, 1207 Cortez Avenue, represented the project. Commissioners asked about the wainscot on the outside of the house,the floor joist system,about the connection between the tapered column and the beam above at the front;requested at last meeting that all windows have mullions to capture Prairie style;pillars to support balcony at the rear are heavy, adding brick wainscot would reduce bulk, applicant agreed. Could have spent more time on the design of the right side of the building. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Deal noted that this project has come a long way would move to approve by resolution with the added condition that brick wainscoting be added to the bottom of the columns at the rear and mullion bars be added to the top of the front windows,the wainscoting proposed on the sides of the house can be left as shown,and the conditions in the staff report: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 26,2006, sheets Al through A5,and that any changes to building materials,exterior finishes,footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit; all windows shall be wood framed without muntins or mullions except for the existing first floor front window opposite the porch which shall have mullions at the top to reflect the Prairie Style of the architecture and that brick wainscoting shall be added to the bottom of the columns on the rear elevation of the house;2) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's September 23, 2005, memo, the City Engineer's September 26,2005,memo,the City Arborist's October 19,2005,memo,and the Fire Marshal's,Recycling Specialist's and NPDES Coordinator's September 26,2005,memos,shall be met;3),that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage, which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch,shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 4) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is no licensed 4 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury; 5)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection, a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height; 6) that prior to final inspection,Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type, etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans;7)that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 8)that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 9)that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 10)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; and 11)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with amended conditions regarding adding mullions to the top of the existing window at the front and brick wainscoting to the base of the columns on the rear elevation. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi,Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:30 p.m. 5. 2105 ROOSEVELT AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST FLOOR REMODEL AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (DENNIS AND JULIE CARLSON, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;JOHN STEWART,STEWART ASSOCIATES,DESIGNER) (59 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 12, 2006 P.C. MEETING) The applicant requested that this item be delayed because her architect had a conflicting meeting in Hillsborough and was expected shortly. Chair Brownrigg noted that this item could be delayed on the action calendar until later in the meeting when the architect was present. Commission concurred. 6. 1465 BALBOA AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW,TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (JACK MCCARTHY, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; BRIAN ROCHE, PROPERTY OWNER) (65 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report July 10,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Fifteen conditions were suggested for consideration.There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Jack McCarthy, architect, represented the project. Met with neighbors,sent out 34 letters,three responded. One wanted the driveway shifted to other side,not possible because of space, location of an existing tree, and because the living area of house on other side faces the present driveway. Commissioners noted dramatic improvement in design, shows driveway AC paving; applicant noted mistake,will be pervious;discussed depth ofporch,noted could increase if changed pitch on `-- roof which would also enhance the style; columns need more mass on the front porch; fireplace in family room visually needs a chimney extension higher than the eave;on front elevation the beam bracket is out of 5 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10,2006 scale,6x would look better; like front elevation changes;noted were putting in a Magnolia but cannot find on the drawing, should bring landscape plan back as an FYI; understand that can use true divided light or—. simulated true divided lite windows; garage should be shingled on all four sides. Comments from the floor: Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue. This is a good example of how design review works;thank the applicant and architect,this is in the scale of the block;the public meeting was good since this is a spec house;lot of hardscape might be reduced by having the steps from the porch exit to the left and use the driveway as the walkway; there is no access from the front to use the other side of the house,how take out the garbage can; maybe use other vine than star jasmine, hard to maintain; plans say square columns,prefer turned. There were no other comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commission comment: There is a fence shown on the plans on the right side, so cannot exit through the garden on that side. C. Deal moved to approve the application by resolution with the following amendments to the conditions that the front porch shall be deepened by changing the slope of the porch roof,that the knee braces shall be increased to 6x,that all four sides of the garage shall be covered with shingles,that a chimney which extends above the eaves shall be added to the fireplace so that it looks real,and that the Magnolia tree shall be placed on the landscape plan and the plan shall be resubmitted as an FYI to the Commission,and with the following conditions in the staff report: 1) that the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 28, 2006, sheets 1-5 and L1.0; that the design submitted for building permit shall include all of the following changes affirmed by the Planning Department before issuance of a building permit:that the front porch shall be deepened by changing the slope of the porch roof and shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as an FYI,that the knee braces shall be increased to 6x that all four sides of the garage shall be covered with shingles, that a chimney which extends above the eaves shall be added to the fireplace so that it looks real, and that the Magnolia tree shall be placed on the landscape plan and the landscape plan shall be resubmitted as an FYI to the commission; and that any changes to building materials, exterior finishes, footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;2)that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's March 24,2006 memo,the City Engineer's, Fire Marshal's and NPDES Coordinator's March 27, 2006 memos, and the Recycling Specialist's March 29,2006 memo,shall be met;3)that demolition for removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 4)that any changes to the size or envelope of the basement, first or second floors,or garage,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 5) that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint;6) that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 7)that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is no licensed professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department;8)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9) that prior to final -� inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trirr materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a 6 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11)that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; 12)that during demolition of the existing residence,site preparation and construction of the new residence, the applicant shall use all applicable "best management practices" as identified in Burlingame's Storm Water Ordinance,to prevent erosion and off-site sedimentation of storm water runoff; 13)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance; 14)that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program,and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; and 15)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve with amended conditions. The motion passed on a 5-0-2(Cers. Cauchi,Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 8:50 p.m. 7. 1525 CHAPIN AVENUE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (JAMES WONG, APPLICANT AND ARCHITECT; AND JOHN AND ROSA VEGA, PROPERTY OWNERS) (44 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN Reference staff report July 10,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. James Wong,architect,represented the project. He noted that he would respond to questions. Commissioners asked if the stone veneer covered all of the concrete base on the house,yes,there is existing concrete footing,stone will cover footing all the way to the ground;concern was that the original project did not accomplish the objectives of the design guidelines and reflect what is in the neighborhood, do not feel that the revisions make it better; are the three holes on the west elevation vents,yes will be tile;balustrade is too heavy particularly with the quoins,rarely use quoins in Burlingame as they are out of character, commonly on much bigger houses, the sliding glass door clashes with the guardrail; on the front elevation there are errors on the plans: 3" wood molding not shown on existing windows, should add to tie in,roof drawn as 4/12 but noted as 3/12,second floor balustrade does not work, little window above does not relate, second floor balcony is too large for a single family residential use (same as on west elevation,conflicts with gable);rear elevation more design detail than front,looks like two different houses,no consistency in style. Architect summarized changes made while working with design reviewer. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C. Terrones agreed with the other commissioners that he could not support this project not because it is different from the neighborhood, agree this neighborhood is eclectic, but because there is too much inconsistency within the design of this house,quoins do not consistently wrap corner to corner and not used throughout,and are only detail have included,mistake to replicate lone arch window at front,should identify some other better character building detail in the existing house, stone molding added as wainscot is not �.. included on the east elevation,need to carry design elements throughout,problems with this design is in the 7 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 details; for these reasons moved to deny this project without prejudice. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: It was noted that the concern is not with the massing,the building needs to reflect a particular architectural style;applicant should slowly walk the neighborhood,there are beautiful examples there, identify something that will fit in, look at the detail on the house,may have to change massing to fit the new style;detail is important as are the elements used to provide it,may need to upgrade some windows, this is a difficult house to add on to;some existing features cover up character such as the cap on the wall at the front and the small window added over the large front window; the landscape plan is very light,when add second story front and rear landscaping should be redone to add larger plant materials,the existing gate should be changed to match the style of the house chosen. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to deny without prejudice. The motion passed on a 5- 0-2(Cers. Cauchi,Vistica absent)voice vote. Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:15 p.m. 8. 127 LOMA VISTA DRIVE, ZONED R-1 — APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST AND SECOND STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING(LUIS ROBLES,APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; JAIME GOMEZ, PROPERTY OWNER) (35 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: ERICA STROHMEIER Reference staff report July 10,2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Eleven conditions were suggested for consideration. Commission asked if the family room and den were called bedrooms? CP noted that for planning review purposes,because parking is bases' -� on the number of bedrooms,a bedroom is defined as any room with four walls,a window and a door,that is not a living room, dining room or kitchen. These two rooms qualify so were counted as bedrooms. There were not further questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Luis Robles,341 Channing Way,designer,and Jaime Gomez, 127 Loma Vista, property owner, represented the project. Noted would like to make the gate on the left wrought iron; noted that the height is well under 30 feet, do we still need to have the ridge line surveyed? Chair noted yes. Commissioners asked about the house and the columns both being stucco;would there be wrought iron at the decorative window at the front; are columns round?Yes. Commissioners noted that the applicant had done a nice job of mass and style, and made the following comments regarding the project: • Drawing detail on rafter tails should be corrected should be noted as 3x6,should be 4x6 wood brackets, need heavier rafter tails to keep in scale; • Window on second floor center front is a little too big; • Several windows show clear transom,transom area should be divided lites;should be clear about type of window throughout, true divided light or simulated true divided light; • Roof tiles should be mixed color within same hue; • Use additional wood trim to enhance south elevation; • East elevation beams to support roof could be supported with knee braces with 6x or 4x brackets,would work over door, also use on east side and at rear,would result in good rhythm; -� • Front columns need wood but color change would work, stucco is consistent with Spanish style; 8 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 • On left elevation, material on skirt under balcony a different material such as wood and add wood brackets; • Porch very narrow at door, should revise and widen porch at door; • Could extend porch forward and use variation in paving at front; and • Need to add more landscaping to enhance the Spanish style. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. C.Deal moved to continue this item to provide the applicant the opportunity to make revisions to the plans as noted by the commissioners and to bring the project back on the consent calendar,particular attention should be paid to the detail;a complete landscape plan should be included with the item when it comes back on consent. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Comment on the motion: Almost there, all agree on the details required; gates should be addressed in resubmittal,choice of gate material should be up to the applicant. Commissioners advised the applicant to listen to the tapes of the meeting to make sure all of the Commission's comments are addressed when resubmit. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to continue this item and bring it back on the consent calendar when the revisions including a full landscape plan have been submitted,plan checked and there is space on the agenda. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi, Vistica absent). This item is not appealable since no action was taken. This item concluded at 9:35 p.m. 5. 2105 ROOSEVELT AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A FIRST FLOOR REMODEL AND SECOND STORY ADDITION (DENNIS AND JULIE CARLSON, APPLICANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS;JOHN STEWART,STEWART ASSOCIATES,DESIGNER) (59 NOTICED) PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 12, 2006 P.C. MEETING) Reference staff report July 10, 2006,with attachments. SP Brooks presented the report,reviewed criteria and staff comments. Twelve conditions were suggested for consideration. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. John Stewart, 1351 Laurel Street,project architect,noted that significant changes were made to the project, the front entry was changed to get rid of the tower, added trellis, there was a question about the stairs, there will be eight feet of clearance for the stairwell; have signatures from nine neighbors in support of the project. Commissioners noted that the sketch on the front of the plans is charming,can landscaping be added along the side of the driveway as shown on this sketch;what are the materials used for the columns on the front porch, rendering and elevations don't match. The applicant noted that vines can be added along the driveway, the porch will have a stucco wall with half column as shown on the elevations. Commissioners noted that the roof is now being chopped off to meet the 30 foot height requirement, in the future, would rather see a request for special permit to allow the roof to come to a peak. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. C.Auran moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following amended conditions: 1)that `-- the project shall be built as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 27, 9 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 2006,sheets Al through A6,and date stamped June 1,2006,sheet Al showing landscape details,including that the header over the window shall be 2x8,the columns shall be 6x6, and the corbels shall be 6x8; and that any changes to building materials,exterior finishes,footprint or floor area of the building shall require an amendment to this permit;2)that the landscape plan shall be revised to incorporate landscaping as shown on the rendering; 3) that the conditions of the Chief Building Official's April 7, 2006 memo, the City Engineer's April 10,2006 memo,the Fire Marshal's April 7,2006 memo,the Recycling Specialist's April 24, 2006 memo,and the NPDES Coordinator's April 10,2006 memo shall be met;4)that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 5)that the flat portion of the roof shall be built so that it does not contain a roof curb; 6) that any changes to the size or envelope of the first or second floors, or garage,which would include adding or enlarging a dormer(s),moving or changing windows and architectural features or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 7) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection,the project architect,engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans;if there is no licensed professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 8)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 9) that prior to final inspection, Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details (trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 10) that all air ducts, plumbing vents, and flues shall be combined, where possible, to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street;and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued; 11)that the project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition, as amended by the City of Burlingame; 12) that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition,new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements;any partial or full demolition of a structure, interior or exterior, shall require a demolition permit; and 13) that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503,the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance. The motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Crs. Cauchi, Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 9:45 p.m. 9. 1818 TROUSDALE DRIVE, ZONED TW — APPLICATION FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION,DESIGN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BUILDING HEIGHT AND FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR A NEW FOUR-STORY ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY(BILL LINDSTROM,SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT,INC.,APPLICANT;MICHAEL KITSUN, MITHUN ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECT; TROUSDALE PROPERTIES, PROPERTY OWNER) (38 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: RUBEN HURIN CA Anderson recused himself from the proceedings and left the dais and chambers because his son worked for the applicant within past year. Reference staff report July 10,2006,with attachments. Pk.Hurin presented the report,reviewed criteria anC -� staff comments. Fifty-four conditions were suggested for consideration. 10 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 Commissioners asked Staff:What will the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Development fee required to be paid in Condition No. 4 be used for? CP Monroe noted that the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan identifies the projects which will be built using these fees; there are several streetscape projects identified including the linear park and pedestrian pathway proposed along the west side of El Camino Real between Murchison and Trousdale which will provide a link between the BART station and this area. Commissioners noted that the conditions of approval address storage of construction materials,what about equipment on the street? The Public Works Department regulates this and requires permits for locating dumpsters and other equipment in the parking area along the street. There is also a condition requiring screening for the driveway ramp, is this reflected on the plans?Yes. Condition No. 40 regulates the use of radios during construction for noise mitigation,what level of use would trigger? This would not apply to cell phones or handheld devices. It does apply to construction workers because of noise from music, etc. impacting on adjacent residential uses. If this building were ever converted to condominiums,would it have to come back to the Planning Commission for review? Yes,would require different approvals and a review of the onsite parking. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Dan Zemanek,Sunrise;Jerry McDevitt,Mithun Architects;and Linda Gates, David Gates and Associates, Landscape Architect; represented the project, noted that the comments from previous Commission meetings have been incorporated into the project, and asked to address two of the conditions of approval. Condition No. 3 requires that demolition shall not occur until a building permit is issued,would like some leeway so that if the Chief Building Official allows a separate demolition permit it would be okay. Condition No.6 limits the number of employees on site to a maximum of 22 and that an increase will require an amendment,there may be some times between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.that this number may be exceeded,the shift changes occur outside of that time frame,so it would not affect the traffic counts,would like to see this number increased. CP Monroe noted: that it is the policy of the Chief Building Official that a demolition permit shall not be issued until a building permit is issued, empty sites can become a nuisance and public hazard; it is at the request of the Chief Building Official with the agreement of the Commission that this condition is being added to all project approvals. She also noted that the City establishes thresholds on the number of employees to properly evaluate traffic and parking impacts of a facility, need to set some limit. Commissioners noted: that overall, the design is good, but would like to see upgrades to some of the materials proposed,such as the proposed vinyl clad windows,stucco covered foam window trim,and would rather see clay tile than concrete tile. Would also like to see a wall and landscape screen for the delivery area/fire lane along Trousdale. The project architect offered a compromise to use aluminum clad windows and precast concrete sills on the ground floor and vinyl clad windows and foam trim on the upper floors,and agreed to use clay tiles for the roof, as well as aluminum treated to look like copper for the downspouts and leader heads. Commissioners'questions: thanked the applicant for revising the project to conform to the ten foot setback and making the building more interesting,and asked about the common open space area on the ground floor, it is there for the resident's enjoyment but there are no restrooms nearby. The applicant noted bathrooms in open space this is not a feature that is usually included in their facilities,most residents with an incontinence problem use the patio level,residents don't use the outdoor areas unless escorted. Commissioners noted that this is a highly visible roof, since a lot of houses in the hillside area look down on this site, it is important how it looks,on drawings it looks clean,want to make sure that the equipment on the roof is installed so that it is neat and tidy;the material used for the flat roof inside the parapet should be a neutral color and should �- not be reflective. The applicant noted that there will be three larger gas fired HVAC units for the common areas, and small individual units for the resident's rooms,these will be wrapped and installed close to the 11 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10,2006 parapet so that they are not visible. The area inside the parapet will have a stucco finish,will be a darker, neutral gray,should be unobtrusive. Commissioners complimented the choice of plant material used in the -� landscaping and if the Australian Willow proposed as screen trees will be large enough for this scale building. Ms.Gates noted that while something taller could be proposed,generally trying to create a smaller residential scale along the edges that will provide a screen without overpowering the space. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. ND-539P and mitigation monitoring plan included in the conditions of approval for the proposed Sunrise project. Chair Brownrigg made a motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Crs. Cauchi, Vistica absent) voice vote. Commissioners' discussion: on the requested changes to the conditions of approval,noted that an increase in the maximum number of employees on site to 35 is acceptable,and suggested that the wording be changed to state that "any permanent increase" in the number of employees would require Planning Commission review,and noted can support the increase because this site is close to public transit. Commissioners agreed that the applicant should have an opportunity to work with the Chief Building Official on whether a separate demolition and grading permit could be issued to allow a little bit of a fast track,language could include"at the discretion of the Chief Building Official". C. Osterling moved to approve the application,by resolution,with the following amended conditions: 1) that the assisted living facility shall be built and operate as shown on the plans submitted to the Planning Department date stamped June 15, 2006, sheets GO.1, A1.1 through A4.2, C-1, D-1 and L-1 through L-3, with the exception of the wall sign which requires a separate sign permit application; and that the roofing material shall be clay tile,aluminum clad windows and precast concrete sills shall be used on the first floor windows,downspouts with leader heads shall be exposed as a design feature and shall be aluminum treated to look like copper, the material used for the flat portion of the roof shall be neutral and nonglare, and all equipment on the roof shall be installed so that it is orderly when viewed from above;2)that the conditions of the City Traffic Engineer's May 19,2006,memo,the City Engineer's May 18,2006,August 8,2005,June 16,2005 and March 31,2005,memos,the Chief Building Official's May 7,2006,memo and March 9,2005, memos,the Fire Marshal's May 8,2006 and March 14,2005,memos,the City Arborist's May 10,2006 and June 28, 2005, memos, that the Recycling Specialist's May 8, 2006 and June 10, 2005, memos, and the NPDES Coordinator's May 9, 2006, August 15, 2005 and March 16, 2005, memos shall be met; 3) that demolition or removal of the existing structures and any grading or earth moving on the site shall not occur until a building permit has been issued,unless approved by the Chief Building Official, and such site work shall be required to comply with all the regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District;4)that prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the applicant shall pay the first half of the North Burlingame Rollins Road Development fee in the amount of$17,181.01, made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; 5) that prior to scheduling the final framing inspection for the condominium building,the applicant shall pay the second half of the North Burlingame Rollins Road Development fee in the amount of$17,181.01,made payable to the City of Burlingame and submitted to the Planning Department; 6) that this assisted living facility shall have a maximum of 35 employees on site at any one time, including the business manager; that any permanent increase in the number of employees over 35 on site at any one time shall require an amendment to this permit; 7)that the 36 on-site parking spaces shall be used only for the residents,visitors and employees of the assisted living facility and shall not be leased or rented for storage of automobiles either by businesses on this site or b� -� other businesses for off-site parking; 8) that the applicant shall dedicate an easement to the City of Burlingame for the sidewalk adjacent to the drop-off zone; all necessary documents shall be filed with the 12 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit;9)that a 72'-0"long"no parking"red curb zone shall be installed along Trousdale Drive starting from the corner of Trousdale and Ogden Drive;a 10'- 0" long "no parking" red curb zone shall be installed on each side of the drop off zone on Ogden Drive, starting from the corner of Trousdale and Ogden Drive; 10)that any changes to the size or envelope of the building,which would include expanding the footprint or floor area of the structure,replacing or relocating windows or changing the roof height or pitch, shall be subject to Planning Commission review; 11) that storage of construction materials and equipment on the street or in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited; 12) that the applicant shall receive a Tree Removal Permit from the Parks Department before removing the protected-sized trees at the front of the property along Ogden Drive,and that a building permit shall not be issued before such permits are issued; 13)that card reader/intercom system shall be installed in the driveway off Ogden Drive a minimum 20'-0'back from the front property line;the card reader/intercom system shall be connected to the administrative center to provide guest access to the parking area by pushing a button inside the building; 14)that prior to scheduling the foundation inspection a licensed surveyor shall locate the property corners and set the building footprint; 15)that prior to underfloor frame inspection the surveyor shall certify the first floor elevation of the new structure(s) and the various surveys shall be accepted by the City Engineer; 16) that prior to scheduling the framing inspection, the project architect, engineer or other licensed professional shall provide architectural certification that the architectural details such as window locations and bays are built as shown on the approved plans; if there is no licensed professional involved in the project,the property owner or contractor shall provide the certification under penalty of perjury. Certifications shall be submitted to the Building Department; 17)that prior to scheduling the roof deck inspection,a licensed surveyor shall shoot the height of the roof ridge and provide certification of that height to the Building Department; 18)that prior to final inspection,Planning Department staff will inspect and note compliance of the architectural details(trim materials,window type,etc.)to verify that the project has been built according to the approved Planning and Building plans; 19)that all air ducts,plumbing vents,and flues shall be combined,where possible,to a single termination and installed on the portions of the roof not visible from the street; and that these venting details shall be included and approved in the construction plans before a Building permit is issued;20)that the project shall comply with the Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling Ordinance which requires affected demolition, new construction and alteration projects to submit a Waste Reduction plan and meet recycling requirements; any partial or full demolition of a structure,interior or exterior,shall require a demolition permit;21)that the applicant shall comply with Ordinance 1503, the City of Burlingame Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance;22)that the project is subject to the state-mandated water conservation program,and a complete Irrigation Water Management Plan must be submitted with landscape and irrigation plans at time of permit application; 23) that the landscaping noted on sheets L-2 and L-3 shall be installed according to plan and shall be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system; landscaping that does not survive on the site shall be immediately replaced with an equivalent species; 24) that the applicant shall submit an erosion and sedimentation control plan describing BMPs(Best Management Practices)to be used to prevent soil,dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system; the plan shall include a site plan showing the property lines, existing and proposed topography and slope; areas to be disturbed, locations of cut/fill and soil storage/disposal areas; areas with existing vegetation to be protected; existing and proposed drainage patterns and structures;watercourse or sensitive areas on-site or immediately downstream of a project; and designated construction access routes, Staging areas and washout areas; 25) that off-site runoff shall be diverted around the construction site and all on-site runoff shall be diverted around exposed construction areas;26)that methods and procedures such as sediment basins or traps,earthen dikes or berms,silt fences, straw bale dikes,check dams storm drain inlet protection soil blanket or mats,and covers for soil stock piles to stabilize denuded areas shall be installed to maintain temporary erosion controls and sediment control continuously until permanent erosion controls have been established;27)that all construction materials and waste,including solid wastes,paints,concrete,petroleum products,chemicals,washwater or sediment,shall 13 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 be stored, handled and disposed of properly to prevent the discharge of all potential pollutants into stormwater; 28) that no vehicles or equipment shall be cleaned, fueled or maintained on-site, except in -� designed areas which runoff is contained and treated;29)that construction access routes are limited in order to prevent the tracking of dirt onto the public right-of-way,clean off-site paved areas and sidewalks using dry sweeping methods; 30)that common landscape areas shall be designed to reduce excess irrigation run- off, promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides; 31) that this project shall meet all the requirements of the California Building and Uniform Fire Codes,2001 Edition,as amended by the City of Burlingame;32)that to screen views to the parking garage ramp from the residences to the west,plans shall include a trellis structure covered with vines maintained by the property owner to span above the ramp or additional space for planting trees whose canopy will be sufficient to cover the driveway; 33) that flat, non-reflective paint or integrated coloring shall be used in all exterior building materials throughout the project;34)that prior to issuance of a building permit,a detailed Exterior Lighting Plan shall be provided to the City of Burlingame for review. The lighting plan shall be based on the following standards: a)The cone of light shall be focused on the site and stray light shall be controlled through use of low-brightness fixtures with optical controls;b)All exterior light sources shall be shielded and fully blocked from off-site views, except for the street address; c) No uplighting of the structure or vegetation will be permitted from any outdoor light fixture; and d) On-demand exterior lighting systems shall be employed where feasible.Area lighting and security lighting will be controlled by the use of timed switches and/or motion detectors; 35)that the garage shall be restricted to allow passenger vehicles only. Delivery trucks and paratransit vehicles shall use either the service/delivery parking area with access from Trousdale Drive or the 84-foot passenger loading zone on Ogden Drive just south of the proposed garage driveway for loading and unloading purposes only;36)that the driveway serving the small off-street parking area on the eastern side of the proposed project shall be restricted to allow right turns in and out only,to the satisfaction of the City's Traffic Engineer; 37)that visible signage shall be posted prohibiting left-turns for vehicles existing the garage driveway.A"no parking"zone shall be installed between the garage driveway and the loading zone to improve sight distance for exiting vehicles that will be required to turn right. Furthermore,landscaping near the garage driveway shall be maintained not to exceed the three-foot height of the proposed iron fences near the garage entrance/exit; 38)that the project contractor shall implement best management practices for noise reduction, such as muffling and shielding intakes and exhausts of gas powered tools,generators,and other noise-producing equipment. Construction activities shall abide by the construction hours in the Municipal Code and by further restrictions placed on the Peninsula Medical Center, which limit construction hours to 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. There shall be no construction on Sundays or holidays; 39)that trucks shall be fully loaded to minimize the number of necessary trips and to further reduce noise related to truck travel;40)that no radios shall be used by construction personnel on the site at any time;41)that the project applicant shall retain a qualified acoustical engineer familiar with aviation noise impacts to prepare an acoustical study, in accordance with State Title 24 requirements. The acoustical study shall identify methods of design and construction to comply with the applicable portions of the Uniform Building Code Title 24,Appendix 36, Sound Transmission Controls and with the FAA Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program so that construction shall achieve an indoor noise level of 45 dBA, or less, as measured for aircraft noise events (Taken from Chapter 7, Section 2 of the NB/RR Specific Plan);42)that the project sump pumps and generator shall be located in the underground garage and shall be soundproofed with a sound trap in the exhaust ducts. The sump pump shall be baffled to further minimize noise levels to residents. Project plans shall indicate the location of this equipment and noise mitigation prior to issuance of building permits;43)that demolition of the existing structures shall be required to receive a permit from the Bay Area Air Quality Management-� District prior to issuance of a demolition permit by the Building Department.All requirements of the perim shall be complied with during construction;44)that the following notes shall be incorporated on the grading and building plans prior to issuance of grading or building permits,and the measures shall be implemented 14 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 during construction activities: a)Water all active construction and disturbed areas at least twice daily during dry periods;b)Cover all trucks hauling soil,sand,and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard;c)Pave,apply water three times daily,or apply(nontoxic)soil stabilizers on �-- all unpaved access roads,parking areas,and staging areas at construction sites; d)Sweep daily(with water sweepers) all on-site paved access roads,parking areas, and staging areas at sites of construction activity. Dust, sediment, and debris shall not be washed into the storm drain system; e) Sweep streets daily(with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets. Dust, sediment, and debris shall not be washed into the storm drain system;f)Excavation and grading activities shall be suspended and dust control measures shall be implemented when winds exceed 25 miles per hour;and g)Comply with all City NPDES (stormwater control) requirements during construction and operation; 45) that all recommendations outlined in the December 20,2004 Asbestos and Lead Paint Survey Report conducted for the property by Kleinfelder shall be implemented prior to and during demolition of the existing building on the site; 46) that the recommendations by Kleinfelder in the Feasibility-Level Geotechnical Study dated December 30, 2004, shall be implemented at each appropriate phase of project construction. As recommended in the feasibility-level investigation, a design level geotechnical investigation shall also be prepared when specific details regarding building type, loads, and dimensions have been formalized. The supplemental investigation shall include additional subsurface exploration, and laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Recommendations of the investigation, particularly related to expansive soils, liquefaction, and groundwater, shall be implemented; 47) that the project shall be required to meet all construction requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes, including seismic standards for structural stability and other related construction considerations;48)that if the project is constructed during the wet season(October through May),an erosion control and/or sediment control plan,compliant with the City's NPDES(stormwater control)requirements,shall be prepared and implemented,to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department,prior to the onset of the wet season, and shall be maintained throughout the construction period;49)that all project grading,construction and subsequent operations shall comply with the provisions of the City's NPDES requirements. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) outlining construction phase and post-construction phase measures to reduce pollutant discharge from the site shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of grading or building permits; 50) that tree grates selected by the City and consistent with the North Burlingame/Rollins Road Specific Plan design criteria shall be installed around all trees to be planted in sidewalk areas on Trousdale Drive, per City guidelines; 51) that the project landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist prior to issuance of any grading and/or building permits,and all landscaping shall be installed prior to scheduling final inspection.This work shall include installation of all trees within sidewalk areas and the installation of the curb, gutter and sidewalk; 52) that grading and/or construction shall stop immediately if archaeological or paleontological resources are uncovered during grading or other onsite excavation activities. Work shall not resume in the area of the discovery until a qualified archaeologist (or other equivalent specialist) provides an evaluation of the significance of the resources and what can be done to preserve them. Disposition of the identified resource shall be implemented compliant with State law prior to further work within 50 feet of the location of the resource; 53)that the applicant shall submit a site drainage plan to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of grading or building permits. The plan shall show all site drainage flowing to the street level by gravity. The plan shall show the direction and volume of drainage and shall confirm that no drainage enters neighboring properties. Groundwater from the foundation perimeter drain shall be directed to onsite landscaping/swales,with excess water drained to the City storm drain system on Trousdale Drive; 54)that the applicant shall prepare and submit to the City Engineer a sewer study that assesses the impact of this project to determine if the additional sewage flows can be accommodated by 1)the existing line in Trousdale Drive or 2)the upgraded line(if required)for the hospital project. If the analysis results in a determination that the 12"main requires upgrading,the applicant shall contribute the project's fair share,as calculated by 15 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 the City Engineer, of funding for the improvements. The motion was seconded by C. Deal. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to approve. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Crs. Cauchi and Vistica absent). Appeal procedures were advised. This item concluded at 10:45 p.m. The Commission took a five minute break and resumed proceedings at 10:50 p.m. 10. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ZONING CONSISTENCY—BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT PLANNER:MARGARET MONROE(NOTICED IN THE SAN MATEO TIMES,PUBLISHED JUNE 30, 2006) Recognizing the late hour, and after asking about the number of people in the audience who were here for the General Plan amendment,noting that there were few,Chair Brownrigg suggested that this item be moved to the end of the agenda. The Commission concurred. IX. DESIGN REVIEW STUDY ITEMS 11. 1535 VANCOUVER AVENUE,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (GARY PARTEE, APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER;JAMES CHU, CHU DESIGN&ENGR.,INC.,DESIGNER) (70 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: KRISTINA WOERNER Chair Brownrigg noted that he lives within 500 feet of this project,recused himself from the proceedings, and left the dais and chambers. CP Monroe briefly presented the project description. There were no questions of staff. Acting Chair Deal opened the public comment. James Chu, 39 West 43�d Avenue, San Mateo, project designer,and Gary Partee,property owner,presented the project,noting that some details were omitted from the plans: the trim on the windows will be cedar,the sills will be wood,the front door will be stained wood, will use copper gutters and downspouts, there will be fiberglass columns on the right elevation, and the trellis will be made of cedar. Commissioners asked: what are the header dimensions,will the decorative window on the front elevation be leaded glass; are the posts on the right elevation round? The applicant noted that the header will be a 3 x 8, the window will be leaded glass and the vents will be copper,the posts on the right elevation will be round. Commissioners noted that this street is difficult to maneuver,it is narrow,requested that the applicant make every effort during construction to keep the dumpster on site so it will not impact the neighborhood. Commissioners commented that the Oak tree at the front of the house is moderate size now at 1/3 of its growth curve,the crown and roots will continue to expand,it would be better if it were in a different place, landscaping as proposed is full,if Oak tree removed could add a couple of trees. CP Monroe noted that there is a separate permit process required for tree removal in a case like this. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa; and Trudy Conneally, 1539 Vancouver Avenue, spoke;noting that the plans are almost the exact house that was built at 1433 Balboa Avenue, don't think the owner of that house would appreciate their house being replicated,applicant is a talented designer,of 40 houses he designed in last fe" years, 15 are of exceptional design, but most are derivatives, when talking about the eclectic charm of Burlingame, unique design is important, don't want to see another cookie cutter house; would appreciate 16 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 having the Oak tree in front removed,would be easier to take out now than in 15 years,don't know if new owners will maintain the tree,the previous owners did not,landscaping proposed looks nice,there is a wood fence proposed along the side,there is a wood fence with ivy there now,would like the applicant to consider using a dark clad cyclone fence and.plant English Laurel in a staggered pattern on either side, in two years the plants will be five feet tall,wonderful green fence,could plant right away to get well established before complete house. There were no other comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. Commissioners made the following comments about the project: • In the future should work in some'patina'into the house design,the charm in Burlingame's traditional designs is that the houses have evolved over time, could use different materials in some places to give the house a little instant history; • Add a condition that retention of the Oak at the property line is not a condition of approval; and • Work with the neighbor to see if can work out a'green'fence using clad chain link with English Laurel alternating along the side property line. C. Auran made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the above comments including the detail items mentioned by the applicant have been addressed on the plans. This motion was seconded by C. Osterling. Vice-Chair Deal called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans had been revised as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 4-0-2-1 (Crs. Cauchi, Vistica absent; C. Brownrigg recused). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 11:00 p.m. Chair Brownrigg returned to the chambers and dais. 12. 860 FAIRFIELD ROAD,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW TWO- STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND DETACHED GARAGE (MARK ROBERTSON, APPLICANT AND DESIGNER; BRIAN AND LAURA HUFF-DOX, PROPERTY OWNERS) (71 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER: KRISTINA WOERNER SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. Commissioners asked if the garage was proposed to be four feet from the property line; no,the proposed setback from property line is 12". There were no further questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Mark Robertson, 919 Grant Place, San Mateo, project designer, was available to respond to questions. Commissioners asked if the applicant would consider turning the fence in towards the garage and not continue it along the property line,this will allow access to the garage wall from the adjoining easement for maintenance. The applicant agreed,noting that no fence is proposed adjacent to the garage at the rear property line,there is a low wall there,then an easement. Commissioners made the following comments regarding the project: • North elevation needs help, a pop out could be added at the first floor or a bay at the second floor to break up the long roof line;there is a lot of articulation on the south elevation,but on the north,there is a long train of roof, • Brackets shown to hold on the downspouts are dominant, will they be as dominant as shown, should depict on drawing as they will look built; and 17 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 • Existing landscaping is lean,just adding trees is not enough, need a landscape plan with larger scale shrubs to provide screening on both street frontages,should consider fast growing shrubs such as English Laurel or Victorian Box. There were no other comments from the floor. The public comment was closed. C. Deal made a motion to place this item on the consent calendar at a time when the above revisions have been made, plan checked and there is space on an agenda. This motion was seconded by C. Auran. Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the consent calendar when plans have been revised and checked as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (Crs. Cauchi, Vistica absent). The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 11:25 p.m. 13. 1819 MONTECITO WAY,ZONED R-1—APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW,HILLSIDE AREA CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, FLOOR AREA RATIO VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR HEIGHT FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION(45 NOTICED)PROJECT PLANNER:RUBEN HURIN SP Brooks briefly presented the project description. Commissioners noted that it appears the applicant is asking to swap area covered by a trellis for building area,asked if a building permit had been issued for the trellis which is proposed to be removed. SP Brooks said staff will check and bring that information when the project comes back to the Commission. There were no further questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public comment. Bob Sauvageau, RYS Architects, 7 Joost Avenue, San-� Francisco represented the project,and noted that they are reducing the scope of work from the project which was previously approved by the Commission in 2002, will be enlarging the living room into space now occupied by a balcony over the ground floor garage, matching the existing roof design, noted that two neighbors, Sofia and Bill Medeiros, 5 Piedra Court, and Bernard A. Ross, 2805 Frontera Way, were in attendance earlier but left,had submitted comments to the Planning Commission expressing support of the project noting that it would not impose on their views. Commissioners asked the applicant if there was a building permit issued for the trellis to be removed; is there crawl space that is counted in floor area calculation? The applicant noted that he did not know if there were permits issued for a trellis,the trellis was there when the current owner bought the house;there is no crawl space counted in FAR,it is all habitable space. Commissioners noted that on the variance application form the justification given for the variance is that this is a corner lot and setbacks were different in previous zoning code, this finding does not seem to relate to the request for a floor area ratio variance, need better justification. There were no other comments from the floor and the public comment was closed. Commissioners made the following comments about the project: • This is already a very large house exceeding allowed FAR and are now asking to make it larger,do not see justification;not clear that removing an open trellis at the rear is a trade off for adding mass and bulk to the main structure; a house that big should have a conforming two-car garage since there is only one covered space provided as a result the extra square footage from the parking space is used for living area; house is 1500 SF over the maximum;house is over 4200 SF,don't see the necessary findings regardin€ -� loss of enjoyment of property rights if can't make addition in this case; if there were floor area being removed elsewhere in the main residence might consider,but this is well over the maximum now; 18 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 • Could more information be provided about the previous 2002 approval to better understand the decision that was made at that time; • There needs to be more attention to the exterior garage wall,proposal makes large wall look taller;there is a crying need for landscaping along the front wall, large scale shrubs to frame the view; • Retaining wall needs to be upgraded; • Concerned with new entrance roof, it doesn't tie in well with the main roof, • Think idea of incorporating the deck over the garage into the house is possible; • Calling for all the existing aluminum windows to be replaced throughout with white vinyl windows, would rather see wood clad windows,better upgrade; and • On the rear elevation,the extended balcony is excessive, 5'overhang of unsupported balcony will look odd. C. Brownrigg made a motion to place this item on the regular action calendar at a time when the above comments have been addressed particularly the findings for the FAR variance and special permit for height, and revisions have been made, plan checked by staff and there is room on the agenda. This motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a vote on the motion to place this item on the regular action calendar when project has been revised and all issues identified addressed as directed. The motion passed on a voice vote 5-0-2 (Crs. Cauchi, Vistica absent). Commissioners cautioned that there needs to be thought given to the issue of the floor area ratio variance, this request is substantial and larger than any previously granted, project should be revised to reduce FAR exception. The Planning Commission's action is advisory and not appealable. This item concluded at 11:55 p.m. �.— VIII. REGULAR ACTION ITEMS (continued) 10. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ZONING CONSISTENCY—BAYFRONT SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT PLANNER:MARGARET MONROE(NOTICED IN THE SAN MATEO TIMES,PUBLISHED JUNE 30, 2006) Reference staff report July 10, 2006,with attachments. CP Monroe presented the report summarizing the amendments to the Bayfront Specific Plan in order to make the zoning and the specific plan consistent in their direction. She noted that this item had been studied by the Planning Commission at their meeting on June 26,2006,and Commission had directed no changes to submitted revisions. There were no questions of staff. Chair Brownrigg opened the public hearing. Pat Giorni, 1445 Balboa Avenue, spoke. Remain opposed to extended stay hotels in the Bayfront planning area,do not want anything which could be used now or in the future as a residential use; previous discussions by Council noted how people could get around the limitations on stay,uncomfortable that anyone could live in the Bayfront area. Concerned with the change from stories to height in feet in the Anza Point area, this area has water on three sides, is less seismically stable, faces Coyote Point Park and open bay, should keep all perimeter heights to 30 feet;Airport Blvd. is windy, concerned that as developed wind at ground level will be a bigger problem for pedestrians and bicyclists. CP noted that based on plan and zoning all height regulations in the Anza Point area would be subservient to the community wind standards, wind evaluation would also address wind speeds at ground level, so heights shown on illustrations in the plan are moderated by the community wind standard and the amendment clarifies that. There were no further comments from the floor. The public hearing was closed. 19 City of Burlingame Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes July 10, 2006 C. Brownrigg moved to recommend approval of the amendments to the Bayfront Specific Plan made to -� make the plan and the zoning consistent. The motion was seconded by C. Terrones. Chair Brownrigg called for a voice vote on the motion to recommend the amendments to the Bayfront Specific Plan to the City Council, noting that each of these amendments was reviewed along with the implementing zoning at the time the zoning was adopted. The motion passed on a 5-0-2 (Cers. Cauchi, Vistica absent)voice vote. This item is a recommendation to the City Council and will be placed on the next available Council agenda. This item concluded at 12:00 p.m. X. PLANNER REPORTS - City Council regular meeting of July 5, 2006—cancelled. - FYI: 836 Newhall Road—changes to a previously approved Design Review project. Planning Commission had no comments on the proposed changes and noted that they could support them. - FYI: Commission comments regarding 116 Bloomfield Road. Commission noted that this house is even larger when seen in the field than it looks in the pictures,it is in need of landscaping. Should be a lesson regarding translation of plans to construction. XI. ADJOURNMENT Chair Brownrigg adjourned the meeting at 12:08 p.m. --� Respectfully submitted, Jerry Deal, Acting Secretary S:WINUTESIunapproved.07.1 O.06.doe 20 ' POLICE DEPARTMENT BURLINGAME City of Burlingame Jack L. Van Etten 99 Chief of Police Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: Please note that the statistical information contained in the May, 2006 police department report is displayed in both numbers and percentages. When reviewing the report, the percentages of certain crimes might've dramatically increased or decreased in percentage (compared to the previous month or year). When reviewing the police department report please also consider the actual numbers in various crime categories in conjunction with the percentages. Even though the percentages may have dramatically increased or decreased, the actual number change may be slight or negligible. 1.TRAINING The police department continues to exceed minimum state training standards for our sworn staff. Additional training is being provided to Communications Dispatchers and non-sworn support staff. 2. STAFFING The Police Department is currently authorized at 41 sworn positions. In the next 06-07 FY, sworn staffing will increase by one to 42 positions. This includes one detective that is working part time (with other officers from all police departments in our county) and assigned to the County Gang Task Force. It is anticipated that three sworn positions will retire by the end of the calendar year; one officer on disability(who has been out for one year), another officer and a sergeant. The department plans to hire for the additional officer position as soon as possible. We are in the process of backgrounding several police officer candidates and one communications dispatcher to fill known or anticipated vacancies. The police department is working closely with Human Resources for advertising, testing and filling these positions. We have replaced a part-time (per diem) Parking Enforcement Officer who will assist and fill-in for PEO's on vacation and to supplement Saturday enforcement. At the present time, four officers continue to be out due to long term injuries. One officer will disability retire; one officer is tentatively scheduled to return to duty at the end of June; one officer is expected to return in August/September; the officer injured in a recent vehicle accident is expected to return in June/July. 3. PROJECTS The police department is completing a police facility camera replacement and upgrade to a digital (IP) camera foundation, where expansion is possible. We have completely revised our policies and procedures manual and upgrading it onto DVD. Our Field Training Officer(FTO) manual has also been completely revised to meet new state standards. We will be making a presentation to council regarding red light photo enforcement in July or August, followed by a staff report asking council for direction and approval for this traffic calming, accident reduction enforcement tool for our community. 4. COMMUNITY MATTERS The police department continues to receive information from the public regarding a number of criminal, traffic and parking related matters. All of these matters are prioritized, addressed and handled in the most effective manner possible. When necessary, additional outside resources are also brought in to assist current staff with specific or unusual issues. 1111 Trousdale Drive- Post Office Box 551 -Burlingame, California 94011-0551 -(650)777-4100- Fax(650)697-8130 )6-13-06 SUMMARY OF PART ONE OFFENSES PAGE: 1 FOR: MAY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD ]rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change 4urder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter 0 0 0 0 0 7anslaughter by Negligence 0 0 0 0 0 tape By Force 1 1 4 1 3 300.00 ittempt to Commit Forcible Rape 0 0 0 0 0 robbery Firearm 1 1 3 3 0 0.00 robbery Knife 0 0 2 0 2 tobbery Other Dangerous Weapon 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 robbery Strong-Arm 2 2 12 6 6 100.00 kssault - Firearm 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 kssault - Knife 0 0 1 4 -3 -75.00 lssault - Other Dangerous Weapon 4 2 11 8 3 37.50 Wsault - Hands,Fists,Feet 0 0 5 1 4 400.00 18sault - Other (Simple) 12 24 75 83 -8 -9.64 3urglary - Forcible Entry 5 8 26 36 -10 -27.78 3urglary - Unlawful Entry 5 2 40 28 12 42.86 3urglary - Attempted Forcible Entry 1 0 2 2 0 0.00 larceny Pocket-Picking 0 0 0 0 0 larceny Purse-Snatching 0 0 2 0 2 larceny Shoplifting 3 3 21 17 4 23.53 larceny From Motor Vehicle 22 25 124 112 12 10.71 larceny Motor Veh Parts Accessories 14 18 55 64 -9 -14.06 larceny Bicycles 2 0 3 9 -6 -66.67 .larceny From Building 11 14 47 42 5 11.90 larceny From Any Coin-Op Machine 2 1 8 10 -2 -20.00 larceny All Other 6 9 32 62 -30 -48.39 4otor Vehicle Theft Auto 5 8 34 34 0 0.00 4otor Vehicle Theft Bus 1 0 5 2 3 150.00 4otor vehicle Theft Other 1 0 3 0 3 98 118 516 527 98 118 516 527 i 6-13-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 1 CITY REPORT FOR: MAY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD 'rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change Change all Other Offenses 31 37 183 198 -15 -7.58 animal Abuse 0 0 0 0 0 animal Nuisance 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 arson 4 0 12 4 8 200.00 assists to Outside Agencies 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Violations 0 0 0 0 0 ligamy 0 0 0 0 0 Lomb Offense 0 0 0 0 0 tomb Threat 0 1 0 2 -2 -100.00 wibery 0 0 0 0 0 )heck Offenses 3 0 12 4 8 200.00 11ild Neglect/prot custody 4 2 30 15 15 100.00 :omputer Crime 0 0 0 0 0 :onspiracy 0 0 0 0 0 :redit Card Offenses 1 0 2 0 2 )ruelty to Dependent Adult 2 0 2 2 0 0.00 :urfew and Loitering Laws 0 0 0 2 2 -100.00 )eath Investigation 3 5 14 23 -9 -39.13 )isorderly Conduct 1 1 9 18 -9 -50.00 )river's License Violations 0 2 3 4 -1 -25.00 )riving Under the Influence 6 8 30 32 -2 -6.25 )rug Abuse Violations 2 0 12 13 -1 -7.69 )rug/Sex Registrants/Violations 1 0 2 0 2 )runkeness 11 1 31 13 18 138.46 3mbezzlement 0 0 2 2 0 0.00 >scape 0 0 0 0 0 3xtortion 0 0 0 0 0 False Police Reports 1 0l 0 1 alae Reports of Emergency 0 0 2 0 2 Fish and Game Violations 0 0 0 0 0 Forgery and Counterfeiting 6 4 19 21 2 -9.52 Found Property 7 13 26 50 -24 -48.00 Fraud 2 0 14 15 -1 -6.67 3ambling 0 0 0 0 0 darrassing Phone Calls 4 6 13 13 0 0.00 -6-13-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 2 ' CITY REPORT FOR: MAY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD :rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change 8 Change lit and Run Accidents 8 2 19 16 3 18.75 Impersonation 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 :ncest 0 0 0 0 0 :ndecent Exposure 1 0 3 0 3 Intimidating a Witness 0 0 0 0 0 Cidnapping 0 0 0 0 0 Lewd Conduct 0 0 1 0 1 Liquor Laws 0 0 2 2 0 0.00 wittering/Dumping 0 0 0 0 0 4arijuana Violations 3 1 7 7 0 0.00 4ental Health Cases 10 7 42 31 11 35.48 4issing Person 4 1 23 27 -4 -14.81 4issing Property 10 13 37 36 1 2.78 . 4unicipal Code Violations 5 7 38 24 14 56.33 4arcotics Sales/Manufacture 0 0 0 0 0 )ffenses Against Children 0 1 3 1 2 200.00 )ther Assaults 12 24 75 83 -8 -9.64 )ther Juvenile Offenses 0 0 0 0 0 )ther Police Service 11 12 30 33 -3 -9.09 Pandering for immoral purposes 0 0 0 0 0 Parole Violations 1 0 2 0 2 Perjury 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of Burglary Tools 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 Possession of drug paraphernalia 0 0 0 0 0 Possession of obscene literature;picture 0 0 0 0 0 Probation Violations 0 0 3 1 2 200.00 Prostitution and Commercial Vice 1 0 5 1 4 400.00 Prowling 0 0 2 2 0 0.00 Resisting Arrest 0 0 1 1 0 0.00 Restraining Orders 0 0 0 12 -12 -100.00 Runaways (Under 18) 0 0 0 0 0 Sex Offenses 0 0 2 1 1 100.00 Sex Offenses against Children 0 1 1 1 0 0.00 Sodomy 0 0 0 0 0 Stalking 0 0 0 0 0 16-13-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PART TWO OFFENSES PAGE: 3 CITY REPORT FOR: MAY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual YTD YTD 'rime Classification.................... Current Year.. YTD.. YTD.. Change % Change Statutory Rape 0 0 0 2 -2 -100.00 Stolen Property;Buying;Receiving;Possess 0 1 2 3 -1 -33.33 Suspended License 2 3 17 12 5 41.67 Cax Evasion 0 0 0 0 0 Cerrorist Threats 0 1 4 4 0 0.00 rowed Vehicle 29 27 136 167 -31 -18.56 Crespassing 0 0 7 6 1 16.67 Cruants/Incorrigible Juvs 0 0 0 1 -1 -100.00 '.. JS Mail Crimes 0 0 0 0 0 Jagrancy 0 0 0 0 0 Jandalism 24 19 100 91 9 9.89 Jehicle Code Violations 5 1 8 13 -5 -38.46 liolation of Court Order 1 0 5 3 2 66.67 Aarrants - Felony 2 1 5 6 -1 -16.67 Narrants - Misd 4 8 25 35 -10 -28.57 aeapons;Carrying,Possessing 2 0 5 3 2 66.67 Nelfare Fraud 0 0 0 0 0 224 210 1,030 1,060 224 210 1,030 1,060 06-13-06 MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CITATIONS PAGE : 1 CITY REPORT FOR: MAY, 2006 Current Prev Last Actual Actual Crime Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current Year. . YTD. . YTD. . Parking Citations 3455 1 , 823 15 , 124 14 , 407 Moving Citations 156 120 1 , 105 542 ------ ----- - ------ - - - - - - - - 3611 1, 943 _16,-2-2-9 - 141-949- 3611 4 9,4P 3611 1, 943 16 , 229 14 , 949 BURLINGAME Officer Productivity. . . . generated on 06/13/2006 at 10 : 57 : 45 AM Reported On: All Officers Report Range: 05/01/2006 to 05/31/2006 Data Type Reported on: PARKING Valid % All Voids % All % Officer: ID: Cnt Valid Cnt Voids Valid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ALVISO 355 1161 33.66 8 21.62 99.32 DAZA-QUIROZ 634 114 3.31 4 10.81 96.61 FEITELBERG 508 1063 30.82 9 24.32 99.16 GARRETT 501 584 16.93 12 32.43 97.99 KIRKPATRICK 502 420 12.18 4 10.81 99.06 MORAN 201 95 2.75 0 0.00 100.00 ROSCOE 503 12 0.35 0 0.00 100.00 Total 3449 37 Page 1 of 1 City of Burlingame MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY June 2006 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF F. Y. 2006 F. Y.2005 DIFF Permit Type # # % # # % WATER HEATER 15 14,741 5 82 79,603 83 SWIMMING POOL 5 103,800 12 209,850 -51 SIGN 3 7,500 2 9,500 -21 29 79,677 31 103,879 -23 ROOFING 32 396,517 22 322,345 23 268 3,993,657 242 2,944,328 36 RETAINING WALL 1 100,000 5 169,017 4 102,000 66 PLUMBING 8 20,681 16 5,000 314 340 1,183,827 468 181,010 554 NEW SFD 4 1,924,800 2 694,000 177 17 6,584,800 16 6,130,639 7 NEW COMMERCIAL NEW 5 UNIT APT OR CO 1 85,000 1 2,465,540 -97 NEW 3 OR 4 UNIT APT MECHANICAL 5 2,500 35 160,865 55 169,550 -5 KITCHEN UPGRADE 7 180,862 1 22,500 704 39 1,052,456 23 471,275 123 FURNACE 35 140,175 32 20,000 601 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 17 116,200 City of Burlingame MONTHLY PERMIT ACTIVITY June 2006 THIS MONTH THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DIFF F. Y. 2006 F. Y.2005 DIFF Permit Type # # % # # % ELECTRICAL 6 9,750 9 74 277,922 178 14,000 1,885 BATHROOM UPGRADE 1 20,000 47 854,863 22 306,900 179 ALTERATION RESIDENTI 35 1,718,369 54 2,539,285 -32 414 16,052,426 458 15,237,079 5 ALTERATION NON RES 18 3,669,377 10 1,120,500 227 109 28,607,325 96 8,901,862 221 Totals: 129 7,962,597 127 4,815,630 65 1,518 59,541,613 1,721 37,257,912 60 Monthly permit activity for FY 05/06 is similar to FY 04/05.Although it appears that construction has increased by 60 to 65% these numbers are a reflection of the change to our new CRW permit tracking software. With the old AS-400 computer system valuations for many permits was not recorded. The new CRW permit tracking system requires a value for all construction. The permit fees are then based on the value of the construction. Information that was not previously collected and included in this report(i.e. furnaces,water heaters, and electrical services) is now included. CITY BURLINGAME w° '° ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Date: July 17, 2006 Attached is a copy of the letter which the Centennial Executive Committee is sending to artists and architects in the community soliciting their ideas for an 'object' to represent Burlingame's first hundred years. The purpose of the commemoration art is to provide a vehicle for the community to join together to sponsor and build. It's dedication will be an integral part of the City's Centennial celebration. Please let Cathy Baylock know if there is anyone in the art or architectural or any associated field who you think should be invited to participate in this search. The deadline for comments and submittals is August 4, 2006. k a f�4 Bb F2iE NGA M i The City of Burlingame CITY HALL■501 PRIMROSE ROAD TEL: (650)558-7200 BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 FAX: (650)342-8386 July 12, 2006 Dear , The Executive Committee in charge of Burlingame's Centennial would like to have a permanent monument or other structure created to commemorate the city's 100th birthday in June 2008. We would appreciate your help in determining what the city should erect to commemorate this important event. It could be a fountain, gazebo, sculpture or other structure, and it could be located in a number of places. We would like to present your suggestions to the Committee on August 7 and ask that you share your thoughts with us (and simple sketches, if appropriate)no later than Friday, August 4, 2006. One idea that the Committee likes is incorporating the old City Hall cupola from the parking lot next to Blockbuster and adding decorative bricks(that people could buy),along with the relief of Marianne,the French symbol of freedom,which was on the face of the old city hall and is in storage at the library. (Pictures of the old City Hall and Marianne are enclosed.) However, we are open to other thoughts. • Transform the two traffic islands between Burlingame City Hall and the Burlingame Main Library into one roundabout with a structure in the middle. This area might become the focal point for the city's holiday tree-lighting ceremony. • Move the Wurlitzer "dancing maidens" fountain from behind Malouf s to the area in front of the train station(probably impossible, due to difficulty in getting permission from the Wurlitzer family). • Build a new fountain in front of the train station. • Build a new plaza in front of the train station, suitable for community gatherings and the farmer's market. • Create a gateway for the city on El Camino at Murchison. (The frontage area will be widened and landscaped.) • Create a gateway at Howard Avenue and El Camino. • Create a structure at the entrance to Washington Park that is kitty-corner from the train station,near the flagpole and tennis courts. • Put something on the lawn in front of the main Post Office. • Place something on the triangle between Stacks and Comcast. • Add a structure in front of the Gap store,where Park intersects Burlingame Avenue. • Place historical brass plaques in appropriate places around the city. CC Register online for the City of Burlingame list serve at ww w.burlingame.org H v Centennial Commemoration Page 2 July 12, 2006 Please send your suggestions to Burlingame Vice Mayor Terry Nagel by Friday,August 4, 2006. Terry can be reached at 2337 Poppy Drive, Burlingame 94010; TerrjQNagelkaol.com. Her work phone is (650) 331-1020 (Monday-Thursday); her home phone is (650) 347-3576. Sincerely, Cathy Baylock Chair, Centennial Executive Committee CITY OF BURLINGAME TO: Mayor Baylock and City Council DATE: July 12, 2006 FROM: Jim Nantell, City Manager SUBJECT: Continuation of Downtownarking Permit Program. On Tuesday July 11th City Attorney Larry Anderson,Finance Director Jesus Nava and I met with Cheryl Enright along with Quent Cordair and Kevin Osborne, representing the newly formed Downtown Burlingame Business Association(DBBA). The purpose of the meeting was to transition the management of the new parking permit program to DBBA. Kevin Osborne, who operates an insurance agency out of the Fax Plaza Mall has generously volunteered to handle the sales of the parking permits for the next year. In April the City Council adopted a resolution to allow the parking permit program in long term city parking lots and on streets in the downtown Burlingame Avenue area. The three month pilot program began in May and has experienced very favorable response from downtown employers and employees. Mr. Cordair indicated that he had received numerous contacts from downtown businesses requesting that he do what he could to keep the program going forward and he was delighted that Mr. Osborne had come forward to volunteer his services. Cheryl Enright shared the complications associated with her work to create the permits and is very pleased that the program will continue. We have turned over all the information on the program and intend to continue with it though the DBBA. Although we all agree that we would eventually hope to provide a$20/month pass for the use exclusively in the $1/day lots we will not complicate the transition of the program by attempting to do that at this time. Any future decision to implement the $20 passes will come back to the Council for formal action. Cc George Bagdon Jack Van Etten Jesus Nava